Dan Perrins strikes back at Adele Mercier

TRPACC · 2014-04-13T17:31:39+00:00

What did I say about the fish that time? You ignored me, now look at you.

HolySchmoly · 2014-04-13T15:36:13+00:00

Light text on a dark background is a typographic outrage. I refuse to read. Sorry.

EDIT: Just to be clear, for those who can't read or have difficulty understanding, I offer no judgement about the content. It may be fine and very worth reading. All who want are free to read it. I do not judge it not worth reading. How could I know, I haven't read it. There is much I haven't read that is worth reading. I have never read David Hume, four example, but consider him well worth reading. But if you present him in light text against dark background I will refuse, not because of the content, but because of the typography. I reserve the right to make such a refusal for myself and it does not entail any judgement whatever about the content of what I refuse to read.

If you study my comments you will not find a sequence of words which passes judgement on the content of this webpage, merely one which expresses a refusal to read it. This is not the same thing.

Title	Dan Perrins strikes back at Adele Mercier
Author	kevinwayne
Upvotes	10
Comments	28
Date	April 13, 2014 3:25 PM UTC (12 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/mensrights/comments/22xeer/dan-perrins-strikes-back-at-adele-mercier/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/dan-perrins-strikes-back-at-adele-mercier.1616261 https://theredarchive.com/post/1616261

Comments