TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

      • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead

      • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

/r/relationships apparently auto removes threads started by redpill posters, as bonus a vote brigade

redpillshadow
December 19, 2013
19 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title /r/relationships apparently auto removes threads started by redpill posters, as bonus a vote brigade
Author

redpillshadow
Upvotes 19
Comments 24
Date December 19, 2013 8:53 AM UTC
(12 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1t8il7/rrelationships_apparently_auto_removes_threads/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/rrelationships-apparently-auto-removes-threads.9028
https://theredarchive.com/post/9028
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill
Top posts by redpillshadow

The best advice reddit has to offer on getting females to your college party [askhamsters]

297 upvotes
July 5, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

"I Don’t Want to Hire Women" - a female feminist entrepreneur

161 upvotes
May 16, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Just treat women as people and everything will be alright

140 upvotes
June 3, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

A great example of word mincing to get a crazy audience on your side.

127 upvotes
August 3, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Porn casting director breaks feminist hamster with a few simple questions

125 upvotes
February 28, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Do ugly girls really have a hard time getting laid? [old misc experiments]

120 upvotes
April 30, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Gender neutrality hurts women, literally. The toll the new events at the Olympics demand.

105 upvotes
February 21, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

PepsiCo CEO Indra K. Nooyi: "I don't think women can have it all."

99 upvotes
July 2, 2014
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–]trp13 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

"Diamonds are beta tax. A girl in love would marry her man with an onion ring." - LaidNYC

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Diamonds like women are literally a dime a dozen. If a woman is truly special and I was comfortable enough to trust her I'd buy her a Ruby...something truly special and rare. But Unicorns dont exist so more money for me!

[–]floor-pi 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

This may be true, but then, any sort of a socially well adjusted person knows that a $10 ring isn't acceptable (regardless of beta blah blah) unless it's by necessity, and certainly, the manner in which he proposed is unacceptable too under any circumstances, for a couple who have 'marriage' as a plan.

The comments in that link above are silly. The guy is maladjusted and has issues, there is no defending him. If that's what you're all aspiring to then i think TRP needs to do a bit of goal setting.

[–]Glorious_Master 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

10$ rings are toys for girls if you live in a poor country you have other norms probably

also don't marry unless you are both orthodox jews/muslims and your rabbanate/sharia court is valid

[–]floor-pi 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't see anything wrong with marriage in terms of TRP ethos.

But yeah you're right, $10 rings are toys. This guy is going to look like a moron to every person in his whole life, from alpha to beta guys, sexy to dowdy girls, what he has done, and how he is acting, is not something to defend or aspire to. Acting like him will do you no favours in your life unless your plan is to be socially isolated.

[–]Glorious_Master 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

maybe in trp ethos, but ths odds are stacked against you. even if shes wife material she can be influenced/change over a decade or so. which means... longer ltr prior to marrige if you so want it.

also if he honestly wanted to marry her, said ring isn't exactly something he won't see or won't be relatedto him if she reluctently accepted that.

[–]floor-pi 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

also if he honestly wanted to marry her, said ring isn't exactly something he won't see or won't be relatedto him if she reluctently accepted that.

Yep absolutely, I never even thought of that.

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

...LaidNyc wants his accreditation. LOL. The senseless plagiarism!

[–]KJL13 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If you're getting married, a $9.99 ring is retarded. Even if you don't want to do diamonds, at least get gold (or white gold) so it will last and won't irritate your spouse's skin. He could have easily been sub $200.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]SnakeInTheAss 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Gotta be careful with exotic materials. In the event of an emergency where it needs to be cut off, having some fancy metal could cost you your finger.

[–]KJL13 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah I mean if you can't buck up $200, you shouldn't be getting married. I honestly can't think of a worse way to start off a marriage", Oh I'm about to sign a contract that will give this woman half of my shit in the event of a divorce. I'd better piss her off first." Consider it an investment that when she looks at the ring she'll get tingles instead of resentment.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She was taken advantage of... Because she had to pay her way...

She keeps using that word, i dont think she knows what it means.

[–]JohnPeel 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Holy hamstering Batman!

[–]TRP Vanguard: "Dark Triad Expert"IllimitableMan 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Who gives a fuck about /r/relationships?

This is irrelevant. Lots of people hate us. This adds nothing.

[–]dvrzero 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I posted in that thread and had 30 down votes as of last time I checked. Do I get a prize? I even managed to use "rascal" and "home shopping network" in one sentence.

I wasn't even trolling... I just get sick of memes on subreddits sometimes.

[–]_whistler -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

My favorite part was when the girl who originally posted in Relationships couldn't figure out how to answer a simple fucking question about what attracted her to this guy in the first place, beyond the generic Disney answers. Good example of the difference between the rational-core mind and emotional-core mind of the respective sexes.

[–]TRP Vanguardnicethingyoucanthave 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

the girl who originally posted in Relationships couldn't figure out how to answer a simple fucking question about what attracted her to this guy

In her defense, here's what she said: "he is smart, driven, motivated, attractive, funny, family oriented among other things. We shared similar interests as well and have great chemistry."

What were you looking for? Like, physically what attracted her to him? The thing is, even after the ring gaff, she could probably still say he's hot (if he was before).

[–]_whistler -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Yes, those are the Disney answers. I initially asked why she stayed with him if he was such a shitty character, and she responded with 'I loved him'. So I explained that this was not a descriptive enough answer because you don't just randomly fall in love with people. I wanted her to actually think about what, specifically, was the reason she stayed with a man who 'was always the taker in the relationship' - her characterization of him.

She apparently couldn't perform this mental exercise, and came back with all the canned qualities every single woman will give you about their random Prince Charming. I mean, substitute the 'he is' with a 'I'm looking for a guy who is', and you have every dating advert ever. I got tired of her lack of effort, and tuned out.

[–]TRP Vanguardnicethingyoucanthave 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I wanted her to actually think about what, specifically, was the reason she stayed with a man who 'was always the taker in the relationship' - her characterization of him.

Well, isn't the answer: "in spite of him taking and not giving, he was smart, driven, motivated, physically attractive, funny, family-oriented"

Isn't the answer that those qualities are so attractive that she put up with the stuff she didn't like

[–]_whistler -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It was her attempt at an answer. But it's not a retrospective answer - which is what I asked her to do, apply the same retrospective filter to her past attraction as she had applied to her current revulsion. It's a current, hamster-driven answer with no specifics whatsoever.

'Because he's a shitty guy and that's how I feel about him, but I also know I don't like shitty guys, why did I stay with him? Well, what are all the qualities I know I like about men? I like them to be smart, driven, motivated, physically attractive, funny, family-oriented...hey, he must have been all of those things!'

It's not an honest answer, it's a hamster answer. Which is why I ditched the convo. At times I've had productive conversations with women who are able to get around their hamster, but this wasn't shaping up to be one of those times.

[–]TRP Vanguardnicethingyoucanthave 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's not an honest answer, it's a hamster answer.

If she had a sudden moment of perfect clarity, what would she say? "I was attracted to him because he's an asshole" Is that it?

[–]_whistler -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't know what she'd say. If I already knew the answer, I wouldn't have to ask the question. But just because I don't know the real answer, doesn't mean I can't spot a phony one.

[–]floor-pi 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

smart, driven, motivated, physically attractive, funny, family-oriented

How descriptive do you want her to be? He's funny, smart and physically attractive, do you need a list of jokes he tells?

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter