OMG. obvious misandry posing as research to validate demeaning attitudes to men and boys.

skyarrow999 · 2022-11-24T21:45:43+00:00

Are you exhausted and running close to your limit? Well you won't feel like having sex. Our studies show that yes, in fact, being spent by the end of the day makes you less likely to have sex. We were surprised no one has done research that puts this obvious fact to the test in a sexist manner. So to prove our point, we asked asked only women explicitly about this in perspective to their male partner. Our results showed that biased sampling does indeed provide biased results. So now we've written you an article to justify the idea that 'men bad'!

It admits that more research is needed though, so it's all good... Right?

At least it's written in an easily digestible, non-toxic manner, which makes it also all good, right?

Research. Journalism. Objectivity.

Cool.

pottawacommie · 2022-11-24T22:29:26+00:00

God forbid a man takes a breather after a hard day at work. Jesus Christ.

Vanirae93 · 2022-11-24T21:04:32+00:00

I don't think this is misandry, but it does seem like half-baked science trying to push an agenda.

rabel111 · 2022-11-24T20:29:04+00:00

Really didn't think I'd see more academics pushing such shallow, shoddy research just to validate the "girl's club" bad-mouthing of men and boys. I know men and women who are useless at domestic housework and cooking, but these misandrists suggest its only men. The report they reference collected "self-reported" data, and excluded much of the work usually only done by men and boys. "Dolly" level science being used to support gender hatred.

Unnecessary_Timeline · 2022-11-25T03:41:44+00:00

The journal this study was published in has a very poor SJR rank. It’s 1.149, which basically means that for every 1 article they publish, they receive 1.149 citations, but that also includes self-citations, where they cite studies published in their own journal! In 2021 self-cites were 11% of their total citations. So their score is honestly even worse than it appears.

The top scores in the category of Psychology are ~8.0, for reference.

Basically this is a poorly performing journal which indicates their work was either mythologically flawed, or respected journals saw this paper as without valuable and/or not legitimate.

denvercaniac · 2022-11-25T02:02:12+00:00

So don't cohabitate and take care of yourself. W?

putinCila · 2022-11-25T05:50:45+00:00

If a wife doesn't have sex with her husband for an extended period of time, it is likely she is or is planning to cheat on her man. The man has two options file for divorce or be a man and force f her.

pvtshoebox · 2022-11-25T19:02:03+00:00

I have a great, balanced relationship w my gf. We communicate tidiness goals, prioritize tasks, and volunteer to complete them together.

Often in these studies I feel like the women are not including their partners in the goal-setting or prioritizing, then just assign tasks, while usually reserving the bill of the work to be done themselves as to avoid confrontation. The inevitable result of this dysfunctional team dynamic is that the male partner is blindsided and defensive when the female partner is no longer satisfied in the situation.

The other thing about this - if a man is called a child for accepting his partner’s domestic labor, then what is a woman who earns less but accepts her partner’s money.

If he is a child, then she is a prostitute.

Title	OMG. obvious misandry posing as research to validate demeaning attitudes to men and boys.
Author	rabel111
Upvotes	57
Comments	14
Date	November 24, 2022 8:23 PM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/z3tp5a/omg_obvious_misandry_posing_as_research_to/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/omg-obvious-misandry-posing-as-research-to.1141989 https://theredarchive.com/post/1141989

Comments