TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Prince-Noctis Archive

View 4 posts and 900 comments by Prince-Noctis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No. Mine would be.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/18 03:14 PM
1

Rather date the dude with a sex doll. Those ain't got STDs quite like a hoe. Wouldn't care since it's just an expensive toy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/18 01:58 PM
1

Sex negative. I would like to think they consider that sex negative. If I'm corrected by a feminist, I give up and I have no idea what hypocrisy they blather.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/18 06:10 PM
1

I should have specified prior to marriage as being the definition of "outside the institution"--for that is what I intended. Will you take my clarification of terms or pull a yarn I hadn't intended to weave?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/18 06:01 PM
1

I'm a mix. Open sexual experimentation and conversation I'm down for. I also don't promote abstinence as the only acceptable form of birth control. I do however negatively judge some sexual activity like promiscuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/18 05:59 PM
1

It doesn't though. Traditional opinions describes sex as fundamentally negative prior to marriage. It is not casting judgment on which or what relations are acceptable, only that all are. So what sex positivity takes issue with then, is the basis that any and the act of sex is bad before marriage. It does not promote cheating, since it has no quarrel with what types of relations is or aren't acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/18 05:47 PM
1

I'm just conveying her position. Frankly I have very little interest in what is or isn't this crusade's opinion of matters. Sex positivity is the conveying that sexual acts and experimentation are wrongfully shamed on the basis of sex being a fundamentally negative experience. The concept that sex acts outside the institution are inherently 'negative' would indeed be sex negative by this definition. Sex positivity has no opinion on what defines acceptable or unacceptable relations only that sex …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/18 05:35 PM
1

To clarify her frustration, since we speak more similarly in terms, she's attempting to convey that sex positivity is focused on consensual acts not relations. Sex positivity is not about having sex with consensual persons, but more open consensual experimentation in bed. Sodomy is a good example of this. Sex positivity is not about embracing homosexuality or age gaps, but less shamefully engaging in sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/18 05:26 PM
1

Go your own way. Why do you give a fuck? You're doing it wrong if you think it's some kind of movement--it's for the individual level.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/18 04:02 PM
2

Best friend relationships are the best.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/18 01:06 AM
1

We met on an Naruto Flash Game Forum 10 years ago. I was a clan leader and had merged my clan with his and so he became one of my clan members. We got off on the wrong foot, but eventually he started to crush on me. I rejected him for multiple reasons, but we became friends. Eventually we were each other's best friends. We started dating after a few years and met up a couple times in person to play video games like Pokemon Stadium and hang out. I bought a place and he moved in with me last year.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/18 05:30 PM
2

I don't find any lies acceptable, but I acknowledge that's more of the autism. It's about as acceptable as a woman going around and checking for condoms or other indicators of an affair. Going through his phone. That sort of thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 08:31 PM
5

It would. People don't take well to having their loyalty questioned though if they deem it unprecedented. Kind of like the wife that keeps asking if you've done this or that. The whole "Well, did you fuck her?" vibe. It's considered offensive to ask if serious. There's always consequences to perceived accusations--better to proceed with caution if they're worth it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 07:05 PM
3

Yeah, I'm one of those people. My solution has been to avoid others and stay in my house--but that's not exactly a good suggestion for everyone. Most do fine at reading and communicating with people. My advice was for the majority--not for people such as myself that get along better with jigsaw puzzles.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 05:45 PM
2

When she has given him no reason to distrust her to that extent. A good liar may a woman be, but all liars get caught out on smaller lies now and then.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/18 02:26 PM
4

I don't have animosity towards lookism complaints from either men or women was my point. I was arguing that we as a sub hold differing levels of empathy for lookism complaints from men vs women. I do not get that same vibe.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 03:08 PM
9

It's not people's jobs to go about pretending to be attracted to people for reputation points on Facebook. The only people that complain about it are those that feel they are victims for it. Physical appearances aren't negated due to personal grievances.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/18 02:52 PM
3

"Ok" looking, but then in the description "nice-looking". You messed up your own question, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/18 02:36 AM
1

OP wants a circle jerk. I can't even be bothered to help with his masturbation.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/18 02:09 AM
1

Are you seriously complaining about people complaining?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/18 08:07 PM
1

The first, I'd never share and frankly sex isn't such a big deal for me that I would compromise that. It's not like I couldn't have fun in bed with someone I'm not all that sexually attracted to. Sides, sexual attraction can build over time. I'm already in a relationship like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/18 03:20 PM
1

By your definition, I am bisexual.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 07:38 PM
3

I'm not imposing anything. It's explanation of why the behavior currently exists. That doesn't entail consequences for directness could potentially decrease and the behavior become less persistent in women. That will happen when females feel less threatened by others, especially males, if they state things bluntly. If it becomes beneficial for females to be direct, it will happen. It's what your topic asks for. An explanation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 07:34 PM
1

Because I'm a confused autist and I don't intend to be with a woman in a relationship, so I don't see a point in identifying as anything other than straight. I get this question a lot though--and now I'm starting to think it be easier to say bisexual...even though I'd still get complaints that I haven't had sex with a woman so I "wouldn't know any better". Ugh, there's no winning.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 07:31 PM
7

There is no 'supposed to'. It's more or less that the ramifications of being direct had been more threatening towards women more than men. Same thing applies to vulnerable males. If the big guy calls the little guy in the room a pussy, he's going to get away with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 07:25 PM
9

I was downvoted already--women punish swiftly. It is beneficial for women to operate socially indirectly to avoid confrontation and social repercussion. It places less responsibility on women so that the interpreter is more responsible for what is communicated. This way females can not only avoid some of the worst reactions, but step back if the reaction is unfavorable. If it is not directly stated, it becomes much easier to state it was not 'the intended message'. Basically, it has been benefic…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 07:20 PM
7

I can't stand it either, but I have ASD and can say from experience forwardness pisses women the fuck off. Some men as well. There is a reason women are indirect in their communication--and it's because it is beneficial for them to be so. Don't plan on it happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 06:50 PM
1

Label doesn't really matter to me, I only intend to be with the man I have now--so it's pretty moot currently.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 06:41 PM
1

Well, I used to be RP for quite some time--so that's not exactly surprising.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 06:36 PM
1

There are some people one can fuck or get pleasure from but have little to no interest in establishing a relationship with. That's what females often can be to other females. They're pretty and fun, but female behavior and mannerisms aren't often what females are inclined to desire in a mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 06:12 PM
1

Absolutely not. I get off on lesbian porn and I'm straight. It's very common for women to have sexual interest in other women--way more than it is for men. There's multiple evolutionary explanations for this as well. It was relatively often that females would bed with other women in polygamous relationships. That being said, having sexual interest in a woman doesn't mean you have any romantic inclinations towards them. Which is where this thread gets it wrong. Women may have curious relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 06:07 PM
6

I like to be in control. Normally my sexual fantasies and interests involve being on top of a youthful, delicate, flustered prey underneath me. We don't all get to live out our porn fantasies, but I sure as hell enjoy the idea of having a chance of that. Pegging is off the table with my SO, but there's other ways to achieve that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 05:37 PM
5

Probably because females are naturally submissive and typically scout for masculine features which are not particularly often as strong in men within the bisexual community. Another factor is women with religious values would find it to be irreconcilable--and a large part of the US is religious. Moved my reply to here.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 05:31 PM
6

Yes. He'd probably be more open to pegging--major positive there. Now if he is a slut, that's different to being bisexual. "I fucked a couple guys" is different to "I fucked a different dude every weekend".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/18 05:18 PM
1

I think everyone understands BDSM better than the OP, but when someone is that far out from the average person's reference--sometimes it's not worth trying to reel them back into reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/18 12:24 AM
0

Former and I'm into effeminate, pretty, youthful men. Nonetheless, I still have female biologically induced traits. Voice pitch raises when attracted--a sexual signal. Similarly, some of my behaviors are contradictory to desirable ones--like childlike playfulness, giggling, shoulder shrugging, and body shrinking. Basically, I still have female signs of sexual attraction despite them being counteractive and counter intuitive to my controlling demeanor. Despite wanting to behave in a more dominant…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/18 11:48 PM
1

The topic is specifically related to sex and implicates all are naturally submissive. Are you lost?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/18 11:40 PM
1

Amusing you mentioned that. I have more of a personal taste for being on top and in control despite being female--but ASD certainly makes things screwy on the cognitive front. I will state, however, there can be notable dissonance between physiological pressures and psychological ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/18 05:19 PM
1

Bless the fact I have a male unicorn.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/18 03:15 PM
1

Low socioeconomic conditions typically insist on an unstable and unpredictable environment that pressure short term mating strategies. This entails males and females will be seeking mates based on present qualities and not on invested ones. Mating will be less about personality traits and fatherly qualities and much more about sexual chemistry and financial resources. The lower classes will focus on what can be offered immediately, and as such, many long term outcomes will be the ramifications o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/18 03:01 PM
2

I'd expect sarcasm only from those that cannot tell the difference between good and bad reporting and good and bad science.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/18 12:08 AM
1

Females definitely have an appearances threshold and it's particularly more stringent in low socioeconomic conditions, as good research papers provide. I don't disagree with the basis of the study, but the methodology and the conclusions that media guzzled and spat out for the simple minded folk who will then hit share for their facebooks and twitters. It's not science, it's media sensationalism and research done to reach big, inconclusive dumbass headlines. If you were in STEM you could sniff t…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/18 11:36 PM
9

Marriage is still vowing to commit to one another. Girlfriend/boyfriend status sure won't scare potential suitors quite as much as a ring on the hand either. Forever girlfriend/boyfriends will always be a joke in terms of commitment. In such case they'd both be prepared to leave each other when life inevitably hits the rocks. Solid relationship A++. It's planning for the present as opposed to the future (low class mentality). My mother supported her husband, my father, through drug rehabs due to…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/18 09:54 PM
8

Stupid headlines and dumb methodology. Garbage. What's next? "Study finds men only value women based on their physical appearance and little else" reported by Vox? You got to be kidding me with this shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/18 07:25 PM
2

People that play mobile games are not considered to be video gamers or play video games--it's not considered core. To take the literal is obscuring the intention of the term.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/18 02:33 PM
2

I may like Final Fantasy Brave Exvius on mobile, but mobile gaming is not what people refer to when they say video games or video gamers. Most console and PC games are considered core. My grandmother that plays scrabble on her laptop would not be called a video gamer similarly, and broadening the term to be so inclusive is stripping the meaning of the term as it was intended.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/18 01:51 PM
24

There isn't. I find the best can be found in places you have an interest. I like video games and so I found my SO in a video game community. You won't find someone perfect--no such thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/18 09:41 PM
8

Exactly this. Maybe women often do have it easier, but so do people of fairer skin complexion, people of higher socioeconomic status, people of natural talent, people with naturally attractive looks, etc etc. Anyone can easily sit down and pick out people that supposedly have it easier in life. To the incel, you probably live life on easy mode. Is it true? Probably not. Life is never quite that simple. This whole victim mentality is utterly pointless and until they realize what they have they'll…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/18 05:52 PM
3

Probably because you're not a virgin? That's my point though, N-count matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/18 12:29 AM
1

What part of human evolution has demonstrated a trend towards apathetic, antisocial and uncooperative behavior? Humans are exceptionally social, empathetic and cooperative species compared to bonobos or other relatives. Human sexual relations are much closer to a pair bonding species when compared to chimps or bonobos. The human infant study compares the differences in species, and last I checked--women were human. Male and female bonobos both rewarded antisocial behavior and were highly sensiti…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/18 12:21 AM
9

I don't think sex is all that complicated. Might be a bit awkward at first, sure, but practice makes perfect. When you have a lifetime, there's plenty of time to do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 10:13 PM
4

Yeah, we're doing great. We stayed at a hotel, played Pokemon Stadium on N64 and drank whiskey. Good memory with plenty more after and many still to come.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 10:08 PM
2

You're confusing way too many subjects to lead to a desired result. Female mating preferences that focus on genetic quality are related to fast strategy and focus on good mating. This is in contrast with mating preferences in females that focus on father quality or provider quality. What preference a female has depends on her environment--in strenuous, dangerous and unpredictable times the female focuses on fast strategy: mating. This is because the parents are less likely to be able to provide …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 09:56 PM
1

Hmm, I have a more cynical view of humans in general. I see all relationships between humans as being transactional--where people cut ties if it offers more cons than benefits. Male, female--doesn't particularly matter. A bad deal is a bad deal.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 09:27 PM
5

Does this apply to both sexes? Definitely. I remember the time my male coworker lost his virginity on a tinder app. He knew it was a ONS, but he skipped out on work the following day. When he showed up the day after that he wanted me to give him a hug because he was upset she left the next morning. As you can tell by my tone, I did not--I gave him the awkward one-arm hug. It was one of those very strange things I encountered in my life.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 08:35 PM
1

I wanted to add mention of this. Link There are a number of studies that have been done that demonstrate time and time again, that waiting to have sex is more likely to succeed in the long run. While males may be an involuntary celibate, the female virgins are almost always a voluntary celibate--so it is absolutely relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 08:20 PM
22

I'm a virgin with a virgin. N-count matters, because it signals someone's attitude towards sex and romance. You think a male or female with a high N count is going to want to take romance and dating slow? A dating couple spends the night in a hotel room. The high N people would likely fuck, but us virgins? Whip out N64 and get the alcohol.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 08:09 PM
1

Well it's already been almost 7 years so that will be easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 07:24 PM
1

I lose my virginity if it's voluntary? Now you're being ridiculous. Frankly he's already getting his shit together, so his actions speak louder than your words.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 07:22 PM
1

Doomed to fail is amusing because I doubt there's any evidence of that. Virgin hookups have the lowest divorce rates for a reason, if anything, our relationship is highly likely to statistically succeed. We've both invested everything in each other already. He's losing weight by the week, taking care of the house and making dinner. I'm working, paying the bills and helping out where I can. We've spoken everyday since '09 and have not come close to getting tired of one another. Living with him ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 07:18 PM
1

Yet our relationship is a lot more than that. Even with all the porn I watch and masturbating I do--sex isn't such a big deal compared to having someone I want in my life for the rest of my days. Someone I can trust and be honest with. We're on the same wavelength in that regard. So we're both waiting on him to lose weight and get put back together--but that isn't a big deal to us. We've waited over 5 years to be together, what's a couple more? I don't think a lot of people are fortunate enough …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 06:46 PM
20

From the same article: In similar experiments, human babies as young as three months have shown a marked preference for people acting in cooperative, prosocial ways. The bonobos, on the other hand, were drawn to the jerks. The bonobos in these experiments directly contradict similar experiments done with humans. I'm not sure how much of this is applicable to extract since the basis is contradictory to human experiment. We know human females tend to prefer high status males, but it is not of the …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 04:55 PM
1

What exactly is the nightmare portion?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 02:45 PM
1

Hell yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 02:42 PM
1

Because I know what kind of man he is. He's an honest man whose words would never lead to less than what was said.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 02:41 PM
1

I am well aware of feral children, as they had been mentioned in Nature via Nurture. What exactly was the point of bringing up a case where development of a child had been purposely sabotaged beyond repair? Example of genetic extremities doesn't serve the discussion matter. The quote I had provided was made by a man who observed and lived through the plight of concentration camps--to which he bore witness of people who both overcame and succumbed to radical suffering.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/18 02:39 PM
3

But yeah, sex doesn't just magic low self-esteem away no matter how much incels put that pussy on a pedestal. Good response, much appreciated. Mental mind games can be a tough match-up to win. I wish you luck with yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 10:47 PM
1

Kind of interesting because it's the opposite of what I'd expect. Santa doesn't exist, so if I found a fat old man dressed in a red suit in my place I'd first suspect the fucker is breaking into my house. Good reply though, it's different.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 10:07 PM
2

Right, it's being sensible.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 09:55 PM
4

911 I have an emergency this morning and I need you to hop right on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 09:51 PM
1

So probably not low self esteem enough to punch mirrors, but it can be modestly validating to those males questioning of their attractiveness. Good to note. I think your self esteem is probably better than the ones I'm thinking of. You have confidence enough to approach women, which is pretty healthy--that's a compliment, mind you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 09:47 PM
2

And that's why it be damn hard for a man like that to believe it. It's like a chick sayin' it was Santa that banged her.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 09:42 PM
2

She said every 5th tinder lay was with a skinny nerdy type and she did it specifically to feel good about herself. Lol, at least she's honest. I don't think many females are that self aware or willing to be upfront about that sort of thing. I'm making myself laugh now thinking of what she could label her charity--start an organization. Make-A-Dick-Happy. Semen Foundation. I'm amusing myself now. I need to stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 09:40 PM
1

So you have been laid but you still have low self esteem? Do you then believe these women find you sexually attractive, but it doesn't convince you that you are? I don't know if you can explain that dissonance but give it a shot if you can.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 09:35 PM
4

A craving to peg a delicate, youthful, pretty, flushed prey in the asshole? Sure, but we don't all get to live out our porn fantasies and fetishes. I'll live.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 09:31 PM
2

If a male score himself a 2/10 he'd probably believe the 3/10 woman. If a 9/10 babe were up to bang though he'd probably assume she's full of shit, no? I'm not talking about the guy that thinks he's somewhat attractive but doesn't get why women won't fuck him. I'm talking about the males with low self esteem--the type that would degrade themselves by saying they're "ugly" or outright "unattractive". They honestly perceive themselves that way and would probably argue with me they're objectively u…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 09:26 PM
-1

womon don't feel shame for not fucking losers You could shame a woman to feel bad her hair isn't braided that day. I think you can if it's done by the right person and influence. However, even if it weren't the case, could you say a woman wouldn't fuck a man to feel like a better person for it?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 09:21 PM
1

I have a cynical mindset on certain topics--notable trust issues, so I found it hard to believe males would just accept some new circumstance when it doesn't fit a pattern of experience. Good response.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 09:18 PM
4

The only one capable of making a change to the mental state is the person themselves. It's the same way therapy works. A therapist can sit there, reassure you, suggest solutions to you--but nothing matters unless you yourself make a change and effort. The environment has its influences, but it isn't the decision maker or the agent of the problem. The same quote in my profile is relevant here: “Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms—to choose one’s attitu…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 09:13 PM
2

That's a good point. There's probably a good reason that females are predisposed to offering validation and reassurance even if it isn't fully honest. Ignorance is bliss to some reasonable extent, perhaps.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 09:09 PM
2

I think people with low self esteem are definitely more likely to scrutinize something contradictory to their perspective. Cynicism doesn't go down the drain when presented with something that no longer fits a rigid pattern.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 09:06 PM
2

I think he's aware he's unattractive because she's not fucking him, not that fucking him would mean he is attractive. Her not wanting to fuck him, sure, likely means he's unattractive. However, does a man getting fucked mean he is sexually attractive? I don't think so. Maybe it's wallet that's attractive, how do you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 09:03 PM
2

I don't think the term 'pity fuck' came from thin air. Females will do things to signal virtue for themselves and for others. It's also why making a female feel like she's a terrible person for not giving into demands is highly effective--a common manipulation tactic. Females try to use that tactic against males with limited success, because it's projecting what works on them. Females care about their image, sometimes to the point of fucking a less than super sexually attractive guy. They'll do …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 08:58 PM
1

Would you? Let's say 9/10 wants to fuck you after you treat her to a dinner date. Would you suspect it legitimate or not? Based on what?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 08:51 PM
4

I don't think an attractive woman can convince a man he's attractive simply by fucking him. If he scales her a 9 and himself a 3-4. I think people in that position would likely suspect she's full of shit--even if she weren't. Maybe she is, maybe she isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 08:49 PM
2

The only person that can fix low self esteem is the person that has low self esteem. You can improve yourself and become attractive or mope about it. If we don't criticize ourselves, we never have reason to improve.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 08:05 PM
1

Hah, I say it is. I couldn't think of a more perfect match.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 06:09 PM
1

When someone is repulsed by themselves it's very difficult to do any of those activities. He's still a male, so when he puts himself back together those will come to him naturally. He has a lot of redeeming qualities, one of them being his diligence. It's a matter of time. I don't mind being the sexual go-getter in this relationship later anyhow. I've always preferred the hunt. I don't expect him to pull a 180, but he'll be much more open to things when he has his confidence. For now his shame i…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 05:59 PM
3

More than worth it. I've invested my life in him for good reason. He's an intelligent, loyal, honest, selfless man that had a rough set of circumstances. I can trust him with anything, whether it be my neurological issues or my credit card. He's always tagged along in my interests and I can't picture life without his presence anymore. His companionship is weighted in gold.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 04:56 PM
1

No, he hasn't masturbated yet. Which is personally amusing since I'm at it on the daily. Haven't kissed yet. It's a strange relationship, but I have ASD so that's not all that surprising. We're happy as is, so waiting ain't a big deal. He'll get around to that sort of thing once he builds himself back up. He's still getting accustomed to living in a nice place anyway. He's working out daily and taking care of the place--him getting to a better place is a matter of time only.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 04:49 PM
1

Low self esteem. Won't even let me in the room when he's working out let alone when he's undressed. While he gets back in shape I don't mind waiting. He doesn't want to remember having sex with the love his life while he feels like shit about himself--it's respectable. We have an entire lifetime so what's a couple years. My sex drive is infinitely larger than his, but that might be a matter of health on his part and weirdness on mine. I'm the one with a hard drive of porn in this relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 04:42 PM
1

Don't worry, I masturbate plenty in the mean time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 04:38 PM
1

Definitely. My dumbass autistic virgin ass managed to snag my adorable virgin male-unicorn. We live together, in love--haven't had had sex (mutually placed on back burner). Playing League of Legends together is sexy anyway. Love ain't like a fairy tale, ain't need to be sealed with a kiss or a dick in a hole. Not to say that ain't happen later.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 04:25 PM
8

Alcohol dependence is definitely much higher for males. Males prefer self medication methods--that and the difference in self reporting would skew the degree of the results.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 03:40 PM
8

Indeed. Males on the other hand, for example, are more vulnerable to mental disorders related to a lack of empathy--like Antisocial Personality Disorder. Similarly, there had been advantage for males to lack empathy towards their adversaries. Empathy was more pressured for in females than it was males for care of the young.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 03:35 PM
14

Females are more predisposed to neurotic disorders than males. It had been advantageous for the female to worry about the health and well-being of herself, her mate and her young.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 03:21 PM
4

Fictional men. Works out fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/18 02:12 PM
3

From the title, I thought you were leading into something about a gay sex orgy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 05:49 PM
6

You fuck her, you don't marry her. A male's romantic and sexual attraction differs just as a woman's may. Some of the females he'd fuck are not going to elicit the "I want this woman to be the mother of my children" response--for a damn good reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 05:46 PM
2

If it's worth the drama risk, you do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 05:41 PM
4

FWBs usually ends up with someone developing emotional longing for the other. Sex hormones certainly don't help the equation. It's a dangerous game to play. I don't recommend a FWB arrangement specifically due to high-risk drama, but do what you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 04:04 PM
3

Fuck-zoned. I like it. Friends-with-benefits is a dangerous territory I don't suggest to anyone. Stick with one night stands. Regardless, I think this situation occurs when the female invests in a male, but is unable to directly confront the situation due to her anxiety. Her unwillingness to confront the scenario directly prolongs her confusion yet simultaneously reassures her because the scenario continues. It leads to a horribly communicated, cataclysmic explosion of feeling disappointed, emba…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 03:34 PM
1

If you directly tell them you're not interested and they press further, that's crossing a line. That's him taking a shot, and you shooting him down, and him persisting. That's wholly different to the sign language you were referring to with the expectation they can infer no chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 01:55 AM
1

What being cruel? No, I quite do. I don't see being direct and honest as being cruel. My growing up I had seen more cruelty in the fake smiles and pleasantry of females that only speak mind when the victim were out of sight. I don't have a filter and I can be quite abrasive--but it's not out of ill intent.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 01:38 AM
1

What is the cruelty here exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 01:15 AM
1

The way you talk about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 01:14 AM
1

Maybe you should actually try it sometime.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 01:03 AM
1

Nope, I don't. You need fries for that salt?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 01:00 AM
1

Isn't it? Lol. The idea that other people don't have telepathic communication really grates on some of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 12:36 AM
1

Cutting them off with "I'm sorry, I'm not interested" usually works. It's not that complicated. Amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/18 12:34 AM
1

You can't seem to get out of your own mind. You know they have no chance, they don't. That's what you're not getting.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/18 10:10 PM
10

Do you know what manipulation is? Manipulation entails deceiving someone to doing something while hiding the full details with disingenuous or malicious intent. She may have decided to do those things, but if he intentionally leads her on that doing so would lead to more than casual sex--then that guy had manipulated her. Otherwise, fair game she knew the risks.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/18 10:07 PM
2

Not being too open to talking is not equivalent to a guy having zero chance. You're not getting that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/18 10:06 PM
1

A phone call has urgency that a book and a song do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/18 10:04 PM
2

my attempt to put it out there that there are no chances Right, simply visibly doing something isn't telepathic communication of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/18 09:44 PM
3

That and those women that said such are likely actively thinking and learning about the sexual marketplace. The average woman that gives a cutesy Disney reply like "Just be yourself!" is not going to be diabolically thinking about curbing the sexual market away from low quality males. She's not going to be thinking that far ahead--you're assigning too much credit.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/18 08:53 PM
3

Just because you're doing something, doesn't mean he doesn't have a chance. That is something you assume he's aware of.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/18 08:50 PM
1

I think they give terrible advice because it's an effortless reply or they just don't have a clue. I think you assign too much intelligence to them when you make the assumption they know what they want--and even further how it negative or positively effects their sexual marketplace.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/18 08:41 PM
6

Men initiate and take a risk on an interaction with you. I find it fascinating that you place fault on them for being unable to read your particular mind. Perhaps you should attempt pondering the minds of those outside of your own. They may not have had a shot with you, but that doesn't entail they wouldn't with the next woman that isn't you. Men have been bred to initiate and persist because that has been what works. It's personally amusing that you find it irksome that men are doing what women…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/18 08:21 PM
2

Online dating doesn't always entail the use of dating sites. The online dating environment is quite a platform for gamers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/18 02:23 PM
2

No one cares you don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/18 04:35 AM
2

No it will not. A high quality female plunged into the projects will still be a high quality female. It will not put a dampen in her overall attractiveness such that a high quality male would feel. That's where we get into a subjectivity. A female without her makeup, her good clothes, her facial products, her social brigade of harpies loses a lot of attractive status similar. A female in those conditions typically attracts sleazy short-sighted men that are not high quality in terms of the femini…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 09:54 PM
2

A male is not deprived or robbed of his skill, his craft, his intelligence, his talent and his experience by plunging him into another environment where opportunities are more scarce. Plunging a high quality female into the the projects depraved of healthy food, good clothing, makeup, social status will similarly put the dampener on her own attractiveness but she too will not be robbed good genetics or sharpened social intelligence. A successful male or female may be dropped at the bottom of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 09:27 PM
2

I didn't say he has high economic status. He has an environment in which he operates. He exists on a plane of reality with external factors at all points of his living existence. You cannot separate the man from the environment he interacts. The existence of the field is not conditional. His resulting attractive status is both on part due to controllable and random factors like the female.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 09:00 PM
2

The presence of external factors--the existence of an environment--is not conditional. The environment itself is a mix of circumstance and controllable factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 08:54 PM
2

The presence of external factors is not conditional, his environment is a mix of controllable and circumstantial factors. Male attractiveness is partially circumstantial, but so is the female's.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 08:40 PM
2

I agreed it made him less attractive in that circumstance, not your shady feminine slide in of a second claim that proclaims male attractiveness more generally conditional. Given a constant level of male attractiveness, multiple studies corroborate that a male's attractiveness is HIGHLY conditional on his economic status. A male's attractiveness being more conditional on his economic status is not being argued with. Holy shit. Go play with a feminist instead. Please, for the love of fuck, go do …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 08:29 PM
2

A male being less attractive than a female, in a box, does not necessitate it more or less conditional than the female's method of attraction. Posing a hypothetical that evaluates only by male standards is unhinged stupidity and the only thing you've been playing at is word games.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 08:17 PM
2

You agreed with the conclusion of my thought experiment. Male attractiveness is more conditional. Your dishonesty parallels that of a female. The italics was a reflection of your point, not mine. This has far surpassed the point of annoyance. As if anything you've said here has been scientific by the minimal of standards. Cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 08:11 PM
2

You still came to the logical conclusion that male attractiveness is more conditional. You love putting words in my mouth. I didn't. Thought experiments do not demonstrate extendable conclusions. I guess you wouldn't know shit about that though. That's not the equivalent scenario. The equivalent scenario would be what if the woman lost all her economic status cues. Convenient.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 07:44 PM
2

"The research" Research that doesn't exist. You keep placing humans in a god damn box. A male will lose his attractive qualities if he is separated from his environment, unlike the female, therefore his love is less conditional. Yes, if we somehow lived in a world without an environment that be the case. If I magically and hypothetical stripped females of their physical attractiveness, guess what, now the male's attractive. Is the reality either scenario? No. It's a stupid, self-serving, emotion…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 07:20 PM
3

So he'd be similarly attracted to an indistinguishable, abhorrently ugly, female human because 'she' has internal female sexuality? Let me guess, you conveniently define appearances as internal but weave around status, skills and merit. Your evidence is 'it's obvious'. Brilliant. My lovely Disney Prince, I don't think there's going much further with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 06:57 PM
3

No, your "subjective valuing" is the claim that one type of valuing is more 'core to their being' than the other. For the last bloody fucking time, I am not arguing that there exists differeces in how males and females value their mates. Clearly there are. You do not get to shift the burden of proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 06:25 PM
5

I have to drop the thread. You still don't get why my subjective valuing of self was in reference to your subjective valuing. I never equated female sexuality to treating women as sex objects, I was mocking your statement as treating them as such. Your bias in manipulating female sexuality into simply 'being a woman' for the sake of your argument is not a game I'm willing to play. You are an amicable troll, but I suggest you play this game with feminists--not a former red pill rager.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 05:30 PM
3

-2. You still don't get it. I'm moving on. -3. It is not more or less significantly conditional is my position. Economic status is literally more conditional than simply being a woman. I like how you manipulated female sexuality into being a female but did not manipulate economic status into having a dollar. I don't know why I'm sparing you anymore of my patience. -4. I'm not responding to this. You're shoving arguments in my mouth I am not making and your attempts at doing so are getting less h…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 05:18 PM
3

I don't care. I don't care to argue shit you want for common complaints I don't have. How I subjectively value myself is mocking your subjective interpretation of valuable. You just don't get it. You haven't refuted the fact that men and women are valued differently. That is because I haven't. Who the fuck are you arguing with? My argument was that career success is far more conditional and you have not refuted this claim. Me: I wonder how you managed to pull that wide sweeping, non-evidenced, c…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 04:55 PM
4

I don't care. Get your agenda off me. It was a refute to your own subjective valuing. Less conditional? Sounds like a blind assumption a female is less likely to get uncompromisingly less sexually attractive than he is to uncompromisingly lose accomplishments/skills. I wonder how you managed to pull that wide sweeping, non-evidenced, claim out of your ass. But isn't treating women like a sex object treating women as a being of sexual desire Fun word game. I'll pass on your ridiculous equating.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 04:31 PM
3

I don't care about feminists. Get your agenda off me. Because I haven't refuted what they tend to value each other for, I refuted your feelzy interpretation of which was more pure. You saying that one is more pure than the other and more relative to their "core being" is the Disney shit. Do you not know what a sex object fucking is? A dildo? A vibrator? A fleshlight? Anal beads? A blow-up doll? What land do you come from? "I treat women like sex objects--but not that sex object, or that sex obje…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 04:04 PM
8

But isn't treating women like a sex object Fleshlight is a sex object. You said it, not I. I'm not sure why you're also arguing with something you've projected onto me, because I haven't expressed an issue with men loving women the way they do. The only difference between you and I, is that I also do not have an issue with how women love men the way they do. Your Disney laden interpretation of male love isn't a convincing argument. I don't smoke the fairy tale shit that somehow associates physic…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 03:43 PM
15

Women often fake liking a man to get him to pay for her dinner? Males and females are both pretty manipulative. It's like saying a female pretends she likes a man to get into his bank account. So what? Should females not ask for advice on getting into relationships similar because some of them are out to snatch cash off gullible males?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 03:19 PM
13

Okay, I certainly don't agree with their point, but you're saying loving a woman like a fleshlight is more "pure" than loving a man like a wallet? C'mon dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 03:15 PM
4

Damn, men be playin' like chicks now slappin' that divorce card ultimatum on the table.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 02:59 PM
11

It is only casual sex that I don't like because that is what men use to feel powerful over women and humiliate her. There are plenty of females that enjoy casual sex similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 02:54 PM
6

Chads get to be the nice ones That's an amusing assumption. You think Chads are more entitled to being nice instead of the opposite?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 02:46 PM
5

So you automatically associate men seeking casual sex with the manipulative dude? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 02:28 PM
2

Why do you care so much what other people think? Just go sluttin' and fuck the haters. God damn dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 02:24 PM
2

Why do you associate that with the concept of "real love"? Like any relationship between people, friendship or otherwise, it's an exchange. If a male places a female's beauty as paramount and she his resources--in the absence of those offerings the relationship will wane. It is why males, when her beauty or sexual offerings fades, may cheat with a female more young and beautiful. It is why females, when her male stops providing the security and comfort--run into the arms of another male. Love is…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 02:11 PM
3

Curious. If a male provides a female comfort and security for nesting (financial, physical, emotional etc.) and the female provides the male offspring, nurturing, and sexual satisfaction in return...what is this fairy tale love you speak of?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 05:43 AM
6

You can't help the man that seeks excuses and validation instead of solutions. When someone sits down and asks why people don't care about their problems they don't intend to lift themselves and prefer to be lifted by others. This, as opposed to facing their own accountability and responsibility in handling it. It's the same reason the only reply they'll offer is another excuse--another example of failure--to demonstrate to themselves and others that they have no means of changing their scenario…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 05:35 AM
2

I prefer bluntly not caring to the pretending to give a fuck to rake in those snazzy virtue points. If you ask why people don't care, prepare for the honest answers at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 05:20 AM
9

Why not Because they'll always be a disappointment. Hate, like any petty emotion, clouds the mind from being able to take a more rational approach and perspective.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 02:58 AM
11

I've been detoxing from a full on red pill rage phase. I won't ever be blue and I'm not going back to red. Hate is simply a hassle. I try not to hold females to male standards. Red pill, particularly the MGTOW crowd, was gateway of motivation to study humans from a more rational and scientific standpoint. I've invested in doing that. Picking a side is contradictory to the goal of being a more detached observer. I take from from both sides.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/18 02:45 AM
6

Undoubtedly. Validation-seeker sighted.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 08:57 PM
3

In that the male's married have a higher n count than do married females. Meaning females that aren't married or may even not be planning to get married are probably having quite a bit of sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 08:21 PM
8

Bingo
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 08:12 PM
1

Yes, male's just have a higher average N count. Those with only one sexual partner are are still exceptionally less likely to get divorced. The most stable marriages have been between virgins.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 08:10 PM
5

People care about themselves. When redpill advocates ideas and concepts people consider detrimental to themselves or people they give a fuck about--that's when and why they step in. People do not care about other people's problems without benefit to themselves. You don't, I don't, nor does the next person. Nobody gives a fuck you or I am a nerd and the world keeps on spinnin'. Take accountability for your problems and manage them.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 07:41 PM
16

Just like you care about those poor, ugly, 2 cent whores that can't dig out enough 'resources' from males right? All those other people get to have fun and raise families. It's not fair she was born hideous, she says.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 06:01 PM
6

I care as much as much as I care about women about getting buck for a bang. I mock women for that, and I sure as hell will mock men. Why do you think people should care?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 05:42 PM
5

Right in what manner? That your context can and does occur?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 03:38 PM
4

It is, but your wide claim shouldn't be based on only your specific context of events. Sometimes the male is manipulative, other times the female. Humans, overall, can be intentionally ignorant to the suffering of others when chasing their own selfish goals and desires. There are indeed females that intentionally lead a male on, but there are indeed males that value a female no further than her ability to sexually or emotionally sate him.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 03:35 PM
7

Hmm, well, the way I presume females use the phrase is to refer to a male that gives the appearance of being honestly altruistic. However, this altruism is a ruse to fulfill his goal of acquiring her. Once his end is met, either by succeeding or failing, the ruse drops and he becomes the embodiment of all opposite qualities--his more honest character. Essentially, I would think that the "nice guy" description females use is for males that utilize a feminine type manipulation. Not referring to th…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 03:29 PM
4

Women hate stalkers because they're the soul-sucked victims of their cruelty and a man's constant showing up on the doorstep is a reminder of her evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/18 03:20 PM
1

Mine doesn't even have a job--so nope.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/17 11:22 PM
1

I moved my mouse to the right. Am I doing moral good by not doing anything bad to others? This is just moronic. That's what happens when you shred your own position trying to evade.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/17 08:59 PM
1

If something is natural and doesn't hurt anyone, it's morally good. morally good morally good morally good No, I'd say it's morally neutral morally neutral You are just dishonestly contradictory. Done wasting time with someone that expresses themselves differently for the sake of argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/17 08:57 PM
1

If something is natural and doesn't hurt anyone, it's morally good. Clearly something isn't morally good based on it not going something bad to other--meaning the fact that something is 'natural' assigns good moral value. Your words, not mine. Do you even understand what you write?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/17 08:52 PM
0

If something is natural and doesn't hurt anyone, it's morally good. If you want to dishonestly pretend it wasn't the argument you were making, go right ahead.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/17 08:48 PM
0

Again, you're arguing that something has more moral quality because it is natural or more difficult to discourage. It is a fallacy, because what is natural or 'ought to be' plays no part in moral evaluation. That's the point of the fallacy, which you clearly missed. You can't package 'natural' moral value with something else and think it gets you through a loophole. The naturalistic fallacy is the concept that the 'natural' value cannot be used as a valid reason to associate something with moral…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/17 08:37 PM
0

You're claiming that something natural is more morally acceptable, which is a fallacious argument. You have stated that the moral result only defers based on whether there is a negative effect onto others--making whether it is natural or not insignificant to your own end result. When called out on why something natural is inherently more good, you backpedaled to say that it was more difficult to discourage--which apparently makes something less...immoral? Obviously you wouldn't want to defend su…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/17 08:23 PM
2

I don't leave my house, neither of us have friends, and we both hate being social. I really don't care what strangers think about him.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/17 03:18 PM
1

It's not nearly as significant. If you look at separate statistics for the types of games played by gender, as well as difference in gaming hour averages--you get a better picture.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/17 11:45 PM
2

Those statistics often end up counting video games that aren't exactly recognized as legitimate under the gamer title like Farmville, solitaire or mobile gaming. They also don't discriminate between people that spend 30 minutes every week playing Mario Kart and 5 hours a day of Halo. The sex differences in video game audiences are nowhere near equivalent. You are in a minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/17 08:50 PM
2

No, I don't curb my word choices. It's been noted, but it doesn't particularly bother him. I just define words I use he's not familiar with. "That word is bigger than you are" is a commonly made joke. His intelligence is better seen in gameplay.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/17 02:46 PM
1

I don't think anyone would state murder and sex are equivalent. It was another example of the point being made.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/17 06:23 AM
1

I have a bigger vocabulary than my SO. Doesn't particularly mean much.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/17 12:42 AM
2

This is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 08:42 PM
2

Not at this moment. Everything about him is worth everything and more though. When he loses more weight he'll grow on me for being physically attractive as well, and I'm already starting to see that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 05:20 PM
3

Let me explain this thoroughly as possible. Human behaviors will not escape moral judgement unless they exist in a vacuum. For example, science is amoral. However, if a human is practicing science that human does not exist outside of a moral framework. A human that perceives his science as amoral is immoral. A human cannot operate with no regard or concern for how his/her choices, behaviors, actions etc. have an effect on other people--unless he/she is immoral. For the purpose of discussion, Red…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 03:29 PM
1

That would have to be the assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/17 04:03 AM
1

But sexual strategy is amoral Do you live in a bubble?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/17 08:47 PM
3

When it comes to tampering birth control it's a bit intentional and evidenced. More along the lines of what you're suggesting, it be like a female claiming rape because she consented to sex but didn't want him to ejaculate in her and he did. Those sort of scenarios very rarely fly in court. Same with the condom scenario I mentioned. Did he forget to wear a condom, or did he purposely not wear it? Who knows. There's plenty of shitty things people can do, but the law doesn't necessarily step in fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 09:53 PM
3

Amusing.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 09:05 PM
3

You're right, I had meant not a thing to which you extend it but that was unclear. The majority of states simply have rape by deception to cover cases where you consented to have sex with person A and it turned out to be person B. Rape by deception is covering the decision to have sex with someone you have consented to have sex with--that someone you consented to have sex with was not the same someone you had sex with. It's why it's also used in cases where someone claimed to be a male someone a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 09:00 PM
3

I'm pretty sure it can include slave labor by threat of incarceration and massive debt. You have successfully landed in 'taxes infringe upon my bodily integrity' land. Next time you decide to drive home an argument with "[IT'S THE LAW, DEAL WITH IT]", make sure you're not actually typing into a public forum where people have been educated to know how objectively stupid that sounds. Someone's mad the current laws don't work the way he's defining them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 08:41 PM
3

Rape by deception is not a thing. Wear a condom. A woman that thinks she had sex with a doctor instead of a construction worker doesn't get to cry rape similar. Yeesh, you know inevitably male contraceptive pills are going to be a thing, right? You know that birth control pills aren't a 100% thing, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 08:15 PM
3

It's not objective, whatever you want to paint it. Body integrity rights of men are voided by the state when women decide not to have an abortion I don't think you know what body integrity entails. It's why I can't forcefully take your kidney to save another person's life. You're still pushing for this female-rights-only narrative, but with an Amendment to the Constitution guaranteeing due process under the law, you can't get away with your sexism and own group preferences. Ah, personally humoro…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 08:09 PM
5

'Right', 'wrong', 'should' or 'shouldn't'--you don't even notice your own emotional and subjective approach to this entire matter? You can't say men take a gamble and women don't. You're right, and that's why I haven't said that. I would like to think that if a woman has a right not to be a mother. A right not to be a mother? Where is this law? Let me guess, it's your subjective interpretation of body integrity rights because it's convenient to your narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 07:42 PM
3

Aha, someone finally picked up the loophole I left. It's why I said sex instead of pregnancy. Rape is a different matter and I would agree he should not be held accountable for what is derived from the infringing of his rights. /u/Atlas_B_Shruggin perhaps can chime if that is reasonable enough for me to support.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 07:33 PM
9

Women get to pick whether they are subject to child support laws, and men do not. Is that right or wrong? The law, again, doesn't care what you feel is right or wrong. Women do not get to pick if they are subject to them or not, if the child exists--same as the father. I never get tired of this argument. Women lie to men about being on the pill, and no form of contraception is 100% - ask any educator. You have sex, you take a gamble. You don't wear a condom, you take a riskier gamble. I don't fe…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 07:18 PM
8

Women are protected from parenthood and Men are not. Cry me a river. That has nothing to do with the 14th amendment. You are treated equally by the law. If a male gets pregnant, they have a right to an abortion under the same law. The law does not care about your feelings. If the father does not want to be the parent, he should not be slave to the mother's decision Who made the decision not to wear a condom? Am I supposed to feel pity for the man that took a risk and lost a gamble? Oh the poor v…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 06:48 PM
9

I like the fact you brought up the 14th amendment. I doubt a male would be denied an abortion if he were pregnant under similar grounds. What does that have to do with anything? You are trying to make equivalent a scenario that is not equivalent. The female's decision regarding her body is exclusive to her until the child reaches a controversial point in development where that is no longer the case. At that point there is another human being whose body has rights of its own. Your feelings on the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 06:39 PM
9

Indeed they do, but even so how is a male 'tricked' into making a female pregnant? What part of sex do they have no means of controlling for that risk?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 05:27 PM
14

Birth control is not a guaranteed form of protection. It never has been. If a male wants to take preventative measures he should on his end, like using a condom. So how does this happen again?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 04:56 PM
11

Tricked into having sex, how?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 04:50 PM
11

I'm not blue pill. Scientific facts of the world cannot be ignored. Would you like to attempt sabotage of my character once more by placing words in my mouth you are able to argue? I'm sure creating a misrepresented argument is much easier to tackle than what is directly being expressed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 04:46 PM
18

Females and males are different. You're expecting universal 'fairness' in a subject that is clearly deprived of it for biological reasons. At the point a female has birthed a child it has all the constitutional rights inherent to it for existing as a human being. While the female has the choice to prevent this child from existing by having an abortion before a controversial point in development, so can you but not fertilizing her eggs in the first place. You could also apply this to females--'we…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 04:42 PM
6

Humans have a tendency to think in a linear fashion, but the reality of this answer and of many others is that there is more than one solution.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/17 02:42 PM
11

Chad is just a stereotype concept (often exaggerated like many) and has never been a real person. This isn't complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/17 07:00 PM
1

Yes, yes it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/17 03:22 PM
3

The people who take part are to blame. This type foul play occurs extremely rarely considering the risks involved. The typical person does not resort to bribery.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/17 02:26 PM
5

I invested everything in my SO. Do or die, or don't get on my ride.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/17 05:16 AM
3

My parents were dual income with my Mother making less than my Father despite her working longer hours. They both tried to help out around the house and they both spent money on their hobbies. My Mother often handled finances, and her skills in doing so helped in the time he was laid off for years. They simply pooled their money together and attempted to cooperate and help each other out. If any of their hobbies got excessive, they'd scold the other and make compromise. If your marriage is at th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/17 05:15 PM
2

It's a group share, there's no hint in that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/17 02:11 PM
2

I've always had male friends and never had this issue. We share porn, we play video games, and we call each other faggots. This topic has a primitive view of male behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/17 01:52 PM
1

We don't demand that people think/act a certain way. "LIFT. Don't be a cuck or a beta. LIFT." Cult is just another slur. Insults are not very often grounded in reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/17 04:44 PM
12

I was discussing natural human monogamous relations that are evolutionary pressured. I was not discussing child-free relationships, polygamous relationships, female breadwinner relationships or other caveat types you could use to shift the goal post. In a majority of monogamous relationships where a female is providing offspring, a male is providing resources. It is the simple the Nurturer/Provider schematic. I am discussing frequently-occurring balanced monogamous relationships between males an…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 05:01 PM
6

When a male and female pursue a monogamous relationship which is the assumed case with cheating, the contract between both is to remain exclusive. The female provides only him offspring and the male only her his primary resources. That's not her perception of fair, as you painted it, that was the agreed upon fair. If you want another perspective to suit your 'it's not the same' justification, she is paying offspring to a man that is not exclusively hers as was agreed upon entering the relationsh…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 04:42 PM
15

Meh, he can get a surrogate and make his own kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 04:27 PM
12

Yes, just a classic case of cherry picking to suit your narrative. If the female provides the male offspring and the male provides resources for the female's offspring--in the case either one cheats and conceives a child their contribution to the relationship is being dishonestly cut and shared with an outside player. The male is providing resources to children not the female's own, or the female is providing offspring that are not the male's own. It's really fucking simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 04:25 PM
6

Men can't get women pregnant? Hello?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/17 04:10 PM
2

I ain't stylish, but I ain't a slut either. He knows I'm smarter than he is. The last thing I am is feminine. I don't have domestic skills or feminine hobbies. So no, doesn't work for me, but I found a boy anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/17 03:07 PM
1

Kek
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 06:04 PM
3

You still haven't provided a rational argument to prove me wrong though.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 06:02 PM
3

There's no debating with people that only offer emotional arguments. You're on a debate sub flailing your emotions around like it should be taken seriously. It's a joke and will be treated with corresponding joking comments. If you want to be taken seriously, try a rational claim and argument. Otherwise, eat the dishes you serve and don't bitch about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 05:58 PM
8

He's completely emotionally compromised on the subject of women. Unless you want the incel bible thrown at you I'd step a few feet back from the dude and let him do his preaching.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 05:51 PM
26

Everyone missed the point of the topic to indirectly prove the point of the topic. Women and men are different, the OP did not say otherwise in the opening comment. The foundational point of the thread was that people rely on the fact that females and males are different in order to justify many hypocrisies and poor behaviors/choices. For example, a man complaining about his wife's parenting while being a worse parent himself--excusing himself with the basis that he isn't the nurturer. A woman c…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 02:21 PM
13

I have autism, so definitely the autistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/17 01:57 AM
1

He is. We've been together since April 2011 but we were good friends for a couple years before that. We met online, spoke everyday and are now living together. Being on PPD definitely makes me realize how fortunate I am that we found one another. I've not always been a great person, but with him I always strive to be better than the person I was yesterday. He was my friend when I had none. In a world full of pretense and fakes, he was the only thing remained genuine.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/17 05:23 PM
1

Very honest and direct. When it comes to anything he is often exceptionally modest. He's quite easily flustered and I find it adorable. He prefers not to make decisions and is very selfless--which meshes well with my selfish demeanor. He has always followed me in my interests and has remained a dependable support for me in my life. His loyalty has always been steadfast and his affection unwavering. I can trust him with everything and he trusts me the same way. He's a guy who will follow me anywh…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/17 04:49 PM
1

08) All hail
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/17 04:08 PM
1

Rood. PC > PS4 > XBone
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/17 04:02 PM
1

Pissing in some bushes. Running bare. Living in the wilderness and screeching society can't cage you. This is very similar to male's reaching enlightenment by committing to no-fap and its holy dolphin mascot.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/17 01:58 PM
1

Yes and yes. I think I'm very fortunate to have someone like him.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/17 12:38 PM
6

TL;DR A man/woman that doesn't want to marry ain't worth risking committing to. I am shocked.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/17 10:18 PM
1

Cool. I got a NAMALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/17 10:07 PM
4

Seems to work just fine for him and I.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/17 08:22 PM
1

You say it like it isn't already a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/17 07:59 PM
4

Insurance benefits, tax deductions, medical disability/illness and spousal death aid to name a few. If shit hits the fan, I guess you're all set to get fucked. If the going gets rough you two are all set to leave one another. Happy relationship you got there. Good thing you can leave easily when that happens. It would be tough to risk that with someone not worth it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/17 07:31 PM
3

Marriage is just a way to trap him into a relationship So you two don't plan to be together until death? Do you not have any income that you'd be risking him paying alimony or something? What is the damn point of staying separated outside of blatant neuroticism and virtue signaling? You planning on having out of wedlock kids or something? Help me understand your choice here if the plan is to stay together.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/17 05:57 PM
6

I think this has to do with females wanting to be desired in an exclusive and passionate manner. The way these men are often portrayed is that they are more difficult to tame and thus would be harder to steal once tamed. She wants a man that only can become available to her--if that makes sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/17 03:55 PM
1

I prefer submissiveness from my man. I've already been persuaded to spend the rest of my life with him. He's already ruined me for any other man. If one were to equate loyalty to submission, then I can surely state that much.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/17 12:59 PM
5

What epidemic?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/17 04:13 AM
2

I don't see how people can remain in an intimate relationship while upholding false pretenses. If your relationship is based upon a lie it will inevitably dissolve. Vulnerability is acceptable in an intimate relationship because it is a part of communication with your partner. That being said, male emotional stability is something females often rely on as they themselves are more often emotional unstable. Vulnerability is not something that repels females. What repels females is males showing si…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 06:17 PM
1

Indeed it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 03:00 PM
1

It's not about being better though. For a male to seek intelligence in females does not necessitate he finds someone he deems above or below himself. I will add it's in the same regard of finding an attractive female. It does not necessitate he will be inherently inferior or superior in comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 02:34 PM
1

I don't think anyone would like to see themselves inferior, but that dichotomy skews the intended goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 02:24 PM
1

I personally wouldn't want to be with a partner that in the back of my mind I'm frustrated with and find stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 02:14 PM
1

That presumption is quite fallacious. I wouldn't argue that in certain cases that holds true, but it certainly doesn't for a substantial amount either. People may desire somewhat equivalent intelligent partners because of numerous reasons: communication (vocabulary), interests in stimulating conversation topics, and flexible thinking to name a few.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/17 02:13 PM
7

Intelligence in males is more coveted than intelligence in females when it comes to relationship material.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/17 09:09 PM
1

Most Western women seem to have an egalitarian and non-traditional interpretation of what makes for a good wife. This includes basic tenets like commitment, compromise, and affection.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/17 05:12 PM
1

'Sisterhood' is a joke. I don't know what fantasy land it derives from, because females are well known for being both vicious and backstabbing to one another.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/17 02:53 PM
2

Makes me realize how fortunate my SO and I are to be outside of conventional dating. Not really of any benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/17 05:03 PM
1

I don't have role models of either sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/17 05:02 PM
2

The bottom is typically low socioeconomic classes, the socially deficit, or the outright hideous. The female hierarchy is composed of social influence, class and beauty. It is the fundamental evaluation by other females, other qualities are typically evaluated afterward. When females compete, it usually falls into one of the three.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/17 02:12 PM
2

I'm not looking for advice, not that I don't appreciate your attempts. My point has been simply that female competition exists, female hierarchy exists--not talking about outliers or females with exceptionally high tolerance.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/17 06:27 PM
4

I'm actually living just fine, I'm 25 and and am living in my own condo. That wasn't intended for sympathy, merely to be explanatory. Social castes don't just disappear. For those still actively participating in social groups and society they're still very much intact. Choosing to ignore the female hierarchy is also ignoring the competition among females. Males and females don't stop being competitive after high school, it just settles down. Just because you do not participate in it, does not en…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/17 06:15 PM
5

I'm not speaking of individual women. Most women are average in the female social hierarchy. However, as someone at the bottom of the social female hierarchy it often entails women ostracizing and avoiding affiliation. Women typically do not wish to be affiliated or seen with a female they deem below their social caste. Some have more tolerance than others, but there's normally a limit. Male hierarchy works differently, and is often more physically involved towards males at their 'bottom'. Not t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/17 05:53 PM
7

If you mean among women, it's those at the top of the female social hierarchy. What defines a quality woman for a man, on the other hand, is based on the attributes he is evaluating.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/17 04:12 PM
1

Way to bring your drama onto reddit and be passive aggressive about it. I'm blocking you now because I'm not going to put up with it here. You're literally the first person I've ever had to block on reddit. Congrats. Feel free to leave a smartass reply below this line so it can be the first comment I blissfully ignore.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/17 01:32 AM
1

Still being cray I see. I changed it from "politely" to "as politely as we can deign". No need to get your little panties in a bunch.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/17 01:14 AM
4

I can't say I've been devoid of flaws in my behavior, similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/17 03:58 PM
6

they can be angry all they want, it's none of anyone's business. When you post on Reddit you're actively making it people's business. Just saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/17 03:55 PM
4

If I have to repeat myself again, I'm going to plant my head on my desk real hard. It is not excusable. Humans have emotions whether they are reasonable, justifiable or even downright incomprehensible. While it is convenient to assume people will handle their illogical processes, the standard human does not remotely operate similar to an AI. People have all kinds of issues, and the only thing humans can do is attempt to comprehend one another and provide an amount of toleration. I'm not perfect …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/17 03:53 PM
3

Incels are a completely separate matter to red pill. I would presume a lot of the anger there is misdirected self hate or even resentment for social outcasting. It is not justifiable, it is not excusable, but it is comprehensible. That being said, it means their comments and thoughts do not remain unchallenged. It be beneficial, though, if we can address one another as politely as we can deign.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/17 03:23 PM
12

Some men are in an emotional rage phase. This is pretty standard considering the set of circumstances that often lends to men arriving to red pill. It's quite often temporary. Somehow, after bad experience(s), it is more acceptable for women to distrust men than for men to distrust women. It is not justified, but it is comprehensible.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/17 03:10 PM
31

Viewing women to operate differently is not equivalent to viewing them as inferior.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/17 02:49 PM
4

It's not real who the fuck cares. Oh shit! I just shot someone in the head in a video game--fuck, I must be a murdering psychopath just waiting for their chance.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/17 06:22 PM
2

I lean more red which is why I wear the purple flair, it has nothing to do with there being a purple pill. I had my red pill rage phase, as they say, but I've calmed down a lot since then. I now prefer to interpret from a more scientific and analytical standpoint rather than to be complicit with emotional bias towards females. I see being red pill/blue pill more for those that still view human behavior and sexual relations through a tinted lens. The world isn't black-and-white for your ease of c…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/17 03:37 PM
5

When a man considers a woman out of his league, he won't approach her. When a woman does--she doesn't expect his commitment to her. The result looks different, but it isn't that dissimilar. 'She won't choose me' versus 'He won't choose to stay with me'. Plus the woman that loses to Stacy in capturing desired interest and puts herself down for it isn't a myth. 'He'll never notice me, because I'm x, y, and z.'
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 08:55 PM
4

You seriously think women don't also have low self esteem issues and get wildly insecure about potential other options a man has? Women get like that when they consider someone is out of their 'league' it definitely isn't limited to men. She ain't checking your phone behind your back because she's confident.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 08:47 PM
8

I'm an engineer with a NEET. Neither is a valid point. There are always going to be people insecure when they feel someone else is out of their 'league'. Not everyone does--and the occurrence isn't limited to men. It depends where you place your own worth and that of others.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 08:39 PM
1

I think you're a little bit too emotionally invested in this issue. You're a man that clearly has traditional values, but at the same time you claim society no longer has them. There's very little to debate when your tone and perspective is biased in such a manner that you perceive the world to be against you and your personal values. I agree fully that men have it difficult--even more so than the average woman. However, I won't play the fiddle and suggest that men are victims. The world is unfa…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 11:45 PM
1

There's nothing wrong with a stay-at-home father, he can be just as capable of raising kids as a woman. If there are multiple children it can be much cheaper for one of the parents to stay home versus sending them to daycare--that is a decision worth respecting. There is still a lot of women that both work and perform household chores. I do not witness as many men buying groceries like you exaggerate. Studies demonstrate my point more than yours as well. This is not saying it is an issue, but wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 06:14 PM
6

The fact you make performing household chores emasculating suggests otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 04:41 AM
4

Appeal to Nature
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/17 04:39 AM
3

I flirt with my boyfriend, other than that I flirt with quite a number of women but most are aware I'm not serious. It's easier for me to be inappropriate with women then men, because with women there's generally understanding there's no investment in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/17 04:11 PM
9

Most of the studies that elude to women being less happy are strictly from around the 1970's when women did have less responsibility than they do currently. We're still in a transitioning time period where women do have a job but there's still quite a bit of expectation for them also to handle most household chores. People are using this idea (female happiness) too much to shove their tradcon agendas down people's throats. I'm not concerned about this issue. I don't see why people pretend to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/17 02:55 PM
8

You seem to be indirectly referring to theory of mind. Theory of mind deficits are particularly prevalent in populations with autistic traits (STEM)--of course autism goes hand-in-hand with intelligence variation (for better or worse).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/17 10:06 PM
1

Hey, I said KS for the pentakill, not win a game. Win lane, lose game.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/17 10:01 PM
1

KS, naturally. Lux support can do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/17 09:59 PM
1

Bronzo.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/17 09:57 PM
2

There is a claim that women can't appreciate certain male intelligence aspects, ie. the ability to do math isn't sexy. I call bullshit on that one. Pentakills on LoL are sexy as hell. Taking the derivatives of my curves is hella fuckin' sexy too. Wth.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/17 09:56 PM
21

The argument isn't that looks do or don't matter, but to what degree physical appearance is relevant in romantic relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/17 06:23 PM
2

The fact that 97 percent of paid alimony goes to women points to something. Do women make 3 percent of the money in families? NO. 5 percent of women who get married will receive alimony Many can and will suck men dry. You humiliate yourself just fine on your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/17 04:05 PM
3

Such strong arguments, much wow. This is why harpies have no place at a table of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/17 06:26 PM
3

I am quite a ways from blue pill. I will make fun of all the silly 'fee fee' arguments that don't even hold up to the standards of a struggling middle school student. Do you have anything of substance to add are you just whining that I pointed out the initial claim is unsubstantiated and emotionally compromised? You're free to speak when you have a good argument, otherwise it's best you sit down before you embarrass yourself. Bring numbers and logical reasoning, not your emotions and screeching.…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/17 06:14 PM
12

The intelligence around here is amusing. Are basic math courses no longer required? Let me walk you through nice and easy. This doesn't entail only 3% of women are not going to get alimony out of a divorce, it entails that in cases where alimony support is given which is around 10% and dropping, 97% of those cases it will be to the wife. If we use basic deduction, we can take a gander that those cases are likely where the woman stays at home. So around 10% of women coming out of a divorce get al…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/17 01:49 AM
3

What's that supposed to mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/17 12:07 AM
10

That's convenient. Unfortunately there are more than 1% of female breadwinners. Your math is not quite good.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 11:53 PM
12

You realize the qualifier "all" is legitimately discredited through the use of a single counterexample, right? I know simple logic is beyond most in these parts but hopefully that elementary idea is understood. There are statistics available that show that there exists female breadwinners which blows your ridiculous, emotionally laden narrative right out of its tearful waters. Try again feelzy, bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 11:18 PM
14

So what is the claim being made here? That some women take advantage of men? Wow. I never knew that one. Cynical and paranoid statements setup for confirmation bias and the typical 'deny all evident counterexamples' routine are getting exhausting. Is there legitimately any value behind your claim beyond 'I feel like women do x'?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 11:11 PM
3

Actions speak louder than words. Someone's past is informative regardless of what pretty words and pleasantries they may deliver. I don't understand why women get so defensive on this topic. Whether someone finds such past relationship information a problem or not just depends on what they're looking for. I rule out men very similar. I'm not going to end up with a man that sleeps around. I'm a virgin with a virgin--we share similar mindsets regarding sex. That's normally how things end up for pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 04:39 PM
13

No, it's not rape. This is a ridiculous question. You break up with people if they break promises you don't charge them for fucking assault. The man and the woman can retract their consent at any point--the other person needs to stop. This isn't rocket science. If you don't like the fact they lied to you, get with someone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 05:40 PM
2

My marketplace of the introverted, mentally ill, nerds and weirdos remains about the same. I'm just over here observing for my own interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/17 04:46 PM
0

The single life isn't the end of the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/17 02:40 PM
4

I should specify: "raises thresholds towards emotional stimuli that would result in a tearful reaction". A high concentration of prolactin is one of those hormones that can make it more difficult for females.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 12:43 PM
7

A large part of the conscious decision to stifle and suppress emotions has a lot more to do with one's upbringing. Physiologically, however, women are at a disadvantage when it comes to holding back tears. Evolutionary pressures made it advantageous for females to communicate distress. Hormones make it more difficult for a female to tolerate stress levels and even tear duct size for females is smaller than a male's. A female's tears will spill onto her cheek much faster than a male's due to this…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/17 12:26 PM
2

People with similar ideas for a relationship tend to locate people similar. If someone values sex as a pinnacle act of intimacy and vulnerability, they're not likely to end up with someone who values it less than that (is more promiscuous). Similarly, you're not going to find someone who values consistent physical attention, affection and reassurance with someone that isn't big on physical contact. It is typically better to find someone with a similar n count, because they are usually going to b…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/17 02:37 AM
7

Not much. Maybe put more effort into clothes and stuff. I could be a burn victim and my SO wouldn't stop lovin' me. Hm, I could even do some roleplay when it came to sex--pull a deadpool.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/17 12:01 PM
10

Huffington Post links to a press release, not a study, but it refers to a study that is...hah. Why can't anyone do their homework without their feelings tinting their ability to acquire information? I like how this 'study' is also being used to endorse cheating. Man, I wonder if Ashley Madison would love results that suggest that. It even adoringly uses their slogan in the paper title. Another bogus study for people that like to reaffirm their worldview. Next on shocking news, new research assoc…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/17 03:15 AM
1

Are you stating that what determines a lesser human, by your decree, is a person's sex alone?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 03:37 PM
1

Human is indeed, a what, my fellow.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 03:34 PM
2

lesser person women are inferior are men Do you not see the logical flaw in applying averages to the individual person? How do you subscribe to the belief that an individual woman shall remain inferior to the average man despite what prowess or accomplishment she may have? You say this is biological, but remain ignorant or simply exclude by force of will the individual variety of genetics that predispose one human to be more healthy, more intelligent, more capable than another. Why do you assume…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 03:22 PM
1

They earn your respect. But the same doesn't apply to women, for reasons?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 02:22 PM
1

Did the big, bad layman's em dash scare you away? I find this funny coming from someone that can't even provide basic legible formatting. Go back to your prayin' my dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 01:55 PM
1

When someones tries to convert red pill to a religion, I can't seem to get the image of a chubby bloke in a Hot Topic trying to get people to read his rusty tome while wearing his magician robes out of my mind. Science is no religion. Evolution has no intent--you people not only desecrate it but I can't tell if you're actually trying to be serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 01:49 PM
2

I need your advice then. In terms of success and income, I am above most men. In order to respect my inferiors, should I start treating the average man like a dog? I like dogs. They're great when well trained. I'd never hurt a dog.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/17 01:22 PM
2

Just excuses not to try.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/17 04:26 PM
1

Results I figured my narcissism score would be higher than the other two.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 12:02 PM
3

What did you make this post for? So we could shit on your girlfriend and validate you? A+ relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/17 02:37 AM
3

I have other priorities than sex. Unlike the hypothetical female, I'm simply not going to have sex with someone I don't care intimately for. Married to or not is negligent. I know what I want in life. Just because a woman hasn't had sex doesn't mean she hasn't had or isn't in a relationship. As for mental illness, probably about as much as other women. Additionally, it still goes to show that divorce rates are lower with a woman that has not had many premarital sex partners. If a man finds the i…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/17 06:20 PM
2

I think a majority of them are just doing it to be edgy. Not a feminist, don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/17 03:53 AM
1

Yes, because long-winded personal attacks while everyone stares like a pack of zebras is such a joyous way to learn.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 11:13 PM
1

Shit, I lost my virginity without even knowing about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 11:10 PM
1

Alright Sherlock, what options did I have between exposing my belly, and getting my ass thrown out for fighting back?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 11:10 PM
1

It be very hard to get men to do my work in college when I skipped nearly all of the lectures. I guess that imaginary friendo I have in my closet is male...maybe he dun did it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 11:07 PM
1

Pfft, as if my confidence can be that easily derailed.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 11:02 PM
1

I'm an engineer, please place yourself underneath my boot.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 10:58 PM
1

I'm not familiar with the term. How to put this...I recognize there are men that would be willing to be with me, but I don't truly see them as options. Before I met my boyfriend I was unable to find someone that melded with my personality, and even now I still view him like he's the best man I'll ever have. Losing him would still amount to near everything for me. I don't see a way to replace him in my life. There's a lot of men out there, but there's only one of him.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 10:47 PM
2

I mostly comment just to walk myself through my reasoning and explanation--attempting to find a better means of explaining myself and my input. It helps me rethink my own opinions. Sometimes I'm given new food for thought and I'm always grateful for that as well. For some posts of mine, I'm sure it's part of ego satisfaction. I enjoy these things.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 10:30 PM
1

He'll get there.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/17 01:10 AM
1

Well, he started going for a degree on a full scholarship, but unfortunate circumstances led to him being unable to continue with his education. He's been stuck in poverty without a job to education for years. He's moving in with me, getting healthy, then he can get a job, save up and go back to school when he's ready. It's a tough road, but he's an intelligent and determined guy. He can make it happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 06:57 PM
4

You're a walking, talking confirmation bias then? Well, I guess your username attests.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 06:23 PM
3

What's wrong with that? I'm guessing you like your men like an Edward right out of Twilight.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 05:53 PM
1

I'm with him because he's honest, loyal, dependable, routine-oriented, humble, patient, intelligent, altruistic, direct, relatively selfless, and humorous.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 04:56 PM
3

I'm sure donkeys start looking attractive if you do enough coke.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 01:28 PM
9

No, this is making the assumption that the only thing attractive about a person is found in their outward appearance. Creating a good impression isn't about lying about what kind of person you are, but demonstrating your best characteristics. It's the same reason you don't show up to a job interview in your boxers and flip flops. Acting politely, professionally , gratuitously, and confidently is not necessarily a lie. Attractive qualities are often found in attitude and behavior, they are not me…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/17 01:08 PM
1

Your mistake is discounting the biological pressures that incur female mating choice as the dominant mating strategy. Females have been pressured to select a suitable male, these 'valuable' males, as you refer to, are not pressured to select. A man with access to more women, is not pressured as a female to limit his choices and select one due to reproductive limitations. If anything, he may hoard them all like Genghis freaking Khan.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 11:24 PM
2

Demonstrate to him that I have what he's missing or desiring in his life. Develop his trust and show my own loyalty. Actions speak louder than words. If that doesn't work or he makes his rejection clear then I'm not what he's looking for and I carry on my way.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 07:24 PM
2

Women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 03:55 PM
2

Nah. Just more of a tomboy as they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 01:14 PM
2

We got a bad ass over here.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 10:52 AM
1

*grill
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 10:49 AM
2

I appreciate the compliment.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 10:44 AM
3

I am female, just weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 10:31 AM
1

I'm not proficient enough in woman speak to decipher this.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 03:05 AM
1

Doesn't effect me, why should I care?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/17 02:59 AM
2

Not only that, but the issue for females with autism is primarily other females. Good looks ain't help there, if anything it may even make it worse, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 04:26 PM
3

That is incredibly ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 03:46 PM
1

Proud autistic nerdlet.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 03:16 PM
4

Loyal, honest, kind, humorous, intelligent, routine-oriented and home-bodied. Personality is way more important to me than physical appearance.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 01:19 PM
3

Sasuke Uchiha. 2D > 3D. Would bang that sexy ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 01:15 PM
3

Bang. Bang.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/17 01:02 AM
1

How to explain this another way...Let me use the shark analogy, let's say I place the present day shark in an ancestral environment. That shark will not begin to behave and act like its ancestors simply because I have placed it there. This is because the modern day shark has a genetic composition yielded from its more recent environments. Genetics are not simply in charge of physical appearance, but behaviors as well. Certainly you realize this--however, if you strip a human of its current envir…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 09:24 PM
2

You cannot simply say things are logically concluded, action over words.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 09:06 PM
2

Yeah, realized that walking to my car looking at it. I hate when when articles do that, reminds me of suicide statistics. Anyway, what I stated still stands.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 06:17 PM
6

There is no default state, and I don't think you understand evolution fundamentally to suggest such. Culture is intricately bound in the human genome and we are designed not only to have culture, but to be influenced genetically by it. Our genetics are to be informed by our environment, just as we act upon it, it's more of a circular logic relationship. One cannot separate the biological outcome from the environment it is influencing and being influenced upon. What had been the biological outcom…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 06:02 PM
5

Again look at the trend preceding that dip, why are you asserting that polygamy is default?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:33 PM
6

Monogamy wasn't a recent invention and has proliferated across various human populations despite geographical disconnect. Look at that article you linked again, that astronomical dip for men is unprecedented given the trend preceding it. Provided Graph How did you manage to interpret monogamy as culturally enforced phenomenon from that? Why do you insinuate that the observed dip is the "natural" state given the trend preceding and following it depicts otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:27 PM
1

Like being a cunt.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 05:02 PM
3

It's not just 'blues' that would find these statements slanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 04:50 PM
7

What about those women that stay in abusive relationships with crazy men-- Nah, let's stick with the one-sided narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 04:48 PM
2

I hope you realize in light of some of these replies that your position is not a result of logical processes. Humans are both more rigid and spontaneous than you give credit for. If ideas, even that of love, were stagnate than humans would not bear the flexibility to survive, improve and flourish in a changing environment. If love, additionally, were so fickle, then humans would also be too inconsistent to support healthy development of their offspring. It's a healthy balance for both sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 04:40 PM
4

Cheaters are scum. I have no sympathy for such people. It is never justified and all people that engage in cheating will be treated by me like the filth they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 02:55 PM
2

Those ain't too bad by the looks of it. Haven't worked with them though. Anyway I better get to bed before I hate myself in the mornin', nice chat mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 04:02 AM
2

I was more along those lines in my sophmore year, our project ended up being a wirelessly controlled omni-directional robot (which was totally bad ass). Junior year was all VHDL, and then when we got to senior year they had us mostly programming in ASM--something, something, understanding fundamentals something, something. I took a python class that year as well though, but our project course was entirely in C. I don't miss Dragonboards they made us use, any chance I had I went for using an Ardu…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:58 AM
1

Yeah, I remember that course. We delved into VHDL and assembly for that work.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:50 AM
2

Yeah, you have a lot to look forward to. The reason I went into computer engineering is I loved the satisfaction of the results--blinking lights, beeping noises, the loud humming of a spinning motor. I definitely get to experience that on the job. It's helpful they're also pretty understanding and accommodating which I particularly need for ASD.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:48 AM
2

That's what I did in school, but in my job I mostly develop LabVIEW applications and I'm a certified developer in it. We primarily focus on developing and integrating dynamometer and hydraulic test systems, real-time control and data acquisition and custom test machines. I've gotten my hands in Python to Veristand. It's a pretty cool experience to be working on a test application for medical equipment one day and ECUs for a private jet another. It's a good career path, no doubt. My last couple o…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:44 AM
2

Hell fucking yeah. Same. Best fuckin' route.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:36 AM
2

Other way around. I'm a computer engineer, but I work as a project engineer in developing intricate test stands. He's a NEET and has been for some years, but he wants to finish his degree in nursing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:33 AM
1

I'm more of a nerd than he is. Autism ftw.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:32 AM
2

He's not in the best condition right now due to circumstance. I don't mind it in light of his other traits. Appearances are temporary and trivial for me in the grand scheme. He's moving in with me in a couple weeks.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 03:25 AM
2

I'm more awkward than this chick, but also sexier. Hello sexy~ Ah wait--that's my reflection. Oh well, 10/10 would bang myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 02:49 AM
1

Yeah, I got that. I just cuss a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/17 02:17 AM
5

People still find a way to downvote. Regardless, it's more likely that they're here because they are interested in the dynamics between the sexes. It's really all that it takes. It's why I am here.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 07:14 PM
1

You are entitled to do that. The law doesn't stop working just because you're a fucking dumbass that gambles with their life and possessions. The law gonna blame you for the crime and dismiss it? No, but we're all free to call you a grade A moron. Just like I can call women that dress promiscuously in a dark, foreign alley dumb broads.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 06:59 PM
7

I read a lot of stupid shit, but this is near the top. This isn't even RP rhetoric, just a dumb frat boy who thinks he's got the world figured out until he finds out his parents ain't paying to wipe his stupid ass. If anyone you love develops cancer, be sure to remind them it's their fault for not being healthy enough yah dumb mule. If I shot yah in the knee, I guess you could blame yourself for not carryin' yourself. FFS, men or women gettin' raped or killed ain't their god damn fault. This log…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 06:52 PM
5

Appearance does matter, but how much it matters varies by person. My standards are far lower than most in the physical looks department because I have other priorities in a partner. Also, men and women both manipulate for sex and money. If you don't take proper precautions before you start developing dopey 'goo-goo' eyes, then I feel little sympathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 06:20 PM
2

Summary - Invalidate the claim that: For all X, Y is true. I like to stroke my own cock, so providing a counterexample isn't allowed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 06:10 PM
2

A post dedicated to building a strawman and valiantly tackling it down. Congrats.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:30 PM
1

Just as I do now.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 05:09 PM
0

Rich and unattractive. I prefer things over most people anyway. I love my jigsaw puzzles, books and video games. Edit: Clearly someone hates jigsaw puzzles.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 04:40 PM
1

No. I personally dislike being called a woman more than a female. You don't see me telling women to shut the fuck up about it though. Who the fuck cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 04:16 PM
2

Murder is illegal and therefore it does not exist. I don't support the blithering of the wage gap, but arguments against it have been worse. This logic is more stupid than one could strangle out of a dopey-eyed crackhead. There are multiple explanations to explain away most of the wage gap that do not infer sex discrimination. However, there is a fraction that is unable to be explained--claiming you have the reason is as fraudulent as they. In the case of the average woman, the wage gap is often…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/17 11:56 AM
3

There's certainly a happy middle ground. There are going to be people that care too much about appearing socially untoward and others that care too little. Romantic attraction can often be found in demonstration of social proficiency and so a lot of times these behaviors have been rewarding to both sexes--albeit displayed in somewhat different manners. The female that knows when and where to touch you will typically be more romantically successful than the female that does not. A male that knows…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 11:05 PM
2

I find social nuance stupid as well, but it's somewhat important to understand. People like myself would otherwise show up to a job interview in tennis shoes, make burping noises in a conference, or laugh in inappropriate contexts. Do I understand why I should not greet people at the door in just my underwear and bra? Do I understand why I should make myself profoundly presentable in public? Not particularly. If I was bothered enough to not be a social pariah I would make more changes to my beha…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 10:45 PM
3

I'm curious if you have a source for that or can detail what structure(s) you're referring to, as far as I'm aware rational choices are more often made when lacking awareness of social or emotional factors. People with ASD have higher intelligence variation (for better or worse) but I find that a separate matter. They experience a life where reason must be used to procure the same conclusions the average person makes without--obviously practice can help.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:41 PM
3

To be fair, not everyone with autism is the same level of functioning, and some have more deficits than others. "Asperger's Syndrome" was removed in DSM-4, and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) implemented in DSM-5 has more specific and tightly controlled criteria. One of the necessary conditions of ASD for diagnosis is significant difficulty in daily functioning due to symptoms. Basically, it's not a fair comparison. However, that's also the point. He, and people similar, should not base their own…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:36 PM
4

Have you met a lot of people with autism? I wouldn't say those with autism have superior logic by any means, they're simply less susceptible to pressures from social subtleties and have a tendency to both focus and prefer patterns/certainty. They are often forced to compensate for social deficits by utilizing cognitive processes used for reasoning (multi-tasking and thinking while speaking become difficult tasks because of this). That being said, you'll meet a lot of utterly stupid, stubborn, bl…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:22 PM
3

A lot of people with autism can't hold down a job either, but I wouldn't be working my ass off right now if I subscribed to the mentality of impossibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 06:03 PM
1

Losers are made through attitude. All I really have to say when it comes to people with that mentality.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 05:57 PM
3

No way, I'm a confused autist trying to decipher if people are being satirical or legitimate.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 04:30 PM
2

Hah, that ain't a sniff test I'd be willing to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:56 PM
2

Nah. I have to pay attention to my clothes coming out of the laundry though, else my boxers end up in my brothers' drawers and my underwear in my sisters'. If I didn't have a different pant size there'd be a heck of of a time figuring out which jeans are mine. Sibling: "Is that mine?" Me: "No! ....wait...yes." And vice versa is a very common conversation in this house.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:39 PM
2

A lot of things get shared in a house of seven. I'm the oldest of 5. I tend to use my brother's deodorant. No sense in buying my own right now if it's just doing to be grabbed by another anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:35 PM
2

It really is a chore, I hate wasting the time for a quick shower. Deodorant works when I do remember it, but I haven't got a routine for it. The stupid ass deodorant gets placed somewhere different each morning by family members. I'm moving out within a month, so it should be much easier to organize my morning ritual without people sabotaging it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:32 PM
2

Eh, I'm working on wearing deodorant more often. I tend to sweat more than I pay credit to. Better to remember wearing deodorant rather than requiring the extra shower. Even now I forgot to put some on this morning. As I said, a work in progress.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 03:25 PM
4

If only the world worked that way. It's kind of the same reason people don't walk out of their houses in their underwear, invite people over while their home looks like a battlefield, and engage in social decorum. As someone with autism I struggle to understand these social conventions similarly--took me a long time for people to explain to me bras vs bikini tops. I still walk around in my boxers outside because they may as well be shorts in my mind. What you have to realize about people, howeve…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 02:26 PM
3

Nah, they're fine. I think I'd have a much larger problem with them if they were any bigger than A cup. Having tits is inconvenient. I love tits on other women though.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/17 02:03 PM
3

This is basically asserting that the Alpha Male characteristically drawn by others is pretty equivalent to a sociopath. It takes advantage of the fact that the term alpha is not scientifically accurate. The existence of legitimate human alpha males has been, for the majority, not accepted within the biology department. Due to this, you have this freedom to vandalize the concept with your interpretation of what it entails. I'm not saying you're incorrect. I'm saying that you are taking a swim in …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 08:13 PM
1

Would bang, my penis is more worthwhile.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 05:26 PM
0

As penis bearing kin, females will never reach my intelligence potential.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 05:24 PM
2

"Obvious" - proceeds not to explain.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 04:55 PM
2

Losers are made through attitude.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/17 04:48 PM
2

None. As if I'd give up this body.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 10:48 PM
1

The jig is up.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 06:12 PM
1

More like recovering sexist. I have a bit of a negative past with other women that bites me at the ankles. I'm in therapy. I do pretty well most days but catch me on an off day and I might have a critical remark about women that is more scathing than rational.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/17 02:52 AM
1

I'm female but I'd probably prefer having been born male. Most of my interests align with men and the manner of which I prefer to be treated is similar. I typically have a lot of difficulty relating and conversing with women and share little in common with them. That and periods and pregnancy are just downright undesirable experiences. I'm competitive in gaming, and being female drops the bar so frustratingly low. The hilarious part is that men wonder why females are shit at the game. It's like:…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/17 04:47 PM
2

I'm a female with ASD. This is mostly accurate, although the extreme male brain theory doesn't hold for males on the spectrum and has mostly been dismissed at this point. Autism results in developmental deficits that the male and female brain compensates for differently. The manner that the female brain compensates for the deficits results in characteristics and features that resemble the neural architecture and behavior of males. I'm a confused soul. Thanks autism. However, yes, there has been …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 05:38 PM
2

No. That be dumb. Toys are awesome.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/17 05:27 PM
1

It is simply the way my mind works that I must reconcile often, and sometimes the process is unpleasant. I can't help my mind is predisposed towards literal interpretations due to ASD, but just because I express struggle in that area does not entail I'm jumping off rooftops about it, clearly. Instead I chose to comprehend why I create these expectations and unrealistic depictions of social frameworks. I have my bad days, don't we all? The only reason I paint it as something bad in this instance …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/17 09:54 PM
1

A large part of it is likely the autism I have, but also my poor experiences with females. The things people say--while they may not intend to be dishonest--can often be when taken literally. I can feel disappointed or betrayed by what my mind perceives as having been deceptive. I have deficits in theory of mind so the manner I display my affection is often projected onto others--and clearly it wouldn't be the same. My rigid mentality clashes and conflicts with other people as a part of my sympt…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 03:47 PM
2

I'm still surprised people deny the existence of mental illness.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 02:58 AM
4

How about The Ancestor's Tale by Richard Dawkins? That be a good start. The Selfish Gene perhaps. Maybe Nature via Nurture by Matt Ridley. Anything that actually gives you somewhat of an informed opinion on biology and human evolution. Throwing the stamp of biological reality despite demonstrating a clear lack of knowledge on the subject is a good way to to leave yourself vulnerable to attack. Actually, considering what you wrote, you may want to read The Score: The Science of the Male Sex Drive…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 02:34 AM
1

On bad days, sometimes I think women are incapable of genuine affection. However, when I have my head on straight, I realize I'm just incapable of comprehending it. Sometimes we make rationalized demons out of the matters we find difficult to understand through our experiences. There's hints of truth within what both red and blue pill tout, but it's often--in both cases--an oversimplified and convenient delivery of the reality. They wouldn't be pills if they weren't easy to swallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 02:17 AM
2

Hah. You might want to actually pick up a book and read it sometime.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 01:54 AM
2

It takes a filthy, disgusting person to commit anything like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/17 01:50 AM
2

Eh, been around red pill spaces before. Not particularly speaking of TRP the sub. I used to listen to Stardusk sometime ago. At least you're aware of its flaws and I can't say that of many I run into...but perhaps I've been less than fortunate in the manner. There isn't a lot of competition, I suppose you're right in that regard. Still the wide variety of individuals attracted to red pill can have have motivations beyond that of sexual frustration. I can think of a couple of individuals that wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/17 09:04 PM
3

You can call it a strawman. I've been involved in red pill at one point. If you want to call it a strawman then please do educate me on the methodology, rigor and accountability RP has? Many practices begin from less than informed applications, but there is usually some sort of structure involved and accountability upheld. This isn't anywhere found in RP as far as I'm aware.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/17 08:08 PM
6

What makes you jump to labeling RP a serious application? It is visibly an individually ill-motivated pursuit of knowledge and applied without vigor, accountability and/or methodology. This isn't a mechanic using his knowledge to attempt fixing a car or a psychologist attempting to advise a person; this is a subset of people using their experiences to prove or disprove viewpoints about sex and gender without credibility--often crucifying scientific methodology in favor of propaganda and rhetoric…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/17 07:41 PM
1

Nature via Nurture I was specifically referring to, but Red Queen is a good one as well. Good to know someone around here actually does reading.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/17 07:27 PM
1

About time. Have you read the book by Matt Ridley then?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/17 07:18 PM
1

Yep, good point.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/17 03:22 AM
1

In a lot of therapy I suppose. I guess my boyfriend is somewhat critical like her, but they're not really all that alike.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/17 11:39 PM
4

It's people trying to rationalize their experiences and emotions, and it has little to do with science. Have to be light-hearted about it to a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/17 06:32 PM
4

It is difficult for me to even fathom such a thing. That's an awful one.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/17 06:25 PM
1

Ah, the high school cafeteria. On the bright side, all the 350+ other students had to share a table while I had a whole table for my junk
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/17 06:22 PM
1

On the last bit, probably the same reason I enjoy anime as much as I do. Social connections aren't as strong as their literally taken counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/17 06:14 PM
3

I have a ton of anxiety that I take medication and attend therapy for. Anyone I'm in a relationship with is not intended to be my therapist or my caretaker, so it's roughly the same when not in a relationship. I do not look for the type of men you describe, but then again I have mother issues instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/17 05:51 PM
1

High school. No friends, recently pissed off someone I admired in school, and my siblings started to ostracize me similar to my peers. I started getting depressed and closed off. People online started harassing me (following me on multiple platforms to send nasty messages and even got a hold of my phone number to threaten me). My parents broke into my room after I had told my little brother to leave me alone. They told me the reason nobody wanted to be around me was because I was a mean and nast…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/17 05:36 PM
1

No 3. I'd tap that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/17 01:49 AM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 08:47 PM
2

Internships are not always during the summer. What? Most interns here, including myself once upon a time, work year round. So why do women seem too? Their career choices are usually focused on having flexible and considerate hours. That isn't the same way male dominated careers are. Men work longer hours on average compared to women and a majority of those hours can be found in male dominated careers. Every college student has time to spend 3-4 hours on a weekend partying. Nobody has that much w…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 05:30 PM
2

Yea they weren't ready to deal with women because they aren't confident, probably don't lift, or don't have a masculine identity as a whole. No, that wasn't the case. Particularly the accountant I know is both masculine and goes to the gym every week, but he's busy working 10-12 hours a day right now getting his career going. In college it wasn't much different because he had an internship going. Confidence isn't his problem. There are many similar cases like his. Not everyone has time to have a…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 05:08 PM
2

Perhaps those careers, but there a difference as well in others. I have a degree in engineering. Can't say I partook in that environment, but I know a lot of guys in similar majors, or even those in accounting that weren't ready to deal with women until they got settled into their careers first. Most of them were pursuing a degree and also working at internships. Edit: Fuck me, I tried to edit my previous post for grammar and deleted it. Good thing you quoted it. That's what I get for having OCD…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 04:34 PM
1

Maybe because men are busy going to college to study engineering and women are not as busy getting those degrees in childhood education? Just an idea.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 04:22 PM
2

A degree in social services or nutrition is just as rigorous as one in engineering, right? Degrees males typically go for are more time consuming generally. I don't think it's a stretch to say the small difference in the number of bachelor degrees is insignificant. Men are typically more focused on building a career at that point in their lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 04:09 PM
1

20-24? Aren't those men just busy getting hard earned degrees?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 12:04 PM
2

Wow what's next!? Hot women get more hits from interested men even if they're crazy!? I'm learning something new.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/17 12:48 AM
1

Pretty much.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/17 03:43 PM
2

I'm the breadwinner if that's what you mean, don't see how that is significant though.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/17 11:13 PM
3

I guess they don't align with your ideas of what is best. I focus on loyalty, routine-orientation, intelligence, and emotional stability in my partner. Financial success is irrelevant to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/17 09:38 PM
3

I'll impose my own standards. Whether the 'species'--whoever that is--appreciates it similar or not is not my concern.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/17 06:47 PM
1

I don't disagree a fundamental loyalty issue still exists in either case, but in the case of money or looks (likely to wane and easily evaluated) they are much less multi-factored and complex. In the case of such exterior factors there are substantially less factors at play and the evaluation of better option is much more accessible. To illustrate this point, consider someone that is with someone on part of their appearance and catches sight of someone younger and more beautiful. In the case of …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/17 03:02 PM
1

Loyal to looks? Appearance does not retain its value--it wanes. I don't see how one could be loyal to something that no longer is.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/17 12:37 AM
1

What is there to be loyal to if looks and money are all prominently one cares for?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/17 04:34 PM
7

Did you mean independent?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/17 12:33 PM
1

Indeed. What is there to be loyal to if looks and money are all prominently one cares for? Other factors would be their personality, their opinions or thoughts--anything that does not fall under looks and money. A person that only appreciates those things remains there exclusively for it: sex and/or money. They don't care what you say or think, just what's in your wallet or the beauty offered.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/17 11:55 AM
1

Apologies, that's my pedantic speech kicking in and using archaic definitions. When I say exclusively--clearly there is no such thing as 100%--instead I'm saying it's relatively excessive in comparison to anything else. To say someone is shallow is to accuse them of excessively caring for physical or material attributes to the point where other factors remain near completely unaccounted for. By that token, little binds a shallow person to a specific person when better option or opportunity prese…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/17 04:44 AM
2

Very nice. That's a good resource offering.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/17 04:33 AM
1

Plenty. Ask any cheating slut, player or gold digger. That guy has more cash?--hasta la vista , baby. When I say exclusively, it's relatively surmountable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/17 04:22 AM
1

Alone? Nope. Plenty of other fucks in the sea. As part of the equation--sure. Edit: Let me attempt to rephrase this. I think your definition of shallow is not similar to mine. If I were to accuse someone of being shallow it would be to accuse them of loving exclusively or solely the physical or material aspect of a person. Appreciating a person's beauty or the simple act of rejecting someone due to not being physically attracted would not be considered shallow by such definition. Now if someone …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/17 04:09 AM
1

I'd say it destroys them less than dating a cunt.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/17 04:07 AM
1

That's a lot of naturalistic fallacy. The reason people denounce such attraction is because it is not rewarding. Perhaps, for lust but not for love. Sex and physical attraction does not maintain a relationship. It's not shallow to appreciate physical beauty, only it exclusively.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/17 04:05 AM
1

You haven't watched Fullmetal Alchemist brotherhood!?!? Go watch it right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 02:41 PM
1

Normal is overrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 02:33 PM
1

It also makes one susceptible to the nastier side of people--the condemning, condescending, manipulating and ostracizing side. If anything, then would simply show how people treat those that are socially inept. Many people with autism are especially likely to develop depression and a cynical mindset towards others due to this. They are often bullied to a far higher degree. Are you surprised the dog kicked learns to bite? Not saying they are not without error, but the blame is on multiple parties…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 02:30 PM
1

I used to be pretty sexist, so I can't say it wasn't true for me. Most don't go to red pill due to good experiences with women. A lot of times, it's after a particularly nasty woman in one's life. It's the same case for women that speak ill of men--bad experiences can do that. I wouldn't write these experiences off as being necessarily a consequence of their actions though as this implies. A lot of people don't become that way on their own.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/17 02:22 PM
1

Read my edit. This is not an acceptable form of argument. Guessing but with the presentation that it is implied or accurate...somehow--you're stretching your defense thin. Keep in mind observation and prediction of behaviors is different from the implication or practice of labeling motive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 10:28 PM
1

Suggestion and providing possible insight is not the same thing as using it as a basis of argument (accusatory/implied). So no, that's not what is going on here. You cannot make claim to the motives of others, you can only guess and suggest. If this were a logical practice, then the perception and observance of male malevolence in mundane behaviors would be more profound and logically appealing then its truly baseless narrative. Flip this around and you'd realize that you might as well be a femi…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 10:19 PM
2

Woman's intuition is not valid as an legitimate argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 10:18 PM
4

No, that's not how this works. Providing insight to another on a personal level or comprehensive understanding on the biological ultimate level are both valid. What is not valid is an argument founded upon the implied or accused motives of others. It is not a logical argument--it is fallacious. Additionally an observer is not automatically objective as you imply, such is only pursued by use of the scientific method. Even then, it must be checked and balanced with rigor, methodology, and accounta…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 10:07 PM
2

Probably as attractive as being flat is--not everyone is into it but there are definitely people that are. A smaller jaw with some stubble goes a long way. Dress also is a considerable factor. Work with it, not against it. People have all kinds of insecurities--mine was my nose when I was younger. The more you focus on it, the more transparent it is in a mirror. Depression also significantly increases the perception of one's facial features as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 06:04 PM
2

Misogyny is behavior or idea motivated by dislike/hatred of the female sex or innate belief in their lack of potentiality (female inferiority). To accuse someone of being misogynistic is also to accuse them of having this motivation. Many such accusations of motivation are without evidence. Disagreement is not on definition, but on what is considered significant evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 05:53 PM
4

Isn't this jaw thing much like tits?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 05:48 PM
2

I'm quite frankly rude, but at least I'm self aware.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 04:30 PM
20

How many assumptions have you drawn to reach these conclusions, merely from observation and your subjective viewpoint--no? How is it you think you have not presented a clear case of confirmation bias when you have presented a case where all holes have been filled by your viewpoint? What is the criteria for the rejection of this idea? What prevents one from labeling someone a coward instead of cautionary man? Do you not see the logical flaws?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 04:21 PM
4

A comprehensible human trait and defensive cognition, but not the best foundation of reason or appeal when given opportunity to reflect.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 04:17 PM
36

So how does one challenge this view if your perspective is one of transparent confirmation bias? It is also a fallacious argument to say you understand the motives of others better than they themselves do. This just comes off as obscenely defensive. Example: The people that make us out to be crazy are just jealous we know the truth about green-headed aliens--they don't want to admit they themselves think it's true.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 04:10 PM
2

Indeed, and my clinical psychologist would agree likely.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 03:23 PM
3

It's not 'playing themselves' as you whimsically put it, but rather challenging themselves. They're learning how to make choices and take on responsibility in a time where they can still fantasize about a more leisure led life that wasn't too long ago (one that men do not even consider for themselves, as it is more unacceptable to do so). They'll get over it. Give it time. Happiness is not given, it's both found and made.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 03:04 PM
1

I need to move out more quickly than I anticipated. I'm becoming too bitter with my parents. Maybe 10% down will satisfy me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 02:59 PM
1

League of Legends erryday.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/17 02:58 PM
1

Did a friend betray you? In what way? My concept of 'friend' is too literally taken, likely due on part of my ASD. Nonetheless, I have a history of some people that I placed on a pedestal and regarded as a friend in my youth. I was crudely reminded it was a one-way street. The one I regarded most highly screamed at me in a room full of people, had a volleyball spiked to my face, and then chastised me for not regarding her feelings more as she watched me clean the blood off my face. I stopped tal…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/17 02:35 AM
3

Not really. Only in the friendship department. It's why I don't label people friends anymore. Humans cannot be trusted. I have found therapy helpful to ease some of my animosity. Fortunately, I do and can trust my boyfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 08:14 PM
1

Only in the friendship department. It's why I don't trust humans and won't label people friends anymore. Therapy helps.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 08:12 PM
1

Right, and the connotation of rationalize is that it isn't appropriate, but I digress--this has devolved into wordplay unintentionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 07:38 PM
1

I think you should refer to the definition of rationalization. To rationalize something is a matter of logically justifying something immoral or unacceptable. This is why it is listed as a form of manipulation or as a common defense mechanism. For example, hitting a child and then claiming that was for their own good is a form of rationalizing. Say a man cheated, but to justify his lack of honesty he may rationalize that informing her would harm her more. Here's another common one, say someone s…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/17 04:37 PM
1

No, in the case of homosexuality it is not embedded morality (at least not anymore, thankfully). It was an example, however, that there are some straight men that not consider it. I suppose incest would have been a clearer example in hindsight, although murder will do.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 11:39 PM
1

Action taken not led by rational thought and then later someone attempts to explain or justify that action through logical appeal. People rationalize their thoughtless behaviors all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 11:36 PM
2

The question is posed apples to oranges. Why compare how they taste? I can only presume it was motivated. The chosen word of 'need' is not compelling.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 07:18 PM
1

This is captured by 'gratification'.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 07:16 PM
2

Right next to having sex with another man for most of those straight. If it does come across it's pervaded by a deep sense of disgust, not with complacency and mulling. It's the same embedded morality that makes murder not an appealing option for most despite a lacking presence of perceived consequence.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 07:09 PM
1

No, it's because I don't comprehend the rationalizing of actions lacking rational thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 07:04 PM
3

I think my opportunities to be unfaithful are no less. The temptations for doing wrong are no less present in the life of a human being. What these men full prey to is the idea of gratification, the ease of its accessibility, and the idea they shall bear no consequences for their actions. It occurs when a man is assured in not getting caught and has no responsibility or remorse beyond view of accountability. It is the type of person that cannot be trusted.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 06:00 PM
1

These matters which depress and demotivate you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 05:19 PM
3

I've always had a high sex drive and have been chronically masturbating since the age of 8. Despite this, cheating never crossed my mind because it's not about sating sexual need. Maybe, people feel dishonesty is natural because it's easier to be a blatant selfish human being?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 05:15 PM
10

That's my point. There's a subset on here that seems to claim it cannot be helped and then proceed to list excuses of pseudo-scientific appeal.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 02:14 PM
17

Is this another ridiculous attempt at excusing males for being unable to control their libido? Where is thy agency? I don't get this nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 01:42 PM
1

I'll admit to it being uncommon. Why would you bother in depressing yourself by pondering it?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 01:12 PM
1

Yes, he's unemployed. I'm a recluse and I avoid most social interaction, so my social circles are vastly different to yours. My point in mentioning those things is because, most people, such as yourself, would have a hard time comprehending the idea of us being together based on outward appearance alone. Romantic attraction and love isn't always based or founded upon on matters of physical appearance or financial benefit--I was offering an exception to your pointless rhetoric.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 12:52 PM
1

So you say. I'm fairly above average--a slim, dirty blonde haired, upper middle class white chick. My boyfriend is a NEET, in poverty, and quite overweight at this time. Yet, I'd still place him above everyone here for the man that he is. Despite his circumstance, his character exceeds all I've met. We've been together for 6-7 years now and I'm getting a place for us to move in together next year. Life isn't as simple as you would prefer to paint it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 12:13 PM
1

Perhaps for the majority. There is no one more suitable than my current boyfriend--unless he is to be compared with a figment of imagination.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 12:01 PM
3

His belongings and gifts would be on my porch. He can take them and get out like the deceitful slut he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/17 01:21 AM
1

Ah, I read that more contextually than you with the idea that the naming of such a person (that agrees with) would entail explanation or study behind their claims (otherwise it be one hell of an intellectual suicide). I don't think the OP specifically stated the naming alone would confirm it, but maybe they did intend it? Who knows, OP is unresponsive anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 09:30 PM
1

No, you're manipulating the presented question. The terminology is never used to describe human behavior in credited study or explanation. If the terminology were used in such contexts it reasonably follows there would need to be corresponding evidence and explanation for doing so that can be pointed toward. It is not fallacious to ask for this, and at no point did the OP say it is untrue because no one credible has stated it--only has it been insinuated that such terminology usage is unsupporte…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 06:45 PM
1

That fallacy entails that a poor argument casts something as inherently correct because someone credible simply said it was, that does not mean asking for credible sources, research and explanation is fallacious. That's like trusting a doctor without a degree or explanation as much as one with a degree and explanation--credibility does mean something. It's simply a fallacious argument to say Y is true because X said so without further reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 06:26 PM
4

At that point just pull the plug on me so I can can remember the man as I knew him and not the needy slut he became.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 05:55 PM
8

There probably is many but how many are willing to fuck their careers? The old non-falsifiable 'they exist beyond view'. Might as well claim that: Invisible squirrels with three tails exist--but how many are willing to make their presence known? You're right about one thing, no one can prove you wrong with that kind of reasoning.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 05:50 PM
7

"Do human alpha males really exist, or do we just have big brawny guys? I asked Stanford neuroscientist and primate expert Robert Sapolsky, who said he had his doubts. In some other species, alpha males exercise a kind of power that goes beyond what you see in humans. In dogs and wolves, for example, everyone has a place in a hierarchy, from one to, say, twenty. Dog number one is the alpha male but he's constantly being challenged by dog number two. In baboons, however, there's just one alpha ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 05:20 PM
4

Serial monogamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 04:39 PM
2

Couldn't answer that for you, but there have been other studies that demonstrate women looking for long term relationships actively seek out men that enjoy and care for children--and are able to decipher this on based on facial features. If I were to guess why women would be attracts to narcissistic personalities as well--likely it's the resource provision aspect and less to do with narcissistic traits. It's likely an unintended consequence of seeking resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 04:36 PM
1

Depends on what she's looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/17 01:46 PM
1

Wait, I'm a gay man? I'm okay with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 06:25 PM
1

Considering I'm reading a book presently on the science of the male sex drive--I'd say I appreciate it appropriately. However, the desecrated and distorted version of male sexuality you speak of is not the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 01:57 PM
2

Trying to build a romantic relationship on anything but sexual attraction is futile. Sounds like a recipe for disaster.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 01:23 PM
1

I think it's highly attractive in a romantic partner. I can't handle any spontaneous or extroverted types. I need someone that adores the routine--finds contentment in the mundane and simple lifestyle. Like, yes, please sit around the house and play video games or watch Netflix with me. It's even easier if he also has separate interests that gives me the leisure of having plenty of time in doing things on my own. I've only ever wanted someone that could enjoy a quiet morning. Thankfully my boyfr…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/17 02:06 AM
1

I'm starting to think this kind of judgement is cast on my own boyfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 02:37 PM
5

Getting a relationship and maintaining one are two different kinds of effort. Getting a man's attention is easier than the continuous demonstration you deserve to keep it over another. Unlike other men who sought my attention, this man demonstrated he valued me as a friend prior. I was the one with walls and a cynical regard for other people, and he carefully navigated my fortress to its center. If you ask me, he attracted me, but ask him and he'll say it the other way. To do well for the one ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 02:26 PM
2

I disagree. It's not a sex based issue. People simply want they cannot have or what they see themselves incapable of attaining. Actually experiencing or having the ability to get something relieves that desire--it's the same reason people take what they have for granted. You may also want to reconsider the idea that men benefit more than women in romantic relationships. Women are less at risk to suffer from depression and other mental illness when in a long, stable relationship. Both sexes benef…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/17 04:15 AM
1

The point is usually based on the person met--whatever quality/qualities they possess you want around for the rest of your life. Have a family, whatever. Don't need a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 07:48 PM
2

If person A was in nursing, they'd probably have a better shot as a male. Different sex ratios, different contexts, different opportunities.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 04:48 PM
1

This question is ridiculous. I can't even bother to reply, which is about the same amount of effort as this topic made anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/17 04:45 PM
1

It may not be cute, but Samurai X: Trust and Betrayal is my favorite depiction of romance. Their relationship is how I picture my own, simplistic and routine. Quiet. Small forms of contentment between two broken people; they changed each other at a steady pace. I find it relatable. The tragedy at the end, both its anguish and agony, always makes me tearful.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/17 07:28 PM
1

What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/17 06:59 PM
2

Good mention.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/17 06:30 PM
1

Sounds like personal taste then, no idea why you think that all men are similar to you in that respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/17 06:29 PM
3

Why ought it be? Men can enjoy romance. Do you think you'll get cooties?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/17 06:06 PM
2

It would move contraception and the whole responsibility aspect of sex to the female alone. Not a good idea for various reasons. Two heads are better than one. That doesn't mean nothing should be done. Child support costs can unfortunately be beyond reasonable. There should be a better process to determine how much ought to be distributed, and the amount should be reviewed every few years for financial changes (or upon request). There should also be some authority on how child support money is s…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/17 03:12 AM
1

And if it is universally perceived as long relative to an (average) object you're familiar with ...no. No this is not how science works. I'll stop here.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 02:32 PM
1

Color me astounded. 'How does do science?' I'm starting think it ought to be a crash course.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 02:27 PM
1

No, they are not. The shared experience is the the physical measure of the face: the height, the width, the distance between the eyes. These are objective measures we can make about a person because they are a shared perception--it is what determines our reality. Cold. Hard. Facts. We can measure the average perceived value shared among a subset of humans. That average is objectively measuring (given ideal methodology), the subjective judgements of a population of humans. That measure is a reali…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 02:21 PM
1

Objectivity requires a lack of judgement. When you place in so many components of partiality and judgement, the objective foundation is lost. It is why science seeks to remove those factors through rigor. Objective reality is composed by shared truth, and such perceptions are not shared by others (individual perception + estimation)--which is what makes them blatant subjectivity. That doesn't entail there is no objective aspects that underlie those perceptions, but to say those judgements are ob…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 02:08 PM
1

Every perception has a subjective and objective component, but how can they argue that the individually judged observation through the senses is objective? "I objectively think you look like a nerd." -> They don't find this a contradiction? Fascinating.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 02:03 PM
1

The cognitive aspect of it, which is the individual weighing and measurement aspect of perception, yes, the observation of through the senses part not so much.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 01:57 PM
1

As subjective as labeling someone 'hot' or 'sexy'. The topic may as well have been: "Is the label 'sexy' subjective?" Hence, my making fun of it. Labels themselves may be based on a perceived value by an individual, but that does not mean they have no objective facts that influence those perceptions. While the label 'sexy' is subjective, certain physical characteristics can be reasonably measured to be more appealing on average. It is often facts that influence the directions of population perce…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 01:44 PM
1

It was all sarcasm on my end. Chad is subjective, it's a label based on perceived value of genetic makeup or sexual appeal on part of it. I thought this topic was more or less a leading question.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 01:30 PM
4

Subjective? Definitely not. "Chad" is based on a specific set of genetic markers that can be determined through laboratory testing. It just so happens that everyone labeled a "Chad" develops these genetic variants immediately following identification in order to justify any rhetoric that follows.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 01:23 PM
1

Something like that, lol
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/17 12:15 PM
6

I take it you're familiar with Robert Sapolsky's lectures and Tinbergen's 4 questions? Based on your tag, have you read Nature via Nurture by Matt Ridley? I would hope so. There's not many people in this atmosphere actually willing to do their homework, so color me pleasantly amused if this is the case. I think the biggest example of people not understanding the difference between proximate mechanisms and ultimate biological explanations is the entire hypergamy argument as justification for indi…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 08:44 PM
4

It's not even theoretically valid in psychometrics, it's a cute fad though.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 06:46 PM
5

Want some fries?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 06:14 PM
5

People with ASD have cognitive empathy deficits which make it difficult to recognize and understand the emotions of others and even ourselves. ASD also makes the communication and expression of emotion more difficult. All of this does not mean a lacking emotional disposition, especially given the notable meltdown and and neurotic symptoms that often plague those with the disorder. There is a shred of truth in that females on the spectrum tend to have neurological architecture that is more remini…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 05:40 PM
5

There's various forms of empathetic responses, but women seem to have much higher responses to affective empathy in particular. It depends by which expression and definition of emotion you contrive it as being, but by most common emotional definitions--females would come out on top. Females are more susceptible to the emotional contexts of their environment. This does undermine male emotion or the means by which they often express it, often in more comparatively lethal and risky manners.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 03:45 PM
2

We can be susceptible to laying claim upon other people and investing too much that we can't cope with an unprepared loss. The reminder of it being temporary ensures we remain with a supply for potential loss, rather than left as starved beings. It's a manner to deal with grief, with envy, and with jealously--the solemn reminder that we can't hold people to ourselves in the manner they paint it as with their exaggerated soothing words and cooing. I always took things too literally, and when one …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 03:01 PM
5

I have the exact same defense mechanism regarding 'friends' so I can't criticize. It helps with coping.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 02:47 PM
1

Through various studies, I suppose, but then again I have to wonder what the threshold is for establishing sexual attraction. I probably experience more than the typical heterosexual female in terms of sexual attraction to other females, possibly bisexual by some definitions. I don't think much of it though since it really doesn't apply to my decision making. Bisexual seems strange when really it's just a matter of perverseness on my part.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 02:07 PM
2

Significantly more than males, and many studies do elude to many females experiencing sexual attraction to other females.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 01:56 PM
1

Straight works since I have no intention to be with a woman. Seems a lot simpler don't it? I'm just a degenerate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 01:42 PM
2

I think most females would be considered bisexual by that definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 01:41 PM
1

I'm not so sure of that one.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 01:36 PM
1

I don't see women in a romantic manner though, more like a sex object or fetish--so straight seems more appropriate.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 01:35 PM
1

Maybe it's because I have fetishes for many things women are involved in, like belly bumps. Or, maybe I'm just attracted to submissive behavior. On the other hand, I do love tits. Contradictions, indeed I have.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 02:59 AM
3

I'm sexually attracted to women, but I'm straight. I can't stand women, especially in any romantic sense...I guess I could fuck one though? Not that I would, I'll stick to porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/17 02:36 AM
1

I was unaware a topic was made. As I replied to you, I'll also reiterate here: Is it that people want a non-desperate person with options who chooses/wants them from among the extensive options, rather than a desperate person who has no options and just needs them? "Yes, I prefer someone that selects me for what I offer. I do not care for men that unabashed chase anything that resembles a 'grill'." But I thought love was about "needing" the person in some deep way? So I'm confused now. "Maybe in…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 06:15 PM
1

Games, in-game items, and stupid shit. I started using male on my profile when was 16 for that reason. Same reason I always pick masculine usernames. Hate the attention females get in communities I frequent.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/17 04:54 PM
1

Egalitarian relationship preference. No pill. Marry: Good Boy Selfish and Selfless Engineer Fuck: Above Kill: Everyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 05:19 PM
1

Fixed typos, I was on my way out the door. Do males whine to you in this way? Ah, the spoiled kind like my brothers, but with them its acceptable--lol. Male gamers buy you gifts IRL to try to woo you? You know gamers IRL? Nah. I don't leave my house very often and have no social life, by choice. Online, definitely experience this. Offline, the most I've personally experienced is paying for my food despite my protests. I find a way to get back at them, eventually. I hate having to go through the …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 03:03 PM
1

Can you elaborate on what you mean by each? Not taking a negative for sexual activity. If I'm not comfortable engaging in sex, especially early on in a relationship, I don't want someone constantly pushes for it. Same with financial decisions, I'm not going to have someone that constantly whines they can't have something beyond the reasonable and a firm "no". People that are used to getting what they want, when they want it, are likely to engage in this behavior. Men buy you gifts even after you…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 01:01 PM
1

Worshiping in the bedroom maybe, the goodness of ourselves praised, but never should our flaws be ignored without protest; We should never be placed above the thresholds of doing wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 11:54 AM
1

Which boundaries do you have in mind as examples? Sex and finance are the obvious ones. I suppose the one I'm personally annoyed with is the gift thing, where someone doesn't take "no" for an answer and buys you shit anyway. "No means, no" their Mothers should have taught them. Is it that people want a non-desperate person with options who chooses/wants them from among the extensive options, rather than a desperate person who has no options and just needs them? Yes, I prefer someone that selects…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 11:50 AM
1

The 'woe is me' attitude This is something completely unhealthy for me to deal with. It's people that are not happy on their own and so they latch onto a relationship and emotionally leech off the other person. People that can't love themselves, complain nonstop, but have all the excuses in the world not to fix themselves. Pressuring boundaries For some reason the first "no" wasn't enough and neither was the second. This is someone out to get something and has little to no respect for your opini…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 03:26 AM
1

Wouldn't be a safe place for me, but I don't see the harm in have sex segregated universities as an option. A better option for me? Improved online education.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 02:49 AM
1

As in people crave for things that are too implausible to others, to themselves, and so they become complicit with something carefully not one thing or the other--but such balancing acts hardly exist in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 01:47 AM
1

I don't see how not saying it would help the situation any.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 01:01 AM
1

My sensory processing is screwed up. I have sensory seeking behaviors, but particularly tactile, vestibular, and proprioception. When I elbow bang, hit my chest or any manner of those things it's fulfilling a need for stimulation. This usually occurs when I'm emotionally excited, frustrated, anxious or when I'm attempting creative thought processes--even just the composing of these words requires an amount of stimuli (bouncing on my balance ball chair). I don't get as much feedback from my sense…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/17 12:57 AM
1

Eh, touche, but still.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 10:22 PM
1

Oh, so the sparkly version.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 08:51 PM
1

A what, not a who. My hope for people to realize their contradictions, I suppose.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 08:48 PM
1

Was his name also Chad?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 08:45 PM
1

RIP
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 08:44 PM
2

Hmm, so basically the hollow realization that the foreplay was the dirty scene you were waiting for?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 08:42 PM
2

Same. I heard it was caught between wanting to be porn and a romance--ended in some confused/mangled thing in between.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 08:38 PM
9

No, definitely not. I like BDSM myself, but 50 Shades wasn't exactly a good representation of it from what I can piece together. Better off sticking to porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 08:28 PM
9

That females are sexually attracted to extremely masculine and dominant men that often teeter on the edge of overly controlling, physically demanding, and non-communicating. Moral of 50 Shades: Woman complaining? Buy her something shiny instead, she'll forget about it. Didn't read it, but heard plenty about it. Doesn't take a lot of effort to get the gist.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 08:18 PM
1

--and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 07:40 PM
20

Yes. Evidence: Popularity of 50 Shades of Grey.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 07:34 PM
1

No. I have ASD.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 06:27 PM
1

When I'm distressed I tend to hit myself, repeat words, and my ability to speak goes down to a few words. If I can manage to say "no" despite having ASD, I think these women can manage acquiring the mental fortitude to summon up a single word themselves. If they can't, they should shake their head in a clear indication. It's a bad idea to expect males to read nonverbal language when there's a plethora of them that have some type of difficultly, even disorder, in doing so. Teach women to say no i…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 06:17 PM
3

I'm mentally ill myself and I can understand people not wanting to deal with those kinds of issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 01:28 PM
3

More like, it's someone you already may have an interest in, but a red flag appears and you run for the hills.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 01:26 PM
1

Friends are overrated anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 12:22 PM
5

Every Sunday night, I stay up late not mentally prepared to start another work week. Every Monday morning, I regret not going to bed sooner.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 03:40 AM
1

I don't doubt that. I imagine it wouldn't be easy to find dominant women, especially if some of them don't leave their house to the degree I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 03:33 AM
1

Touche. I think a lot of women don't take pleasure so much in the control and voyeuristic aspect. I think it also helps that while I have a hard time with light touch, I'm also quite sensory seeking on part of my disorderly processing--certainly makes the idea of licking, biting, running my hands over someone a little more profound. cough Of course that same behavior also makes me quite the social pariah incapable of discerning appropriate contact with others, especially when drunk and my inhibi…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 03:22 AM
1

Lol, most men typically run and cover their asshole when you mention the idea of pegging. I am sexy, but, I do have autism. I'm not normally one to leave the house. Pros and cons. I'm considerably neurotic as they say. Despite my sex drive being pretty damn active, I'm still a creature of rigid routine. I strongly desire both stability and consistency--and that isn't found in casual sex. A simple, mundane life with a possible monogamous relationship will work just fine. Orgasms are part of my da…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/17 03:05 AM
3

Well, to reiterate another--it's a red flag for a woman that finds this a red flag.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 11:15 PM
2

Yeah, my boy doesn't. Have you considered dating a woman then?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 08:15 PM
1

I'm just not grasping what the difference is. I'm not criticizing people making these choices in their priorities, only when they complain or pretend they didn't make that choice. Edited to clarify. I think this is just a misunderstanding at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 07:14 PM
1

So then a woman prioritizes sex and babies if she wants to? I'm talking about women that want to have their career but somehow complain they can't do that and be in a relationship at the same time. You're correct in my lack of understanding, but I think making choices is different to complaining there aren't any.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 07:03 PM
1

I can't argue that decision. I wouldn't want kids with someone that didn't agree to the responsibility of actually raising them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 07:02 PM
2

I guess that means the woman made a sad choice in a husband then.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 06:24 PM
0

Instead of telling me I can't understand, tell me what I don't understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 06:18 PM
2

Someone gets it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 05:46 PM
1

Nope. Don't see why it would be.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 05:36 PM
0

I'm in a 6+ year long relationship holding all the financial responsibility at this present time. I do not see any logical reason why women cannot make money and play the romance game after work, or do they have fainting spells that ruin their careers on part of being in a romantic relationship that I'm unaware of? Forgive me, but I impart agency for females instead of holding them damsel to expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 05:29 PM
3

'Socially expected', so? What makes your decisions mercy to the court of public opinion? It's just an excuse for women to choose to handle these matters over the father and then blame society for why they decided to leave work early instead of asking the father time to time. Take some responsibility instead of excusing it on expectations having influence over choice. If you want to do that, sure, but don't blame society for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 05:25 PM
2

Sure, typically, but that's not always the case. If one person takes into account the financial burden of having a child and plans accordingly--just as men do all the time, then it isn't an issue. Women they seem to groan it's impossible for them to do so--despite most of the time it being a choice. The reason most women typically decide to take on most of the responsibility is because the father's income is equivalent or more than theirs that it becomes the preferable option between them. I mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 05:03 PM
2

The part where she makes it dichotomous. I see the lack of risk in having both. I'll concede that it's mostly an unnecessary provocation.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 04:19 PM
1

What does that have to do with anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 04:17 PM
4

I focus on my career, make money, and make compromises for my relationship. Why are women so incompetent they think it's an impossibility to do all those things? Do what you want, but don't say how other people are better off with that crude logic if one were to even call it that.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 01:03 PM
2

My SO and I compromise all the time. I think what is more indicative of an unhealthy relationship is the inability to compromise or the avoiding of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/17 01:00 PM
1

he's not "trying to convince" men losing custody (or not being the custodial parent if that's what you mean ) is a good thing, His: Now women get custody of the children. Guess what guys? This is a benefit.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 06:41 PM
8

Interesting, so you don't mind people cheating on you as long as you never find out. Ignorance is bliss type?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 06:37 PM
2

No, it wasn't. He tried to make light of an issue that clearly is highly variable upon context and is currently not systematically favorable towards men. Trying to convince men that losing custody of their children is a good thing doesn't address the problem, it flat out accepts the status quo. Not every divorce is going to be the MGTOW nightmare it's painted out to be, certainly, but the problem remains that when men need the system most it fails them the hardest. Make men less vulnerable to a …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 06:01 PM
1

Never said they were.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 05:52 PM
1

Can't always be avoided.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 05:52 PM
3

That depends on what's involved. Pretending a divorce between two mutual parties without the presence of children is the same as a divorce with a lazy wife that cheated and often neglected her children, but still manages to acquire more custody and finances (which she uses more for her own luxury over the needs of her children)--is not doing anyone justice. If the woman your divorcing is a decent human being, great, might not be so bad. If she's a narcissistic cunt--well that's a different story…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 05:42 PM
3

Not always, but being screwed in the financial and especially custody aspect can really make a mess of people's lives. Divorce isn't pleasant, especially in scenarios where it's one sided or when infidelity was involved. Children are a huge part of major discrepancies in divorces. Men don't get the better end of the stick in that deal and it should be solved instead of thrown under the proverbial rug.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 05:38 PM
3

Not everyone's divorce experience is the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 05:22 PM
3

Why should TBPs be convincing women that rape is the worst thing in the world, when there are plenty of women who are able to live their lives just fine after the fact ? I love your logic, so I edited it for you. Not saying they're the same thing, but your logic use here is so bad I had to point it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 05:18 PM
6

This isn't some woman on the street's rejection and maybe you should stop devaluing the experience of divorced men. They no longer have a secure and stable home life, their lives change drastically, they may lose access to their children--their emotional support is stripped from them. It's not the momentary pitfall feeling following the rejection of a pretty girl, it's the grief of having lost a family and the support underneath their feet. You're being intentionally dishonest trying to ridicule…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 05:13 PM
17

These are someone's children you're talking about. Their sons and daughters. You are making this argument from the stance that the man is some kind of extreme sociopath. I'm sure if your kid got hit by a bus one day, you don't think 'Oh nice, one less expense'. Which is basically what I highlighted and the argument you legitimately offer. You're twisting men into something they're not for this opinion of yours--it's dehumanizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 04:42 PM
17

Now women get custody of the children. Guess what guys? This is a benefit. There is a lot wrong with this post, but I'll just highlight this one.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 04:34 PM
2

Individual outcome is a result of environmental factors and biological predisposition--when the environment is more constant, it is a given that variability in biological predisposition becomes that much more transparent. One cannot eviscerate differences in environmental factors and not expect biology to then play a larger factor in observed differences. This is in agreement with what you've stated.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 04:16 PM
3

Yep. I know what I like. My porn and fantasies attest. I like to do the touching, really not big on being touched. I prefer control. I have a lot of voyeurism. I don't need sex to know my preferences, just like men and women don't have to have sex to know they want to give/take it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 02:47 PM
2

I like pretty boys. The kind that easily fluster, have a nice ass, muscularly toned, pretty face (softer), somewhere around 5'10 to 11"--submissive but definitely no woman. Those are the kind I just want to bend over. On a serious note though, I'm sure women prefer an Edward out of Twilight. Men, probably some Mel Gibson Braveheart look-a-like interpretation. The ideal male probably significantly defers by region though.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 02:16 PM
2

Thank you good soul!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/17 02:28 AM
1

This was already established as rape before this affirmative consent business since the woman would be too incapacitated to provide refusal. The only proof they need, in those cases, is their impairment of decision making. That hasn't changed. They never had to proved they 'didn't consent' only that they were too impaired to 'refuse'.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 05:03 PM
1

Hmm, not a bad point. I'll concede that one in part, but only because I think 'no' and 'stop' are pretty explicit.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 04:52 PM
1

....that's already established as rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 04:50 PM
1

Nah, just a female with clinical autism, so I understand the difficulty of nonverbal cues. My autism in a sexual encounter isn't difficult to imagine, it's a daily part of life. I understand the motive, and I'm not saying the opposite approach is impossible, just a little more anxiety inducing than you would think for those that struggle with social communication--I'd paint it more neutral than beneficial in that manner.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 04:44 PM
1

Yet that's exactly why the approach is being made. No, I don't see how that protect someone like myself. "No", "Stop", and being pushed off of someone is a lot more explicit than significantly worrying if the women is enjoying it the entire time and if mannerisms means she wants it or is not entirely into it, and might regret it later--to which I'd be held fault. If anything it make me anxious and more unattractively unconfident as I ask, and ask again if she likes it, what she likes, doesn't li…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 04:20 PM
1

but I think the attitude is that society has an obligation to protect it's weakest members. Yeah, see, that basically highlights my criticism of these approaches. What is bred often with good intentions and hazardous logic, is often manipulated and used by the malevolent and exploiting.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 04:07 PM
2

Legitimate response. I see the motive now. I can see the motivation of wanting to prevent scenarios where women are pressured into sex, but I also think that it is removing the responsibility and capability a woman has to make decisions during a sexual encounter. Ultimately, even if she was pressured, her actions and decisions do not weigh less than another human being (unless, of course, notable impaired decision making or coercion was present). Regret of one's own choices or decisions is ultim…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 03:52 PM
1

It was a joke trying to get a genuine rebuttal to something outrageously silly. Silly and easy to provide a rebuttal to. I'm genuinely curious why such a policy attempts to shift the role of responsibility in sexual engagement. To me, personally, it comes across as viewing someone incapable of telling another to stop unwanted advancement or give a simple no. Can you refute that, or not? What is the motivation of this shift, if not that?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 03:29 PM
1

Ah, well, I guess that makes sense because women are typically incapable of making decisions about what they want--is that the idea behind it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 03:18 PM
3

Typical women are saints narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 01:30 PM
2

Because it can't be.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 01:29 PM
1

Same, lol. Seem like a bunch of social justice malarkey that won't actually hold up in court. They can write the laws, but enforcing is another matter entirely. They're full of shit in my book. It does have an influence on the college campuses though despite the status quo portrait the OP paints it to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 01:22 PM
0

Thank you. I'm surprised that could ever work in law, does the OP seriously not see the issue with that?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 01:20 PM
2

...The new definition being?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 01:17 PM
2

...but the lion
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 01:15 PM
1

Change to what? That's what I'm not getting. Is it a movement focusing on enforcing what is or isn't explicit consent? What is the difference between consent and affirmative consent? That is what I want to know and what the OP seems to muddy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 01:11 PM
3

How many sexual partners have you had? NONE 4.65% 2 Are you kidding me? I was one of the two women who've never had a sexual partner before? Why do I genuinely feel surprised that people around me have had sex at some point? Damn, I should probably get around to at least having my first kiss...meh, or not...I can wait a few years. Fapping is fun anyway. Better questions, why ain't these hoes savin' the baby lion? IT'S A BABY LION.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 01:06 PM
1

Ohhhhhhhhhh. RIP, muh bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 01:05 PM
1

This might be what's going on, I'm curious to see how the OP responds.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 12:38 PM
1

Lmao, yep
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 12:36 PM
2

It's pretty common in "Anti-SJW" communities to highlight affirmative consent thing. Example
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 12:19 PM
2

Can you answer what is the actual change with this 'affirmative consent' hype? I think it's more of a phrase that people came up with recently to express their moral superiority on social media. Someone stating they're for sexual consent would get nothing but a rolling and eyes of a muttering of 'duh', but throw in 'affirmative' and suddenly they're hip and morally worthy of applause. Seriously, what's the deal?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 12:10 PM
2

I think it's more common in the youtube community. I'm familiar with the people she's attempting to address, but I doubt they'd be here willfully challenging their views.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 12:04 PM
1

More accessible porn?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 02:48 AM
2

Eh, I like tits and ass. Maybe it's just a trend towards growing acceptance of anal sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 02:46 AM
1

As long as he's my loser, and I'm his moron. But nah, ain't the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/17 02:42 AM
1

Well, they're their own brand of crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/17 11:52 PM
15

I love murdering people in video games, I guess I'm a hypocrite when it comes to criticizing those that murder IRL. Feelsbadman.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/17 02:24 PM
1

We already have such drugs, they're called antidepressants. The first couple of weeks on those I was miserable about not having a sex drive (mine is really high), so I would assume probably not. I missed fapping so damn bad. Thankfully mine came back after the first couple months.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/17 02:18 PM
1

Maybeeeee. Some prude doesn't like my porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/17 02:05 PM
1

Nope. A man that would consider cheating on me can find the door. I wouldn't consider cheating so it's only fair. I mate for life and if my partner doesn't feel similar he's a waste of my time. I'd rather live on my own, otherwise. This is coming from a position that any man can cheat if they desire to (attempting to do so is the same shit in my book).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/17 01:17 PM
2

It's porn. I find females tend to prefer writing/reading more over the visual though--granted, I prefer visual. The people that enjoy my type of porn like tentacle rape, rather extreme hentai, belly bumps, sex with toys etc. are typically men. There's something about watching a woman or man being dominated that is a turn on. I guess that's why I'm into pegging, though. Really, porn isn't the lens into someone's soul.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/17 01:07 PM
1

Yeah, I was pretty fragile back in high school and generally I did and still do come across as an idiot due to my deficits. I had pretty strong depression back then and into early college. I snapped out of it and took on a more arrogant, eccentric, and apathetic persona though. I gave up on having friends years ago, it was the happiest decision I ever made. I've been fortunate in finding an SO though, don't need much beyond him. Hopefully that woman ended up happy, similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/17 11:18 AM
5

That's a good way of putting it. I prefer matters a lot more direct, so men haven't been an issue for me as much. When I'm attacked upfront, I at least have the option to retaliate appropriately. Men tend not to wait so long either, unlike the more meticulous and cautious approach of women. Considering how awful I am at picking up on social subtleties the approach men more often take is exceedingly easier for me to deal with.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 08:59 PM
1

Touche. If what I am is crazy, it's more fun anyhow.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 07:17 PM
2

Yet, I'm the crazy one.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 05:55 PM
3

I don't disagree with that much, but relationships and women are not necessarily the epitome of one's life.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 04:43 PM
6

Men don't require women to reach their full potential--or self actualize as you put it. Relationships are not a bundle of magic, sparkles and fairy dust. What is this about not blaming women for emotional pain? If I'm in a relationship with someone, and they cheat, then I'm authorized to say they're a cheating cunt. That's different if I have unrequited feelings for another and get rejected, because they ain't owe me shittttt. Emotional pain in a LTR relationship can't be avoided, so if someone …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 04:39 PM
5

Pretty much sums it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 02:23 PM
5

Frankly, I'm not sure. My professor was absolutely senseless and unprofessional about it, I mean look at this shit: Click. Him being foreign is no excuse for that grammatical abhorrence. Then he went on about neither of us graduating (emails were aimed at both Joshua and I). That's the only screenshot I have left of that catastrophe on my desktop. I lost access to my university email after graduating. I'm not sure what the difference would have been if it was a male accuser. I could only guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 01:41 PM
4

Eh, I still prefer male buddies online and definitely enjoy the lewd jokes. The subset of men I tend to prefer (geeks and nerds) may be vulgar, as women would label it, but they respect lines that shouldn't be crossed so I never had the issue. I always preferred the 'bro treatment' as they say. I suppose I should add I don't hate women anymore. I can get along with the mentally ill types, generally. I also comprehend females better these days based on what I've learned. I do have more distrust t…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 12:29 PM
10

I'll answer you and /u/KrispyMcSockington at the same time since its nearly the same question. Women often came across disingenuously and unkind. I had a hard time keeping up with female social games: both in their indirectness and more convoluted non-verbal language. After so many years, I finally started picking up on the condescension late high school. At this time my own sisters also went through a phase of treating me like a social pariah. For example, I was screeched at in locker room beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 11:22 AM
5

There's too many studies that refute this. There's a general consensus in the scientific community that males have the stronger sex drive. They think more about sex, fantasize more often and masturbate more frequently. Men will sacrifice more for sex than a woman will. Think about it, men often initiate sex and rarely do they refuse--women on the other hand, are quite the opposite. And this is coming from a female that chronically masturbates since the age of 8. Yes, there are females with stron…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 02:56 AM
6

Indeed female, for better or worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 02:17 AM
9

No. I went through a woman hating phase. I got it sorted out with reading books on genetics, human behavior--and also going to therapy. Just took some years. I went through a 'red pill' phase of sorts a couple years back. I was objectively sexist as fuck though. I got out of red pill (better said, my head out of my ass) about a half a year after and moved onto more intensive hobby study after that. Therapy occurred after that and smoothed out some of my edges I still had. I don't have the best o…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/17 01:57 AM
1

Something legendary.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 11:23 PM
1

Cool, seems like a pretty common story these days. Friends first and what not. It's like how we've replaced courting and dating. Yeah, especially in my case because I hadn't done the whole 'friendship' thing at that point. Hardly was ready for dating, so it was much appreciated. You're the breadwinner I take it? Yeah. He's stuck in poverty as a NEET and I'm a computer engineer--duh math. Diamonds make the world shine brighter. Action figures make mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 11:14 PM
1

You'd be surprised how many feminists and women have no idea what a social construct is, but still use it as an argument. I think your perspective on that is ideologically influenced. The reason I'm so informed on what social constructs are (compared to a general person), for instance, is having to sit there and teach people what it entailed--and the people I had to were from both ideological perspectives.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 10:52 PM
1

Can someone describe more accurately what 'black pill' is?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 10:07 PM
1

I have actually. Found my SO on an anime flash game forum (romantic I know). We were friends for a few years first. Been together for about 6+. He was going into nursing before unfortunate circumstance led to otherwise, so he's been a NEET for a solid while now. We mostly play League of Legends these days. We met up a few times and hung out (I live in MI, him in OH). I've paid off my student loans and am now saving up for a very nice detached condo to move in together with him next year. I lucke…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 09:38 PM
1

Nope, I'm pretty happy living more isolated. I typically reject invitations to go out. People are a bundle of uncertainty and spontaneity--and that's a lot of stress for me. Most of my interest in human behavior is an attempt to make matters less uncertain and unpredictable, more decipherable (especially females). I like my life strictly routine and mundane--the only flexibility I like is in ideas. Extroversion is not something I ever demonstrated from the very beginning, nor have I ever appreci…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 09:09 PM
1

Eh, I much prefer never leaving my house, doing jigsaw puzzles, and playin' video games all god damn day--of course, reading the occasional book on genetics or human behavior. Not to mention my stereotypical job as a computer engineer. I'm a walking cliché. Nerd lyfe is best lyfe, mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 08:54 PM
1

INTP with clinical autism. I'm a voluntary recluse and it feels good, dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 08:29 PM
3

Well if one were to use that measure, I am one epic failure of a a female--lmfao. I get what you were trying to get at now. Certainly that correlation to behavior, skills/interests, and cognitive processes plays much hint towards the likely neurological development of an individual without a lab full of expensive equipment.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 07:28 PM
3

I think I'm starting to comprehend your position more. It's a bit roundabout, but what you're suggesting is that just because a female or male has variation that may more closely resemble the opposite sex does not entail they are no longer considered an individual of their sex, correct? If that's the case, we would agree, and I don't think I've said anything that contradict that. My only point has been to clarify, that significant variations of sex development in the brain occur and it can leave…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 07:16 PM
3

Genetics are what the nature and nurture debate is regarding, and it's already been well established that neither can be removed from the equation--Matt Ridley covered this quite thoroughly in The Agile Gene. Certainly these people seem to stress the perception of the underpinning realities--and there are definitely many among them that would ignore or even outright dismiss the foundation of those perceptions. Of course, there are others on the opposing end that emotionally react to suggestions …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 07:10 PM
2

Lmfao. Brilliant, because consent would be considered a social construct. That trigger the hell out of people.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 06:53 PM
3

...I think I'll side on the side of neurological studies of physical brain differences and calculated measures then this arbitrarily defined skill thing you're speaking of. You're right, you do speak womanese well, I can't comprehend it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 06:40 PM
8

Social constructs have nothing to do with the nurture and nature debate. It's just this new craze with pointing out human defined metaphorical boxes and labels that are not an observance of reality but rather human created means of perceiving and communicating those realities. The passage of time is real, the way humans communicate and measure it is based on an agreed upon perception of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 06:37 PM
5

Sex...is a social construct. No. You can't just run away with these declarations of social constructs. Male is XY and Female XX--just because there are disorders where this differs does not entail those labeled realities are socially constructed--otherwise every label is a social construct. If I say 'this is a horse and this is a dolphin', you don't get to point at an eagle and say 'the first two were social constructions because another in the category exists'.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 06:27 PM
5

your soul squints And if I don't have one?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 06:10 PM
3

I don't think anyone would argue they are the same. However, there are variations that sometimes more closely resemble the opposite sex than their own. That doesn't entail males can have female's brains or vice versa, but that some variations find themselves in strange places. Disorders in the development of one's neurology can lead to these nontrivial variations. Certain genetic predispositions sometimes have neurological characteristics more similar to the opposite sex as well (ex. homosexuali…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 06:03 PM
3

Well it is, but there is more to sex than genitalia. I don't think a man is simply a chick with a dick. There are multiple stages of sex development, and thus there are more places where things can get obscure. Consider that the brain occurs in a different development period than the genitalia. There might be instances where the brain may have abnormal sex development that the body does not. This is why disorders like gender dysphoria are significantly heritable in twin studies as there is somet…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 05:54 PM
2

Nope, I'm still female. I'm just this confused...autistic...thing...Actually--best not to think about it. There's more to men and women than the neurology and genitalia though, sex is actually quite complicated in that it extends to numerous faculties of one's biology. Makes disorders of sexual development complicated for that reason. Genitalia is usually the best marker though (and certainly the most obvious...most of the time). And I doubt he/she could answer your question because that would m…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 05:01 PM
3

Hah, same, but I waver from megazord to carnivorous creature from the void.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 04:50 PM
3

Yeah, that's how it's used because they're not constraining the word and instead leaving it to the whims of each and every individual. It is a word that means nothing because it means everything a person can come up with--and then even further made vague by someone claiming something as valid or not valid based on their own whims. It's a fucking mess. It's why I typically have to strangle them into defining it. Attack helicopter is one of those valid means to demonstrate its absurdity.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 04:45 PM
1

A lot less so with effective contraceptives. Depends who the choice is and if there are children afoot. If we're talking about informed decisions then we should tell women not to get married at all, since unmarried ones are happier and earn more then their married counterparts. I tend to doubt the validity of some of those studies. A woman that prefers to be single certainly would be happier single. A woman that prefers to be married and with a family risks more (relationship, financial, etc obs…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 04:42 PM
1

Ehehehe--never said it was easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 04:35 PM
2

Language is a communication tool. Language often changes with the passage of time from one meaning into another--presently, gender is often refers to the sex people and others perceive and assign one being. The definition you even provided does not contradict that. It is entirely based on a real thing, sex--which is what I tried to emphasize. Now, the willy nilly types like to skew 'gender' into being a societal perception based on nothing but human idea, but that isn't correct. A word means not…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 04:28 PM
1

It definitely does!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 04:10 PM
1

Biologically sex differentiation in the body and brain occurs at two different stages of development, meaning the environment (hormones, chemical substances etc.) during the second half of pregnancy (brain development) may differ from the first (genitalia development). That isn't to say there is a strict 'male' and 'female' brain, but there are certainly notable differences like the amount of gray matter or the size of brain structures. People that identify as transgender often have brains that …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 04:05 PM
1

Even in a modern society scenario, many of those women would have to take up the mantle of men and forgo creating offspring. I completely disagree with you that an average woman is more valuable than a man--her reproductive ability today is in as much demand as providing resource to thrive on.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 03:50 PM
1

100:1? Depends. If we're talking in a population in the wilderness, probably with 100:1 men to women, the female/offspring heavy population would like starve or die to predators/otherwise. On the other hand, in a society with which men already helped build probably the 100:1 women to men population since women may be able to take on some roles of men in providing for the offspring. I find it amazing you'd place men's value today solely on their ability to create offspring and so derive an ideal …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 03:19 PM
1

I have no idea how women having a choice to be and stay with a man would make it harder for men. /sarcasm When you stop placing pussy on a pedestal, you'll realize you don't depend on women either. I'm starting to think you're incapable of doing that though considering you claim to be a slave to your sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 03:13 PM
1

Yet that's exactly what you brought this into, trying to say, in the extreme, women are more valuable to the species. They aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 02:54 PM
1

The species wouldn't be fine though. Offspring can't just be birthed, they have to also survive. You can't just pop out a bunch of babies without any resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 02:47 PM
1

If 50% of a nation died, a country would be placed in a position of vulnerability--of economic and military proportions. Children may be created, but the nation would struggle in providing for them. The world doesn't keep spinning the same without men, like you want to make it sound. If 50% of women died in a country, a country would be placed in a position of population vulnerability. What little offspring created would likely be provided and protected for more, however. Both of these situation…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 02:25 PM
2

The best minds aren't just measured by financial reward. You keep placing a man's value on his ability to get sex from women--and that's not all that men are or have to offer. If you think a woman is a lopsided deal, then don't take it. Where is the male's agency in these equations of yours? They don't have to settle for women and they don't have to place their value in a hands of a woman. Women are valued for what they are, men are valued for what they do. This is just a perception that suits w…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 02:17 PM
2

Not everyone requires the approval of others to find worth in themselves and their work, and one need not look further than some of the best minds this world has to offer for proof of that. When I think of the achievements of great men, it often has little to do with how many women they've taken to bed. If you measure people's worth by their ability to acquire sex--if you choose to allow women to determine your worth, well, I have little sympathy for the pain that derives from that choice you've…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 01:33 PM
2

I think self validation is the easier route to go. Why place your validation in the hands of women? Why not in your father? Your brother? Your best friend, even? If not them why not yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 01:13 PM
2

Their deaths are never needless. Men often die to protect those women and/or his society, those women would have been dead without. The species would not be fine without men's sacrifice similar. A man's value is found in his ability to protect and provide for the environment offspring flourish, and a woman's in her ability to create offspring. It's about the offspring--whether men died in war and women to labor mattered little. The less men, the less protection--not all value is placed in creati…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 01:12 PM
2

I'd say there's porn for that. Humans crave physical intimacy with others, and don't think that's particularly heightened for men. Sexual need? Yes men have more of that...but if it were simply a matter of sex drive there are many ways to satisfy that. I think what men crave more isn't sex, but validation. In my opinion, if you need a woman to validate what you have to offer--perhaps that need is found in a lack of self esteem and not a lack of a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 01:03 PM
2

Very little do people appreciate what others offer--or even their own fortunes in life. You'll find that is a human trait. It's not just women that are that way. Look at all the 'groups' of the world--and you'll find a similar mentality. Us vs them. People only care about the groups they ascribe to, due to their own personal gain. People never see their own fortunes--only what others have they do not. We're not that different, I just find people to be the disappointment--not just women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 12:59 PM
2

Single motherhood, including the 'work' involved in pregnancy and birthing--isn't fundamentally a one person job. About as 'easy' as men getting a surrogate or adopting a child on their own. Men don't depend and need women as much as you make it out to be. If it's simply a matter of having sex for men, as you put it, then yes they're at a disadvantage if putting one's dick in a woman's hole is a requirement to your life. Women are at a disadvantage if they need resources for children and/or them…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 12:51 PM
1

The ones that enjoy routine and home as much someone with autism--do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 12:36 PM
1

I always prefer the company of those that are also mentally ill.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 12:35 PM
2

Why do you shamelessly place pussy on a pedestal? Women need men to protect and provide for the society and environment their offspring require. Men are important and valuable similar to women, just because that importance is not found in the reproductive game as much as women doesn't mean they are worth less than women--you're just choosing the lens to see a perspective that suits you.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 12:30 PM
3

Are women too picky or are men not good enough or is our biology just designed not to have easily satisfied females... Women kind of have to be picky, to some degree, because the wrong choice is costly (despite them making poor choices still). It's still not what women do. Can you condition them to do it? We had something similar with the patriarchy and there weren't happy with that situation for obvious reasons No, it's not. It's not a matter of conditioning, rather than women learning how to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 12:15 PM
2

I still find this incorrect. If importance is placed on society's willingness to place the safety of women above men, then yes--that is solely based on the reproductive pressures. However, it is foolish to ever assert the importance of men is below women because of that alone. Men's importance is found in the building of society--the providing and protection of an environment necessary for offspring to flourish. Society requires both sexes and their contributions may be different, but of equal i…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 12:03 PM
7

Is that not the case for all humans? Do you recognize that this is all perceptual based? That you're actively choosing this lens?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 11:42 AM
2

Is a woman glaringly shit if she doesn't meet stringent requirements? Nah. My point was more: Our decisions are our responsibility. Given their distaste for men in general how much can be attributed to taste is unclear I can agree to that much, but I'd argue the evidence of women struggling to make good choices in male partners is obvious in present day issues with relationships and marriages. Them being picky...well that's common complaint here enough. So I can somewhat rest assured what I prev…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 03:42 AM
2

Rarely have I seen men hold particularly requirements for that. Compared to women anyway. Their responsibility at that point. Just like it's a woman's for picking a dude that was glaringly shit. How common is this? Don't you only see from 40 year old east coast journalists Eh, any female dominated atmosphere like 2xchromosomes, feminist groups to just some women hanging out. What's the good choice here? Pick a flaky alpha who will ditch her or beat her or choose a clingy beta who she'll despise …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 03:25 AM
2

Whatever that particular male would define as a 'good' woman--it differs based on which male you ask. Why do you think that Given how much complaints women make about men and the constant harping on the lack of 'good men'--the choices they make resulting in single mother homes and abusive situations...yeah, I'd say they struggle in make good choices regarding men. The man gets no taste of what a relationship is like in the process Sometimes not getting a taste is better than shit in the mouth. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 03:08 AM
2

Female choice is still the dominant human sexual strategy, but I don't see how that makes women more 'valuable'. Acquiring a good woman is probably just as difficult as picking a good man. Females clearly struggle on making the right choices regarding men, similar to how males struggle to get a woman to choose him. They're different experiences--again--I don't see why women are being placed on a pedestal and a majority of men being made into being worth less. So maybe there's a lot of men out th…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 02:55 AM
1

Okay. How is that different from women?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 02:36 AM
3

I'm saying women don't have the value above men being asserted.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 02:34 AM
3

About as well as a man can adopt a child on his own (or get a surrogate).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 02:23 AM
2

That's not the average man by far.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 02:17 AM
1

He can provide for one woman at a time.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 02:16 AM
2

Pretty sure you can't make babies without men. Women may carry the higher burden of reproduction game, but there's 'work' involved in that process. During that process the male puts in his own 'work' to help provide for the offspring. I don't see why you would value women more than men with that logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 02:07 AM
5

women only value men for what they can do for them That's a baseless assertion. Can you explain this?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 01:55 AM
4

I mean I care about strange men as any other human--not much.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 01:51 AM
3

"They" should care because it affects their fathers, their brothers, their sons, and their husbands. You can't separate male problems and male experiences from people one knows unless there are literally no men you know nor care for--which I find it hard to believe. Why would people not care about the grievances and troubles those they care for are likely to come across?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/17 01:30 AM
9

Red pill marriage seems like an exaggerated form of traditional marriage. A marriage where a man can only feel safe by ensuring his woman is financially and emotionally dependent upon him. The woman is basically just this useless, needy tool that follows the man around and takes orders like a dumb, dependable puppy. From my perspective, it's two low self esteem individuals that don't what to take risks with losing their partner. For the male, it sounds exhausting to constantly make an effort to …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 04:30 PM
2

I find the variety of opinions to be more interesting than the echo chambers.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 04:06 PM
1

I have self respect, but I actually value the promises I make. In the event of an issue in my relationship I immediately think to resolve those conflicts through compromise and discourse--I don't jump to thinking of divorce. It is childish and the sign of immaturity. Do marriage vows mean nothing to you people?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 02:14 PM
2

Yes, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 01:31 AM
6

Don't you think that's just being a little dramatic?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 01:22 AM
3

That's a bit prudish don't you think? Divorce, just for that? RED FLAG.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 01:05 AM
7

It sounds so boringgggg though. "I had sex with a pretty girl" sums that up. Why do women want men to talk about them like they were a gazelle out of a herd instead of a lioness?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 12:53 AM
10

Husband: "So yeah. I don't know what else you want me to say." Male friend: "Well, what she look like? I mean what's sex like between you two?" Husband: "Well normally, we just do it after we watch an episode of Game of Thrones. It's kind of like a Wednesday thing." Male friend: "A Wednesday...thing?" Husband: "I mean I work late on Mondays and she works late on Thursdays--" Male friend: "Focus dude, you're in the bed and--?" Husband: "Well usually she wants me to wait until she takes her contac…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 12:28 AM
9

Male friend: "So my wife and I tried this new thing right, and she was just fuckin' wild man. She was so damn vocal and I got to pound into her all damn night. What about you man? How's your wife and you?" Husband: "Me?" Male friend: "Yeah, you! How's it goin' with your hot miss?" Husband: "Well I guess it's alright. Had dinner about 5 the night before and we decided to have sex." Male friend: "And...?" Husband: "And we had sex. I don't know, I mean, it was great or whatever." Male friend: "...o…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 12:17 AM
5

You're going to think it's dehumanizing until your husband talks about sex with you like he just read the Sunday newspaper.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 12:08 AM
1

I had that when I was younger, found I was a lot happier giving it up. Being among people was a hell of a lot lonelier and stressful than just learning to appreciate my own company (and video games).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/17 12:03 AM
19

Women are the judges. The guys go out there, on the ice, and put on a performance hoping the woman enjoys it. Of course, when he gets off the ice and thinks he put on a good performance and the judges seem to like it he's going to pump his fists in the air and celebrate it (probably rub it in his competitions' faces), meanwhile the woman (judge) is just going to comment to the one next her, "Ah, yes, brilliant performance, his style was details here". They are completely different experiences.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 11:59 PM
1

Exactly. I find it easier that way too. Saves me time if I can find out when people aren't fond of me within the first few minutes rather than a few months. The whole social frolicking thing people do still evades me.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 11:55 PM
1

Yeah it does, so long as you're doin' that there's only so much one can do, just whatever opportunity comes your way at that point. I'm a little visibly autistic with the screeching and whatnot, hehe. It's not that I have good social skills, not by a long run, I'm just really good at being really bad at it. Lmao, and that's what I sell.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 11:35 PM
1

Well that's where a lot of smiling and laughing comes in handy--people see it as a lot more nonthreatening, or just less weird in the bad way. I play myself off as quite harmless and I think that's one of the better ways to manage it at least. It takes a lot of acceptance and willingness to be seen that way though, since you have to be confident enough to make jokes of yourself. Kind of like Deadpool 4th wall breaking: "Hey, I'm an autistic, motherfuckin' loser--pleased to make your acquaintance…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 11:15 PM
1

Eh, I think being seen as a creep, freak, or weirdo is kind of inherent to having autism. I just kind of accept it and make jokes about it. Nothing I can do about it aside from own it. I guess it's up to you on what you prefer. Not like anything makes you pursue romantic relations, can just let happen in strange occasions. Like banning someone off a chatroom in my case--good times, good times.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 11:00 PM
2

I'm on the spectrum myself but I found my relationship on an anime flash game forum--romantic I know. Don't have any friends, but I can play off my anxiety as eccentric confidence quite well in any blue moon social outtings.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 10:58 PM
1

Do you have ASD too? No offense, just out of curiosity.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 10:41 PM
2

It's all non serious and I tend to make sure there's enough humor in it that someone can noncommittally make it obvious they're uncomfortable with it--just a simple 'alright, no touchy got it salute '. Not that I don't get bad reactions time to time--one can't avoid those. I'm usually seen as a bit of a weirdo, but I don't mind. Maybe the majority ain't into it, but my kind of people are--small as they may be.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 10:27 PM
1

I usually flirt by being rather...in front and obvious. I comment on their tits, I make moaning noises when they make a good gameplay, I might drop my voice low and say something dirty, and I might grope them or make comments about doing so. I'm a freak though.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 08:10 PM
5

I don't think men or women would find that sexy. No body hair is nice, but the tube sock underwear on the other hand....it ruins everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 07:18 PM
2

When I look at attractive men or women, I sometimes think about how I'd love to bend that sexy ass over. I don't think you want more freaks like me around though. You might start wearing a protective plate to cover your asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 05:28 PM
2

This. The intros and foreplay can take way too long.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 04:53 PM
10

I don't think I treat women differently, but I can say there is a desensitizing effect based on how far my porn has spiraled further into degeneracy. While an image of woman's breast wouldn't get me to blink, being able to touch them would still have that original excitement and exhilaration. I think the desensitizing effect is limited to certain aspects of sexual experience. Virgins watching a bunch of porn are still undoubtedly virgin for that reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 04:46 PM
5

Define "adequate male".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/17 01:31 AM
3

Robert Sapolsky, that guy herald as a genius and the leading figure in the neuoroendocrinologist/primatologist domain--the professor of numerous domains at Stanford University...versus internet chick that only knows how to discredit work she hasn't read and lectures she hasn't heard. Alpha males in other species exercise power beyond what can be found in humans. In wolves, for example, everyone has a place within the hierarchy. Number one, may be the alpha, but he's consistently challenged by th…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 11:40 PM
1

I positively melt around small furry things The hard question now...which small furry animal is your favorite?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 10:21 PM
3

I think I'll side on the leading primatologist on the matter, Robert Sapolsky, when he said this about humans: "In general, I think there's nothing resembling dominance hierarchies, let alone alpha males, for a number of reasons." To clarify, alpha males did indeed rule the common ape ancestor that humans shared with chimps--approximately 7 million years ago, but that has all but disappeared. Men and women are more monogamous and more alike.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 09:53 PM
1

Yeah I get that. Well, I wish ASD meant responsible children--but unfortunately it comes bundled with a shitlist of problems. I wouldn't wish it on anyone, especially my kiddos. Still, liking the type of women you're into is probably gonna leave you with an empty wallet. I guess a good start is finding one that doesn't expect you to pay for shit, and then additionally doesn't blow money on a packet of gum.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 07:58 PM
1

Yeah, mine came in a binder of discs that came with our old windows 98. Better children? Likely not. Part of my reservation about havin' kiddos is that they will have a higher chance of having ASD themselves. Not to mention all my other crazy. Perverted incel ain't so bad though, means your humor is likely quite interesting given the experience. I'm still a degenerate. As long as your perversion comes in handy for the bedroom, ay?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 07:49 PM
1

Interesting type you're attracted to. Yeah, I still have my discs. Loved it when steam released it again because getting the discs to work on my Windows 7 machine at the time was a pain in the ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 07:04 PM
1

No kiddin'. It's not exactly attractive to be an autistic female lookin' to peg a dude. I'd be one hell of a shitty advertisement. I'm lucky my SO wants to stick his dick in crazy. Flamboyant, huh? Usually just means you're fun to be around and it's often attractive to females when displaying confidence in that manner. It can be masculine if perceived that way.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 06:51 PM
1

Could you point me to one?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 04:03 PM
3

I don't refute that. I should probably clarify my previous statement with, "more than females do".
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 03:26 AM
1

Lmao, good one!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 03:18 AM
2

Self-fulfilling prophecy? No, not really. When people have a preconceived view of the world it tints their vision. I'm guilty of having my own negative viewpoint, so it's not incomprehensible to me. Expecting the worst makes it easier to avoid the pain that comes when falling from bliss.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 01:22 AM
1

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 12:25 AM
1

"Cunt say what?"
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/17 12:20 AM
1

I think you missed the point of this topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 11:45 PM
1

I have a huge thing for effeminate males as well--especially a young, pretty face. I don't think mine goes quite as far as yours in terms of nail polish, but that's pretty cool. Rugby, damn gurl.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 08:06 PM
1

the diversity of male DNA available for mating would go down You're not making much sense to me, however. Are you claiming there's a large diversity of male DNA compared to females or less? Random genetic drift is heightened in smaller populations, because there is a reduction in diversity. Mitochondrial genome are recombining, hitchhiking is strong--so when hooked onto a favorable allele it will become fixation within a population. How old is your source on this, I'd be interested in reading wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 07:42 PM
2

Hopefully that stereotype dies out relatively soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 06:47 PM
1

I don't think I did. All DNA demonstrates is that there have been more mothers than fathers. Some of that is likely due to infidelity, I'm sure, but there are other factors to consider. The distribution of females to males (espicially where male populations were smaller [war, fighting]), the biological pressure for males to seek out a variety + young females (perhaps before betrothal), migration in female populations, lower survival rates of lower social caste males, etc. I'm not saying women do…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 06:23 PM
2

Dick deflator?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:59 PM
2

I'm also diagnosed autistic, go us.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:23 PM
2

Online shopping++
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:22 PM
1

Maybe you're a dragon and not a werewolf.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 05:02 PM
4

I think you underestimate the leisure of technology, it was around 40 hours a week in housework back in the 1950's-60's. Now? Not even half that. Stay-at-home today is basically watching Netflix all day (unless, of course, they got 3+ young children or something).
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 04:59 PM
1

I don't disagree, I think there are other factors that play into it. There's violence and other aspects that makes it a bit less simplified.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 04:34 PM
3

The insight is appreciated, sounds ideal to me. The less hassle the better in my book.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 04:29 PM
2

Males typically prefer works of nonfiction and historical writing, females tend to towards romance and fiction. It's one of the complaints regarding education--that they usually focus on literature females take more interest in and lose male interest in reading. Why that difference in trends exists is more nuanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 04:27 PM
1

I'd say same on the jewelry, but truth is that I'm a nerd that wears the Ring of Lucii around my neck.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 04:15 PM
2

Courthouse wedding, not a bad idea. Congrats btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 04:09 PM
6

I am great with kids. This is one of those things that I wish wasn't considered to be outside of the stereotype. It's great that you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 04:09 PM
2

I can relate on the wedding thing, although for me it's more like I don't get the point and all the trouble seems like overkill. Kind of tempted to just go to Vegas so it's over and done with--of course permitting my SO feels similar by that time. However, then I consider the nagging my Mother would offer....I have to really consider which would be more effort in the long run.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 04:05 PM
2

It's no problem, just a misunderstanding.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 03:08 PM
3

When that trying to 'look attractive' relies on causing the emotional distress of cheating on your married partner and then lying about it when caught? The 'I want him/her to know they're worthless and I'm the best and/or only option they have' manipulation? Sounds like textbook villain to me with clear negative intent upon the other person + lack of transparency for self gain (attractiveness). I have no idea what you're speaking of, and I think you lost the context of this conversation. Edited …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 02:19 PM
2

I didn't say manipulation isn't common, humans--the social creatures they are--often benefit from deception. Manipulation being with or without malicious intent is perceptual based and largely is determined to whom it benefits. When that 'looking attractive' relies on the harm of another person and intended lack of transparency--yes, I think it's bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 02:08 PM
1

Similar to the cheetah, humans passed through a similar genetic bottleneck (although for the cheetah it was more extreme). Various human populations were reduced to very small numbers--many going extinct at this time--but some managed to pull through. This is why there is so much genetic uniformity today, and this explanation doesn't come from some layman youtube 'guru'--but Richard Dawkins himself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 01:00 PM
5

Manipulation differs from persuasion based on factors of transparency, the intent, and the impact upon the other person. It has a more negative connotation compared to persuasion due to the perceptional weight of those factors. It is why people say one person is persuading someone to leave the house and hang out that day versus manipulating someone into giving their money based on a dishonest narrative. Manipulation is the proper word to use when denoting a person's lack of transparency, negativ…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/17 12:37 PM
9

I don't know which is more stupid--the guy that wrote that or the woman that managed to pick that diamond. That's all kinds of crazy and manipulative.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 07:53 PM
4

A psychology study without the full article is pretty worthless. I sure won't be paying for it though. I'd really like to see more of the methodology.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 07:44 PM
1

If this is the case, I'm in the negatives. Good thing my SO is decent at this stuff. I just know how to nuke things.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 07:31 PM
22

People don't understand shit about biology, but they like to pretend they've picked up a single book on it. Ultimate biological explanations are the reason proximate mechanisms exist, they are not the motivation behind individual decision making as these people like to scandalize science into being. Evolutionary science isn't a 'horoscope' for people's choices--like it's commonly and crudely masqueraded as in order for people to validate themselves and their perceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 06:47 PM
1

Primarily, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 05:58 PM
1

I don't disagree, but outside of those niche communities, most males tend to find it emasculating to get pegged.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 05:54 PM
1

I think it brings up far more ethical issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 05:50 PM
1

Couldn't help myself, but sentient sexbots would be another matter entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 05:34 PM
4

Human history is littered with many instances where females were only rewarded to males of higher social standing. Males typically did not have access to females above their social standing, but often females did for males. Additionally, children from those of lower social standing would much less often survive the harsh environment. Twisting science into a narrative with buzzwords like 'cheating' and 'rape' serves no justice and remains without evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 05:32 PM
4

Yes and no. Women wear makeup for social impression--just like you don't go to the store in your pajamas, typically. She wants to be well received by others. Her walking out into the public without makeup can feel like yourself doing so while in need of a shower. Women typically like how they feel, in public, among the eyes of others when wearing makeup. Of course some care more for appearances and impressions than others. Might be similar to men walking out into the public face unshaven, hair a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 05:09 PM
1

I think I have more game than quite a few of these dudes. Some have more game though, it's about the same off PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 04:55 PM
3

Upvote. There's definitely a good use and reliance upon other social skills when one is not inherently the epitome of female fantasy in the physical department.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 04:51 PM
1

Oh, I see the issue. You think it's wrong they claim their love is the same. Well, in degree it's impossible to say and is based on the individual, but as for the type they probably feel that way, so I wouldn't say it is dishonest. Besides, I doubt many women pick up books on human behavior, biology, genetics, evolutionary explanation, etc. to know much better. Reminds me of a question my therapist once asked me, it was: "Do you feel pain more or less than others?" I had paused. I always assumed…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 04:16 PM
1

Again, it is subjective to state which is more 'strong', they're different in such a manner it is apples to oranges comparison. Despite this difference, a male and female's differing forms of love have been pressured to meld together--to focus on aspects of the relationship the counterpart is less suited for.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 04:00 PM
1

It does not entail a woman's love is fake, but rather women are more susceptible to stress and strains within their relationships. Studies demonstrate that women are more neurotic than their male counterparts. Females worrying about the finances, relationships, and health of their families is not just a stereotype. A male's love is more enduring because he is less susceptible to worry about the issues plaguing his relationships, and indeed, his ability to find another suitable mate is less than …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 03:41 PM
3

I've had plenty of shitty female experiences--but that anecdotal evidence is not evidence enough to warrant a broad claim for most women. I agree, however, that the women you speak of sound deplorable and that women can be ferocious to indirectly sever a tie they no longer care for. Humans, you'll find, do plenty to retain their social 'goodness'.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 03:24 PM
1

I disagree with that statement. Really depends on the person. Sating the sex drive is one thing--sating the need for physical intimacy with another human being is another. I have much of the former and very little of the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 03:20 PM
3

In terms of reproduction they still carry the burden, but like you and I both said, birth control changes the cost of sexual activity. Again, similar to approach being more rare, females are more selective. They will be more likely to find mates less suitable. The rest gets a bit emotional, humans tend to form a temporary monogamous pair bonds. This topic alone claims that men desire a variety of females for sexual gratification. I will agree, however, that females tend to avoid confrontation an…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 03:15 PM
1

What makes you equate DNA to 'cheating' versus a subset of men having access to a larger pool of females?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 03:06 PM
2

Some people don't recognize that option.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 01:53 PM
2

It's very rare for females to make the approach because of 'female choice' that composes the human mating strategy. Females have been pressured to be selective about their sexual partners because they carry the most cost in the reproductive game. Of course birth control changes the game, and we may start seeing more of a shift that entices a more androgynous degree on initiating romantic/sexual interest. Such shifts take time, though. Until then, the pressure is on men to present themselves and …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 01:50 PM
1

Do you mean in the bedroom? It's so hard to find men willing to allow a woman control--so protective of their rosebuds, it's a darn shame.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 01:40 PM
1

I think it's a little too nuanced on the psychological and physiological state of an individual for these evolutionary explanations to be deemed suitable. There are many factors, mental or physical, that can tank a sex drive. Additionally, many studies this particular individual utilizes are survey based, which leaves it open to not only those factors--but additionally cultural ones. I think it's likely that male and sex drives differ, but also likely in more acute manners than these broad strok…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 01:33 PM
1

Girls are watching porn and masturbating too. Like... A LOT. More and and more. I can attest that I masturbate and watch porn on the daily.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 01:20 PM
1

war against women. The low self esteem of these women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 12:48 PM
2

Unfortunately.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 12:39 PM
2

I think they're attractive. My SO has a low sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 12:30 PM
2

Wank away~let freedom reign.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 12:22 PM
1

I will mourn all the poor AI killed by my hands while playin' video games.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 12:21 PM
1

Eh, I have a card to give officers so they don't think I'm some crazy slurrin' drunk. Who said romance wasn't extremely difficult for myself? Of course it's hard--my life is on hard mode, but that doesn't entail it isn't doable. I met my SO on a silly flash game: a NEET that lives in poverty--victim of poor circumstance. Regardless, I found his intelligence charming. We play video games together while escaping our lives and the effort didn't stop at getting him. I continuously work hard to make …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 12:06 PM
2

Ehhh--not exactly to that degree. You're kind of askin' for validation in it being impossible, though. Nothing ever really is. If I subscribed to that attitude I'd be in a lot different of a scenario right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 11:13 AM
1

The people I work with, which are all quirky engineers, would attest to otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 11:05 AM
2

In my language, that's a mating call. Swiggity swooty, I’m coming for that booty~
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 11:03 AM
1

You're over exaggerating, just a little bit. Tone and confidence factor in a lot into how people receive things.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 10:59 AM
3

I can already tell you, the confidence needs a lot of work--and yes, confidence is a huge thing. Intelligence and/or humor. You have flaws to make a joke out of. I have chronic verbal tics that make me randomly screech--yes, autistic screeching, literally. I make the biggest joke out of it. I own it, and people find it funny but in a charming way. You are offering these women nothing because you feel and make nothing out of yourself. Perhaps this was harsh, but I ain't known for bein' anything b…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 02:36 AM
6

You have to put something on the table. What are you offering these women? If not appearance, your charm? Your wit?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 12:23 AM
2

I disagree with that sentiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 12:16 AM
2

You'd be surprised.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 12:15 AM
3

A guy that can't get a girl?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 12:14 AM
1

Now I'm unequivocally confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 12:13 AM
1

Young and crazy? Welp, you're out of luck then. You have to put something on the table.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 12:09 AM
1

It depends.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 12:05 AM
3

Not kidding. Intelligence is one of those indicators of potential resource return, similar to how tits are for fertility. There's a reason it's high on surveys for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/17 12:02 AM
10

Intelligence is a highly sought after trait, perhaps more than wealth and appearance. Therefore, the worst thing you can do as someone with low stats in the physical appearance department is be stupid on top of it. What are our options in life? Work hard and he happy with what little we got while they get stuff just because they exist?? You know, I actually have diagnosed autism. I have a hard time just leaving my routines to go to a gas station, can't figure out a drive thru and routinely jump …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 11:53 PM
6

Are you suggesting that men are incapable of making any rational decisions when around women? That they're stripped of any agency as soon as they set sights upon a chick with a nice rack? I like to give men a little more credit in their ability to make decisions without a significant dose of mind altering substance. I tend to hold people accountable for their own bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 10:14 PM
2

I know, I was playing along with it, lol. I don't think they're clinically psychotic either--just stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 10:09 PM
7

I don't see how someone's decision to stick around and drool would be the woman's fault. If someone (woman or man) dumps people easily that's a red flag like any other for a committed relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 09:07 PM
8

Beta orbiters they withhold sex from? Are you saying a promiscuous man is the equivalent of a female with male friends? Sounds like apples to oranges.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 08:16 PM
1

Females more than males do tend to have more collectivist attitudes...that's actually an interesting perspective. Thanks for sharing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 07:25 PM
1

Women are better parents. Hahaha. I can't breathe.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 06:54 PM
2

As long they're upfront from the start and determined to demonstrate their change in tune, then I'd have little qualms about it. There is, however, more to doubt and therefore more to prove. Actions are louder than words. It's a sign to be wary--old habits die hard. Chances are still low, however, that he'd be the type I'd be searching for. People with a high N-count are generally expecting a speed for physical intimacy I wouldn't be able to give. Naturally, I'd be upfront on my end of things as…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 06:08 PM
1

Yeah, just wanted to clarify at least that it isn't just males. That and it doesn't actually entail someone sees women in some monstrous manner.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 05:09 PM
1

25/F/No Pill. I'm not big on the idea of kids but my SO wants them without debate, so inevitably I will have kids at some point. Personally, I'm not hyped because there's a chance they might get my autism. That, and who wants to be that 'mentally ill' parent? Kids are a joy, but a lot of work. I don't think kids are 'owned' or 'in debt' to their parents--I'd say they do carry our person on in a way.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 05:05 PM
2

Do you think it makes them less of a person to choose to make buck off their body? Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that her choice?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 04:57 PM
1

I choked.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 04:53 PM
1

It is only proper of the natural order.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 04:51 PM
2

Wait, but I'm autistic. Maybe instead they're psychotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 04:49 PM
2

You're welcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 04:46 PM
2

You provide evidence like a woman. whistles
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 04:39 PM
2

I watch a lot of porn. A lot. Of porn. You realize that it isn't just males that get off on porn, right? I like men being objectified in my porn too, it's sexy. Having control in the bedroom is a kink for me, and some (especially women) may have an interest in the opposite. I mean, what's the harm in enjoying that during sex? Some men and women enjoy that non-vanilla treatment in the bedroom. It's just consensual sex, what's the harm in it?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 04:09 PM
1

I say let them have it. Sexbots sound fun.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 03:56 PM
2

Who needs strats when I got hacks? Nah, but really, saves a ton of time. I don't get how slowly putting things on the table makes it better--just takes longer to find out it's not gonna work.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 03:50 PM
1

Then they struggled to desire them, as I had mentioned. Same answer. If it was a matter of casual sex only while searching for a partner it would be less evidence of being able to commit, but it would demonstrate a need for physical intimacy (and speed of it) I couldn't satisfy, personally. It would still be undesirable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 03:44 PM
1

What's wrong with AI sexbots?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 03:39 PM
4

I just put everything on the table. Don't want it, don't buy it, and sure as hell don't waste my time. I don't comprehend this social frolicking about each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 03:34 PM
2

They are two different things, but you were trying to paint it as though the past shouldn't matter, and the point is--well--it does. What people say can vary strongly to what they do.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 02:43 PM
1

One's past makes the person we are today for the better or worse. Actions speak louder. If a chick says she won't cheat but her past reeks of it, do you willy nilly trust her?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 02:40 PM
8

Nope. There's little to be said about promiscuity aside from casting doubt upon one's ability to commit to a relationship. Nothing morally wrong about it, just choices that don't match what I'm looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 02:31 PM
1

They ain't any better--inevitably questions about previous relationships come up.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 02:30 PM
1

Lmao, that's relatively interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 02:20 PM
2

Right, and I think that's the case for many people. We end up with people more similar. I rented an expensive hotel room for my boyfriend and I and that night we... Played Pokemon Stadium, cards and drank whiskey. That's a damn good time to us, but someone looking for more physical intimacy would probably be quite disappointed if not think it bizarre.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 01:31 PM
1

I'll concede my point on it being some single indicator about someone's ability to be in a committed relationship and state that there are other factors involved--but a higher N count does increase doubt--desirably or not. It means you have more prove, not that it isn't unattainable.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 01:26 PM
1

"Gross" is a bit far, it's understandably unattractive in a partner due to individual preferences, but sex itself isn't some malicious act. Standards are quite subjective and having sex with women says little about having the ability to love women--they aren't mutually exclusive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 01:21 PM
6

Lying is a great way to waste your time with someone that wouldn't accept you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 12:48 PM
2

It's relative, if they were sexually active in their 20's and are in their 40's--no longer being promiscuous--that's clearly a different scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 12:44 PM
2

Meh, you'd be surprised. I haven't had friends in over decade and I do quite well sticking to my routines and staying in my house--voluntarily. Solitary is historically something I'm quite good at. If it's really a matter of bad luck for you, then perhaps you'll win the lotto one day soon.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 12:41 PM
1

You claim to want and be low N-count. if guys dump you, your N-count will go up no matter if you want it or not. This has nothing to do with your desire of LTR. That's where you're wrong--it's why people like myself and yourself wouldn't belong together anyhow. We're two very different animals. I've been in a relationship for 6+ years, haven't had sex, and we're moving in together next year. If it doesn't work out, for some magical reason, I don't plan to have another relationship and will lead …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 12:28 PM
3

Naturally it's relative.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 12:14 PM
3

When someone has a high N count it means--for one reason or another--they struggled to either maintain or desire a long-term relationship. When looking for a commitment based relationship, one typically skips over them. The record you have is against your word. That doesn't entail you can't find an LTR, but the pool you will have to search through will likely be women just as experienced as you are (which makes it more difficult to decipher on your end as well).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 12:10 PM
3

Actions speak louder than words.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 11:58 AM
19

High N-count is completely unattractive when it comes to looking for a commitment based relationship. I'm sure they'll be able to fetch women that have a hard time being committed similar--yah know, in it for the buck or bang.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 10:41 AM
1

In the case of visual discriminators, it is unlike many species to have such prominently noticeable features despite such irregular genetic uniformity (evidence eludes to a bottleneck similar to the cheetahs). Humans are often able to define the "race" of an individual by visual indicators, but why is that despite geneticists having such difficulty sorting humans by those same defined 'lines'? The answer is theorized, certainly environmental pressures are factor, but also sexual mating strategie…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 02:18 AM
1

I'm a computer engineer--my job title is a junior project engineer and I primarily work in a small office that develops software for intricate test based systems. I think with how competitive the field is, employers are more willing to make likeable environments to entice retention. It's why I prefer the small company I work at.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 02:01 AM
4

It could even be outright banned, though I think that it is too accepted at this point to be a feasible approach. Just because it is a moderately accepted practice doesn't make it unfeasible to ban. Societal views do not remain stagnate to new information and comprehension--one need not look further than female circumcision bans or even the increasing rights of homosexuals. Accepting the status quo because it is the current status quo is to reject the very idea of progression. In the case of mal…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 01:24 AM
1

Humans have evolved to be wary of other humans based on visual discriminators as well, "The Ancestor's Tale" by Richard Dawkins. There are evolutionary influences at play for many things, but while explainable and comprehensible as to why those things are it does not make them necessarily good--hence the naturalistic fallacy. I understand that females are more wary of males just as people are more wary of foreigners or humans that appear different to them in complexion--doesn't entail, however, …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/17 12:44 AM
2

I wouldn't say it's pointless. I've received good insight into other perceptions on the matter. Including yours. It was basically what I was looking for.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 11:28 PM
1

Pentakill Janna, let's go!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 07:30 PM
1

It has its disadvantages, but really in light of everyone's own individuals struggles--it's just an addition to one's individual portfolio. Everyone has their folder of struggles and that's important to recognize. I think people are more tolerable these days of others and if not we have more freedom today to walk away and choose not to be apart of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 07:13 PM
1

Proximate mechanisms are not not equivalent to ultimate biological explanations, you can reference Tinbergen's Four Questions, for details. Females typically seek out qualities in a potential mate that promote stability and resources for her offspring, where a male typically focuses more on signs demonstrating fertility. These reasons are why the proximate mechanisms exist--not that that they are the motivations of individual actions. TRP commonly make the mistake of painting proximate mechanism…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 06:58 PM
1

I think being rude sticks out anywhere, but yes, typically more in workplace settings.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 06:35 PM
2

Didn't say it was appropriate, but it happens off-record--like all gossip and ranting.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 06:31 PM
1

That's what her first statement implied. I wanted to know if she hid her feminine qualities more in a desire to be taken more seriously by male coworkers. I wondered if she felt the need to downplay her femininity so she stood out less as the female of the office over a being coworker. It was simple curiosity. If not, okay. It wasn't clear to me. I think you've had your fill crucifying me for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 06:07 PM
1

I have and no, I wasn't. I was legitimately curious if an environment with more males made her uncomfortable with displaying feminine attributes. Sue me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 05:59 PM
1

I wasn't attempting to lead her into anything. She expressed being uncomfortable among men because as a female she stands out. ...where there's mostly only guys then the things that make you a girl really stand out. I was attempting to understand that statement, and if you wish to demonize me for that effort, so be it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 05:49 PM
2

I'm not trying to put words in her mouth. I was legitimately curious and confused by what she was attempting to express. I felt like I was being misunderstood, so I kept trying to reword my question. Edit: Oh that flair.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 05:43 PM
1

Yeah, I consider myself fortunate in that respect. It's a good career to be in.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 05:33 PM
1

I'm alright with being open. I have a balance ball chair at work since I primarily work in my office as an engineer. It is my most helpful item. I usually keep sensory balls on my desk, carpet samples, headphones, etc. I have a fidget cube I keep attached to my wallet everywhere I go and I usually have a marble fidget toy somewhere on me. I have chronic vocal tics as well, but my workplace is pretty understanding about my random noise-making (I take 'autistic screeching' to the literal level). I…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 05:27 PM
1

Yeah, makes sense that the gravity of that would differ. It can definitely be a brutal blow to the self esteem.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 05:08 PM
1

Everyone has their problems. Thankfully I have a good therapist and accommodations for my continuous sensory needs. I appreciate the sentiment.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 05:03 PM
3

Mah, don't be, I found someone that fits well.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 05:01 PM
3

Nah, I'm still a virgin. He just came on too fast for me (I take slow to the next level) and I was an anxious little shit. I wanted to have a friend first before I went in that department. So that's what happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 04:56 PM
2

He's not ready yet because our lives are a bit complicated right now. We're focusing on getting our lives together before we worry about all the other nonsense. Neither of us are ready for physical intimacy for different reasons, so it works out. His is more to do with poverty and health and mine to do with my sensory processing difficulties. Waiting isn't a big deal to either of us. We're a bit of an outlier given our...complex backgrounds.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 04:50 PM
2

I do have ASD, so weird is just a daily part of my life. I masturbate plenty though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 04:45 PM
2

Neither of us are big on sex and we have other priorities. I'm trying to gather up enough money to get a nice condo and have him move in with me next year. We've been together for about 6 years now. We're just more interested in playing video games together. I'm sure moving in together may change some dynamics--eh, a bit of an odd pair though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 04:43 PM
3

I friendzoned my SO. Now he's my SO. Was it really a friendzone then?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 04:27 PM
3

F/no pill/25 Nowhere. I frankly don't require sex, orgasms are fun but not everything. I haven't had sex and frankly care little about it beyond my own self indulgences (which is often). My SO getting a pentakill is all the 'sex' I need. Sure I want to have sex one day, but it's quite low on my list of priorities. Although, I concede my autism probably makes it less appetizing. I just want a comfortable lifestyle where I can do the same thing everyday and leave my house once every blue moon.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 04:23 PM
4

https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/98955/1/dp8184.pdf Here is a very comprehensive review of a multitude of studies. It finds that women and men differ little in the HL task compared to the IG and EG tasks. The HL task differs in that it measures risk loving on top of risk aversion. That is: females are more risk averse but are less differing in risk loving. The study you linked does encroach on a genetic known, that nurture and nature are inherently inseparable (Matt Ridley's The Agile Gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 03:36 PM
2

I wouldn't doubt it did in acute manners, other hormones likely do as well, but the nuance of it is not something I claim to hold knowledge of presently. If any of my claims are emboldened or contested enough to warrant that I provide a study, I shall or either concede my point/leave my point in open doubt.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 03:12 PM
3

No, it doesn't suggest that. That study is based on female rats and simply concludes that there is still much to be investigated on the effects of particular and differing stress responses and hormones in play. There's more than one type of stress, and that study is about a very acute transmission that I'm going to assume neither I or you completely understand the nuance of. I wouldn't suggest popping things into google you simply want to validate without being ready to weigh it against all othe…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 03:06 PM
4

There are still more studies currently that attest to otherwise, but I will change my position if the science community changes its opinion based on new evidence. Even in economics, it remains evidenced enough to lead with it as assumption. The problem with that particular study, I find, is the low quantity of subjects and the lack of risk involved in the gambling methodology. It is not exactly the best test of risk aversion if the stakes are too low.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 02:59 PM
5

I'm honestly amused the things you accuse women of you choose to instead actively demonstrate. Rigor, methodology, and rational approach is for scrubs, is it? Does the 'matriarchy' oppose your ability to evidence your truths? You can sit here and kick your feet about it, but your assertions will need to stand up to scrutiny. A woman raped does not get to claim all men are rapists due to her experiences alone, similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 02:48 PM
1

If the odds are against, the typical human response is often pleasant sincere shock of rarity and expectation for the common result. A lottery is a good example of this. I wouldn't paint expectation of the common scenario to necessarily always be condescending, so some tolerance of this must be offered. It is only those that react negatively to the unexpected that need to reevaluate. I don't think women experience this more, as it is more of a human quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 02:41 PM
5

Anecdotal evidence is something, but not something to be heavily relied upon for various and large encompassing claims. Assertions like that ought to be heavily self scrutinized and questioned. I have anecdotal evidence of my own that would not speak well of females and their behavior, but it is my responsibility to take those opinions of mine and continuously test them against newly acquired knowledge. I did not stop at my subjective interpretations and perception, but instead took to books and…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 02:31 PM
6

You talk about "feels", but all your evidence provided is based on your own perception--and I must say, personally, seems quite emotionally compromised. Your lack of evidence does not discredit your claims, but it doesn't support them either. There's likely a inkling of truth subscribed in your opinion, but it is hidden in the massive amount of non-evidenced assertions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 02:23 PM
2

Do you think that differences between male and female dominated environments cannot be breached due to innate differences? That is--that males will typically feel isolated in a female dominated environment as females feel isolated in a male dominated environment? Should there be an effort to make all environments more equitably sex distributed to avoid this sense of isolation and intimidation despite other factors that may interfere (ex. lack of interest)?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 02:14 PM
8

Why are women, more than men, driven to quit due to workplace pressures and stress? Do you not think that perhaps some (not all) of the difference seen in these fields is perhaps due to women placing more precedence on their physical and mental well being? There are also various psychological studies that demonstrate that women, more than men, report physical and emotional symptoms of stress. Female coping mechanisms to stress do differ from men on a hormonal level. That particular study mention…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 02:07 PM
1

Why do state women prefer other women in their environments for validation? For protection? Validation for? protection from? What evidence do you base your assertion of incompetency on?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 01:51 PM
1

I'm open to being corrected. As it stands in the present time, female interests on the matter dominate the political atmosphere due to feminist groups and leadership (more emphasized and vocal). Females are making more strides than men on the matter. Perhaps that is why I hear more of it spoken freely from females regarding male dominated environments. If you want to disagree with that observation, you are not unable to do so. I've never made it my intention to appear unquestionable.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 01:47 PM
2

I'm not sure what this is eluding to, are you saying that females are disinterested in being in leadership positions? I am sure there is credible amount of evidence to otherwise. If not, it could use some clarification.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 01:39 PM
2

Well neither is men feeling shame for appearing effeminate entirely irrational, there is much evolutionary and biological reasoning for men to not display an image that may be perceived as feminine. While females feeling intimidated is similarly valid, I wonder if it too should be similarly discouraged by that same stroke of logic. People always have to be on guard, as people do pose a threat to them, but enforcing that fear can sometimes be perceived a detriment despite it's validation (i.e. im…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 01:34 PM
1

I never claimed such. I never said it was just women, only that female complaints on the matter appear to be more emphasized and vocal.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 01:26 PM
1

While those feelings, I can understand, are valid--do you think they should be discredited? As in, do you think it should be stressed that females should not feel intimidated among males similar to how it is emphasized that men ought not to shame or be shamed of typically perceived feminine traits and behaviors?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 01:25 PM
3

I think similar, which is why the emphasis seems mystifying to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 01:19 PM
2

I mean perceived as a 'female' more than another 'coworker'. Like you're trying to fit in and assimilate to your male dominated environment by shifting focus away from what makes you stand out (i.e. being female).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 01:16 PM
2

Hmm, I suppose it's that motivation females have to interfere with an environment to make it more female habitable that perhaps underlies the distinction I witness.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 01:13 PM
3

I think even females heavily complain about other women being on their menstrual cycles in the workplace since it's not exactly professional to behave in such a manner.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 01:10 PM
3

Why is it intimidating?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 01:06 PM
1

Eh, not what I'm particularly trying to get at. I'm not saying you would try to pass yourself off as male or even particularly masculine. Rather are you more self aware and anxious of your feminine qualities in an effort to not be treated or perceived as a female (since that treatment or perception would make you stand out)?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 01:05 PM
1

Do you think, with a platform and social acceptability, males would find environments with a relatively lower amount of males to be a problem needing interference similar?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 12:59 PM
2

Well, if you're trying to fit in, there would definitely be an amount of embarrassment if you feel like you're displaying traits or qualities that stand out, no? I mean, in a case among men, feminine behaviors or attention would stand out.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 12:57 PM
-1

Do you think that male environments make females more anxious and self aware of their feminine qualities? Do you think there is a sense of shame in displaying feminine traits when among males?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 12:48 PM
8

Color me ignorant, but I could use a clarification of the obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 12:46 PM
2

Well, I can certainly agree to that, but feminism is largely a vocalization of female concerns and interests. Why are female interests, on this subject, more prominent and vocal than males? Why is there a significant amount of women that will emphasize the need, not desire, for more female environments? There is skeptically more stress for female exclusive groups and activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 12:45 PM
1

Wouldn't you say that men are typically discouraged by a female dominated environment due to the stigma of appearing feminine though? I don't think the source of demotivation is equivalent because females being more masculine has much less of a stigma.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 12:33 PM
3

Do you think it is the same though? Whether it be nursing, teaching, or social services--males do not typically seem to complain about there being a lack of males, but rather avoid the profession, community, and/or interest out of shame of appearing feminine. I find this to be a different reaction to a substantial gender difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 12:28 PM
3

Hmm, well, that's somewhat contentious. If a man does not value himself but values another--how are you able to ascertain that he values a woman less than a man that also values himself? How are you able to give measure to that? For example, say a man does not value his life, but he values his craft. Despite this, he values a woman more than that craft. Another man values himself, his life, but values his woman more. How can are you able to say the the latter man values his woman more?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 03:10 AM
2

Your post is a little difficult to follow, I admit.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 02:41 AM
3

i dont understand this whole idea of betas 'valuing women too much and putting them on the pedastal'. I was explaining what you did not understand. Putting women on a pedestal entails selling oneself short.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 02:39 AM
3

Not all confident men are assholes. The criticism is that there are men who forfeit their own happiness, their own confidence, and their own dreams all in hopes of satisfying a woman who sees no further than her own desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 02:29 AM
5

A good person is just a matter of perception, but there exist societal norms as to what typically defines 'good' and 'bad' actions. The culmination of one's actions is how people will judge the weight of your character.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/17 12:01 AM
1

I think it has a lot less with being told what one can and cannot do, and more about recognizing one's own potential remaining untested.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/17 05:44 PM
2

That list of traits was difficult to reconcile when my major attributes for my partner were not listed. Routine-oriented, homebody, and shared interests (gaming).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/17 02:19 PM
2

Humans judge others on many metrics. Fairness isn't particularly part of that equation. Also, having a healthy body weight has nothing to do with starving oneself.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/17 04:52 AM
1

Indirect? Vagueness and indirectness are something women often employ so that they are able to avoid full commitment to their decisions. It's a means of manipulating social scenarios to one's benefit while decreasing risk to oneself. Emotional manipulation is also suggested in your post. Men should diminish the significance a woman gives to her own emotions by retaining stance--rather than jump into her fray. Being direct and to the point is not playing on a woman's terms and relinquishes their …
/r/TheRedPill19/10/16 12:49 PM
6

I disagree. Self respect should not be reliant on the approval of women. A woman's gaze should neither be given the power to determine the weight of a man's worth nor given the ability to dictate the direction of his contentment--that is for him to do alone.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/16 03:37 PM
1

Most women are naturally submissive, especially the more socially dominant types. Women prefer men make the decisions for them and their compliance often follows a short, tepid verbal resistance.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/16 12:42 AM
2

That's not a bad thing. There's such a thing as sharing the ideas of the red pill without having to rely on convenient diction. If anything, one can take it as a challenge--to see if they've absorbed the knowledge.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/16 12:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter