Abc recently posted this comment:

I guess it just goes to show how differently each person there interprets TRP.

Red pill school replied this comment:

I think for there to be a fair and honest debate here, people should drop the pedantic tone, like the whole "women aren't really children" line and "feminism isn't a sexual strategy according to the dictionary..." I think it's disingenuous to make these arguments, because they misrepresent exactly what we're getting at. Obviously we don't think women are literally children, and feminists wouldn't say they're doing this for sex. The point is realizing the context of our conversation- that we're looking at things from a sexual strategy standpoint and interpreting what effect they have on this. There are some good arguments to be made one way or another- and none of them are literal interpretations of our views.

Red pill school seems to think that TRP is taken too literally. This leads to many questions.

  • Is TRP really meant to be taken as an analogy rather than literally (similarly to how people interpret the Bible)? Or is this just the view of red pill school?

  • If so: Why can't TRP be taken literally? How does everyone in TRP know that it isn't meant to be taken literally? What is the purpose of holding a view that isn't meant to be taken literally?