~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MRAs Are Wrong About The White Feather MovementYour'e beautiful when you troll and grandstand and never address anything relevant to the topic ;-) | /r/MensRights | 23/09/17 01:37 PM |
| 1 | MRAs Are Wrong About The White Feather MovementBut I'm happy to block you on this account too, if that makes you feel better :D | /r/MensRights | 23/09/17 03:10 AM |
| 1 | MRAs Are Wrong About The White Feather MovementI wasn't talking to you, porky Too fucking bad Basement Dweller. I replied to you. What happened to me being blocked, idiot? Are you blind? Take a look at the name on the account, Dumbshit. When you're too much of a drama queen for Paul Elam & Co. to deal with, you need to review your strategy Not really. It just means that even simple, non-aggressive questions can set off people who aren't confident in their opinions. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/17 03:09 AM |
| 1 | MRAs Are Wrong About The White Feather MovementBecause they couldn't take the truth? ;-) | /r/MensRights | 23/09/17 02:40 AM |
| 1 | MRAs Are Wrong About The White Feather MovementYou're wrong. I can see at least 3 videos not critical of the MRM just on the 1st page. | /r/MensRights | 23/09/17 02:04 AM |
| 1 | MRAs Are Wrong About The White Feather MovementGreat~! At least you won't be offering any opinions ;-) | /r/MensRights | 23/09/17 01:52 AM |
| 1 | MRAs Are Wrong About The White Feather MovementFyi, you're blocked on that account. Now you're blocked on this one :p | /r/MensRights | 23/09/17 01:50 AM |
| 0 | Karen Straughan Doesn't Understand Government Spending [EXPANDED]If everyone else's dislike of the video is anything to go by It means somebody's Goddess got gored. Simple as that. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/17 01:52 AM |
| 1 | Karen Straughan Doesn't Understand Government Spending [EXPANDED]Karen Straughan and everyone who defends men's human rights have been subject to continuum of abuse Uh-huh. Sort like the way Stalin or Mao persecuted Christians. Sure thing Yup yup yup. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/17 01:48 AM |
| 1 | Karen Straughan Doesn't Understand Government Spending [EXPANDED]I'm not into reading comments on Reddit. Make a video :p | /r/MensRights | 04/09/17 01:46 AM |
| 1 | In Education: Girls Doodle Boys FloodleLMAO!!! And your point is...? You're the crybaby and you're as ego-centric as some Feminists, if you think that the intro is all about you. Fyi, the previous video you couldn't get much past 1/3 of is my most popular episode. So I guess I have no needs for your criticisms, or anyone's for that matter. Or you could just fuck off & not watch my videos at all. Wouldn't break my heart in the least. | /r/MensRights | 07/08/14 06:17 PM |
| -1 | In Education: Girls Doodle Boys FloodleI'm almost as old as you Why are you taking that personally, you said you got to almost 12 minutes ls time??? ;-) | /r/MensRights | 07/08/14 04:33 AM |
| 1 | Women in the MRM? (EEK!)Pot met kettle. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/14 01:55 PM |
| – | Women in the MRM? (EEK!)The only useful purpose you served is to give John and Dianna's opinion a wider audience I hope they don't die of embarrassment, as you will when he mirrors my video, because he knows I'm right. Everybody already knows Argumentum ad populum. You're spinning your wheels. Your childish hissy fits and personal attacks are more confirmation of denial. So you actually cannot back up your claims. Concession noted. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/14 01:52 PM |
| – | Women in the MRM? (EEK!)I'm not talking about AEI claim, just that they are gynocentric trad cons. Either way. He can back it up as a "generalized statement" if he wants. Bottom line is, WAF is broad and diverse and includes even some FeMRA's (as I pointed out,) so he's dead wrong. they just been pinching their nose at the stench trying not to let it bother them You mean at what they found out about 5 minutes ago? Just a bit of a lie posing anti-feminists as MRM, just sayin Care to back up that assertion? Credit goes t… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/14 01:43 PM |
| – | Women in the MRM? (EEK!)"11:50 losing argument" I thought it was pretty descriptive of his whole video, myself "I'm pretty sure John and Dianna knew this a long time ago, props for daring say it." Doubt it. John challenged me to back up my statements & I did if you go to the comments section of his video. He was asked by more than 1 person to validate his "AEI" claim & he has yet to do it. Pretty certain he knows I'm in the right. He asked if he could mirror the introduction version of the same video: http://youtu.be/A… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/14 01:28 PM |
| 2 | Thom Hartmann thinks jokes about Women's Bodies sexist, but not about Men's SchlongsIn this case, the women would have more balls than Thom. Think about the implications of that one. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/14 07:34 PM |
| 1 | Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone!I cited that to show that "friendzone" is a topic for nutballs. Once again you haven't bothered to even hear me out on the topic, and so you have no basis for this. I might also add that recently DoomRulz also did a video on this topic & it has bee covered by AVfM, plus my video on the topic has appeared in Men's Rights Weekly and been reblogged by MGTOW's, MRA's and funny, not a single PUA has shown up for it, afaik. Plus it's my best performing video in terms of views so far. So I'm going to c… | /r/MensRights | 15/06/14 01:37 AM |
| 1 | Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone!To elevate this to the status of men's rights issue is to de legitimise actual mens rights issues. That's absurd. And you have no place making that decision for others. ETA: Your source is a 1st rate nutball from hell. | /r/MensRights | 14/06/14 11:04 PM |
| 1 | Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone!PUA is based around "nice guys" trying to learn and being sold learning. Except that you apparently never watched the video, because that has fuck-all to do with what I am on about. Just because you say the nice guy thing is rooted in basic biology doesn't make it so. Let me know when you want to land on the same planet. Biological attraction is there and felt before there is "niceness" and conversations, that's the biology in action. So? This guy has written well about it. Only real notable thi… | /r/MensRights | 14/06/14 11:52 AM |
| 1 | Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone!About time the intelligent part of this subreddit showed up! | /r/MensRights | 12/06/14 12:52 AM |
| 1 | Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone!But if you search this sub alone, there are posts on the topic. It would appear this does need to be brought up, as too many so-called "MRA's" don't seem to have a clue who's side they are arguing on. | /r/MensRights | 12/06/14 12:49 AM |
| 2 | Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone!The friend zone is just a thing between a certain guys who think being nice generates sexual attraction Bullshit. It's actually a very realistic assessment of the fact that any male/female interaction can - biologically speaking - turn into something more. Spending time with someone, sharing inmost thoughts, etc - these are all headed somewhere. Its more PUA related Just because you state it, doesn't make it so. the main "red pill" writers have written about them being deluded and say pretty muc… | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 08:37 AM |
| 1 | r/mensrights Search results on Friendzone, Friend Zone, & Nice Guys, & the COOLEST new video on the topic + Great ResourcesFortunately Reddit is only a small part in the big picture of things, & not really effective. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 02:27 AM |
| 1 | r/mensrights Search results on Friendzone, Friend Zone, & Nice Guys, & the COOLEST new video on the topic + Great ResourcesWhen you get into the social realm, it isn't really a "rights" issue because you have zero rights to any social expectations. Except Feminism insists otherwise, so we address those issues. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 02:26 AM |
| 1 | r/mensrights Search results on Friendzone, Friend Zone, & Nice Guys, & the COOLEST new video on the topic + Great ResourcesStraw man argument if I ever heard one. If your dogs was a topic tied to gender-related issues, then of course it would be. FZ/Nice Guy issues are related to gender. Therefore, it's an MRA issue. 100%. FAIL | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 01:48 AM |
| 1 | r/mensrights Search results on Friendzone, Friend Zone, & Nice Guys, & the COOLEST new video on the topic + Great ResourcesStraw man argument if I ever heard one. If Atheism was tied to gender-related issues, then of course it would be. FZ/Nice Guy issues are related to gender. Therefore, it's an MRA issue. 100%. FAIL | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 01:47 AM |
| 1 | r/mensrights Search results on Friendzone, Friend Zone, & Nice Guys, & the COOLEST new video on the topic + Great ResourcesSince when does it have to be in the "legal" realm? And why are there several results from this subreddit on this very topic? | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 01:25 AM |
| 1 | r/mensrights Search results on Friendzone, Friend Zone, & Nice Guys, & the COOLEST new video on the topic + Great ResourcesThen why are there several results from this subreddit on this very topic? | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 01:24 AM |
| 1 | r/mensrights Search results on Friendzone, Friend Zone, & Nice Guys, & the COOLEST new video on the topic + Great ResourcesThen why are there several results from this subreddit on this very topic? | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 01:23 AM |
| 1 | r/mensrights Search results on Friendzone, Friend Zone, & Nice Guys, & the COOLEST new video on the topic + Great ResourcesLook out! It's a Nice Guy! DESTROY HIM!!11! by Karen Straughan. http://youtu.be/a9XDb0nxSO4 My video: Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone! http://youtu.be/lHIN1eKmx5E | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 01:23 AM |
| 1 | r/mensrights Search results on Friendzone, Friend Zone, & Nice Guys, & the COOLEST new video on the topic + Great Resourceshttp://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/27r3y8/yes_girls_there_is_a_friend_zone/ci4bkcs | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 01:21 AM |
| 1 | r/mensrights Search results on Friendzone, Friend Zone, & Nice Guys, & the COOLEST new video on the topic + Great ResourcesIt deals with how women treat men in a social sense and the confusion men experience in changing social roles. It deals with how Feminism calls the Friend Zone a misogynist concept. It has 100% to do with Men's Rights. Plus I got a request to do it based on my outspoken views on Feminism & Men's Issues. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 01:20 AM |
| -1 | r/mensrights Search results on Friendzone, Friend Zone, & Nice Guys, & the COOLEST new video on the topic + Great Resourcesbeep I'm sorry this question has already been answered. Please try another. | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 12:25 AM |
| -2 | r/mensrights Search results on Friendzone, Friend Zone, & Nice Guys, & the COOLEST new video on the topic + Great ResourcesDownvoters burn in HELL! | /r/MensRights | 11/06/14 12:23 AM |
| 2 | Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone!http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=friend+zone&restrict_sr=on http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=friendzone&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=nice+guys&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 11:39 PM |
| 2 | Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone!http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=friend+zone&restrict_sr=on http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=friendzone&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=nice+guys&restrict_sr=on&sort=relevance&t=all | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 11:39 PM |
| 1 | Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone!Nope. It deals with how women treat men in a social sense and the confusion men experience in changing social roles. It deals with how Feminism calls the Friend Zone a misogynist concept. It has 100% to do with Men's Rights. Plus I got a request to do it based on my outspoken views on Feminism. Nice try, though. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 11:20 PM |
| 0 | Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone!Even though Karen Straughan did a major video on it? | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 02:25 PM |
| 1 | Yes Girls, There is a Friend Zone!You are kidding me, right? | /r/MensRights | 10/06/14 02:24 PM |
| 0 | Real Talk Vol 4: The Psycho Bytch ReportKeep your fukking downvotes to YOURSELF!!! | /r/MensRights | 02/06/14 08:37 PM |
| 0 | Can we have a serious critique of Karen Straughan's talk at Ryerson?I look at this and go "Boy, I have read... a lame @$$ thread!" ;-) | /r/MensRights | 28/04/14 12:05 PM |
| 0 | Can we have a serious critique of Karen Straughan's talk at Ryerson?Doesn't seem like you have much of a real reason to "critique" her. Methinks you strain @gnats & swallow camels. | /r/MensRights | 22/04/14 07:44 PM |
| 0 | Diana Davison Reveals a Feminist tried to "out" her as an MRA at workAs she said, her coworkers believe in free speech. Because she got a good response from them. | /r/MensRights | 22/04/14 05:30 AM |
| 1 | Can we have a serious critique of Karen Straughan's talk at Ryerson?Would you feel the same way if Karen were male? Do some soul searching and determine for yourself whether you are being easier on her than a male or not. Nobody seems to be making it clear exactly what was wrong with Karen's talk that we should be critiquing? I have no criticisms, myself. No need to soul search at all. I've defended Elam/AVfM before, so no I don't think genetalia is a motivator, here. | /r/MensRights | 22/04/14 05:27 AM |
| 0 | Can we have a serious critique of Karen Straughan's talk at Ryerson?Nobody seems to be making it clear exactly what was wrong with Karen's talk that we should be critiquing? I have no criticisms, myself. | /r/MensRights | 22/04/14 05:24 AM |
| 2 | Diana Davison Reveals a Feminist tried to "out" her as an MRA at workEven so-called "Non-Feminist" businesses have to follow legal PC protocol. Or placate the women that work for/patronize them. | /r/MensRights | 20/04/14 07:22 PM |
| 1 | Please mark your own submissions with flair!Click on the "flair" link in the flat list (the list that says "comment source share save hide ...") Nothing of the sort shows up when I go there. | /r/MensRights | 17/04/14 03:42 AM |
| -1 | Dan Perrins strikes back at Adele MercierSorry, not feeling like being someone's white n___r today. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/14 02:23 AM |
| 1 | Dan Perrins strikes back at Adele MercierThis is the longest convo I've yet seen on a post that did nothing to discuss & evaluate the content therein. | /r/MensRights | 14/04/14 01:23 AM |
| 3 | Dan Perrins strikes back at Adele MercierGet a life. | /r/MensRights | 13/04/14 03:55 PM |
| 1 | DEATH THREAT Posted on Men's Rights Edmonton Website [Article by Fidelbogen]Says the troll with no proof of that assertion. | /r/MensRights | 10/04/14 12:39 PM |
| 2 | DEATH THREAT Posted on Men's Rights Edmonton Website [Article by Fidelbogen]The difference is Flapjack, Fidelbogen posted proof, RW did not. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/14 05:30 PM |
| 3 | DEATH THREAT Posted on Men's Rights Edmonton Website [Article by Fidelbogen]Has she ever shown proof? | /r/MensRights | 09/04/14 04:54 PM |
| 1 | Is Adele Mercier trying to say "Lights Out" to Typhon Blue?She is, but Mankind Global Media Network is my blog. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/14 05:04 AM |
| 1 | Is Adele Mercier trying to say "Lights Out" to Typhon Blue?This is not AVfM, Flapjack. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/14 03:06 AM |
| 1 | Is Adele Mercier trying to say "Lights Out" to Typhon Blue?What you've read is how it is. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/14 03:05 AM |
| 1 | Is Adele Mercier trying to say "Lights Out" to Typhon Blue?I don't think it's wrong to ask the question. You don't need evidence for that. | /r/MensRights | 09/04/14 03:03 AM |
| 5 | I'm getting real tired of the tone in the MR subreddit.Go tone police somewhere else. | /r/MensRights | 08/04/14 06:15 AM |
| 1 | Solution to Gender Sentencing Disparities Found? [The Onion]If this was linked to the video, it's not as clear that people would draw the connection via the ORIGINAL title. | /r/MensRights | 07/04/14 04:43 AM |
| 1 | Karen Straughan vs Naomi the brainwashed feminist. Full debate.Hi Karen - I looked around for that source, still couldn't find it. Could you by any chance provide it please & thanks. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/14 12:02 AM |
| 1 | RAINN's president stands behind comments distancing itself from "rape culture"I'm glad that so far, RAINN is sticking to their guns on disowning the term "rape culture." However, when they continue to endorse the Preponderance of Evidence standard on campus rape accusations, repeat dodgy stats like the 1 in 4 thing, and when they have yet to expand their definition of rape to include "made to penetrate," then they are clutching their pearls and trying to have it both ways. They are keeping vital aspects of Valenti's arguments - that men are almost all socialized to be pot… | /r/MensRights | 01/04/14 03:39 AM |
| 1 | Mankind Global Media Network: RAINN's Redemption? Not so fast! [An open letter.]The quote you're linking is basically twisting the dictionary-meaning around completely. No, it's not. dictionary.law.com: the greater weight of the evidence required in a civil (non-criminal) lawsuit for the trier of fact (jury or judge without a jury) to decide in favor of one side or the other. This preponderance is based on the more convincing evidence and its probable truth or accuracy, and not on the amount of evidence. merriam-webster: 1: a superiority in weight, power, importance, OR str… | /r/MensRights | 29/03/14 03:55 AM |
| 1 | Mankind Global Media Network: RAINN's Redemption? Not so fast! [An open letter.]As for the word "preponderance": The quality or fact of being greater in number, quantity, or importance. Here's a neat idea: Why not instead of trying to pump meanings into things based on some off-the-wall interpretation, some assumed meaning that you try to pump into a word, you familiarize yourself with legal terminology and it's common usage in context? You are making assumptions about "preponderance of evidence" that is so off the beaten path I would think you'd feel the cold winds blowing… | /r/MensRights | 28/03/14 12:58 PM |
| 1 | Mankind Global Media Network: RAINN's Redemption? Not so fast! [An open letter.]So, if they're doing this, there's something else than this going on. Or, they're just making it up and claiming to have a law backing it when they don't, hoping nobody will check. No offense, but you strike me as being kinda late to the party. | /r/MensRights | 28/03/14 08:26 AM |
| 1 | Karen Straughan - Feminism: Socialism in Panties @NHLF14No matter how much I like a particular MRA, when he or she starts "Commie-baiting," I tune out. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/14 03:09 PM |
| 3 | Mankind Global Media Network: RAINN's Redemption? Not so fast! [An open letter.]Here's some things that might help you better understand the Preponderance of Evidence issue: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/08/30/on_sexual_harassment_and_title_ix_111065.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_burden_of_proof | /r/MensRights | 27/03/14 02:59 PM |
| 4 | Mankind Global Media Network: RAINN's Redemption? Not so fast! [An open letter.]How the hell do you get this: Purpose: Prohibits gender discrimination in any educational program or activity that receives federal funds. Independent undergraduate programs may be single-sex programs, and an exemption is contained for religiously affiliated colleges if a conflict exists between Title IX and their religious tenets. ...out of "preponderance of evidence?" Do you even understand what the term means? Frankly, I don't really like this article, as it's written in the way that bratty t… | /r/MensRights | 27/03/14 02:30 PM |
| 1 | Mankind Global Media Network: RAINN's Redemption? Not so fast! [An open letter.]No one is moving the goalpost, I've never had a set goalpost to begin with. I meant RAINN. It's a sign of progress, not a sign of RAINN changing allegiance. Time will tell. | /r/MensRights | 27/03/14 04:18 AM |
| 1 | Mankind Global Media Network: RAINN's Redemption? Not so fast! [An open letter.]Giving alleged victims counseling is not the same as putting them in front of a college tribunal. If that's what is actually happening, as opposed to the norm which is that campus authorities are actually doing the whole enchilada. Now, if they still support the 'preponderance of the evidence' standard than that is troubling. And they are. That's why it casts doubt on the veracity of using campus staff to do things that might be better left offsite. Even the "counselling" can do that, & then the… | /r/MensRights | 26/03/14 10:06 PM |
| 2 | Women In Academia Are Less Likely Than Men To Cooperate With Lower-Ranked ColleaguesThey are always talking about a so-called "boys club" that leaves women out. | /r/MensRights | 19/03/14 05:04 PM |
| 2 | Women In Academia Are Less Likely Than Men To Cooperate With Lower-Ranked ColleaguesTHINK | /r/MensRights | 19/03/14 04:54 PM |
| 1 | Who here thinks this is an effective approach [Thx AVfM]LOL | /r/MensRights | 19/03/14 04:22 PM |
| 1 | Youtube video depicting Female Perpetrators of Violence under attack. MIRROR REQUESTEDThat's who requested the mirror! | /r/MensRights | 17/03/14 07:59 PM |
| 1 | No Parthenogenesis? No Objection!The view that life begins at fertilization reached acceptance from mainstream sources at one point. In 1967, New York City school officials launched a large sex education program. The fifth grade text book stated "Human life begins when the sperm cells of the father and the egg cells of the mother unite. This union is referred to as fertilization. For fertilization to take place and a baby to begin growing, the sperm cell must come in direct contact with the egg cell." Similarly, a text book use… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/14 11:16 AM |
| 1 | No Parthenogenesis? No Objection!You're knuckling under to Feminism and ignoring the science of human development. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/14 11:10 AM |
| 1 | No Parthenogenesis? No Objection!The arbitrary decisions made by various authorities on what constitutes life in the womb, so many months, first heartbeat, etc seems...wrong. How can we possibly pin down when a life becomes a life in the womb, is it ever until it's born, or is it the second that the sperm penetrates the ovum. The correct answer is: "When the genetic code is complete." | /r/MensRights | 16/03/14 11:08 AM |
| 1 | No Parthenogenesis? No Objection!No, it's Feminism bashing. Guilty as charged | /r/MensRights | 16/03/14 11:04 AM |
| 1 | No Parthenogenesis? No Objection!If you have a catchier term, by all means. But I think this phrase itself might work in a heated debate. | /r/MensRights | 16/03/14 11:03 AM |
| 1 | Girl VS Guy Pickpocket Experiment!Yes it is, we are talking about what is happening on the video, and if a cop sees that and doesn't stop he/she, the one that got robbed could sue him and their department. This is about how a group of people are presented with a situation where they get something stolen in secret and if they will "call it or not" How this is actually contradicting anything I said is beyond me. Might I suggest learning to write for clarity? Also, use Reddit formatting. Nope, you still only mocked the statement i … | /r/MensRights | 16/03/14 10:59 AM |
| 1 | Girl VS Guy Pickpocket Experiment!Yes cops do this, can't argue with that but this is not what we are talking about, that is a whole another can of worms. Actually, no it isn't. It's quite in the vein of an apologetic for a misandrist society. No, i'm right and you are wrong, and that is final!!! (that is what you wrote) Suit yourself. I clearly i said i made an assumption there and was before the "scientific" statement, i kept them separate. Also don't re-structure what i wrote to put in an attack. Never accused anyone of being… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/14 02:10 AM |
| 0 | No Parthenogenesis? No Objection!It's a poorly thought out reaction to feminist behavior, in my opinion. Most people have never heard of the word parthenogenesis, let alone understand it. A perfect opportunity to educate them, and explain it in the context of the inter-dependency of the sexes. And why fish need bicycles. Imo, if women create a female sperm, that's fine with me. I don't see it as "the end of men"...In fact, I see people with that attitude to be entirely sensationalist. Even if it became wildly popular, men would… | /r/MensRights | 16/03/14 01:18 AM |
| 1 | Girl VS Guy Pickpocket Experiment!Yeah except it isn't. You could argue that it's a phenotypic trait, but then so would having 10 mates. Humans choose to hate other because they can be assholes if they so choose to. if you think you shouldn't stop a woman for committing a crime because she is a woman then you are just an imbecile. And that's why the cops often arrest the man during a DV call based on VAWA, regardless if she was the primary or even sole aggressor. Society is imbecilic. Point rejected. Granted it was a generalize … | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 07:57 PM |
| 1 | Girl VS Guy Pickpocket Experiment!How do you know men are less likely to do this? Would you not have called her out? or this is mainly a male trait? Because you decided to give me the "women called her out, too" argument, I gave you a trait in females tht may explain why more men wouldn't. Both sides in my opinion are mostly populated by good people. Aw, how smarmily sweet, Let's all hold hand s& sing 'kum bah-yah." It is just the ones that don't stop talking and just lash out hate that are the problem. This video is fuel for th… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 11:37 AM |
| 1 | Girl VS Guy Pickpocket Experiment!Ahh sudoscience Pseudoscience. Learn to spell. The first clip he sued them all and won. What the hell are you talking about? The second one is.. they are assholes. A big world full of stupid people. But still, you really think this is proof of anything other than that those people are idiots is beyond me. Clearly you re just dancing around the issue. The "Slap" video is only an example of something that happens on a regular basis. Not so much dogpiling on a guy for defending himself, but women i… | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 09:42 AM |
| 2 | Girl VS Guy Pickpocket Experiment!"Women and children 1st." | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 09:32 AM |
| 1 | Girl VS Guy Pickpocket Experiment!I'd bet that if the experimenters and camera crew were interviewed at length, we'd get told a lot more than what's seen in an edited video that likely would support the main point. OR... you could just go here: http://youtu.be/V4akMaeZ0-k OR EVEN ...here: http://youtu.be/-57-i1S95Kk Lots and lots of these kinds of anecdotes happen all the time and have done so for years. Remember what they said on the Titanic? | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 12:18 AM |
| 2 | Girl VS Guy Pickpocket Experiment!I'd bet that if the experimenters and camera crew were interviewed at length, we'd get told a lot more than what's seen in an edited video that likely would support the main point. OR... you could just go here: http://youtu.be/V4akMaeZ0-k Lots and lots of these kinds of anecdotes happen all the time and have done so for years. Remember what they said on the Titanic? | /r/MensRights | 15/03/14 12:12 AM |
| 3 | Mothers leave work because they don't want to behave like working men, study suggests -- ScienceDailyHa ha ha ha ha ;-) You're funnnnny. Like there's never been women behind all that, insisting men work those extra hours, rewarding them with a relationship if so. Checkmate denied. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/14 11:55 PM |
| 1 | Suggested response to the #BanBossy thing: #OwnItDontBanItGalk~! | /r/MensRights | 13/03/14 05:53 AM |
| 2 | Suggested response to the #BanBossy thing: #OwnItDontBanItDownvoters DIE IN A FIRE! | /r/MensRights | 12/03/14 06:44 PM |
| 1 | Negative response to #BanBossy (with images, tweets)· Storify [we should have been put our two cents in, so next time something's trending get on twitter and represent for men and boys]http://underthegoddess.blogspot.com/2014/03/suggested-response-to-banbossy-thing.html Our response to #BanBossy? How about #OwnItDontBanIt | /r/MensRights | 12/03/14 05:44 PM |
| 1 | We need to act on #BANBOSSY it's trending and we need MRA's to remind people that boys are the ones failing in schools right now!http://underthegoddess.blogspot.com/2014/03/suggested-response-to-banbossy-thing.html Our response to #BanBossy? How about #OwnItDontBanIt | /r/MensRights | 12/03/14 05:44 PM |
| 1 | Google supports #BanBossyhttp://underthegoddess.blogspot.com/2014/03/suggested-response-to-banbossy-thing.html Our response to #BanBossy? How about #OwnItDontBanIt | /r/MensRights | 12/03/14 05:43 PM |
| 1 | Debunking the Men’s Rights MovementI dont see a commenter with that name? | /r/MensRights | 12/03/14 05:41 PM |
| 1 | Democrat lawmaker to revive bill on interstate compact among state father registriesHeh? | /r/MensRights | 12/03/14 06:27 AM |
| -22 | Ha, ha, ha! Ya'right, women can do anything men can. Just look at the Ukraine.B3c4u53 !'m 1 h0ttt d00d | /r/MensRights | 08/03/14 05:20 PM |
| 1 | An attempt to find common ground between the Feminist and Mens Rights movements - SimilismDon't think we're ready. Maybe few years down the road after the Feminists have gotten fatigued a bit. But right now, agitating for Men & Boys needs to be the focus. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/14 09:01 AM |
| 4 | News analyst calls the double standard of female teacher sex offenders SYSTEMIC DISCRIMINATIONBecause she isn't. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/14 08:21 AM |
| 2 | Feminist Guardian newspaper extensively covers rape allegations against Nile Ranger, then fails to print a single word about his acquittal. Please submit a complaint.gasp The word "Feminist" is in the title~! /s | /r/MensRights | 08/03/14 07:38 AM |
| 1 | Ha, ha, ha! Ya'right, women can do anything men can. Just look at the Ukraine.If there's any doubt, find me the women here: http://youtu.be/5SBo0akeDMY | /r/MensRights | 08/03/14 07:19 AM |
| 1 | Ha, ha, ha! Ya'right, women can do anything men can. Just look at the Ukraine.If there's any doubt, find me the women here: http://youtu.be/5SBo0akeDMY | /r/MensRights | 08/03/14 07:19 AM |
| -29 | Ha, ha, ha! Ya'right, women can do anything men can. Just look at the Ukraine.Go away. | /r/MensRights | 08/03/14 07:15 AM |
| 0 | Ha, ha, ha! Ya'right, women can do anything men can. Just look at the Ukraine.Read it @home... | /r/MensRights | 06/03/14 03:17 AM |
| 2 | Oregon is trying to put the ERA on the ballot in November. [VIDEO]It's an attempt to amend the constitution in order to make gender equality the law of the land. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/14 02:59 AM |
| -3 | Eric Holder makes case for felons to get voting rights back [ 5.8 million Americans are not allowed to vote because of felony convictions, nearly 38 percent are black.] Compassion for men is A GOOD THING!How dare he! He should do like Reagan did and court the KKK! ;-) | /r/MensRights | 04/03/14 08:12 PM |
| -5 | What would Feminists do without stereotypes to further their mythology?So you I know you're in the the enforcing of freedom limiting rules is wrong, I you do it stage civil disobedience anyway, and you expect us to be blown away by your tenacity and turn away from expect you to continue in your wrongheaded, horrible, misguided rules of the sub regardless of the fact that this is not how it was founded, and "Men's Rights vs. Anti Feminism" is a clear false dichotomy that anyone with the intelligence of a banana slug ought to be able to understand. FIFY | /r/MensRights | 04/03/14 07:58 AM |
| -7 | What would Feminists do without stereotypes to further their mythology?Feel free to not bother me with your "It's about Men's rights not Feminism" shaming. It won't work here. | /r/MensRights | 04/03/14 03:37 AM |
| 1 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?we are now at the point as a movement that we either work and become stronger or we just stay on here bitching and becoming the male equivalent of tumblr feminists. I don't see it that way. I see what was a safe space here for men has now been violated and there's such confusion that no one knows who to trust. Potential allies are also put off by losing your edge, believe it or not. Formatting help is always a link below your reply box. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/14 06:50 AM |
| 2 | Karen Straughan vs Naomi the brainwashed feminist. Full debate.There is no insult like the truth. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/14 06:08 PM |
| 2 | Karen Straughan vs Naomi the brainwashed feminist. Full debate.Mhmmm, lots. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/14 04:04 PM |
| 2 | Karen Straughan vs Naomi the brainwashed feminist. Full debate.Nope. I believe it's a POSSLQ arrangement. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/14 03:58 PM |
| 2 | Karen Straughan vs Naomi the brainwashed feminist. Full debate.NW cut you off when you tried to explain it, I noticed. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/14 03:56 PM |
| 3 | Karen Straughan vs Naomi the brainwashed feminist. Full debate.She really has been in front of a TV camera the most. Wore a red dress, even. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/14 03:46 PM |
| 2 | Karen Straughan vs Naomi the brainwashed feminist. Full debate.Mugs for the camera a lot, too. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/14 03:35 PM |
| 2 | Karen Straughan vs Naomi the brainwashed feminist. Full debate.Excellent job & thank-you Karen. I hope you'll post your sources for some of the things like the one about coal mining soon? | /r/MensRights | 01/03/14 03:34 PM |
| 2 | Karen Straughan vs Naomi the brainwashed feminist. Full debate.Let's see you build a movement across a spectrum of activists of different viewpoints. You can't, if you believe urban legends and favor one faction over another. | /r/MensRights | 01/03/14 03:17 PM |
| 0 | Adult conversation re Antifeminism Help or Hurt the Men's Movement? [Sorry, finger waggerz.]You have nothing to contribute. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/14 01:17 PM |
| 5 | Karen Straughan vs Naomi the brainwashed feminist. Full debate.Yep. You don't have to read it. | /r/MensRights | 28/02/14 11:49 AM |
| -1 | Adult conversation re Antifeminism Help or Hurt the Men's Movement? [Sorry, finger waggerz.]Awwww... Butthurt, Downvoterz? | /r/MensRights | 28/02/14 10:00 AM |
| 1 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?See, we have discussed these issues before: http://youtu.be/lcZAICRr_ow | /r/MensRights | 28/02/14 08:41 AM |
| 1 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?Oh, and could you please format properly so your posts are easier to follow? | /r/MensRights | 28/02/14 07:46 AM |
| 2 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?and cafe is not a mens rights movement they are egalitarian HUH? Their speakers have been marquee' MRA's like Karen Straughan, who preaches dropping the Feminist label. Fyi, "Egalitarian" is how most of the MRM would characterize themselves. so we agree on that, why bring that up as a point? Do you have a short memory? You said earlier: the idea that feminism causes some of mens ills is ingrained, we don't need that now feminism isn't all bad There's no way I would get that you agree out of that… | /r/MensRights | 28/02/14 07:39 AM |
| -1 | Dan Perrins shows the attitude you should be having, not your wimpy "moderation."Mmmmkaayyy... | /r/MensRights | 27/02/14 03:42 PM |
| 2 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?the idea that feminism causes some of mens ills is ingrained, Funny, I could have sworn that it was the idea that men are the cause of women being oppressed that's ingrained. Silly me. we need to be actually advocating, banding together, making this a movement out in the world and not just online. Bullshit. Have you never heard of CAFE'? They've been holding men's rights conferences out in the real world: College campuses. Know what they got for it? A bunch of Feminazi's screaming in their faces… | /r/MensRights | 27/02/14 09:04 AM |
| 1 | Men's Rights Edmonton » The Difference Between “Sex” and “Gender” by FidelbogenPatriarchy theory depends on an ethical premise; namely, that a division of labour in human prehistory was unjust and that this injustice has been projected forward through most of human civilization. This claim can be true even if you are an essentialist, because even if men and women are essentially biased in favour of a patriarchical structure, it does not follow that that bias must necessarily be just. No, because the notion that people are making these choices based on a biological predispo… | /r/MensRights | 26/02/14 07:55 PM |
| 1 | Men's Rights Edmonton » The Difference Between “Sex” and “Gender” by FidelbogenFirst off, is your background in biology? There is a broad consensus that there is more variance across gender norms than not (in fact, there are almost no gender characteristics that are constant across all cultures). I don't think that the consensus is as broad as you make it out to be, and I also think you're incorrect re the characteristics that are common to many cultures: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-how-and-why-sex-differences/201110/sex-difference-vs-gender-difference-oh-im-so… | /r/MensRights | 26/02/14 07:48 PM |
| 1 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?Tell that to the website. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/14 10:21 PM |
| 1 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?Not what I'm seeing at all: Top 275 Single Ply Male Squats Nick Weite USAPL 903 Steve Mann USAPL 881 Keith Mitchell USPA 848 Top 105 Multi Ply Female Squats ELAINE GRIMWOOD IPA 370 Dawn Hickman UPA 314 I have no idea where you saw what you saw, but I can remember watching the 1st man ever to press 1/4 a ton on TV when I was almost a teen. Years later, men are doing almost a full ton and women are just getting past 1/4 a ton. ETA: Damn I just refreshed the page and it changed! Look at these: Top … | /r/MensRights | 25/02/14 03:37 PM |
| 1 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?It's been ages since I saw the list that I did see, but here's these: http://www.powerliftingwatch.com/yearly-rankings http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world_records_in_Olympic_weightlifting#Men http://www.powerlifting-ipf.com/fileadmin/data/results/2010/World_Men_and_Women/Men/scoresheet_m.htm http://www.powerlifting-ipf.com/fileadmin/data/results/2010/World_Men_and_Women/Women/scoresheet_w.htm | /r/MensRights | 25/02/14 06:58 AM |
| 1 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.Keep telling yourself that :) | /r/MensRights | 25/02/14 06:39 AM |
| 0 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?Right but if you look at the power lifters, even the women who lift the most don't touch the category of the men who lift the most. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/14 05:19 AM |
| 1 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.Whatever you like. Feel free to keep ranting & raving. I have made my point and if you can't figure it out, learn to read. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/14 01:03 AM |
| 1 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.Good grief, are you still riding this train? Get over it, I've moved on... | /r/MensRights | 25/02/14 12:56 AM |
| 1 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.Prefer to illustrate. | /r/MensRights | 25/02/14 12:53 AM |
| 1 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.Oh look - there's a point. It's on your head. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 11:53 PM |
| 2 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.I said that there was insufficient evidence to point towards this single (and unlikely) influence, and it was likely a culmination of several things. Oh, I see. So you know more about his situation than he does. Glad we got that cleared up. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 11:22 PM |
| -1 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?You are quite the comic. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 11:21 PM |
| 0 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?And you can't do shit about it, either! :) | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 10:28 PM |
| 2 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.What does "judgment call" mean to you? | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 10:27 PM |
| 2 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.If you cannot read, why are you here? | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 10:20 PM |
| 0 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?So, see the case point above, as spoken by OP, which has successfully narrowed down the options. What we're seeing here is either a serious delusion, or deliberate trolling. I'm glad we finally agree that this is what you are doing. If the former, the delusion definitely centers around extremism, and the continuous belief held by OP that he is incapable of being incorrect, and should be master of what is and is not discussed in this forum. So far it's been you and your ilk that haven't budged an… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 10:19 PM |
| 2 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.advising that he not just blame some fictional demon called "feminism" for the demise of his marriage. Sounds like a judgement call on your part. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 10:14 PM |
| -4 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?I resent OPs claim that my beliefs aren't genuine because I don't side with either extreme. Resent it all you want to. You are being called out for a reason. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 09:57 PM |
| -7 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?Fantastic. Those were obviously said by someone who cares about what this subreddit is supposed to be for. And compiled by someone who think he or she can intimidate. #FAIL | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 09:53 PM |
| -5 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?And I will continue to do so, as long as I see those who do not have the best interests of Men & Boys here. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 06:04 PM |
| 3 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.Saying "Feminism defines men's concerns out of existence" is like saying "Christianity is against homosexuality". Yeah okay, some do. The most outspoken do. But feminism, like most ideologies, has many branches that don't all feel the same way about everything. Oh, boy! NAFALT! So show me Feminists who have truly shown concerns for men's issues? Most of them tell me things that are at best peripheral that we "should" be doing. Saying "I am opposed to feminism" is a dumb statement, because that's… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 05:57 PM |
| 1 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.You are such an idiot to drinking the sexism "women are vapid shallow harpies" Kool-Aid. Do you really think that helps? It's people like you and /u/theozoph, spouting their Red Pill bullshit, who make progressing in the area of men's rights MORE DIFFICULT than it already is. Nope. You cannot prove that in real terms. It is not making it more difficult, it is already difficult. Standing against Feminism has actually won attention and support. Men who talk about their problems and life experience… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 05:52 PM |
| -1 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?he seems to believe that feminism is solely to blame for brainwashing his ex-wife. Nope. He listed fundamentalism also. Some people think it is. Others, not so much. Of course they're going to talk about it, and it is good for all of us to discuss it, including OP Then there should be an r/Divorce or r/UnsolicitedAdvice board. Keep your moderation to yourself. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 05:47 PM |
| 5 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.On the basis of anyone who knows the propensity of Feminism to define Men's concerns out of existence. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 05:37 PM |
| -2 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?It's annoying sometimes, but it spurs debate, which is good. Those are your words. You care more about debate then the effect on him. Busted. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 05:35 PM |
| -4 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?Feminists and moderates have been doing this forever. No they haven't. Not to this degree. It's annoying sometimes, but it spurs debate, which is good. Fuck you for caring more about your "moderation" and "debates" than a person's pain. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 05:33 PM |
| -6 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?This is a sub for mens rights, not a sub against feminism. False dichotomy, and you don't understand men's rights if you think that. but the post you refer to should ideally have people supporting the man and his problems in a positive way rather than whining about feminism. Dumbass: The word Feminism is in the title. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 05:30 PM |
| -5 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?Nope. It's only very recently that I've noticed a lot of people doing this and there's been Feminist bashing in this board for ages. Quit tone policing. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 05:26 PM |
| -7 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?The comments in that thread quickly deviated from consoling the man to bitching about how venomous feminism is. Well DUH - Feminism is in the title. It's not concern trolling. It's balancing out a one-sided discussion. There is no need to "balance out" everything. Would you want to be told "Hey you got terminal cancer, but look on the bright side, you got a few more years left?" Sometimes there's no need to "balance." Just let people have their pain. R/mensrights is a place that promotes free sp… | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 05:23 PM |
| -5 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?I'm more true than someone who comes in here and tells people who have been using this subreddit forever in ways they see fit - that they now have to knuckle under to you. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 05:11 PM |
| -2 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?I didn't. I asked you a legitimate question. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 04:59 PM |
| -8 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?Apparently so. I don't think you should dictate to someone what they can & cannot talk about between men's rights & anti-feminism. This is because of this thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1yphwr/i_lost_my_wife_in_a_big_part_to_feminism That's what sparked this thread here you are talking on now. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 04:58 PM |
| -7 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?I think it's best to turn that back on you: Why do you think it's in his best interests.... his or any man's? | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 04:35 PM |
| 1 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.This is the response you have to someone who's hurting and pouring out his soul? You don't have his interests at heart, for one. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 04:30 PM |
| -4 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?But some posts are strictly "Look at the big dumb feminists and how bigoted they are!" Yeah. We already know that a lot of them are bigots. What's that have to do with men's rights? Except a lot of those comments came from thread about the guy hurting over his divorce? You think that's a legit way to treat people? | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 04:09 PM |
| -5 | What is up with these Fake "Moderates" & Concern trolls?I think you should find another subreddit. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 04:07 PM |
| 0 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?Now you're trying to do HipHop? :D I guess that's what's left when you can't answer simple questions. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 03:08 PM |
| 1 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.You are such an asshole for your lack of decorum with someone who's sharing their suffering. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 02:18 PM |
| 2 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.You are such an asshole for your lack of decorum with someone who's sharing their suffering. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 02:16 PM |
| -2 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.Go away. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 02:13 PM |
| -1 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.Go somewhere else if you don't have the best interests of the men who come here. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 02:12 PM |
| 1 | I lost my wife in a big part to feminism.That is a lie. | /r/MensRights | 24/02/14 02:10 PM |
| 0 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?Yeah ok Mr. Elitist with nothing to contribute to the overall discussion ;-) | /r/MensRights | 23/02/14 10:28 PM |
| 0 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?Does nothing for me. Can you give an estimate? But take a look at the top male power lifters in the world. Then take a look at their female counterparts. Those women have had nothing stopping them from developing their upper body strength, yet the best female lifter can't even get in the same league with the low end of the men! Exception indeed. A woman who could get in that category would be a rare exception. | /r/MensRights | 23/02/14 12:27 AM |
| -16 | Adria got told by me...D0wnv0t3rz r0t !n h311~! | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 05:32 PM |
| 0 | The Kind of Gender Issues Book a Sarah Palin supporter would write.Miracles do happen. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 04:34 PM |
| -2 | The Kind of Gender Issues Book a Sarah Palin supporter would write.Fuck off, downvoterz. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 04:31 PM |
| 1 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?So rather than be vague, how many is "several" million? | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 04:25 PM |
| 1 | Hang out with Conservatives. You'll get away from all those Feminazi's. Yup YupDid a blog post, gave you credit: http://underthegoddess.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-kind-of-gender-issues-book-sarah.html | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 01:04 PM |
| 1 | Hang out with Conservatives. You'll get away from all those Feminazi's. Yup Yuphttp://www.amazon.com/Clueless-Real-Solutions-Dont-Women/dp/0882822659 http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/clueless-bobbie-reid/1112725012?ean=9780882824710 http://www.bobbiereid.com/clueless.html | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 09:41 AM |
| 1 | Hang out with Conservatives. You'll get away from all those Feminazi's. Yup YupInteresting, thanks. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 09:38 AM |
| 1 | Action Opportunity: Urge Goshen College to correct apparently discriminatory statements on their web siteGoshen may be considered liberal in the grand scheme of things when compared to other Christian schools. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 02:14 AM |
| 1 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?But between the two, who could be more likely trained to do it? | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 01:10 AM |
| 2 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?Israel has shown what I'm saying to be correct for ~50 years If you've got some links on that, I'd greatly appreciate it. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 01:09 AM |
| 1 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?You might modify your answer when you watch this. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 01:06 AM |
| 3 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?while women on average have less upper body strength Spells "exception" to me. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 01:04 AM |
| 2 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?Using the word "exceptions" to qualify such people is extremely subjective, and I fail to see how its use would have any inherent meaning in this debate. Simple. It gets you to the basic answer. | /r/MensRights | 22/02/14 01:03 AM |
| 6 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?Note - they shouldn't ever lower the bar for physical strength on a job. There are 3.5 Billion women in the world, simply keep recruiting until a woman with an adequate physique shows up for the job. They are out there. But then aren't you admitting that these are exceptions? | /r/MensRights | 21/02/14 03:41 PM |
| 1 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?Muchas gracias for the links. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/14 03:40 PM |
| 1 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?But this is also due to how society has made women become so much physically weaker than men. Women are taught to play with barbie dolls and makeup growing up. I think you can change how you raise them all you want to, but women will still never be able to repel up a sheer rock wall with half her weight in ammo around her waist. Just my 2 cents. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/14 02:28 PM |
| 2 | Can women really work the same jobs as men?Thanks for reminding me about that. i should look over manwomanmyth's videos again. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/14 09:31 AM |
| 1 | Shocking Facts About America's For-Profit Prison IndustryBasically it means that they get a flat rate for keeping the lights on, and if prisoners exceeded 90%, each percentage point increases the amount proportionally by 1%. Pretty certain most people don't get sumtin' for nuttin'. | /r/MensRights | 21/02/14 08:55 AM |
| 1 | She barefacedly says men are more likely to commit DVFeel free to tell them. I'm not Aussie, so I don't have all the good info. | /r/MensRights | 19/02/14 02:39 AM |
| 1 | So why the Hell is this blog titled 'Under the Goddess,' Anyway?Yeah, I wrote that? lol | /r/MensRights | 19/02/14 02:09 AM |
| 6 | 60 Minutes admits feminism has stifled scientific research which is now showing the genders are very different on a cellular level.Nope. The Obama administration has SEVEN COMMISSIONS for Women's health, ZERO for men: http://youtu.be/V9B2jE8e_5k?t=1m20s That means, in terms of allocation of resources, "separate" means "exclusive." So go fuck yourself. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/14 01:17 AM |
| 2 | 60 Minutes admits feminism has stifled scientific research which is now showing the genders are very different on a cellular level.Original story: http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/sex-matters-drugs-can-affect-sexes-differently | /r/MensRights | 18/02/14 01:11 AM |
| 2 | 60 Minutes admits feminism has stifled scientific research which is now showing the genders are very different on a cellular level.http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sex-matters-who-has-the-softer-heart/ | /r/MensRights | 18/02/14 12:37 AM |
| 2 | 60 Minutes admits feminism has stifled scientific research which is now showing the genders are very different on a cellular level.For those who can't see it on Youtube: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sex-matters-who-has-the-softer-heart/ | /r/MensRights | 18/02/14 12:35 AM |
| 1 | My Commentary on the 60 Minutes "Pig Heart Sex Differences" video~!http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sex-matters-who-has-the-softer-heart/ | /r/MensRights | 18/02/14 12:35 AM |
| 1 | My Commentary on the 60 Minutes "Pig Heart Sex Differences" video~!OC? | /r/MensRights | 18/02/14 12:25 AM |
| 1 | Widespread sex differences in gene expression and splicing in the adult human brainYou might want to show up to this discussion: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1y4tgv/60_minutes_admits_feminism_has_stifled_scientific/ | /r/MensRights | 17/02/14 05:52 PM |
| 2 | Widespread sex differences in gene expression and splicing in the adult human brainYou might want to show up to this discussion: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1y4tgv/60_minutes_admits_feminism_has_stifled_scientific/ | /r/MensRights | 17/02/14 05:52 PM |
| 3 | 60 Minutes admits feminism has stifled scientific research which is now showing the genders are very different on a cellular level.Where is this thing about dosages? I can't find it in the video. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/14 05:21 PM |
| 1 | Beware of Fake Anti-Feminist Blogs that are seething with Feminist PoisonThanks for that. So then is the blogger correct in assuming Prostate cancer patients have life better than Breast cancer patients? | /r/MensRights | 17/02/14 05:16 PM |
| 1 | Beware of Fake Anti-Feminist Blogs that are seething with Feminist PoisonOk, so could you please break that down in layman's terms for us? I'm not sure what all the above means. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/14 08:57 AM |
| 1 | Depressed men more likely than women to commit suicideHow so? Attempting but not completing means you didn't really want to do it. Learn your basic psychology. | /r/MensRights | 15/02/14 11:57 AM |
| 1 | Hang out with Conservatives. You'll get away from all those Feminazi's. Yup YupSAVE also talks about how VAWA now has inclusive language written into it. That was likely more the reason for the GOP shift. I doubt they cowered to the "War on Women" thing. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/14 12:24 AM |
| 1 | Hang out with Conservatives. You'll get away from all those Feminazi's. Yup Yupacting as if their side is always right and "pure" (Dems never do anything bad ever) Nope. Not here. I just get tired of being pigenholed by "rightys" thinking they own me. | /r/MensRights | 11/02/14 12:21 AM |
| 1 | Hang out with Conservatives. You'll get away from all those Feminazi's. Yup Yupthe left of left news stations (MSNBC) LMAO! | /r/MensRights | 11/02/14 12:19 AM |
| 2 | Hang out with Conservatives. You'll get away from all those Feminazi's. Yup YupNo luck. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/14 05:20 PM |
| 1 | Hang out with Conservatives. You'll get away from all those Feminazi's. Yup YupAuthor? | /r/MensRights | 10/02/14 05:04 PM |
| 1 | Hang out with Conservatives. You'll get away from all those Feminazi's. Yup YupInteresting. Care to share? | /r/MensRights | 10/02/14 04:53 PM |
| 1 | Families are still living the nightmare of false memories of sexual abuseWhat is really recovered is the memory of the emotion, and the brain tends to fill in the missing pieces with imagined "facts" so that it makes sense to it. Do you happen to have a source for this by any chance? | /r/MensRights | 10/02/14 04:27 PM |
| 1 | The Irish Slave Trade – The Forgotten “White” SlavesAnd fuck-you very much for downvoting. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/14 08:53 AM |
| 1 | The Irish Slave Trade – The Forgotten “White” SlavesAnd if you have to ask what this has to do with the MRM, consider it an antidote to SJW extremism. | /r/MensRights | 10/02/14 06:55 AM |
| 1 | Woody Allen Convicted By The New York Times?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQkb7vSW9mQ&feature=youtu.be&t=22m55s Full discussion. Explosive. | /r/MensRights | 09/02/14 11:36 AM |
| 1 | 8-year-old hero who saved six declared honorary firefighter at funeralIt's important, because the news has taken to say "Firefighters," erasing the fact that men risked their lives. I guarantee you that you wouldn't be protesting this if it was reported that an 8-year-old girl did the good deed. Request rejected. | /r/MensRights | 02/02/14 01:18 PM |
| 1 | Domestic Violence: Men Vs. Women. Read this and tell me what you get out of it?Interesting. A friend of mine read the article and came up with 80% violence done by men. I shit you not :)) | /r/MensRights | 01/02/14 09:43 PM |
| 2 | Allan McLeod Online: Maybe I’ll replace my MRA label with the title ‘Equalist’I take no responsibility for the content. I report, you decide. | /r/MensRights | 01/02/14 03:40 AM |
| 1 | 20 Ways to Please a Woman [Is this 'Entitlement?' Thoughts?]No less than Laci Green, who's been the subject of several videos connected to AVfM. | /r/MensRights | 01/02/14 02:52 AM |
| 2 | Alahverdian case updateSeems to me like it's trumped up? | /r/MensRights | 31/01/14 09:26 PM |
| 0 | 8-year-old hero who saved six declared honorary firefighter at funeralIt's not politicized. | /r/MensRights | 31/01/14 09:17 PM |
| 2 | 8-year-old hero who saved six declared honorary firefighter at funeralNo. This came on the wire from MensENews.org. It's a positive story about males. | /r/MensRights | 31/01/14 07:44 PM |
| 1 | Definition of IronyNot to him, however... | /r/MensRights | 30/01/14 09:52 AM |
| 1 | "97% of rapists don't spend a day in jail" - why this feminist statistic is dishonest, and harmful to victims. [Original Analysis]Nice work again, Celda. Have re-published and credited your work before. | /r/MensRights | 27/01/14 11:44 AM |
| 1 | About that stuff from the Crown Prosecution Service you see Feminists spreading aroundI don't think this is a particularly good article frankly, it simply repeats a lot of past problems and accusations levelled against Britain's prosecution service in order to attempt to discredit a recent report they issued which claimed false rape accusations were 'rare'. The point is people using it as a factoid to say "stfu MRA's" when the reality is they don't consider where it comes from geographically nor the veracity of who's putting it out. My personal reading is that 10-15% of rapes are… | /r/MensRights | 26/01/14 09:42 PM |
| 1 | About that stuff from the Crown Prosecution Service you see Feminists spreading aroundThanks. We're just barely starting to get around to that,if at all. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/14 12:43 PM |
| 2 | This double standard on "Pro-Choice" has always bugged meNo one bothers to actually show any research as to whether or not a fetus is a human life. That's the question we should be asking. I've written about that topic here and here. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/14 09:39 AM |
| 1 | A study in Partisan PoliticsIt's preventative medicine that is well within the purview of govt provided healthcare In your opinion. Not everyone even thinks there should be Government provided healthcare. I don't have a problem with it personally, but so far you are the only one who seems to be trying to politicize this subreddit. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/14 06:00 AM |
| 1 | A study in Partisan PoliticsShe's been a major topic around here lately, so excuse me if I don't take you seriously. And this is not an attempt to politicize anything. It's no different than the Libertarian position repeated here often that the government should't pony up where personal responsibility can do the elbow grease. In this case and on this issue, Huckabee is 100% correct. And furthermore, you can always not read it. | /r/MensRights | 26/01/14 05:29 AM |
| 1 | A study in Partisan PoliticsProbably so. I'm saying this for the aesthetics more than anything. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/14 05:50 PM |
| 0 | A study in Partisan PoliticsAm i supposed to know who the woman on the right is? If you don't know who she is, you aren't really a regular participant here. In other words, fuck you and the horse you rode in on. | /r/MensRights | 25/01/14 10:46 AM |
| 1 | What in the actual fuck!?!?!?!?Try a better approach to the same topic: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1w36k2/a_study_in_partisan_politics/ | /r/MensRights | 25/01/14 05:17 AM |
| 1 | The problem with Wendy Davis is not that she’s a terrible mother, a gold-digging, possibly violent, drug taking tramp who used her husband as an ATM machine – the problem is that she’s a liar. Why not own your Amazon Grrl Power Stick it to the Man Feminazi shit, Wendy?Idk - If you mean the upvotes? Those are prolly just trolls from other subreddits also. | /r/MensRights | 24/01/14 02:23 PM |
| -3 | The problem with Wendy Davis is not that she’s a terrible mother, a gold-digging, possibly violent, drug taking tramp who used her husband as an ATM machine – the problem is that she’s a liar. Why not own your Amazon Grrl Power Stick it to the Man Feminazi shit, Wendy?Might try not making your 1st post a shaming one. Just sayin'. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/14 08:40 PM |
| -3 | The problem with Wendy Davis is not that she’s a terrible mother, a gold-digging, possibly violent, drug taking tramp who used her husband as an ATM machine – the problem is that she’s a liar. Why not own your Amazon Grrl Power Stick it to the Man Feminazi shit, Wendy?Part of the ongoing debate in the "man-o-sphere" is whether or not it's enough to be "for" men's rights, but as well to be against Feminism. What this editorial does is take Feminism to task for putting people like Wendy Davis on their shoulders and look the other way from the excess. And your pattern fits that of a r/MensRights disruptive troll. Show up with a "new" account, shame people for their content, insist on their own way as far as what should & shouldn't be discussed. Advice rejected. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/14 08:13 PM |
| -1 | The problem with Wendy Davis is not that she’s a terrible mother, a gold-digging, possibly violent, drug taking tramp who used her husband as an ATM machine – the problem is that she’s a liar. Why not own your Amazon Grrl Power Stick it to the Man Feminazi shit, Wendy?If you want to dispute the image of this group as knuckle-dragging woman haters...you have to elevate your content. That is going to be the case no matter what anyone says. The hit pieces will focus on what they want to & spin it however they like, as has been my experience. And since this is only your 2nd comment, I'd say "troll" is at least apropos. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/14 08:03 PM |
| 0 | The problem with Wendy Davis is not that she’s a terrible mother, a gold-digging, possibly violent, drug taking tramp who used her husband as an ATM machine – the problem is that she’s a liar. Why not own your Amazon Grrl Power Stick it to the Man Feminazi shit, Wendy?Not worth the effort for a troll account with only 1 comment. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/14 07:50 PM |
| -6 | The problem with Wendy Davis is not that she’s a terrible mother, a gold-digging, possibly violent, drug taking tramp who used her husband as an ATM machine – the problem is that she’s a liar. Why not own your Amazon Grrl Power Stick it to the Man Feminazi shit, Wendy?Go tone police/concern troll somewhere else. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/14 06:49 PM |
| 1 | NCFM SF members work with other groups to support the documentary Divorce Corp!That's what I was trying to think of, thanks. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/14 06:48 PM |
| 1 | NCFM SF members work with other groups to support the documentary Divorce Corp!Allred. I guess, who better to talk about the Mafia than a member of the Mafia? | /r/MensRights | 23/01/14 04:47 PM |
| 2 | New research shows Canadian boys not faring wellNo. | /r/MensRights | 23/01/14 01:49 AM |
| 2 | Big money in Female Rape-Fantasy PornGroovy, mon~! |m/ | /r/MensRights | 19/01/14 06:05 AM |
| 1 | Big money in Female Rape-Fantasy PornAlso, people can like whatever the fuck they want. Who is saying they can't? | /r/MensRights | 19/01/14 05:55 AM |
| 1 | Big money in Female Rape-Fantasy PornSo surely you've heard that discussed and now here's (more) proof. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/14 05:54 AM |
| 2 | Woman launches bid to harvest wealthy banker fiancé's spermdailymail.co.uk | /r/MensRights | 19/01/14 03:45 AM |
| 2 | Big money in Female Rape-Fantasy PornSo Duh, Feminists deny that women have Rape Fantasies. | /r/MensRights | 19/01/14 03:36 AM |
| 3 | Abandoning Men: Jill Gets Welfare–Jack Becomes HomelessI've been involved with the homeless, and I wouldn't read it that way. I would read it as men have a resilience to adapt & change that most women do not. Gender essentialism. | /r/MensRights | 18/01/14 09:41 PM |
| 2 | Understanding Privilege: What are the questions we should be asking?It is a symbol of Goddess culture, however. And you're kinda nit-picking. | /r/MensRights | 16/01/14 09:18 PM |
| 1 | Talitha Stone: The Anita Sarkeesian of musicI thought he was Snoop Lion, now~! ;-) | /r/MensRights | 15/01/14 09:21 AM |
| 2 | A little compilation of real-world feminism.What about the feminist who proposed the basis for the tender years doctrine? ... you know, the reason custody is so lopsided in the first place. Just as an fyi, the discussion on this needs to be broadened a tad. It would seem the TYD actually existed in practice prior to the 19th century for quite some time. 19th Century feminists argued for broader application of it, much like today. You can see the comments discussion I had with Tom James, an attorney that's written extensively about these t… | /r/MensRights | 14/01/14 08:13 PM |
| 1 | What Shall be the Fate of Gynocentrism? by FidelbogenLOL | /r/MensRights | 14/01/14 02:10 AM |
| 4 | What Shall be the Fate of Gynocentrism? by FidelbogenOne of Mr. Fidelbogen's best videos in terms of being sober & realistic. If you listen to only one, this should be the one. Short, but to the point. | /r/MensRights | 13/01/14 10:14 PM |
| 1 | AVFM Republishes Kevin Wayne/Under The GoddessAll because of one position I hold? I was right that this is an indication of a feminizing influence creeping into our ranks slowly but surely. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/14 08:19 PM |
| 0 | I was banned from /r/offmychest for arguing that men should have some say in their child's abortion. Just because the mother carries their child, it doesn't mean it's exclusively hers.Bro, know that there are those who support you | /r/MensRights | 09/01/14 08:15 PM |
| 5 | There needs to be a national conversation about the reliability of sexual assault surveys that insist one-in-five college women are victimizedI think it's a fair assumption that young women are being socialized to make spurious assault claims. Ohio is a clear-cut example. That she even thought she could get away with that when there were witnesses, photos & videos shows the hubris of today's Sexual grievance Industry. | /r/MensRights | 09/01/14 08:05 PM |
| 1 | Fidelbogen: To Reason with a Feminist is Wasted Effort ← Men's Human Rights OntarioLOL Why did this post of his get immediate response, but the video I posted of his netted a big fat goose egg? | /r/MensRights | 09/01/14 03:41 AM |
| 1 | Hey Feminists! Why don't you critique "Toxic Femininity" for once and leave the men alone?On the Wikipedia page you shared with me, she is listed in at least 2 Roman legends. But hey - she's generally considered a Greek goddess, so Greek she is! | /r/MensRights | 08/01/14 11:07 PM |
| 1 | Hey Feminists! Why don't you critique "Toxic Femininity" for once and leave the men alone?Looks to me like she was in both Greek & Roman mythology as well? | /r/MensRights | 08/01/14 06:07 AM |
| 0 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!I don't think so. If bodily autonomy is a feminist conspiracy with no other basis, then what right do men have to control how their sperm is used? It most certainly is a false equivalency. You are equating the use of someone's sperm over and against their intentions with actually having sex, which presumably they had intentions to do so. And I didn't say it had no other basis, but that the concept of bodily autonomy pre-feminist governance never seemed to have the meaning of a woman being reliev… | /r/MensRights | 01/01/14 07:40 PM |
| 13 | Update: The man whose wife lied about being infertile and had three abortions behind her back has updated.Those of you that were intentionally misrepresenting this man's "dealbreaker" statement, now that there's proof that you were as wrong as wrong can be, it might be a good time to do some self-reflection and ask yourself why exactly you were so hellbent on misrepresenting an innocent man's statement to try and vilify him in favor of a woman who has provably lied and betrayed him. That you would go to such lengths to absolve a woman who clearly did wrong by smearing a man who clearly didn't speaks… | /r/MensRights | 01/01/14 07:25 AM |
| -1 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!I don't see it as "delusion". I think it's kind of sick that you have a problem with bodily autonomy. Do you think spermjacking is okay, too? What a false equivalency. These are the words of a paranoid conspiracy theorist, not a person with a rational argument. Oh yes, the old "Conspiracy" canard thrown out whenever someone dares speak outside the holy accepted canon of meta-narratives. Put your thinking cap on: Why do we disagree with the Feminists in regards to the "Women' Oppression" thing? T… | /r/MensRights | 01/01/14 12:32 AM |
| 2 | College told me men can't be raped and tried to discredit meWhat's this "Unverified" crap at the top? | /r/MensRights | 31/12/13 03:07 PM |
| -1 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!Why? Part of the problem with the whole debate is that it's been couched in terms of the "woman's" (or so Feminism would have it) issues and concerns. Who says men cannot have equal input, especially when part of the problem is that young men today are being taught that they will be cut out of the loop. Just be a paycheck for the mother who wants to live high on the child support gravy-train, and don't expect you'll ever see your kids. The problem is, you've been deluded by the bodily autonomy a… | /r/MensRights | 31/12/13 09:00 AM |
| 0 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!And I have a spaceship in my garage, but you can't see it because you're a meany-head. :) | /r/MensRights | 31/12/13 08:56 AM |
| -1 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!If he wants to grow one in his own womb, he's welcome to. "No uterus, no opinion." Is that what you're saying? | /r/MensRights | 31/12/13 05:46 AM |
| 0 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!Refute the premise of it being rooted in their concept of Patriarchy, then. Hurling invectives at me proves nothing. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/13 05:45 AM |
| 1 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!From a legal standpoint, you would be incorrect. That's because the SCOTUS we had at the time overstepped their boundaries. The unborn child doesn't own what you name for them in your will. The child could have no claim to it until they were born and possibly reaching majority. That's as fine a synopsis as you need as to why there is essentially no difference between a born & unborn child. | /r/MensRights | 31/12/13 03:19 AM |
| 1 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!Also I should mention that you are conflating rights of personhood with rights of adulthood. The right to life is conferred on you from birth forward at least it's agreed upon by most people. I'm saying that the notion that you magically become a person 5 minutes before you hit the birth canal is a myth. We give legal rights to a fetus now. You can include an unborn child in your will. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/13 11:23 PM |
| 1 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!Children can't vote or consent to contracts, so in that sense they do not have that aspect of personhood. The fact they will later doesn't confer them voting privileges beforehand. Of course. But we don't kill them for it. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/13 11:10 PM |
| 1 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!Personhood. But I don't agree that there is a point in time when a developing human "becomes" a person. It's not like Boy Scout merit badges or moving up to a management position. You are continuing to develop, even after birth. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/13 10:50 PM |
| 1 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!Just a general comment to all reading here. No one has touched on the issue of a man's right to his progeny, and that Abortion can be a violation of that, same as an estranged mother of a man's child would be in violation by not allowing him to see his kids. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/13 10:14 PM |
| 0 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!Also I might add, your line of questioning assumes there is a "point" of personhood. And that's a premise I refuse to grant. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/13 09:53 PM |
| 0 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!When does a human being have personhood to where they have the right to life? Ask Mr. Hippocrates. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/13 09:51 PM |
| 0 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!There are degrees of personhood. And...? | /r/MensRights | 30/12/13 09:44 PM |
| 0 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!As long as it is a "human" in the "human development" trajectory, it is a "person" by default. I have a right to learn to ride a bike. I may not be able to until I move out of toddler stage and my legs become longer and more sure and my brain operates with better judgment. But the "right" to learn to ride it is always there, waiting for the moment I decide to do so. It isn't relinquished by my body not being able to just yet. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/13 09:28 PM |
| -1 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!And even if you reject that conclusion, "it's better to give life than to receive freedom from responsibility" is also an attack on every form of contraception. No pills for her - she's better off being pregnant! No condoms for him (let alone Vasalgel, if it ever passes the medical trials) - he's better off becoming a father whether he likes it or not! Only nature decides! If you read my blog post more carefully, you would have seen that I addressed this when I wrote: Furthermore, this moves int… | /r/MensRights | 30/12/13 09:22 PM |
| 0 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!Being alive is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for personhood. Developing into aspects of personhood definitely are, which a human fetus always is. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/13 09:13 PM |
| 1 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!So? | /r/MensRights | 30/12/13 09:09 PM |
| 0 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!If this is true, everyone is ethically obligated to reproduce at every possible opportunity. Literally, men and women are ethically obligated to say "yes" at every opportunity to procreate and conceive and arguable, to make every possible effort to conceive at all times. That's a reductio ad absurdum take on the meme. Those who are closest to the issue know that "it's better to give life" is a generalized statement, not an invective to pop out babies at all costs. You're just as bad as anyone tr… | /r/MensRights | 30/12/13 09:08 PM |
| 1 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!No, because our laws give rights to only one of those. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/13 08:57 PM |
| 0 | Men's Rights and Abortion Rhetoric: You Sound Just Like A Feminist!You haven't read that much of me, then. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/13 08:53 PM |
| 1 | The Female Psychopath (No booty-shakin', just facts)One had booty-shakin and facts, the other had just facts. Just a way to differentiate. | /r/MensRights | 30/12/13 02:46 PM |
| 1 | Fidelbogen Tweets against the White Ribbon Campaign. You should too.If you have something, start it. I'll be sure and promote it on my blog and pass it around, provided it's a good cause that doesn't have the backhand of shaming men. | /r/MensRights | 29/12/13 12:36 AM |
| 1 | The Female Psychopath (No booty-shakin', just facts)Referring to this other post of mine: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1tugip/the_female_psychopath/ | /r/MensRights | 28/12/13 10:13 AM |
| 1 | Fidelbogen Tweets against the White Ribbon Campaign. You should too.Bully for him. | /r/MensRights | 26/12/13 11:23 AM |
| 5 | Fidelbogen Tweets against the White Ribbon Campaign. You should too.You can only put so much in a Tweet! | /r/MensRights | 25/12/13 09:10 PM |
| 1 | Well see, Men get homeless and this is about a homeless man +Santana is da bomb. So Merry Christmas & enjoy thisSome1 said Santana is taking care of him now, but I haven't looked for verification. | /r/MensRights | 25/12/13 06:51 PM |
| 1 | Hypocrisy at it's finest!They're both men, aren't they? | /r/MensRights | 23/12/13 08:49 PM |
| 1 | Online App Allows Women To Rate Men Without their Knowledge [CHANGE.ORG PETITION TO SHUT LULU DOWN!]I'd be curious as to how popular that is. I bet it's not as high-profile as Lulu, or women would be up in arms. http://www.androidpit.com/en/android/market/apps/app/com.wRateMyGirlfriendorEx/Rate-My-Girlfriend-Or-Ex-GF From the looks of it, the app is about sharing pix and rating them on a scale of 1 - 10. Doesn't seem like it's about info sharing, which is what Lulu is more about. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/13 12:38 AM |
| 1 | Online App Allows Women To Rate Men Without their Knowledge [CHANGE.ORG PETITION TO SHUT LULU DOWN!]Good question. But even without that, it can damage your personal life. | /r/MensRights | 23/12/13 12:18 AM |
| 2 | Online App Allows Women To Rate Men Without their Knowledge [CHANGE.ORG PETITION TO SHUT LULU DOWN!]I don't agree with shutting down apps like lulu. To do so would violate freedom of speech - and would be censorship Maybe, maybe not. It seems as if the sector of the public has as much a right to voice their displeasure as those who choose to use it have a right to their choice as well. It ultimately comes down to Lulu's owners and whether or not it's worth it to them to ride the storm of criticism to it's logical conclusion. | /r/MensRights | 22/12/13 12:14 PM |
| 3 | Did COTWA blow the call on Occidental College?http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/kids-false-reporting-is-bad-mmmkay/ | /r/MensRights | 21/12/13 09:52 PM |
| 1 | Did COTWA blow the call on Occidental College?Also when you report a crime, it's usually to those trained to handle the complaints. | /r/MensRights | 21/12/13 09:46 PM |
| 5 | Did COTWA blow the call on Occidental College?It raised awareness of Feminist Governance on campus. | /r/MensRights | 21/12/13 09:45 PM |
| 6 | Did COTWA blow the call on Occidental College?If you want to say that, then fine: They should stand or fall on the basis of their own use of "Free Speech." It's called "consequences." | /r/MensRights | 21/12/13 09:34 PM |
| 5 | Did COTWA blow the call on Occidental College?I think "progressives" means "Feminists & others aghast at the spam attacks." | /r/MensRights | 21/12/13 09:14 PM |
| 2 | It wasn't always just women who were sexually harassed in the office: 100 years ago, a 15 year old boy died during such an event.Surreal. | /r/MensRights | 18/12/13 12:49 PM |
| 6 | Rebecca Watson tries to live out rape fantasy?Your problem is, you are assuming it was a joke in terms of it having no truth to it at all. 1) We do know RW has indicated drunken sex is rape. 2) We also know she admits to drinking - a lot. 3) Therefore, if you follow this out, there's a logical inconsistency between her beliefs & actions. Good grief, do I have to walk it out in baby-steps for you? | /r/MensRights | 17/12/13 08:27 AM |
| 2 | Rebecca Watson tries to live out rape fantasy?in order to accuse someone of wanting to be raped Funny how you defend RW's statement as a joke, and then you take seriously SparkyFister's title of her "living out" a rape fantasy. The real point of the clip with the tweet added is to show her logical inconsistencies. The title is satirizing the whole process. | /r/MensRights | 17/12/13 02:51 AM |
| 1 | Rebecca Watson tries to live out rape fantasy?Okay, have it your way. In either case, you're wrong. :) | /r/MensRights | 17/12/13 02:46 AM |
| 3 | Professor charged over 1995 murder of her alleged rapist after her ex-boyfriend 'stabbed him to death.''Stabbed him to death' does that nicely, without redundancy. Now go troll somewhere else. | /r/MensRights | 16/12/13 01:14 PM |
| 1 | Rebecca Watson tries to live out rape fantasy?Tell that to the maker of the video. | /r/MensRights | 16/12/13 01:10 PM |
| 1 | What do you think of this video from feminist Rebecca Watson? 4 minutes in, the man makes it clear he's uncomfortable using only a condom for birth control and asks if she's on the pill. For this, she viciously shames and humiliates him.http://youtu.be/HC5BAFtdt54 | /r/MensRights | 16/12/13 06:05 AM |
| 1 | Angry Harry, Left-leaning MRA?MRA's are involved in a lefty style social justice cause whether they like it or not. Nailed it. | /r/MensRights | 16/12/13 03:20 AM |
| 1 | Angry Harry, Left-leaning MRA?Don't give up. | /r/MensRights | 16/12/13 03:19 AM |
| 3 | Angry Harry, Left-leaning MRA?As long as it's ruminating on Men's issues, I respectfully disagree. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/13 10:22 AM |
| 1 | Angry Harry, Left-leaning MRA?ETA: Made that previous statement less demanding. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/13 10:14 AM |
| 3 | Angry Harry, Left-leaning MRA?I found this discussion challenging to my thinking. If you don't want that, perhaps it's actually you who are "inappropriate for the sub?" | /r/MensRights | 15/12/13 10:11 AM |
| 1 | Angry Harry, Left-leaning MRA?Perhaps you recall a junior senator not even close to finishing his first term running and winning for his progressive skin tone I didn't vote for that "Junior Senator" either time, but if I were to make a choice based on intelligence, character, and experience, it would not be the Half Governor who said "I told congress thanks but no thanks on the Bridge To Nowhere." That was a lie. Congress told her that. Or the bit about Community Organizers. I'd vote for a Community Organizer over her based … | /r/MensRights | 15/12/13 10:09 AM |
| 3 | Angry Harry, Left-leaning MRA?I have as much right to talk in here as you do. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/13 10:02 AM |
| 1 | Angry Harry, Left-leaning MRA?marxism Commie-baiting does Zero to impress me. And there is such a thing as Marxist Anti-Feminism. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/13 09:47 AM |
| 2 | Angry Harry, Left-leaning MRA?Oh, I should mention: Gloria Steinem in bed with the Christian Right during those "Satanic Panic" trials. False rape and abuse accusations, and the specter of so-called "Recovered Memory Therapy." The adoption of the "Courtship" model of dating & marriage by some Christian families. Infantilized many young women, who wound up in abusive marriages. Phyllis Schlafly opposed the ERA as a means of protecting Female Privilege. Including the male-only draft, "dependent wife" benefits under Social Secu… | /r/MensRights | 15/12/13 09:42 AM |
| 1 | Angry Harry, Left-leaning MRA?a preoccupation towards luring people with entitlements to shift proven structures in such a way that it allows them control over the direction and redistribution for ulterior enrichment The Warren Farrell citation above, answers this nicely. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/13 09:18 AM |
| 3 | Angry Harry, Left-leaning MRA?You cannot deny that the American left is currently home to a lot of pandering for the female vote And you cannot deny the same thing of the Right: Proxy violence in the middle East against the so-called "Islamo-Fascist" hobgoblin. Ever hear a center right woman talk about how great it was to feel like "you can lay your head down safely at night" due to Bush-era policies? I have. Don't even bother telling me Obama has continued those policies. They all started one place. And one side is definite… | /r/MensRights | 15/12/13 09:16 AM |
| 0 | Angry Harry, Left-leaning MRA?Men trapped in the prison-industrial complex And that's where Anti-Privatization can come in. Think outside the box. The MRM is not a place for Left vs. Right political arguments. Take it elsewhere. No. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/13 08:45 AM |
| 8 | Angry Harry, Left-leaning MRA?True 'dat. | /r/MensRights | 15/12/13 03:30 AM |
| 1 | Even vindicated, Journalists hack up Hunter Yeltonis that there are confidentiality laws preventing them from revealing this kid's record or even details of the incident Which the school seems to have done a shitty job of hiding, since there are murmurings of prior disciplinary actions floating around. I'm all for Red Pill and MGOTW...but the herd mentality of men lining up to shield any fucking bad behavior "Bad behaviour..." that wouldn't have had an eye batted at it in another time, place or culture. And pre-Anita Hill, def would not be call… | /r/MensRights | 14/12/13 11:55 PM |
| 1 | Warren Farrell asks for other book cover ideas.If you actually believed that, you would ignore the comments about a "hissy fit" rather than defending it and getting consistently downvoted, no? No. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/13 04:21 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:the word you're looking for might be inflammatory but ingratiating means something entirely different than how you're using it here. How so? in·gra·ti·at·ing 1. intended to gain approval or favor; sycophantic. Cathy Young was "ingratiating" in that she was attempting to gain the approval of her Feminist readers by such statements as: her tendency to quote bitter men obsessed with female treachery | /r/MensRights | 12/12/13 01:17 PM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:So believing awful things about an entire gender might not be prejudice? Might be.... true? Im not affirming anything sans confirmation, because if I do, you'll insist I said something I didn't. Today you apologize for bigots. Mensrights, ladies and gentlemen! But you did, anyway. Feminism, gentlemen and ladies! | /r/MensRights | 12/12/13 01:07 PM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:Do you or do you not think that "holding negative beliefs against the female gender" is an example of prejudice? It could possibly be. | /r/MensRights | 12/12/13 05:16 AM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:You did not follow up that statement with "for the sake of argument". You straight up agreed. You must seriously be high as kite or in need of a reading lesson. Of course I didn't follow that statement up with "for the sake of argument," because that wasn't what I was assuming "for the sake of argument. Do I have to walk it out in baby-steps for you? If you weren't using it as an example of a misogynist religion (with individuals within it who weren't misogynistic) then why on earth did you brin… | /r/MensRights | 12/12/13 05:01 AM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:being apart of a common religion that has/had negative views against the female gender ..is under the list of ""What doesn't make someone a misogynist" If someone is a member of the Catholic church, but think they should ordain women priests, as one could do an still be a good catholic, then they aren't misogynistic. But AGAIN, I was saying "for the sake of argument." Do you have a clue what that means? Look up the phrase. Look up "Devil's Advocate:" In common parlance, a devil's advocate is som… | /r/MensRights | 12/12/13 12:20 AM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:Nice try, but you never established that the Catholic church is misogynist. Or that it holds negative views of the female gender. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/13 09:32 PM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:You think "Feminists" have messed with the Wikipedia page of "guilt by association" to win this argument? No I think that because: I don't see the words "irrelevant association" stated so explicitly on other websites that talk about Fallacies. Feminists have been messing with Wikipedia. The Wikipedia page you lifted the quote from has [citation needed] somewhat near the quote. Not a good sign. While it is true that I don't know the author, or the motives that brought about what is written on Wik… | /r/MensRights | 11/12/13 08:16 PM |
| 1 | How can we build a common-sense MRM community? [Request for Ideas]Fyi, I skimmed through the Elam article you just shred and while he makes many valid points, in the end it's just has a whiff of tin-foil-hattedness for my blood. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/13 04:44 PM |
| 1 | How can we build a common-sense MRM community? [Request for Ideas]First off, it's not about me (or anyone) becoming the new "leader." Secondly, I hear what you are saying, but I'd like to offer a countervailing perspective: http://youtu.be/MIJLLb1Evkk?t=10m26s It's best understood in the whole context of the video, but I've linked you to the point he's making that I'd like to echo. Also: What would you think about a manifesto of excellence we should strive for - something many could put their names on? | /r/MensRights | 11/12/13 04:13 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:1 The quote does not say I would withdraw my support for Warren Farrell or his book. It is in reference to his re-release campaign. 2 All the stuff you mentioned, sans this "Reddit thread" was written before Elam approached me about it. 3 Once I'm kicked to the curb, I am no longer under any obligation to keep quiet. 4 The blog post was not misleading, anymore than Mr. Elam's so-called "satire" is. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/13 03:49 PM |
| 0 | Warren Farrell asks for other book cover ideas.Keep telling yourself that. More people here who've read everything supported me. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/13 03:38 PM |
| 0 | Warren Farrell asks for other book cover ideas.Nope. Not as long as the owner of the site reserves the right to publish things that are a lot worse. Not as long as the same person hypocritically showed up on the comments of the blog post he didn't like (mine) and got belittling and personal - after making a big lecture about "decorum." The only one pretending here is you. As well as sucking a lot of AVfM arse. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/13 02:54 PM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:This is the definition of guilt by association Since Feminists have taken to diddling with Wikipedia, I like to cast my net a bit wider. I must say I've never heard the definition worded the way the one you posted has done. In a discussion of the misogyny inherent in MR and individuals thereof it is vitally relevant that they are members of said movement. Hard to imagine anything more relevant really. Well you are moving the goalposts a bit, because the Catholic Church was the example. Being a f… | /r/MensRights | 11/12/13 08:33 AM |
| 1 | Warren Farrell asks for other book cover ideas."He" didn't "throw a fit" about anything. You seem to be the only one here with a hissy fit over me exercising freedom of speech. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/13 05:03 AM |
| 0 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:That's some pretty intense irony coming from an MRA. No it isn't. Learn your logical fallacies. Start with "Guilt by association." Tell me, do you think I'm misandrist for being a feminist? No, Camille Paglia and Christina Hoff Sommers call themselves Feminists, but their ideals are quite different at several junctures. I do think Feminism proper holds some misandric ideals, but some individual feminists may not be as misandrist. It's a question that can only be answered on a case-by-case basis. | /r/MensRights | 11/12/13 05:01 AM |
| 1 | How can we build a common-sense MRM community? [Request for Ideas]Ok, I've reset it to accept Anon comments now. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/13 07:25 PM |
| 1 | How can we build a common-sense MRM community? [Request for Ideas]I'll take a look at allowing Anon comments when I have time. Lots to do tonight. I think what I'm talking about is us taking ownership of our own movement. Warren, Erin, Paul, etc all had to start somewhere. Rather than allow titular heads of the MRM to screw the pooch and put up with it because "they've done sooooo much" for us, we should be doing two things: 1) Initiating activism on the ground/local level 2) Stating what we will & won't accept as behaviour from those who purport to speak on o… | /r/MensRights | 10/12/13 08:09 AM |
| 0 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:Many people would argue that supporting an organization that upholds those beliefs is upholding misogyny and participating in it nonetheless And those people wo would argue that are bigots. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/13 07:32 AM |
| 0 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:If someone is a member of the Catholic church, but think they should ordain women priests, as one could do an still be a good catholic, then they aren't misogynistic. Therefore: What doesn't make someone a misogynist/being apart of a common religion that has/had negative views against the female gender ...is true. By stating otherwise, you are stereotyping. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/13 02:04 AM |
| 0 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:The church's beliefs are misogynistic and the person also holds those beliefs, therefore the persons beliefs are... We're so close! We couldn't be more far apart. You are stereotyping. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/13 01:51 AM |
| 0 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:"Being part of a religions that has/had negative views of the female gender" Nope. That would mean the religion is misogynist (assuming that you are right for the sake of argument.) A person could be "a part of" that religion and not be misogynistic. Still spinning your wheels. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/13 01:37 AM |
| 0 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:"that's as may be" is a capitulation that at least one item on the list is in fact misogynist. Nope. "That's as may be" is an admission that: "Holding negative views against the female gender" is explicitly misogynist ... is probably true. It says absolutely nothing about how I view that in relation to the list above. I don't, because I categorically reject your worldview, or your social constructs and tautologies to try and make the answers come out how you want. You didn't even put in the effo… | /r/MensRights | 10/12/13 01:29 AM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:Figures you'd want to walk that one back. Maybe later you can make a misandry list and submit it to the OED. No, I wasn't "walking back" anything. You tried to place what was your responsibility on me. The simple fact remains that misogyny is broader than hate, it includes prejudice. You might not like that fact but that does not make it inaccurate. So? "Holding negative views against the female gender" is explicitly misogynist. That's as may be. But it has nothing to do with what the list above… | /r/MensRights | 10/12/13 01:07 AM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:Back up a few steps to where you failed to refute the lists of what does & doesn't constitute misogyny. I'm not inclined to bring anything after that clusterfail. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/13 12:37 AM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Dead weight? Mr. Elam admitted right on AVFM that I had shown him evidence of my activism, and that I will probably do some good. So far the only "dead weight" here appears to be you. | /r/MensRights | 10/12/13 12:05 AM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:So, this thread is a little pointless then isn't it. No, but your input is. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 11:49 PM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:Incidentally, i should point out that derailing the thread is precisely what you did do. The topic is not Cathy young, but what constitutes misogyny. You'd rather Fanboy over CY, than contribute productively to the discussion: FAIL morally FAIL categorically FAIL productively ...and you never demonstrated anything regarding your allegations that I said CY said all MRA's are women bashing. FAIL all the way around. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 11:48 PM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:Several of those slurs represent specific prejudice against women (slut especially) and ascribing to a belief system which "has negative views about the female gender" is pretty explicitly prejudiced. Ummmm... no. Slut can be used as a descriptive term for a man. For your second point, see if you can find similarly reputable definitions of misandry. Then we can discuss the legitimacy of its use in context. No, there is no need to. If you are going to say any criticism of a female or an invective… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 11:42 PM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:Nothing in anything you've shown, eliminates the 1st list above. None of those bullets would fall under misogyny. ~Unless~ You want to be fair and say every time something bad is said about a man is "misandry." Otherwise, this is hot air. PS: Be careful about what you read on Wikipedia. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 11:17 PM |
| 0 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:LOL Sorry but there is nothing to admit as far as I can see, because you didn't demonstrate anywhere that I was wrong. As soon as you do, I will admit it so. Or you can delude yourself otherwise. Your call. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 10:45 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Men's rights UK Got a link to that? | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 10:37 PM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:Well, now you're getting personal by claiming I look like a troll or hijacking, so we're pretty much done here. Just telling what you look like. The onus is on you to change that, if you don't like it. The difference is that you broadened Young's specification. No, I actually generalized in a way that she didn't specifically do so, but not in a way that disagrees with her statement MRA's is different from leading men's websites. Objects in one set may or may not be in the other set. I did not sa… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 10:30 PM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:Some poor people are criminals. Not all poor people all criminals. It would be inaccurate to claim I said that poor people are criminals. It is inaccurate to claim Cathy Young accused MRAs of woman bashing when she qualified that. Nope. Both her statement & mine are accurate, see the Hitler example. Cathy Young did not accuse MRAs of woman bashing. Yes she did. Cathy Young did not accuse men of woman bashing. Irrelevant, since some MRA's are female and the gender of whoever is bashing was not in… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 09:56 PM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:I am an MRA. She did not accuse me of woman bashing. So? She did not accuse most MRAs of woman bashing. My statement did not imply "most" in any way shape or form. She did not accuse most MRA websites of woman bashing. Ditto. She accused some leading men's rights websites, such as AVFM of woman bashing. Which is still accurately represented by: she accused MRA's of woman-bashing. They were MRA's she accused. If I say "Hitler sent Jews to the gas chamber," that statement would be 100% accurate, b… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 09:38 PM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:Cathy Young wrote: Some leading men’s rights websites such as A Voice for Men offer a steady diet of vulgar woman-bashing that discredits any valid points they may make. "Some leading men's websites" means that she intends the scope of her accusation to fall outside of AVFM. Therefore my statement: she accused MRA's of "woman-bashing" ...is 100% accurate. I did not say she accused "all" MRA's of anything. The people she did accuse were MRA's, so to say "she accused MRA's of 'woman-bashing'" is p… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 09:21 PM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:Methinks you are splitting hairs. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 09:13 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Just was wondering if you could direct us... | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 09:10 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Who would you say is "the real MRM?" | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 08:28 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Wonder who the sock-puppets are? | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 08:02 PM |
| 3 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:But Kevin decided to go pull a Rebecca Watson and threatened to withdraw his support for the book unless Warren Farrell picked a cover that Kevin found suitable. Absurd. I never once said I would withdraw my support for "The Myth of Male Power" or Warren Farrell. In fact, since the melee' at AVfM, I've posted the full audio book on my blog, and posted another video by WF. He then went on to misconstrue the entire debate that happened on AVfM on his own blog, which is what precipitated the fallin… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 07:56 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:I sure wouldn't be doing it to ask for forgiveness, if I did send it to Elam, which I may not do after all. Thanks for the support, though. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 07:48 PM |
| 1 | What does/doesn’t make someone a misogynist:Did you intend to post this here? | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 07:47 PM |
| 2 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Ok, I did it. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 06:21 PM |
| 2 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:I'd be curious to know if you ever get it confirmed if that is in fact, Erin. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 05:22 PM |
| 2 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:If that was 'disrespect,' then all concerned have extremely thin hides. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 05:09 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Censorship? That's exactly what you're loudly clamoring for here. Nope. That can't be, because public input was asked for. Some people want to use an image and you throw a tantrum of moral outrage, declare yourself spokesperson for the MRM Nope. Just that I care more what others have to deal with that you obviously do. And when you say: I'm calling you people out on your poor form. You set yourself up as the Mom of the MRM way more than I ever set myself up as a spokesperson. and declare that th… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 05:08 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:I'm calling you people out on your poor form. You criticize others over bullshit and then passive-aggressively take the debate to Reddit when you're dissatisfied with getting banned from other people's websites who you just won't shut the fuck up about. LOL Sorry, I guess censorship, pettiness, hypocritically posting on someone else's blog and getting personal and insulting, and dumb ideas for publicity are things I'm going to have to learn to like. After all, the Feminazi's will appreciate the … | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 04:58 PM |
| 2 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Except that there was no personal attacks made by anyone that were directed at Warren Farrell. The reply PE made on my blog, now that falls in the realm of getting personal. By definition. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 04:52 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:And you have some business proclaiming yourself the spokesperson? At least 2 notches above one that doesn't give fuck-all. I don't like the trolls who say "this isn't a men's rights issue" on every other post, or the tone-police trolls who really just seem eager to jump out of the trenches waving a white flag at the first sign of feminist outrage (as some say, most MRAs are one blowjob away from being a White Knight). This is about those of us who are in the front lines, in the trenches, dealing… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 04:42 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:I could just give fuck-all. Which is exactly why you have no business speaking to or on behalf of the MRM. At the very least, I would think the potential outrage created by these covers would be absolutely hilarious, entertaining, and deeply satisfying. Yep. You don't care if the message gets across though the melee', you just want a brouhaha. Fuck whether or not Men's best interests are served. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 04:15 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Was that guy a troll and the mods brought the hammer down, or did he just have a twinge of conscious? | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 01:12 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:What photo? | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 01:07 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:That's a decision for the book's author to make peace with. Nope. We're the ones on the ground that have to put up with the fallout, as those whom he purports to represent. Every time one of the MRM Big Dogs shits the carpet, the Feminists try to rub our noses in it. Unless you could just give fuck-all. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 12:29 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:I would argue that this is a great spoof on things such as Budweiser ads. Their use of female sexuality to get their message across is far less relevant than to this book. So? It's a re-issue. The point is to broaden the books readership, not to sell a second copy to those who already have it. Which you cannot guarantee won't backfire. No, you're pointing the very argument that the book sets out to make. It's kind of clever, like using your enemy's strengths against them, akin to reverse psychol… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 12:23 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:If they don't even hear about the book to begin with, then your point is moot. WF has already been on Oprah, Donahue & Barbara Walters numerous times. I think the book has had it's proper reach. A re-launch would be good in terms of getting publicity for the event itself, and since the Men's movement has crystallized better than it did 20 years ago, there's no reason to assume it won't go farther this time. A more eye appealing cover would help, but sleaze tactics will just be noise on the frequ… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 12:18 PM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Again, female sexuality sells. It gets everyone's attention. Same with Budweiser ads. But there's such a thing as proper targeting of your audience, and proper marketing for maximum effect. If you are thinking any attention at all, even bad attention, is better than no attention - you aren't badass, you're just pathetic & desperate. Feminists, for example, will be outraged when they feel that something that "belongs" to them is being used to discredit Patriarchal theory No, they won't be "outrag… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 12:03 PM |
| 6 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:No, I agree with you that Elam's response wasn't that great either. He wasn't bridge building But I totally see why he might be put off by part of it. She seems to have laced her honey with a little cyanide here & there. That much is obvious. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 07:55 AM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Female sexuality sells. And ironically, that in itself would help drive author's point home And ironically, many of the constituency that is supposed to be represented by the book could be turned off to it. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 07:37 AM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:And quite frankly, would not contribute to book sales. I don't think you can say the proposed covers will contribute to sales, either. You're just speculating. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 07:32 AM |
| 6 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:In just reading Cathy Young's column without finishing the AVfM review, she makes a lot of good points, but says some ingratiating things: But these points, too, are undercut by Smith’s embrace of extreme “war on men” rhetoric — including the dubious thesis that men are shunning marriage as a rebellion against their disenfranchisement — and her tendency to quote bitter men obsessed with female treachery. I don't think it's extreme in the least to say there's been a war on men. And if she's unfam… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 07:26 AM |
| 3 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:I know. He thinks posting those quotes from me is going to make me look bad at this point. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 06:54 AM |
| 3 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:I don't have problem with anyone supporting them, I just think they need to pull their heads out of it. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 06:52 AM |
| 0 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:The folks at againstmensrights really want one of the three choices to become the official cover Can you please link me to this? | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 06:50 AM |
| 2 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:I was banned from AVFM for defending Cathy Young against Paul and his gang's bullshit smears. Got link? | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 06:49 AM |
| 10 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Since you agreed to keep the peace, my personal opinion is that you could have been given a second chance. But its his call. He's right in that your post is quite disrespectful of Warren Farrell. I suspect that if you sent that blogpost over to WF, he wouldnt even get back to you. Ad that's your call. Others read that post and don't see me saying anything bad about WF at all. Plus I've posted the entire Audio Book on my blog! I just see the whole thing as PE being embarrassed and overly defensiv… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 02:58 AM |
| 8 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:but ever since that scurrilous attack i have seen him as a suspect character Ditto | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 02:25 AM |
| 10 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:You have no clue how to have a polite disagreement, and Paul told you about decorum and you seemed to agree. I "agreed" to keep the peace. Mr. Elam proceeded to post on my blog and become personally insulting, which is something I never did towards him. Plus he seemed to agree that the convo was closed,and there was no more need for banter back & forth as long as I would agree to drop it. I did. So then he follows up by blocking me? Really... he's the one who needs to learn about decorum. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 02:22 AM |
| 3 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Yeah, I'm sorry, but your criticism is pretty inane. Not an opinion shared by everyone, in fact I've gotten more support over it than criticism. but it's really difficult to believe that in all honesty you simply just have no idea how those images relate to "The Myth of Male Power. And you honestly think that the topics covered in that book are best served by those proposed covers? The worshipful portrayals of femininity and seductive power should have been your first clue Oh, please. Those woul… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 02:11 AM |
| 7 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:And as I have already pointed out here, and will be pointing out to Mr. Elam in an email I'm drafting to him, whenever one of the "big dogs" in the MRM shits the carpet ("satire," register-her, etc.) the Feminists try rubbing our noses in it. We're the ones on the ground dealing with the fallout. We're the ones ending up in attempted derailing arguments over it. We had a phrase in my Radio Broadcasting days: "it's not what you mean, it's what I think you mean." IOW, the fallout is what counts, a… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 02:05 AM |
| 2 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Shot down, Mr. Snarky :) | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 12:56 AM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:If you think AVFM saying mean nasty and nasty things about mean and nasty people is a "close equivalent" of someone advocating mass armed bloody warfare, you're either deliberately lying or you have some kind of mental problem. No I said it was the "closest" equivalent, not a "close" equivalent. posts Feminists' home addresses Such irony! here's a crazy idea: Make one and send it to Dr. Farrell himself. The AVFM post about the covers asked for input from readers of AVFM. Therefore, it should hav… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 12:50 AM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:There isn't a close equivalent. Of course not. Metaphors rarely are. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 12:37 AM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:That comparison is from Karen, not myself. I'm saying that whatever the closest equivalent, should be reconsidered. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 12:32 AM |
| 1 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Ask Elam: [email protected] | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 12:31 AM |
| 3 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Nope. Any movement can do just fine with out it's Malcolm X's. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 12:30 AM |
| 5 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Nope. You're rebutting an argument no one is making. | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 12:27 AM |
| 2 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:What bugs me are the armchair quarterbacks who always think they have a better idea, but can never manage to do it themselves Huh? None of us have the connecttions to WF, so that's irrelevant. or point out others who can, while still acting like their points are valid. When any of the "big dogs" of the MRM do something that creates controversy, it's those of us on the ground who bear the brunt of it every time a Feminist tries to derail a debate by throwing up the bullshit in our faces. Therefor… | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 12:25 AM |
| 2 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Why? | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 12:19 AM |
| 8 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:How many comments do you regularly receive on your blog? Lots and lots of comments...on the Tumblr mirror that the blog originated from. Case dismissed :) | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 12:16 AM |
| 5 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:As if AVFM is the totality of the Men's movement? And so what if anyone can or cannot provide whatever. They also won't give us: Register-her Badly phrased screed they call "satire." Paul Elam I rest my case :) | /r/MensRights | 09/12/13 12:05 AM |
| 8 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:the MRM has nothing to show Guess again: http://underthegoddess.blogspot.com/p/you-hear-it-all-time-mras-arent-really.html | /r/MensRights | 08/12/13 11:50 PM |
| 9 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:Get thee behind me, Satan. | /r/MensRights | 08/12/13 11:48 PM |
| 11 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:What are some grievances you'd like to list? I'm interested... | /r/MensRights | 08/12/13 10:55 PM |
| 13 | What dissent gets you on AVfM:The funny thing is - I hear what they are assuming the point is behind those covers, I'm just lampooning them because I think it's a lousy strategy. THIN SKINNED! | /r/MensRights | 08/12/13 10:54 PM |
| 3 | Prison Privatization Harms Men & Boys: Penn Judge Sentenced 28 Years For Selling Kids to PrisonsI don't get your statutory rape comment, but: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kids_for_cash_scandal http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/11/mark-ciavarella-jr_n_924324.html | /r/MensRights | 06/12/13 03:10 PM |
| 2 | Gender Essentialism FTW!Nature vs. Nurture is always a debate. Obviously both apply. I just reject the "blank slate" idea, is all. | /r/MensRights | 06/12/13 11:50 AM |
| 3 | Warren Farrell asks AVFM readers to help him choose a book coverNope. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/13 06:22 AM |
| 4 | Warren Farrell asks AVFM readers to help him choose a book coverMy Dad was a WWII Mess Sargent. Taught mom how to cook. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/13 04:48 AM |
| 3 | Warren Farrell asks AVFM readers to help him choose a book coverI agree. Apparently dissent isn't wanted on AVfM? At least, not very loud dissent. | /r/MensRights | 05/12/13 12:04 AM |
| 1 | Gender Essentialism FTW!Well thanks, that explains that. But I posted 2 other items from underthegoddess and also got downvoted! | /r/MensRights | 05/12/13 12:02 AM |
| -2 | Gender Essentialism FTW!Why don't you downvoters all go chop your fingers off? | /r/MensRights | 04/12/13 11:16 PM |
| 1 | A woman who falsely claimed to be kidnapped and sexually assaulted presents two lessons for us all: One, the police will track your location through your cell phone's history. Two, yes, women do make false accusations, regardless of the PC cant.it makes the news every month or so More like: every day if not more often. http://underthegoddess.blogspot.com/search/label/false%20rape%20accusations | /r/MensRights | 04/12/13 07:06 PM |
| 1 | A woman who falsely claimed to be kidnapped and sexually assaulted presents two lessons for us all: One, the police will track your location through your cell phone's history. Two, yes, women do make false accusations, regardless of the PC cant.Ok, then let's just say "Women lie about rape." | /r/MensRights | 03/12/13 08:00 PM |
| 2 | RamzPaul violence against women day satire "In the USA, 77% of murder victims are male. Our goal is to get that number up to 100%"Agreed. I won't use any of Ramzpaul's stuff for that reason, even though he raises some good points. | /r/MensRights | 01/12/13 02:45 PM |
| 0 | RamzPaul violence against women day satire "In the USA, 77% of murder victims are male. Our goal is to get that number up to 100%"We had a rule when I was in my Radio Broadcasting days: "It's not what you mean, it's what I think you mean." | /r/MensRights | 01/12/13 02:45 PM |
| 1 | Liberal Democrats get Fathers Paternity Leave rightsHow could Single Fathers have shared parental leave? | /r/MensRights | 30/11/13 12:26 AM |
| 0 | Debate: Is Feminism Toxic for Men?Funny, but other people commenting here saw it. Check the comments of the vid. | /r/MensRights | 28/11/13 12:31 AM |
| 1 | Debate: Is Feminism Toxic for Men?Right bout now, you're acting like a drunk boxer who doesn't realize nobody's showing up to get in the ring with you. He already admitted he didn't do very well. | /r/MensRights | 27/11/13 04:05 PM |
| 9 | This is refreshing to see. Help for men. (x-post r/pics)So who is the organization? | /r/MensRights | 27/11/13 03:52 PM |
| 2 | Huffpo writer Charles Clymer to publicly debate Paul ElamGoogling you gets a band named "Tracy Morgan Freeman" | /r/MensRights | 23/11/13 11:38 AM |
| 1 | Huffpo writer Charles Clymer to publicly debate Paul Elamhe'll step on many toes in doing so Either way, Clymer is toast, I'm betting. Even if there may be better MRA's than Elam. | /r/MensRights | 23/11/13 11:35 AM |
| 2 | Huffpo writer Charles Clymer to publicly debate Paul ElamGive one example of an issue that's held to by the MHRM that Feminist's haven't fought us tooth & nail on. | /r/MensRights | 23/11/13 11:27 AM |
| 1 | Prostate Cancer mainly effects Old Farts, so it doesn't matter.Thanks for that. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/13 07:49 AM |
| 1 | Prostate Cancer mainly effects Old Farts, so it doesn't matter.Could you please link us to the stats on that? | /r/MensRights | 21/11/13 12:28 AM |
| 2 | Debigotizer says she's not a bigot, based on info from the SPLC.That's her. Could you find out about that for me? Credit will be given where due. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/13 12:02 AM |
| 2 | Were women convicted in 'ritual abuse panic'? Junk science law aids their release [San Antonio 4]TX has a generous recomp law, too. Wonder if it applies, here. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/13 04:00 PM |
| 2 | Were women convicted in 'ritual abuse panic'? Junk science law aids their release [San Antonio 4]Isn't that the point of the story? | /r/MensRights | 20/11/13 03:48 PM |
| 4 | Were women convicted in 'ritual abuse panic'? Junk science law aids their release [San Antonio 4]Yes, I know these aren't "falsely accused men," but the SRA panic thing is highly relevant. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/13 01:16 PM |
| 1 | Prostate Cancer mainly effects Old Farts, so it doesn't matter.But it's there - so agitating on their behalf is better than me starting something. | /r/MensRights | 20/11/13 12:44 PM |
| 1 | Tips For Succeeding As A Woman In The Workplace | The OnionI don't see what you guys are seeing in this. I think you're looking for something to criticize. What it makes me think of is the "Threat Narratives" thing. | /r/MensRights | 19/11/13 06:35 PM |
| 1 | Prostate Cancer mainly effects Old Farts, so it doesn't matter.One question for you all: if it was a choice between treating prostate cancer in a 60 year old man or breast cancer in a 30 year old woman, which would you choose? Systemic discrimination is Systemic discrimination. No matter how you dress it up. You have 10 days left, shouldn't you be out promoting Movember? | /r/MensRights | 19/11/13 06:21 PM |
| 1 | Prostate Cancer mainly effects Old Farts, so it doesn't matter.This is the problem with socialized medicine, you have to choose. Because Private Insurance never causes hardship by taking the choice away from you. | /r/MensRights | 19/11/13 06:18 PM |
| 1 | Prostate Cancer mainly effects Old Farts, so it doesn't matter.What about Movember? | /r/MensRights | 18/11/13 08:48 PM |
| 1 | Prostate Cancer mainly effects Old Farts, so it doesn't matter.Go on there and give her a piece of your mind! | /r/MensRights | 18/11/13 08:18 AM |
| 1 | Prostate Cancer mainly effects Old Farts, so it doesn't matter.Well, Movember is one of those things people are doing to raise awareness. | /r/MensRights | 18/11/13 08:16 AM |
| 2 | Prostate Cancer mainly effects Old Farts, so it doesn't matter.Please note the sardonic nature of the title & the calls for debunking. | /r/MensRights | 18/11/13 02:39 AM |
| 2 | Warren Farrell gets back into it with the Cackling Quacks: HuffPost LiveAlso, Warren Farrell at least cited his book, which wasn't much but it was more than they did. Given the time constraints, it was fair. Anyone can go get his book and look for the references. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/13 03:43 PM |
| 2 | Warren Farrell gets back into it with the Cackling Quacks: HuffPost Live1) Not allowing Warren to enlarge on his ideas by hogging the floor. 2) General hostility. 3) Stats such as the one who said "94% of workplace deaths occur in the home" without clarification or citation of source. 4) Accusing him, indirectly, of "pitting women against men." 5) Spouting off gender wage-gap propaganda, despite the fact that numerous articles have been written against it - and then they act like it's unheard of that someone might disagree. Those are just what I have from memory I'm… | /r/MensRights | 10/11/13 12:59 AM |
| 1 | Warren Farrell gets back into it with the Cackling Quacks: HuffPost LiveThat's a stretch to call it "the workplace," though. And funny she never cited anything. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/13 10:32 PM |
| 2 | Under The Goddess - What has the Mens Movement done to help men?That is awesome, thanks for that. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/13 10:29 PM |
| 2 | Under The Goddess - What has the Mens Movement done to help men?Ummm... a good portion of that list is from Reddit~! | /r/MensRights | 09/11/13 02:48 PM |
| 3 | Warren Farrell gets back into it with the Cackling Quacks: HuffPost Live"Cackling Quacks" is 100% fair & accurate. Morons would be closer to the truth, but then I'd be accused of being ableist. | /r/MensRights | 09/11/13 01:35 PM |
| 1 | I wasn't even surprised when I found this in my textbook.Shouldn't even matter. If it is in the law, we need to be discussing it. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/13 01:45 AM |
| 1 | I wasn't even surprised when I found this in my textbook.Shouldn't even matter. If it is in the law, we need to be discussing it. | /r/MensRights | 08/11/13 01:43 AM |
| 1 | Automatic guardian rights planned for unwed fathersIs Guardianship the same as custody or parentage? I would think one would be more flexible than the others. | /r/MensRights | 04/11/13 05:13 AM |
| 0 | MRA's, please don't do this! What other groups within MRA do you think give us a bad name?I don't honestly see what y'all are bitchin' 'bout. Gender Essentialism FTW! | /r/MensRights | 04/11/13 01:58 AM |
| 1 | In Ohio University sex act caught on video, prosecutor reveals facts that show it was not sexual assault; the school should drop its investigationSry, I had a description on the page, now I've put it back. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/13 09:29 PM |
| 1 | COTWA sides with the feminists on this oneApparently you've heard very little about what happens to male students kicked out because some chick cried "rape." Even if found not guilty, they can still be kicked out. Ask the OP if you don't believe me. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/13 01:21 PM |
| 1 | In Ohio University sex act caught on video, prosecutor reveals facts that show it was not sexual assault; the school should drop its investigationlol Nah. It's my blog. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/13 01:02 PM |
| 1 | COTWA sides with the feminists on this oneHello??? They can still ruin that young man's reputation and expel him. | /r/MensRights | 31/10/13 07:09 AM |
| 1 | In Ohio University sex act caught on video, prosecutor reveals facts that show it was not sexual assault; the school should drop its investigationYou're calling Under The Goddess a "Feminist blog" wtf??? | /r/MensRights | 31/10/13 07:08 AM |
| 2 | COTWA sides with the feminists on this oneUnder The Goddess does not share your position on this issue. If the University should drop it, so should the students. Everything you state here that is wrong with how the University is handling this and talking about it, applies to those sticky notes. You even refer to an OP-ED by a student in the campus newspaper that was out of line, and rightly so. How are these sticky notes different? The problem is gossiping tongues. Feminism has it's own support network. Let them talk for themselves. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/13 10:38 AM |
| 1 | COTWA sides with the feminists on this oneThe school is reportedly still investigating. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/13 10:34 AM |
| 1 | In Ohio University sex act caught on video, prosecutor reveals facts that show it was not sexual assault; the school should drop its investigationUnder The Goddess sides with COTWA on this, and has mirrored the blog post. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/13 10:28 AM |
| 2 | In Ohio University sex act caught on video, prosecutor reveals facts that show it was not sexual assault; the school should drop its investigationThe school didn't wait for the district attorney to reach its conclusions before it held an event last Thursday titled “Campus Conversation: Sexual Assault, Consent, and Bystander Intervention Something tells me that Title IX had a part to play in this? | /r/MensRights | 30/10/13 10:13 AM |
| 2 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?And your point is? | /r/MensRights | 29/10/13 10:15 PM |
| 2 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?Sure thing. Whatever you say. snicker | /r/MensRights | 29/10/13 10:15 PM |
| 2 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?LOL Low level thinking, my friend. You can have a military, just realize that there is no need for aggression that has the US in oh, what is it - 70+ wars that they'll admit to? Good job, Patriarchy. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/13 09:41 PM |
| 2 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?Wow, you show a lot of good tendencies towards thoughtful writing and articulation, until someone begins to poke at your meta-narrative, and this is how you respond? Thanks for the ad hom. What a satisfying admission of defeat. | /r/MensRights | 29/10/13 09:39 PM |
| 1 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?I strongly suggest looking at the work of Peter Wright, who's done some excellent historical research. From the intro to an excerpt from his blog: That we live in a gynocentric (woman-centered, woman-elevating) culture is not rationally disputable to anyone who looks around with open eyes. Many thinkers believe this elevation of women–and the intensification of misandry that so frequently results from it–is genetic and inescapable. Male disposability, rather than being a nominal reality that is … | /r/MensRights | 29/10/13 08:00 AM |
| 2 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?You didn't address any of my points. All you've done is to re-iterate your basic thesis that you took umpteen paragraphs to articulate. 1) women make babies, men don't. But making babies doesn't answer the question of prejudice and warmongering against real or perceived enemies, materialism, poor allocation of resources, threat narratives, female hypo-agency, and all the things I mentioned. Women can make babies, sure - but that doesn't mean that all the bullshit done in their name is justified.… | /r/MensRights | 29/10/13 03:37 AM |
| 2 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?Since you demand a meatier response, I've detailed what I think are the problems contributing to male disposability in my lengthy response to Demonspawn above . | /r/MensRights | 26/10/13 07:57 PM |
| 1 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?I've detailed what I think are the problems contributing to male disposability in my lengthy response to Demonspawn below. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/13 07:54 PM |
| 1 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?Ok so this is off the beaten path of what my original purpose is/was. But in conflating "traditionalism" with the political Right, you miss the obvious: One could hold to genuine trad values and still support universal health care, green power, public education, public transportation, non-aggression in US Foreign policy, end to the surveillance state, halter-breaking Wall St, etc. Now to state why I reject your thesis out of hand, in 6 easy steps: Biological differences may have played a part in… | /r/MensRights | 26/10/13 07:52 PM |
| 1 | COTWA was wrong about the Ohio University video sex actViewers were outraged when they saw a video of the alleged rape, because they say it didn’t look like the sexual assault, contrary to the assertions of Ohio law enforcement. Actually, LE never made any such claim, as COTWA admitted in the retraction. | /r/MensRights | 25/10/13 07:40 AM |
| 3 | COTWA was wrong about the Ohio University video sex actNobody's perfect, speaking as one who participated in Rachel bashing to begin with. | /r/MensRights | 25/10/13 12:25 AM |
| 1 | COTWA was wrong about the Ohio University video sex acthttp://www.cotwa.info/2013/10/false-rape-label-should-not-be-thrown.html | /r/MensRights | 25/10/13 12:19 AM |
| 2 | COTWA was wrong about the Ohio University video sex actI'm sure I wasn't. :) | /r/MensRights | 25/10/13 12:18 AM |
| 7 | COTWA was wrong about the Ohio University video sex actHe thought it was assault. Until I showed him different research. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/13 04:36 PM |
| 1 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?We don't bother with a real answer... because we didn't get a real question :) | /r/MensRights | 24/10/13 03:57 PM |
| 0 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?LOL You see it that way... because of personal bias. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/13 03:52 PM |
| 1 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?I think that's mainly because those are who are a lot of the Main Ideologues, but I think Warren Farrell may be the future of the movement, as well a the best of it's past. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/13 09:19 AM |
| 0 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?Sorry if I felt like I was being ganged up on, but I did. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/13 02:46 AM |
| 6 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?As well, they could just straightforward ask me what other examples would I like to talk about? But... nahhhhhh ;-) | /r/MensRights | 24/10/13 02:21 AM |
| 1 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?You mad? | /r/MensRights | 24/10/13 01:34 AM |
| 4 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?So? | /r/MensRights | 24/10/13 01:14 AM |
| 5 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?So? | /r/MensRights | 24/10/13 01:14 AM |
| 4 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?Excuse me for thinking that Father's rights are men's issues. Most father's are men, last I checked. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/13 01:01 AM |
| 4 | What was that again about Conservativism being more "appropriate" for Men's Issues?That's because this is a post about Father's rights. You want to focus on those issues, bring it up on your own post. | /r/MensRights | 24/10/13 12:59 AM |
| 1 | Gynocentrism and its cultural origins | Gynocentrism was invented in the Middle Ages (12th century) with the cultural practices of romantic chivalry and courtly love. It continues today relatively unchanged from the original.I suggest you contact the blog owner with those concerns. | /r/MensRights | 23/10/13 09:57 PM |
| 7 | Student misidentified as Ohio University rape victim is too terrified to leave her house because of vicious attacks by internet trollsI don't think it's quite fair to project all of that on this random girl who herself, is a victim of a false accusations. If we don't believe "2 wrongs don't make a right" why are we here? | /r/MensRights | 23/10/13 09:31 AM |
| 0 | Is COTWA losing their objectivity? You be the judge.Thanks. Any references on Blackouts? | /r/MensRights | 19/10/13 10:27 AM |
| 0 | Is COTWA losing their objectivity? You be the judge.Yoffe came back tonite: http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/10/18/rape_culture_and_binge_drinking_emily_yoffe_responds_to_her_critics.html | /r/MensRights | 19/10/13 09:51 AM |
| -1 | Is COTWA losing their objectivity? You be the judge.But I guess Emily Yoffe don't count, eh? | /r/MensRights | 19/10/13 09:42 AM |
| 0 | Is COTWA losing their objectivity? You be the judge.I can't be moved to see it that way, sorry. Most people I think have a picture in their minds of what an assault or rape looks like, even if they've never witnessed one. likely is incapable of giving real consent "real consent" "real consent" "real consent" That falls into the Feminist semantic trap that they've been pushing on rape & alcohol for quite sometime now. Not buying into it. | /r/MensRights | 19/10/13 09:39 AM |
| 0 | Is COTWA losing their objectivity? You be the judge.PS: It's all about the "agency" thing. | /r/MensRights | 19/10/13 08:34 AM |
| 2 | Is COTWA losing their objectivity? You be the judge.I simply cannot agree. She's an adult, she has a mouth that works. She had plenty of opportunity to say something, but chose not to. You saw the photo. Do people being assaulted react like that? Does someone being raped caress the back of his head and thrust her pelvis his direction (as in the video?) There's more than enough to go on that COTWA shouldn't speak as if it's a forgone conclusion that this is rape, and enough more me to speak as if it isn't. The reactions of the people aren't all th… | /r/MensRights | 19/10/13 08:33 AM |
| 1 | Updated: List of useful linksNational Post Link on Spousal abuse is also dead. | /r/MensRights | 17/10/13 11:36 AM |
| 1 | Updated: List of useful linksReddit comment by Celda showing list of ways males are oppressed Nothing there. | /r/MensRights | 17/10/13 11:31 AM |
| 1 | Convincing men to "man up" for healthcare.And unless you aren't a tax payer, tax-payer funded means you are indeed paying for it. However, there are certain aspects of the pay as you go system that allows Private Industry to run amok in driving up the costs of things in a way that isn't found under Single Payer systems: http://www.pnhp.org/resources/60-percent-of-health-spending-is-already-publicly-financed-enough-to-cover-everyone | /r/MensRights | 13/10/13 09:57 AM |
| 1 | Offsite MensRightsCan you do something about your CAPTCHA? Piece 'o shit thing gave me a hard time just now and then locked me out. There are CAPTCHA systems that are a little more readable, you know. | /r/MensRights | 16/09/13 09:06 AM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.So I think we can safely say chocobutt is a Feminist troll pretending to be somewhat sympathetic to MRA's? | /r/MensRights | 16/09/13 07:44 AM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Chocobluff dodges responsibility to deal with facts, and when asked for proof all you get is told your demand for info is "idiotic." The main reason for correcting lies is so others who happen on this thread won't be wrongly persuaded. | /r/MensRights | 15/09/13 05:41 AM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Excellent. This clown (M or F?) needs to be taken behind the woodshed a time or two. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/13 09:13 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Here, Chocobrainwashed. Lean some facts: http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/WageGa http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/04/16/its-time-that-we-end-the-equal-pay-myth/ http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704415104576250672504707048.html http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505125_162-28246928/the-gender-pay-gap-is-a-complete-myth/ http://www.businessinsider.com/actually-the-gender-pay-gap-is-just-a-myth-2011-3?op… | /r/MensRights | 14/09/13 02:59 AM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.He's talking about you, who still hasn't offered squat for proof of any of your assertions, despite being repeatedly asked to do so. | /r/MensRights | 14/09/13 12:35 AM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Actually, I appreciate the input overall ... there's some good stuff up there! | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 11:49 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Careful what you say. Chocoboat will accuse you of saying Women shouldn't be allowed to vote! ;-) | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 12:03 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.If that wasn't what you were saying, then what the fuck have you been talking about for over an hour? I'm trying to tell you what history was all about, which you are obviously very ignorant of. I am trying to tell you that in the historical context of voting, you cannot expect that people would automatically go "Oh gosh, why don't we just make it so everyone can vote?" I'm telling you that you cannot speak for women and say they were all denied the right to vote, when: There were men AND women … | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 07:38 AM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.You deny saying things that you provably said just a few posts earlier Where is your PROOF! Then you accuse me of lying when I repeat your own words back to you. You've NEVER once "repeated my own words," only your caricature. You think MRAs are against the idea of every human being having equal rights and responsibilities regardless of their gender Nope. I know they are the only ones who do. At least between them and the Feminists. You have completely lost touch with reality. I'm done with you.… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 06:56 AM |
| 2 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.So I'm still waiting for you to prove the following: The existence of the so-called "Glass Ceiling." What proof is there that there are so-called "good 'ol boys clubs" sitting at the top of corporations rubbing their hands with glee at the idea of keeping women out of the upper echelons of wealth and position? The existence of men refusing to hire women for whatever irrational reason or list of reasons that you claim they have. Proof that i said women shouldn't be hired in these companies. Proof… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 06:52 AM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Women's groups have practiced the most egregious "separate but equal" of all: National Organization of Women Why not National Organization of Equality? Violence Against Women Act Why not just "Domestic Violence Act?" Reproductive rights for Women But men have no reproductive rights. And not only that, but naming the problem (Patriarchy) after Men, and the solution (Feminism) after Women. Not exactly a great use of inclusive language, there. But then, VAWA didn't have inclusive language either, u… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 06:44 AM |
| 2 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Uh, no. That was you. You asked who was trying to prevent women from gaining the right to vote in the 1900s, and I answered "anti-suffragists". You then randomly pointed out that they don't exist in the year 2013, for no apparent reason. Nope. Never said that, because you were confused about the era I was asking about. Your demands are idiotic. I can't name any male rape victim's names either, so does that mean men never get raped? I can't pull a list out of my pocket full of names of men who ha… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 06:20 AM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.I would be, if I went around protesting against women having the right to vote just because it would benefit me financially. That's not lying. That's having a different opinion. It doesn't surprise me that someone who argues against women's suffrage Nobody's doing that here. Now you stop lying. This is why this convo has gone nowhere, because you repeatedly and apropos of nothing, accuse me of saying things I have not said and holding positions I do not hold. unable to conceive of a person who w… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 06:11 AM |
| 2 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Women's groups have practiced the most egregious "separate but equal" of all: National Organization of Women Why not National Organization of Equality? Violence Against Women Act Why not just "Domestic Violence Act?" Reproductive rights for Women But men have no reproductive rights. And not only that, but naming the problem (Patriarchy) after Men, and the solution (Feminism) after Women. Not exactly a great use of inclusive language, there. But then, VAWA didn't have inclusive language either, u… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:40 AM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.And who exactly did men "seize" the right to vote from? So you don't know your American history? | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:10 AM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Then why did you talk about anti-suffragists not existing today? I didn't. You did. While anti-suffragists do not exist today, we do still have sexists, and some of them are in positions of power. Sometimes they promote less-qualified men instead of more-qualified women, Really. And what is your proof of this? Who is doing this to whom? They have irrational concerns that a woman will screw up at her job and make expensive mistakes, or not be effective, or will crack under the pressure. LOL Okaaa… | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 03:07 AM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.I wish they had, but I can understand why they didn't. Yeah, when voting didn't exist prior to that, it's a little hard. But that never seems to occur to you. You think there should be voting and then "presto change-o" everyone can vote! It doesn't seem to sink into you that not everyone is going to automatically think like you, especially 200+ years ago. That's why you are clearly operating from an elitist perspective, or cultural imperialism. The only other Democracy that the Americans had to … | /r/MensRights | 13/09/13 02:59 AM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.I am a moral person who is capable of judging what is sensible. What, do I have to pass some kind of test to be allowed an opinion? Apparently you think so. You want 18th and 19th century men and women to think like you, coming from a paradigm where voting rights are a given. Remember: Voting was NOT allowed to all men. if you were not a property owner or a non-white, you couldn't vote. So to say "Men" had the right to vote and "Women" did not is actually false. Do you realize that after women g… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 10:26 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Did you forget that we're talking about the early 1900s? No, but you apparently have. You keep talking about all that as if the people back then are even operating with the same paradigms as we have today. Are you intentionally being dense in order to try to prove some point? Tu quoque. What I'm against is telling women, upon their encountering sexists who won't promote them and reinforce the "glass ceiling" WHO is doing that? that their only option is to start their own company if they want to … | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 10:12 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.I guess not. I think that treating all people as equals is pretty important, and if you're going to fight against it then you better have a damn good reason. Who are you to judge what is a good reason? I understand their viewpoint, but I also judge it. I don't think it was the right thing to do. And they judge yours is wrong too. So? OK, I'm in the shoes of someone who will directly be negatively affected by women having the right to vote. "This is terrible news, I'm going to lose money/influenc… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 10:01 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Anti-suffragists, and much of society in general when it came to earning high level jobs Anti suffragists do not exist anymore, or at least as an organized entity with any clout. Who supposedly is stopping them from getting high earning jobs? Who? Where? Do you have proof of this, or do you just assume the answer? The people who would tell them "women can't do that", "women aren't capable of that", "we don't hire women here", "women aren't accepted into this program". Who??? When??? You've been … | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 09:58 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Well, of course. I was only referring to men vs women, not aristocrats vs commoners And you cannot over-simplify things like that. That's right. I do know that equality for everyone is best. No you don't. How? You aren't. Sadly, you are the third person I've met here who thinks that I don't belong because I believe in equality instead of giving men more power than women. There is no one here, including myself who has argued anything even close to that. I can see you probably listen with an open … | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 09:53 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.OK. The wikipedia link makes it sound like it was a right-wing political movement, made up of conservative women who didn't want to give all women the vote, believing that this would mean an influx of voters that would favor the Left. But you didn't read all of it, apparently. Emma Goldman was an Anarchist, and had her own reasons: Anti-suffragism was not limited to conservative elements. The anarchist Emma Goldman opposed suffragism on the grounds that women were more inclined toward legal enfo… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 09:46 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.If "equal" means "none for anyone", it is still equal. Not really. The aristocracy had more power than ever when there was no democracy. And women were able to ensconce themselves right in the middle of those aristocracies You cannot deny it. I can tell somebody doesn't understand that equal rights has nothing to do with that subject. Yep. Your point a finger at others and telling then you know what's best. I am in favor of equal rights and responsibilities for everyone. Because I recognize that… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 09:29 PM |
| 2 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Once again, when confronted with facts that prove women didn't have equal treatment, your reaction is to mock them and make fun of the fact that their mistreatment isn't the worst thing to ever happen to a human being. What facts are you referring to? You're ignoring the issue. Just because most women at the time were housewives "making babies", that doesn't mean it's right to restrict women from doing much beyond that. Who is doing that? There is no reason to disallow a single woman from having… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 09:24 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.When you say that women who don't like dealing with the glass ceiling should go open their companies and run them how they like, that strongly implies that you think the "glass ceiling" is acceptable, and the correct way for women to handle this problem is to make their own companies instead of removing the glass ceiling. And so women go out and start their own companies. They run it the way they want to, promote and pay whomever however they like. New jobs are created, and nobody has to get bea… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 09:20 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Equality means that everyone has equal rights under the law and equal voting power. Do you realize that voting didn't even exist until 100-200 years ago? If you manufacture and sell a product that some people see as harmful, and your society takes a vote and is overwhelmingly in favor of making your product illegal, that is an unfortunate turn of events for you. I can tell somebody has never run a business or had to lose it. Rather than insulting me, perhaps you could clearly explain your point … | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 09:10 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Cultural imperialism? I'm sorry? Are you saying women are natives from another culture, whose simple ways of life we shouldn't disturb? We are talking about history. Pay attention. What women would have vehemently disagreed with me? Traditionalists who believe the woman's place is in the kitchen, obeying her husband's commands? Not sure what your point is here. I just pointed it out to you, and you apparently have ignored it. Try educating yourself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-suffragism#… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 09:07 PM |
| 2 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.No one was stopping women from learning about certain topics. But they often did face many obstacles on their path to becoming a lawyer/doctor/etc. that the men on the same path did not have to face. Yes these poor poor poor women. Sitting on the internet (constructed by men) on computers or phones (built by men) in houses (constructed by men) going to jobs in vehicles (invented, developed, built by men) using electricity (lines dug and constructed by men, wiring installed by men) getting up to … | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 09:01 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Yes, I am comparing blacks to women. Both are groups of human beings that did not have equal rights or opportunities in life in the past. And how many blacks were able to marry into the aristocracy? Do you even understand what a legitimate minority is? http://www.thefreedictionary.com/minority **mi·nor·i·ty a. A racial, religious, political, national, or other group thought to be different from the larger group of which it is part. b. A group having little power or representation relative to oth… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 08:51 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Because that's what we do as human beings. We try to create a society that is good, and eliminate the bad things in it. No, that is not what we do, unless you think that it's a good thing to put sandals on the natives feet. What you are doing is Cultural Imperialism. I am putting myself in women's shoes (not literally. lol), and I'm having a lot of trouble imagining how my lot in life would be worse if I was treated like a full fledged human being rather than a second class citizen. No, you are … | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 08:40 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.A person who believes in equality. For whom? How much equality is it when your livelihood is shut down? And your example is ridiculous. We shouldn't give women the right to vote because their votes might cause something I don't like? You are still trying to point your finger at people in past times situations before women were allowed to vote, and insisting they take a post-suffrage view. That is intellectual dishonesty of the highest order. Put yourself in their shoes! The rest of what you say … | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 08:34 PM |
| 2 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Why don't blacks open their own restaurants, and put up their own water fountains, and start their own schools? Why do they get equal access to the things that were created by whites? Is that seriously your argument? Are you seriously comparing Blacks to Women? And your equivalency is laughably idiotic: entrepreneurship = segregation That's exactly what you are implying? | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 08:29 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.In just re-reading the comment by fredflints that you are replying to here, you missed the train entirely. He told you that science at one time was about tinkering with magnets or whatever on your own. What stopped women from doing it? You completely avoided the question and started talking about other areas where they were denied entry based on being deemed unqualified. So why didn't women take the time out to play with magnets or prisms? Because a lot of them were too busy making babies and ra… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 08:25 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Just one example: Your re-write of my Question #3 inserts info you are wanting to get into up front, whereas I'm assuming that will come down the line in the conversation. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 08:02 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Thanks for the input and thought provoking comments. Not sure that I need to re-write the questions that badly, though :) | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 07:56 PM |
| 2 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.So why don't women who bitch and moan about the "Glass Ceiling" start their own tech companies? Why do they get affirmative action to place them in jobs with companies already up and running thanks to the efforts of men, and then crow about how well they do in an environment made by men? Forget the Glass Ceiling, go build your own building and put in whatever kind of ceiling you like! | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 07:51 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.But I don't think that's the most relevant thing to be discussing. There are plenty of men who think circumcision is fine because "mine turned out fine, so who cares". Does that prove that circumcision is good, or should be acceptable by society? Hardly. Why are we trying to determine for others what is "good?" Please don't mistake me for some anti-MRA here, I'm simply stating the facts. Would you be OK living in a society where only women can vote, even if they didn't abuse the power and took m… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 07:45 PM |
| 1 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.There is no reason why women shouldn't have had those same rights and responsibilities. But who are you to make that determination? If you were married to a Tavern owner, or perhaps co-owned the biz with your spouse, would you not be concerned that Women gaining political capital may in fact shut your business down? Just who gave us Prohibition, anyway? Ok, so it was passed 6 months before Women got the right to vote. So that would make a Tavern owner more concerned about the changes, would it n… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 07:36 PM |
| 2 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.Well, and on top of that - look at the list of things I posted elsewhere on this thread about things that Women's Groups accomplished before they had the right to vote: Prohibition, Tender Years Doctrine, age of Consent. It's often assumed that voting is the only thing you can do to bring change, but obviously not. | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 09:19 AM |
| 2 | Feedback please: Three Questions on the topic of "Women's Oppression" in history.They couldn't vote for the first few decades, You need to more carefully read Question #3. I don't think women were even united on the question of voting. Do a search for "Anti-Suffrage Movement," "Women's National Anti-Suffrage League," "Helen Kendrick Johnson," "Emma Goldman." Furthermore, most men weren't able to vote, as well. (See Question #1.) Did women benefit? Some of them, I guess. You guess? Being married to an aristocrat it could be argued, gave one more leverage than actual voting. T… | /r/MensRights | 12/09/13 08:38 AM |
| 1 | Anyone on Tumblr wanna take a crack at this (cough) fine piece of writing?Thanks for the great effort! All anyone has to do is look at the number of single mothers with children from different fathers. Sperm pump, indeed. | /r/MensRights | 09/09/13 02:15 AM |
| 2 | [Tumblr/Video] Woman sexually assaults young teenage boy on the bus, removing his clothes and grinding on him. People on the bus laugh at it as if it's some fucking joke.Come to think of it, have you not run into just how much vigilantism happens out int he real world on even just an accusation of rape? http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2011/11/penn-state-scandal-was-systemic-failure.html Feast your eyes on the anecdotes therein. You cannot sustain your "Rape Culture" hobgoblin by that. | /r/MensRights | 08/09/13 04:11 PM |
| 1 | Anyone on Tumblr wanna take a crack at this (cough) fine piece of writing?Appreciate all the participation so far. Hopefully someone will respond & reblog on Tumblr also. I already have, but this needs more input. | /r/MensRights | 08/09/13 04:03 PM |
| 1 | [Tumblr/Video] Woman sexually assaults young teenage boy on the bus, removing his clothes and grinding on him. People on the bus laugh at it as if it's some fucking joke.And it is cultural - in Europe the problem of sexual abuse in prison, while not insignificant, is not anywhere near as rampant as it is in the US Because the US has a "Rape Culture" or because Europe has a different penal system? I have no idea, I'm just pointing out that your conclusion may not be drawn from the premise based on other data. Someone who lived in Europe for awhile once told me: "Sex in Europe is considered a bodily function. Americans have elevated it to a crime." Dunno how accur… | /r/MensRights | 08/09/13 02:47 PM |
| 0 | [Tumblr/Video] Woman sexually assaults young teenage boy on the bus, removing his clothes and grinding on him. People on the bus laugh at it as if it's some fucking joke.I doubt this is much of a validation of "Rape Culture" or even "rape minimizing culture" though you try hard to make it so. This looks to be a few drunk women and some obviously under-enlightened youths. Now if this were to happen with sober adults and teenagers who've been educated to where they know a little better, then you might have a case. And no, I don't think it follows then that we should "teach men not to rape." Rapists don't do so on the basis of their education. The question is, does… | /r/MensRights | 08/09/13 02:39 PM |
| 1 | Anyone on Tumblr wanna take a crack at this (cough) fine piece of writing?I think especially his last paragraph can be responded to quite handily. I sent the link to Karen, but never heard back on it. | /r/MensRights | 08/09/13 01:32 PM |
| 1 | Honey Badger Radio: Rape as political currencyI hope Karen will post the text of her intro, with references? | /r/MensRights | 06/09/13 04:54 AM |
| 1 | Gloria Steinem said this tonight...I did not say any of the things you are claiming. Her problem is using the hobgoblin of predators in the military as rationale for why we can't have more bases, when the US in fact are in 75+ wars worldwide (that they will admit to.) Don't you think this is enough? Here, take a look at just one little corner of the world: http://i.imgur.com/XR0bP.jpg And the reason why I didn't link to the video is because I saw it in the original live feed on Rt.com, and didn't know there would be a recording a… | /r/MensRights | 04/09/13 07:15 AM |
| 1 | Gloria Steinem said this tonight...The reason why I didn't link to the video is because I saw it in the Rt.com live feed, and didn't know there would be a recording available or when. Plus looking at the video shows I quoted her correctly. Nice try though, but #FAIL! | /r/MensRights | 04/09/13 07:08 AM |
| 1 | Gloria Steinem said this tonight...Thanks for proving that I indeed quoted her correctly. Now go away. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/13 07:02 AM |
| 0 | Gloria Steinem said this tonight...Really though: Ralph Nader, Noam Chomsky, those have all pointed out the same thing. | /r/MensRights | 04/09/13 06:58 AM |
| 1 | If men and women were to trully separate...Ok so I'm not sure what you are saying. I think you are saying men would crack (give in) 1st, but in reality, women need men more? Care to elaborate? | /r/MensRights | 28/08/13 12:35 AM |
| 2 | If men and women were to trully separate...let things settle down, then adopt a new way of relating AHA! So you do perceive of a scenario where one or more sides give it up! So how about answering the question? | /r/MensRights | 28/08/13 12:24 AM |
| 2 | If men and women were to trully separate...I know Ayn Rand tells bedtime stories to the contrary, but actually... the population would start dwindling and... | /r/MensRights | 27/08/13 11:56 PM |
| 2 | Racist or Feminist? You decide! by Typhon BlueI can see why someone would suspect this to be the case and wouldn't necessarily regard them as an awful misandrist for it. No, but a lot of other things that go along with it would make it that way. If they hold to a general "men are rapists" attitude, or if they think they can fix anything by "teaching men not to rape," then I would say there's definitely some Misandry going on there. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/13 11:39 PM |
| 5 | Do you agree?Lost me @#3. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/13 11:01 PM |
| 1 | Racist or Feminist? You decide! by Typhon BlueBecause more men prefer to be a Top? j/k | /r/MensRights | 05/08/13 10:40 PM |
| 8 | Facebook's "Being Liberal" page sure has been pushing this narrative hard lately.Since the meme in question said "Since the dawn of time," then Biblical laws on circumcision would be included. Your assets are also often a result of your work. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/13 08:24 PM |
| 1 | Facebook's "Being Liberal" page sure has been pushing this narrative hard lately.Totally feel ya, Bro. Same thing with Abortion, as far as I'm concerned. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/13 08:20 PM |
| 2 | Men's Rights Edmonton versus the Slutters By Typhon BlueCalling this "Victim Blaming" highly indicative of Bullshit Femmspeak. It's like Humpty-Dumpty said (roughly) "A word means what I choose it to mean." i'm going to assume you actually understand the basic difference between a formal uniform and bullshit harmful stereotypes. What you keep avoiding is that rapists didn't sign up for the Women's Studies course next semester, and are totally oblivious to your better intentions. The police chief who said "Don't dress like a slut" wasn't expecting you… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/13 03:19 AM |
| 1 | Men's Rights Edmonton versus the Slutters By Typhon BlueIf that were the case, why do I see so many men and women happy and willing to go to a bar/party to get drunk and hook up? Unfortunately there isn't a clear-cut way to define this kind of thing; I think the best way to go is to play it safe and be 100% sure that the person you are about to have sex with is clearly ok with it, and that they are 'with it' enough to give meaningful consent. Hell, I've even heard of contracts people signed. But you can't always guarantee that the proper steps will b… | /r/MensRights | 02/08/13 08:57 PM |
| 2 | Men's Rights Edmonton versus the Slutters By Typhon BlueNo it isn't: http://31.media.tumblr.com/b952f86dfbb6a4ee9c44f37d4f844031/tumblr_mqwk6rJaPk1r9758ko1_500.jpg | /r/MensRights | 02/08/13 08:40 PM |
| 2 | Men's Rights Edmonton versus the Slutters By Typhon BlueYou have only so much control over what others will think of you. You mainly have control over how you deal with yourself. That's Basic Adulthood 101. Telling you that you need to look out for your own safety is only victim-blaming in Femmspeak. If you have ever told anyone "lock your house or you're going ot get yourself robbed," then you are saying the same thing. What you are doing is called "special Pleading." It's telling when certain women's groups engage in special-pleading over something… | /r/MensRights | 02/08/13 10:02 AM |
| 2 | Men's Rights Edmonton versus the Slutters By Typhon Blueok. no one (except the very crazy) legitimately thinks that every girl who's ever had sex drunk is a rape victim. That's pretty much where the culture is going. "enthusiastic consent" refers more generally to the notion that both parties should be 100% clear that the other wants to have sex before they start Fine. As long as any misunderstanding is worked out between the 2 parties involved is kept that way. The law should stay out of it if it's a marginal case based largely on misunderstanding. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/13 06:36 AM |
| 2 | Men's Rights Edmonton versus the Slutters By Typhon BlueI don't get to put the blame on someone else if I get drunk & haves sex. You shouldn't, either. | /r/MensRights | 02/08/13 05:22 AM |
| 2 | Men's Rights Edmonton versus the Slutters By Typhon Blueenthusiastic consent Female agency denial alert. | /r/MensRights | 01/08/13 10:26 PM |
| 1 | Helen Mees, NYU Feminist Professor who was arrested recently, is cited in article about Dutch Women.My Dutch friend who pointed out to me Mees' personal scandals says nobody takes her seriously in The Netherlands these days. | /r/MensRights | 31/07/13 05:21 PM |
| 4 | Helen Mees, NYU Feminist Professor who was arrested recently, is cited in article about Dutch Women.Thanks for this info goes to http://brinkhost.nl | /r/MensRights | 30/07/13 11:09 PM |
| 1 | The number of female voters has exceeded the number of male voters in every presidential election since 1964.I looked at it. That ain't what it's sayin'. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/13 02:15 PM |
| 2 | The number of female voters has exceeded the number of male voters in every presidential election since 1964.STFU and stop telling us what to talk about and we'll not tell you what to talk about. How's that work for ya? | /r/MensRights | 30/07/13 08:26 AM |
| 1 | The number of female voters has exceeded the number of male voters in every presidential election since 1964.Actually, the .pdf says 1980, not 1964. | /r/MensRights | 30/07/13 08:23 AM |
| 1 | Warren Farrell vs a Theologian and 2 Cackling Quacks HuffPost LiveDamn those 2 Quacks cackled enough for ten people~! ;-) | /r/MensRights | 27/07/13 04:08 PM |
| 3 | "Don't be that lying feminist" by GirlwriteswhatSomething like 6% of all reported rapes are false. Really now? Any idea what the overall percentage of any crimes are false? :) While you ponder that, take a look at this: http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/How_often_do_DNA_tests_prove_innocence_in_your_cases_Does_testing_ever_prove_guilt.php | /r/MensRights | 16/07/13 09:37 AM |
| 0 | Honest Question Re MRA Support of the ERA:Nope. You can't make that out of what I said no matter how you try and blow that smoke. And if you will read the rest of the discussions here, you'll see I'm not even saying what your assuming. Methinks thous has't the fallacy of the stick firmly planted up thine. Please remove stick from up thine prior to participating. And if you can't, Fuck Off. I'm not submitting to your ploys to try and shut discussion down. :) | /r/MensRights | 23/06/13 05:45 AM |
| 1 | Honest Question Re MRA Support of the ERA:Interesting, thanks for the info. By and large, I don't think Feminism can be said to be dedicated to alleviating this inequity. Not to the same degree as suffrage, anyway. It still comes down to more efforts for the rights than for the responsibility. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 07:16 PM |
| 0 | Honest Question Re MRA Support of the ERA:No, Genius. It wasn't an argument, it was a question. If I had been making a dogmatic statement, then you might have a point. But as it is, I simply was trying to get people's input for reflection. You came at this like I was pushing a point of view #FAIL! | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 07:02 PM |
| 1 | Someone's workplace gets it right. (x-post from r/pics.)Females have a "Staff," too? /s | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 08:45 AM |
| 1 | Honest Question Re MRA Support of the ERA:In addition, DavidByron posted this. Have a look and tell me you think the ERA couldn't be screwed with in the same way? http://www.hrcr.org/safrica/equality/canada_law.html | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 07:27 AM |
| 1 | Honest Question Re MRA Support of the ERA:DavidBryon just shared this: http://www.hrcr.org/safrica/equality/canada_law.html | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 07:13 AM |
| 1 | Honest Question Re MRA Support of the ERA:You go, dude! Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 07:11 AM |
| 0 | Honest Question Re MRA Support of the ERA:Killing what, honest & open discussion? Yayyyy! ;-) | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 07:09 AM |
| 1 | Honest Question Re MRA Support of the ERA:I did address it. No you did not. Now you are talking bout the ERA. Before, you weren't. The Black Panthers were a legitimate civil rights group at one time and among other things got breakfast programs in schools. So then here you are using an example that would mean "Yes it's possible that it could have been 'good' at one time." If I was opposed to black supremacism, would that mean I couldn't embrace something created by the original black panthers that supported egalitarianism to oppose blac… | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 07:07 AM |
| 1 | Honest Question Re MRA Support of the ERA:Thanks for the info about the CEA, I hadn't heard of it. Are you sure NOW ever did try to end the Male-Only draft? Sources? Seems like the Carter thing is true, as I've found it by searching. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 07:00 AM |
| 0 | Honest Question Re MRA Support of the ERA:This was meant to start discussion, not hammer dogma one way or another. Apparently that's not what you're about. Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 06:58 AM |
| 1 | Honest Question Re MRA Support of the ERA:Excuse me? How many videos, blog posts, and other things I've encountered that supports that very position. Take Girwritewhat's famous rant against "Nice Feminists," for example, which I guess was written by John Hembling. | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 06:54 AM |
| 1 | Honest Question Re MRA Support of the ERA:If you read the comments in the Paul Elam article I linked, NOW is on record as supporting it. People are still missing the question: since Feminism did once support it, how do we view Feminism historically, then? | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 06:52 AM |
| 1 | Honest Question Re MRA Support of the ERA:Actually, if you read the comments in the Paul Elam article I linked, NOW is on record as supporting it. And people are still missing the question: since Feminism did once support it, how do we view Feminism historically, then? | /r/MensRights | 22/06/13 06:51 AM |
| -1 | Honest Question Re MRA Support of the ERA:Not really. It is a simple, honest question. Could you please address the point about the ERA? | /r/MensRights | 21/06/13 01:08 PM |
| 0 | Honest Question Re MRA Support of the ERA:You may very well be right. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/13 01:06 PM |
| 2 | 36yo woman has a child with 11yo boy, won't be charged with rape because the rape laws "only apply to males"Just found out something in the article is wrong. It sates that both men and women could get up to 20 years for this crime. Actually, it's only bout 14 years for women: http://au.ibtimes.com/articles/479376/20130617/new-zealand-rape-law-women-sexual-predators.htm#.UcQd5fnvv6W Thanks to http://femmerenaissance.tumblr.com/ for the corrected info. | /r/MensRights | 21/06/13 09:39 AM |
| 1 | Are we fanatics?Very good. There's a Feminazi who insists that's all wrong, that it's a figment of the MRA imagination. Perhaps you'd like to add some of your own comments to that: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1g0qh3/should_have_known_better_but_i_wanted_her_to/cag2wa8?context=3 | /r/MensRights | 15/06/13 04:29 AM |
| 1 | The problem of unwanted sexual contacts in the military "is not just a woman's issue. More than half of the victims are men." - Kirsten Gillibrand. Politifact Rating: Mostly TrueGracias~! | /r/MensRights | 13/06/13 07:10 AM |
| 1 | The problem of unwanted sexual contacts in the military "is not just a woman's issue. More than half of the victims are men." - Kirsten Gillibrand. Politifact Rating: Mostly TrueCan I get a link to that from you? Would be greatly appreciated! | /r/MensRights | 13/06/13 04:17 AM |
| 1 | Should have known better, but I wanted her to understand what she was really saying.Unsurprisingly, you have gone out of your way to miss the point. You have started with the presumption that a guiding principle in the US has been that men must be willing to serve to earn their right to vote. This is simply wrong. You quote "Citizens" in bold -- but citizenship did not convey the right to vote. It wasn't until about fifty years ago that the US decided that if you are conscripted, you have the right to vote. That should tell you something right there (leaving aside literacy test… | /r/MensRights | 11/06/13 09:14 AM |
| 1 | Should have known better, but I wanted her to understand what she was really saying.Here's the NCFM press release on suing to end the Male-Only Draft: http://ncfm.org/2013/04/action/ncfm-sues-selective-service-for-requiring-only-men-to-register-for-the-draft/ Let's see you cough up those friend-of-the-court briefs, already! | /r/MensRights | 11/06/13 03:15 AM |
| 2 | Should have known better, but I wanted her to understand what she was really saying.This was based on their age. You can argue that it's unfair to send men to war who can't vote, and in fact this was rectified fifty years later. This again points to the fact that people did not connect fighting with voting. They were considered two separate issues. No it does not. I gave you a link to where the court decision on it was cited. Also. I just referred to the general attitude that I happen to be old enough to remember ("if I have to go to war, should I not be able to vote?") You did… | /r/MensRights | 11/06/13 02:47 AM |
| 1 | Politics: A lesson in RealityFor those of you scratching your heads over all of this, take a quick less-than-2-minute crash course in understanding the problem: http://youtu.be/wAkdHzpXXo0 | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 02:19 PM |
| 1 | Politics: A lesson in RealityCrash course in understanding the whole thing: http://youtu.be/wAkdHzpXXo0 | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 02:08 PM |
| 2 | Politics: A lesson in RealityOne other topic relevant to all of this. IcarusLived just reminded me of something I could have included on the above motivational poster: http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/659dkrod.asp If that doesn't show you an example of what I'm talking bout, in real shoeleather meets pavement terms, Idk what will. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 02:03 PM |
| 1 | Politics: A lesson in RealityThere's only so much I can put in one small space :) http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/659dkrod.asp | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 01:58 PM |
| 2 | Politics: A lesson in RealityTwo other things: Ronald Wilson Reagan, that "horrible patriarch,' actually signed the 1st ever No-fault Divorce bill into law as Governor. He also liberalized the abortion laws. There's some kind of attempt to whitewash that out there by a conservative site saying he was "in anguish" over it, or some such happy horseshit, but in the end, the results are the results. The same man got to be President by promising to appoint only Pro-Life justices, but then gave us Kennedy and O'Connor (capitulati… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 01:57 PM |
| 1 | Politics: A lesson in RealityActually it does not. You are miles off of what I'm saying, and you've misread the intent of the entire meme. It is intended to show correlation, but not necessarily causality. The issue boils down to the following: 1) Certain Women's Groups claim to be about equality and freedom for everyone, but their efforts don't always amount to this. Some of the very candidates or issues they have supported has made things worse, such as Prohibition. Or the fact that they got the right to vote, but didn't … | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 01:17 PM |
| 3 | Politics: A lesson in RealityDoesn't wash at all: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phyllis_Schlafly#Opposition_to_an_Equal_Rights_Amendment Schlafly became an outspoken opponent of the Equal Rights Amendment during the 1970s as the organizer of the "STOP ERA" campaign. STOP is an initialism for "Stop Taking Our Privileges." Schlafly argued that the ERA would take away gender specific privileges currently enjoyed by women, including "dependent wife" benefits under Social Security and the exemption from Selective Service registra… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 01:10 PM |
| 1 | Politics: A lesson in RealityBecause you simply don't get what it is that the meme is saying. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 01:06 PM |
| 1 | Politics: A lesson in RealityAnd there were never any Repubs who voted for any of that? | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 01:05 PM |
| 3 | Should have known better, but I wanted her to understand what she was really saying.Throughout US history, there have men been who could vote who were not conscripted and vice versa. Conscription has had a long, strange path. So this doesn't seem to be saying anything, other than the fact that not everyone in existence gets picked to go to war? But it misses what I'm saying by a mile! What I'm pointing out is how the general attitude of whether or not someone is deemed worthy to vote could have come about to be mainly white men with property. If that specifically didn't come up… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 12:54 PM |
| 1 | Politics: A lesson in RealityThat's very true. But it doesn't change the reality of the point I'm making one iota. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 10:19 AM |
| 3 | Should have known better, but I wanted her to understand what she was really saying.First off, the US was not a "Democracy" in the truest sense of the word. We elect representatives to write the laws, and point electors to elect the President. The US is a "Representative Democracy" which is one step away form Direct Democracy, although you can find instances of the latter being practiced here, too. Second, for you to say: but they didn't have a vote - in a country that was founded on democracy. ...is being anachronistic and assumes that the same views on what a Democracy should… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 09:42 AM |
| 2 | Should have known better, but I wanted her to understand what she was really saying.LOL thanks. 2nd time this week I missed out on somebody's humor. Ironically, it was about gender Issues as well. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 08:32 AM |
| 4 | Politics: A lesson in RealityWell even more that, Feminism likes to claim they are bout Freedom and Equality for all, but they don't seem to weight very carefully the consequences of their actions when voting or pushing certain legislation. Especially onerous is when they think they are also making things better for men. They haven't done shit in that regard. Ever. Women actually had more power while not being able to vote than is often realized. Prohibition (18th Amendment) was passed by the US Senate a full 6 months befor… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 08:17 AM |
| 2 | Should have known better, but I wanted her to understand what she was really saying.Man, that'd be an even more fucked up way to issue voting rights: "Go serve and then you can vote!" "What if I don't come back?" Not even close to the thought process that was used. | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 08:07 AM |
| 3 | Should have known better, but I wanted her to understand what she was really saying.And those same women who got the right to vote did so while their younger 18-20 brothers could still be conscripted into Military service. While the women still got to stay home and draw a check if the old man bought it on the battlefield. And the claim is valid... in terms of the fact that that's how they thought back in those days: If you have a vested interest in the land to the point that you own property, or are going to war to defend it, you deserve the right to have a say in how things ar… | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 08:05 AM |
| 0 | Should have known better, but I wanted her to understand what she was really saying.http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 07:54 AM |
| 0 | Should have known better, but I wanted her to understand what she was really saying.Here's something on the Gender Pay Gap. This was a study done of the dept of Labor in 2009: http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf | /r/MensRights | 10/06/13 07:54 AM |
| 3 | Earl Silverman's death, needs to be our call to action. (Please read)I suggest Lori Harfenist "The Resident" on RT, and who has her own personal Yt channel. Get her while she's not too big to Twitter back & forth with us common folk. EDITED TO ADD: Here's contact info: http://www.theresident.net/ http://www.twitter.com/TheResident http://www.youtube.com/user/theresident | /r/MensRights | 27/04/13 11:24 PM |
| 1 | Feminism’s mythology of rape cultureBurglary culture is so prevalent and normalised... that we teach ourselves "lock your doors and set up alarms", instead of teaching burglars to "DON'T DO IT". If the burglars only knew they shouldn't enter the property of others and steal their valuables, I know they would stop. I just know. Are you a burglary supporter? Do YOU tell your friends and family to lock their doors, thereby perpetuating burglary culture? | /r/MensRights | 24/04/13 05:47 PM |
| 1 | Rapetard SocietyAgreed... Check this video out I posted earlier, same topic. Note the presence of people invading the MRA subreddit who seem to have rather odd opinions on the matter: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1csgyc/rape_culture_facts/ | /r/MensRights | 23/04/13 08:37 PM |
| 3 | Rape culture factsThis is from the comments, I though it was Spot on: Burglary culture is so prevalent and normalised... that we teach ourselves "lock your doors and set up alarms", instead of teaching burglars to "DON'T DO IT". If the burglars only knew they shouldn't enter the property of others and steal their valuables, I know they would stop. I just know. Are you a burglary supporter? Do YOU tell your friends and family to lock their doors, thereby perpetuating burglary culture? | /r/MensRights | 23/04/13 07:46 AM |
| 4 | Rapetard SocietyThis is from the comments, I though it was Spot on: Burglary culture is so prevalent and normalised... that we teach ourselves "lock your doors and set up alarms", instead of teaching burglars to "DON'T DO IT". If the burglars only knew they shouldn't enter the property of others and steal their valuables, I know they would stop. I just know. Are you a burglary supporter? Do YOU tell your friends and family to lock their doors, thereby perpetuating burglary culture? | /r/MensRights | 23/04/13 07:45 AM |
| 1 | Rape culture factshttp://youtu.be/0trsY1T5kdY | /r/MensRights | 23/04/13 07:31 AM |
| 1 | Rape culture factshttp://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/125xlx/rape_culture_is_hate_culture/?already_submitted=true | /r/MensRights | 23/04/13 07:23 AM |
| 1 | Rape culture factshttp://youtu.be/tlKD_Uft14o | /r/MensRights | 23/04/13 07:10 AM |
| 1 | Rape culture factsLots of talk on here on "research" but not any real attempt @presenting any. Talk is cheap. And if all MRA's agreed there was such a thing as Rape Culture, there would be no movement, period. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/13 07:09 AM |
| 1 | Rape culture factsLots of talk on here on "research" but not any real attempt @presenting any. Talk is cheap. | /r/MensRights | 23/04/13 07:07 AM |
| 2 | Are there any credible Wikipedia editors around here? I could use some backup.Check out the Wikipedia entry on the Southern Poverty Law Center. Nothing is mentioned about criticism the organization has. (Fortunately Sourcewatch.org does.) Then go to the talk page and see how one of their editors was chastised for trying to include negative info about the SPLC. Uphill battle, Bro! | /r/MensRights | 15/04/13 04:39 AM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersNothing of what you quoted does anything to attack the widely accepted assertion that, on average, adoption produces better long-term outcomes than foster care and orphanages in the United States. But did I actually attack that assertion? No. There were other reasons I gave for the position I have. You found some papers that don't discuss the issue at all, some papers that discuss how to improve foster care in other countries, some papers that talk about equivalence disruption rates (which are t… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/13 10:05 AM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersI can produce anecdotes of children who age out of foster care, desperately wanting to be adopted, and fall into homelessness and criminality. Of course, you are talking apples and oranges here, but that's ok, babble aimlessly on! You can't use those examples to set social policy. Did you or did you not say that adoption is not a popular alternative? Did your or did you not give me a huge sob story, replete with stats about how thousands of kinds are waiting to be adopted, but not getting there?… | /r/MensRights | 11/04/13 09:54 AM |
| 2 | Erin Pizzey Ask Me Anything on Reddit 14 April 2013, 4pm London Time, 11am Eastern time in the USAsk Dean Esmay lol | /r/MensRights | 07/04/13 07:31 AM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersI checked through several links on the 1st page of results, and read some of what was easiest to access - if it was a .pdf I could grab, or some other readable format. I'm not going to submit to your request for me to spend a large share of time doing homework, but perhaps if I respond to a couple of the articles, you'll get a cloo that you are wasting both our times, here. Before I do that, I'd like to point out that: I'm not going to spend a ton of time to write a research paper for you, becau… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/13 05:15 AM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersIf you ask me, I find your reactions to my examples to be bad faith argumentation. If there is an example, it is a good sign that such things are present elsewhere. It also raises the possibility that Long-term Foster Care may be getting short shrift, and that may account fro some of the perceived differences. It's like pointing out that there is more use of Oil and Coal than alternative energy sources, and complaining not enough evidence shows the latter is the better real, all the while pourin… | /r/MensRights | 06/04/13 02:50 AM |
| 3 | Did you know women hold up half the sky?Apparently it's a Maoist slogan. | /r/MensRights | 05/04/13 09:08 AM |
| -1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption Lawyershttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_international_adoption_scandals http://theadoptionspotlight.wordpress.com/2012/06/24/the-reeces-rainbow-russian-corruption-index/ http://savvythinker.com/adoption-corruption-6-hold-non-profit-adoption-agencies-accountable/ http://adoptedjane.blogspot.com/2008/08/dark-and-seedy-side-to-corruption-in.html http://pulitzercenter.org/articles/ethiopia-addis-ababa-better-future-adoption-services-corruption http://www.tinyspark.org/podcasts/adoption/ http://www.bran… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/13 10:41 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersAnecdotes are not the way to create social policy. Mhmm. And correlation =/= causation. So far, I haven't seen any real evidence that the evil long-term foster care caused any of the problems by those who are in the system, and def not in such a way that would make those problems suddenly disappear upon adption. Fair is fair. If you are going to call my anecdotes insufficient, then I'm going to say that a lot of the research I've so far encountered doesn't seem to say what you wish it would. fan… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/13 10:26 PM |
| 0 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersMore obfuscation and dancing around the issue. "Remaining in Faster care" is by definition "not reunited with their birth parents." But it is not by definition "never having contact with your birth parents" or "a terrible situation." I neglected to mention that the same buddy of mine who grew up in foster care has been raising his niece since she was 10. She's about to turn 19. It hasn't been so bad. Birth mother i dead because of drugs. Location of birth father is known, but not much chance of … | /r/MensRights | 04/04/13 08:14 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersI think you are doing somersaults to try and win an argument and you probably work for an adoption agency :) | /r/MensRights | 04/04/13 08:12 PM |
| 0 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersNow, you're just obfuscating. Your issue was that I wasn't concerned outside my own experience. I gave you a couple of examples to the contrary. You can either choose to believe me or not. That's on you, not me. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/13 07:36 PM |
| 1 | Mark Cuban mentions drafting Brittney Griner because ‘hey everybody, let’s look at Mark Cuban!’ | Ball Don't LieWhat about another WNBA player who could meet the weight requirements so she wouldn't get slammed around too much? | /r/MensRights | 04/04/13 02:55 AM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersOkay, so this doesn't really break any new ground, and anything I have to say at this point will be a re-hash of what I said elsewhere, so we'll move on. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/13 02:42 AM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersIn point of fact: "The Majority of Children Leaving Foster Care Return to Their Birth Parents. Nearly sixty percent of the 251,000 children who exited foster care in 1999 were reunited with their birth parents. About one fifth were adopted or placed with a permanent guardian. Of those children who were adopted, 64% were adopted by a foster parent and 16% by a relative. http://www.adoptioninstitute.org/FactOverview/foster.html#6 So don't be so cavalier about adoption. You might be messing things … | /r/MensRights | 04/04/13 02:39 AM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersIf I were to hurl an accusation back in your direction, I might say that you and other MRAs only really care about the rights of the men that they personally identify with. I think we all suffer from that myopia to some extent, myself included, so please don't consider it too much of an insult. :-) That is in fact, why I gave you anecdotes from a buddy of mine and my Gf's daughter. So in regards to your "insult" - nice try ;-) If you don't believe they make a good faith effort to find the biofat… | /r/MensRights | 04/04/13 01:58 AM |
| 1 | Mark Cuban mentions drafting Brittney Griner because ‘hey everybody, let’s look at Mark Cuban!’ | Ball Don't LieNo team would start her as a gimmick. One would hope so. As it is, I think the suggestion of the WNBA player who won't get knocked around as much makes more sense. After all, think of just the safety an an athlete is risking by being put in extreme circumstances. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/13 01:34 AM |
| 1 | Mark Cuban mentions drafting Brittney Griner because ‘hey everybody, let’s look at Mark Cuban!’ | Ball Don't LieMe too, as long as that's what's actually done. If you watched the video, a issue was raised that she might not weigh enough compared to other point guards in the league. Another WNBA player was suggested as being a better candidate for that. | /r/MensRights | 04/04/13 01:23 AM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersI am glad that your buddy had a good placement in his teen years. I'd be a hell of a lot gladder if he had been adopted years before and given a chance at the security that children with loving mothers and fathers take for granted. The security that YOU take for granted. If that was something that was possible in all circumstances, would we be having this discussion? You mean an adoptive family can't be secretly a rat? | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 10:48 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersAnd ultimately, it's all down to the choices people make. Nothing makes Adoption better than Foster care except the choices people make. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 10:44 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersIn point of fact, I think the conclusion that you both are driving me to is this: Why the hell have adoption at all? If someone can do just as well or better in a formal or informal foster-care relationship, I don't see what is the need to drag the state into it so heavily. Again, I'll refer to my buddy who was in foster care most of his life, and finally had a stable one he stayed in from his teens on through part of his adult life until marriage. My Gf's daughter is being taken care of by an a… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 06:56 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersYou seem to think that children in foster care that need adoptive homes are incredibly rare. This is just not the case. 650k children were in foster care last year. 15% of those (nearly 100k last year) were in an institution or group home (euphemism for orphanage). Last year, 60k or nearly 10% of all children in foster care had their parents TPRed - both parents. The mothers in these cases are almost always TPRed due to a determination that they are unfit. Moreover, the average adopted foster ch… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 06:35 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersIt would also suck to deny children the opportunity for real adoptive families because you imagine that an absentee (by choice or not) father will swoop in to save the day. Sometimes we just need to be practical and cut our losses. You appear to be saying that the only important relationships are ones formed early in life, i.e., the "tender years" doctrine. Well, we are flat not going to agree. You are right if (and only if) you can verify that those are the penultimate time people need to have … | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 06:22 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersYou seem to think that TPRed biofathers who would be outraged and pursue their rights is the common case. Idk why you would come to that conclusion? AFAIK, my bio father never made any attempt. Only thing I have to go on is a story my Grandmother told about him trying real hard to get to me, and let's just say that Gma had a habit of telling.. stories. In any case, I don't see where I've stated one way or another as to it being common. His only comment on the number was "a welter of cases." "Wel… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 06:16 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersTo even draw a clearer picture for you: Most of my immediate family including my bio mother, adoptive father, a grandmother and an aunt are now deceased. What family is left are ones I was never close to or don't seem to show an interest in keeping in touch. In fact, the relatives of the adoptive father are by their own admission not a close-knit bunch. Saw one of my Uncles once after 30+ years right before my Dad & oldest step Bro passed. No connections whatsoever to the relatives on the Biolog… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 05:23 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersI've been a long-time lurker, but I decided to create an account to respond. You're really off base on this. If you were "adopted on your Dad's side," that likely means that your fit mother found a new partner who decided to make you his son. That's great for you, but it's not really what's at stake with the registry. In point of fact, that is exactly why I question the whole notion of "TPRing" the bio dad, if no attempt has been made to contact him to see what he has to say on the matter. Not t… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 05:00 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersThis seems to be the part you are missing: Adoption lawyers love putative father registries because it makes their job so much easier than it used to be. That’s because, in the not-too-distant past, fathers’ rights in adoption cases were very different from today’s. Generally speaking, if the state wanted to bypass the father in the adoption process, the mother or the adoptive parents had to show that the biological father had “abandoned” the child, i.e. he’d made no effort to provide for the mo… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 04:29 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersThe one thing we CAN'T do is punish the child for the sins of the mother by leaving him in foster care when there he could be in a loving adoptive family This is another pov of yours that I really don't see the need for. I know of situations where they would have been better off in Foster care. You talk as if that's purgatory and the Father coming back and claiming his rights is Hell. Can't agree. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 04:18 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersWithout the registry or some other method of TPRing putative fathers, the kids he (allegedly) left behind would be in legal limbo until they were 18. They'd never have real parents or a real home. That's not OK. Doesn't seem to me that this is the inevitable conclusion, but have it your way. if someone is a no-show, they are a no-show. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 04:15 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersSo... what changes do we make? Seems to me it's articulated in the article. Insist she pony up. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 03:42 PM |
| 1 | Is it possible to be an MRA and a liberal at the same time?Are you even seriously paying attention? Yep, and I notice Repubs doing a lot of the same thing. VAWA wouldn't have passed initially without them. And Ronald Reagan was the 1st Governor to sign No Faults into law. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 03:39 PM |
| 1 | Is it possible to be an MRA and a liberal at the same time?There's a certain canard running around that's parallel to all of this that says Feminism = Collectivism. That's Bullshit, IMHO. All you need to do is look at the Pro-choice movement, and see rugged individualism and "Fuck you I will do what I want with my life" in it's most naked and ugliest form. I have and will continue to maintain that if you want to destroy Feminism, one way would be to bring an end to Abortion on Demand. | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 03:35 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersBtw, I've been meaning to ask you: What the hell is a TPR? | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 03:19 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersI take it that you are not a member of an adoptive family. In fact, I was. Adopted on my Dad's side, but who was married to my biological mother. Any other assumptions you's like to make? Because that is pretty much the most ignorant thing anybody has ever said to me about adoption. That it's something done by fiat as opposed to something done by nature? That aside, my point is that if you can't track down the biological father and speak to him personally, than you are to some degree dependent o… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 03:19 PM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersIt seems to me you aren't comparing apples to apples: You're talking about a deliberate absent father vs. a father who's being blocked from access to his progeny because some dumb bitch decided to cut him out of the loop. Are they taken away from their adoptive parents if some dude shows up three years from now claiming that the pregnancy was hidden from him? ...is answered by: It would have meant children could live in the care of fit fathers who desired to care for them. And above all it would… | /r/MensRights | 03/04/13 04:09 AM |
| 1 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersDid you read the article? Of course states could have placed the burden on the mother of simply telling the truth. That would have meant telling the adoption court who the father was. It would have meant allowing him to exercise his parental rights if he so desired. And of course it would have meant handing the child over to the dad, assuming he proved himself to be a fit parent, if that’s what he wanted. All of that would have been sensible. It would have encouraged women to tell the truth inst… | /r/MensRights | 02/04/13 07:41 PM |
| 4 | National Putative Father Registry: A Bad Idea Promoted by Adoption LawyersSo what does this have to do with the article? | /r/MensRights | 02/04/13 07:37 PM |
| 4 | Toronto Star interview with Paul ElamAs Mr Elam tells us in the interview, the MSM has already shown a pattern of being willfully obtuse. Given the direction she seemed to be trying to take things when she spoke to Paul, I think this is a more than fair approach. Plus, if he waited until after the interview is published, the chances are higher that they would just accuse him of editing. | /r/MensRights | 02/04/13 08:21 AM |
| 2 | An open letter to feministsYou don't think MRAs twist people's words around? And I don't see how I've twisted Elam's words, I linked the article which speaks for itself. I've already gone to seed explaining it to you. You appear to be willfully obtuse. My assessment stands. I think what you mean is they don't engage in victim shaming. Nope. I mean they don't think anyone who's a woman should have to accept responsibility for themselves. It does not encourage women to laugh at male genital mutilation. Feminism has nothing … | /r/MensRights | 01/04/13 11:48 PM |
| 1 | An open letter to feministsYou can disagree with Paul Elam all you want to, but I think your caricature of him is what's out of line. | /r/MensRights | 01/04/13 01:13 AM |
| 2 | An open letter to feministsPlease tell me how it is more extreme than men's rights activism. It twists people's words around. For example, your misreading of Elam in a way that attention to context, syntax & a basic knowledge of the English language would show itself to be a deliberate smear on your part. You deliberately tried to make him sound like a rape apologist, which is false and elf-serving. It makes any such warnings of dangerous behaviour that could lead to assault "Slut Shaming," whereas no similar warnings for… | /r/MensRights | 01/04/13 01:08 AM |
| 1 | An open letter to feministsNot going to answer the question? No surprise. It's probably because you know you have said such things ;-) Everyone is responsible for their own actions to a certain degree, and it can be true even if they are the victim of a crime. Denial of this fact only shows exactly why you Feminazi's are worse by far. You are proving it right here and now. And even if you disagree, which is your right, you cannot possibly put a statement such as Elam's on a par with suggesting sending men to the glue fact… | /r/MensRights | 01/04/13 12:35 AM |
| 1 | An open letter to feministsHe didn't say they "deserved" anything. Have you ever said to anyone "lock your car, you're just asking to get robbed in this neighborhood?" | /r/MensRights | 31/03/13 11:34 PM |
| 1 | An open letter to feministsNope. He's talking about a specific sector of the female population that does a specific thing. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/13 11:31 PM |
| 2 | An open letter to feministsTom Martin is not that big in the MRA outside of the UK, and your anecdotes don't qualify as evidence. And nobody said women deserved to get raped. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/13 11:26 PM |
| 2 | An open letter to feminists"They" ...who? Who is he talking about? | /r/MensRights | 31/03/13 11:20 PM |
| 2 | An open letter to feministsI read the article. No need for you to be patronizing by posting text. Here's the claim you made: Paul Elam also thinks women are whores who are "begging" for rape. Nowhere in that text you just posted, nor in the original article does he say that. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/13 11:16 PM |
| 0 | The Day I Taught How Not to Rape - Read this *ahem* fine piece of writing and react, please.One other thing should be pointed out: Although she didn't specifically name men, her designations of who said what in that classroom that bothered her were most def gender-specific. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/13 10:33 PM |
| 0 | The Day I Taught How Not to Rape - Read this *ahem* fine piece of writing and react, please.Ultimately, the Elephant in the room will have to be dealt with: Just how effective is this whole “Teach not to rape” thing in the long run? Here’s my call: You will shame lots of people and cause many young men to question their own self-worth, and not touch a hair on the head of the actual Rapist, who doesn’t give a Rats Arse what you tell her or him | /r/MensRights | 31/03/13 10:32 PM |
| 0 | The Day I Taught How Not to Rape - Read this *ahem* fine piece of writing and react, please.Careful, troll detected. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/13 05:09 PM |
| 1 | The Day I Taught How Not to Rape - Read this *ahem* fine piece of writing and react, please.1st off, this: http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/false-rape-culture/if-other-groups-were-targeted-like-men/ Look at the way she stereotyped the male students she interacted with: “Baby Fat,” “potential rapists.” And she never addresses the crux of the problem, which is that someone could have buyers remorse and as such decide to call “rape” something they the night before fully intended to consent to. Or that the Innocence Project has a 43% conviction overturn rate when they are able to se… | /r/MensRights | 31/03/13 05:09 PM |
| 1 | An open letter to feministshttp://theantifeminist.com/david-fraudtrelle-paedocrite-of-the-month-winner-february-david-futrelle/ | /r/MensRights | 31/03/13 08:30 AM |
| 2 | An open letter to feministsI got curious so I hunted up Tom Martin and found the stuff manboobz says about him, which I take it is your main source of info. Futrelle even admits that Martin is not very well known outside the UK, so Xnay on your "leading" comment. And his bit about 10 year-old prostitutes? Would never be published or uttered by anyone on AVfM, NCFM, etc etc. Meanwhile, you still have the convos that were found on RadFem hub which outstrip anything Martin says BY FAR. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/13 08:27 AM |
| 2 | An open letter to feministsFunny, never even heard of Tom Martin until now, so he can't be that "leading." And you are twisting Paul Elam's words around to suit your own agenda. Neither of these individuals have ever said anything close to Solanas, and you still haven't dealt with the Angent Orange discovery of what Feminists say when they think no one is hearing. FAIL on 4 counts. Now run on home, little girl. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/13 08:05 AM |
| 2 | An open letter to feministsOh really? Valerie is yesterdays news? Check out this: http://www.avoiceformen.com/featured/agent-orange-files-released/ And Elam hasn't come even close to to Solanas or the stuff at the above link, so don't even try comparing. But thanks for outing yourself as a Feminist with an axe to grind rather than a point to make. | /r/MensRights | 31/03/13 12:06 AM |
| 2 | An open letter to feministsNope. Feminism doesn't police their own extremes. A male Valerie Solanas wouldn't even exist in our movement, and would be considered radioactive. Valerie has writer's scholarships named after her. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/13 11:42 PM |
| 2 | An open letter to feminists"Look," yourself. We ARE promoting the interest of equality for both genders. That's why we don't favor the rollback of advances for women, but ask that men be given reciprocal consideration and be let loose of our "obligation" to women. Feminazi's OTOH, want their cake and eat it too. That's why they ADD TO the privileges they enjoyed under patriarchy (and there are many!) They don't trade a set of privileges for a set of rights. They greedily hold on to both. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/13 11:29 PM |
| 1 | An open letter to feministsWe do. What is not so much used is "Masculist." | /r/MensRights | 30/03/13 11:15 PM |
| 1 | An open letter to feministsIf they are truly for equality, then they need to call themselves something else. "Egalitarian," for example. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/13 11:08 PM |
| 9 | This pile of crap just showed up on Canadian "news". "Why men shouldn't be left alone with children".It's the Patriarchy. That's what made her hold the camera while he did his his evil deeds. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/13 11:43 AM |
| 7 | I was simply turning around in a parking lot when suddenly...You're an idiot. | /r/MensRights | 30/03/13 11:37 AM |
| 6 | An open letter to feministsMen's Human Rights Movement ;-) | /r/MensRights | 30/03/13 11:06 AM |
| 1 | I got into a discussion with my staunch feminist friend and I'm not sure that I was in the right. It's been bothering me a whole lot, so I decided to post it here for your consideration.Doesn't seem like she says much of anything, to me? | /r/MensRights | 25/03/13 05:50 AM |
| 0 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"I didn't misrepresent you, I pointed out what was happening. According to your narrative or interpretation, of course. People were disagreeing with you, gasp Horrors! you seemed to be misunderstanding the situation, "Seemed." So right there you show that you only have assumptions based on what you think I'm saying. and you were getting downvoted. And that's supposed to mean ...what? Is this supposed to be like Scouts where we treat Karma like merit badges? All of your comments are there, clearly… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 10:06 PM |
| 0 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"Actually now that I see what you are replying to, there isn't a hint of sarcasm in anything I said. Just honesty. But you can keep on making stuff up about me if it makes you feel better. /s <- I'll put the little "sarcasm" tag, just for you. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 09:47 PM |
| 1 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"Now I'm attacking you. But keep making stuff up about me if it makes you feel better. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 09:45 PM |
| 0 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"And misrepresenting someone and making unwarranted assumptions about their intent, or what they do & don't understand does you no good. Boom. Most of the people on here are arguing against claims I'm not even making. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 09:42 PM |
| 1 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"So you can see inside everyone's brain and can know what they are thinking/feeling at any moment? Hey, when do you run for god? ;-D | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 08:02 PM |
| 1 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"OK, so you're no projecting so much as making an unwarranted assumption. Glad we got that cleared up. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 07:18 PM |
| 1 | Anyone know of someone who's done research in The Netherlands?Again, appreciate the efforts |m/ | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 05:56 PM |
| 0 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"Okay, so call it false convictions, then. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 11:57 AM |
| 1 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"Projection, much? | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 11:56 AM |
| 1 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"Dream on. So far no one's put a dent in what I'm saying :] And if they think they are, they're the ones trying to throw knockout punches and ignoring what I say in reply. | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 11:56 AM |
| 1 | Anyone know of someone who's done research in The Netherlands?It's saying the page is too large when I hit the translate button, or we don't support that kind of link when I use the drag-and-drop! :( Could you perhaps summarize what it's about and I'll send it to my friend? Has it got any good dirt on the system? lol | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 12:52 AM |
| 1 | Anyone know of someone who's done research in The Netherlands?Awesome, thanks! | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 12:46 AM |
| -2 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"Are you really suggesting that nobody is in jail for a crime they committed? No, or I wouldn't be saying some have been proven guilty. Are you suggesting that the Innocence Project is supposed to be prescient and never try to clear a person who seems innocent but turns out not to be? I hope they clear as many people as possible, actually! What exactly are you saying here? You seem to be saying that because they chose to try and get these people off, that there's a bias to the sample, and I'm say… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 12:22 AM |
| -1 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"There could be, but we have no idea if there is. You would be making a huge assumption by drawing any inference from this data. If lots of different studies in lots of different situations seemed to indicate that there are > 40% of all turnips are worm-infested before they hit the market, I sure as hell ain't gonna be buying turnips soon! So since the IP is not the only study that renders similar results, it is not a huge assumption at all. It is also possible for me to win the lottery. That doe… | /r/MensRights | 14/03/13 12:00 AM |
| -5 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"Not at all. There could be a lot of overlap! Easily. And someone could easily be raped by one person, but chose to point the finger at someone else. It is possible. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 11:45 PM |
| -2 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"Anyone can come in here and claim they worked for the IP. Doesn't mean it's true, does it? | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 11:44 PM |
| -2 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"As I said, it could be much higher in reality. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 11:40 PM |
| 0 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"I think you are wanting there to be one whether that conclusion is warranted or not. There could have been sex, and the plaintiff decided to finger someone else to take the heat off of her. Easily enough to see how. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 11:39 PM |
| -2 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"Okay, so adjust for all the poor saps who's lives were ruined by a FA, and yet it sent to jail. Then you should have an accurate picture. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 11:29 PM |
| -3 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"The cases selected by the Innocence Project are not a representative sample of all criminal cases. Of course not. Lots of False Accusations don't even make it to court, let alone jail. I am stating that I think it mirrors the actual picture a lot more than you care to admit. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 11:26 PM |
| 2 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"Whether it proves there was a crime or not is irrelevant. It proves a false accusation was made. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 11:24 PM |
| -4 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"They also admit they sometimes confirm the prosecution theory. So that shoots a hole right in your premise. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 11:19 PM |
| -1 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"PS: The whole sample is skewed to those already rotting in jail, so your logic doesn't hold up very well. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 11:17 PM |
| -5 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"So the fact that 43% of the cases with DNA led to exoneration does not mean that 43% of all convictions are erroneous, Of course. It could be astronomically higher! as the IP's sample is already more skewed towards including cases of false convictions. Couldn't be. They said almost the same amount proves the prosecution theory. Source: I have worked with a chapter of the Innocence Project See elsewhere in these comments, where I cited the Kanin Study and the Ottawa & Bavarian Police Departments. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 11:14 PM |
| -7 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"This information is a bit skewed because it's from the Innocence Project. Because you don't like where it leads? In order for them to help, the incarcerated person needs to put forth an effort and can only be helped if there's DNA evidence in the case. But absence of DNA evidence doesn't automatically mean guilt, just that no evidence has survived. It's actually kind of strange that any guilty people actually go through all this trouble just to prove they did it. Nothing strange about it at all.… | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 10:46 PM |
| -4 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"This means that there was a rapist, but they got the wrong guy. There's no reason whatsoever to draw that conclusion. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 10:40 PM |
| -8 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"You appear to be doing lots of mental gyrations to come to an unwarranted conclusion? | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 10:38 PM |
| -1 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"300 samples! | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 09:12 PM |
| 0 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"True, the actual number could be much higher. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 09:11 PM |
| 0 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"http://blog.lib.umn.edu/jbs/maysession/KaninFalseRapeAllegations.pdf http://www.mediaradar.org/mcdowell_kanin_credible.php For Ottowa: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2011/02/31-percent-of-all-sexual-assault-claims.html For Barvaria: http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/way-over-50-of-rape-accusations-are-false-7-4-blatantly-enough-to-prosecute-bavarian-police-research-report | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 09:08 PM |
| 0 | "DNA testing proved innocence in about 43% of cases"The numbers coincide with the Kanin study, and with similar reports from the Ottowa and Barvarian PD's. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 08:34 PM |
| 1 | Anyone know of someone who's done research in The Netherlands?No problem dude! I copied that .pdf file to my HD, but now I don't see where the link to it went? :( Care to repost? | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 07:05 PM |
| 1 | Anyone know of someone who's done research in The Netherlands?Interesting. I know someone who lives in Groningen. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 10:35 AM |
| 1 | Anyone know of someone who's done research in The Netherlands?Appreciate the efforts. | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 10:33 AM |
| 1 | Anyone know of someone who's done research in The Netherlands?English? | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 02:35 AM |
| 1 | Anyone know of someone who's done research in The Netherlands?English? | /r/MensRights | 13/03/13 02:35 AM |
| 1 | 'Women Own 1% of World Property': A Feminist Myth That Won't DieSounds good. Would you be so kind as to offer a resource for that? Thanks. | /r/MensRights | 09/03/13 10:38 AM |
| 1 | The Colonization of Male Space by FidelbogenNo shit. The last AVfM radio broadcast was a crap pile of nothing, AFAICS. | /r/MensRights | 06/03/13 05:10 AM |
| 1 | Advice on women dating narcissists - Should we men apply it to women also?Look for http://menwhoareabused.com - Youtube user begood4000. A lot about female narcissists there. | /r/MensRights | 03/03/13 09:58 AM |
| 1 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already.However, it is the same as it not being immutable. And if not immutable, it may be indirectly related to choice. Height for instance, may not be so much a choice, but "growth" can be. I knew a mother of a really short son who wasn't growing who was trying to get help for him. There was in fact, some medically professional things that could have been done to get him out of that "rut." | /r/MensRights | 19/02/13 09:47 PM |
| 1 | How many of you think the problem of False Allegations is rooted in Feminism and why?All in how you talk. I'd say the current False Accusations Culture is rooted in Feminism, if only because of chronological reasons. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/13 08:38 PM |
| 0 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already.Not really. There's a big discussion going on about the matter here. | /r/MensRights | 18/02/13 04:52 AM |
| 1 | How many of you think the problem of False Allegations is rooted in Feminism and why?And if it wasn't rewarding them, there would not be this current problem. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 11:47 PM |
| 2 | How many of you think the problem of False Allegations is rooted in Feminism and why?That's completely silly. Killing people was before the Atom Bomb. So you would claim the Atom Bomb doesn't kill people? Check the info on this thread posted by Sigil1. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 11:40 PM |
| 3 | How many of you think the problem of False Allegations is rooted in Feminism and why?The link he provided successfully refutes your claim of feminism not being the blame of the false accusation culture. You misunderstood. I am claiming the opposite. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 11:30 PM |
| 2 | How many of you think the problem of False Allegations is rooted in Feminism and why?I think it's all in how you talk. I would very much say the current False Accusations Culture is rooted in Feminism, if only because of chronological reasons. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 11:08 PM |
| 3 | How many of you think the problem of False Allegations is rooted in Feminism and why?I don't think you have done any research into this. Don't tell me that, tell it to the dude in the convo I linked above who's denying the connection. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 11:04 PM |
| 2 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already.You are completely missing the point, altogether. I never claimed the girls on the screenshot were Feminists. But it DOES have it's roots in a climate caused by Feminism. Let's see what others think about the matter, shall we: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/18ppvh/how_many_of_you_think_the_problem_of_false/ | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 11:02 PM |
| -1 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already.I think if you were to ask around, you'd find more see a direct connection than you realize. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 10:24 PM |
| -1 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already.No, I think the climate of False Rape Accusations *can be traced to Feminism. Otherwise, why even include it as a Men's issue? | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 10:09 PM |
| -2 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already.The person in question may not represent Feminism per se, but Feminism is the fertile ground on which such accusations grow. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 09:33 PM |
| -1 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already.The person in question may not represent Feminism per se, but Feminism is the fertile ground on which such accusations grow. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 09:33 PM |
| 1 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already.My choice of words was indeed deliberate ;-) | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 09:03 PM |
| 1 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already."Psychological Coercion" What will the fertilized minds of Feminazi's grow next? | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 08:23 PM |
| -2 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already.The person in question may not represent Feminism per se, but Feminism is the fertile ground on which such accusations grow. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 08:20 PM |
| -2 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already.The person in question may not represent Feminism per se, but Feminism is the fertile ground on which such accusations grow. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 08:11 PM |
| -1 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already.as if being straight is a choice... Actually it is. Sexual orientation is not a fixed matter, not at all: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexality#Fluidity_of_orientation "The American Psychiatric Association (APA) has stated "some people believe that sexual orientation is innate and fixed; however, sexual orientation develops across a person's lifetime". In a joint statement with other major American medical organizations, the APA says that "different people realize at different points in thei… | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 08:04 PM |
| 3 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already.http://breakingtheglasses.blogspot.ca/2013/02/vawa-and-stalking.html#.USB0X3eoS58 | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 06:11 AM |
| 7 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already.Say it was a convo of a bunch of young doods talking about how one of them has a gf claiming she's PG, and he's conferring with his friends on how they should all say they fucked her too? Tell me you wouldn't see that as a sign of male oppression? | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 04:43 AM |
| 11 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already.Wasn't that difficult, you didn't have a point to begin with, except your head. | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 04:41 AM |
| 12 | More proof Feminism is out of control! But you knew that, already.I didn't say "women," I said "feminism." #DERP! | /r/MensRights | 17/02/13 04:34 AM |
| 7 | Something that made me rethink feminists (No big victory, but it ends well for me...)I believe the term you are looking for is "Charm Offensive." | /r/MensRights | 06/02/13 10:06 AM |
| 1 | Is there a site which focuses on men's issues but is friendly toward feminism?campaigns that actively place women in the role of victim 100% of the time and men in the role of perpetrator 100% of the time Excellent. Next time someone tries to give me the NAFALT, I'm going to ask them to show me the faction of feminism that doesn't do this, and listen for the crickets! | /r/MensRights | 03/02/13 02:40 AM |
| 2 | Thomas Sowell, this man is a heroThe point about Blacks wasn't that great on his part. He pretty much admitted they are (were) not getting as much education. However, the part about Women is sound, AFAICS. | /r/MensRights | 27/01/13 10:28 AM |
| 7 | US expands definition of rape to include menThe take away from all of this is to show how it's been almost 100 years since the definition of rape has been updated at all. From there, it can be argued that there's more work to be done. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/13 12:52 AM |
| 2 | US expands definition of rape to include menI just report. You decide. lol j/k ;-) I took notice of that Drunken bit, too. | /r/MensRights | 12/01/13 12:27 AM |
| 16 | Woman convicted of raping, pimping and filming her 14 y/o daughter having sex. Not called a rapist, pedophile or child pornographer. Headline says she "exploited" her daughter.Sort of what I was thinking. Only more like 10 years at the outside. | /r/MensRights | 11/01/13 10:02 PM |
| 2 | A Tumblr Feminazi Responds To A GWW Video? I don't follow you: "Rule of thumb, ask their opinion and if its similar wall out of the restaurant right there" Oh, I think you meant "walk out of the restaurant?" | /r/MensRights | 11/01/13 09:28 PM |
| 26 | Woman convicted of raping, pimping and filming her 14 y/o daughter having sex. Not called a rapist, pedophile or child pornographer. Headline says she "exploited" her daughter.Somebody will point this out, in regards to the title, so we may as well take note: "'The defendant was her pot pusher, her pornography producer and her predator,' he said." | /r/MensRights | 11/01/13 09:10 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter