I've read the material here, and I think as a generalization most of the sentiments contain enough accuracy for consideration.

There is a serious flaw in this line of reasoning however: statistics. All comparisons are built on the mean average of female attributes. The Gaussian distribution surely does peak near enough where it is assumed in these forums, that enough of the distribution has these ideals applicable to them that it would be a successful method. That said, scientific analysis on the topic reveals that the difference in sexual strategy is orders of magnitude more varied WITHIN the sexes than between the averages of the sexes. This itself seems like a dramatic conclusion, but should be absolutely obvious without needing to be studied (compare full BP to full RP).

So, if you want to play the game of mild characteristic shifts in sociological statistics, you can't limit it to the sexes. It has to also apply to the races. Though the difference in intelligence WITHIN races is much much greater than BETWEEN them, the mean average of black IQ IS lower than white IQ, which IS lower than asian IQ. Further, though levels of testosterone again varies greatly from individual to individual, distributions clearly show that the mean of black's testosterone IS greater than white's, which IS greater than asian's.

Since we are only concerned about statistical means that allow us to have more accurate, though probably less politically correct, prejudice, there is no way to separate the two ideas. TRPers, if actually true to themselves and the truth of the world around them, must be racist, and hold sentiments for the races which are as strong as between the sexes, since the mean differences are just as significant.