I've been thinking, In the US Female Circumcision is illegal but Male Circumcision isn't (the Female Genital Mutilation Act 1996), but that (to my knowlege) only covers biological females. I suggest we point this out to the "Sex is a social construct" crowd as a way to push for a ban on Male Circumcision

is order

Y Means Yes to previous question N Means no to previous question

1: "since the law only covers the FGM of biological females, shouldn't we abolish it for being transphobic?"

2Y: "So would this new law also cover the genital mutilation of all biological males? As any of them may be future trans women"

3YY: That's our goal

3YN: "Why're you denying future trans-women's rights?"

2N: "So then trans-women aren't real women or are they just undeserving of the same rights as biological women?"