This isn't going to be a super in-depth post... because I kicked my own ass pretty hard at the gym

I'm just typing as much of this as I can before I pass out

For reference, I found TRP around 2017, I think, it took me about a year to stop being a purple-pilled puss-boi about it, and now I'm really digging in. If I'm being honest, I'm probably a 4-5 in the looks department, but I'm decently quick-witted and flirty so that helps bump me a bit.

Recently listened to the audiobook Art of Seduction by Robert Green. He gives his seduction process, which has a few key differences from how TRP approaches seduction. So like a good sociopat scientist I experimented with one of the different key points which I found interesting.

The key point RG made that is different from TRP (that I have experimented with anyway) is that he cautions you to not immediately approach, but to instead behave disinterestedly towards your target for a while first, while repeatedly demonstrating high SMV-- whereas most of TRP advice is "approach and don't leave until she either loses your interest or tells you to fuck off". I'm not saying either is wrong, but it did illuminate something that could be useful to my fellow learners here.

I took six average women (4-6 HBD) and used the "approach and stay" method, with an overall positive turnout. (hereby defined as got their contact info at the least, if not a date)

I took five above-average women (7-9's) and used the A+S method with mixed to negative results. 1 girl gave me the bedroom eyes but hasn't texted me back yet.

My hypothesis here is that they're used to male attention, maybe they aren't used to the 'approach and stay', per se, but certainly they have a charcuterie board of foreskins and dick cheeses to pick apart at their leisure.

I had a hunch that the RG method of building rapport without even looking at them would be the way to get their attention.

Had to be a bit risky on this one and fish within my University. Only way to test my hypothesis, sadly.

So I got involved in one of the casual clubs at school with an equal gender mix, a few hot women and a few average women. Ignored all of them except for one who I made a friend-based relationship with. No games, just chillin'. (oh and along with partying with my new bros from said club)

Built my reputation through them, then began to bump into the other women in the halls etc. about 4 school days after.

The average women were...receptive but hesitant? to my advances. Not sure why on that one. But the above-average were much more receptive, giving out their personal info no problem.

Haven't gotten laid from the results of this experiment tho, I'm too close to finishing my time at Uni to fuck around with any kind of claim against me

No control group because I'm a bro scientist not a real scientist.

TL;DR: OP posits that the best method for attracting high SMV women is to be near-and-around them, demonstrating SMV & especially social proof, but behave disinterestedly for several days before any kind of approach, after which point hit it hard and fast. Has worked with positive results for him so far.

I'm open to discussion, also anyone have any ideas why the average women were hesitant? Maybe they were afraid of competing against the alpha women? Idk gonna go sleep now