I am working on something big, it involves Sarkeesian, I don't want to say more now but i will be sure to post a link when it's done.

I have had to look through all of Sarkeesian's videos and public appearances (media interviews and talks). I know, I know no one should have to do this, it was horrible...

But, I noticed something strange and I wonder if anyone else has noticed this, it's only something you would notice if you watched all her stuff together and in a short time.

What clued me in to this is this video here of a talk at Carlton University in Canada...

here https://apps.carleton.edu/events/convocations/audio_video/?item_id=968399

what's special about this one is that she gives an extended question period which she doesn't normally do...

What I think i've noticed that maybe no one else has pointed out is that in her media appearances she seems that she is being coached. What I mean is that she has hired someone (or more than one person) to help her with things like 'staying on message' and how to do a 'talking point'

The reason i noticed it with the carlton speaking engagement is that she gave the question period and as anyone who has ever given a question period for a talk knows, it's much harder to 'stay on message', naturally because it's more unpredictable. Contrast this to her media appearances on CNN and democracy now where it's all crisp, clean and with no stumbles.

It's bizarre to say the least, I hasten to say what i have done here has not proven anything and in fact if she has a 'media coach' it might not be that significant after all.

I have a friend who works with the Liberal Party of Canada and has worked on things like this, that is how to have candidates tow the party line, stay on message and avoid gaffes. It's a complicated process of coaching and looking at yourself on video so you can ditch things like nervous ticks and something like 'eye rolling' for when you meet your opponent in debate. It's long hard work and it's also expensive (50-100 an hour or more to the coach). If you wanna a concrete example of what I am talking about just go find who ran for congress and failed the first time but ran again later and won (maybe they won two years later for example) You can see that they improved on media appearances and speaking engagements most likely.

What does this mean if I am right? Maybe nothing? But it does raise some questions.

Who is paying for this? Why is she doing this? When did she begin to be coached?

If I might be permitted to speculate, maybe she is getting this help from the DNC (priming people for when Hillary runs), maybe Soros or maybe a foundation...???

well that's all for now, I will keep you all posted on my thing.

thoughts???

To quote Winston Churchill

In War: Resolution In Defeat: Defiance In Victory: Magnanimity In Peace: Good Will ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Stay Classy My Brothers

Dini out.