TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

karmasutur3 Archive

View 1 posts and 801 comments by karmasutur3 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You could not be more wrong. Down-regulation of several opioid receptors and rewiring of synaptic pathways as a reaction to heroin is an immediate effect in all first time users as a function of the structure of our human neurobiology - regardless of previous drug use, opioid or not. Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9283506 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11002906 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2156952 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11120394 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubm…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/15 09:48 PM
3

Hi! GO READ THE SIDEBAR! Thanks for playing, come again when you've read the sidebar materials, we'll be available for help anytime.
/r/askTRP18/06/15 12:59 AM
20

Text and message only for logistics. Text and message only for logistics. Text and message only for logistics. Text and message only for logistics. Text and message only for logistics. Text and message only for logistics. Text and message only for logistics. Text and message only for logistics. Text and message only for logistics. Text and message only for logistics. Text and message only for logistics. Text and message only for logistics.
/r/askTRP17/06/15 10:31 PM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/karmasuture/comments/37ihtp/fuck_off_this_is_so_i_dont_have_to_copy_paste/
/r/askTRP17/06/15 08:32 PM
-2

Then it would (arguably) be a little more like living in the 1860's or 1940's? How do I tell you this a stupid fucking question without insulting you?
/r/askTRP06/06/15 08:15 PM
9

Women reinforce social friendship bonds by complimenting each other, but they don't really mean it. Men reinforce social friendship bonds by insulting each other, but they don't really mean it. When you can tell a friend that he's a 'dumb cocksucker' and you don't fear any physical reprecussions, he is your friend. Likewise, the reverse is true. The reason we do this is to toughen each other up, and because men primarily communicate through humor in social settings. In a deeper sense, since men …
/r/askTRP06/06/15 05:20 PM
4

You have to understand why males do this. Tell me why you think we do this.
/r/askTRP06/06/15 04:56 PM
5

It's one of two possibilities: you got bullied when you were young guys were trying to befriend you, and you thought it was bullying It's hard to tell the difference between disrespect and male friendship Always assume it's friendship then. Joke back. If they try to start a literal fistfight or make you leave the area when you do this, it was disrespect. If not, it was banter. How do you guys do it? You cowboy the fuck up. There is no step by step method of not being a pussy. You just man up. Tr…
/r/askTRP06/06/15 04:20 PM
8

It feels more like disrespect than trying to befriend me. That's because you were raised in a feminized society, or your father failed in his charge. If you're uncomfortable with this, you need to work on your friendships with males. Second thing is that I don't want to be THAT close to them. Thats beside the point. If you were wired right in the head, you wouldn't be uncomfortable, you would see it for the thing it is. Which is, they are trying to be friends. If you don't want to , fine. But wh…
/r/askTRP06/06/15 04:00 PM
14

Men tease and rip on other men as a mechanism of developing rapport. I call my friends faggots, I call them bitches, I call them drunkass retards. They call me the same. Stop being a pussy. Rip them right back. They don't hate you, they are befriending you.
/r/askTRP06/06/15 03:35 PM
1

Very funny.
/r/askTRP05/06/15 12:42 AM
1

Heavy lifting just hurts my shoulders which leads to no sleep You need the heavy lifting. Find a workaround: Different lifts, different equipment, pain medication, sleep medication, whatever. It's really really important. It's good you're lifting however. But a good start isn't enough. Find out how to move on. so many things are triggers now Oh god, here we go again. (this is a joke on my part, because of another thread, ignore it). Wait, hold up....... Aw fuck cmon really?!? 41 minute old accou…
/r/askTRP05/06/15 12:23 AM
3

Aw fuck, that's right. I am a shithead.
/r/askTRP04/06/15 10:04 PM
3

but pushing through the hazing and (not entirely unwarranted) suspicion can yield gems like this. I wish I could be sorry for doubting, but often we are under troll attack daily here, and it appears I jumped the gun on edward. But for instance, the most blatant troll I know in TRP that isn't banned is now in the thread ( /u/favours_of_the_moon ). Thanks for confirming my advice wasn't wasted on edward.
/r/askTRP04/06/15 09:45 PM
-1

All right, I'll bite. Lets assume you're not a troll. Why the are you using language like 'trigger' ?
/r/askTRP04/06/15 09:03 PM
2

Answered my question succinctly. Troll it is. Edit: I was wrong.
/r/askTRP04/06/15 08:57 PM
9

this stuff is a trigger. Dude, use of feminist terms and language doesn't go over with me. So are you a feminist troll, or are you just so feminized by our society that you don't realize those ideas and terms are bullshit?
/r/askTRP04/06/15 08:52 PM
33

First step is to make your life more interesting. Get involved in your local tennis club. Pick up skiing or snowboarding . learn to sail a boat . start bicycling. Start racing carts. Buy a gun , go to the range all the time. Join a rock climbing group. Volunteer at a hospital once a month. Learn to fly an airplane. Join a kickball or softball or soccer league. Start a monthly poker night . rebuild an old car . you get the point yet ? fill your life up. Then , instead of a date , you just invite …
/r/askTRP04/06/15 03:08 PM
1

Feminism is a shit test. The only way to win is to disengage.
/r/askTRP03/06/15 11:23 PM
6

Here you go . http://www.reddit.com/r/karmasuture/comments/37ihtp/fuck_off_this_is_so_i_dont_have_to_copy_paste/
/r/askTRP03/06/15 02:23 PM
6

Here you go. http://www.reddit.com/r/karmasuture/comments/37ihtp/fuck_off_this_is_so_i_dont_have_to_copy_paste/
/r/askTRP03/06/15 04:43 AM
5

By forcing yourself to. It's like when you first start lifting. You don't see gains on day one. Just put one foot in front of the other. Have faith, confidence in yourself. After 44 women that should be a cinch.
/r/askTRP03/06/15 04:40 AM
0

Just been watching you troll here for a week. Most don't last a day.
/r/askTRP03/06/15 12:48 AM
0

How are you NOT banned from here yet?
/r/askTRP02/06/15 08:46 PM
17

No. Law of Power 30: Make your accomplishments seem effortless When you show them the process, they can imagine the effort.
/r/askTRP02/06/15 01:10 AM
9

R E A D T H E M O T H E R F U C K I N G S I D E B A R I N T H E M A I N S U B .
/r/askTRP01/06/15 06:32 PM
133

Your exclusive relationship isn't exclusive to her. Next. She has never given me a reason to doubt her fidelity You know, other than giving her number to other guys in front of you.
/r/askTRP01/06/15 05:33 PM
1

Here, read the how to lift section here in this garbage thing I made: IS this how you are doing the 5x5? Specifically the protocol for stalling and deloading? http://www.reddit.com/r/karmasuture/comments/37ihtp/fuck_off_this_is_so_i_dont_have_to_copy_paste/ If you have all of your lifts at stall, you should switch to 3 sets, 5 reps. (5x3)
/r/askTRP01/06/15 03:42 PM
1

This is a mistake, I believe. Your warmup should get you warm, but you want to expend as little effort (read: ATP) as possible . This is why you should never run a few miles before you lift, or play your league soccer games that night of the week before you lift. You want your body's energy stores to be rested and at full when you enter your sets. So stretch, then maybe just pump the empty bar for a set or two just to get the blood running. Then jump right into it. Do you know how to transition …
/r/askTRP01/06/15 02:34 PM
1

Well clearly not Nepal. I don't see you weighing in. Just talking shit.
/r/askTRP01/06/15 01:23 AM
11

It matters, but be thankful you're not a woman. It matters a hell of a lot more for them. Will you have to compensate? Yes. How much? Depends on how bad your face is. If it's a 1/10, you better get a 9/10 body to go with it. 4/10 face? Maybe you can scrape by with a 7/10 or 8/10 body. See what I mean? Accept what you are, work on everything you can, play to your strengths. Broke bodybuilders dont flaunt their busted toyotas when approaching. Rich guys will mention their Royce, however. Improve e…
/r/askTRP01/06/15 01:17 AM
1

Care to contribute an opposing argument, or are you just going to talk shit?
/r/askTRP01/06/15 01:06 AM
1

Remake the post, and put it where it belongs? It's just one man's opinion, but we get way too many people cluttering up this place just because a post didn't do well in the main. Keeping this place open for legitimate questions is important in my humble view.
/r/askTRP31/05/15 10:22 PM
1

Remy, while this post is worthwhile, this is asktrp. I feel like you ought to delete this, and post it in the main sub.
/r/askTRP31/05/15 10:02 PM
1

Rephrase this, I don't know what you are asking.
/r/askTRP31/05/15 02:59 PM
3

My list is validated by 10 years of absolutely zero drama and stress and frustrations in my love life. I'm sure, but they are preferences, not signs of an RP woman. For instance, this one in particular: Typically goes to bed before 11, even on weekends. I mean, you're equating a belief system about the sexes to what hour someone prefers to go to sleep. So, if I stay up because I work in a hospital, that means I'm a feminist? No, dude. I'm not saying that your personal preferences don't work for …
/r/askTRP31/05/15 02:59 PM
2

Because putting food on the table is really important to them: They are more willing to follow the orders of their male captain / provider. They don't have that 'pride'. (At least not at first). They are more likely to see feminists as overly privileged and since poor girls often have to resort to manual labor, they realize they can't compete in that area, and that the world is run by men. They are the easiest girl to train or teach if you are successful, however they are usually uneducated, and…
/r/askTRP31/05/15 02:31 PM
1

Here you go bud. http://www.reddit.com/r/karmasuture/comments/37ihtp/fuck_off_this_is_so_i_dont_have_to_copy_paste/
/r/askTRP31/05/15 02:18 PM
2

Get rid of this troll.
/r/askTRP31/05/15 02:04 PM
1

impossible to tell . She might have taken mushrooms, she might be a bitch, she might be flirting. Hey, guess what? Dont use text for anything but logistics, it makes you look like a sissy boy if you text all day.
/r/askTRP31/05/15 01:27 PM
3

It's nice to know that every single guy on asktrp is ripped, tall, with good facial aesthetics and rich. Ya'll motherfuckers are either doing your job and reading the sidebar or you have fucking delusions of grandeur. Anyhow, yeah sure try online dating. Fair warning, however. The attractive ones on sites usually fall into one of two camps, either post wall and older, or validation addicts.
/r/askTRP31/05/15 01:24 PM
1

I don't know man. I've had many an impassioned debate over there, as well as here. Note that I'm calling him an amateur, and i'm insulting his argument, and he's doing the same : We sling some insults and some crossfire. But that's fine in my eyes. If an admin comes in and snarls at us both, clearly I know at least I'll not repeat it. But we actually came to a consensus and mutual respect , if you read through it all. Something positive came out of it.
/r/askTRP30/05/15 09:04 PM
1

Allright, OverdoseofRedpill can't put together a logical statement to save his life, but clearly you can. So here's what I would say to that. We have clear scientific evidence that the father being present delivers a quantifiable across-the-board advantage to their offspring, and we have clear scientific evidence that being absent has the reverse effect. His original posit was something like, 'Why not go MGTOW, and donate sperm, and hope, therefore eliminating any investment in relationships in …
/r/askTRP30/05/15 06:38 PM
7

Ok first off: now changed into Friends with benefits Friends with benefits literally means friends who fuck, but are not in a relationship. Problem is that we didnt have sex yet So you've kissed. And some. You are NOT FWB. Technically you're orbiting this girl, if it werent for the near sex. YOu still might be beta orbiting her. she stopped me and said that she cant do this and doesent want to lose her virginity under these circumstances (since I am not her boyfriend) She's doing her job. Women …
/r/askTRP30/05/15 06:17 PM
1

I have run simulations of Grudgers, Suckers, and Cheaters, I collected data on my own. Prove it, post it. Maybe you're also published in the area of area of evolutionary genetics (like me)? A theory is not data. Evolution is not data. But calling a theory metaphysics is a logical fallacy. If you look at the histone genes, they have been preserved throughout the history of animal life because they are so crucial. An entire book cannot be correct on every account. You need to include anthropology …
/r/askTRP30/05/15 05:57 PM
1

Always.
/r/askTRP30/05/15 05:40 PM
2

Oh yeah? Address this! http://www.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/37ulvn/150_kids_fathered_by_a_single_sperm_donor/crq0hd9 Oh, also, argument from authority is only a fallacy if the person isn't an authority. So you want me to imgur my diploma or? Where is yours?
/r/askTRP30/05/15 05:36 PM
1

That's true. That's why the veterans need to continue to dive into the discussion, and contribute, and vote. But we need the mob of new and toxic too, for the masters only learn more through teaching. Nay, indeed, if you had your eyes, you might fail of the knowing me: it is a wise father that knows his own child. Well, old man, I will tell you news of your son: give me your blessing: truth will come to light; murder cannot be hid long; a man's son may, but at the length truth will out. -Shakesp…
/r/askTRP30/05/15 05:22 PM
0

Nah, let him go. Let him roll with it. Men defend their positions, men are aggressive. At least he's not a pussy, at the very least he's not so weak he can't try and defend his ideas. This is a friendly fistfight, don't call the cops, no one has a knife out. Lets see who gets their ass beat.
/r/askTRP30/05/15 05:12 PM
2

Thanks. Please remember, however, that if you try it, and don't see a major change in your success, then keep experimenting. Try 30 comfort, 70 alpha. Try 10 comfort, 90 alpha. Try 0 comfort, 100 alpha. Try 60 comfort, 40 alpha. Then, when you start getting success, stop and analyze. Why is it working? Use your knowledge of TRP and this forum to figure that out.
/r/askTRP30/05/15 03:42 PM
2

Maybe I didn't emphasize the negatives enough. No no, it's not that. If you can get yourself thinking 'I could use to be a little tiny bit more in shape' instead of 'In this area, I have arrived!' you will never fall into the trap of arrogance with your self improvement. but I seriously don't know what the fuck to do with it It's the display part, if you're right. What do I mean? I think you should buy and read this book. I has something important for you to understand, and It might actually tak…
/r/askTRP30/05/15 03:37 PM
0

Dunno about you, but I don't trust a single woman to raise my offspring correctly for one-half shit. Great, you passed on your genes, but it's nature AND nurture, and you just fucked up the nurture. So now you have even more feminized fat fucking cunts in the world. Men need to lead the family unit, full stop.
/r/askTRP30/05/15 03:19 PM
2

Her husband is a short ugly guy who murders chickens for ten bucks an hour. I win. Then how come she didn't just jump into your arms? Qui petit alta nimis, retro lapsus ponitur imis, my man. Yeah yeah, you're like every other guy here, ripped up and with a half a million in the bank and a huge cock. Get a grip, If you were half the hot shit you think you are, you wouldn't be here asking stuff. Not trying to knock you down, you need that confidence. But get thirsty for more. More ripped, more mon…
/r/askTRP30/05/15 03:17 PM
2

You read the sidebar in r/theredpill. Which you really need to do before posting anything else. yes, that means you.
/r/askTRP30/05/15 03:08 PM
4

I am a shitbag I have no room to talk. I had a major, MAJOR shitbag phase once. I just bring it up to keep the thought in your head. And essentially the reason for that is twofold: Gaming married women (in my humble eyes) goes against abundance mentality except in rare situations, and it can lead to very dangerous situations in several ways. But don't let me give you the thought that I'm morally judging you. Again I think asktrp needs more field reports like this: Honest, not fucking stroking yo…
/r/askTRP30/05/15 02:42 PM
9

She let herself enjoy it for about ten seconds, then she announced she had to leave, and practically bolted out the door. Looks like you forgot the pulling in the phrase, 'push pull'. Either too fast, or too much despite the right time. Always leave her wanting more. Was it a mistake to target someone I had history with? Possibly but it's better to try and fail than it is to wonder. This is one of the first field reports in a while where I feel like you're actually attempting to do what you are …
/r/askTRP30/05/15 02:25 PM
1

I told her why is she purposely ignoring me Never say this. Thirsty thirsty. . I blocked her number, and deleted her number so that she can never contact me again. Good, good next. Nice work. Celebrate small victories, it's important. My ultimate goal, is to transcend these desires of being with someone, improve my body through workouts, meditate hard and study hard to secure the career. Good plan. Keep that shit up! Look to the long road, but take it one day at a time. And seriously, how is it …
/r/askTRP30/05/15 04:51 AM
2

Timestamp : 5 hours ago. Sorted by hot. If you were expecting things to freeze 5+ hours down the line, well then. Don't know what to tell you. Why would I sort all time to take today's snapshot?
/r/askTRP30/05/15 03:41 AM
2

The place I work at at sells them for 30,000 max Really? With the surgery and the 20k battery? 100k was everything all together, then another 20k battery every 7-10 years for the remainder of my life.
/r/askTRP29/05/15 09:43 PM
9

Target velocity achieved, settling into orbit... For some reason orbiting jokes just slay me.
/r/askTRP29/05/15 07:25 PM
2

Even if I am the one that told her we can be friends? One, it doesn't matter who says it, and two it was directly after she rejected your escalations. I thought the fact that I brought it up before makes a difference. No. Especially not in this situation. You cannot be friends with women you are attracted to. See this site please and this site please and this site please and this site please and this site please and then please never friendzone yourself again, and never accept it if a woman trie…
/r/askTRP29/05/15 07:16 PM
3

Well I don't know about India. In America, hard next is the best method.
/r/askTRP29/05/15 07:11 PM
3

I would read married man sex life. It has one of the best guides to being beta and fixing it while attempting to maintain the relationship out there. http://marriedmansexlife.com/
/r/askTRP29/05/15 07:10 PM
3

Outside of superfeminizedredditinternetumblr, most women will immediately equate any interest in men as you being a full homosexual. So no, I wouldn't hint in that direction, and I would put that suggestion down for the shit test it is.
/r/askTRP29/05/15 07:09 PM
3

Most attractive women have hordes of orbiters that they fully believe are their friends. They almost never sleep with any of them, and neither do their hot friends. You will not get the preselection you are seeking by orbiting. Most attractive women have alphas that run through most, or the entire group, sleeping with everyone eventually. You WILL get the preselection you are seeking by this. Next time a woman rejects you, next. If she asks if you can be friends, SAY NO. In many cases (probably …
/r/askTRP29/05/15 07:03 PM
4

He's right. Man the fuck up. And by man the fuck up, I mean that any disability can be worked through. I have a 100,000 dollar metal battery box in my chest that runs my fucking heart for me. Doesn't stop me. Find workarounds, OP. If you have to start with feathers instead of weights, start there. Perfect form will minimize or totally eliminate injury. Perhaps your doctors really said to you, 'never ever ever deadlift'. Mine told me I would die if I climbed everest. Ok. IN that case, find a subs…
/r/askTRP29/05/15 06:56 PM
2

I respect that you have your own opinion I still disagree with it.
/r/askTRP29/05/15 06:53 PM
1

The correct answer, buried at the bottom. top.
/r/askTRP29/05/15 06:50 PM
4

She wanted to grab lunch the next day. a week passes Did you turn her down? Bad logistics? Need more info. she refused me, telling me that she had started talking and getting with her ex about a month back, whom she had dated for a few years. She's attempting to see if she can orbit you. I said "ok" and then I told her we can be friends You beta orbit yourself. she is fun to hang out with and obviously will help me attract women due to my close proximity (and she has hot friends as well) Game wo…
/r/askTRP29/05/15 06:47 PM
2

do you agree with obfuscating your sexual orientation and letting her hamster wheel spin itself? Incorrect. You should obfuscate your desire for her, if anything. And in most situations, not that. Remember, the alpha isn't hiding that he wants sex: It's the other way around. He's prominantly displaying it, in fact. But he has the pick of the litter. So he's waiting for women to qualify to him, so he can pick the best one: because after all, how do you choose between a bunch of 9+ women? By their…
/r/askTRP29/05/15 06:40 PM
45

No. Here's why: These girls will only be interested in you agreeing to pay extra money to take you for a lap dance. So, instead of getting useful feedback on what will, or wont work, instead they will give you the feedback that everything you say will work! And then you will go try it on a non-stripper, and will fail miserably. i feel like this could help take the fear out of approaching and conversing. No. Because when you approach a stripper, they will accept. You need to approach women and fa…
/r/askTRP29/05/15 06:33 PM
1

I don't know if you're still hanging out, but hello again! Too bad rthepatriarchy fell apart. I miss the discussions we used to have in there. How much flak have you taken for putting a face to the internet name?
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 06:29 PM
2

No. It's a tool. Use it how you will.
/r/askTRP29/05/15 05:12 AM
2

I'll write a book entitled "Never grovel at the sight of tits, and other ultra-deep realizations".
/r/askTRP29/05/15 03:46 AM
1

You: You put black boxes on them. Are you injured? Disfigured in a shark attack??? There it is: a way to address it without dropping frame. Make her concerned that she's not all that - or at least you don't think so. you would like to see the tits, but make her work for it. In this situation it might just work. The critical part is flipping the frame around from "dont you wanna see more of me " to "Oh god, I want this guy to see more of me". Let her work for your attention Not you begging for he…
/r/askTRP29/05/15 03:45 AM
1

I'm not saying that. Once in a blue moon, I've seen guys do everything right, and get rejected, and once in a blue moon i've seen guys do everything wrong, and still manage to get the girl. But recognize that your response wasn't optimal at all.
/r/askTRP29/05/15 02:09 AM
6

I just wanted an excuse to write 'chad thundercocking' in a sentence.
/r/askTRP29/05/15 02:08 AM
6

AWALT.
/r/askTRP29/05/15 12:31 AM
3

Dont keep that rule for the rest of your life, just until you're proficient at sleeping with women at the very least. This way, if you text only for logistics, at the very least, you get rejected prior to the meetup. This will indicate that your SMV is low, and that you need to go lift/get more career-money/etc. Then we'll address that. If they at least sometimes agree to meet up with you, that will indicate you are at least reasonably attractive, in other words have a decent level of sexual mar…
/r/askTRP29/05/15 12:14 AM
6

I know. Don't let me dissuade you from posting. You NEED to post. But you have this thing backwards. You have got to read the sidebar. You really have to. You are very concerned about if what you said will make this girl wet, but you are fucking up the fundamentals. So until you 'get it' a little more, here's a rule: NO INSTANT MESSENGER OF ANY KIND OR TEXT MESSAGING UNLESS IT'S FOR LOGISTICS In other words, unless you are setting up a time to meet up with the girl, you don't use it. Example: Sh…
/r/askTRP28/05/15 11:59 PM
10

Ok , here we go , line by line: WHAT THE FUCK DUDE. No more texting unless it's for meetup logistics. What are you 12? You're 27 . 27 27. This whole interaction is just attention for her. What are you getting out of this? NOTHING. When you give away attention and validation without getting anything in return you prove to the girl that you are not worth anything. THis conversation MIGHT be appropriate after you've had sex. MAYBE. No, it's not, but at least it might be somewhere in the ballpark. T…
/r/askTRP28/05/15 11:43 PM
6

http://therationalmale.com/2012/02/24/the-flow/
/r/askTRP28/05/15 11:16 PM
29

No. TRP is a TOOL. It's a fucking hammer, it's a screwdriver. It's a drilling rig. It's a cruise missile. It's a library full of books. You can fucking break everything with it. Or you can mend everything. You can ruin relationship after relationship, you can cause divorce after divorce chad thundercocking through couples. Or you can avoid married women altogether. You can break heart after heart and leave a trail of alpha widows in your wake. Or you can pick your women and chip and fix and poli…
/r/askTRP28/05/15 10:26 PM
1

Not good enough. Here, this is laid out well enough for a pure beginner to understand. It's time to start following through. http://www.reddit.com/r/karmasuture/comments/37ihtp/fuck_off_this_is_so_i_dont_have_to_copy_paste/ You're not too weak to lift, you're weak because you don't. This program is for a pure beginner.
/r/askTRP28/05/15 08:29 PM
2

Are you lifting?
/r/askTRP28/05/15 08:20 PM
2

What are you doing to address it?
/r/askTRP28/05/15 07:50 PM
1

So? Why wouldn't he appreciate chasing women? Is he missing a dick?
/r/askTRP28/05/15 07:22 PM
9

and the refusal when I said "get rid of the black parts" Ooops. See, when you said that, what you communicated was 'Yes, I want to see more of you." So, not only do you just toss her the validation, you tip your hand. This was a great opportunity to set her hamster running. It was also a great opportunity to solidfy a frame where if she behaves like you want, she'll get rewarded (a frame where you are in control). But you blew that. If you say something cocky or funny without acknowledging the t…
/r/askTRP28/05/15 07:21 PM
4

Why aren't you confident? Why are you letting people walk all over you? but I think people don't think of me like a real person or dont respect me enough. Have they told you that? or are you just picking that up? What i'm trying to figure out is what about your maculinity has made you so afraid - why don't you feel as good as other men. Because this isn't about other people respecting you, they will respect you when you respect yourself. So why don't you respect yourself?
/r/askTRP28/05/15 07:12 PM
2

How old are you?
/r/askTRP28/05/15 06:51 PM
14

Are you really asking if a girl sending pictures of her tits to you is an IOI?
/r/askTRP28/05/15 06:50 PM
1

Why wouldn't he appreciate chasing women? Is he missing a dick?
/r/askTRP28/05/15 06:42 PM
1

Stop looking at him as your competition. Start looking at him as your wingman. Take control of the situation. That's what a leader does - that's what the AMOG does. It's probably going to be easy, given that he's quiet, and you think you're more attractive. Why make an enemy when you can make a friend? Edit: There is a lot right with PUA stuff, but there is a lot wrong too. One of the things that is fundamentally flawed, is that at it's core, it's still feminized. One symptom of this is how it o…
/r/askTRP28/05/15 04:57 PM
20

I'm pretty fucked for life No, you are not. If you want to change, you will. Time to read the sidebar, time to start lifting, it's time to change, and it starts right now, today. Right this instant. Wait no longer.
/r/askTRP28/05/15 04:52 PM
3

Generally looking for canned responses, 'do x, do y' ; looking for a short term solution, Not a good idea, and there isn't one. You're already sexual. Issue is, you're not showing it. But, if you display your sexual desires before you are attractive, you will be labelled as creepy. So, work on yourself in the gym, read the sidebar, and work on your sexual market value. When women start giving you signals (indicators that they are interested in you) then you simply display the sexuality you alrea…
/r/askTRP28/05/15 01:21 PM
1

493 words, that's how many words it took you to say "I'm jealous of guys with big dicks." Well, what do we tell short guys? We tell them work on things you can change, and get over yourself. You need to be more laconic, as well.
/r/askTRP28/05/15 12:38 PM
4

She's gonna be scared, and she's gonna hurt. (no matter what she appears to display). So be a commanding force: be in control, be gentle. You can pound her into oblivion later on, in future encounters, and you can let her know that. But this time, her first time, you're gonna be gentle and get through it with you as captain. You're the leader, the teacher.
/r/askTRP28/05/15 03:46 AM
7

Be gentle. (the first time)
/r/askTRP28/05/15 03:20 AM
8

GFTOW.
/r/askTRP28/05/15 03:19 AM
2

Then decrease it . do 1750. If that doesn't work , talk to your nutritionist and decrease it further . what is stopping you from that ?
/r/askTRP28/05/15 01:53 AM
3

You can almost never successfully plate an ex, and when you do it's usually volatile and short and can lead to complications. Hard next, as daygamer suggests.
/r/askTRP28/05/15 01:32 AM
2

Joined a gym and nothing Nope. This is a failure on your part. Let me rephrase this. What is your EXACT caloric intake daily?
/r/askTRP28/05/15 01:26 AM
6

Yeah, never do that. Be a man.
/r/askTRP28/05/15 12:51 AM
6

Clean, decisive, quick, and ending contact with her- permanently. This is much kinder than slow, indecisive, messy, full of explanations, and keeping contact going. If you do that, you're going to drag both of you through the mud.
/r/askTRP28/05/15 12:26 AM
5

You have to listen to what women do, not what they say. That's a key TRP concept. If you listen to what women say, and follow their advice, you will be roundly fucking destroyed.
/r/askTRP28/05/15 12:23 AM
2

GFTOW. http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=FTOW
/r/askTRP28/05/15 12:17 AM
3

You have oneitis. Preach it.
/r/askTRP28/05/15 12:16 AM
25

I've been thinking of saying something along the way of "I'm trying to find myself and I'm afraid I'm gonna hurt you again along the way" Yeah, you're right about falling back into beta ways. First off, I don't think she's holding you back, I think you're holding you back. Second, if you're not fully ready and excited and stoked to have children with this girl after 3 years, you're never going to be. Nothing is going to magically improve. You might gain some headway, but if you even remotely fee…
/r/askTRP28/05/15 12:14 AM
2

It's not the baldness. You're lacking in other areas.
/r/askTRP28/05/15 12:00 AM
2

Nope, you're dead fucking wrong.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 11:12 PM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/karmasuture/comments/37ihtp/fuck_off_this_is_so_i_dont_have_to_copy_paste/
/r/askTRP27/05/15 10:56 PM
3

Ok, assuming you're not full of shit and you're well versed in the theory: Please answer the following - once we cover the basics, we'll troubleshoot you on a more advanced level. Are you lifting? Are you setting reasonable goals and attempting to achieve them, one week at a time? Are you tracking these goals to monitor your progress? Do you have a job? How old are you? How long have you been reading the theory?
/r/askTRP27/05/15 10:02 PM
25

No. I fucking hate you. Of course I will help you.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 09:04 PM
9

Low SMV guys think women don't approach, because often women don't approach in front of other people. So they don't see it, thus it doesn't exist. Put a secret camera on your local chad thundercock and watch it stream on in.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 08:37 PM
18

Anytime.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 07:50 PM
22

All right . so today , you are going to call around and get a cheap gym membership. And you are going to start reading the sidebar in r/theredpill today . OK ? I'll help you put together your lifting program tomorrow when you pm me and tell me how finding a gym went , and tell me which sidebar items you read .
/r/askTRP27/05/15 07:41 PM
1

Sure. But you don't understand either theory. So until you actually read the sidebar , I can't help you . after you get a rudimentary understanding of the theory , I can tell you what you are doing wrong . until then , what will happen is this : You will ask 'what is wrong with me ' And I will say ' (x) is what is wrong . ' And you will say one of two things : what is (x)? Or no ! That isn't it ! So stop wasting both our time and read the god damned motherfucking stupid sidebar . Then come back …
/r/askTRP27/05/15 07:38 PM
1

fuck it, I'm not going to worry about it anymore, it's not worth my time. I'm happy I had the balls to ask her and escalate to the level I did. Its a massive improvement for me. I went outside my comfort zone to get what I wanted. That's the spirit. Keep pushing the envelope. Good discussion.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 07:20 PM
2

You edited this post. Tyler is NOT the master of masters. Not even close.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 07:19 PM
2

I disagree. Allowing the guys who think this, but aren't brave enough to post it - maybe reading it being coldly refuted will help. Speak with your replies and downvotes.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 07:18 PM
2

but women don't make sense. They want that commitment/security, if they don't get it, all your other efforts will be minimized This makes perfect sense. If a girl stopped fucking you, would anything she did in the past count for shit? If you sit down and talk to them about careers and all that, they will understand logically, but emotionally it hasn't changed anything. This is why the sitting them down and talking to them is mostly futile. Women are simply not wired the same way as we are, prior…
/r/askTRP27/05/15 07:16 PM
2

Well, you're admitting here (and it clear from what you're writing) that you're reverting to previous pre-trp modes of thinking. And that means that you probably weren't acting as well as you have been either. I'd bet my left testicle that if I could magically go back in time, and film you pursuing one of your less attractive plates, and then film you during this pursuit of this woman, the footage would show clear differences in your attitude. So when you say: I am going through previous modes o…
/r/askTRP27/05/15 07:06 PM
11

Then go study it. Study it like a college class in chemisty. Take notes. Read all of it. If it didn't help, you weren't paying attention, or you didn't get it.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 06:59 PM
14

Well, first things first. Do you lift?
/r/askTRP27/05/15 06:54 PM
12

Please, give me some advice. Go. Read. The. Sidebar. If you want help, start at the beginning. It's clear you haven't read a thing, and haven't even tried.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 06:53 PM
44

Why don't women approach me? Fixed that for you. Protip: Women approach men.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 06:51 PM
1

No.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 06:35 PM
0

Oh dude. Please consider giving yourself about 6 months of hard work, and study of the sidebar before offering any more 'advice' here. Post up some questions. You're gonna need some help.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 06:31 PM
3

OK . Diagnosis: You reverted to previous modes of thinking and behaving because this girl is more attractive than you are used to. Very common. You have to treat the hotter girls like they aren't, especially in your own mind. What you are going through is the seed of oneitis. So, it's time to escalate madly, or next. You've already kinda torpedoed this one.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 06:29 PM
1

Question one: How many other plates are you currently sleeping with. Question two: why are you asking girls out before you are sleeping with them? what do you mean by 'asking out'? Question three: What do you mean here? Meet up and close (sorta) finally: what does TRP think? I don't know yet provide more information please.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 06:09 PM
6

It's like working out. You start, you get newbie gains. You are happy. You keep lifting. You plateau. You can't figure out what is wrong. You try everything. You finally break the plateau. Then you get gains. You are happy. You keep lifting. Now i'm going to copy paste a comment of mine, from a few weeks ago, because i'm Miss Motherfucking Cleo, and I can see your future. If you're doing your job, and becoming higher and higher on the SMV ladder, your tastes will change. I can remember when all …
/r/askTRP27/05/15 02:28 PM
5

Rinse and repeat. Build the dataset. One of my greatest mentors said this, to a similar question I asked. "In life, when you can't go forward, and you can't go back, you know what you do? More of the same." Someday, you'll run the data, run plating to it's natural conclusion. then you'll have to make a choice. Right now, you just rinse and repeat.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 01:56 PM
2

How is asking if you care about her at all = trying to get you to commit?
/r/askTRP27/05/15 02:29 AM
3

Men provide the committment, women provide the sex, correct? Hah! Good, you're paying attention, that's an awesome sign. Especially for asktrp. Good. Youre saying that I cant provide the kind of commitment she needs on a per-weekend basis? At first, no problem. After 2.5 years? Probably not. Would it be salvagable if she moved closer? I don't know. You could give me all the information possible, I could make a better assessment, but still not a perfect assessment. I'm a married RP'er. So, I'm se…
/r/askTRP27/05/15 02:08 AM
1

Was going to vouch for you, but apparently the vanguard realizes your contributions already.
/r/askTRP27/05/15 01:31 AM
1

Yes. I've no idea, but I felt I had to come dispel that tardbag idea. He afterward edited the post.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/15 12:23 AM
1

Well, I can't give you any help with your unwillingness to do the book work for TRP. When you're ready, I'll be ready to help. But if you're lifting consistently, and not seeing gains, I can give you a program which will fix it without any doubt. Pm me.
/r/askTRP26/05/15 08:17 PM
2

After marrying. to scare off the golddiggers? I think this falls under another category, the insane vetting of potentials. I don't think guys should reveal what they do for a living until very deep into the relationship. If plating, they shouldn't reveal it at all imho. That's basic Sun Tzu right there. "Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak."
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 04:35 PM
3

You do what NASA does. They know that shoving a few people into a capsule and sticking on top of a barely controlled sustained explosion which sends them out of the atmosphere is very very dangerous. So they spend years and years planning, working, doing the math over and over, doing computer simulations, having whole teams train the astronauts in every imaginable scenario of failure in a simulator. And even then, they are still aware that things can go horribly wrong (challenger, columbia etc).…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/15 03:14 PM
1

Ahh, that's understandable.
/r/askTRP26/05/15 02:53 PM
3

I agree. Also, I've noticed that TRP bot isn't working lately - and hadn't thought of it until this post.
/r/askTRP26/05/15 02:44 PM
2

Do women not find teachers/men who work with children as attractive? YOu shouldn't be telling women what you do until LTR. "I'm a Microscopic submarine pilot." "I'm Don trump's janitor and hairstylist." "I have a career feeding extremely wealthy horses genetically modified carrots." "Oh? Me, I'm homeless. (order yourself expensive drink)" If she pushes you for your occupation, deflect, if she continues to push, it's not a good sign. Do I really need to regularly put myself in uncomfortable chall…
/r/askTRP25/05/15 07:30 PM
1

No, he blew up. Read his comments. I did, son. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrjwaqZfjIY
/r/askTRP25/05/15 04:18 AM
3

But I think there's some underlining play there, what do you guys think of this? I'm still relatively new to RP so I'd love some advice and information from you all. I'd consider the sweater lost, or at least not worth the trouble of going after it.
/r/askTRP25/05/15 02:33 AM
1

Yes, it's a troll post. 3 month old account, look at the posting history. The report button is right there.
/r/askTRP25/05/15 02:29 AM
1

Wow, a full four hours and you're not banned from asktrp yet. I'm surprised.
/r/askTRP25/05/15 02:28 AM
2

Yeah, but before 17 girls are immature to the point of psychosis.
/r/askTRP25/05/15 02:03 AM
1

Chad Thundercock gives a fuck about whatever Chad Thundercock gives a fuck about, and fuck anyone that doesn't like it, especially one of his many GFs. I suggest you read that last paragraph again. No need. See, Chad Thundercock is not overly emotional. Blowing up over a girl closing a tab is overly emotional, full stop. Sure, if chad gives the order to close the tab, and she doesn't humor him, he's got ten others waiting in the wings, so buh bye girlie if that's his pleasure. But Chad isn't gon…
/r/askTRP25/05/15 01:36 AM
5

The correct answer.
/r/askTRP24/05/15 07:30 PM
1

Yup!
/r/askTRP24/05/15 07:26 PM
3

please tell me when a woman grows up I would argue that up until somewhere between 13-17, girls are children. Then they grow up a bit and become 'the most responsible teenager in the room'. You're right, AWALT. But AWALT doesn't mean 'every girl is always the same from age 8 to age 80.' That's pedantic. but the fact that you don't see this yet tells me i am probably older than you. So your argument hinges on being older than me? Not smart. and the fact that you think 17 is a kid means you are in…
/r/askTRP24/05/15 07:21 PM
1

it helps make me a more lively and fun person to talk to rather than being a stoic oak all the time. Just a thought, but maybe if you feel like you're standing around, you're the one that is bored. You may not be that guy that entertains. Maybe someone needs to entertain you. But there is a give and take in everything. What can you offer so that you are worthy of being entertained? It can sometimes be as simple as, 'im really attractive and therefore deserve that.' and so on. This is really a nu…
/r/askTRP24/05/15 05:57 PM
3

I think I see better results if I go the other route with the mentality of "giving more people a chance, pretend to be SO FUCKING INTERESTED in their petty lives, let more people into my life", etc. instead of what I usually do which is ignore people that don't benefit me, be very selfish and never spend my time with someone unless I'm getting something back, etc. And this is where trp and life get interesting. TRP always leads to this, after you get some of it down, and get some perspective and…
/r/askTRP24/05/15 05:23 PM
5

Yeah, all you ever hear in TRP is 'alpha alpha alpha alpha' and for good reason. Because 99% of the guys here are far far too beta, and need alpha. And it's not really good for new guys to hear that you need a balance of alpha and beta, cause they will read that, and then add more beta to themselves, when they are already way way way too beta. But, if you act too alpha in an LTR, you will drive the girl away as surely as acting too beta. There is a zone, a balance you need to find. If you over-a…
/r/askTRP24/05/15 05:05 PM
4

I reply matter-of-fact and nonchalant and say "okay, talk to you another time". Sometimes a great comfort builder is talking through it while you stay totally unemotional. Instead of brushing her off, talk about it, just stay stoic. I feel like she fears losing me too much - Is there a large disparity in your SMV and her SMV?
/r/askTRP24/05/15 04:56 PM
2

I think focusing on being the most awesome man (lifting, dressing well, academics/career, etc) is #1 Yeah, sounds great. The reason answering a question from a 17 year old is so different than answering a question from a 19 year old is that usually there is heaps of maturity that have been gained. Usually they either had to start at least partially supporting themselves, which means they probably had a job, and that insane ego has been knocked down a few pegs by dredging along at minimum wage. O…
/r/askTRP24/05/15 04:55 PM
37

Do you approve of this? (hint: that's all that matters)
/r/askTRP24/05/15 04:46 PM
8

Ok. Then things are good, ignore the complaining. Every girl has a desired preference for how much alpha you act, and how much beta you display. Getting that balance of sex and comfort right is hard. It's very very hard. I'm not saying don't listen to her, but wait to care until things arent going perfect. Then try and figure out if you need to add more comfort, or less comfort. Until then, hold frame. Remember, you're the rock, she's the emotional one. Let her beat upon you like waves on to the…
/r/askTRP24/05/15 04:44 PM
12

They say in law enforcement , 'follow the money.' Think of this problem like that . except with this it's like follow the sex . You listen to what she says far too much . listen to what she does . so how is the sex ? How frequent ? Does she initiate ?
/r/askTRP24/05/15 04:17 PM
5

(this opinion is backed up by scientific research) It's hugely critical to a child to have both a mother and a father. How will it affect his relationship with other women? the effect will be immense.
/r/askTRP24/05/15 03:18 PM
61

When a woman says we're not fucking She sometimes means we're not fucking but sometimes she means we're totally going to fuck. When it's a 16f it's hard to tell which. My advice to you is please wear a condom.....aw fuck, let me be honest for a second. I fucking hate giving high schoolers advice here. this is because the women you are gaming are not women. They are little girls. They haven't fully developed yet. It's hard to tell the difference between 'scared virgin in love with you' and 'shit …
/r/askTRP24/05/15 03:00 PM
9

You really think men in the 1940's didn't seek sex? You think the alphas were any less alpha back then? Being traditional doesn't mean throwing away RP components. should I reconsider my approach and embrace traditional masculinity just as she embraces traditional femininity Yeah, that's the whole point of TRP. Being a browbeat beta and waiting on her hand and foot isn't traditional masculinity. Traditional masculinity is please bring me my whiskey, woman.
/r/askTRP24/05/15 02:33 PM
2

Thanks for the laugh, I needed that. Also, TRPdating is right. Stop orbiting. Fire retros, prepare for re-entry.
/r/askTRP24/05/15 02:30 PM
2

Well here's a quick breakdown: Talked to a girl, she mentioned having a boyfriend but agreed to meet up for coffee. Sounds fine so far. The day before the date, she says she can't do it, that the relationship is falling apart but since it's been 2 years she wants to see where it goes and that she can't join me for coffee. Didn't create enough attraction / didn't strike fast enough / you missed some signal. That's ok too. No one is perfect, and sometimes the girl just isn't into it. and asked her…
/r/askTRP24/05/15 02:21 PM
4

and asked her if she's down for coffee as friends, Yay for freindzoning yourself. Yay for the opposite of abundance mentality. Yay for fucking up.
/r/askTRP24/05/15 06:08 AM
1

This isn't always the same. I'm 6'0" , and I shot up to that height when I was 16 and never grew again.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/05/15 09:26 PM
3

College game changes significantly. Just by being there you score points in the 'has potential' category . the whole idea of college is sacrifice money now to get more money later , so not having a car isn't nearly the issue it is in high school .
/r/askTRP23/05/15 03:04 PM
0

Also look at Charles Manson, at his age he's still getting 18yo pussy. And fat billionaires get girls too. If some aspect of your existence is off the end, in the 99th percentile, like looks, or money, or dark triad? It will make women swoon. It's evolutionary biology. You're thinking that women are logical with this stuff: THEY AREN'T. They go by how they feel, so it doesn't matter that the logic states that that bad boy Manson isn't ever getting out of prison, or that he's old, or broke, or cr…
/r/askTRP23/05/15 01:52 PM
0

google 'dark triad'. Cmon man, basic stuff. Have you read the sidebar?
/r/askTRP23/05/15 01:18 PM
16

Ahhh, the beta mindset. Nothing you do is creepy if you're attractive. Assume the sale.
/r/askTRP23/05/15 04:14 AM
10

Channel that rage into learning to work out, lift, and get a nice body. Channel that money into a high class escort that will not give you a disease. That's a start. Then, go read the sidebar like a madman. Remember how you studied in college? Study the sidebar like that.
/r/askTRP23/05/15 01:48 AM
4

Ok......That's a chick I wouldn't smash. Open deception means that you'll experience deception. Hard next. Find a girl who isn't totally off the rails.
/r/askTRP23/05/15 01:47 AM
4

From the age of 22 to 24 I did not own a car. I owned a bicycle and a skateboard. For some girls, this was of course, totally unacceptable. But I promise you my life during that time was so filled with sexual interactions that it wasn't until I was around 27 that I bettered that time period. So no, if other things are in line, it doesn't matter. How to adapt? Meet up at places, show up on your bike. If someone gives you shit, make fun of their being out of shape. "How do you think I keep these a…
/r/askTRP23/05/15 01:45 AM
2

In my humble personal opinion, missing out on women between the ages of 18 to 24 would be unfortunate. IF someone put a gun to my head, and said, 'pick any five year period to go MGTOW or die before the age of 40' I would probably pick 25-30. Being young and stupid and irresponsible and without responsibility was pretty fun.
/r/askTRP22/05/15 10:10 PM
3

I have an opinion on this matter. I started on this road a long time ago. Ladder theory, then Mystery, then The Game, then PUA then Game Theory then the resurgence of the MRA then TheRedPill. Things will change. Things will be found to be flawed, or immature, or the landscape will change around them. What will survive is what works, and what stands up to the field testing and critique and landscape changes. So I applaud him for critiquing TRP. A applaud him for attempting to push things forward,…
/r/TheRedPill22/05/15 09:29 PM
1

Well I started follow progenitors to TRP theory like ladder theory in the late 1990's- then moved on to Mystery's work, then The Game, etc. So maybe you'll get to a greater understanding faster than I did.
/r/askTRP22/05/15 08:49 PM
0

I disagree.
/r/askTRP22/05/15 05:46 PM
1

thats the spirit.
/r/askTRP22/05/15 03:18 PM
1

You said schemas too many times. I don't think that word means what you think it means.
/r/askTRP22/05/15 07:58 AM
1

Cant detect humor? Check. Gets overly upset about the truth? Check. Accusations of the reverse stance in order to sway readers to your cause (accusing me of being an sjw)? Check. So, explain how you're not a troll again?
/r/askTRP22/05/15 07:55 AM
2

yeah. He'll still get hit, but starting to liquidate now will help.
/r/askTRP22/05/15 07:53 AM
2

hahahaha.
/r/askTRP22/05/15 07:52 AM
1

Couldn't say it better.
/r/askTRP22/05/15 06:00 AM
2

Of course they can be gamed, but when you consider how much power is in the hands of women right now, do you really expect them not to abuse the shit out of it? Show them the power, they'll act like every other woman. AWALT.
/r/askTRP22/05/15 05:57 AM
-1

Ahhh, another 2 month old troll account! I love you guys. Get fucked!
/r/askTRP22/05/15 05:55 AM
1

That's what you're trying to say when you call him an asshole, though I think this phrasing is a bit more useful and less arrogant. Yes. And yes, I'm arrogant. It's purposeful, in this forum. And what's this that you think there is such a thing as "good dark triad? Dark triad for a greater purpose is the good one. Dark triad to murder and bury your lovers, or abuse people for sport, that's the shitty one. Lastly, if we're going to resort to labels Ahhh, the good old feminist label argument. Here…
/r/askTRP22/05/15 05:54 AM
2

Essentially when in an LTR you can be fucked if the other person lies to you Not if you've already prepared for that contingency. Cheers brother.
/r/askTRP22/05/15 05:52 AM
4

Read the sidebar. Study it. Take notes. Lift. Find an outdoor hobby. Work on your career. Read the sidebar. Study it. Take notes. Lift. Find an outdoor hobby. Work on your career. READ THE FUCKING SIDEBAR. Come back in a month, tell us how it's going.
/r/askTRP22/05/15 03:15 AM
3

Wouldn't count on it. Liquidate hard as you can . I'd sell your cars and then rent one , stash cash like red44 is suggesting , if you can sell the house do it . if you trust your dad , give him the house cash , if not , bury it somewhere . You literally need to appear broke on paper asap and keep it that way .
/r/askTRP22/05/15 02:55 AM
4

If your smv was as high as you think it is, you would have them coming to you . So you need to identify what you lack , and obtain it or work around it . So what are we missing ? Wait hold up, I just realized you said freshmen in high school , not college . My advice is shut up , read , stop posting and return in 3-4 years.
/r/askTRP22/05/15 02:48 AM
1

So I'd never seen this terminology attached before, and I did a cursory google search to see where it's coming from, and all I see is a bunch of shitty promotion for this Jordan Harbinger guy. Sooooooo you are him? A paid schill? Go fuck yourself, get out of here. Some highlights, for the interested: "Jordan has always had an affinity for social influence, ... working with law enforcement agencies before he was even old enough to drive." - Fucking lol. "Rich: Wait, you split tested things in the…
/r/askTRP22/05/15 02:11 AM
1

The way you've presented the charm dynamic thing here, sounds like a feminist got close to a concept and described it, albeit in a half-broken and pretty lost way. (no offense if this is your particular theory). It's got some pretty good understanding at the core, but what is fundamentally broken about it is the attempt at viewing men and women from the same lens, as well as the attempt to overlay it into all types of relationships and social dynamics. I mean, the social dynamic is going to be w…
/r/askTRP22/05/15 01:51 AM
1

Essentially doesnt social media just reflect what you already are? If you're a popular, handsome dude doing fun things then your social media will reflect that but if you're a loser then it will probably reflect that too This is what i've been telling you for like, 4 replies.
/r/askTRP22/05/15 12:16 AM
1

However I can personally say I've gotten a substantial amount of ass from being popular on social media No, you've gotten laid from being high value, which has nothing to do with being popular on social media. Social media may give you the access to the girls, but that same access can be gotten by going to a bar, or a library, or a rave, or a college class, or wherever the women physically are. It's a simple logistical tool. Where you are confused is that you think it's the popularity on social …
/r/askTRP22/05/15 12:07 AM
4

I can't delve deep with the points I mentioned above with them. Then they aren't really your friends. The best answer they'd give me is 'just stop talking to them' You're not a mind reader. You gotta speak up. They might surprise you. because they just jump on whatever I say like piranhas. Can you give an example?
/r/askTRP22/05/15 12:00 AM
3

Why aren't you having this discussion with your boys?
/r/askTRP21/05/15 11:52 PM
10

Treat her like a 5/10 . Realize that if you don't, you'll screw this up and that's the most likely outcome, because she's your first 'hot' girl. Learn as much from it as you can, and move on to the next one.
/r/askTRP21/05/15 11:45 PM
1

What would you answer to that? When you've read more, you'll know how to destroy these argument easily. But, by that time, you won't do it, because you'll realize the futility in arguing with a feminist. Because they aren't arguing. They just spout the 'feels'. There is no logic there, you can't argue with illogical. My advice is stay outta purplepill debate and the bluepill, and read the sidebar. until you have a good grasp of things. (Answer: Feminists say this: "Having sex with someone who is…
/r/askTRP21/05/15 11:42 PM
5

I've read a bunch of posts over at /r/theredpill but these days, the whole sub is basically MRA shit and stories about whores, so all it does is piss me off. Wrong. You're just resisting swallowing the pill. You really want to change? Go study the sidebar in /r/theredpill. And I mean study that thing. You want to stay the same? Keep throwing your pity party. My RSVP will read 'declined'.
/r/askTRP21/05/15 11:34 PM
14

I haven't read the sidebar at all, and i'm just coming here to ask questions instead of reading the motherfucking sidebar in /r/theredpill. What should I do? There, fixed your question.
/r/askTRP21/05/15 11:32 PM
4

So you flaked on a girl and forgot about her for months and then you're wondering why she unfreinded you?
/r/askTRP21/05/15 10:50 PM
2

You are right, it is clear that I do have shit to deal with that I should be more trusting and not suspecting the worst especially when she has given me no reason to suspect anything. Well, I keep a healthy dose of skepticism at all times. But recognize that the mistrust isn't mistrust here, it's emotional outburst and attempting to do emotional damage just because? Even though there are horror stories out there I should not be trying to look for that in my own relationship especially when I am …
/r/askTRP21/05/15 10:45 PM
3

but when she kept insisting that she didn't know what I was talking about and denying what she did I kept pushing it (looking back on it I should have just dropped it at that point). Dude, I dont remember what I ate for lunch two days ago. She probably didn't know what the fuck you were talking about. YES you should have dropped it. But this incident is a good thing, because it highlights that you have some shit to deal with. However I did not act upset or angry while this was all going down Eve…
/r/askTRP21/05/15 08:45 PM
9

Well, first you have to understand her request. Do you know why she's asking to hang out? Cause I do.
/r/askTRP21/05/15 08:09 PM
3

This bothers me deeply. She is well past the wall and has no hope of landing a strong alpha to act as a father. I feel sorry for the poor boy because it seems like he has a lot going in his favor, but is going to his mother for advice on things that she has no business or ability to answer. Anyone have any experience mentoring? Or just advice on how to help this kid before he becomes a BB. Not your business. Stay out of it, unless asked. She fucked up. This is a result of her actions. You've sti…
/r/askTRP21/05/15 08:08 PM
17

(told her to close a tab about celebrity gossip on my browser since we were talking. She minimized it instead hoping I wouldn't notice) Ok, benefit of the doubt, I'll read on. Instead she started denying that she didn't mean to minimize it (spent a good 5 minutes trying to convince me that she thought I meant minimize and not close). I wouldn't budge and called her out on it. Then she said that she did it knowingly to tease me (which I responded by saying why spend the previous 5 minutes trying …
/r/askTRP21/05/15 08:01 PM
2

How old are you?
/r/askTRP21/05/15 06:24 PM
3

No. This is one-itis, with a lot of other things. And it makes me cringe. Because 22 years ago, I was you. Do yourself a favor, and go read the everloving shit out of the sidebar. Study it. Save yourself years of this cycle of pain and difficulty. Wake yourself up!
/r/askTRP21/05/15 06:23 PM
1

, but not sure how should I play this situation better, because restricting with force taking her food from me like a dog wouldn't be a correct reaction in my opinion Well the situation is complex at this point. However, it's very clear with that kind of behavior she's displaying that either you're mistaking playfulness for disrespect, or she is actually disrespecting you. Which do you think it is?
/r/askTRP21/05/15 06:20 PM
1

Look at the situation from a little more distant view. You were beta with her in the past right? She thinks you're under her control. You still are. If you had two dogs in a pack, and you were watching them, and a female dog came up to a male dog that was eating, and she started aggressively taking his food, and he.......ignored it? Kept his head down, didn't growl, or bark at her? Which dog is dominant here? The female. She thinks she has, or has, the dominant position in the interaction. That'…
/r/askTRP21/05/15 06:01 PM
6

Shit test, agree and amplify, if you didn't recognize this yourself, it's time to go back to the sidebar and read the basics. But it's kinda a major turn off when guys are that immature." Agree and amplify. "Yes! I am ultra immature, in fact we're playing firetrucks later. Do NOT bring your stupid barbies."
/r/askTRP21/05/15 05:43 PM
3

Google searches. A whole lot of hiring practices are actually automated now, and having the right keywords counts a lot more than writing an RP resume. So, google up and read about it.
/r/askTRP21/05/15 02:48 AM
3

They get a job they don't like, married to a woman who doesn't deserve him, and die having not achieved their greatest potential. Yup. That's the long and short of it. For elaboration, READ THIS FUCKING BOOK. It might change your life. http://www.amazon.com/Awareness-The-Perils-Opportunities-Reality/dp/0385249373 (it's RP. Advanced. )
/r/askTRP21/05/15 02:45 AM
2

Np!
/r/askTRP21/05/15 02:09 AM
3

So just cold approach until im not scared anymore? Yeah, but you need to track it. If you're this scared, you'll hamster out all the time. Seriously, get a notebook. If you're afraid of losing it, write it in code. If you are as in as good of shape as you claim to be, I guaran-god-damn-fucking-tee that you keep a record of every rep, every set you do in the gym. Do the same thing with your approaches.
/r/askTRP21/05/15 01:59 AM
1

Well, do a risk-reward assessment, or a opportunity cost assessment. What will it cost you to be an ironworker? What will it cost you to be a engineer? Are you capable of paying those costs? What will you get in return?
/r/askTRP21/05/15 01:57 AM
3

You thinking your job will help you with an issue which is always self-created (because they all are) is hamstering. You have to work to solve your issues. Approach anxiety isn't going to disappear because you get a greeter job. Approach anxiety is going to disappear only if you actively work at it. In order to get rid of that, you need to work. You need to bust out a notebook, or a computer, or whatever, and start recording every time you approach a woman. And by that I mean every time you hit …
/r/askTRP21/05/15 01:35 AM
0

theredpill is a lifestyle Wrong. The red pill is a tool. What you do with it, how you live your life (your lifestyle) is up to you. The question becomes, what do you want, and how do you get there. Asking that, that belongs here. Asking which is better between ironworker and mechanical engineer does fucking nothing, unless you've already determined what you want, and started investigating how you're going to get there.
/r/askTRP21/05/15 01:30 AM
4

I just got a job as a greeter kinda for a restaurant so that should help out my social probs. Fat chance. Time to commit to doing 1000 approaches. Get over that fear. "There is nothing to fear, but fear itself."
/r/askTRP21/05/15 01:27 AM
2

Just wondering about the little things.. Little things don't matter as much as the big things. You're in a huge dry spell? You lifting? You working? Why are you in the dry spell?
/r/askTRP21/05/15 01:21 AM
-1

Sorry, what in the ugly fuck does this have to do with TRP?
/r/askTRP21/05/15 01:20 AM
2

All these comments, and no one mentions it yet. Increase the amount of failures. Your first breakup will fucking HURT. Like no other. Your first love betraying you will ruin your shit. But 50 betrayals down the line? No one gives a fuck by then. It's based in neurology: something called habituation. Over time, the nervous system compensates for constant stimulation. So, the more you feel anger, the less you'll feel it. The more you feel the sting of rejection, the less intensely you'll feel it. …
/r/askTRP21/05/15 01:18 AM
2

Ah, time for my come-out-of-lurk-mode-once-every-six-months post. Happily married man. I never would have married my wife, if she didn't take my last name. Food for thought.
/r/RedPillWomen18/05/15 05:34 PM
2

I feel like you haven't read the sidebar, at all.
/r/askTRP17/05/15 10:45 PM
6

Wall of text crits you for 3405. You die. Fucking format a paragraph, please.
/r/askTRP17/05/15 06:22 AM
1

I got kicked out of school all of that stuff is really irrelevant No, it's not irrelevant. You're being immature and short sighted. Go back, reread it until you understand. You can acquire more friends, you can acquire more prospects. If you are feeling suicidal, please seek professional help. If not, go reread everything. And I mean everything.
/r/askTRP16/05/15 11:34 PM
2

Read the sidebar, FFS.
/r/askTRP16/05/15 09:43 PM
7

Is this curable? Yes. Risk-seeking behavior will cure this permanently. Warning! Risk seeking behavior can kill you!! Read this rationally and think, research, and be as careful as you possibly can if you engage in risk-seeking behaviors or sports!!!!!!! It's not my fucking fault if you get killed. What are risk-seeking behaviors? More extreme sports - Backcountry alpine skiing / snowboarding, racing cars, cliff diving, skydiving, wingsuiting, hang-gliding, racing motorcycles, Motocross, stunt d…
/r/askTRP16/05/15 07:24 PM
9

Women are not men, and vice versa. Women are locks, Men are keys. A good key opens almost every lock. A bad key opens few or none. A good lock opens to few keys. A bad lock opens to every key. Your count should be high, hers should be low when you enter an LTR. Also, if you are asking questions like this, do NOT enter an LTR anytime soon, you're not ready.
/r/askTRP16/05/15 06:27 PM
3

Yes, you're overthinking it. Second: copy paste of what I said two days ago on this subject: First off, you shouldn't be telling them right off the bat what you really do. Couple reasons: like if you run into a gold-digging whore, you just gave away a lot of information. Bad. Second, it's boring and not playful. Not your title, actually seems cool, but it's boring to be so transparent about such a defining point of your life. Make them work for it. "Undersea basket weaver." "Elephant rollerskate…
/r/askTRP16/05/15 06:21 PM
4

Ok, so good old Khan probably saw more naked women than a 15 year old, but not as many as a 25 year old. I'll tell him, when I get him to stop yelling about conquering the world again.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 06:18 PM
3

Genghis Khan is on the old-dead-guy line, screaming something like "Internet or no, my harem ruled over brazzers!" , I think. My mongolic is pretty rusty.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 06:12 PM
10

It's not a plus, it's motherfucking essential. Lifting is a piece of the puzzle for TRP that cannot be ignored. You need it. You can run, running is a plus. You can get preselection, preselection is a plus. But to hammer this point home: Lifting. Is. Essential. If you would like some starter programs, already set up for you, easy to follow, and easy to execute, please PM me, I have excel spreadsheets and everything for your newbie lifting pleasure.
/r/askTRP15/05/15 09:01 PM
3

This is a great point. That's why without strong frame and game, even powerful older men can get ignored by younger women. It's the status of those in that particular woman's cultural group or subgroup. IT's worth saying that some status can easily transcend this limitation, like for instance, movie stars of a certain calibre.
/r/askTRP15/05/15 08:55 PM
1

Dude. Next next nexxxxt.
/r/askTRP15/05/15 02:23 AM
7

About 5-20% , depending on area. It's why we hammer 'lift, lift lift' all fucking day long. Males in this era are incredibly distracted and lazy. A simple act like being in shape can raise your SMV massively.
/r/askTRP14/05/15 01:19 AM
1

I really expected a little more from you. Cmon man.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 05:47 AM
4

hanging out with other humans.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 05:46 AM
1

You have stamina, I'll give you that. Still hovering at 2/10 , 3/10 maaaaybe.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 04:17 AM
1

1/10 trying to bait me into explaining your trolling so you can refute. Basic stuff. The russian judges were happier with your massive-insult-blatant-gaslighting.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 03:38 AM
1

Aaaaaaand we're back! 4/10 - More gaslighting, insults, and now a bonus point for pointing the troll finger back! So your highest scores of the day! 5/10, a halfway decent troll attempt.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 03:10 AM
1

Oh no! you took a break and just lost the plot. It's wholly without fire or passion. You just fell apart here. Well, I was rooting for you. Sorry, this time 0/10. Initially you responded to me keep that in mind. Yup! To tell you that you were way the fuck off base
/r/askTRP13/05/15 02:44 AM
1

I was just thinking that what if i want to give her a massage because I like giving massages every now and then? Ahhhhhh, hold your horses. Now you're hamstering. But a massage every now and then without receiving something imediately first, doesn't seem like a horrible idea. And that's what you're hung up on. It is. I mean, it sunk you here. How many times on TRP do you see the advice never buy women drinks, or never take a woman on a date until you've slept together? Same concept.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 02:42 AM
0

Don't feed the trolls, just hit the report button.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 12:20 AM
1

Better! Nice, taking an insult that you said, then claiming that I said it, that's good gaslighting troll bait (ledditor for three years). But You're using the word nonsensical too much, and that's making you come off like a broken record. I mean, you have the grammatical and punctuation errors in the right places. You want the trolled to think you're dumb, when really you're the puppetmaster. But when you repeat yourself, you introduce the worry that perhaps what is being said isn't really genu…
/r/askTRP13/05/15 12:00 AM
1

I dont see any socialization in that list.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 11:46 PM
18

First off, you shouldn't be telling them right off the bat what you really do. Couple reasons: like if you run into a gold-digging whore, you just gave away a lot of information. Bad. Second, it's boring and not playful. Not your title, actually seems cool, but it's boring to be so transparent about such a defining point of your life. Make them work for it. "Undersea basket weaver." "Elephant rollerskate rocket scientist." Even if you don't go the funny or playful route, make her work for the in…
/r/askTRP12/05/15 11:44 PM
2

Exactly. Increasing T won't have a terribly large effect on your hairline. Your genetics will.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 09:44 PM
1

Why do you want to act like an asshole? That's counterproductive.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 09:43 PM
2

Anecdote time! I used to try to soften the blow. Then I found that didn't help, so I went with fast, and decisive breakups. I had a fraternity brother, who was breaking up with a girl around this time, and I happened to be there, in his apartment, discussing his girl with him, at the moment he chose to end it. And he 'nothinged' her. Got out his phone, deleted her number, blocked her on every social media, informed his roommates that she was no longer allowed in the house, and went about his day…
/r/askTRP12/05/15 09:41 PM
0

I did mention you can't make me angry, right? Like I said, you have to up the trolling game. I mean, think about how many srs trolls we get here. It's practically daily, and over 3 years that is a lot of practice. I know you can do better than this. Cmon, hit me.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 09:33 PM
1

http://oels.byu.edu/student/idioms/proverbs/Horsetowater.html
/r/askTRP12/05/15 09:17 PM
3

Okay so basically what you're saying is that you wouldn't even give her the massage until she does something for you first. That makes sense. Right. Have you read the sidebar? You need more sidebar. This is classic beta orbiting. Giving massages, buying drinks, gifts, getting nothing. How do you prevent it? Don't orbit. You first, then her.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 09:16 PM
2

especially the most attractive ones, will lose their shit if you do or say anything that implies that they are not attractive. Refusing sex falls into this category. In one case I've seen a girl refused sex, and she went grade-A-certified full thermo-nuclear. In another case, I saw one immediately fall back to false rape accusation.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 08:54 PM
0

If you're gonna troll and be successful in this sub, you're going to have to do a lot better than this.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 08:46 PM
1

♂ I have to write a bunch of crap here so the bot doesn't tell me I need more words to give credit. So instead of reading my comment, re-read what u/shititsthecops said, twice, It's important.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 08:44 PM
2

but I am worried about coming of as a creepy. That's classic approach anxiety, and you have to get over it. The answer to your original question: Where do you guys usually meet your women Everywhere. From internet dating sites, to school or bars or the grocery store. Women inhabit the planet, go find em. They are quite literally everywhere.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 08:25 PM
4

Exactly, that's why it was out of left field. I'd never seen such a random shit test. Perhaps she just wanted to ensure I was extra aggressive with her that night. Who knows.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 08:22 PM
9

does it make her more attracted to me? Depends on the woman. I've seen it go both ways. Some women are too fragile to deal with it, and they will hamster other reasons why you aren't fucking them, then sabotage things or self destruct. Conversely, some women will up their game thinking they are fucking up. Depends on the girl.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 08:19 PM
3

Short answer: No. Next. Long answer: Hey, it's been done. What one man can do, another man can do. It's gonna be very tough. Have fun with the crazy once she sorts out what she's become.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 08:18 PM
-1

http://33.media.tumblr.com/4077c10befda2a3a7da1591d24e6d463/tumblr_n26wj0apFN1rw80z2o4_500.gif
/r/askTRP12/05/15 07:54 PM
9

This is a great one.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 07:40 PM
1

Actually I wouldn't. But that's neither here nor there. I would go read the sidebar. If you're asking this kind of question, I don't get a strong feeling like you're 'getting' the red pill.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 07:34 PM
8

How would you go about not giving her what she wants until she gives you what you want first? By being patient. You've got a common beta line of thought in your head : That's she's got the goods, she is the prize, and you need to trade her something to get it. YOU are the prize. YOU have the goods. If you don't, you need to go back to the sidebar, lift more, read more, and become the prize. When you do what they want first, you are saying to them "Hi! I'm not the prize. I would like to trade you…
/r/askTRP12/05/15 07:27 PM
1

don't spend time fucking 5-6 point girls This. I know there are guys that fuck everything that has vagina basically, and there are some very selective guys, just want to hear your opinions and pros/cons on that. I think most guys who continue to improve SMV give up on lower rating / low value women.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 06:59 PM
15

tried leaning in for a kiss and she immediatly stopped me and asked me to just continue with the massage. During this whole interaction, you continue to provide her with what she's asking for, and she's continuously denying you what you're asking for. By not withdrawing what she wanted, you display that you are a lower value male. A high value male isn't going to put up with this. so then - By the end she tells me that she would like me to continue giving her massages when she needed, but no pus…
/r/askTRP12/05/15 06:54 PM
3

Good point. Also, people are flat different. I know goofy fucking alphas. I know serious, silent alphas.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 06:22 PM
3

There's a difference between confidence, and vanity. Vanity is usually a desire for validation. So where do you feel self-conscious about yourself?
/r/askTRP12/05/15 06:19 PM
4

To each his own. The critical part is the A&A, and holding frame.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 06:13 PM
5

Aggressively pushed through it. Much of the reason that was a lot different than any other LMR, was because on your fucking wedding night, freezing out isn't a great option! When you're married, you can't just next someone, you can't just drop the mic and walk away. You have to learn RP applications working with basically one hand tied behind your back, so to speak.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 06:12 PM
1

e and am I wasting my time going to the gym if I'm not gaining any weight Starting strength is a great program to bulk up with. GOMAD can also really help you bulk up, even just using the diet part with Starting Strength. I have an excellent online excel spreadsheet for starting strength. I never gained as much as I did on that program, and I had been lifting for several years before I found it. I too, when I was younger, had a lot of trouble putting on bulk and keeping it on. But in the end, it…
/r/askTRP12/05/15 05:59 PM
2

How are you seeking attention? Like specifically, what are you doing?
/r/askTRP12/05/15 05:44 PM
3

She threw me strong, fake LMR on the wedding night . In addition to being waaaaay out of character, in retrospect, I think it was a test to see if being married was going to change the levels of power in the relationship.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 05:41 PM
2

You're quite welcome.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 05:30 PM
3

You don't know how to talk to girls "Wait, you're a girl?!?!?!" "Is this your way of telling me to shut up and kiss me? Gotta buy me a drink first, at least. cmon now." I don't like your attitude "I knew you were after me just for my looks. I'm more than a piece of meat, you know." You don't have any sisters, do you? "Not after the sex change operations. Speaking of which, let me introduce you to 'Brad' ....." but how do you turn things around? Agree and Amplify! Amused Mastery!!!!!!
/r/askTRP12/05/15 05:16 PM
6

The laws of power, and reading Sun Tzu's art of war can help a lot with turning your confidence into something less threatening.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 05:08 PM
1

You escalated by grabbing a hand, and she immediately said no. I don't think you're doing well with this particular girl. so yea I'm awesome Superbia eunt pro a cado
/r/askTRP12/05/15 05:04 PM
1

Do sluts return after being dumped Depends on how you dump or next them.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 04:59 PM
1

English is your second language, I assume?
/r/askTRP12/05/15 04:53 PM
7

Oh god no, nothing like that. That's not a shit test.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 04:45 PM
2

What I was trying to say was, elaborate on your question. IT's too short, there's no context. Use your words.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 04:27 PM
5

Well, I'm married. I can tell you, that you need to have a fully honed and perfected redpill 'toolbox' before you start. And what it's like, it's like starting all over again. Everyone starts from a different point in life, some guys who find TRP start off pretty good, girls aren't that hard. Some guys start as massively frustrated betas and it takes years for them to get laid for the first time. But wherever you start, getting married is ....I would estimate 2 times to 10 times harder than spin…
/r/askTRP12/05/15 04:23 PM
2

When do you have to? (Assuming you're well versed in redpill studies and behavior, and you are an accomplished man:) When getting married is the the only forward path that doesn't have more risk than reward in a logical risk/reward assessment. Here's an example: 35 year old guy who has been spinning plates for 15 years. Is incredibly well versed in all aspects of TRP. Finds an upper tier RedPill woman. (there are no unicorns, but some women are better / hotter / smarter than others). Man desires…
/r/askTRP12/05/15 04:17 PM
1

Where is the question. This is asktrp. I got band but oh well. YOu mean banned? There was probably a reason for that.......
/r/askTRP12/05/15 03:53 PM
2

TRP isn't a parlor trick. It assesses the probable biological and evolutionary and social causes for female attraction, uses field tests to confirm them, and them you apply it. It's simply to raise your value in the sexual marketplace. So you are essentially asking, "Does making something more valuable to women really make it more valuable to women?"
/r/askTRP12/05/15 03:53 PM
11

My father gave this advice to me, and it worked very well. "Don't get married unless you absolutely have to." My father and mother are still happily married, and so am I. And I didn't get married until I had to. If you follow that advice, you'll know when it's time. This isn't that. Protip: If you're asking if you should, you shouldn't.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 03:51 PM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2dmw7f/asktrp_crosspost_alan_the_alpha_bob_the_beta/ This will help. You have your assumptions crossed a bit. By this age, he's got this well built, instinctual and natural way of interacting with women that quickly and efficiently weeds out the types of women he does not want to fuck. His entire demeanor is colored by this, he tests, disarms, and observes the women around him with amused mastery every moment he's with them.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 03:47 PM
1

actually, european girls just consider it backup birth control - the american stigma isn't there. Your argument fails on all points dude.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 01:24 PM
1

I definitely can't guarantee that income haha, and will be on the lookout for any more behavior from her like this. It didn't come off shitty at all, the straight talk is what I need to here. IF a judge ordered it, you damn well would be able to my friend. IT's more than just that, it's all the things we provide to women. They provide shit tons to us too, but in this day and age, most guys give away everything they have to girls while expecting nothing in return. that's insane.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 02:14 AM
1

Start small. Set a goal. "I will read TRP for 25 minutes today. " Put a whiteboard up in your room. Mark down when you succeed, and when you fail. Take stock of your progress at the end of every week. Flip the fuck out if you don't see regular progression. Reward yourself if you do. Break the problem up into manageable things. It's impossible for the uninitiated to just study 25 hours a week. But it's pretty fucking easy to sit down, twice a day, and study for 15 minutes. Then next week, increas…
/r/askTRP12/05/15 02:11 AM
2

Nope. And learning discipline is key to this, that's a huge huge part. The fact that you're shying away from that, is not a good sign. Adhd is massively over-diagnosed, especially in men. The feminist imperative has us thinking male behaviors and male nature is a 'mental disorder'. Schools are hostile to the guy who can't sit still, they call him short attention span, adhd, and give him speed. What young men need is male centric education, and learning discipline. Now, i'm not saying if you have…
/r/askTRP12/05/15 01:35 AM
0

Meaning people can ask questions and recieve helpful feedback Yes. That's exactly what I'm trying to provide you with. I see a lot of the younger people in the forums here trying to apply the red pill to everything, and I mean everything. The red pill is not to help you order your stationary for your graduation announcements. IT's not going to help you choose the color of your car. So the help I'm trying to offer you here is to let you know that you're kinda barking up the wrong tree. It's good …
/r/askTRP12/05/15 01:30 AM
2

IN the sidebar on /r/theredpill, study (not read, STUDY - print them out, highlight shit, take notes, reread it again. and again) the following: everything under the heading 'New here' everything under the heading 'Not sure if the red pill is for you' everything under the heading 'Theory Reading' everything under the heading 'Good Links' That's weeks, if not months and months of material - perhaps years if you are slow. Follow the links inside those pages as well.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 01:18 AM
2

Oh, boy. and (she was first to say this) she would get an abortion. Don't you fucking dare believe this. That's an insane amount of power to put in her hands. Source: I've been there. That comment she made isn't worth the breath she used to speak it. This has me very worried, like is this something she is now considering which is why I am coming to you. Yeah, actually you should be mortified. Guys who fuck chicks, trusting that she takes her pill when she says she will, are just being suckers. Y…
/r/askTRP12/05/15 01:09 AM
3

note: I have set goals quite low and haven't given it too much taught really, if you have any suggestions please, do. I don't think the question is really whether they are high or low goals, but are they the right ones? How much sidebar and related material have you really read? Beginner goals shouldn't be 20 phone numbers they should be 10-20 hours a week reading sidebar and other RP related materials. You should learn that shit absolutely cold as ice. Now, you need field work too, but I would …
/r/askTRP12/05/15 01:03 AM
2

Yeah, don't focus on the winning, focus on the process. "Get one number every day" - Terrible goal. "Make ten approaches every day" - Great goal.
/r/askTRP12/05/15 12:53 AM
3

decided it would turn me into a sociopath, Trp is a tool. It's not going to turn you into anything. You use it however you want. For instance, I'm married with a kid. Do what you want. I'd like to think I am as far from a sociopath as you can be. And from lots of the stories on here I'm scared if I don't lose this belief I'll end up even more depressed in the long run. But something is holding me back and I can't figure out what. Cause it's painful to wake up. It's so much easier to stay asleep.…
/r/askTRP11/05/15 10:20 PM
1

Step one: Is he your friend? If he's not, do whatever you want, they aren't married. If he is, move to step two. Step two: So he's your friend: What are your personal standards in this situation? Do you think it's dishonorable to fuck your buddy's desired chick / ex? Where do your morals lie in this matter? If your own morals say it's shitty, don't do it. If you don't give a fuck about these things, then go for it. TRP is a tool, not a religion. Sort it out, use it for what you want, 'evil' or '…
/r/askTRP11/05/15 09:03 PM
1

Well put: Even (by my own shitty estimation) 95% of men I meet are so urbanized, that in a realistic hunter / gatherer situation, I would expect them to starve or be killed. People really really underestimate the harshness of the natural world without civilization , by and large. And then they fail to realize that for 99.9999999999% of human history and evolution, that was reality. That sliver of superiority that men have in physical prowess and strength and speed was absolutely fucking needed, …
/r/askTRP08/05/15 10:16 PM
2

This is a great response, and the right way to think about things. A rational judging of the situation, and a willingness to forgive temporary issues beyond her control, but an awareness that a permanent reduction of the meeting of your needs may require you to next her. And like abdada said, it depends a lot on what the exact situation is and for how long and so on.
/r/askTRP08/05/15 01:35 AM
4

I would just like to know how some of you would bring this up. I wouldn't. I would just set a clear boundary. "If we're fucking, you're only with me. If you do anything with anyone else, I'll never have anything to do with you ever again." Not because you're jealous, or insecure, but because you're worth that and more and that's daddy's rules. Sitting her down to 'have a talk' about 'you seem to get wet over my buddy brad and that makes me uncomfortable' is just about as weak and beta a thing I …
/r/askTRP08/05/15 01:31 AM
6

No problem. This is just one angle too: Often since a single mom is trying to compete in a world of 'fun' younger, hotter women that also could use a decent guy, she's going to ignore your fuckups. They are very very easy to plate, for the abovementioned reasons, but if you're trying to learn to spin plates, it gives you a false sense of success, and your abilities and upwards mobility towards higher SMV women will be hampered because you're not getting realistic feedback on your self and your g…
/r/askTRP08/05/15 01:26 AM
3

By reading the sidebar.
/r/askTRP08/05/15 01:22 AM
37

One of the reasons that it's not recommended: If you have a kid, you know the unbelievable amount of work, time, and resources it takes to raise a kid without being shitty. And when you take one of the people out of that equation (the man) the weight of it on her is doubled. If you don't have a kid, or before you have a kid, you think something along the lines of 'Well, cmon, how hard can it be?" It's way, way, way, way harder than you think if you give a fuck about your kids, especially at firs…
/r/askTRP07/05/15 11:43 PM
1

I'll concede that it's possible this is one-itis, and i'll also concede that perhaps I took his post the way I did in order to expand on some ideas that have been rolling around in my head. But assuming he's solid in his RP fundamentals, and assuming it's NOT one-itis, then I think my post still holds water. IF it is one-itis, I guess it's solid but just off-topic.
/r/askTRP07/05/15 07:06 PM
2

How do I submit it to /r/bestof[1] for explaining RP sexual strategy and so much more, so succinctly and accurately Meh, don't bother, SJW's and hamplanets will downvote you to oblivion. Thanks for the vote of confidence. Here's the shitty band if you care And yeah, they pretty much are. If you were born 30+ years ago, they will probably sound awesome. If not, and you're younger, they will sound like old sad bastard music.
/r/askTRP07/05/15 01:37 PM
1

Is there a question here? wrap that shit up dude.
/r/askTRP07/05/15 02:42 AM
1

Np. Honestly, be fully ready for a negative response: IT seems like she just didn't text. Aaaaaand.....if she did misunderstand? Prime location for a shit test.
/r/askTRP07/05/15 01:59 AM
2

Here's the deal though wouldn't it be weird if I asked for her number out of the blue It only seems weird because you are acting the beta. Alphas ask for numbers every day. Especially when the girl is giving you signals.
/r/askTRP07/05/15 01:56 AM
1

Zen buddist here. Wrong fucking forum, dude. This is asktrp, not askbuddists.
/r/askTRP07/05/15 01:53 AM
2

I've heard there is this thing called online dating.
/r/askTRP07/05/15 01:48 AM
2

"I might have lost your number. I get a lot of texts. Mind resending? "
/r/askTRP07/05/15 01:47 AM
2

The right comment. You've moved beyond this caliber of woman. You won't feel this way, even on random one night stands, if the woman is at or above your caliber.
/r/askTRP07/05/15 01:06 AM
2

I see her somewhat frequently at the cafe and figured maybe I should mention I never got a text from her, due to a possible miscommunication. Thoughts? If it was a miscommunication, she probably would have said something by now. It's probably less a 'miscommunication' than a rejection. Easy way to find out tho, go up to her, and be direct. If it's a miscommunication, she'll be relieved you didn't reject her. If she rejected you, she'll do it again. Problem solved.
/r/askTRP07/05/15 01:02 AM
1

, basically she said she loves me but she doesn't think she'll ever be IN love with me Dude, if you're buying into this mess, you really need to reread the sidebar, and fast. You're a mess! Go read the sidebar, and I mean now. Also next.
/r/askTRP06/05/15 11:53 PM
1

no point running game now. Arguable, but not a massive loss if you take a small bit of time off. Summer tho, it's a fun time.....
/r/askTRP06/05/15 11:38 PM
2

Allright. Well, there was once a point where endless rejection might have had some really negative consequences for me. There was also a point where endless rejection only served to strengthen my resolve. So, if you're gonna go monk , and not approach and take yourself out of the scene, to preserve your confidence, fine. But a year and a half? How long are you going to be your age? Not fucking long. Shit changes. That's a long, LONG time of missed opportunities at your age. Body matters, but it'…
/r/askTRP06/05/15 11:09 PM
3

The way you develop abundance mentality is by banging lots of girls and spinning plates. The way you develop abundance mentality is by banging lots of girls and spinning plates. The way you develop abundance mentality is by banging lots of girls and spinning plates. The way you develop abundance mentality is by banging lots of girls and spinning plates. It needed to be said several more times. ♂
/r/askTRP06/05/15 10:52 PM
1

Is there something wrong with me for wanting to not approach? Here's a better question. Assuming you achieve your goals with your fitness, do you think more approaching is going to hurt your game, or help it in the long run? If you're out of shape, and you're not rich, and you go out and approach women, your game needs to be on-fucking-point if you want to succeed. It's like working out with weights strapped to your body. It's a huge handicap. But learning something with a huge handicap makes yo…
/r/askTRP06/05/15 10:46 PM
33

In other news, the sky is blue. All kidding aside: If you're doing your job, and becoming higher and higher on the SMV ladder, your tastes will change. I can remember when all I wanted was just to fuck a girl who had a phenomenal rack. Then once I did that, I wanted to fuck a girl who was phenomenally hot all over. Fast forwards a few years, all I wanted was to fuck two girls at once. Then I wanted to fuck two phenomenally hot girls at once. Are you with me? One of my favorite lines from some sh…
/r/askTRP06/05/15 10:30 PM
14

Warning: This advice is for redpillers in LTR's, if you're spinning, this may not apply to you. If your in the right position with your gf or wife, other men hitting on her will annoy her or give her minor validation. So, hopefully, if she's not praying to these guys on her knees because she prefers you more, often (but not always) it's a combination of an emotional support request ("ugh, i hate it when these dudes hit on me!") and a little bragging. So I've always treated them like such. Offer …
/r/askTRP06/05/15 09:51 PM
1

There's only shitloads on the sidebar in /r/theredpill Start there. No. I'm fucking serious. Go read everything on the god-damned sidebar.
/r/askTRP06/05/15 09:18 PM
1

It's been a core component of my modus operandi for so long, I can't remember, honestly. I doubt anything that comes out of my mouth is wholly original.
/r/askTRP05/05/15 09:31 PM
3

Better than having it drag out. Tempus Edax Rerum, dude.
/r/askTRP05/05/15 09:25 PM
2

It's about realizing that all relationships, sexual or otherwise, impart some level of risk. This is the core idea behind those that choose the MGTOW strategy: They deem the risk/reward to be failing across the board, and refuse to play. Also realizing that you cannot change the behaviors of others, only yourself. So, you acknowledge that you while you may not be at fault for the harm she dealt to you, you allowed her to do it. It's the opposite of a victim mentality.
/r/askTRP05/05/15 09:22 PM
2

Hard. Hard and complete, if I found myself in her presence, I literally acted as if she didn't exist. The quicker and harsher the cut, the less time the bullshit will haunt you.
/r/askTRP05/05/15 09:16 PM
1

Girl cheats. Guy says, 'she's just a bitch.' Easy to focus on that, rather than fix his beta behaviors. This leads to anger and more insecure behavior, which actually attracts the type of girls more likely to cheat. Which leads you back again to the start.
/r/askTRP05/05/15 09:14 PM
2

:)
/r/askTRP05/05/15 08:59 PM
5

What circumstances allowed you to just not care about what she did? Nexting. Having so many others available that weren't batshit.
/r/askTRP05/05/15 08:58 PM
1

Like the politics or not, the healthcare marketplace will get you cheap (read: essentially free) healthcare. Or apply for bluecross/shield. You not having healthcare after the bill they passed is simply laziness, not lack of money.
/r/askTRP05/05/15 08:57 PM
1

feel like people give too little credit to looking at what she fucked up. It's cause it can often really screw up your progress at best, and at worst create serious cyclical hang-ups that take huge work to unlearn.
/r/askTRP05/05/15 08:52 PM
1

1 don't act insecure or jealous Yup. You can show the appropriate measure of attachment for the length of the interaction. You can set clear boundaries. (i.e. If I ever catch you sleeping with anyone else, you'll never see me again.) But you can't show jealousy, which is essentially fear. 2 don't make fun of a girls looks, Depends on the girl. 3 if you walk away do it with full intent and not as a trick, Yeah, that's a good way to put it. 4 do not placate an angry woman, just go back to whatever…
/r/askTRP05/05/15 08:45 PM
10

Or are sometimes things just aren't possible? Of course. There isn't a man on earth who can get literally any woman on earth. So yes, sometimes you can do everything right and fail. however : You should come at every interaction as if that isn't the case. Never look for what she fucked up, look at where you can improve. The goal of attaining perfection isn't possible. The pursuit of it is quite essential. It's all about progress, not perfection.
/r/askTRP05/05/15 03:20 PM
1

Working my way back into an industry. Financial situation isn't where it should be but it's working its way up Not a big deal, unless you're oversharing with her. Are you bitching about it to her? I've been way less active with my female orbiters Not a huge deal, preselection is a good tool, but you can't create attraction alone with it, so it can often be ignored. She's been sleeping over a fair bit, monopolizing my time, and I've been quite available Are you her ltr? what are you to her? What …
/r/askTRP05/05/15 02:06 PM
2

/u/Gunho_Khan is right. You shouldn't be hiding your insecurities, you should move beyond them. Unfortunately, for lots of new guys, it's very hard. The only thing that breeds true confidence and outcome independence is success, and you need confidence and outcome independence to succeed in the first place. It's a catch 22. So, you can start with 'faking it until you make it'. Also drawing as much confidence as you can from small victories will help. I really feel like you haven't read or haven'…
/r/askTRP05/05/15 01:39 PM
1

Well that's a good thing to identify. What other reasons does she have to be less attracted to you? I mean, this sounds a lot like one-itis: she displays tons of long term potential.
/r/askTRP05/05/15 01:30 PM
1

I've been a little more "discuss" shit that's bothering me lately regarding her behaviour Dude, we're not women. Your male friends are there for emotional support. You're supposed to be her rock, not the other way around.
/r/askTRP05/05/15 01:12 PM
3

Honestly there isn't a lot of information to go on, other than : Has declined sex twice in the last week. and and I'd prefer not to do that this time as she displays tons of long term potential. I'm getting that you've lost the upper hand here and her attraction is waning, but you don't really offer any reasons why that should be. So what are you doing to drive her away? How are you being unattractive?
/r/askTRP05/05/15 01:03 PM
2

Should I stop doing this? Yes, you should stop acting like a woman.
/r/askTRP05/05/15 12:58 PM
1

Men are not women. Women aren't men. I don't subscribe to the idea of 'alpha' females, or 'beta' women for that matter.
/r/askTRP05/05/15 12:55 PM
3

TRP's stance on female friends. That you don't really have any, at least not in the conventional sense. YOu're putting a lot of thought into this, and it doesn't need any, imho. Also, the harder truth of the matter is if you really are attractive, and you get yourself sorted out, you'll find sometime in the future that all those girls in your immediate circle weren't being nice to you out of friendship either, but rather attraction. For instance, when I got married, I was very very surprised to …
/r/askTRP05/05/15 12:40 PM
3

Glad you guys are showing up to do this. I barely make it in here anymore to help. Cheers.
/r/askTRP30/04/15 10:42 PM
8

Ah, this is what I was trying to say above, but apparently i was too verbose. get at least enough conscious negative experiences of women's shit so that pedestalisation forever becomes impossible Having this is a great thing.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/15 01:42 PM
46

I believe that most of the reason why most guys are still plugged in is because they really don't want to face the reality of unplugging. Sometimes, however, they get a dose of it thrown in their face unwillingly, and that (temporary) smashing of the illusion causes that unmitigated pain. I think it's hard to not 'sense' the red pill right below the surface of things, even if you've never been exposed to those types of ideas. Most men in this age just don't go seeking it : or have the unfortunat…
/r/TheRedPill17/04/15 05:10 AM
442

Try heroin No. Anyone reading this? FUCK NO. Why would you throw this in there, with all this other well crafted advice? That's like throwing in 'play legitimate Russian roulette' . Are you nuts? IIRC, something like 23% of first time Heroin users will become addicted, and eventually close to half of those addicts will die from it. So for every 10 people that try heroin, at least one will die directly from it, and that is a incredibly conservative estimate. I'm not anti-drug, and fuck the curren…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/15 05:49 PM
1

I also have my own views on a lot of subjects and they are not always perfectly in line with the views of other people on this sub. Ok, I'll bite. Differing viewpoints are great. New people are good too. But this is one of the only male spaces I know of. One of the things that means is I'm going to be brutally honest, and aggressive about my opinion here - because I expect you to be a man, and to be able to handle that. So here goes. Your (very short) comment history is just full of comments lik…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/15 07:53 PM
1

Wtf are you doing in this sub? Why am I even asking.....another less-than-a-month-old account spouting blue pill bullshit. If you're not a SRS troll, just do yourself a favor, and read the sidebar and shut up for a few months.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/15 04:24 AM
2

You're not getting it. Your cultural argument is the same as the all vaginas are the same argument. They are both wrong at best, and indoctrinated feminist party bullshit at worst.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 03:33 PM
10

noop. Cause, biology. Yes, there is variation. The 'it's all cultural argument' is another feminist 'all vaginas are the same size' argument. TLDR: horseshit.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/15 02:00 PM
1

Well, what I'm trying to point out is that we all have standards, and some would argue ,needs in a relationship (myself included). But others things don't matter to men. If she withholds sex, is an awful nag, and becomes a blue whale, would it change your opinion if she had a masters degree? Would you care if she drove a porshe? Probably not. Most men don't care about that, not very much anyhow. This is because it all comes down to value (SMV) and the fact that what women value is often differen…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 02:38 PM
1

then how in the ever loving fuck are you to build a life together? Kind of like building a house on a foundation of quicksand... You're looking at the partnership the wrong way. Lets say you married a really attractive, very sweet girl. Five years into the relationship, she's still faithful to you. But : She gains a lot of weight until she's really unattractive, she refuses anything except 1 sexual activity a month, which she obviously despises, and consistently orders you around, nagging all da…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/15 01:44 PM
1

Wrong.
/r/askTRP31/03/15 07:04 PM
2

This reeks of validation seeking from your woman, don't ever do this. She doesn't exist to validate you - why would you want validation from the equivalent of a 3 year old? Build male peers around you, validate through them. And learn to self validate This is a big deal. You hit the nail on the head. Men everywhere in this generation (and some past) look all the time for needs, and they ignore that they require these needs met by the company of other men. 'No man is an island'. (John Donne, I be…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/15 06:26 PM
18

If we need to be in alpha mode all the time. No, that's not right. If plating is your goal, then maybe, but if a relationship is your goal, all alpha will end a relationship . What women refer to as 'being in love' with a guy, is when your alpha and beta traits are specifically calibrated to her specific preferences for a mate. If we cannot go down on shit tests, which are everywhere. Learning to handle them is one thing, but it's about progress, not perfection. No one is perfect. We cannot be/l…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/15 05:17 PM
3

Shit tests are shit tests. You failed one. You dropped frame. Why do you think she acted the bitch? What is feminism, really?? Think about it. It's one huge shit test. Including the man hate and the bitchiness. When they can't get a reaction out of you anymore, that's when you'll be winning. You think you're unplugged, but you have a ways to go.
/r/askTRP27/03/15 10:54 PM
1

Don't know if the mods did, but it might have been brigaded : It was an obvious BP or troll comment at the top of a thread.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/15 05:40 PM
3

This is a great comment, one that's not said enough. Especially for those of us that came from or live in the remnants of a culture of honor in the south and southwest. A beta who's been run through the ringer by his shitty wife, may not focus on her at all when he finds out about you two, he may focus on you. And where I'm from, there are all kinds of guys, young, old, stupid, smart, beta, alpha - but I don't know any who doesn't own at least a rifle.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/15 02:19 PM
15

Putting conversation with a woman on a pedestal is pretty plugged in.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/15 01:59 PM
2

maybe see if I can get some sex then dip back out that's exactly what she wants dude. NO. Get rid of your oneitis, and do it fast.
/r/askTRP24/03/15 03:44 PM
2

Nice try, SRS.
/r/askTRP24/03/15 04:35 AM
3

Yeah, that seems like a total feminist shit list. Stop posting this garbage.
/r/askTRP24/03/15 02:25 AM
3

If there were a trp checklist for marriage, I don't think one single question that you listed above would be on it.
/r/askTRP24/03/15 12:40 AM
3

It's like investing. Start now, and you'll be wealthy later.
/r/askTRP24/03/15 12:13 AM
3

Go see /r/redpillwomen
/r/askTRP24/03/15 12:12 AM
1

It depends on if you're in a gay relationship where the dynamic resembles that of a heterosexual one, and if that is the case, then you could get a bit out of it.
/r/askTRP24/03/15 12:12 AM
1

The longer it goes on, the higher the probability that sort of drama goes down. The less firm and clear you are about nexting, the more likely this sort of drama goes down.
/r/askTRP23/03/15 11:43 PM
1

The issue I have here is not that she thinks I'm a child, I know I'm not. If this were true, you wouldn't be upset by it. It's my outcome dependance on the opinions of whoever is there with us. Right, because you don't want others to see your immaturity. Bad news: Everyone is immature at your age. Embrace it. Yup, there's always work to do no matter what. Thanks. That's the spirit! np.
/r/askTRP23/03/15 10:26 PM
14

That's not your business.
/r/askTRP23/03/15 10:24 PM
20

We're not the church of scientology. Lead by example.
/r/askTRP23/03/15 10:07 PM
9

The red pill is a tool. Do whatever the hell you want with it. Wanna fuck a few girls, then get married cause you're inclined to due to your religion? Fine. Wanna not fuck anyone but your bride to be? fine. Wanna have a huge orgy? Fine. Trp isn't a religion. Go do what you want.
/r/askTRP23/03/15 09:50 PM
1

Kinda. Not really. I mean, you posted because it must be bothering you. But an abundance mentality means you really shouldn't be worrying about if she likes you, but rather what you are doing, and what she is doing. She's not the prize here, you are. Unless you're just another blue pill zombie. You understand what i'm getting at?
/r/askTRP23/03/15 09:19 PM
1

So you think the texting just died down a little because we've been together for awhile now? Could be. Could be she's riding the dick of ten other guys. Could be neither, or both. I mean, with this situation you're describing, can you do much more than keep an eye on it, and work on yourself?
/r/askTRP23/03/15 09:10 PM
2

she isn't looking for a long term relationship Either riding the CC, or alternatively she could mean "I'M TOTALLY LOOKING FOR A RELATIONISHIP". Don't listen to what they say. Listen to what they do. Escalate if you wanna bed her, don't if you don't. Analysis of what is going on with her won't yield much, you need to focus on what is going on with you. Honestly I think a trip to the sidebar (or back there) for some reading might do you some good.
/r/askTRP23/03/15 09:02 PM
1

Ty.
/r/askTRP23/03/15 08:55 PM
1

I would say your assumption is correct regarding his experience. So you say a clear difference moving your back day away from chest? Was that the only variable you changed? It really was. (ok, well ALMOST, just a couple lift variants, but nothing significant). Plus I saw myself go through another phase like when I got my noob gains at the very start. Every single lift went way up, it was like I was suddenly on gear (I've never used it). I ended up plateauing again, but like, 7 months later. It w…
/r/askTRP23/03/15 08:55 PM
2

You can't expect a lifetime of living one way to suddenly reverse. It's gonna take a lot of time and effort. really' getting ' this might take a while, but it's a totally valid quest. but am not sure what to do. Take some advice from another discipline: "Do the next 'right' thing' Human beings have to chunk, that is, break problems down into manageable segments. You don't build the great pyramid in one day. You build it one block at a time. The most important thing is to do something today, no m…
/r/askTRP23/03/15 08:50 PM
1

Could be lots of things. How old are you, and her, and how long you been having sex?
/r/askTRP23/03/15 08:43 PM
1

I do 7 or 8 chest exercises and get no peripheral weakness when I train back the next day. You mean notice no peripheral weakness. Ever moved it to a different day for a few months and checked your progression? Maybe its 7+ years of MMC but I never noticed that. Here's another thing, guys at your level are often different, like as was said: more experienced athletes may require splitting opposing muscle groups on consecutive days I'd say you're more experienced at 7+ years. And like I said, I'm …
/r/askTRP23/03/15 08:22 PM
2

Cmon man, you kidding me? He's insanely well known, very talented, extremely rich actor with an excellent build, genetic facial structure, and a british accent. In other words, he's a prototype alpha movie star. Like quite a few others. On top of that, since he's an actor, his job is to often portray other alphas on tv and film, which further magnifies his attractive qualites, allowing women's hamsters to run wild. So, then, he does a youtube video. This brings it home a little, allows the woman…
/r/askTRP23/03/15 08:02 PM
2

Yup, this is absolutely right. ♂ This is what i'm trying to suggest with not taking photos next event. You will virtually 'vanish' and people will miss you (or in this case your efforts). It's that classic 'you don't know what you've got, till it's gone'.
/r/askTRP23/03/15 07:51 PM
2

Because I'm assuming that OP is lifting like he should be lifting with a schedule like that. Which means he's going to get some peripheral work on his back and biceps (slightly) doing bench on chest day. Which means, he goes back in in 24 hours, and lifts back and biceps, and his muscles are going to perform just slightly worse (or lots, if he's doing lots of weight or reps) than they would after 48 hours of rest. Sources: http://breakingmuscle.com/olympic-weightlifting/how-much-recovery-do-you-…
/r/askTRP23/03/15 07:23 PM
3

Well, to be honest, I think you have validation and appreciation kind of a little confused. What is it, rules of power 30 says, 'make your accomplishments appear effortless?" That's a good rule. Anyhow, if you apply some push and pull to your social situations, it can help. For instance: Effortlessly rock the camera setup. Shoot like mad, give photos to everyone, say nothing about it : it was no big deal. Then, next time, don't do it. Now, maybe they thought it was shitty photography, or promoti…
/r/askTRP23/03/15 07:02 PM
1

Oh cool now I can read it.
/r/askTRP23/03/15 06:36 PM
11

It used to be called 'The Rationalization hamster'. That describes it better. Here's an example. Woman goes out, get obliterated on vodka, fucks a lumberjack biker out on parole, who doesn't return her calls after. The irresponsible CHOICE she made Getting hammered. The resulting situation Plowed by lumberjack. The rationalization hamster Uh, he sort of took advantage of me, maybe roofied me. BULLSHIT! The final result "This isn't my fault" Except......it IS her fucking fault, and she WANTED the…
/r/askTRP23/03/15 06:35 PM
4

You're a player implies that you're bedding multiple women. Asking if you have a girlfriend can in some cases imply that you might not. It's less of an IOI. Still an ioi, but less.
/r/askTRP23/03/15 06:26 PM
5

Should I take a rest day? I don't really think I need it You need it. It's probably hindering your progression a LOT. Swimming / running / etc can go on in between lifting days, but for instance, I don't agree with your back and bicep day right after chest day followed by legs. I'd aim more for a lift day, then a swim day. Then a lift day, then a running day. I mean, you can plan out 2-a-days a lot better than what you're listing here, even though I don't reccomend it. after a year 2-3 a day lif…
/r/askTRP23/03/15 05:10 PM
2

It was made as such by the big mods/supermods , because it's needed to push the feminist agenda.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 04:34 PM
1

Agree and amplify, or ignore and escalate.
/r/askTRP23/03/15 04:18 PM
1

The white knight is strong with this one.
/r/askTRP23/03/15 04:17 PM
6

There are a lot of personalities out there. You don't need to be a Roganesque cocky burly guy to be alpha. You can, but you can also be a Hanks. You can be a Federer, or a Franco. Using red pill concepts doesn't form you into a specific kind of person, rather it's the process of becoming your own man.
/r/askTRP18/03/15 02:59 PM
15

I swear non of these girls were interesting Because in our current culture, they don't have to be.
/r/askTRP14/03/15 11:06 PM
3

You are right. But TRP is a tool, you use it how you will. You wanna spin fucktons of plates? Go ahead. Wanna get married? No skin off my back either. I say stop arguing for what TRP should be used for, and start arguing TRP.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/15 02:20 AM
1

Drastically. And integrating this stuff into your life, opens up so many options. YOu put a lot of work into yourself and your knowledge and your life through RP, and your choices just open up. Want a wife? No problem. Want a GF but not a wife? No problem. Want to have casual sex but no GF? No problem. This list goes way on, and not just in the relationships/sex area. But even more so, there is an emotional and mental peace to be gained through the understanding. I look back on my far past self,…
/r/askTRP12/03/15 09:47 PM
2

I don't think exposing her to RP is harmful. If she freaks out and refuses to consider the ideas, the truth, then OP knows she'll never go higher than plate. Really depends on the situation and what is desired. But in this case, we can clearly see that OP has little to NO RP understanding, so he should shut up and not talk about RP. Not until he's got a grip of the basics.
/r/askTRP12/03/15 04:10 AM
1

Well, if you want the path, here it is: Read the fucking sidebar, then read it again. Then fucking read it again. Come back when you have a basic understanding, we'll be ready to help.
/r/askTRP12/03/15 04:08 AM
1

Again, attempting to compare apples to oranges isn't going to yield anything of use. A man asking a woman how to get a woman is fundamentally different than a woman asking a man how to get a man.
/r/askTRP12/03/15 02:46 AM
3

You are just setting off all kinds of troll flags in my head. Pretend mastery of TRP, yet asking for advice easily gained by reading sidebar? Check. Not-so-subtle bragging? Check. Passive aggressive attacks? Check. Bet my lunch you're either a troll or underage.
/r/askTRP12/03/15 02:15 AM
1

You have to get your mind right. You are doing these things to her, because you think it's what she wants, or needs, to hear.( Probably because it's what you want to hear in reverse. ) What she NEEDS is a good man. That's it. (read: Higher SMV than her). I want to destroy her insecurities. I want to be soft. What if keeping her insecure would make her the happiest? What if you could never be soft without killing her attraction? What if the opposite in each case was true, or neither? The real tru…
/r/askTRP12/03/15 12:40 AM
0

You're not getting it. She could be the most enlightened woman with the sharpest intellect in all the world, but... YOU CANNOT FIGURE OUT HOW TO CATCH FISH BY ASKING THE FISH. You will never get anything useful. They don't know why. Their experience and knowledge will only serve to confuse you. Sarcasm doesn't suit you, either, oh newbie.
/r/askTRP12/03/15 12:20 AM
2

WTF has this forum come to? Fuck your concern troll, and it's a valid thing that this guy has posted.
/r/askTRP11/03/15 11:33 PM
6

What I mean of course is that if you are giving up your leverage , you're not really doing it right.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 08:49 PM
4

reality is that once you put a ring on it you've lost all leverage that you have over her no matter what you do This is, unfortunately, not correct.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 07:53 PM
2

The problem is, once I start seeing one woman exclusively, the cracks start to show. I start becoming needy and fixated. I don't want to approach other women to remove the pressure because I'm looking for commitment, but at the same time, I need to figure out an approach for crushing the needy behaviour. Your neediness is a symptom, not the disease. You have to get to the point where you are the prize, and you know it. The suggestions that TRP makes are designed to lead you down the path to bett…
/r/askTRP07/03/15 07:49 PM
6

Noop.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/15 07:35 PM
4

dou·ble·speak ˈdəbəlˌspēk Noun is language that deliberately disguises, distorts, or reverses the meaning of words. Doublespeak may take the form of euphemisms (e.g., "downsizing" for layoffs, "servicing the target" for bombing[1]), in which case it is primarily meant to make the truth sound more palatable. It may also refer to intentional ambiguity in language or to actual inversions of meaning (for example, naming a state of war "peace"). In such cases, doublespeak disguises the nature of the …
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/15 06:25 PM
4

feminism is advocating for women's rights. Noop. I believe that they should be equal and a part of that is equality in physical altercations. your definition of feminism is just as incorrect Much doublespeak. Such feminist.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/15 05:02 PM
2

Two totally different accounts two people overusing (and incorrectly, at that) the word platitude. Do I smell an alt?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/15 05:00 PM
2

Lol. See "no true Scotsman" and instead of checking your privilege check your logic .
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/15 02:54 PM
5

Noop. That's egalitarianism. Feminism says women can hit men , and men should never hit back. This is not a feminist sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/03/15 02:42 PM
6

So it's not equality of opportunity they want, it's equality of outcome. Marxism in other words Exactly, and often, when you look at who originally manipulated the premises to make the comparisons, you start gathering evidence that this whole SJW movement isn't an accident via poorly presented information, or bias and ignorance - but a carefully crafted strategy. But that's a whole other thing.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/15 10:16 PM
13

The thing is, most feminists do believes in equality. People just pay attention to the feminazis because controversy is entertaining. The core premise of feminism is that there is a current and significant power and privilege disparity that favors men. IF that disparity doesn't exist, or is, on the whole insignificant, or worse, not comparable: Then feminists can believe in equality all they want, it doesn't make them for equality at all. A good metaphor is, If you think the guy next door has 10…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/15 06:13 PM
16

Or a swan? or one of the many other birds with those characteristics. That's the problem with over generalization, they lend themselves to fallacies. Sure as hell isnt a horse. Feminism =/= Egalitarianism. I mean, it's part of the feminist propaganda to claim feminism helps men, or claim it's something it patently isn't. With all the #Ineedfeminism stuff, but at the end of the day it's just horseshit orwellian doublespeak. Same tired nonsense, sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a c…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/15 05:48 PM
24

Here's some shit for you that actual feminism and feminists stand for: Nooop. Egalitarianism is what you're describing. Not feminism. Calling those bullet points feminism is like calling a duck a horse. If it's got a bill, wings, webbed feet, and quacks, it's a duck. If you support all the things you just said, you're egalitarian, NOT feminist.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/15 04:55 PM
25

Feminism is for all fucking sexes and all fucking genders. No, it's really not.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/15 04:22 PM
3

Yes. Not fired, but pigeonholed. I was hired as a temp worker at a company. Within six months, I was offered a salaried project manager position. It was a small 'family' run franchise, a manufacturing place. The sales guy was a successful, high selling, record setting dude. He'd been there 15 years. The owner was a very, very intellectually incapable woman. So, the sales guy was also hugely lazy. Thought he was the big swinging dick there, and I suppose he was. But being a lazy fuck, he would gl…
/r/askTRP11/02/15 01:22 AM
0

Look, IDGAF if you wanna be fully left, and in support of it here. Fine. Whether I agree or disagree is irrelevant in this instance. Here is what I have a problem with: SJWs should be fought against, suggesting group action against SJW. Look, fuck 'us'. There is no 'US' in TRP. There is you, the singular, or I. It's not 'we'. This is not r/mensrights. I disagree with this fundamentally. Live a red pill life, and they fall apart before you , like you were Moses parting the red sea. but don't thro…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 09:49 PM
-1

1 month old account? Check. Thinly veiled concern trolling? Check. Res tagged as "probable SRS alt damage control acct" I'll check up on you next year, see If i'm wrong. Here's a preemtive FUCK YOU if i'm right.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 08:18 PM
2

They organize on irc , or at least that is the rumor .
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 08:00 PM
2

Then what the fuck are you doing here?
/r/askTRP06/02/15 12:18 AM
2

Ok boys, sit down and shut up. Daddy's here to give a real answer. So, it's a online dating site, how is it any different than Tinder, PoF, or Match.com? It's got a steep pay wall, that's what. (I'll get back to the importance of this in a minute). You can get discounts, but it's about fifty bucks for a one month plan. It's got a bunch of matching software, other sites have that too, blah blah blah who knows if anything it does is going to work / not work. That's beside the point. The question t…
/r/askTRP05/02/15 08:04 PM
2

She still portrays the ways of men as wrong and tries to change opinions based on what she thinks is the proper way of thinking. No, she portrays the ways of men as different - as they are. Your view on what is civilized is distorted. To be civilized does not mean to be marriage material Disagree again. You're over-simplifying what I said. That's your own doing. Not your wife's. You chose to compromise your way of life in what you perceived to be the civilized version. It's my doing, but she ins…
/r/RedPillWomen19/10/14 06:12 PM
1

Ok, that helps. it's amusing, because my job practically had me doing precisely that all day, lugging around cases of copy-paper. I used to think this too, and while physically demanding jobs can help a little, it's amazing how much better lifting is for you. And how much more you will get out of it. For a beginner, you'll want to budget 3 days a week. You need those days to have a day of 'rest' in between them each. (So you are really looking at monday-wednesday-friday, or tuesday thursday satu…
/r/askTRP17/08/14 04:52 PM
7

Here's an example: Two professional baseball players in the world series. Player A. Practices all the time. Studies the game. works 16 hours a day, 7 days a week at being the best baseball player in the world. Has a mean competitive streak. he does all this because winning is everything. If he doesn't win, he considers himself a loser. Player B. Practices all the time. Studies the game. works 16 hours a day, 7 days a week at being the best baseball player in the world. Has a mean competitive str…
/r/askTRP06/08/14 07:52 PM
4

Chuck Yeager Such an example of a solid man. T.E. Lawrence Essentially the real life indiana jones. The black devil, Erich Hartmann Top scoring fighter pilot ace of all time - fighting for the wrong side. His life story is totally admirable however. Reinhold Messner Makes the late Sir Edmund Hillary look weak in comparison, and that's saying something. Beck Weathers Rewrote what a human being can survive at high altitude. Simo Häyhä Cause being the most ridiculous sniper of all time isn't enough…
/r/askTRP02/08/14 06:43 PM
36

I'm a RPM. I lurk, I almost never ever post or comment. Guys that are coming here for advice instead of going to /r/theredpill always make me wanna shake my head a bit. It's a terrible sign. It's resistance to swallowing the pill. These guys really don't understand that you don't want to ask the fish how to catch fish. This subreddit is devoted to women becoming really, really good catches, i.e. becoming a quality woman. It is NOT devoted to landing a quality woman. They are really only hurting …
/r/RedPillWomen17/07/14 04:06 AM
1

In your photos, you should be alone, NOT with friends or pets or with other males. Most of the photos should be demure, one of them can (and probably should) be slightly provocative (a little cleavage or a well fitting whatever). You should be looking at the camera for most if not all of the photos (no glamour shots). The first thing I think is negative if I see a 'staged' photo - unless you are clearly a model - and if you are I'd rather see you downplaying it rather than showing it off. One of…
/r/RedPillWomen07/02/14 08:27 PM
6

Concerning honor, I'm going to defer to something known as Lao Tzu's dictum: "He who knows, cannot say: He who says, cannot know." I know that sounds like garbage, consider the parable that goes along with it : Lao-Tzu's followers were all in a room arguing over what his dictum meant. He walked into the room, and a follower asked him to explain it. He replied, "Who here has smelled a rose?" And they all acknowledged that they had. Then he said, "Ok, so you know the smell. Now describe it." They …
/r/RedPillWomen05/02/14 06:49 AM
6

For my comment, I was only speaking on honor. I'm of the personal opinion that Softharem is correct in saying and women are only loyal to their emotions and to elaborate, I have seen loyalty in women, but it's inspired by the man: A man seems to be able to choose loyalty without inspiration. That may be poorly said: I should say I have not seen loyalty in a woman for a man who has a consistently worthless frame.
/r/RedPillWomen05/02/14 03:27 AM
4

(coming out of lurk mode for a second) I agree with SoftHarem here. Honor is absolutely a male abstract, and the only comparison I can make is giving birth. A man could dress up like a pregnant woman, he could study it, he could spend a lifetime contemplating it and trying to understand what giving birth feels like, but he's NEVER going to know what it's like to give birth. Honor is like that. I've never seen a woman yet who experiences the concept correctly.
/r/RedPillWomen05/02/14 02:06 AM
2

That's not a strawman, that's what you said. In response to "maybe talking about murder isn't really the best thing for the reputation of this sub", you said "we are not going to feminize this discussion". How is that a strawman? It's a strawman because you're asking men who are speaking like men to speak like women. When I tell you to stop feminizing the conversation, you equate my argument , which was stop feminizing the conversation, to "you support murder?" which is a FUCKING STRAWMAN. I did…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 07:42 PM
2

"There's not even an modern word for it but I assure you its a thing, really." Lao-tzu's dictum, moron. "He who knows, cannot say. He who says, cannot know". Here's a parable to help you understand. Lao-tzu's followers were all in a room arguing over what his dictum meant. He walked into the room, and a follower asked him to explain it. He replied, "Who here has smelled a rose?" And they all acknowledged that they had. Then he said, "Ok, so you know the smell. Now describe it." They all fell sil…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 06:55 PM
1

Nice strawman . What the fuck are you doing in this discussion ?
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 04:32 PM
2

We are not going to feminize this discussion for you or anyone else . We don't give a fuck who likes us or what they think . Your mindset is so horribly bluepill in that regard .
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 04:24 PM
6

I would not go ltr until you can spin plates w/o drama. Ltr is redpill on hardmode. If you're not a master of plates, you will get housed in ltr game. It's like college football compared to the nfl. Big step up.
/r/askTRP13/01/14 04:46 AM
0

Buddhism provides nothing you could not have learned elsewhere. The incomplete wisdom it does provide comes packaged with the superstition and scientific ignorance of ancient men. Clearly, you're unfamiliar with Zen. May wanna know what you're talking about before opening the mouth. Like all religions it's obsolete and irrelevant. Again your ignorance shows. Zen is more of a philosophy. Zen actually rejects the buddhist texts in the idea that meditation is the only way to the enlightenment we al…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 04:19 AM
-15

It's not on point, or funny. Next.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/14 10:05 PM
1

Here here. Women contribute tons too, but the problem in our society is that the contribution can be woefully uneven, and men's contribution is obviously ignored.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/14 08:19 PM
1

Off topic, but it's great how in this space, you have men acting like fucking men. Both tear into each other, both confident, no one butthurt. Both willing to listen to logic and reason. And a good comment comes out of it too: Half the reason the advice on here is so negative towards women is that you get dudes who can get laid but cant keep their women in check once it becomes a relationship. Well I don't know so much if them being negative is because of that, I think it's because so many women…
/r/TheRedPill11/01/14 05:38 AM
1

You said, single mom, not widow, asshole. No reason for ad hominem, you're making it look like in your post that red pill guys ought to go after single moms. Being a single dad getting with a widow is fine, by normal redpill probabilities. But realize that is NOT what your post sounded like.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/14 02:46 AM
12

This is a decent exception to don't date a single mom - if you're already a single dad.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 09:08 PM
-4

So you're scraping the bottom of the barrel? Why not get something worthwhile?????? her ability to be self sufficient can make her a better partner than some floozy. READ THE FUCKING SIDEBAR STUFF, lurk and return when you've got your head on straight. The fact that she's a single mom is the definition of fucking floozy.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 08:19 PM
2

Thanks . I'm one of the few married rp'ers I see , and I followed this advice from my dad and it served me well : Don't commit in any way to a woman , unless you have no other option - and do not get married unless you absolutely have to . If you are 19 , the last thing you should do is look for a ltr . Let it come to you , and resist it as hard as you can . If you're looking for a decent woman ( unicorn ) in a sea of bullshit , you need this attitude from the start . I went through soooooo many…
/r/askTRP10/01/14 09:14 AM
2

You're not spinning if you're considering a ltr . If you're considering and ltr , why oh why if you have read anything about redpill would you be considering women who already have children ??!?? And to elaborate , if you were actually reading and applying theory , you would be better off that most men out there , and privy to better women , and you're going to pick scraps ? So she's hot - find one as hot without a kid , why complicate ? Unless this is really double one-itis .....
/r/askTRP10/01/14 03:18 AM
2

First: Start working out, and what I mean by that is work out and do a little every day and DO NOT STOP. Working out hard 15-30 minutes a day from the age of 15 to 35 will have astounding results. Try to get with as many women as you can in high school. 99% of high school age guys are so afraid and unconfident, if you are confident in HS, you can roll any girl in the school. Give no fucks about what other people think of you, if possible, in HS.
/r/askTRP09/01/14 04:35 PM
0

I'm not hating on the guy . Go troll somewhere else .
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 08:12 AM
43

Exactly. And yet it's posted like look! If you would just not ask for anything, we'll give you what you want. Just don't ask. See? Complete bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 07:13 PM
12

Women could have value : it's just that currently with the state of feminism, they have gotten away with not having any. Don't discount what is with what can be. Just like most men are bluepill and not awake, like most women are just good for a lay. But: Some men are redpill, and some women are more than a fuck.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 03:33 PM
6

Thus trying to alter reality to make herself feel better. Denial, full stop.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 07:23 PM
33

There is a lot to tear apart here, but the point that struck me the hardest was the quote. How unbelievably arrogant to say that. "I'm on a quest to redefine and rewrite the ideals of beauty." You dont get to go into someone else's head, and change the way they think, change what they find beautiful, because it makes you feel more comfortable.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 05:56 PM
2

depends on what you mean by bad. ideally, ive found that at my best, i didnt do this. Also one of the primary ways women 'make themselves available' is proximity, and telling you "ill be here at this time", and then you show up, thats kind of a qualification. you made the time to show up at the right time to see her, whether you are admitting that or not to yourself. its better if you have them coming to you, as a generality.
/r/askTRP12/12/13 08:00 PM
3

It was a logical decision by me where I want a drink I'll go there because there is an opportunity to either bump into this chick This is where you are dropping her frame into yours.
/r/askTRP12/12/13 07:26 PM
13

So even if we take the idea that in the cases you mentioned, justice was served - indicating two men and one women committed DV to the point of bringing their partner to kill them, doesn't that exhibit why the MRM wants so desperately to bring awareness to the DV against men issue? I realize it's a tiny sample size, but for the sake of logic here.....
/r/MensRights15/06/12 02:22 PM
15

"There are no feminists in a house fire.' HAHAHAHA so TRUE!
/r/MensRights23/05/12 07:23 PM
11

Gay people are people too. I support the rights of gays. Without gays, where would the world be? Way less fabulous. So don't mind me, I'm going to go put my penis in a vagina. You can put yours in an asshole. Let's just wash hands before we shake hands, and continue our fight for egalitarianism together.
/r/MensRights23/05/12 05:26 PM
7

Hrm. I was raised with a family that came from a ranching background. I was never taught that women were less than men, but rather I was taught that men chose (that's an important word) to do the hardest work in many cases. This meant that men were afforded an immense amount of respect. Rather, anyone who chose to do the difficult, self-sacrificing things were offered a level of respect that I don't often see outside that 'culture' I grew up in. I usually shy away from descriptions of masculinit…
/r/MensRights22/05/12 08:28 PM
5

Asking this question indicates to me (without looking into your profile) that you must be new here. Anyone here who comes here , and stays, and truly reads and reasons and isn't blinded by rage or whatever understands certain things. It's like having your eyes opened. It's like when you learn that your parents are just humans, when you realize that there is no Santa, or when you realize that you will die one day. And it's very hard to come to the realization that we live in a feminist society in…
/r/MensRights17/05/12 06:19 PM
1

anti feminism rather than gender egalitarianism I believe that anti-feminism can quite well be gender egalitarianism, which I whole-heartedly support.
/r/MensRights15/05/12 05:46 PM
8

Yup. That's an understatement. I used to be very angry at feminism , and it's results in all our lives. Now I simply pity the women and men who don't understand. I feel awful for them. I want to help!
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:49 PM
10

And you're probably just going to see the continued normalization of single motherhood Initially, I think yes. Because feminism's influence is still very systemic and pervasive. However, study after study has shown that single parent children are (on the whole ) at a disadvantage. And females especially are not going to ignore forever the disadvantages, because we are, after all, creatures rules by natural laws. Thus, once the disadvantage is very apparent, women will stop raising their girls to…
/r/MensRights25/04/12 05:48 PM
39

Feminists asking, "where the normal men are" is similar to: Stalin asking why there's not an opposition to his communist pary. USAF commanders asking where the Iraqi air force is after the first wave of the 1991 invasion of Iraq. President Truman wanting to know why Hiroshima won't return his phone calls. I could go on all day. When one destroys a social construct that produced what one wanted in a man(and some things you didn't want) one must accept the consequences as their own. The largest fa…
/r/MensRights04/04/12 09:38 PM
-1

Aint no troll here. Also, go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 01:55 AM
0

In addition to being a troll, you are also wrong.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 07:31 PM
1

I'm sure girlwriteswhat is happy that this is getting posted every single week here.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 07:30 PM
10

I agree. And that's why I fully support the mods and the moderation policies of our subreddit.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 12:08 AM
24

I feel awful when I read things like this. The main reason is because she/he is discussing how they have hashed out 'facts' in "safe spaces" before hand, and made their choices based on that. Which is saying that they choose the information they are going to believe in , in a place where everyone agrees with their philosophies and methods, and then once they have all agreed (their desires and motives of course all being in alignment) they then go out into the world. Where they use the most decei…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 11:16 PM
1

I love it when someone slams home a point with a very small amount of words. You tend to do it a lot, I think I've told you before.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:23 PM
8

Doesn't SRS say outrageous things to everyone of any subreddit just for the hell of it? No, that's /r/circlejerk . That place is usually funny. /r/Shitredditsays is if you took radical feminists, added a downvote bridage / IRC component, a fuckload of liberalism, and then added four parts lying, cheating, secret society. They will claim they are not a downvote brigade, not actually radical feminist, etc etc. Don't take my word for it, go read twenty top threads.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:22 PM
2

Ah, I see. Let me clarify: Of the issues that the MRM addresses in the current date and age, I would personally estimate that 75% or more of them are a direct result of the feminist movement between the period of 1955 to the present. So to answer you, from a legal standpoint, for the sake of argument, yes - or some date before. But I certainly wouldn't peel back the progress of women, I simply want to stop the destruction of men's legal rights.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:15 PM
1

I'm afraid I don't follow.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 04:46 PM
3

1) Blaming feminism for the problems that men face is stupid and pointless. Ok. By that logic then we really shouldn't blame HIV for causing AIDS, right? Maybe we shouldn't blame lung cancer for lung cancer related deaths?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 03:52 PM
1

Here, you are obviously trying to downplay the mainstream prevalence of feminism in women No, i'm not trying to downplay that. Not at all. and you follow it up with a very small anecdotal sample size of women who don't subscribe to it Yes, I was discussing anecdotal opinions, not fact. So, was that not your implication? It absolutely is my anecdotal implication that the vast majority of women that I know both do not identify with feminism, nor support it. In my geographic home area. It is essent…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:24 AM
3

That they are fully functional human beings with nothing to feel slighted about?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 03:22 AM
1

Clearly I'm not making a comment on the number of feminists, just the viewpoints of those who don't identify as such. Or did you miss that part?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 03:21 AM
4

I can't just tell you to pay attention to the women around you and ask whether they think these things. No, that would require too much thought. No. You have to construct a reasonably logical argument, lest someone mistake you for a fucking retard.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:18 AM
6

No. I'm not a troll. I'm a not-very-well known MRA. I used to post a lot here, but now I mostly just observe. You haven't cited anything. ignoring citation, you haven't provided any reasonably logical argument. I see you posting every day, and I applaud your enthusiasm again. But you give me an opportunity to say something. There are many people we need to reach to illicit change. We need to infuse logical argument and a stoic, yet firm, call to our culture that men are not to be subjugated in t…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:41 AM
1

Most should not be allowed on the road. I disagree, but my wife certainly agrees wholeheartedly, i can tell you that.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:30 AM
8

This is why I don't post often. But i'm diving in right now. Cause I'm about to help an MRA brother or sister learn to defend themself. I'm here to help you! I'm going to play devil's advocate to a certain degree, because you obviously have a passion for mens rights. And I can get behind and support that kind of passion. But your passion is overriding your ability to make a coherent statement here, either of opinion, or a rational argument. Stop treating your opinions like facts, stop treating y…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:28 AM
5

Back up. Let's define our arguments here. Correct me in your response if you think I'm interpreting you wrong, but you are venturing that nearly all women are against men's rights, correct? To be clear, my argument is that most, and in fact IN MY HUMBLE EXPERIENCE, the vast majority (75%+) of NON-Feminist women are not against men's rights. are we straight with each other's arguments?
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:33 PM
1

I'm sorry, I don't know where or who you are referring to as calling to shut us down. Links?
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:00 PM
7

Well my good friend, I think, although you do much work to promote our 'cause' such as it is, that this post is full of either 1. Bias or 2. Bullshit. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and say it's bias. What I mean is: You must know a lot of feminists. I find that non-feminist identifying women tend not to feel the way about these things than you have stated. My sister is a hardcore cowgirl and country western singer. You really won't find her saying that men keep the woman down. M…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:55 PM
1

Lol. Yes, she does need more views, she's amazing. But SpiritofJames, I see you are very new here! Welcome! May wanna use the search function before posting to keep things tidy. :) (she's been here a lot longer than the video, I assure you)
/r/MensRights10/02/12 04:30 PM
3

My life became exponentially better when I began looking at what people did, and not what they stated. I only listen to what people say, to put it in my mental 'memory' banks, and then later, after I have evidence on what they do, compare it with what they say to determine if they are a liar. I don't care what the theory of the feminist movement is. I don't care about their rhetoric. I only care what these movements cause, what they do. How they alter behavior, policy, culture, law, and ultimate…
/r/MensRights26/01/12 05:38 PM
6

I think the reason lgbt is self destructing and the reason we aren't when we undergo such a more serious attack is the policy of doing nothing. Let them get downvoted: Ban clear trolls, and continue to speak the truth. That's kind the point of my post: We survive because we don't overdo it.
/r/MensRights24/01/12 03:30 AM
1

Word. :) Well, make your own traditions I say.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 02:28 PM
1

I hate the idea of spending money on rocks, but I also try and understand that some people like diamonds as much as I like dirtbikes. The problem is not that it's an expensive rock, its that I am expected to buy it for her because I am the man. If the chick you're with doesn't think your dirtbike is as important as her rock, then I'm willing to bet you would be better served by moving on.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:27 PM
2

Wow, she's crazy racist.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:25 PM
1

You know, I tentatively disagree. If the disability isn't your fault, then sometimes you labor underneath a very difficult weight in life.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:15 PM
1

It's crap like this that keeps us from action and direction. Who gives a flying fuck about ladies night? Can we instead discuss the LAWS that can be used to brutalize men? Not a totally harmless discount on alcohol for women?
/r/MensRights12/01/12 09:03 PM
2

Wall of text crits me for 12938. I die.
/r/MensRights12/01/12 08:36 PM
3

What we need , as a human species, is to recognize when we are lying to ourselves. This woman's article is a long treatise about what is happening to marriage, and is from not only a highly feminist perspective, but also it ignores a critical and ironic issue. In addition, IF we (via the feminist thought) are really moving away from marriage as what women want (a feminist ideal) then why is she even attempting to thinly veil her desire for one? In the months leading to my breakup with Allan, my …
/r/MensRights02/12/11 08:45 PM
5

Um, you wanna talk about a post without value or logic, this is it. Sorry , how are we getting from shitty woman to women cause homophobia? If anything I find religious reasons to be the cause of most homophobia. But I can actually back that statement up because they are indoctrinated to believe that homosexuality is evil in most cases. However a drunk girl mistaking you for a gay man, then being a bitch because you insulted her, how does that cause homophobia again? Because it just rubs off? Wh…
/r/MensRights14/11/11 11:35 PM
2

No, I'm saying I went through all of them, and either his posts were deleted, (some) or not offensive or sexist (the rest) . I don't like the blog because it's sexist sensationalist bullshit. Not because I don't like it. I'm done with you. :> Let me guess, I present evidence that your 'evidence' is bullshit, and you go ad hominem and fucking quit. GOOD . get the fuck out of the subreddit, and don't come back you whiny crazy ass bitch.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 09:50 PM
2

Oh , imagine my surprise when your proof is a link to the blogs of one of our biggest trolls, manboobz. FACEPALM Jesus, really? This is why I can't take the detractors seriously. I just got screamed at the other day for an hour over PM the other day from a feminist trying to tell me manboobz was a troll FROM /r/mensrights . Some of you guys are fucking BLIND. You don't look for evidence, you don't critically think, you make wild, highly spun accusations of sexism and bigotry and then look down o…
/r/MensRights11/11/11 09:36 PM
2

Here's the thing. You are posting in r/MR , a place that is trolled NON STOP from /srs and /amr, and you're asking me to believe Ann is a crazy sexist bastard based on 'cuz I said so'. You could be teef's fifth troll account for all I know. So i'm not trying to be a bitch, but really, if you want to accuse someone of sexism in this particular sub, I need more proof than 'said so'. Of course that would go without saying, except......you're probably trolling...........
/r/MensRights11/11/11 06:49 PM
2

Pics or links or it didn't happen.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 01:34 PM
1

Oh hi, I didn't see you there troll. How are you tonight?
/r/MensRights11/11/11 01:48 AM
4

Mainly because I don't agree with the path of more political correctness to fix sexism problems. The more we push the slider in that direction, the more opportunities develop to criminalize things that from a rational perspective, shouldn't be remotely criminal. I don't believe in the neither strategy in other words. I believe in the both strategy. A.k.a I'm ok with ladies nights, sororities, women's only areas in gyms, as long as I can have my hunting clubs, fraternities, and men's only bars. h…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:30 PM
0

Nope .
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:53 PM
-1

over half of of the romance novels women read have the main character raped by the male love interest and a third of women admit to having rape fantasies. Over 77% of internet facts are made up. Your citing rape fantasy as a reason why sexual selection could in one generation weed all out violence in society. Fucking troll. Humans aren't magically different, but if you had gotten past high school you would have found out that genes don't work like that you moron.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 01:29 PM
1

It's non-relevant because he was making the (impossible) claim that if human women didn't select for a behavior, it would go extinct in a single generation. Now, if you don't already have an objection to that, right off the bat, let me give you a ton of them: Behaviors are the result of a combination of genetics (probably the smallest factor here), environment. (and the culture in which the individual is familiar, goes with environment). Thus, since it's not a single gene contributing to any beh…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 01:27 PM
4

Dude, you think that two non relevant studies about facial structure (how is that behavior related, or evolutionarily related to behavior) and one that mentions behavior with no citations and no links to a study is good science? Not much makes me angry but I'm gonna fucking rage on you here. What the fuck do you think I am? A highschooler impressed with hearsay and pseudoscience? Second off, even IF we take the non-cited bullshit you just posted as 1. true and 2. relevant you still aren't addres…
/r/MensRights08/11/11 10:20 PM
11

Biology major here. That's a huge oversimplification, and totally untrue in the way you're stating it. Behavior in humans is complex: A man may court a woman, displaying no agressive tendencies, she selects him for that, then later on he becomes aggressive and violent. As long as she was A. pregnant before and B. the child survives the genes move on.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 07:23 PM
3

Um, I'm not sure why we give half a fuck. I'm one of the more vehemently anti-feminist people here (I think the entire movement should be systematically dismantled) but I'm downvoting your post. This is not /srs or /amr. We're not trolls. (well, most of us anyways) Who cares what feminazis are saying on reddit, much less teefs of all people. Understanding the mechanisms behind feminism and how we got to this place is one thing. Recognizing the fallacies are another. But how is this just anything…
/r/MensRights08/11/11 01:47 PM
1

Ok, I just sorted through a lot of against's post history, and we're all familiar with manboobz. But manboobz is trying to troll us, is he/she not? Clearly only exists to make us look bad. I think we're perhaps at odds at our definition of troll? Cause Againstdildosucking is crass, sarcastic, i'm sure what you would refer to as offensive and sexist........really fucking angry, probably sick, and the length of account time screams troll.....but...... Trolling is when you pretend to have a positio…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 11:13 PM
20

Well spoken. No misogyny, no hate. Just preaching the truth. Have an upvote.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 10:41 PM
1

Seriously, i'm not being sarcastic. I've only been here several months. Show me.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 10:24 PM
1

And I know it's been said before, but I'm gonna say it again, for the millionth time, we get censored by feminists at every step, and since we're trying to desperately show the movement in general that sort of behavior is deplorable, we do our best to NOT ban or silence people just because they disagree with us.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 10:18 PM
2

It's the only course of action that I can see. We can't use this case as an argument to change the law so it doesn't prosecute men at this time, there will be endless cries of "pedophile!" from the entire world, whether that's valid or not. So really all you are left with is making an example of the sexism via the route of trying to get the law enforced through a snail mail campaign. I think we ought to do electronic methods as well.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 10:17 PM
1

You were asking if I actually believed that less than 5% of our subscriber base were trolls or extremists. Or that most of our members (note, 27,000 on the sidebar) are non-misogynistic , calm, reasonable people ? If you're going to say that 4 people out of 27,000 are bad then yeah, I'm going to totally agree with you! I bet it's like ten times that number or more! But this accusation that we are trolling you? That's new to my eyes. We get trolled by the MINUTE here. It's clear and present. It's…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 10:13 PM
1

Well I think we ought to be informed of the legality of said action first. Anyone who is knowledgeble on the subject know ?
/r/MensRights03/11/11 08:32 PM
2

But suppose I am a complex sock puppet troller ... my account: not banned. Your obvious troll: not banned. This post: not removed. This does nothing to help my original point ... that the people here are either being led by extremists, or are being completely fooled by the trolls trying to derail you You are the trolls trying to derail us. We're not banning you because we can just downvote you, and since you have constantly tried to discredit us, we want a record of this sort of thing. It's not …
/r/MensRights03/11/11 06:55 PM
1

Yup. this is all it is.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 06:32 PM
2

Both accounts are brand new, not only the racist guy but the guy making the post calling attention to it. Don't let it fool you, sometimes the accounts are older, but the comment history will reveal their nature.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 06:11 PM
2

Here's a call to arms from an action oriented MRA. First we need to find out what the statutory rape laws are in this case. If she did indeed commit the crime, it allows us an opportunity. Can anyone confirm this? I'm going to go looking, If it's true... lets find the physical address of the DA's office involved. Then lets write actual letters to the DA demanding that since the woman swore under penalty of perjury that she committed statutory rape, that she be brought to justice? Anyone got a be…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 05:05 PM
4

I upvoted you, but I disagree. If it's a person spouting crazy contradictory bullshit, 99% of the time, it's a troll. If it's a person calling attention to the crazy person in a way that asks the question "Why are you all like this" or "Why do you guys allow this" it's the same kind of troll. Probably the same peson. Downvote, move on.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 05:00 PM
2

Oh fuck you troll. If you want to DO something about it how about NOT making posts that call attention to it, go into his account, downvote everything, and go about your day. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:58 PM
1

Because the part that is unspoken is that it's not about just ANY man, it's about the man she wants. There is this whole side of the issue that isn't brought up. Why is she with him in the first place? This is , quite literally, the best man she can get with her current 'fitness status'. It's no good from an evolutionary perspective to just snag anyone. These articles make it seem like it's about the baby, and that's only partially true. It's about the right baby, and thus, the right man. Clearl…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:56 PM
32

That man will spend the rest of his life in prison. And he should. And when feminism / society begins to understand that women murderers are no different, i will feel a great peace. As the Amazing Atheist said: (I'm paraphrasing) "You let her go because the person that murdered him said he was an asshole!?!?!?!"
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:51 PM
6

No, he's getting upvoted by sockpuppet accounts and troll upvote brigades, which, unless you want to challenge me, you are part of.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:44 PM
5

I see the /srs and /amr upvote brigades are in effect early today. You have no idea the pity I feel for you guys/girls. You are what you hate. I couldn't live with myself.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:40 PM
3

No offense if you are someone real, but pretty much any account that's posting in this sub and is two minutes old is a troll in my eyes until proven otherwise. You're attempting to bring attention to someone who , if you read his/her comment history, is either fucking nuts out of their mind (unlikely) or a troll mean to discredit us (highly likely) . So to continue, you're attempting to draw attention to what is more than likely, a troll from /srs or /amr. The parsimonious explanation for your p…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:39 PM
1

As if allllll those fake throwaways don't immediately subscribe in order to make it look much, much bigger than it is. In fact you can probably cut OUR numbers by several thousand due to the trolls being subscribed here as well.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:31 PM
1

I didn't understand your comment, it didn't seem to address my comment.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:26 PM
7

Your racist bullshit comments are not welcome here. On behalf of me and all sane people, go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:24 PM
3

Let me explain how this is working, for the confused. Make 2 new throwaways. Let em sit for a while. Now take those 2, with your regular account, and do the following. Troll account 1: make clearly unnacceptable statements, racist, sexist, and insane. Also support MRM Troll account 2 : argue with account 1, from a normal MRM viewpoint for the most part, but make self look bad as well. Regular account: Link to this in other subs, call attention to the crazy, have troll friends upvote comments suc…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:23 PM
1

If you want to present evidence to the contrary I'm all ears.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 01:59 PM
3

Yes. We've been over this ground before: They have a firm belief in the current pervasive existence of a vast male privilege and a patriarchy. So if you are a feminist, the idea that men need any rights, or more than they have now, can be viewed by some as offensive. Then you add to that the fact that this subreddit, movement, and community are active and growing, and you add to that the fact that some people are shitty, and you get places like /shitredditsays /againstmensrights and at least som…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 12:51 PM
1

did you not read my post?
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:45 AM
0

All valid points. As a counter: I come from an odd little background. I tried to become a rockstar before I did anything else in my little life. Over about a 6 year period, I threw myself into it, for better or worse. I found something interesting. I was much more efficient at writing music if I practiced writing music. If I spent 10 hours a day working on my technique, it only helped the writing process nominally. Same with performing, same with studying the process of writing. But when I just …
/r/MensRights02/11/11 10:52 PM
2

Some of us are vocally anti-feminist. Me, for instance.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 09:30 PM
0

Point taken, although perhaps my idealism that good product will (eventually) rise like cream, in today's world perhaps that sort of idea is unfounded.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 09:25 PM
0

Here is the issue with saying that. While in spirit I may agree with you that some women act this way, and there could be evolutionary reasons that this behavior would be advantageous, I can't go there. Mainly because no one can propose a way to put this into a form that is falsifiable. How do we prove it? Because I know guys that do this, and girls that don't. So clearly, it's not a black and white issue. Then we have to prove that a statistically significant portion of a decent sample size has…
/r/MensRights02/11/11 08:29 PM
2

Your platform is the cited research you do. If not you, who? If not now, when?
/r/MensRights02/11/11 08:03 PM
5

I think the consensus here is no, most people here don't think this should really be rape if 19 yo has sex with a 16 year old consentually. HOWEVER this is a discussion of our current LEGAL system, and the feminist bias within it. A man would be prosecuted for felony statutory rape under the laws. INstead, she's suing him. Now imagine a 20 year old man suing a 17 year old girl for money because he got her pregnant, even if that wouldn't get him arrested. Clearly, we have some sexism in the legal…
/r/MensRights02/11/11 07:15 PM
22

You need to write a book. please.
/r/MensRights02/11/11 05:14 PM
15

I made this exact thread when I started here. Yes, there is a clear, obvious and cited effort on the part of some feminists to do anything to discredit us. They make fake accounts, twist arguments, make posts in other places, and they have upvote and downvote brigades in place, to promote any post that makes us look socially unacceptable, and bury and post that is rational or good. From what I can gather, they are very, very active. There seem to be about 100 of them or more total that are like …
/r/MensRights02/11/11 05:11 PM
-1

Right. Because since we were the ones sent to die, there was at least some measure of respect of our perspective and ideas. Don't get me wrong, I think we've all evolved from that. I think women completely deserve the vote. As long as they can accept the draft. As long as they can accept that having a womb doesn't entitle them to anything more than having a dick does for me. As long as the courts can be made blind to sex. It's like the bullshit of not letting 18 year olds drink, but they can be …
/r/MensRights02/11/11 12:18 AM
3

Dude, this times a billion. This is the problem with theorycraft. Feminists have ideas. They got those ideas into our legal system, and the fucking plane is crashing. Like anyone who is at the helm of the problem, they blame their chosen enemy, instead of themselves, driving the problem on at an increased rate. Who knows how an idea will function until it's implemented. Having said that, I'm not quitting until all our ideas about equal legal rights are implemented. I think it will get better. If…
/r/MensRights02/11/11 12:12 AM
1

I can get on board with that. As devil's advocate however, I would be interested to read about the positions and thoughts of the opposition more than I do.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 08:08 PM
4

Indoctrination, ruling the nation.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 07:13 PM
17

If I went on a forum and starting discussing plans to kill women, I'm pretty sure I could be arrested and thrown in prison. So why are we not calling the police on this one?
/r/MensRights30/10/11 04:22 PM
2

From an evolutionary standpoint, you have to remember that some kind of higher cognitive abilities, along with at least rudimentary language, go back in our species a long, long time. Shortest estimate is 120,000 years, the longest is several million. 1 Knowing that, think back really far. You're a group of humans, or human ancestors, in your typical group of 5-50 people. Your highest technologies are a spear, and fire. the men are about as tall as the women, give or take a bit. But the girls ar…
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:43 PM
7

"the media discourse about the worsening "good man drought" drives two key aspects of the scarcity model: the necessity of compromise with men and of competition with women. The fewer genuinely good men there are, the greater the bargaining power they have in relationship — and the more concessions women (at least those who are eager for marriage) are told they must make. Since so many successful women want to draw from the ever-shrinking pool of genuinely attractive and functional dudes, rivalr…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 02:27 PM
1

My Fiancée and I have discussed this. She's taking my name when we get married, but the first male child will have her (maiden) last name. She wants to extend the gesture of changing her name to me, which I demand, but she has no brothers, and no one else in her family to carry on her family's last name. I have a brother and two sisters, and many cousins and so on, thus my family name is solid. These things mean something, but I'm not sure they belong here, because I thought we are supposed to b…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 05:05 PM
2

I came here to say this. We have a lot of people harping on how false rape claims destroy the lives of men because they are assumed guilty before they go to trial. We should require the same from ourselves. As for myself, until the verdict, he might as well have tripped and sliced his dick on a razorblade.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:54 PM
2

I'm not really seeing how this is sexist.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 04:52 PM
0

Ah, I see what you are saying. While I don't agree with all of it, I do see things from a very similar perspective, one where I think not much has really changed since early society, the scope has just increased.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 09:59 PM
1

Care to break down your (rather intriguing on the surface) statement?
/r/MensRights10/10/11 07:44 PM
1

I disagree, but I'm upvoting you. I'll bet you a chicken dinner they crash and burn in the next 20 years.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 06:44 PM
0

I agree, but I think the movement as a whole will come to this realization someday.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 06:08 PM
9

I kinda dig this. It's a lot like a labor dispute to me. If you had a company, and every employee gets on board, and walks out, it's devastating. Feminists are like awful employers. They want to rape you for everything you've got, while simultaneously trying to get you to believe that they don't need you, and that you need to be better. But actually, they depend on you. They need you, and they can't exist without you. But most people are too scared, too in the dark, and they aren't willing to do…
/r/MensRights10/10/11 03:51 PM
4

Then we shouldn't act on it.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 02:23 PM
2

There are a few critical things we can do to make sure we don't take the same path. Seek only equal legal rights. Never refuse anyone access to the movement based on sex, or other bias (I.E. saying it's a men's only movement, or a straight only movement. This is a movement for the equal legal rights of men. If you support this issue, I don't care if you are a legless lesbian with aids who is a radical muslim, we should welcome you.) We must annihilate the misogyny. MUST. ( I know its fucking har…
/r/MensRights10/10/11 02:21 PM
7

I was forced into a self-defense situation in an apartment complex in around 2007. My assailant was my size / weight. He had consumed an unknown quantity of unknown drugs. My guess would be small to moderate amounts of alcohol, pot, and cocaine / amphetamine, if I had to guess. I was hanging with one guy I knew and four that I hadn't met before. Everyone else was sober, it was a sunday, people were watching football. Apparently the assailant was in his bedroom doing drugs(you could smell the wee…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 07:38 PM
4

All I'm going to say is this: If someone feels a sexual attraction to something that is socially or ideologically unacceptable, they often attempt to ignore it, or bury it. It doesn't work. Biology > Ideology in most cases. Eg. I can spend the rest of my entire life, telling everyone that I'm not attracted to big tits. I can write novels about it, I can build my entire existence around the discussion of how flat chested women are what turn me on. I can decry my fellow men for getting with large …
/r/MensRights07/10/11 05:02 PM
5

Using 60's men as an example for how men now should act is retarded It's even more retarded than that. It's cause they are fundamentally attracted to these men, but are not realizing they are supposedly ideologically opposed to everything that they are. Even abandoning morality or ideology all together, they can't get what they want, even if they knew what they wanted. I just want to grab them and look right in the eyes of these misinformed women, and yell: "Oh, you mean want a 6'2" tall guy , t…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 04:55 PM
7

Getting married in december. Both me and my fianceé support the movement wholeheartedly.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 04:28 PM
7

Says the third poster.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 04:25 PM
7

Well, a few of you have seen my comments here. What you guys and girls probably don't know is that I'm a 5th generation NM cattle rancher. I was fortunate enough to get to spend some time with my great grandfather before he died, and when I was very young once, he told me this. I think it holds true for both men and women. "Karmasutur3: If you are going to hit a man, kill him. If you aren't willing to do that, then walk away. " The advice has served me quite well. I've only ever hit one man, and…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 03:54 PM
2

Thank you for your support. And you are welcome. I feel like I have a strange perspective , because I have been allowed through fortunate life experience to have "come full circle" so to speak. at 16-19 I was a typical american male, very white-knight-ish and with a head full of feminist leanings from our education system. At 20, I met a woman who can only be described as a genius level sociopathic demon, who systematically demolished me for the next 3 years. My mid-twenties were marked with sev…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 03:38 PM
2

When your mouth moves, smart things fall out of it. Time and again.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 01:55 PM
5

You bring up a point I've tried to bring up over and over again. I don't think men or women are inherently good or evil. I don't think either. I think it's valid to draw the conclusion, however, that both men and women, when given extraordinary amounts of power, the vast majority of those men and women will abuse it. I also firmly believe that the balance of power (on the whole) rests with women in the United States, and therefore most (>50%) of power abusers happen to be women. Not all women wi…
/r/MensRights07/10/11 01:40 PM
2

That's not appeal to emotion . Here is a helpful website that illustrates logical fallacies . http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/appeal-to-emotion.html Please read that and see if you would like to revise your comment before we move forward .
/r/MensRights05/10/11 07:06 PM
2

No, I didn't. I'm only willing to fight for equal rights for men if it's based on logic and data. If you feel differently, I'm not willing to lower my standards (stoop) to join you. \verb /sto͞op/ stooped, past participle; stooped, past tense; stooping, present participle; stoops, 3rd person singular present 1.Bend one's head or body forward and downward 2.Have the head and shoulders habitually bent forward 3.(of a bird of prey) Swoop down on a quarry *4. Lower one's moral standards so far as to…
/r/MensRights05/10/11 05:58 PM
3

No, I didn't. I'm only willing to fight for equal rights for men if it's based on logic and data. If you feel differently, I'm not willing to lower my standards (stoop) to join you.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 05:57 PM
3

Well if what you are saying is true, and we, as a movement stoop to that, I want no part of it. I'm not willing to fight bullshit with bullshit. And I vehemently disagree.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 05:20 PM
0

No, you don't have my support at all, but it's clear that's not everyone's consensus. I'm not asking for a gag order. A gag order would be you out of the sidebar and banned. An order to not constantly shamelessly promote seems to be what Ig said. If you aren't going to further the discussion, just promote your own subreddit, I think it's within simple rediqquette to downvote you, and call you out on it.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 05:12 PM
0

Well obviously it's not in this subreddit's policy to do excessive advertising. So actually while it's relevant to you, It's relevant to me to have you stop. You are in the sidebar , and have some people's tentative support. Annoying them doesn't further your attempts imo.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 05:01 PM
3

Disagree. That's what ruined the feminist movement. If you base your ideology on non-concrete items like offensiveness and other subjective items, they can be twisted by any individual. Eventually, you just end up having emotional reactions, that incite others, which eventually result in lawmaking, which eventually results in bias towards one group or another. If we are going to go down that path, and try and 'win' people over by emotional perceptions, I want no part of this movement. Many, many…
/r/MensRights05/10/11 04:57 PM
-2

The Men's rights movement is , as far as I'm aware, about procuring Legal rights. Equal ones. I don't give two ***** about socially unacceptable. We post things about socially unacceptable things and sexism here to further our own knowledge about the current situation, but taking steps to make them not acceptable is not what I think we ought to be doing. If you want to write letters, write letters about the legal rights you want made equal for men and women. That's progress. We DO NOT want to be…
/r/MensRights05/10/11 04:48 PM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/krs4j/masculism_reddit_join_if_interested/c2mo4xm To quote, "please remember that an abundance of advertising does go against the rules of this subreddit."
/r/MensRights05/10/11 04:43 PM
0

Let me go find it.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 04:38 PM
2

Another case of how to manipulate data with simple charts in order to futher an ideology, in this case attempting to dis-credit the anti-feminist movement.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 04:38 PM
0

I thought you guys got called out for excessive advertising in another thread. Is this not the case?
/r/MensRights05/10/11 04:20 PM
1

I'm not at all surprised.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 08:45 PM
2

And I quote: "There's something incredibly intense and extremely disturbing about pornography." This dude is quite literally out of his mind. But I have to remind myself: It's all bullshit, without falsifiable theory through actual data. Not spun data, or spun stats, but real honest data. And they simply don't have any leg to stand on.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 06:27 PM
3

Exactly. :)
/r/MensRights27/09/11 09:05 PM
14

Right? Make statement based on NO scientific research, build ideas upon it. I'll bet money the author seriously just made that shit up on the spot. My life would be so much easier if I could just believe in shit I make up as I go.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 04:51 PM
2

Oh man, for some reason I read this as " to raise prostitution and testicular cancer awareness."
/r/MensRights26/09/11 09:52 PM
0

*facepalm Like saying: I'm way less concerned with not calling black people niggers, but more concerned with correcting the racial issues towards them. Except calling them niggers IS a racial issue, just like falling into the pitfalls of the feminist movement is not what the MRM wants to do.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 02:01 PM
4

We've been over this ground a few days ago: They are puppets or morons, they are wanting to include feminist ideals and have suspect connections to a feminist blog. Or at least that's how it appears, the jury is still actually out. I encourage you to go over there and read things, but the more I read from the mods the more it's a very sketchy ploy, as far as I can assertain.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:54 PM
1

bitterness and pointless rage It's not bitter, nor pointless. If you get angry at injustices, it's a good thing. I don't hate women at all. Go read my comment history. You're a trolling, assuming asshat.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 02:24 AM
2

Oh don't get me wrong, I think you're going to blow up! When all the feminists realize that they are welcome there and that it gives them an opportunity to co-opt part of the movement. But the actual MRA's will be here.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 02:39 PM
1

No, I'm not a very angry person. I'm a really happy person who also happens to be very passionate. Reached out to? Like I'm a sick infant? It's not suprising? You guys come in here, like something is wrong with us. Like the anger and outrage here is not acceptable. Like something is fundamentally wrong with the movement and the subreddit. What is wrong is everyone else. What is wrong is men and women who don't see these injustices, these people they are stepping on . And they are stepping on you…
/r/MensRights24/09/11 02:38 PM
1

have fun with your 81 readers. (25 thousand here) .
/r/MensRights24/09/11 05:40 AM
0

You guys are hugely mislead, and I can't think of something shittier for activists to do . It's not equivalent to first wave feminism. It's not equivalent to feminism at all, and that's where you are falling apart. Well, there's more than that, but you guys are all acting like asshole sockpuppets. You don't have the same end goal, because you don't understand the opposition, nor the way to get there. And you are liars! way to try and smooth everyone into it , without stating that you were being …
/r/MensRights24/09/11 05:39 AM
1

Thick headed little bitch , aren't cha?
/r/MensRights23/09/11 08:28 PM
1

Why would I contribute activist materials and thoughts that are supposed to support the rights of men in a subreddit where the mods want to include feminist idealism? Why would I contribute scientific materials and thoughts that are supposed to support scientific advancement in a subreddit where the mods want to include amish idealism? Why would I contribute atheistic materials and thoughts that are supposed to support the non-existence of god in a subreddit where the mods want to include a chri…
/r/MensRights23/09/11 07:57 PM
1

Maybe. check the convo thread I've been having with them in the announcement post: If they aren't trolls, they are still starting to reveal some really feminist ideologies , mainly as I poke them to provoke a lil anger and try to get them to take a stance. My jury is still out, but i am highly skeptical.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 02:02 PM
1

I have studied some of it and I don't believe so Really? Realllly? Feminism is compatible with MRM? I can't take you seriously at all now. The MAIN premise to ALL feminism(s) is the male patriarchy and past female oppression. THIS SITS DIRECTLY IN OPPOSITION TO CURRENT SCIENTIFIC DATA AND IS THE LIE THAT HAS RESULTED IN THE CURRENT LEGAL SITUATION FOR MEN. Anyways, I’m done defending feminism for tonight Dude, go back to twoX. You shouldn't be defending , you should be attacking. As I have said …
/r/MensRights23/09/11 12:50 PM
0

Scumbag ! Plans to create new MRA subreddit........ ......so they can include more feminist ideas. Smells. Fishy.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 12:33 PM
1

:) Good call.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 05:24 AM
0

with or against is a false dichotomy here No. It's not a with or against. It's a case of women's only or men's only spaces are sexist. but are also different: we are socialized differently and we are biologically different. incorrect usage of socialized, and yes we are biologically different, but the question here isn't our differences but simply the fact that the LAW should treat us as equals, end of story. So all the differences amount to nothing in the context of modern life. The experiences …
/r/MensRights23/09/11 05:21 AM
1

Yeah, this wasn't really relevant after their announcement posts got downvoted into the ground by (presumably) skeptics. Oh well.
/r/MensRights23/09/11 03:46 AM
1

Well, this is definitely one of the big reasons. We see a potential for cooperation with feminists that are equality-minded (there are different types of feminists, as it is a big tent movement) and, as I said before, bridge-building is one of the aims we hope to achieve. Ah. There it is, a little of it anyways. Here's the crux of the problem, and why I allow myself to be associated with this subreddit. IF you actually study feminism, you will find that it's absolutely incompatible with the idea…
/r/MensRights23/09/11 01:27 AM
1

First two points: never said or thought otherwise Actually, my first point is that this is a subreddit not by men for men, but by everyone for men's rights. disincluding women or men from something implies rejection in some form, creating a 'space' for a gender is , in a sense, being 'against' the other gender to some degree . This is an important distinction between having a space where we (men and women) discuss the legal rights we think everyone (including men) should have, rather than a spac…
/r/MensRights22/09/11 11:45 PM
2

since we are another men's space that is by men and for men This subreddit is NOT that. We're not against women. We're for equal legal rights for men and women. We're against FEMINISM. by men and for men : by women for women This is a common request of the feminist movement. A common feminist idea. MRA's ought to be gender neutral by definition. We don't want a MEN's space. we want fucking equal rights. Why are all the accounts associated with this new subreddit 3-4 months old, can anyone tell m…
/r/MensRights22/09/11 10:31 PM
0

See thats the thing, there's tons of overlap between what r/mensrights does and what this space is about, the difference is in degree, or focus, or how much priority or energy we spend in that area. If you can't explain how the subreddits are different, I have no faith in your ability to mod a subreddit. We have a truly excellent team of mods behind us, but I'm here promoting in r/mensrights first because we need a solid base of MRA participants before we begin reaching out to everyone else. Car…
/r/MensRights22/09/11 10:25 PM
0

He or she isn't answering at all.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 10:00 PM
0

Ok, maybe. I'm trying to feel you out here. Cmon, let's further the discussion! Lets get you to answer the above questions.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 10:00 PM
2

reaching out to the general public to help them recognize that men's issues are real and worth paying attention to. We want to bring this to the mainstream I love playing devil's advocate. How does /r/mensrights not do this? Why shouldn't we have more than one as well I can think of one reason: Negative feminist response. Anyone who has been in this subreddit for more than a week can easily find evidence that women who routinely take action as feminist activists oppose this entire movement, and …
/r/MensRights22/09/11 09:12 PM
4

Divide, and conquer. That's the most efficient strategy to deal with your enemies. Why would we need /r/masculism when we have this here? What is wrong with this discussion? If it's a better representation of what we are being activists for, then great, but I read every single word of this entire thread and wasn't able to glean anything other than plans to mod slightly more.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 08:52 PM
0

Preach it !
/r/MensRights22/09/11 08:36 PM
0

Is it bad that even though I know you are totally kidding, and in sarcastic mode, jesting your ass off, that just the fact that I know that someone out there might misconstrue this as actual belief makes me a touch queasy? I just want to grab them all, drag them into a library, and make them read, and read and read and read so that they can understand the humanity of ALL of us! And then get a huge fucking microphone and a massive fucking marshall amplifier stack and just loop fifteen second of t…
/r/MensRights22/09/11 01:11 AM
1

First off, I upvote your creative name furiously. Second off, I am with you. But I've met sociopaths and insane people, and they lie to themselves enough to where they begin to really subscribe to it. But they know. It's buried under layers of thought processes designed to justify it, but they know. The motivations are never complicated. It always boils down to Sex, Money, Power, Security, or Renown.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 11:16 PM
2

Well spoken. And the really hilarious part (in a bad way) is that there are many, many sad and upset men and women out there, slogging through things, and they believe what they have been told, which is that they are a victim, they are on the short end of the stick, and to rise up and beat down the man and his patriarchy. But feminism was supposed to empower women. Not convince them of weakness, then get them to attack men. So instead of empowering women and gaining equality, we're stuck with th…
/r/MensRights21/09/11 10:19 PM
2

Good question.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 09:52 PM
3

Well, just like reading most feminist literature, my head is full of fuck now. It has , literally, no meaning. Centering around the idea of penis as violent implement of male oppression the article just spirals around making no real statements. Nothing is backed up. As an argument, it's totally without premise. This is fiction, it's prose, it's woven words meant to imply or invoke an emotion. And then the sudden realization occurs to me that it's based on things like this, we have lawmakers maki…
/r/MensRights21/09/11 09:45 PM
11

I know. But really, we've obviously got someone writing to the masses here. They know how stupid most people are. They know the way to get through amidst all the adverts and media. You get the male moron's attention with sex, beer and sports. And if you really think deeper about this, there is different levels of stupid. You have to realize that the originators of these feminist platforms KNOW they are full of shit, because they know they have manipulated the data. Then here come some college ed…
/r/MensRights21/09/11 08:53 PM
2

Lol. I guess I have their attention.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 08:33 PM
2

It's simple. Claim male privilege. Choose not to enter that subject of study. When males dominate the subject, claim misogyny and ask for more power. Take the power, continue to not choose the subject of study. Continue to complain about male privilege, ask for even more power. Rinse, repeat, until you have all the power, and you have everyone convinced you are the weak, helpless one. Sun Tzu wrote about these types of strategies in the 'art of war'. When you are strong, appear weak.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 10:34 PM
-1

Dissecting minute aspects of anything easily leads to being able to claim whatever you want. But the armor we should wear as MRA is that we shouldn't delve into that. Stick with the truth, let the feminists be ambiguous. Eventually their 'arguments' that are shitty like this one will fall apart in the face of simplicity. Like, you make as much money as us. You have better working conditions as us. The courts ruled based on misandry.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 12:09 AM
5

And from this point on behave as though a judge is looking over your shoulder 24/7. ^ THIS
/r/MensRights14/09/11 03:22 PM
1

That's not it at all. We have to make the truth known. There is shitty truth, and there is happy truth. You are twisting words my friend, and that usually means troll alert..... Time to go check your posting history and find out!
/r/MensRights09/09/11 08:26 PM
0

I would argue that if you hadn't noticed your partners' feminist tendecies before marriage, then that's significant in itself. I personally wouldn't recommend that following either the fem or mensrights subreddits is a good idea to base your future choices on. I guess we have a simple difference of opinion. I think you should be reading both, then choosing, not none, then choosing. shrug
/r/MensRights09/09/11 03:01 PM
0

All of the Faq's , and the other information there. There is a lot of info about how divorces go, and no matter how you slice it, even in the best of demographics, you run at least a 10-30% chance of being stuck in those painful situations. And that's significant!! Now, is r/mensrights a good cross section by your above definition? No, we expound on the downsides, because , after all, aren't we involved in activism here? But as a counterpoint, there are bright spots. For instance, I even wrote i…
/r/MensRights09/09/11 02:33 PM
2

Actually, there IS a massive imbalance in what some MRA's refer to as the 'death professions'. It's a group of 95% male-dominated set of jobs, and (unless i'm mistaken) firefighting is one of them. Citation, and please watch all the parts of the video if you actually care about the MRA movement. These professions get people killed on a regular basis. So the point I think here, is that one of the continual rallying cries of feminism is : We don't get paid equal dollars for equal work! We are oppr…
/r/MensRights09/09/11 02:17 PM
-2

No, this is incorrect. Please see sidebar for citation and statistic.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 01:45 PM
2

Preach it ! This is , in my mind, the main functional portion that allows men to group with feminists and annihilate their own rights.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 05:51 PM
6

Truer words ! But I guess that's what you do when you have power. You ignore dissenting opinion from those who don't threaten you. MRA's are aware of the feminist tactics, so it actually benefits them to assault. I guess the part that makes me rage is that when they do that, the averages just look the other way. Now that, I don't understand.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 04:09 PM
13

People wonder how the culture is the way it is. Higher education in women headed for teaching positions includes feminist subjects. Then they go teach all the things. Then the culture changes.
/r/MensRights02/09/11 01:54 PM
11

Post in WTF : Millions of upvotes, everyone's enraged. Post in MR : 5 people care. MRA's enter convo in wtf thread, instantly attacked. FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU.....
/r/MensRights02/09/11 01:07 PM
1

Yeah, that's not in question. What I'm talking about is how the differences in our internal workings often produce different interpretations of external stimuli, and how culture has a massive impact on this. Then it follows logically that , like in many situations for men in our current culture, the comments from feminists or those who have subscribed to the culture leave men in catch-22 like situations. Either volunteer help and get lambasted for mansplaining, or stay quiet and be labelled inco…
/r/MensRights02/09/11 12:39 PM
1

I beg to differ. She says, "A non-lawyer dude that I work with has several times given me a general overview of laws that I deal with on a daily basis. Despite the fact that I tell him, shortly but not Too Bitchily, that I am aware of what he is telling me, he repeatedly does this anyway." and "When I've been in gyms working out, men have offered me unsolicited tips on new exercises to try," Ok. But we need more information, and here's why what I've said is relevant : She says unsolicited. She s…
/r/MensRights01/09/11 10:15 PM
1

Well spoken.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 09:19 PM
2

One of the things I've found in my own life, is the following: Women often make blatant or subtle or invisible requests for emotional support through their actions, words or behaviors from the people around them. Often men respond to these requests more readily than other women for reasons that I should hope this sub-reddit finds obvious. But I think the problem comes where a man who has been conditioned to this type of social request either: A. Is unable to tell the difference between a request…
/r/MensRights01/09/11 09:16 PM
3

Care to posit something that would inform us why you think this is a post that belongs here before the blue downy arrow comes to visit you?
/r/MensRights01/09/11 08:50 PM
-5

Downvote, didn't see how this is relavent to MRA's.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 08:49 PM
7

And she wonders why she's single.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 08:46 PM
1

I kinda feel like that is the case too, but really the more society, men and women, continue feeling pain from the results of feminism's impact on the culture we have, the more people will wake up.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 12:17 PM
1

It's amazing to me how some people can put things in perspective so easily and quickly.
/r/MensRights01/09/11 12:11 AM
10

I want a nuclear powered upvote button, please.
/r/MensRights31/08/11 08:42 PM
1

No, I think the particular aspect of this that could even be brought into a discussion of things that further support for the bs idea of rape culture is: If you did a study, targeting these muslim women, seeing how many had been raped by counting the number of surgeries. But it's a religious conflict of interest here: The women aren't taking men (in this article) to court over rape, they are citing rape as a reason to get the surgery to cover the fact that they are sleeping around. So yes, it's …
/r/MensRights30/08/11 06:36 PM
5

Oh man, if this doesn't enrage you I don't know what should. How in the world did they keep trying this guy? I mean jesus. And you gotta think, this guy had all the monetary means necessary to construct a defense! Imagine the guys who are broke!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights30/08/11 06:02 PM
1

Yeah, I get that. I agree we need to address this cultural attitude. But I think this article is a terrible example. We can upvote better examples. It's poorly written, only half on topic, and the part of the article that addresses false rape accusations is less than a sentence long.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 05:57 PM
2

Well I get what you are saying, but I'm not sure how it should deserve to be in Men's Rights. Because the situation is the same as a man lying to a doctor about not ever working out, to get lipo, or a woman lying about whether she used a condom when getting funding for an abortion. Obviously we need to raise awareness about false rape accusations, but my downvote comes from the opinion that this article is not a very good example of this type of behavior, even if it is relevant.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 04:33 PM
2

Um, guys, hate to say this, but downvoting this. That's because this article isn't saying that the women are claiming specific rape, but rather claiming that their claims are fradulent in order to have the surgery. Read the article, Imo.
/r/MensRights30/08/11 12:57 PM
7

I'm not sure of the relevance to this subreddit, at all.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 04:24 PM
1

Yeah. Women doesn't equal feminist doesn't equal MRA doesn't equal Radical Feminist. All distinct things to me.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 09:04 PM
2

I do. In divorce proceedings, the names and sexes of the persons are redacted, and they are assigned numbers instead. The proceedings are all done through electronic or paper means, if in person is required, use technology to make the voices gender neutral.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 08:52 PM
1

What hasn't been mentioned is controlling your frame here. They can attempt to apply whatever label they like, but if you refuse it, the tables in most cases instantly turn.
/r/MensRights21/08/11 08:23 PM
1

Actually, with a 3.5 college GPA and a 29 composite or higher on the MCAT, the matriculant acceptance rate is 85%. So, it's not that hard to believe
/r/MensRights21/08/11 02:06 AM
5

Well, I don't give a shit about traditional roles, or I give way less of a fuck about them, what I care about is each sex getting what they want. And I'm kind of with these Danish women, and the reason is: It seems like they are perfectly free to choose what they want, and it seems like they are choosing a balance between work, family, and recreation. and celda: you quoted that moral obligation line I think you are absolutely right. But, coming from someone that is trying to get into medical sch…
/r/MensRights20/08/11 04:12 PM
6

People are ok with it because it's in good fun, and doesn't hurt anyone. Why I think your post here calling attention to it is quite valid is that women shouldn't be mad at things in the inverse that are also in good fun, and don't hurt anyone. Obvious double standard, but I think the battle should be clear: Lets not fuck ourselves by requiring that everyone get offended by this sort of thing (I'm not, are you?) but rather calling people out who feign offense for the inverse, feminist perspectiv…
/r/MensRights19/08/11 09:22 PM
4

A lot of things are called human nature. hu·man na·ture Noun: The general psychological characteristics, feelings, and behavioral traits of humankind, regarded as shared by all humans. Ok, so you can get away with saying this, but I think that the point of men's rights is to further men's rights. So In cases like this,I agree with you that it may be easy to relish in things like this, but I think we should resist that impulse in the interest of furthering our own rights. It's hard sometimes to h…
/r/MensRights18/08/11 07:03 PM
2

Yeah. The fuck is increasing all the time too.....it's shit like this, feminists....
/r/MensRights18/08/11 04:52 PM
13

I would relish the opportunity to report a woman who did something like that to me or to someone in my presence This will only make us no better than feminists. Downvote for the attitude of trying to wage war, not promote the rights of men. *Note, not the reporting, we should be doing that. Relishing in it, that's shitty.
/r/MensRights18/08/11 04:47 PM
1

I am, instead, trying to defend an imperfect system because I cannot envision any other way that would work as well. This is why I asked if anyone could write a better law. I guess at the end of the day, I agree with you, I just think we ought to try loosening the reins instead of tightening them. And we all know that this is pure bullshit. Fucking generalizations - How do they work? Dude, I wish I could upvote your whole account for this comment. I literally cracked up. Kudos. I see your perspe…
/r/MensRights16/08/11 03:07 PM
3

Upvote for sane discussion, first off. Now, to continue with our dialog: Rape is the act of having sex with someone who either refuses to give consent or is incapable of giving consent. (Please note that no mention of sex was included in that definition.) Can we agree with that definition? Totally agreed. I maintain that in cases of "he said/she said" if this regulation isn't in place, it will ALWAYS be the woman who loses. Now, this is a logically consistent argument, and stands up, until we cl…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 10:38 PM
4

As a new guy as well, I was shocked to see just how much hatred has/was been spewed at me , literally as soon as I started posting here. And beyond that, I'm sad that I'm the type of person who would never make a second reddit account, because posting just once in men's rights has meant that my other posts in unrelated subreddits (like ffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu) seem to be systematically downvoted. :( For example, the other day I posted a comic which was on the what's hot page, and was quickly three…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 09:12 PM
1

You missed my point. Your, and the argument of the law, is that it's the other person's responsibility to not have sex in the case that the partner is intoxicated. So, even if that's true, then in that case where sex occurs between two drunk people, then: The man raped the woman, and simultaneously, the woman raped the man. Actually, you missed the point. I really beg to differ. And I think it matters, because in a situation with 2 people performing the same crime, at the same time, if one is to…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 08:43 PM
3

What about drunk women that take advantage of drunk men? Your argument is illogical and not sound. If the above is true, you just proved me right. It is immoral - no question - except that the number of cases of men going to the police and reporting being raped by women is close to zero. If there is no perceived problem, the courts tend to ignore the issue. You missed my point. Your, and the argument of the law, is that it's the other person's responsibility to not have sex in the case that the …
/r/MensRights15/08/11 05:42 PM
1

It says I'm forbidden from that subreddit. I would assume I'm already banned? Wow, I'm pretty new here......
/r/MensRights15/08/11 04:54 PM
9

I don't know. I always assumed that since older men are usually more solvent, experienced, confident, and have more social status that younger men that it automatically attracts women , young or old. The younger women have an advantage in that situation.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 04:49 PM
8

As kloo2yoo says here feminists want to be able to personally sign off on the myriad of men's rights issues and thereby maintain control and domination over men politically in the media and legally in the courts. Upvote, reason, sanity.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 03:43 PM
4

Oh, you think you can play then? Lets get down then. You think that the word is black and white, don't you? Damn, that's pretty simplistic. Yes, I do. The problem comes when our technology and laws are not up to the challenge of determining who is a rapist and who is a false accuser of rape, and there are plenty of both to go around. Until we are wearing neural implants that show both intoxication level and mental intent / consent, we're going to have to lay down rules, like all the human societ…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 03:32 PM
7

You're insane. Getting a girl drunk to where she can't consent and sleeping with her = rape Getting drunk together and having sex if you both consent = not rape Getting drunk together and having sex if she doesn't consent = rape For anyone who is female and disagreeing, think of it this way: You're at a party, you've had four drinks. You're coherent, but you wouldn't drive a car. Johnny Depp walks in, has two shots at the bar, then walks over to you and says- "You're the most beautiful woman I'v…
/r/MensRights15/08/11 02:49 PM
7

You can't be educated.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 04:19 PM
4

No more than men are objectified.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 02:28 AM
1

Which I would like to say is valid.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 05:47 PM
5

This critique is only applicable when it's used as an argument. For instance: Sometimes feminist ideals claim oppression by the male dominated privileged group, by claiming that language can be used as a method by which to perpetuate stereotypes, thus roles, thus continue the culture of oppression. Therefore, the argument goes, don't call us cunts, because it's not just an insult, it's basically hate speech. I agree with matthabitat that we should be focusing on actual issues, but I also think t…
/r/MensRights13/08/11 04:58 PM
5

I am afraid that when it comes time, I won't have the means to replace the battery in my cardiac pacemaker that keeps my chances for longer life in a good state. I am afraid that I will die before my parents. I am afraid that most men will continue to be silent / ignorant on the issues that are affecting us. I am afraid that I will not have the personal strength to be victorious in the matter of my dreams, in a world that is so incredibly fucked up.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 09:24 PM
8

Also, a rape victim deciding the first thing she wants to do after being raped is be alone with a guy she met a week ago? Come on. This.
/r/MensRights12/08/11 08:42 PM
5

Two comments. In my higher education, I saw a professor cite a study where at minimum, 5-10% of fathers are cuckolded in the united states with at least one child. Second item: I had an experience once , where i was narrowly saved by a family friend from becoming one of those men. I dated a girl for about a year. We broke up. About three months later, she called me out of the blue, and we had sex once. I used protection. Afterwards (exactly one month later) she called claiming pregnancy. I broug…
/r/MensRights09/08/11 03:37 PM
4

For heterosexual women, feminism can be a nightmare. Women are the only oppressed group who are expected to love their oppressor. But please stop trying to play nice. Until we overthrow male supremacy and admit that male power is the problem, not radical feminism, nothing will change. :( Please go see this interview
/r/MensRights08/08/11 11:38 PM
1

As already stated: "My argument is that common sense makes the answer obvious. Of course women who've had previous sexual partners have a greater tendency to initiate divorce. This is obvious to anyone who understands women." Already addressed, see last post. Your response is just a lot of words strung together that aren't at all relevant. I'm sure that's just how it appears to you. To everyone else it's called logical argument. Don't feel bad, theoretical physics makes me feel that way. You jus…
/r/MensRights03/08/11 01:41 PM
1

Ugh. My argument is that common sense makes the answer obvious. Of course women who've had previous sexual partners have a greater tendency to initiate divorce. This is obvious to anyone who understands women. So, your argument is now Women who have had previous sexual partners have a greater tendency to initiate divorce. This is obvious to those who understand women. I don't understand women. Dude, Begginging the Question (sort of), Ad Hominem, Personal Attack Fallacy, Appeal to Authority all a…
/r/MensRights02/08/11 10:07 PM
1

I have a hard time swallowing that, especially when you ignore well structured argument, and then repeat logically invalid ones, over and over again. What is the fundamental difference between marriage and having sex with someone? What defines it ? Oh no, It's not that you take vows to stay with someone forever (lifelong contract) and sign a piece of paper and file it with the state government (lifelong contract) which if it's violated is put to the test in a court of law (contract) , no not at …
/r/MensRights02/08/11 02:13 PM
1

Hi. Community college isn't that expensive. You should look into it! May I suggest introductory courses in philosophy before you continue making a complete ass of yourself on the internet?
/r/MensRights02/08/11 03:44 AM
1

Marriage is currently a legal contract. Defining it as a subset is incorrect. –noun a set that is a part of a larger set. No, i disagree. And while I agree that it's ludicrous to punish people for ending a relationship, wanting to punish people for breaking their legal contracts (marriage) is ok. If it's not wrong to promise to never fuck anyone else for the rest of your life and put that in a legal contract, and then break it - Then it's not wrong for you to contract work with me legally and fo…
/r/MensRights01/08/11 11:30 PM
1

What I'm saying is it's ludicrous to punish people for wanting to end a relationship. relationship does not equal marriage. Marriage is different. You are using the terms as if they were the same. This is your logic. It's Okay to quit doing A. therefore, you are wrong because you said it's wrong to quit doing B. Not the same , you troll. Then you follow that uneducated troll of an argument with: Since A is true, and you disagree you are stupid If you are stupid, every opinion is false. So if a s…
/r/MensRights01/08/11 11:13 PM
1

Precisely. How is it , that a contractor can sign a contract, and if the company defaults, the company is liable for losses but if a person signs a contract and they default you want them to be not liable? Is that what you are saying?
/r/MensRights01/08/11 10:56 PM
2

Oh man. Let me break it down for you , you moron. Description of Appeal to Ridicule The Appeal to Ridicule is a fallacy in which ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an "argument." This line of "reasoning" has the following form: X, which is some form of ridicule is presented (typically directed at the claim). Therefore claim C is false. Your argument is: Virgins have a better chance of not divorcing. This is because it has been proven by a journal article. My counter: The cited jo…
/r/MensRights01/08/11 10:53 PM
1

No, I'm not saying she deserves money. I'm saying he defaulted on a life long promise. Should she not be compensated for that? How do we compensate for that? These problems abound.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 10:46 PM
1

First off, your situation is obviously deplorable, and I feel for you, and even my best empathy would be probably a hollow gesture at best, but suffice to say I'm enraged for you. I think your whole theory about attracting the right woman is bunk. I'm a "strong" man and I attracted a "strong" woman You certainly have the right to your opinion. You may be correct. Your experience is valid, and relevant. I think our definitions of strong might be quite different. I wasn't necessarily talking about…
/r/MensRights01/08/11 10:21 PM
1

Or her own, for that matter.
/r/MensRights01/08/11 09:33 PM
1

Men aren't being "dominated" in family situations because they aren't manning up enough. It's because the law is flatly against them. Yes, this is true, that the law is flatly against us. But the instigators of the manipulative behavior is the woman in your example, correct? Then I would think we would want to examine the root cause of the manipulative behavior. Why is it, when the laws are skewed against us, that our ex-significant others are using the laws, when they don't have to? That's the …
/r/MensRights01/08/11 09:10 PM
1

There are MANY breadwinners out there, men especially, who are stuck in marriages and suffer physical, mental, emotional, and sexual abuse at the hands of their spouses on a regular basis. Divorce means the loss of their kids and financial security so they stay. You won't hear any popular songs, or watch any popular TV shows dealing with this issue, but this is the true underbelly of marriage. This is an interesting and valid point because now we are no longer discussing how the laws affect men …
/r/MensRights01/08/11 05:38 PM
1

But life isn't about being EQUAL, it's about having a FAIR chance given your circumstances and opportunities I like when women understand that they have certain advantages and disadvantages over men. That makes the dialog on how to resolve our differences go so much more smoothly. All the mainstream feminist thought I've ever been able to get through seems to insist this isn't the case. But I can prove it anytime, and anywhere. Kudos and upvotes.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 07:00 PM
2

I must be crazy for taking in all the data available to me You aren't taking in data, or analyzing it in any useful way , at least from what I can see from here. Conflicts of interest are always to be avoided. Of course women who are virgins are going to be more likely to be faithful than women who have slept with many men. If you don't understand this, you don't fucking understand women Yes. I have such a massive mis-understanding of women that I think of them as human beings. Pardon my mistake…
/r/MensRights30/07/11 06:57 PM
1

My future marriage, at this point , based on demographic, stands an objective 65% chance of success right now. If I wait to have a child for over a year after I get married, that chance will be above 70%. So as is stands, I only even have to worry about divorce and the horrors therein as a less than one in three chance. Added financial benefits of marriage on one side, ~10 to 20% chance things go to pure shit (after prenup, other factors), I'm quite comfortable with my cost benefit being pretty …
/r/MensRights30/07/11 03:09 PM
2

Lol. Troll. Heritage foundation data is not independent scientfically peer reviewed information. Conservative church funded lobbies also don't fall under the category of valid science, due to conflict of interest, even if it looks good on the surface, or even if i happen to agree with some republican ideas. In other words, the data has been manipulated, and since you linked the article, you know that, so then you're a troll. Or crazy. good day sir.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 02:49 PM
0

Obviously something that anyone with emotions would understand. I'm talking about how my sister was emotionally, financially, and mentally harmed by her ex-husband. She did many things for him, but I C WAT ur doin therrr, and it's not going to work.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 02:40 PM
2

I agree with you. I also think it's going to be hard tho, going forward, to make sure that neither women or men are oppressed.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 02:37 PM
3

especially with your tendency to rely on "peer reviewed studies" over common sense I must be misunderstanding you here. Again, to distill what you just said, you said I was out of line for not going with my common sense. You put peer reviewed study in quotations, as if to infer it's lack of accuracy? So my common sense, which I am assuming you are implying tells me that way more people get divorced, is more accurate than a peer reviewed scientific journal? I'm just trying to get your logic strai…
/r/MensRights30/07/11 04:27 AM
1

Good advice, and I have an awesome relationship with them fortunately.
/r/MensRights30/07/11 01:14 AM
1

So are you trollin cause you want me to categorically ignore you, or was there a point that I missed?
/r/MensRights29/07/11 10:41 PM
3

Yeah. I'm not understanding why this isn't getting upvoted like crazy. Perhaps this is a good time , since I new , to ask about these downvote bridages I keep reading about?
/r/MensRights29/07/11 10:36 PM
2

Allright. As a book lover, I am actually going to, lets suspend the discussion until then, yeah?
/r/MensRights29/07/11 09:17 PM
5

Upvoted for sanity.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 09:16 PM
2

Yes, but as I said, that's like talking about getting rid of the police department if there's no crime. No, that comparison is a straw man argument. Stop trying to cycle back to it. I'm not that uneducated. "To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by replacing it with a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position." AAAND.... but that particular case will…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 09:15 PM
1

Ok, so I read all of this, and your articulation is such that: You're telling the truth, and you're not a troll. or You're a really, really good troll. Now, I think it's the former, and that you aren't a troll. But here is what you have to do for me, if you want us to enter into a discussion where we can really exchange ideas: You gotta cite sources. Here's why: I see a serious logical flaw in making a claim that tax breaks for married couples are the result of state sanctioned male slavery.( ra…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 08:50 PM
6

I think you were going for Misandric Yeah, probably. :) What? Why do you think he should be punished for wanting to end a relationship? No what I said was, I was enraged that someone could take 7 years of my sister's time, and suffer no ill effects of any kind. She changed her life for him. She doesn't have 40 million dollars. She needs to work, to build a life for herself. She stopped doing that to be with him. He goes on to the next phase of his life, whatever he's doing. She starts over, minu…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 08:26 PM
2

Still incredibly crazy imho.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 08:14 PM
2

Unfortunately churches conflict with my philosophical systems.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 08:12 PM
5

I'm not going to respond to most of this, because it's really silly, but I do want to say one thing: It shifts the dynamic, emasculating you Something I would like to see in Men's Rights, is the concept that our masculinity is OUR OWN, and that we don't allow it to be taken. A woman can't take your masculinity if you don't allow it. They may take our lives, but they will never take our freedom! And the book looks very interesting, but I would need to see the peer-reviewed science behind the clai…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 08:10 PM
6

True statement. But then you miss the legal and financial benefits therof. I realize there is risk, but there is also risk in the other direction too.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 07:50 PM
2

In my case, the numbers are over 50%. Something closer to 60 or 70. At minimum half, even at a conservative estimate. (Factors, Age, family history, education history.) As far as: Not comparable. Your hypothetical "never leave each other" is a pipe dream, similar to my "no crime". "Low crime rates" would be more accurately represented with something like a golden marriage. Let me restate my point then. Either the marriage will fail, or it won't. The net result of choosing to marry in the case of…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 07:47 PM
2

I never called you misogynistic. And this statement: How about the misandry directed toward a fellow that is trying to help you? Suggests you don't understand the meaning of the word. It means the hatred of men or boys. Perhaps another word would suit you better. Your next comment: Dude if ever I virtually met anyone that should get married, it's you. The word virtually means , almost, or just about. So you said: Dude, if ever I just about met anyone that should get married, it's you. I'm assumi…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 07:16 PM
3

It's not a hypothetical. Either we stay together , or we don't. There is a probability for both. Then the choices are , get married or not. Now, obviously, we are well versed on the pitfalls of marriage in the case of divorce, but it does bear discussion on the other possibility. So to answer your argument, I give a shit. You should too, imho. Arguing one side of an issue never works. Edit: proof in case - logical failure. You said that this argument is the same as "what's the downside of gettin…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 06:42 PM
2

First off I think you have zero chance of staying faithful to this woman if half of what you're writing is true It's a nonzero chance, first of all in any case, and dividing my years of sexual activity vs . number of women....... 3.5 a year. Is that so out of line? LEGAL marriage is literally for her. It is NOT for you Actually I'm going to get legal tax breaks, and should she die I'll get her life insurance, and control of our assets. When the shit hits the fan, and it will Hold up just a minut…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 06:34 PM
1

What really gets me is how you could ever rule for more than half. That's a huge logical fail.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 06:16 PM
3

Upvote for logical discussion first off. And I agree that the system and laws surrounding the system of marriage are in quite a mysandratic state. (I may have made that word up) But I did get to see my sister go through a divorce that her ex-husband initiated. It was awful. He was an extremely wealthy man who came from an exceeding wealthy family. They were together for 7 years, married for 5. My family is not exceedingly wealthy, but not bad off. One day, he came home, and asked for a divorce. …
/r/MensRights29/07/11 06:06 PM
9

Your argument as I understand it is as follows: She's asking me to marry her. If she really wanted to be with me, she wouldn't. My counter argument is that: She's not asking. This makes your first postulate untrue, and at this point your argument is logically invalid. Your counter to that is: I don't understand anything you are saying I can't understand anything you are saying because you didn't ,(sub postulate) and you must be equivalent to me. The biggest problem with Men's Rights as a forum i…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:43 PM
3

Here's the problem with that . She's already proven herself in situations like this before. I can't say I've said that exact thing, but many things like it. I want to state that your vitriol is serving a purpose here, because I think we might share an opinion that a large number of men never stop to consider the modus operandi of women, largely because they don't understand. And I keep answering you because I do think it 'spreads' the knowledge so to speak. And I have seen women, the vast , vast…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:36 PM
2

She's not asking. If you had read my posts you would understand that.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:22 PM
1

And to you , good sir.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:21 PM
2

LOL, one of my favorite things is humor, and sarcasm. Dude she doesn't even like you if she calls you a whore!?!? You're out of your fucking mind. Your blinded by the p@ssy. There is no hope IMO I'd be willing to bet I've been with 3-4 times as many women as you. I went through that phase at 17, and knew every possible pitfall of what men refer to as 'blinded by the p@ssy' by age 19. Nope. If this was about p@ssy, I would go get more p@ssy. It's not. Dude your saying things ever single sap, I me…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:19 PM
5

The possibility does exist.It's a good point, and I think more men would be better served by keeping this in mind. I also think that men could learn to give how THEY want to give, and interact how THEY want to interact with their world, without thinking that an idea like that is mutually exclusive with the realization that bad things may happen. It may be, but sometimes it isn't.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:09 PM
5

I wasn't stating fact as it pertains to my relationship, I was constructing postulates to ask the question, In the case that a relationship ends up lasting, what are the negatives of marriage?
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:05 PM
1

This is answered in as much detail by the state as I could muster below.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:03 PM
1

Thanks. I certainly paid my dues, so to speak.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 05:00 PM
1

Yes. Whenever I see anyone young getting married I want to throw bricks at their heads. I am old. In love? I would say fuck yes, but I better description would be it's more like like a ridiculous synchronicity. It's like, all my favorite attributes of all my favorite people got rolled into one person, and that person is female and has a huge rack and somehow thinks I'm a walking man-god. Like that.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:57 PM
4

Upvoted because in ALL statistical analysis, you must have a root understanding of the way they are organized. Generalized statements of a statistical nature are rarely what I could call 'true'. Also, as a side note, since my parents and her parents are still together, that actually ups our chances by quite a lot. And we are both older than 26, and we've both been to college.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:50 PM
4

Lets make a pretty crazy postulate. Bob and Susan will never leave each other. Lets make a less crazy postulate. Bob and Susan will have 2 kids. Now if these two postulates are true , what are the negatives of marriage? I guess what I'm saying is in the case your marriage doesn't fail isn't it an advantage? A seperate question, if a pre-nup is worthless why have it at all? Isn't a try at protecting yourself And one small other point or question, I'm 31, as mentioned, and this is not my first rod…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:45 PM
3

It's quite possible in the future, and has been true for the majority of my fiancée's and my relationship, that she has made more than me, just for the record. That may change. but it may not.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:45 PM
1

Yes. In fact, i've had discussions with my parents , and my fiancée.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:42 PM
2

Well put.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:41 PM
5

I can try, although it's a problematic, for this reason: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Friar_Tucks_Monastery/message/443 After you read that- wall of text crits you for 1000. If you read my responses, my family told me, "Never get married unless you can't avoid it. " When I was 7, i didn't understand at all. When I was 18 I understood even less. My parents wouldn't explain, and that was their answer to a lot of questions. I asked how I would know if I ever came to it, they just stated, "you'll k…
/r/MensRights29/07/11 04:28 PM
7

Both. All my life. *Edit: They couldn't be happier, by the way. It is funny advice however, and true. Kept me out of some trouble, probably more than I know.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:30 PM
6

I will, and I will. Oh and hello, I'm going to go read your conspiracy thread, looks interesting. And......for the sake of constructive discussion, what would be your main points against marriage? Or a link to a thread on it?
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:30 PM
7

I come from a family with a mother and father married my entire life. My parents have given me an example showing what a functional modern marriage should look like, along with the following advice, all my life: "Do not get married unless you have no other choice." I am 31, and have always followed that advice. Edit: Yes, there will be prenups, fyi. forgot to add that.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 03:18 PM
7

No. My desire to be married is my own. Massive flaws in the system of laws and society's concept of marriage aside, I have my own concept of marriage with my wife-to-be. Being pro Men's Rights does not mean that I must also necessarily be anti-marriage, whatever the concept.
/r/MensRights29/07/11 02:49 PM
–

. Is that just as bad as being a virgin from a womans point of view? It's not their business how many people you sleep with. If they ask, it's an IOI, agree and amplify. "ten billion. " "Only one, scarlett johanssen. Oh, that's her calling now." "No, totally a virgin, i'm saving my soul for satan. Did I mention I love cults????" and so on. You're focused on your dick. Stop it. Focus on reading everything on the sidebar, ten times. (including the sex god method)
/r/askTRP
–

You have a normal, standard, run-of-the-mill dick. Get over it. It's more than enough. Get it out of your head, and go read the sidebar and work on yourself - you know, lifting, career, reading, etc. To make a comparison, some guys are 6'4". They are more attractive to women. Some guys are 5'0". They are less attractive. Most guys are like 5'10" or whatever. Not tall, not short, just medium. But medium is fine. Be grateful, you're not five feet. Can't change it. Move on to things you can change.…
/r/askTRP
–

I'm 21 and loath being called a child Truth hurts, grow up. If I tell you that you're a pink elephant, are you going to be insulted? Fuck no! Cause you know you aren't a pink elephant, you're a human. And you know that. But if you were fat, and I called you fat, you might get pissed, because maybe you're not happy with yourself, and you're angry that I forced you to face your denial . So, your sister, who grew up with you and thus knows you pretty well, is pushing your buttons, cause she knows y…
/r/askTRP
–

But if I had my perfect body, I wouldn't have to worry about shit. oh, if only it were this easy. It gets massively easier, buuuuut..... You can talk your way into a girls pants if you're not ripped, but if you're 600 lbs, it's a lot harder , or impossible. And that's even if you're a god at talking women's pants off. Don't ignore the other parts of your game. You wouldn't stop working out to just run game. So don't neglect your game just to work out. Don't become mentally 600 lbs of lazy no gam…
/r/askTRP
–

Stop looking at the bigger picture. You have to chunk this stuff. I am not going to be spinning HB10s So start with 5's. Then once you can spin 5's, then get 6's. Then once you can do that, move on to 7's. Chunk your issues into manageable problems. And guess what, to a 4'11' woman, you might as well be taller, so just accept that your dating pool for much hotter women is going to be maybe limited to short chicks. So what? average looking, or cute nerdy girls. No party sluts. No super fun girls …
/r/askTRP
–

First off, lol high school or middle school. Jesus christ. Second off : From the sidebar: The Red Pill: Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men. And I feel like I would have to reach pretty fucking far to get from sexual strategy to helping you win your middle school election, so... What is the nicest way you can think of for me to tell you 'wrong forum, fuck off?"
/r/askTRP
–

Your alpha traits must be balanced with your beta. In the right situation, telling a woman you love her can make her follow you around forever. If you are telling women this, and they are bailing, you are acting waaaaay too beta, and need to cut that out, and add more alpha behaviors. It's clear that you're saying this too much, too early. Way too early.
/r/askTRP
–

Only if field work doesn't follow. Hypotheticals are what start the process. They have their place.
/r/askTRP
–

Dunno. He messaged asking what lifting would do. I gave a huge response, asked if he wanted help putting together a program. No response.
/r/askTRP
–

Because it's essential. Let me say it again, because it bears repeating: Lifting is essential Not good, not optional, not skippable, not great, not suggested: Lifting is essential.
/r/askTRP
–

I hate to be the one to tell you this, but you're pretty far beta-ized. We've been talking for a while but nothing exclusive. I'm guessing you haven't slept together, or aren't old enough to sleep together. What pissed her off was I told her yesterday that I wanted to move on because I sensed a lot of drama and also she didn't seem very interested Three huge problems here: You're so feminized, that instead of informing her you're moving on, you're discussing feelings (want to move on, vs 'i'm mo…
/r/askTRP
–

If you want an answer , ask a question, provide details. Stop beating around the bush like a woman.
/r/askTRP
–

Kegels. No, really. Kegels. Look up tantra. When you beat off, stop right before you finish, repeat this over and over until you can mentally control yourself. Beat off several times before a date/ encounter. Think of baseball and dead children during sex.
/r/askTRP
–

Nah, they become teenagers. :) :)
/r/askTRP
–

Good. Lift and lift and lift and try and read as much RP as you can. Fundamentals until you graduate.
/r/askTRP
–

I dunno. Never been there. Be right back, I'll go take a look. ... ... Ok, Im back. Great, now I have fucking cancer. Lets boil this bitch down. Top ten posts in askfeminists translated | Top Voted Answers, Translated IF a girl has had any alcohol, is any sex rape? | Yup, it's rape. I was circumscised w/o my permission at birth, isnt that fucked? | Nope, cause you're a man. I agree that all sex is rape, so what about sex for only procreation? | You're unattractive, and fucked up. Feminists disav…
/r/askTRP
–

No, apparently I misjudged edward, but maybe it's because you post in half the threads here. Can you blame me when you camp out here 24/7 with the subtle trolls? Here's some of your greatest hits in TRP, before you delete them: http://imgur.com/a/BPSsF
/r/askTRP
–

doesn't seem too effective when talking about success with women. Wait, so high sexual market value doesn't do it? Bullshit. When I think of guys I know who are successful with women, they are rarely well rounded. They have one thing about them that pulls women in. Is it more important to be extremely strong in one area, or pretty strong in several? This is excellently addressed in ladder theory. "...your theory sucks.' I can see how one could come to this conclusion since I state that women wan…
/r/askTRP
–

asdfasdf832's account is 3 days old.
/r/askTRP
–

Wow, what a troll argument. A girl who got an eyebrow piercing and took it out might not have slept with 20 guys. Now, is an eyebrow piercing alternative, possibly risk seeking, and sometimes indicative of a slut? Yeah, but maybe one thing didn't lead to the other. You can unpierce an eyebrow. You can't unfuck 20 guys. Why am I even engaging a 2 day old troll account? That's a better question. Getting soft in my old age.
/r/askTRP
–

Yeah, I've been here for more than (looks at your account) 2 days. Giving sound advice and helping out.
/r/askTRP
–

I see your reasoning behind a lot of this, but a lot of this doesn't make sense to me. No tattoos. Not even the butterfly on an ankle. I agree heavily tatooed girls are a red flag, but one tattoo? I disagree. It's not 1960. No odd piercings, and no scars where one was present. So no one can ever change? Ok, you're now a beta forever. WTF. Doesn't drink regularly/socially. I know a gaggle of hardcore republican red pill traditionalist women, and if you take away their wine they will shoot you wit…
/r/askTRP
–

The following types of women are more likely to be more 'rp'; Country girls (move to rural Texas/Montana/New Mexico /etc). Religious girls. Foreign girls. Socioeconomically very low girls. There are some others, but every group comes with it's downsides. Like religious girls can be intolerable to me. I grew up country, so that's my cup of tea, but I could see how it could fuck with some people. How did I find mine? A long time ago, I became very honest about how I felt about feminism. So, women …
/r/askTRP
–

Dude I always respect aggressive men who can go into battle verbal or otherwise and come out the other side without resentment. This is how two men discuss and argue . i just wish it could have been over a beer instead of over the Internet.
/r/askTRP
–

Now that I've written this all out, it suddenly occurs to me that the hamplanet factor totally overrides everything else. What kind of women use IVF and raise a kid solo? Feminists! Ugly, fat, stupid feminists. An attractive women has no problem getting married ! You're fucking your genetic lineage here: All your offspring are not only raised without a male presence, but they are just that much fatter, shorter, dumber, and poor. If you handpick a hot smart girl, your genetics are not only booste…
/r/askTRP
–

you should grow up. You keep saying this without addressing the argument. You're young, and you're uneducated in evolutionary biology. I get it man, I really do. Dawkins is a beginner's book. If you had any real study you wouldn't be so fervent to defend him.
/r/askTRP
–

Genetics is science, not metaphysics. YOu are right about that. Now show me dawkin's data. OH WAIT. It was a metaphysics book, that's right. There wasn't any. And guess what? The gene-centered view of evolution (that dawkins fostered) hinges significantly on the assumption that acquired characteristics aren't inheritied, and epigenetics is blowing that assumption out of the water. The hard science of phosphorylate tagging of nucleotides and other emerging epigenetic evidence ruins this shit. Now…
/r/askTRP
–

So you donate your sperm, and are not around as a father figure, to 5 women. Of those 5 women, 1 guy is an incurable incel so never reproduces, one guy gets married, but since he's a beta he gets cucked and his kids arent his, one dies in a car accident, one of a drug overdose because dad wasn't around, and one gets married and has two daughters, but since he's weak, his wife and girls are dominant and super fat, and they never find husbands because they are hamplanets. Due to natural and sexual…
/r/askTRP
–

Really ? Gonna throw 1970's metaphysics at me in the age of epigenetics ? You know Dawkins has abandoned much of his original positions as hard science has progressed , right ? Fucking amateur hour .
/r/askTRP
–

Not when they get selected against and disappear .
/r/askTRP
–

You're looking at this the wrong way. Yeah, keep it coming to the guy with the bio degree. Insects, fish, mammals, all reproduce as much as possible. There are many reproductive strategies in the animal kingdom, ours is a species that actually invests a ton in the quality of reproduction (even at the physical level) and not the quantity (which is common of complex higher order animals). I mean I see that you listened to 5 minutes of high school bio but you have your wires crossed. Homo sapiens s…
/r/askTRP
–

No, overwhelming scientific research indicates you need a devoted (to the child) male presence in the formative years, and that cuckolds don't cut it. Garbage idea. What's the point of passing on your genetics if they're broken.
/r/askTRP
–

Great. Now read the entire sidebar. I FUCKING MEAN IT. I'll slap you with a dead salmon in the gooch if you come back here and start asking shit without reading every god-damn link in that sidebar.
/r/askTRP
–

I appreciate the vote of confidence, but also we need the opposing views - even when they are wrong. An echo chamber does us no good, if we do that, we're no better than the feminists. Also your username is hilarious. I bet he really did have a hairy ass.
/r/askTRP
–

think I'm a player and that makes them cautious. Been there, it's a huge plus, it just means you have to game them for a longer amount of time. So, when not texting for awhile I think they honestly get scared away that I'm just going to try to use them. This is really simple stuff, if you think about it the right way. If you think you're being too beta, add lots more alpha. In this case, I think you are suspecting you are being too alpha, don't be afraid to add more beta comfort. Experiment, and…
/r/askTRP
–

Is this bad, especially when trying to set up a first meeting? No. It's hard to under-do texting, it's easy to overdo it. You're reading too much into this. It's like .05% learning when to text, and 99.95% having a high sexual market value. So instead of stressing whether you texted at the right time, because women aren't reacting to your meetups, look at your lifting regimen, your clothing, your job, etc. Raise your SMV. Are you lifting?
/r/askTRP
–

"Because I want to fuck you, and if you're already bringing a guy you plan to hook up with then I'm not going out Wait, you're willing to fuck her although she's married, but not if she brings another guy? Edit: Ooops, I need to read more in detail. You create boundaries as you wish. You can say 'I never sleep with women who are fucking other men. If I find out, they are done forever. It's how I roll'. That's fine.
/r/askTRP
–

How old are you, how old is the girl, how old is he.
/r/askTRP
–

We aren't here to promote or advertise. Lead by example. IF he sees your success and asks you how you do it, recommend TRP to him. Otherwise, I would keep your mouth shut. First rule of fight club bla bla bla.
/r/askTRP
–

Looking at the mom will predict her future. 90% of the time, it works every time.
/r/askTRP
–

Look at her mom. (in the digital age, how can you not have the opportunity?)
/r/askTRP
–

Is it? I graduated college a year ago, and before I start sinking in major hours and effort into this girl, I want to get my own life together first. I finally paid off my student loan debt, and now I plan on working through grad school to get my master's while working full time. It is that worrying. Let me tell you why. In this day and age, getting married is very very risky. For those of us that prioritize children and family, we have to mitigate this risk as much as humanly possible. Most wom…
/r/askTRP
–

Best Shape of my Life, healthy dead game, healthy life outside LTR. Sex is still drying up. LDR I'll wager 500 dollars on this: She's stepping out, either emotionally or physically. What do we mostly provide to women? What do they mostly provide to us? (if you don't know the answers to this, you need to go back to the sidebar, and also watch a lot of the cult of black phillip on youtube.) Whether you mean it to be this way or not, you cannot provide what you NEED to provide in an LTR at LDR dist…
/r/askTRP
–

Well, no matter what the situation, when you behave like this, you are a beta orbiter to this girl. You are giving away your emotional support without getting anything in return. please watch this video immediately before continuing to read Men and women cannot be friends. She's not your friend. She is using you. the solution: Stop hanging out with this girl. Now, as other responders have noted, she might have called you over in order you give you the opportunity to escalate with her, so she cou…
/r/askTRP
–

Allright, it's early and it sunday and I could be a bit less cranky, you're right. Here's the thing : This forum is 97% lost and broken men, who come here because every time they say anything in /r/theredpill they get ignored or downvoted to oblivion. The other 3% is guys for whatever insanely misguided reason, have chosen to make the almost certainly futile choice to attempt to help out with what they have learned. I spend 1-2 hours a week , wading through the endlessly repeating shitposts over…
/r/askTRP
–

This is asktrp. Not "I can't seem to get a post off the ground in /r/theredpill, so I'll go to /r/asktrp where only 80 people are kicking it, and hope my post generates some karma there." Delete this, post up in /r/trp. Also, this post is garbage.
/r/askTRP
–

Please slap me into shape. This is Oneitis, pure and simple. The cure? The same as it's been in the past twenty years. GFTOW (go fuck ten other women)
/r/askTRP
–

Well, contrary to popular belief, men NEED support systems. I finally found mine in college, I started college when I was 26, and I joined a fraternity. Those guys are my support group, brothers for life. If you aren't in college, and thus missed out, and can't find your support? Go find your local masons. Men only, adult fraternity. It will take time and effort, but you'll get what you want. Or post here. We're here for you man.
/r/askTRP
–

I asked her to hang Saturday, she said "We can" So, you sleep with her once, and open a second event, and she agrees. Good sign. If she's not responding much, you need to FUCKING read the SIDEbar and realize you're probably smothering her with texts. So maybe lay the fuck off. I say "can I come over around 6?" Wrong, wrong wrong. You don't ask. You tell. So, never say 'can I come over?" say "I'm coming over at 6" Get the phrase 'Can I' the fuck out of your vocabulary. Never say it again to a wom…
/r/askTRP
–

in years here, i've seen this all before. As I've said many times before, you're gonna have to do better than this, shitbag. You'll wear yourself out, and disappear, like all the other trolls. Nite nite.
/r/askTRP
–

keep on trolling! God, half of this is rote from the sidebar, the other half is total made up horseshit.
/r/askTRP
–

Relationship dynamics are not office dynamics. Irrelevant.
/r/askTRP
–

In this context, you're talking about pursuit, or the act of pursuing someone. The higher SMV partner (the male in this scenario you've put forth as the ideal, which is......sort of right) has no need to pursue the lower partner. The lower partner is consciously or subconscously aware that they are lower SMV, and therefore is driven to pursue the higher SMV partner. Buuuuuuuuuuut this is a very oversimplified, and sort of wrong view of relationships. It's still a kind of feminist thinking, in th…
/r/askTRP
–

Yeah. It's a photo of you, not you. The people that are into that, are usually 'photoshopped', so to speak. The biggest baddest alphas and captains of men that I know either hardly even look at it, or don't even have accounts.
/r/askTRP
–

You disagree with the increasing importance of social media? Yeah. It's a small piece of the social puzzle. It's small enough that you can totally ignore it (not have any instagram, facebook, twitter) and have the same amount of success with women than with it. Which is unlike lifting. Or your career. Lets not pretend that it is not a massive influence on today's youth It's a lot smaller than you think, clearly. Let me put it this way: If you were broke, with no education, and 300 lbs, and short…
/r/askTRP
–

It seems to be an increasingly important part of this generations lives. No. I have noticed that online popularity does a lot for social status and SMV It can help with preselection. Compared to being in shape, holding frame, dealing with shit tests well, having financial status? It's almost nothing. It's a tool. Perfect use of it can increase your SMV, but not enough for me to advocate. Time better spent? Gym, Career, In-person interaction, etc.
/r/askTRP
–

we still haven't had that beer begging, asking. You should be commanding, telling. So, next time: "Beer! thursday. Pick you up at 7." "Beer at john doe's bar monday night." However..... H: hmm H: fine. H: next Tuesday This isn't bad. Agreeing to meet you? Not shitty. At least it's a foot in the door at the very least. Run with it. Alphas seek sexual contact. Seek it.
/r/askTRP
–

Ask yourself: WWCTCD?
/r/askTRP
–

the only reason you are considering showing up at all, is because of your one-itis. Don't go. Go game other women. Get past it. The fact that you wanna make her jealous shows you're not over it. Go get over it. Go fuck ten other women.
/r/askTRP
–

Not much man. I came back a little while ago, glad to see you're still around dropping science.
/r/askTRP
–

Long time no see. :)
/r/askTRP
–

Ummmmmm...........I have no idea what you just said.
/r/askTRP
–

Good, a little better that time. Got insults, both overt and subtle, and you take a stab in the dark, hoping to hit a weak point and get a reaction. Buuuuuut the tone is still just flat, you need to reach out, and feign an olive branch for a minute to hook the reader. Even more so with someone used to dealing with trolls. And it helps to hook the reader if when you do that, you admit the trolling a little, so that you get a few sympathy points as well. You didn't do that. This is an exercise in …
/r/askTRP
–

You realize, of course, that you can't anger me. I don't know how many 3 month old account trolls come here to try and piss people off, you can get fucked with the rest of them. So used to this by now. Bye!
/r/askTRP
–

Not only are you offtopic, you're not offering him any help with what he posted. Either keep it to yourself, or explain yourself and try to help. The forum doesn't work for shit with an off-topic one sentence soundbite.
/r/askTRP
–

GFTOW. (go fuck ten other women) Come back and tell me after you've bedded ten more, that you still miss her.
/r/askTRP
–

TRP is about controlling you, not controlling others. If a woman you're with isn't dressing how you like, go get another woman. Don't be a douche and try and micromanage their clothing style.
/r/askTRP
–

I understand there is a lot I can improve But im not sure where. Again, not trying to be shitty, but pretty much everywhere. I've made changes including mandatory workouts, Good. making male friends Good. never complaining about anything to a girl, Uh, well passive agressive jealousy is a complaint. see: why, what's over there? Some old boyfriend?" What you said here, is this: "I'm jealous and scared of your previous attractions." Which is essentially saying 'I'm threatened by other men", and a …
/r/askTRP
–

"No, let's not go there, let's keep walking." I say "why, what's over there? Some old boyfriend?" laughing. Then she enters into a big huff saying "I'll go over there, but there's nothing over there, you don't trust me at all. You display lack of confidence and jealousy, which lowers your SMV, which results in a hard shit test from her. Not surprising. but it doesnt seem to work as she just keeps walking, so after 5 minutes I got up and followed her and tried a different tactic, physically huggi…
/r/askTRP
–

Hate to break it to you, but everything at least kind of fades, eventually man. If you're expecting the same feelings forever about the same chick for the rest of your life, I got news, they will change. That's not to say LTR's of decades and marriages can't work, but they always change somewhat. But I mean, I feel like you're less asking that and more worried, and wondering it bothers me? Where this is coming from. YOu don't seem very.....confident in her feelings towards you. Maybe you need to…
/r/askTRP
–

but slowly let things die. This doesn't work nearly as well as don't answer the texts or calls. In fact, if you're gonna next, get to it. Today is better than tomorrow. And if you've already been fucking a crazy person, You're already well within 'nexting' territory. Abundance mentality . Why hang on to crap, when there is so much more waiting out there?
/r/askTRP
–

Wall of crap crits you for 340,120. You die.
/r/askTRP
–

lemme see if this works Apparently it does, thought you couldn't link to TRP from here, and it would automod out. Good deal.
/r/askTRP
–

Done. Check your pm
/r/askTRP
–

think I just come off as too much of a 'nice' guy, and not douchey enough... which i've been changing Got a couple wires crossed here. Instead of typing it out again, i'm gonna be a douche (hah!) and PM you something I wrote a while back. It's not douchey the girls are after.
/r/askTRP
–

But when I shared my new-found motivation and goals with my relatives No point to this. Not their business. Stop airing your laundry to women, and keep it where it belongs. With your close male friends. This is a symptom of our feminized society. You've been taught to seek role models and knowledge from women, and you must learn that your tribe isn't the ones who bear children, it's the ones with dicks. I highly suggest pushing towards more TRP sidebar material, and also, maybe this book: http:/…
/r/askTRP
–

Estimate by multiplying whatever number she says by about 2x-4x.
/r/askTRP
–

When you first have to drop your fantasies, it's very depressing. But, if you don't give up, and keep digging, and learn more truth, you will find some very encouraging things at the bottom of the pile. In other words, I think everyone idealistic is depressed by the reality of things, but in the end, I wouldn't have it any other way, the way things are. It puts so much control in your hands, in the end. It means that you can make choices and get what you need, rather than just being screwed.
/r/askTRP
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter