I know this is a horse that's been beaten to death, I know I should just go out and do 50+ direct approaches, and then 50+ indirect approaches and see what works better. Before this, I want some real insight from guys who have had real experience with both. I don't mean just getting numbers, girls hand out numbers like candy. I'm talking about f-closes (meaning closes that were born from a daygame interaction, not actually closing during the day, I know that's super rare).
I'm reading both "Day Bang" from Roosh V and "As You Are" by Nick Sparks. Roosh advocates strictly for indirect day game, Nick Sparks is much more ambiguous. He advocates for a "natural method" but never indicates whether it should be used for night game or day game. He does mention it's optimal for "social situations" (which I guess means night game?).
Since Roosh likes indirect day game, he seems to favor each interaction having an "opener". Nick Sparks doesn't believe in openers; his opener looks like "Hi, how are you?", but says if you deliver it genuinely and confidently, it'll work just as well as any other opener. He writes that none of your interactions with anybody in any imaginable situation should have a "hidden agenda" behind them (which I don't understand, the girl's face/body is what motivated you to come talk to her, let's be honest. You don't really care "how she's doing", how could you? You don't know her).
I dunno if there are any fans of Nick Sparks on here, but does his method work in a daytime situation? Feels like if a girl had a random guy come up to her and start a conversation like that, she would be weirded out. No matter how confident or alpha his delivery is, she would see his intentions even though he's not stating them outright, which is the definition of "creepy". I can totally see how the Sparks method is great for night game; I feel day game is a different animal, but he seems to think you can apply this "natural" method to both situations and get the same results.
The beauty of the Roosh approach is that it flies under the radar, but is also less "genuine" because you don't really care about whatever your opener is commenting on, it's just a method to getting her talking and starting a conversation without "scaring the cat". Sparks makes it sound so simple, like you could just walk up to a girl in any daytime situation and say "Hey, how are you doing" and it won't seem creepy or weird to her if you deliver it right. Goddamnit... it feels like the more I read the less I know. It feels more and more like I need to just go fall flat on my face for a few months before I can truly understand.
TL;DR: Trying to figure out what kind of daygame works best? Being honest, direct and showing her all your cards in the first sentence, or going indirect and allowing a conversation to happen so you have room for a little game?
[–]DaygameCoach 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]allislost81 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Phix_Me[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]fatClaus[🍰] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Nick_Sparks 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Arcenturion 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Arcenturion 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Arcenturion 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link