TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

rabel111 Archive

View 154 posts and 5,302 comments by rabel111 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1025

Edu./Occu.rabel111/r/MensRights12/07/21 03:51 AM
918

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights05/04/23 12:12 AM
901

mental healthrabel111/r/MensRights15/06/26 12:00 AM
768

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights03/11/24 11:54 PM
694

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights27/04/21 05:50 AM
665

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights06/11/25 10:13 AM
627

Anti-MRMrabel111/r/MensRights19/11/24 02:41 AM
623

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:36 AM
583

Legal Rightsrabel111/r/MensRights27/01/26 08:13 PM
571

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights03/07/25 12:52 AM
565

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights05/07/25 01:20 AM
534

Anti-MRMrabel111/r/MensRights11/12/22 10:11 PM
512

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights26/11/20 10:14 PM
511

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights17/03/25 05:05 AM
509

mental healthrabel111/r/MensRights15/05/25 04:52 AM
506

Legal Rightsrabel111/r/MensRights18/02/25 08:28 PM
502

Feminismrabel111/r/MensRights11/07/23 02:54 AM
488

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights07/02/22 03:03 AM
482

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights02/06/25 03:23 AM
455

Edu./Occu.rabel111/r/MensRights12/05/23 01:20 AM
448

Social Issuesrabel111/r/MensRights17/06/26 05:50 AM
444

Edu./Occu.rabel111/r/MensRights15/09/21 04:16 AM
401

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights08/04/24 11:31 PM
389

Legal Rightsrabel111/r/MensRights27/03/26 11:04 AM
388

Feminismrabel111/r/MensRights09/05/24 02:08 AM
384

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights08/07/25 01:46 AM
375

Social Issuesrabel111/r/MensRights17/11/23 06:25 AM
358

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights05/09/21 02:20 AM
346

Anti-MRMrabel111/r/MensRights08/01/24 11:37 AM
336

Social Issuesrabel111/r/MensRights08/04/24 11:45 PM
328

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights03/01/21 01:10 AM
321

Edu./Occu.rabel111/r/MensRights15/08/25 03:28 AM
320

Social Issuesrabel111/r/MensRights15/06/26 01:40 AM
318

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights02/09/25 05:58 AM
315

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights14/06/23 11:30 PM
314

Anti-MRMrabel111/r/MensRights03/01/23 12:19 AM
310

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights16/04/26 11:50 PM
262

Social Issuesrabel111/r/MensRights06/02/24 02:41 AM
262

Feminismrabel111/r/MensRights14/03/24 12:35 AM
247

Feminismrabel111/r/MensRights09/04/25 11:53 PM
244

Feminismrabel111/r/MensRights10/01/24 08:50 PM
244

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights18/08/24 12:56 AM
242

Social Issuesrabel111/r/MensRights24/11/24 09:32 PM
242

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights01/07/26 05:01 AM
241

Edu./Occu.rabel111/r/MensRights10/05/23 03:19 AM
231

Legal Rightsrabel111/r/MensRights10/06/25 04:43 AM
225

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights26/09/24 11:31 PM
224

Anti-MRMrabel111/r/MensRights15/07/25 02:29 AM
210

Legal Rightsrabel111/r/MensRights12/02/24 07:53 PM
206

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights25/06/25 01:12 AM
194

Feminismrabel111/r/MensRights09/01/23 11:35 PM
193

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights01/03/24 03:29 AM
187

Social Issuesrabel111/r/MensRights06/04/22 12:57 AM
183

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights25/10/22 04:10 AM
183

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights04/06/25 01:33 AM
181

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights01/10/21 03:33 AM
179

Generalrabel111/r/MensRights05/01/23 12:32 AM
177

Generalrabel111/r/MensRights20/09/24 03:45 AM
174

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights06/07/25 10:59 PM
173

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights28/02/22 03:10 AM
169

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights01/02/24 01:39 AM
166

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights11/06/24 11:13 PM
165

Feminismrabel111/r/MensRights11/03/24 09:08 PM
159

Feminismrabel111/r/MensRights05/08/24 11:21 PM
155

Generalrabel111/r/MensRights20/06/26 04:24 AM
154

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights12/05/26 01:08 AM
148

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights21/02/23 04:42 AM
148

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights05/12/22 02:55 AM
146

Edu./Occu.rabel111/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:04 AM
137

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:25 AM
136

Anti-MRMrabel111/r/MensRights01/05/24 11:26 PM
136

Feminismrabel111/r/MensRights24/04/25 01:45 AM
136

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights28/02/25 12:22 AM
129

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights23/02/26 12:34 AM
125

Feminismrabel111/r/MensRights02/06/26 03:17 AM
125

Feminismrabel111/r/MensRights18/03/24 10:22 PM
119

Legal Rightsrabel111/r/MensRights26/06/24 12:32 AM
116

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:41 AM
115

Social Issuesrabel111/r/MensRights10/01/23 09:17 PM
112

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights17/08/23 10:02 PM
111

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights30/09/25 12:37 AM
106

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights16/07/23 11:45 PM
105

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights19/11/23 11:41 PM
103

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights23/09/21 10:59 PM
100

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights13/10/23 12:57 AM
97

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights17/11/24 11:13 PM
95

Intactivismrabel111/r/MensRights21/08/25 02:00 AM
90

Marriage/Childrenrabel111/r/MensRights25/10/23 11:28 PM
89

Activism/Supportrabel111/r/MensRights18/05/26 12:53 AM
87

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights07/12/22 10:12 PM
87

Generalrabel111/r/MensRights25/11/25 12:10 PM
85

mental healthrabel111/r/MensRights15/05/25 05:53 AM
85

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights15/02/23 02:00 AM
84

Marriage/Childrenrabel111/r/MensRights06/12/21 10:00 PM
83

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights13/02/23 11:25 PM
83

Edu./Occu.rabel111/r/MensRights21/12/22 12:47 AM
83

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights11/07/20 11:46 PM
79

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights08/09/20 03:36 AM
78

Social Issuesrabel111/r/MensRights19/06/23 11:02 AM
74

Social Issuesrabel111/r/MensRights26/11/23 10:23 PM
73

Feminismrabel111/r/MensRights13/02/26 11:29 PM
72

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights26/11/21 10:54 PM
71

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights05/05/21 02:39 AM
70

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights12/02/20 11:16 PM
70

mental healthrabel111/r/MensRights17/01/24 02:25 AM
70

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights15/07/22 01:28 AM
68

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights23/09/20 11:43 PM
68

Social Issuesrabel111/r/MensRights22/12/22 05:29 AM
66

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights20/01/21 11:44 PM
65

Feminismrabel111/r/MensRights29/03/20 09:41 PM
61

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights19/07/22 01:03 AM
61

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights07/07/20 10:12 PM
60

Legal Rightsrabel111/r/MensRights02/07/24 12:40 AM
60

Activism/Supportrabel111/r/MensRights04/12/25 09:30 PM
59

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights24/02/23 03:02 AM
59

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights22/08/24 06:27 AM
57

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights24/11/22 08:23 PM
56

Generalrabel111/r/MensRights21/08/23 06:12 AM
53

Feminismrabel111/r/MensRights04/04/24 12:08 AM
53

Social Issuesrabel111/r/MensRights17/01/20 10:54 PM
52

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights05/04/20 10:58 PM
51

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights23/08/20 11:52 AM
51

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights06/11/19 11:24 PM
51

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights08/02/24 01:03 AM
49

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights08/10/23 10:30 PM
49

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights04/03/23 10:48 PM
48

Social Issuesrabel111/r/MensRights12/03/20 12:17 AM
45

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights15/07/25 01:51 AM
44

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights21/07/20 01:48 AM
39

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights17/11/21 03:22 AM
35

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights15/07/20 06:52 AM
34

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights04/10/21 04:43 AM
30

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights15/09/23 05:18 AM
28

Legal Rightsrabel111/r/MensRights27/05/21 01:18 AM
28

rabel111/r/MensRights17/02/20 02:27 AM
28

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights22/09/25 11:57 PM
27

Edu./Occu.rabel111/r/MensRights15/02/22 10:58 PM
27

Feminismrabel111/r/MensRights27/11/19 05:19 AM
27

Humourrabel111/r/MensRights10/04/20 01:41 AM
25

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights11/03/20 04:51 AM
22

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights13/01/25 01:51 AM
21

Social Issuesrabel111/r/MensRights27/06/23 02:56 AM
20

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights17/06/19 11:56 AM
19

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights20/07/23 01:47 AM
18

Generalrabel111/r/MensRights01/02/21 01:48 AM
17

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights21/12/21 04:29 AM
16

Legal Rightsrabel111/r/MensRights21/04/23 04:01 AM
15

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights22/06/23 01:57 AM
15

Healthrabel111/r/MensRights22/07/20 01:15 AM
14

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights01/06/20 02:10 AM
14

Anti-MRMrabel111/r/MensRights19/11/19 04:27 AM
12

Anti-MRMrabel111/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:01 AM
9

Discriminationrabel111/r/MensRights06/04/21 03:22 AM
3

Generalrabel111/r/MensRights27/04/23 01:13 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 5,302 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Every woman commenting like that has blood on their hands, enabling monsters who murder their children
/r/MensRights11/08/26 09:50 AM
1

Good move. More than likely, once the honeymoon phase of your relationship wore off, she would tarr you with the same misandrist brush. Better to end it when the red flag rises, than when there are children and a mortgage.
/r/MensRights10/08/26 09:47 PM
3

Thanks for the new set of rules that explain all the things we should ignore, in order to stop seeing the hatred feminism is targeting at men and boys. I agree. If we ignore statistics, ignore evidence and ignore all criticisms of feminism, then feminism doesn't look too bad. Unfortunately, just focusing on positives, doesn't address the issues men and boys face in an increasingly male-hostile community. When feminist icons, feminist academics, feminist publications and feminist influenced organ…
/r/MensRights08/08/26 10:10 PM
62

Feminist men are using the oldest trick in the human library - "its not me, its the ones who look like me, I hate them as much as you do, and I can prove it, by hating them even more than you!" Often feminist men are academics taking the path of least resistence, pathologising other men to prove their credentials. You can recognise them by the way they always offer alternative ways of being "male" that do not offend feminists.
/r/MensRights08/08/26 09:49 PM
2

Laws like these do not protect people. These laws simply create an environment where women can inflict the same violence lawfully. Spain is codifying the legalisation of women's violence. Let that sink in. The logical progression of this is that women will soon be given the right of life or death over men and boys, in order to protect women?
/r/MensRights06/08/26 11:17 PM
6

Lisa Britton is one of the few women thinkers in our world who sees the issues faced by men and boys, and acknowledges the importance of those issues. What is concerning is the hostility of the comments to her article. It seems acknowledging the humanity of men and boys is treason against feminism, and punishable by cancellation.
/r/MensRights05/08/26 01:22 AM
1

Standing with you, not against you.
/r/MensRights05/08/26 01:12 AM
1

The women in the change room
/r/MensRights05/08/26 01:10 AM
14

Women's violence excused and reframed as defensive, justified. This callous murderer was the aggressor, angry at her partner for not acknowledging he was wrong in a an argument. Not a victim. Listening to her attorney arguing the same old cliche of "women victim" made me physically sick.
/r/MensRights03/08/26 09:06 PM
4

The comments reveal a culturally entrenched devaluing of men and boys in terms of their human rights, their physical autonomy, and their emotional/sexual identity. Our communities, particularly feminists in our institutions, have great difficulty acknowledging the right of men and boys to NOT consent to sex with women. Women find this idea offensive and frightening, and react violently with abusive language, false allegations and child rape, to reassert their sexual egos. "How dare a man turn me…
/r/MensRights03/08/26 12:05 AM
4

Well said. The use of terms like emotional intelligence and emotional availablity have been abused to demean men and boys who CHOOSE to not reveal their emotional self to people who are hostile. Just like "toxic masculinity" and "healthy masculnity" these terms are the weapons of anti-male rhetoric that defines all masculine traits as flaws. Feminists continue to try to control people, by redefining their identities. Psycho-social terrorists.
/r/MensRights02/08/26 11:57 PM
8

Another privileged woman demanding position and power with no work and no responsibility. A quick look at sectors of our institutions where women dominate shows a culture of prejudice, bias and violence. Is this the new world?
/r/MensRights02/08/26 01:05 AM
0

This complaint is primarily from the UK government who are desperate to silence X in the UK because of the anti-government messaging there. Most of the MSM in the UK is controlled by government or woke media, and X has become the last free speech media. No doubt there are things posted on X that need too be removed. But there is no evidence that X is any more reluctant to address these issues than any other social media. The focus on women and children only is because the UK government and MSM a…
/r/MensRights30/07/26 09:34 PM
2

Emotionality is complex and diverse in experience and expression. Suggesting that gender sterotypes of emotionality are a reaaonable discussion point is not helpful. The gender stereotype that men are less emotional than women is a feminist myth. We have along and historic record of men expressing an extremely wide range of emotional experiences of extrordinary depth and intensity. Its disingenuous to ignore this. Just because men choose when, where, how, and with whom they share their emotional…
/r/MensRights30/07/26 03:54 AM
3

The Unia stated that "According to case law, artistic and political expressions enjoy broad protection under freedom of expression, even when they provoke, shock, or offend" and noted that "That protection can only be limited in the event of an actual incitement to discrimination, exclusion, or hatred." The Unia then decided that "although it may be perceived as polarizing or offensive, must be seen in this context as a symbolic and artistic expression." Its difficult to understand how this stat…
/r/MensRights30/07/26 03:33 AM
5

My experience of universities is that there is palpable antimale culture that is celebrated with a malicious nasty temper. Universities dominated by women become bastions of discrimination, gender hatred and open contempt for people on the basis of sex, race, sexual preference and political views. Sadly, as women have become more powerful in university culture and administration, they have exercised all of the worst practices of intolerance and prejudice, and appear happy to do so.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 09:46 PM
5

My experience of universities is that there is palpable antimale culture that is celebrated with a malicious nasty temper. Universities dominated by women become bastions of discrimination, gender hatred and open contempt for people on the basis of sex, race, sexual preference and political views. Sadly, as women have become more powerful in university culture and administration, they have exercised all of the worst practices of intolerance and prejudice, and appear happy to do so.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 09:46 PM
2

So the ECHR reveals its view, that men are not entitled to the same human rights rights as women. This is a view that treats men and boys like animals, indentured slaves required by law to comply with the demands of the state, without any rights to agency or choice. This ruling is based on the birth sex of individuals, not their abilities in conflict, their state of health, physicality, trainig, mental suitability for conflict or any other metric that measure usefulness in armed or unarmed confl…
/r/MensRights28/07/26 09:41 PM
2

Coach a witness is unlawful in the UK. It would allow a witness to be instructed on how to subtly change their testimony to make it more consistent with the required factual criteria for a conviction. This isn't about constructing an argument. Arguments are presented by legal representatives, not witnesses. A witness is expected to answer questions in their own words, based on their own experience of the events. AI would seek out the statements that result in conviction instead of the witnesses …
/r/MensRights28/07/26 09:31 PM
16

So much of the damaging ideology festering in our colleges and universities, is the direct result of the feminised culture raging unchecked.
/r/MensRights28/07/26 12:29 PM
3

The number of ideological conflicts here is high. The bias is feminist. "A husband forcing sex upon a wife in a traditional cuture" is equally likely to have been a wife forcing a husband. Many men were divorsed by their wife due to not porividing sufficient intimacy. "Removing a condomn" is rape, but poking holes in a condom is not? "Stealing money back from a sex worker" is rape? NO! it theft. Not revealing transexuality is rape, but not revealing lesbian or gay sexuality is not rape?
/r/MensRights27/07/26 03:44 AM
1

Not quite. AI algorithms are complex, and include filters and safeguards to moderate unwanted outcomes. For examle, outcoes that approve of genocide, rape, inciting violence, etc. One of the main themes many AIs embed in the algorithm is feminist ideologicaal framing of gender power relations, and men's violence agaoinst women. In some respects this stops the AI from approving of Andrew Tait like ideas. But given the ideolological basis of much of the programming is derivd from intersectional "r…
/r/MensRights26/07/26 08:23 PM
4

Ai not only pulls data from the available sources on the net. It is also impacted by filters and changes made to its algorithm. The AI algorithms are not transparent. Se we can never know if there are filters placed on the algorithm that impact gendered results.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 08:17 PM
11

So the dutch singer Sophia Straat pick people out by sex and race for the sake of inclusion. Just a racist sexist pig.
/r/MensRights26/07/26 12:16 AM
2

After being forced to endure women's hairy legs and arm pits for so long, men should be allowed to wear shorts.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 09:21 PM
18

Anyone waiting for the followup article claiming women are suffering most from the marriage drought, because they are no longer receiving "fre" property and alimony from divorse?
/r/MensRights22/07/26 09:18 PM
10

Because hurty words are so much more hrmful than killing male babies.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 05:12 AM
3

These are not good intentions. The safety of children is not advanced by practicing prejudice and gender hatred in public spaces. Small minded people who ignore the epidemc of women's sexual violence against children, are a bigger risk to child safety.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 09:14 PM
2

Toxic masculiinity is hate speech because its use is based on the assumption that masculinity exists on a continuum of more or less toxicity. That is, toxicity is the explicit value that describes the extent of the diviersity of masculine identity. The use of the term "feminine toxicity" makes the same assumption about female identity. Both uses are infantile examples of gender hatred, and should be condemned.
/r/MensRights21/07/26 09:10 PM
1

This is consistent with the European Court of Human Rights not rcognising men and boys as human. As subhumans, men and boys are not entitled to human rights. Without human rights, there is no social contract for men and boys to recognise the authority of the ECHR, or the rights it attributes to women and girls.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 03:45 AM
2

Hard to ignore the politics when the article text refers to a "very controversial minister of Defence", "a war that is not going according to plan" and "Gym-Bros." This article is fillled with bias and obvious antagonistic views. It is what it is. A hit piece designed to demean, cloaked in a political opinion. TRT has been associated with adverse events on the basis of poor evidence. Most recent meta-analyses have demonstrated that the benefits of TRT outweigh the potential harms in the appropri…
/r/MensRights19/07/26 02:10 AM
6

The school had evidence that the boy was a suicide risk, evidence which they concealed from the family. The school staff must be held accountable for treating a child like a criminal, without evidence, without due process, without empathy or acknowledgement of what the foreseeable outcome of their summary punishment would be. The school killed this boys as sure as if they had executed him themselves. How many more innocent children will die before these MONSTERS learn that ideology is not more i…
/r/MensRights14/07/26 09:14 PM
5

False accusers must be held accountable for their lies. So too those who treat someone as guilty of a crime, merely for being accused. In this case, the school must be held accountable for the foreseeable results of treating a child like a rapist, punishing him without proof, without due process without empathy.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 09:10 PM
31

Same in Australia. Girls first, before the "dirty little boys". Teachers were sexist pigs, pushing women's liberation while brutally enforcing strict male gender roles on boys.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 12:05 AM
7

"In the final days of the war, the Germans preferred to send 12-year-old boys to the front rather than healthy and strong women. This is evident in every regime that is backed into a corner and losing a war. They would sooner send their children of the inferior sex into combat than any woman!" And the German women let them do it. Its the same now. Feminists scream for equality, but not in the front line battle of metal and flesh. Cowards.
/r/MensRights14/07/26 12:03 AM
10

The underlying principle that supports the "misogyny of male suicide" is a fundamental belief that men and boys are subhuman. This same belief that men and boys are subhuman, underlies antisuicide support services in Australia, the UK, USA, Canada and New Zealand, where woke governments have given control of these services to feminist activists with no empathy for men and boys. The brutal denial of life saving services for suicidal men and boys is part of an epidemic of service denial that satur…
/r/MensRights13/07/26 11:59 PM
13

Resilience is a fundamental part of the male psychy. Despite millenia of attempts to subdue or control men, and consistent with the lack of unconditional in-group bias, men have sort out and fought for freedom. So its no surprise that men and boys continue to resist efforts to corral their creativity and energy. Take a quick look at the YouTube collection of indie creative story telling. Since Hollywood became a dogma of feminised soup, YouTube has taken off with highly diverse creative culture.…
/r/MensRights13/07/26 05:13 AM
9

Agreed. I have seen a rapid influx of accounts with anti-MRA views, or feminist ally views, posting anything from click-bait questions to obvious ad hominem attcks with little content other than opinionated hostility. Not sure if these are female lurkers with nothing better to do than throw insults and meritless arguments at people to start fights, or immigrants from LeftWingMaleAdvocates and other poorly populated feminist men's groups. Either way, its best to treat these posts with respect, bu…
/r/MensRights10/07/26 03:33 AM
1

True. But that kind of logical anomaly is rarely a problem for rusted on feminists
/r/MensRights10/07/26 01:53 AM
26

The vast majority of women are just good people, trying to get along in life. UNTIL you mention women's rights or men's rights or feminism. Modern women have been taught from birth that feminism is about equality, about raising women's right to be equal to men. They have been taught nothing about the human rights of men, and react aggressively if challemged on this issue. A small minority of women, those capable of critical thinking outside the female ingroup bias, can see the facts without the …
/r/MensRights08/07/26 09:55 PM
14

A therapist who treats men as women's therapy accessory? OMG When that girl grows up she will realise that individuals make their own decisions about their relationships. Loved the comment that "men are not at the same level as women" and "will surpass men in their emotional development". This is the kind of female supremacist our modern education system is producing.
/r/MensRights08/07/26 09:47 PM
6

This is a vile denial of basic human rights for male children in Singapore
/r/MensRights07/07/26 09:07 PM
15

Men are shamed for looking at porn. Men are shamed for having sexual feelings. Men are shamed for wanting sex, and having sex. Men are just being shamed for being masculine. The clear message is that women just like shaming men, and no matter who you are, what you do, what you don't do, or whateve, they will continue to shame you. Its their addiction. Shame men is how many women stroke their own egos.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 09:05 PM
0

You really need to get some education about how laws are read.
/r/MensRights07/07/26 09:02 PM
4

Australian DV and Child Protection services refuse to acknowledge women's violence. How many more children will die, being used as props for their mothers' emotional stability and mental health. When will the lives of little boys matter? Several reports were made to child services about the safety of this poor boy. The mother was an alleged drug user, suspected of experiencing several drug related psychotic episodes, and had several DV orders restraining her. Despite this, the boy's safety was n…
/r/MensRights07/07/26 01:13 AM
1

The decision of the Appellate Court was that the charge of femicide was dismissed and the case was returned to the Court of First Instance to see if other charges could be filed. The conviction had to be dismissed, as the law was unconstitutional (see the reasons above). And here is where you loose the plot. If one "element" of a criminal conviction cannot be proved, or is unconstitutional, the law fails for that conviction. You cannot continue with a conviction just because MOST of the elements…
/r/MensRights07/07/26 12:43 AM
11

First of all, the statement is wrong. Violent crimes are committed by individuals, not collectives. This profiling of people by demographic characteristics has long been recognised as racist, sexist, bigotted intolerance. Secondly, only reported crime is included in the counts. Women's violence is not recognised as violence by the community, and particularly by women's advocates. Yet we know that the incidence of domestic violence in female same sex relationships is much higher than in heteosexu…
/r/MensRights06/07/26 11:51 PM
1

Have you bothered to read the actual decision? Or just the news?
/r/MensRights06/07/26 09:31 PM
0

Increasingly, for men having sex with women, sex has become a burden, a job satisfying women's need to feel beautiful, desirable and in love. The burden of this work is expensive in terms of financial investment, intensive in terms of labor, and seldom provides equivalent satisfaction for men. The incidence of faked male orgasm is increasing, while time to faked orgasm is decreasing, to minimise the duration of the burden.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 03:42 AM
4

There is a never ending supply of women who believe they are entitled by their sex, to femsplain masculinity and male behaviour to men and boys. They are power hungry narcissists, attempting to impose their views on what men should feel, what men should think, how men should express their identity and experiences, and what masculinity should be.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 03:15 AM
27

The idea that in emergency aid situations, a demographic group can be selected to receive no assistance, selected to die, is only ever implimented targeting men and boys. This is the response of MONSTERS. UN women must be held to account for their crimes against humanity, selecting who lives and who dies, based on sex.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 03:11 AM
1

The 'manosphere' is just another form of feminist hate speech used to associate 'all men' with 'toxic masculinity'. The term is used to gather up any non-feminist narratives by men or about men and masculinity under a single umbrella, and then attach the extreme anti-social beliefs of a small number of men and women to the broader non-feminist population. Typically, discussions about the manosphere identify the vulnerability of boys and their disengagement from mainstream feminist ideals, sugges…
/r/MensRights03/07/26 10:11 PM
2

Not correct. The decision of the court stated that the femicide laws were unconstitutional for three main reasons: legal vagueness, infringement of the presumption of innocence, and unequal treatment based on sex. This isn't just about changing the 'name' of a crime for data collection. That data can already be collected.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 09:22 PM
1

That little femstat blew my mind as well. Its the way they justify their sociopathy. Playing with definitions, only looking at specific populations, making men in crisis invisible. But just saying "if we don't count these men" is a classic.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 12:15 AM
14

There is a war being waged against boys in education. Men and boys are not falling behind, they are being pushed down, abused, ambushed and marked down while girls and women are given every bonus in the book.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 09:31 PM
2

Baiter
/r/MensRights30/06/26 10:00 AM
-11

How casually you redefine the sexual identity of people. But you clearly believe you have that right, the right to treat others like animals, rename them, assume their sexuality, and place them on a killing board like butterflies. Sociopathy
/r/MensRights30/06/26 09:57 AM
1

They teach the ideology of Dworkin, Solanas, Morgan etc in university and college courses on gende studies, not as extremists, but as icons. They made Solanas a heroine in a recent movie. Which gender studies courses teach Tate etc? These feminist extremes, are mainstream. Stop denying the core principle of feminism, the violent hatred of men and boys.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 05:54 AM
5

You reap what you sow.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 01:12 AM
3

The epidemic is the misinformation being spread by feminist academics and journalists, who redefine violence against women to include not agreeing with a woman, not deferring to a woman, not consenting to a woman, looking at a woman, speaking to a woman or not speaking to a woman.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 01:09 AM
6

These sexist pigs show that they value identity above human rights. Identities have no soul, have no rights. Human rights attach to individuals, not classes. The UN Women sexist pigs must be held to account for their crimes against humanity.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 12:57 AM
2

The UN complicit in the execution of 8,000 men and boys. This reflects the UN attitudes to men and boys over time, treating them as subhuman, unimportant, and not worth protection. This is consistent with the UN Women demand that women and girls be treated as more deserving of help and protection, on the basis of their biological sex, not their need. The sexist pigs who work for the UN, or support the UN, should be investigated for their crimes against humanity.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 12:54 AM
1

"Women are not “taught” that hitting men is ok- we are taught not to hit anybody." Garbage. women's violence against men and boys is praised as "empowerment", and forms a large component of feminist influenced media. From Dworkin "I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp”, Solanas "kill men" (SCUM Manifesto), Ford "#KILLALLMEN", Gearhart "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race", Harmange "I hate men", to Morgan "man-hating’ is an honoura…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 12:46 AM
5

In the highly heirarchial social landscape of women, victimhood is a currency. Once you reveal your status as a survivor of rape, you threaten the position of women as primary victims (i.e. in any conversation, being a woman gives you more victim currency compared to men, even if you haven't been a direct victim). Therefore, as a threat to a woman's social standing, you must be diminished, either by trivialising your experience of rape, turning your experience of rape into a form of misogyny, or…
/r/MensRights28/06/26 11:40 PM
22

So funny to listen to these fools making up excuses for whats happening without actually asking the people involved (uninvolved?). Its like a bunch of rich brats sitting in a club making shit up without any evidence, relying on their "social power" to float their opinion to the top. From what I've heard from young men, most are sick of young women who expect to be treated like independent, strong individuals on one hand, while still expecting to be treated like princesses on the other. So they b…
/r/MensRights28/06/26 09:57 PM
2

THere is no human right that endorses the power to make people agree with your world view or opinion about gender. I stopped having any sympathy for trans rights when I was branded as "cismale" without my consent, without regard to my perception of my identity, without regard to my finding that label offensive and degrading. Go fight your fight somewhere else. I have no time for your issues, because they involve degrading me, and others who do nothing more than disagree with you.
/r/MensRights27/06/26 04:19 AM
1

Delusional conspiracy theory. Apart from your own psychotic ramblings and screen shots of gender studies bubble-babble, show any documentary evidence that this is government policy.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 11:59 PM
42

Just another article demonstrating the left-wing feminist hatred of boys. Incapable of intellecyual arguments outside the feminist bubble, these bullies pick on children, and even then rely on no right of reply to spew their demeaning dribble on boys.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 11:50 PM
10

There is an endless supply of women eager to femsplain masculinity to men and boys. Respect Victoria demands that men and boys change the gender identity to a single rigid form designed and approved by women. That alone explains the brutality of their antipathy to men and boys. It explains the depth of their narcissistic arrogance and hypocracy. Respect Victoria ironicly shows no respect for men and boys, and treats them like problematic animals to be trained and controlled.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 06:05 AM
3

Stalking is a serious violence against a person and is not tolerated. Unless the perpetrator is a woman. Then its just a poor choice.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 05:59 AM
15

They aren't talking about violence and harms. They are talking female supremacy. They minimise women's violence to excuse their own violence. They trivialise male victims, because they really believe men and boys are subhuman. When they talk about men and boys, its like they are talking about problematic animals. The preferred solution to their "man" problem, is to #KILLALLMEN
/r/MensRights26/06/26 05:56 AM
21

Why would anyone dedicate their lives to being a wage slave to governments and corporations who hate you for being male? Particularly when everything you work hard to create will be taken from you on a woman's whim. Own nothing, and they can take nothing. What are you loosing? Not much - nagging, petty tantrums, unreasonable demands, abuse, coersion, greed, and debt.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 04:28 AM
54

The most consistently missing data in research about men and boys, is the thoughts and opinions of men and boys. Often these are replaced by feminist ideological narratives (never positive) or stereotypes.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 04:24 AM
1

Man, that's unbelievably callous to say that to a grieving father. I hope you didn't let her hate spoil that moment of being with your beatiful boy.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 04:17 AM
50

There were similar arguments about FGM in terms of improved hygiene, reduced incidence of STDs, better moral health,etc. All these false flag arguments were not just dismissed. They were condemned for being misogynistic, demeaning, sexist etc. Yet somehow, when it comes to the human rights of baby boys to body autonomy, we have to agrue why they should have that right! The insipid sexist argument about hygiene, the manipulated biased studies, the sexist dismissal of men's human rights, all this …
/r/MensRights24/06/26 01:06 AM
7

A woman throws a barstool at a man holding a 5 year old child. The stool hits the man and the child. The woman is charged and pleas guilty to aggravated assault. The Family Court judge ignores the violence of the woman, and targets the fact that the man was filming the assault. The judge criticises the man for filming instead of protecting the child. But both these parents alleged the other were violent in the relationship, and currently both were subject to restraining orders. The man is clearl…
/r/MensRights24/06/26 12:48 AM
1

How sad is it that we have to talk about Fathers Day as if any scraps of acknowledgement are better than nothing.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 08:57 PM
23

When AI is more interesting and less toxic than your relationship with a demanding narcissistic woman, this is what happens. The fact that these women find fault in men not worsipping them, says it all.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 08:53 PM
64

The tech environment at corporate level has always been highly misandrist. Its some kind of nerdish cultural cringe, like rich powerful nerds realising they are now highly attractive to women (i.e. rich/powerful), and are suddenly having to negotiate with women who are still pushing feminnist ideals. Its an apologist state of mind, a systemic SIMPing.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 08:51 PM
2

Perpetrator of violence and sexist behaviour always try to minimise and trivialise the impact of their behaviour. Its part of the narcissistic disorder that allows them to dehumanise the victims of their violence. So when feminists say "misandry is not as harmful" what they actually saying is that they believe men and boys are less human than women and girls, and violence targeting them is not important.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 08:47 PM
15

Just another woman femsplaining masculinnity to men. Have no experience, no knowledge of masculinity, this scam artist is exploiting vulnerable men using the oldest tricks in the book. Of cource, CNN runs with the story.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 09:21 PM
15

Democracy is dead in Canada. Now you will be treated differently by law, depending on your sex, race religion or political affiliations. Canaada has officially become a fascist state. God help you all.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 01:35 AM
8

Andrea Dworking, Valarie Solanas, Simone de Beauvoir and a host of other hate speech writers, are considered inspirational feminist icons in College gender studies courses taught to aspiring journalists, teachers, lawyers, healthcare workers, political activists and even in core STEM subjects.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 01:31 AM
1

I wondered about that too. One of the most popular defenses raised by female teachers who abuse young school boys, is "the boy initiated the sex", " the boy sexually abused me". How many child sex offenders are skewing these surveys, by projecting their criminal sexual abuse of children, as misogynistic abuse instigated by boys? Is this why their female colleagues are so reluctant to report women who sexually abuse underage or school age boys?
/r/MensRights21/06/26 01:27 AM
6

As of now, she is entitled to 50% or more of your assets. All assets.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 04:36 AM
27

AI is the poster child of gynocentrism in information technology. Trained on woke publications and pumped up on feminist filters, AI sourced text is UN Women on steroids. Try asking AI if circumcision is evidence of misandry in health care.
/r/MensRights20/06/26 04:32 AM
4

When you think you have the right to demand another person MUST reconstruct the gender identity to make you happy, you are a MONSTER. BLOCKED
/r/MensRights19/06/26 12:12 AM
1

Feminism is the product of female ingroup bias. Its selective, gander based and brutal.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 09:37 PM
1

Homelessness in Australia has increased by 25% over 5 years. Semi-permanent tent cities are appearing in all capital cities. Recent headlines have highlighted increased violence, increased poverty and a housing crisis that has average house prices in capital cities increasing from $680,000 in the first quarter of 2014 to around $1.4 million at the end of 2024, with little increase in wages over that time, and an 18% per-capita fall in GDP. Increasing numbers of Australians, working as well as wo…
/r/MensRights18/06/26 09:34 PM
2

No. At the end of the article they quote Ben Vasiliou runs the Man Cave, a mental health charity that works with thousands of young men in schools around the country. Man Cave is a feminist based program that involves "reconstructing" male gender identities into "healthy" masculinities (measured in benefits to women and girls). The equivalent of gay conversion therapy.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 09:11 PM
2

So true. It seems to be a pattern that where women succeed and dominate, hostility to men and boys blossoms. What's going on?
/r/MensRights17/06/26 11:13 PM
2

Its a had gig. How did our schools become so hostile to men and boys? I can see the hatred at the heart of feminism. But it seems to be more than just feminism.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 11:10 PM
1

If we expect parents to parent, then we have to also structure our communities so both parents do not have to work 60 hour weeks to keep a roof over their families. Currently, families need both parents working, with children in child care from under 2 years of age. Our children are being raised by strangers with curriculums written by the same people who wrote the guides in the OP.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 11:08 PM
1

It is a propaganda driven movement. All of the evidence they provided was surveys of teachers. Teachers who had been taught in colleges and universities to identify boys as problematic and misogynistic. They call a meeting welcoming teachers interested in the impact of the manosphere on misogyny in schools, and ask for a hands up at the meeting of all teachers who have witnessed or experienced misogyny inspired by the manosphere in their school? Everyone raises the hand!! OMG a crisis!!
/r/MensRights17/06/26 11:05 PM
2

That's scarey true. Zealots are a danger to civil society. but zealotry is seductive and addictive. What's the cause of this change in our institutions. Its not just the war on boys in schools. We seem to have set aside science and adopted mob rule.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 10:59 PM
1

So true. This is what is so painful to watch. The teaching profession in Australia seem incapable of honest reflection. Boys behaviour is more often thean not, a response to the way they are being treated in schools. Poor behaviour, combative behaviour, is very likely the reaction some boys are having to the blatant misandry and gynocentrism boys are experiencing. As you say, they reject the stereotyping imposed on them by teachers politicised and hypersensitised by activist academics in college…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 10:55 PM
5

From what I hear, this is happening every day, whether at assemblies, in classrooms, in an entrenched culture, or just in the personal gender politics of those teachers running the respectful relationships programs.
/r/MensRights17/06/26 10:47 PM
93

https://anrows-2019.s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/05093402/DF-ANROWS-ManosphereGuide-Final.pdf The guidelines are provided by the University of Melbourne and the Australian National Research Organisation for Women's Safety (ANROWS), as a resource for teachers in secondary schools (Years 7 to 12) on the harmful impacts of the manosphere for young people, teachers and school communities, its links to violence, recruitment pathways for boys and young men, and the role o…
/r/MensRights17/06/26 05:50 AM
4

So many men have grown up in families where women lead, and men are trained like animals to serve and obey. Even today, in modern comedy, its not uncommon for female matriarchs to joke about "training" their men. I think what you call a dis-service, is actually abuse.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 09:25 PM
5

That reminds me of my fathers advice. No one gives you rights, the only rights we have in a hostile world are those we can take and defend.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 12:48 AM
3

So right. Research into male suicide draws men's mental state, men's ideas, men's intentions, from feminist discourse. The one data source that is never included is men themselves. Even surveys are populated with loaded questions, that force men's responses into demeaning scales of toxicity.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 12:45 AM
5

I think we are all tied. And the chances of women ever reconstructing their gender identities in response to men's rights is next to ZERO. What riles is that women expect that men will reconstruct their gender identities because women demand they should.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 12:41 AM
5

I agree with Striped-F. Do yourself a treat, and visit Bettina's Substack. She's an early 70s women's liberation fighter. That was back when being a women's rights activist was hard, and going public about risky. She fought hard for women at great personal risk and expense. After seeing what was happeninng to men and boys in modern Australia, she stepped up and spoke the truth again, with the same urgency, same strength and same fearless voice. She has been targeted by university mobs, media sta…
/r/MensRights16/06/26 12:36 AM
4

We don't give up that easily. Not at all really. Every day we fight the snakes, the spiders, the sharks the crocs, not to mention the 45c summers that fry eggs on your shoulders. No, really. It's important we never give up.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 12:26 AM
31

We know for sure that the one in three stat is a myth. We also know that no one is interested in male victims of womn's violence.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 04:02 AM
9

From the time feminists working at the University of York, UK, signed a joint letter to their university administration, demanding that a meeting for IMD addressing the issue of male suicide must be cancelled, feminism was demonstrated to have no empathy of sympathy for male victims of suicide. That little example of feminist antipathy for men's health was typified by the infamous Clementine Ford, who's attitude to the tragedy of COVID 19 and men's health was "Honestly, corona-virus isn't killin…
/r/MensRights15/06/26 04:00 AM
84

I don't know anyone who doesn't k ow a man who has taken his own life. All of them were good people. None had any hope of receiving any help in their time of need. All they are offered is lessons in male privilege, berating for being thoughtless of what their suicide would do to the women in their lives.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 01:46 AM
12

Indeed. Blood on their hands, and they are celebrating.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 01:44 AM
73

So boys who do not reconstruct their masculine identities are all going to bash girls? I don't think so. This crisis farming by yet another feminist academic femsplaining masculinity to men and boys, borrows heavily on assumed facts (feminist memes) that portray all masculinies as harmful to women.
/r/MensRights15/06/26 01:42 AM
2

Highly recommend everyone read this article. The message about Fathers taking family leave is clear. If men don't act like women, then they are invisible and problematic. Invisible, because academics don't research men when exploring their behaviour, they make assumptions about men's behaviour based on epidemiological data and confirmation bias. If men take leave in different patterns to women, that leave becomes invisible. Problematic, because when men do not act like women, their behaviour is …
/r/MensRights11/06/26 09:59 PM
5

That statement is very true. Often, people who oppose human rights for men and boys, suggest that Men's Rights are somehow all about turning back the clock to a time when men ruled women. That's not the case. It is very not the case. Many women who fight for women's rights also fight for men's rights. Its the same movement, its about human rights and the liberation of men and women from strict gender roles that deny agency and freedom. Women achieved (work in progress) liberation from their stri…
/r/MensRights11/06/26 09:41 PM
3

When ever a legal process or legal fraternity is captured by an activist ideology, it acts like a paramilitary army in terms of offensive and defensive responses. In the case of Family Courts and divorse, any intrusion by "others" (i.e. men) results in a circling of the wagons, guns blazing and only one solution. Not you. When you are immersed in the divorse process, you may like you are in a conversation but are not hearing everything that everyone else hears, that's because its true. The facts…
/r/MensRights09/06/26 03:56 AM
4

Ah, the feminist lens. Why do you think soft looking women and hard looking men validates your world view of feminist dogma? Are you so entrenched in believing women must actualise themselves thru adopted male traits?
/r/MensRights09/06/26 03:42 AM
7

Get your head out of the feminist myths. Women haven't been taught to be submissive in secular communities for nearly a century. The theme is go girls. You're ancient history needs to be retired. Open your eyes.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 09:10 PM
3

Sadly, this is the impact of these gynocentric laws in Australia. Men are avoiding healthcare interactions for fear of being labelled potential perpetrators for doing so. Find a friend you can talk to.
/r/MensRights06/06/26 12:28 AM
15

Where do you live (country). In Australia there is a government sanctioned move to treat all men as potential perpetrators of violence against women, when everr men use health, mental health or social services. Here's a summary I posted a while ago. The Victorian government in Australia has introduced practice guidelines for health care professionals aimed at reducing family violence (The Family Violence Multi-agency Risk Assessment and Management (MARAM) Framework). Addressing the risk of famil…
/r/MensRights05/06/26 02:45 AM
61

The first statement in this report says it all "Men’s violence remains a persistent and preventable public health crisis in Australia." The report is heavily weighted with "toxic masculinity" which the researchers have cleverly renamed "the Man Box." According to the report, masculine traits are violent, controlling, abusive, dominant, etc. And the only way to fix this is to recreate masculinity using feminist ideology. In fact, the report devotes three chapters to explaining antifeminism is vio…
/r/MensRights02/06/26 03:25 AM
1

Do not send your son to public schools. Better to home school with a collective of other home school families. The hatred of boys, and conscious/unconscious bias against boys is so culturally entrenched in public schools, it will crush your beautiful boy within a few days. Read some of the teacher social media if you want to understand the intensity of the misandry boys endure daily in education.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 06:15 AM
3

More offensive is "women and their children". This language is often used to make male parents invisible, and extrapolated to disguise women's demands as children's rights, and children as women's property.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 06:06 AM
3

The NYT showing us all that they are so out of touch with reality, they are still pushing the antimale rhetorhic that decimated the Democrats at the 2020 election. Their bleatings about patriarchy, white supremacy, toxic masculinity and the female goddess are so dumb. They really believe they are the new world order. OMG. The only crisis that masculinity is facing is the rise of narcissistic feminist fascism in mainstream media and policy, and intersectional puppets trying to rewrite history and…
/r/MensRights31/05/26 09:22 PM
5

The cowards of the White Feather movement were all for other people facing death, horrific injuries, and the madness of war, but never volunteered to place themselves in that position. There are no word to describe their brutal enforcement of the strict male gender role, while protesting their own liberation.
/r/MensRights31/05/26 09:14 PM
22

Communities are structural sound while sufficient members of the community believe there is value in sacrificing personal benefit for community good. A healthy community can survive a finite number of individuals who pursue personal satiation before community good. In fact, a healthy community requires such individuals to innovate and expansion. When the ratio of community good and personal satiation becomes too negative, the community structure becomes increasingly unstable, until collapse.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 12:01 PM
1

Despite some comments, this is a letter (not a thesis), and follows a disorganised unsupported narrative that lacks logical progression or proofs. But the idea that feminism is a fascist movement is not without merit. Fascism can be defined as a political philosophy or movement that places ideological identity above individual freedom, characterised by social conformity to strict narratives of within-group loyalty and brutal suppression of opposition. The core principle of fascism is tribal loya…
/r/MensRights28/05/26 12:06 AM
2

We should be careful of falling into a mythopoetic movement that mistakes a return to historic strict traditional masculine values and behaviours, for men's rights. Men's rights is primarily based on empowering men and boys to have a choice about whoever and whatever they are or want to be. That is liberation from strict male gender roles and identities, not a rebirth of old ways.
/r/MensRights27/05/26 11:44 PM
3

Don't get too excited if you do find a link to "men's mental health." Most men's mental health services measure men's mental health in terms of benefits experienced by women; i.e. the feminist based "healthy masculinities" approach requiring men's sexual identities be reconstructed to be consistent with feminist principles.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 12:22 AM
5

Sounds like another "believe all women" scam, only this time its "don't ever believe men." Most likely the OP is a KILLALLMEN apologist?
/r/MensRights26/05/26 12:12 AM
3

Great reading list
/r/MensRights26/05/26 12:09 AM
1

Historical data often quoted by feminists suggests the vast majority of sexual offenses, and sexual offenses against children, are perpetrated by men. And it is claimed that historical data is consistent with more recent criminal conviction stats. This is assumed without question, as it matches the feminist narrative of men's violence against women. However, further examination of the data suggests there has been long term under reporting of female sexual offending generally, and recent increase…
/r/MensRights25/05/26 01:40 AM
8

Despite all the misinformation spread by feminist academics about male sexual violence, the real crisis appears to be a tsunami of female sexual predators working in our schools, raping young boys at an alarming rate. The massive increase in the number of women being convicted (not just accused) of child sexual abuse, is being ignored by our MSM and institutions. Two facts are really concerning. Firstly, we know women are very reluctant to report female sexual abuse of children, so the numbers o…
/r/MensRights24/05/26 09:49 PM
8

Just another example of women's choices being made men's responsibility. A clear message to all men. DO NOT DONATE SPERM. Even if you think you are safe and protected from liability, the laws can be changed at any time, retrospectively, making your kind gesture a lifetime of financial responsibility (including your deceased estate).
/r/MensRights24/05/26 09:40 PM
7

There is nothing wrong with you. There is something fundamentally wrong with the people who see you in a bad light, just because you are male.
/r/MensRights24/05/26 04:37 AM
1

Agreed. Men need to be seen as assets to schools, rather than risks.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 04:09 AM
16

This groping was malicious, as shown by the demeaning slur aimed at the man during/after. Malicious sexual assault is not funny, or harmless.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 05:56 AM
1

Very true. But the hreat of false accusations that stops men entering teaching as a profession, is just part of the antimale culture that boys are subjected to every day, for a decade and a half. Until the malicious antimale culture of the teaching profession is addressed, boys will continue to look beyond mainstream misandry for environments where they are treated like people with human rights.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 05:53 AM
26

Some women are quite OK with being sexist, racist, body shaming, narcissists. The female equivalent of Andrew Tait. What shocks is the number of women who approve this behaviour. It says a lot about the difference between what women claim to be, versus what they really are.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 01:03 AM
2

Also Australian, also in education (adult). The policing of gender politics in education is brutal and dogmatic. There is only one narrative, and that narrative does not include boys as anything other than a problem or part of the invisible mass. No one is allowed to identify how boys are failing, without citing their problematic conformity to traditional masculine norms and rising misogyny. This retains the primacy of "women's rights" in the education narrative, and preserves the social empower…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:58 AM
96

There is a strong cultural component to this trend. Strongly misogynistic cultures are florishing while western cultures are dying. Ironicly, feminism is self-selecting for extinction.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 01:08 AM
3

Oops. My apology. Reading on phone makes it hard to see the quotation marks. Fully agree with you. Will be more careful reading next time, and count to ten.
/r/MensRights17/05/26 01:02 AM
1

Yhe only thing toxic about toxic masculinity is the people who continue to refer to others as "toxc" You have a serious gender hatred issue and need help.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 02:08 AM
136

Being a male teacher of female students is like being a scratching post for cats. They will test all their powers against you, just to see what happens. Good luck. Disengage asap.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 03:56 AM
35

A very thorough meta-analysis that found no clear causal relationship between testosterone and risk taking in males or females. Heterogenerous findings in included trials, showed methodology may have influenced outcomes. The "terrible" testosterone myth busted one more time. How long until this message gets through to the social sciences.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 03:46 AM
84

You left out the most important advice...... look for another job ASAP.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 03:32 AM
22

Three local events I heard about, focused on men's mental health. All three were really about women's expectations of men's behaviour. Too often men's mental health is used as an excuse to be critical of men's behaviours, and their impact on women. That's not men's mental health. It's men's conformity to women's benefits.
/r/MensRights15/05/26 01:33 AM
1

So adopt the mentality of those sexist pigs fom 50 years ago. What a win.
/r/MensRights14/05/26 09:06 AM
6

Its so interesting to see first hand, the obnoxious psuedo-logic of a feminist ideologue trying to justify their gender hatred. Here's a point by point deconstruction of this bullshit. "most single issue voters, vote based off abortion laws". Firstly, lets excuse this femsplain for assuming that the US is the whole world. Its not true. Open your eyes. Notwithstanding this arrogance, abortion has rarely been the primary single issue for voters except for surveys run in the year immediately after …
/r/MensRights14/05/26 12:35 AM
5

So true. These feminist studies start with the conclusion, then work their way back to inventing evidence. Sadly, these feminist researchers have been put in charge of men's health, men's suicide prevention and men's charities (like movember) all over Australia. But no one blinks when $millions in government and charity spending shows no inprovement men's health outcomes or suicide rates. OMG. Rather than consider that they might need to change their approach to men's health and male suicide, th…
/r/MensRights13/05/26 02:00 AM
45

Feminist academics of the Movember institute, Melbourne University and Australian Institute of Family Studies (and friends) have once again published a study based on the Ten to Men data set, to prove that men who exhibit masculine traits are knuckle dragging, women bashing, subhuman, brutes. This latest study uses the infamous CMNI (Conformity to Masculine Norms Index) in a new multi-dimensional form (CMNI-22), to link negative feminist perceptions of men to men's conformity to traditional male…
/r/MensRights12/05/26 01:08 AM
15

While any discipline with a lower proportion of women is targeted for advancing unqualified female applicants, no effort is being made to increase the proporton of men in nursing, education, healthcare, psychology, social sciences or gender studies.
/r/MensRights11/05/26 05:36 AM
5

This "research" (its not really research) is from an academic who has made a career from femporn; i.e. published works based on feminist ideological framing of masculinity as the evil of all evils. It sells well, and was the only viable career path for male academics in social sciences over the last half century. All his articles follow the same trajectory: here is an issue - women most affected - flawed violent masculinity is to blame - can only be fixed by reconstructing the identities of all …
/r/MensRights08/05/26 12:14 AM
7

Sounds like any breakroom i have ever been in with a majority of women.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 11:55 PM
3

No, no, no, no, no. This is not a step forward in Australia. Its a step towards strictor control over men and boys by the government, to brutally enforce a strict male gender roll of obedience, servitude and silence. May 2025 — Dan Repacholi MP appointed Australia’s first Special Envoy for Men’s Health. The special envoy for Men's Health is currently on a listening tour to talk with men, with the MP Ged Kearney, the Assistant Minister for the Prevention of Family Violence (men's violence against…
/r/MensRights06/05/26 06:07 AM
1

Its a self-serving meme, that is born of the prejudice of feminist women, who trivialise the life experiences of men, and deny women's violence.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 12:27 AM
1

Over several decades I was privileged to watch women's rights advance remarkably, not to the point where it was all done, but to a point where equality was within reach, and motivation to continue to strive for and maintain equality, becoming mainstream. Then something happened. The militant fringe that always hated men and boys became increasingly powerful and widely supported by academia. Now all that progress has been lost, and I have great trepidation for the future of boys and girls. Boys a…
/r/MensRights29/04/26 03:14 AM
27

The Victorian government in Australia has introduced practice guidelines for health care professionals aimed at reducing family violence (The Family Violence Multi-agency Risk Assessment and Management (MARAM) Framework). Addressing the risk of family violence is commendable. But when assessing risk is infused with gender ideology, then the results are violations of human rights, and nothing to do with reducing family violence. www.vic.gov.au/family-violence-multi-agency-risk-assessment-and-mana…
/r/MensRights29/04/26 01:40 AM
1

Because being an advocate for women places a person outside the appropriate safe guards against personal bias, gender bias, gender prejudice and sex discrimination. It has become so normalised, that people appointed to positions specifically tasked with protecting people from gender discrimination in our community, have 100% been women, 100% stated in their acceptance speeches that they were going to be advocates for women, and have turned their work places into female dominated, man hating gett…
/r/MensRights28/04/26 09:25 PM
2

If you don't know the answer to that, you are so morally bankrupt, you're not worth talking to. Check your moral compass then try talking to people again.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 08:34 AM
2

Feminists self selecting for extinction
/r/MensRights26/04/26 01:41 AM
11

Spend decades reaching girls to be gynocentric dictators in relationship, then blame boys because they opt out of the princess project? Omg
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:34 AM
2

The people running this sexist disinformation campaign have self identified as sexist pigs. Their irrational and pathological hatred of men and boys is so out of control, they are searching endlessly for any validation of their delusional mental state, regardless of how implausible.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 12:17 AM
7

Making false allegations is almost a popcorn adventure fro some people.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 12:09 AM
7

Discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion etc, is morally and legally wrong. Its a short cut to totalitarian dictatorships.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 12:02 AM
14

"Uneducated men are easier to control" But there's the issue. Feminist academics and activists have taken a top-down approach to their activism in terms of engaging men. Rather than a grass roots approach to changing men into compliant protectors/providers, they believe that making changes to government policy, education and media, they can change men. Make laws, criminalise non-compliance, make standards of inclusion that require belief in feminism. But its not working. They are complaining lou…
/r/MensRights22/04/26 11:54 PM
81

In a university with a majority of female students and a majority of female graduates, and a majority of female employees. These sexist pigs are only looking for areas where women do not dominate and address to areas to increase the numbers of women. In areas where women do dominate, they take no interest or action. This is purely sexist discrimination, not equity. Their stated and unhiden goal is to eliminate men and boys from education in Canada.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 09:14 PM
3

A toxic women's culture appears to be a widespreadd problem.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 03:15 AM
6

What is most obnoxious about this, is the authors are all highly paid academics in the Australian education system. Experts on gender, domestic violence and relationships. Their take away statement about a Minister for men and boys is?...... 'Overall, the creation of a minister for men and boys signals the Victorian government is willing to engage with complex and sensitive questions about gender, men’s violence and misogyny.' The academic experts teaching our children, training the teachers who…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 09:21 PM
1

Firstly let make jurisdiction clear. My data is geographically Australian. Notwithstanding that, the similarities between the Australian and US legal systems are few, but fundamental. Firstly, the Australian Human Rights Commission which over sees and staffs the Australian Sex Discrimination Commission (SDC), is staffed 85% by women. The SDC employs almost exclusively women. While this is openly acknowledged, no action has or will be taken to either investigate or fix this bias. This gender bias…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 12:44 AM
3

Wrong. While the laws are not gendered, the gateways to enforcement are jealously guarded by feminist zealots.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 09:10 AM
2

Have to wonder if the judges hearing these cases are all into little boys too, because just like the publications that refuse to use the 'r' word or 'p' word for female sexual abusers, they don't appear to think its a serious crime. A slap on thw wrist, and off you go, hunting the next liitle boy for afternoon delights.
/r/MensRights14/04/26 09:07 AM
6

There is one thing that feminism is not, and that's inclusive. Feminists are so enarmoured of their 'only like me' biased perception of the world, all they see is women and girls. Everyone else is invisible, subhuman. So while they snort and giggle like sexist pigs, they feel perfectly entitled to work in academia or government or in NGOs and implementing programs addressing homelessness, domestic violence, sexual violence, sexual abuse of children, stepping over the bodies of men and boys in th…
/r/MensRights14/04/26 08:59 AM
1

No facts?
/r/MensRights12/04/26 11:52 PM
2

Its just another shallow device for owning the dialogue. By making women who choose family and nuturing as a life choice, just failed form of feminism, these harpies are professing ownership of other women. Its all about power, centralised power, power in the hands of the feminist elite, who tell other women when they a good or bad.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 11:49 PM
4

The only time women are "doing it all" is when they only see their own work, and are deliberately blind to the work and sacrifices of men. They are addicted to hate, because it makes them feel like big brave women.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 11:46 PM
-12

After decades of affirmative action to increasse female engagement across so many previously male dominated professions and jobs, the results are that women are succeeding! So now that's a problem? REALLY?
/r/MensRights12/04/26 11:43 PM
1

The question isn't about Lois. Its about whether the women involved have committed a crime by publishing the episode. Is this lawful?
/r/MensRights12/04/26 11:41 PM
13

The ultimate atribution of responsibility to men. If this case succeeds, every man will be responsible for the happiness and mental health of his female partner. Is she depressed? Is she self harming? Is she dissatisfied? Its the man's fault. If there are any consequences to her 'unhappiness' then the man will be punished, not the poor woman. Not based on evidence, just on gossip and one person's characterisation of a relationship. The woman's acts of unhappiness, self harm, depression, anxiety,…
/r/MensRights08/04/26 11:24 PM
7

Your question is tainted by sexist discrimination. So long as men are considered outsiders, atreated as risks to families rather than as family members and active involved parents, the sexist privilege afforded women as the ONLY parents in families, will continue to protect women from consequences for their actions. Women are afforded mitigation in both determinations of guilt and in sentencing, on the basis that they are considered the sole carers of children while men are considered protectors…
/r/MensRights31/03/26 08:15 PM
2

A society demonstrates its humanity by whether it treats people differently because of their sex, race, etc. The violence against boys in schools is common world wide. Mostly its emotional and psychological in many places, but in India, men and boys are treated like criminals if they dare not adhere to strict gender behavioural norms. Men and boys should be free to be who they are, not forced into slavery by social violence.
/r/MensRights31/03/26 08:07 PM
1

True. But some of the most radical feminists are men.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 08:36 PM
3

Do not associate feminism with all women - This is correct and a useful reminder that feminism is not a surrogate for all women. However, feminist ideology, feminist memes, and common memes repeated by women and adopted by feminist writers/speakers, are often mixed. Repeating gendered stereotypes or memes that demean or generalise about men is a common sexist behaviour can be acted out by women and feminists. It's reasonable to be critical of sexist behaviours regardless of their ideological ori…
/r/MensRights25/03/26 12:44 AM
5

No enthusiastic consent. That's rape. Take those facts to the police, and no doubt the victim would be arrested and charged with something, while his abuser would be offered support and compensation.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 08:42 PM
13

A truely instructive article demonstrating how the BBC displays extraordinary empathy for women, while treating men and boys as subhuman objects. If you ever had any belief in feminism as a movement for equality of human rights, this article should either shake that belief to its core, or validate your sexist ideology.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 08:39 PM
8

A very professional take-down of the flawed academic rigor behind the feminist framing of masculinity as a toxic harmful doctrine.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 08:35 PM
3

Written indelibly on history, the disgusting sexist slurrs that millions of women celebrate and repeat. If your gf or partner likes this misandrist hate speech, then your relationship is doomed, its just a matter of when, and how much. Carpenter is no better than Andrew Tate.
/r/MensRights22/03/26 07:53 AM
2

Sadly true.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 09:39 AM
4

"That might sound genuine if we hadnt just experienced an experiment to reimagine men and masculinity based on what feminists believe is right" That paradox is lost on many who see misogyny in any criticism of or disagreement with women. These critics of the manosphere lump all men who have opinions or discussions about men's experiences, into the same melting pot with the Tates, without ever acknowledging that many are not misogynists or adherents to traditional masculinity.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 03:22 AM
13

Well said. In addition, many women are dumbfounded that men and boys aren't eager to simply adopt the masculine identity that others (often women) believe is acceptable. Imagine if men suddenly demanded that women should alter their social/sexual identity to suit men's needs/wants, or to make men feel safer? This acknowledgement of the humanity of boys, suggests that at least some women, some feminists, are finally demonstrating insight into the toxic antimale culture imposed on boys in our scho…
/r/MensRights20/03/26 01:49 AM
12

This is not lawful. But it is typical of the blind eye constantly applied to women's sexual violence.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 08:02 PM
19

Celebrities like Carpenter use misandry as a click bait, assured that it appeals to millions of women, and guarantees a massive positive hit rate. this only works when millions of women agree with what she she says, and get some kind of 'feel good' response to demeaning and belittling men and boys. This is just a symptom of the massive level of misandry in the modern female culture, the same culture that provides such a fertile bed for radical feminist hate speech and gender hatred. The sad part…
/r/MensRights17/03/26 08:29 PM
17

There is no reliable evidence that boys are not enroling in higher education, and moving into trades instead, while there is evidence of an increasing cohort of boys who are neither engaged in employment or education. This argument is a feminist myth, espoused to distract from the antimale enviroment in education.
/r/MensRights16/03/26 08:13 PM
2

When our feminist commissars tighten the noose, redefining misogyny as opposition to feminism is just the beginning. Next comes the book of crimes and the police raids in the night. "The manosphere describes a community of online influencers and content creators who see men and boys as "victims" of gender equality and aim to reassert patriarchal and traditional gender roles."
/r/MensRights14/03/26 08:02 AM
1

Sorry. I don't have any confidence in survey results published by the Canadian academic class. They are better known for their dishonesty, unprofessional attitudes and garbage research.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 11:10 PM
19

Just another female in authority abusing her position and power, and then shocked when someone stands up and says "NO". So many women in powerful positions showing they are ever bit as corrupt and abusive as the men they replaced.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 11:05 PM
3

The Netflix doco is called "Inside the Manosphere" Not really interested in arguing with a bot.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 11:01 PM
5

Quote: "During the 90-minute film Inside the Manosphere, Louis examined how prominent male content creators are helping form young men's ideas about masculinity." The article portrays the manosphere as a strawman of extreme misogynists influencing boys. Whatever literary device is used as the story-line, that is the core subject, the bait that entices the concerned parent, and the basis of the entirely negative portrayl of men who dare to have an opinion about masculinity.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 08:12 PM
2

First off, stop disclaiming every issue related to boys education by reassuring people that girls will not be disadvantaged. That apologism is unnecessary and subserviant. If boys having equal rights to an education means fewer girls enter college/university, then so be it. We do not own girls anything. They have shown no empathy for boys in education, and many have actively applauded the failure of the education system to include boys and men. Secondly, the failure of the education system to ac…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 02:16 AM
7

My understanding is that one of the major issues of personal safety in women's sport was the sexual violence that some women inflict on other women. Nothing to do with men at all.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 02:05 AM
13

Peer reviewed research has demonstrated that men experience online violence at a higher rate compared to women. This article only proves that these sexist pigs in the Government don't care about the safety and welfare of men and boys, consider men and boys to be subhuman, and only turn their mind to men and boys when they want something done, or need a scape-goat. The gender hatred of the UK Home Office is legendary.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 02:02 AM
13

Misandry was common, supported by teachers, and rewarded when I was a student. Now, as an educator, its only gotten worse.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 01:54 AM
2

This is a strawman, a paper trail with no substance or funding, designed to give the appearance of acknowledging and working to improve "men's health", while actually doing nothing, and enabling women to the control of the Office of Men's health. Note these statements included in the Bill, which enable women to control any functions or operations enacted as a result of the report or recommendations made subsequent to this Bill, and protect the Office of Women's Health specifically. The small pri…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:24 PM
10

Fascists always divide and conquer. Today, its straight white men. Tomorow it will be some other subgroup. Eventually, it will just be the fascists setting on group against another, until eveyone is restrained by draconian laws, all for our own protection.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 10:54 PM
15

In Germany, only one sex is entitled to safe spaces. In Germany, only one sex has any say in who deserves safe spaces. In Germany, men are treated like animals, their labor stolen and given to others, their freedoms restricted for the benefit of others, their lives sacrificed (under threat of execution) for the welfare of others. When will the men of Germany stand up to their abusers?
/r/MensRights10/03/26 10:50 PM
11

Louis Theroux provides an excellent display of the misandrist terminology being used to demonize and vilify any dialogue that includes men and boys, outside the feminist narrative. Theroux, a pathetic left wing Guardian hack, interviewed anyone he could find with unevolved misogynistic views about women, and declared them the representatives of the "manosphere", who are trying to seduce misguided boys away from their feminist saviours. The people Theroux deliberately left out of his hit piece on…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 10:44 PM
1

The harms inflicted in innocent peoples by the cultural violence and racist neo-colonialism of the Gates and Bezos empires is unmeasurable. These modern date overlords must be held to account.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 11:28 PM
9

Its no so much a lie, as an expression of extreme sexism, extreme racism and sex/race based vilification/hate speech. This woman seriously needs help, and verly likely has severe PTSD. The BBC is being irresponsible exploiting her mental health issues to publish rage bait articles vilifying all men.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 11:17 PM
5

If any organisation, movement, charity or 'game' insists on only recognising the human rights of people who are female, then the members of that organisation are sexist pigs, who most likely also empower racism, religious intolerance and other forms of discrimination.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 11:12 PM
84

"The future is female" is the hate speech of the female supremacy movement. "Toxic masculinity" is the hate speech of the feminist academic movement. "focusing on women's health" is directly discriminating against men and boys by ignoring their rights to health care.
/r/MensRights08/03/26 03:56 AM
3

The capture of academia by the feminist movement has and will result in an education system that will always favour women and girls, and ferment resentment and hatred of men and boys. So long as our universities and colleges are controlled by this hate movement, there will be no fairness, no equality or equity, in our cultures. The sexist culture of the intelligensia must be addressed, and true egalitarian principles empowered.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 08:07 PM
9

A perfect example of the genfer bias that proliferates in feminist dominated administrations. No matter what the facts say about the groups most ikely to be affected by adverse events, men will always be discriminated against and their welbeing ignored.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 08:02 PM
2

Anyone know the alleged facts of this case? Seems like a lot of misinformation around this guy.
/r/MensRights03/03/26 08:34 PM
8

These imagined acts of sexual violence demonstrate the intensity of the hatred these women have for men and boys. The same hatred will most likely be demonstrated in microaggressions expressed in their daily lives, from the rolls as teachers, carers, policy makers, everything. And we wonder why female dominated professions are creating increasingly hostile environments for men boys and male babies.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 12:15 AM
1

Most likely that expllains your lack of empathy and shallow emotional reserve.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 12:11 AM
9

As our education elites becoming increasingly feminized, the blatant discrimination against straight white men increases, and becomes obvious. These sexist pigs are so assured of their moral superiority, targetong the gendercide of men and boys is nolonger a hiden agenda. It is remorseless and open.
/r/MensRights01/03/26 12:10 AM
23

This is not a Men's Health Strategy. Its just another Blame Men Strategy, running the same old tropes that men don't seek help and all their problems will be addressed if they can be taught to go to their doctors/services. Its a false flag.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 11:25 PM
1

There are many woman and men who believe that feminism is about equality, and has achieved great benefits for women. Good people who look at each person rather than their tribal identity, who believe all people have value and meaning. But they confuse feminism with the Women's Liberation Movement. Women's lib won many landmark equality battles for women in the 20th century, with the energy of many great women and good men. Feminism was always the radical fringe movement, based on the hatred of m…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 10:25 PM
1

All good. Have a read of this work by Dr John Barry, about the harms of using these kinds of terminology. You may have already. The practice of placing masculinnity on a scale of more or less toxicity, is neither useful or consistent with how we frame any other sexual identity. https://www.johnbarrypsychologist.com/research-highlights/new-paper-reactions-to-contemporary-narratives-about-masculinity-a-pilot-study
/r/MensRights25/02/26 10:08 PM
2

'most little boys are going to begin by behaving sub-optimally, in one way or another, no matter who their parents are' The entrenched gender hatred that underpins this woman's belief that little boys are subhuman monsters who require training, like dogs or farm animals, is shocking, but consistent with the antimale education system run by feminist teachers across western cultures. Women like this should never be allowed near children, ever.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 02:54 AM
7

Toxic massculinity is feminist hate speech. If you are not a feminist, you sure sound like one.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 02:48 AM
14

So long as that entry in Wikipedia exists, any student I have who references Wiki, fails the course. Wikipedia is a toxic cesspool of feminist hate speech and harmful identity politics. Wikipedia is garbage.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 02:46 AM
13

I don't think Disney has the capability to do these kinds of movies any more. The talent pool is so diluted with feminist, DEI, and sexless intersectionals, their framework of male idenitity is twisted beyond redemption.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 02:41 AM
15

In The UK, Australia sexual exploitation of children by women was not a criminal offense until very recently (1980-90s). In addition, women are very unlikely to report sexual offenses committed by other women. Its normalised, glorified or considered a cry for help by the abuser woman. So not much point in looking for these data.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 02:37 AM
0

More survey garbage!
/r/MensRights25/02/26 02:33 AM
14

The slight of hand used to excuse feminism from its worst abuses of human rights is disingenuous and dishonest. You cannot erase the bigotry, gender hatred and violence of feminism with a sanitised dictionary definition.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 02:31 AM
20

No. She is just full of feminist inspired gender hatred. She is one of a generation of girls who have been taught that hating people because of their sex or race or religion, is heroic and brave.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 02:23 AM
18

The extent and intensity of the hatred feminism inspires in women is shocking. The ideology of hatred and violence must be stopped and removed from all influence on government, education, health and social unity.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 02:21 AM
10

The great work by The Nuzzo Etter (James Nuzzo, 3 Apr 2025) summarises the terrible disparity in Australian health spending between Australian men and women, and demonstrates the sexist bias of the Australian health system against men and boys. This bias is evinced by the continuing poor health outcomes of Australian men and boys. What really demonstrates the entrenched misandry of the Australian Health sector, is that this disparity has elicited no discussion, outside the manosphere. The silenc…
/r/MensRights23/02/26 12:46 AM
10

The unintended consequence of this re-education program for young men and boys, will be further disengagement of boys from mainstream education, and the radicalisation of boys by the very people attempting to deconstruct their masculine identities. When will women learn that femsplaining masculinity to men and boys, their pontificating on a subject of which they are so totally ignorant, only elicits further reactive hatred of fem-fascism.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 11:59 PM
3

Angry white males studies course, run by a nilhilist SIMP who hopes that throwing the rest of male humanity under the bus will give his life meaning. Really, when the only way to get tenure is to support a culture of gender hatred and misandry, you know academia is doomed.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 12:21 AM
8

Left-wing feminist academics capture universities and colleges. Training of all female dominated professions, including teaching and journalism, includes feminist framing of men and boys are perpetrators of violence against women and girls, and focuses all positive benevolent treatment on women and girls. Journalists and teachers trained in feminist captured colleges and universities espouse myoptic gynocentric views of boys in education, and men and boys in the media.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 12:10 AM
24

How bad is it, when speaking truth at a university cost you your job. What are they teaching if not the truth?
/r/MensRights20/02/26 06:49 AM
6

Its controlling behaviour, coersive control. Convince the victim that they are defective, that its all their fault, provide a solution, but then claim the solution is for evidence of their defect. Men are the victims of systemic coersive control.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 07:56 PM
6

Coke is off the menu
/r/MensRights19/02/26 04:53 AM
17

Perhaps wrestling control of suicide prevention services from feminist ideologues who continue to base men's mental health on theories of hegemonic masculinity. This femnist framing of masculinity as a violent, intolerant doctrone constructed of toxic masculinity, fragile masculinity etc, alienates men and boys. Men and boys are more than willing to talk about suicide and mental health. It's just the people they talk to have entirely negative attitudes to masculinity, based on dogma obsessed wit…
/r/MensRights18/02/26 09:33 PM
2

Time-Dot is taking you for a ride. What are the rules for men in those same middle-eastern countries? Are they equaly severe a repressive?
/r/MensRights16/02/26 10:01 PM
7

Hopeful. But prepare to be disappointed.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 10:58 AM
1

Health research, epidemiology of live pre-mature births collected at all hospitals and birthing services, death certificates. At the moment, a child at 26-28 weeks gestation is likely to survive with appropriate medical attention, with a high risk of complications. There are always exceptions, and under most current abortion laws, terminations after this are lawful if there are reasons (mothers health, birth defects, placental dysfunction, fetal death).
/r/MensRights15/02/26 10:08 PM
1

I agree. Once a child can survive outside the womb, with or without medical intervention, it has human rights. Using presence of a brain as a standard is problematic, as we would need to define what constitutes a brain.
/r/MensRights15/02/26 06:30 AM
7

Reasoning to support the OP heading. A surgical procedure conducted without consent is assault. FACT. The only exception is life-saving emergency procedures where consent cannot be obtained due to the circumstances. While parents have the right to consent to surgical procedures for their dependent children, that right is not unlimited. Parents can only consent to surgical procedures for dependent children if the procedure is both NECESSARY and in the best interests of the child. Circumcision don…
/r/MensRights15/02/26 12:25 AM
50

An inherent part of antidiscrimination laws is exceptions for jobs with fundamental requirements that cannot be avoided or adjusted. In this case, the ability to exhibit a level of fitness necessary to execute the required actions of a fire-fighter. By showing no consideration for these fundamental requirements, the WRC has not follwed the law, and has made a woke decision that will undermine the affectiveness and safety of fire-fighting in the UK. Bad decision, that will result in deaths and in…
/r/MensRights15/02/26 12:09 AM
1

Its not about whether the woman had an abortion. The lack of empathy for a man or in this case a child, grieving for a death baby, experiencing a huge loss in the face of absolute hopelessness, all that is brushed under the carpet. Its laughed at by feminists, who actively try to humiliate men and boys experiencing the loss of a child.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 11:37 PM
1

some retailers withdrew the merchandise. But feminists belittled this abuse of boys, and despite wide spread agreement that the merchandise was misandrist and harmful to boys, sales of the offending t-shirts increased. Women perchased the t-shirts for their girls to wear. That says something about the attitudes of women towards men, regardless of whether they consider themselves feminists.
/r/MensRights13/02/26 11:57 PM
2

And she wasn't the only woman abusing boys and girls enticed into the Epstein sphere of influence.
/r/MensRights13/02/26 11:39 PM
18

I have no doubt that every woman has the right to decide wheter or not to have an abortion (up to when the child has human rights). But the feminist idea that males have no reproductive rights is problematic. Feminism excludes men (and boys) from all consideration in the abortion event, treating them like animals with no emotional or spiritual investment, no connection with the child. This is an extension of the SCUM manifesto strawman of 'all men are rapist', incapable of empathy, compassion or…
/r/MensRights13/02/26 11:37 PM
16

She didn't just recruit. She was a sexual predator with a lust for young girls.
/r/MensRights11/02/26 10:15 PM
17

It seems that many female sexual predators (like Maxwell) who associated with Epstein are being ignored, their predation on young women and young men whitewashed, and their sexual crimes hiden under convenient claims of powerlessness. Why aren't their name plastered across the media, their reputations destroyed and their "me/too" transgressions listed in public forums?
/r/MensRights11/02/26 10:14 PM
1

Placing masculinity on a continuum where it can only be more or less toxic is just gender hatred, hate speechand on personal exchanges, domestic violence..
/r/MensRights08/02/26 10:37 AM
6

The women of Iran do not deserve to have men sacrifice their lives for them.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 03:53 AM
3

They have no sympathy or empathy for men. Even men who die for them, are treated like animals. Liberate yourself from playing the traditional male gender role of protector/provider. Its time to be free, to choose your life, not have it imposed on you like a prison sentence.
/r/MensRights04/02/26 03:51 AM
1

Its telling that the courts hold fathers in such contempt, rather than recognising the benefits fathers offer to their children, the love they have for their children and the need children have for their fathers. As radical as your analysis sounds, its basically true. One unfounded accusation by a vexaous ex-partner is all it takes to remove a father from the lives of his children. That starts the process of supervised reintroduction visits that impoverish the father and destroy the father-child…
/r/MensRights04/02/26 03:47 AM
0

Hate speech is a crime.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 11:31 PM
88

"Men want birth control to support women, and reclaim agency" Screw supporting women. Men want birth control to win reproductive rights, to empower their CONSENT to PARENTING. Women already have that agency over their reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights02/02/26 11:24 PM
65

Why are female predators being redacted from the released files?
/r/MensRights02/02/26 11:19 PM
3

Their stated aims. Their staff is almost entirely femle. Their web pages feature almost all girls. Do some looking!
/r/MensRights01/02/26 08:01 PM
1

When they propose that men do not experience harm from DV to the same extent as women, what they are really saying, is that they should not be held accountable for their abuse of men. Its a get-out-of-jail-free card, that gives them permission to abuse their partners, brothers, fathers, male children, while placing themselves (the perpetrators) in the victims seat, a victim of their victims harms.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 02:15 AM
4

The Childrens Society UK is a female dominated woke industry social service that focuses on espousing gender fluid ideology. They are extremely anti male, and are very likely just a feminist front for a child indoctrination.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 02:10 AM
8

Translation: 'I'd only feel safe if I lived with a man who adheres to strict traditional male sex roles of protecting women, and who would sacrifice his safety and life in exchange for my peace of mind.'
/r/MensRights01/02/26 01:58 AM
3

Feminists focus on discrimination against women. They are never concerned about discrimination against men, because by their own definition, that experience cannot exist. When a feminist states that feminism is about equality, they are lying.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 01:55 AM
12

One look at the literary and physophical history of the world shows that much of the very best literature was written by men, read by men and critiqued by men. Somehow, feminists have convinced themselves that men and boys have inferior reading and writing skills compared to girls, when the failing literacy of boys parallels the rise of female domination of education.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 01:45 AM
22

Blaming boys for the harms inflicted on them by their sexist teachers.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 01:32 AM
3

That is truely insane.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 04:25 AM
12

Too true. Its so easy to fuel the torches and pitchforks approach to every problem when you have a pre-packaged scape-goat that everyone in your group hates.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 10:29 PM
4

Generally, and in Canada, divorce occurs when there is a breakdown of the marital relationship. Most divorces that end up contested on child matters in courts, are in courts due to disagreement between the parents about child custody, contact and maintenance. This woman wants the courts to assume all mothers are victims of DV, using coersive control and financial violence as a baseline. Thus all custody matters would begin with the assumption that the father is a risk to the mother and the child…
/r/MensRights29/01/26 10:26 PM
132

The magnitude of misandrist psychopathy amoungst feminist women is shocking, and they make no attempt to hide it. How many women in health, education and government share this psycho's aspiration of forced sterilisation for boys. How many act on their misandrist beliefs in the professions?
/r/MensRights29/01/26 08:19 PM
1

In Australia, for a single parent to qualify for any benefits, they must show that the non-carer parent is paying childsupport. Read the article, sure. But the issue is bigger tha the article.
/r/MensRights29/01/26 08:12 PM
1

Awesome work by James L. Nuzzo. Thanks James. Your work is inspirational. James' tables informing these data show the marginalisation of men (particularly heterosexual men) in Australian administrative politics. As the Australian Human Rights Commission is dominated by feminist women, real equality or equity in Australian policy development or law is unlikely to succeed. Our universities, schools, administrative and health services are heading towards being 100% female dominated and focused
/r/MensRights29/01/26 12:10 AM
5

Not a constitutional expert. But equal rights doesn't appear to result in equal responsibility under US law. While opportunities must be equal, its up to individual citizens to contest inequalities in Courts that are politically captured. As for outcomes/responsibilities, it looks like democrats (feminists) adhere to the feminist ideological requirement for the liberation of women from societal expectations and brutal enforcement of traditional male sex roles. Republicans adhere to traditional f…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 11:28 PM
2

Firstly, family law cases cannot lawfully be reported, unless de-identified. Particularly child matters. Then the FCA and Federal Magistrates are reluctant to intervene in CS matters, given their orders must be time limited, result in stupid outcomes requiring ongoing adjustments as circumstances change during the specified period, and can be overturned by subsequent administrative assessments when circumstances change. Taking a matter to court is time intensive and costly. We're talking $10s of…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 10:46 AM
6

Section 117 of the Child Support (Assessment) Act 1989, requires the liable parent to commence procedings in the Family Law circuit of the Federal Court of Australia after exhausting all administraive applications for reassessment and appeal. Section 117 can only be used to secure a departure from administrative assessment in the circumstances of the grounds listed in s.117 (2). None of the grounds for departure from assessment relate to a liable parent being a minor, or a victim of sexual assau…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 04:35 AM
38

Yes. It is the law in Australia. The Family Law Act 1975 defines parent without any limitation on the age of a father, so even a younger boy will be considered a parent in Australian Law. Child support laws do not provide any exceptions for liable parents under the age of 18 years, or liable parents who were victims of female on male rape. In fact, adut female rape of boys was not a criminal offense until 2018, well after the Family Law Act 1975 was enacted. So the concept of child fathers being…
/r/MensRights28/01/26 01:22 AM
1

Don't be sucked in by this gratuitous admission of men's issues to the Government platform. The response is small, because that all the feminist members of government would tolerate, and more than the feminist controllers of the public service would willingly impliment. Actually, even this small amount of funding will most likely never result in anything more than an advertising campaign, telling men to 'man up' or 'stop avoiding responsibility'.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 08:26 PM
2

Agree. Gamma bias was based on an important body of knowledge, derived from research during a period of feminist control of academia. It was a tremendous effort in a hostile enviroment. But it is less accessable to most men and women, like most academic writing. Not because it lack validity or truth. But because it is not expressed in ordinary language. It needs to be packaged in appealing, accessable terms.
/r/MensRights26/01/26 08:21 PM
2

Feminists desperately need Shakespeare to be female, because they are generally incapable of original creative works. This is not because women lack talent or creativity. Some of our greatest authors have been women, and their works exhibit a diverse and uniquely feminine view of the everyday, as well as the extraordinary. But feminists works are so inocculated with noxious ideology, it poisons their engagement with the imaginations of their readers/audienc. Even other feminists can only nod in …
/r/MensRights26/01/26 08:17 PM
4

Highly recommended reading for all MRAs. Gamma bias neatly explains the bias against men and boys in our communities. The subconscious bias that inhabits the values of good people, but enables bad outcomes for men and boys. If you think you are a good person, an humanitarian, an egalitarian, read this article and discover gamma bias.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 11:44 PM
10

For women who don't need men, they spend a lot of time talking about not needing men. Move on babes. No body is very interested, except other women so independent they can't stand being around other people, desperately not needing men. Although, maybe I'm being hasty? This might be the only way forward for beta women who have no hope of bagging a prime alpha man (7 figure salary, 8 bedroom, 6 bathroom home). Swapping cats for caviar.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 11:36 PM
2

Emotional intelligence is just jargon for engagement with the matriarchial heirarchy and the enforcement of strict male gender roles on men and boys.
/r/MensRights23/01/26 10:53 PM
3

Look at any environment where women dominate. Far from being the utopia that many claim women naturally create, these environments are toxic, systematically remove men and boys from all levels of the environment (excluding those required to keep the structure going), and inevitably accuse any remaining men or boys of abuse/misogyny. Look at our schools, where females dominate, boys are being accused of sexual harassment of their teachers, a crisis, an epidemic of misogyny, because they do not re…
/r/MensRights20/01/26 08:29 PM
29

Feminism is a movement of hatred, violence and power. Not sure why you are surprised when feminist act like femiists.
/r/MensRights20/01/26 08:22 PM
2

Generally men have never needed "safe spaces" to speak up against oppression. They make these space thru shere will and determiination. What they do need are mental health and family services that are not hostile to masculinity, and treat men as human, police and court systems that treat them with equality and respect. Political institutions that recognise men as individuals with rights to autonomy and self ddetermination, not just as slave armies.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 11:57 PM
4

Yes. Then the investigation in the people who worked for the UN, and their crimes against humnity.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 11:55 PM
21

The left wing politic generally adopt, use and then discard individual social subgroups or causes. Their values radiate from the attainment of power, with little or no regard to the real benefit of the groups they claim to support. Left wing MRAs will frequently support Men's Rights, while concurrently explaining the achievement of men's rights in terms of benefits to women and girls, benefits to the community generally, but without any real benefits to men and boys (except that men and boys wil…
/r/MensRights17/01/26 11:53 PM
6

Noticed this frequently, but usually its about powershell ingroup bias, and also targets other older women. Speculated as to whether there were samesex friends-with-benefits situations, but regardless, the older woman maintains her position of matriarch over the younger womeen in her selected group, and can then simply ignore men (given the systemic biaas against men and boys), or attack other women in the workplace with her army of younger dependent women.
/r/MensRights17/01/26 11:42 PM
1

Comedy is a litnus test for how far boundaries of acceptable behaviour and speech can be pushed, before uncomfortable laughter becomes moral outrage. The humour of male genital violence for female audiences is becoming both increasingly frequent and increasingly violent. This reflects the impact of growing female influence and authority in social structures controlling media and social conscience. Women's pleasure from witnessing violence against men and boys is concerning, particularly given it…
/r/MensRights14/01/26 01:27 AM
1

Suddenly strict gender roles are important? But only for men, and only when women benefit. Men's sexual revolution liberates them from servitude to women. No longer will men be forced to throw their lives away, protecting the very same people who treat them with contempt and suspicion, and deny the human rights.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 07:39 PM
1

Thanks for clarifying. All good.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 12:32 AM
2

No argument about the value of wearing condoms. but mutilating the genital of little boys and girls is disgusting. The two issues have nothing in common.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 12:30 AM
12

Not sure why this article reports that a 33 year old accused rapist is currently pregnant (who cares), or that the mother of a student thought she was a nice person. "One woman, who claimed she went to school with Craig and later had her children taught by her, wrote: She was a fantastic music teacher and a great friend at school. A bubbly and happy person. I am in shock.” This reporting is inconsistent with the Australian Government National Office for Child Safety "Reporting on Child Sexual Ab…
/r/MensRights08/01/26 12:18 AM
39

Given that lack of material benefit, and risk of serious adverse events (including death) associated with neonatal circumcision, the risk/benefit ratio is insane. In addition, there is no good quality evidence supporting the claim that male circumcision prevents of the acquisition of HIV in heterosexual men. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12917962/
/r/MensRights07/01/26 05:00 PM
3

Why would anyone want to adopt a hate based ideology as repulsive as feminism?
/r/MensRights07/01/26 09:40 AM
2

The empathy gap is just another feminist myth created by sexist researchers using psychology tools derived by psycho feminist researchers. Empathy is not a gendered attribute. Empathy is the basis of the male disposibility.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 08:26 PM
11

Home grown agreements for sperm donation really are massive risks, in terms of child support and claims on your estate (your will). It makes no difference what agreement you make with the mother. The claim for child support is a right of the child, and the mother frequently will be unable to get single parent or family benefits without showing that child support is being paid, or claimed through the courts. In some countries, sperm donors who are sourced through fertility clinics, are protected …
/r/MensRights05/01/26 08:20 PM
3

Typically, in American and Westminster law, women who are conspirators in unlawful enterprises are considered to have been under the control and influence of their male colleagues, and are given lower sentences. Even when they were the main instigators or organisers of the crimes.
/r/MensRights05/01/26 08:08 PM
5

But men were only included as potential abusers. Any men attempting to use these services were firstly framed as abusers using the system to harass women, and were secretly vetted to elicit admissions of violence against women..
/r/MensRights04/01/26 07:28 AM
11

Disinformation. The science is clear that testosterone levels are not correlated with violence. Stop spreading feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 12:15 AM
8

You know academia is hopelessly biased against men and boys when this kind of sexist hate speech is published in univesity texts. On a wider note, this is consistent with the wider anti-male narrative that infests female dominated professions.
/r/MensRights02/01/26 12:12 AM
10

The violence embedded in the feminist psychy is consistent with the hate that drives feminist ideology. The hatered for men and boys is so entrenched it bridges gaps in logic with in-group bias, and make theses these monsters look like victims.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 12:06 AM
1

Thanks to the diligent MODs who objectively examined the ideological roots of this survey, and explained, then removed the post. The ideologically driven gender studies dominated by feminist researchers have built a body of knowledge that frames masculinity in entirely negative terms. Researchers embedded in these feminised schools of thought have restyled the language used in public discourse to mimic positive attitudes to men and masculinity, but the underlying theoretical basis remains fundam…
/r/MensRights24/12/25 10:35 PM
2

I used to think the linking of feminism to Nazis was a sick joke, and extreme misogyny. But now it looks like feminism is really the most prevalent neo-nazi movement in modern culture. Re-education camps for gods sake? and no one in authority is seeing this?
/r/MensRights24/12/25 10:21 PM
31

Men and boys owe nothing to women strangers. We are not their thug squad by devine right. We have no duty to act for their benefit, any more than we would act for any other people. We have the right to protect who we choose, or not.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 11:59 PM
1

The media are so sexist in their reporting, it never occurred to them that adult women were abusing teen aged girls. Given the only person convicted of sexual abuse of girls in this circus was a woman, this seems odd?
/r/MensRights22/12/25 06:38 PM
2

the troubling thing about the recent epidemic of female teachers raping boys in schools, is that they are not being reported by their female colleagues. This means there is a culture of tolerating women raping little boys in our schools, colleges and universities, a normalisation of the sexual abuse of boys by adult women. How many more boys are being raped daily by female predators, operating in our schools with the approval or complicit silence of other teachers?
/r/MensRights21/12/25 01:03 AM
8

Ironicly, suicide prevention services in Australia have been given over to feminist women to run for the benefit of the community. These feminists have systematically turned suicide prevention services into "women only" areas, focused on the needs of women and girls who are neither suicidal or at risk of self harm, and where men and boys feel so alienated and demeaned, their use of suicide prevention services has diminished over time, while their need and search for services has increased. We ha…
/r/MensRights21/12/25 12:56 AM
14

I have also worked in female dominted professions, and this kind of demeaning sexist speech targeting men and boys is common. I would also note that its very likely your colleagues are making similarly demeaning comments about you and your sexuality, because they feel safe to do so. You're male, and the "girls club" will always see you as "other", and because you are a minority "weak".
/r/MensRights21/12/25 12:42 AM
3

Re-education camps for little boys who anoy their teacher, or are the victim of malicious girls gossip and lies. This is Nazi Germany in UK schools, with female teachers in the role of Nazi informers.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 04:35 PM
10

The sexist pigs in America have broadcast to world that baby boys are less than animals, and bodies can be mutilated at birth at the whim of psychotic parents.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 04:33 PM
3

Training the generation of boys who will overthrow the government.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 11:03 PM
13

Guess this explains the boring nature of the arts and intellectual discourse lately. Endless remakes of the same stories (destroyed by cultural appropiation), endless accounts of victimhood and self-adoration, repetative intellectual condemnation of of our communities and culture by disaffected narcissists demanding validation of their entitlement (wankers). We are experiencing a dark ages of introspective sausage factory behavioural propaganda, while the real creativity is blossoming on the net…
/r/MensRights18/12/25 10:14 PM
8

Typical that posting on the only sub in Reddit that allows men to discuss the human rights of men and boys, gets you banned from other subs, silenced not because of what you say, but because you dared to speak at all.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 10:04 PM
37

This is what happens when a government is dominated by feminist women. It descends into a brutal radicalised fascism, with laws enforcing in group bias, and outlawing any diverrsity of thought and freedom of speech.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 09:57 PM
1

Shades of Hitler's Germany, the cultural revolution in China and Stalin's re-education camps. Will teachers in the UK, and other students, become the informants in Stamer's UK war against freedom of thought in young men? How long until families, and fathers are also reported for inciting misogyny? How many young boys will be falsely accused of misogyny by malicious girls, or radicalised teachers?
/r/MensRights18/12/25 09:52 PM
5

I think you nailed it. This study is focusing on masculinity as the cause of men's poor engagement with health services, completely ignoring social determinants of health outcomes, and poor matching of health services to men's health needs. Your kids deserve better.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 08:18 PM
5

Sorry. But I'm not sorry, and your statement is wrong, or at best, disengenuous. The lead investigator of this study has several studies published that all use the feminist "hegemonic masculinity" strawman to frame traditional masculinity in entirely negative terms. The "willingness to seek help" pathway of feminist literature uses the hegemonic masculinity hate model to frame men's poor health outcomes as derived from men's reluctance to seek help, one of the key domains of the hegemonic model.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 08:15 PM
13

These researchers are applying feminist theory to interpret men's experiences. They are using the depraved feminist strawman of hegemonic masculinity (a psychotic depiction of traditional masculinity as an identity of violence against women, control over women, homophobia, intolerance, emotional incapacity), to characterise men as knuckle dragging wife beating animals, who are incapable of seeking help because of their masculine identities. OMG.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 10:49 AM
1

The new German slave army begins to take shape. Female leaders ordering men and boys to stand up and take responsibility, while women hide behind them.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 10:49 PM
6

Another attempt from the sexist pigs to make men and boys the 'thug squad' for inconvenienced disgruntaled women.
/r/MensRights15/12/25 10:46 PM
12

The right body integrity. The right to consent or not consent to sexual relations. The right equal access to education. The right of boys to be protected from sexual abuse by adult women. The right to self determination, without being forced into slave armies. The right equal representation in ALL UN bodies. The right to parent their chidren and be involved in their lives. The right to equality before the courts, and equal representation on ALL bodies providing guidelines and advice to Courts. T…
/r/MensRights15/12/25 10:42 PM
67

So activiely organising to deny men and boys human rights is good for women's rights? NO!!!! Femonism is a hate movement, opperating under a deception of being about equal rights, nothing more,
/r/MensRights14/12/25 11:01 PM
35

Forced re-education of boys by radical feminist ideologues who hate their existance.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 05:41 PM
1

The most recent Family Court of Australia annual reports has been striped of all reporting of employment stats. The only mention of men and boys is related to enlisting men to police other men's violence against women. Equity and inclusion addresses issues experienced by LGBTIQ.... but not men. The court is so captured by feminist pigs, it's hopeless.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 10:35 AM
1

These are strictly required by law in Australia, and available to the public. However, as the incredible injustices recorded in these annual reports has been exposed, the format of annual reports has been changed to more descriptive, less informative information.
/r/MensRights14/12/25 10:23 AM
5

Changing laws to make men the official enemies of the state. Canada will get what they pay for. Men and boys boys growing up in a systems that treats them as subhuman. See where that gets your social cohesion and inclusion.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 08:17 PM
1

Family Court annual reports.
/r/MensRights11/12/25 07:18 PM
12

Just another rich moron who's ego has been inflated by fawning fortune hunting women, but really thinks it's his personality and principles women are attracted too. Even he knows its money. But his brain is so addled by self adoration, he forgets, so many men and boys do not have the money to buy the attention of shallow women .
/r/MensRights09/12/25 08:08 PM
1

The reason why apparently impartial laws are resulting in absurdly gendered and exist outcomes in our courts, is the hidden agendas infor​ming judicial processes, decision making and sentencing. Advisory guidelines, written by radical feminist academic and women's advocates, guide judges and police to believe the oral evidence of women in preference to men, apply theories of 'trauma info​rmed' and 'gendered' decision making when considering women's credibility an​d culpability, and interpret mal…
/r/MensRights08/12/25 06:34 PM
3

Over the last 50 years of increasing feminist control of universities and colleges, the rights and needs of women have become the unilateral focus of the humanities. The feminist underpinning of gender studies, has infused university discourse with a distrust and hat​red of men and boys. The proto-image of a strong and empowered woman, has come to include a keystone irrational anger and distain for men and masculinity. The more women hate men, the greater their projected empowerment.
/r/MensRights08/12/25 06:25 PM
17

Most of us find happiness in relations with others, in healthy respectful relationships. But marriage is a contract with no written rules, that favors women over men regardless of factual evidence, that will be interpreted by courts run by people who hate you, or are afraid of people who hate you. Treat marriage as a hostile partnership in terms of law. Get legal advice before you expose your assets on how to exclude your wealth and personal security from inclusion as marital assets. But. In ter…
/r/MensRights07/12/25 08:26 PM
3

Hang in there mate. Find somewhere safe and leave ASAP. But be prepared for the back lash, of family and friends who will lie to protect your abuser because she is female.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 08:18 PM
15

This is really happening. From my experience, femse led departments descend into single sex department quickly. Nepotism, cronyism, discrimination by sexual preference becomes the norm, all under an umbrella of woke silence. Our academia has become a religious cult.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 08:14 PM
2

That's New Zealand. The child rapist paradise, where women can rape under age boys as much as they like without remorse ot rebuke.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 06:16 AM
3

Be patient. York University alumni seem to be too fragile to tolerate people outside a very narrow range of similar thinking sheep. This is the same pillar of virtue that cancelled a conference addressing male suicide when feminist alumni complained it would benefit men. Poor little possums.
/r/MensRights07/12/25 06:10 AM
18

But wasn't he also poorly equipped? And equally likely to die? And given the biological superiority of women's bodies feminists claim, wasn"t he more likely to die? You are describing a man being accused of not protecting a woman, a failure of his strict male role model. And the brutal enforcement of this male role model by a culture that holds men responsible for women's safety.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 05:35 PM
9

Women talk about not needing men, claiming men will be crying in their beards and falling apart. Men just walk away, while women scream misogyny, and screech that men aren't allowed to do that.
/r/MensRights05/12/25 10:55 AM
2

The only thing creepy here is two women sharing an irrational prejudice about men, and thinking that's OK.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 04:09 PM
2

A shallow and hateful feminist myth that frames all men as dangerous animals.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 12:03 PM
1

When identity politics reinforces the idea that the particular identity groups are not responsible for thei actions, and must be considered victims in all social/familial transactions, then these types of inhuman events are inevidible
/r/MensRights01/12/25 05:55 PM
1

Just a web page asking for money. No one identified as running it, no background info on events or programs offered, no annual reports. Anyone can register a charity. And why would a charity for suicide prevention be collecting money for tiktokkers. SCAM
/r/MensRights29/11/25 04:10 PM
2

Scam? Seems to be limited to a single web page with a raffle. Registered as a charity, describes events, but is lacking in background info or named credible organizers.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 12:13 PM
3

Being an MRA is a natural expression of my empathy and caring for fellow travellers in life. I have always cared for the rights and wellbeing of others and have stood shoulder to shoulder with men and women to support women's rights, victims of violence and those less fortunate. What amazes me is the genuine but complete disbelief and often venomous attacks I experience from the women who I have supported and helped when ever I acknowledge the rights and wellbeing men and boys. Their gender prej…
/r/MensRights29/11/25 11:50 AM
7

A systematic literature review of the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed databases including 28 systematic reviews with meta-analyses, concluded that the sensitivity of mammography techniques ranged from 55 to 91%, and specificity from 84 to 97%. Sensitivity and specificity for breast cancer screening are very poor, even when compared to PSAs, but care is centred on giving women choices, regardless of age or likely outcomes, with massive support services and publically funded treatments. For m…
/r/MensRights29/11/25 11:33 AM
49

Given men are already more likely to receive 60% longer sentences, in real terms, this will make little practical difference. In terms of the Italy's attitude to human rights, this is irrefutible evidence that men and boys are considered subhuman by female professionals.
/r/MensRights29/11/25 09:48 AM
6

Once more, men are being told to sacrifice their lives for the benefit of their communities. The truth of paternity is not important. The connection between father and child is trivial, fathering as meaningless as animal husbandry. Not one mention of the impact of this on men, the emotional pain of being deceived, living the lie. Not even a mild rebuke of the women who's lies and corruption cause the problem. Every child has the right to know their biological parents. Every adult has the right t…
/r/MensRights28/11/25 06:37 AM
6

When the laws of your country criminalizes your identity, and targets you with draconian punishments, be cautious whenever you interact with the law. Offer no information or co-operation other than the minimum required by law, and demand a lawyer as a first resort. Draconian laws are not for your protection.
/r/MensRights27/11/25 01:59 AM
1

Correct. These stats do not show that men are promoted at higher rates than women in teaching. The high proportions of men in admin are the remnants of the deminishing male work force, nothing more. The feminized education profession's refusal to acknowledge the extreme gender inequity in teaching, or the extraordinary amount of severe damage this is doing to children, particularly boys, demonstrates a malicious resentful sexism that exhibits no impartiality, no empathy, no compassion, and no pr…
/r/MensRights26/11/25 09:23 PM
1

Past the point of their respect meaning anything. It has no value.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 09:10 PM
8

And the progressive left is feminism.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 09:09 PM
1

Same. Over it. Nothing offered would bring me back.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 09:09 PM
1

Same. Over it. Nothing offered would bring me back.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 09:08 PM
249

As terfs scream about the erosion of women only spaces, boys spaces have been completely colonised and appropriated by girls and women. This isn't about inclusion, its about the malicious destruction of male identity.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 07:46 PM
35

The establishment has recognized men and boys as no longer compliant. Now they are reaching out for men and boys, not to help them or welcome they back to civil society, but to entice and control them. Beware of the feminist government reaching out for men and boys with strings (barbed wire) attached.
/r/MensRights25/11/25 12:14 PM
2

Sorry about your brother. We need a lot more focus and funding on men's mental health and suicide prevention. But Movember is not the way to help men and boys with mental health issues. They are taking the "masculinity is a harmful doctrine" appoach to men's mental health that causes more harm than good. Similar to the "toxic masculinity" hate speech, Movember now focuses on traditional masculinity as causing men;s mental health issues, rebranding their "toxic masculinity"approach as "positive m…
/r/MensRights23/11/25 10:27 AM
20

Consent laws like this recently enacted in Italy, have had devastating impacts on the ways people interact in dating, social events generally and at work in other juridictions with similar laws. The problem with these laws is that the onus of proving consent falls on men and boy (the laws are very infrequently applied to women and girls). Consent is difficult to prove, particularly for the entire period of any interaction, for multiple actions (each kiss, each touch). In other countries with the…
/r/MensRights23/11/25 10:02 AM
12

One persons opinion is interesting, but doesn't make unlawful sexist acts OK. This is still sexist, and must be challenged.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 09:51 AM
1

Writing this article would be a very brave act. As others have said, ou will be attacked. But more importantly, some who may even offer support and approval will use their positions of power to undermine your final school evaluations, poison your school reference, and even start claudestine movements to have you shamed, suspended or accused of criminal acts. Act bravely, but not without forethought.
/r/MensRights23/11/25 09:48 AM
6

Who is Andrew Wilson, and why is his garbage posted here?
/r/MensRights23/11/25 09:43 AM
1

Wanting gender equality has nothing to do with feminism. Feminism is a hateful ideology, based on malicious misandry and callous indifference to the wellbeing of men and boys.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 05:47 PM
12

Her sexual abuse of 4 young boys was found to be lawful, in the criminal case brought against her by the police. Now, in a civil case a judge decided she did nothing morally wrong, and could not be expected to have known that her sexual abuse of young boys might cause harm! This decision by the sexist pigs in Australian courts aligns Australian law and social conscience with the pigs who claim boys who are raped by women are lucky sods, and should thank their abusers for the great sex.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 01:24 AM
3

It seems that all the people who are screaming at men and boys to step up and take responsibility, all the feminist journalists who so bravely support gender equality and equity of outcomes, are all quietly sipping their tea. Funny how the professional standards of feminist journalists disappear whenever its not women experiencing hardship? Not funny really. Its callous and sexist.
/r/MensRights20/11/25 08:08 AM
1

Despite a long history of the Law and the judiciary supporting the equality and independence of women, India continues to perpetuate the falacy of married men being responsible for the actions of their wives, including taking responsibility for any child born during a marriage, regardless of no biological link, relationship or consent. This primative enforcement of strict traditional gender roles on men, but not women, identifies the India legal system as primative, sexist and patronising. When …
/r/MensRights20/11/25 08:03 AM
14

You do know that only reason women got rights was because men supported their cause? Or have edited that out of your mind?
/r/MensRights16/11/25 09:09 PM
17

Consistent with feminist ideology, any empathy for men is dehumanized and condemned.
/r/MensRights16/11/25 04:18 PM
1

If a conscripted man refuses to serve in the military and refuses alternative civil service, he is subject to legal prosecution and imprisonment. Constitionally, he cannot be subject to military court marshal (i.e summarily executed), but he will be fined and imprisoned. Read deeper.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 09:00 PM
7

Consciption is the raising of a slave army. Slave owners (the state), and those who support the enslavement of men (feminists), are repugnant tyrannts.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 08:47 PM
1

Curious too, let us know.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 08:42 PM
6

There is no masculinity crisis. There is an organised and unfetted persecution of men and boys by feminist captured professions, academics and institutions.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 10:07 PM
2

If Germany is press-ganging a slave army, then they should never turn their back to the slaves.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 09:58 PM
1

That's a hard questions. Movember used to be the only charity that really focused on men. Now its just one of many false flags run be feminists.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 09:46 PM
1

Keep playing with yourself.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 08:37 AM
6

Who will be on the council, who will control the council, what are the terms of reference. This is either run by men fir men, or a false flag, run by feminist academics.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 09:10 AM
1

Interesting watching a male professional red pill for the first time. Clearly this bro hasn't been listening to MRA focused media. The sheep realising the wolves are just other sheep in wolf clothing.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 12:53 AM
3

Any analysis that measures the behaviours or humanity of men in terms of benefits for women, is sexist violence.
/r/MensRights11/11/25 12:42 AM
13

Epidemiological research shows that men and boys are far more likely to be victims of violence overall, and in public. Why are you ignoring that? Gamma bias?
/r/MensRights07/11/25 12:16 PM
12

Why should women have that choice but not men
/r/MensRights07/11/25 07:23 AM
3

"We may terminate your service without notice if you are alleged to have committed domestic or family violence against an end-user of a service." "We may also transfer the phone number or email address to the alleged victim if they are an authenticated end-user of the service." Similar to the debanking scandal that errupted recently. Stopping people accused of DV accessing email services and email histories that may include evidence supporting their innocence, and giving control of those service…
/r/MensRights07/11/25 02:15 AM
21

Awesome
/r/MensRights06/11/25 01:36 PM
6

Same in Australia. Extreme sexism in Family Law and services.
/r/MensRights06/11/25 09:25 AM
7

Looking forward to seeing what advances in men's health come from this month. Please note that Movember Australia denies the existence of Men's Health Month, and contnues to redirect $million in donations to projects benefiting women.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 04:35 PM
11

A self identified sexist pig. Call her out for what she is.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 04:26 PM
4

The idea that masculinity requires men to adhere to a strict male gender role of "protector", is beyond stupid. All people feel the responsibility to save others from harm, male or female. But when men are actively targeted when they respond in harm situations, they would be stupid to place themselves at risk. Screw them. I don't rescue women, ever.
/r/MensRights04/11/25 04:20 PM
11

MRAs are not feminist? Oh my! How terrible /s
/r/MensRights01/11/25 06:47 AM
20

This appears to be consistent with research showing female teacher prejudice againts boys. Women have a problem with sexist behavours targeting men and boys that must be addressed.
/r/MensRights01/11/25 06:44 AM
14

You really do have an issue with recognising the human rights of men. The rights of male Uber drivers to be treated the same as female Uber drivers. That is, not treating all male Uber drivers like potential rapists and violent knukle dragging women bashers.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 09:25 AM
52

The only issues covered by the BBC relating to men in Ukraine, are about men who are not willing to fight. https://www.bbc.com/audio/play/m001mvw5 Shows you how much the BBC cares about the human rights of men and boys, and how men are valued by the average BBC gutter journo.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 09:23 AM
19

How convenient to trample the rights of some, just to pander to the irrational fears of others.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 09:04 AM
1

Frozen sperm, and frozen embryos, are increasingly being treated as "property" in divorce/separation situations, and is being divided between partners. The courts recognize the rights of women to reproduce, but do not recognize men's reproductive rights (I.e. the right to not consent to being a father).
/r/MensRights31/10/25 05:02 AM
2

https://theconversation.com/who-gets-the-frozen-embryos-in-the-divorce-101022
/r/MensRights31/10/25 04:57 AM
2

https://www.progress.org.uk/texas-sperm-bank-sued-for-giving-sperm-to-mans-ex-girlfriend/
/r/MensRights31/10/25 04:55 AM
2

https://bioedge.org/beginning-of-life-issues/woman-had-2-children-after-secretly-taking-ex-husbands-frozen-sperm/
/r/MensRights31/10/25 04:49 AM
18

When researchers only collect data that supports their prior prejudices, the results of the research, and programs based on the results, are just more prejudice. But our educators are reframing their prejudice as evidenced based policy. The intelligencia war on boys continues.
/r/MensRights29/10/25 09:04 AM
2

Any woman you have relationship with can make an application to a court, to access and use your sperm. Once your sperm is stored or frozen, it can be accessed, without your permission, by the organisation that stores it, legally or illegally.
/r/MensRights29/10/25 08:45 AM
6

DO NOT DO THIS Freezing your sperm may make it vulnerable to legal challenges by women, wanting to use your sperm for fertilisation.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 07:56 AM
0

The usual bullshit argument to ensure that men are denied basic health care otherwise provided to women.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 08:10 PM
78

This event occured several years ago. Despite international headlines, no action was taken against the principal or teachers involved. The message sent to education professionals was clear. Gendered abuse in schools targeting boys is OK. Just don't get caught.
/r/MensRights24/10/25 03:04 PM
1

Politics always seems to be a choice between evils. Until we see the tidfe of popular opinion (media) turn to be more pro-men's rights, political priorities will not address our needs.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 06:59 AM
5

Good read. Would be good to have a critique of the original thesis. If this reflects modern society, we are in deep trouble, and heading for a new dark-ages.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 08:49 AM
2

Nailed it.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 08:27 AM
19

The democrats have made it clear "the future is female". At least republicans have a place for men and boys in their future.
/r/MensRights20/10/25 08:23 AM
20

As Senators Roberts exposed, these sexist pigs are focusing their academic prejudice on analyses that support thier bias against men and boys. Any data that is not useful in this war on men and boys is minimised, ignored, or interpreted through a affirmation bias so entrenched, it stumbles over even simple questions. These are the evil fanatics masquerading as objective investigators, who are informing our government policy and school curricullum. Its a brutal, relentless war against little boys…
/r/MensRights18/10/25 09:17 AM
3

Unless universities have a consistent policy of recruitment that targets both male and female diversity across all courses, this is just sexist pigs making the world a prejudice hell.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 08:00 AM
18

Still infected with the feminist virus, this woman believes her life is just a matter of choices, with results assured by her privilege. Her confession is true. She acted badly, treated others cruelly, ended up alone. But her belief that she was a victim of feminism is flawed. Feminism just endorsed her worst behaviours, and she enjoyed that freedom to act like a monster without remorse.
/r/MensRights14/10/25 07:52 AM
1

Typical female privilege. Sex offender spends one day in prison.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 06:57 AM
2

Heroic woman falls. Thanks to Erin for her unwavering humanity and compassion.
/r/MensRights09/10/25 06:54 AM
1

Thanks. I'll check it out.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 12:48 PM
2

We now have expert evidence showing that false accusations are not victimless crimes, and that the impact on victims of false accusations is likely to be severe and long term. Thank you
/r/MensRights05/10/25 09:52 PM
40

Until DV event include ALL victims without prejudice, its nothing to do with DV. Its just a bunch of sexist pigs, celebrating their gender hatred.
/r/MensRights01/10/25 12:00 AM
1

True.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 11:56 PM
3

Good point. Given the robust gender bias in Australian academic research, the only causes of female problem gambling that will be investigated will all be external (i.e. social determionants related to oppression of women).
/r/MensRights30/09/25 11:49 PM
1

The result of suffering 12 years of sexist domination by resentful female teachers
/r/MensRights30/09/25 12:51 AM
1

Sad but true. I have listened to boys in schools talk about their experiences, and the bias you observed at a program level is operative in every lesson plan, every individual interaction and in every teacher. It has become cultural, with many teachers who see the bias, like you, leaving the profession demoralised and concerned.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 12:48 AM
1

Sad but true. I have listened to boys in schools talk about their experiences, and the bias you observed at a program level is operative in every lesson plan, every individual interaction and in every teacher. It has become cultural, with many teachers who see the bias, like you, leaving the profession demoralised and concerned.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 12:48 AM
2

Damn right they do. I've witnessed it.
/r/MensRights30/09/25 12:45 AM
4

Young Australian men aged 18–25 years are at disproportionately increased risk for gambling problems compared to their older or female counterparts. Researchers from the Western Australian Kids Research Institute and Movember used individual patient data from the largest longitudinal cohort study on Australian men’s health (Ten to Men Study) to identify the psychosocial, health-related, and gambling-related behavioural predictors of problem gambling severity in 265 young men aged 18–25 years. Th…
/r/MensRights30/09/25 12:37 AM
5

A really important and topical issue, well covered by John Barry. Highly recommended listening for every man, and definitely, every male academic or professional. AI will potentially spreaad the deficit approach to masculinity from academia to all areas of social discourse.
/r/MensRights29/09/25 01:42 AM
3

Sadly, the Family Court of Australia has become a political swamp of anti-male advocates. Its difficult for any father to navigate the Family Law process without becoming a victim of negative gender generalisations targeting men. For ordinary good men, its become a process of harm minimisation, attempting to preserve some contact between children and fathers. Any attempt to protect children from an abusive mother, or gain 50% custody/contact usually results in years of sexist persecution and fam…
/r/MensRights29/09/25 01:23 AM
9

Every college and university in Australia has a "Gender Equity" department, that is focused on ensuring gender equity in education. Even tho 60-70% of university graduates are women, and 60-70% of academics employed by universities are women, these "Gender Equity" departments remain run 100% by women, for women, and continue to impliement programs to increase the numbers of women entering and graduating from universities. Their aim is to remove men and boys from education altogether. They have n…
/r/MensRights29/09/25 01:11 AM
2

How many guys here have faked an orgasm, or pushed to orgasm ASAP just to get it over and done with?
/r/MensRights29/09/25 12:43 AM
5

Complaints about the sexual performance of men appear to be primarily from women. They vary over time and by nature from "men are selfish", "men want sex all the time", "men never want sex any more", "men are emotionally unavailable", "men are too emotional", "men don't give me an orgasm", "men are too focused on giving women an orgasm". Really? The only consistent issue is that some women are constantly complaining when men do not meet their wants/needs, whether women have taken the time to exp…
/r/MensRights29/09/25 12:39 AM
1

Around 50:50. At a guess? But then you should deduct a few more percentage points for those who are only expressing empathy for men and boys because they are in the honeymoon period of their relationship, and are intensely tribal. Then deduct a few more percentage points for those who are personally impacted by the financial burden placed on seperated fathers, and underrstand that their own futures are hobbled by onerous obligations to support another woman (they hate that). Then deduct a few mo…
/r/MensRights26/09/25 03:19 AM
1

Given the vast majority of single parents are women, and 80% or more of childcare and early years teachers are women, it seems that women are systematically programing boys to be rapists? Really? Is that their argument?
/r/MensRights26/09/25 03:09 AM
1

There is a lot of mis-information online about using aromatase (not aromatize) inhibitors in combination with testoserone supplements to balance male serum estrogen or achieve optimised levels. Many home-grown testosterone clinics are also using this dangerous practice. Some doctors are also prescribing these medications concomitantly. But the evidence from clinical studies on the use of aromatase inhibitors is clear. The studies show that taking aromatase inhibitors while on testosterone therap…
/r/MensRights26/09/25 03:03 AM
1

Correct. But that occurs regardless of whether the testosterone is endogenous or exogenous. Returning testosterone to normal levels, or therapeutic levels, does not cause excessive levels of estrogen. You understand the process, but neither the context or the magnitude of the events.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 01:14 AM
1

If you knew anything about science you would recognise "cardiovascular events" as a group of events including acute mycardial infarct, heart failure (with or without reduced left ventricular ejection fraction), peripheral arterial disease, aortic artery disease, and stroke (hemorrhagic or non-hemorrhagic). As for "1840s" ? You pulled that date out of your ass just like your psuedoscience.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 01:14 AM
2

The correct dose is important. It should be administered under the management of a physician with expertise in men's sexual health.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 02:20 AM
2

There is no evidence that testosterone supplement use in men with low serum testosterone, has dose dependency, or additional negative impact on the endocrine system. The benefits are clear. The harms have nothing to do with dependency, and are more likely to be a small potential increase in cardiovascular events.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 02:18 AM
3

The use of HRT in men and women is not equitable. Women are provided HRT to relieve the burden of menopause, and maintain pre-menopausal sexul health and libido. HRT is rarely offered to men, and is less likely to be covered by public subsidies or insurance. Men's health is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 02:15 AM
2

If you don't understand science, then stop trying to silence people who do science for a living. The title of the OP is a question, not a statement. If there is a correlation between testosterone and obesity/lean body mass (as noted in this study and many others testosterone studies) then the scientific approach leads naturally to question if there is also causation. While big observational studies identify correlation, further controlled studies are required to show causation. Your suggestion t…
/r/MensRights24/09/25 02:11 AM
2

This is the denial of services approach common to men's health, in contrast to women's heath which provides "options" rather than proscription. HRT is commonly used for women in menopause. Are you suggesting this should stop?
/r/MensRights23/09/25 11:48 PM
1

The selective exclusion of the most extreme misandrist reddits shows (twoxchromosomes) the entrenched misandry of the study authors. This study was designed and forced to show no difference in gender hatred between reddit communities.
/r/MensRights23/09/25 01:03 AM
2

These extremes are actually very common.
/r/MensRights23/09/25 01:00 AM
13

The discrimination against white males in AI algorithms is real, observable, reproducable and has impact. Sadly, modern scientific and humanity based researchers are using AI to accelarate the first labor intensive steps in research studies, without considering the impact of this racist, sexist bias. Systematic reviews, the first step of identifying the body of knowledge that will inform academic study, are now commonly being conducted by AI. Academic overview is used to effectively identify AI …
/r/MensRights23/09/25 12:52 AM
2

Male aging, which involves changes in male sex hormone regulation similar to but discrete from female menopause, is a well documented event in the lives of all men. All men. This sexual event in men is often referred to as andropause. However, while menopause is widely recognised and treated with HRT (hormone replacement therapy), andropause is ignored or treated as a conspiracy theory by sexual health clinics and practitioners. Walk into any sexual health clinic and you will find many mentions …
/r/MensRights23/09/25 12:37 AM
52

Feminism has nothing to do with equality. Its just hated, resentment and callous revenge for imagined wrongs.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 11:52 AM
8

Says a lot about your character if you enjoy a fictional vilification of child.
/r/MensRights17/09/25 03:49 AM
2

Another vicous murdering sexist woman who truely believes she will never be held accountable for her interpartner violence. Its a growing cohort of women who feel so privileged, they believe the laws do not apply to them. Interesting to see in the article and comments here, people rushing to excuse her violence and blame her victim for the violence. It tells you a lot about people when they rush to invent excuses for violent women. Also interesting to see that at the end of the article, the auth…
/r/MensRights15/09/25 09:44 PM
27

Most feminists are so insecure about their sexuality, they need to demean men to prop up their fragile egos. Its hate men or be left contemplating their shallow empty lives.
/r/MensRights15/09/25 09:40 PM
1

As an example. a great Australian women's soccer player complained about sexual harassment she experienced and witnessed over the course of her long career. Her complaints included examples where other women protected female sexual predators who were targeting younger players. All were silenced, because any complaints ended a career. You will notice that even in the articles discussing this issue in its time, its hard to understand that the alleged perpetrators were women. No one was ever discip…
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:36 AM
1

Must be time to start examining the sex lives, and online comments of female sports people to troll for bad behaviour. It seems female sports people are getting off with free pass here, not withstanding their appauling hate speech and predatory sexuality.
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:21 AM
14

Agreed. Positive masculinity is one component of the "toxic masculinity" scale used by feminists to force people to think about masculinity on a shallow linear scale that includes the psychotic "Valerie Solanas: SCUM manefesto" definition of masculinity at one extreme, and a complient, feminised, feminist approved masculinity at the other. Its been widely established to cause more harm to men and boys than the nebulous disingenuous behaviours it is alleged to describe (these change depending on …
/r/MensRights14/09/25 02:09 AM
5

Now that comment is hate speech. The good old feminist slogan of "if you complain about what we say, you are the problem". May you guys should go back to MensLib or TwoXC where hate speech targeting men is rewarded. "Toxic Masculinity" and its sugar coated cousin "positive masculinity" have been identified as hate speech, damaging to men and boys, for so long, only hardened men hating feminists and SIMPs continue to use the terms. Read Drs Martin Seager and John Barry research on this "The Centr…
/r/MensRights13/09/25 11:29 PM
1

Not suicide. Trantrums of very minor self harm, scatching their arms, cutting their hair, saying "I'll kill myself if you don't let me out"
/r/MensRights13/09/25 12:11 AM
3

Wonderful to see so many femtrols, baiting on this issue. What they all try to obscure, is that this program will treat child offenders differently on the basis of the BIRTH SEX alone. The magnitude of sexism entrenched in this program is massive. That these sexist pigs would confine empathy and compassion to some child offenders and not others, on the basis of the BIRTH SEX, demonstrates a level of prejudice indicative of sociopathy. The same people supporting this sexist initiative, should be …
/r/MensRights13/09/25 12:08 AM
2

“Its (not proven) abolition would mark a milestone in the journey toward a more just and compassionate Scottish legal system – one that puts the rights and wellbeing of victims at its heart.” Given the belief of the Victim Support Scotland CEO (above), the intention of this reform is to change the burden of proof required to achieve a guilty verdict in rape and sexual assault cases. The idea that different crimes can have different burdens of proof, based on the birth sex of the victim, not the …
/r/MensRights13/09/25 12:00 AM
1

OMG you're delusional. No one is offering any alternative sentencing for men! They are given sentences that are more often incarceraton, 69% longer prison sentences, less hope of parole and living conditions that are appauling. The OP isn't even about men or women, its about girls. Its about treating boys and girls differently, because of their BIRTH SEX. Self harm, scratching, holding your breath is not suicide. Its a tantrum.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 11:42 PM
12

Oh wake up. Petuant stupid female criminals threatening to hold their breath and turn blue if they are punished by the law for the crime they commit? What kind of infantile idiots are we dealing with?
/r/MensRights11/09/25 09:30 PM
2

Sorry mate. I wasn't anything you said that was sexist. It was who you are.
/r/MensRights11/09/25 04:41 AM
10

One of the cardinal signals of class priivilege is the removal of the right to question or propose an alternate proposition. If the leadership heirarchy of the workgroup you find yourself in at present is female, then you, as a male, are not of sufficient worth to question anyone on the heirarchy.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 11:10 PM
23

Strange how they focus on mothers being abused by fathers, when the abuse is frequently bilateral. Be careful here. We had the presumption of 50:50 custody in Australia for a short time, but feminist academics and legal scolars quickly created data that suggested all contact between children and the father was abusive and violent. Now the presumption of 50:50 custody is gone, and more than 80% of children live with the mother, many never able to know their father at all.
/r/MensRights07/09/25 05:24 AM
1

Narcissists are always big noting themselves, claiming titles, achievements and victimhood where none exists, just to bolster their need to feel superior to others. People like this poor professor, belonging to the despised class of "men and boys", can only big note himself by denying his brothers, and throwing them under the bus of feminist self-adoration. Just remember, that this professor will never be a feminist, and will never be anything other than a despised man. His desperate bid to cast…
/r/MensRights07/09/25 05:16 AM
69

In schools, girls are taught that if 2 people are intoxicated and have sex, the male is a rapist and girl is a victim. This entrenched culture of strict gender responsibility, that requires boys to be responsible for consent while girls girls are not, is symptomatic of a culture that places the onus on boys to be responsibly for decisions they make or girls make.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 12:11 AM
1

Punishing male employees, whether they have done anything wrong or not, is a short-cut to promotion or self-preservation for straight white males in positions of authority. This small push-back is welcome, but the forces intimidating managers/commandrs to practice this abuse are still intact, strong and unmitigated.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 12:06 AM
7

Good see hear of some push back against the subjective perceptions of harassment. Now we need to push for women exposing themselves in the workplace to be classified as sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 11:57 PM
31

Data from Ten to Men – the Australian Institute of Family Studies’ (AIFS) longitudinal study of the health of boys and men has been used as the first national estimate of male intimate partner violence perpetration in Australia. The connection between this and men's health is not explained. Similar questions have not been asked of Australian Women. What the study does say is this: Interpartner violence is a critical health issue in Australia and has recently been described as a national crisis b…
/r/MensRights02/09/25 06:10 AM
15

The vilification of male sexuality by women is an issue that has festered over the history of mankind. But not all women are like this, and often its other men (SIMPs) who are the instigators of this sexist view of men's sexuality.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 10:03 PM
1

For some reason people seem to love infantising african American men. Why?
/r/MensRights31/08/25 10:01 PM
1

This article misses the mark on a few issues. "Well, although it is part of traditional masculinity to have control over your feelings, there is evidence that when men are depressed they are more likely than women to ‘act out’ in violence. Worse still, men kill themselves at three times the rate that women do." This may well be true, but why are men doing this? The idea that men are less capable of introspection, or are dumb animals who act wihtout reason or thought like children, is insulting a…
/r/MensRights31/08/25 10:00 PM
1

Typical treatment experienced by men who are victims of sexual assault. And the same sexist pigs wonder why men and boys are reluctant to report when they are victims of women's violence. In context, remember this is in a country that persists with the sexist attitude that women are incapable of raping a man or a child. While the number of female rapists in the UK contines to climb at a horrifying rate.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 09:29 PM
24

Woman physically assaults man, sexually assaults man, in public, and get away with just a slap on the wrist. Where does she work? Are they going to sack her, or do they support her sexually abusive behaviour?
/r/MensRights28/08/25 03:51 AM
18

International Men's Day is the one day each year that the UN truely expresses its hatred and malicious indifference to the experiences and crises of 50% of the world population, on the basis of sex. If the UN is this sexist, the UN is also very likely even more racist, more intolerant of freedom of relighion and more likely to support violence against all kinds of people (including women and girls) when its expedient to do so. IMD is the day the UN laughs at the hundreds of thousands of men who …
/r/MensRights27/08/25 11:33 PM
6

The use of the term "cis male" is offensive and sexist. Its hate speech created by people who hate men and boys, and shouldn't be used or tolerated.
/r/MensRights26/08/25 09:08 PM
1

The Australian domestic violence scam is thriving, and continues to enable the feminist myth that DV is overwhelmingly male on female violence. They even say that viollence against children is overwhelmingly perpetrated by men. This blatant lie is complwetely at odds with the evidence. And the 10s of thousands of men and boys who are victims of women's violence every year will continue to be denied emergency services, accomadation and couselling because they are male and the attackers are privil…
/r/MensRights25/08/25 08:53 PM
2

Most of the arguments support earlier maturity of girls are related to one of three fallacies. There's the organic fallacy, that female brains mature earlier than male brains. This eugenics argument is very popular with feminists and frequently gets airtime on men's forums like MensLib and LeftWingMaleAdvocates. This argument makes a false equivalence between brain growth and socialised maturity citing good scientific research as well as feminist confirmation bias trash, explaining the later mat…
/r/MensRights24/08/25 09:29 PM
110

Anyone who measures the health and welbeing of men and boys, by the imact of their being alive on women and girls, is just a con artist. They admitting that they have so little understanding of the lived experiences of men and boys, the only way they can relate to them, is through the experiences of women. This is the "tell" that reveals the feminist basis of their beliefs. And as feminists, they can never understand or have empathy for men and boys. Feminism relies on the conceptualisation of m…
/r/MensRights23/08/25 01:23 AM
13

Both of the teen victims of this sexual predator were old enough to consent. But the prosecutors assumed that because the victims were high school students and the confessed predator taught middle school, there was no teacher/student relationship or responsibility. Why they assumed the teachers position of authority was not relevant here, is beyond a joke. She only knew the victims because of her interactions with them as students. She should have been prosecuted. I suspect her tears had somethi…
/r/MensRights22/08/25 04:59 AM
29

The people reviewing your APP are clearly aware of the TeaApp practice of naming and shaming men using defamatory language, and posting possibly illegal materials. Is this an example of Apple acting badly, or rogue Apple employees abusing their positions to enforce censorship consistent with their own personal beliefs and prejudices? Much like Twitter (pre-X)
/r/MensRights21/08/25 01:25 AM
49

Movember has been hijacked by feminists and is diverting money to women's organisations, and projects that measure men's mental health in terms of benefits experienced by women. Do Not Donate To Movember. Your Money Will Not Benefit Men!
/r/MensRights19/08/25 12:06 AM
52

Absolutely. Circumcision is sexual abuse and should be prosecuted.
/r/MensRights19/08/25 12:01 AM
4

"Women vote based on social issues" Are you kidding? Women only vote on social issues that advantage women! Look at the callous misandry of UN women!!! Listen to the rhetoric of Harris, Clinton and Michelle Obama! They Hate Men.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 11:58 PM
19

Guess you sum up the problem with the democrats. All they do is demand they we don't vote for Trump. What's missing is any policies that understand men and boys as Americans, as people with human rights. So long as the Democrats have nothing to offer other than "orange men bad" and "all men bad" and "the future is female", I would vote for lump of wood before a democrat.
/r/MensRights18/08/25 11:55 PM
1

Having practiced as a lawyer myself, I know that logical argument when challenged, is frequently found to be anything but logical, and more often than not, unreasonable. This is not a peer reviewed online journal, or a publication of citation level discourse. Its a casual forum for commenting on issues related to men's rights, open to a cohort of people with or without academic training. Fit to purpose, there is no expectation that comments should be supported by citations. Notwithstanding that,…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 11:13 PM
1

Not sure whether you are genuinely confused, or so indoctrinated you are incapable of seeing antimale dialogue and ideology. I usually refuse to provide step by step examples of cited works, as it rewards lazy readers, or trolls. But I will give you the benefit of the doubt. This is just a few text samples demonstrating how boys and girls are framed differently in the curriculum and resource docs. Try reading them from an impartial point of view, without the feminist lens. The "Resilience, Right…
/r/MensRights18/08/25 12:19 AM
3

Stop trolling. There are entire sections of the source material that refer to gendered violence, and resistence to change. You're just a lying troll who refuses to see the obvious so you can continue to validate your sexist attitudes.
/r/MensRights17/08/25 01:04 AM
1

Amazing what people will do to silence other voices. As our voices grow stronger, and more people listen, we will experience more attempts to disrupt.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 06:59 AM
4

Quite odd you can't find the sections where they portray boys and men in completely negative terms, while others have found those I mentioned, and added more thay they have found. You sound a bit trollish. Try re-reading them, and check out the comments by Marvin the Magpie above.
/r/MensRights16/08/25 01:12 AM
9

Its not often that MRAs can talk about positive change, and even more infrequent that they can bring about change. But the fall (even gradual) of the term "toxic masculinity" may be one such occassion. As Dr Barry and associates acknowledged, the waning popularity of terms like "toxic masculinity" may not be indicative of cultural change. But there is some light in darkness of pathologised masculinity. MRAs, and in particular, psychologists and academics specialising in men's mental health, have…
/r/MensRights15/08/25 05:14 AM
35

Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan attacked a news reporter (The Australian's Rachel Baxendale) for reporting on the radical push of transgender ideology to five-year-olds in Victorian schools. Parents were outraged that the Victorian school curriculum had recently added new materials to its “Respectful Relationships" modules, including radial transgender ideology. Children as young as 5 years were being taught they could choose their gender, that their body parts do not have to match how they feel…
/r/MensRights15/08/25 03:28 AM
1

Ahhh, of the top of my head..... Margaret Thatcher and Elizabeth II sent men to die in an unnecessary war in the Falklands. There was nothing to gain from this war, and in the long term, it is arguable that while the UK won the battle for the Falklands, Argentine won the war. But it seems Thatcher was insulted by the Argentine president (General Leopoldo Galtieri), a man and a misogynist, who called her "politically inadequate". Almost immediately Thatcher sent men to die and be mutilated so she…
/r/MensRights14/08/25 01:35 AM
6

Male victims of domestic violence continue to be ignored by DV services and government policies. But as the callous indifference of the feminist academics who are driving this ignorance becomes increasingly difficult to ignore, hide or justify, these academics are frantically attempting to entrench gendered language into DV laws and policies. Their only motivation is to block all help for male victims, and force authorities to treat all male victims as perpetrators. History will look back on the…
/r/MensRights14/08/25 12:50 AM
14

Regardless of arguments from radical feminists, both FGM and MGM are criminal sexual assaults when undertaken on children, with or without the consent of the child. Both are irreversible, both risk disfigurement or death without any benefit to the child, and both are expressions of control and oppression.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 12:42 AM
6

Agree. Piercings do not remove any tissue, and over time heal completely. This means children who have had piercings done without their consent, have to option to "undo" the procedure with nothing more than very minor or no scaring. This option to "undo" is the key component.
/r/MensRights14/08/25 12:35 AM
7

The UK government shifts the war on boys into high gear. All based on a fictional TV series that got the facts wrong. How many teen boy suicides will result from this latest push to criminalise masculinity and whiteness? The government has become the enemy of men and boys. The police the brute squad, and the courts the jackals.
/r/MensRights10/08/25 08:55 PM
49

Men talking to each other about their experiences, and one day organising to address issues that they share, scares feminists more than any thing else.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 09:42 PM
8

You really are desperate to believe your own bullshit. Men are using drugs and alcohol because their physical and mental health needs are being ignored by female dominated health services. Its the sexist pigs in health policy and academia who are creating the crisis in men's health.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 03:55 AM
10

This is nothing but bubble talk, for the same liberal bubble dwellers who are still unable to believe that Trump won the last election, and men and boys aren't lining up to worship the women who are denegrating and hating them. Hate speech pretending to be journalism.
/r/MensRights06/08/25 03:35 AM
3

Higly recommend looking at alternatives to Movember for your men's health donations. In Australia you can do this by donating directly to the "Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia", leaving Movember out of the loop so funds cannot be redirected to women's rights organisations. The PCFA is the coal-face organisation that does the research into prostate cancer and testicular cancer, actually researches the impact on prostate cancer on men's quality of life, and directly funds specialised nurses…
/r/MensRights06/08/25 01:09 AM
1

If they really bel I eved in equality, why name their ideology after women? They are luars.
/r/MensRights02/08/25 10:15 AM
1

Nah, That's rape.
/r/MensRights01/08/25 06:16 AM
1

There many studies that have looked at the impact of sex on learning, and whether single sex schools are better or worse compared to co-ed. The science seems to depend on the confirmation bias of the researchers. Numerous studies claiming to review 30 years of data on whether boys brains are any different from girls brains, conclude there is no difference, and as many claim there is a difference. Its the same with scholastic achievement. The science is so murky, we will never know. What is clear…
/r/MensRights31/07/25 05:17 AM
1

When in co-ed schools, girls are given better grades by female teachers, raising them above the boys. In girl only schools, there are no boys to populate the lower grades.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 05:06 AM
2

The number of girl only schools in Australia is increasing, while the number of boy only schools is decreasing. Studies suggest that boys do better in single sex schools, while girls do better in co-ed schools. Go figure.
/r/MensRights30/07/25 06:05 AM
1

For a chapter in a text entitled "Positive identity for Men" there was very little positive language, and whole heap of negativity. These academics who specialise in the study of the "far-right", always seem to forget that centre, left and right are all relative to the subjective orientation of the observer. The other flag for these types, is their obscession with Andrew Tate. Its like a rebranded of TDS. They really do believe that if they can personify all evil in an individual person, they ca…
/r/MensRights30/07/25 04:42 AM
7

A not guilty verdict is just that. NOT GUILTY. The accusation was false. The evidence or the accuser was so inconsistent, so contradictory, it was not believable. She lied.
/r/MensRights28/07/25 10:30 AM
1

This case was prosecuted on evidence that could never result in a conviction, primarily because it was obvious the complainant was lying. Why did she lie? to secure payments in a civil case. The accused have lost their jobs, their careers, and have been publically abuse and sexually harassed as a result of false accusations. Victims advocates only cared about one outcome here. The ‘Horrible messaging’ for victims, that will set back the work being done to support victims of gender-based, sexuali…
/r/MensRights28/07/25 12:48 AM
13

The policy of assigning male health care workers to violent or aggressive patients is wide spread and culturally entrenched in health care, policing and emergency services. Male health care workers, infact all males generally, are coersed, shamed and threatened by managers, colleagues and the community, to take these dangerous and potentially injurous roles volunterally. If they do not, they are brutally abused, marginalised, sexually harassed, and publically shamed. Even in this case, while the…
/r/MensRights28/07/25 12:29 AM
19

Claimed, but the court adjudicated the sex as consensual. The facts as found by the court was that the accusation was not proven, and therefore, did not happen the way accused. An accusation that is aquitted in a court of law, where the proof of an accusation is examined using ALL the FACTS, did not happen.
/r/MensRights27/07/25 11:13 PM
20

The NHL position, that vilifies men engaging in consensual sex, is not acceptable. Its a targeted sexual discrimination that suggests men engaging in lawful sexual acts with consenting adults, is held to a higher standard than women. What's worse, is that this sexist standard is not written or spoken, but is brutally enforced. The standard is a nebulous criteria that is not codified anywhere, other than the semi-psychotic rants of feminist extremists who are operating outside the law, to enforce…
/r/MensRights27/07/25 09:25 PM
9

Really demonstrates how fasicst feminism is. When having a different opinion is considered hate speech that requires silencing. OMG
/r/MensRights25/07/25 08:53 PM
4

Italy makes it clear that female privilege is policy. Men are considered subhuman. Remember that when your government calls on you to protect your country, or when a woman asks for your help.
/r/MensRights25/07/25 08:47 PM
1

The perception of bias in the conduct of a criminal case, is a serious issue that strikes at the credibility and reputation of the courts. This judge openly stated that she had prejudices impacting her sentencing, based on the sex of the accused. She stated that was a factor that influenced her decision! Whether there is evidence of bias or not, the perception of bias is the legal standard for a judge to recuse themselves from hearing or sentencing. By declaring her bias, and then carrying on wi…
/r/MensRights24/07/25 12:58 AM
11

Then you either need psychiatric treatment for your mental health disorder, or counselling for your sexist profiling.
/r/MensRights23/07/25 11:29 PM
2

Remember, all of these studies are based on self reported work. While there is a minority of women and men who work their fingers to the bone, the truth is that many women exaggerate the amount of domestic work they do, and ignore the the work their partners do to keep their households running. The myth of the modern woman, slaving away ing the house 7 days a week, is simply a myth. But it is another convenient stereotype feminists use to claim to high moral ground. The ideal of a woman scrubbin…
/r/MensRights22/07/25 09:48 PM
5

Not sure whats happening north of the equator, but Movember Australia has definitely been captured by feminist academia, and donations should be considered with caution. Movember Australia is already on the nose since handing over $3.2 million in donations for men's health to the Australian Government in 2024 to fund research to help young men and boys "foster healthy, respectful relationships", and stop bashing women and girls. Whether this money found its way back to the Movember Global Direct…
/r/MensRights22/07/25 02:50 AM
1

My understanding is that they do use metrics, but these are derived from the DV industry, that frames men as perpetrators of violence against women and children. Completely ignoring the fact, that mothers are the person most likely to abuse or kill children.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 02:39 AM
0

The "best interests of the child" scam has been running for decades. Why is it a scam? Because the Family Courts continue to enforce traditional gender sex roles for men by stereotyp[ing them as providers. So the best interests of the child are viewed as mother gets custody, and father gets minimal or no contact with children, while support mother and children. That's the scam. No acknowledgement of women's liberation in the workplace. No recognision of fathers as essential parental influences o…
/r/MensRights17/07/25 09:23 PM
13

Identifying the wrong guy is a false allegation. The reframing of false allegations as wrong allegations is dumb way to divert attention away from people making false allegations. Just because someone was raped, that does not give them the right to make allegations without oversite or burden of proof. Its not about blaming the victim of the rape. Its about acknowledging people falsely accused of rape.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 01:33 AM
21

Garbage. The 2% myth was derived from cases proven in courts to be false. The numbers of freal false accusations that never make it to final court decisions is up around 30%. Stop posting debunked feminist hate speech! You have deliberately taken the the lowest estimate, based on the narrowest definition of "false allegation" without acknowledging the massive range of estimates from 1.5-90%. Not honest! Try reading this excellent analysis of the available data informing false rape allegations. I…
/r/MensRights17/07/25 12:50 AM
1

Quite a few of these types of place exist in Australia, New Zealand and the UK. Called "Men's Sheds" ? But recently, women have been demanding access to these men's places, and succeeding. So they will soon be just like the other men's places, over run by hostile women. The only men's place we still have in this world is the toilet, and often even this is being policed by women with stop watches.
/r/MensRights17/07/25 12:46 AM
20

No! Scandinavian countries have NOT succeeded in achieving gender equality. No! Scandinavian countries have NOT avoided the gender war. They have just silenced it. OMG. Get off the coolaide. Conscription is almost universally male only, men in tertiary education are in the minority, men in public services jobs are in the minority in all scandinavian countries. MRAs are ignored as right-wing extremists!!
/r/MensRights17/07/25 12:26 AM
12

Note that in Australia, even suggesting that women may instigate DV may be a career ending event for academics or public servants "Australian academic, Dr. Fiona Girkin, recently made headlines after she seemingly agreed with the idea that women often instigate violence in domestic situations. She claimed that in her work with the Tasmania Police “they’re seeing just as many women as they are men in domestic violence situations as the perpetrator.” As a result of her statements, she was placed u…
/r/MensRights16/07/25 09:50 PM
2

True. Remember, the eSafety commissioners attitudes to criticism of feminism (check links above). And her powers to share any data she has with the Federal Police. As she is the government arbiture of what is or isn't unacceptable speech, her determinations carry some weight in any criminal matter where there is grey definitions of hate speech.
/r/MensRights16/07/25 09:45 PM
5

In Australian schools, boys comprised 80% of suspensions (the most severe disciplinary action). In addition, 1% of school aged boys have been diagnosed with autism, and 13-15% have been diagnosed with ADHD and spectrum related disorders, increasingly frequently flagged in pre-school or school environments by teachers. So in Australian schools there is already a culture of hyper-vigilance of boys behaviour and of dealing more severely with boys. In an oppositional gendered culture, teachers are p…
/r/MensRights16/07/25 12:36 AM
-17

It was just a 150 year old sycamore tree with a life span of about 250-300 years. It can be grown again. In what world can a person get a suspended sentence for abusing a child, but more than 2 years in prison for cutting down a tree that can be replaced? This is a female judge venting her pent-up misandry, by projecting her hatred of men onto these idiots.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 11:57 PM
5

Early feminists were both sexist and racist. Feminism has one of the most rewritten histories in history. Feminism was, is and always will be, a hate movement that only considers the political rights (not human rights) of a small subset of women, and inappropriately appropriates the benefits experienced by women due to any other causes. All feminist arguments about benefits to men and boys, or for women and girls, depend on sanitised, ideological arguments that ignore the real world aims and imp…
/r/MensRights15/07/25 09:03 PM
15

This is the Australian eSafety Commissioner claiming that only women, girls and minorities are targeted in online violence. https://womensagenda.com.au/latest/eight-to-two-the-abysmal-ratio-we-must-factor-into-gendered-violence/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Inman_Grant https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/about-the-commissioner Then check out the eSafety web page that lists special populations at risk of online violence. Who's missing? https://www.esafety.gov.au/
/r/MensRights15/07/25 09:16 AM
10

Too true. The book was hard going, but nowhere near as daunting as the reality TV.
/r/MensRights15/07/25 05:36 AM
1

Hit the nail on the head. Feminists are overall completely ignorant about masculinity and men/boys. Their knowledge of all thing male is drawn from feminist dialogues that rehash ideological framings of masculinity as a doctrine, not a lived experience. This is why all their attempts at controlling, subverting or swaying men and boys towards a feminist pathway have failed miserably. They really are incapable of communicating with men and boys as human beings with agency, individuality and person…
/r/MensRights14/07/25 03:27 AM
4

It violates several laws. Feeling uncomforatble is just a pseudonym fo being sexist/racist
/r/MensRights11/07/25 04:05 AM
13

Its shocking to think that many of the alleged victims of DV are actually female perpetrators. What's even more sobering is the number of DV workers who are either perpetratinng DV themselves, or knowingly enabling the violence of other female perpetrators.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 11:31 PM
5

Amazing how many people thought it was OK to discriminate against a father, to think this parent was sex trafficing because he was a male. Really? Does that mean all the racial profiling we have been warned about is also OK? Best to be safe isn't it? NO!!! Sexisrt pigs with wings. I'll have tyo remember that when ever I care for an airline employee in hospital. Its most likely they are going to be sexist pigs, right?
/r/MensRights09/07/25 11:26 PM
2

Yeah, human rights are a waste of time for feminist pigs, who think men and boys deserve to be treated like animals.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 11:19 PM
3

Seems like that is the popular usage in the feminist bubble.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 11:17 PM
9

The frequency of these sexist statements from bigoted organisations is a testament to the discrimination against men in European society, the dehumanising of men and boys by radical feminist. Historically, these bigots will be seen for what they are. Not organisations based on respect for human rights, but sexist pigs who consider men and boys to be subhuman.
/r/MensRights09/07/25 11:16 PM
2

So true. Is it that these boys didn't demonstrate adequate acceptable radicalisation?
/r/MensRights09/07/25 03:15 AM
9

The erasure of men and boys from considerations of human rights under the UN charters, and generally, demonstrates the entrenched misandry of modern western democracies. This begs the question, how did we loose sight of men and boys a human beings, entitled to the same rights and protections as women and girls? Sadly, the answer is that men and boys have never been considered as equal beneficiaries of human rights, compared to women and girls. Our social fabric has depended on the repeated callo…
/r/MensRights09/07/25 03:14 AM
8

Absolutely. I knew these rad fems were pushing hardline misandry in the Labour Gov, but I didn't realise how many boys had been impacted by guidelines that identified criticism of feminism as terrorism, and referred for re-education. This is Cold-war Soviet Union level thought police. And they are targeting boys through their schools and health care services!!
/r/MensRights08/07/25 09:14 PM
3

The Amnesty International report is on their web page (https://www.amnesty.org.uk/prevent) The information about PREVENT and CHANNEL is easily found by searching the UK Gov web site (Google it). The article in the OP is the citation for the increase in numbers referred to PREVENT.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 09:10 PM
111

Boys referred to PREVENT have their referrals reviewed by the police, and are either handled by the police if considered "high risk", or referred to "Channel Panels" run by local councils or authorities. These panels review the referral to consider whether the boy needs ongoing re-education/counselling, or referral to Child Protective Services or mental health services. Below is a summary of an actual referral, published in the Amnesty International review. Michael’s story: ‘A child with non-soc…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 02:28 AM
65

The E-Karen has sweeping powers to secretly investigate Australian citizens posting "suspect" speech on social media. They can access any information about us, without ever informing us, and share that information with other government agencies.
/r/MensRights08/07/25 02:15 AM
28

CONTEST is the United Kingdom's counter-terrorism strategy, established in early 2003 in response to the events of 9/11. CONTEST is composed of four core strategies: Prevent, Pursue, Protect, and Prepare. PREVENT is the most controversial of these strategies as it includes a positive duty (Prevent duty) on specified authorities in education, health, local authorities, police and criminal justice agencies (prisons and probation) to help prevent the risk of people becoming terrorists or supporting…
/r/MensRights08/07/25 01:46 AM
1

Over the last few decades, feminist academics have achived dominance across many social science fields, and now run the studies that provide much of the evidence around these disciplines. We are seeing the results of extreme bias in these fields that appears to consistent with other similarly run studies, providing reproducable results. The results of these studies, and the narratives in the social science disciplines demonstrate their extreme bias when compared to the acid test. The studies fai…
/r/MensRights07/07/25 09:18 PM
1

Why would any man be interested in working for a company that considers men to be untrustworthy around children, and actively discriminates against men in a workfore where men are marginalised and vilified?
/r/MensRights07/07/25 09:04 PM
7

Yeah, there's lots of misandry driving that narrative, as some of the comments below demonstrate. But as you identified, a very low proportion of men may commit these crimes (<1%), and a similarly low proportion of women. Misandrists use the relative measures most likely to sensationalise the differences in rates between male and female perpetrators, in order to exploit these tragic disgusting events for their own agendas. Given the hypervigilance men experience in female dominated professions (…
/r/MensRights07/07/25 04:59 AM
45

As the Inspire Early Learning Journey ban on male child care workers changing nappies contunes, without any Austrtalian authority pointing out that this breaks all relevant State and Federal antidiscrimination laws, the impact on ALL men in Australian health care needs to be evaluated. This is more than just a weird decision. Because this ban hasn't been challenged by the Victorian and Commonwealth Sex Discrimination Commissioners (all feminist women), or the Victorian Government (which provides…
/r/MensRights06/07/25 11:09 PM
1

You are a complete creep.
/r/MensRights06/07/25 10:34 AM
2

Its ironic that men are being restricted from having contact with young children, can change and bath their children in their homes, but not in childcare. Sexist pigs using this tragedy to vilify all men. Sick
/r/MensRights06/07/25 01:25 AM
10

It was a gay man who abused these children. Would you ban gay men from childcare?
/r/MensRights05/07/25 08:58 AM
7

The man allegednto have committed the crimes that inspired this knee jerk response was gay. Should they ban all gay men from child care? Would that be appropriate?
/r/MensRights05/07/25 08:43 AM
4

This is a world-wide trend. In Australia almost all public health jobs are now designated as "targeted". That is, targeted to vulnerable population subgroups. This targeting provides an exemption from anti-discrimination laws. By designating job advertisements as targeted, employers can restrict their employment to designated subgroups of applicants. Guess which population subgroup is the only group designated as NOT a vulnerable subgroup? White heterosexual males. However, recently white hetero…
/r/MensRights04/07/25 01:27 AM
1

Wow. How could you ever construe my speech as identifying me as a victim, unless you are gaslighting? As a crisis counsellor, a health care practitioner of 40 years + experience, and having practiced as a solicitor in Family Law, I can assure you, any examination of "relationships" from one person's point of view, can only provide a skewed and value ladened framing of any relational issues discussed. This article focused entirely on the experience of women in relationships with men, while delibe…
/r/MensRights04/07/25 12:27 AM
5

Too true. These sexist pigs targeted men, not because all are are sexual predators of children, but because they could exploit this tragedy to give voice to their gender hatred. This woman is not concerned with the safety of children, but with the vilification of men.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:32 PM
1

Commune: defined as to get very close to someone or something by exchanging feelings or thoughts (Oxford dictionary). When you deliberately miscontrue the meaning of words to deny the speech of others, and are so entrenched in gynocentrism that you believe relationships can be discussed by only considering the thoughts and feelings of a woman, then you are incapable of meaningful discussion.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 05:28 PM
20

See the nearby post about Australia considering banning all men from early childcare jobs, or giving mothers the option to choose child care only provided by women, because all men are potential rapists.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 07:26 AM
3

Relationships are not a commune of an individual mate. If you believe any discussion of relationships can focus on one person and still be a rational discussion, you need to go back to school.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 07:20 AM
23

The stats you refer to are based on reports? arrests? charged? or convictions? Given women's sexual violence is less likely to be reported, less likely to be believed, rarely charged and even when convicted, often results in soft sentencing, the stats you cite are impacted by the same bias you exhibit.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 07:18 AM
70

The empathy gap has evolved into a war against men and boys. Feminists are on the attack, pathologising masculinity, demanding boys be indoctrinated from birth to control their beliefs and behaviour and insisting that all men be characterised as rapists and misogynists
/r/MensRights03/07/25 04:15 AM
3

That must be why this article only looked at the issue from the point of view of women who cheat. How egalitarian.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 03:59 AM
7

Don't fooled. The women complaining about the male gaze are staring just as much as men, if not more. Its the sex of the person who is staring that offends them, not the stare. They're sexist pigs who will find everything men do offensive.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 03:54 AM
36

"Please everyone check out rMensRights. You wouldn't believe the delusions there. Many are totally convinced women are more likely than men to commit violence, that sort of thing." Not asking you anything. You are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 02:10 AM
40

"most child predators and people with paraphilias involving are predominantly male". But not all. The sexual abuse of children by women was not considered a criminal offense in Australia until the mid 1980s. That culture of trivialising women's sexual abuse of children continues today, with reports of female sexual predators and abusers lagging behind the report rates in other countries. "I'd be wary even if it is a blood relative. Even for most of us here, I would bet your gut feeling makes you…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 01:15 AM
90

There are calls for men to be banned from working in childcare centres after allegations of sexual assault and child rape were levelled at male ex-sector employee charged with 70 sexual offences. Health authorities have urged the parents of 1200 children who may have been in affected care centres, to have them tested for STIs. The founder of the Independent Collective of Survivors (female), said banning men from the childcare sector was an "extreme" position, but that the safety of children, m…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 01:01 AM
2

The fundamental flaws in the self-serving article attempting to justify women cheating on their partners. Cheating women are reframed as trying to save their relationships. WRONG. Cheating is cheating, and any woman who lies to their intimate partner, has doomed their relationship. By not being honest in their relationship they have unilaterally decided that only they are entitled to sexual satisfaction, that they know their partner is fully satisfied with their sexual relationship (the same sex…
/r/MensRights03/07/25 12:46 AM
1

Always comes down to that. You just know!
/r/MensRights03/07/25 12:25 AM
13

Tea Dating Advice inc (authors of the APP) appears to be operating out of California. https://www.teaforwomen.com The founder statement appears to be a copy/paste of an unrelated man. The female founder may be authentic. The APP is only operating in the US where laws protect social media companies from liability due to comments on their media.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 05:55 AM
5

Have to wonder if these people who think sex with a child (student) isn't rape, are projecting about their own behaviour.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 05:40 AM
12

He was a student, she was a teacher. That makes a relationship of unequal power, and that makes it rape. I think you are earning a reputation for enabling rape, a disgusting state of mind, and I suggest you get help ASAP before you cause harm.
/r/MensRights02/07/25 05:38 AM
1

I'm very tired of pseudo academic arguments with poorly related citations being flaunted by feminists with flawed logic and no idea about how to interpret research reports. So I reviewed you evidence and found it to be pretty garbage. Brody & Hall (2008) – Gender and Emotion The correct citation is “Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (2008). Gender and emotion in context. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-. Jones, & B. L. Feldman (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed).” It’s from a chapter in a book. The text…
/r/MensRights02/07/25 05:33 AM
2

T?He biggest threat to the liberation of men and boys from strict male gender roles is the UN Women. These sexist pigs seek to control and oppress men and boys. Having realised that men cannot be controlled, they are attacking boys, intending to brainwash them with feminist anti-male rehoric
/r/MensRights01/07/25 12:17 AM
1

To put this in perspective, data on DV related homocides in the Australian state of NSW for 12 months (Apr 24 - Mar 25) reads as follows: Intimate partner homicide victims females 10, males 5. Domestic violence related homicide victims females 14, males 9, children 11. 64% of child victims were boys. Perpetrators of child homicides were equally spread between males and females, with biological mothers most likely to be perpetrators. These stats show that men comprise 1/3 of all intimate partner …
/r/MensRights30/06/25 02:09 AM
2

This brutal dismembering, buring and beheading of a man has been buried by the Australian media. Minimal reporting, mostly sympathetic to the alleged perpetrator and the victims family. This is typical of the misandry of the Australian mainstream media. The alleged brutal murder of a man by his female partner is not news. The woman accused of the killing is not portrayed as a monster, and no one has made any comment about the suffering this poor man would have experienced at the hands of his kil…
/r/MensRights30/06/25 01:46 AM
1

I wonder ghow charitiable these people would sound, if they offered grants that excluded indigenous people, or immigrants, or muslims? Its amazing how easily people discriminate against boys, just because of their sex, and still act all virtuous.
/r/MensRights26/06/25 09:14 PM
6

WRONG! Parents can only consent to surgical procedures that benfit the child. The crime is that male children are treated worse than animals, and no one stands up for their rights to bodily autonomy. Circumcision is child sexual abuse, and anyone associated with it should be held criminally responsible and never be allowed near children for life.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 04:19 AM
5

Your success is a tribute to your resiliance. Denial of essential services due to birth sex, is an abuse of human rights. I'm amazed that such abuses are so endemic in the Australian health system, and unacknowledged by Australian academia.
/r/MensRights25/06/25 03:21 AM
11

Shocking, but so not unexpected. It seems the evidence bar is so low for requested exemptions from feminist organisations, its almost a rubber stamp. In Australia, the idea that men and boys cannot experience sex discrimination, has become mainstream. ALL Commonwealth Sex Discrimination Commissioners in Australia have been women, ALL have declared their feminist ideals, ALL have stated that they intended to work for the RIGHTS OF WOMEN! NONE has acknowledged that men and boys can be victims of s…
/r/MensRights25/06/25 01:52 AM
11

Women douses man with petrol, and sets him on fire. Woman is a victim of misogyny? I must have missed something here.This was not an act of passion. She went to the garage, retrieved the petrol, poured it over him, then taunted him, and set him on fire.
/r/MensRights24/06/25 09:44 PM
21

It is a complete failure of the legal system. It is a family court that is so biased in favour of women, it cannot seperate the best interests of the children, from the wants of their mothers. The solution to every issue raised in family courts, is to reduce conflict by removing fathers from the family unit. As a father, you are viewed as a problem, not a parent. But you cannot allow yourself to fall into the mire of depression, anger and resentment that the family court steers you to. You have …
/r/MensRights23/06/25 09:51 PM
1

Those who seek to rely must prove. THe reverse onus of proof is a scam. There is not proof of patriarchy. Its a myth.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 01:20 AM
4

The modern feminist woman is so toxic, so boring, life is just better, more fulfilling and happier without them. Its not a movement. its not MGTOW, its not a rage, its just people choosing to live a good life, and sweetheart, that's not you!
/r/MensRights23/06/25 01:13 AM
0

TikTok is toxic trash.
/r/MensRights23/06/25 01:05 AM
30

If the UN becomes the paramilitary arm of feminism, reaching into the laws and policies of independent countries, then it should be resisted, defunded, and deconstructed at every opportunity. Equality can never be achieved by only addessing the rights of one kind of person.
/r/MensRights21/06/25 05:49 PM
42

The presumption of fatherhood for all children born during a marriage is a common feature of Westminster based legal systems. It is a remnant of the archaic concept that men who are married, are responsible for the acts of their wife, whether they approved or even had knowledge of the acts. Its not surprising that feminists are 100% behind the continuation of this transfer of responsibility, husband responsible for wife's acts, debts and contracts.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 05:16 PM
1

Incredible story. I wonder how often this story is repeated in other cases, but is never discovered. The synergism between DV services and the family courts has turned family law into a no-man's land, where fathers are systematically removed from the lives of children, and framed a dangerous animals to be managed and controlled.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 01:03 AM
26

In modern feminism, man talking to each other about their experiences is another male space that must be pulled down and exposed to feminist review. Men (and women) talking to each other and sharing any views that are critical of, or at least, not supportive of feminism, has been reframed as the precurser to violence against women. Giving feminists the moral authority to police the speech of men and boys, with an urgency linked to potential future violence, is letting the fox loose in the hen ho…
/r/MensRights16/06/25 11:42 PM
6

Just another woman who only understands men as a series of checkboxes on her list of requirements. She's all "if your not giving women what they want, you must be a loser sissy. WTF! Well, here's some news for Lahren. Its not all about you. Just because a man doesn't want to give you everything you want, when you want it, doesn't mean he's living in his mom's basement. Men do have a life, independent of you and their moms.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 09:11 PM
2

And there you have revealled the boots and all gender bias of feminist research academics. Their research is so entrenched with confirmation bias driven by feminist ideology, it would never occur to her to even consider the data discordance you have summarised so well. It just not on her horizon. This discordance is brushed aside by claiming her research was focused on "violence against women", as if this violence can be discretely invesigated without any reference to female on male, male on mal…
/r/MensRights13/06/25 05:05 AM
5

Toxic masculinity is feminist hate speech. Anyone who suggests it is a genuine term, an academic term or a misunderstood term, is just a sexist pig. The is no such thing as toxic masculinity. But its use is a handy way to identify feminists who hate men and boys.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 03:29 AM
1

There's something wrong with your vision.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 03:26 AM
19

The author acknowledges her recent research that identifies men who use alcohol, have mental health issues, are suicidal, or depressed, as more likely to perpetrate domestic violence. She also suugests that GPs should be enlisted to identify these men during health care consultations for early intervention. This practice will enlist doctors as police investigators and trigger mandatory reporting. The author doesn't state this directly because she doesn't see men as individuals with human rights,…
/r/MensRights10/06/25 11:45 AM
166

Women's advocates, including Movember, are suggesting that General Medical Practitioners (GPs) should interrogate male patients about their use of violence in personal relationships. Australian law includes mandatory reporting by GPs if they suspect child abuse or domestic violence during any interaction with patients. If all male patients are to be suspected of domestic violence at first instance, and asked about their use of violence in the relationships by GPs, the GPs are then compelled by l…
/r/MensRights10/06/25 04:50 AM
3

This woman's claim about men being untidy is part of a larger mother goddess myth that women perpetuate. The whole imaginary characterisation of women as selfless cleaners, carers, nuturers, empaths, with superior emotional intelligence, social and language skills, and appreciation of community, its all just a lie! A lie that women rely on as a buttress to their love of taking the higher moral ground.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 11:56 PM
1

This is an example of a recent trend of women normalising sexist attitudes, using fear of men to justify a gender appartheid. All men are no more dangerous than all people of color, all immigrants, all islamists, all homosexuals or all spiders. By normalising the fear of "all men" as a justification for gender appartheid, modern feminism is partitioning modern society into increasingly smaller and more numerous gettos of sameness, separated by ignorance, mistrust and misinformation.
/r/MensRights05/06/25 11:50 PM
1

That was my experience as well. Violence was always a risk where I grew up. Late night/early morning, bars, pubs, sporting events. My behaviour was always moderated by multiple risk/benefit judgements. Stand my ground or give way, win the war or pick my battles, speak up versus hold my tongue, these were mundane everyday decisions that occured in all environments. What I did notice as a male, was if I made the wrong call, or over stepped my mark, I paid the price immediately, physically, sometim…
/r/MensRights04/06/25 05:18 AM
26

I think many of them connect the dots, but just don't care to do anything about it. Its the feminist utopia.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 05:04 AM
16

The similarity is uncanny, and deeply disturbing. Something is happening, and it seems to be flying under the radar of female educators who either don't care, or are entirely happy with the collapse of male enrolments in higher education. I get the feeling we are watching a slow motion video of a new emerging appartheid, an institutional separation of men and women that will be unreconcilable and deadly to civil society.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 05:02 AM
35

Sadly true. Most universities in Australia are now openly hostile to men and boys. Not sure how radical feminist ideology captured Australian academia, but it seems to be related to the emergence of antisemitism and neoracist critical race/gender theory.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 02:06 AM
15

Before anyone offers the usual misinformation memes about boys and men moving to trades, consider the facts. The Strategic Review of the Australian Apprenticeship Inventive System Final Report 2024, noted extreme shortages in all trades and non-trades occupations in Australia are predicted to continue through to 2028, as the proportions of boys opting for trades continues to decline relative to demand. More than 60% of all Australian employers of trades and non-trades for the Other Services, Man…
/r/MensRights04/06/25 01:59 AM
1

Using the sex of the perpetrator to vilify the victim is a disgusting example of gender hatred. If you think this kind of sexist logic justifies denying support for victims of violence, then you are the problem.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 11:43 PM
2

When ever a feminist controls public funding, you can certain of one thing. Men will never receive benefits from any related program, unless women benefit as well.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 11:37 PM
15

The loudest message from the Democrats for men is "THE FUTURE IS FEMALE" That can never be influenced to a pro-male agenda, or even gender equality.
/r/MensRights03/06/25 11:32 PM
2

Reframing interactions between men and women as "men's violence", when there is no violence, is a power play used by some women. It takes full advantage of the gamma bias identified by Seager and Barry (2019). Seager, M., & Barry, J. A. (2019). Cognitive distortion in thinking about gender issues: Gamma bias and the gender distortion matrix. In The Palgrave handbook of male psychology and mental health (pp. 87- 104). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Accessed online 27th Feb 2020 https://link.springer.c…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 10:35 PM
14

Very true. The fears are real, and unfortunately, too often based on personal experiences of threatening situations. But exploiting these fears does nothing to address women's safety in the community. Violence experienced by women in our community will only be reduced when all violence is addressed. Focusing on some victims and not others is a false flag, an ideological fiction. There is no magical force-field that can separate women from a culture where violence experienced by men is ignored an…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 04:28 AM
113

The Australian Bureau of Statistics reported that for 2023, 65% of victims of homicide and related crimes in Australia were males. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare reported that in Australia for the 2021-2022 period, 42% of men and 31% of women experienced physical violence, and that 74.8% of homicide victims were men. Regardless of the fact that men are 1.6 times more likely to be victims of violence in Australia, this Australian politician published misinformation completely igno…
/r/MensRights02/06/25 03:24 AM
36

It is more likely that being publically associated with Bettina Arndt (even just inviewed), was a serious enough anti-feminist act to warrant professional assement. Feminist academics exhibit an irrational venomous hatred Bettina Arndt, for her amazing bravery in speaking out when gender narratives are based on fictions rather than facts. I note that this is an assessment, not a dismissal. But its really a silencing of a highly educationed and informed academic. This is an extremely aggressive a…
/r/MensRights30/05/25 04:02 AM
4

Following the Netflix "Adolescence" fictional drama, Australian academics are ready to persecute potential future crimes, by limiting the freedoms and communications of boys in Auystralian schools.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 03:52 AM
7

The DV stats reported by the ABS are biased by the guidelines, policies and procedures impacting the arresting, charging and convicting of DV offenders. These DV guidelines, policies and procedures are written by Australian feminist academics, who only acknowledge female victims and male perpetrators. The result of this is that gender biased DV law enforcement provides the stats used to justify the bias in DV law enforcement. Its a circular logic, a self-perpetuating mythology.
/r/MensRights30/05/25 03:49 AM
16

The DV industry in universities is so entrenched and dominated by aggressive feminist ideology, that any disenting opinion is considered to be so offense, it requires disciplinary action or dismissal. These are the same academics educating our teachers, psychologists, nurses, doctors and politicians. Our young professionals in Australia are being indoctrinated into radical feminist ideology, a radical intersectional culture that considers all men and boys to be subhuman dangerous animals.
/r/MensRights29/05/25 09:24 PM
3

The study you cited has limitations, and does not support your claim. The filicide data used in this study were derived from the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR) for a period of 32 years from 1976 to 2007, and included individuals ARRESTED (conviction data were not available) for homicide committed against biological children or stepchildren. The study was of filicide, and included adult children (18 years or older). Excluding adult children and s…
/r/MensRights26/05/25 01:00 AM
19

Sadly, any researchers or professionals who do not support the feminist DV narrative, and threaten the DV cash-cow, are pounced on by the Australian cancel; culture. Its particularly vicious if those researchers and professionals are women who tell the truth. Thanks to the brave Dr. Fiona Girkin and Bettina Arndt, who have risked their lives and their careers to tell the truth about their experiences of DV in Australia.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 11:50 PM
2

Gendering of the class battle between the rich and powerful and the working poor, is how feminism seeks to legitimise its hatred of men.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 01:05 AM
3

When parenting in family law is judged by the quality of the parent, not their sex, there may be the smallest sliver of light on the horizon for gender equality in family law. But the family law support services are all captured by the feminist DV industry, and extreme misandrists. Men like Carr are trading in popular appeal among feminist influenced women and men, to embellish their careers and fame. Cheap popularists, who's critical thinking is pre-written in the blood of fatherless children.
/r/MensRights25/05/25 01:03 AM
10

Sadly, you are just one of millions of men across the world, trapped in loveless violent marriages by sexist family law courts. When your only way out involves financial ruin, family trauma/marginalisation, leaving vulnerable family members in violent family relationships and legal vilification, many men remain silently in bad relationships, to protect themselves, their children and their families. History will look back at the sexist crimes committed by so many government and judicial authoriti…
/r/MensRights25/05/25 12:53 AM
6

The comments reveal an entrenched culture of vicious feminist hatred for men and boys. The suggestion setting someone on fire is a reasonable act for a women who is offended, was not only applauded, it was considered funny. Judge Jennifer English said she rejected the claim that Walpole was “provoked” when she retrieved a jerry can of petrol, doused her victim, and set him alite. However, the same judge also said “It is never easy to send a young person, particularly a young woman, to jail.” Cle…
/r/MensRights24/05/25 04:44 AM
3

So true. How much harm does modern psychology do to men and boys, for the sake of its gynocentric ideology..
/r/MensRights23/05/25 06:31 AM
5

Would like to see source for that claim. In Australia, just in the last month, a mother attempted to kill by fire two men, an 11 year old boy, and her 3 children (boy 9, girl 7, girl 4). She succeeded in killing her 3 young children, but she (with self inflicted injuries) and the others survived. In addition, a grandmother (primary carer for her daughters children), killed her 2 young nephews (boy 7, boy 6), while she survived self inflicted injuries. Just one month, 5 killed, 3 attempted to kil…
/r/MensRights21/05/25 04:27 AM
1

The re-characterising of heterosexual relationships as women's work, is consistent with feminism's dehumanising of men and men's experiences. Its more feminist hate speech, dressed up as social theory.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 11:19 PM
1

The solution is unisex prisons, where social norms ensure equity.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 07:00 AM
3

I once knew a femtroll who was so filled with bitterness and gender hatred, the only way she could get off was by trolling other people's lives. It was sad, and annoying.
/r/MensRights18/05/25 09:15 AM
2

There seems to be a disparity between the focus of the study conclusions, and the results of the data. The study authors note that information about the prevalence of intimate partner violence in Australia, including differences by gender, age, and sexual orientation, is limited. However, the study data show that intimate partner physical, sexual, and psychological violence is widespread, with significantly more women reporting experiencing each type of violence than men (any intimate partner vi…
/r/MensRights18/05/25 12:39 AM
2

Would love the citation for that.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 04:29 AM
6

I suspect that as such a large proportion of participants were female, an analysis was not appropriate. But they showed no interest in that correlation either.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 04:26 AM
22

That was harsh. Hope you eventually got the help you needed. Its so hard to get people to stop femsplaining to men, and start listening.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 06:03 AM
96

An excellent and very revealing UK study. That study debunked the ASSUMPTION that men were not seeking mental health advice prior to suicide. It also questioned the assumption that "traditional masculinity norms" were the cause of men's poor use of mental health and suicide prevention services, the feminist myth that effectively instigated a scorched earth approach to any serious non-ideological research or health care services focused on suicidal men.
/r/MensRights15/05/25 05:39 AM
20

Only the link to the BMC Public Health Journal. Provides the abstract at least. Will look for an open access summary. Https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22676-6 (original article where I found citation) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31989723/ (Link to article described in OP) Sorry
/r/MensRights15/05/25 05:30 AM
1

Very true. There has only been a spike in sexual assaults, and that correlates with the expansion of the definition of sexual assault to included any unwanted approaches, subjective complaints of feeling uncomfortable and the recording of all complaints.
/r/MensRights14/05/25 09:29 PM
3

Absolutely. In many Western cultures, laws and societal beliefs, excluded any ideation that women could commit acts of violence or acts of sexual violence. Even today, women are legally incapable of rape in the UK. As recently a tyhe 1970s in Australia, women were legally incapable sexually abusing children.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 09:14 PM
26

Generations of Australian women taught that ALL men kill women. Less than 0.1% of Australian men kill anyone, and fewer kill women. Generations of Australian women taught to ONLY value women's lives. When you are taught that its OK to treat all men as subhuman, then its OK to define empowerment as justifiable gynocentric sexism that excludes empathy for men and boys. Generations of Australian women taught that only women are victims of violence. But the Australian Bureau of Statistics for 2023 s…
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:16 AM
3

How about changing the laws to be ethical, equitable and unbiased?
/r/MensRights13/05/25 12:04 AM
5

In 2006, after an extensive investigation into Family Law custody and residence outcomes in Australia, the Howard Government passed the "Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Bill 2005" which reflected the Government’s determination to ensure the right of children to grow up with the love and support of both their parents. Although these laws centred on the rights of the child to know and be parented by both the Mother and Father, with a presumption of 50% residency between paren…
/r/MensRights12/05/25 11:53 PM
30

An analysis done by a journalist. It's a scam. There was no research, no study, no analysis, just a journalist adding up numbers from a government report. They provided no study protocol, no reported analysis for peer review, no link to the evidence and no data. Its just a hit piece on men and boys to showcase female victim hood regardless of facts to the contrary. This is just the same old feminist hate speech, dressed up as "research", that proves nothing but confirms the bias of the sexist pi…
/r/MensRights12/05/25 11:21 PM
19

As the article notes, France and Germany brutally silence and criminalise men who want to know the truth about their children. This kind of state santioned fraud is cowardly and self-serving, and shows that men in France and Germany have no human rights, are considered subhuman, and are only tolerated so long as they continue to slave as providers and protectors.
/r/MensRights12/05/25 02:57 AM
52

This woman was a serial rapist who's crimes against an unknown number of children were enabled by a cohort of feminist educators who refused to see what she was really doing in plain sight!
/r/MensRights12/05/25 02:41 AM
0

I don't think Turkey is backwards. It is one of the most progressive countries in Europe, and has been for hundreds of years. But as you note, in some regions women are subjugated, honour killings persist, and sexual violence against women is tolerated. Is that different from other countries? When women's participation in the workforce and education is lower compared to other countries, the answer is yes, but not by much.
/r/MensRights12/05/25 02:31 AM
1

Fighting for equal rights for women in a culture where women are subjugated is necessary and right. Fighting to subjugated men and boys is wrong, and aways will be wrong.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 12:10 PM
6

A noble and worthy aspiration. I wish you well in that endeavour. All men and women should enjoy freedom, dignity and self-determination, while providing compassion, support and respect to our fellow travellers.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 01:21 AM
25

Feminism is Turkey is very different from feminism in Western cultures. It's easy to be generous and recognise discrimination against others, when you are the victim of such pronounced discrimination. When women in Turkey have more equality, more power, similar to Western cultures, that's when feminist generosity will evaporate, just like in Western cultures. Many men help Women's Liberation in Western cultures. They have all been erased from feminist histories.
/r/MensRights09/05/25 12:53 AM
9

Many women like feminism because it makes them feel powerful, allows them to have no responsibility for their anger and gender bias, and it validates their every act and every word without moderation. When feminists talk to individual men in their lives, acts of hatred and bias become personal and accountable, and they are less likely to exhibit them without moderation. Be clear, that as soon as this feminist is no longer a friend, she will deal with you the way she deals with men at a societal …
/r/MensRights09/05/25 12:45 AM
43

Sounds very reasonable, but then it becomes clear, that this woman believes its Men's fault they are divorsed. I don't care how nicely she phrases it or how much she stresses that it was the way society made them be men. She still lays no blame on women, and only offers men the opportunity to be better men. Just another woman femsplaining masculinity to men!
/r/MensRights09/05/25 12:39 AM
10

So feminists aspire to a patriarchy of women (The Matriarchy). Wow. What is also cool is that when I type "The Matriarchy", it auto corrects to "The Patriarchy". Try it out!
/r/MensRights09/05/25 12:23 AM
4

"But just that in my experience, every single time I heard from a man" People who talk in absolutes are more likely so culturally biased, they are blind to alternative views, and incapable of seeing what is right in front of their eyes, unless it validates their predetermined views. In this Reddit, I'm sure this comment had a lot of likes (hundreds if not thousands), because it validates the feminist myth that men are "dead beat dads" and "women are victims".
/r/MensRights09/05/25 12:16 AM
33

Seems like Rowe has identified the problem, but offers no insights or solutions. Why are young men disengaging from the community? Boys disengaging starts in schools, is entrenched by time they are choosing college versus trades, and continues throughout their lives. WHY? It's not because they are being told to go to college, because the proportions of boys going to college has fallen off a cliff. Trades and unskilled jobs have demonstrated the same cliff. Boys are giving up before they have sta…
/r/MensRights09/05/25 12:07 AM
45

When rape is not about non-consensual sex it is not rape. Feminist activists (not Women's activists) have normalised modern ideological principles that define rape as a disequalibrium of power between two people involved in consensual sex acts. Given feminist ideology also places all men in positions of power and control over all women, this ideological approach to rape makes all men rapists, and all women victims, and dictates that men cannot be raped by women. For the prosecutors in this case,…
/r/MensRights08/05/25 11:43 PM
43

A discussion about boys thats all about girls, in the same old feminist sh#t, with the same old gynocentric focus. Feminists are incapable of having a discussion about men and boys that doesn't centre around the needs and wants of women and girls. So much so that even before they have any idea about whats going wrong for boys, they have to caution themselves to remain focused on girls. As for the expert in men and boys, SG, this explains why the democrats were so clueless about men and boys in t…
/r/MensRights05/05/25 11:57 PM
5

Noticed that MRA terms like "red pill" etc, are being redefined with gross generalised negative characteristics. What is "red pill" etc. We should try to have some uniform understanding of these terms, even if that just an understanding of the different definitions floating about. I've heard "red pill" used to describe any MRA thinking, but with MRAs made out to be Andrew Tate type characters who believe in the SCUM manifesto definition of maleness (controlling, misogynist, homophobic, violent, …
/r/MensRights05/05/25 11:44 PM
11

Yr right. In many countries now, in cases of assault, manslaughter and murder, a male on female crime is treated as an aggrevating factor, requiring more severe punishment, mandatory prison, longer prison sentences, rejection of the presumption of bail, etc.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 11:35 PM
5

Victim literature, the Mills and Boon of feminist self adulation.
/r/MensRights03/05/25 11:12 AM
4

Feminism always was, always will be, about women's rights. The core aims of feminism mandate the brutal enforcement of strict the male gender role of protector and provider, otherwise women lose the right to choose whether to work or have a family. These choices are only available to women as "rights" if there is a redistribution of wealth and responsibility that supports those choices. If men have choices, then women's choices will include sacrifices, because they cannot have it all. So feminis…
/r/MensRights30/04/25 09:27 PM
3

Honestly, listening to sexist pigs like you, who describe female violence as not a problem, is really enttertaining. In most countries across the world womens violence is increasing at rate of up to 300%. This reflects increased female violence, but also the increase in gender neutral laws. For example, in the UK, rape is not illegal for women. It's not a crime women can be convicted of. In Australia, women who committed historical rapes of children cannot be prosecuted. Many women convicted of …
/r/MensRights29/04/25 12:30 AM
2

There is no men's only space that women haven't destroyed, attacked, demonised or invaded. Why? Because they are afraid of what men will talk about or do, when they aren't supervised by women. Why is it so hard for these women to understand that male only spaces aren't about excluding women. They are nothing to do with women. It's not about you!
/r/MensRights28/04/25 01:36 AM
5

Yes it is blaming all men. The push by man hating feminists to make DV about "male culture", to make all men responsible, is wide spread. Its hyjacking and important issue to empower their misandry. Ask Erin Pissey about the the death threats she received, the violence she endured, for simply saying that women can be violent too!
/r/MensRights27/04/25 09:09 PM
2

Its a certainty that the misandry that is espoused by academia discussed on reddit, including the labelling of masculinity as a harmful doctrine by the APA, the use of the terms toxic masculinity and healthy masculinity, the assumption that masculinity is the cause of harms experienced by men and boys, has not been identified by the AI as misandry. There is a massive body of misandry in Reddit that is normalised by sexist ideologies in academia, that AI is not eqiped to identify.
/r/MensRights27/04/25 01:21 AM
9

By definition it is no longer a Men's Shed. Why do these sexist women insist on bullying their way into male only spaces?
/r/MensRights26/04/25 07:52 AM
6

Or is it the phones making it harder for the establishment to lie and get away with it?
/r/MensRights25/04/25 03:47 AM
6

By giving $million donated to men's health to a women's organisation? That's fraud, not help!
/r/MensRights25/04/25 03:44 AM
51

Movember once more shows that it has been firmly captured by the feminist narrative of “toxic masculinity”, and the hero of modern male gender role enslavement, “healthy masculinity”. In this article, Movember clearly states its support for the feminist propaganda of the Netflix “Adolescence” drama series, regardless of its obvious inaccuracies, exaggerations, and endorsement of moral panic. In fact, “Adolescence” appears to be the crisis that Movember desperately needed to turn on the tap of go…
/r/MensRights24/04/25 01:45 AM
3

" The solution isn’t to attack masculinity—it’s to rebuild it. " You need to get off the feminist coolaide. There is nothing wrong with masculinity. What's wrong is the constant negative framing of masculinity as something that is violent, dominant etc, the patriarchy! This " healthy masculinity " sham is the messaging of the psychotic SCUM manifesto, that masculinity is everything feminists claim, the harmful doctrine that need to be refashioned to stop men and boys harming women and men.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 12:08 AM
1

All AI work off what has been flooding the internet, with grading, filters and other algorithms set up to try and identify mainstream from conspiracy theories. However, AI algorithms also look at the online record of the questioner, to contextualise the answer to fit the needs of individual inquiry. So we all get slightly different answers as the internet landscape changes, as AI learns, and according to our internet history.
/r/MensRights20/04/25 11:05 PM
1

Like I said a month ago. Over 30 years of health care experience, multiple episodes. Negative male stereotypes were the norm, and the only positive male characteristics mentioned were those that involved acting on behalf of women, or male body objectification. One particular episode involved a young man who was particularly well endowed. While he was unconscious recovering from anaesthetic, more than a dozen female nurses entered his cubicle to take a look. It was disgusting, but no one complain…
/r/MensRights20/04/25 10:56 PM
2

Interesting, but depressing, to see how eager so many people are to validate their hatred and fear of men and boys, that an obvious fiction excites their mob mentality. Its all pitchforks and torches for boys now, or medicated, brainwashed, usefulness, Is this really just an icon for androphobia?
/r/MensRights20/04/25 10:16 AM
2

Bbfc, the service that provide personal censorship?
/r/MensRights15/04/25 02:05 PM
26

Easy fix. Just pay all the feminists to clean up the garbage. Pay them what the men were getting.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 10:54 AM
1

And yet they singled out a straight white boy as the example of knife crime in schools, regardless of this not reflecting the history of knife crime in the UK? The violemnce in the series is all gendered violence, boys violence against girls and adult women? Are you serious? This series is the modern media resurrection of the SCUM Manifesto (Valerie Solanas).
/r/MensRights12/04/25 03:22 AM
3

In the article the author link disability pensions with the 7 mill NILFs. The author estimates up to 4 mill of the NILFs (conservative) are not in the Labor market, and not reachable by normal market forces used to increase workforce participation.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 01:13 AM
3

Not children, 'boys'. The ideas of 'toxic masculinity' and the 'manosphere' are global statements vilifying men and boys, feminist hate speech. You need to take your bubble glasses off.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 01:08 AM
3

Not sure you are ready for male solidarity. Most men I know are only really interested in 'solidarity' when something is going to be done, imminently. You may not like what they do.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 01:05 AM
37

First, get rid of this insulting idea that boys are afraid of looking weak. They are not. They know how weak they are. They are afraid of how others 'treat' them when they honestly talk about their feelings. They have been continually been brutalised by their mothers, their teachers, their female peers, every time they talk about their feelings. Their ideas, experiences and emotions have been ridiculed and undermined, reframed as toxic masculinity, Andrew Tate inspired, misogynistic violence. Th…
/r/MensRights12/04/25 01:00 AM
10

The toxic feminism you see today in France, did not blosom out of nothing. Feminism has always been a hate movement of sexist women. During the 60s-90s the women's liberation movement achieved great things for women, but these women (average women, housewives) were not of the feminist movement (Dworkin, Solanas). PThe oppression of women by the patriarchy was a feminist idea. Equal rights and freedom from sex roles was women's Lib. The feminist movement has appropriated the achievements and popu…
/r/MensRights12/04/25 12:49 AM
5

The feminist myth of traditional masculinity, is similar in both magnitude and malicious, to the myth of toxic masculinity.\ Traditional masculinity is defined by feminists (first red flag) as masculinity consistent with patriarchy theory (second red flag) and is primarily identified by the infusion of responsibilities to protect and provide for women, respect women, and worship women, into male identity. REAL masculinity has nothing to do with this garbage guilt trip, and never has. Masculinity…
/r/MensRights12/04/25 12:39 AM
20

Too true. The separation of dependent male children from their primary carer, immediately after they have experienced domestic violence, is an indictment of the callousness of feminist dominated DV services. Forcing women to chose between deserting their sons and receiving DV services, is a brutal, sexist offence.
/r/MensRights12/04/25 12:26 AM
6

The problem with the feminist dominated DV culture in the UK and internationally, is that they deny the diversity of DV. Victims of women's violence in same-sex and heterosexual relationships, as well as male victims in same-sex relationships, are denied services on the basis of their sexuality. The government commissoners, police and judiciary tasked with the job of prosecuting these unlawful acts, apply the very same prejudices they are tasked with prosecuting, when they choose to selectively …
/r/MensRights12/04/25 12:22 AM
6

Across western nations the numbers of women only schools is increasing while the numbers of men only schools is plummeting. If support segregated schools, we make it easy for money to be directed to women's education (excluding men). At the moment, several successful antidiscrimination cases have be won against women only scholarships etc. This would bypass those wins.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 11:06 PM
47

This is not 7 million young men not wanting to work. Its 7 million young men with a disability. The sexist pigs at the NYPost wants to target young men with disabilities, but not young women with disabilities. He equates young men with a disability to single mothers of older school aged children.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:35 AM
2

No. That would just facilitate more discrimination against men and boys.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 03:30 AM
11

Cheers. Must remember to check the archives. The red-flag for radical feminists is that very prominent dehumanising of men and boys as objects, obstructions to harmony, peace and unicorn farts.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 01:40 AM
10

Agree with you. Particularly about 'kids who flipped out don't get closure, they get suspended'. Boys who flip out are quickly categorised as toxic man/boys, providing teachers with substantial immediate topical victim status, and removing all onus on the teacher to find any practical solutions addressing the issues driving the behaviour.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 01:38 AM
7

Except traditionally, teaching was a male dominated profession. Women have only moved into teaching in recent times, but quickly dominated and excluded men from the profession.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 01:32 AM
19

Really the low pay issue is a feminist myth designed to redirect criticism away from sexist treatment of men in education at all levels. The feminist hacks who constantly suggest this are expressing their own misandrist attitudes, and have never asked men (except with leading questions). There are plenty of men working in lower paid jobs, and just as many men as women, who are dedicated to teaching and nurturing children.
/r/MensRights10/04/25 01:31 AM
29

Radical feminist journalists at the Guardian reviewed the call for more male teachers in schools, as role models for boys, and warned that 'Masculinity is still defined largely in terms of public profile, competitive success and social status. Significantly, these qualities confer power over others.........We do not need to reaffirm masculinity, we need to redefine it, blurring the destructive boundaries between the masculine and feminine.' We should all be cautious of male role models in school…
/r/MensRights10/04/25 12:01 AM
13

The UN is a corrupt racist, sexist organisation that has caused massive harm to many people across the world. Much of the work of the UN is destructive to culture and autonomy, and denegrates men and boys in particular. The key reason behind this is the dominance of western academics in UN policy creation, and the feminist ideological foundations of its abuse and violence.
/r/MensRights09/04/25 03:58 AM
524

When there is a men's space that isn't accountable to women, it triggers man hating feminists. It's not that feminists can't come here and post ideas, its that feminists can't control the narrative here, can't shut down men who speaks the truth, and that drives feminists absolutely nuts.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 02:50 AM
1

'Take your all-women-are-horrible ideologies' ? I point out that boys are offered no protect from sexual predators under the law until very recently, are not considered 'victims' even in the present by the women publically employed to help victims, and are publically humiliated by feminists (not women, FEMINISTS) and you interpret that as 'all-women-are-horrible' ? If you interpret any examples of men and boys not having their human rights respected in the law, and examples of feminists acting l…
/r/MensRights03/04/25 08:40 PM
2

The outcomes discussed here are not supporting boys, they are confining, reconstructing and controlling boys. TConsider the red flags for this malicious victimisation of boys. The use of global terms by the people who wrote or support this approach, global terms like 'toxic masculinity' and the 'manosphere', global terms which always seem to require careful explanation to show why their natural meaning must be ignored, and nebulous continuously changing meanings used instead. The inclusion of al…
/r/MensRights02/04/25 08:10 PM
2

There have been a group of femtrolls brigading this thread, passing off meaningless statements as facts. But their consistent praising of the Adolescence series is seriously flawed, and reflects their personal bias, their gender grievence, and their inability to critically examine the hubris of passing off a fictional invention as a documentary. Here are just a few of the FACTS these fenmtrolls refuse to acknowledge. There is no epidemic of manosphere inspired violence as depicted in the series.…
/r/MensRights01/04/25 11:08 PM
9

Given the Democrats gameplay with other identity groups, their approach to men and boys would more likely be one of inclusions and control, exploiting the issues experienced by men and boys to power the Democrat vote machine, with no real solutions. Never trust feminists claiming that feminism is good for men and boys.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 08:37 PM
10

Cases like this expose the depraved morality of feminist women in positions of power. The refusal of other women to make this monster responsible for her rapacious pedophilia suggests she is not the only feminist in Iceland with little boys in their closet.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 08:23 PM
47

Adolescence is a conspiracy theory of feminist hate candy. It is bring on the most destructive initiative in the UK education system in history, with the vilification of all male students. It's hate speech on steroids.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 07:55 PM
126

Then why didn't they use those sources? This was just a made up fictional story, that attributed an amalgum of violence inspired by religious fundamentalism, individuals with severe mental health issues and feminist mythology to straight white boys. The ideation of a Mano sphere, the renamed patriarchy, is a dead give away. This is modern media adopting the psychosis of Varlie Solanas' SCUM manifesto.
/r/MensRights31/03/25 07:53 PM
26

The Labor government in Australia has recognised these events as an escalation in violence against women and girls in our community, and that this will be addressed in its $4.4 billion funding for gender based violence against women in Australia. https://ministers.pmc.gov.au/mccarthy/2024/commonwealth-investments-prevent-and-respond-gender-based-violence
/r/MensRights31/03/25 03:53 AM
2

https://www.ourwatch.org.au/media-reporting https://gbvaor.net/sites/default/files/2019-07/Media%20guidelines%20for%20reporting%20on%20GBV%20-%20GBV%20AoR%202014.pdf https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/migration/rs/Guidelines_WEB-VERSION-ENG.pdf https://www.ifj.org/fileadmin/user_upload/IFJ_Guidelines_for_Reporting_on_Violence_Against_Women_EN.pdf https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-09/SafetyByDesign-technology-facilitated-gender-based-violence-industry-guide.pdf
/r/MensRights31/03/25 03:43 AM
3

All Western media are directed to adhere to the UN Guidelines for the reporting gendered violence. The sexist guidelines include advice to editors of the following practices: all violence involving women should be reported by female journalists; all female journalists reporting gendered violence be trained in feminist run workshops on gendered violence; reporting of specific cases should include information stressing that violence against women is a community phenomenum of men's violence; this i…
/r/MensRights30/03/25 10:49 PM
1

The majority of Islam in western countries, is not fundamentalist, and there is plenty of partying, sex and bars.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 01:00 AM
19

Given the opposition to left wing woke policies are mostly male, the targeting of men and boys for extraordinary laws to protect women and society from violence makes political sense, in a Marxist methodology.
/r/MensRights29/03/25 12:59 AM
3

In Australia, just recently, two women who raped a number of school boys over several years, threatened to kill them if they told anyone, then accused them of rape when they final went to police to report the sexual abuse, have been found to have sexually abused these boys, but walked free from the court without punishment, because it was quite lawful for women to rape little boys at the time of the offences. The rape and sexual abuse was not a criminal offence because the perpetrator was a woma…
/r/MensRights26/03/25 10:44 PM
2

I appreciate your vision of a committee or meeting of men, as that could be very helpful for any movement, especially one that is so shunned by the media and politically captured community institutions. But masculinity and gender roles are so diverse, there are so many different, valuable, personal stories of what being a man is about, trying to make one story the main story, would not work. It's better that we listen to each other about what we experience, and share our stories. The human right…
/r/MensRights26/03/25 10:36 PM
1

The 2nd wave of feminism is misnamed. This was the popular Women's Liberation Movement, and had very little to do with feminism. Feminism during this period was a radical, violent fringe movement including radical personalities like Solanas, Dworkin, etc, who's feminism could be more correctly deconstructed and characterised as a glad-bag of aggressive, angry, often violent subgroups. Women's Lib was a popular movement aimed at the sexual revolution, equal rights etc, but comprised of young wome…
/r/MensRights26/03/25 10:24 PM
48

This fictional Netflix series links homicidal sociopathic murders of young girls to anyone who speaks publically in support of Men's human rights. It attacks masculinity as a culture that glorifies and baths in violence, aggression and hatred, with a patriarchal obscession with violence towards women, a doctrine of pathological mental and emotional dysfunction that is not able to self-regulate and needs to be externally (maternally) restrained. This demonising of men and boys and the condemnatio…
/r/MensRights25/03/25 10:53 PM
8

Not a journalist. Just a gender studies grad writing femporn, feminist rock-candy.
/r/MensRights24/03/25 10:48 PM
17

Radicalised? Like #KILLALLMEN or the gendercide demanded by Dworkin. The real fascists here are people like you who are trying to put male children into indoctrination camps. You want to deny boys the basic human rights of freedom of speech and freedom of association, so the only ideas they hear are ideas you approve of. You're ideas are so sexist and toxic, you can't win over the minds of young men, so you bring out the government thugs to brutalise boys and force your ideology into their heads…
/r/MensRights24/03/25 02:20 AM
40

It's based on feminist framing of masculinity as a dangerous doctrine. The whole drama was feminist hate speech, making believe that ALL men and boys are nothing more than potential rapists and women bashers. You believe that boys are just going to roll over and accept that they are horrible beasts who need belling? This kind of gender hatred will destroy all social cohesion between men and boys and our community, and creat a generation of outcasts, ripe for recruitment by radical religions.
/r/MensRights23/03/25 08:33 PM
3

Apologists like Thorne accept without question that responsibility for conflict lies with children, rather than adults. This sexist assumption, that endorses the claim by many women, that they are victims of children's violence, that they have been raped by the children they were sexually abusing, is informed by [prejudice not evidence. Restricting the world of boys, so they are not exposed to opposing ideologies and ideas, is not a solution. It's a slide into a dystopian society that enslaves t…
/r/MensRights23/03/25 12:53 AM
6

All the self proclaimed men's groups with any reference to improving men or focusing on making men better, are all based on the assumption that there is something fundamentally wrong with every male on the planet, something that needs fixing. That's feminist hate speech. If another man says to you, join us as we try to provide a better masculinity for men and boys, run away. They are manipulative experts in coersive control.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 05:11 AM
2

Absolutely. This is a propaganda campaign to breed a generation of compliant boys who are offered only one avenue of escape from misandry, vilification and ridicule. An avenue contructed by feminist authors that makes boys who obey feminist masters.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 03:16 AM
2

That and the blind acceptance of the strict traditional male gender role as provider and protector.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 03:14 AM
9

This mass misinformation is a concerted effort to frame young men as a threat to society. The next stage will be targeted re-education of young men to 'save' them from the 'manosphere' and redirect them into 'healthy masculinity' so they can continue to maintain the infrastructure of our communities, and be called on (shamed) into laying down their lives for the benefit of others, either in isolation/unemployment/depression, dangerous occupations, or fighting wars. This is the descent into the m…
/r/MensRights21/03/25 03:11 AM
3

Cancelled my Netflix. Really don't need to be watching sexist crap at all.
/r/MensRights21/03/25 03:01 AM
7

Feminism is a toxic hate ideology and has no place in a modern tolerant society.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 11:08 PM
7

Sorry you've experienced this grief and loss of friendship. But you have to wonder how genuine the friendships were if they women involved harboured so much hate for your masculine identity. What they are exhibiting is not just a female trait. Many people have ethical and moral positions that are based on equality, equity, empathy and compassion, but feel justified when acting outside these ideological parameters. Thus their excuse for using hate speech that may be perceived as racist, sexist, x…
/r/MensRights19/03/25 11:00 PM
14

Sexual assault of men and boys by women has been historically ignored, and even in the most progressive of communities, remains trivialised/normalised. Men complaining of sexual assault by women are viewed as clever predators or trouble makers, and in many cases, end up being prosecuted.
/r/MensRights19/03/25 10:42 PM
5

Too true. But I suspect that something more sinister is in the making. Something that identifies masculinity as an antisocial doctrine of violence against women that requires re-education camps, monitoring and curtailed freedoms.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 11:47 PM
7

These are all good articles identifying the massive tragedy of suicide in our communities (men and women), all identifying how the rate of men killing themselves is more than 3 times the rate of women. In 2023, in Australia there were 2,419 male suicides and 795 female suicides, yet suicide prevention services continue to provide more services to women and girls than to men and boys. This disparity is growing every year. The unspoken, headline from all these articles, is that despite the acknowl…
/r/MensRights17/03/25 11:44 PM
2

I wish there was something to positive to say to you about protecting your son from the hate and resentment of his teachers. But the culture of anti-masculinity is so entrenched in educator training, its impossible to do that. You either tell him the truth about why he will be treated so differently from his female peers and risk sending him off into a fringe anti-female spiral, or you try to overwhelm the negativity he experiences at school with positivity at home, but this is like stopping the…
/r/MensRights16/03/25 07:58 PM
2

Feminism is a hate movement based on the vilification of men and boys, and the elevation of women and girls to positions of privilege. Any movement based on hatred is disgusting, divisive and morally impoverished. You really need to reconsider your support for a movement that claims to be for equality, but only considers the rights and issues of women and girls.
/r/MensRights11/03/25 01:43 AM
3

A suicide attempt for women includes all episodes of self harm whether it was intended to end life or not, including trivial injuries such as scratching. Suicide attempts for women are counted by episodes, with some individuals recording as many as 50 attempts in a month, all counted as individual attempted suicides.
/r/MensRights09/03/25 09:56 PM
7

Not so. There is always pushback from feminist groups in discussions about genital mutilation, demanding that female genital mutilation be recognised as far more damaging than male genital mutilation, and a priority over male genital mutilation which they describe as minor. Then there are those extreme feminists who's hatred of men is so pathological, they draw gratification from the pain these poor babies are forced to endure. You are a rare exception.
/r/MensRights08/03/25 06:30 AM
3

How often is the mental load nothing more than one person imposing their own values and priorities onto others in their family, without consent or regard for the values or priorities of others. Its a bit shallow all this reframing of controlling behaviour as 'mental load', but they are feminists, so what to expect?
/r/MensRights07/03/25 12:58 AM
4

Any woman who finds this funny, entertaining or not objectionable, is a perpetrator of gendered violence, and should be called out for the sexist scum they are.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 12:48 AM
7

And the pre-sentencing reports for white male christians are invariably prejudical, mostly written by feminist service providers and proponents of critical race theory. This kind of fascist law-making is the inevitible result of intersectional feminist theory, and will either destroy our country or lead to civil war.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 12:45 AM
6

How stupid is this response. If any law talks about subgroups, its always to incude some and exclude others. Otherwise there is no logical reason to discuss subgroups. Its obvious which group is excluded from any benefits here. Stop femtrolling and get a real job.
/r/MensRights07/03/25 12:42 AM
1

The impact of this kind of disrespectful behaviour should not be minimised. People provide their bodies to science for the benefit of our community, with an expectation that their bodies will be dealt with respectfully. This kind of flipant behaviour displays a disregard for the intention and consent of the person who donated their body, as well as a callous disregard for their family and loved ones. In addition, it proves a level of sexist behaviour incompatible with professional conduct. All o…
/r/MensRights07/03/25 12:26 AM
47

Any male, any straight white male in the UK, is many times more likely to be imprisoned for any crime compared to any other identity group, regardless of guilt or crime committed. There are many in the Labor government who want some form of monitoring, and restricted freedoms for all straight white men.
/r/MensRights06/03/25 12:07 AM
3

Men work longer hours in more dangerous jobs and get paid less. Bring on the revolution.
/r/MensRights05/03/25 12:58 AM
2

Any person who believes masculinity exists on a continuum where the more masculine you are the toxic ou become, is a sexist pig. You need a reality check if you think toxic masculinity is anything other than hate speech. You bias is so entrenched in your belief, you are incapable of genuine insight.
/r/MensRights03/03/25 10:38 PM
11

Having worked in the health industry for many years, I have witnessed women from all health care professions, openly take pleasure in the discomfort, pain and poor health outcomes of men and boys. The language used when talking about health issues experienced by men is frequently demeaning, hateful and condescending. For some unklnown reason, many of these women compare the experiences of men in care, to their own experiences, as if this negates the experiences of these men, as if the experience…
/r/MensRights02/03/25 11:10 PM
1

These feeble minded feminist academics continue their clueless slide into culturally entrenched misandry. They are completely any lacking insight into their own prejudice. The obvious negativity of the language they use to describe men and boys, is only relieved when men and boys become subservient and compliant. These sexist pigs want men to be more like women, but not empowered women. They only want these neo-masculine men to be empowered in their policing of other men. In the same breath that…
/r/MensRights02/03/25 11:00 PM
28

The review was undertaken by the office of the prosecutors accused of mishandling the cases of sexual assault. That's the accused finding themselves not guilty! "The review, which was undertaken by the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions and ordered by its top prosecutor – Sally Dowling – found 97% of its sexual assault cases heard over an eight-month period last year met the required standards to prosecute. It comes after a rare spat between senior prosecutors and judges after some di…
/r/MensRights28/02/25 12:24 AM
1

Love playing with femtrolls and reading their pathetic attempts to belittle and shame. Genital mutilation of children is sexual abuse, something you seem to accept a OK. Lookout for the cops.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 07:53 PM
5

Wishful thinking. If you are femtrolling and looking to bait people, then you have failed. Debunking feminist myths is not an anger exercise, its a community service.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:14 AM
2

Not sure why everything i say has to be connected to your comment. Its not boys versus girls. Its fighting for rights receognised for girls, that should also be recognised for boys. Get over the 'boys versus girls' thing. This is human rights, and recognising that a human right is not something you can recognise and protect for just some people and not others.
/r/MensRights27/02/25 03:12 AM
3

It looks like the social fabric of the UK is in its final days of decay. When a nation declares war on its own people, whether due to political/religious beliefs, race or sex/sexuality, its time to horde food, learn self defense and get ready for the fall. Sadly, any new stable politic in the UK is unlikely to be christian or democratic, so it may be prudent to get out while you still can. US or Canada, despite their issues, might be good candidates. South of the equator, Australia is uncertain,…
/r/MensRights26/02/25 11:16 PM
9

Those benefits are a fiction. The studies support this have been debunked so many times, anyone still pushing that agenda are just pushing sh#t. There are no benefits of genital mutilation that cannot be achieved with a wash cloth a minimal level of hygiene.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 11:03 PM
6

Not aimed at you like that. The idea that the opinions of 99%+ women in your known cohort are relevant to this issue is the problem. Its not up to us to convince women anything about the issue. They can continue to believe what they believe, but should be condemned by a civil society for their rapacious sexual abuse of boys. The issue is the human rights of male children to bodily integrity. A right enjoyed by girls in our western democracies. We as a culture understand the concepts of human rig…
/r/MensRights26/02/25 10:58 PM
7

Unlikely to inspire men to support online moderation when the people likely to police it are only focused on the rights of women and girls. It would be giving sexist pigs the power to control everyone's online speech. Regardless, the idea that proactive law enforcement is required, reveals a desire for thought crimes. These man hating feminist want to be able to police speech, before any crimes or offenses have been committed. The e-safety Commissioner of Australia has recently been caught abusi…
/r/MensRights26/02/25 10:42 PM
5

Because the sexual abuse of babies, involving genital mutilation, is a perversion inflicted on vulnerable children by a rapacious cult of violent child molesters. Protecting children from sexual abuse is important in all civilised societies, and is one of the cardinal characteristics that separates humans from animals.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 10:28 PM
12

Do you really think the mutilation of infant boys can be justified by the opinions of women??? That has got to be the most sexist argument of all time! Who cares what a cohort of random women think about men's bodies. Any woman who thinks its OK to mutilate children's genitals is not worth talking to, and would never be a potential partner for any civilised person.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 10:24 PM
14

The surgical mutilation of infants does nothing to improve their sex life. The trauma and abuse they suffer, at the time of the mutilation, and during the remainder of their childhood at the hands of abusive parents, scare them for life. No mention at all of early onset erectile disfunction in circumcised men? Or is that a welcome result for feminists.
/r/MensRights26/02/25 10:19 PM
1

The lead instructor is training these young boys to accept the male gender role of deference to women. This gynocentric training is explained away as training boys to be gentlemen, be kind, be thoughtful of others, etc. But make no mistake. This is just the beginning of a brutal education, training these boys to be disposable, provider/protector males, in a social order that depends on their submission and sacrifice. Unfortunately, the church shares this common bias with feminism and state educa…
/r/MensRights24/02/25 09:03 PM
1

Keep your woke insults and virtue signallinng to yourself. You are a failed ideology of division, disinformation and historical revisionism without hope or humanity. A callous embodiment of extreme Marxism obsessed with victimhood.
/r/MensRights24/02/25 08:41 PM
1

Name one that hasn't
/r/MensRights24/02/25 08:44 AM
3

The problem isn't that capitalism is good. The problem is that the alternatives are even worse. Marxist ideologically driven political environs inevitably require that men labor under the yoke of strict male gender roles, brutally enforced. This is the only way men can be forced to contionue the building, maintenance and evolution of the infrustructure that supports and protects our social fabric. Socialism, communism and capitalism all require the servitude of men. Its just that capitalism leav…
/r/MensRights23/02/25 08:30 PM
1

Of all the hundreds or thousands of kisses, hugs and touching, experienced that day, this one, and only this one was sexual assault. The difference was the hatred many feminists harbored for this passionate successful man. They had to drag him down. Their pathological hatred demanded it. If the player already had her hands on his hips, why wasn't that common assault? Because she was female!
/r/MensRights22/02/25 11:40 PM
2

Awesome work by a dedicated and brave human rights activists. We all own you a debt of gratitude for the impact of your work on the wall of indifference we work and live beneath every day. Thank you. The willingness of our service providers and policy makers to enact services and policies that directly target people on the basis of their sex, rather than need, is just the tip of the iceberg. The gynocentricity of social empathy is so culturally entrenched, to the point that men are denied servic…
/r/MensRights20/02/25 11:23 PM
3

I note that for the only female sex offender to be identified as a Sexually Violent Predator, she had to have female victims. While evidence of women's sexual violence at this level of sustained brutality could not be ignored or brushed off as consensual, I have to wonder how many female sex offenders with the same level of brutality are not apprehended or dealt with similarly, simply because their victims were men or boys.
/r/MensRights20/02/25 11:04 PM
2

I believe you are right
/r/MensRights20/02/25 06:18 AM
64

Ms Lam, an Australian school teacher in the 1970s at the time of the alleged offenses. She previously pleaded not guilty to 15 counts of indecent assault upon a male, however, before a trial took place the Court of Criminal Appeal (CCA) ruled that the historical charge never applied to women — and quashed the indictment. According to a CCA ruling in a separate case involving the same charge and the same legal issue, there are no alternative offences available under the legislation of that time. …
/r/MensRights18/02/25 08:35 PM
1

Its an immature attention seeking behaviour that displays an embarrassing lack of knowledge about reproductive physiology, and seeks to equate masterbation with the killing of full term babies. The proposed bill makes it clear, that these women are so privileged, they believe any argument, no matter how stupid, supports their position of etitlement.
/r/MensRights16/02/25 09:00 PM
1

Be careful not to confuse women's rights with feminists. Women's rights is a good cause, inseverably linked to the human rights of men, children and all people. Its worth fighting for. Feminism is a hate movement that targets men as the cause of all societal problems. It is the excuse many men and women use to validate their aggression and hatred, and dehumanise the target of the hatred thru pseudoscientific ideological dogma. Most of the women you appear to have encountered, are identifying as …
/r/MensRights16/02/25 08:48 PM
3

Possibly because the 4B movement was most popular amongst lesbian seperatists, and the impact of their sex strike was really just not noticed?
/r/MensRights16/02/25 07:50 PM
1

Every child has the right to know their biological parents, regardless of the needs of women to have the lies and deception hiden, to avoid embarassment and discovery. It says a lot about our community, when the embarassment of a woman is more important than the rights of a child.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 11:59 PM
24

Statistics on attempted suicide by women is tainted by the redefinition of 'suicide' by feminist acdemics to include any self-harm, whether intended to end life or not. So the suicides attempts by women include self harm by non lethal methods, self-inflicted scratches, or even just stating that they want to die. Similar behaviours by men are generally not included in the statistics, as self-harm in men is characterised as 'violence'. The treatment and management of suicide by our health services…
/r/MensRights11/02/25 11:55 PM
1

There is a relationship recession, but this author is speaking from the perspective of a woman who has had her relationship (married), had her children, is most likely menopausal or post-menopausal, and sees relationships as an option amongst other more interesting options. Women who are anti-family or post-family, giving advice to young men and women, is a spent penny reminiscing the silk purse.
/r/MensRights11/02/25 02:25 AM
10

There is no statue of limitations on child sexual assault. This crime could be prosecuted right now, except the police and the community see nothing wrong with the sexual assault of men and boys by women and girls.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 08:18 PM
1

Yeah oops. Should read before i flap my lips. Apologies.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 09:00 AM
5

What you are suggesting is that boys are biologically deteriorating over time, and as a result, producing deteriorating educational outcomes over time. That suggestion is implausible. Nothing else left to say.
/r/MensRights04/02/25 01:20 AM
1

So suddenly this is impacting boys in education? And suddenly, this biological cause is accelerating so boys are maturing larter and later to explain their plummetting education outcomes? Your sexist garbage is as implausible as it is sexist. It feminist eugenics, at a level last displayed in Nazi Germany.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 11:45 PM
25

The impact of women's in-group bias on judicial decision making, and the contempt for the value of men's lives, is destroying the privilege of law in our society. Once that privilege is broken, our communities will degenerate into disorder, chaos and violence. No police force is big enough to contain that disaster. The softly-softly approach that female judges are reserving for female defendents must be addressed. The only outcome of these sexist pigs letting women off, even for murder, is the b…
/r/MensRights03/02/25 11:35 PM
2

Over the last 4 decades, we have witnessed a systematic attack on men's spaces in Western communities. Men's spaces have been vilified as patriarchial bastions of misogyny and sexualised objectification of women's bodies. Men's spaces have been destroyed in the most part. One side effect of this is that men no longer have spaces in which they are able to enjoy the company of men, and share their experience of masculinity, without critical feminist condemnation and gendered violence. Even in adul…
/r/MensRights03/02/25 02:10 AM
5

The UK Home Sec acknowledging she is a sexist pig, by only considering female victims of domestic violence. These sexist pigs who only see victims who are the same sex as themselves, are the problem, not the solution.
/r/MensRights03/02/25 01:27 AM
1

Men entering these fields, the swamps of pseudo-science, only validate the gender hatred and prejudice of their gynocentrism. Don't.
/r/MensRights01/02/25 12:15 PM
1

Every extreme leftist regimen needs a scapegoat, and for the feminist left, its men and boys. People advocating for the human rights of men and boys are described as terrorists by these fascists.
/r/MensRights31/01/25 01:32 PM
2

This latest murder of three girls was commited by a young man radicalised by islamic fundamentalism. Starmer ignores the ideology/religion that radicalised the boy, and justifies the murder of young women/girls, and instead, focused only on his sex, age and contact with online forums that are critical of feminism. Starmer's aim is to identify all boys who are disengaged with the feminist social establishment, as potential terrorists. Now boys who question feminism can be labelled as dangerous th…
/r/MensRights28/01/25 08:06 PM
4

UK declares war against boys. Again.
/r/MensRights28/01/25 10:20 AM
1

So they are erasing the evidence of their sexist bias. This is not a positive. Its feminists digging trenches.
/r/MensRights24/01/25 01:12 AM
1

Why are you talkinng about weapons?
/r/MensRights22/01/25 08:11 PM
2

Womennnnnnnnns justice Board commences two teired justice system where only men are imprisoned and only women are treated with compassion and human dignity.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 08:09 PM
5

And every one of those children has a father. These sexist pigs are pretending that only women care for children, while men are like animals, providing sperm then pissing off like lizards.
/r/MensRights22/01/25 08:08 PM
3

Articles on the impact of sex hormones on in utero sexual development of males and females is interesting, but not informative in understanding life-time changes in the sexual health of men and boys. While there is renewed interest in revising health care related to menopause in women, with growing numbers of women opting for hormone replacement therapies (subsidised by government), there is little to no interest in the attenuation in testosterone in men with age, and testosterone replacement th…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 04:26 AM
6

Looks like the gloves are off in the UK, and men are on the menu. Any interaction men have with the UK justice system, is likely to be infused with prejudice and and gender hatred, as the justice system becomes more radicalised by feminist ideology. The best bet for men is to have no interactions with the legal system, offer no assistence or information, and treat all legal representatives as hostile and nefarious. What we need is a guide to the minimum information required to be provided to pol…
/r/MensRights22/01/25 03:02 AM
28

Because only women have children who depend on them! You know, 'Women and their children'. These sexist pigs would most likely be happy if more men were imprisoned. Maybe all men should be imprisoned at puberty, and only releaased into the community when proven safe?
/r/MensRights22/01/25 02:56 AM
2

OP
/r/MensRights20/01/25 11:11 PM
1

Every one should listen to this vid. The hijacking of feminism by corporate greed, what a story. Almost as good as the hijacking of women's liberation by femeinist extremists.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 08:33 PM
27

Not quite. That's the narrative of sexual health academics who have focused on the sexual physiology of women over their life time, and only consider the sexual pysiology of men and in terms of maturing or creating sperm for women. The sexual development and experience of men over their life time is more complex than that, but has been almost entirely neglected in general medical practice. Testosterone levels in men change over their lifetime, and begin to decline from about 40 - 50 years of age…
/r/MensRights20/01/25 08:31 PM
5

Virtue signalling is the art of the beta male. When boys grow up being constantly battered and demeaned, experiencing psychological and emotional violence in every eviroment they inhabit, they learn how to blend in with the background, earn enough approval to be functional. We shouldn't abuse these men. We should help them remember the face of their father.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 02:47 AM
66

If I were you, I'd start to reformat your resume as for a gender fluid person. Go non-binary, and attack anyone who questions your sexuality. You should have a job in a few weeks.
/r/MensRights20/01/25 02:41 AM
9

Constantly. They have no concept of misnandry, and believe their prejudice is just factual.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 01:51 PM
51

Your wife choosing the donor is the end of your marriage.
/r/MensRights19/01/25 01:49 PM
2

A study conducted by 3 feminist scolars using intersectional qualitative and quantitative methods. They collected data from the US National Violent Death Reporting System (2014-2018) for suicides in young people aged 7-24 years. The generalisation of this data is not appropriate, given the narrow age band. The study included 78.4% males. Results of the study then showed that 713 (80.8%) male suicide events were related to IPV, while 11,388 (78.3%, about the same proportion) were not relaated to …
/r/MensRights16/01/25 06:04 AM
37

All the young men reading this. Now you know where you stand. That girl friend standing next to you will be rescued, saved, awarded or fought for, while you are sacrificed. Do you think she will fight for you? Or even wait for you? If you know where you stand, know when to turn your back on these pigs.
/r/MensRights16/01/25 04:30 AM
3

I started collating and comparing NAPLAN data for boys and girls, but have not had time to complete. Preliminary view suggested boys and girls start school with very similar language apptitude, but increasing over time lagged further behind. It seemed the more exposure boys had to our female dominated education system, the less well they performed, even in objective tests?
/r/MensRights16/01/25 01:47 AM
1

In 2012 Cambodia passed a law specifically designed to address acid violence, regulating the production and distribution of concentrated acid. Until the enactment of the 2012 Acid Law, Cambodian law enforcement and medical personnel did not record incidents of acid violence. Since the passage of the 2012 law, Cambodia has seen a reduction in attacks, though underreporting of incidents and lack of authoritative statistics make it impossible to know the full scope of the problem. Since the passage…
/r/MensRights13/01/25 02:25 AM
12

The Indian Supreme Court has finally addressed the issue of male victims of acid attacks being ignored, and denied assistance and support. But that hasn't stopped the feminist sexist pigs from doubling down on their efforts to exclude male victims from all support and financial assistance in Indonesia and India. https://www.indiatoday.in/mail-today/story/supreme-court-to-look-into-male-acid-attack-victims-woes-1166957-2018-02-10 Similar issues for male victims are evident in Indonesia, but conti…
/r/MensRights13/01/25 01:53 AM
8

There is no limit to number of fembot scolars and journalists femsplaining masculinity to men, as if masculinity is defined by women's needs and its framing in feminist ideology. It really says a lot about feminists that they would appropriate the gender identity of others, without any consultation or authority, in order to denegrate and control others. That the moral and ethical swamp of feminism.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 11:04 PM
3

By only offering help to female victims of slavery, then counting the numbers of people experiencing slavery based on the numbers receiving help, these sexist pigs have manufactured these statistics to reflect their sexist bias.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 10:58 PM
46

Sexist pigs in the civil service and Britsh academia have successfully redefined male victims of domestic violence as 'violence against women', effective making women's violence against men invisible. How much longer are these sexist pigs going to be allowed to propagate such obvious lies to misappropriate government funds for their own enrichment?
/r/MensRights12/01/25 10:55 PM
7

The right to a fair trial just died in Canada. Now people accused of rape in Canada may not be allowed to present evidence that proves their innocence, because it could embarass the alleged victim. This isn't justice. Its the yoke of an oppressive, sexist regime, hell bent on putting innocent people in prison for heinous crimes they did not commit.
/r/MensRights12/01/25 10:51 PM
62

Just another sexist pig who thinks everything male is dangerous and problematic. Well, reality check..... its OK to be male, and its OK to be conservative. That's how a tolerant democracy works. Feminism's marxist roots really start to show when the totalitarian ideals of feminist leaders start to emerge, and they comment on the rights of people to participate in social and political discourse, judged by their sex, gender identity, and political beliefs. Is it any surprise that a feminist believ…
/r/MensRights09/01/25 01:37 AM
1

False flag. The conversation is most likely a fiction created to prove a point of view held by the creator. Its implausible that anyone accused of being so deceptive, would openly admit rape so naively.
/r/MensRights06/01/25 12:03 AM
9

Totally agree. Manhood (masculinity) is not in crisis. Its under attack from people who want to redefine manhood to serve their own agendas, subjugate men as a passive workforce to power their agendas, and enlist men to police other men who do not adhere to their agendas. This is feminists trying to brutally enforce strict male gender roles on men and boys. I reject that. Masculinity is not a thing that should be defined, redefined, enforced and manipulated to serve others. It is personal, broad…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 11:58 PM
8

Some men (not all, but I believe most) supported women's liberation and the equal rights of women. It was only with the support of these men that change came about. After all, if women were so disenfranchised, the only way to effect change was with the active involvement of those enfranchised men. So some (most) men have always been listening to women. Those men (and women) who have resisted change for all women, have been those at the top of the power/wealth pyramid, who have resisted change fo…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 11:50 PM
35

A few problems with the article, and the trajectory of this discussion in feminised media. Young men are not turning against feminism, but are realising that feminism is hostile and maliciously targeting young men. Its not not young men turning against feminism, but young men realising the truth, and escaping from the feminist prisons their mothers and teachers taught them to obey and fear. Young men are not turning against feminism, they are turning towards influencers and opinion leaders who a…
/r/MensRights05/01/25 08:35 PM
75

The idea that men MUST sacrific their lives for the benefit of others and our community, is antiquated and sexist The opinions of others about what men SHOULD do is nothing more than sexist pigs demanding men adhere to strict a strict male gender role, or be judged for how well they adhere to a strict male gender role, that is centred on the benefit of others, and the disposability of men. Do what you please guys. Its up to you. Don't let people shame you into believing that you must live up to …
/r/MensRights05/01/25 08:19 PM
3

Not sure how many countries list this behaviour as a criminal offense. And here is another woman admitting to criminal domestic violence, and getting wide support.
/r/MensRights04/01/25 12:14 AM
5

A very clear indicator of the gender bias in the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. When a government science based bureau, with the job of collecting, collating and reporting on epidemiological data used to inform the future focus and funding of government services, shows such blatant misandry, its clear there will be few services for men and boys, and no consideration of the human rights of men and boys in government. So often, women academic carry such a huge bias in faviour of other women, men a…
/r/MensRights02/01/25 10:06 PM
21

The 'boys will be boys' meme has become the anthem of the man hating feminist extremists. It translates as follows: boys acting like boys is toxic, because all boys a bad. It ignores the fact that boys acting like boys can actually be good, even exemplary, compassionate, empathetic. It focuses on entirely negative framing of boys behaviour, so negative, that just being a boy is something so pathologically deviant, it needs apology, re-education and medication.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 09:42 PM
1

Laws on parental responsibility and child support are specific to jurisdiction, so laws in the US may be different to laws in the UK, Canada, Australia, Europe, Asia. Even in the US, laws differ between states. But be certain, laws about parental responsibility and laws about child support are different laws. A man may be denied as a parent, but still required to pay child support. The two laws, Family Law and Child support laws, are seperate, do not have to be logically related, and as usual, a…
/r/MensRights02/01/25 09:33 PM
3

A 'business as usual', passive approach is how we find ourselves in this situation. We either stand up for our rights, or acquiesce to an ideological academia that is hostile to our gender.
/r/MensRights02/01/25 02:10 AM
2

Women's rights is not feminism. Feminism is a radical hate movement that hijacked women's rights.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 02:11 AM
5

What kind of sociopath rapes an 11 year old, and then blames the child. Clearly she has no remorse or insight into her offending, and she poses a high risk of reoffending. How much longer are our schools and colleges going to remain buffets for female pedophiles, living behind the shadow of sexist perceptions of sex offender profiling.
/r/MensRights21/12/24 10:09 PM
10

Free speech protected by the first amendment ends at inciting of violence, coersive control, threatening. This woman's speech was in the context of a domestic relationship, was intended to control and cause harm, and was coersive. It's not free speech. It's domestic violence, an aggravated criminal offense, causing death.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 10:17 PM
10

She felt entitled at the time, to punish his disobedience with lethal force. And the law makers didn't disagree too strongly with her entitlement. They only challenged the magnitude of her entitlement.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 10:11 PM
3

The moral compass of feminism is so wrecked. Treating men like subhuman animals is only one small step away from committing holocaust. Once the dehumanisation is normalised, the killings justified, the rights group demonized, the ghettos appear.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 10:07 PM
7

There are media guidelines in every Western country that require violence against women to be reported by female journalists with training certification in 'violence against women'. This training has become so normalised, that it has now taken over all reporting of violence where women are involved, either as victims, or perpetrators. So women perpetrators ar presented as victims of men's violence against women.
/r/MensRights17/12/24 08:09 PM
3

Feminist explains how important it is to understand and recruit men and boys, but how it must be done without supporting, empowering or acknowledging any of their issues. One of clearest examples of how feminism requires the exploitation of men and boys, and the enforcing of strict traditional male role models.
/r/MensRights16/12/24 07:25 PM
2

The new law makers of the UK are not in the parliament. They are the troops of policy and guidence makers who lurk in the administrative staff and academic advisors to the judiciary and government. These lurking judicial influencers, instruct the police, judiciary, and public service, on how to interpret and apply laws, policies and procedures. They have no faces, no accountability and frequently persue personal agendas that are out of step, or radical when compared to the general public. How ha…
/r/MensRights15/12/24 09:23 PM
2

"what can be done in terms of encouraging a boy to take school more seriously" That sounds like you have already made up your mind that its your brother's fault his isn't engaged with his education and isn't doing well at school. The facts, as many above relate, suggest there is nothing wrong with boys. Our schools have become so hostile to men and boys, that nearly all male teachers have opted out of education, and boys, who can't opt out, are disengaging. Its the same issue for male teachers a…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 11:08 PM
12

Awesome historical framework. This needs expansion and publication.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 10:56 PM
7

Reeves, and the cohort of social justice professionals he is associated with, are false flag MRAs. They are not hero's of our movement. They are the enemy. The framing of masculinity espoused by Reeves, Seidler, Galloway, is one of biological inferiority, pathological violence and failure. Their only resonating ideas are the acknowledgement of the disadvantage experienced by men and boys in modern society, and the failure of language that demeans men and boys (e.g. toxic masculinity) to engage m…
/r/MensRights11/12/24 10:53 PM
16

The same women who sceam for women only spaces, demanded the tearing down of men only spaces. I don't reward hypocrits.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 10:32 PM
2

The victim centred justice movement, that will ensure higher rates of a convictions in crimes designated as 'gendered'. These self-indulgent feminist initiatives will not cower men and boys. They will create an army of motivated men and women who reject the injustice of a government/judiciary that targets people for persecution and imprisonment by their immutable characteristics.
/r/MensRights11/12/24 10:28 PM
3

In most jurusdictions, parents are legally able to consent to surgical procedures for children. But this right to consent is not unlimited. Parental consent is only lawful, if the procedures are in the best interests of the child. Adult parents consenting to circumcision of their children, without a directly related and contemporaneous risk to the child's welbeing, could be prosecuted when the child reaches adulthood and lodges a complaint, for criminal assault. Medical and surgical staff involv…
/r/MensRights10/12/24 10:54 PM
66

Full of accusations and irrefutible evidence right up to point where she has to provide her deposition? Sounds like she isn't too sure about how well her story will stand up to legal examination. People who prefer trial by media, and run away from trial with due process, are usually liars.
/r/MensRights10/12/24 10:47 PM
6

The feminist mentality drives both the panic when boys out perform girls in maths (by a very small margin), and the terror teachers express when boys refuse to submit to female domination in schools. Its an amazing outcome for boys to achive this result, when school environments are so hostile to boys and masculinity, and educators and education policy are deliberately designed to support girls and suppress boys. Boys have demonstrated once again, that in every subject that has empirical estimat…
/r/MensRights10/12/24 01:11 AM
1

There has been ample research that has established the key risk factors for male suicide. These risk factors are prodominately external, such as relationship breakdown, family breakdown (particularly involving separation from children), relationship conflict, homeleswsness, financial hardship, drug/alcohol addiction etc. While mental health issues are a factor for some, they are not for most men considering or acting suicide. The risk factors for women who suicide are predominately related to me…
/r/MensRights05/12/24 04:01 AM
1

After how many years of being told they are rapists, misogynists, anti-social, emotional mutes, young men have learned that who or what they are has no impact on how they are regarded or treated by teachers in schools. Just being male set the tone of every casual remark, every rebuke, every admonishment. So it is a joke. Not a funny joke like this sociopath teacher implies. He is clearly so unengaged with the boys he associates with, so out of touch, he is entirely incapable of perceiving of the…
/r/MensRights05/12/24 03:27 AM
7

Not a surprise that these female teachers openly discuss how to suppress male students. Misandry in schools is normalised, encouraged and celebrated.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 10:23 PM
1

You know. Every woman knows what every man is thinking and feeling, and every man is an emotional cripple, incapable of expressing emotions. This is the key argument supporting the feminist myth that Shakespeare, Keats, Byron, Shelley, Scott, van Gogh, Picasso Warhol, infact all the great composers, poets, artists and authors were all women. This modern feminist myth is nothing more than the stereotyping of men by sexist pigs intent on demeaning, insulting and denigrating people based on the mal…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 10:13 PM
2

Violence and suicide are not traditional masculine norms.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 10:00 PM
7

Thanks Rory. I was going to evaluate this research article, but you did such a good job, it would be redundant to do it again. You are correct. The use of the termn "cis gendered" gives away the feminist under tow that infests this meanless woke soup, riddled with confirmation bias. When researchers use terms like "cis gendered" to describe men, they have already assumed it is reasonable to erase the sexual identity of men, and replace it with a feminist proxy, full of negative attributes, demea…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 09:58 PM
5

Democrats still thinking that their dumb lies will be believed if they just scream louder at people. Sad, delusional people.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:52 AM
1

True. After that they sack the man from his job, remove his children, and search for other victims of his gendered violence.
/r/MensRights29/11/24 05:40 AM
5

Gendered education may be the only way to protect boys from the sexist teachers who are putting them down, publically humiliating them, and sexually abusing them.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 09:16 PM
9

Because in Australia, if you are a male victim of domestic violence, you must have done something to deserve it.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 08:21 PM
19

The French are so controlled by feminist harpies, they treat men like animals. As a man you have no right to know whether a child is your own or not. That is decided by a woman, any woman who declares you a father. French men have no parental rights, no human rights, and no voice.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 08:16 PM
1

I'll have to look into that. Sweden sounds revolutionary.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 08:14 PM
5

Hard to imagine a more divisive, discriminatory and hate fuelled initiative. How is helping the most privileged women in our economy, while ignoring the most disadvantaged men and women in our economy, going to do anything other than sow more hatred of the elitist political class? Its the same old greedy jobs for the faithful, that comes with corruption and ethical failure.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 01:33 AM
1

That imaginary scenario may be living rent free in your head, but its not in this group. Unless you believe calling out misandry is a form of misogyny.
/r/MensRights28/11/24 01:25 AM
2

The progression of feminism from a radical social movement to a mainstream ideological base, has resulted in preserving all the radical gender hatred without any moderating concern for a more pragmatic framing of human rights. So for feminist dominated government services and policies, human rights have been reframed as women's rights, and the community has been refashioned as the community of women. Men have been recast as the invaders, the protagonists, the dangerous cringe. So long as feminis…
/r/MensRights28/11/24 01:15 AM
1

Intellect is a poor measure of intelligence.
/r/MensRights27/11/24 07:51 AM
1

"The first article you linked said nothing specific to women" The article specifically mentions women twice. The article relies on a collection of quotes from a study that investigated population growth focusing only on the motivations of women, as if men were invisible or irrelivant to reproductive outcomes. Your dishonesty is deliberate and obvious, and your gynocentrism is so entrenched, you can't even see it. "The second (link) happens to be a study of women to which you add your own bizzaro…
/r/MensRights25/11/24 11:14 PM
7

Correct. Life expectations and opportunities have changed for men and women. But our feminist dominated academia are only surveying the motivations, needs and opinions of women, not men. Because feminism is an ideology that only considers the benefits and agency of women, feminist academics assume that men will always be performing their strict gender role of provider and protector, spraying sperm around like dumb animals. Its taken for granted. IVF only accounts for a small proportion of total …
/r/MensRights25/11/24 03:13 AM
150

This article in the Conversation, refers to a study about population. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11113-019-09516-3 But the article and the study only investigates the motivations, needs, and opinions of women. The study notes once, that men are not included in the investigation, because they afre not considered to be participants in family planning. The article treats the opinions of women as absolute and simply doesn't acknowledge the absence of men. Apparently women alone decid…
/r/MensRights24/11/24 09:36 PM
44

It's deliberate, targeted and organized. Google has encouraged a work culture where discrimination against men is valued and entrenched. How sick is that.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 09:30 AM
1

Excellent interview by Bettina Arndt, exposing the bias in Australia's domestic violence laws, and courts generally. Essential watching.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 11:35 PM
1

This is a men's rights sub. The sub includes many women who believe in the human rights of men and women and children. Feminism is frequently criticised, because it actively promotes misandry and hate speech targeting men, and is based on an ideology that places the rights of women to have everything they want, before the basic human rights of men.
/r/MensRights20/11/24 10:55 PM
2

Many of the men on the sub, have women in their lives who are supportive, loving, and value the human rights of all people equally. But there are some women who support men's rights, until it comes down to competing rights. Then we have to ask, will they side with the wants and needs of women, or the human rights rights of men? Easy test. Ask if sexual harassment of men is as serious as sexual harassment of women (eg is it sexual harassment or sexual assault if a woman touches or kisses a man/bo…
/r/MensRights20/11/24 10:47 PM
2

So do you think they were trolling r/mensrights? Or di they decide that any mention of IMD was unacceptable? These sexist pigs must be so full of hate and resentment.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 11:24 PM
6

We need to understand what this ignorance of IMD means, what it tells us about Australia. It is deliberate, organised and vindictive. It is a barometer of the indifference of our media, schools, government and culture, to the issues that impact men and boys. Australia no only doesn't care about men and boys, Australia hates men and boys.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 08:17 PM
61

We need to understand what this means. It means our communities do not acknowledge the humanity of men and boys. It is not accidental. It is deliberate, organised and vindictive. Its the barometer of misandry.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 08:14 PM
8

Sounds bad in India. Like Australia, maybe worse. Stay positive.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 07:53 AM
7

Cheers. Here's to positive male role models, all of us.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 07:52 AM
6

Sorry to hear you were treated so poorly. I hope you have done well, despite everything the DCP threw at you.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 07:51 AM
56

Sadly, the anonymous person who wrote those words was ignorant or careless of the actual IMD theme (positive male role models). What makes me angry is that they are entirely unaware that the positive male role models theme, if celebrated and supported, would directly address the issue they believe validates their misandry. What makes me cry, is that its their hatred of men that inspires them to only express solutions that demean and demonise men and masculinity.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 04:31 AM
22

Interesting that this toffee nosed grammar graduate has decided that masculinity is a just a word that is completely made up, but also a spectrum of negative personal flaws on which we all must measure our failure as men, and then again, some broken idea of masculinity that "we" (sic) push into the world, and by doing so create more broken men? Honestly, the poor kid who wrote this sounds confused and a bit self flagellating. He stitches together a series of half formed ideas, only vaguely conne…
/r/MensRights19/11/24 04:14 AM
24

Whether we believe he has or has not done the things he is accused of doing, until his case is heard, he remains accused, not convicted. Vile or not. As for horse sh#t, 100% agree.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 03:56 AM
3

US police. Gun happy murderers. Men should never trust cops. They'll kill you.
/r/MensRights19/11/24 01:13 AM
7

I have no problem with addressing violence against women (although the focus only on violence against women seems to be a sexist extension of strict gender roles casting women as defenseless victims, never perpetrators, and men as either perpetrators or protectors, never victims). But the complete lack of any acknowledgement of genuine men's rights online presence and influence, is an unnecessary misandrist prejudice. There is no subtlety here. All online men's forums/podcasts are tarred with th…
/r/MensRights18/11/24 04:14 AM
46

According to the 2021 census, 67.1% of homeless people in Wales and England are men. Notwithstanding this, the vast majority of safe temporary housing and resources are used for the benefit of women. In addition, the sexist pigs writing these articles, and running homelessness services in the UK, are desperately trying to redefine homelessness to include women living in houses they don't really like, and add populations of impacted women using the old chestnut of "women more affected, we just ca…
/r/MensRights18/11/24 02:18 AM
26

The idea that Hollywood should be "constructing healthier visions of the future” is frightening, given the moral depravity that infests the Hollywood culture, and the anti-male ethos of modern media. Perhaps we should be looking away from the stagnant swamp of Hollywood sophistry and wokery, and looking more at the creative fire of YouTube and other contempary centres of modern literature.
/r/MensRights18/11/24 02:07 AM
46

It seems the only violence being addressed is violence by men against women. And the only respect being discussed, is boys respect for women. As you drill down into the resources for this campaign, the anti-masculinity becomes more apparent. Masculinity online is only portrayed as harmful, violent, misogynistic, and dangerous. Men's rights issues are never acknowledged or addressed.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 11:17 PM
1

We all need down time from the negatives in the world, or run the risk of burnout. And lets face it, burnout in men's rights is a dark angry hopeless place, right next door to radical feminism. And its not just OK to value and enjoy the best of our lives, the core experiences that give our lives meaning, value and joy. In fact, its imperative that we focus on those core experiences of love, family, belonging, pleasure and sharing. They are the reasons our lives are worth living. But we must neve…
/r/MensRights17/11/24 11:08 PM
1

When I read bullshit I call it out. And you're full of it. Problem is, stalkers like you, femtrolls, just keep on posting factless dribble, to bait endless and pointless comments. Post one piece of credible evidence that the mortality rate for women and girls is higher in red states compared to blue. You can't. Because you made it up. So you attack the person. Boring. Go back to your "The View" bubble.
/r/MensRights17/11/24 12:12 AM
4

As a barrister, this woman used her privilege as an officer of the court, to pervert the course of justice for her own ends. Solicitors and barristers are expected to conduct themselves with extreme moral fortitude, because of the position of trust they occuy in our legal system. If a barrister says "this is true", their statement carries more weight than if you or I stated the opposite. Because of that position of trust and privilege, they are held to a higher standard, and any crime or transgr…
/r/MensRights11/11/24 08:10 PM
2

Many white women didn't swallow the pink pill Kamala was pushing. Most likely because white women are not all career minded, abortion obscessed, radical feminists. White women are not a homogenous group who all think the same. The political class have framed social groups as homogenous for so long, they really do believe their own fictions. What counts is that the vision of America proposed by Kamala was rejected by the majority of Americans. That's democracy. Suggesting the majority were right …
/r/MensRights11/11/24 03:08 AM
0

"Children girls and women are dying in red states" You are so full of bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 02:53 AM
1

No rights have been removed. Its all about revenge, spit and emotional violence.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 02:52 AM
2

There is no known registry of "movements" Your whole rant is just toxic dribble.
/r/MensRights11/11/24 02:51 AM
1

Health professional over 40 years, researching cancer medicines. Neoplasia is a form of cancer. OMG
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:36 PM
1

Neoplasia is cancer. Depriving men of involvement in their own health, or misleading them in order to manipulate their health care decision is morally corrupt. Not to mention, uninformed consent to therapies is invalid. Practitioner caught doing this may be subject to professional deregistration or criminal prosecution. Even if you can dig up an example (both of the above are not), it doesn't make it OK.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:00 PM
1

Which cancers were renamed?
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:31 AM
5

Well said. The problem for democrats when it comes to men, is not just a matter of poor campaign choices. The proble, as you have described, is fundamental, ideological, and impossible to sequest from the core principles driving democrat politics and policies. Democrats are anti-male, gynocentric, and sexist.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:31 PM
26

The key argument from health professionals suggesting removal of the word cancer from Grade 1 Prostate Cancer diagnoses, is summed up as this: "With a different name, such as a premalignant lesion, patients (men) would be alerted that it’s not a completely normal or benign condition but they wouldn’t be scared by the word “cancer.” If you make that sort of nomenclature change, people (men) may be more open to the idea of accepting active surveillance,” he says." So removing the cancer is primari…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 11:26 PM
9

Male nurses are not always opting for these unsociable hours or the overtime. More frequently it's women requesting particular hours or reduced hours to fit their social/family preferences. The male nurses are stereotyped as providers, and forced to cover the unpopular hours.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:21 PM
9

Women's liberation movement (not feminism) achieve much of the work women enjoy today. Feminists were a violent fringe movement better known for bombings, assaults, white female privilege and white feathering. Feminist often claim the work done done by women's iberation as feminist, but just feminist rewriting history with propaganda.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 10:26 PM
5

You really do need help.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 11:36 AM
3

This is a gender stereotype, that demonstrates the paradoxical approach of our legal system to gendered laws. Women's Lib appropriately and heroically worked for the liberation of women from strict gender roles. To a large extent, and with the support of many men and women, this has been achieved. Women are now the majority of unioversity trained professionals, have careers, and can do most anything any man can do. However, feminism is not women's liberation. It is a more odious marxist ideology…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 02:54 AM
3

This is a must read for all men. Thanks for posting.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 02:39 AM
66

Another disingenuous "feminist" insisting that feminism (the movement) is not what it is, not what it says, not what it does, but can be clensed of its flaws and crimes by a dictionary definition. Feminism the movement, has not been advocating for equality for a few decades now. Equality has been replaced with equity, because equity endorses female privilege as a means of reparations, allowing women to remain preferenced in areas where they are no longer discriminated against or marginalised.. F…
/r/MensRights08/11/24 02:28 AM
6

Absolutely.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 10:15 PM
28

The "no real feminist" delusion doesn't pass the pub test. Feminism, as taught, applied and theorised in our unvoversities, colleges and schools, is an ideology of gender hatred, based on the core belief that all men are rapists who oppress women for men's benefit. There is no "good feminism." Feminism is no about equality, evinced by the replacement of "equality" with "equity", the the proliferation of anti-male memes in feminist dialogue. Any ideology that tolerates and idolises memes like "KI…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 08:57 PM
11

The basis of the Movember scam is this. Masculinity is naturally toxic. Men who exhibit traditional or heteronormative masculine traits are mentally ill. Providing re-education for men and boys in "healthy masculinity" is necessary health care, a treatment for their uncontrolled, unapproved, naturally toxic masculinity. The "healthy masculinity" treatment is best offered to men, by involving feminist women who understand "real" masculinity better than men. The biggest red flag here is that men, …
/r/MensRights07/11/24 08:51 PM
18

Is this redirection of donations from men's health to women's programs, a criminal misuse of funds? Should Movember's charity status be revoked, and its office holders prosecuted for fraud? Given any criminal actions that benefit women or cause harm to men are trivialised and not persued by Australian law enforcement agencies, Movember is unlikely to be investigated, but the impact of their wokeness on the Movember brand should be severe.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 08:42 PM
28

Certainly not a life partner sharing love, affection and a mutual future. Our bros in Japan have been under the pump for some time. It must be difficult for them.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 05:14 AM
36

The impact of feminist ideology on relationships, embodied in programs such as "respectful relationships" and "enthusiastic consent", has run its natural course. Everyone to too terrified to interact with girls, for fear of being persecuted. Our imperfect selves, are being compelled by force of law, to only engage in relationships that perfectly embody ideological principles. Given no one is perfect, and the core tenant of the ideological principles is "men are bad", the only alternative for boy…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 05:12 AM
20

Well said
/r/MensRights06/11/24 04:06 AM
215

When you donate to Movember this year, remember a substantial part of your donation will go to women's issues, not men. https://www.dss.gov.au/about-the-department/news/70266 https://au.movember.com/story/movember-partnering-with-department-of-social-services
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:37 AM
2

In Australia, the data show that girl do slightly better in single sex environments. It's difficult to find reliable data for boys. In addition, while the number of single sex schools for boys is decreasing, and enrolement also decreasing (supply driven, fewer schools), there are more single sex schools for girls, and enrolments (demand driven) are increasing. There is substantial pressure on boys single sex schools to conform with feminist driven agendas and demonstrate curriculums that confirm…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:26 AM
1

If you informed the AI algorithms with the data contained in the REDDIT comments and administration, the AI would express the same biases as the REDDIT data. However, the algorithms may alter the magnitidue of bias.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 12:00 AM
4

When my first marriage failed, and my ex stopped my contact with my kids, I sought out counselling to help with my grief. The first cousellor I attended thru the Family Court refused to acknowledge my grief, and made it clear they only counselled men for aggression control. There was no history or accusations of aggression in my marriage. When I approached Family Court counsellors about my ex's violence with my children, bringing police reports and affidavits from witnesses, I was told that if I…
/r/MensRights05/11/24 11:13 PM
19

When is rape not rape. When the rapist is a woman. The harm done by this pedophile is ignored. Her risk to the community is ignored. Her rapacious behaviour is condoned and trivialised by a judiciary instructed and controlled by radical feminist academics. Soon her victim will be an adult, and her grooming complete. The coercive control this pedophile exerts over her victim will become lawful, and celebrated by Pride.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 10:58 PM
4

As all of the comments so far acknowledge, people, and particularly men, are generally reluctant to speak out about obvious discrimination against men and boys. The source, reasoning and validity of this reluctance deserves more examination. Why are we so afraid of speaking out? What are we afraid of, and who are the movers/shakers who give action to our fears. If there are real issues, how are these be stigmatised as red flags of masculine privilege or mysogyny? Who is stigmatising? What is the…
/r/MensRights05/11/24 12:47 AM
3

No female academics? Are you for real. Have YOU read the article? In the original research paper the authors state that to address this question of whether Grade 1 prostate cancer should be called cancer, an international symposium convened stakeholders from various fields. Approximately 20% of these were woman who not oncologists or urologists. For Australia 50% of contributors were woman. The author of the article is a woman, and a feminist activist. Her interest in prostate cancer? Reducing t…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 11:31 PM
6

There are no facts in the article supporting anything you've said. Only opinions.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 10:40 PM
6

So it justified name calling? How old are you?
/r/MensRights04/11/24 10:35 PM
5

Two court cases showing women can use men's sperm without consent, or even in the commission of a felony, and still not be held responsible, while the man is treated as responsible to the child. S.F. was an Alabama man who passed out in a bed at a party. In the ensuing months, T.M. bragged to friends and acquaintances that she had engaged in sexual intercourse with S.F. while he was unconscious and, in her words, “saved her a trip to the sperm bank.” A child resulted from the incident. In 1994, …
/r/MensRights04/11/24 10:34 PM
6

I guess men appear that way to sexist pigs, but more to do with your prejudices.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 09:56 PM
1

Which one?
/r/MensRights04/11/24 09:55 PM
2

Thanks for the well presented and balanced explanation/opinion. My background in health research makes these kinds of articles difficult to tolerate, particularly in termsa of the differences in the approaches to women's health and men's in mainstream media, academia and government policy. The article, and many like it, completely ignore the QoL impacts of stage 1 prostate cancer that increase over time in elderly men being targeted for active surveilance, and focus on overall survival, progress…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 09:54 PM
9

Stage 1 cancer in women over 70 is still called cancer, and is treated. Given the similar prognosis (both will die with cancer, not of cancer) explain the difference? Then explain it to the elderly men with poor bladder emptying, why asymtomatic cancer in elderly women is considered more worthy of treatment.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 11:19 AM
12

Yeah. For feminists, prostate cancer isn't a problem. It just isn't killing men fast enough.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 08:52 AM
28

Thanks for the name calling. It really sets the bar for your comment. What is the impact of grade 1 prostate cancer on quality of life. Would prefer EQ5D-5L scores as evidence rather than baby insults. If you have those, then maybe you can explain the difference in approach between cancers affecting men versus women, and why women are offered options rather than redefinitions? Systematic reviews of studies in the long-term HRQoL in men on active surveillance show differences in specific function…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 08:50 AM
1

You do realise that Movember Australia has given $millions of donations to women's programs? And is supporting the ideology of "toxic masculinity" and the necessity of teaching men and boys about "healthy masculinity"? Movember is not a men's health org. Its a front for feminist misandry.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 12:57 AM
41

Note the focus on older men in terms of mortality, with no consideration of quality of life, agency, human rights.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 12:46 AM
25

The only cancer mentioned in prostate cancer. The only people mentioned are men. While it is implied that this approach may be applied to other cancers, it is not. When looked at in terms of the approach to cancers experienced by women, women are provided information, involvement, options and empowerment. Men are offered a reclassification of their cancer to avoid information, involvement, options and empowerment. While the article doesn't provide a clear statement like "we are targeting men", i…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 12:44 AM
6

The organisation I work for have an equity and diversity department that aims to address the inequity experienced by women in employment and workplace experience. Now our workforce is 70% women, our management is 52% women, our equity and diversity department is celebrating their achievement, and aiming to make further gains for women. Mean while, my experiences as a man in the place are ignored. No one cares that men are being actively excluded from employment, management and promotions, on the…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 12:38 AM
24

So true demo man. Radical feminists dominate academia, education and media, to the point that any non-feminist talking points are demonised and silenced. People who pretend that radical feminism is not a mainstream bias in current affairs, are just turning a blind eye to the misandry and misery men and boys are living with on a daily basis.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 12:28 AM
282

Low risk prostate cancer should be reclassified as "not cancer", because men are incapable of coping or being involved in their own care. Female oncology specialists and prostate cancer groups (strangely all CEOed by women) are all for infantising men. Apparently, calling prostate cancer, "cancer", and giving men control of their health options, is considered a poor outcome. OMG.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 11:56 PM
6

Consent is not valid if it is based on misinformation. When doctors tell a man that a vasectomy can be easily and reliably reversed, they are providing misinformation. So the consent is not informed consent, and is invalid.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 11:31 PM
8

Because the same people say FGM is a horrendous crime against humanity, but MGM is a mother's right.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 11:24 PM
5

And what guarantee do you have that your stored sperm will not be accessed by some woman to produce a child? Courts have given ex-wives and girlfriends access to men's sperm, regardless of the man not consenting to that sperm being used!
/r/MensRights03/11/24 11:23 PM
10

What a lot of men may not realise, is that who they vote for in this election has a real impact on the furture of men's rights and men's health. Given Harris overwhelmingly supports women and girls in all issues (excluding trans rights), but has no future programs for men and boys, and no acknowledgement of the issues faced by men and boys, a vote for Harris supports the view that men's rights and men's health are issues that are not important. If Harris gets elected while dismissing the issues …
/r/MensRights03/11/24 11:17 PM
9

Movember is no longer a charity for men and boys. It has given funds donated for men's health, to women's programs. That's abput as dishonest as it gets. I will no longer support or donate to Movemberr, and I hope it collapses.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 11:45 PM
7

Coverture was primarily a method used to provide a debtor with access to funds. Women who married, who incurred debt, incurred it in their husband's name, whether married or divorced, with or without the husband's consent or knowledge, and husband remained legally responsible for the debt. It wasn't a means of control. It was a means of making men responsible for women's acts.
/r/MensRights31/10/24 11:40 PM
7

Again, fertility and family experts are focused on the experiences of women. There is little or no consideration of men's experience of parenting, or why they are avoiding parenting, other than the opinions of women about men. So long as men are excluded from these discussions, the birth rate will continue to fall. If men ever have access to oral birth control, the rate would plummet.
/r/MensRights30/10/24 11:16 PM
37

Men always have had plutonic love for other men. Don't get sucked into this feminised view, that men's love of other men must be expressed in feminised ways. Men's love for other men is what happens in sports, men's activities, men's places. These environments that have been attacked and desrtroyed by feminist harpies over the last several decades. Our love for other men (plutonic) has been attacked by jealous women throughout history. This is why so many women isolate their male partners (their…
/r/MensRights28/10/24 11:31 PM
10

Because it provides a win for feminism, it empowers feminism. Because so many women believe in their own reproductive rights, and completely ignore the possibility that men may also have reproductive rights, its a recruiter issue for feminism.
/r/MensRights28/10/24 11:27 PM
1

Absolute garbage. Your false messaging about relative statistics are commonly used by feminist trolls to hide absolute numbers. Large numbers of boys are being raped and sexually assaulted by women in positions of authority. FACT. Relative proportions in no way minimise this FACT. Apologists like you are the feminist scum who try to normalise and trivialise women's sexual violence.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 09:21 PM
1

3 year in prison, followed by a book contract with a feminist publisher, a talking tour with university feminist academics, and an Order of Australia medal for the empowerment of women.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 09:16 PM
16

Same as women. The "godess" image of women slaving in the home, is a myth. Most women only do the minimum, and spend more time shopping/socialising than cooking/cleaning.
/r/MensRights27/10/24 09:09 PM
3

Several studies have identified that a small number of women repeatedly self harm before presenting at emergency departments, up to 50+ time a year. Each presentation is counted as a suicide attempt.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 06:10 AM
2

The definition of suicide attempt includes self harm with no intention to end life. The combining of suicide with self harm is a fraud, conducted by feminist academics, to shift focus from the men's suicide crisis, back to attention seeking women.
/r/MensRights26/10/24 06:07 AM
1

You are so full of feminist crap. The usual "cite the source" approach from a troll too lazy to do a quick google search? Really? That's a primary school level argument? How old are you? In 2023 in the US the biggest population of homeless people was white (324,854), followed by black (243,624), hispanic (179,336), indigenous (23,116) and asian (11,574). Of the homeless population, 61% are male. Men form the largest proportion of homelessness in every racial group. This pattern is consistent acr…
/r/MensRights25/10/24 12:06 AM
26

Women's ingroup bias has been verified in multiple studies. Teachers see female students as sisters in the struggle to overthrow the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 10:18 PM
2

Healthy masculinity is just the soft centre of the toxic masculinity ideology. Fake men's health initiatives, including Movember, promote healthy masculinity as the only valid expression masculinity. The tell is, "healthy masculinity" is measured by men's attitudes to women! Sound like a repackaged feminist patriarchy arguement? Much? So now men and boys can only achieve healthy masculinity after having therapy to expunge their toxic masculine identity. We will be getting masculinity as a prescr…
/r/MensRights23/10/24 10:03 PM
1

Straight white males are no on the list of vulnerable groups. Every other social group is, including women. Every service, every assistance program now uses the list of vulnerable groups to target funding. Your facts are fictional misandry. You really need to get out of the feminist bubble.
/r/MensRights23/10/24 09:59 PM
7

Its about control. Many women in relationships isolate their male partner from their friends and family, emotionally blackmaling their partner into a dependent relationship centred on the woman's friends family and vision of the family unit. Its the form factor for women's violence in relationships.
/r/MensRights22/10/24 09:51 PM
25

Femtrolls like you forget, that even within these subgroups, white males are selected as the least likely group to be targeted for assistance. Progressive, feminist influenced policy makers prioritise assistance for groups identified as most vulnerable. The list of most vulnerable groups is the same list from the Democrat web page cited by OP, which excludes straight white males as a discrete group. While women, LGBTQI, african americans, indigenous americans, etc, are included as vulnerable gro…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 10:13 PM
63

Any man who votes democrat, is voting to their own marginalisation. Racism, in kind with sexism, combines the two worst forms of discrimination. For a political party to openly exclude one demographic, to make one demographic invisible, is shocking. Notably, more women vote democrat than republican, demonstrating that most women are comfortable with sexism and racism when its men being victimised.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 09:53 PM
5

But he didn't include women who will not vote for Harris because she is a woman. The attack is gendered.
/r/MensRights11/10/24 08:25 AM
17

OK. So that's OK then?
/r/MensRights10/10/24 09:39 PM
23

Inciting violence is a crime. Inciting violence against men us is just an embarassment. If they were serious, he would be fired.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 09:38 PM
18

The reactions of male feminists are often driven by the need to prove the merit of their ally status, by being even more radical than the most radical female feminists. Partly driven by their identity crisis, blaming men (other men) is a slimy way of stating "not me" its other men who are the sexist pigs. But throwing brothers under the bus does not earn respect of feminists, just their contempt.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 06:15 AM
2

As we move forward with positive action for men and boys, we will all encounter those who also seek to help, but carry with them the language of bias and prejudice, and the myths that have become fact due to unchallenged bias and prejudice. These helpers, and their unhelpful or even harmful bagage, must be challengened of our movement forward will fall into spirals of failure.
/r/MensRights02/10/24 10:56 PM
15

Check the links. This is really happening.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 01:45 AM
14

That's the important issue. These elites, mostly but not exclusively women, are dictating what will be taught to boys in schools as 'healthy masculinity'. Similarly, this framing of 'healthy masculinity' will drive mental health and other health service provision, and government policy, by setting the standard of behaviour expected of men and boys. If we let these elites do this, our public expressions of our masculinity will be limited within the boundaries of our attitudes to women, and the pr…
/r/MensRights27/09/24 01:42 AM
39

Sadly, one of the people driving this initiative, is a guy, Dr Zac Seidler, an Australian psychologist, doing reseach on male suicide funded by our donations to Movember. He and Terry organised the transfer of $3.2 million dollars of Movember donations to a feminist women's group. https://au.movember.com/story/movember-partnering-with-department-of-social-services
/r/MensRights27/09/24 12:19 AM
37

That appears to be how it started. Now its looking like a front for another feminist power grab, using money donated for men's health (not even men's rights) for the benefit of women and girls. How tthe f#k can they imagine that defining masculinity primarily by attitudes to women, is useful to men and boys? My donations to Movember have ended to good. I'm sick to death of everything aimed to help men and boys being hijacked by feminist pigs.
/r/MensRights27/09/24 12:13 AM
105

Michelle Terry, CEO of Movember: Movember and HeForShe will collaborate to advance research on the intersections of men's health and gender equality, focusing particularly on promoting HEALTHY MASCULINITIES. This partnership will involve sharing research findings with HeForShe partners and developing guidelines for effective communication around healthy masculinities. This partnership will equip organizations with the tools to foster positive masculinity, benefiting the broader field of gender e…
/r/MensRights26/09/24 11:33 PM
1

Truyly pathetic authors with little more to say than "cis white men bad" "everyone else good". Their scholarly exercise is limited to everyone agreeing to hate the same subgroup in society, a game better played in school yards and kindergartens, but now the primary research methods for lazy feminist academics needing a publication to boost their earnings.
/r/MensRights23/09/24 12:45 AM
4

Pathologising uncontrolled masculinity. A feminist academic reciting ideological principles. His call to criminalise gendered behaviours, that's criminalising behaviours acted by men, but not women, is the give away. He is a weak person seeking approval from maternal figures to comfort his feels of being unloved.
/r/MensRights22/09/24 05:33 AM
10

Notwithstanding the truth of your framing of masculinity as an innate expression of an immutable personal experience, in traditional terminology, masculinnity is both nature and nurture, both an innate experience and a social construct. The problem with teaching "healthy masculinity" in our schools and universities, and enabling this social reconstruction of masculinity in our laws and services, is that it will not be masculinity. It will suppress and mask masulinity, with a set of acceptable ta…
/r/MensRights20/09/24 04:32 AM
7

The publication of hate speech directed at men and boys is not restricted by social convention, and is not policed by regulatory authorities or police. People like Clementine Ford are free to persue careers based on publication of hate speech, in the knowledge that most public servants employed to regulate hate speech, human rights and sex discrimination, share her views, prejudices and gendered hatred of men and boys.
/r/MensRights19/09/24 01:41 AM
6

Even if only 10% or less of education admin are woke activists, the other women working in education enable their sexist vendettas by their silence. Those who do not call out these sexist pigs are still reeping the benefits of their sexist crimes. Their silent disagreement is just as bad, if not worse!
/r/MensRights17/09/24 12:55 AM
5

I remember the number of young men who willing went to war to protect their communities, their families, and their way of life. Millions of them. Now its hard to find any young men who would do the same. They know their communities hate them, their families are being ripped from their lives and destroyed, and their way of life has become hostile to the male sex. The next time we call on our young men to sacrifice their lives for our benefit, we may be calling out to a dark empty room.
/r/MensRights17/09/24 12:48 AM
1

Just another feminist think-tank trying to look like a government authority. Its a #KILLALLMEN club.
/r/MensRights16/09/24 03:22 AM
1

True. Thanks for the correction. Even when the same mode of sucide is used, men will succeed while women will not. The difference is the intention.
/r/MensRights11/09/24 04:57 AM
5

The judge is putting the prosecutors request in context of the law. But there are 2 big issues here. The man will never be able to afford an attorney for District Court, and will fail in his attempt, achieving a bigger legal bill in addition to his current debts. The prosecutor knows this, the judge knows this, but they act like justice will be done. The mother in this case has no legal fees, all her fees being dumped on the man in this case. The prosecutor puts this solution to the man, knowing…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 11:53 PM
2

Please show me the Korean antifeminist web sites promoting the idea of killing all women, grinding up female babies, and making Korea a male only nation?
/r/MensRights08/09/24 11:45 PM
11

There is a problem with the data you are being informed with. More men are successful in with the attepts at suicide. And this is due to the means of suicide men use. But this is not because men are inherently more likely to use more violent methods. Most women who are recorded in our suicide databases and registries as 'attempted suicide', were not attempting to end their lives. The definition of attempted suicide was altered by academics to include most self-harm, however trivial, even if ther…
/r/MensRights08/09/24 11:40 PM
2

Because for these sexist pigs, only female hostages are human.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 09:32 PM
2

Cheers. Its a long journey friend, and we all learn along the way. I know I have. Talking here has helped me remove a lot angst from my thoughts. I hope the younger generation can hold it together long enough for the pendulum to recentre.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 06:09 AM
2

I have frequently experienced women saying they care about men and boys, in terms of human rights, family breakdown and health, but this caring quickly evaporates when it comes to actually doing anything, calling for change or changing their own expectations. The first chinks in the caring usually appear when there are competing rights, and then its always 'women's rights come first'. Equally vexing is the belief that whatever adversity, discrimination or hardship men experience, women are alway…
/r/MensRights06/09/24 12:51 AM
0

This is in the UK, under the Westminster legal system that has historically refuses to acknowledge the sexual criminality of women and girls, and still struggles with holding women accountable for their sexual violence. So all of these historically verified episodes will be related to men abusing boys, because no one kept records of women abusing boys, as they believed it could not happen. There will be even fewer records of women abusing girls, because that was beyond unthinkable.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 12:42 AM

Go back to your CNN bubble babe. Your insults are childish and say more about your state of mind. The US is not the whole world, and mosrt of us are bored shitless with your childish politics, corrupt courts and government, and narcissistic media.
/r/MensRights06/09/24 12:36 AM
3

What is your source? I think you should examine the transmission rates of HIV on the African continent, where heterosexual transmission is way above the rate you derive from the Canadian MSM websites. You might be confusing prevalence in the Canadian population with seroconversion. HIV is more easily tranmitted via body fluid/blood exposue, but can also be transmitted by sexual contact (heterosexual or homosexual), perinatal transmission from an infected mother to a foetus or newborn, and breast…
/r/MensRights06/09/24 12:33 AM
9

The use of language is important in how we understand ourselves and others, so the framing of this behaviour is very important. Continued use of the word 'mansplain' perpetuates the association of men with a negative term. While I applaud your ability to hear and use the term without feeling victimised, use of the term is harmful to boys and vulnerable men. For this reason, its important that when women talk down to men, and impose their views on issues they are not qualified to explain (i.e. yo…
/r/MensRights06/09/24 12:18 AM
2

The problem with the changes feminism brought to dating, is that none of them have been about improving the lives of women or men. Feminism is and always has been about power, hatred and gynocentrism. It is the 'women liberation movement' movement (heroic and revolutionary) that was hijacked by man hating gender seperatists, and is focused on destroying relationships between men and women. So many of the founding principles of feminism were written by man hating lesbians who defined all heterose…
/r/MensRights05/09/24 09:46 PM

You're selling that coolaid here? OMG.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 09:44 PM
4

More bluntly, they don't care about men. If they have any feeling towards men and boys, its toleration at best, outright hate and resentment more frequently.
/r/MensRights05/09/24 09:40 PM
8

Sorry. There is no crisis in masculinity. That's a feminnist beatup to drag men into a redefinition of masculinity and maleness. Its toxic hate speech, a natural extenstion of the misandry that is infesting our culture. The crisis is in how our culture is demonising men, boys and masculinity, discriminating against men and boys in education, health, employment, media and government policy. We are experiencing a crisis in feminist ideology, and ideology that is increasing exhibiting its fundament…
/r/MensRights04/09/24 11:43 PM
1

Gynocentrism, and casual/malevolent misandry in women's culture, is as old as human kind.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 11:15 PM
3

Wait to see how many men gain access to this 'open' program, and if they do, what kind of sexist abuse they have to endure. A sexist pig is always a sexist pig.
/r/MensRights04/09/24 11:13 PM
2

These women are afraid that their rapacious behaviour may now also be criminalised. Afraid that their sexualised predatory behaviour may be caught, examined in a court of law, and if proven, result in their conviction and imprisonment. An impartial examination of the facts, is not a bias, unless these women expect that they should be above the law. Do they expect that they can act badly, then accuse others of acting badly to disguisee their crimes? Let the courts decide, not the mobs or the medi…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 09:36 PM
7

This is just the tip of the iceburg. For years teachers have been claiming that the ovewhelming dominance of education by women had no negative impact on boys education. Now, again, we have evidence that there is a system bias against boys from female teachers. This is just in a single domain where the evidence could not be hiden, restructured or adjusted into insignificance, and suggests a wider, entrenched culture of misandry and abuse of boys by a teaching profession infested with feminist id…
/r/MensRights02/09/24 09:20 PM
3

The data on teacher perpetrators of sexual assault is increasingly difficult to find, with the only reliable study I've heard of, relying on a FOI application to force the release of data (I found a partial abstract, but couldn't get access to that publication). Most sexual offenses data available is general. Specific data derived from educational institutions or gevernment based research, relied on surveys with self reported unsubstantiated events described as sexual harassment/inappropriate be…
/r/MensRights27/08/24 01:41 AM
3

The deeper we dig, the worse movember looks.
/r/MensRights23/08/24 11:43 AM
5

For marxists, revolutions, including social revolutions, are the result of class struggles between dominant classes, on the one hand, and oppressed classes, on the other. Revolutions are not necessarily the bloody disasters of the French revolutuion or Maos cultural revolution, but are a radical redistribution of power between classes. In order to bring about these radical redistributions of power, marxist recognise that class consciouness is essential, so polarising populations into opposing cl…
/r/MensRights23/08/24 12:53 AM
3

It appears that the Dr Zac Seidler, the Global Director of Men’s Health Research at Movember, is also a panel member of the Australian government expert panel for working to end violence against women with rapid review into prevention approaches. As this is Dr Seidler inappropriately using money donated to help men, to advance his own professional standing and career prospects, using money intended for to benefit men to directly fund a project for women, how can movember continue to legally main…
/r/MensRights23/08/24 12:36 AM
7

Worth a look. Womens lib was really good. Focused on liberating women from strict gender roles, real choices. Not the eclastic prison of feminist autism
/r/MensRights22/08/24 01:29 PM
68

Back then it was 'womens liberation' Feninism just hijacked that movement, and its good will. Feminism has always been a deeply political marxist movement based on dividing our community by sex, use the vectors of oppression and hared.
/r/MensRights22/08/24 06:45 AM
6

Amazing that you have reached such a balanced and mature understanding of your childhood experience in a feminist household. Credit to you. Your mom/aunt clearly cares for you, even if her ideology was damaging. For me, your story highlights the extent of women's violence experienced by our boys, a violence that may have its origins in feminist ideology, but a violence that is physical, mental, emotional, but intensely personal as well as unrelenting and almost universally validated by our media…
/r/MensRights21/08/24 01:58 AM
16

You're being down voted to spreading feminist misinformation about child support. You're justifying a rapist being paid by her victim, a victim forced to pay his rapist, a child rapist who is allowed to raise a child? OMG...... the nasty sexist violence of that injustice, to place the care and development of a child into the hands of a child rapist, and force her victim to pay her money? That's not justice. Its the most sexist laws of alll time! By the way. The money is not paid to the child, an…
/r/MensRights20/08/24 11:32 PM
7

Ciold support in all countries where its mandated, has components for the mother's living expenses. For example, the housing component is for the housing of the mother and child, not just the child. So we call it child support, but the child only directly benefits from a small fraction of the payments, indirectly benefits from most of the payment, and the mother legally has the vast majority of benefit, and possession. Calling it child support is just another feminist misnomer to justify the tra…
/r/MensRights20/08/24 11:26 PM
0

Very true, but a bit late. Western societies are already in a state of collapse, and there's not much that can be done to save them. Our only hope is that the US doesn't blow up the world in response to the ascending Asian paternalist culture that still values ALL of its people.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 11:22 PM
1

Karen Smith is expressing the natural state of her feminism, that is her hatred of anything or anyone male, a hate so intense and so baseless, it renders her incapable of tolerating any men in the spaces she inhabits, unless she exerts coersive control over their speech and behaviour.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 11:18 PM
2

In terms of academic qualifications associated with Gender Studies, perhaps not so much for postgraduate research, gender studies is a misnomer. Gender studies is infact women's studies, with a base firmly entrenched in feminist narratives. You will no doubt find strong academic opposition to your studies if you step outside the feminist narrative. The body of knowledge you would be expected to use to support your propositions, resarch proposals and grant applications, will ALL be biased by the …
/r/MensRights18/08/24 11:30 PM
1

The increase in sexual assaults across Australia are elained by the much broader redefinition of sexual assault.
/r/MensRights15/08/24 08:50 PM
12

The New Zealand Health and Disability Commissioner (Dr Vanessa Caldwell) has only limited powers to address these kinds of complaints. However, the mild rebuke of the surgeon and medical staff who commited this crime, suggests Dr Vanessa Caldwell is a sexist pig who believes amputation of the male foreskin to be a trivial matter. Typical feminist pig. While it may not be worth while for this an to sue his surgeon (NZ has some very sexist laws), the removal of the man's foreskin without his conse…
/r/MensRights13/08/24 12:01 AM
1

Your experience with your son's reflects my own. They are not mute recepticals for this propaganda, and reject it disengage rebel, particularly when they speak to each other or see online criticism of feminist ideology. But you're right about women's health as well, to some degree. Menstration is covered with a massive amount of online and health system information. While the costs of women's mentration is not subsidised by most governments, neither are most healthy, non-pathological hygene issu…
/r/MensRights06/08/24 09:35 PM
18

Another woman tryinng to cash in on the casual misandry that is endemic in our communities. She thought everyone would believe her implausible story, and most did. Any health professional should know its impossible for a person to survive 40 days without water and food.
/r/MensRights06/08/24 09:20 PM
21

The focus only on men, all men, as dangerous animals who need to be altered to be safe, ignores the violence of women in our communities, and the true causes of domestic violence. The ideological hijacking of the domestic violence industry in Australia, is so complete, no one even questions the the sexist assumption that 'men' are the problem, and women commit no acts of violence. So the gravy train for feminist academics, blaming the patriarchy and toxic masculinity continues, and the industry …
/r/MensRights05/08/24 11:23 PM
2

Generalisations of this kind are aways the memes of sexist pigs. The division of personality traits by sex, race or sexual preference is a disgusting attack on human rights, and is indicative of an entrenched culture of elite entitlement.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 03:31 AM
1

In Australia, the proportion of male teachers in primary schools (Years 1-6), has fallen from 20.2% in 2006, to 18% in 2022. Similarly, in secondary schools (Years 7-12), the prportion of male teachers has fallen from 43.4% in 2006, to 38.6% in 2022. In addition, male teachers have on average earned 83.3% of the average professional salary in 2021, while female teachers have earned 93.5%of the average professional salary, a wage gap of 10.2%. Around 2020, the NSW Department of Education started …
/r/MensRights05/08/24 12:22 AM
1

As do we all.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 11:54 PM
3

Feminists fighting over the money, rip popular feminist myths to shreds. This shows how entrenched feminist ideologues are in academia and policy making in Australia. They no longer have to worry about fighting men or the patriarchy. The biggest threat to their ongoing cash-cow is other feminists.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 11:53 PM
0

You make a convincing case.. Its hard to battle odds like that when so much of you life is invested, and at risk. The alternative?
/r/MensRights04/08/24 08:59 PM
1

If your self awareness has only enlightened you in terms of how you are more acceptable to women, then you still have a long to go to achieving self actualisation and agency.
/r/MensRights04/08/24 08:57 PM
24

Its the UK, where by definition women are incapable of rape. This woman admitted to raping a young boy, but the worst crime she could be charged with was penetrative sex with a minor. She will never have to live with the stigma of being a convicted child rapist, while her victim will spend the rest of his life living with being a rape survivor. The legal system in the UK, from police to high court, is inhabited by sexist pigs, imposing sexist laws, that are deliberately targeted to supress and c…
/r/MensRights03/08/24 01:17 AM
14

The common habit of women referring to men as 'creepy', 'nerdy', 'weird', 'incel' is casual misandry, the constant female violence that men and boys live with every day of their lives. This endemic casual misandry in our media, schools, health service, government policy, is most obvious and widespread in our everyday language.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 01:11 AM
22

Make no mistake. Harris is a man hating feminist, who treats men as disposible assets for achiving her priority goals. Her pet man is a feminist SIMP, who is most likely more misandrist than her.
/r/MensRights03/08/24 01:07 AM
2

Feminist academics and feminist theory created the transgender ideology that is threatening the genetic purity of the female supremacy movement. Feminists like JK Rowling, have reached out to reasonably minded people across the world, to address the injustice that feminism has created. Now that there appears to be a ground swell of support for women in sport, feminists like JK Rowling are attempting to blame the violence of transgender activism on men and boys. This is the same method used to hi…
/r/MensRights03/08/24 01:05 AM
2

'Because the intersectional (or ‘woke’) view almost inevitably prevents the therapist from seeing the world from the client’s point of view (unless the client is woke), I think it’s fair to say that increasingly, white heterosexual men are the only demographic that therapists are influenced in their training to withhold empathy from.' This explains why so many men who seek help only attend one visit with a counsellor or mental health practitioner. HCWs are trained to withold empathy from male cl…
/r/MensRights02/08/24 09:56 PM
8

Fear not ozzie bros. Feminists scholars from Monash university in Melbourne are going to fix the problem. They have designed resources to help Australian teachers address the scurge of toxic masculinity in ozzie boys. It seems Australian teachers don't know what to do with boys, but have retreated to the good old reliable 'it must be their toxic masculinity' because apparently boys are not being well behaved girls, persist in trying to be boys, and are talking back at our teachers and frightenin…
/r/MensRights01/08/24 06:22 AM
1

It means what it means. That is if you have reason to doubt if you are the father of a child, chances are 50:50 you aren't the father. This is a concept that some women are incapable or unwilling to comprehend. If they haven't had the experience, for them, it doesn't exist. This is different for feminists who believe that any issue experienced by men must be trivialised and/or deplatformed, as men experiencing disadvantage or discrimination and daring to speak aboput it, is a form of violence ag…
/r/MensRights01/08/24 05:58 AM
1

Perhaps because most men deal with it at the time, or just move on, without escalating it into a major problem. This what most women did in the past, and most still do now. Given most are attempts at humor/romance/misadventure. Its the vocal sisters of the perpetually offended who make these most annoying instances into media events.
/r/MensRights01/08/24 05:44 AM
3

Segregation back with all its evil prejudice and hatred, all at the hands of feminism.
/r/MensRights31/07/24 07:48 PM
9

Feminism is defined not by its dictionary definition, but by its acts, and the acts it condones. Feminism, by its acts and failures to act, is a brutal barbaric violent hate movement, that condones the genital mutilation of men, boys and babies, the denial of human rights of men and boys, and demands men and boys adhere to a strict gynocentric gender role, dictated by feminists, under threat of violence.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 11:34 PM
10

The delusion that never stops giving.
/r/MensRights30/07/24 09:54 AM
2

So true. The goddess myth requires men to avert their gaze, for face the wraith of the law.
/r/MensRights29/07/24 09:16 PM
58

There are two justice systems in America. One that is forgiving and avoids jail at all costs for women, and one that is brutal and uses jail as the default for men and boys. The messages this sends to the community are clear. Its OK for women to sexually abuse boys, or at least, it not really a serious crime. Men and boys are subhuman beasts of burden, who are required to support women under a brutal and archaic system that imposes strict male gender laws enforced by violence and imprisonment. M…
/r/MensRights28/07/24 11:17 PM
24

The existance of pedophile females who prey on young boys is no longer in dispute, except in feminist circles where complicit women hide their crimes and the crimes of other women behind a veil of ideologically constructed gendered sexual violence. These feminist circle have a long history of sexually abusing children, and advocating for the abolition or lowering of the age of consent to enable their sexual depravity.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 11:16 PM
1

Then let's work together. Your issues are particular to you, as mine are to me. We can only share our experiences. But we have all be abused by communnities that deny empathy, services and human rights to men and boys, without insight or remorse. We have all witnessed the persecution of men who step outside the box of the strict male sex role that requires men to take responsibility for everyones choices, without realising their own. Whether that step was into men loving men, or men not conformi…
/r/MensRights27/07/24 11:11 PM
10

Your words 'everything that's bad for you is worse for us'. How is that not putting gay men's issues ahead of men's issues?
/r/MensRights27/07/24 12:00 AM
12

You lost me at 'everything that's bad for you is worse for us'. I'm not interested in people who think everyone should be second place to their own plight, just because they are gay. Are you here about men's rights? Or just your rights?
/r/MensRights26/07/24 11:57 PM
1

Not reading Mills and Boone romances is not a crime. Men and boys read plenty, but not the book pigs like this author want them to read. Shove the woke lit where-ever, and stop making up stories about men and boys.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 02:51 AM
2

Get your boys out of UK schools ASAP. They are about to unleash a war against boys unlike anything we have seen so far. Sexist pigs like Jess Phillips have the power, and are ruthless in their hatred of men and boys.
/r/MensRights26/07/24 02:48 AM
0

Feminism has become mainstream and aggressive, so the best advice for the moment, is hand-on and wait for the dust to settle.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 01:42 AM
4

People with mental health issues frewuently adopt this aggressive victim stance, as it validates both their paranoia and their need for violent expression.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 01:40 AM
1

As the proportion of health care workers and policy makers who are female increases, the focus on men's health issues plummets. Health care workers are increasingly sexist in their focus, consentrating on people who are like themselves, or have similar issues, and ignoring those they hold in contempt (men and boys). These sexist pigs will be recognised in history for their disgusting gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 12:50 AM
1

My take as well. Her entire academic career is feminist based, and her idea of expert consensus, is all my feminist friends agree. Danger Will Robinson
/r/MensRights21/07/24 12:44 AM
6

Totallly agree. This transmisandry term is an intersectional construct designed to focus attention and resources on a small minority of people experiencing hardship, at the expense of the large majority facing similar hardship. Once we allow misandry to measured on an intersectional continuum, men's issues will once again be pushed to the bottom of the pack, and denied services and empathy.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 12:39 AM
20

The absurdity of the methodology used in the study, the biased construction of the instrument questions, the extreme confirmation bias, OMG. If this is the level of academic incompetence that is informing the Australian government policy on violence, then we are doomed. It reads like a Cleo Magazine article. Read this recent survey by the Australian Institute of Criminology, entitled "Perpetration of sexual violence in a community sample of adult Australians" (link below). It shows how coersion …
/r/MensRights19/07/24 03:32 AM
-1

This sounds like a tragic accident. Sad for the child and the carer. However, the difference in attitudes of caseworkers to male versus female carers is substantial, and we should be asking, would this have ended differently if it had been a male carer talking to the caseworker? Did the carer herself not understand the violence of using her substantial body weight to forcibly restrain the child? Do women generally, have no understanding of female violence (i.e. do not believe themselves capable …
/r/MensRights18/07/24 12:58 AM
9

When an airline acts in a completely sexist way, to support the sexist pigs who think all men are dangerous animals, that airline should be delicenced. Unfortunately, as India slips into the feminist bubble of self-evident truths (i.e. sexist bigotry), this is unlike to happen. Boycott!
/r/MensRights17/07/24 09:57 PM
9

Sexist pigs and feminists insist that men be brutally forced to conform to strict traditional male gender roles, and then label men conforming to strict traditional male gender roles as toxic, and support denying men health, mental health, and social services because they say men's problems are caused by men adhering to strict traditional male gender roles. So the men who did nothing to protect this spoilt little brat when she wanted protection, did the right thing. These sexist pigs do not dese…
/r/MensRights17/07/24 09:54 PM
12

Not sure about role models being identified as individuals. Most of my life I've collected principles, values and world views from a wide selection of people, literature, philosophies and ideologies without any ideation of individuals. After all, we all have flaws and prejudices. As for famous personalities, most are shallow and self adoring.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 11:31 PM
13

Its not a game, and there are no scores. The sexual abuse and mutilation of babies is known to be the worst form of sexual abuse in all civilised societies. The admission that you do not think its even worth reading about, demonstrates the utter depravity of your deliberate ignorance and savagery.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 12:44 AM
20

More precisely, a lot of women have very bigoted views about men and boys. Very likely, if we could look at the views these women have about other issues and people (i.e. not their virtue signalling pretend views), we would see more bigotry.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 03:21 AM
8

Hate to break it to the femtrolls, but many men fake their orgasms just to get it over with. So there's no real orgasm gap (assuming you can measure sexual pleasure by orgasms alone, I think feminists need to stop watching so much porn, its distorting their poor understanding of intimacy). Feminists have made sex and intimacy work in stead of pleasure, sucking the life out of relationships just like they suck the life out of every other facit of the modern world.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 01:31 AM
16

A shallow unimaginative framing of men and masculinity in stereotypyed rigid roles based on feminist ideological hatred of masculinity rather than real living men. The man is a con artist attempting to make money from topical issues. But make no mistake. "Toxic masculinity' is hate speech. You can attempt to explain that it is a misunderstood term with a complex and elusive meaning, but the truth is, its meaning is elusive only because it is hate speech, and all its other meanings are nebulous, …
/r/MensRights08/07/24 09:38 PM
1

"Nueces County District Attorney Jimmy Granberry said that for cases of this nature, multiple factors had to be examined. "She had already been under supervision for four years," Granberry said. "We do not believe that she is an ongoing threat at this time." There is the problem. the whiteknighters in our legaal system are incapable of understanding the danger these female predators present to the community, and incapable of believing that women can commit these crimes, even in the face of irref…
/r/MensRights07/07/24 09:58 PM
4

I regularly hear women make sexist comments about men. Its frequently 'men cannot multitask', or 'men are incapable of empathy'. They believe these are factual and non-sexist.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 05:29 AM
15

Women dominate the psycology and counselling professions, and exhibit a profound and entrenched anti-male culture that discourages men from effective therapy for depression. The WHO collects service data from psycologist and counsellor service providers (primarily used by women) and state that women are 50% more likely to be depressed than men. This is the same as banning men from using buses, then collecting data that states men don't use buses. Its the way feminism forces the denial of service…
/r/MensRights05/07/24 02:31 AM
9

These poor parents who believe its up to them to decide for their children, are either poorly informed, or just dumb. The law does not allow parents to consent to any procedure for their children. If this were true, they could consent to amputation of fingers, limbs, ears etc. The law is clear. Parents can only consent to procedures that are 1. necessary, and 2. beneficial. The law will take the children away from parents who try to consent to anything not consistent with these limits, or who do…
/r/MensRights03/07/24 10:53 PM
2

And yet she is an iconic feminist who's revered by the movement and her ideology taught in colleges and schools. The definition of masculinity in her psychotic SCUM manifesto is the basis for the stereotyped framing of masculinity in modern feminism.
/r/MensRights03/07/24 12:40 AM
3

lol
/r/MensRights02/07/24 03:09 AM
12

Its not the male judges that are the issue. Its the dominant female culture of the court that claims to be adjudicating 'family' matters. Its the clerks, associates, registrars, counsellors, independent child representatives, and social workers who are almost all female. The gynocentric culture frames fathers in much the same way men are framed in women's change rooms.
/r/MensRights02/07/24 03:09 AM
3

More great research by John Barry and the Centre for Male Psychology, showing its not masculinity that bad for men's mental health, its negative attitudes to masculinity propagated in social media and academia that are bad for men's mental health. How long until these feminnist academics are brought to justice for the harms they are doing to men and boys.
/r/MensRights01/07/24 09:32 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter