TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Samantha_Cruz Archive

View 10 posts and 863 comments by Samantha_Cruz on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
33

wouldn't that same logic require that all babies be aborted since they "touch" the mother's body before the delivery?
/r/MensRights16/08/20 11:58 AM
2

maybe I'm insane but I think Corporal Punishment is a much better option than Prison for relatively minor crimes, Applying it ONLY to boys is certainly a concern but I really don't get the opposition to CP in general... a week in Jail is a whole lot more destructive to a persons life than a caning. I don't think it's a good option for schools at all but I think it should be a viable judicial option as an alternative to prison. This sort of punishment should require a trial with legal protections…
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:15 PM
2

it was a poll by "Friends of Journalism" - were you actually expecting a Journalist to be unbiased? The beatings will continue until morale improves!!!
/r/MensRights25/05/20 12:36 PM
3

Just saying that you should provide that context in your post. without it the post will end up being posted/reported as 'proof' of those 'toxic misogynists' that are calling for the death of women...
/r/MensRights25/05/20 11:40 AM
2

what is the context for this post? - is this related to someone specifically calling for the killing of men faster? - without providing that context this looks pretty vulgar.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 11:25 AM
4

you aren't in the r/mgtow2 forum; this is /r/mensrights
/r/MensRights21/05/20 09:50 PM
3

maybe that's because we don't like hate groups that advocate against gender equality.
/r/MensRights21/05/20 09:42 PM
0

there is an entire /r/askfeminst subreddit - so what is it that you think makes you a person that should host an AMA? - are you on the "feminism" steering committee? a world renowned leader in the feminist movement... or just some random person on reddit that thinks they are 'special' enough to merit an AMA?
/r/MensRights21/05/20 09:26 PM
8

generally with an AMA you have to actually have something interesting for us to ask about.
/r/MensRights21/05/20 08:58 PM
20

the virus specifically rides on ACE2 enzymes which men have more of in their blood. That isn't because "men are weaker" - it's just that men have more of this enzyme in their system which the virus is able to exploit. Women are more prone to Osteoarthritis, Lupus and Multiple Sclerosis but none of that means that "women are weaker"... this clickbait headline is retarded nonsense. a higher rate of risk for one particular disease "proves" nothing other than a higher risk for that specific disease.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 02:50 PM
2

English translation (via google translate)
/r/MensRights15/05/20 02:40 PM
13

wait; I thought gender was a social construct? so wouldn't that mean that mother's day is also father's day?
/r/MensRights10/05/20 06:09 PM
1

audacity even... Not sure what your concern is with this; I totally approve. Religion has been oppressing women for millennia and that shit needs to stop. Supporting mens right does not require the subjugation of women or denying that there are issues harming women. Many churches to this day still do not allow women to take leadership positions; That bronze age nonsense needs to die.
/r/MensRights10/05/20 01:31 PM
13

MRI's have been done on babies before and after a circumcision and show clear evidence of trauma - https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201501/circumcision-s-psychological-damage
/r/MensRights09/05/20 05:41 PM
2

as I said. I am only providing the entire statement. personally I think you can read it a couple of different ways; If you are looking for a reason to be offended you can interpret it one way; if you are looking for a reason to rationalize what she said then you can interpret it differently. given the first part about not wanting to work in a set with "just white people" seems to be more about preferring a diverse cast; the phrasing of her second statement about men seems to imply not wanting me…
/r/MensRights30/04/20 07:44 PM
5

I am only citing the exact quote she made since many of the memes and videos about that statement seem to cherry pick a small part of that statement.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 07:35 PM
10

what she actually said was "and it's also really exciting not just what we put on screen, but also to work inside of productions that are inclusive. Like I don't want to show up on set and just see a bunch of white people, no offense. and I don't want to work in the company of a bunch of men, No offense. you know i want so show up on a set and have it look like the world that I walk around in every day."
/r/MensRights30/04/20 06:01 PM
5

for reporters covering sporting events. not for adult teachers leering at underage students. and really the solution to that SHOULD have been NO REPORTERS in the locker room... Let them have some fricken privacy.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 02:03 PM
2

and the fact that the principal told them to do it could be grounds to push for a conspiracy charge under rico. It shouldn't come to that but they need to get slapped hard with a reality stick and stop doing this nonsense.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 12:37 PM
3

it also sends the message that it would be ok as long as the woman was attractive.
/r/MensRights29/04/20 12:35 PM
41

that's why you make it a formal police complaint. there is no reason why a female teacher should be in the male bathrooms. the principal won't do anything to stop it unless their neck is on the line... let them explain to the police, and then the courts how exactly this is acceptable behavior.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:27 PM
56

file a police report about a peeping tom in the bathrooms with the local police; make sure to give a good description of the teacher. she has no business in the male bathroom at all. bring criminal charges if they do not stop her illegal behavior.
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:15 PM
35

if they are on break why is it a problem that they might be on the phone?
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:12 PM
3

stats are based on the NISVS which is entirely based on telephone surveys across the US. This sampling method entirely excludes all prison inmates since they don't have phones.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 06:16 PM
20

"hardcore feminist" and "women shouldn't be able to have an abortion" usually don't go together...
/r/MensRights25/04/20 03:30 PM
2

what are you suggesting they do here? kill women to even things out? i don't think the virus cares about gender issues. it isn't making a political statement. it isn't part of an evil feminist conspiracy to kill men. it's a virus. men are more susceptible, sucks but it isn't about your rights.
/r/MensRights24/04/20 12:18 AM
4

Li Shang was never part of the Mulan Legends that predated the Disney movie by centuries. Neither was the talking lizard dragon. In the legends Mulan entered the military as an already skilled fighter; not a nincompoop. I loved the disney movie but it was absolutely not faithful to the original legends. Regardless of their reasons for replacing the Li Shang character - he never should have been there in the first place. That was Disney trying to force a romantic fantasy into the Mulan legacy tha…
/r/MensRights22/04/20 09:51 AM
6

I never suggested that it was... I was only citing the rule that subreddit has for top level posts. - I don't agree with their definitions at all. if Feminism was truly a movement for "equality" then I'd be one but they lost any credibility for that claim decades ago.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 08:15 PM
0

You would have to ask them that question; The rule however is spelled out on the right side of their main page for everyone to read.
/r/MensRights16/04/20 03:57 PM
24

their rule is that only feminists can make "top level" comments - the point of that subreddit is to "ask feminists" - so if you aren't a feminist you aren't being asked; so they consider it inappropriate for anyone else to make a 'top level comment' to a post. it is basically the same as many other "ask" subreddits. - i.e. "askscience" requires that top level posts be scientifically informed answers; non scientific answers are not allowed at the top level. You can ask followup questions or comme…
/r/MensRights16/04/20 03:29 PM
2

a "Virgin" is a person that has not yet had sex. (male or female) an "intact hymen" is not the same thing as there are a number of ways the Hymen can be broken that do not involve sex (i.e gymnastics...) and it is also possible to have sex without breaking the hymen. A person that has had "anal sex" is not a virgin even if they still have an intact hymen. They might claim to be but they would be lying when they said that.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 10:43 PM
4

pretty sure a lot of black men would disagree with that argument as well.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 04:29 PM
7

I doubt there would be any reason why Viagara would only help males with Covid-19 - Viagara wasn't even created as a drug for erection issues - that was an unexpected (and very popular) side effect - it was mainly created to help with heart conditions (mostly high blood pressure) and is just as effective in that role regardless of the gender of the patient. Viagra was created based on some discoveries about the effectiveness of Nitric Oxide and oxygen levels in the blood and that isn't affected …
/r/MensRights09/04/20 03:02 PM
1

when we had sex education the boys were in a totally different classroom
/r/MensRights09/04/20 12:30 PM
6

They try to include all crimes that fit the FBI definition but it's not always clear in the state records so there are obvious gaps. I don't know why some people can't recognize that men get raped and it's just as traumatic as a female getting raped... - men can't get pregnant but every other aspect of it can be just as traumatizing and for the most part men have no resources to go to when they are victimized.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 07:34 PM
6

it will be a long battle; some states still to this day only recognize females as victims of "rape" under their laws regardless of the circumstances. i.e. Georgia OCGA 16-6-1 (a) A person commits the offense of rape when he has carnal knowledge of: (1) A female forcibly and against her will; or (2) A female who is less than ten years of age. Carnal knowledge in rape occurs when there is any penetration of the female sex organ by the male sex organ. The fact that the person allegedly raped is the…
/r/MensRights03/04/20 07:23 PM
1

it seems you are having difficulty reading. perhaps you should increase the font size on your computer.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 07:18 PM
8

the FBI definition change back in 2012 expanded the scope over the old definition which was more gender specific - The new definition is “The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” that definition is not adequate but it is better than the old one; and it isn't the basis for most state laws. very few people are prosecuted under the "FBI Definition" of rape; the…
/r/MensRights03/04/20 07:12 PM
1

i did not say anything about beating anyone.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 06:47 PM
11

circumcision should be banned immediately until after this crisis passes because it is an unnecessary surgical procedure. - just like other non essential medical procedures are on hold.
/r/MensRights02/04/20 11:31 PM
0

this says she's already gone - https://www.koimoi.com/hollywood-2/amber-heard-out-of-jason-momoa-aquaman-2-post-johnny-depp-controversy/
/r/MensRights31/03/20 08:13 PM
2

I am not a big fan of calling this "mens rights" at all for the very same reason that I don't like the idea of "feminism" at all.. both are by definition a gendered focus group advocating for the interests of a specific gender; both are going to tend to see the world through that lens and doing this is not a path for 'equality'. It tends to cement us into an 'us' against 'them' mentality that leads people to think that any gain for the 'other side' is a 'loss' for them... 40 years ago the struct…
/r/MensRights29/03/20 07:46 PM
1

I have no idea about that.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 09:51 PM
1

My comment is not at all about whether men have a good reason to smoke or not. - it is entirely about the clearly observed fact that smoking leads to a higher risk with this particular disease. "why" someone chooses to smoke makes no difference in how that smoking affects them and whether it leads to a higher rate of risk for respiratory diseases. the fact is that men do smoke at a higher rate than women; that fact alone means men are at a higher risk because of that choice. The morality of it i…
/r/MensRights26/03/20 09:30 PM
2

not sure where you came up with those numbers, the current US population is ~331 Million; the "adult" (over 18) population is ~209 Million; of that ~100.9 Million are male and ~108 million are female. 13.6% of females is 14.7 Million 16.7% of males is 16.9 Million Smoking certainly increases your risk factor but they aren't all expected to die; my comment was that the gap between the rate of smokers (male vs females) was only 3% in the US but it is considerably higher in other parts of the world…
/r/MensRights26/03/20 09:21 PM
5

the article i linked states: Women are far more susceptible to autoimmune diseases, like rheumatoid arthritis and lupus, in which the immune system shifts into overdrive and attacks the body’s own organs and tissues. Nearly 80 percent of those with autoimmune diseases are women, Dr. Clayton noted.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 05:54 PM
13

one major contributing factor is that men do smoke at a higher rate than women (in the us this is only about a 3% difference with 13.6% of adult females smoking vs. 16.7% of adult males but worldwide nearly 40% of men smoke vs. only 9% of women. however there are differences in the immune system that may be factors - not necessarily that the male immune system is weaker but it acts in different ways; with some diseases men are better adapted to resist those but in this one females seem to have a…
/r/MensRights26/03/20 03:38 PM
4

China is pretty bad for anyone that believes in freedom, they are locking up muslims in internment camps, The tibetans, and anyone that's part of Falun Gong or a 'not approved' christian group would probably disagree about your statement that "China is not so bad"... Ask Hong Kong how much better off they are under Chinese control than they were under British Control. and you asked which country was worse for men... not which countries give the most preferential treatment to females over men... …
/r/MensRights24/03/20 02:28 PM
2

both claim to be a movement for "equality" and both fall short of that goal by the fact that they are established in a way that creates a gendered focus view on their goals. - Feminism (IMO) has fallen further off the target but both have to varying degrees. a movement that was truly for equality would not be pitting one gender against the other. - it would not be exclusively focused on advancing a single groups interests while marginalizing/trodding on the interests of the other.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 02:14 PM
5

These are the worst countries for anyone to live in regardless of gender and they are all basket cases for human rights. I would think that most men (as well as most women) would be far better off in India than any of the countries on my list.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 01:58 PM
2

North Korea Somalia Sudan Venezuela Yemen Syria Saudi Arabia China Myanmar Nigeria
/r/MensRights24/03/20 01:56 PM
2

I have no clue how many "feminists" or even "females" are involved in the response; OP's question is specifically about the ones "shown in the media" - the heads of various task forces that are basically the spokespersons for the effort; that kinda ignores what is actually happening in the field and in the labs etc. - It may be predominantly male but I haven't seen anything to indicate that. What I do see however is that Dr. Brix is the main technical lead and seems to be the most competent of t…
/r/MensRights18/03/20 01:11 PM
19

Dr. Deborah Birx is the coronavirus response coordinator in the US Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove is a Technical Lead for the WHO emergency response team Both of them have been pretty frequently included in media coverage;
/r/MensRights18/03/20 11:59 AM
4

I have been supportive of mensrights for a while; I recognize that men have issues of inequality and have issues that need attention. It really annoys me how feminists react to any attempt to discuss issues affecting men; it's disgusting... I see that occasionally here as well but in general it doesn't appear to get a lot of traction when people are blatantly anti-female. - It happens but it's rare (and at least some of it appears to be attempts by trolls to make us look bad). There are some gro…
/r/MensRights17/03/20 08:07 PM
10

no; we need equality. human rights apply to everyone regardless of gender. the biggest problem with "Feminism" is that it leads people into an "us" against "them" mindset where we focus only on the needs of one group and see anything the "other group" wants as if it's "evil opposition" - That same mindset is ALSO a problem with the concept of "Mens Rights". - we ALL have issues and we will never get there while we keep pitting one group against the other. everyone has problems and concerns and t…
/r/MensRights17/03/20 06:35 PM
10

given that I support equality I don't see any reason to keep that secret. equality doesn't need to focus on one gender only and we will never get there until we stop trying to make this an "us" against them" struggle. we all have issues/needs and areas where we could do a better job of treating people fairly.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 10:15 PM
1

you seem to be unable or unwilling to actually state a specific point that you disagree with so I'll assume you are just a lazy troll.
/r/MensRights15/03/20 12:47 PM
6

did anyone notice the fatal flaw in emergency services when all pharmaceuticals, surgical masks, etc. were 'outsourced' to the cheapest manufacturing facilities in China?
/r/MensRights13/03/20 12:22 PM
1

once again I'll refer to a medical source - I'm not a doctor so perhaps I'm using an incorrect terminology but the article here clearly does show that there are some (very rare) instances where phimosis (and paraphimosis) can lead to medical emergencies in children.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 09:10 PM
1

note that the comment you are replying to specifies "Severe phimosis" and isn't talking about general phimosis that is normal; most instances of Phimosis clear up on their own by adolescence however if it is 'severe' it can possibly lead to a medical emergency; That is a very rare situation and certainly not one that justifies the widespread practice of circumcision seen in some countries. - I agree that Phimosis itself is 'normal' in children; but "severe phimosis" that causes pain does sometim…
/r/MensRights11/03/20 08:48 PM
6

Pretty sure the typical recovery time for an adult after circumcision is ~2 weeks and you probably only need to skip work for 1 week. You should not be obligated to explain the reason for a medical absence; they MIGHT require a note from the doctor but that should not have any details about the specific reason.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 08:43 PM
2

just a couple of days ago I was talking to some people and a very similar subject came up about grown men 'hanging out' in the boys locker room at the YMCA; taking showers and walking around naked. adult males were not supposed to be in that locker room at all; there was a separate locker room for adults and the guys talking about them said they always felt like those guys were intentionally trying to expose themself and 'hang around' where they could see the younger boys naked. - I don't have a…
/r/MensRights11/03/20 08:22 PM
3

what is your link supposed to show? If your point is to show the discussions "here" in this subreddit a better search query would be "harvey weinstein trial site:reddit.com/r/mensrights"
/r/MensRights11/03/20 07:50 PM
9

Neurologists have taken MRI's of toddlers before and after a circumcision and demonstrated that the exact same parts of the brain impacted by trauma show very clear signs of permanent changes consistent with trauma. Whether it is more or less traumatic however does not justify it. It is wrong for exactly the same reason female genital mutilation is wrong. There is no medical justification for performing this procedure on a child aside from (very rare) instances of severe phimosis (which I alread…
/r/MensRights11/03/20 07:31 PM
10

sorry to hear that; truly. I would get that second opinion first but if it's severe enough that it causes pain I suspect you'll be better off having it done.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 06:48 PM
14

are we only allowed to care about an issue if it's "The worst possible thing in the world?" should we stop caring about parents selling off their daughters to a man 4 times their age simply because some other children get blown up by landmines? This isn't a competition for who has it worse. It's about bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 06:42 PM
34

severe phimosis is about the only truly legitimate reason for circumcision of a child as it can pose an actual medical emergency. If you have 'severe phimosis' you may want to reconsider going through the procedure if it's causing you pain. Not all cases of phimosis however would be considered 'severe' but I'd at least get a second opinion from a urologist. https://www.phimostretch.com/blogs/news/phimosis-stages
/r/MensRights11/03/20 06:38 PM
1

I would love to agree with that however in the wake of decisions such as this where the supreme court essentially says due process doesn't apply because the 'trial' was against the money instead of the person the money was being stolen from... I agree that an argument can be made but the courts haven't supported those arguments on public schools holding these administrative hearings despite public schools being 'state actors'; the claim that a private school is a 'state actor' is even less compe…
/r/MensRights11/03/20 01:33 PM
4

the due process clause of the constitution relates to criminal trials and does not apply to civil trials or administrative actions by schools. I am not arguing against using due process standards in these cases but trying to argue that the constitution applies to those cases is not going to be a winning strategy. (5th Amendment) No person shall ... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law (14th amendment) nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or pr…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:10 PM
1

the article I found didn't break it down at all; It just mentioned the overall percentage of female vs. male staff in those fields across the UK. - I didn't find any similar statistics for the US or Mexico. I would be surprised if they are significantly different.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 09:19 PM
1

there are genetic markers but the differences in the genes are not that much; it's like saying that people with green eyes are genetically different from people with blue eyes... - that doesn't make it a 'different race'. Sorry to burst your delusion - you aren't part of a superior race; we're all the same.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 07:27 PM
2

"The entire world disagrees with you." except for most genetic scientists and plenty of other people that recognize that "race" is a meaningless construct used to divide people. "Race" has no biological basis There is no notable genetic difference between 'the races' - we're all the same other than some very minor differences due to the environment - that is all. "Race" is a social construct - with no genetic validity
/r/MensRights10/03/20 06:39 PM
1

that's a very vague question; I am entirely in favor of equal rights for everyone without regards to the amount of pigment in their skin. we're all humans and this concept of "race" doesn't make any rational sense. skin pigmentation tells me absolutely nothing about a person other than how much direct sun exposure their ancestors got over many centuries of evolution. It's a meaningless reason to divide people over what should be a non-issue.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 05:48 PM
1

bodily autonomy - Female Genital Mutilation is illegal in most countries even where Circumcision of males is not. and there is a concept of a "Financial abortion" which should be an option for males however it is not currently an option in many places. - Where exactly is the "False Equivalence" - if a woman gets pregnant (except in cases of actual forcible rape) both parties engaged in the behavior that led to the pregnancy but only one of them has the option to wash their hands of the responsib…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 05:47 PM
4

The felony is the reason men get denied the 'right to vote'.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 05:42 PM
3

equal treatment under the law and equal opportunity for any job; this does NOT mean that racial quota's or affirmative action programs are justified - those both create their own form of inequality.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 04:00 PM
10

it means equality is for everyone.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 03:29 AM
19

I support equality for everyone regardless of gender. the statement regarding "the original idea of feminism" is too vague to comment on. - I support equality. I support women having the right to vote but I think they should have the same obligations as men when it comes to the draft. - Men do not have the right to vote or get public aid for college unless they register with the secret service and (if called) serve in the military. If they refuse to register they are denied both; Why should fema…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 01:03 AM
1

I didn't see your reply before I added an edit to the prior comment - but I think it might be trying to guess based on cookies - the 5 autosubscribed defaults I ended up with don't really make much sense however I do frequently browse /r/all/new and comment on various topics and I suspect at least 2 of the defaults it gave me resulted from something I commented on in /r/airforce just a few days ago.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 08:07 PM
3

I just created a test account and there were only 5 subreddits added; that wasn't one of them... "gifs" and for some reason "Navy" and a few others that made no sense but 2xchromosomes was not on the list at all... I got an initial page with what looked like an attempt to give me a list of suggestions to join but I cancelled out of that without choosing any. edit: I THINK it is trying to guess what I am interested in perhaps from previous subreddits visited(?) - I am not certain what exactly the…
/r/MensRights09/03/20 07:43 PM
7

you don't. default subreddits no longer exist - you get directed to /r/popular which adds links based on popularity
/r/MensRights09/03/20 07:37 PM
12

it might be illegal but in the hypothetical situation where no men were working at all it seems highly unlikely that there would be any functional police agency or military that could enforce those laws. the power/water/fuel/natural gas grids would all be offline almost immediately; telecommunication would be down fairly quickly and even if the most senior female (now the acting president) tried to give orders - they have no effective means of getting the message out and nearly no functional enf…
/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:28 PM
6

not sure about Mexico but in the UK ~10% of employees in Electrical Powerplants, Water Treatment/Wastewater Management, Natural Gas Infrastructure, Electrical Grid Infrastructure are female. (The article doesn't give any granularity about what their actual roles are within those organizations but clearly they are a small percentage of the overall staffing for critical infrastructure organizations). - If women walked out it seems highly likely that the powergrid and water supply would remain in o…
/r/MensRights09/03/20 04:14 PM
6

I am Princess Angelina Contessa Louisa Francesca Banana Fanna Bo Besca the Third. (dot warner from animaniacs)
/r/MensRights07/03/20 01:59 PM
18

I wasn't even married; my father was a Colonel but it was weird because almost every time I'd meet another female on base they seemed to assume I was married and wanted to know where I sat on the pecking order... I'm just buying groceries.. I don't need the drama... ((ha, i just did it... I'm one of THEM!!!!! nooooooo!!!!!))
/r/MensRights07/03/20 01:54 PM
60

no clue if anyone is daft enough to have a bumper sticker like that but i've lived on a military base and there are absolutely women like that. they almost always ask your husbands rank before any other question. it's really creepy. 'their most important consideration' is knowing the rank and they measure themself based on their own spouses rank. - "I'm better than you because my husband is a blah blah blah..." If you have no accomplishments of your own that is probably the best they can do.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 01:40 PM
10

bodily autonomy - Female Genital Mutilation is illegal in most countries even where Circumcision of males is not. another would be the option to 'opt out' of being financially responsible for a child conceived when you don't want it... - females (in many countries) can get an abortion simply because they don't want to be responsible for a kid for 18 years; men do not have that option.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 06:07 PM
0

Donald Trump could be the first transgendered president.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:28 PM
1

the Legend of Mulan was around a long time before the Disney movie and there was never a character named "Li Shang" until Disney invented him for their movie that was only loosely based on the Mulan Legend. There was no Mushu either and she served for 12 years before returning to her family. in the original legends she served for 10 years and rose to the rank of General before she revealed herself as a woman (she was not forcefully outed) and when she did she was respected for her bravery and se…
/r/MensRights05/03/20 07:48 PM
2

at least they had waffles!
/r/MensRights04/03/20 01:25 PM
2

It's been decades since I read the books but there was no mushu and no "li shang" from what I remember. There IS a "Li Shang" in Chinese history but I don't know of any connection between that historical character and the Mulan Legend. Perhaps the "Li Shang" character in the movie derived from "Luo Cheng" in that story. Also; Mulan didn't commit suicide in the original legend; that was only in the latter "Romance" legend. in the actual Chinese Legends Mulan was not an awkward naive girl with no …
/r/MensRights04/03/20 01:07 PM
3

Disney didn't create "Mulan" out of thin air; the Legend of Mulan is an old Chinese tale that was disneyfied and that telling of the story is hardly true to the original Chinese legend. I don't even remember "Li Shang" being part of it in any capacity and he certainly didn't become her boyfriend even if he was. - (I love the original Disney movie but Disney did not invent Mulan) I think (could be wrong) but I suspect the character "li shang" derived from a latter story (the Sui Tang Romance) - w…
/r/MensRights04/03/20 11:20 AM
1

I was thinking more along the line of nanite technology that burns the fat so there isn't any stretching to begin with...
/r/MensRights03/03/20 02:24 PM
1

I was hoping for more of an external incubator to avoid the scurge of stretch marks and other 'stretching' related carnage; although it probably would be nice to have an excuse to eat 16 slices of cake in one sitting...
/r/MensRights03/03/20 01:35 AM
4

I'd prefer to not have to be there either...
/r/MensRights03/03/20 01:16 AM
64

and they’d never complain about sex again. I think you are seriously underestimating our ability to find things to complain about...
/r/MensRights02/03/20 06:01 PM
10

I would include almost all of the 'liberal arts' degrees in there as well; particularly subjects such as gender studies, humanities, sociology etc. - Those degrees don't add anything to your set of job skills and you've basically wasted years of education and often gone into considerable debt for a degree that doesn't really lead to a job that earns any more than your basic high school diploma. I love art, drawing and music etc. but it doesn't translate into a well paying job for most people and…
/r/MensRights29/02/20 04:44 PM
5

if men can "rape women with their eyes" then being forced to penetrate is also "rape". crappy legal definitions do not change the fact that they have been victimized and failing to recognize them as actual victims and get them the help they need is exactly why this is an important issue for men's rights. You seem to have a misandrist view that seems to want to prevent men that have been victimized from even being recognized as victims because "some other demographic are being victimized too"... …
/r/MensRights29/02/20 03:03 PM
9

your countries weak and likely gendered legal definition of "rape" does not mean that there aren't males being raped; it only means that males have no legal recourse to claim it as rape when they have been victimized. aggravated sodomy or forced to penetrate or any other forced sexual contact almost certainly does happen in your country. you however are citing statistics for the US and those statistic show that men are raped regardless of how desperately you want to pretend otherwise. further: a…
/r/MensRights29/02/20 02:51 PM
5

even if women are more frequently raped - men are still raped. Men still need access to assistance programs for rape victims but these are very rare. Why are you unable to see this rather obvious fact. Recognizing that men are also victims of sexual violence does not take anything away from female victims.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 02:44 PM
8

again you are using statistics collected by telephone surveys which do not include prisoners which have a significant percentage of male victims of sexual violence. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey is a national random digit dial (RDD) telephone survey of the non-institutionalized English and/or Spanish-speaking U.S. population aged 18 or older. NISVS uses a dual-frame sampling strategy that includes both landline and cell phones. The survey was conducted in 50 states and…
/r/MensRights29/02/20 02:37 PM
11

Summary reports from the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey present data on the national prevalence of intimate partner violence (IPV), sexual violence (SV), and stalking among women and men in the United States. The ongoing NISVS survey provides data that will be used to track IPV, SV, and stalking trends over time. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) is an ongoing, nationally representative random-digit-dial (RDD) telephone survey of sexual violen…
/r/MensRights29/02/20 02:10 PM
5

in some places circumcision is done mostly for religious reasons - That's absolutely immoral but that is the primary 'reason' cited by the people doing it. - in the US it is not specifically religious but (really it is religious) a fear of "Masturbation insanity" that kickstarted a practice that hardly existed at all in the US prior to ~1890. John Harvey Kellogg was one of the most visible proponents of circumcision; he cited a seriously flawed medical study (involving exactly one patient) that …
/r/MensRights27/02/20 05:37 PM
11

"you're fine so it's no big deal".... How about basic bodily autonomy; why should someone else choose to have you mutilated without your informed consent? No-one should have that right without a legitimate medical emergency. Toddlers cannot provide informed consent and a parents preference or religion should not be acceptable reasons to mutilate a childs genitals.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 04:28 PM
17

these are the same people that call the police if a man shows up with a child at the playground without his wifes supervision.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 02:16 PM
1

it is an excuse but it is not a "Valid excuse" the government is absolutely wrong to permit either of these activities for any reason and religion is absolutely used to claim a justification for the 'oral suction' child molestation process. (the only legitimate exception for circumcision is in an actual medical emergency such as severe phimosis but nearly all of the other so called medical excuses made for the practice can easily wait until the subject is old enough to make an informed decision …
/r/MensRights27/02/20 11:42 AM
9

how is this not treated as sexual assault? Religion is not a valid excuse for mutilating genitals or sexually assaulting a child.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 12:19 AM
7

did she have you circumcised as a child? I'd hit her with that if she did.... genital mutilation of children should be a crime.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 11:39 PM
3

it's a struggle to see the world through other peoples eyes. many don't even try. It's one of the reasons I'd really like to see the entire concept of "feminism" end; and that's for the same reason I want the entire concept of "men's rights" to end - because both of these mindsets tend to lead us to think of the world as 'us against them'. they create camps that pit one group against the other; "Mens Rights" is ridiculed but it is a response to the negative impact from "feminism" that (at least …
/r/MensRights25/02/20 04:04 PM
3

I remember our (female) music teacher had a blue mustache; don't remember her name but we all remember that mustache.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 03:23 PM
5

i like them too; never actually read the book but I think it was meant as satire of the exact sort of comment OP is referring to above.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 02:17 PM
21

I recall when a book came out called "real men don't eat quiche" and my first thought was that "real men eat whatever the hell they want to eat".
/r/MensRights25/02/20 02:04 PM
42

Circumcision of a child should be illegal unless there is an immediate medical emergency. there should not be any religious exception at all. They can choose to do this when they are old enough to make an informed decision for themself.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 08:54 PM
4

there are always going to be fringe extremists in any group; I referred to the general "manosphere" because some of those elements are the same sorts of fringe extremists that make us all look bad; Generally this subreddit seems (to me) as if it's fairly balanced and supportive of equality; the more radical misogynistic fringe don't get a lot of traction here where in /r/feminsm the "lunatic fringe" seems to be the most vocal and widely supported group. I used to call myself a feminist because I…
/r/MensRights16/02/20 06:14 PM
12

I feel that ‘man-hating’ is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them. Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor The nuclear family must be destroyed… Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process. Linda Gordon I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig. Andrea Dworkin Since marriage constit…
/r/MensRights16/02/20 05:22 PM
5

dailymail and dailystar seem to have a new 'sex dolls are so realistic' "news article" about twice a week; I really think they are paid advertisements from realdolls since that company gets mentioned in almost every one of them.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 01:41 PM
11

I'm puzzled why every single article I ever see talking about these 'sex robots' claiming they are 'so realistic' and 'lifelike' are always coming from british 'newspapers'. This one is from the BBC but most are either from dailystar or dailymail. is there something weird happening in the UK where totally lifeless lumps of latex that don't move at all during sex can be so easily mistaken for actual human companions?
/r/MensRights15/02/20 01:07 PM
1

Riding in a separate train car is not the same thing as accusing all males of being sexual abusers. It is avoiding the few that are. I absolutely agree that there are some women that make the far more ridiculous claim that 'all men are...'; I have never said that and do not believe it to be the case. MOST people are decent. MOST females are not false rape accusers... I do not automatically believe every woman that makes these sorts of claims; nor do I automatically believe every claim to be fals…
/r/MensRights15/02/20 01:05 AM
3

and once again you didn't bother to read what I actually said... I did NOT demonize all men; I specifically pointed at the few bad apples that make this sort of thing necessary. I don't personally see a problem with offering the option. the sad reality is that there are bad apples in the gene pool that make this sort of thing necessary. There should be equal accomodations for males tho, so if you segregated 1 car ONLY for females you would need to also have a car that only males or you've just c…
/r/MensRights15/02/20 12:54 AM
2

did you even read my comment? I very specifically stated that they need to make comparable accommodations for males otherwise it's a new problem... I don't personally see a problem with offering the option. the sad reality is that there are bad apples in the gene pool that make this sort of thing necessary. There should be equal accomodations for males tho, so if you segregated 1 car ONLY for females you would need to also have a car that only males or you've just created a new problem. with tra…
/r/MensRights15/02/20 12:49 AM
0

exactly where did I say "fuck all men"... I merely pointed out that there IS an actual problem being addressed by these women only cars; I don't think the solution is to get rid of those options but to also make accommodations to equally benefit men. I don't see a big problem with strangers groping people here in Atlanta when I ride the local transit system but in some places it is a bigger problem; I mentioned Manila specifically because those trains along EDSA are always packed and it happens …
/r/MensRights15/02/20 12:43 AM
3

I very specifically did cite the problem that it isn't fair to not have comparable accomodations for males. I actually have that in there twice.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 12:40 AM
1

perhaps you are correct; I'll never understand how your solution of asking women to pay extra to ride in a train car where they won't be groped is a 'better solution'.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 12:29 AM
0

You pay taxes for lots of things you aren't allowed to use. My local University refuses to let me use their particle accelerator. My local police department won't let me use their gun range or drive their uber cool armored swat van to the grocery store, those mean people at NASA won't even let me take joy rides in the space shuttle. I addressed that second problem you mention twice in the comment you are replying to. our local system has a cell phone app that anyone can use to report harassment …
/r/MensRights15/02/20 12:13 AM
1

that also inconveniences all the trains behind them that now have to wait on the tracks to clear.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 10:43 PM
1

I agree and I added a similar thought to the post you are replying to before I saw this comment. -
/r/MensRights14/02/20 10:42 PM
0

I don't personally see a problem with offering the option. the sad reality is that there are bad apples in the gene pool that make this sort of thing necessary. There should be equal accomodations for males tho, so if you segregated 1 car ONLY for females you would need to also have a car that only males or you've just created a new problem. Segregation has a bad rep because it is largely associated with segregation due to a very bigoted and misguided policy but that doesn't mean it's always a b…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 10:32 PM
36

so the article mentions a subreddit called 'sluthate' which appears to be almost completly dead and has a whopping 16 total posts and only 72 followers... it says nothing about the methodology they used to analyze the posts and it's an article on dailymail.co.uk which appears to be a tabloid focused mostly on celebrity gossip and constantly running articles about these amazing totally realistic sex dolls that look to me as if they are paid advertisements for 'realdolls'. I might take the article…
/r/MensRights13/02/20 09:09 PM
6

why does mike wazowski have two eyes?
/r/MensRights11/02/20 10:41 PM
2

I'd bet that 95% of the time that those 5 boyfriends asked her where she wanted to eat they got no useful response... therefore he made the decision for her and saved her from certain starvation. they are so evil that way...
/r/MensRights10/02/20 07:14 PM
9

I think equality should apply to everyone. men have issues too and a lot of feminists dismiss male issues entirely as if even talking about them is an attack on women. I used to call myself a feminist until i started to recognize that there was real harm being done to male students in school as a result of the efforts to make schools "better for females". even trying to discuss this reality was met with outright hostility by feminists. I totally support everyone getting the best education possib…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 06:07 PM
14

it is being reported in a few different papers - This one has a bit more detail - https://www.outlookindia.com/newsscroll/up-jilted-lover-attacks-boy-for-refusing-advances/1728341 saw nearly identical articles on 7 different websites; they appear to all be less than 12 hours old and sourced from here - https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/india/india-girl-slashes-boys-face-for-refusing-advances-1.1581057113212
/r/MensRights07/02/20 11:41 AM
14

I think part of it is a mental defensive mechanism; they don't want to acknowledge that what they've done was immoral. - any excuse will do.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 12:40 AM
23

This practice should have been restricted a long time ago never existed at all. ftfy
/r/MensRights27/01/20 10:42 AM
2

that Judge is not with the Supreme Court; he's a judge out of Houston. There are higher courts that will certainly have to hear appeals. the article even mentions that the next court of appeals is the 5th Circuit Court in New Orleans. - If they agree and the government continues to appeal then it would be up to the Supreme Court to make a final decision on the constitutionality. Until then the Judges ruling has no impact anywhere outside of the jurisdiction of his court. It's unlikely that the g…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 12:03 AM
7

ok, so.. that is disputing OP's "friend" even more thoroughly... either way males are much more succesful when they try. that totally goes against the claim that it is due to males being 'weaker psychologically'
/r/MensRights25/01/20 09:19 PM
1

from your own comment... Suicide attempts are between two and four times more frequent among females.[9][10][11] Researchers have attributed the difference between attempted and completed suicides among the sexes to males using more lethal means to end their lives.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 09:15 PM
11

curiously males and females attempt suicide at roughly the same rate. males are just more successful. how does that fit with this persons claim?
/r/MensRights25/01/20 09:08 PM
25

any claim made without evidence can be rejected without evidence.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 01:06 AM
3

I haven't had a chance to do much digging here but the cursory glance I ran found a few stats such as this one from 2017 that shows that the percentage of men getting degrees has increased overall but females are increasing at a higher rate. (at least through 2015 statistics used in the article). what I really want to dig into when I get a chance is what the trends are across various different degree programs and how they compare. frankly there are quite a few 'college degrees' out there that ar…
/r/MensRights22/01/20 11:31 PM
20

a lot of it also had to do with protecting women from much more dangerous situations. specifically because of their increased 'reproductive' value; meanwhile men were largely considered disposable; if you lose 90% of the men from your city in battle you can fairly rapidly replace them but if you lose 90% of your women your city is unlikely to ever recover. This is why the so called "patriarchy" kept women closer to home rather than sending them out into combat or out hunting in the wilderness et…
/r/MensRights22/01/20 09:30 PM
5

kinda off topic but we often hear about the ever increasing disparity between female college graduates vs. male college graduates but are the number of male students actually decreasing or is it just a matter of a much larger number of females going to college now (vs. the past?)... (I haven't tried to look any of this up yet, the topic of "the future is female" just reminded me about the topic...) - I'm curious however if there really are fewer males going to college now than in the past or doe…
/r/MensRights22/01/20 05:08 PM
19

then sue them under Title 9.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 04:56 PM
1

and there is no evidence at all that indicates whether she has or has not taken any other action. this single screenshot is only a request for advice on insurance. nothing else. you are assuming the worst without evidence to support that assumption.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 01:52 AM
1

she doesn't control his actions. thinking that he might do something is hardly the same as causing it. also nothing in that post indicates whether or not she may have contacted anyone about his mental health. it is a seperate conversation. you want to assume the worst but there is no evidence here to support either assumption.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 01:31 AM
1

how would that be fraud if she is clearly stating that he is high risk for suicide from the very beginning of the conversation? she isn't forcing him to commit suicide, she is trying to protect herself in case he does.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 01:06 AM
2

this question doesn't require her to justify her actions. since i have no information about the reasons for the divorce or the situation I am not going to simply assume either way. I certainly do not expect her to stay with him simply because he threatens to kill himself; if anything she should report any threats or actions that suggest he might kill himself to mental health professionals; I certainly don't see any reason for her to report her feelings about it to insurance salesmen.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 11:01 PM
0

she is getting divorced, she might have good reasons, she might not. she might be a cold hearted bitch, she might not. her question is not a request for counseling or therapy or sympathy from anti-male feminists. it's a question that appears to be simply asking what the best option is for insurance based on the facts of her situation. Why do you think it's necessary to add the emotional aspects of her situation to the question when it has no relevance to determining the best insurance option for…
/r/MensRights21/01/20 10:35 PM
1

she is asking about her insurance options and explaining the situation... that's all.. I don't see why anyone would expect that she adds a ton of irrelevant detail to every question she asks. the possibility that he might commit suicide is relevant to the question about insurance; how she FEELS about that is not.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 10:28 PM
-4

It doesn't say what she requested. I have no basis to tell if what she requested is reasonable or not. (I already mentioned that in my original comment). It very well might be a case of divorce rape but this particular question she asked by itself doesn't give me any clues to support a belief either way. sometimes women getting divorced are vicious bitches; sometimes they are trying to act reasonable; I don't see sufficient evidence to tell based on this question. btw: if you watched "Marriage S…
/r/MensRights21/01/20 10:19 PM
-10

no, but why is that necessary in a post where she is asking about her insurance options? I care about your future; but I don't mention it in every post I make because it isn't pertinent to the discussion.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 09:56 PM
-18

I don't see where it says that she does or doesn't care about that. she appears to be asking about her insurance options so her opinion about his life choices isn't really relevant to her question and she doesn't say anything about that. - only acknowledging that he has a history of suicidal acts and this might trigger him to try again. - are you suggesting that she should not divorce him because he might commit suicide as a result? - I have known people that use threats like that as emotional b…
/r/MensRights21/01/20 09:49 PM
-28

what are you concerned about here? a woman that is getting divorced wants life insurance to provide for the two kids one of which has known disabilities that will likely require support throughout his entire life. looking for insurance options isn't taking anything from her ex husband. Really not sure what your concern is here. i get that the 'divorce rape' might be an issue but I don't see anything in there about what specifically she's asking for and whether it's reasonable or not.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 08:50 PM
16

a "female james bond" doesn't make any sense. a "female secret agent for MI6 in the 00 program" does make sense and could potentially be awesome IF they are doing this to tell a good story and not 'preach' a social justice empowerment narrative. - I don't go to movies or concerts to listen to a political speech. I go to be entertained. when the story takes a backseat to a politically driven agenda it usually ends up failing the 'entertainment' test. I don't care if I agree or not; I am not wasti…
/r/MensRights16/01/20 09:34 PM
28

I didn't see Charlies Angels because it looked stupid. I am planning to see "Birds of Prey" because it looks awesome. They both feature strong female lead action characters. CA was very much created with the goal of pushing a 'female empowerment' message but (from what I've seen) Birds of Prey looks more like it was created as a good story that has female leads. I don't go to movies to be preached at just like I don't go to concerts to listen to the performers rant about politics. I go to be ent…
/r/MensRights16/01/20 04:36 PM
14

(google translated) When it comes to divorces, some fight with all means - especially when it comes to future childcare. On the advice of his lawyer, a 42-year-old wanted to be particularly smart last year and kept making video recordings of his wife, who was still living in the same household, for evidence purposes. Especially when she went to the bathroom with the children for personal hygiene. In view of the impending divorce war over the children, the mother had in fact made unnatural commit…
/r/MensRights14/01/20 11:04 PM
7

if feminism truly was a movement for equality then i would be a feminist but that isn't the case. the current movement is very much a female supremacy movement and should be identified as a hate group.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 01:45 AM
2

not certain where this is but if they made this change due to a change in the law it makes sense as a transitional step this is probably the best they can do at the moment. - it's not ideal but the ideal alternative is to construct multiple unisex 'family bathrooms' that anyone can use regardless of their 'socially constructed' gender choices. - the restaurant has to comply with the laws and this is probably the least bad option immediately available to them until they can get a remodeling budge…
/r/MensRights10/01/20 11:55 PM
3

some places have them (especially newer construction) and it will most likely become more common in future construction (especially with the 'evolving views of which bathroom so and so is supposed to use)... - but I wouldn't expect older facilities to spend tons of money totally redesigning bathroom facilities/locker facilities etc. overnight... I'd raise the concern to the facility management; they may not have an immediate solution but if people make it clear that this is something they expect…
/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:38 PM
2

I suspect a lot of them are just writing their fantasy and not actually doing what they claim in reality; no way to tell. I certainly hope no-one is really taking those sorts of risks. part of the advantage of the 'rape roleplay' approach is that you can screen the players, have std checks, require condoms, safety nets and safe words and totally schedule your rape for the ideal time. and if it's roleplay only and consensual you don't have to worry nearly as much that your rapist isn't going to w…
/r/MensRights08/01/20 09:04 PM
3

there are some people that at least claim to 'want to actually be raped' - i don't understand that mindset but apparently they exist and (according to the claims they are making) they intentionally put themselves in risky situations 'hoping' to actually be raped (I'm not at all a fan of that idea - it's called 'rape-baiting and most of the time they are talking about 'acting drunk at a party' and pretending to pass out hoping 'someone takes advantage' but I've heard people claim to do much worse…
/r/MensRights08/01/20 08:34 PM
2

which army? lots of countries have them...
/r/MensRights08/01/20 04:55 PM
4

was the random stranger a man?
/r/MensRights08/01/20 04:07 PM
5

I've heard of people that claimed to be 'genetically superior' before... it didn't turn out well.
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:15 PM
3

I don't see a problem with people acting out fantasies of all sorts as long as they keep a grip on the difference between fantasy and reality. I personally am rather fond of rape roleplay and misogyny fetish themed play but that is 'roleplay' - it isn't something that translates to the rest of my reality and it certainly doesn't mean I actually want to be 'raped'. rape roleplay is very different from "rape" as it is consensual, negotiated in advance with limits defined and safe words etc. - it's…
/r/MensRights08/01/20 01:12 PM
4

bafta "best film" nominations “1917” “The Irishman” “Joker” “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” “Parasite” of their "Best Film" list - I've seen every one of those and 1917 is (IMO) best of that group, I'd argue that "Just Mercy" is better if it even qualifies, it was released in a few theaters before the end of the year but isn't released to most theaters until this coming weekend so maybe it didn't make the cutoff. It looks better than any of them but it's not listed for any category. Joker, Irish…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 06:59 PM
1

I saw both movies on the same night. Marriage Story was better. You can tell Scorsese that it's what real cinema looks like. personally I'm thinking 1917 or Just Mercy should win best picture. (IMO)
/r/MensRights07/01/20 06:29 PM
1

i suspect it would have to be a private pension plan of some sort, social security/medicare don't make any gender distinction on when you are eligible for those benefits; same with 401k and 504c plans. fwiw: the current arizona retirement pension for state employees also makes no gender distinction. it is possible to retire at 50 as long as you have at least 5 years of service but you get lower benefits than a full retirement. https://www.azasrs.gov/content/estimate-your-benefits
/r/MensRights05/01/20 07:00 PM
2

one thing I have seen happen; when a married couple is close to the same age and one has much higher earnings than the other; the one with the lower earnings sometimes opts to retire at 62 and begin claiming Social Security at that time (at the lower partial rate) and then when the higher earning spouse reaches 'full' retirement age that person retires and they get the full benefits for the higher earning spouse. technically anyone 'can' retire at 62 and claim the partial social security rate ho…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 06:50 PM
1

you can retire at any age you want. if you are referring to eligibility for/filing for social security benefits - that's a federal program that has a minimum age of 62 to get partial benefits up to 66 (currently) to get full benefits (for those born after 1960 it's at 67 years of age). if you are referring to pension plans - that depends entirely on the plan. you can (for instance) retire at 55 and begin withdrawing from your 401K plan without penalty - you must begin taking mandatory distributi…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 06:26 PM
12

but prohibition worked out so well during the drug war... /s
/r/MensRights04/01/20 05:10 PM
1

I have frequently anonymously paid for the meals for military members when I see them in restaurants. I hope I never buy that particular military spouse anything. I appreciate the military members for what they do but I don't appreciate entitled privileged babies that expect to get stuff for free and anyone that tips $0 is scum
/r/MensRights03/01/20 09:29 PM
16

If you define Feminism as a movement for equality then I am a feminist; but the feminist movement seems to have an awful lot of very vocal rabid misandrists as spokespersons and I refuse to call myself a feminist while those voices are not being shouted down by the rest of the movement. There are legitimate issues women face; I mentioned catcalling in the last post so I'll use that as an example because it is a real issue when men do that; it can certainly create an uncomfortable situation. the …
/r/MensRights31/12/19 06:45 PM
46

many feminists define "rape" using an incredibly wide definition when talking about female victims; i.e. "looking at them" is being "raped with their eyes"; catcalling is "verbal rape" and if the female changes her mind after having consented to intercourse (like, maybe a week later because he didn't return her phone call) it's still 'rape' because.. uhm... 'time travel'... however if the victim is 'male' they specifically limit it to old, outdated definitions that hardly anyone uses anymore tha…
/r/MensRights31/12/19 06:23 PM
8

any adult that chooses to have a circumcision should be free to make that decision but no one should ever force that on a child that does not have the ability to consent to this totally unnecessary procedure. it is almost never medically necessary and none of the so called benefits need to be done on an infant, they can wait until the subject is old enough to make an informed decision for themself. no religious "right" gives you the authority to force that on a child but as an adult you can feel…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 01:31 AM
2

and if you had allowed her to continue; by feminist definitions; you would be a rapist. the fact that she even tried to give you head is probably enough for some feminists to convict you of rape.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 01:22 AM
7

if you choose to drink or do drugs it is your choice and you are responsible for the things you do. it is "rape" if someone gives you a drug without your consent/knowledge or ignores you when you say no. i might consider it rape if a subject is obviously drunk beyond reason but when both parties are in that state which one raped which? best plan: don't get that drunk/high without a designated chaperone. this constant attempt to twist everything into "rape" cheapens the word. why should anyone ta…
/r/MensRights30/12/19 12:51 AM
4

I don't believe there is a "Patriarchy" - I believe that there are only a small group of people that have power in society and they oppress everyone. Some of those people are female; Some of them are male; some of them are white, some of them are black, some of them are asian, some of them are hispanic, some of them are christians, some of them are muslims: all of them are politicians that seek power above all else and none of them have your best interests at heart. being 'female' doesn't mean y…
/r/MensRights29/12/19 07:26 PM
4

I'd argue that the few individuals that held power in government oppressed everyone else; male and female alike but they also protected females a lot more frequently than they protected those males that didn't have political sway. men (outside of the narrow power elite of society) were entirely disposable; females at least had the 'value' of their reproductive capability. this concept of "patriarchy" really didn't greatly benefit the average male; it only benefited the small percentage that actu…
/r/MensRights29/12/19 06:04 PM
4

I don't know what you are trying to ask here. If you had asked me 20 years ago if I was a feminist I most certainly would have said "yes" because my understanding (at the time) was that feminism was a movement for equality. I suspect a significant percentage of people that call themselves "feminist" today are in the same boat; they actually see it as a good thing and I think there are legitimate issues that feminism raises. However the movement as a whole has a lot of vocal leaders that are clea…
/r/MensRights29/12/19 04:47 PM
4

I support equality for everyone. Feminism does address some legitimate issues of inequality however it also has a very vocal and active segment that is openly anti-male and the movement marginalizes the needs of men because it is entirely focused on expanding rights/privileges for females without regards to males at all. many within the movement see any effort at helping men as if it is an attack of females but curiously have tunnel vision and won't even consider the possibility that their effor…
/r/MensRights29/12/19 04:19 PM
1

it isn't about fame; it's about being taken on a level playing field with males doing the same or similar work. female scientists were not getting published in peer reviewed journals, some had to resort to using fake identities just to get their papers taken seriously by the scientific community. This is NOT as much of an issue today however it absolutely was an issue and there were quite a few female scientist doing serious research. I don't know what the topics are in the tour that this person…
/r/MensRights28/12/19 07:40 PM
2

female scientists often were marginalized in scientific papers and reporting; I don't really see a problem with highlighting the fact that many of the early researchers were female. It isn't as true today but there was certainly a time when the trade journals wouldn't even publish papers from female researchers and many scientific societies didn't admit female members. - one of the earliest paleontologists was Mary Anning who was a fossil hunter in the early 1800s and discovered Ichthyosaurs, Pl…
/r/MensRights28/12/19 01:16 PM
2

if you want women to send you nudes you should probably be grateful and not use them against her if things don't work out someday down the road; that's just part of being a decent human. if you've got intimate photos as part of an intimate relationship and choose to use them for revenge then you're the one that should be ashamed. This protects men from revenge porn too and pretty sure more women are willing to send nudes if they have reasonable confidence they aren't going to be sent out to the …
/r/MensRights26/12/19 05:11 PM
1

pretty sure they call it musturbation because we must do it; several times a day. in the shower, in the halls, in the laundry room, in the elevator and at least twice in the cafeteria.
/r/MensRights19/12/19 12:43 AM
1

this has been posted here at least 4 times in the past 6 hours already.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 11:24 PM
40

so..... why did he run against hillary?
/r/MensRights16/12/19 09:39 PM
8

according to webster's... "indisputably""not disputable : unquestionable" no-one anywhere disputes that statement? It cannot be questioned? Why did he run against Hillary when she was "indisputably better" than him as a world leader?
/r/MensRights16/12/19 09:37 PM
24

pretty sure that being listed on the SPLC list of hate groups only proves that you aren't willing to pay them bribes to avoid their extortion racket.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 10:34 PM
12

the headline seems to be saying that people that buy sex robots are using them.... isn't that kinda the point of buying them? news flash: the people that aren't buying sex robots aren't... film at eleven. and why is every single article ever published about sex dolls always from the dailystar... are they getting paid to promote these things? They seem to have another sensational click bait article about these "totally realistic" lifeless lumps of latex every day... is nothing else happening in e…
/r/MensRights10/12/19 11:35 PM
14

the article claims that "aggression" and "repression of emotions" are characteristic traits of "traditional masculinity" - I disagree with those being "characteristic" of masculinity"; "Aggression" has never been a core 'masculine' characteristic; assertiveness, stoicism, bravery are... Chivalry, honesty, integrity are all positive aspects that feminists tend to ignore. "Assertiveness" is not the same thing as "Aggressive" - Being "assertive" does not seem harmful at all but passive people often…
/r/MensRights10/12/19 01:16 PM
2

I agree but since these are totally different methods of counting Sweden ends up looking artificially higher than other countries. It is frequently cited as the 'rape capital of the world' which is clearly not the case; it is a statistical anomaly related almost entirely to the different standard of reporting those numbers. I like their standard better but it isn't followed by the rest of the world so it isn't valid to compare those numbers out of context.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 02:25 PM
11

I am seeing ~58% here and here. Where are you seeing 100%?
/r/MensRights02/12/19 05:25 PM
16

In Sweden around 58% of rape reports allege that the rapist was a person of foreign descent and 80% of all convicted "sex offenders" are immigrants.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 05:09 PM
8

Not sure about all of those countries but one major factor that makes Sweden appear to have a very high rate of rape is the method they use for counting rapes. for instance they count every individual instance of rape of the same victim by the same perpetrator in their national crime report where most countries group them together into a single report. So a victim that has been raped a dozen times by the same man would appear as 12 rapes in the national trends for Sweden but only one time in the…
/r/MensRights02/12/19 05:04 PM
20

If it hadn't been for mothers the people that invented wifi wouldn't have been born. Without men those women wouldn't have gotten pregnant. Maybe we need both and claims like this are just stupid petty distractions.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 11:11 PM
1

in that story it was Noah, his 3 sons and the 4 wives that survived on the Arc (a total of 8 people). nothing specifically gender biased about that particular outrageous behavior as he seemed to kill and 'save' somewhat equally... it's awful for a whole bunch of other reasons but I don't think you can pin that one on Gender discrimination.
/r/MensRights25/11/19 10:45 PM
3

What OP referenced was a claim that the Egyptian pharaoh ordered the massacre of male children of the Israelis. (there is no historical evidence that this occurred outside the claims in the bible). Regardless that example was not an example of "god ordering" the death of males however there certainly are examples of exactly that happening if you choose to believe the biblical narrative. Numbers 31 for instance tells the story of the "massacre of the Midians" which does call for the wholesale mur…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 01:43 AM
7

you can learn how to wash properly. the surgery is traumatic and unnecessary. almost every so called 'health benefit' can easily wait until the subject is an adult capable of making that decision for themself. the only time it MIGHT become necessary is IF the subject has phimosis which is a very rare condition that can become an emergency if left untreated but it hardly justifies doing this to any child that does not have that condition.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 10:14 PM
13

why would you be 'for' performing an unnecessary and potentially harmful surgical procedure on an infant against their will? Circumcision was nearly non-existant (in the US) prior to 1890 when it was pushed by certain "anti-Masturbation" crusaders (one of whom was John Harvey Kellogg who also created 'corn flakes') as a means to prevent "Masturbation insanity". Why would removing that particular piece of skin have any impact on the rate of masturbation if that particular piece of skin was not se…
/r/MensRights20/11/19 06:59 PM
5

I think equality should apply to everyone.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 12:38 AM
8

FvF has Jason Bourne and Batman CA has a girl with no emotions that used to cheat on her vampire boyfriend with a werewolf. this doesn't seem all that difficult to understand.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 04:22 PM
1

sometimes life isn't fair and there are no perfect solutions. Financial abortion would address most of the issue you are complaining about except for the 'emotional' aspects - and yep... that very very limited scenario doesn't have a good solution.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 12:09 PM
1

I think you missed the part where I said "rapists deserve the death penalty".... I didn't gender qualify that statement and I certainly believe women can rape men and that it does happen.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 12:05 PM
1

you are the one that brought "rape" into the discussion with YOUR statement below "Unless you will force women to give birth to children conceived from rape, its not equal in spirit."
/r/MensRights19/11/19 12:00 PM
1

the only way your argument here makes even the remotest sense is if you are talking about a female raping a male and it's pretty unlikely that the male in that situation is going to get pregnant. if a male rapes a woman the woman did not consent to having his child and I don't give a damn if he whines and complains and has a hissy fit if he doesn't approve of her later decisions because he's a fucking rapist. If she gets pregnant as a result of that rape he doesn't deserve any vote in what the v…
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:57 AM
1

where did i say anything of the sort? You are moving the goalposts because you know your position on rapists is indefensible and now you're pulling imaginary straw men out of your ass.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:51 AM
1

a rapist does not 'deserve' the right to continue dictating the life of the person they raped. they 'deserve' the death penalty.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:46 AM
1

no-one 'forced' a rapist to make that woman pregnant... you are suggesting that it's analogous; that's absurd and indefensible and if he is a rapist frankly he doesn't deserve any 'rights' at all; he 'deserves' to be executed.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:40 AM
2

forcing a woman to carry the child of their rapist is a monstrous position and even suggesting that makes me think you're a troll or a psychopath.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:35 AM
1

Financial Abortion would address exactly what you are talking about. That's the entire point.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:20 AM
1

did you read the part about "financial abortion"?
/r/MensRights19/11/19 11:09 AM
5

it isn't a 'competition for who has it worse' but when people talk about issues affecting women they get taken seriously; whenever anyone brings up an issue facing males it gets ridiculed or ignored. I'm banned from /r/feminism entirely because I participate here. I support equality for everyone but apparently the moderators of /r/feminism think that's worthy of an automatic ban; why would that be the case if "feminism" is about "equality"?
/r/MensRights19/11/19 01:16 AM
11

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-theater-the-brain/201503/no-there-is-no-such-thing-adhd
/r/MensRights18/11/19 11:34 PM
15

have you seen what is happening to boys in public schools? They are being pressured to take drugs for perfectly normal behavior because teachers want them to behave 'like the girls do'.... - they are deemed 'defective' for being restless; This after 'recess' is being eliminated in many schools; a practice that is very useful in the education of boys because it gives them a break, allows them to expend energy and take a break from 'sitting still for hours' which is simply not biologically normal …
/r/MensRights18/11/19 11:23 PM
10

yes, some women believe that men deserve equality too. weird; i know....
/r/MensRights18/11/19 09:18 PM
4

that is exactly where the concept of "Financial Abortion" applies - That 'should' be the law if the government cares about 'equality' at all. Women have numerous options to 'opt out' of parental responsibilities after conception, men currently have zero.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 08:32 PM
8

that's not a rational option - you cannot force the female to undergo a medical procedure against her will... I would support the "financial abortion" option; if a woman can have an abortion based solely on her preference not to be burdened by ~18 years of parenthood then the father should also have the right to opt out of taking on that same financial/personal obligation. - but you can't carry that to the point of forcing another person to have a medical procedure that they are not consenting t…
/r/MensRights18/11/19 08:18 PM
11

in many countries the retirement age for women is lower by legal fiat. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retirement_age there is not one single country anywhere that sets the retirement age for women higher than that for males. 'at best' they have the same retirement age
/r/MensRights17/11/19 08:58 PM
6

Being Charlie seems like a pretty big demotion from startfleet captain or telepathic leader of a mutant army.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 05:04 PM
2

it is also an lgbtq issue but that hardly negates It as a legitimate men's rights issue. It looks like a feminist issue as well. if true then females are paid less or denied opportunity at that company based on gender...
/r/MensRights15/11/19 08:48 PM
10

I have no idea whether his claim is true of not however if it is true then his employer stopped treating him "as a man" because he was gay. That raises lots of questions, like why would females get lower pay in the first place, gender should have zero impact on his pay but he is also being denied his male identity based on sexual orientation. The article states that his pay was cut because (presumably) the boss considered him to be female. Yes, that is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 08:40 PM
15

Gay men are men too.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 08:15 PM
1

I wasn't trying to suggest otherwise however whenever I read a post that makes a generalized claim such as this I do think it's important to actually go and read what the bill actually says. It is rather obviously targeted at the practice of sending UDP's which does happen quite a lot. I would think any unsolicited porn of any sort should be banned via any messaging platform (email, sms, web pop ups, postal mail etc.); I certainly don't think that material should be illegal for those adults that…
/r/MensRights13/11/19 11:10 AM
1

I sent a bunch of these without comment to a friend over the period of about 2 weeks before they figured out what they all had in common.
/r/MensRights13/11/19 10:53 AM
12

the text of the bill is not limited just to "dick pics" A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT relating to the creation of the criminal offense of unlawful electronic transmission of sexually explicit visual material. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS: SECTION 1. Chapter 21, Penal Code, is amended by adding Section 21.19 to read as follows: Sec. 21.19. UNLAWFUL ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF SEXUALLY EXPLICIT VISUAL MATERIAL. (a) In this section, "intimate parts," "sexual conduct," and "v…
/r/MensRights12/11/19 07:25 PM
5

I send unsolicited dick pics a lot.
/r/MensRights12/11/19 07:14 PM
2

same article with same photos appears in several websites but curiously none of them name any full names of the parties or cite the jurisdiction where this court case was tried; seems really likely to be fake edit: looks like ihayanews.com is the original source of the article - that is a news parody site.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 03:08 PM
13

you have no basis for comparison of sex when circumcised vs uncircumcised and you will never know what sex would be like with that skin intact because that option was stolen from you without your consent. The entire procedure was very rare prior to 1890 in the US but became common almost entirely as a means to prevent the "evils of masturbation". If you don't think that particular piece of skin was sensitive then why would you or anyone else believe that removing it would have an effect on the r…
/r/MensRights03/11/19 04:36 PM
5

agreed; religion is not justification for mutilating a child. if they CHOOSE to have that done when they are old enough to make an informed decision then that is their choice but it is absolutely child abuse to allow mutilation of an infant
/r/MensRights31/10/19 04:39 PM
12

not sure your can cite 'god agrees' since it's pretty clear in the bible that god loves little boys foreskins; way back in Genesis God tries to kill Moses but Zipporah doesn't want Moses killed, so in Exodus 4 (verses 24 to 26) 24 And it came to pass by the way in the inn, that the Lord met him, and sought to kill him. 25 Then Zipporah took a sharp stone, and cut off the foreskin of her son, and cast it at his feet, and said, Surely a bloody husband art thou to me. 26 So he let him go: then she …
/r/MensRights31/10/19 02:46 PM
9

he is trying to insult males that are "involuntarily celibate". not exactly a good start for someone claiming that they are opposed to 'harassment'.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 01:13 PM
9

i stopped reading after "incel";
/r/MensRights27/10/19 01:08 PM
2

you should certainly be allowed to choose that option once you are old enough to make an informed choice but performing this on an infant; against their will when there is no urgent medical need should be a crime. no "religious exception" should ever justify genital mutilation of a child. If an adult WANTS to have it done to themselves then they can choose it when they are old enough to make an informed choice. Did you know that circumcision was nearly non existant in the United States before ~1…
/r/MensRights25/10/19 01:17 PM
11

article here without the paywall - https://academic.oup.com/ije/article/40/5/1367/658163
/r/MensRights21/10/19 10:53 PM
9

Circumcision was one of those Jewish practices that was specifically rejected within Christianity from the early years of the church (specifically mentioning it as one of the Jewish requirements that no longer apply); however back in the 1850's a doctor (Jonathan Hutchinson) began to advocate for circumcision supposedly as a means to prevent the spread of Syphilis and to prevent masturbation.; in the 1870s US doctors (notably Lewis Sayre) was claiming that circumcision prevented paralysis; and i…
/r/MensRights19/10/19 04:48 PM
6

feminists want to deny males any options that might lessen their near monopoly/control over men's access to sexual activity. If men have other options then feminists are not as valuable in the sexual marketplace and won't be kept on the princess pedestal that they think that they totally deserve based on nothing more than being born with an innie instead of an outie.. I do disagree with one specific statement that Janet made; 'nobody worries about the use of sex toys that have male characteristi…
/r/MensRights19/10/19 04:04 PM
10

does this mean men should pee in the sinks now? or perhaps the solution is to pee on the city administrators desk.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 07:11 PM
16

2019 years and 10.5 months ago... it says so right here on my calendar. back then the earth was flat and at the center of the universe too.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 05:09 PM
7

that sounds more like he's trying to live out a femdom fantasy.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 05:07 PM
4

you always had the option to unsubscribe.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 02:38 PM
1

I am female and I would agree that the feminist movement tends to be dominated by a vocal group that views the world exactly as you describe; I think that is a major reason why the majority of women do NOT consider themselves to be feminist. (only 26% in Britain) (Only 34% in the US) also among those that do think of themselves as "Feminists" most of them are not these radical toxic vocal misandrists that get all the attention; most people just don't pay that much attention to the statements tho…
/r/MensRights03/10/19 03:11 PM
2

are you asking me why I would post in /r/feminism? - For one I don't believe that the average person that thinks of themselves as "feminist" can be defined based on the more radical voices that seem to be the most vocal in that community. If you had asked me 15 years ago if I was a feminist I would have almost certainly said 'yes' - At the time I believed that feminism was actually a movement for equality; it wasn't until I noticed some of the harm that radical feminism was causing to some boys …
/r/MensRights02/10/19 09:39 PM
4

I would probably post in /r/feminism occasionally if I wasn't banned because I've dared to post comments in this forum; I support equality for both genders, there are most certainly issues that women face that need attention but there are often issues men face as well and for the most part feminism seems very hostile to even talking about most of those issues; I assume it's because they think helping men somehow harms them which is just absurd.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 08:09 PM
1

so it sounds like she is saying that the only reason men commit suicide more often than females is because females are incompetent...
/r/MensRights26/09/19 09:54 PM
10

but men are 'privileged' because they are the ones that work all the dangerous jobs in construction, mining, farming, factories, fishing, steel mills, and oil rigs and they are the ones fighting fires and in the front line combat positions and swat teams. These jobs of course are totally open to females but curiously very few of them seem to want to share in this 'privilege'. weird. it's almost as if they have a choice.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 05:17 PM
5

meanwhile feminists are constantly complaining about a 'wage gap'...
/r/MensRights26/09/19 02:04 PM
3

Read about this a few days ago; the jury found him 'not guilty' after less than 30 minutes of deliberation. I really believe that the jury should have the power to convict the prosecutors and judges that allow this sort of prosecutorial misconduct to happen in the first place. They are the ones that deserve to be in jail.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 05:09 PM
1

I've been here for years. anyone that supports equality regardless of gender is welcome.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:09 PM
1

Just around the corner from paddleboro
/r/MensRights20/09/19 02:35 AM
11

build enough hotels and you're bound to lose a few construction workers along the way.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 10:23 PM
51

for added realism; in addition to getting more money for passing 'go'; women will also get shorter sentences in jail and die in workplace injuries at 1/7th the rate of male players.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 08:50 PM
91

according to the article on WGN the photos were not available when they published (and that was for two people, one 82 year old male and an 85 year old female) Police arrested (left to right) Daniel F. Dobbins, 67; Otto D. Williams, 62; Charles L. Ardito, 75; and John Linartz, 62; after allegedly finding them engaged in sexual activity in a Connecticut conservation area. Photos were not available for the other two people arrested, Richard Butler, 82, and Joyce Butler, 85. (Fairfield Police Dept.…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 12:00 PM
1

it's probably best if she doesn't reproduce at all.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 12:54 PM
-1

and their point is that the topics are brought up so frequently that they created a megathread so those topics don't drown out all other conversations. if I want to have a serious conversation about any of those topics I wouldn't be taking it to /r/unpopularopinion in the first place.
/r/MensRights28/06/19 12:28 PM
1

from /r/unpopularopinion stickie post: - the criteria there has nothing to do with the issue being "magically solved" - it is about the popularity of the topic and clustering those conversations into a single thread. All opinions about popular topics must be posted in their respective mega-thread Meta mega-thread Mental health mega-thread LGBTQ mega-thread Vaccination and anti-vaxx mega-thread Men's rights/MGTOW mega-thread Feminism mega-thread US politics mega-thread Obesity mega-thread Transge…
/r/MensRights28/06/19 12:17 PM
2

that was from a bot telling you that if it was about feminism you need to post it in the appropriate thread instead of creating (yet another) new topic that they get rather flooded with. They didn't tell you that you couldn't post it and even invited you to contact a moderator if you feel that it is not "about feminism". the entire point of mega threads is to keep related topics in one thread rather than having thousands of nearly duplicate threads saying exactly the same thing and drowning out …
/r/MensRights28/06/19 11:47 AM
1

It seems like a legitimate argument: similar articles 'should' follow the same basic style and layout unless there is a good editorial case why the style/layout needs to follow different rules. - Given the nature of Wikipedia where 'anyone' can edit articles it isn't surprising to see articles using different styles because there isn't a formal editorial review like you might see in the older printed "encyclopedia" days. Odds are very good that any attempt to alter the current design is going to…
/r/MensRights13/06/19 11:30 PM
1

that seems to be a continuation of the "has been described as" portion that preceeded it and if that is the case then I agree that there are people that have described the Mens Rights Movement in that way; I am NOT saying that I agree with those conclusions; I am stating that the wikipedia article is correct in stating that those claims have been made. The fact that it mentions the views of opposing camps is not in itself evidence that the article is biased; that is typical in any article such a…
/r/MensRights13/06/19 10:51 PM
4

The subject and the image linked to was a short snippet that is correctly stating that there are people with opposing views... I don't see a problem with wikipedia stating that. I do NOT agree with those opposing viewpoints but that doesn't make the wikipedia article biased or even unfair. It is common practice to mention the "other side" of political movements harping back to the "fairness doctrine" that used to force news organizations to give 'equal time' to "the other side" which was never e…
/r/MensRights13/06/19 02:08 PM
2

I am pretty sure the 'average' person that thinks of themself as "feminist" doesn't actually agree with the most radical statements that "some feminists" make. Many of them would even argue that those radical voices do not define their movement... Likewise you can point out that there ARE people like Roosh that are out there; I don't consider him a spokesperson for my views and I don't think it's reasonable to paint the entire movement based on the tripe that comes out of his writings.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 01:47 PM
6

The declaration OP made is about how Wikipedia describes MRA's and is clearly about Wikipedia. It is not about how the SPLC views MRA's; it is clearly referencing how Wikipedia describes MRA's. The evidence cited is a factually correct statement that talks about 'concerns' raised by other entities and is consistent with how other political movements are described in other wikipedia articles and is also consistent with how many news organizations describe political movements. This isn't "Bias" an…
/r/MensRights13/06/19 01:29 PM
-4

so you are saying that the subject of this specific thread is NOT the topic of this thread? "holy shit....have you guys seen how wikipedia describes MRA's"?
/r/MensRights13/06/19 01:09 PM
-5

that has nothing to do with "wikipedia". The article referenced is factually correct in the section of the article that is being cited. If you disagree with the southern poverty law center then that is an entirely different topic. It's worthy of note that the wikipedia article on the SPLC also cites the complaints that have been raised about their tactics/methods
/r/MensRights13/06/19 01:06 PM
-3

is anything in your screenshot there incorrect? The statement that it makes there correctly states that some people claim that the "Men's Rights Movement" is exactly what they state... Their "claim" does not make it true but the wiki article is correct in pointing out that some people make those claims. The wiki article on Feminism has a paragraph specifically about criticism of the feminist movement as well Anti-feminism and criticism of feminism and in that section they point out that there ar…
/r/MensRights13/06/19 12:26 PM
3

are men not 'judged' for the condition of the lawn? something much more visible to everyone driving by on the street 24 hours a day/7 days a week/52 weeks a year... this is not to imply that yard work or house work is 'solely' the responsibility of a single gender but it is just as much true as the claim about the 'messy house' which is ONLY visible to the people you invite inside.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 12:07 PM
4

this is a tv court; not a criminal court. This "court" doesn't have the authority to put someone on the sex offender registry regardless of the gender of the parties.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 04:23 PM
2

actual rapes that occur "actual rapes that are proven"
/r/MensRights25/05/19 10:37 PM
1

34 is a certainly a mens rights issue. boys are falling behind in education and being treated as if they are defective for 'not behaving like girls'. the changes intended to make schools 'better for girls' are absolutely harming boys.
/r/MensRights18/04/19 05:44 PM
17

Is it any suprise at all that this was released on April 1st?
/r/MensRights01/04/19 12:28 PM
12

"31 million girls around the world are not going to school" meanwhile; in this BBC article hat actualy cites the source it appears that ~57 million children have no access to school yet somehow the article about "equality" doesn't bother mentioning the ~26 million boys that also have the same problem.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 10:56 PM
2

this is what you get upset over? I'm not sure how many of these posts are just trolls trying to make MensRights look petty vs how many are pathetic enough to actually think this way...
/r/MensRights11/03/19 11:35 PM
1

"My Country" is also incredibly vague and provides no context for what the numbers mean and your graphic provides no clue to determine the context or source of the data.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 12:54 PM
3

what country are you referring to? The US statistics show a consistent pattern where male donations are higher than female donations going back every single year (other than 2010 where females had a slight lead) going back as far as at least 1988 but the gap is nothing like what is shown in your chart. https://www.statista.com/statistics/398450/number-of-us-organ-donors-by-gender/
/r/MensRights25/02/19 07:56 AM
2

this has already been posted: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/au5tzn/military_draft_judge_rules_maleonly_registration/
/r/MensRights24/02/19 01:57 PM
1

of course; just like we have to automatically believe actors when they claim that white maga hat wearing racists tied a noose around their neck. Why would anyone ever lie about that sort of thing?
/r/MensRights21/02/19 09:24 PM
4

The headline should read "Feminists: afraid of competition from inanimate objects" This has nothing to do with "danger". It is entirely about attempting to use government power to deny men access to alternative options. Dildo's and phallic shaped vibrators do not cause me to "normalize violence against men"; nor do they foster any "objectifying, sexualised and degrading attitudes" towards males. Weirdly enough; I just use them to get off...
/r/MensRights21/02/19 09:18 PM
6

I would downvote that one too; That isn't a matter of equality. I might agree with regards to the "financial abortion option" which I think men should have the right to however forcing the woman to carry a child to full term against her will is not a matter of 'equality' at all. The male is NOT unduly burdened by the physical burdens related to her pregnancy.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 11:44 AM
13

she's is "the director of the Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Program and a professor of sociology"; 91% of Sociology Majors are female. While it doesn't look like she's doing much to create gender parity in her field on the bright side at least there aren't many men wasting their lives pursuing a "women's studies" or "sociology" degree.
/r/MensRights15/12/18 11:02 PM
7

According to this article only 38% of females consider themselves "feminist". Even when you consider the statement that "46% of millenials" say they are feminist consider that a lot of them say that because they haven't noticed the glaring misandry and total disregard for issues affecting males within the movement because the media and Hollywood gloss over a lot of the worst things they say and paint it as a " movement for equality" despite the reality; I suspect quite a few of those (46% or 38%…
/r/MensRights14/12/18 11:38 PM
23

lots of women hate feminism too.... it gives us all a bad name. I always say that I believe in equality; which is why I'm NOT a feminist.
/r/MensRights14/12/18 08:15 PM
26

neither should be considered 'indecent' - they are natural body parts. nothing indecent about them.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 07:36 PM
2

I don't see anything in the article that would be grounds for charging her with anything; It doesn't say specifically why they dismissed the charges; most likely it was a lack of evidence to prosecute which doesn't necessarily mean that she was lying; only that they don't have sufficient evidence to convict. I'd agree with sending her to prison IF you can show evidence that she lied or falsely accused him but I'm not seeing anything here to establish that.
/r/MensRights02/12/18 09:53 PM
5

tell her that her clitoris is creepy and you want her to get it cut off. when she bolts she'll be doing you a favor...
/r/MensRights08/11/18 01:35 PM
5

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/nov/5/brett-kavanaughs-lying-accusers-should-be-thrown-j/
/r/MensRights07/11/18 11:14 PM
459

anyone that testified under oath should certainly face perjury charges; defamation/slander is often considered a civil offense and may not be subject to 'criminal' prosecution. - it SHOULD be a crime but that doesn't mean that it is. It would depend on where and how those statements were made. Personally I think anyone making these sorts of false accusations should face the same penalties that their victim would have faced had their lies not been discovered but that isn't likely to happen.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 01:57 PM
50

"Girl Scouts" are not responsible for the changes the Boy Scouts made; They have been against that move since the change was first announced; Both organizations have seen steadily declining membership; BSA largely made this change because their own management wanted to increase the pool of potential members; GSA had nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 12:59 PM
2

training? I'm not sure that This club is likely to have an extensive training program for their bouncer staff.
/r/MensRights01/11/18 02:34 PM
3

I have this rather radical belief that equality should apply to everyone... including males. I didn't pay any attention to feminism or mens rights until I noticed how schools were treating boys as broken/defective - requiring drugs because they didn't automatically act 'like girls'. our local school made multiple attempts to convince us to have two kids drugged for behavior that is 100% normal for boys. after observing that it started becoming more and more obvious that schools had become hostil…
/r/MensRights01/11/18 01:49 PM
4

this is a hoax video; staged performance.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 09:06 PM
3

OP's article is from a british paper so i'll refer to suffrage specifically in britain; prior to 1884 only male land owners could vote in 1984 parliament extended this to all male tax payers then in 1918 (after several years of forced conscription for "the great war" they extended voting rights to all adult males specificallly because many of the soldiers fighting and dying in the war were previously not eligible to vote. One key argument was that if someone is eligible to be forcefully conscrip…
/r/MensRights19/09/18 08:42 PM
6

male suffrage requires registration for the draft... women's suffrage requires having a vajayjay. no surprise we have to register to read about it.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 09:55 AM
15

the first rule of feminist fight club is to "tell everyone about feminist fight club"; use a bullhorn if necessary.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 05:23 PM
1

My point was that when they look at the data with an agenda they twist the findings to find the conclusion that best serves their bias. In this case clearly they intended to find some way to blame the lack of success of women on some 'evil' characteristic of men rather than acknowledging where the women were falling short. "Men are too confident!!!" is pretty much the same thing as saying "women aren't as confident as men"; "Men are Arrogant" is pretty much the same as saying "women are too timi…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 10:13 AM
6

If one were intentionally trying to skew this to serve a sexist agenda it seems like this exact same "study" would suggest that it's men that take risks and accomplish things while the women stand around wallowing in their lack of pride or confidence... fortunately we have these renowned scholars to explain it to us properly.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:02 PM
1

The OP's article is not the same as the Aziz Ansari story; Aziz was accused of unwanted touching/failure to get 'affirmative consent' and the so called "victim" claims that the date turned into a "nightmare". - That is vastly different from the satire article OP posted where the woman is claiming that they had consensual sex but she's "a victim" because she wanted a relationship and he didn't return her messages... in what way is this "pretty much the Aziz Ansari Story"? If anything it sounds a …
/r/MensRights21/06/18 08:22 PM
2

Did you browse through the other articles on that site?
/r/MensRights20/06/18 09:52 PM
15

rawvox.com is a satire site. The article is satire.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 08:44 PM
3

apparently he thinks that you can't be here at all; let alone make a first post unless you've already posted before. fortunately he doesn't make or enforce the rules.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 01:15 PM
3

clearly you haven't looked very hard.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 12:48 PM
4

you also specifically argued against two people that replied "good" to the fact that the UK has a 2 year prison sentence for people taking upskirt photos and implied that taking photos of men fully dressed on the subway should also be illegal. Seems you are 'conveniently forgetting' to mention that part. and now you are breaking reddit rules by creating another account to get around the fact that you've been banned.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 12:43 PM
1

Who even watches these pageants? I really don't understand why anyone would want to watch them. I pretty much feel the same way about most of the garbage on tv so maybe it's just me but it seems like a mind numbing waste of time.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 12:45 AM
11

if they're ever addressed at all. they think they 'are' addressing it by calling boys defective and demanding their parents put them on drugs for simply not behaving the same as girls.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 08:06 PM
20

curious that she totally forgot to mention that nearly all of them involved shooters that were using anti-depressants and/or adhd drugs.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 07:29 PM
4

Soooo, a clothing manufacturer wants people to wear... clothes? If your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 03:39 AM
5

every male between the age of 18 - 25 is required, by law, to register with selective service "in case there is a draft". congress can opt to institute a draft at any time if a need arises and ONLY men are subject to conscription and historically an awful lot of men have. It is true that we have not had an active draft in the US since the end of the war in Vietnam but the preference for an all volunteer military is only a preference and if congress feels that it is necessary they WILL impose the…
/r/MensRights18/05/18 04:01 PM
18

since Gender is just a 'social construct' you should tell him that you're a girl now and take the higher grade.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 12:31 PM
2

Hey!! No one asked if I wanted to be born!!!
/r/MensRights13/05/18 01:57 AM
5

We didn't back where I was raised. Had dirt floor houses and babies just went naked around the house. They actually potty trained faster that way.
/r/MensRights13/05/18 01:56 AM
1

As far as public funding goes; the only somewhat credible justification I've heard from nih officials was that prostate cancer mostly affects men at a much later age than breast cancer so with limited funds they spend the research dollars where it's going to have the biggest benefit. I still think there is an unjustifiable imbalance but at least part of the reason is legit. Regarding private charitable contributions I suspect awareness is simply a lot higher because breasts are a lot nicer to lo…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 08:44 PM
48

Why should I care about my employee's sex lives (or lack thereof)? It's None of my, or her, f'n business.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 11:17 PM
2

you may want to delete this post and post again with a more appropriate title; as it is this is likely to get reported.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:41 PM
2

asking for votes or vote manipulation is against Reddit Rules - https://www.reddithelp.com/en/categories/rules-reporting/account-and-community-restrictions/what-constitutes-vote-cheating-or
/r/MensRights03/05/18 04:39 PM
1

It's really interesting to hear her say that so many men are brainwashing experts. It's almost as if she thinks women aren't smart enough to resist Jedi mind tricks.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 12:36 AM
12

This is really easy: Feminists see dildos/vibrators etc. as tools that "liberate women" and increase options for females. They view any sex bot/fleshlight etc. as a tool that decreases female power over men because it gives men other alternatives; thus it does not benefit females at all and therefore must be demonized.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 01:59 PM
10

I believe equality should apply to men too. I started getting involved in men's rights issues after seeing how boys are being mistreated by schools. That was the wake up call for me. Teachers demanding they be drugged (Saying they had 'adhd' but that was b.s. the school wanted them to sit still for hours and behave "like girls" and treated them like something was wrong with them just for being male.) The school position was that they had mental problems because they wanted to do activities inste…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 12:45 AM
14

What would Rosa Parks think about this plan?
/r/MensRights09/03/18 12:37 AM
1

Has that always been the policy? I know I've been frisked by male agents in the past. (Although it has been a while since happened)
/r/MensRights02/03/18 01:54 AM
34

Is banning female genital mutilation 'anti-Islamic'? Don't actually care if it is, your right to religion does not give you the right to cut up someone else's body.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 03:11 AM
20

it's certainly a big part, but I think the mass drugging of boys (with ritalin/adderall etc.) to get them to 'behave' more like girls and the rising use of anti-depressants has a pretty significant role as well. The hysterical reaction to INCREASE the use of anti-depressants seems more likely to make the problem worse. (and the demonizing and emasculation of boys is probably a pretty big part of the reason they think they need anti-depressants in the first place).
/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:52 PM
1

you mean the assumptions about you that i made based on the previous two comments where you very specifically called me a "stuck up cunt" and a "fat fuck virgin male who doesn't even know what a pussy looks like"? - those make your character extremely clear. You are the idiot that attacked me for giving very sound legal advise to the OP. You not agreeing with it does not justify the immaturity or harshness of your response but I can easily see from your other comments to other posters that this …
/r/MensRights21/02/18 08:27 PM
1

Thanks! you did an excellent job of proving my point; establishing along the way not only that you are a misogynist but you are also a misandrist that apparently thinks mens rights are only for "certain men".
/r/MensRights21/02/18 01:28 PM
1

and you are an abusive jackass.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 10:35 PM
1

Then why are you talking shit? https://socialnomics.net/2014/12/30/social-media-can-and-will-be-used-against-you-in-court/
/r/MensRights20/02/18 07:24 PM
38

rather than posting this on the internet you really need to be talking to a lawyer. Anything you post online could end up being used against you.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 10:18 PM
15

Uhm.... perhaps an annual prostate exam?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 11:36 PM
6

It's the same nonsense as the complaints about the government paying for Viagra and not birth control for women. The free government provided Viagara is ONLY paid for by the VA and DOD for members of the military, their dependents and retirees all of whom ALSO qualify for free birth control. Viagra is also a viable medicine for heart conditions; it's use for erectile dysfunction was discovered as a surprising side effect that became the most famous use of the drug.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:52 PM
5

Emphasize means to place emphasis (importance) on the subject. The word you are probably looking for is 'empathize' which means to have 'empathy' (compassion)
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:09 PM
56

Who is giving out 'free condoms' and why? Most likely it is an effort to prevent the spread of sexually transmitted disease and is funded as preventative medicine. Is there some specific medical issue that tampons prevent?
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:01 PM
1

Not sure why that is even a crime. He is legally old enough to consent. She should probably be fired for breaking the rules of employment. Connecticut however does have a law that deals specifically with sex between teachers and students that is rather unusual because it applies to students that are over 18. That is not the case in most states but apparently Connecticut went way over the normal standard here. Generally, under CGS Sec. 53a-71, a person is guilty of sexual assault in the second de…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 09:34 PM
3

How is the feminist fight club fighting against the "patriarchy"? According to them it is by opposing the female prime minister.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 02:31 AM
13

The radical notion that equality applies to everyone.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 11:35 PM
3

"males cannot experience emotions such as remorse and generosity" "all apparent "cases" of male sexual abuse are always from people who lack any understanding of the definition of such terms" "Males do not experience mental trauma as they are incapable of doing so" Did you really need to run the math to realize that this image has problems?
/r/MensRights24/01/18 08:18 PM
415

a few reasons an accuser might lie immediately come to mind. 1: not wanting to admit to their spouse that they committed adultery. 2: not wanting to admit to their parents that they aren't a sweet innocent little virgin. 3: not wanting to admit to their friends that they had sex with someone because of their self imposed 'i'm not a slut' defense mechanism. 4: revenge because some guy they had sex with didn't return their phone calls. 5: not wanting to own up to their own irresponsibility when th…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 08:40 PM
-1

"Pursuit of happiness" appears nowhere in the constitution; the Due process clause addresses cases threatening "life, liberty or property". a right to due process certainly extends beyond criminal trials which we can see affirmed by the courts in the Goldberg v. Kelly case that I mentioned in my previous comment (that was added in an edit I made a few minutes after posting the original comment so you may not have seen it when replying). - What exactly constitutes a denial of "life, liberty, or p…
/r/MensRights10/12/17 03:34 PM
0

The constitutional requirement for "due process" relates to trials where the accused is deprived of "life, liberty, or property" - These campus tribunals are not criminal trials so although I absolutely agree that they should have due process rights here I'm not sure if the courts will agree that the 5th Amendment (or 14th) applies. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the l…
/r/MensRights10/12/17 03:04 PM
7

You mean; kinda like college students on campus' across america when facing "Title IX" tribunals. If she supports imposing that standard on college students then she is at least being consistent; unlike Nancy Pelosi that is claiming that he "deserves due process" when she has been repeatedly supportive of the 'dear colleague' standards... I absolutely agree that Conyers should have due process rights; just as every college student in america should have due process rights. Where I disagree is th…
/r/MensRights26/11/17 05:54 PM
9

Legislators should absolutely be held to the same or higher standards as they impose on the rest of society. - If they support campus tribunals where accused men are denied due process rights then they absolutely should be held to that same standard when they find themselves accused. The correct response to this should be to guarantee due process to EVERYONE; but to expect that they get more rights than the people that they are supposed to be serving is wrong.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 05:08 PM
1

No clue if he is or isn't guilty of the accusations but given her historical support of campus witch hunts and the denial of due process rights to male students on college campus' across the country it is certainly interesting that she suddenly thinks 'due process' might be a good thing...
/r/MensRights26/11/17 04:16 PM
-1

The second photo in this article looks like a sexual assault to me.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 01:15 AM
7

you're really going to need some actual evidence to promote a claim like this; stating that "we don't really know" what the rate is when all of the statistics suggest that the male murder rate is substantially higher isn't very valuable as evidence goes. - Further the number of google hits doesn't tell us all that much either since a murderer getting a reduced sentence is likely to be reported in a lot of papers. When we talk about 'equality' i really don't think the goal should be to make our c…
/r/MensRights10/11/17 07:27 PM
3

just 2 days ago there was a post about some neurologists that did MRI's of an infant before and after a circumcision; the 'after' scan showed clear evidence of changes in parts of the brain related to Trauma. - the same areas of the brain effected by PTSD.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 06:09 PM
1

They are asking the wrong question. The correct question would be "why does ANYONE spend the time and money to pursue a degree that doesn't prepare you at all for any useful job?"
/r/MensRights07/11/17 12:59 AM
3

Almost all of the 'slut shaming' I have ever encountered has come from other women. I think it's a coping mechanism that women use to feel better about their lack of success in the dating pool.
/r/MensRights05/11/17 01:11 AM
1

Do men care about beauty pageants? That's an interesting question; How many men actually watch these shows? I haven't found any real breakdown of the audience demographics but I have a hard time understanding what the appeal is for men (unless they have a relative/close friend or so unfortunate enough to be a contestant...) I can't think of many less interesting ways I could spend that time...
/r/MensRights05/11/17 01:08 AM
33

Viagra is purchased by the VA for people that qualify for VA benefits and for active duty military. Female veterans and female active duty military and their dependants also get free pregnancy care including delivery and birth control. No other government program purchases or provides Viagra. The poster is intentionally deceptive or it's creator is an idiot.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 10:50 PM
1

While this certainly might be a good topic you haven't provided any evidence/arguments to support such a broad declaration. Did you have any substance to add to this?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 04:42 PM
19

It's so thoughtful of the feminists to tell me how i'm allowed to think. Apparently they think that all Asians are required to be exactly alike. Asia's a big place encompassing 2/3 of the worlds population. I am from the Philippines which is part of asia but I have no more in common with Pakistani's or Koreans than I do with the average native of Norway. Too bad feminists are so stuck in 'group identity' that they can't recognize that every person is an individual.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 02:40 PM
14

No fan of CNN; they are far too biased but at least on this piece they seem to have gotten it right.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 12:28 PM
14

Even CNN recognizes that these campus sexual assault hearings are going way overboard. This is surprisingly good news - Similar articles in Salon and other news organizations have been posted in the past few days but I noticed this one on CNN hadn't been mentioned.
/r/MensRights13/09/17 12:23 PM
351

apparently they don't value male customers. so stop shopping there.
/r/MensRights12/09/17 12:05 PM
2

"clickbait" is basically a form of advertisement; they are advertising for clicks in order to sell more ads - and they print these articles that are masquerading as if they are 'news stories' - "realdolls" seems to get mentioned by name in nearly all of them (although it wasn't in the one linked to this thread) and I do believe they are trying to get these stories out there in order to sell products; what better way than to have a faux 'swooning journalist' lamenting about how horribly realistic…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 07:42 PM
4

There have been a lot of these "news articles" in the past year about these "amazingly realistic sex dolls". They are appearing with such frequency that they seem to me as if they are paid advertisements and not some spontaneous interest by 'journalists'. The reality is that they may look more human but they are still lifeless, inert lumps of latex with a crude voice chip and some ai to operate the voice chip being the extent of their 'personality'. - Yes they are certainly better and more reali…
/r/MensRights23/08/17 12:02 PM
2

Another paid advertisement pretending to be a "news story".
/r/MensRights23/08/17 01:16 AM
1

then how do we get out?
/r/MensRights17/08/17 09:58 PM
4

I tend to be mostly conservative but without the 'religious' baggage that seems to dominate the conversation to many "republicans" - I probably fall closer to the 'libertarian' party than 'republican' - especially in areas where religion seems to be the main driving factor... One striking exception I took to the article was their comments on abortion. - I'm no fan of abortion; I wish fewer people would have them but I'm glad it's a legal option. I would prefer to see the government simply stay o…
/r/MensRights11/08/17 02:17 PM
47

rule #3 is in direct violation of the first 2...
/r/MensRights07/08/17 12:38 PM
4

I think their first problem is that they seem to think that they are 'entitled' to a 'good man' and they seem to be complaining that "good men" aren't interested in them... why would a 'good man' WANT these women? What are they offering in return? The entire article talks about what THEY want. they casually dismiss men that are 'more than a little overweight' but every one of them looks to be 'more than a little overweight' themselves and i'm sure they'd be 'offended' by the fact that i'm even c…
/r/MensRights06/08/17 07:53 PM
4

she survived the rape that she committed against her own sister... how very brave and couragous of her. no wonder she's considered such an inspiration to feminists everywhere.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 02:13 PM
4

she told the truth about being a rapist tho... she admits to raping her sister.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 08:52 PM
3

regarding "enticing criminal behavior" - i don't condone actual rape; rape roleplay is vastly different because it is entirely consensual; the limits and rules/conditions are negotiated up front; safe words are established. - I even encourage anyone playing any sort of rape roleplay to record video of the 'pre scene negotiations' just in case the victim is a nutcase that would turn around and claim that there was no consent. - No-one should ever risk social ruin and jail for acting out fantasies…
/r/MensRights02/08/17 08:21 PM
2

very true; i wish they'd allow for those; i search both terms quite often and pornhub doesn't return anything; you can use a google search like "site:pornhub.com rape" to find rape themed videos on pornhub but that still bypasses the pornhub stats collection.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 07:42 PM
2

I'm being totally selfish by being open about it; Helps me find people that have compatible interests; If you try to pretend you don't have these interests then it's very unlikely that anyone else is going to bring it up on their own until you're considerably invested in a relationship.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 07:38 PM
12

Women looking for violent porn are just internalizing their oppression and misogyny!" I certainly can't speak for anyone but myself but I certainly watch 'rough sex'/abuse themed porn and I have never claimed to be oppressed and I certainly don't hate other women (I hate 'feminism'; in part because it's not at all about 'equality' despite their fervent claims; it has very clearly become an anti-male female supremacy hate group - feminism is intentionally hostile to men as well as working against…
/r/MensRights02/08/17 03:10 PM
21

pornhub searches by gender (2016)
/r/MensRights02/08/17 12:10 PM
31

according to pornhub stats women search for rough sex far more frequently than men do.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 12:09 PM
2

it seems you put a lot of effort into creating an acronym that is pretty obviously meant to be disparaging. Not sure how this helps make the point; the only thing it's likely to do is give them ammo to support their claims that MRA's are petty and misogynistic.
/r/MensRights25/07/17 04:12 PM
2

last i heard flame throwers were legal in most of the US (California being the only state that specifically prohibits them) - Seems a bit overkill for "anti-pervert" purposes (whatever that means; someone being "perverted" hardly justifies assault) but for those situations where you need to resort to some defensive force Stun Guns and Pepper Spray would both be quite effective and far less destructive.
/r/MensRights23/07/17 04:57 PM
12

I'm a female engineer and I don't feel that there have ever been any gender based barriers to becoming an engineer or getting hired; if anything I feel that affirmative action & gender quota's hurt more than it helps. - Specifically because no matter how succesful I am; no matter how good I ever get at my job; There will always be people that think that I only got the job due to preferential treatment due to my gender. Even I have questioned whether I got promoted ahead of other (possibly more q…
/r/MensRights22/07/17 07:12 PM
11

the fact that there weren't enough lifeboats is the reason that they had to decide which lives were more valuable. They decided that the women were more valuable specifically because of their reproductive role. and I don't even understand what you are trying to get at with your comment on british rule.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 09:25 PM
32

It's certainly true that the 'reason' for the notion of "women and children first" (at least the 'women' part of that concept) is related to women's role in reproduction - The harsh reality is that if we were to lose 90% of the male population society would recover a LOT faster than if we lost 90% of the female population. This is why females have historically been 'protected' to a much greater extent than men and recognizing this reality isn't a "feminist" notion; it's just reality and a huge p…
/r/MensRights21/07/17 07:10 PM
6

the FBI collects statistics from police reports across the entire country and states that 105,626 sexual assaults were reported in 2016 (using the revised definition from 2013); If it is true that 63% of offenses are not reported to police that would give us 285,475 total sexual assaults across the entire country. The National Center for Education Statistics states that there are 11.5 Million female college students enrolled in 2016; If we were incredibly generous and concluded that 100% of thes…
/r/MensRights14/07/17 11:57 AM
10

personally i am concerned about the rights of prostitutes.. they should absolutely have the right to be prostitutes if that is their choice; prostitution should be legal; legalized prostitution would be safer for the customer and the providers. Feminism (and religious conservative zealots) have actively made prostitution MORE dangerous for both by keeping it illegal. keeping prostitution illegal also makes it more likely that children and 'human trafficking victims' will be part of the trade; if…
/r/MensRights13/07/17 11:11 PM
39

I've seen multiple articles lately pushing for rules about these 'sex bots'; women buy sex toys too but these articles don't seem to be very concerned about the "rights" of vibrators. - We are still quite a ways from having sentient robots; I suspect the poorly hidden agenda is that they are opposed to men having options that don't give women power. - if more men turn to sex bots for sexual gratification these women fear that they will have less ability to exploit men for their financial gratifi…
/r/MensRights13/07/17 11:02 PM
4

If you didn't cry during Toy Story 3 then there is something wrong with you...
/r/MensRights13/07/17 01:40 PM
33

it's on amazon prime; no cost beyond the amazon prime membership.
/r/MensRights12/07/17 09:32 PM
2

1: pretty sure this is an area where women CHOOSE to wear uncomfortable shoes; 6: really? women have thousands of options for pants but apparently it's men that can't complain because they have no options at all (since "all men's pants are the same"). 7: condom's do reduce sensitivity; birth control pills do NOT reduce sensitivity. I would much rather take the pill than have him wear condoms because it feels better to me too.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 04:01 PM
2

When i'm elected dictator i will be way too busy eating all the chocolate to do any real damage.
/r/MensRights06/07/17 11:30 AM
4

I've said quite a few times that the "rape culture" being described by feminists doesn't exist but what they describe does look an awful lot like my 'fantasy land'; What I don't understand is why they seem to think it actually exists in the real world... Certainly rape happens but it's nowhere close to the levels that they claim and contrary to their dogma most men are absolutely appalled at the idea of actually raping someone. I don't know if there's anything to it but I have often suspected th…
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:31 PM
8

granted I'm pretty jaded but after reading this i can't stop thinking that we need to plan a big bukkake party for the next prostate cancer awareness month (cumming in September!!!)... seems like it would be a lot more fun than running one of those pink ribbon marathons. "Let's help rub out prostate cancer!!!"
/r/MensRights05/07/17 03:36 PM
44

so getting a happy ending should be tax deductible as it's a preventative medical expense.
/r/MensRights05/07/17 11:36 AM
0

the government has no business regulating the private relationships between consenting adults.
/r/MensRights01/07/17 01:38 PM
1

I was having similar thoughts listening to a Jimmy Buffet concert yesterday when "Why don't we get drunk and screw" came on... I'm sure the feminists would love to use that as "proof" of a "rape culture"...
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:38 PM
2

is he going to have to drop out of elementary school and get a job so he can start making child support payments?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 12:44 PM
7

The story is also reported in Times of India
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:35 PM
5

Contrary to feminist doctrine it's not only men that commit rape and domestic violence.
/r/MensRights24/06/17 04:18 PM
1

This reminds me of an old book "real men don't eat quiche" - really stupid title; Real men eat whatever they want to eat. - Why should you let other people determine whether you want a pedicure or not? - it's your decision; not an obligation regardless of what the rest of the male population does.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 05:36 PM
2

the kit is $30, however you also have to send it to a lab which will charge lab fees (which are around $35-40 more) so the total cost is around $70. still a bargain imo if only for the peace of mind.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 06:08 PM
1

International Women's Day started on March 8th 1909 (two years before the fire) by the socialist party of america in New York, the fire was exploited to advance their agenda; (as another famous socialist once said "Never let a disaster go to waste") They were not killed; they died from the fire/smoke inhalation or from jumping out of windows; they might have been able to escape except the exit doors were locked which was fairly common practice at the time in many factories (to prevent theft, wor…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:05 PM
1

What "Lie" are you referring to regarding the factory fire? The fire was certainly real and there were 123 females (and 23 males) killed in the fire. It was known as the "Triangle Shirtwaist factory fire" - Nothing about it was due to sexism; it was a garment factory that employed a lot of females and they died in part because the doors were locked which is a safety issue but had nothing to do with them being female. I have no idea why that would have been a 'celebration' or a particularly memor…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 03:02 PM
2

They can be used in court however it's a lot easier to challenge them and have them thrown out over some gap in the evidence chain. I'd certainly recommend a home test for anyone that has doubts but if it becomes necessary to take it to court I'd certainly recommend getting the legal version; that would require actually going to a lab that can do legal tests; verifying identity and paying the higher costs. - the test itself is pretty much the same.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:54 PM
3

a DNA Paternity test that will stand up in court typically costs between $300-$500 which is a lot more expensive than the home test kit because it involves maintaining chain of custody/witness/identification of the subjects etc to survive any potential court challenges. Non-Legal Paternity tests can be found for less than $70 (most pharmacies have a test kit for ~$30 that you have to send to a lab; the lab charges are typically around $35) If these tests became more routine the cost per test wou…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:41 PM
1

15 years ago if you had asked me if i was a feminist i probably would have said yes; i was never a 'feminist activist' and at the time i naively believed that feminism was for equality; It wasn't until I started looking a lot closer at the claims being made that I recognized the lies for what they were. polls that claim that "20% of women claim to be feminists" are usually based on a fairly simple question asked to a random audience. - a lot of people don't pay close attention; even fewer analyz…
/r/MensRights21/06/17 01:04 PM
8

even amongst that 20% i suspect that a lot of them are operating under the belief that feminism is about equality because they simply don't pay enough attention to what the feminist activists actually say;
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:11 PM
2

regarding the statement "Women are only good for sex" Whenever you are specifically limiting the criteria to "what good are women" then the very question asks what unique quality in females is of value that does not exist in males. - I have many skills and abilities as an individual but the only ones I can really say are specifically related to my existence "as a female" pretty much boils down to my reproductive role and my sexual use - This doesn't offend me at all.... I can do lots of other th…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 09:00 PM
1

Surely the "fuck your feelings" right can handle it. Sounds kinda like feminists talking about "male tears". congratulations; You've demonstrated here the answer to OP's question perfectly.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 10:53 AM
0

Pretty sure that I already mentioned that my comment is about the debate fallacy being employed; not at all about the merits of climate change as a science. Whether you agree with climate change or not it is incredibly obvious that the effort to paint those in opposition as "deniers" is exactly the tactic i am referring to. - it is an ad-hominem attack regardless of whether climate change is or isn't "true". This tactic is used very frequently by the left for a whole host of topics whether it's …
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:19 PM
1

Wait; Are you telling me that you don't know what really happened to the dinosaurs?
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:11 PM
2

the specific term "deniers" was chosen to attempt to equate them with holocaust deniers and that is clearly an effort to smear and paint people evil in a way crafted to silence the debate - I am pointing out that specific aspect of behavior; the political debate is largely taking place between liberal and conservative sides; even if the conservatives are wrong the tactics being used are pretty blatantly obvious to anyone that cares to look.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 03:48 PM
4

I mentioned climate change specifically because anyone that raises questions about it is vilified in very much the same way. - Science is not settled "by consensus" Science welcomes scrutiny and debate. The very fact that many people on the left try to cut off the debate and demonize any opposition to climate change is entirely political and has nothing at all to do with "science". It really isn't relevant to this discussion whether climate change is real or not; or can be proven or not; the pat…
/r/MensRights10/06/17 07:08 PM
3

it looks like his last paragraph says "many liberals"...
/r/MensRights10/06/17 03:00 PM
7

claiming that the statement "in the minds of many liberals" is the same thing as "generalizing all liberals" is also a "tad unfair".
/r/MensRights10/06/17 02:56 PM
8

you may be; however there's clear evidence that this is a common tactic used by many liberals. It is used by conservatives as well but not anywhere near as frequently or effectively as the liberals use it. It is a well known debate fallacy known as "Argumentum ad hominem " aka "ad hominem attacks" - which are arguments against the character of the person rather than against the actual facts presented. One well known example being that of "Joe the Plumber" who asked Obama a question where Obama r…
/r/MensRights10/06/17 02:53 PM
21

in the minds of many liberals any opposition to their goals is the same thing as "hatred". For instance anyone opposed to Obama's agenda was branded a "racist" - anyone opposed to Hillary's election was branded a "misogynist" - anyone that questions Global Warming is branded a "denier"... conservatives are routinely called 'facists' for having the gall to think that it's better public policy to expect people to get a job rather than live a lifetime on welfare; and they run ads claiming that we'r…
/r/MensRights10/06/17 02:37 PM
9

"MRA Icon"? that's total bs. What a surprise to see that this is your first and only post to /r/MensRights
/r/MensRights08/06/17 05:21 PM
2

I am the one that mentioned having posted hundreds of times in /r/MensRights - that's certainly true; I only found 5 threads that she had ever commented in (including this one) and only a handful of total comments. I know nothing of her motivation but I certainly haven't been able to find anything to support her claim.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 10:26 PM
7

no doubt they exist; any large group of people is going to have a lunatic fringe element. I looked over the 4 threads that she had commented in and nothing that I saw in the comments seemed "misogynistic" to me.. perhaps something was there that has since been deleted but if i can't see it I have no way to evaluate what was said... She also asked that people comment on her comment rather than her gender but in one of the two threads that she referred to she is the one that brought her gender int…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 07:24 PM
28

I'm female and I've posted hundreds of comments in this subreddit without encountering any misogyny or sexism (unless you count trolls and they hardly represent the community.) I see exactly 4 total threads that you've posted comments to in /r/MensRights prior to this message. A father's love knows no bounds; "Father overdoses on heroin to shock his addict son into going to rehab-told his son "if you won't stop I will do the same as you"-Son is now seeking rehab". Time we stop forgetting fathers…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:29 PM
2

"Empathy" is where you 'put yourself in the shoes of another' - "sympathy" is feeling compassion.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 06:26 PM
5

he didn't do a thing to "me" - 'vengenance' has nothing to do with it. He is a cancer that should be removed permanently from society for the health of society. and the law very clearly gives juries the ability to impose different sentences based on the severity of the crime and the danger that the criminal poses to society. This isn't a "vengeance argument". And this is not someone you want to position as some "men's rights" poster child - he is exactly the sort of jackass that feminists would …
/r/MensRights06/06/17 11:37 AM
5

I already said that I think life in prison is too good for him and I absolutely think that it's relevant how much damage he did; I think it's insane that the taxpayers are going to be stuck paying to keep his sorry ass alive for at least the next 36 years. If a female did this sort of damage to a male that she assaulted then I would think the same of her. - in my opinion this really has little to do with "men's rights" or "gender equality"; it has to do with this individual being a danger to soc…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:45 PM
10

This wasn't a minor assault, he beat two people half to death. there are photo's of Christy taken at the hospital after the assault here - http://www.espn.com/espnw/news-commentary/article/12627754/the-tragic-love-story-christy-mack-mma-fighter-war-machine.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:24 PM
4

he seriously beat the #% out of Christy Mack and another man that was in her house. personally I think life in prison is too good for him.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:15 PM
5

did you look at the image that op provided? the one that very specifically complains that mens razors and deodorant are NOT taxed but tampons are... The article linked to in the thread that OP's screenshot came from even specifically refers to the VAT in the EU which taxes tampons at 5% (as an essential item) but taxes mens razors and deodorant at 20%...
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:08 PM
2

Going to a "liberal arts school" is not the same as "getting a liberal arts degree". A computer science degree is a lot more valuable to a lot more employers than a degree in women's studies; or humanities...
/r/MensRights05/06/17 06:24 PM
7

mens razors and deodorant ARE taxed...
/r/MensRights05/06/17 02:22 PM
3

That wasn't the case among the brands of body wash that I listed at any of the websites for the stores I mentioned. I did see some higher priced options for some of the premium "dove" products that at least implied that they had more moisturizer or some other benefit however most of the female dove products were priced exactly the same per ounce as the male dove products. - and that pattern held true for softsoap and suave. The only real difference I saw was that there were a lot of brands that …
/r/MensRights05/06/17 02:05 PM
7

so the theory is that products for women cost more than products for men... There is a grain of truth to this but it is mostly myth. For instance I can go to the CVS website and compare the women's body wash vs the men's body wash and it's absolutely true that the 8 most expensive options are female body wash products. - What the feminists don't mention is that there are simply "a lot more options for females" - nearly 3 times as many "female" body wash product choices available. - What they als…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 01:01 PM
3

you can find it "meangingful" all day long however that wasn't the point of my post; I spoke directly to the ability to PAY THE STUDENT LOAN which was the entire premise of the article referenced by OP. - female students supposedly 'suffering horribly' because they have more trouble paying down their student loan debt; perhaps if they chose degree programs and careers that actually got them highly paying jobs, such as engineering or many other applied degrees then they would have a lot easier ti…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:46 PM
2

because liberal arts is a waste of money and time; it basically allows you to check off a list that you "have a degree" which might be an entry level requirement for some jobs but it doesn't actually prepare you for anything of any particular value to an employer. A lot of females opt for the easier/less valuable degree's and then claim that it's "sexism" when they get lower paying jobs. If you go into thousands of dollars in debt to pay for a liberal arts degree you would have probably been bet…
/r/MensRights03/06/17 04:35 PM
1014

i bet most anyone with an engineering degree would be able to pay off their student loans a lot faster than someone with a liberal arts "degree" for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with what's between their legs.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 09:17 PM
3

in a "rape culture" rapists would be celebrities, revered and respected. we would hold parades in their honor; sorta like bill clinton. however, most rapists don't get honored with parades; rapists are reviled and despised; the mere accusation of being a rapist totally destroys the life, reputation and career prospects of nearly any man that isn't a leading liberal political celebrity. so the only place "rape culture" exists is at major gatherings of the DNC.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:11 PM
14

it is very thoughtful of them to demonstrate what oppressive gender based discrimination really looks like.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 01:27 PM
6

I'm certainly not suggesting that there is no link between the recent immigration and increased rape trends; My point was mainly that it's not quite as clear cut as some people want to make it seem. Regarding the changes in how rapes are counted - One english source is this snopes article - it mentions a few factors including the statement "For one thing, Sweden tallies each incident as a separate case, even if the accusation, perpetrator and victim are the same, a practice that may create confu…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 11:04 PM
6

These are movies based on comic books - a female character having super powers doesn't seem any more far fetched than a man having super powers. Haven't seen the movie yet so I'll reserve judgement on how 'feminist' it is but i'm personally not bothered by depictions of strong women; Absolutely loved the Netflix Jessica Jones series; nothing about that felt particularly "feminist" to me at all; meanwhile the recent attempt at a Supergirl TV show seemed to be constantly pushing feminism. I'm not …
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:19 PM
2

the city isn't 'charging' them with rape because the current state code doesn't allow it however they are reporting the incidents as rapes to the FBI for crime reporting statistics. So the rate reported to the FBI is what 'doubled'. The better news from the article is that there is at least an effort to push this change statewide and get a more gender neutral definition for rape in the state code.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 06:01 PM
28

one major reason that Sweden is often cited as having recently become a "rape capital of the world" is that they changed the way rapes are recorded. In the past (and in many other countries) a victim that is raped multiple times by the same assailant is counted one time however several years ago Sweden changed their reporting standards and every individual instance of rape is counted; this is one major reason that they saw a large spike over the past 8-10 years. - Certainly there are other facto…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 03:41 PM
38

City of Atlanta for the first time began to report male victims in their "rape reports" - Previously many of the men that were sexually assaulted were categorized under "sodomy" laws and not considered victims of "rape". the incidents of rape reported by the city immediately doubled; more evidence suggesting that men are victims of rape at nearly the same rate as females. The article mentions that many of these would have previously been considered "forced sodomy" however it doesn't give any ind…
/r/MensRights30/05/17 01:10 PM
5

it is also available on amazon video streaming.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 03:22 PM
4

the nerve of some people; actually saying things that the New York Times doesn't agree with. That darn first amendment; always causing trouble.
/r/MensRights30/04/17 01:00 PM
4

Do they serve ice cream in jail?
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/17 02:48 PM
7

so; according to you; of the 47 threads opened in this sub in the past 24 hours exactly 3 of them have anything to do with circumcision. Therefore it is "basically and (sic) anti-circ sub."
/r/MensRights21/04/17 10:53 PM
2

News flash: it's possible to wash your penis; even if you have an intact foreskin.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 10:41 PM
8

Do you mean kinda like FGM is not a female rights issue?
/r/MensRights21/04/17 10:38 PM
1

I'm sure there's more than one factor involved in this however it seems to me that after several generations of not being given a choice about what sort of career you were going to be assigned might have had an impact on gender preferences that lasted beyond the demise of the soviet union. Further females were not forced to serve 2 years in the soviet military which allowed them to get ahead of their male 'peers' academically.
/r/MensRights21/04/17 04:39 PM
6

'typing' and 'data entry' is a far cry from writing programs;
/r/MensRights19/04/17 09:40 PM
8

the article makes the claim that "Computer programming, for instance, used to be a relatively menial role done by women. But when male programmers began to outnumber female ones, the job began paying more and gained prestige." When exactly did female "computer programmers" outnumber men?
/r/MensRights19/04/17 08:39 PM
3

maybe it's just me but I'm not finding the link to the article you are referring to. However I have seen some similar articles from a few months ago and they seemed to totally ignore the fact that adding more immigrants to construction markets causes the pay to drop; adding more immigrants to farming markets causes the pay to drop; adding more H1B immigrants to the IT Field causes pay to drop; those are all expected/totally predictible results of adding more workers to any particular field; a we…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 07:58 PM
1

i merged them because the growth reflected in the numbers for both groups was quite similar. - and in both cases the increase was more significant for males than females across either group. The conclusion that this increase was "particularly for women" is without merit unless you're a misandrist that thinks men's lives don't matter.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 07:38 PM
5

"particularly for women"? - the rate for white/Native American/Alaska Native males went up over 5 points (from 20 to 25.8) - the rate for white/Native American/Alaska Native women went up 2.5 points (from 5 to 7.5)... all other demographics appear to be relatively flat... how is that "particularly for women"?
/r/MensRights18/04/17 06:36 PM
46

Regarding the boy that admitted having sex with a dog previously; the last sentence of the article states: "but the crimes occurred before the bestiality law went into effect." If the law wasn't in effect at the time then it wasn't a "crime" at the time regardless of whether you think it should have been or not...
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/17 06:30 PM
7

The main difference is that it's apparently possible to get the "patriarchy" to do something about issues affecting women.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 12:39 AM
2

get with the program mister; you must file a signed and notarized legal consent agreement with the local recorders court detailing the specific actions that will be performed between each thrust. You may have consent to insert two fingers in her butt however if you twist them without a signed and notarized consent decree you are doomed.
/r/MGTOW06/04/17 07:06 PM
2

so i am pathological for being able to recognize that someone is attractive without having sexual interest in them? I would worry more about someone that cannot distiguish between the two; I see attractive people every day and have no interest in sleeping with them.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 04:29 PM
3

saying that someone is "attractive" is not "sexualizing" the massage; why would you or anyone else be upset if someone commented that you were attractive? it obligates you to nothing.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 02:41 AM
1

I'm pretty much just referring to the current "Supergirl" tv show. never saw the comics or the cartoons; in General I'm not a big fan of Superman or Supergirl; they have too many superpowers and only ONE weakness; so lets break out kryptonite in every single episode... boring... overused.. too cliche... sick of it...
/r/MensRights04/04/17 09:17 PM
7

I can't really say much about the sales of comics since I don't think i've ever bought a single 'comic book' however I do watch and thoroughly enjoy the MCU movies and TV shows. Personally i loved Jessica Jones; she's a very powerful female character and doesn't appear to be some contrived character that exists solely to meet some 'diversity' agenda and despite having certain powers she still seems genuine, broken and flawed. The actress that played her was brilliant as was the entire story. I a…
/r/MensRights04/04/17 01:17 PM
7

if you're trying to have "conversations" while "having sex" you aren't doing either right...
/r/MGTOW02/04/17 07:49 PM
4

I would argue that it does harm women. For instance the feminist demands for 'gender equality' translates to lowered standards and expectations for women in order to meet 'quota's' which leads to resentment from people that may have had to work harder or conform to higher standards to qualify as a male; meanwhile those females are often assumed to have only gotten their job due to those lowered standards regardless of how qualified they might be. This equally applies to racial affirmative action…
/r/MensRights02/04/17 06:53 PM
0

Sodomy laws are mostly invalid due to the supreme court ruling in Lawrence v. Texas (2003). The only section that is still applicable would be the part related to aggravated sodomy.
/r/MensRights02/04/17 03:58 PM
7

the headline seems to imply that "men will be replaced" - but how is it any less likely that "women will be replaced" by female sex robots? There will probably be a bigger market for female sex robots than male sex robots so when a headline suggests that this is "only" an issue of "men being replaced" it seems rather biased. Personally i doubt either gender will be "replaced" but I suspect many people that would not have had many options in the past will find that they have options once these th…
/r/MensRights25/03/17 04:15 PM
1

understood; we've been through major shifts in the labor market before but the concern with this one has more to do with the scale and scope of what is coming and if it happens as quickly/suddenly as some people are predicting there will be a very painful transition. The people in "low skill jobs" are going to be the hardest hit and also have the hardest time adapting to most of the future jobs that get created in the aftermath. "low skilled jobs" = "easy to automate"...
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:54 PM
2

One of the biggest concerns about the looming rise of automation is the possibility that 'very few' people will actually have jobs in the aftermath; we've certainly had industrial revolutions in the past where large sectors of employment vaporized but nothing has ever approached the scale of what is predicted over the next 20 years. - Many people might not have the ability to get any sort of work; social welfare systems (already heavily strained) will likely fail if we lose a significant portion…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:35 PM
1

No doubt that a huge number of jobs will be automated and it will cause some huge turmoil regardless. An awful lot of the newly automated jobs will clearly be "easy" and "not dangerous" routine type jobs (i.e. book-keeping, bank tellers, store clerks, and all those 'assembly line' food assemblers at your fast food joints that somehow think they should make $15 an hour and get health benefits are going to quickly be replaced...) - those are "easy to replace" but a lot of effort is being made to a…
/r/MensRights24/03/17 11:20 PM
2

I'm not sure that this is a bad thing; a lot of the jobs expected to be automated are the same jobs that end up killing a lot of men; notably construction/mining/agricultural/truck driving/logging all of which are big killers... There are certainly lots of jobs that aren't big killers that will also be eliminated but how big is this disparity once you take those out of the equation?
/r/MensRights24/03/17 10:40 PM
3

I'm guessing it was a cross between ebonics and foghorn leghorn.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 02:24 PM
1

a friend of mine ran for state house as a republican about 10 years ago; during her campaign she got "a lot" of dildos and other sex toys in the mail; "how dare" a woman run for office as a conservative... someone spent a lot of money on a very retarded harassment campaign, i seriously doubt these "contributions" were coming from men or conservatives.
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:37 PM
1

that's called "femsplaining"
/r/MensRights24/03/17 01:32 PM
16

under current law in the US we don't need the fathers consent to get an abortion and we don't even have to tell the father if we don't want to. We don't need a 'reason' either; our reason could be as simple as "i'm just not ready to have a child" or "it's an inconvenient time..." - I'm not a big fan of abortion however the baby could not survive without the host body for most of the first two trimesters so I'm not thrilled about the idea of banning them either. However in the interest of 'fairne…
/r/MensRights22/03/17 08:43 PM
1

did you read the links in the sidebar? particularly the one called "Reference book of Men's Issues" It has several links that cover specific issues with lots of links to detailed summaries, articles etc.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 11:12 PM
7

that comment seems more misogynistic than misandric; shooting women for engaging in a private business transaction between consenting adults. If a prostitute is engaging in that business based on her own free will then she is clearly getting 'something' of value in exchange for the services she provides; Are these feminists truly in favor of women having the ability to choose the line of work they want to engage in? It seems based on this comment that she doesn't think so... if this hypothetical…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:43 PM
1

What specific steps is necessary to "verify age"? are you saying that it should be illegal to have sex with someone unless you have checked their ID? Now we MUST show identification; presumably with our real name and real address etc. before we are allowed to have a one-night stand with someone we met at a party? Maybe some people want to have sex but don't want to ever see that person again or isn't ready to give them a real name, real address, real phone number etc. - That happens a lot more o…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 03:48 PM
1

what exactly does this man have to do in order to verify the age of someone before having sex with them in your imagination? This girl allegedly appeared to be older than 16 to multiple witnesses. she was drinking in a bar and had been served alcohol by a bartender that thought she was old enough to drink. she was questioned by police that were explicitly looking for underage persons and they had no issues and moved on believing that she was old enough. the judge specifically stated in her rulin…
/r/MensRights20/03/17 03:16 PM
1

of course, personal insults are so much more effective at proving your superior intellect than actually making coherent arguments.
/r/MensRights20/03/17 12:51 PM
26

so, if the genders were reversed.... would the man get paid "damages" if the woman wasn't giving him enough sex? How do you prove and/or quantify these damages? Is video evidence of intercourse required? perhaps all marital sexual activity should be televised so the evidence is preserved in case there are any disputes 21 years into a marriage.
/r/MensRights18/03/17 06:48 PM
2

7th grade class from Brookline in 1958 7th grade class from Brookline in 1965 6th grade class from Franklin middle school in 2011 6th grade class from Escola Americana in 1964 Most of the girls in those 4 photos above look prepubescent or barely pubescent; however in each photo there are a few girls that appear to be quite a bit older/more physically mature and i suspect that those specific 12-13 year olds could pretty easily pass themselves off as being 16 if they tried. This girl was in 7th Gr…
/r/MensRights18/03/17 04:24 PM
8

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/feel See verb definition 3:1 3.1 Hold an opinion. ‘I felt I could make a useful contribution’
/r/MensRights17/03/17 05:28 PM
6

given that the taxi driver specifically testified in court that he believed that the girl looked to be around 20, that the bartender served her alcohol apparently believing that she was old enough to drink (you can drink alcohol at 16 in scotland when served with meals; otherwise the drinking age is 18), that the police testified that they had not had any concerns about the age of the girl, given that the judge herself stated in her ruling that she felt that the girl appeared to be older and tha…
/r/MensRights17/03/17 04:57 PM
7

I couldn't do that at 12, but at 14 I rather frequently claimed to be 18 and got away with it. You can look at class photos of 6th graders and see that the majority of the girls look barely pubescent however you will also see a handful that could easily pass for 16.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 03:13 PM
19

apparently the police, the taxi driver, the judge and the accused man ALL felt that she looked over 16.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 03:03 PM
2

Following this same logic they shouldn't use any product created by a man... for instance: a man invented birth control pills; (Gregory Goodwin Pincus) men invented the light bulb (Edison and Hiram Maxim and Joseph Swan) a man invented the automobile (Karl Benz) men invented the internet (several men really, The main names include Leonard Kleinrock who wrote the framework of what became Arpanet which evolved into the internet; Robert Metcalf, David Riggle, Mark Painter, Douglas Terry, Songnian Z…
/r/MensRights16/03/17 03:19 PM
11

Birth Control doesn't include condoms? it doesn't include "emergency contraception"? "The Pill" - under ACA the prescription is free; prior to ACA i had a $5 copay on prescriptions so the direct out of pocket prescription cost was ~$60 per year. the 'main cost' tho' is the doctor visits necessary to get the prescription. Why this even requires a prescription is pretty puzzling to me; I suspect it's mostly due to doctors wanting to protect their monopoly however if it were 'over the counter' it w…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 05:39 PM
2

I am hardly 'anti-woman' - it seems pretty clear that the "sammich" comment is a joke; the entire premise of this thread is due to some retarded idea spouted by a feminist that tries to claim that women shouldn't be reading books written by men. That's absolutely stupid and I'm not about to let some nitwit dictate to me what i'm allowed to read. I can only hope that the suggestion by this woman is also a joke because i'm having a hard time believing anyone could be stupid enough to actually sugg…
/r/MensRights11/03/17 01:17 PM
8

definitely do NOT read a script and keep it polite and civil. I know a few of the Republican Senators and many of their staff; I've worked on several campaigns over the past several years. If you are reading a script it will sound phony; it will come across as spam. If possible you might want to consider visiting their office; especially if you live in their district. parking is a bit of a challenge near the capital; especially during the legislative session but you can almost always find a spac…
/r/MensRights10/03/17 11:11 PM
14

well fortunately i don't let opinionated nutcases decide what I'm allowed to read. would you like fries with that?
/r/MensRights10/03/17 10:47 PM
30

you don't need the 'better ones' to make sammiches...
/r/MensRights10/03/17 10:21 PM
157

so; basically girls can't read engineering text books, medical textbooks or math textbooks... fortunately we have plenty of cookbooks to choose from.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 07:11 PM
24

Asian Female here: The "eye opening" situation for me was seeing how schools are becoming more and more 'anti-male'; particularly how teaching methods have been changed to benefit females to the point that schools have become downright hostile to boys; This includes closing down competitive sports programs because not enough women sign up for sports programs and TITLE IX triggers penalties because of womens choices (and not in any way due to discrimination). - To the mass drugging of boys for no…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 10:15 PM
1

I hate to bring up the subject of 'abortion' here however one of the common qualifiers cited by those opposed to abortion includes "except in the case of rape, incest or when the life of the mother is threatened". - just assuming that this became the official standard I would expect to see a huge increase in the number of false rape claims... another factor that may not have been as prevalent in 1994 (when this study was made) is the feminist attempt to broaden the 'definition' and call it 'rape…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 02:29 PM
7

There was a lot of whining about Jennifer Lawrence "making less than her male co-stars" on a movie back before anyone knew who she was; Perhaps it would be fair to ask if she will refuse higher pay in all future movies unless her male co-stars are paid the same as she is. edited: got bored and did just a smidge of checking and ran across this lovely gem from Cinema Blend talking specifically about Jennifer Lawrence's pay in some OTHER movies; with all the whining and outrage over her earning les…
/r/MensRights27/02/17 01:09 PM
1

and i totally forgot to mention that the 'entire' reason that he fell 'in love' with her was because she asked him if he was 'gay' in an interview... because..uhm... apparently he's a billionaire and that's just the sort of thing that makes billionaires fall in love... i'm sure it makes perfect sense to the typical disney princess fan; (where the male 'prince charming' sort is totally void of any character depth or personality...)
/r/askTRP14/02/17 09:46 PM
–

I'll save you the trouble... "Inner Goddess" <--- Repeat 2,000,000 times.... Disney Princess fantasy <--- "Very attractive Young Billionaire falls madly in love with young college student; buys her audi's, apple computers, takes her gliding and on helicopter rides etc. --- typical Disney Princess delusion BS...; oh.. and he's also a creepy stalker that would probably get served with a restraining order if he wasn't a good looking billionaire;... did i mention that he was a billionaire? horribly …
/r/askTRP14/02/17 03:58 PM
13

isn't it great how this sign that says "you will not find walls here." is posted.... on a wall?
/r/MensRights10/02/17 01:12 AM
–

regarding the abortion itself it might be worth asking "why"; i had one years ago due to an ectopic pregnancy; (the egg was growing in the fallopian tubes and not in the womb) - if i hadn't had the abortion it would have killed me. the baby would not have survived in either case... it sucks but it certainly wasn't a case where i just wanted to get rid of a baby for 'convenience'.
/r/askTRP09/02/17 11:54 AM
1

how are you defining "conservative"? there are certainly many "social conservatives" that push religious agendas but there are also quite a few "fiscal conservatives" that are more focused on minimizing government control over our lives; fiscal responsibility, maximum personal freedom AND personal responsibility. I consider myself part of this latter group. I don't like the "social conservative" aspects that some 'conservatives' are trying to push. I support gay marriage on the basis that govern…
/r/MensRights09/02/17 11:37 AM
3

and curiously enough we're the ones frequently referred to as "exotic"...
/r/MensRights08/02/17 09:11 PM
21

we're only about 2/3 of the worlds population so it's pretty easy to understand...
/r/MensRights08/02/17 02:14 PM
2

couldn't begin to say how common it is although it's clearly a very popular fantasy with women. I've heard studys claim that 'rape' is the third most common fantasy theme among women; nancy friday's book from the 70's (my secret garden) suggested that around 38% of women fantasized about 'being forced to have sex' and I've seen other studies that suggest numbers as high as the mid 60% range. According to pornhub viewing stats women search for 'rough sex', 'gang bang', and 'bondage' themed porn a…
/r/askTRP02/02/17 05:46 PM
4

Bomb squads have been called out over Vibrators before as they were seen as a 'suspicious package'... Feminists should immediately demand an end to the vibratorarchy and put a stop to this madness for good!! - just don't ban them until after i get my next order from Amazon filled... when vibrators are outlawed; only outlaws will have vibrators!
/r/MensRights02/02/17 10:36 AM
2

are you totally ignoring that these unnecessary medical procedures are being done on toddlers that do not have the ability to consent? adults can consent to those medical procedures but there is no good reason to do it to a child. let them decide for themselves when they are old enough to understand.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 04:28 PM
2

Clearly YOU are trying to change the meaning of what is in the specific OP because absolutely nothing in the OP suggests what you are claiming. further there is NO ban on muslims; there is a 90 day ban on immigration from 7 specific countries that were identified by the OBAMA administration as being state sponsors of terrorism. there are over 50 other muslim majority countries where there is no hold on immigration at all. If it were a "ban on muslims" then it would clearly affect those other cou…
/r/MensRights01/02/17 01:13 PM
1

'lone wolf white terrorists who turn out to belong to online white supremacist & MRA communities'; "PizzaGate"; "Santa Barbara", "Quebec City" and "white guys radicalized by MRM/Hate Groups on social media" don't suggest "white immigrants from Europe" - 3 of those clearly have zero connection to "europe" and the bizarre comparisons of "MRA/MRM" groups to "hate groups" is just plain retarded but also doesn't imply anything about "europe" or "white immigrants" at all.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 11:47 AM
2

it is 100 deaths that were caused by an entirely unnecessary medical procedure.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 11:44 AM
11

some of us are rather fond of them; MOST of the ones I see are circumcised because I live in the US where it is a disturbingly common practice but I certainly don't consider the uncircumcised ones to be 'weird' - i actually like the variety of appearance but think that it's totally wrong to inflict such a treatment on a child when there is almost no good medical justification...
/r/MensRights31/01/17 05:05 PM
30

over 97% of circumcisions performed are not medically necessary and circumcision results in more than 100 deaths per year... http://www.circumstitions.com/death.html
/r/MensRights31/01/17 05:02 PM
10

an adult CHOOSING to get circumcised is entirely different from forcing an unnecessary surgical alteration on a toddler. If an adult male wants to have a circumcision that is entirely their call; but why should parents force that on a child? and why would forcing genital mutilation on females be unacceptable if it is entirely acceptable to mutilate male genitals?
/r/MensRights31/01/17 04:39 PM
2

what is the point of this argument anyway? are they actually suggesting that we should go ahead and bring over more potential terrorists BECAUSE there might already be terrorists here?
/r/MensRights31/01/17 04:25 PM
1

I just deleted my comment; not the OP's post.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 12:10 AM
1

ahhh, duh. thanks. I totally missed that :)) i deleted my comment since it was totally messed up; thanks for pointing out my mistake.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 12:02 AM
–

/r/feminism is a default sub too; why shouldn't mens rights be treated equally?
/r/MensRights21/01/17 11:38 PM
1

Trump won because everyone was afraid that Madonna was going to try to give them a blowjob if they voted for Hillary.
/r/MensRights21/01/17 07:08 PM
1

it looks like the source for that statement is found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4267265/ and is based (according to the footnotes) in a 2003 study (below) Fazio R. H., Olson M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: their meaning and use. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54, 297–327. 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225 If you go to the link provided by the poster of the youtube video (view full lesson) there are several articles and discussions that provide furt…
/r/MensRights12/01/17 07:05 PM
1

I knew what you meant :) I stand by my answer :)) the self important nitwit thinks he's beyond being talked down to by the President Elect... The media apparently still hasn't recognized that no-one trusts or respects them at all. they were certainly biased before but their behavior during the last election stripped them of any credibility that they ever had... their blatant dishonesty is so bad that Dan "fake but accurate" Rather is actually giving lessons on "finding the truth in the news"... …
/r/MensRights11/01/17 11:38 PM
1

it meant that he feels like the president elect is 'supposed' to cater to the reporters princess delusion... he's a reporter; we're supposed to worship him... what is this world coming to when people actually have the gall to stand up to lying biased reporters. it's never happened before...
/r/MensRights11/01/17 10:24 PM
2

way overdue - one of the most awesome moments in television history was him directly telling a CNN reporter that "you can't ask questions, you're fake news" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiWg7L0NJYU
/r/MensRights11/01/17 06:01 PM
4

if she's "independent" she should be able to do those things for herself...
/r/askTRP11/01/17 02:43 PM
40

the original reason is mostly due to the damage being done to young boys in education under the name of feminism; i'm all for schools helping girls do well however we have to recognize the damage that is being done to the boys by these changes and work to ensure schools serve the needs of boys as well.
/r/MensRights09/01/17 06:16 PM
2

why does this story with the claim that this is a "surprising development"? there have been plenty of examples of people pulling stunts like this for years. These claims seem to be false more often than they turn up being true.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/01/17 10:26 PM
7

"Wishful thinking"? I've commented a few times that this imagined belief in a "rape culture" looks so similar to my 'fantasies' but has no grounds in reality; I suspect that a lot of the people making this claim just want to believe that they are 'so desirable' that men can't control themselves were it not for their 'brave' stand against the evil 'rape culture' 'patriarchy' that they imagine that they live in. if they were forced to admit that they really don't live in that delusional world it w…
/r/MensRights08/01/17 05:25 PM
1

i can't speak for anyone but myself but generally pictures that look like you are 'posing' and trying to show off your build tend to come off more 'conceited' and don't really help your case... i would focus more on pictures of you doing fun/interesting things; you can 'show off the physique' without making it look like that's your intent; for instance since you like mountain climbing you could include photos of you doing that; we'll certainly see your body but it will seem more natural than som…
/r/askTRP05/01/17 05:02 PM
4

This likely will increase the number of underage prostitutes simply because they can now work with little fear of arrest, many of these underage providers will lie about their age to johns because MOST johns are NOT looking for underage girls... The end result will be johns getting arrested on 'child molesting' charges when they never intended to do anything with a child at all... prostitution should be entirely legalized with providers licensed with regular health checks/education etc. this pro…
/r/MensRights30/12/16 03:05 PM
1

Feminism is it's own worst enemy. (for many reasons, but just to focus on one...) They push to lower the standards so 'more women' can get in which basically says that 'women just aren't smart enough to meet the same standards as men..." - the end result being that any female is assumed to have been given 'special treatment' just to meet some ridiculous 'diversity goal' even when they ARE just as good as the males they are competing with... I know I am good at my job; but even I question whether…
/r/MensRights28/12/16 03:52 PM
1

I am an engineer... I had no idea it was "sexy"...
/r/MensRights28/12/16 03:34 PM
10

this is referring to a 'study' based on github 'pulls' that get accepted and makes the claim that a higher percentage of the pulls submitted by females were accepted vs. those submitted by males. I commented on that study when it first came out; nowhere in the study does it mention the complexity of pulls or the quality of code changes. for instance I am NOT a programmer but I have submitted hundreds of pull requests for minor changes; sometimes little more than rewording of error messages to ma…
/r/MensRights28/12/16 02:44 PM
1

The only way to create "gender parity" is to mandate which careers everyone will enter. STEM gender disparity is caused by 'freedom of choice'. women freely CHOOSE other career paths or simply lack the aptitude for STEM. Discrimination has nothing to do with it at all. There are no barriers to women in STEM, There are numerous incentives and opportunities but just like firefighting, construction, combat positions, coal mining and many other occupations... women just don't sign up at all if they …
/r/MensRights28/12/16 02:05 AM
1

I have no idea if "most feminists" are male, certainly some are. but among females only 18-31% claim to be feminists; feminism is seen as too extreme by the majority; Believing in EQUALITY is very different from believing in "feminism". I believe in equality which is why I support mens rights.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 07:50 PM
2

First: You are not responsible for the actions of anyone other than yourself. Why would you 'apologize' for the actions of 'others'? Second: Are you implying in your apology that "most of your gender" is guilty of something? MOST females are NOT feminists...I am female and can't stand feminists. I suspect that a lot of the people that call themselves 'feminists' don't actually pay enough attention to hear see what feminism actually says. the few women that are "activists" for feminism get way to…
/r/MensRights26/12/16 06:42 PM
15

maybe they were all just afraid that madonna would try to give them a blowjob.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 11:57 PM
1

"why" do some people like "horror movies"? The reasons you list might have some influence but I don't even know "WHY" i have mine; I certainly couldn't begin to guess what lies behind hers; I know that "rape fantasies" have been ranked as the 3rd most common fantasy among women and that various studies suggest that they are had by somewhere between 31% and 62% of females according to Psychology today and they also have a few articles that attempt to summarize some of the research about 'why' we …
/r/askTRP22/12/16 10:42 AM
2

I can certainly understand why you might find it 'sick'; it goes against a lot of what we've been taught; Considering the fantasy from the female perspective it's "all about me" - i get to the the center of attention, they are doing these things 'to me' - because they "WANT ME" so badly that they would take me no matter how much i resist ... - I consider it a variation on the princess fantasy; she gets to be totally validated as desirable and wanted and she can act out the 'victim role' based on…
/r/askTRP21/12/16 11:22 PM
1

no problem, I've done a lot of these and it can be really amazing when done well. - I love that you are willing to look into how to do it and feel free to ask if you have any questions; this is a very common fantasy for women however from the male perspective it is quite a different experience and goes against much of what society has hammered into our psyches our entire lives; despite the shrill feminist rhetoric most men are NOT rapists and consider rape to be an abhorrent act; the power dynam…
/r/askTRP21/12/16 09:26 PM
9

"it's a trap!!!!" rape and rape roleplay are very different things. for your own legal health you would want to make it clear that you won't play any sort of force roleplay without some basic ground rules in place; These protect you and her. you cannot read minds and before ever venturing into any sort of force play you should have clearly established safe words so she can easily signal the difference between a "real no" and a "i just want to protest no but i don't really want you to stop..." sh…
/r/askTRP21/12/16 06:39 PM
1

liberals assume that anyone that doesn't agree with their ideology must be dumb. that isn't news. One interesting observation about the third link is that they are trying to equate violence at the Trump Rally's as evidence to support their biased opinion and they conveniently ignore the evidence that the people causing that violence were PAID by the clinton campaign to provoke people at these rallys.
/r/askTRP13/12/16 12:24 AM
2

Intelligence is your capacity to learn and your ability to apply what you know. IQ tests don't exactly measure "intelligence". It is an 'estimate' of intelligence that begins with an assumption of what a person of a certain age (or with a certain level of education) is expected to know and assumes that they should be able to use that set of knowledge to solve questions on the test; but the results can easily be gamed by studying certain test techniques that can make you appear to have gained sev…
/r/askTRP13/12/16 12:15 AM
3

what specifically is feminism doing to improve education for boys? - feminist policies over the past several decades have gone a long way towards making schools "better for girls" but these changes have made schools hostile to boys. title 9 for instance may be 'well intentioned' however it has decimated school sports primarily because women generally just aren't interested in joining most collegiate sports even when they are available. title 9 requirements kick in and very popular sports for men…
/r/MensRights11/12/16 09:24 PM
15

I certainly have those fantasies and I am neither a liberal or a feminist. Rape fantasies are 'very common' among females and I am pretty sure they exist across all political persuasions; - I do think however that the "rape culture" myth is a feminist delusion that is at least partially caused by these women that are deluded by their princess fantasy where they believe that "all men want to rape me because i'm just so %#%#% hot that they can't control themselves" and they've convinced themselves…
/r/TheRedPill11/12/16 07:16 PM
1

There are quite a few very real examples of real women in actual STEM roles. If they truly want to inspire people they should put more focus on showing REAL examples; it doesn't take an engineering degree to be an actress.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 09:02 PM
2

love the list; Diane Fossey's role in 'Gorrilas in the Mist' is clearly NOT an instance where they put a female in the role just for 'political correctness' - It's a true story of an actual female that devoted herself to studying gorrillas in rwanda - she wasn't trained as an anthropologist; she was actually an occupational therapist before heading off on her study. One of the "most ridiculous" examples where they bent over backwards to put a female in a stem role was the character "Christmas Jo…
/r/MensRights10/12/16 08:56 PM
13

that seems kinda backwards to me; i AM a female engineer - i took the career path i did because i was interested in it; 'films' had nothing to do with that decision. I hardly ever watch TV because it is mostly stupid mindless drivel; however many shows and movies seem that they are depicting females as engineeers at a much greater rate than I see in the 'real world'. For instance Chloe in '24', Skye and Simmons in 'Agents of Shield', Kari Byron in 'mythbusters', Temperance, camille and angela in…
/r/MensRights09/12/16 11:40 PM
4

they love to cite misleading articles like this as 'proof' of their claims and they have a religious like devotion to the propoganda that they believe so fervently in despite the evidence to the contrary. that seems like they are treating it 'as gospel' to me... This is hardly the 'best' example of this; it's just one that popped up in the news today with a sensational headline that just isn't substantiated by the evidence presented. - not that 67% is anything to brag about but she clearly has a…
/r/MensRights25/11/16 08:42 PM
5

That is precisely what I was referring to; the article makes eronious conclusions and becomes just another 'source' of inaccurate 'facts' that are then taken as 'gospel' by SJW's.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 06:25 PM
5

i was looking to find the basis for this earlier and pretty much all I found was hit piece opinions (many quoting Harry Reid; the man who admitted lying about Mitt Romneys taxes in the last election AFTER the election was over and it no longer mattered... like he is somehow a credible source for anything...) and accusations that he is anti-semetic but I so far haven't found anything that specifically cites any actual evidence to back up these claims.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 11:08 PM
1

Love the video; I have no idea what is or isn't the "proper TRP view of politics" but I am very sick of government pandering to the crybabies. Clinton did not lose because of her gender and trump certainly didn't win because of 'racism'. - That's a false narrative pushed by liberals that refuse to acknowledge just how corrupt their 'chosen one' really is or how unpopular their world view is. Admitting to the truth would force them to face the fact that people don't like their IDEAS or their blat…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/16 05:08 PM
1

That would require one heck of a cannon... Perhaps she can join Cher on Jupiter.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 11:46 PM
1

I was down in Big Bend National Park a few years ago; hanging out at a hot spring on the side of the Rio Grande and watched busload after busload drop people off in Boquillas where they wandered over, waded across the river and dispersed into texas. I easily saw over 200 people cross over in the ~2 hours we were there and never once saw any sign of border enforcement (other than the completly closed checkpoint that appeared to be entirely unmanned). I hear that they have reopened it sometime las…
/r/MensRights11/11/16 11:42 PM
2

no-one is allowed to have opinions that deviate from theirs.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 05:15 PM
38

Mexico doesn't want them either so they need to hurry and sneak across the border now before we build that wall
/r/MensRights11/11/16 04:34 PM
38

I was thinking more along the lines of a giant catapult
/r/MensRights11/11/16 04:29 PM
1

typical liberal spin; they refuse to acknowledge that it is their IDEAS that were rejected; they won't even acknowledge that a major reason hillary lost was due to her pathological lying and that she based her "experience" credentials on her 30 years career in graft and corruption. - For liberals it is far more convenient to ignore the reality of why they were soundly defeated and spin the story into one of "sexism" and "racism" - their spin is intended to serve their interests and paint them as…
/r/MensRights11/11/16 01:08 PM
1

If her ONLY reason to vote for Hillary is because she has a Vajayjay then in her mind any opposition to hillary's annointment as the 'chosen one' MUST be proof of misogyny... However in the real world both of the major candidates for president have serious character issues; Hillary is a corrupt, opportunistic liar that sold access to the state department as pay for play for donations to her personal fake charity slush fund and grossly mishandled classified information but at the end of the day m…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 01:14 PM
2

The same way Ford pardoned Nixon when he had never been charged with anything.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/11/16 12:23 PM
3

I would think his career would be just as 'over' if he was pardoned - i would think most voters would frown on electing him after that. - it basically implies that he got special treatment that just isn't available to 'regular people' and a pardon would (at least in the minds of many) imply that he was probably guilty and didn't have much of a chance of winning a trial. I suspect Obama's motivation to pardon hillary would have more to do with sparing the DNC from the fallout from a trial since t…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 07:43 PM
10

Ford pardoned Nixon - Nixon was never convicted of anything. Hillary needs to be prosecuted; the scale of her corruption is staggering. The harsh reality is that Obama will probably pardon her to try to prevent her from being prosecuted because a huge percentage of the population is still in denial about just how corrupt she is and how far the media and the DNC collaborated in that corruption and a trial would lay this bare to those with their head in the sand.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 03:49 PM
14

she isn't in prison yet. sadly obama will probably issue a pardon for her and her crony's before he leaves office so she will never be put in her proper place.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/16 11:48 AM
4

"you fucking dumbass" - clearly you are incapable of debating a point without resorting to personal attacks. First I did NOT suggest that that war was a war to end slavery; I don't even call it the "civil war" because I consider secession to be a valid right of the states and thus the Confederacy was a seperate country; thus lincoln's actions amounted to an unprovoked military invasion of another sovreign nation and NOT a "Civil War". I'm Glad slavery ended but I consider lincolns actions to be …
/r/MensRights08/11/16 09:37 PM
5

An awful lot of people died between 1860 and 1865 to lead us to the ratification of the 15th amendment. perhaps you've heard of the tiny skirmish between the confederate states and lincolns union army... also there is no "right to vote" at all. strike that phrase from your vocabulary. this "right" does not exist. As an example convicted felons are not allowed to vote in most places. Every constitutional reference related to who can vote is a prohibition on specific criteria used to deny the vote…
/r/MensRights08/11/16 08:27 PM
3

this idea of a "Man Tax" is sort of like the Jizya tax in some Muslim countries levied against people that are not Muslims; or the 20% tax on Jewish wealth imposed by Goering in the 1930s. Granted we are talking about a pharmacy choosing to give a selective 7% discount to females but this so called "pink tax" relates to feminine hygiene products only. I rather doubt any females spend 7% more of their income than men based on just their purchases of tampons and pads. that's pretty absurd. I don't…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 11:24 PM
2

one option you might want to consider is doing workouts in a pool where you would have very little stress on the foot but are able to vigorously work your legs until you are able to put more stress on the foot.
/r/askTRP12/10/16 09:39 PM
13

maybe we should draft them since this whole "volunteer army" thing isn't working out for them...
/r/MensRights12/10/16 07:21 PM
2

i recognized it. but the possibility of naked hildabeast nightmares are much more disturbing.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 06:49 PM
3

I rarely applaud it when people threaten to kill me but in this case I will make an exception. I would not wish dreams of naked hildabeasts on anyone.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 05:12 PM
5

Not about to defend Trump's actions however Hillary attempted to echo the feminist position that "rape accusers should be believed" - that position was even on her campaign website until she got called out for the extreme hypocrisy of her response to all of these women that have accused Bill of sexual harassment including instances of rape and sexual assault. She then acts 'offended' because Trump was recorded having a discussion that was crude but if you actually listen to the conversation he w…
/r/MensRights12/10/16 01:39 AM
3

Hillary's 'outrage' is entirely fabricated; she curses like a sailor and it is widely known that she has been verbally abusive to Arkansas State Troopers and Secret Service officers that were providing her security when she was first lady and earlier when Bill was Governor of Arkansas. - http://nypost.com/2015/10/02/secret-service-agents-hillary-is-a-nightmare-to-work-with/ She is also reported to have used derogatory terms in reference to Jews and developmentally challenged children. when devel…
/r/MensRights12/10/16 01:17 AM
1

perhaps you didn't recognize the sarcasm in the first part because it is so consistent with the actual teachings of feminism.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:50 PM
5

<Official response from the womens studies department at the university of feminism> of course healthcare, education and basic human needs are only important for females and if you think they are important for males too then obviously you are a misogynyst pig and no-one should pay any attention to you evil people ... you should know this by now... everything is about women because.. uhm... patriarchy... there are people that still use facebook?
/r/MensRights10/10/16 09:35 PM
4

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/01/06/10007698-us-broadens-definition-of-rape-includes-male-victims The "FBI" definition changed in 2012 The old definition was "The carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will.” The new definition is: “Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” That CAN include males as victims but it still does NOT include men …
/r/MensRights19/09/16 10:53 AM
3

the other 60% wouldn't admit it..
/r/MensRights05/09/16 09:49 PM
2

I can only speak for myself and to me I think arousal is a lot more 'mental' than 'physical'. - getting the attitude right and creating the right 'mental mood' is much more impressive than 'size'.
/r/askTRP02/09/16 05:43 PM
5

"rape" and "rape roleplay" are very different things. "Rape Fantasy" and "Rape Roleplay" is something a LOT of women enjoy. this is very very different from actually being "raped". in Rape Roleplay and Rape Fantasy the so called "victim" is fully consenting and acting out a fantasy. Rape roleplay is negotiated in advance, limits are respected and the 'victim' always has the option to use a 'safeword' if things get overwhelming. I personally don't think we live in a "Rape Culture" because rapists…
/r/MensRights02/09/16 04:33 PM
1

<google translate link of source document> https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.welt.de%2Fvermischtes%2Farticle157807277%2FVerhoehnung-aller-die-tatsaechlich-Opfer-geworden-sind.html&edit-text=&act=url
/r/MensRights22/08/16 05:57 PM
3

he also didn't mention that men get murdered 4x more often than women; that they die in workplace accidents at 7x the rate of women; that men commit suicide 3x more often than women.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 11:14 PM
26

the majority of sexual assault victims in the military are male. therefore men shouldn't be drafted either.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 12:29 AM
29

"women and children in this society are not as valued as men". Is this why missing girls get so much more attention than missing boys? - Is this why ONLY men are required (or even allowed) to register for the draft? Is this why abused women have shelter options that are not available to men? Is this why there is such a public outcry over female genital mutilation (affecting ~3 million girls per year) but hardly any protest over the mutilation of male genitals (affecting over 11 million boys) eve…
/r/MensRights02/06/16 12:51 PM
1

if you are referring to /r/TheRedPill or /r/AskTRP then start with the sidebar content that explains TRP philosophy in significant detail. You aren't obligated to agree with all of it; I certainly don't agree with everything but I still post in both groups quite frequently; I just avoid commenting on topics where I don't agree or have nothing of benefit to add. Usually the angry posters are fairly easy to spot and I assume that they are rebounding from a failed relationship or some other feeling…
/r/RedPillWomen23/05/16 11:19 PM
1

the general philosophy of TRP is not the problem, most of TRP is about improving men, helping them become more masculine, becoming more 'alpha' and developing some characteristics that are (at least in my opinion) mostly positive. - There are some people that post that are in the anger phase/bitter/hurt from past relationships or 'whatever' and tend to vent some of that frustration there but that shouldn't be confused with the actual philosophy of TRP nor does it represent the entire community. …
/r/RedPillWomen23/05/16 10:59 PM
16

it's feminisms mission to take ALL the fun and spontaneity out of sex; i truly can't imagine how sex could possibly be any fun at all if you did this "question and answer" approach described in the article. i think they are just annoyed that no-one is desperate enough to have sex with THEM so they want to destroy it for everyone else.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 09:35 PM
32

your honor; the prosecution would like to present exhibit 37; the signed and notarized consent decree as filed with the state recorders court; we've highlighted on page 87, paragraph 347, subsection c; you will see that the defendant was given permission to insert his index finger up to the second knuckle in the plaintiffs ass however it clearly did not grant permission for him to twist the finger; based on this clear lack of consent the prosecution seeks the death penalty.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 09:22 PM
2

guilty!!
/r/askTRP01/05/16 08:05 PM
0

aww, you say the sweetest things.
/r/askTRP01/05/16 08:04 PM
0

ooh!! i have to misbehave?!!! that will be fun...
/r/askTRP01/05/16 06:06 PM
1

her post specifically stated that she thought women could not post on /r/AskTRP or /r/TheRedPill. I was responding to that statement.
/r/RedPillWomen01/05/16 04:29 PM
5

hey!! don't forget the spankings!!! those are very important!!!
/r/askTRP01/05/16 04:09 PM
3

"worded like a boy"... you mean i used logic to frame the argument? sorry; i forget i'm supposed to be an irrational feminist to have a vajayjay; i'll try to turn off my brain next time i post.
/r/RedPillWomen01/05/16 04:07 PM
1

I am not a moderator here; I can't speak for their enforcement actions. The rules however are spelled out in the sidebar and pretty easy to check. I personally don't mind if people debate issues and honest debate would include male centric opinions so i'd usually err on the side of allowing it unless it was clearly trying to push a contrary agenda.
/r/RedPillWomen01/05/16 03:08 PM
1

the rules for THIS forum are spelled out in the sidebar. Your original question suggested that females weren't allowed to post to TRP forums which I can assure you is NOT true. I do it all the time.
/r/RedPillWomen01/05/16 03:01 PM
2

That's why I suggested the authorities would have to investigate it. I have no way to validate the image or see your private message thread nor do the moderators of this forum. Arguing about it here is kinda pointless.
/r/RedPillWomen01/05/16 03:00 PM
2

If i was giving "non TRP" advice in AskTRP then I would expect Rule Zero to be applied. If you are asking about THIS forum Rule Zero is quite different. - Male-centric advice is not permitted. Do not give advice to women which is primarily intended to benefit men, or is based around male desires without considerations for women's desires or goals. Male users will be scrutinized more closely for compliance, but this rule applies to both sexes.
/r/RedPillWomen01/05/16 02:56 PM
3

if someone sent you a death threat then you need to report it to the authorities, that looks like a PM and not something that the moderators of this forum can do anything about. - They have no ability to moderate Private Messages.
/r/RedPillWomen01/05/16 02:53 PM
2

i care about womens rights also, unlike feminists i actually believe in legal equality as opposed to "special treatment" and the sort of reverse discrimination that seems to be the constant liberal agenda. however there are plenty of forums to discuss womens rights; if you want to discuss mens rights or mens issues then certainly Mens Rights forums are an appropriate place.
/r/RedPillWomen01/05/16 02:51 PM
6

I hang out and give advice on TRP and mensrights forums quite frequently because i care about Mens Rights and I support men improving themselves. No-one has ever said that I wasn't "allowed" to post there; The worst I've seen was someone asking WHY i was posting there. However if you are going to post on TRP forums then your advice needs to be supportive of TRP goals; That's "Rule Zero" - there is absolutely NO rule against females participating in their forums. If you go there pushing a feminis…
/r/RedPillWomen01/05/16 02:41 PM
7

if an accusation is PROVEN to be false - not merely suspected; but clearly demonstrated to be false then it is clear that the person making the false charges was willing to wrongly send an innocent person to jail, ruin their lives and reputation and in many cases subject them to violence (as rapists are not typically treated all that kindly by police or fellow prisoners). Why should they NOT suffer the exact same consequences that they were so willing to subject an innocent person to?
/r/MensRights30/04/16 08:08 PM
10

If we can get rid of it entirely even better; but as long as we still have it and men can get added for simply urinating in an alley behind the bar or hiring a consenting adult prostitute then false accusers clearly deserve to be listed so their potential victims can be warned.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 05:24 PM
18

if the accusation is proven to be false the accuser should suffer the same punishment that the accused would have faced if convicted including being required to register as a sex offender.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 04:19 PM
15

seems like they are afraid of the competition. The women offering these services may be doing it for money,or to find better opportunites abroad but so what? they are getting what they are after just as the man is; as long as everyone is a consenting adult i don't see why anyone else should care what their reasons are.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:20 PM
0

Using the feminist definition of "rape" we really ARE living in a "rape culture" because according to their definition of rape; it is totally f'n awesome!! I can't WAIT to get raped tonight!!! Feminists make a lot more sense when you realize that the words they use have absolutely no meaning at all.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/16 10:27 PM
1

I'm pretty sure if a taxi driver asked me what "Jer-Jer" was i'd be finding a different taxi.
/r/askTRP26/04/16 06:17 PM
2

are you referring to his comment where he specifically said "Lady, you ain't no Pinay." or the comment where he challenged my "cebu" credentials with " ok, what is "jer-jer" ? what is "kweck-kweck"? What is Cebu Province's leading foreign-currency earner?" He's the one that needs to chill; I don't have to prove anything to him. He has a chip on his shoulder about something. Frankly I don't get it but I have better things to do.
/r/askTRP26/04/16 06:01 PM
2

you must have a very over inflated opinion of yourself if you seriously think I need to pass your ridiculous test.
/r/askTRP26/04/16 02:53 PM
2

Thank you for telling me that i am not pinay; my mother will be shocked. I'm well aware of differences between various regions of the Philippines, I'm from cebu and i can see some regional differences between (for instance) visayans and ilocanos but when i see a person from vietnam i can't readily say for certain that they are vietnamese vs. filipino; many could very easily pass as pinoy based on appearance. it is usually when they start talking that i notice pretty distinct differences.
/r/askTRP25/04/16 01:13 PM
0

"Satire" is supposed to be "funny". The article was stupid. nothing funny about it at all.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 11:49 AM
-2

soooo, basically what the author is saying is that he's too stupid to have any GOOD ideas.... doing this would equate to the single stupidest moment in the entire series... this is why humanities majors should never be taken seriously. No surprise to see that he went to Brown University;
/r/MensRights25/04/16 12:08 AM
1

I'm filipina; I don't think of myself first as an "Asian" because it's just too broad a category; over 2/3 of the worlds population is "Asian" but I have no more in common with people from India or Afghanistan than your average native of New Jersey. This is not saying anything "good" or "bad" about the Philippines, India or Afghanistan, it is merely that they are so vastly different that I don't feel all that 'connected' to them culturally despite all of us being "Asian". It never bothers me to …
/r/askTRP24/04/16 09:00 PM
5

I'm filipina and get asked this all the time and it's a question I ask others at times; I don't see why it's a problem; Nothing about the question implies that "you aren't welcome here"; Her insecurity isn't your responsibility.
/r/askTRP24/04/16 07:19 PM
2

tell that to bill cosby who has been vilified for "crimes" that weren't crimes when the acts were committed.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 07:17 PM
7

Cleopatra, Catherine the Great, Queen Elizabeth I, Margaret Thatcher, Queen Anne and Zenobia of Palmyra all started wars during their reigns. Not to mention it was queen isabella of spain who started the spanish inquisition and the conquest of the "new world"
/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:45 PM
10

when the secret service visits you later today tell them i said hi. She certainly deserves to be prosecuted. - 18 U.S. Code § 798 - Disclosure of classified information: (a) Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified informati…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/16 05:59 PM
1

The 5th amendment is referring to capital crimes and criminal trials. the universities are not conducting "criminal trials" - they are holding disciplinary hearings that have little 'legal impact' outside of academia; the due process clause within the 5th amendment is for criminal cases where the accused can be deprived of life, liberty, or property. the schools are not depriving them of any of those; the outcome is usually depriving them of an education 'from that specific college' so it would …
/r/MensRights19/04/16 10:40 PM
1

Since you love screenshots so much - have you seen THIS one? http://imgur.com/gt2RYqj
/r/MensRights17/04/16 10:49 PM
3

that image doesn't "prove" anything; /u/lethn is not a moderator of MensRights at all; he was stating his opinion and not acting as some "reddit overlord" as your OTHER brand new account claimed. no matter how many new accounts you create to post your claims it won't change these facts. You continue getting banned because you continue doing the same nonsense that got your old accounts banned. You must have a very sad life if this is the sort of thing you find 'amusing'.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 10:39 PM
1

did you look at the screen shot op used as "proof"?
/r/MensRights17/04/16 10:14 PM
1

/u/lethn is not a "reddit overlord".
/r/MensRights17/04/16 09:25 PM
4

not about to pay $30 for the 'privilege' of reading her garbage. I would however ask why it's perfectly acceptable to mutilate a male childs penis but abhorrent to mutilate a females clitoris? If an adult male CHOOSES to have a circumcision that is certainly his right but forcing that decision on an infant is no less of a violation than what is done in female genital mutilations. By her standard ONLY men should be making decisions about her vagina because females are clearly biased and since per…
/r/MensRights15/04/16 09:19 PM
5

At least part of it is going to relate to females being less likely to say things that might 'hurt peoples feelings' - it is far more common for men to 'rib' each other; insulting each other playfully or twisting comments in a joking way - most women don't "get" this concept and tend to communicate in a very different way - often even making insincere compliments to avoid saying something that 'might' be taken as an insult. the basic idea is that men insult each other but don't really mean it; a…
/r/askTRP14/04/16 11:40 AM
2

You sounded like a cookie thief to me so i gave you a fake number!! I'm eating all my d#$ cookies mister before you steal them!
/r/askTRP04/04/16 03:29 PM
3

so according to her "definition" pretty much ALL sex is rape... using her definition i guess we DO live in a rape culture because rape is apparently totally f'n awesome! i can't wait to get raped tonight!!!! Feminists make so much more sense when you realize that the words they use have absolutely no meaning at all.
/r/RedPillWives03/04/16 09:40 PM
1

my boyfriend loves to sneak up on me when my panties are around my ankles.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 11:41 PM
1

what a surprise: an account that's only 12 minutes old.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 08:56 PM
1

fwiw: the FBI "definition" of rape is not a universal law and isn't even the definition used by the various states within the US; every state has their own definitions and they vary. some states still ONLY consider it "rape" when a penis penetrates a vagina without consent. Many states have expanded the legal definition to include any non-consensual penetration of any orifice; and some have also expanded the definition to include men being 'forced to penetrate'. - so the "legal definition" varie…
/r/MensRights02/04/16 12:28 PM
3

any time "more people" flood a particular career the wages go down. This is the case when illegal immigrants flood the construction market this is the case when indian migrants flood the technology market this is the case when immigrants flood the farming labor market. none of this is due to 'discrimination' - the effect is a basic and well understood case of supply and demand. - How is this somehow "different" when 'females' flood a particular market?
/r/MensRights01/04/16 02:59 PM
1

i'm sure they'll demand that the government step in and demand "title IX" style protection of all professional womens sports; it's worked out sooooooo well for colleges.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 01:11 PM
2

looks like you got the hint and came up with a totally new rant for your brand new account to post. still painfully obvious but at least you posted it on april fools day.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 11:55 AM
6

you might want to take a closer look at the data about the wage gap; it is seriously exaggerated and nowhere near the "77%" that gets parroted around so often; many of these differences in pay can be accounted for to the point where this 'gap' nearly vanishes entirely. If nothing else review the rebuttals and make up your own mind;
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:32 PM
2

why is it any of their business if you own an AR-15? "Yes; I have the ability to protect my children when necessary; Why don't you? Don't you care enough to protect them?"
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:22 PM
3

if you haven't already checked there is a "frequently asked questions" list in the sidebar that has a lengthy summary of many of the common points; that would be a pretty good overview and has a lot of links to good articles on the various topics.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:07 PM
1

what a surprise to see you using yet another of your alt accounts to reply... again... can't you keep track of which account you're using?
/r/MensRights31/03/16 03:52 PM
2

it's the repetitive pattern of posting the SAME things and his abusive rhetoric in comments that I'm referring to; i've discussed several of his suggestions with other accounts he's had trying to give the benefit of the doubt but the pattern is really very obvious and if you go back and check his first post you'll see that it's already been 'removed' by the moderators. no clue what his 'game' is - but it seems more likely to be an attempt to discredit r/mensrights than to have any rational discu…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 03:23 PM
3

the account is a troll; he's only just created the account and if you look at his first post in the comments it is pretty obviously the same person that's been posting these "i'm a female that was raped and it was all my fault" spam using multiple different accounts over the past few days and accusing "reddit" of being feminist because his troll posts and abusive comments keep getting him banned. - He's a broken record.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 12:24 PM
1

this thread appears to be deleted now but i'm sure he'll be back with yet another account. - he has a few easily identifiable 'issues' that make it pretty obvious we're dealing with the same troll.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 02:08 AM
28

rape accusations have been made for totally consensual sex that the accuser claims was not consensual after the fact or even claims that she only 'consented' because she was 'afraid to say no' even though absolutely no threats were ever made. i wouldn't consider either of those to be rape but in the mind of some feminists it's "rape" when an unattractive man looks at you "the wrong way". rape hysteria and this totally imaginary "rape culture" IS a real weapon that feminist bullies use against me…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/16 12:50 AM
1

i don't think so, i'm not a moderator but i would have banned him too. i'm pretty sure it will get deleted soon
/r/MensRights31/03/16 12:43 AM
1

he's been spamming garbage for a few weeks using dozens of different accounts; always the same garbage. - and today he's been pretending to be a female rape victim posting her 'confession' that it was all her fault to a mens rights group totally off topic and clearly a troll.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 12:39 AM
1

you might want to clarify what she means there a bit more; i suspect she wants you to be more dominant and assertive and not necessarily "mean" (i could be wrong but you should probably talk to her and get a better understanding of what she's actually looking for.) you can be assertive and dominant without being "mean". It is also possible that she does want you to act "mean" in certain situations; for instance i love it when my owner acts bullying/mean/abusive in certain types of sex games but …
/r/askTRP30/03/16 11:14 PM
110

“I didn’t want a trial,” Jackie said in 2014. “I can’t imagine getting up on a defense stand having them tear me apart.” I can't imagine being a member of a fraternity that was seriously violated by the entire campus, faculty and administration; globally shamed all based on totally fabricated charges. I can't imagine being a man falsely accused of rape and named in a major magazine; having my life and reputation raked over the coals and investigated by the police for a totally imaginary delusion…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/16 09:18 PM
2

You have to avoid taking rejection personally; It often isn't about you at all; and even when it is it's a very subjective thing; not all women value the same things in men; (despite the notion of "AWALT" we don't really roll off the factory floor with identical programming) any reasonably attractive female (even us unintelligent crazy ones) have far more 'offers' than we can possibly accept; most of these offers HAVE to get rejected and that sucks for both parties because most of us don't WANT …
/r/askTRP30/03/16 02:15 PM
1

You'll have to ask the prosecutors there; not all of the claims of these various women are the same; not all of them allege that drugs were involved and some of them are more recent than others including at least one from 2008. Many of these allegations also fall well outside of the statue of limitations and some people are trying to suggest that the courts should ignore that as well. People can demand all sorts of things but that doesn't mean the courts should allow it. Also you can bring up ci…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 12:39 PM
2

Not arguing that; Totally agree. but your post suggests that 93% of these cases had no DNA evidence at all which is very unlikely. DNA can only tell us who has been there; it doesn't prove a crime occurred.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 12:31 PM
2

It's entirely possible that DNA evidence can exist; it's not even all that unusual to see cases where consensual sex occurred (and plenty of DNA evidence exists) but when the girl gets 'caught' by her boyfriend/husband/parents she claims 'rape' because she doesn't want to admit to her consensual actions. - plenty of DNA exists in these cases but that doesn't "prove" that a rape occurred.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 12:23 PM
3

In the United States, the Congress is prohibited from passing ex post facto laws by clause 3 of Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution. This means that no-one can be charged with a crime that wasn't a crime at the time the action was committed.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 11:59 AM
10

she did a pretty good job of confessing to her crimes there.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 08:14 PM
1

and curiously still no link to your source.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 06:15 PM
1

Your abusive attitude is the reason you keep getting banned and why you have nearly no credibility. I only asked for a source to your claim. Grow up. and it's curious that you "found it in 14 fucking seconds" but still seem incapable of providing a link to a source for your claim.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 05:51 PM
1

Remember just 2 hours ago when you were using an entirely different account. I said "extraordinary claims generally require a good deal of scrutiny before rational people are going to take them seriously;" - You are still making claims such as "trying to put through legislature to provide that a woman can pre-emptively kill her parent in his sleep is she thinks he might harm her"(sic) - can you cite evidence for this claim? I've never heard of any effort to enact any such legislation.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 05:30 PM
1

extraordinary claims generally require a good deal of scrutiny before rational people are going to take them seriously; the exact problem so many of the feminists "surveys" have is that they are clearly biased in both the wording of the questions and the audience targeted to produce the results. You state a "survey" that claims an 81% rate of males being "violently assaulted" by females, That would clearly fall into the "extraordinary claim" category and it SHOULD be scrutinized by anyone before…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 01:08 PM
1

If you are still looking for lists I ran across another with more listings than the one i sent a few days ago - http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/345396 Hope it helps.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 11:22 PM
1

no clue on whether she's 'testing' you or not, she might actually want to do it but that doesn't obligate you to allow it. "my opinion" is that an alpha male would do what HE wants to do; if he actually wanted to be 'pegged' then i don't see how it diminishes his alpha status (although i'm sure some might disagree). I know a lot of men enjoy prostate stimulation even if they aren't particularly into anal penetration; the fact that anal penetration is the easiest way to stimulate the prostate mea…
/r/askTRP27/03/16 03:35 PM
1

There absolutely is NOT a "rape culture". If there were we would be honoring rapists with parades and praising them on national TV. Quite the opposite is the reality; rapists are vilified, demonized, socially shunned pariahs that are despised by nearly every person, male or female. Rapists are hated for very good reason. The feminist myth of a rape culture is a delusion. It only exists because feminists are able to use it as a weapon and the ONLY reason that it is effective is because everyone d…
/r/MensRights27/03/16 03:27 PM
1

you seem to care far too much what SHE thinks. what do YOU think.
/r/askTRP27/03/16 01:43 PM
6

if you aren't having sex with someone of the same sex it isn't "gay" and even if you do that by itself doesn't change your sexual preference. you won't become "gay" by having a dildo in your ass. lots of men enjoy anal penetration but have no sexual interest in other men. nothing wrong with that.
/r/askTRP27/03/16 01:13 PM
2

"Who is to blame for her rape. answer: the woman is to blame." (4 hours ago) "It's not her fault she got raped." (10 minutes ago) so you admit that it's "not her fault she got raped" in this reply; however that is in direct contradiction to the statement you made in a previous comment in this thread.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 09:01 PM
2

being "hardwired" for rape is precisely why he belongs in jail. Because HE is a threat to society; nothing SHE did in the example that you provided was a danger to society.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 08:39 PM
2

and if the rapist hadn't raped her she would not have been raped. it is HIS fault that he raped her; Not HER fault for taking a shortcut. You cannot place the blame for his criminal conduct on HER simply because she made a decision that wasn't "the best". Even if she made that walk naked, blindfolded and with her wrists cuffed behind her back it does NOT give him the right to rape her.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 07:56 PM
1

The scenario you are painting here is absolutely NOT "her fault" - It's certainly legitimate to suggest that she would have been better served by taking a safer route but that does NOT make her the guilty party in this crime.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 06:06 PM
2

he's posted links to the exact same survey at least 3 times in the past 24 hours, i raised the same objections to Q8 and Q9 yesterday. I'd also be highly suspect of any survey that is clearly being targeted to a very specific target audience. This is exactly how we end up with "surveys" suggesting "1 in 5 women are raped" at college...
/r/MensRights26/03/16 06:01 PM
3

clearly i must be the dumbest person in the room because despite your brilliant response here i still totally fail to understand how your comment relates in any way to the "false accusation" flair. Perhaps you can explain it using simpler words because "idiot" has three syllables and is far more than a moron like i can comprehend.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 05:23 PM
6

This is totally out of context with the "false accusation" tag: the article is about a claim that 1 in 5 british muslims support jihadists and not at all about the "1 in 5 women are raped" claim;
/r/MensRights26/03/16 04:58 PM
5

just like in the real world did they make the boys do most of the unpleasant, hard and risky tasks, work longer hours, and die 7 times more often than the females doing the 'same work'?
/r/MensRights26/03/16 11:46 AM
1

I've read the rape definitions in a lot of jurisdictions and they are usually broken down into a few specific sections; there is a category of rape for "violent offenses" - where physical force was used often referred to as "aggravated rape" - and another category that encompasses the use of drugs etc. - this goes back for decades; if you are wanting to stick purely to the older legal definitions of rape then in many places it is "impossible" to rape a man based purely on the legal definition th…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 01:29 PM
1

i totally agree that she should be presumed to be lying by the police; the investigators are SUPPOSED to be skeptical of claims. No argument there. What I am saying however is that we shouldn't artificially delay the investigation into the accused. an investigation is merely an effort to determine the truth. It is the fact that currently we publicly name the people accused of these sorts of crimes before the claims are substantiated that causes the real damage here. - There needs to be a much hi…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 01:23 PM
1

rape doesn't "have" to be violent; if a person slips rohpynol into her drink and has sex with her that would clearly also be rape. I don't personally consider it 'rape' if the woman consciously chooses to drink more than she can handle and then hooks up and has 'morning regrets' - because that was entirely her decision; She put herself into an impaired state and her actions as a result of her decisions are entirely HER responsibility; It can often be difficult to tell just how impaired someone i…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 01:12 PM
4

in evaluating the numbers above you're making the claim that ~97% of these are "false accusations" - that is clearly not the case - simply because a case cannot be proven doesn't make it a false accusation. lack of evidence, the inability to locate the suspect, the death of the suspect, the accuser failing to followup or refusing to cooperate and other factors might lead to an accusation not resulting in a conviction. this is NOT proof that those accusations were 'false'. The often cited number …
/r/MensRights25/03/16 12:54 PM
1

don't know what options you have there but i'd be looking for some sort of active date such as rock wall climbing, rope courses or even jogging in a decent park - the physical exercise will warm you up in cooler weather. if they don't have a car you can also look for attractions that they might like to see that aren't easy to get to without a car;
/r/askTRP25/03/16 12:44 PM
1

I would agree that police should assume the accuser is lying just as they should assume the accused is lying; they need to investigate them both to determine who the actual victim is. It doesn't make sense to 'hold off' the investigation of the accused while they 'thoroughly investigate the background of the ' accuser. "Investigating" the accused is NOT the problem; the problem is that the accused is publicly named; his career, reputation and life is ruined based on accusations that have not bee…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 12:03 PM
3

when i was 14 i was having pretty regular sex with a 33 year old man. i never felt anything about that was "disgusting" "evil" or "perverted" - i don't know if this is the correct definition of "paedophilia" but i've always assumed that it refers to people with a sexual interest in prepubescent children. a post pubescent 16 year old can often look indistinguishable from an 18 year old and her emotional maturity and ability to make wise decisions about sex has a lot more to do with how she's prep…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 12:16 AM
1

sorry; i got on my soap box and didn't even answer your actual question; sorry :) this isn't exactly what you're after but it's a pretty detailed list of a lot of these cases and you should be able to derive a pretty good list using this - http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/39783/
/r/MensRights24/03/16 07:43 PM
1

question 8 and 9 have really poor options; why doesn't #8 have the option "what the hell is wrong with that bitch?" or something similar because BOTH answers you provide assume that the male is going to be blamed. question 9 is NOT a simple "yes/no" situation; the accuser should absolutely be vetted but that doesn't mean that the accused should not be scrutinized as well; it doesn't make sense to wait the entire time it might take to 'fully investigate' the accusers "history and social reputatio…
/r/MensRights24/03/16 06:15 PM
2

I think it's more due to societies attitudes in general about sex; back home sex was hardly considered some horrible thing. the US is still very prudish about most aspects of sexuality. That's an attitude i refuse to adopt because i LIKE sex; i think sex is awesome; I never once considered that sex to be harmful even though the man was close to twice my age. it was fun; I really can't imagine how some of these feminists seem to view sex in such a negative light; it truly baffles me; they are mis…
/r/MensRights24/03/16 05:58 PM
6

i had sex with an older man (several times) when i was 14, (age of consent in the country where i was living at the time was 12 so this was NOT a case of "statutory rape") the sex was consensual and i don't feel that it harmed me in any way. - there was no need for anyone to go to jail over it because there was no 'victim' or 'harm'. If I did the exact same thing here (in georgia) the man would be "a rapist" solely due to the different 'age of consent' laws. - I am still the same person, still j…
/r/MensRights24/03/16 12:40 PM
1

I don't think the fantasies themselves are a problem at all; no-one should feel guilty or self hating over a fantasy; there is a huge difference between a fantasy and actually raping someone without consent; fantasy harms no-one. I am fortunate to know several men that enjoy acting out rape roleplay; they have similar fantasies and whenever these types of scenes are acted out it is always very clearly a consensual 'act' - the 'rape' is merely an illusion; none of these people are being monsters …
/r/MensRights22/03/16 05:09 PM
2

handcuffs are fun too although they can overtighten during rough play if you don't double lock them first and that thin metal tends to pinch; The clejuso model 15 is a lot nicer; they feel so much more secure while being much less prone to pinching and it's very easy to quickly engage the double lock; love them for longer term wear. expensive but so much better than your typical police cuffs.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:22 AM
1

if done properly they should both be tied behind my back.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:23 AM
1

I just noticed something changed in the linked article above - What follows here is NOT the original text although parts of it remain; According to Violence Against Children Surveys (VACS) in the United States, an estimated 11% of high school girls report that they have been raped, and VACS notes the majority of those rapes go unreported. VACS is the first national survey of its kind on the prevalence of emotional, physical and sexual violence against children developed by the U.S. Centers for D…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:46 PM
2

love it!! i was just watching a stand up comedy routine by Jimmy Carr; he's hilarious if you haven't seen him; One of my favorite lines "I was raised catholic and one of the things I hated was going to church, with the constant standing up, sitting down and kneeling. I wish the priest would just pick a position and fuck me."
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:57 PM
1

in MY fantasies (sorry i KEEP mentioning them :)) but they are relevant to rape culture discussions ) as the victim of these imaginary assaults i am totally the center of attention; all my mean evil rapists want me; it's a very ego driven fantasy and I think that's part of why it's quite popular among women while men generally find it repulsive - everyone WANTS to be desired and the appearance in those fantasies from the 'male perspective' seems very much like he isn't wanted. (honestly when I p…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:25 PM
1

All of our jobs are going to be replaced by automation regardless. Sex bots basically change nothing about "jobs" (unless you're referring to prostitution jobs which will probably still have room for real women). There will probably ALSO be sex bots for women; I haven't heard anyone suggest that my jackrabbit made men obsolete. Honestly I'd argue that my jackrabbit is to mens benefit overall; it helps make sex more fun and even tho' i can get a quick release with mr bunny i always want more; I'm…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:58 PM
2

i am partially being facetious but it is really bizarre; the rape culture myth is so obviously false that i can't imagine any sane person actually believing it if they spend more than a few minutes questioning the subject at all. - Extraordinary claims (such as the 1 in 5 myth) demand scrutiny; those that accept these claims without question are naive dupes; those that make these claims without checking their facts are causing harm and supporting this false narrative. (obama comes to mind as wel…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:00 PM
4

good video; I left a comment there suggesting that feminists use the "rape culture" myth as a weapon against men and they've been so succesful with that weapon for years that they are now trying to create a REAL rape culture; in a feminists logic impaired imagination they are imagining how much better their weapon will be when it's actually true... i am being a bit facetious but i've often questioned why this obvious lie that is so easily discredited is accepted by anyone; i've also noticed that…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 06:14 PM
2

I'm not an anarchist; 'minimal' government interference does not mean "No regulations at all". we have a government today where every single person alive is guilty of violating multiple conflicting regulations every single day. the sheer volume of federal regulations is ridiculous and no-one could possibly know all of them; let alone avoid unwiitingly violating one. the federal government seems to feel that there are NO constraints on it's power but the constitution only grants a limited set of …
/r/MensRights21/03/16 02:34 AM
-1

has been the choice for western countries, the bottom 80% got poorer, and the top 20% got much, much richer. So unless you in the top 20% its a foolish choice for you. the "bottom 80%" of the people in the US are fabulously wealthy in comparison to almost all of the rest of the planet; that's entirely because the free market created a system where risk and innovation can be rewarded and led to more innovation and creativity that benefits everyone in the country. as we slide AWAY from a free mark…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 02:27 AM
1

the "establishment" wants bigger government, MORE government control, more regulation. The republican establishment wants more government in different areas than the democrat establishment but they are both seeking to expand government control over our lives and neither of them are doing a thing to reduce debt or out of control spending. Libertarians want LESS government interference and more personal responsibility. I don't agree with their stance on immigration/open borders but if you value in…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:53 AM
-1

Bernie Sanders is a big government/nanny state socialist. If you are the sort of person that wants mommy government to provide everything for you, change your diaper and shield you from the 'burden' of having to think for yourself then you are probably going to vote for bernie or hillary. If you want LESS government interference in your life you don't have any good options because the republicans are barely any better than the democrats. a Libertarian would be the most logical choice but that's …
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:26 AM
13

as "more people" enter any field the pay drops because there is more competition for the jobs; it isn't a "gender pay gap" when male H1B immigrants from india flood the technology market. it isn't a "gender pay gap" when illegal immigrants from mexico flood the market for farm and construction workers. All three of those fields saw pay drops for predictable reasons that had NOTHING to do with gender. How is this somehow NOT a factor when it's "women" flooding the market?
/r/MensRights20/03/16 04:21 PM
-1

that's good; I wasn't suggesting otherwise and as i said i like the idea of the op "for my relationships" - it just alarms me to see the advice to spank without mentioning consent and although i totally love being my owners property it is NOT something "all women" enjoy. many would be horrified at the thought so be careful; safe, sane and consensual.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/16 04:08 PM
1

in any large group of people there are going to be outlying fringe elements and the opponents of those groups often tend to point to those fringe elements to suggest that they represent the entire group. I see this played out all the time with media coverage of conservative political events; I was in Downtown Atlanta for a Tea Party event with somewhere around 20,000 people a few years ago; the streets around the capital were filled with normal people that were basically all there protesting out…
/r/askTRP20/03/16 03:05 PM
0

it's your legal health in jeopardy if you don't get consent. personally i love spankings but that's me. my individual choice. spank someone who doesn't and you may find yourself in a very bad legal situation. i like the suggestion in op in general; totally fine with that in MY relationships but i don't want to see you or anyone else in jail over it which is the entire reason i'm making a fuss over consent.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/16 02:10 PM
0

unless we're counting jrotc (technically it was the national service training program in the phillipines but it's similar to JROTC in the US) i have never been in the military; my comment only referenced "self defense" with regards to MY training which is totally unrelated to the military; i am small and i've noticed that trainers almost always attempt to pair me up with people around the same size.. that is understandable to a point however i want to also train with larger people because almost…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/03/16 01:10 PM
4

Prosecutors in Attleboro Massachusetts tried exactly that - officers entered a private sex party under false pretenses and arrested several people, including a woman for 'assault' because she was spanking a man with a wooden spoon. it was a consensual act; they still attempted to charge her with assault until the judge threw out the charges after considerable public outcry. consent IS admissible evidence and I don't see how it isn't admissible as a "defense against criminal charges". It won't st…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/16 12:33 PM
0

i don't recall saying anything about what YOU do; the op gave advice suggesting that you should spank her and made no mention of consent. if there is no consent for that then it would most certainly be considered assault in most places. even WITH consent there is a danger of it being considered assault and there have been attempts to prosecute consenting adults for spanking EVEN when all of the adults insisted that the activities were entirely consensual - look up "paddleboro" for an example in …
/r/TheRedPill20/03/16 11:59 AM
0

at least in courts you still have due process rights and evidence of consent should be admissible evidence (yes, i know feminists are trying to eliminate your due process rights but you still have them in criminal trials); a jury would be expected to determine if that consent is applicable to the situation and that's the real gamble. Many people; perhaps 'most' people would not understand why i might actually WANT to consent to spanking "at any time, for any reason". many people make the automat…
/r/TheRedPill20/03/16 11:54 AM
0

why does she hate vegetables? Vegetables are living creatures too!!!
/r/askTRP19/03/16 04:24 PM
11

I can't tell from this limited view of the situation but I admire her as well; i don't see that she attempted to back down; she needs to learn tactics to deal with her size disadvantage but she's in the ring and she took a tough hit and got back up and looked like she was still in the fight. She's there to learn; that's why you train and I hope she makes it.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/16 08:37 PM
4

not suggesting it is an example of such; i have no idea why it was posted. I don't see anything wrong at all with what happened in the video; they are training and it SHOULD be tough; if he was soft on her he would NOT be doing her any favors. I am only 4'11" tall; nearly everone that I might ever have a conflict with is going to be larger than I am. It is the reality. When I do self defense drills my size is an undeniable disadvantage and it cannot be ignored. I expect it to be used against me;…
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/16 08:21 PM
8

Men fill the vast majority of all of the toughest and most dangerous jobs; Mining, Garbage Collection, Construction, Road crews, Firefighting, Combat Roles, Farming, Pest Control, sewage, welding;... well over 95% male with little if any sign of interest by female applicants. Men die on the job far more than females because men are the ones taking the risks and doing the hardest and most dangerous jobs. Males largely pursue degrees in "engineering", "specialized medicine", "business", Computer S…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 08:14 PM
5

she was hit very hard as part of combat training; she was wearing pads and she NEEDS to learn how to defend herself if she's ever going to become an effective combat soldier. There is VERY GOOD REASON for the training. It would be inexcusable for the military to go soft on her just because she's female or just because she's smaller.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/03/16 07:46 PM
8

The article reminded me of the recent post someone else submitted regarding firefighter quotas being totally met for males while a "large number" of positions designated for females remained unfilled. I don't get how anyone's best interest is served by having nearly 150 firefighter positions remain unfilled solely due to this ridiculously misguided quest for "gender equality". One of the biggest problems with affirmative action and race or gender based quota's; those "must be filled by female" p…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:31 PM
4

There has been an observable trend already showing women in some units having a higher rate of pregnancy when deployed to combat zones and women in the navy getting pregnant to get out of a lengthy tour. Not easy to prove motivation but I suspect quite a few of these were intentional actions to get out of an unpleasant deployment.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:20 PM
7

This isn't really a surprise, Just like it's no surprise that women don't apply for firefighting positions or demand equal representation in the garbage collection and mining industries...
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:02 PM
1

did you try google translate: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.archive.org%2Fstream%2Flapornocratieoul00prouuoft%2Flapornocratieoul00prouuoft_djvu.txt&edit-text=&act=url
/r/askTRP13/03/16 11:36 PM
1

certainly that is all true but it's equally true for a lot of leftist causes. any dissent is "hate speech" - any opposition to obama is "racism", any opposition to hillary is "sexism" - any opposition to "Global Warming" is "denial" - any opposition to liberalism is "fascism" - Leftist automatically try to demonize anyone that argues against their dogma because they have no actual facts to use in defense of their beliefs. They know that attacking the reputation of anyone opposed to their ideas i…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 07:38 PM
3

FBI Crime stats show a pretty steady annual rape rate of ~300,000 reported rapes per year when prison rape and non-prison rape rates are combined; around 210,000 of those take place in prison each year; http://ojp.gov/programs/pdfs/prea_final_rule.pdf vs ~90,000 rapes outside of prison. https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2014/crime-in-the-u.s.-2014/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/rape further a notable percentage of the rape reports outside of prison were male victims; acco…
/r/MensRights13/03/16 02:57 AM
6

Technically i have a nursing degree but I've been working in IT for most of my career; (so far nearly 9 years in IT vs about 2 years doing direct health care); I have never felt that there was any barrier in place keeping me out of IT, I took several STEM classes in college because I was interested enough to take them as electives or just 'extra' courses and they have been far more beneficial to me than any of my nursing courses. The only "Barrier" is the choices we make. any woman that has the …
/r/MensRights11/03/16 11:36 PM
6

I'd much rather have Samuel L. Jackson - every single turn requires at least one use of "mother f***** left" or "mother f***** right". or maybe Sam Kinison screaming directions in his preacher voice; that would be pretty awesome.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 08:14 PM
2

Journalists aren't mostly propagandists... they are just lazy and credulous. They take feminists (who are malicious) at their word. it would certainly be a mistake to assume she's intelligent. i've seen little evidence so far. her claim took less than 20 minutes to thoroughly debunk based on the exact same sources that she cited.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 08:04 PM
7

it's kinda shocking just how easy it is to demonstrate that these feminist claims are lies when they are so often reported by "journalists" as if they are facts. - it seems we have very few actual "journalists" these days; most seem to be activists pushing an agenda. any reputable journalist would have been much more careful with the facts. No surprise that they have comments disabled on the article; - a good sign that the writer knows that her story won't hold up under the light of open debate;…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 03:01 PM
2

did he just call hillary clinton a liar? She was "totally broke" when they left the white house!!!! she said so herself!!!
/r/MensRights10/03/16 01:34 PM
22

interesting that they are apparently sourcing that figure from the "VACS" surveys - i only find VACS reports for 8 countries; all of which are third world countries; mostly in Africa (with the notable exceptions of Haiti and Cambodia). http://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/vacs/publications.html Seems like they are once again cherry picking worst case scenarios and trying to suggest that the findings are representative of the entire world. note: There IS a huge issue with children getting raped …
/r/MensRights10/03/16 01:22 PM
6

From what I've seen, it's not a big fear of most women, for whatever reason. I generally don't fear rape because it's actually a very rare thing. Forcible rape is incredibly rare in the US; this ridiculous description the SJW's paint of a "rape culture" sounds a lot more like my "fantasy dream world where ALL men want to rape me constantly" than anything remotely resembling the actual world we live in. unlike the SJW's i can tell the difference between my fantasy world and the real one.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/16 03:02 AM
4

only speaking for myself here: - i certainly have lots of rape fantasies and i've done rape roleplay when i'm lucky enough to have the chance. in those types of scenes i resist and protest 'a lot' because it's such a tremendous rush and makes it much more exciting... - if i 'surrendered too easily' and didn't have that struggle the overall impact of the scene would not be nearly as arousing. i am pretty small so it's unlikely that i could overpower any reasonably fit attackers which is awesome f…
/r/TheRedPill10/03/16 02:38 AM
1

that might be the case at many banks but there are still loan officers at the community bank i use and at the credit union my parents use and they do the loan approvals in house.
/r/askTRP10/03/16 01:55 AM
1

understood, and they probably see you more often than the loan officers would. but in terms of access to your financial data the loan officers could get a lot more info.
/r/askTRP09/03/16 09:16 PM
3

being a loan officer would probably beat being a 'teller' - anyone that routinely deals with credit checks can get a lot more financial detail about you than the teller. All the teller can see is your transactions with that specific bank. (which is a lot but doesn't usually include investment accounts unless they are with the same bank and that's normally where the real money is). Bank tellers have a 98.3% chance of being entirely eliminated by AI systems within the next 8 years according to htt…
/r/askTRP09/03/16 09:08 PM
2

she's demonstrating that she has the intellectual equivalent of a 5th grader. was it in response to Rubio's ridiculous stunt during the debates? because sadly that wasn't much better. edit: i checked and apparently she released that drawing sometime before 2/11/2016 - the "penis size" debate was in early march so it was apparently unrelated. both situations still seem pretty pathetic although i did like this response to the debate - http://imgur.com/ehUHLOJ -
/r/askTRP09/03/16 11:51 AM
2

there was a time we used to lock insane people up because they were a threat to society.. now we allow them to maintain blogs and share their lunatic rantings with the world.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 08:26 PM
2

i disabled facebook, deleted my account and totally blocked their domain 4 days after i first checked it out years ago. I couldn't stand the inept constant stream of junk that was flooding me. Never regretted blocking it. Facebook is a tremendous waste of time.
/r/askTRP05/03/16 08:20 PM
2

Fantasies must be headier than reality to make up for not being real. yeah; they are pretty 'unrealistic' at times :)) usually involving dozens of men lined up around the block waiting for the next available port to dock with... spotlights from circling television crew helicopters illuminating the stage while large crowds of people call me lewd/filthy names... oops, sorry, i need to run take a quick emergency break. be back when i run out of batteries.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/16 05:56 PM
1

as always i am totally incapable of speaking for anyone other than myself - For me i know that there is obviously going to be a minimum standard of health and hygiene and reasonable fitness and clearly men that have it all together are going to be more appealing however as long as a man has acceptable levels of the above criteria it is almost entirely attitude and demeanor - how they portray themselves and how they make me "feel" inside - if they exude confidence and strength they don't NEED mov…
/r/TheRedPill05/03/16 05:12 PM
1

one of the reasons i follow this subreddit is because i find it very interesting to understand how men think and one of the reasons i offer my opinion on some topics is because i think it might help others understand how women think. (not that i think exactly like all other women but i certainly have a different perspective on many topics here.) I hear women complain that they just don't understand men, (or men saying they just don't understand women) quite frequently. I know that reading the co…
/r/TheRedPill05/03/16 01:40 PM
2

good luck on that front :)) it's not an easy topic to bring up but for those of us that love these sorts of fantasies it is truly an amazing experience. most women are afraid to bring it up because of their slut denial and men are often afraid of scaring her off if they bring it up; plus a lot of men don't really understand that consensual rough sex can be an incredible rush to so many women; there is a lot of natural aversion to 'hitting women' and being branded as an abusive man but playing th…
/r/TheRedPill05/03/16 12:31 AM
3

females tend to think in terms of emotion; making decisions based on how it makes them "feel" as opposed to men who largely make decisions based on a more rational/logical basis; this is not an "absolute" or "awalt" concept but it is clearly true in general. using logic and rational arguments or facts does not work with a lot of women; it's like speaking a totally different language, all the facts in the world don't mean a thing if her 'fee fee's are in the way. what i find truly amazing is when…
/r/TheRedPill05/03/16 12:29 AM
3

I don't know many women that want to be raped. I do know plenty that love their rape fantasies and enjoy acting them out. these are entirely different things. as for 'fantasy men' - i have no idea how common this is but I sometimes fantasize about being raped in an alley by a group of homeless men that haven't had showers in weeks; the alley smells like a urinal and the men appear (and smell) like they've been living on the street for years... They are hardly "prince charming" material. I've fan…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/16 11:07 PM
1

rape roleplay is very different from rape; rape roleplay is absolutely consensual and negotiated in advance - it is a means of fulfilling a fantasy and has an illusion of being non consensual but it is very much consensual. without that consent it is rape and totally immoral. my fantasy is 'just a fantasy' - as i mentioned i would never want to impose that on anyone outside of a consensual roleplay. it is simply one of the scenarios that comes up from time to time in my fantasies. never actually…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/16 10:25 PM
3

it would also be so incredibly disruptive to the fun and spontaneity of sex that i think it would take most of the fun out of it. - i play out rape roleplay scenes when i am lucky enough to have the opportunity and those scenes really require the sort of pre-scene negotiations that "affirmative consent" wants to impose on everyone but a rape roleplay scene is incredibly different and that up front negotiation takes a LOT of the "surprise" and "apprehension" out of the roleplay scene.. because i …
/r/TheRedPill04/03/16 10:15 PM
4

i can picture "affirmative consent" lawsuits in a few years.. "your honor, you can see in section 7, paragraph 15 sub paragraph b of the consent decree; witnessed and notarized by the law firm of almen arerapists and scum; as filed with the recorders court after pre contact negotiations in August of last year that the plaintiff agreed to allow the defendent to put his right index finger in her ass up to the second knuckle but she did not consent to any twisting of that finger so lacking that con…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/16 09:52 PM
0

i have no idea how anyone else thinks; i can only speak about what happens in my head. - and i am certainly NOT a feminist. i do however love spankings, being dominated, punished, roleplay games etc. and among my fondest fantasies are some where men finally get so fed up with the constant whining of feminists that they fight back and teach women what a 'rape culture' really looks like - granted thats only a fantasy and i wouldn't want to impose such a fate on anyone else (other than in a rolepla…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/16 09:48 PM
1

if you really want to go point by point... (1) it would be wonderful to not have to fear walking out at night but whining about this doesn't make you safer. the reality is that i am small, it's a biological reality, criminals of all sorts look for the softest, easiest targets, it is common sense to expect that they will go for the lowest hanging fruit. if you make yourself a soft target you can expect to be victimized. This isn't "victim blaming" - no amount of "equality laws" is going to change…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 09:13 PM
5

The one you want. I recall seeing a book once "real men don't eat quiche"... i thought the entire premise was stupid because "real men eat whatever the hell they want to eat".
/r/askTRP04/03/16 08:17 PM
1

women also frequently get sentenced to significantly shorter prison terms for the exact same offense as men. men ARE raped outside of prison are you saying that rape is somehow less of a violation if you are a prisoner? Jennifer Lawrence never had to take her clothes off to become one of the most highly paid women in hollywood. She did it by being awesome, down to earth and not consumed by that 'entitled princess delusion' that seems to affect so many hollywood celebrities. The one frequently ci…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 07:31 PM
1

I'll reference an article on the subject that claims to list 18 specific "disadvantages" women face in the world. http://thoughtcatalog.com/isla-sofia/2014/04/18-reasons-why-the-concept-of-female-privilege-is-insane/ Personally i only see two of them as being legitimate and neither of them are due to "patriarchy" or "oppression" - they are just natural results of our physical differences. the rest are either entirely imaginary (such as the pay gap), entirely self inflicted (such as #15 where she…
/r/MensRights04/03/16 06:44 PM
4

good luck arguing that distinction in court.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 04:52 AM
2

This article from last October claims that he photoshopped images of her face onto naked porn images that he used in online posts advertising her as a "gang bang slut" and "no limit slave" and gave out her home address. http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland/alleged-stalking-victim-robyn-night-calls-for-revenge-porn-laws-20151029-gkm5bg.html You made the claim in your post that this is "a completely unrelated claim" which is the only point of disagreement here.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 04:10 AM
3

not seeing anything in the article stating that they were pictures of her face; the "images of me are online" claim does not state at all the nature of the photos.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 03:42 AM
4

it does state "images of me are online..." - i agree that it doesn't specifically indicate that they are porn but it hardly rules it out. I do suspect she's lying... "over 50 strangers" showing up demanding sex sounds very much like someones fantasy (including mine :))
/r/MensRights04/03/16 03:33 AM
3

If this is true it might be a related claim - the article doesn't specifically state whether he was using actual 'porn' images of her in the ads to attract the 'rapists' that were showing up at her door but he was intentionally impersonating her as some form of revenge so if he used her 'porn' images in the process it sure sounds like it would be 'revenge porn'. not saying it's true, i know nothing more than the claims of the article but i just don't see that it's "unrelated" to revenge porn.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 03:24 AM
1

i totally agree with the idea of bringing back flogging for many criminal offenses; it would be far less cruel and most likely a lot more effective than prison when dealing with non-violent crimes. I suspect a considerable percentage of criminals would gladly opt for a flogging instead of a lengthy prison term and it would save a tremendous amount of money too.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 02:17 AM
25

if she's hooking up with people on tinder she's probably hooked up with quite a few. she's probably trying to scam them all into paying her child support and i wouldn't be at all surprised if she wasn't even pregnant. get a lawyer, she needs to prove paternity. If she isn't even pregnant you should have her investigated for fraud because i strongly suspect she's scamming others.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 05:16 PM
2

you're old enough to get deployed to Afghanistan but not old enough to go to Panama City Beach? - tell them you're going TDY to Tyndall. Billeting is probably cheaper than any of the beach hotels anyway :)
/r/askTRP03/03/16 12:35 AM
2

you are under no legal obligation to follow their rules. Stop asking permission and tell them you are going. Text them some pictures so they know you are ok; preferably not after having too many drinks.
/r/askTRP02/03/16 11:58 PM
5

you also should consider that any female that actually does sign up for 'seeking arrangements' is there because they are looking for exactly that sort of financial arrangement; Women that aren't would not be signing up on that site at all since that's pretty much the entire point of the site. so i'm not sure you can make many conclusions about "all women" based on responses from that particular site.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/16 04:50 PM
3

I fully expect police investigators to doubt any claim made by anyone in a criminal investigation; that is part and parcel of the job of investigating; They HAVE to be skeptical of any claim because quite often criminals lie and sometimes the accuser is the one lying and the real victim is the man that has been falsely accused. There has been a lot of pressure, particularly in colleges lately to require investigators to believe female accusers regardless of the actual evidence; This is a horribl…
/r/MensRights28/02/16 08:41 PM
4

Feminist thought is so pervasive in media and education; we constantly hear the claims repeated so often by feminists that it's 'easy' to fall into the trap of believing these claims at face value if you don't try to actually challenge the hype and look for the truth. Many feminist claims are clearly unsupported by facts. for instance the myth of "rape culture" and "patriarchy" are distortions of reality used as a weapon against all things masculine and the people inventing these claims absolute…
/r/MensRights28/02/16 08:20 PM
1

that does take a lot of the fun out of it.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 12:46 AM
7

does it taste the same? Can we get it by the gallon at the grocery store yet? It's hard to meet my daily needs 1 teaspoon at a time... Thumbs up for the comment "when robots can make click bait we won't need Julie Bindel".
/r/MensRights26/02/16 08:08 PM
4

all drugs should be legalized. I really don't care what you choose to put into your own body. It should be none of the governments business. the use of drugs is NOT an acceptable excuse for other criminal conduct and robbing and assaulting people is already illegal regardless of what drugs or alcohol you may have consumed. We should focus the massive amount of money we currently waste throwing people in jail for simple possession or use of drugs on treatment and education efforts which would be …
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:44 PM
4

the 19th amendment was ratified by the house and senate in 1919 and was officially ratified in August of 1920.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/16 04:27 PM
1

I sent the links via PM because the mod bot deletes posts with links
/r/TheRedPill20/02/16 04:21 PM
12

the great expansion of the welfare state began with FDR in the 1930s and later with Johnson's "war on poverty" in the 1960s. - FDR became president after women won the right to vote in 1920. Black males have been allowed to vote since the passage of the 15th amendment in 1870. totally agree that these social programs are destroying the economy but your timeline here is incorrect.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/16 04:07 PM
3

oops, forgot that i couldn't post links - reposting without the links to the polls - feel free to PM if you want the source according to a 2013 huffington post poll only about 23% of women consider themselves "feminists" although about 82% believe in "equality". Further it shows that nearly twice as many women overall have a NEGATIVE view of Feminism than a POSITIVE view (with around 30% claiming a "neutral" view.) Some of us DO believe in "equality" with regards to legal rights and opportunitie…
/r/TheRedPill20/02/16 12:16 PM
7

In case others are wondering: The first question that came to mind when reading this was "what is the source of these quotes" - I thought it might be some femdom fetish site or such but it appears that most of them came from a "human sexuality" forum post specifically asking women if they would "castrate a guy and why" - http://www.topix.com/forum/news/sex/T256ICGC1D7DJGSPQ/p2 Nothing in the question seems to suggest that it's "merely a fantasy"; it seems posed as "would you really want to do it…
/r/MensRights19/02/16 06:16 PM
2

I totally agree; I hate the very concept of affirmative action for exactly this reason. No matter how well i manage to do my job, no matter what amount of skills i have; the very fact that "diversity goals" MIGHT have influenced the hiring decision completely negates the legitimacy of my achievement in many peoples eyes. i have those doubts about my own placement in my current job; I think i'm really good at my job however i will probably always have lingering doubts about whether i was truly th…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 10:02 PM
1

of course, betty and wilma were always by the back fence gossiping while fred and barney were busy riding around on a borosaurus at the quarry; haven't you studied ancient history? even with the higher rate of infant mortality and death during childbirth and random bear maulings some ancient people lived well into their 70s. The overall life expectancy was a lot lower for many reasons however it was hardly unknown to have people live similarly long lives as we tend to have today as long as they …
/r/MensRights15/02/16 09:47 PM
11

Two other reasons immediately come to mind: 1: They got caught by their boyfriend/husband/parents but don't want to accept personal responsibility for their choice; 2: they actually DID consent to sex and then later decided they regretted it or got mad at the guy and want revenge. and regardless of how you feel about abortion one thing is clear. If we limit the ability to have legal abortions JUST to women that have been raped the number of false rape accusations will skyrocket.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/16 06:59 PM
1

Since you don't have custody you would have to get the custodial parent to sign a form 8332 granting you the right to claim the dependency. If she isn't willing to agree to that you would need to petition the court to make a ruling. the "default" assumption by the IRS is that the custodial parent is entitled to the claim but the child support payments you are making are not taxable income to her; they are taxable income to you so if you do legitimately pay over half of her support you should be …
/r/MensRights15/02/16 06:51 PM
1

two notable female developers left GitHub last year with complaints about harassment and a culture that they said was "toxic". I don't know of any takeover by feminists;
/r/MensRights15/02/16 12:21 PM
1

women sitting around the camp would clearly have been talking constantly, there may not be anthropological evidence of "gossiping" but they clearly would have been talking with each other a lot more often about many things and gossip would seem pretty likely.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 11:51 AM
2

thumbs up for that; i mainly added item 7 because i do think it would be really good if a business could actually be clear about the nature of the business. I would think there would still be a market for massages with 'happy endings'. no problem at all with that; it would just be nice if i could tell the difference when i look at the business ads because generally if i want a massage it's... well.. because i want a massage and the places that cater to the "happy ending" market are not always ob…
/r/TheRedPill14/02/16 05:51 PM
-1

I'm curious how much of that is due to the historical gender roles/differences in lifestyle over most of human history - By that i mean that for much of human history (until fairly recently) men tended to be 'out' hunting/fishing/guarding the camp/working fields etc. those are largely solitary and quiet single purpose pursuits while women tended to stay back at the camp raising kids, cooking, sewing and socializing/gossiping etc, to a much greater extent than males. - That pattern repeating over…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 05:37 PM
40

the article appears to be primarily based on the percentage of "pull requests" submitted that are accepted on GitHub. i am NOT a coder and never claimed to be but i do work with several projects on github for software that we use at work. I have submitted hundreds of pull requests for relatively minor code changes, most were accepted and didn't require tremendous review mainly because they were pretty minor changes to fix grammar or look and feel issues. Meanwhile we have several actual programm…
/r/MensRights14/02/16 12:54 PM
1

you could interpret that as an opportunity to make a case for yourself. Whether you think it's "fair" or not doesn't change the reality - Most reasonably attractive women have far more offers than they can accept. Most are going to be somewhat selective and it sounds like a question where she wants to know what you bring to the table. I'm pretty sure that fits the definition of "shit test" but it is what it is. - How you react to that is entirely your call but i would look at it as an opportunit…
/r/askTRP13/02/16 08:24 PM
6

that basically means that it is NOT all in effect. - if the government is not enforcing the licensing, health education and regular health inspections requirements and not auditing providers that fail to document their earnings that is a failure of the government; not a failure in the concept of legalized prostitution.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/16 03:05 PM
4

even feminazis could see how they lose ALL their power when escorts become the norm(stigma removal included). They do; that's why feminists largely oppose legalized prostitution but want to demand that police only arrest the customers. Their position has been that the provider is a "victim" of male oppression. One of the reasons that I think it SHOULD be legalized is because under the current system the customers have no way to know for certain that the provider is legally old enough nor do they…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/16 12:35 PM
7

I totally agree that prostitution should be legal as long as all parties are consenting adults however you are never going to get it passed by a majority of voters based on these arguments. No politician would ever go on record supporting it using those reasons stated above. Prostitution should be legalized for several reasons that you probably CAN get support for. 1: Mandatory education - particularly health education would help minimize the risks of spreading STD. 2: Licensing providers - allo…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/16 12:25 PM
2

if you are paying more than 50% of the childs support you should be able to claim her as your dependent.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 11:29 PM
2

TMI alert: I put condoms on 'insertables' when i use them anally. also they might be left over from a time when you were not exclusive such as that time you were apart. It looks bad but there might be a legitimate explanation. I would at least ask, and i would hardly blame you for being skeptical.
/r/askTRP12/02/16 08:20 PM
2

i don't see anything in any of my comments there where i demanded anyone do anything. A statement was made in a previous comment suggesting that Russian men were "beta fucks" - my comment merely points out that unlike the beta cucks in germany the Russian men took action and beat the hell out of a bunch of refugees that were harassing women. I frankly don't give a damn if you want to stay out of the encounter when a refugee mob is molesting a girl; go for it. but if you think those Russian men w…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/16 10:54 AM
-2

That was in response to a comment that "Russians are beta as fuck compared to Muslims living in Russia". and it paints a pretty clear distinction between the response of Russian Men vs. those in Cologne. "What's good about white knighting"? - You have something against men being masculine or do you prefer the inaction of the German Men?
/r/TheRedPill11/02/16 07:47 PM
0

This was just last week in Russia - A rather sharp contrast to what happened in Cologne. http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/04/refugees-go-clubbing-in-russia-harass-girls-wake-up-in-hospital-the-next-morning/
/r/TheRedPill11/02/16 06:36 PM
1

No test is going to be perfect; I know some people will answer MBTI questions based on what they think they SHOULD say (or what they "WISH" their personality was like) as opposed to what they would really do. for instance a woman i know pretty well just took an online MBTI a few days ago and her results came back as "ENTP" but i've known her for years and there is no way she is truly a "T"... she is entirely irrational and clearly makes most decisions on emotion. However if you answer the questi…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/16 11:18 AM
3

in general i don't like the concept of "group identity" at all - it's a very liberal notion. I consider everyone individuals. It's certainly true that there are general characteristics that are more common in females just as there are certain characteristics that are more common in men but it's certainly never been 100%. I know some women that are more logical, dominant and assertive than some men. Those tend to be considered 'masculine' traits but we are all unique individuals; not robots that …
/r/TheRedPill10/02/16 11:10 AM
1

how dare you throw rational observational evidence at my delusional theory!!! help!!! i'm being opressed!!! - oops, sorry, i feel better now. that's very true and it doesn't make a bit of sense; i totally don't understand why anyone does that. i should know better than to try to suggest that my personal feelings have anything to do with anyone other than myself..
/r/TheRedPill10/02/16 01:43 AM
-2

"nice" is not a contradiction of "masculine, dominant and strong" - "nice" does not mean "do everything i say"... You can be "nice" while still being assertive and without being a doormat; my owner is very dominant; but he isn't rude, arrogant or a jerk (except in roleplay where it's really meant as fun). He treats others very well; he is quite chivalrous in many regards; These are not mutually exclusive characteristics. Clearly a lot of women DO tend to drift towards jerks but i suspect what th…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/16 12:05 AM
9

Reviewing the MBTI (Myers Briggs) trends based on Gender this is pretty clear; The "T/F" (Thinking vs Feeling) trait clearly trends very strong towards males being "thinkers" (basing their decisions on rational thought and analysis) vs a significant shift where females largely base decisions on "Feelings" (basing decisions on how it makes them "feel" or emotional based decision making). Breaking down the stats solely on this category shows that around 70% of females fall into a "Feeling" categor…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 10:47 PM
1

women talk a lot more than men; It's wired in our brains http://www.today.com/health/chatty-cathy-listen-new-study-reveals-why-women-talk-more-1C8469360 I often say that we don't all come off an assembly line with identical programming but sometimes it IS programming. - Over most of the history of humans females stayed back at the camp with all the other females taking care of kids, sewing, cooking, cleaning and talking/gossiping incessantly while the men were nearly always out hunting, fishing,…
/r/askTRP09/02/16 07:32 PM
1

generals are not normally in front line combat positions (they MAY have come up through those positions but are certainly not in one by the time they make General) so they aren't likely to get much, if any, sexual benefit from adding women to those particular roles and i am pretty sure most of them recognize that having women in these roles would lead to diminished effectiveness which does directly reflect on their performance. They would clearly get a 'sexual benefit' by adding women in some po…
/r/askTRP09/02/16 12:48 PM
2

Nothing here about trump but Rubio has already stated that he supports it (sort of) - http://www.ibtimes.com/republicans-want-draft-women-military-gop-debate-focuses-female-troops-2297187 notice however that all 3 of them said they would "allow women" to sign up with selective service; none of them specifically stated that they would 'require' women to sign up.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 02:25 AM
12

it's good to find out that he doesn't believe in equality before the election.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 02:17 AM
1

I have no idea if global warming is real or not; it is clearly not an area of science i have a clue about. however one thing that disturbs me a lot is that debate/opposing views are not tolerated at all. - "consensus - the science is settled, al gore made a movie it MUST be true!!!" Throw anyone that disagrees in jail!!! - anyone that even asks questions is vilified, insulted and censored. that isn't how science is supposed to work; it IS however the standard method of liberal politics (which ce…
/r/TheRedPill08/02/16 01:27 AM
1

so far the NSA hasn't released their data; i'm sure they know. :)
/r/askTRP07/02/16 10:15 PM
1

Recent studies seem to suggest the men and women cheat at pretty much the same rate. http://abcnews.go.com/Health/women-cheating-men-study/story?id=13885519 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/02/cheating-wives_n_3536412.html I can't find the source survey for the ABC article so I'm going to go with the sourced numbers (from bloomberg) used by the huff piece which states that men cheat at a slightly higher rate of 21% vs. Women at ~14.7% - Both far higher than it should be and probably both es…
/r/askTRP07/02/16 06:23 PM
1

masturbation is normal and doesn't mean anything is wrong with your relationship. - Masturbation is "me time" - when i can let myself get lost in a fantasy and enjoy the sensation. - Sex is "us time" - where my focus SHOULD be more on giving him pleasure more than simply taking my own. (of course it should be mutually satisfying but my focus IS going to be on him, not me) let her enjoy it without guilt, you might even 'assist' if she is receptive but keep in mind that you might be breaking her o…
/r/askTRP07/02/16 03:01 PM
2

any time that you are trying to improve your life you will meet resistance from people that simply want you to remain the same. - I drank pretty heavily in college; when i moved away i chose to completely stop drinking because nothing good came from it; i have zero regrets, it was a very easy change to make because i was moving halfway across the country and all of that support network from college were no longer trying to drag me to clubs every night. it would not have been nearly as easy if i …
/r/askTRP07/02/16 02:44 PM
-1

most colleges don't have a "legal system" - they have a "mob mentality" where there is a total lack of 'due process'. men are presumed guilty if any female has her 'feewings hurt"; no need for trial or even a single shred of evidence that any actual crime occurred.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/16 01:56 PM
1

not all degrees are equal. I know plenty of college educated idiots. Psychology, Nursing, Communication, Elementary Education, Literature, Sociology and Liberal Arts made up 7 of the top 10 degrees awarded to females in 2012. - I generally think of these as mostly pointless "soft degrees"; "general" degrees that allow you to check off a box that says you have a degree when you apply for some often unrelated job that requires "some generic degree" but aren't exactly among the more intellectually …
/r/MensRights07/02/16 01:28 PM
1

Girls enjoy sex too; I don't feel "used" when i have sex because I am getting as much pleasure out of it as the guy that i'm with (hopefully) and I personally don't see the harm in having sex as long as it's consensual. We have birth control and STD testing and other methods of preventing the spread of STD's so most of the risk factors that used to make this a much bigger deal are simply no longer as big of a factor. I do understand that many men really want their potential spouse to be 'pure' b…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/16 11:44 AM
1

I'd be surprised if they could find that many women that are physically qualified for the job. Firefighters carry a lot of equipment and need the strength to carry unconscious victims while wearing their gear. i'm fine with 'legal equality' but that does NOT mean we are equal in every measure, men clearly have a significant strength advantage and it's pretty ridiculous to deny it. Lowering the standards puts peoples lives at risk and that is not an acceptable price for "feel good" legislation.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 01:21 PM
2

i would even say that the goal of "women" (particularly the feminists) are quite frequently against the best interest of women too. One rather obvious example is taking place all over europe where they have welcomed totally unconstrained immigration into their country by people from parts of the world that are openly hostile to everything they claim to stand for. Feminists shun/vilify every aspect of masculinity and then get upset when all the "real men" have vanished and been replaced by beta s…
/r/TheRedPill06/02/16 01:04 AM
1

Her answer to whether women should be required to register for the selective service was: "I have a hard time imagining the kind of national emergency that would require the use of the Selective Service System,"; So; if that is true... why should men have to sign up? "women have always been the primary victims of war." = Actual quote from Hillary Clinton, Seriously? in her view the man getting KILLED is NOT the victim here... Is this not reason enough to vote against her? No way I would ever vot…
/r/TheRedPill05/02/16 07:20 PM
2

it would be very interesting to know how many women would prefer the apparent inaction of the effeminate beta german boys to the assaults in Cologne vs this recent reaction to a similar incident by Russian Men; http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/04/refugees-go-clubbing-in-russia-harass-girls-wake-up-in-hospital-the-next-morning/ There are very good reasons to appreciate alpha males. feminists are incredibly naive because they THINK that they are oppressed by their imaginary 'patriarchal' "rape cultu…
/r/TheRedPill05/02/16 07:07 PM
1

no problem at all, i thought his attempt was rather amusing
/r/TheRedPill05/02/16 06:19 PM
3

education is frequently very hostile to male teachers, especially if they are not feminists.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 05:18 PM
12

I actually like the idea of title 9 in theory but it has been widely misinterpreted in ways that pressure colleges to establish quotas in sports enrollments, threats of lawsuitsagainst schools that have a wider gender gap in athletic programs has resulted in the damage. - This is really NOT the original intent of title 9 but fear of those lawsuits is the reason why so many collegiate sports have been cut.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 04:45 PM
2

from his posting history (that only goes back a few hours) i'd say he just created the account to make offensive posts.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 04:39 PM
12

totally agree; i am all for lifting barriers where we can but NOT lowering the standards just to meet some arbitrary diversity quota; When standards are lowered the prestige is diminished; anyone female is assumed to have "only" gotten that role because the standards were lower no matter how qualified she may have been. lowering the standards basically says that you cannot make it on your own; you aren't good enough to do this without lowered expectations. It's exactly the same with race based q…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 03:59 PM
25

setting artificial quotas where exactly 50% of the jobs MUST be filled by women is what i am referring to (see the image in the post, it clearly states 350 openings are for men and 350 are for women). I never suggested that no woman can do the job but if you actually need 700 fire fighters how is anyone truly helped by limiting your options, There are still plenty of unfilled positions and no-one benefits if qualified females are not even applying. so politicians pass some ridiculous 'feel good'…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 02:14 PM
5

true and it shouldn't matter. - anyone that's been victimized deserves to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 01:50 PM
22

what they also fail to notice is that a female victim DOESN'T have it "worse".1 women have lots of support if they get abused, people take it seriously, we get protection, have shelters, the police actually investigate our claims and almost without exception the accused male is vilified and socially shunned even when there is absolutely no evidence that he did anything wrong. also female victims are not vilified/blamed for not being "strong enough" or "man enough" to have dealt with it themselve…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 01:12 PM
141

College sports have been decimated due to fears of lawsuits under title 9 because of the imbalance between the number of females in competitive sports vs. the number of males. This was never because women didn't have the opportunity to play; They just don't sign up for these sports because they aren't interested. Women (in general) are much less interested in competitive sports than men so it is quite natural that they would be less represented in athletics. The ugly side effect of title 9 is th…
/r/MensRights05/02/16 12:36 PM
1

is this the original article? the date at the top seems far too recent (was it ONLY 1 year ago?) and the disclaimer at the top also specifically claims that it is 'satire' (which i don't recall being there when i first read it) however it seems like it's the same article i read 'a while ago' (seems like it was nearly 2 years ago but i should know better than to trust my memory) - http://www.rooshv.com/how-to-stop-rape
/r/askTRP04/02/16 07:02 PM
0

i think i read his article sometime ago (whenever it first hit the news a few years ago) and if i remember correctly he had said that he thought it would be a measure to prevent false rape accusations AND encourage females to take responsibility for their own safety, something along the lines of "if you go to their house, what did you think was going to happen".. i am not 100% sure that was his article tho as it's been a while since i saw it. If it was that article i thought it was a bit extreme…
/r/askTRP04/02/16 05:38 PM
1

Perhaps sections 2A, 2B and 2C would still be applicable as all three of those sections specifically address non consensual sodomy; i have no doubt lawrence v. texas was NOT intented to make non consensual sodomy legal but i know for certain that it has been misused that way*. It is curious why prosecutors would prefer to use the sodomy charge when there is a rape statute that could clearly be equally applied. I don't see why a non consensual violation of a males anus would be any less of a viol…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 03:57 PM
2

California Penal code 261 would also include non consensual penetration of the anus as rape (regardless of the gender of the victim); no need in that case for a separate "sodomy" charge. many states still have laws against same sex marriage in their books but they are still entirely invalid based on last years supreme court decision. the sodomy statues haven't been removed from the books in all states either but they are just as invalid as the laws prohibiting same sex marriage. That case (lawre…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 03:41 PM
4

at least within the US the sodomy laws were ruled unconstitutional back in 2003; (Lawrence v. Texas) - some states haven't removed those statutes from the books but there is no basis for a "sodomy" charge under any US law currently. You can be "sodomized" but that's not a legal concept; in the US the definition of rape varies by state. Georgia for instance specifically limits it to female victims penetrated by a male sex organ but california, new york & virginia, (and the UCMJ which applies to m…
/r/MensRights04/02/16 03:00 PM
17

haven't seen much misogyny here other than a few comments from trolls that got deleted pretty quickly and i've been pretty annoyed by the feminist movement for a long time; well before i even heard of TRP; the damage they are doing to men is obvious to any rational observer and they do NOT speak for me.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/16 02:16 AM
54

why not? i like men that are masculine, dominant, alpha, - i'm interested in understanding what they like and i'm interested in seeing more men become masculine; i don't see a conflict there. Many of the goals of TRP; particularly men becoming better men, more alpha and less like the modern effeminate sheep are also things i want to support and encourage.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/16 02:11 AM
60

"how to treat a woman"? feminism insists that women are equal so why should they be treated special? personally i hold doors open for people all the time with no regard to their gender and i'm a small asian female; i consider it 'basic courtesy' to hold the door open for anyone if they are reasonably close or carrying something. I don't see it as some act of "chivalry" - however it bugs me to see people expecting to be treated like a princess. Feminists absolutely do NOT speak for me; i abhor mo…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/16 12:02 AM
11

that may be a factor in the language difference but also consider that through most of human history women stayed back at the campsite/home cooking, sewing, cleaning, maintaining the camp, caring for the children and talking incessantly with the other women in the camp while the men were often out hunting, fishing, or working in fields which was largely silent solitary pursuits (even hunting parties rarely spoke so as not to frighten the prey). over millennia this would clearly have an impact on…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/16 09:33 PM
3

so it's working. she's getting the attention. i wouldn't be surprised if she's also timing these crisis situations for times when you want to do something that might not involve her. it's a way to keep you from having fun without her. that's a total guess but i've seen that pattern several times from desperate clingy boys (which can be just as annoying as desperate leechy clingy soul-sucking girls). with one guy i could predict his suicide threats with uncanny accuracy days in advance because i …
/r/askTRP03/02/16 08:56 PM
2

i find dinner or movie dates kinda lame and 'common' and almost formulaic (is that even a word?). a movie doesn't really give me any opportunity to get to know you and especially as a "first date" it's kinda pointless because i probably won't want to start making out that soon unless i already feel pretty comfortable with you... i prefer activity dates; going out and 'doing something' - that could be climbing rock walls, zip lining, dave and busters or even a bowling alley would be preferable to…
/r/askTRP03/02/16 08:35 PM
4

anyone that threatens suicide are just looking for attention or trying to manipulate you. it is really easy to kill yourself if you want to; threatening to do it doesn't make any sense for someone that actually plans to.
/r/askTRP03/02/16 08:03 PM
-4

I would add honorably completing the minimum service commitment before you are allowed to vote.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/16 11:50 PM
2

i don't know how old he is but i still think Harrison Ford is seriously hot. as for star wars I'd rather do the wookie than luke; even after his training luke never seemed very masculine to me and crybaby Anakin? seriously? THAT is Darth Vader? what a total disappointment.
/r/askTRP02/02/16 11:42 PM
2

I can't speak for other women; I only know what's in my mind and what I like is that masculine men tend to be more dominant; Fit/Healthy, assertive, strong and confident; I am really not at all interested in the effeminate metrosexual feminist sheep that most men have become; that has zero sexual appeal to me. I might consider them friends but they just aren't someone i'd ever want to date. Viggo Mortenson (Aragorn in LOTR) is way near the top of my lust list. His coworker Orlando Bloom doesn't …
/r/askTRP02/02/16 11:31 PM
3

i love this!! childish immature bratty behavior should not be rewarded or condoned. if she cannot treat others with respect she doesn't deserve any respect herself. well played and don't feel guilty for teaching her a well deserved lesson. she owes all of your friends a public apology too and she owes you a big thanks for teaching her some basic manners.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/16 08:54 PM
1

there are plenty of examples of feminists clearly demonstrating misandry on their part. they truly believe that any opposition to their carefully constructed narrative is misogyny because they feel they have a divine right to be kept on a pedestal and given the princess treatment; they also feel that it's quite unfair to expect them to actually earn the special treatment. everything in their narrative insists that men are the privileged ones. For instance it's a "privilege" to be drafted and sen…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/16 04:52 PM
2

maybe she doesn't think it's any of your business. - are you IN a relationship with her where that would even matter? why would she feel that she even needs to answer such a question from you?
/r/askTRP01/02/16 03:04 PM
2

because they fear acknowledging such incidents were false, it will create an atmosphere where legitimate rape victims are afraid to go to the police. i think the bigger fear is that people might actually believe that women are sometimes lying when they make these claims. - It is fairly common for feminists to totally dismiss any suggestion that a woman might be lying about her abuse despite rather overwhelming evidence that it happens pretty frequently. It doesn't fit their narrative to allow an…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 12:46 PM
2

domination is NOT misogyny. my owner is very dominant; i wouldn't want it any other way. i think it's ridiculous how some women seem to think their Vagina is so freaking amazingly valuable that they don't have to contribute anything else to the relationship. "i have a Vagina - worship me; buy me food and jewelry and pay for everything and maybe once you sign a lifetime pledge to provide for me forever i might let you give me pleasure" seems like a pretty lopsided deal to me. It's hardly like sex…
/r/TheRedPill31/01/16 05:45 PM
1

I'm looking but can't find where you mentioned one single "right" that men have that women don't?
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/16 01:03 PM
2

you mention wanting to judge her actions but i'm not seeing much in your post that gives any insight to her or her actions. you talk about your goals and your actions but very little that would give any clue what is going on in her head. are you content with accepting 'anyone' she might choose as a partner for a threesome? - if it were me i'd want to be part of the selection process; if you leave this entirely to her and she chooses someone that you're not going to be willing to go vertical with…
/r/askTRP25/01/16 12:59 PM
1

all true and maybe i never will; to me it just seems like an alien concept. i understand that men don't find it attractive; it's the basis for that belief that eludes me and that aspect is probably better suited for a different subreddit anyway. best regards and thanks for all the input.
/r/askTRP25/01/16 04:37 AM
2

i wouldn't stress over it; a huge dick is obviously going to get noticed but female arousal is really mostly a mental process; if you bring the right attitude you won't disappoint.
/r/askTRP25/01/16 03:40 AM
1

personally i don't see how women are damaged from having sex and i don't really see why it's that big of a deal currently given that we have paternity testing, std testing and birth control pretty widely available so i pretty much asked exactly the same question in another thread here just a few hours ago. (the "N" count thread) summarizing the answers given there: 1: paternity: Men would want to know that the child that they are being expected to provide for is actually their own. 2: std: Conce…
/r/askTRP25/01/16 03:36 AM
0

Thanks for that answer; It helps; I can certainly understand the concerns about paternity; especially with the long term financial obligations that it would entail. if i was to have sex with 10 men at a party i would still be 100% certain that a baby that resulted from it would still be mine and clearly that would NOT be the case for any of those men. that makes perfect sense. The concerns about STD's also makes sense although i don't see how that would be any greater than the concern that a fem…
/r/askTRP25/01/16 12:48 AM
0

I understand that it's a common objection that many men have and i don't mean to suggest that it's "wrong" i just don't understand what is behind the objection to a woman having previous partners. I don't see how we're "harmed" by having more experience. That seems (from my pov) to be a benefit because it means that i know more things to try, have skills that others may lack and that i'm not afraid to try new things. What is the 'real' downside? - What is often called "pure" and "innocent" also …
/r/askTRP24/01/16 10:41 PM
-1

hopefully i'm not totally out of line by asking this but i really don't understand why this is such a big deal to men. has she been 'damaged' by having sex with others? Why is it "wrong" for a girl to have several previous encounters but somehow "ok" for guys? i can certainly understand you being concerned about diseases but that's equally valid regardless of whether it's a male or female partner and they do have tests for that available at most health care facilities so i just don't get why thi…
/r/askTRP24/01/16 09:52 PM
1

apparently they have found video of this girl on her most recent trip to the grocery store. http://www.bitsandpieces.us/2016/01/23/stocking-up-for-the-storm/
/r/TheRedPill23/01/16 11:59 PM
2

banana's are pretty awesome
/r/TheRedPill23/01/16 07:10 PM
3

one thing i like about men is that they are much more direct and honest about criticism; in general with men they actually tell you what they want; it's really quite refreshing.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/16 08:11 PM
6

it sure sounds like ASD; she says that there was nearly no intimacy in her past relationship for a long time so she's almost certainly going to be starved for intimacy and possibly embarrassed that she felt so aroused. she may be embarrassed that she got aroused and intimate so easily/quickly with you and she's pushing you away because she worries that if she keeps seeing you that she will succumb to those temptations before she's 'ready'. i suspect reassuring her that her behavior wasn't bad, s…
/r/askTRP22/01/16 07:26 PM
7

these girls should be paying his legal bills; it looks like their entire case was contrived bs. he made no threats, they just don't like his politics. what they did to HIM was a bigger crime; especially the attempt to slander him as a pedophile.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/16 06:12 PM
3

apparently she was a webcam model well before she was 'forced' to do porn - LINK NSFW http://i.imgur.com/T7si6fJ.jpg
/r/TheRedPill21/01/16 10:30 PM
1

hopefully, but the good news is that you now have a great reason to convince any future partners about the wonders of blow jobs! No More morning sickness!!
/r/askTRP21/01/16 09:45 PM
1

according to the article you cited it's less that 20 out of 100,000. that's 0.002% not 0.1% and was only observed in 21% of the women studied with the highest concentration seen in those that had previously been pregnant with male children. of those that had never been pregnant only 10% had any evidence of male dna despite having had previous unprotected sex. and no; it's really not something i'm worried about;
/r/askTRP21/01/16 09:34 PM
1

it doesn't dilute your contribution to the DNA of the children at all; if anything it would dilute her contribution. and even then i doubt there's really any difference to the DNA of the children from this; it being 'present' doesn't alter her eggs, nor does it alter your sperm. when they meet the resulting offspring is going to be a combination of that. Her body having traces of other DNA won't make any notable change to the makeup of these children. The affect of her exposure to the other mens…
/r/askTRP21/01/16 08:45 PM
1

you have traces of the DNA of every one of your ancestors and assuming this article is true it would also include everyone your maternal ancestors ever had sex with as well. i don't really see it as a problem, it actually improves the immune system and makes you more likely to survive.
/r/askTRP21/01/16 07:38 PM
1

I don't think the article is saying that the "sperm" remains around for her entire life; It says the DNA stays in her bloodstream; not the 'sperm' - the sperm is just a delivery mechanism. it's been observed that women that often swallow their partners semen tend to have less problems with 'morning sickness' when they get pregnant (yeah, i'm assuming she didn't swallow it that time). it's believed that this is because their immune system has adapted to the mans DNA to a greater extent than those…
/r/askTRP21/01/16 07:27 PM
5

I don't know anything about "girlsdoporn" but i do have two friends that have done porn shoots and nothing about her story adds up. - The compliance requirements for 18 U.S.C. Section 2257 could not have been met without her consensual participation. There is no doubt when you are filling out all that paperwork exactly what the nature of the business is going to be.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/16 06:39 PM
1

hopefully they'd let me participate :) i prefer hanging out with men because women (in general) tend to spend all their time talking about nonsense and men actually do things... it's just much more fun.
/r/TheRedPill21/01/16 06:25 PM
3

does she seem to be treating it as a "chore" vs something she really wants to do on it's own? - her attitude about it is often the biggest inhibitor to improving. a lot of girls view blowjobs as some necessary evil that she does just to get you hard enough so she can start using the D for her own pleasure. I certainly understand wanting to fuck too but if that's the 'only' reason she is giving head it's gonna start seeming boring, uninspired and robotic. if that is the situation then changing th…
/r/askTRP21/01/16 05:25 PM
1

i just find it interesting.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/16 08:30 PM
1

i think you are misunderstanding what i've said. Nothing in my comments meant that i think girls should have any preferential treatment and nothing in my comments suggested that i wanted boys to be harmed; Girls are different from boys; they learn in different ways. Denying that is ridiculous. I think it's good that schools WANT to help girls learn; The GOAL of helping girls learn is NOT the problem. The problem is with the implementation because some of these changes cause harm to boys. the evi…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/16 06:58 PM
1

i meant that nothing is WRONG with wanting to help girls. That does not mean that these changes have no downside; Sometimes good intentions have negative consequences. The negative consequences in this case are clearly hurting boys. and I really fail to see how anyone can read my posting history and conclude that i'm a feminist. I am most certainly NOT feminist and am rather consistently against it.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/16 05:05 PM
2

I do think that makes more sense; although personally i would have totally hated going to an all girls school. I don't really see it as discrimination; boys ARE different from girls and denying this doesn't help either. trying to force boys to operate in 'girl mode' is just not healthy.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/16 05:01 PM
11

a lot of this 'mass emasculation' is due to the social conditioning from feminists/liberal control over media and education; there's a very clear hostility towards anything 'masculine' and the repeated theme played over and over again is going to take its toll on the development of boys. i consider it open warfare against boys; the education system especially has bent over backwards to be more friendly towards females and there is really nothing at all wrong with that goal however many of these …
/r/TheRedPill17/01/16 03:10 PM
2

Similarly, women need their sisters, so why don't you join them instead? hanging out with men is usually much more fun.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/16 09:36 PM
2

i don't really know if my recent posts are appropriate or not; Most of them are meant to offer my perspective on how i think with regards to some subjects being discussed; but i've never been real sure how that 'fits' with the basic rule of "red pill theory only'. my intent is to support men becoming more alpha; more dominant; that's a self serving interest of mine because those are the types of men i find appealing but that doesn't necessarily mean i am in agreement with all aspects of TRP; as …
/r/TheRedPill16/01/16 06:50 PM
2

Perhaps; one thing that i personally just don't like about cuckold porn is that often the woman is berating/humiliating her husband for being inadequote which just irks me personally. the focus seems to be on the humiliation of that man, I'm sure there are plenty of people with different viewpoints.. i totally love the aspect of the dominant/alpha male but the attitude towards the beta is specifically what turns me off when i see those scenes. my fantasies just don't include submissive or degrad…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/16 04:38 PM
1

the entire education system has been 'redesigned' to be almost entirely geared towards females at great expense to male education. girls and boys are NOT the same and trying to cater to the way females learn is entirely appropriate for females but causes a lot of problems for males. We've eliminated almost all aspects of competition, demanded that boys be put on drugs (such as ritalin/addreall) while claiming they have mental problems that are just absolutely natural male behavior; rewritten cur…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 06:26 PM
1

forgive me for chiming in here; but since you asked "why" if i can offer another perspective it might help a little with the understanding. It doesn't make what she did "right" and I certainly don't know what HER reasons were for HER actions but i can certainly comment with my view from the 'other side' of the "fucking sluts" equation as _AsapGem so eloquently described it :) to the OP i'm sorry you're hurt by all this; it sucks when relationships go bad; been there and it isn't fun from the oth…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/16 03:54 PM
1

One of the biggest problems I have with "welfare" is that it artificially skews the percentage of people reproducing that really should not be reproducing. It is a system that rewards women for having children without fathers. It has led to an explosion of MORE people on welfare, MORE children raised with no father, MORE reliance on government. It is a shining example of reverse darwinism.
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 03:04 PM
8

a shot of testosterone maybe? I would hope that beta's could learn to become men; i don't understand the appeal of a wimpy effeminate cowardly man (which most cuckold porn seems to feature); i have seen a few cuckold clips and didn't find them appealing at all. I don't think this is quite the same thing but does seem to have some similar aspects. i mention it because it might explain some aspects of the appeal (at least from the perspective of a female). i have some "home invasion" fantasies whe…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 02:01 PM
37

excellent read and spot on. Feminists have gone to some pretty absurd lengths to redefine "rape" so they can use a rather absurd "rape culture" claim as a weapon against men and it seems that they've got no concept what actual rape looks like. Liberals save their outrage and anger for targets that aren't likely to kill them because it's safer than confronting actual evil. I also think that they have a hard time processing it; It is contrary to the delusion that they have created for themselves t…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 12:56 PM
1

I'm sure part of it is the "big dick" aspect but i suspect there's more to it; white porn actors are also cherry picked and rather well endowed as well so that can't be the only factor. I think it has more to do with the taboo nature as well as the stereotype of the angry black thugs - particularly in the gangbang genre; it certainly works for me; and some of those men do look pretty awesome; i'm shocked that i don't see bondage or spanking on either list; Would have never expected that "step mo…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/16 02:24 AM
3

"All Women Are Like That" - there's a link in the right sidebar for "Glossary of Terms and Acronyms" for the common phrases. (as well as a lot of other helpful links)
/r/TheRedPill12/01/16 02:18 PM
3

female arousal is far more mental than physical. a large package doesn't hurt your situation but it is hardly the most important factor.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/16 04:00 PM
1

You're seriously overestimating the importance of a large package. It is certainly something that will get noticed but it is hardly a major factor and for the most part (unless you're one of those creeps that sends out unsolicited pictures of that sort of thing) by the time i'm even aware of your size i've already decided whether i'm interested or not. Atttitude is vastly more important.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/16 03:57 PM
1

we already bring in day laborers to pick lettuce supposedly because 'no american will do the job' - we all know that's a lie; they are just bringing these people in because they do the same job for less money than what the americans that used to do it would work for.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/16 12:36 PM
7

STEM is much harder than sociology or nursing. we want equal pay without having to work hard for it.. duh... haven't you been paying attention? That's what socialism is all about; school teachers should get paid just as much as nuclear engineers. it's socialism 101.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/16 01:57 AM
3

i'm going to publicly apologize here for my last response to this previous comment (now deleted). my response wasn't helpful and i shouldn't have responded in kind to this. - i don't agree with the goal of increasing the number of prostitutes but my main point is that i want less 'human trafficking' - where people are forced through blackmail, duress, threats, physical force etc. to engage in this or any other activity. i am not at all opposed to anyone making a free choice as a consenting adult…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 06:18 PM
1

agreed; I suspect it also benefits many politicians because they don't actually have anything against it but they will pay it lip service to convince a large number of people to vote for them over their feigned 'moral outrage'. If they were actually doing it because they 'cared' about the providers and reducing the human trafficking aspect then legalization is the far more rational approach. I think a lot of politicians that grandstand over this are likely getting contributions from the criminal…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 06:03 PM
1

Not sure I understand the part of your suggestion about relaxing "Fiance visa" regulations. If prostitution were legalized I would think that work visa's for prostitutes would be a valid option - What was the intent of relaxing "Fiance Visa" regulations? Is it connected somehow with legalizing prostitution or do you mean making it easier to bring in women that aren't prostitutes to compete with the rest of the princess population in the country? (not disagreeing, i just don't understand what you…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 05:56 PM
4

If you keep it illegal and "don't enforce it" then you still leave the providers and customers at risk of arrest anytime politicians want to pretend to care about 'crime' by making lots of easy convenient arrests and it has accomplished nothing that improves health and safety for customers or providers. I totally agree with legalizing it. Prostitution isn't going away and maintaining the status quo really ONLY benefits the organized criminals that provide the service (often with trafficked women…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 05:38 PM
-3

the suggestion of increasing the supply of prostitutes for the goal of lowering the cost is rather disturbing (at least to me) - There IS a market for this activity and always will be; I think it's rather stupid to criminalize consenting activities between consenting adults just because it's got something to do with "sex" but it is still a practice I'd much rather see less of. I do agree with legalizing prostitution (and licensing providers) for different reasons. Mainly because the prohibition …
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 02:58 PM
2

"Knocking another guy down for being a Beta is not something we shoud be doing... even though the story is all too familiar." That is an excellent reminder and one we should remember - I am female and I follow this subreddit because I prefer men to be men. submissive feminized males just don't interest me. I am really disgusted by the all too common feminist mindset that somehow thinks they are "helping women" by treating men like pariah. Tearing others down does NOT make you better; I'd much ra…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/16 03:26 PM
1

but it wasn't especially for him, she asked his opinion before sending it out to people who's opinion she actually cared about.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/16 03:21 PM
3

i suppose if by "power" you are referring to the men overpowering me because they are physically stronger but the two examples i gave are not what i would consider to be examples of powerful people in the same context that i thought you were using the term above when you placed the term on the same level as "lots of money and or power".
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 09:39 PM
4

i can't speak for others but i follow this subreddit because i prefer alpha men, i follow this thread because i have rape fantasies and it's interesting to me. and in regards to the quote you made: "scene" was referring to a roleplay situation where a fantasy is being acted out; and while i certainly can't speak for others i only know that my fantasies they don't always have that element; some of my fantasies have taken place in filthy alleys by groups of homeless guys or home invasion robberies…
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 02:16 PM
2

as someone that has rape fantasies (like...uhm... a LOT) i tend to agree mostly with #3 and partially with #2; i have often mentioned that i feel kinda selfish and greedy when we act out rape roleplay scenes because it's "all about me". - meaning that i have the fantasy; i feel wanted, needed, i get all the attention, and the reality is that in a "rape roleplay" (or in fantasy) i'm in control despite the illusion of not being in control. i get to set the terms of what is and isn't acceptable in …
/r/TheRedPill31/12/15 01:57 PM
17

i saw the movie, the acting was awful and sadly it was about as emotionally appealing as the book. I frequently refer to it as a disney princess story because the characters were about as emotionally deep and the relationships made about as much sense as the ones portrayed in early Disney films like Snow White or Sleeping beauty. I truly don't understand the appeal of the book or the movie; it was poorly written even for a porn novel.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/15 10:52 PM
13

arousal is mostly mental; i would have a very difficult time reaching orgasm quickly through JUST physical stimulation alone (it CAN happen and does but it just takes a lot longer to get there) but coupled with a good fantasy or a good 'scene' it can happen in just a few minutes. -
/r/TheRedPill30/12/15 10:44 PM
5

I don't think rape fantasies are limited at all to 'feminists'. I love rape roleplay and rape fantasies and am certainly NOT a feminist; They are very powerful fantasies; but what is described above is clearly made up; i agree it never happened; one would have to be pretty seriously disturbed to 'intentionally' place yourself at risk for actual rape. - "rape roleplay" and "rape fantasy" are fundamentally different from actual "rape". Rape Roleplay is simply acting out a fantasy scenario where th…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/15 10:40 PM
1

the link is in my prior post - section 76 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/9/section/76/enacted
/r/TheRedPill29/12/15 11:04 PM
1

it's interesting how the article admits that men are ALSO bullied (~16%) by females yet consistently refers to the law as targeting "men emotionally bullying women". I dug up the actual bill here and the language of that section of the bill seems mostly gender neutral - http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/9/section/76/enacted
/r/TheRedPill29/12/15 10:47 PM
1

news flash: there are over 2 Billion "Asian girls" and we didn't all roll off an assembly line with exactly the same features and personalities. some of us are awesome, some of us are 'not'. Generalizations like this are really misguided.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/15 09:00 PM
16

I'm far more libertarian than "Republican" but I have been to quite a few Republican events and I have long felt that Republicans are almost universally supportive of "equality". What Liberals tend to point to as their "proof" that they aren't is almost entirely based on Republican opposition to "special rights" such as "affirmative action" or "raced/gender based quota's" etc. - Those are very specifically NOT about equality. they are essentially just reversing the discrimination. Democrats/Libe…
/r/TheRedPill19/12/15 08:07 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter