Here's a quote from Season 1 of House of Cards; "Decisions based on emotion aren't decisions, at all. They're instincts. Which can be of value. The rational and the irrational complement each other. Individually they're far less powerful." - Raymond Tusk

Do you agree with Tusk? Or do you believe in a more Greg House set of ideals (complete rationality without any emotion/irrationality)?

Do you think there could be a middle ground, where they compliment each other, or where one is better than the other in certain situations?

I personally league with House more versus Tusk. I think irrationality in any form is bad.

edit: After reading some of the responses (all of which so far have been insightful and educated to a degree), I am leaning towards the Tusk-minded ideology: the rational and the irrational do compliment each other.