TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Hamster thinks she's ENTITLED to multiple partners while in a committed relationship

atlascrowed

July 19, 2013
12 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Archived from /r/TheRedPill

r/TheRedPill is a subreddit for discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/TheRedPill archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Hamster thinks she's ENTITLED to multiple partners while in a committed relationship
Author

atlascrowed

Upvotes 12
Comments 25
Date July 19, 2013 4:02 PM UTC
(13 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1imz43/hamster_thinks_shes_entitled_to_multiple_partners/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/hamster-thinks-shes-entitled-to-multiple-partners.233770
https://theredarchive.com/post/233770
Red Pill terms in post
hamster
Top posts by atlascrowed

A peek into the hamstering mind of a post-wall feminist who cheated on her husband

105 upvotes
September 27, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

"Oh feminism, what happened to you?" Interesting article from the point of view of a young woman

101 upvotes
August 22, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Female finance student whines about how hard it is to be in finance, blames it on the lack of female mentors available to her generation

86 upvotes
August 20, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

The hamster's on a roll: older, wealthy white women are buying male pros in the Caribbean... but it's a "holiday romance" to them

77 upvotes
August 26, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

My Morpheus girl

59 upvotes
August 6, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Red Pill Isolation

40 upvotes
July 1, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

the Relationship's subreddit to saving your sham of a marriage? "1. Be More Beta, 2. Be More Beta, 3. Be Beta, Damn it!"

36 upvotes
July 22, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Distinguished philosopher Colin McGinn forced to leave his professor post at UMiami after ACCUSATIONS of sexual harassment via email (that he denies!)

28 upvotes
August 5, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 13 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She doesn't want to give up her options and all the attention she's getting while she enjoys her boyfriends emotional commitment. Typical selfish attitude. If he leaves her she'll just look for another beta to be her emotional base.

I'll bet money she's already cheating on the guy.

[–]exbeta 5 points6 points7 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, if the guy doesn't realize that her persistence on the matter greatly implies that she's already been unfaithful, he needs to bury the rest of himself in that sand he has his head in.

Maybe if there was a cuckold-oriented dating site, women like her could gravitate toward that instead of polluting the dating pool for everyone else.

[–]exbeta 8 points9 points10 points 13 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Lol wow let's break this down because that's always so much fun:

1) Do you agree that getting in to a relationship does not by definition restrict you from being attracted to other people.

Translation: SELF CONTROL IS OVERRATED. So every time anyone in a relationship finds him or herself to be attracted to another person, they should be able to fuck with no consequences. Let's ignore the fact that community/society/family is built on these close, exclusive pair bonds.

2) Do you agree that any freedom that is taken from somebody must be properly justified?

Translation: IGNORE CONSEQUENCES. Being exclusive in a relationship is having your "freedom taken". That's like saying if I work at Coca-Cola and start selling their secret recipe and get fired, Coke didn't respect my freedom to sell off their secrets because I chose to ignore their stance on that kind of practice.

3) Do you agree that sex is not by definition a romantic act?

Translation: I WANT MULTIPLE DICKS IN ME. This one is my favorite, because men will use this argument too and for good reason. I can't really fault her here for inherently being a dick hound.

4) Do you agree that one of the primary purposes of a relationship is to promote the interests, well being, and happiness of the other partner involved?

Translation: HE SHOULD KOWTOW TO ME IMMEDIATELY. I love how she's ignoring her boyfriend's feelings on this whole matter from the get go. This is textbook solipsism and my personal biggest pet peeve when it comes to women's motivations.

5) Do you agree that someone else doing an activity does not make your doing of the activity any less than it was (EG. someone is playing mario, then you play mario)?

Translation: SEX IS MEANINGLESS TO ME. Wow, if I'm reading this right (and I have not read any comments where she may clarify), sex to her is emotionless and essentially scratching an itch. Her example is great because it ignores the fact that if "playing mario" meant some other dude's cum is all over the controller when he hands it back to you, and the controller is now comparing you to him and holding it over your head, then yeah, maybe the next guy wouldn't want to play mario so much, especially if he's the one who bought the goddamn console in the first place.

6) Do you agree that preventing someone else from doing an activity that is not detrimental, because you don't want to do the activity is selfish/unacceptable behavior? (eg. stopping someone from eating cake, because you don't personally want cake)

Translation: IF HE WON'T FUCK, SOMEONE ELSE WILL. Sounds like her boyfriend may not want to have sex 100% of the time he's with her and she can't handle that insatiable urge to get dicked.

7) Do you agree that when in a relationship, you are to assume the responsible actions of your partner towards maintaining the healthiness and happiness of the relationship

Translation: HE NEEDS TO TRUST ME REGARDLESS OF ALL EVIDENCE POINTING TO THE CONTRARY. I don't even know what to say here.

That boyfriend of hers needs to run away as fast as he can.

[–]James_Coook 1 point2 points3 points 13 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow! She sounds like quite a catch! She would make a perfect FWB.

[–]exbeta 1 point2 points3 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh for certain, those other guys she's involved with are having a jolly good time.

[–]TRP VanguardYouDislikeMyOpinion 0 points1 point2 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If he was alpha, he would just use her as a plate.

[–]Endorsed Contributor30303030303030 5 points6 points7 points 13 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh dear, when I read "I am a 20 year old female" and "I have a logical argument" I knew this will be good.

And it was. Solipsism at it's best. She's entitled to everything while her boyfriend basically should be quiet and cuddle her after she comes back from some savage boning. All she has to do is ask and answer the same questions from her boyfriends point of view. Not gonna happen though. Me, me, me, me.

[–][deleted] 13 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 13 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Back in college, I used to know a girl who did this. Dude was against it. She, predictably, went off and got boned by some strange anyway.

What happened next, I didn't see coming: When he found out he responded by...proposing.

I didn't keep in touch, so I can't say how it all turned out years down the line. I'm taking all bets that we both know the script, though.

[–]Raav 3 points4 points5 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What happened next, I didn't see coming: When he found out he responded by...proposing

My reaction

[–]AlphaPill 0 points1 point2 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know when I think of a girl cheating the very next thought is always engagement. Obviously the previous commitment bond wasn't strong enough to keep her from cheating so we must upgrade to the next strongest level so that she won't be able to break it in the future. Marriage vows are unbreakable ya know...

[–]BorMato 2 points3 points4 points 13 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

This bullshit absolutely floors me. Holy fuck I can't even wrap my head around this skanky hamster. Of course, as we all can predict, the moment her bf leaves her and then her fuck buddies leave her it will be all, "MEN SUCK! WHY CAN'T I FIND A GOOD GUY WHO LOOKS AFTER ME AND MY INTERESTS ALONE!!! (insert stupid hamstering here)."

[–]Indesejavel 0 points1 point2 points 13 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

the moment her bf leaves her

He's not going to leave her. She will cheat on him, tell him and then he will ask what he did wrong and beg for another chance.

It's a sad sad world.

[–]BorMato 0 points1 point2 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

See I disagree. I feel like if he's already aware of her desire to fuck other dudes and she goes through with it regardless of his feelings, he will leave. I mean it would be a huge blue-pill move to continue. Maybe I'm just hopeful that hes not a total beta.

[–]TRP VanguardYouDislikeMyOpinion 0 points1 point2 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And after years of this, his brain will tell him "you're not doing this shit anymore". And he will become RP.

[–]Modredpillschool 2 points3 points4 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You gotta post NP links man.

http://c.feministvictims.com/f

[–]DaddyMonster 3 points4 points5 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hoes gonna be hoes.

[–]James_Coook 1 point2 points3 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is female solipsism at its finest. She has no sympathy for her boyfriend in this situation. If she is hot, she will have guys queuing up to bang / date her but her bf is probably going to be seen as some type of player / creep by girls. She's just trying to have the best of both worlds.

[–]AlphaPill 1 point2 points3 points 13 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

This is one fucking scary hamster. I think it busted out of its cage, ate her boyfriend and used him as fuel to chase down his ghost.

Does anyone know if this open relationship crap only applies to her or is he also allowed to fuck other people? I have a bad feeling that I already know the answer.

[–]TRP VanguardYouDislikeMyOpinion 1 point2 points3 points 13 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They aren't able to think in the long term properly. They are less loyal and honorable most of the time; they are able to disconnect from the relationship to establish new branches much easier than most men can. Once a man disconnects from an aspect of a relationship, you know there's no fucking around.

That's why you see the "let's be in an open relationship", and as soon as the guy is gaming, and he is getting hit on by girls, SUDDENLY the gf won't want an open relationship anymore. Same thing with grinding.

To answer your question. She probably means an open relationship for both of them, but she is subconsciously betting that he is not going to out-rival her sexcapades, and if he did, her biology (jealousy) would take over and stop it.

[–]AlphaPill 1 point2 points3 points 13 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah, good points. It's amazing how even in that scenario (him managing to indulge more than her) she'd still be able to hamster him into oblivion. He'd be the bad guy and she'd be the victim.

[–]TRP VanguardYouDislikeMyOpinion 1 point2 points3 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hamsterization > Rationalization

[–]WaywardWayfarer 0 points1 point2 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I blame him for trying to stick it out as much as her irrational selfishness. Isn't it wonderful being an animal guided by biological nihilism?

[–][deleted] 13 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]TRP VanguardYouDislikeMyOpinion 1 point2 points3 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We'll she's honestly going to get what she wants. I mean, if I was one of the guys, I'd fuck her. The problem comes when she's 30 :D

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter