TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

TC1827 Archive

View 305 posts and 1,265 comments by TC1827 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2523

HealthTC1827/r/MensRights09/09/19 01:55 AM
2242

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights06/09/19 02:21 AM
1552

Activism/SupportTC1827/r/MensRights08/09/19 03:28 AM
1315

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights23/12/19 12:54 AM
420

TC1827/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/19 12:14 PM
394

TC1827/r/PussyPass13/09/19 09:39 PM
387

HealthTC1827/r/MensRights27/11/19 06:28 PM
358

ProgressTC1827/r/MensRights02/09/19 12:16 PM
330

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights24/11/19 03:07 PM
318

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:31 PM
291

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights11/09/19 11:48 PM
265

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights08/01/20 09:39 PM
237

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights11/07/19 06:17 PM
217

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights24/10/19 08:35 PM
217

TC1827/r/FeminismStopsWhen16/11/19 01:35 PM
209

TC1827/r/FeminismStopsWhen20/11/19 08:58 PM
183

TC1827/r/FeminismStopsWhen24/11/19 09:44 PM
167

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights06/03/20 02:35 PM
163

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:02 PM
156

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights03/10/19 01:08 PM
148

TC1827/r/FeminismStopsWhen05/02/20 04:37 PM
144

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights27/07/19 03:28 AM
136

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights03/10/19 01:01 PM
131

FeminismTC1827/r/MensRights05/09/19 02:37 PM
130

TC1827/r/MensRights10/02/20 03:16 AM
128

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights11/09/19 02:24 AM
128

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights19/07/19 11:37 PM
128

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:35 PM
122

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights26/05/19 07:34 PM
121

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights24/06/19 07:59 PM
119

TC1827/r/MensRights02/10/19 03:07 PM
117

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights06/07/19 06:29 PM
110

HumourTC1827/r/MensRights06/11/19 01:31 AM
109

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights20/09/19 01:48 PM
107

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights04/06/19 09:41 PM
105

HumourTC1827/r/MensRights27/04/20 02:51 AM
105

TC1827/r/MensRights23/09/19 05:00 PM
101

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights15/09/19 12:12 AM
99

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights14/06/19 06:04 PM
93

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights17/10/19 12:55 PM
92

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights09/07/19 01:00 PM
88

TC1827/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:57 PM
87

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights21/04/20 06:45 PM
86

Activism/SupportTC1827/r/MensRights06/09/19 09:41 PM
85

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/20 03:08 PM
84

Legal RightsTC1827/r/MensRights12/09/19 02:31 PM
79

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights29/09/19 01:52 AM
78

TC1827/r/FeminismStopsWhen29/12/19 05:47 AM
71

ProgressTC1827/r/MensRights22/09/19 02:23 AM
70

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights11/08/19 11:23 PM
68

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights31/08/19 03:04 PM
68

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights15/09/19 07:41 PM
66

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/19 01:08 PM
66

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights02/10/19 06:07 PM
65

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights16/10/19 01:32 PM
64

TC1827/r/MensRights19/11/19 06:38 PM
62

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights10/09/19 10:03 PM
62

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights29/04/20 03:18 PM
62

TC1827/r/MensRights21/01/20 03:19 PM
61

Legal RightsTC1827/r/MensRights13/09/19 09:40 PM
61

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights03/07/19 01:21 PM
61

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:42 PM
59

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights20/09/19 07:49 PM
59

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights25/09/19 12:35 PM
58

FeminismTC1827/r/MensRights26/07/19 04:33 PM
56

UnconfirmedTC1827/r/MensRights20/09/19 11:27 PM
54

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights09/08/19 03:23 PM
53

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights26/07/19 03:51 PM
52

Activism/SupportTC1827/r/MensRights23/11/19 02:12 AM
51

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/20 12:43 PM
51

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights12/12/19 01:01 AM
49

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights12/08/19 02:55 AM
48

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights20/08/19 01:38 PM
47

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights13/09/19 07:43 PM
47

TC1827/r/MensRights23/02/20 07:43 PM
46

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/19 06:10 PM
44

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights30/09/19 04:35 AM
44

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights11/07/19 01:44 PM
44

TC1827/r/MensRights12/08/19 04:41 PM
43

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights26/04/20 02:34 AM
43

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/20 01:51 PM
42

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/19 03:10 PM
41

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights23/11/19 09:55 PM
40

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights28/03/20 02:31 AM
40

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 02:08 PM
38

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/20 03:16 AM
38

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights07/01/20 03:52 AM
37

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights12/07/19 02:04 AM
37

Activism/SupportTC1827/r/MensRights11/10/19 07:39 PM
36

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights09/08/19 02:10 PM
36

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights05/06/19 02:42 PM
35

TC1827/r/MensRights12/11/19 07:27 PM
34

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights23/11/19 07:05 PM
34

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/20 02:35 PM
34

TC1827/r/MensRights12/11/19 06:05 PM
34

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights17/09/19 12:00 PM
34

ProgressTC1827/r/MensRights13/06/19 09:20 PM
34

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/19 04:33 PM
32

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/20 07:14 PM
32

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/20 06:40 PM
32

ProgressTC1827/r/MensRights24/09/19 05:29 PM
32

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/19 11:54 AM
31

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights13/08/19 07:58 PM
31

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights07/11/19 01:27 PM
31

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights22/09/19 04:51 PM
31

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights31/07/19 02:27 AM
30

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:42 AM
30

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights16/08/19 03:46 PM
30

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 01:11 PM
30

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/19 02:21 AM
30

Anti-MRMTC1827/r/MensRights25/10/19 11:51 AM
29

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/19 12:58 PM
29

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights30/09/19 04:47 AM
29

ProgressTC1827/r/MensRights14/11/19 10:48 PM
29

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights11/12/19 01:46 AM
29

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/20 09:23 PM
28

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights02/10/19 05:23 PM
28

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 01:04 AM
27

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/19 09:09 PM
27

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 03:56 AM
27

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights22/08/19 12:09 PM
27

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights24/11/19 09:40 PM
27

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights17/10/19 07:42 PM
26

TC1827/r/MensRights27/03/20 10:27 PM
26

Question For WomenTC1827/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/19 09:13 PM
26

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/19 08:35 PM
25

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights28/08/19 02:31 AM
25

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/19 01:33 PM
25

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights11/09/19 01:27 AM
25

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights17/11/19 07:00 PM
25

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/11/19 09:43 PM
24

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights03/06/19 05:33 PM
24

FeminismTC1827/r/MensRights30/09/19 03:51 PM
24

TC1827/r/MensRights15/04/20 04:25 AM
23

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights03/09/19 06:49 PM
23

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights31/03/20 07:34 PM
23

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights17/08/19 01:23 PM
23

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights24/04/20 02:32 PM
22

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights05/09/19 02:05 PM
22

Question For WomenTC1827/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/19 02:26 AM
22

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights05/09/19 02:25 AM
22

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights09/07/19 11:37 PM
22

HealthTC1827/r/MensRights22/09/19 01:34 PM
22

False AccusationTC1827/r/MensRights26/03/20 03:02 PM
21

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights31/08/19 03:28 AM
21

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights30/08/19 05:38 AM
21

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights06/09/19 04:34 AM
21

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights26/07/19 02:24 PM
21

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:18 PM
21

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights18/10/19 04:23 AM
20

TC1827/r/FeminismStopsWhen07/11/19 01:32 PM
20

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights22/09/19 03:51 AM
20

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 01:40 AM
19

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights12/06/19 03:44 AM
19

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/19 02:38 PM
19

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/19 01:03 PM
19

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights24/09/19 03:56 PM
18

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 06:51 PM
18

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights11/12/19 08:20 PM
18

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights03/11/19 02:00 AM
18

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights27/09/19 03:17 AM
18

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights19/07/19 11:58 PM
18

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights04/09/19 11:30 PM
18

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/19 01:28 PM
18

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/01/20 04:08 PM
17

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights04/11/19 03:10 PM
17

TC1827/r/MensRights13/11/19 04:10 PM
17

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights13/03/20 12:37 PM
17

ProgressTC1827/r/MensRights09/08/19 02:15 AM
16

TC1827/r/MensRights22/01/20 03:16 PM
16

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights24/09/19 03:38 AM
16

TC1827/r/MensRights04/05/20 07:26 PM
16

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights03/05/20 05:45 PM
16

TC1827/r/FeminismStopsWhen22/12/19 06:18 PM
16

HealthTC1827/r/MensRights28/09/19 06:14 PM
15

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/20 04:36 PM
15

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/12/19 05:47 AM
15

False AccusationTC1827/r/MensRights05/09/19 05:38 PM
15

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/19 02:45 PM
15

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/19 09:00 PM
15

False AccusationTC1827/r/MensRights11/08/19 11:27 PM
14

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights06/07/19 10:58 AM
14

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights17/01/20 07:11 PM
14

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights12/07/19 10:42 PM
14

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights25/10/19 12:59 AM
13

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/19 12:11 PM
13

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights06/06/19 05:33 PM
13

TC1827/r/MensRights11/10/19 02:02 PM
13

TC1827/r/MensRights15/09/19 10:19 PM
13

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/19 11:40 AM
13

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights28/01/20 04:19 PM
13

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights13/01/20 01:59 PM
13

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights08/02/20 05:05 PM
13

TC1827/r/MensRights22/07/19 11:38 AM
13

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights15/08/19 02:49 PM
12

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights30/05/19 09:59 PM
12

False AccusationTC1827/r/MensRights26/07/19 09:09 PM
12

FeminismTC1827/r/MensRights06/06/19 05:29 PM
11

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/19 10:05 PM
11

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights13/10/19 04:17 AM
11

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights31/08/19 01:35 AM
11

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 07:50 PM
11

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:01 AM
11

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights22/11/19 06:11 PM
11

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights26/07/19 07:12 PM
11

Activism/SupportTC1827/r/MensRights19/11/19 04:55 PM
11

Activism/SupportTC1827/r/MensRights05/09/19 01:06 PM
11

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/20 04:20 PM
11

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights29/08/19 12:47 AM
11

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/19 06:05 PM
10

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights02/08/19 08:49 PM
10

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights05/09/19 12:57 PM
10

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/19 03:08 AM
9

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/19 10:46 PM
9

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights10/03/20 06:20 PM
9

False AccusationTC1827/r/MensRights07/06/19 05:18 PM
9

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights10/09/19 03:29 PM
9

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights19/09/19 03:13 PM
9

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights17/07/19 12:05 AM
9

TC1827/r/MensRights20/08/19 01:29 PM
9

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/11/19 02:48 PM
8

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights23/11/19 02:12 AM
8

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights19/11/19 04:32 PM
8

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights05/09/19 08:17 PM
8

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights23/12/19 12:57 AM
7

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights22/12/19 06:16 PM
7

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights27/01/20 02:24 AM
7

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights24/09/19 01:13 AM
7

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights22/07/19 06:51 PM
7

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/20 04:25 PM
7

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights19/07/19 11:50 PM
7

CMVTC1827/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 04:18 PM
7

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/19 12:59 AM
7

Question For WomenTC1827/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/19 05:05 AM
6

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/19 04:24 AM
6

TC1827/r/MGTOW28/07/19 02:00 PM
6

TC1827/r/MensRights17/10/19 03:12 AM
6

Activism/SupportTC1827/r/MensRights02/10/19 05:45 PM
6

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights13/08/19 03:22 PM
6

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/19 03:28 AM
5

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights16/01/20 02:44 AM
5

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/19 07:27 PM
5

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights06/06/19 05:39 PM
5

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights09/09/19 03:07 AM
5

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights16/06/19 07:04 PM
5

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights20/08/19 03:58 AM
5

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights08/03/20 08:30 PM
4

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights05/08/19 02:57 PM
4

TC1827/r/MGTOW12/09/19 11:38 PM
4

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights21/11/19 06:56 PM
4

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/09/19 11:30 PM
4

UnconfirmedTC1827/r/MensRights09/06/19 10:41 PM
4

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/19 07:00 PM
3

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/19 04:24 AM
3

TC1827/r/MGTOW13/06/19 09:50 PM
3

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/09/19 01:21 AM
3

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/19 03:29 PM
3

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/20 08:44 PM
3

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/20 05:45 PM
3

TC1827/r/MensRights29/08/19 07:30 PM
3

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/19 11:33 AM
3

TC1827/r/MensRights09/01/20 06:07 PM
3

HumourTC1827/r/MensRights05/02/20 04:38 PM
3

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/03/20 03:02 PM
2

DiscriminationTC1827/r/MensRights15/06/19 12:40 PM
2

TC1827/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:29 PM
2

TC1827/r/MGTOW15/09/19 10:30 PM
2

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights04/03/20 12:40 PM
2

TC1827/r/MensRights17/06/19 02:55 AM
2

TC1827/r/MensRights05/09/19 03:42 PM
2

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/19 09:31 PM
2

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/19 05:12 PM
1

TC1827/r/MensRights17/10/19 03:16 PM
1

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights25/07/19 12:00 AM
1

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/19 06:08 PM
1

FeminismTC1827/r/MensRights23/11/19 02:04 AM
1

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights11/04/20 11:05 PM
1

False AccusationTC1827/r/MensRights07/06/19 05:12 PM
1

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights28/08/19 05:33 PM
1

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/08/19 12:43 AM
1

DiscussionTC1827/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 09:24 PM
1

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights16/09/19 09:26 PM
1

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/02/20 05:05 PM
1

TC1827/r/MensRights12/09/19 11:37 PM
1

Question For WomenTC1827/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 03:45 PM
1

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/19 06:06 PM
1

ProgressTC1827/r/MensRights28/11/19 11:12 PM
1

TC1827/r/MensRights21/11/19 04:48 AM
1

TC1827/r/MensRights01/09/19 01:53 PM
1

TC1827/r/MensRights28/01/20 04:06 PM
1

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights04/09/19 03:35 PM
1

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights02/05/20 11:35 PM
0

TC1827/r/MGTOW02/10/19 03:06 AM
0

GeneralTC1827/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:37 AM
0

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/19 06:09 PM
0

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/19 12:36 PM
0

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights31/08/19 03:32 AM
0

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/09/19 03:42 AM
0

TC1827/r/askTRP15/07/19 11:52 PM
0

Social IssuesTC1827/r/MensRights13/08/19 03:02 AM
0

Edu./Occu.TC1827/r/MensRights04/06/19 10:27 PM
0

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/20 08:33 PM
0

Marriage/ChildrenTC1827/r/MensRights21/11/19 04:40 AM
0

TC1827/r/MGTOW02/10/19 05:07 PM
0

TC1827/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/20 02:39 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,265 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

15 hours a week helping this girl he was orbiting on her homework. Guys own grades suffer to help chicks. That's sad. The fact that women have this power over men is a form of gender inequity that needs to be addressed
/r/MensRights05/05/20 05:47 PM
3

Congratulations!!!
/r/MensRights05/05/20 03:25 AM
1

Shoulder Writing?
/r/MensRights05/05/20 02:09 AM
1

I agree with all the points. Will check the book out. Thanks!
/r/MensRights05/05/20 02:07 AM
3

So not only do women have a education system that favours them, and more scholarships, and more oppurtunities due to affirmative action, and an easier time in their school years due to dating dynamics favouring them, they also get marked easily when being assessed. And the worst part is, they still expect their male partners to out earn them, despite women essentially running the inner lap vs men running the outer lap. Men are still expected to be their ATMs
/r/MensRights04/05/20 07:27 PM
12

So not only do women have a education system that favours them, and more scholarships, and more oppurtunities due to affirmative action, and an easier time in their school years due to dating dynamics favouring them, they also get marked easily when being assessed. And the worst part is, they still expect their male partners to out earn them, despite women essentially running the inner lap vs men running the outer lap. Men are still expected to be their ATMs
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/20 07:26 PM
16

What does it take for women to get harsh punishment? Probably being Black, Poor, and Ugly
/r/MensRights04/05/20 12:35 PM
51

Women are wonderful effect Women play the sympathy card Male judges start thinking with their reproductive organ and not their brain Female judges, who are subsumed with the women are oppressed by evil men, want to protect their female privilege
/r/MensRights04/05/20 12:35 PM
2

Well I am against alimony in general so while I think this is amusing and poetic justice, I don't think she should pay him $400K
/r/MensRights04/05/20 02:58 AM
7

I honestly don't know how anyone could think that. Then I remember how effective propaganda has been for centuries
/r/MensRights03/05/20 07:53 PM
-1

Are you against all forms of soliciting or selling porn or anything sexual at all? Yes. It is responsible for divorces, and kids raised in broken homes. It also leads to the casual sex culture which has disproportionally benefits women at the expense of men, vs the monogamous life partnership model which are fair to all parties
/r/MensRights03/05/20 12:13 AM
-2

But hey who is to blame when a person starts doing heroin anyways? The dealer for taking advantage of the person and messing with them chemically
/r/MensRights03/05/20 12:03 AM
-2

Well yes. The same way an addict to heroin is technically consenting
/r/MensRights02/05/20 11:58 PM
-2

no problem with people getting paid for providing a service someone sees as having value. I see it akin to drug dealing. You are playing with chemical reactions in someone's mind to get the addicted to something which is self and socially destructive
/r/MensRights02/05/20 11:52 PM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_domination
/r/MensRights02/05/20 11:51 PM
-1

larger problem with society as a whole. Well yes. We need to bring back socially enforced monogamy and end the rigged dating dynamic. But those taking advantage of others are to blame
/r/MensRights02/05/20 11:43 PM
5

No. Men are very much more oppressed. Proof being men commit suicide 3 times as much.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 10:13 PM
2

Ok. So they are just being willfully blind. I can't go ahead and beat someone up and say "I genuinely didn't know it is wrong" as an excuse. When something is clearly rigged and you are continuing on exploiting it your advantage, you are an oppressor. Willful blindness is not an excuse in the criminal courts, and shouldn't be an excuse here
/r/MensRights30/04/20 01:16 AM
5

It implies intent. There is intent. Proof: the heteronormative dating ritual that women make men go through. Women can easily stop the BS of men having to make the first move, spend money, buy a wedding ring, etc. But they choose not they cause they rather protect their entitlement. Even better - divorce. How many women decide to be the bigger person and not take advantage of the entitlements the law gives them? Taking advantage of a rigged system when there is a 1:1 relationship is partaking in…
/r/MensRights29/04/20 02:39 PM
9

The virus is killing men more as it views men as being more important and targeting them. The toxic patriarchy has influenced the behavior of virus' and has conditioned them to be misogynists /s
/r/MensRights29/04/20 01:13 PM
2

I think US is worse because it has a more traditional culture but also has feminism. So men have the worse of both. Canada isn't as TradCon, so we don't have for example conscription and women are less likely to live of male labour (dual income families are more prevalent here) . However, other than that, Canada and the US have the same BS re: feminism and male oppression
/r/MensRights29/04/20 01:10 PM
3

unique plights in our society, Eh. In the west women's issues are mostly a few loose knots. Men however, have not been freed form traditional gender roles and now deal with new harms due to feminism. Men are very much more opressed
/r/MensRights29/04/20 01:08 PM
120

If a woman touches a man's chest he can only claim physical assault (I don't even think the police will take up such a case), but if a man touches a woman's boobs she can claim sexual assault (even though the argument is that boobs aren't genitalia). Yes! A classic double standard. Women's breasts are sexual when it benefits women, and non-sexual when it benefits women
/r/MensRights29/04/20 01:06 PM
2

This is satire right. (Please)
/r/MensRights26/04/20 06:37 PM
3

I am concerned about someone who needs 3 months wasted on a pointless stone in order to carry their kid. Yes, men should support their pregnant wives. But a man is not an ATM. Historically, when the economy was muscle based, it made sense for men to be providers. Now woman have more opportunity the men, yet they still see men as their ATMs. Women are still more likely to get to relax at home and bond with their kid while men to slave away as providers.
/r/MensRights26/04/20 08:49 AM
5

Thanks!
/r/MensRights26/04/20 08:45 AM
4

Source for that claim?
/r/MensRights26/04/20 03:21 AM
5

Yep. Been doing this for 5 years though. Never saw this
/r/MensRights24/04/20 02:40 PM
3

CONGRAUTLAITONS!!! Do you mind sharing some tricks?
/r/MensRights23/04/20 11:36 AM
7

That's not true. See r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 09:49 PM
8

The funny thing is that the wage gap is about female privilege. Men are still expected to work more hours, be providers / breadwinners / ATMs, and serve women
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/20 11:56 AM
9

Yep. My undergrad was at the most prestigious college in the country. It was run by a bunch of rich, white, conventionally "attractive". private school women. Toxic as hell and quite corrupt as well. I doubt it would be different though if it were men running it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/04/20 11:55 AM
2

The Pay Gap does exist. Because Men are working more hours. Which is sexist. Because men are still seen as providers / breadwinners / ATMs. The pay gap is proof of anti-male sexism. That a man must work hard in school so that he can slave away in the workforce to support a woman who works less hours and lives of his labour
/r/MensRights21/04/20 11:41 AM
2

Progress also makes sure that kids are valued and get a stable upbringing and and that people have access to love. Currently, it has been deregulated, giving an advantage. high male suicide rates, male disposability and gynocentrism, I care about that. Unfair dating dynamics are part of the problem which cause suicide. Again, I am vehemently opposed to the men work, women stay at home system. The men are protectors and providers system. Stop calling me a tradcon. You are using it the way feminis…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/20 12:29 AM
2

course of social progress "Progress" for the sake of progress isn't a good thing. Since the 1970s, our economy has "progressed" by worsening wealth inequality. Not a good thing. The sexual revolution has denied kids a stable home. And has created a situation where men and women each see the other as a sex object, rather than one where people value each others as life partners. It has by and large been a negative force. Good for degenerates who want to sleep around, and good for the "top 20%" of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/04/20 12:00 AM
1

Which is why we need laws and socialization to change this. Men and women should have and equal chance of being pursued
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/20 11:36 PM
2

No I am not. I am very much against the whole men are ATMs for women, and their protectors and providers. But the sexual revolution has benefited women at the expense of men and has reduced people to sexual objects.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/20 11:35 PM
2

You to!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/20 09:04 PM
2

I can go on here, but I honestly think we should just agree to disagree here. I have multiple other things to do. Nice discussion! :)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/20 07:17 PM
3

You have an idealized view of the past. I agree that the passed suck due to the male breadwinner role. The way to get around that is to socialize women that equality goes both ways. That they must be willing to provide. That men are not ATMs. The reason women are okay w/ being single is because they can easily have sex on demand, so many of them sleep around as long as they can. Socially enforced monogamy will end that and socialization will ensure that relationships are equal. The relationship …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/20 06:44 PM
1

Thanks for clarifying I agree that men should have closer friendships. But the core problem IMO lies with women's expectations and sense of entitlement, that needs to be addressed, along with men increasing emotional connections to other men and having more reproductive options. But I also think that we need to bring back to socially enforced monogamy, or at least go back to slut-shaming (regardless of gender), in order to making the dating game more fair and end this whole thing of many women s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/20 05:09 PM
1

I don't think social engineering people to become bisexual is helpful. I do think men should have closer friendships, but I don't men should be encouraged to get physical pleasures from other men. What is needed is social engineering form a young age that equality goes both ways and teaching girls that when they get older they have to start treating men as equals. We also need balance just ensuring that men have a reproduction option equivalent to sperm banks
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/20 04:46 PM
6

For me, the issue is that women have been freed from gender roles but men have not. I am not a fan of the traditional arrangement, except when it comes to sexual relations. We need socially enforced monogamy, or at least a criticism of the sleeping around and then settling down as this arrangement hurts most men by denying them love in their 20s and re-inforces the men chase women dynamic which is opressive against men. We need a society where men and women have an equal likelihood of being aske…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/20 02:49 PM
4

Where is this?
/r/MensRights18/04/20 05:33 PM
2

The fact there are women out there like her who can see the light give my hope
/r/MensRights17/04/20 12:47 PM
8

Judge will get fired by the feminist lobby and force to apologize for being a misogynist in 3, 2, 1...
/r/MensRights16/04/20 11:41 PM
1

The thing is I argue men get screwed in a traditional relationship. They are reduced to being an ATM to a woman who generally takes an easier role and gets to spend more time with the kids and not worry about the stress of earning a living or a career. But I also understand that my POV is a minority one so I can see what is going on
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 10:28 PM
1

I see. Why would you speculate that might be the case?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 09:53 PM
1

However traditional men are not seen as desirable to that many western women. Its almost as though traditional gender roles favour men more than women. Traditional men are seen as unattractive so men were favored under traditional system. That doesn't make sense Traditional gender roles suck for everyone. Now though, women in the west have been freed from them but are still held to it. Men are for example still seen as providers, as ATMs; are still expected to ask women out, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 09:43 PM
3

Yes. It goes against the idea of a life partner. I wouldn't take that deal
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/20 09:18 PM
4

Thanks for sharing. I was always wondering about the "women attempt more suicide" rebuttal. (Thankfully most do not know this and have no real response to the "Men commit suicide more")
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/20 10:56 PM
3

Because they are strong independent women who only killed men because of oppressions by the patriarchy /s
/r/MensRights14/04/20 01:50 PM
4

Or the same sex as the warmongering, primary rigging, corporate stooge Hillary Clinton?
/r/MensRights14/04/20 01:49 PM
14

Men are systematically reduced to be ATMs. Women inherently have the power and use it to marry up. Men are attacked if they dare have standards. Women can easily change this and solve the "wage gap" and the "child care gap", but they don't as both of those are forms of female privilege. They can just marry up, live of male labour, and spend time with the kids. While men are just reduced to being poviders
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/20 05:19 PM
7

nd that's the kicker, men are criticized for not wanting to marry down while women are encouraged not to Yes. That is the issue! Traditional male roles are pretty harmful and anti-male They definitely are. holding men to these roles while 'liberating' women from theirs. You hit the nail right on the head. Women have been freed from traditional gender roles while men are still held to them. Women get the best of both worlds, men get the worst
/r/MensRights11/04/20 07:01 PM
25

When it comes to dating yes because of norms. Men are still expected to initiate, pay, mind read, do everything "correctly" while women can act how they want. The heteronormative dating world is still about the oppression and subjugation of men and the elevation of women. Men are attacked for daring to want a fair deal while women can be straight up racist when it comes to dating and men are attacked for calling them out on it. So on that area, LGBT men have it easier, as long as they overcome h…
/r/MensRights11/04/20 06:27 PM
3

The car insurance industry is a scam. Here in Ontario, we have North America's safest roads but the highest premiums. Because it is a requirement to have insurance, they can charge whatever the f*ck they want. The Ontario insurance regimen discriminates based on: Age Gender Marital status Postal Code (a proxy for race as immigrant heavy areas tend to pay more) Insurance is about extortion, and being racist and sexist and ageist and a bunch of other things while they are at it. Your insurance sho…
/r/MensRights11/04/20 06:22 PM
1

Hmm. Canada is said to have a good handling of it.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 06:18 PM
10

they're shrinking their dating pool I mean when men had higher earning potential, we married down. Now women have higher earning potential, but men are still expected to marry down. I've been heavily criticized and attacked for not wanting to marry down. Everyone should have the same opportunity and the chance to marry someone of the same earning potential. But both traditionalists and feminists are against it. The traditionalist position is anti-male as well, but least it is not contradictory.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 06:16 PM
33

This exactly. So the goals will never be reached. They want women to earn more than men but also retain the ability to marry up. Aka something which is by definition impossible
/r/MensRights11/04/20 02:47 PM
3

I'm so sorry to hear about your tragic loss. I cannot imagine how tough it must be. My Father lost his when we was 10, and the impact has definitely been severe on him
/r/MensRights10/04/20 03:23 AM
4

Visit a church. Or a card store. Or anywhere. Mother's day is acknowledged to no end. Father's day is ignored. A Father is seen as nothing more than an ATM. Men are just seen like that. Reduced to protectors and providers (aka servants) of women. While women are inherently praised to end for simply existing. Edit: My Grade 2 Teacher, who is female, told us 16 years go how Father's day is just not treated the same way. Consider how much is spent on each holiday
/r/MensRights10/04/20 01:13 AM
4

It's funny how they are openly admitting they only wanted one-side equality.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 09:27 PM
2

I support just banning the word, "foid" /"femoid" are akin to "nigger". Unless one is using those worse in a meta-sense, what purpose would one have to use it?
/r/MensRights09/04/20 08:13 PM
2

If she defines the relationship based on the size and cost of a ring she really might not be the one for you. This exactly!
/r/MensRights06/04/20 08:42 PM
3

Depends on the area of law and province. Generally though, from my understanding, a conjugal relationship is needed and the waiting period is usually 3 years. For tax and benefit purposes, it is 1 year but there is no joint tax filing in Canada so the effects are not that bad
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 08:16 PM
2

Thanks for sharing. I'll read the actual court judgement
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 08:15 PM
2

ad campaign created by men. And? The corporate class exploits people. A group of elites created a system that faovurs women over men. The gender of those in power doesn't matter as people don't see themselves as members of an identity group. The real issue are the women who demand that men partake in this ritual. Many women know it is nonsense, yet still subjugate men to it for the lolz
/r/MensRights06/04/20 05:45 PM
4

Reasoning behind this was to protect guys who did civil service from discrimination At least they got something right
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 05:29 PM
8

It's interesting how the willingness to spend 3 months salary on worthless rock is something men are expected to do to prove their love, but no one ever expects women to spend anything like this. But of course it is women who are oppressed and men who are privilieged /s The whole hetrosexual courting custom, from initiation to wedding, is all about the elevation of women and the demeaning of men. It would be nice to get true gender equality in that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 02:03 PM
3

It's interesting how the willingness to spend 3 months salary on worthless rock is something men are expected to do to prove their love, but no one ever expects women to spend anything like this. But of course it is women who are oppressed and men who are privilieged /s The whole hetrosexual courting custom, from initiation to wedding, is all about the elevation of women and the demeaning of men. It would be nice to get true gender equality in that.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 02:03 PM
3

It’s (to my understanding) a local custom. Canadian here of Indian origin. In both Canada and India, men are systematically oppressed into buying ridiculously expensive wedding rings
/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:59 PM
2

The real issue is that men are expected to be ATMs and marry down. While women have a "God given" right to marry up and live of male labour
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 01:08 PM
6

Socialism for women, free market capitalism for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 01:05 PM
24

Wow. That's fucked. The more I read, the more I realize that Canada is comparatively not so bad for Men. No conscription and equal retirement age
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 01:03 PM
1

I am a law student. Asking someone on a date is not harrasment
/r/MensRights05/04/20 05:20 PM
3

Surveys I think
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/20 04:09 PM
2

As a law student, I can tell you that "Do you want to go to a movie on sunday?" is not sexual violence. It is not a pure subjective test. Like a lot of low, it is a mix objective and subjective factor. The alleged perpetrator would have to know or reasonably have known that what s/he said could be reasonably considered harassment.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 01:49 PM
4

I'd say so. I wouldn't like it if a random woman off the street spoke like that to me
/r/MensRights05/04/20 01:30 PM
2

Asking if you can do something Would be okay if a female co-worker randomly asked you if she could grab your bulge? What about if it was your supervisor? Such comments are by their nature attacking. The issue is that there is usually a double standard. Women sexualize men through and through, but are seen as empowered. But men are rightfully criticized for doing it.
/r/MensRights05/04/20 01:10 PM
7

I agree. I am from Ontario. They tell clearly that we can ask someone one a date, that is not harassment. And if the askee's answer wasn't clearly "No" (i.e. something like "I am busy this weekend") then it is fine if one asks again
/r/MensRights05/04/20 12:46 PM
6

From Ontario. I was told by multiple HR depts that one can ask someone on a date - that is not harassments. It is an issue if one does so all multiple times and the askee clearly is disnterested Majority of the time it’s the guy that has to approach a woman. That is the systematic discrimination that needs to be addressed
/r/MensRights05/04/20 12:44 PM
3

Well. "Nice bulge you got there, may I grab it?" sounds like sexual violence
/r/MensRights05/04/20 12:44 PM
-1

Feminist complaining in 3,2,1...
/r/MensRights05/04/20 12:43 PM
0

Well. "Nice bulge you got there, may I grab it?" sounds like sexual violence. From Ontario. I was told by multiple HR depts that one can ask someone on a date - that is not harassments. It is an issue if one does so all multiple times and the askee clearly is disnterested
/r/MensRights05/04/20 12:42 PM
7

From Ontario. I was told by multiple HR depts that one can ask someone on a date - that is not harassments. It is an issue if one does so all multiple times and the askee clearly is disnterested
/r/MensRights05/04/20 12:42 PM
12

Well. "Nice bulge you got there, may I grab it?" sounds like sexual violence
/r/MensRights05/04/20 12:41 PM
7

Yet men are still expected to be ATMs / providers. Men have more expenses but less earning potential.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/20 06:15 PM
39

Cause women are inherently better parents you mysoginistic incel /s
/r/MensRights01/04/20 04:11 PM
2

I want to know at what point in time did it become acceptable for movies to spend more time parenting our children than actual parents. When feminists decided it.
/r/MensRights01/04/20 12:10 AM
4

watching Frozen 2 a couple of times a day is more educational than educational children’s programming. I am a big Frozen fan, but I would never let my kids watch Frozen or any movie on loop. Just cause kids need to learn about delayed gratification if nothing else. And that too much of a good thing will ruin it
/r/MensRights31/03/20 09:23 PM
8

This; but I'd ague that the ruling ruling class is both men and women. Being the spouse of a Billionaire businessperson is a being a billionaire socialite with power behind the throne but less work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/20 02:58 PM
17

100% Women are the privileged ones through and through. We can keep adding to the list. Men are still expected to make the first move. Men are attacked for daring to reject a woman for not meeting his standards (looks, financial, morality, virginity, etc.) while women can reject men for grounds as f*cked up as "I only date people in my own race" and men are attacked if they dare complain. Men are still expected to be providers /ATMs while women have the choice (socially, not necessarily economic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/20 12:24 PM
4

Same
/r/MensRights26/03/20 10:47 PM
18

Same here. It ruins the meaning and the special feeling. I am looking for a life partner, a true love. It really affected me as well because I was raised with the idea that women are more modest naturally and it is men who tend hook up around and that most women want true love. Turns out that the reverse is actually true
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/03/20 10:18 PM
8

Oh yeah. He is a creep.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 09:47 PM
6

Yep. Trudeau did Blackface and his cultists re-elected him. He can literally kill someone and his fans will stick by him
/r/MensRights26/03/20 09:46 PM
10

Don't forget that she only makes 70% of what he does; plus has to pay a tampon tax and a pink tax /s
/r/MensRights26/03/20 02:02 PM
1

u/TechWiz717
/r/MensRights24/03/20 10:38 PM
5

What does this mean? Socialization since childhood mainly. Mold the minds
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/03/20 12:28 AM
2

What do you see as the solution?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/20 05:50 PM
11

Men are taken financially advantage of through and through. Men are financially abused, it is just normalized. Men are socially expected to spend more on women, on dates, on wedding rings, on constant buying gifts. Men are reduced to mere ATMs. And hypergamy. Women marry up. Work less hours. Just live on male labour. Men are denied time away from their kids. It's usually men who support women. And men are criticized if they refuse to marry down. We need government intervention to ensure that hyp…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/03/20 02:43 PM
5

Exactly! Men are seen as ATMs, as providers, who need to do STEM or Med School or some professional to be able to provide. Women can just do whatever and marry up. And if a man refuses to marry down and be a provider, he is attacked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 07:48 PM
4

It is possible that it is a gender reversal or MRA bait; but it also could have happened.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 04:16 PM
6

Wait what?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 03:26 PM
7

Comment 3: That's completely untrue. I work in STEM and also volunteered in teaching young children programming. Boys have been raised and brought up with encouragement to be interested in STEM careers while girls haven't. This sounds like you're making a big deal out of some women rightfully supporting girls to get into STEM, complaining that there aren't enough men in STEM when there is a 90% male-to-female ratio there already? Sponsoring poor boys to attend the bootcamp isn't enough to cover …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 02:45 PM
15

Good news - 2nd comment NTA men are getting the short straw left and right and you are doing something for equality. And to this sub: How dare somebody do what you are doing just FOR the group you deem second class citizens, right?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 02:45 PM
16

Top Comment: And it was all going so well, OP... Catchy title. Check. Church goer. Check. Concerns about disadvantaged children getting opportunities. But then: Gentle turn to point out (grasp pearls) misandrists. Your savior cape fully in place. Check. Sent the boys anyway: cut to OP standing atop righteous mountain, cape whirling in the breeze, arms and legs akimbo. Except... The part where you whine about being told to ask women easier questions and only girls are encouraged toward STEM caree…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 02:43 PM
2

I don't know if it's objectively possible to say if it's better to be drowning in the ocean than dehydrating in the desert. Ok. OP already listed how it is objectively harder for men. Go make your counter case.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 01:10 PM
3

hey absolutely rule, socially and sexually, just as you observe. And that's just the beginning. Yep. Rich western women are more or less living in heaven. Add to that they can reproduce as they wish (one night stand or sperm bank) while a man needs to marry a woman and convince her to stay. I would like to MGTOW, but I also wants kids. Which is the issue. A woman has options and such an easy life ahead of her while men just have to suffer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 01:07 PM
3

I here you! It's f*cked up. Women are insanely privileged in dating. If I guy is rejected, it is because he "did something wrong". Personally, if a girl is so petty to reject a guy over the fact that he "asked her out incorrectly", she is not worth dating. Women are the oppressor class when it comes to dating. They make men initiate and take self-esteem hurts. While women get constant praise and affirmation. Women LOVE talking about equality, but this is one area where they don't even bother try…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/20 12:59 PM
1

The idea of love, real love, not loose sex, is a life partnership. Again, I don't want to be with a woman who sleeps around w/o commitment and then wants someone to settle with. I am looking for a life partner, in my 20s. If a woman wants a life partner, she can find one in her 20s. If she wants to sleep around, she can do that in her 20s and settle down with someone before she turns 35.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 04:15 PM
1

u/TechWiz717
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/20 02:09 PM
3

Most people look for love in their 20s though. I don't want to get married at 45 to someone who spent 30 years sleeping around
/r/MensRights11/03/20 07:40 PM
4

Why would you never trade places?
/r/MensRights11/03/20 07:38 PM
5

I want it balanced as well. I agree. But as long as privilege exists, I rather be on the end which has it. I'm not trans. I don't feel female. But I hate being male
/r/MensRights11/03/20 07:37 PM
2

No. They get it both ways. That is the problem
/r/MensRights11/03/20 07:36 PM
7

So sorry to hear about this mess. I always found the cashier vs stock to be a problem. Men get the harder job. But I thought the pay was same, not women get more for being cash. Where do you work that a secretary makes more than an engineer. That's f*cked up. And yeah, bartenders are just women getting money for looks. Life really is nice for some. My only hope is that we get to be women in the next life
/r/MensRights11/03/20 05:42 PM
4

You acknowledging it is a big first step! I think the only way it will change is if women were to start acknowledging it and working towards fixing it. For change the occur, the privilieged group must be willing to give up privileges and enact it. The oppressed group can fight, but by definition only the privelged group can make it happen
/r/MensRights11/03/20 02:06 PM
9

Men are taken more seriously and are respected much easier in the workplace, and by many people in general. They keep saying this but I have not noticed this. And if it is true, I wonder how much of it is because women do not bother to dress as seriously Women have to battle societal expectations just like guys do it sucks for both sexes Like what? They are inherently valued for who they are, men need to prove themselves. Women are far more likely to be harassed, and assaulted than men. Sure. Al…
/r/MensRights11/03/20 12:59 PM
14

Wanting a family and kids is a bad thing? I don't want to be exploited, I want a loving relationship. Women need to start acting better - don't blame me
/r/MensRights11/03/20 12:26 PM
9

Complaining about how women have it easy makes you no different than all the women who complain that men have it easy The difference being that I have arguments backing my claim. Other than the occasional pregnancy, women have it MUCH easier. Show me where I am wrong
/r/MensRights11/03/20 04:32 AM
18

I want a family, love and kids though. I don't want a prostitute, that is part of the problem. I can't just not care
/r/MensRights11/03/20 03:27 AM
6

I am referring to in general. Of course there are exceptions
/r/MensRights11/03/20 01:51 AM
1

I'm so sorry to hear about your son. What did she do to him?
/r/MensRights11/03/20 12:08 AM
9

protecting and providing That is the thing. Women can provide for themselves. But still systematically oppress men into being providers cause yay equality amirite. Why should I have to protect and provide? That is what serfs do for their overlords
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:26 PM
6

So why be jealous of lazy people who will never accomplish anything real. Because a woman can accomplish more with less effort. Me an Female A are both working towards similliar goals. Female A has an easier time reaching them
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:24 PM
1

yanks with your tipping culture do differently Canuck actually. But even though we have higher wages ($14/hr in Ontario), we still use an American tipping system. And unlike in the US, where the employer must report tips to the IRS, in Canada it is an honour system by the employee. Only about 50% of tips in Canada get reported on a tax return; the other half being under the table
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:23 PM
3

We both need each other to reproduce. In fact women have sperm banks so they really don't need us. While men still need women, which is how they are the privilieged gender
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:18 PM
7

they'd be downgrading his hardware and software...and deleting random drivers. What. Being a woman sounds like an upgrade to me. I can lead a better life and get to house a child
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:17 PM
24

But as a man, we enjoy plenty of benefits. Like what? men have created empires Apex fallacy. Means nothing.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:10 PM
1

Yes. Affirmative action programs are explicitly protected under section 15(2) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms
/r/MensRights10/03/20 10:55 PM
1

They very much at oppressive as men must bear the bulk of the financial and emotional cost
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/20 02:54 AM
2

A childfree life for me would be unfulfilling. I want a family, it just that there don't seem to be any good women out there who I love and who love me back. A woman in that situation has options, a man does not
/r/MensRights09/03/20 02:45 PM
5

No, it's a financial penalty imposed by all the time that I take out from my career to look after kids. That says it right there. You rather slave away for the corporate overlord than spend time with your kids. The fact that you see your kids as a penalty sickens me to no end. they would be worse off than if they had never had kids and had instead be building their work experience etc etc. The real enemy is the corporations. We used to only need one income to support a family. It sucked that men…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/20 02:24 AM
5

parenting penalty That's the problem. You think that spending time with your kid is a penalty, a burden, that comes from your true calling as a corporate drone. Women have the privilege of living of male labour and spending time with their offspring. When women start financially supporting men in equal numbers, then we'll have true equality
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/20 02:07 AM
-5

Donating to sperm banks makes it possible for women to reproduce w/o needing men. While men still need women to reproduce. This creates a power imbalance
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/20 11:44 PM
-3

Donating to sperm banks makes it possible for women to reproduce w/o needing men. While men still need women to reproduce. This creates a power imbalance
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/20 11:43 PM
2

Donating to sperm banks makes it possible for women to reproduce w/o needing men. While men still need women to reproduce. This creates a power imbalance
/r/MensRights08/03/20 09:02 PM
0

Thanks!
/r/MensRights08/03/20 08:36 PM
1

u/techwiz717
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/03/20 08:33 PM
1

u/TechWiz717
/r/MensRights07/03/20 02:04 PM
2

I'm a socialist, but I liked this comment. Crazy how women always find money to spend on make-up and clothes and partying while men must spend it on women, or like me have a whole lot of savings
/r/MensRights07/03/20 02:03 PM
2

I don't think members of the working poor are living the dream
/r/MensRights07/03/20 02:01 PM
1

FYI. Not my graph. I just cross-posted this
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/20 05:45 AM
3

trad con I'm not a trad con. I am against men working and supporting stay at home mothers. I believe in a 20 hour workweek. Each spouse works 20 hours splitting house and office work
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/20 05:45 AM
7

but the fact that they arent being granted to men as well. I generally agree. That's what I think we should focus on
/r/MensRights06/03/20 07:13 PM
0

there are downsides to being a woman as well. I mean the occasional pregnancy I guess. As a whole the evidence is pretty clear
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/20 06:09 PM
2

Edited
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/20 03:44 PM
2

That's what it is though. I have the issue of the hook up culture, regardless of gender. But there is a gender element as well. Women benefit from it at men's expense
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/03/20 03:35 PM
2

Sexism against Men. Men are seen as ATMs while women get to live of male labour
/r/MensRights05/03/20 09:23 PM
3

100% Exactly this
/r/MensRights04/03/20 12:41 PM
1

UofT is still a great place. I graduated there in 2018 and still recommend it. Don't not go because of this. Please.
/r/PussyPass04/03/20 12:39 PM
14

That's what the survey says though. Women want the ability to work but not the obligation to provide. Rights but no responsibility. Men are reduced to ATMs, to resources. Women are living of the labour of men, the way corporatists live of the labour of workers. Maybe not to the same degree, but it is analgous
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/20 11:45 PM
8

Yep. Tell me about it. Women who are upset get all the help and support in the world. They shed one tear and get 100 roses. While men are just left with the pain of their agony
/r/MensRights03/03/20 01:34 PM
2

as long as father's day gets to be all about fathers And that Father's day becomes more celebrated. Currently it is treated as a lesser holiday so I am okay for men to take over Mother's day until it is settled
/r/MensRights02/03/20 12:54 PM
1

Both, though more so w/in residence?
/r/PussyPass02/03/20 12:52 PM
3

Trinity College, mainly in the residence, but I've seen it happen quite a bit in the larkin building as well
/r/MensRights02/03/20 01:18 AM
59

Straight up sexual harassment. That is what it is when you enter the bathroom of the other gender. Women are the real sexual predators in the modern era. Plain and simple. BTW, women entering the men's washroom is normal at the University of Toronto. These pervs need to learn to respect the other gender
/r/MensRights01/03/20 07:20 PM
36

Straight up sexual harassment. That is what it is when you enter the bathroom of the other gender. Women are the real sexual predators in the modern era. Plain and simple. BTW, women entering the men's washroom is normal at the University of Toronto. These pervs need to learn to respect the other gender
/r/PussyPass01/03/20 07:19 PM
4

Abortion is murder. But at the very least, men should have the right to their offspring.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:52 PM
-36

Sex toys reduce the opposite gender to a sexual object and should be illegal regardless
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:52 PM
55

YES! My undergrad college was run by rich white private school girls. They LOVED talking about male privilege. Ironic ot say the least
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:48 PM
30

oung woman is fortunate enough to get millions just through marrying up. Exactly! This a majorly overlooked part in gender equality. Women get to marry up; men have to marry down (generally)
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:47 PM
2

CONGRATULATIONS!!!! Wishing you and your little one all the best! Hopefully she will grow up to respect men and treat them as equals.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 01:41 PM
2

WTF!!!
/r/MensRights28/02/20 12:53 PM
5

How did she plan for reproduction to occur?
/r/MensRights28/02/20 01:25 AM
0

We were clearly talking about university tuition Yes. That is correct. University tuition was a lot more affordable. But also, one did not need a degree and got get work w/ free high school That remains very true today. Tell me where can I find good paying manufacturing jobs that allow me to support a spouse and kids and work 40 hours a week and retire w/ a full pension. Few and far between. I am waiting. business that don't need a specific location prefer to go to find (lots of) workers. Yes. B…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/20 01:15 AM
0

Tuition is a luxury the average family could not afford in 1985 Wrong! Tuition was practically free back then. Before people could have had income w/ just a high school diploma. Now we need a degree to find work due to the decline of local manufacturing. This decline is the reason there is urbanization, we all need to be in cities. Increased concentration of wealth has also raise real estate prices. Back then one person out of high school could support a spouse and kids on one income working 40 …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/20 12:16 AM
8

They want to get to work later, leave earlier, never work on the weekends, and want all holidays off as well. I mean we should go for that. It's stupid that we are working more hours that in the past - bring back the 40 hour workweek. Women entering the workforce should have resulted in men being able to work less hours - 20 hours a week for all
/r/MensRights26/02/20 07:12 PM
2

Yes. The Pay gap exists because men are seen as ATMs and providers. Women want to work w/o providing for men.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 07:10 PM
0

Increased spending because of cost of living has gone through the roof. Back then one could support a spouse and kids and live w/in a reasonably commute on one income. Cost of housing and tuition particularly has gone through the roof. Plus we need a degree now, we didn't historically. We are spending more because real wages are dropping.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/20 01:10 PM
19

Where I did my undergrad, women walked into the men's washroom all the time just cause. He is doing this to change his baby and needs to come here cause anti-male sexism. Yet people say "ESH" to him cause men are always a--holes according to the sub
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:10 AM
1

Good Pot!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/20 05:38 PM
2

Alimony needs to be abolished. The stay-at-home spouse already got to marry up and live of the labour of her / his partner.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 01:55 PM
1

Got it. Thanks!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/20 01:41 PM
2

What is a TERF?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/20 01:37 PM
36

F*ck Bloomberg and his deca-billionaire evilness. He deserves whatever insult he can get. But on principle, what Warren did was wrong. Height jokes are wrong and imitating Trump is not helpful to any kind of discourse. Now the gender dynamics of this of course should mean that Warren should resign and apologize for her "internalized misandry" but of course this won't happen in our female privileged society
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/20 02:17 AM
3

Thanks for telling me about the sub
/r/MensRights23/02/20 08:52 PM
2

I'm saying that we need such a movement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/20 07:34 PM
1

In the US you can have people like Paul or Sanders speak out against party lines and what their party is doing. In Canada, party leaders write the House rules, the speaker is mostly a figure head. Independents and minor party get very little voice. If they speak against the party line, they will get demoted and eventually fired from the party. Almost impossible for an independently minded person to win an election w/o party support. Paul Sr. and Sanders, despite being heterodox, could act the wa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/20 02:58 PM
1

I believe parliamentary system As a Canadian I disagree. What I like about the US system is separation of powers and the allowance for congress people to be independent actors. This is how you got people like Bernie Sanders or Ron Paul. These guys didn't limit themselves to traditional parties and could speak their mind. In Canada though, 99.6% of votes are whipped (that stat is from the 2015-2019 parliament, it is not a guesstimate of mine). MPs have no say, no agency, nothing. They are simply …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/20 12:46 PM
1

economically liberal I mean what is considered economically right. Thanks for clarifying. That is what economic liberalism as I understand used to entail. But honestly, people should stop using the word "economically liberal" because like you said, it can be economically conservative or economically left, depending on the person's understanding of the term. neo-liberal politics have become the dominant force in Western politics Yep. It's been this way since the Clinton / Blair years. Society as …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/20 12:41 PM
2

political left/right divide has become almost entirely cultural/social In Canada it is even weirder. Both the Liberals and Conservative parties are socially liberal. The conservatives pretend to be social conservative / centrist at times to get votes but they are as socially liberal as the liberals. The economics are similar as well. The Cons are openly economically conservative, the Liberals pretend to be centre-left but are essentially the same economically. So in Canada, it is also superficia…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/20 04:03 AM
3

I will say that I, as a man, would much rather raise my kids than slave away in an office. Which is why I do not agree with the confined gender role idea. I would resent having to work and bein away from my kids while my wife got to be with them, the way you say that women would resent having to work. Which shows that men are still systematically oppressed into being ATMs, into being providers by women. That is what needs to be fixed. I agree that freedom to work to be an odd concept as well. Pe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/20 03:58 AM
3

In which case what does this really mean? "A lot" of households have two incomes now, and have adjusted their spending to match. Have we? Back then one could pay for tuition working summers and housing was affordable. Now housing prices are jumping 10% a year. We are simply spending more money on living expenses
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/20 02:43 AM
6

My view is that people shouldn't be forced into boxes. Men should have the freedom to spend time with kids, and women should have the freedom to work. I agree that women entering the workforce has been a loss for men, women, and especially children, for the reasons you have mentioned. And a victory for corps. This is why I think we need a 20 hour workweek. Each spouse works 20, total 40. Each spouse has a chance to develop professionally and bond with kids. 40 hours in total is all that is neede…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/20 02:42 AM
8

But with women often having to get jobs as well This was because of Reganomics / Thatchernomics. Cost of living soared while real wages stagnated, and then fell; forcing everyone to work. So before men worked 40 hours; now men work 60 and women work 40. But "progressives", funded by corporations, convinced us that this is somehow empowering and that everyone working for the corporate overlords instead of one person, while kids are being neglected, is somehow progress. What we need is a 20 hour w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/02/20 06:46 PM
4

I agree. I am a visible minority and am not a fan of identity politics. But their economics are way out of it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/20 07:37 PM
4

Just made a donation!
/r/MensRights13/02/20 02:40 PM
5

No because war is the fault of toxic masculinity and the patriarchy and the male solider's death is due to the oppression he and all men, who are of course a monolithic group, impose on all women. /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/20 04:22 AM
2

I disagree. I think it should be decommercialized, the way Christmas should be as well. And made gender neutral
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/20 03:01 PM
4

Yes! It should be gender neutral but has become all about women. Personally, I think there ought to be government commissions to examine relationships to ensure that each party is getting a fair deal. Men are not ATMs, Men and Women need to realize that.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 12:48 PM
1

Well she is literally living of his labour, this is the least she can do. Big corp benefitted the most from feminism. Convince women that supporting your husband is bad but creating wealth for your corporate overlord is "freedom". Now we need two incomes to support a family instead of one. Thanks feminism /s
/r/MensRights09/02/20 02:57 PM
2

Thanks for your detailed insight. I agree with almost all you have said. I to am not a fan of identity politics and I do find it refreshing that Bernie, at least historically, has spoken out against it. I didn't know he criticized campus rape accusation procedures. And yes, Warren lying about her ethnicity and pretending to be Native American to benefit from Affirmative Action as sickening to say the least. I am a fan of Sanders and Gabbard. I prefer Sanders due to his stronger socialist policie…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/20 02:42 PM
1

Bernie/Tulsi ticket would be great 100% Agree. Also. Happy Cake Day!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/20 05:14 AM
16

Except women are not inherently better cooks. That's BS
/r/FeminismStopsWhen05/02/20 06:31 PM
2

Equal Divorce Courts Equal retirement ages Equal sentencing principles Equal concscription Equal ability to take time of work. And we want social rights. The right to not be seen as ATMs / breadwinners. The right to be equally as likely to be approached when dating. The right to want a fair deal in a partner w/o being criticized. The right to have dates paid for. The right to given as much compliments and love that women get.
/r/MensRights05/02/20 04:40 PM
6

As well as when it comes to making the first move, paying for dates, doing the heavy lifting, designing office dress codes, and of course family court
/r/MensRights05/02/20 04:36 PM
2

I think there should be no poverty, or even a lower-middle class lifestyle. There should be no excess wealth either. Professionals can make money, as can entrepreneurs. Make a lot of money. I think though that a wealth cap of say $50M or so would be great. My main policies: We should bring back the 1950s wealth levels for the middle class. A 1950s factory worker had a better life than someone becoming a lawyer in the 2020s can expect to have. Let's to go back to one income and a 40 hour workweek…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/01/20 04:16 PM
1

None of the media is going to push against any dating/relationship norm that removes female privilege. I agree. Which is where I see that Frozen failed. I think that the marrying down though is a good first step via socialization. In Tangled, Rapunzel, a princess, married an orphaned criminal who felt that he had to steal because of lack of economic opportunity. There is way too much problems and socialization issues. And while we must acknowledge the grim reality, we also need to celebrate what…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/20 02:35 PM
10

The consequences are that women need to put in less effort and just marry up. This is despite the fact that affirmative action and constant self-esteem boosts make life a LOT easier for women to get ahead. Men work harder for their earnings. Men are seen as workhorses for the capitalists, and also an ATM for women. For generations, when the economy was based on physical strength, men married down. Now women are economically privileged but statistically refuse to do so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/20 01:54 PM
2

widely interpreted as a metaphor for LGBT experiences. Yep. The thing is many people have related to Elsa. LGBTQ+ for sure, but so do those with autism, depression, those who are faithless in a religious family, etc. My issue is when people see it exclusively as a LGTBQ+ anthem and see it as "overwhelming evidence that Elsa is gay". Elsa and Frozen mean a lot to a lot of people with a lot of identities, and her singleness means a lot. Making her gay cheapens her
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/20 01:47 PM
2

It actually reinforces the stereotype of men being the bumbling idiot. How? Olaf is comic relief, he is meant to be the funny naïve (childlikeish) sidekick. (He also is merchandise) The Duke of Weselton is a scheming villain, as is Hans. Not an idiot. Agnarr is seen as a good King. Mattias is a competent Lieutenant. Kristoff is a vagrant orphaned peasant, as in he is from a disadvantaged background. He isn't an idiot - he is a very useful sidekick in Frozen. Now in Frozen II he was reduced to a …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/20 01:43 PM
3

Fair enough!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/01/20 03:16 AM
6

and the men weren't portrayed as dumb like in every sitcom and commercial. Yes. That is annoying!!!! And yeah, they made good movie w/ good messages w/o being SJW about it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/20 09:22 PM
4

I like your analysis. Now I like Frozen even more, Amazing!!! Thanks! do fast forward through 99% of the songs, lol. Interesting. Considering that most people cite the songs as among their favourite parts. Any reason you don't like the songs. I have been banned from the mensrights reddit. They normally don't ban.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/20 09:17 PM
5

Right off the bat I appreciated how it dispelled feminine Disney stereotypes without resorting to a heavy handed “look everyone!!! Women!!! Power!!! FEMINISM!!!!” YES!!! That was an amazing part of the film! I related to the characters in many ways. Elsa and Anna quite a bit but I do like Kristoff's arc as well re: marrying up
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/20 09:15 PM
4

Never thought about it this way! That is an amazing theory!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/20 09:13 PM
5

I really like your analysis though. Especially how some of it is empowering to both men and women Thanks!! average Frozen fan Is a 6-10 year old. I think they will pick up on it well! Philogyny Learned a new word! they might "get" it It has the upvotes on r/Frozen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/20 09:12 PM
2

Elsa is very much a Mary Sue. In addition to ice powers, she can create sentient snowmen, is extremely intelligent (especially when it comes to engineering and math), a beloved and competent Queen, a loving sister, and someone who is very physically attractive as well. Her "flaw" really is the guilt and anxiety which she bares. And her sense of duty causing her to want to do it all. She is flawed, but in a very Mary Sue kind of way. Anna of course is more flawed, but she too is extremely kind he…
/r/MensRights28/01/20 08:52 PM
3

Not in Canada
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/20 08:16 PM
1

Ideal for who? I think it is bad. But society views it as an idea. eisure was almost unheard of until very recently That is a lie. Medieval peasants had more leisure than we do. In the 1950s, men wored 40 hours a week, women did house work, and everyone had more leisure. Now men and women both work 60+ hours a week for less wealth than we had in the 1950s
/r/MensRights28/01/20 06:33 PM
3

Hisotrically societal norms was against sleeping around then settling down. Now that is the ideal. Historically, societal norms were against women having careers. Now it is in favour of it. Feminists managed to change societal norms, MRAs need to work to do the same
/r/MensRights28/01/20 06:01 PM
5

The idea being that this sort of socialization since childhood will change societal norms
/r/MensRights28/01/20 05:38 PM
13

Cause: Affirmative Action. Women getting a lot of empowerment support. Women get praised. Dating norms giving women a LOT more self-esteem. Now if women would marry down and financially support men this wouldn't be as much of a concern. But women in large part still see men as ATMs. Solution is simple. End gender based affirmative action. Change socialization that gives male and female empowerment and provides for examples of women marrying down
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/01/20 03:21 PM
3

Every man pays for sex. You just pay indirectly. Every man pays for love. That's the problem. Women are the sellers, the capitalists if you will. Creating a systematic oppression problem that needs to be solves via socialization of men and women at a young age
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/20 09:17 PM
2

I see your emotional experience as concerning. Hearing all these stories about emotional abuse makes me feel that men will never get to be happy. That they are never really loved. Men have to listen to women, but women do not care of their own partner's problems.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/20 06:53 PM
1

How??? Women are the one's reducing men to objects. As dicks in their 20s and as sperm cells, wallets, etc. in their 30s. It is akin to men leaving their wives and sleeping around w/ younger women when they turn 45. Women tend to be more desriable vis-à-vis men when younger and vice verca when older. Socially enforced monogamy equalized it. Women, many of them anyway, are exploting that. I also have issues with the notion of hook ups as it inherently reduces the value of the opposite gender to s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/20 06:43 PM
5

ometimes I’m having a down day and I want to vent. I have dozens of stressors constantly plaguing me and I want to talk about them. Except I can’t. Yes!! That's is f*cking annoying. Women get soo many emotional support networks, especially compared to men. Another reason I wish I was a woman. But if your partner is not letting you express yourself, then it looks like the issue is with your partner
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/20 06:40 PM
0

The young age is though is the foundational era of finding partners. Being single till 30 so that some 30 year old ex-slut can "settle down" with you isn't going to solve anything
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/20 06:31 PM
3

Where's the enforcement part? I'm calling for a return to a culture which valued humans as humans and not as sex objects / ATMs / sperm cells / wombs. It is not about men owning women or women owning men. The decline of commitment has primarily benefitted women at the expense of men. h fuck you Pradeep. Even your own women are tired of getting dick pics every 12 seconds. I don't send d*ck picks. There is no such thing as "own woman". Race / colour doesn't matter. Take your white supremacist POV …
/r/MensRights27/01/20 04:24 PM
6

I think both genders should be looking for life partners and am not a fan of the hookup culture. And yes, I am actually attracted to high income earners / successful women. BUT, I am also saying that one of the many privileges of being a woman is that they get a lot of attraction as self-esteem boosts. and if they ever feel like hooking up it is easy for them
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:36 PM
3

No, the world isn't based on "lookism" it's alot deeper than that Yes. I know. I am referring to one specific aspect. When you say shit like "degeneracy" you're sounding like a third-world weirdo who wants to own a woman with his own right hand, but that's not how it works in western culture. No. I am simply calling for a return to socially enforced monogamy. Where people did not sleep around but rather believed in commitment. I am not claling for 3rd world ownership. f you think it's so awesome…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 03:13 PM
3

You're missing the point. I am saying that it is easier for a woman to be physically attractive to the opposite gender. She wants attention, she can easily get it. Imagine all the self-esteem boosts
/r/MensRights27/01/20 01:58 PM
5

It's easy for women to get attention but not the kind of attention anyone would want. A lot of it has to do with degeneracy culture has taken over society and replaced the socially enforced monogamy. Degeneracy culture sucks for society as a whole, but was advocated by many 2nd wave feminists. Because it allows women to sleep around when younger and then commit when older while it leaves many men w/o love in their 20s. A lot of it has to do w/ women having the privilege to be approached. If wome…
/r/MensRights27/01/20 01:54 PM
3

Good one!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/20 03:29 PM
7

Amazing! Thanks!!! Should be sidebarred and crossposted to r/MensRights For the MLM definition, I would add that many MRAs feel that by refusing to be critical of 3rd wave femnisim, it is doing a disservice to men's issues. For incel, I would add that r/ForeverAlone is good current representation of what "Incel" used to be about
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/20 03:19 PM
0

If one wants kids what is he supposed to do
/r/MensRights23/01/20 10:46 PM
12

Oh yeah. Things are f*cked up. Men are still seen as ATMs (aka breadwinners or providers) for women
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/20 10:46 PM
18

Makes sense. School system favours women. Women have more social support, empathy, self-esteem boosts allowing to focus more. Men need to expend resources finding love while women get resources spent on them. Affirmative action makes it easier for women to find work. Decline of manufacturing has mostly impact men. Men are the economically oppressed class, and are still expected to be ATMs
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/20 10:45 PM
22

Which is why men need to stop marrying down. Refuse to take a loosing deal, despite all the pressure you may face. Equality goes both ways, women have higher earning potential these days. It is about time that women start financially supporting their husbands
/r/MensRights23/01/20 08:56 PM
3

Rampant wealth inequality and the wrecking of the working and middle class is one of the greatest and most fundamental causes of male suffering. And the way these things are talked about in the media, it seems like only the most powerful men are singled out and focused on, giving the impression that men have it fine and dandy as a class, ignoring all the homeless and rock-bottom men. Or patriarchy theory giving the impression that, because Jeff Bezos is a man, all the woes of capitalism are some…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/20 10:48 PM
5

Oh yeah! Wealth inequality is F*cke dup. At leas the US has Sanders and he has a big following. No one in Canada seems to care enough about it. Changing topics, what is the subs rule on things that are just left wing items in general, and do not relate to male issues?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/20 09:22 PM
2

Yep. Because of corporatist trade deals putting an end to local manufacturing, disproportionately impacting men. At the same time, housing prices rose 10% a year!!! And while men are being disproportionately impacted, men are still expected to be ATMs / breadwinners / providers for their wives and families
/r/MensRights21/01/20 03:22 PM
5

I agree, well kind of. As a minority, I feel like "race" privilege is overstated. It is more connections /establishment privilege, which is correlated with race but is not race itself. There are somethings like sentencing and police behaviour of course though which the evidence is undeniable. And yes, I think female privilege is overwhelmingly present in western society. I don't really see any sort of male privileges out there other than having shorter lines in the bathroom and not having to get…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/20 02:46 PM
2

Ouch! Sorry to hear that
/r/MensRights21/01/20 01:10 AM
2

I want a fair deal. Like most of my peers have. Just because I am male doesn't mean I should have to be an ATM, especially women have higher earning potential than me. No one told my dream girl who turned me down to go down 2 steps to be with me, I shouldn't have to go down 20. I came from a position of relative unprivilege and worked my way up. The fact that I should till have to marry down after that is f*cked up. Look. I cannot find a good partner period. Someone who shares my values and I ca…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 01:12 AM
5

Toronto. But I mean that logically I don't think that I'll ever find one. There are a lot of women, but most of society is degenerate - I want someone who shares my values. And I want a fair deal, like my peers I want someone about as successful as myself which is doesn't seem to be happening. I have been unable to find a mutual click with anyone. Yeah we need to contribute. I already bring a lot to the table and want a fair deal. But part of romance is a special love of being valued
/r/MensRights18/01/20 12:11 AM
9

"Incel" is the epitome of victim blaming. It happens because of a decline of socially enforced monogamy + dating rules being easier for women + men not being allowed to convey emotion. I've been there. I know that I will never be loved. My life, no matter how good it might seem resume wise, will never be good cause I will never be loved unconditionally for who I am. If suicide didn't shame my family, I would have done it. I'm functional and at peace. But I am not happy and the idea that I would …
/r/MensRights17/01/20 01:40 PM
5

Because Men are seen as ATMs. Logically the best interest of the child would be placing it w/ the Father, the non-fraudulent parent. But women are seen as "natural better parents" and men have been reduced to mere ATMs - the male provider role is just that. As a man I cannot have a kid unless a woman agrees to be my wife. But a woman can have sex or a kid, and get it paid for, very easily. It's crazy how much better women have it
/r/MensRights17/01/20 01:31 PM
1

u/TechWiz717
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/20 01:19 AM
4

As a South Asian of Muslim background, I also am happy that we all agree how nonsensical this is
/r/MensRights13/01/20 08:42 PM
2

Hit it right on the head
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/20 06:05 PM
3

The thing is women are more collective and men are more individualistic. Gender dynamics are a prisoner's dilemma. Women are able to work together to fight for the advancement of their gender. Men for some reason are not able to. Men are essentially all partaking in a rat race, causing us all to suffer. Which is why the only way I see change is if the government interacts and socializes the genders from a young age
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/20 02:51 PM
1

And this occurs because men are expected to work more hours and be providers. The fact that women get to work less hours needs to end. Now let's add how much men are expected to spend on women vs vice-verca. Yes. Women come out ahead
/r/MensRights13/01/20 02:00 PM
6

And this occurs because men are expected to work more hours and be providers. The fact that women get to work less hours needs to end. Now let's add how much men are expected to spend on women vs vice-verca. Yes. Women come out ahead
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/20 01:59 PM
5

Preferences I am okay with if it something like "I am just not attracted to brown girls". (though it may be worth questioning the subconscious reasons why). But I have issue with people who only date those from their own ethnicity. And yes, I have issue with the double standard as well
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/20 10:52 PM
8

Know this first hand. I have been heavily criticized for wanting a woman who is at least about as successful as myself and who shares my moral values. I want a fair deal. But at the same time, I am told that I just need to accept rejection from women, even if it is for something as offensive as them wanting a guy from the same ethnicity as them
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/01/20 09:58 PM
1

Thank you for proving my point about men not getting sympathy. Jordan Peterson is a victim blaming a--hole and you are proving my point. That everyone's suffering is somehow their own fault - luck, society, other people have nothing to do with one's issues. If one just pulls up their bootstraps we would all be better of. Newsfalsh, compared to the 1950s we have been working harder for less due to increasing corporatist policeis. Peterson has made some good points on identiy politics but honestly…
/r/MensRights10/01/20 03:53 AM
5

How? We more "pure" capitalism since then thanks to people like Regan and Thatcher. We have lower taxes on the super rich, opened trade deals, and deregulated and privatized the economy. We had more socialist policies back then
/r/MensRights09/01/20 09:18 PM
6

Interesting you say that, considering that quality of life was better in the 1950s / 60s. Since then, we have been working harder and producing more wealth for our corporate overlords for a lower quality of life
/r/MensRights09/01/20 08:53 PM
4

100%. I am with you there. I am primarily an economic leftist and abhor identity politics. Saying this as a visible minority
/r/MensRights09/01/20 08:52 PM
10

I agree. If a man complains he "is being a Beta" and that women acting that way "is just their nature"
/r/MensRights09/01/20 01:56 AM
14

Yep. One of the reasons I really wish I was a woman
/r/MensRights08/01/20 11:14 PM
1

100%
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 05:22 PM
3

I'm really sorry to hear about your experiences. Wishing you all the best.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 04:02 PM
1

Yep. 100%. Would be nice if there was work done to get gender equality on this front
/r/MensRights07/01/20 03:59 PM
2

What happened afterwards. How did you come to terms w/ loosing your privilege
/r/MensRights07/01/20 03:53 PM
2

double the workforce and you effectively halve the value of labour. Yep. Women entering the workforce should have resulted in men working less hours. Not a situation where everyone wors. That having 'a career' is better than having more time to spend at home with your kids. Is it fuck. I agree. I'd much rather spend time with my kids than a corporate serf. Yet somehow corporations have convinced people that being a serf is a privilege and spending time with your kids is an obligation and comes i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 02:28 PM
4

I agree. Identity politics has caused the left to loose focus and quit addressing the real issue. Saying this as a visible minority
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 02:08 PM
2

It's like everyone always assumes the best of girls and the worst of boys. Yep it is crazy. I've seen the effect when it comes to romantic rejection. If a guy is rejected it is because on how he did something wrong. If a girl is rejected, the outpour of sympathy arrives.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:27 PM
0

1 in 4 women are sexually assaulted before the age of 21 Source? Besides men sexual assault is underreported due to stigma. Plus with all the false rape accusations, the actual number is probably a lot lower. dress code during school is stricter for women Not where I live (Toronto). No dress codes here regardless of gender. But men normally don't walk around shirtless so it is women who really have lower standards. Besides in any office it is reversed. Dress shirts + dress pants for men, T-Shirt…
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:23 PM
1

Not from my experience. I get the whole "Mean Girls" thingy but women also have closer friendships as well from what I have observed
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:19 PM
3

Yep
/r/MensRights07/01/20 01:18 PM
6

convey more value to domestic labor performed by women. Yes & No. Domestic labour is undervalued so that corporations can get people in the workplace and lower wages. It is also overvalued by feminists and TradCons - it is not the hardest job in the world. So we need to reduce the 'enslaved houswife' message but not overvalue the work.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 01:18 PM
2

Wait. You work 60 hours + do 2 / hours a day on chores? How many hours does your wife work. And that is the problem with the corporatist system. In the 1950s we only needed one income, now we need 2. We ae working twice as hard for a lower standard of living
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 01:16 PM
1

Interesting insight!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 01:15 PM
13

Yep. It's crazy. Men are the one's expected to work more hours for the corporate overlords, which causes the "wage gap", yet somehow it is seen as oppression against women. I am waiting for the day when a man could just as easily hope to marry up and be supported. That would be true equality
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/20 04:03 AM
8

Yep. Housework is less glamourous but it is easy. Housewives / stay-at-home moms have it made
/r/MensRights07/01/20 03:58 AM
4

r/NotTheOnion
/r/MensRights07/01/20 03:47 AM
1

Usually men who have the labour intensive long hour jobs that disallow them from voting
/r/MensRights07/01/20 03:46 AM
10

Remember, womens' sufferagates were also referred to as spinistressess and old maids. AKA incels. They have no argument so they resort to cheap name calling
/r/MensRights02/01/20 04:36 PM
2

Seriously. Not wanting to kill your self is cowardice. It is a case of women having more support system. But you turn a case of discrimination against men into an anti-women tirade.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 08:07 PM
6

Cause they are brainwashed into believing that they are oppressed because of their gender, despite having it easier
/r/MensRights24/12/19 01:44 PM
6

I doubt that is true. Men have higher suicide rates. Women are probably diagnosed more due to stigma against male mental health issues and men being attacked for expressing emotions
/r/MensRights24/12/19 01:44 PM
1

i missed that memo that this was actually me oppressing her, she didn't though and made it clear i was the lucky one I don't get how people actually unironically believe this. That living of your husband's labour means that you are being opressed
/r/MensRights24/12/19 01:39 PM
1

support a 1950s lifestyle. Which was superior to modern life
/r/MensRights23/12/19 06:13 PM
1

Could you support a spouse and kids? Anyone can support themselves? 1950s salary allowed you support a family
/r/MensRights23/12/19 05:54 PM
1

I save. I've been saving for a down payment since I was 15. Which is stupid as this should not be a concern and it wasn't in the past but now it is cause housing prices rise 10% a year due to corporate excess raising real estate prices. So year, a 1950s factory worker could work 40 hours a week and afford a house w/ a reasonable commute and support a spouse in kids. A modern lawyer needs to work 60-80 hours a week and cannot afford that due to housing costs through the roof. Globalization has ef…
/r/MensRights23/12/19 05:43 PM
2

I save. I've been saving for a down payment since I was 15. Which is stupid as this should not be a concern and it wasn't in the past but now it is cause housing prices rise 10% a year due to corporate excess raising real estate prices. So year, a 1950s factory worker could work 40 hours a week and afford a house w/ a reasonable commute and support a spouse in kids. A modern lawyer needs to work 60-80 hours a week and cannot afford that due to housing costs through the roof. Globalization has ef…
/r/MensRights23/12/19 05:43 PM
2

Right. So let's ignore data because it goes against world view. Objectively, we are working harder for less compared to the 1950s. And FYI, I am in law school so not sure what "better' job is. And I would have been far better off as a 1950s lawyer. A 1950s teacher or retail manager would have it better. Even a 1950s factory worker considering how crazy the cost of living is
/r/MensRights23/12/19 05:17 PM
4

But if a man did that, he would be arrested for indecent exposure, and rightly so. Yay equality /s
/r/MensRights23/12/19 02:36 PM
1

Cause men dress professionally and women don't. And yet they complain about their "burden"
/r/MensRights23/12/19 02:14 PM
1

Yep. Men dressing formally at all levels and women cannot even dress up for parliament. Female sense of entitlement right there
/r/MensRights23/12/19 02:13 PM
2

Ah yes. The Myth of overconsumption: "https://slate.com/business/2016/05/overspending-isnt-why-americans-are-in-debt-an-excerpt-from-elizabeth-warrens-the-two-income-trap-explains-why.html" Yeah, the 1950s were great for America So it is true and not a myth. And life was better in the 1950s throughout the western world. We are producing more wealth than before though so the country is doing fine; the corporate elite are just exploiting us more. tiny black-and-white TV Again we have a few more to…
/r/MensRights23/12/19 02:11 PM
1

Cause men dress professionally and women don't. And yet they complain about their "burden"
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:22 PM
4

Yoga pants are tight pants. Leggings are not even pants
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:21 PM
6

But comparatively speaking, men put up with more. It's like having an article which states that "private school kids put up with a lot"
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:18 PM
11

business casual is pretty broad. For women yes. Their "business casual" can include a tank top and shorts. For men, it is long sleeve dress shirts & dress pants. If you are lucky, it may cover a short sleeved dress shirt
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:15 PM
14

On the flip side, because of that flexibility Oh no, I have too many options. That is part of patriarchial oppression /s If we make rules, then we are in trouble for telling women what to wear. If we don't make rules, we are in trouble for being vague
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:14 PM
2

In the 1950s one person with a high school education could work 40 hours a week and support a spouse and two kids. People with degrees had it made Now due to corporate trade deals killing local manufacturing people are forced to go into white collar jobs requiring multiple degrees, work 60-80 hours a week each, produce more wealth than ever before, get no pension, have crumbling infrastructure as the corporate elite don't pay taxes anymore, housing prices are through the roof, employers no longe…
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:12 PM
3

It's not just attractiveness though. It is wealth and female privilege as well. And if you are smart / ambitious / etc, then you have that plus the attractiveness bonus. I've gone to school with these kinds of people, their lives are pretty much perfect
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:31 AM
3

So the fact that most of our wealth goes to our corporate overlords is not oppression? That compared to the 1950s we are working harder for a lower quality of life is not oppression?
/r/MensRights23/12/19 01:28 AM
1

This does relate to standard office dress code discrimination. Women already dress more casually and want to go a step further
/r/MensRights22/12/19 07:24 PM
6

I do blame her. She is probably clamouring for "gender equality" and claiming how she is oppressed. Women who claim to believe in equality but take advantage of gender roles are grade A hypocrites.
/r/MensRights22/12/19 06:21 PM
1

Wow!!
/r/MensRights19/12/19 01:13 PM
1

Oh yeah. I worked at a county office and the rule was dress shirts + dress pants + dress shoes for men. Women, it wasn't even being presentable. Sleeveless tops were okay, as were miniskirts and capris. They did not have to be formal. They could also wear T-Shirts and khaki pants, or really any pants as long as they were black. (no jeans, leggings, or yoga pants though). On Fridays, men could were T-Shirts and jeans, but no shorts. Women could wear essentially anything = leggings, yoga pants, sh…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 08:08 PM
1

Yes of course. That to
/r/MensRights17/12/19 08:03 PM
11

No you don't get it. The Patriarchy allows men to reduce their carbon footprints and cost of living. /s
/r/MensRights17/12/19 04:03 PM
8

Office is wrong. Men have to wear dress shoes while women can just come in whatever
/r/MensRights17/12/19 04:02 PM
5

The Freemasons remain a men only space
/r/MensRights17/12/19 04:01 PM
3

r/NotTheOnion
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:59 PM
10

But but but but I though that men didn't care about kids and spend all their time and money watching sports and drinking beer. /s
/r/MensRights17/12/19 03:59 PM
5

Men are unfortunately just seen as ATMs. My Mother and I have debated this kind of stuff multiple times. She thinks that men should take pride in being able to support their wives and that I should be open to marrying women who aren't as successful as I am and should let my wife not work if that is what she prefers.
/r/MensRights11/12/19 02:45 AM
8

A job disproportionately available to women who then claimed that they are oppressed by it
/r/MensRights11/12/19 01:46 AM
5

There we go. Overwhelming proof that women are better people. /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/12/19 06:58 PM
1

Congratulations on finding the one!!!! Being single till 37 sounds horrible though. How did you manage? Also, how old was she when you got married?
/r/MensRights05/12/19 04:09 PM
7

The divorce laws are cruel to the party with the most assets That is one of my rationals and something I use when justifying my decision. there is some serious hypocrisy on their part. 100% One of the many hypocrisies modern women have
/r/MensRights04/12/19 10:39 PM
31

duty as men is to always provide Sorry. I am not an ATM. Women need to stop seeing as as such
/r/MensRights04/12/19 07:24 PM
1

Yes. Sleeping around and then wanting someone else to settle down with is wrong
/r/MensRights04/12/19 07:23 PM
46

Yes. As a man I have been pressured extensively and criticized for not wanting to marry down. Sorry I want a fair deal. If I were a woman, you would be respecting me for valuing myself and not giving my love to any random person.
/r/MensRights04/12/19 07:22 PM
4

Meanwhile women consistently acutally sexual assault women and get away with it.
/r/MensRights27/11/19 09:02 PM
2

I agree. I am not a Brit but I would vote for them regardless. And raising pensions for women would bring money to the whole family unit in general.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/11/19 01:42 AM
1

most women would prefer to stay home with their kids. As a man I would prefer to do this when the kids are young. Unfortunately, a greater portion of women would rather neglect their kids so that they can be a "privileged" office worker over an "oppressed" mother. So feminist propaganda has gone against women's own interest
/r/MensRights26/11/19 05:03 PM
2

some women do while living for free in houses paid for by men, off utilities paid for by men, off food provided by men, etc. This. This is what people need to understand. Stay-At-Home parents, mostly women, not only get to spend quality time with the kids and take a break from work, they get their partner to do all the labour so that they can live the easy life
/r/MensRights26/11/19 02:02 PM
1

Eh. I personally am not a fan of UBI. Plus he supports VAT, which is highly regressive. And like everyone, he thinks Stay-At-Home moms who live of male labour are working for free: https://twitter.com/AndrewYang/status/1009861540076539907
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/19 02:01 PM
1

How so?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/11/19 04:35 AM
3

Ah good to know. Thanks!
/r/MensRights25/11/19 08:04 PM
2

Curious. Where are you located?
/r/MensRights25/11/19 07:53 PM
11

WTF??? How are they kept out? The reason men have the dangerous jobs are because men re still seen as ATMs, as providers, as resources for women. That' it. Women need to start being providers. Until it is equally likely for men to be financially supported by women, there won't be equality
/r/MensRights25/11/19 07:50 PM
3

Congratulations!!!!!
/r/MensRights25/11/19 07:46 PM
2

That's what I told her. She had no response
/r/FeminismStopsWhen25/11/19 05:08 PM
2

I think a Sanders/Gabbard 2020 ticket is what America (and the world) needs, I think they would have a great chance of defeating Trump, and they cover each other's weaknesses quite well. This!!!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/19 04:30 PM
4

Why would I trust a Billionaire to help anyone. In fact, since he is pro-Billionaire, the only way he can really be "left" is if he is willing to launch into the feminist identity politics. So I see him an a hinderance to men. The most pro-male candidates I see would be Bernie (who wants to bring back local manufacturing (jobs generally held by men)) and reduce the cost of living (men are still the primary breadwinners / ATMs of society so will benefit from this), and Tulsi (who is anti-war and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/19 04:30 PM
1

It's called an exit tax
/r/MensRights25/11/19 01:17 PM
3

Oh yeah. I usually ignore them
/r/MensRights25/11/19 02:38 AM
-1

Because compared to the 1950s we have been working harder for less throughout the Western World. We are producing more wealth yet more and more is going to megacorporations and billionaires who are richer than ever while our standards of living are dropping. Labour under Corbyn has pleged to fix it
/r/MensRights25/11/19 02:38 AM
3

*Upper-Middle class and Upper class white women. And yes. It is like this in Canada as well. I went to undergrad with them. Their lives are more or heaven like than anyone else's. Yet they are very likely to talk about how their lives would be better if they were men and how the "patriarchy" is holding them back
/r/MensRights25/11/19 12:13 AM
3

I agree. Making both retirement ages 63 would have been very possible. We are producing more wealth than ever before, we are just getting lesser and lesser of it (in both relative and absolute terms)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/11/19 12:11 AM
2

I don't live in the UK but Brits here should do this
/r/MensRights25/11/19 12:09 AM
17

That's what I told her
/r/FeminismStopsWhen24/11/19 11:17 PM
36

Only if you are female
/r/FeminismStopsWhen24/11/19 09:59 PM
4

I discussed this w/ two female friends of mine. Friend 1 agrees that the compensation scheme is nonsense. Compensating the privileged party goes against the idea of making it equal and she does think it should be equal. Friend 2 supports this and thinks that women should retire early. Her argument: "Women work less hours when they are younger as they take care of kids so they should be able to retire early". Not exaggerating or misrepresenting. Her argument was that since women work less hours t…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 09:08 PM
6

I discussed this w/ two female friends of mine. Friend 1 agrees that the compensation scheme is nonsense. Compensating the privileged party goes against the idea of making it equal she does think it should be equal. Friend 2 supports this and thinks that women should retire early. Her argument: "Women work less hours when they are younger as they take care of kids so they should be able to retire early". Not exaggerating or misrepresenting. Her argument was that since women work less hours they …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/11/19 09:05 PM
11

I discussed this w/ two female friends of mine. Friend 1 agrees that the compensation scheme is nonsense. Compensating the privileged party goes against the idea of making it equal and she does think it should be equal. Friend 2 supports this and thinks that women should retire early. Her argument: "Women work less hours when they are younger as they take care of kids so they should be able to retire early". Not exaggerating or misrepresenting. Her argument was that since women work less hours t…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 09:05 PM
1

Yeah but you see women have the right to marry up and be provided for. It's our biology. It is men who have to work and support us. Really, we should be having a retirement age of 25. Of course we have the right to work less hours and get he same pay as men, - but we have no obligation to support others. /s
/r/MensRights24/11/19 07:44 PM
3

Which means I'd probably being thanking her for paying and giving her some low-key praise for making a material effort to achieve gender equality, That's smart!
/r/MensRights24/11/19 01:31 PM
3

I just meant that they are critical of feminism and feminist culture, don't support chivalry or gynocentrism Ah got it. Thanks!
/r/MensRights24/11/19 02:49 AM
2

Thanks!
/r/MensRights24/11/19 02:48 AM
9

https://removeddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/e0nvtz/aita_for_leaving_my_date_with_the_bill/
/r/MensRights24/11/19 01:09 AM
2

Yes. Chivalry is 100% pure systematic oppression against men. Women are not special goddesses or angels. They do not get special treatment. Women who call for chivalry while also claiming to want equality are hypocrites of the gutter.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 11:38 PM
5

Yep. Men had to die; women relaxed in the safety of home. And yet they had to gall to say that they were oppressed. Let's enact true gender equality. 50% of military combat deaths need to be women. Let's bring affirmative action to the front lines
/r/MensRights23/11/19 06:38 PM
3

My husband and brother are both redpill, but don't necessarily identify as an MRA. So they believe that women won't to oppress men in the dating dynamic, but don't think men are oppressed? That doesn't make much sense to me I would be a member whether or not I had any men in my life because I can't stand to such injustices and unfairness in the world. Thank you!!! they've embraced all of the feminist platitudes they like for themselves, while holding men to all of their traditional expectations …
/r/MensRights23/11/19 05:44 PM
17

Equal opportunity employer. Unless you are male. I'm happy Canada doesn't have selective service. I'd loose it if I have to risk dying so that women, who already are privileged, can continue to live their easier lives and complain how bad they have it
/r/MensRights23/11/19 02:00 AM
10

Women have closer friend connections Women get sympathy. Men are seen as loosers if they complain about life, especially re: dating Dating is eaiser for women Women get celebrated and complimented more. Women's lives are as a whole easier
/r/MensRights23/11/19 01:58 AM
4

Yep. Women are freed form their traditional gender roles but men are still expected to be workers, providers, resources, ATMs. Despite women having higher earning potential than men, men are still seen as ATMs.
/r/MensRights23/11/19 01:57 AM
1

The point in the book is that 1 income families in 1974 have more disposable income than 2 income familieis in 2004. Have you looked at housing prices over the year? (Do I need to find a paper to prove something as clear as that?) It's impossible now to buy a house on one income. Take a look at tuition prices. Lack of local manufacturing means people are effectively forced to go to school. Infrstrucutre has fallen apart. At this point, you are just ignorning reality. AGAIN. 1950S 40 HOURS GAVE M…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/19 12:14 AM
0

I think there is a good case to be made that overall, people today are not any more exploited than in the 20th century, and lead longer, healthier, and dare I say it, maybe even happier lives Happiness peaked in the 1960s. As I have said before. We are working more hours, both parents are working, and cost of living is through the roof. Read: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Two-Income_Trap We are, objectively speaking, working harder for less. Look at the cost of housing. Lawyers and doctors a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/19 08:16 PM
6

Yep. Been there. I was just trying to know more about you as a friend. If I got good vibes, I would have moved to dating. The idea that women expect men to be clear from the start, while they can evade, needs to end
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/19 05:12 PM
0

More dangerous than the Third World countries starving without them, Because of corporate greed and poor distribution - we have more than enough food. Poisoning people to feed them is stupid. So are you going to be OK with living a life where there are no three-point seatbelts (introduced by Volvo in 1959) and no polio vaccine? Yes there are somethings better now. But I rather live in a time when we had more socialist policies and a better overall quality of life. And they are not mutually exclu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/19 05:07 PM
0

even less than you do now (now matter how much or little that is), but instead, there would be drastically more equality? I rather go back to the 1950s (minus the racism, sexism, etc.) where the average person had more wealth in absolute terms. You know when one person working 40 hours could afford to support a spouse, kids, and have a house w/in a short commute and job with a pension Would you rather we didn't have internet, GMO crops, or... what technology is the most problematic to you? GMOs …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/19 03:26 PM
2

These advices existed in the 1950s as well. There was a lot more leisure time back then. And now we all work
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/19 03:21 PM
1

This. The whole comment
/r/MensRights22/11/19 01:44 AM
2

links to other subs, Would that include cross-posts from subs like r/MensRights? I think there is a place for memes, etc. Maybe a Memes Monday or something. Keeps low-effort stuff to one day a week. Many subs do that
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/19 07:10 PM
0

u/Userleansbot
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 06:52 PM
0

Yes. So you want to abolish government and cause anarchy. A law of the jungle where some can just prey on the others.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 06:52 PM
1

you blame rich people for the facts that housing prices have gone up? Yes. Because increased concentration of wealth has caused the ultra-rich to park money in real estate. And wages have not kept up with housing prices. said you have to live downtown LA Corps also abolished local manufacturing and had corporate consolidation forcing everyone into cities causing price raises. In the 1950s, we could get a good house w/ a reasonable commute. We now have to choose bwetween size and convenience. Aga…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 06:22 PM
1

u/UserLeansBot
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 06:19 PM
1

Right. So we should accept that quality of life has just been getting worse of the years as we are more educated, produce more wealth, work more hours, for less real wealth. In the 50s a factory worker working 40 hours a week could afford to support a spuse and 4 kids. Now both parents need to work and can barely afford a place to live, even if they are lawyers
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 06:19 PM
0

How about creating a system that allows everyone have a better quality of life, like we did in the 1950s. Vs the system now in which quality of life except for the corporate overlords, the top 0.01% which has capital and lives on the labour of others has more $ than they know what to do with. If you rather worship corporations vs make sure you profit from your labour, I cannot help you
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 06:12 PM
0

They got the wealth via the exploitation of others. Im not violently taking it. It's called taxes. Do you wish to abolish all forms of taxation?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 03:09 PM
5

Because, well, of course both parents will be working full time and never have time for their children!” It really is a shame that many people on the modern left see this an ideal. Rather than actually reducing the cost of living so that a 40 hour workweek would be what is needed to support a family and that parents can be there for their kids. Unfortunately, other than Corbyn, no one is talking about reducing the workweek or making it that 40 hours can once again support a family
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/19 02:29 PM
4

Children shouldn't be a burden on people's lives, they should be a celebration. The idea of universal child care treats it like that. It tells people, especially women, that their main purpose, their main goal, is to work for their corporate overlord and make money for them. Kids are a nuisance that the government will care for so that you can serve your corporation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/19 02:27 PM
1

u/UserLeansBot
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/19 01:19 PM
2

you can buy with 2019 dollars are a lot better than things you could have bought with 1950 dollars. Because of technology progression through time. But 1. New technology in many ways has caused more problems than are worth. Especially tech developed since the turn of the millennium. It doesn't matter that even the working poor can afford iPhones if even doctors and lawyers cannot afford a place to live. We are producing more wealth than before, but in absolute and real terms, we are getting less…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/19 01:18 PM
1

u/UserLeansBot
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/19 01:15 PM
6

Real GDP per-capita Yes. How much wealth we produce. We are producing more wealth, but are bennefitting less from it. Compared to the 1950s: 1. We need to spend more years in school 2. We are now expected to work free overtime 3. Housing costs have gone through the roof 4. Employers don't provide pensions 5. We only needed one income to support a family, now we need two. In the 1950s, a guy out of high school could work 40 hours and support a wife and kids. Now even lawyers and doctors struggle …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/11/19 01:14 PM
0

1% Worldwide is stupid comparison cause of the exponential nature of wealth and differing cost of living The super rich are those living on capital as opposed ot labour. So like the top 0.01% in the west
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 01:10 PM
1

1950s have top tax rate > 90%. Put in an exit tax to stop people from leaving. Done
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 01:08 PM
2

r/UserLeansBot
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 03:10 AM
1

Well that doesn't exist in Canada. You just cannot accept that not everyone is a greedy evil capitalist?
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 02:51 AM
-8

No. Because we didn't want to profit from a single minimum wage working mother
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 01:31 AM
-10

My parents actually did rent out a condo at below market rates.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 01:18 AM
-12

As a socialist I disagree. I don't mind paying more taxes, as long as super rich pay even more. The issue is that the middle and lower classes pay higher tax rate than the super rich
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 12:19 AM
3

Bad Bot
/r/FeminismStopsWhen21/11/19 12:18 AM
2

Thanks
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/11/19 01:50 PM
1

:)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/19 11:34 PM
4

Did they just pick random non-menstrual stuff out of a hat and split them up on both lists? That's what makes it messed up. Pads for the destitute makes sense, not for those who buy $5 coffee every day. I'm cool w/ giving free chocolate for the destitute, regardless of gender. Giving it to women only is wrong, which is what this seems to be doing
/r/MensRights19/11/19 08:44 PM
9

A box of brand-name tampons costs like $7 USD for 36 of them. That is about the cost of an eyeliner make-up pencil, or two gallons of gas, or mixed drink at a bar. Even buying one 36 count box per month equates to $84 a year (which a man will spend on a single date). Thank you for putting it in perspective. You cannot have $5K worth of jewelry, drink $5 starbuks every day, Uber around cause you can't bother to wait for a bus, Spend $100 / week on clothes, and then complain that a 13% SALES tax (…
/r/MensRights19/11/19 08:42 PM
15

Yep. Subjugation of men right there
/r/MensRights19/11/19 04:49 PM
14

That's all they have. The wage gap lie (which is just women having the privilege to work less hours and men still being oppressed into being providers)
/r/MensRights19/11/19 04:25 PM
4

doubt his 'quality' as a partner, even if they find nothing else at fault with him Yeah. This is an issue. What I see is that single women get sympathy, while single men are attacked. If they don't feel for anyone, they are attacked into lowering their standards. If they do feel and are rejected, they are "incels' if they complain about it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/19 04:23 PM
1

No. He is being satricial. u/ThePigamanAgain, use the 's'
/r/MensRights18/11/19 03:01 PM
2

Origin. When I was a kid. And my Dad said how grocery stores are bad summer jobs for teen guys as boys get assigned to stock while women get cash jobs. I said it was discrimination, and my parents got angry. I also pointed out how women are hypocrites, how they want equality when it suits them but want to be treated as the weaker gender when it suits them. I continued noticing these norms. Men being expected to hold doors, make the first move, pay for dates. I read on how the school system discr…
/r/MensRights18/11/19 02:57 PM
1

the last true "men's spaces" in society. Except in colleges and universities. At the University of Toronto, men's washrooms are de fact gender neutral. The freemasons on the other hand, are men only
/r/MensRights18/11/19 02:42 PM
43

Yes. The mods should launch a go-fund-me
/r/MensRights18/11/19 01:49 AM
17

I'm so sorry to hear that. Does your state / province / country have no statute of limitations for sexual assault? If so, you could still report her
/r/MensRights18/11/19 01:48 AM
12

Yep. Women are infallible goddesses one musn't criticize /s
/r/MensRights17/11/19 07:13 PM
4

Yep. Men have too meet too many criteria and have to generally be a better deal. While women can be anyone. I've been attacked by men and women for rejecting women who are not successful enough. I want a fair (or winning) deal, but women only want winning deals. Until it is equally likely for men and women to marry up, we won't have true equality
/r/MensRights17/11/19 02:25 PM
4

Men don't have feelings remember /s
/r/FeminismStopsWhen17/11/19 02:21 PM
7

So women should have the right to simply live of male labour? And have no means to produce their own wealth? Really?
/r/MensRights16/11/19 01:51 PM
5

Sorry to hear that. Here as been my experience. In minimum wage jobs, women get the easier job (cash vs stock in stores; cash vs kitchen in fast food) but the pay is the same. Women are held to lower standards of attire, so I am not surprised that they are held to lower perofrmance standards either It is of course easier for women to take time for kids. Men are still seen as providers, as ATMs, as resources for women. Affirmative action of course means that women can get promoted. > because thes…
/r/MensRights16/11/19 01:48 PM
6

Universal suffrage was one day seen as radical. Ending (legalized) slavery was one day seen as radical.
/r/MensRights16/11/19 01:44 PM
4

I believe in gender codes 100%. So you believe that men should be called for war while women relax at home. That men should work 60+ hours a week for their corporate overlords while women just relax and spend time with the kids. That men should have to go through all the steps to chase and impress women? Equality goes both ways. Women already have been freed from gender norms (eg. they can vote). Men need that same freedom
/r/MensRights16/11/19 01:42 PM
9

That's the big question, are we still expected to risk our lives to save others? No, unless women would be expected to do the same Exactly. Women should be equally likely to die in combat, protecting families / loved ones, and in dangerous jobs. Women should also be equally likely to financially support men, the era of women living of male labour needs to end
/r/MensRights16/11/19 01:39 PM
3

Equality goes both ways. Until women are equally likely to die for their countries / families, and financially support their families, we will not have true equality!
/r/MensRights16/11/19 01:34 PM
1

u/userleansbot
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/19 01:29 AM
3

should fall on either parent to give up their dreams to stay home with their kid, not just the woman. 100% agree. I think we need a 25 hour workweek. Everyone working 40 hours a week to support a family helps nobody; we're just working twice as hard for our corporate overlords for less. The thing is, many women refuse to marry down and it makes logical sense for the one earning more to work. Until changes and women are willing to be providers, nothing will change.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/19 12:15 AM
1

So you do wonder why everything is not free (or should I say, not supplied to you for free?). Not at all. What I do wonder is that how are we working harder and producing more wealth compared to the 1950s, but are poorer. Answer. Corporate exploitation. In the 1950s the super rich paid taxes, had loyalty to employees, manufactured locally, and provided pensions. Reganomics made the tax code regressive, increased the power of the top, raised concentration of wealth, and made it so that we now wor…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:20 PM
1

Yes. I am a socialist (Democratic Bernie-Corbyn style). And proud of it. who does not understand why we can't all just not work and be happy. This is not what I am calling for, the bot makes jokes about the entire spectrum.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:15 PM
1

Perhaps r/Narcissist as well
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:11 PM
0

Some day you will grow up and think "Tibor was right about everything." This is the stupidest thing you've said so far, and that's saying something. Go back to r/KKK and r/ScrewThePoor
/r/MensRights14/11/19 07:04 PM
4

Females are so fragile and emotional. They should be barred from being in charge of anything, including their own bodies. This does not represent on the MRA movement. F*** off
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:59 PM
0

u/UserLeansBot
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:58 PM
0

For the 2nd time there are plenty of smart beautiful women who want a family. You are contradicting yourself. One hand you are saying that successful women don't want kids. On the other you say that they are plenty of them. You really have issues w/ your insults, sexism, and racism. Not taking any advice from you so just shut up.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:57 PM
1

you're not impressing me as someone to take seriously. Back at you w/ your stereotyping, racist, sexist attitudes and remarks
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:53 PM
1

The law of the jungle is all about the strong exploiting the weak. You want to return to that clearly so you should have no problem w/ someone capturing your son and keeping him as a forced labourer.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:52 PM
1

Well, you come across as a chick or member of the LGBTQ-RAGG-MOPP mop. You need to quite stereotyping. Of men, of women, of LGBTQ+, of Muslims, of immigrants, of everyone. Serious question. Are you a member of the KKK?
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:51 PM
2

Good luck finding someone who sees herself as successful who will give up her "career" at 30-35 to make some kids for you. So you agree there is a systematic issue that men have to take loosing deals? Yet you are laughing at me? You have problems who will give up her "career" I don't see women as baby making machines, unlike you it seems We can raise kids together. As in we take turns taking time off work. Personally, when the kids are young, I would prefer spending time with kids
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:49 PM
1

There is nothing wrong with having and raising kids Yes. I agree. I want someone to have and raise kids with. I have an affinity for kids, and want to date similar. I also want someone about as successful as myself. I just want a fair deal. Invaded by Third World barbarians. ake shits on the floor and than smear it on the walls. Okay. So you are a douche and a racist. FYI, immigrants are more likely to have the stay-at-home woman model you love.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:44 PM
3

I'm 100% straight. eauty and brains are not mutually exclusive AGree Stop demeaning motherhood. How am I doing that? I'm successful and have an affinity for kids. I want someone similar. Someone about as successful as myself whom I can have and raise kids with.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:40 PM
1

Slavery is part of nature. Strong exploiting weak. Should we have abolished it? Should we abolish child labour laws? Minimum wage? Any kind of human rights? As a civilized society we counter law of the jungle
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:39 PM
1

Biology has a role, but sociology is a bigger role and as a civilized society we need to counter the biology
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:19 PM
3

Are you even a guy? That's offensive. I very much am I am 23, and am looking for a woman about (or more) successful than my self. Not looking for the hottest person I can find. I went to the best university in Canada for undergrad and am in a top law school. I won't date an idiot, unambitious, unsuccessful person, no matter how attractive she is. I am looking for a life partner, and a fair deal. Not a 1-off
/r/MensRights14/11/19 06:18 PM
0

Few of us care if the hottie is a secretary or executive I very much do care and have been criticized extensively for it. It's not only biology, it is sociology. A civilized society combats biology, and we need to do this here. Men are being socialized into being providers, that it is their obligation to provide. While women think that they have a God-given right to marry up. We need to remove this socialization, and socialize against the biological imperative as it is no longer practical
/r/MensRights14/11/19 04:31 PM
10

I think you described it very well! Women are rewarded and recognized for their efforts, and are not even expected anymore to give up their professional ambitions for the kids. It's considered cool for kids to be neglected so that the woman can work. But a man, he has to work and provide, weather he likes it or not. And is deemed privileged somehow. And of course, in an era when women have a higher earning potential, men are still seen as ATMs Yay Equality /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/19 03:43 PM
1

Dad is supposed to slave away for his family, putting them first, and is never allowed to pursue what he wants in life. Yep. The systematic oppression of men in a nutshell. Women got liberated from gender roles, but are still subject to it. Women are no longer to give up personal ambition for kids, but are still expected to be willing to give up everything for wife & kids
/r/MensRights14/11/19 03:40 PM
2

Yep. We need massive socialization change. But until then, men need to stand up for themselves and refuse to marry down and reduce themselves to ATMs
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/19 03:37 PM
1

The only way this will change is if men stop marrying down. We married down when the economy favoured us. Is it favours then, they should be marrying down. Men, make sure you get a fair deal. Do not settle for less
/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:18 PM
14

Yeah but men are meant to be providers, it is a means to combat the patriarchy. As a woman, I have an innate right to earn as much as men, while working less hours, and marry someone who makes more than me. If men can not accomplish that, they are oppressing me /s
/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:17 PM
17

Yep. Cause men have been socially oppressed into being providers. But women will not return the favour, and still insist on marrying up, even when they are advantageous
/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:15 PM
7

Wow! I thought you were satirizing feminists with stuff like "Trees are sexist"
/r/MensRights14/11/19 04:57 AM
0

Mega corporations steal form us all the time by evading taxes and exploiting our labour. Compared to the 1950s, we are working harder for less despite producing more, as more and more of what we produce is going to the corporations, as the common person is getting less and less. What I am saying is that you are a hypocrite. You support equality measures when it benefits you. Men are oppressed so let's support them. But an unlucky kid; let him die. You libertarians make me sick with your "f*ck th…
/r/MensRights14/11/19 04:10 AM
0

So you believe that people have no obligation to society and that innocents should suffer through no fault do their own? Tell me why you are on this sub? Shouldn't men just tolerate discrimination? Who are we to tell women to give up their privileges?
/r/MensRights14/11/19 03:57 AM
0

And again, if the tax benefit is hurting the truly destitute instead of the rich then it is the tax system that needs to be fixed. I don't consider having a disposable income of $98K instead of $100K to be suffering.
/r/MensRights14/11/19 03:54 AM
12

Considering how casually women dress in the office, I am not surprised
/r/MensRights14/11/19 12:02 AM
0

Okay. But should the innocent kid suffer? (Assuming it is a mistake; in many cases it is simply because cost of living has gone through the roof and people need help that they didn't need in the 1950s. Canada's CCB is income tested, but untill your family income is 180K, you get something because cost of living is that high)
/r/MensRights13/11/19 10:44 PM
1

geared towards women and their preferences in vehicles. Too young to car shop. Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights13/11/19 08:44 PM
2

5 second search for a scarf. I bus 20 mins each way to Wal-mart (A store which is supposed to have everything). Wasted. Now I need but 30 mins each way to another store. Women show sympathy to each other. Men don't. That's why women keep winning
/r/MensRights13/11/19 08:00 PM
1

parents shouldn't have brought them into this world Mistakes happen. Personal responsibility is dead with you people. Except that compared to the 1950s we are working harder for less. Putting me closer to poverty Yes. Cause the tax system has become more regressive and taxing the poor and middle class more than the rich. So we need to fix the tax system, not punish innocent children. Even if the parents were reckless, should the kid suffer?
/r/MensRights13/11/19 07:59 PM
0

Yes. In a time when cost of living is through the roof and corporate wealth is at the record high, how dare we make sure that those who have money pay a little more to help ensure that no kids live in poverty /s
/r/MensRights13/11/19 05:59 PM
5

"How dare you talk about social discrimination and challenges that men face on r/MensRights" Feminist talk about pockets all the time
/r/MensRights13/11/19 04:44 PM
3

Not at the store I went to
/r/MensRights13/11/19 04:25 PM
2

It's the only department store in my part of Toronto. I live in a low income area. A more expensive store will not last here. And it it is not at Wal-Mart, which has EVERYTHING where else it would be?
/r/MensRights13/11/19 04:24 PM
3

Men could claim what?
/r/MensRights13/11/19 02:53 AM
9

The fact that male suicide rates are significantly higher than female suicide rates is all the proof that we need that we live in a female privileged society. Men are still valued for doing / bringing something; while women are inherently valued. Men are still expected to earn more, to bring more to the table in a relationship. Men are still expected to act a certain way. Men are attacked if they dare complain. Women can easily rise up the ranks via affirmative action, they get more natural affe…
/r/MensRights11/11/19 09:47 PM
23

So sorry to hear that
/r/MensRights11/11/19 09:44 PM
2

It's not choices It is actually sexism against men. Men are still systematically oppressed into being the breadwinners, the providers. Many women still think that they have the God-given right to marry up and live of a man's labour
/r/MensRights11/11/19 04:03 PM
1

Let's go deeper. It is actually sexism against men. Men are still systematically oppressed into being the breadwinners, the providers. Many women still think that they have the God-given right to marry up and live of a man's labour
/r/MensRights11/11/19 04:02 PM
6

It is a confirmed satire account. And yes, I would expect it as well
/r/MensRights11/11/19 03:59 PM
1

It isn't. The account is satire
/r/MensRights11/11/19 03:59 PM
2

This is a satire account.
/r/MensRights11/11/19 03:59 PM
9

They used to refer to Women's suffragists as 'Old Maids' and 'Spinstresses'. AKA femcels!!!
/r/MensRights09/11/19 07:19 PM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights09/11/19 06:03 PM
313

Because being the gender that gets to be asked out is a form of privilege
/r/MensRights08/11/19 08:48 PM
2

Here is another example: https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/cpbd8m/aita_for_being_mad_at_my_friend_for_who_he_tried/ https://www.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/ccdhyn/aita_for_telling_my_daughter_to_lower_her/
/r/MensRights07/11/19 01:34 PM
5

That's called being a gold digger. Yay equality /s
/r/MensRights07/11/19 01:25 PM
1

u/TechWiz717 Is this not overwhelming evidence?
/r/MensRights07/11/19 01:20 PM
2

Thanks!
/r/MensRights06/11/19 07:07 PM
2

Link to article?
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:27 PM
6

We are talking about several hundred thousand men that died in a war just a couple decades prior. Exactly. Women got relax and be with kids. Each gender was oppressed by being forced into gender roles. Now women have gotten freed from it but men are still stuck in thiers
/r/MensRights06/11/19 02:58 PM
8

Around the 80s is when Western family ideals of the nuclear family Which is a good thing. The India extended family ideal is one where the grandparents keep control over their adult children their whole lives. It is a destroyer to one's self-esteemd. There's nothing wrong with having wives do housework and husbands fend for them. That is complimentarianism not oppression. There is if it happens systematically. As a man, I resent being just a pay cheque; that because I am a man I must be willing …
/r/MensRights06/11/19 02:57 PM
8

Yeah. But you patriarchy means that men have a responsibility to initiate. And wage gap means that men have to pay. BTW, the fact that women get asked out is oppressive as it implies that we are objects /s
/r/MensRights06/11/19 01:20 PM
32

India was and is not well functioning and balanced. Men are seen as paycheques and women are not allowed to have sort of career. A man with a working wife is seen as a bad husband. Like the 1950s but even worse gender dynamics due the extended family pressure working against you if say, the Father rather be at home and the Mother rather work Also arranged marriages mean that the concept of love doesn't exist; it used to exist in The West before the sexual revolution Source; Living in Canada but …
/r/MensRights06/11/19 01:17 PM
1

Everyone should be free to marry who they want, Yes. Except men are socially oppressed into marrying down. I am pointing out their double standard
/r/MensRights06/11/19 12:58 PM
1

I think it is both. Men are pressured to settle w/ a loosing deal, a significant part of it is being pressured into marrying down
/r/MensRights06/11/19 12:57 PM
4

Men aren't socially pressured to marry down I've personally faced societal pressure to be open to marrying down. Society can socialize people to combat the biological urges, if there are any, that are behind this
/r/MensRights06/11/19 12:56 PM
2

True
/r/MensRights06/11/19 12:55 PM
3

Go for it!
/r/MensRights06/11/19 03:40 AM
20

.nobody should feel the need to 'marry down' against their will. 100% agree. Except Men are socially pressured into marrying down while many women still think that it is their God given right to marry up. The double standard needs to end Women have more opportunities for success compared to men in the modern era. If anything, women should be marrying down in order to make it work. Men married down when they had more oppurtunities
/r/MensRights06/11/19 03:07 AM
4

I would like to echo u/Quetzalkoalas statement. While I don't agree with every post, comment, or moderation decision on this sub; I love how people like us with very unorthodox views (left wing + belief that men face multiple streams of social & legal discrimination + critical of feminism) are able to get together and form an online community, regardless of age, gender (as I understand there are women on this sub), location, education, sexual orientation, ethnicity, relationship status, parental…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/19 12:01 AM
1

I think it's less that they "don't understand" such an extremely simple concept like "equality" and more to do with the reality that girls can get away without approaching first and will still find a partner for the most part. I didn't mean it literally; I used it the way people use understand as in "unwilling to understand and act on it"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/11/19 10:14 PM
0

It's pretty well understood that women have higher sexual value than men on average, so of course men pursue women. And this needs to change. Bring back socially enforced monogamy so that dating is less about sex and more about a life partnership. And socialize equality from a young age so that each gender has an equal chance of being asked out.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 07:36 PM
3

What does this have to do w/ fish and fisher(wo)men? It's a straight up equality issue, with women being unwilling to give up their privilege
/r/MensRights04/11/19 05:29 PM
1

Yep. Men are unwilling to work together to free themselves, unlike women who stick together. We really need to learn from them
/r/MensRights04/11/19 05:28 PM
5

conservative value of being asked out by a guy Exactly. They hold men to traditional gender roles (w/o the traditional benefits) while freeing themselves of traditional responsibility w/o the traditional benefits
/r/MensRights04/11/19 05:12 PM
5

R/Teenagers, really???? The younger generation is waking up!!!!! 😀😀😀
/r/MensRights03/11/19 02:31 AM
2

The first step is to read the sidebar and FAQ. Read this to see what we at about. https://www.reddit.com/r/rbomi/wiki/main Since you are left leaning, I suggest checking out r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
/r/MensRights03/11/19 02:27 AM
3

Could you escalate it to the school board?? Do no other parents take issue so it is no longer a "you problem"
/r/MensRights03/11/19 01:50 AM
3

No. Not at all. That is a misrepresentation of social conservatives
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/19 10:02 PM
2

I hear you. I am socialist on economic and quality of life issues, but I am conservative on many issues. I am pro-life, against affirmative action, support keeping traditional institutions, against free university, believe that people's moral values have gone down the drain, and believe that we should go back to a monogamous society
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/11/19 12:40 AM
14

What you #incels need to understand is that womyn have unique sexual needs (see orgasm gap) and so for them to have side dick is essentially a human right. #CheckYourMalePrivilege you misogynists. /S
/r/MensRights30/10/19 04:29 PM
8

feminarchy I like this word. And yeah. Both traditionalism and feminism are bad for us
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/19 10:26 PM
1

is that you believe people are incapable of being better. Yes and know. People can improve, but only too a point. Not everyone can be an Olympian Athlete. That is a fact. I believe in wealth redistribution because I believe people should have a strong standard of living. We are working harder than int he 1950s yet have a worse lifestyle as the owners of capital are squeezing the providers of labour. You are a slightly better treated serf so you are cool with being exploited as people below you a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/19 12:11 PM
1

Instead of blaming rich people or society for all of your problems, you should try blaming yourself. What??? I'm calling for improving quality of life for society at large. I am not a economic conservative therefore am not self-centered the way you guys are. you should try blaming yourself. The classic Kevin O'Leary / Ronald Reagan BS on how the homeless choose to homeless. Read up on the veil of ignorance Maybe if you fixed yourself, you could get laid. Ah yes. The classic ad hominem. Are you e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/19 02:18 AM
1

That’s 100% incorrect. It is very much luck. They had the genetic code, the ideas, being the right place due to luck. Effort had a role, but a comparatively minor one. No one finds a couple billion on the road. That is what inheritance is. That is what having a strong genetic code is. That is what being in the right place at the right time is? Ask your self, if Bezos or Zuckerberg were born in Niger, would they be were they are? If they were born to an Inner City Detroit family, would they be wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/19 06:43 PM
2

Socialisation. Socialize women from a young age that equality goes both ways and that it is inappropriate to see men as ATMs and that they need to be open to being breadwinners.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/19 05:13 PM
1

I don’t understand the mentality of expecting people who have more than you to give it you to make your life better A lot of what people accomplished is due to luck. They were fortunate enough to have capital, genetic code, and were in the right place at the right time. Furthermore, we need capital to survive so the very very very few owners of capital make the providers of labour work harder and harder. That's why we have been working harder for less compared to the 1950s Would you oppose aboli…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/10/19 04:48 PM
4

I would argue that women are expected to shoulder most of the emotional labour in the relationship. You're kidding right? Men have to make the first move, be cognizant of how the woman feels. Men are expected to have rules on how to act. Women can just be themselves. The current system is set up so that men are just resources for women's pleasure. Men are expected to put in a LOT more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/10/19 07:51 PM
1

Yes. Mods please remove this post. It is satire
/r/FeminismStopsWhen25/10/19 08:23 PM
1

isregarding the fact of male disposability and elevated importance of women in human history&society I agree that it exists. That is why I want to change it. Unlike you who thinks we should accept being treated as lesser
/r/MensRights25/10/19 04:27 PM
0

r/MensRights is about advocating for change. That's like being the 1960s and saying on r/CivilRights "Reality doesn't care about what you want. People will treat you differently based on your race, its never going to change because its instinctive, not a social construct.""
/r/MensRights25/10/19 03:29 PM
1

Have you ever actually met a woman? I have a couple of female friends and several acquaintances. I want to know which world your live in. Women are close with and support each other to no end. While men refuse to sympathize take seriously each others problems. Just tell each other to "man up" and "suck it up". While women mourn and love each other through tough times
/r/MensRights25/10/19 03:25 PM
1

I am referring more to social support. And while I do get your point about in group bias being bad, in one way I see it as a necessary counter. Kind of like affirmative action in the 1960s.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/19 03:24 PM
0

As a man though, I would prefer having the friend network and social support that women have
/r/MensRights25/10/19 12:22 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/19 12:22 PM
2

As a man, I wish could have the close friend networks and social support the way women do, and that we would act to each other the way women act to each other
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/19 12:21 PM
1

Because compared to the 1950s, we are working longer and harder for less. For me, it is economics, the wealthy need to pay a LOT more so that everyone else can enjoy a higher quality of life. I don't agree with the left on everything. For example, I am pro life and respect traditional institutions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/19 11:53 AM
4

Yes. Men and women both do this for their kids. But the fact that men are expected do more for women than vice verca represents a form of systematic oppression against men that needs to guy. Men are not resources that exist for the pleasure of women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/19 11:47 AM
1

If women are doing something right that results in better emotional outcomes for their gender, why not emulate it
/r/MensRights25/10/19 11:44 AM
3

That's my point. Men do need to learn from women when they are doing something right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/19 11:43 AM
1

All good :)
/r/MensRights25/10/19 03:05 AM
2

I agree but it's not just "men" its everyone. Of course. But we can't just blame women. We need to start being helpful to each other, more supportive to each other's emotions
/r/MensRights25/10/19 03:01 AM
1

You're being sarcastic right?
/r/MensRights25/10/19 03:01 AM
7

It's ridiculous. Women facing tough times are given sympathy. Men are victim-blamed and told to fend for themselves. It's the F*cking "women are wonderful effect" and the fact that millenia of sociological brainwashing has made people view men as net providers, aka serfs / slaves for women.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 09:41 PM
5

I live in Ontario, and from my understanding it is horrible. Shelters are overcrowded and community housing has like a 25-year waitlist
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/19 09:06 PM
7

Men are expected to be initiate, to earn more, to provide, to put women above themselves. That is emotionally and financially abusive
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/19 02:35 PM
1

Fair enough. sorry
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/19 12:59 AM
6

Or if the job is the dangerous or undesirable. Let's get a 50-50 gender quota for enlisted military personnel. Or in oil rigs and coal mines. Unfortunately the whole "men are just ATMs and disposable resources" puts unique pressure on men to provide for women, even at the cost of their lives. Yay patriarchy /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/19 06:32 PM
13

I'm so sorry hearing about the nonsense you had to go to. The female dominated nature of therapy, and the feminist dominated narrative of social sciences does need to be solved. I am normally not a fan of affirmative action, but I can see the case of having male quotas and encouraging males to apply
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/19 06:09 PM
0

Yeah but wage gap/s
/r/MensRights21/10/19 12:18 PM
12

Classic case of men being reduced to ATMs, or as they like to call it, "providers".
/r/MensRights19/10/19 09:09 PM
6

Yeah but you see the wage gap means that he is earning 30% more than her and men need to pay for their historical wrongs. /s
/r/MensRights19/10/19 09:08 PM
5

I am referring to Democratic Socialism. The type that was present in 1950s and 1960s America
/r/MensRights18/10/19 11:12 PM
1

It is about destroying the middle class and creating a two class system with a tiny power elite controlling all resources via the (world) state and the masses having to beg for crumbs. That is literally what capitalism creates. Where the owners of capital, unconstrained by the power of the state, force people to work for scraps. Yes the state is working now more for corps than for people, but the state is the only force powerful enough to combat the corporations. We just need to make it more res…
/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:57 PM
1

Change is unlikely to happen. They said that about slavery and the feudal system as well. I don't even see what they could even do at this point. Socialization of kids at a young age to even out the dating market. And bringing back socially enforced monogamy
/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:08 PM
2

unholy union of a criminal central banking cartel and a state apparatus out of control. I agree that are issues w/ fractional reserve banking. But declining quality of life is very much a result of capitalism. Deregulation (i.e. smaller state) and allowing corporate power to go out of control has lowered wages. Reigning them in will increase wages. And having a strong public sector will provide well paying jobs.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:06 PM
4

The 1950s and 1960s were more socialist than today. Top tax rates between 74 & 93%. And quality fo life was better
/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:03 PM
1

Yes, because the government has never exploited anyone for its own purposes. It's imperfect but it is the best we had MORE/THE RIGHT government everything would be rosy" is ridiculously naive. Deregualtion by Reagan has only led to a declining quality of life.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 05:03 PM
5

1950s and 1960s America was more socialist and life was better than it is now. We are comparably working harder for less.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 02:57 PM
2

I wouldn't really find it appealing to be the husband of a wife who resents me for being strongly socially pressured into settling for me. I'd disagree. I'd feel happy that wife truly believes in love and commitment, and doesn't fling around with random people, and loves me for who I am rather than for my SMV
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/19 02:40 PM
0

I oppose socialism. So you oppose the idea of improving lives for everyone and would rather live in a law of the jungle kind of society where those w/ resources exploit those w/o. If that is the case, why are you here?
/r/MensRights18/10/19 02:39 PM
-5

Government equalizing things is a fantasy - rather a nightmare. So I take it that you oppose the Civil Rights Act?
/r/MensRights18/10/19 01:43 PM
1

The civil rights legislation was a government legislation. W/o that act, nothing would have changed. People need to push government, but government is the only force that can change things
/r/MensRights18/10/19 01:43 PM
1

While I don't agree w/ everything (since I think bringing back socially enforced monogamy is important), I agree w/ everything else and find this piece to be very insightful
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/19 01:18 PM
6

Socially enforced monogamy is a huge part of the problem Wrong. Lack of monogomy means that the most desirable people ('top' 20% men and 'top' 80% women) can sleep around providing less potential partners to the bottom group. he next step is to lower the social barriers that make women less likely to pursue sex. There are no barriers right now and look what happening. If sex was once again seen as special, people wouldn't be sleeping around as above. If men work to close this gap That is like sa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/19 01:16 PM
1

Which is why we need government intervention
/r/MensRights18/10/19 01:11 PM
3

Government has flaws but they are ALWAYS better than no government. Privatize anything and those w/ resources exploit those w/o. Women have higher SMV and therefore exploit men
/r/MensRights18/10/19 01:11 PM
-6

Here's why: Well yeah. We need to equalize it though by government and societal regulation
/r/MensRights18/10/19 01:10 PM
5

What men must do is collectivise against all these double standards perpetuated by women, and stop having sex and relationships with women who demand that men must abide by gender roles whilst refusing to do the same. I agree. Men need to collectivize
/r/MensRights18/10/19 01:09 PM
3

yes they mostly do expect their men to be above them. And that is the problem
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/19 01:09 PM
0

teacching equality on the govt Cause that is their job. No civil rights or equality principles were taught via "personal responsibility"
/r/MensRights18/10/19 04:57 AM
4

Quality of life for the average person is on the decline as people are working harder while cost living explodes, governments are broke, and the mega corporations are richer than once can conceive. Modern neoliberal "left": "Crickets" Most of these corporate exploiters are men (let's ignore the fact that their wives are sharing the wealth). Modern neoliberal "left": Wage Gap. Patriarchy. Opression
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/19 03:03 AM
1

Hunh?
/r/MensRights18/10/19 02:56 AM
3

True. The thing is, I am attracted to women who are more successful than myself. I don't want to marry down; I feel like I deserve a fair deal
/r/MensRights18/10/19 02:41 AM
2

Men always want sex though. And besides, women can't rape. /s
/r/MensRights17/10/19 07:04 PM
60

Female student hugs male teacher ---> Teacher is a sexual predator Male student hugs female teacher ---> Student is a sexual predator Yay equality /s
/r/MensRights17/10/19 01:53 PM
1

Sorry.
/r/MensRights17/10/19 12:36 PM
6

Original Post: "Hey all, M23. Like everyone else, I go through suffering and like to vent to my friends. It is clear that most of my friends are sick of it and more or less ignore my venting texts. This one friend (M27) however, usually does respond, but in a dismissive / condescending manner at times. One time I was on the phone with him, and I mentioned that the future looks bleak due to declining quality of life, and he started saying how it is a self-fulfilling prophecy (cause you know, me d…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/10/19 01:33 PM
9

Original Post: "Hey all, M23. Like everyone else, I go through suffering and like to vent to my friends. It is clear that most of my friends are sick of it and more or less ignore my venting texts. This one friend (M27) however, usually does respond, but in a dismissive / condescending manner at times. One time I was on the phone with him, and I mentioned that the future looks bleak due to declining quality of life, and he started saying how it is a self-fulfilling prophecy (cause you know, me d…
/r/MensRights16/10/19 01:33 PM
8

Yes. A key reason is dating inequity. We need to unrig the dating game. Women need to learn that equality goes both ways. They need to start making the first move. Men need to be taught to not be swayed easily by flirtatious nonsense and that they shouldn't just give their love to anyone
/r/MensRights14/10/19 05:00 PM
30

But but …. Patriarchy. And wage gap /s
/r/MensRights13/10/19 04:01 PM
4

A good women is hard to fine. I want a fair deal - I don't want to marry down. But women only want to marry up. Men are systematically oppressed into accepting a loosing deal. I've been criticized heavily for simply wanting a fiat deal. When men had higher earning potential, we married down and provided. Women have higher earning potential and, on average, refuse to provide
/r/MensRights11/10/19 07:30 PM
2

transportation Hmm. I'd disagree here. Hwy investments have not kept up and intercity bus and rail services has been reduced over the decades. In Canada anyways. it’s also something that can be avoided through life style decision Yes and no. Society not operates on social media in many ways so can only avoid it at a cost. I don’t believe his social programs are. Maybe someday, but we’re no where near where we need to be for some of them I hear you on this one. I support universal health care (it…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 04:49 PM
2

but as quality of living goes even the lowest earners have things and opportunities that weren’t available to them in the 50s. Because of tech. Which brought in its own harm. I mean depression and mental health is on the rise. Corporations expect more and more from us. Life is unaffordable. I see that as a decline. Happiness peaked in the early 1960s for a reason. What's unfeasible about closing tax loopholes, bringing back local manufacturing, and raising taxes on the top? The only unfeasible p…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 04:31 PM
0

Okay. Resulting to ad hominem because you have no argument. Funny thing is, I'm advocating to improve your quality of life, while you to continue to worship your corporate overlords for scraps (kind of like white knighting ironically)
/r/MensRights11/10/19 04:23 PM
2

So what is your proposed model? Government isn't perfect but it is better than Regan's let the market rein. The sellers of labour will be sqeezed more and more by the seller of capital. That is what his happening I do agree that most neoliberal "lefitists" tax the upper middle class instead of the rich. But Bernie is a true leftist who fights for the middle class; he is willing to stand up to the rich, unlike the neolibs, and therefore will tax the rich and not everyone else. The neolibs do this…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 04:16 PM
2

I just find it hard to believe that you're an educated person. How so? Usually if someone tells me they have a degree, I take their word for it. I don't claim they don't have one because they disagree with me. Clearly you are not interested in engaging in good faith, but I will say this. Bernie wants to do a deemed repatriation of taxes. So we can get revenue w/o having to lower rates. Make the super-rich pay their fair share and improve the quality of life for us all
/r/MensRights11/10/19 04:11 PM
3

She's a thief, but the claims of her drugging and raping her clients was fake news ran by tabloids. Ah. And yeah. She is a bad person
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/19 04:08 PM
5

It gives me hope that quite a few Bernie supporters are unhappy about Cardi's endorsement and I am not some outlier here
/r/MensRights11/10/19 03:57 PM
2

You find it hard to believe that educated people might hold a different opinion than you??? Regardless, this is a mens' rights sub. The reason I was frustrated to debate originally because all too often economic conservatives keep looking for debates on a sub which is about systematic discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 03:54 PM
2

I take that last line as saying that you are not interested in debating further. Mind you, your points are easy to debate. BTW, I have an accounting and economics degree from a top university, so I do know a thing or two
/r/MensRights11/10/19 03:45 PM
5

I'm in Canada. In the 1950s, one could graduate from high school, work 40 hours a week, and support a family. If you had a degree, you had it made Now, we need to spend years doing more school. Lack of local manufacturing forces everyone to go to school lowering wages for graduates, even doctors and lawyers. We work hard. Like crazy. 40 hours don't cut it, employers expect 60-80. And both parents have to work. Housing prices are through the roof. Infrastructure has not kept up as corporations wi…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 03:23 PM
3

Okay. You asked for it. Since the 1950s quality of life has been on the decline. We are working harder for less. In the 1950s, high taxes on the top ensured that wealth was spread around. Governments had money for infrastructure. No one had obscene wealth. With one income you could afford to raise a family and buy a good house. Now costs of everything are going through the roof. Families work 100 hours a week and still can't make ends meet. We are living a lower standard of living than in the 50…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 03:19 PM
4

I really don't have the mental energy to debate this right now
/r/MensRights11/10/19 02:52 PM
3

Because I agree with Bernie on economic issues. Increasing corporate greed an excess has lead to a declining quality of life for us all. Bernie is the only one who has always speaking out against the corporations and about the declining quality of life
/r/MensRights11/10/19 02:35 PM
1

I did my undergrad at top university and am at a really good law school. So I would like someone similliar. I mean I don't have kids and wouldn't date someone with kids. It's about having that special affinity for them that some people like myself, and the woman I felt for, had
/r/MensRights10/10/19 08:00 PM
8

No woman has all 5: At least successful as I am Virgin Good with Kids Pleasant to be around Kind and caring. And yes. This is what I am looking for. The difference being is that I bring all of those to the table, I am simply looking for a fair deal. Also, my standards are based on effort and being a good partner / parent, not on superficial stuff Well there was one woman who met all these, and she rejected me. I am heavily criticized for wanting a fair deal and wanting compatilibty but women are…
/r/MensRights10/10/19 04:51 PM
4

indicating an external structuring mechanism, most likely status/wealth/income. Not really. It can also indicate that women are rating looks on a log scale, or that men rating status on a linear scale. The harshness one uses to judge a criteria doesn't indicate criteria being used.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 12:37 PM
5

When men had higher earning potential, they married down. Now women have higher earning potential, and yet men are still expected to be open to marrying down
/r/MensRights09/10/19 07:03 PM
2

you don't hear men turning down women because they don't make enough money. Yep. Men seem to be okay w/ taking a loosing deal. Heck, I've rejected women for not being as successful as myself and have been criticized by MEN or not being willing to marry down
/r/MensRights09/10/19 07:02 PM
37

We need dating equality. Women need to start making the first move and dates should be split. Equality goes both ways. Men need to be socialized to stand up for themselves and women need to be socialized to behave better.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 07:00 PM
18

Men are criticized for daring to have standards. I want someone about as successful as myself and have been extensively criticized for it
/r/MensRights09/10/19 06:58 PM
26

But men are so shallow/s
/r/MensRights09/10/19 06:57 PM
13

Society showing prejudice against men. The Draft is a big one. Straight up legal discrimination. Car insurance discrepancy is another
/r/MensRights09/10/19 06:54 PM
9

And short height
/r/MensRights09/10/19 06:53 PM
1

Misogyny still exists even in first world countries and many women deal with it on a day to day basis. Like still benefiting form benevolent sexism / chivalry? Many women in the west have the best of both worlds. Let's use logic. If women were cheaper to hire, employers would only hire women. It is obvious that women get to work less hours, spend quality time with their kids when they are younger, and get more work-life balance while men are expected to slave away more for their corporate overlo…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 01:25 PM
5

The gap exists because women have the privilege of working less hours and living of male labour as men are socially oppressed into being breadwinners
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:50 PM
38

The gap is completely fair, not arbitrary,and voluntarily created. Not it is not. The gap exists because women have the privilege of working less hours and living of male labour as men are socially oppressed into being breadwinners
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:50 PM
1

For sure. The goal of this post was to discuss societal views as a whole. There are of course multiple exceptions across individuals and even segments of society. But the fact that society as a whole still sees men are providers is a problem
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/19 12:42 PM
3

Exactly! The traditional family structures might work very well for some. However, while women have the choice (except for the rising cost of living now taking that choice away, but socially they do), men do not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/19 12:40 PM
1

Yep. This pressure is playing a key role in my younger brother's depression. My family is Muslim making the pressure even more pronounced
/r/MensRights04/10/19 12:38 PM
1

100%. But men don't want to listen and still get "pride" and being able to financially support their wife. Heck, I've been criticized by , not only women, but by other men for NOT being willing to marry down.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 12:36 PM
1

For sure. But because I am a man, I have been placed under excessive pressure to be open to marrying down. Yay equality /s
/r/MensRights04/10/19 12:35 PM
6

it must be all that unconscious bias that is holding them back. Yes. The face that they can marry up while men are systematically oppressed into marrying down. They don't want to marry down and be breadwinners cause they feel that they have a God given right to marry up
/r/MensRights03/10/19 03:47 PM
3

I completely agree!!!! Btw, just to brag (?), the girl I'm currently kind of dating earns like 3 or 4 times how much I earn. Congratulations!!!!! I'm really happy for you!! I strongly believe we need to abolish that role. I stringly believe it is highly toxic. Yes and Yes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/19 03:38 PM
8

The pay gap is really a stress and pressure gap troubling men, not discrimination against women Yes! Thank you for understanding and seeing the light!!!
/r/MensRights03/10/19 02:58 PM
30

The male bread winner role needs to end. The equal right to work comes with the equal responsibility to provide. Men - stop marrying down, make sure you get a fair deal
/r/MensRights03/10/19 01:08 PM
20

The male bread winner role needs to end. The equal right to work comes with the equal responsibility to provide. Men - stop marrying down, make sure you get a fair deal
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/10/19 01:08 PM
6

Considering that 99.99% of women expect men to do all the work in finding a partner, I'm not sure if such a class exists
/r/MensRights02/10/19 06:09 PM
16

AITA mods are convinced I was trolling so they deleted and locked the post. The post was: "This happened a few weeks ago. I (M23) was meeting with some friends of mine (M20 & F20). These friends are a couple. We were looking for a place to eat, and they were interested in going to a nearby upscale Indian restaurant. Now I am ethnically Indian, and that restaurant was Indian in a whitewashed way. It is overpriced, and not authentically Indian. Plus, I was already running up spending budget lately…
/r/MensRights02/10/19 05:25 PM
5

How do we report a sub?
/r/MensRights02/10/19 05:21 PM
-1

Why would you say no to an easier life?
/r/MGTOW02/10/19 05:18 PM
-1

Why would you say no to an easier life?
/r/MGTOW02/10/19 05:18 PM
1

I’m going to guess that you’ve not really had a long term partner before? (3+ years) I have never been in a relationship at all. You seem to be relying on someone else to get your happiness. However, if you aren’t happy now, you’ll just be unhappy but in a relationship. How? You guys are experts on living alone, so tell me how would I be happier. I imagine someone being my partner, someone loving me unconditionally for who I am would make things great
/r/MGTOW02/10/19 02:25 PM
1

likely between 14-22 I'm 23. You can shape yourself to be a more dominant male, and attract a mate - or you can just go your own way and forge your identity. My main issue right now is finding someone else worth being with
/r/MGTOW02/10/19 01:32 PM
1

You may find her hot for 10 years, but after that, you have like 70 years stuck with a very ugly lad it's not about looks. Read the post
/r/MGTOW02/10/19 12:02 PM
2

100%. The top 0.01% vs the rest of us and standards of living and quality of life continues to fall
/r/MensRights02/10/19 11:57 AM
-4

I know you are messing around but If she takes out the gum from her mouth and asks you to eat it would you eat ? I would actually. Chew the gum which she has been chewing tell me more about this goddess She is the closest thing I have met to one. She very well could be a divine angel
/r/MGTOW02/10/19 04:20 AM
-3

That's your opinion of an illusion. That's the reputation she has in the college. ou think you have those same qualities I know what qualities she has, and I know what I have Maybe she wants to have trains run on her. She is too moral to sleep around
/r/MGTOW02/10/19 04:20 AM
-4

TEN DIFFERENT PIPES I guarantee you she doesn't smoke imagine her taking a poop and never wiping! Imagine something only a 3-year old would do. Okay....
/r/MGTOW02/10/19 03:16 AM
2

The concept of truth is a construct of the patriarchy /s
/r/MensRights01/10/19 12:49 PM
1

If the answer is YES, get up, say "thank you for your time", leave and proceed to look another therapist, since this one will only indoctrinate you into feminism Wouldn't all them follow official guidelines? What do the guidelines say and how bad are they?
/r/MensRights01/10/19 01:15 AM
1

Ah thanks
/r/MensRights30/09/19 10:33 PM
2

I think you need to read up on the Veil of Ignorance. I can keep debating this, but we are gone way of the sub's topic and I, being in law school, holding a job, and volunteering have a lot better stuff to do than to keep debating with a corporate worshipper. Debating you is easy, but I have a lot of better things to do. You wanted to debate, I indulged you. I believe in improving quality of life, you believe in us all one-up each other in a race to the bottom so that our corporate overlord may …
/r/MensRights30/09/19 08:53 PM
2

So not everyone has the skill set. You know, you can learn new things right? Yes. Cause we can all run like Usain Bolt.... People have different genes and certain things can only be developed at a young age. Kind of hard to learn programming when raising 3 kids you know. Again, if you improve your value to your employer, you can charge them more for your services, thus reducing your need to work more hours. You are missing the point. Each person tries to out-do the other, creating a rat race and…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 07:53 PM
2

Again, you're not saying anything about personal choice. What's to stop someone from getting those high paying jobs and becoming rich themselves? What's to stop people from improving their own lot in life through hard work and personal responsibility? Not everyone has the skillset. Or that greed. How is it okay that we need three times as effort compared to the 1950s for the same quality of life??? What is your end goal, that we work 20 hours a day and make barely enough to live. That is where w…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 07:25 PM
2

Oh no. I very well do. Looks like you want to hear it then. We supply labour. Employers supply money. Since there are a lot of people, the cost of labour in a free market drops to an effective 0 wage. This good for employers, and bad for everyone else. So, we can keep one-upping each other in a rat race like economic conservatives love doing; or we find a solution. A solution would be people getting together to form a government which passes laws that balance power and improve quality of life fo…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 05:30 PM
1

I don't you comprehend what is going on. I would try to explain further, but in my experience economic conservatives enjoy being corporate serfs and get some sort of kinky pleasure by being exploited so I am not going to bother
/r/MensRights30/09/19 05:04 PM
2

Ah yes. Keep working harder for less, even as you age. Our role is to be a serf for corporations. Why don't we just bring back indentured servitude while we are at it? /s
/r/MensRights30/09/19 03:49 PM
2

Ah yes. Keep working harder for less, even as you age. Our role is to be a serf for corporations. Why don't we just bring back indentured servitude while we are at it? /s
/r/MensRights30/09/19 03:49 PM
2

What about the fact that employers are stealing people's pensions (or eliminating them) and corporations have been exponentially raising the cost of living for the common person via rent, groceries, medication, etc.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 03:13 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights30/09/19 02:18 PM
13

But you know. Wage gap /s
/r/MensRights30/09/19 01:20 PM
3

That's a really smart idea.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 01:19 PM
4

Disagree. Strongly. In short. People are different, as individuals. I think women should have the right to build careers, and men to spend time with young kids. Both men and women should have the right to be asked out, to marry up, to be provided for, to have a career, to spend time with kids, etc.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 04:33 AM
13

Men and women are different, Yeah. It's unfortunate that women got the better deal. The thing is that a civilized society should be attempting to make it equal, which they are not. It is hard to be able to love someone of a gender who loves talking about equality but is unable to concede anything
/r/MensRights29/09/19 02:00 AM
5

internal locus of control can solve practically any problems that life throws at them That is the Kevin O'Leary / Ronald Regan mindset; the poor just need to work harder. It is classic victim blaming and toxic. The real issue to fix society, including dating inequities
/r/PurplePillDebate28/09/19 02:34 PM
1

Edited my response
/r/MensRights28/09/19 02:15 PM
1

On res only from my experiences
/r/MensRights28/09/19 01:54 PM
4

Not saying that women do not have issues, but it is significantly easier to be a woman IMO. The fact that they are willing to address the issues teenage girls face, despite teenage boys having a 10 times higher suicide rate is concerning. On their blurb: "The final year of high school can be a scary time in the lives of young women. Pressured to perform well at school, facing internal pressure to be perfect, and dealing with the mixed messages of how a girl should behave, young women today face …
/r/MensRights27/09/19 03:19 AM
4

For sure. That is definitely concerning. I've heared that certain feminists are calling for the male population to be reduced to 10% of the current population
/r/FeminismStopsWhen26/09/19 01:23 PM
8

This is a satire account. r/Mensrights looked into it
/r/FeminismStopsWhen26/09/19 12:58 PM
2

100%. That is the key argument I make when debating with people
/r/MensRights26/09/19 12:46 PM
1

Like is saying
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/19 12:45 PM
1

Go ahead
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/19 12:44 AM
1

I want to fuck you" WTFF An 8-year old said that. Yeah, I hate that kid and I haven't even met him.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 11:32 PM
1

I'm really sorry you're going thru that. Thanks! I'm also sorry that I cynically sent you a link to r/egg_irl. Thanks for explaining what the sub was about. I accept your apology. I am in no way trans. I am reminded of President T Roosevelt's "Man in the Arena" speech. Yeah. That is very relevant to me. That's really unfair. Thanks for understanidng what it feels like to be rejected and to then be told that you're supposedly doing everything wrong and that you need to do it the "normal" way all …
/r/MensRights25/09/19 04:35 PM
1

90% of my peers in undergrad were all in loving relationships by the time they graduated. It's kind of hard to not think about it, especially since she was everything I ever wanted. And undergrad, Trinity College (UofT) specifically, is the best place to meet people romantically from what I have seen. I wish the best for you fellow torontonian. Same to you :)
/r/MensRights25/09/19 04:16 PM
2

Well logically, she seems too good of a person to be this infliexible. But a lot of people are saying it was my fault causing me to be in this messed up mental state
/r/MensRights25/09/19 04:07 PM
3

I knew enough about her and I saw things in her I haven't seen in anything else. Namely, I want a successful, ambitious woman of strong moral values (i.e. doesn't get drunk, party, is a virgin, etc.), of excellent character, and has an affinity for kids. I bring all of those to the table. She has all of those. She and I got along really well together as well! And she also has the frills. Things like coming from a financially well-off family and being physically attractive. I really don't care ab…
/r/MensRights25/09/19 04:07 PM
1

Well you both brought in children. It takes 2 to reoproduce. You both give each other a home, a family. I am happy that you found someone and are content. It doesn't change the fact that social dynamics oppress men into accepting a loosing deal. Not something I would be content with and will resent.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 04:03 PM
1

So who is bringing more to the table, your wife or yourself?
/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:48 PM
2

life is not fair. Yes. So let's fix it. And how am I supposed to love someone who brings less to the table than I do??? Someone who demands special treatment. Their gender loves talking about equality, I can't love blatant hypocracy
/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:43 PM
2

make yourself the person you want to be first. then girls will come. if thats what you want in life. Tried. Doesn't work. Enough of the standard "you just need to be better, try harder, bs" Let's actually work on fixing the system, or at least acknowledging it. Men are expected to put in more and that is fundamentally unfair.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:37 PM
-1

I disagree that it is society's fault that male have to impress female to get reproduction rights Sure. But a civilized society moves beyond biology. We no longer beat each other up. We need to start socializing women into acting better its nothing dude. She was everything I ever wanted, my perfect solemate
/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:25 PM
2

What is your hesitation in improving people's lives? Are you sure you are an MRA? Okay. And what does enforcement look like? Is it legally enforced? What are the penalities for violation of the monogamous contract? Is it an actual contract? Who enforces the penalties We are just getting tangled in the weeds here. We can start by returning to slut-shaming (regardless of gender). We can bring back laws against adultery, but apply it to unmarried couples. How do you propose "socializing" these wome…
/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:22 PM
8

A lot of things are going on in mylife. But I guess the core is that my dream girl rejected me and I am simply unable to move on as she was everything I ever wanted in a partner. By far. And a lot of people have been: - Trying to get me to marry down and accept a loosing deal - Trying to convince me that it is my own fault cause I didn't "ask her out" (I did but it "doesn't count" cause I didn't do it "correctly" and I waited too long (cause I wanted to know the person). Also she made it clear t…
/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:11 PM
1

What is r/egg_irl??? A lot of things are going on in mylife. But I guess the core is that my dream girl rejected me and I am simply unable to move on as she was everything I ever wanted in a partner. By far. And a lot of people have been: - Trying to get me to marry down and accept a loosing deal - Trying to convince me that it is my own fault cause I didn't "ask her out" (I did but it "doesn't count" cause I didn't do it "correctly" and I waited too long (cause I wanted to know the person). Als…
/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:10 PM
2

The emotional cost is not huge, at all, to most men. How is it not huge? I find it to be. You are making an investment that you see this person as a worthy life partner
/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:06 PM
3

Socially, how would you fix it? Bring back socially enforced monogomy Socialize women into behaving better. We socialized men, we can do the same in reverse. Stop socializing women into thinking they are entitled to be treated special because of their gender
/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:05 PM
2

I need to read it but it sounds counterintuitive and nonsensical. And observations support my claim. Men are more likely to marry down compared to women. Let's be logical. Males need to weigh cost-benefit analysis. Asking someone out takes on a huge emotional cost. In order to minimize failiure, men will aim for a loosing deal. Besides, women have the freedom to initiate and face no penalties for doing so
/r/MensRights25/09/19 02:46 PM
1

fixing" it in a society So you are just being defeatist. Maybe we should just stop trying to fix the bias in family courts while we are at it You're fucking hilarious. Like you'd even know LoL Hahahahahaha. Goddamn that's funny. Yes. I have a conscience
/r/MensRights25/09/19 02:43 PM
7

However, mathematically this ends up favoring the men anyway How??? Men would end up settling to avoid the pain of getting rejected. Less risk so you aim low. So women will get a man who is better than them because men better than then will aim low to be with them
/r/MensRights25/09/19 02:26 PM
3

Because dating is easier for women. A man will need to put in effort to find love, while a woman can find love w/o trying. Furthermore, divorce courts favour women so walking out is a payoff off for women, and a financial impediment for men. Finally, societal expectations still is men as providers. Men have to provide, women have a right to be provided for. In short, it is because we live in a ridiculously female privileged society, legally and socially.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/19 01:55 PM
-1

Venting / Ranting is what this sub is about. Cause you know we cannot do this everywhere
/r/MensRights25/09/19 12:44 PM
3

Dude. I know these people. They did not marry up. Like you they worked, w/ their gender coming in to make their lives easier, especially romantically
/r/MensRights25/09/19 12:29 PM
1

They are. But their gender allows to get more w/ less effort, especially romantically
/r/MensRights25/09/19 12:28 PM
1

No. The vast majority of them have boyfriends. And those who don't simply don't want one right now
/r/MensRights25/09/19 12:27 PM
1

Ah. Thanks for the insight!
/r/MensRights25/09/19 12:25 PM
2

Or clear-headed and responsible? That. But I am not talking about airheads. The women I am referring to are hard working and intelligent, comparatively speaking. They also have the extra benefit of being female
/r/MensRights25/09/19 04:19 AM
3

IDK. It sounds too much like my wishful thinking
/r/MensRights25/09/19 04:10 AM
3

Making the world safer for women and children, by making men sacrifice everything to ensure their safety
/r/MensRights25/09/19 03:32 AM
2

Link?
/r/MensRights24/09/19 12:29 PM
2

I'm so so happy that he was acquitted! That there is still a sense of justice!! That judge needs to debenched, her desire to silence all of her critics sounds like totalitarianism
/r/MensRights23/09/19 11:41 PM
1

That is the policy of the University of Toronto Student's Union. A non-male must start and no more than two males in a row can speak. So females / transpeople / non-binary people can cut in line in the speakers' list over men in meetings.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 05:05 PM
11

That's an excellent way of describing it.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 03:09 PM
1

Welcome!! Happy that you've seen the light!!
/r/MensRights23/09/19 03:08 PM
1

Yes. Bring back laws against adultery and find ways to promote socially enforced monogamy. Raise, people as kids, that casual sex is bad and that people need to be valued as who they are, not as sexual objects or resources. Also raise women that they are not entitled to marry up, and have to start paying for dates and making the first move
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/09/19 02:57 AM
2

This is the textbook: https://store.thomsonreuters.ca/product-detail/evidence-principles-and-problems-twelfth-edition/
/r/MensRights22/09/19 02:26 AM
13

Yeah. Not only do woman have support and have it easier, they also have a tight friend circle. I'd love to be a woman
/r/MensRights21/09/19 01:09 PM
2

she accuses me of being a financial abuser. That projection.... I can’t even buy a candy bar without her yelling at me for spending money. My wife is a very independent woman up until the point of being financially independent. WTF. She has issues. I'm so, so sorry that she is treating you like this. Of course, if you leave her she'll take your kids and money. What are her grounds for refusing to get a job? I really don't know what I would do in your situation, except quit and declare myself to …
/r/MensRights21/09/19 01:03 PM
9

That's what I thought. But I am financially doing fine, what I am lacking is what women have: Close friend circle Ease in finding love A lot of attention Being chased / asked out. I can just focus on myself The ability to marry up, spend time with kids, and be taken care of
/r/MensRights21/09/19 12:56 PM
3

Yep. In Toronto
/r/MensRights21/09/19 12:53 PM
6

Here you go: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-we-all-had-costumes-on-guests-recall-arabian-nights-gala-trudeau/
/r/MensRights21/09/19 04:34 AM
3

Good question. I think the abuse is more socially than individually. The fact that men are socially expected to be providers. Men and women hold this expectation. Now there are women who do exploit this, but I don't think it is usually the intent. In most cases, couples are doing what they have been socialized to do. But the socialization is going in a one-side, anti-male direction, which has the potential for certain women to abuse. Ordinarily, I think each person should make around the same. I…
/r/MensRights21/09/19 12:06 AM
1

Then you should be happy to see the EITC expanded. I agree with that Women didn't keep wages stagnate, the companies did. Yes corporate greed did that. But there is also supply and demand. If the supply of labour goes up, wages will fall. Markets 101 Many people today require two incomes to raise a family. Yes. Because of increasing corporate greed, trade deals, automation, and women entering the workforce But it's not real anymore Cause 99% of people these days are into sleeping around instead …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 11:12 PM
2

Because corporations brainwashed women into seeing this as oppression so that they would enter the workforce which would lower the price of labour and force everyone to work twice as hard as they did in the 1950s
/r/MensRights20/09/19 10:39 PM
0

Right but as leftists we try to fix the economic model via regulation, we need to regulate the dating market as well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 10:32 PM
1

Explain Number 1, if you can. More people in the labour force means lower real wages. Higher supply for labour w/ same demand. And you can't claim men working as slavery and prefer a traditional arrangement where women stayed home.. I prefer a traditional arrangement in the common person was better of compared to now. We were collectively exploited less. However, women still got the better deal. Now we are all worse off, and women are still getting the better deal. I believe in a model where it …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 10:30 PM
4

Spending time with kids is seen by most rational people as rewarding on its own merit. Only a kid hating radical feminist will see it any other way. And of course, they are also being effectively paid by living of their husband's labour. Personally, I would love for my wife to provide for me while I raise the kids. But that privilege is only available to women cause female privilege and societal entrenched misandry
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 09:43 PM
2

Men need to know what they are getting in to. Women need to be more honest about what they are trying to get That's like saying employees need to know "Your employer is looking to exploit you." People out of desperation will take the job. We need to go back to regulation. Sleeping around values people as sex objects and resources; one life partner values people as individuals. I don't get how the left is Ayn Rand when it comes to dating markets.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 09:41 PM
8

I hope he loses his election I hope so to. But his followers all stand be his grade A hypocrisy. He could stand in the middle of Yonge Street, shoot someone, and not loose a single vote. then get divorce raped and end up homeless like I did Sorry to hear that. Knowing Trudeau though, he'll blame "toxic masculinity"
/r/MensRights20/09/19 09:39 PM
1

Yes. Because women decided to enter the workforce w/o considering the effects that we are all now working harder for our corporate overlords as a result Women still think they have a God-given right to be provided for and men are still socially pressured into slaving away to provide for their wives. Women want to work but not be providers
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 09:37 PM
3

As women entered the workforce it was much harder for them to receive the same family wage Yes. And now we have to work twice as hard for our corporate overlords. Feminists need to accept their responsibility in enriching corporations and lower the living standard for the rest of us. What they should have done as entered the workforce to take the burden of men's shoulders. As women work more hours, men work less and things got even. But women wanted to work w/o but still wanted to someone to wor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 09:32 PM
1

It's societal pressure which makes it abusive
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 09:09 PM
7

And historically it's been unpaid labor. Their payment was 50%+ of their husband's income. They lived of his labour. And got to be with their kids. It sounds like you hate kids. That is their "payment" and it is privilege. woman does earn more money than her make partner it's more likely to be an unhappy marriage. Yeah. Cause women still think they have a right to be provided for so they expect special treatment for being the provider. Equality goes both ways but they don't get it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 09:08 PM
3

You could make a pretty good analogue between this and worker's rights. Women, having easily more power in the sexual marketplace, get to set most of the rules; not entirely different than employers. Citing the consensual nature of the arrangement isn't much different than telling workers with a bad deal to simply get another job. Except this job generally has a ton of legal obligations and social leverage against you should you make your employer cross. That is a very good analogy. Women are li…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 09:06 PM
2

en are both simultaneously supposed to fight their biology and completely kowtow to women's. Yeah. That's the issue. Both men and women should be fighting their biology; biology alone leads to law of the jungle.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 09:04 PM
3

Yep. AITA is mostly young adults to it makes sense that they want the best of the both worlds. The right to be financially supported but no responsibility. I've seen so many hypocritical comments on similar posts and think it is crazy, and I'm 23
/r/MensRights20/09/19 12:42 PM
2

It's his money, he disapproves of cheating. Cheating on one's partner is one of the worst things one can do. And she has to no right to have her schooling funded
/r/MensRights19/09/19 02:12 AM
6

It's called making a point in jest
/r/MensRights18/09/19 07:25 PM
5

The post made the point in jest
/r/MensRights18/09/19 07:25 PM
31

Yes. It should be mandatory at birth.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 07:12 PM
2

I agree that any opposition to unrestrained free trade is good, be it from a Communist gun-grabber like Bernie, or from Trump. The nonsense about "comparative advantage" has little or no meaning in an industrialized world, and fails to account for labor mobility. There are other reasons as well - many of them outlined in the excellent book Free Trade Doesn't Work. I'll check out the book! On Free trade, I 100% agree with you. I am curious, what does your ideal economic model look like?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 06:55 PM
2

Fair point. Although r/mensRights and red-pilled are not the same thing. BTW, 14% of men believe women have it easier, so the mensrights ideals isn't as small as people want to think
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 06:41 PM
2

"labor theory of value". So labour has no value to you???? paleocon policy would have prevented that instead of causing it the way leftist - and globalist - policy has. Globalist policies did cause it yes; but so it Reaganomics conservative policy. And trade deals are championed by conservatives (except for Trump), and opposed by people like Bernie Sanders.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 06:03 PM
2

Yes. It would be. The idea being that both men and women, in aggregate, have an equal chance of being asked out, of being a breadwinner, of marrying up, of taking care of the kids, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 05:33 PM
2

A large percent of a tiny number, is less than a small percent of an enormous number. So we are being exploited more. I'm not saying life was better in the middle ages, but disparity is worse now. I'll stick with indoor plumbing, vaccines, central heating and low infant mortality thank you very much. All of those existed in the 1950s when quality of life was higher. When corporations generated wealth but it was more fairly distributed to employees and the public at large. Compared to the 1950s, …
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:24 PM
2

Nobles in the middle ages shared more of their profits with the peasants and corporations do these days w/ their staff
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:10 PM
2

Wealth inequality is NOT the worst it has been in human history. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jessecolombo/2019/02/28/americas-wealth-inequality-is-at-roaring-twenties-levels/ New Deal" was a raw deal The New Deal allowed the prosperity of the 50s to happen. Along with a 93% top tax rate that allowed for infrastructure investment and lesser concentration of wealth. Life in the 1920s and earlier was horrible for the average person. 1950s-1960s were a golden age with the decline happening soon aft…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:07 PM
5

We can take the high ground after defeating feminism. We won't win if we act like this. We are on a loosing ground so we need to behave better. Also conservatives lost? On social issues yes but economically we are living in the Gilded age again w/ wealth inequality the worst it has ever been anytime in human history and quality of life on the decline since the 1950s.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:48 PM
19

Only women are stupid enough Come on. We are better than feminists as to stoop so low to use slurs like this, especially inaccurate ones
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:53 PM
3

Dollar stores are different. In department and grocery stores, there is a clear demarcation of who does what. Same at places like McDonalds.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 03:53 PM
4

Plenty of women stocking shelves, running cash registers More women do the latter and men the former. Men are assigned to stock shelves, women do the easy cash job. Men are assigned to cook in fast food kitchens, women do the easy cash job. Both get paid the same, but men do more work cause, uh, equality
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 03:44 PM
6

The backlash actually comes from men themselves who don't want to be liberated. Quite lying. Visit r/MensRights. Men clearly want to be freed from making the first move, being the provides / breadwinner (read ATM), having to pay alimony, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 01:27 PM
4

don't think men are clamoring to be sanitation workers, either. It's kind of a bottom-of-the-barrel job that you do in order to survive, Which men are disproportionately taking because men are still seen as being breadwinner / providers (read ATMs). Women don't take those jobs cause they don't need to find love, and if married they get the first dibs to leave the workforce. Men are however only seen as a resource who must slave away
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 01:26 PM
6

Women selectively ask for equality. Traditional gender roles when it suits them, equality when it suits them. Men want fairness. Either full traditional or full equality. Not this half-half mess that is the best of both for men and worst for both for women. Personally, I want full equality. I'd love to be asked out, to be provided for, to be able to marry up and spend time with the kids. I would also like it if women wouldn't get default custody and would start dressing seriously in the office
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 01:24 PM
2

I'm sorry to hear that. Appeal to the school board perhaps? Write to your local trustee? Going to the media may backfire due to their feminist tilt, although if Jordan Peterson gets on your case...
/r/MensRights18/09/19 02:39 AM
2

Exactly. Equality goes both ways. Women should start asking and stop acting entitled
/r/PussyPassDenied17/09/19 02:09 PM
1

None do. Trump in fact made alimony no longer deductible by the payer and no longer taxable by the recipient. Essentially, because of Trump, the payer of alimony has to pay taxes on the alimony which he gives to the recipient. You are paying taxes on what you do not have. I support Bernie Sanders because he is willing to stand up to big corporations and the billionaires improve the quality of life for everyone. I do not support a lot of his social policies, but his economics are spot on. Bernie …
/r/MensRights17/09/19 11:48 AM
3

More importantly, men are socially pressured into being breadwinners and working for and providing for their wives and kids while women do not face this sort of pressure. The "wage gap" is simply women having the privilege of living of male labour and therefore working less while men are expected to slave away
/r/MensRights17/09/19 01:20 AM
4

I don't think it is. But r/Mensrights is stereotyped as being right-wing. And by reddit standards, it is. We don't want people to think that caring about Mens Issues and being a left-winger is mutually exclusive
/r/MensRights16/09/19 10:00 PM
1

Not too many women on this sub - post it as replies to comments that women made on AITA
/r/MensRights16/09/19 12:15 AM
19

Let's not turn this into a left-right issue. Leftwing & MRA are not mutually exclusive
/r/MensRights15/09/19 08:56 PM
2

but hey, if I get into that kind of conversation again, I’ll remember about you. Thanks! So the conclusion is, fuck your husband’s needs because you’re a woman. And if your husband doesn’t do anything for you anymore either, fuck him then too, because he’s lazy and you need to be respected and taken care of in a relationship. Pretty awful, right? Oh Yeah. I'm reading it as "men are resources, do the bare minimum to get the maximum from him. Kind of like CEO-employee relationship honestly". That …
/r/MensRights15/09/19 05:49 PM
2

Thanks for sharing. Yeah those comments are vile. I saw a post where there was guy who got attacked for not letting his 12-year old daughter buy a vibrator. Society is gone of the rockers. What I am interested though is seeing the attacks about you being a "self-hating woman", etc. It's f***ing crazy imagining all the nonsense you are facing for being a "gender traitor"
/r/MensRights15/09/19 05:12 PM
0

It's a shame because on economic issues, the left is spot on. But on social issues they went from "segregation is bad" to "all white men are evil"
/r/MensRights15/09/19 05:09 PM
1

Told them once, in a comment, that I’m a girl, What was the story? Mind sharing the link?
/r/MensRights15/09/19 01:07 PM
27

Satire right? Right? Please
/r/MensRights15/09/19 03:03 AM
10

WTF! I knew male rape is not taken as seriously but this ridiculous! Go to the media - any media who is willing to listen. This is a major health and safety hazard. Make your wife your spokesperson - she's a woman so people will listen to her
/r/MensRights15/09/19 12:37 AM
11

Marry that woman Marry her now! Don't let someone like this fly
/r/MensRights14/09/19 04:28 AM
4

What happened then?? You should have called the cops and press charges. Just to make a point that women have no right to sexually assault someone. She won't get charged but she got scared
/r/MensRights14/09/19 04:28 AM
-4

Yep. Once a fully viable fetus is considered "just a clump of cells" rather than an unborn human child which can feel pain, etc.; it is only a matter of time that killing newborns will be forgiven "cause women go through tremendous stress and need choice even beyond birth"/s
/r/PussyPass14/09/19 12:12 AM
2

Fair. I should have been more clear
/r/MensRights12/09/19 11:19 PM
1

Was it this https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/cl9pvo/dress_code_discussion_on_aita/ ? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/bvlld0/controversy_over_dress_codes_for_women_even_when/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/cxwkns/just_like_women_in_the_workplace_women_in_schools/
/r/MensRights12/09/19 11:19 PM
1

Well neither am I, but I guess I should've been more clear
/r/MensRights12/09/19 11:14 PM
2

This is just laughable considering that being a female is winning the gender lottery and having it easy
/r/MensRights11/09/19 11:41 PM
2

Imagine you wanted to be a scientist and I told you you couldn't, but instead your spouse would go out and do work while you have to take care of the home. Would you feel privileged? I'd be happier than in a system that we would both have to work. I'll feel privileged if I got to marry up (i.e. marry someone w/ higher success potential) and got to aid and share in her success while I took care of the kids.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 07:33 PM
15

I agree. Men need to stick together and not date women who have slept around and now want someone to settle down with
/r/MGTOW11/09/19 06:03 PM
24

She will hit the wall in her late twenties. Then she has the next fifty+ years of being destroyed and generally worthless as a person. Let's be real. She'll marry up and live of her husband's labour
/r/MGTOW11/09/19 05:53 PM
1

"there were some odd cases, but the average industrial era employer was not an abuser". It's naive to think that. No. There is overwhelming documentations that industrial employers were abusive. The idea that men were all these abusive parties in marriages is ridiculous and speaks to your internalized misandry. You automaticity view men who actually worked like crazy so that their wives could relax and live of their labour as abusive???
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 04:48 PM
1

Female domestic labour was never regulated, It was. Via marriage. Divorce courts ensured that the man had the responsibility to keep his wife happy. And societal pressure didn't allow men to treat their wives as servants. There were some odd cases, but the average husband isn't an abuser. In such an arrangement women got the short end of the stick: they were effectively employed by their husbands with no external entity having any insight into how they were being treated, no bargaining rights an…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 02:18 PM
4

Additionally as women began to earn more they insisted men earn even more rather than shifting some of the burden. That's the issue. At least if women had altruistic intentions to help their husbands, it would be great. But instead they still think they have a God given right to be provided for, while also getting their own money cause, eh, equality?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 02:14 PM
1

It now takes 2 full time working people to afford a mortgage on a 3 bed home on the average industrial wage + 33%. I think it has fallen worse. We are working twice as hard for less compared to the 1950s. So it is dual income + automation + immigration + trade deals + outsourcing
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 02:12 PM
2

Corporations did nothing Don't you think corporations would sponsor feminism though and push feminism in that direction
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 02:11 PM
1

, the decision whether to work or not to work is simple: is the extra income going to cover the cost of the childcare? No. Because people value spending time with kids. So is extra income going to cover cost + separation from kid. I would give up $60K in extra income to be with my kid. Let my wife work if she wants a career
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 02:10 PM
3

whoever formally invites should expect to do the paying unless otherwise stipulated. Except men are systematically oppressed into asking women out
/r/MensRights11/09/19 02:08 PM
1

I mean, am I the only one who thinks that bringing someone to your place doesn't necessarily mean to have sex? 100% agree. But we live in such a degenerate world that everyone just wants to have sex all the time
/r/MensRights11/09/19 02:07 PM
3

I do not know why or how it started that men pay for dates dinner. Historically, women didn't earn and marriage was about the girl's father seeing the man has the means to provide for her
/r/MensRights11/09/19 02:06 PM
1

but all of them pay their share no matter what we're doing. Same. A friend of mine doesn't let her boyfriend spend more on her than he does on him. That is equality. I live in Canada
/r/MensRights11/09/19 02:05 PM
2

Considering that they have all the power, I don't see who else could cause such a culture change. They benefitted from it, clearly they played a big role in making it happen
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 04:19 AM
3

Women should have all their rights restricted just to make things even That is not what I am calling for. What I want to know is why women give up their position of privilege in the 1950s. I think each gender should be splitting workforce time, so that we only need 40 hours a week. Also, it is women who have the ability to change this quo. Will you accept a man who earns less, or do you still think that you have a right to marry up? . But yes, women are the ones who are most immediately affected…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 04:18 AM
2

marry someone who wants earning potential I have a strong earning potential. I just want the same. Just because I am a man, I shouldn't be expected to accept less than what I put in. I don't understand how "by definition" it's a better deal. Work by definition is producing resources. Not working is not producing. There is a reason that landlords made peasants work - if they enjoyed it, they would have done it. Work, throughout history, is serving one's feudal or corporate overlord. By definition…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 04:11 AM
3

So we are putting as much in as 1920s working class. Good to know. Hopefully an economic collapse followed by a new new deal and a new 1950s prosperity will arise
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 04:08 AM
3

Now its 80 (40+40) Considering that employers nowadays expect free overtime, it is more like 100 (60 men + 40 women)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 03:52 AM
5

Women were not the ones in any position to enforce the social standards or laws that required men to be in the workforce. Women have biological hormonal privilege that gives them the power so that men cater to female over male desires and women also cater to female over male desires. Look up the 'women are wonderful' effect. There are multiple studies that show that women have a strong ingroup preference, and men have a strong outgroup privilege. Just like a civilized society has made men's phys…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 03:50 AM
3

Okay then don't get married. Problem solved. No. That is not solving the problem. The fact that society deems women to be eligible partners w/o bringing in $ but expects to bring $ is a problem. Men should be able to reproduce and have kids and start a family w/o having to put in more. Equality goes both ways. women that will be the sole bread-winner for those men who don't want to take on that role. Never seen it (outside of a one-off job loss or the man is self-employed and the bus is still st…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 03:45 AM
3

Do you see why I say the whole thing put us in an impossible to reverse situation? I see what you are saying. I'll think it through further and see if I can find a solution
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 03:24 AM
8

And now everyone has to work. Besides, neither did men nor women have a choice. Women still have some choice, men still have 0 choice. Corporations were the only beneficiary
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 03:23 AM
10

men would have left the workforce in droves to let their wives make all the money Except men are socially pressured into working for and providing for women. Women refuse to marry down generally, and many women still think that they have a God-given right to marry up Women had freedom, as much as men did. Each side had it's role. I think each gender should have equal opportunity to work or not work; but forcing us to put in 80 instead of 40 hours of effort isn't a solution. Caring for a spouse a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 03:22 AM
5

Well pass laws to make it happen I guess. If doubling the workforce raised the prices, then halfing the workforce should half the prices, over time. Laws will speed it up
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 03:04 AM
3

https://np.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/d1upwf/aita_for_not_paying_her_tab/ Link
/r/MensRights11/09/19 02:25 AM
7

but we're in a position where it's impossible to reverse the damage that's been done economic wise. I have nothing against women in the workforce; I just think we should have gone to a 25 hour workweek or something so men and women would get equal opportunity to spend time with kids and in the office. Do you think switching the standard workweek down will help?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 02:10 AM
6

How is anyone stupid enough to fall for Scientology or Neo-classical economics? Heh. Good point! But seriously, folks, in the case of women it only had to be a small number of idiots. Okay I understand. Personally, I have nothing against women in the workforce; I just think we should have gone to a 25 hour workweek or something so men and women would get equal opportunity to spend time with kids and in the office
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 02:09 AM
3

Systematic Oppression of men as the laboring class for privileged women
/r/MensRights11/09/19 01:40 AM
5

I'm not white....
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 01:38 AM
2

It's mention of the Second Wave's role that remains verboten. Funny thing is, I was discussing with a female friend of mine how quality of life is on the decline, as cost of living particularly housing, is through the roof. She said to consider that now women are working. I said yeah, things are so bad now that women have to work, we have to work twice as hard. She said, no it was other way around, women started working which raised the cost of living. I said then it looks like corporations fund…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 01:26 AM
2

Women were literally told they were oppressed by having some guy going out, working hard, and then giving them half the money. How were they stupid enough to fall for it?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 01:23 AM
6

Oh yeah. Women having the privilege to stay at home and live of their husband's labour is somehow now considered oppression cause, corporations I guess?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/09/19 01:01 AM
24

I can't see your average family eagerly buying it Watch the feminists then claim that lack of sales represents internalized mysoginy
/r/MensRights10/09/19 10:53 PM
64

Step 2. Actually work as many hours as men. Men are socially pressured into working to provide for and serve their female partners
/r/MGTOW10/09/19 06:16 PM
1

How was it legally easier for him?
/r/MensRights10/09/19 06:13 PM
1

By lowering my standard and willing to accept someone of significantly lower calibre? No thanks!
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:53 PM
1

She's my dream girl. Eveyrthing I ever wanted. Never fell for anyone before or since
/r/MensRights10/09/19 02:26 PM
1

Congratulations? I’m not sure what your point is You say that men just wear T-Shirts and women dress up; and I think it is the opposite. Look at any office. Men wear dress shirts and dress pants. Women wear whatever. I mean, sorry you broke up, but it sounds like ye weren’t right for each other anyway, so I’m not that sorry We never broke up. We never were together. She just rejected me.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 01:36 PM
4

I see myself as economically "socialist" (more Bernie Sanders over Marx), socio-culturally conservative. How might your preferred economic system/theory benefit males compared to alternatives? I believe in returning to a 1950s system where only one income is needed to support a family. However, I would like it so that it's not just men who have to do all the work - social pressure should be placed on either /or parent. Also, like the 1950s, I want a local manufacturing (which is better for men) …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/19 01:12 PM
1

It’s kind of crazy that a lot of guys will complain about how women spend hours doing their hair and makeup, how they spend hours shopping for just the right dress to flatter their shape, and then the same guys will turn around and complain that women don’t put any effort into attracting guys. LPT: the ones with truly smoking bodies spend hours at the gym, or jogging. And then guys will throw on slacks and a shirt and wonder why women aren’t immediately throwing themselves at them. Maybe cause m…
/r/MensRights10/09/19 01:05 PM
2

https://np.reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/cyj5v1/aita_for_telling_my_wife_that_if_she_quits_her/
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/19 01:00 PM
1

Which school board & course? I'm Canadian and never learned this, but I am definitely not surprised
/r/MensRights09/09/19 07:42 PM
1

I've seen stats that show that men are 10 times more likely to commit suicide. Google suicide rate, there should be plenty. I would find you a source but I have a lot of things on my plate right now. Sorry
/r/MensRights09/09/19 05:40 PM
3

I've noticed this as well. Even when babysitting, I've noticed I'm nicer / more attentive to girls over boys. And they are kids so there is no sexual element
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:38 PM
4

So should we accept our biological oppression? Beating each other up is also biology, we don't do that anymore. Socialization can overcome biology
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:38 PM
4

Yes we can. Socialise young kids that women are not inherently more valuable than men. That men are not expected to initiate, to provide. Re-instating socially enforced monogamy would go a long way
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:29 PM
3

There is definitely value for being conventionally attractive. But women have their unique privilege. Take two people in The West, hold all else equal, the woman will have the better life
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:05 PM
3

This sub is about legal and social equality
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:04 PM
2

It can't be rape; men always like to have sex. /s
/r/MensRights09/09/19 01:40 PM
16

Thanks!
/r/MensRights09/09/19 01:28 PM
1

Observation from outside is insufficient Okay. But your claim to the contrary is also based on observation.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 01:24 PM
2

My take from that is that men have more acquaintances than women, while women have more closer friends. For women it is more all or nothing while for men people exist on various levels of the socialization gradient
/r/MensRights09/09/19 01:22 PM
3

Sorry. Will do that next time
/r/MensRights09/09/19 01:16 PM
-1

whereas women will pretend to be friends with people they hate You mean the same way that executives pretend to like their employees but secretly just see them as money-producing slaves. People, regardless of gender, have opportunistic "friendships". We are not going to get anywhere by stereotyping women and denying the truth when they have figured out something better than we can. Men put random women over their male friends. Men are fickle w/ friendships. Women stick together, support each oth…
/r/MensRights09/09/19 03:10 AM
7

New disease is killing 1 in 5 men, this is horrible news for the women who are now partnerless and need to provide for themselves and their kids. Med and law schools are now majority women, this is tragic news for female doctors and lawyers who will now have to marry down and provide Male candidates have been underperforming in politics, forcing women to now govern and take care of the increasingly unproductive male population Chemicals are destroying male fertility, this is horrible news for wo…
/r/MensRights09/09/19 03:04 AM
137

Would you happen to have a link for this clip?
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:58 AM
-2

I asked this before and was downvoted. Women have stronger friendships than men do - why is that?
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:14 AM
1

Just a couple of days ago; the idea of men earning less than they were in the past was deemed a tragedy for women. Now men not having friends is bad for women. Is this for real??
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:12 AM
2

Not at all. I actually live in Toronto!
/r/MensRights09/09/19 01:49 AM
2

Ah! Got it!! Thanks!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/19 11:10 PM
1

Breadpilled?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/09/19 11:03 PM
1

I would like to know the exact cause as well
/r/MensRights08/09/19 07:57 PM
13

As a law student, I agree on both counts
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:53 PM
10

I googled her name, I found her LinkedIn profile. I clicked it, and the page was non-existent. I guess she is now facing just consequences for her actions
/r/MensRights08/09/19 05:52 PM
3

feminists claimed not-working was oppressive and so women returned to the workforce. Which to me was just ridiculous and represented manipulation by the corporations. How is not working oppression and working a privilege??? If women wanted to work so badly, we should have switched the gender roles. But now of course both of us have to work hard for our corporate overlords, while men have to work harder. Went from men working 40 and women working 0 to Men working 60 and women working 40. Yay prog…
/r/MensRights08/09/19 12:51 PM
23

the judges here a Where is 'here'
/r/MensRights08/09/19 12:45 PM
84

See: https://www.wxyz.com/news/region/macomb-county/grieving-dad-jailed-for-repeatedly-criticizing-court-system-in-macomb-county
/r/MensRights08/09/19 12:44 PM
2

It's not an official petition so yeah
/r/MensRights08/09/19 12:44 PM
39

Criticism of government officials is the foundational principle of democracy. The idea that no one is above the law, along with the principle of innocent until proven guilty, are the foundational principles of the Anglo-American justice system. A judge, using her authority to ban criticism of her decision, is acting very much in abuse of power mindset. This is no different than if your mayor banned residents of your town from criticizing him/her. Believing you - a judge - are above criticism sho…
/r/MensRights08/09/19 03:44 AM
43

I don't think you understand the inherent issues with having a bond that forbids one from criticizing a judge.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 03:34 AM
11

Link? In the mean time http://chng.it/9hm4FRZRxd Petition to remove the judge
/r/MensRights08/09/19 03:29 AM
15

http://chng.it/9hm4FRZRxd Petition to remove the judge
/r/MensRights08/09/19 03:29 AM
571

http://chng.it/9hm4FRZRxd Petition to remove the judge
/r/MensRights08/09/19 03:29 AM
8

http://chng.it/9hm4FRZRxd Petition to remove this judge
/r/MensRights08/09/19 03:27 AM
39

Which were that he cannot criticize a judge.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 03:26 AM
89

This is messed up. A judge jailing someone cause she "feels threatened"?? Democracy is based on the idea of criticizing those in power. Giving judge powers to arbitrarily arrest people based on feelings go against everything a justice system is about. This is more than an MRA issue, this is a fundamental civil rights issue
/r/MensRights08/09/19 03:24 AM
97

Considering that law professors deny that anti-male bias even exists (i.e. don't talk about it at all), it is going to long and uphill battle. The only way I think off is to be competent enough, and have enough connections to become a judge, and then hope you don't get appealed. Even Lord Denning (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Denning,_Baron_Denning) the most influential and greatest judge of the modern era had a lot of trouble enacting his reforms. And this guy was a legend in the legal wor…
/r/MensRights08/09/19 03:17 AM
7

Yes. Men should raise their standards. I've been criticized by other men for refusing to date women significantly less successful or moral than myself. Sorry, did an undergrad in Accounting and Economics at a top university, and am in a good law school. I work as a cross-border tax preparer. I don't drink, party, use drugs, am a virgin, don't believe in hook-ups, and generally have my head on my shoulders. I am going to ask for someone as successful and moral as myself. Just cause I am a man, do…
/r/MensRights08/09/19 01:45 AM
7

So: Affirmative action and scholarships give women more oppurtunities than men Women never historically had to work, having the privilege of living of their husband due to male provider roles. Women still have the privilege of spending time with kids, leading to men by definition working more hours and getting promoted / paid more, cause they are oppressed into working Women claim that this is unfair to them, as they are being paid less despite having the privilege to work less hours. So women b…
/r/MensRights08/09/19 01:42 AM
7

"Women who refuse to marry down, at a time when women have more oppurtunities than men, are hurting American men's marriage prospects" Fixed the Headline
/r/MensRights08/09/19 01:41 AM
3

But But wage gap /s.
/r/MensRights08/09/19 01:41 AM
19

Yes. Feminists: "I have the right to dress as slutty and as inappropriately as I like, wherever I want. I have the right to sell my body and my sex. My body my choice" Also Feminist: "Making any kind of reaction to my sexuality is a crime. No looking. No commenting. If you look, comment, or buy sex, you are a criminal" Also: Man showing skin is a sexual predator. Woman showing skin is within her rights and a man being uncomfortable by it is also a sexual predator
/r/MensRights08/09/19 01:40 AM
4

So: Affirmative action and scholarships give women more oppurtunities than men Women never historically had to work, having the privilege of living of their husband due to male provider roles. Women still have the privilege of spending time with kids, leading to men by definition working more hours and getting promoted / paid more, cause they are oppressed into working Women claim that this is unfair to them, as they are being paid less despite having the privilege to work less hours. So women b…
/r/MensRights08/09/19 01:36 AM
1

"Women who refuse to marry down, at a time when women have more oppurtunities than men, are hurting American men's marriage prospects" Fixed the Headline
/r/MensRights08/09/19 01:22 AM
1

"Non-Virgin women are hurting American men's marriage prospects"
/r/MensRights08/09/19 01:21 AM
3

Men have been dating down forever. It is time women did the same. Equality goes both ways
/r/MensRights08/09/19 01:20 AM
6

Ex-Muslim. Can confirm all the above. Would like to add that polygamy means that "lower status" men don't get to be loved
/r/MensRights08/09/19 01:19 AM
482

Jailed for criticizing a judge??? I am in law school and I'm pretty sure that goes against the Principle of Rule of Law. If criticizing a judge is a crime... http://chng.it/9hm4FRZRxd Petition to remove the judge
/r/MensRights08/09/19 01:18 AM
3

Well in Canada is it section 2(b) of the Charter. We have laws against hate speech though, and if the genders were flipped, the book would not be displayed in a public space. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Section_2_of_the_Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms
/r/MensRights07/09/19 01:55 PM
1

I don't think so. I'm worried some radical feminist mother will use it indoctrinate her own kid
/r/MensRights07/09/19 01:54 PM
2

Wait what?
/r/MensRights07/09/19 01:53 PM
3

Yes. I did make it harder. Cause I want someone who share my values. Someone who values me as more than a sex object, rather believes in the value of people, believes in "for richer or for poorer, in sickness and in health, till death do us part"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/19 12:56 AM
2

I'm waiting for the day when men have equal access to marrying up
/r/MensRights06/09/19 09:40 PM
1

Get married while in school. I'm 23 and in law school. I'm okay with marrying right now. Going through the struggles of early life in a hard core capitalist world is what a partner is for. We go through struggles together
/r/MensRights06/09/19 08:38 PM
3

Oh yeah. I know that first hand. A woman who wants a successful man of strong moral character values herself and doesn't give her love to just anyone. She ask for it, even if she doesn't bring that to the table A man who wants a successful woman of strong moral character, even if he brings that to the table, is criticized for it as he is expecting too much from women and needs to stop being so shallow.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 08:35 PM
1

Forcing the rich to pay their fair share of taxes sounds like forcing a social value on them. I agree with that BTW. I just don't understand how the left understands economics, and tends to care about the most vulnerable, but ignores the issues that young men are facing when it comes to love in the name of protecting the holy grail of degeneracy
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/19 08:30 PM
3

Yes. The fact that people are working harder for less is a problem. I used to think being financially stable will solve my problems. It did help, but a bigger part of my depression is my inability to find love, because of hook up culture
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/19 08:28 PM
4

I'm not tradcon. I detest the idea of men having to work while women get to relax at home with the kdis
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/19 08:27 PM
3

Well monogamy is not necessarily synonymous with heteronormativity. Thank you
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/19 08:25 PM
1

Both the fact that people are working harder for less, and increasing promiscuity is the problem. It's not either or
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/19 08:24 PM
5

The left promotes choice. Paying workers less and moving jobs and profits overseas sounds like choice. Left wing ideals are protecting the most vulnerable. The current hook-up culture has resulted in. The bottom 70% of men in looks being unloved in their 20s, leading to sky-high depression, etc. Many kids grown up in broken homes. This sounds like a capitalism run ideal, rather than a socialist situation. The hook up culture values women as sex objects, and men as sex objects + ATMs. Socially en…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/19 11:52 AM
11

I couldn't even imagine looking at someone's paycheck to deem if they are worthy of me. I disagree. I want someone about as successful as myself. The issue is whether one is asking for more than I put in. What I've noticed is it is perfectly acceptable for a woman to aspire to marry up, but if a man dare ask for someone even about as successful as himself, he is criticized excessively for it
/r/MensRights06/09/19 11:45 AM
2

legally tied down to one person is altogether less attractive Which I see as a problem and contrary to left wing ideals. The most vulnerable are kids, who by definition need protection and a stable home. This is why I think the left should be promoting marriage, rather than making degeneracy a key value and combatting it in the name of freedom.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/19 04:43 AM
0

I see it more as not letting ourselves be taken advantage of
/r/MensRights06/09/19 04:41 AM
1

whats with number 8? Have you ever been to an office and seen the discrepancy in dress codes? Men are in dress shirts and dress pants, women are in tank tops and capris / miniskirts
/r/MensRights06/09/19 04:41 AM
45

Nah. I think it is because women are walking away. They rather sleep around rather than commit at a young age and be true life partners
/r/MensRights06/09/19 02:49 AM
0

How is her husband a bad guy? And if they agreed to marriage, how is she?
/r/MGTOW05/09/19 08:03 PM
2

Typos. Check again
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/19 08:00 PM
1

M23. That would be ideal for me. Hoping we can return to a 1950s economy where only one parent needs to work, except that men are equally likely to be provided for
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/19 06:19 PM
3

It's really messed up
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/19 02:35 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrowing_of_Hell
/r/MensRights05/09/19 02:35 PM
1

The ways in which men have been conscripted against their will to fight in armies is much more a form of oppression than the social obligation we've had to provide materially for our families. One is the just less severe form of the other though. The man must put his family / his country above himself
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/19 01:59 PM
2

I disagree that it's as simple as you say. Women elect to do more work at home most of the time. They choose to be the primary caregiver, to take time off from work to raise the kids, to have a greater work-life balance. For whatever reason, men choose to work more. It's not like people are being forced into these roles. Yes, there are social pressures, but there's also a lot of free choice. Except that statistics clearly show that men are expected to be providers. Women have a choice, men do no…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/19 12:53 PM
5

Most men are indifferent. I respect career women, I just don't respect people, regardless of gender, who put service to their corporate overlord (i.e. their career) over their kids
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/19 12:51 PM
2

while men choose to do more of the professional work. Men are "choosing" because men have systematically oppressed into being breadwinners and women refuse to date men who don't provide while men are criticized for wanting successful women (know this first hand)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/09/19 12:50 PM
6

Yep. Except women think that they have some God-Given right to be with the kid and be provided for. It's messed up
/r/MensRights05/09/19 01:14 AM
3

What what? Link? That's crazy, even for reddit
/r/PussyPassDenied04/09/19 11:24 PM
6

Nice!!
/r/MensRights04/09/19 01:10 AM
2

Yep. But we need women only scholarships as we need women in higher education cause, well, um, wage gap and patriarchy. What's even worse is that women still think that they have a God-Given right to marry up and be provided for. So a woman can put in a level 6 effort, affirmative action bumps her to level 7, and the ability to marry up gives her a level 8 lifestyle. Men put in a level 10 effort, affirmative action bumps them down to level 9, and marrying down only allows them to have a level 8 …
/r/MensRights03/09/19 06:47 PM
4

The way I see it, women are the corporate class, the employers if you will, who force men to work and provide for them. Think about it, men make the first move, the same ways employees are the ones who apply. Men have to prove themselves, the same way employees have to. Women, like employers, have the courts at their disposal. Being a stay-at-home mom is a big luxury, yet somehow corporations manipulated women into seeing careers as being a good thing leading to the modern situation where we nee…
/r/MensRights02/09/19 06:04 PM
1

Ouch. Sorry to hear that. Happy cake day though!
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/19 06:00 PM
25

On topic, people REALLY overvalue housework. 100% agree. It only takes a few hours at most
/r/MensRights02/09/19 04:04 PM
7

Yep
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/19 01:30 PM
28

All those wanting him to hit her back; you do realize that he'd get arrested and charged and she'll walk away scott free right?
/r/MensRights02/09/19 01:13 PM
1

If he fought back, he'd be the only one charged unfortunately
/r/MGTOW02/09/19 01:12 PM
2

Satire right? Please?
/r/MensRights02/09/19 02:48 AM
1

Hunh?
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:46 PM
1

Nice!!
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:43 PM
1

The way office dress codes are falling for women, I would say in about 10 years
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:41 PM
4

I don't see an issue w/ co-ed schools, as long as men and women get socialized that women are not goddesses and men should be looking for good women
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:40 PM
1

I definitely think it is easier for women to find love for all the aforementioned reasons, and I do think that it is an inequality that needs to be solved via socialization. As a man, I have been criticized for not wanting to date women significantly less successful than myself. Although I would like to clarify that by "hetrosexual life partners" I am referring to a close best friend of the same gender.https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HeterosexualLifePartners
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:36 PM
2

Demand creates its own supply; I think that is the case here. Society, by giving way to degeneracy, has allowed these items to be marketed and women, following biology, act on it
/r/MensRights01/09/19 02:57 AM
3

Women's rights must be revoked. We don't need "real equality" instead of feminism, we need a hardcore modern patriarchy and remove women's rights. I was with you until this part
/r/MensRights31/08/19 11:15 PM
6

I agree. I used to be against school uniforms as a teenager, but I am strongly in favour of them now, for the modesty and professionalism reasons, as well as the equalization reasons
/r/MensRights31/08/19 09:27 PM
6

Honestly, I don't even think it is radical feminists even, just most young women feel that now
/r/MensRights31/08/19 09:25 PM
-2

They seem to have stronger friend groups from my observations of people. Women seem to have stronger friend groups whom they can go out with me and do things with, even when they are single. Heck, women seem to from heterosexual life partnerships much more easily, providing a semi-rellationship already. Loneliness is big problem in the modern era, and men are clearly affected by it more. Let me pose you a question, at a Prom or any formal college dance, you'll see groups of women going out as fr…
/r/MensRights31/08/19 12:32 PM
-2

Or maybe women don't actually systematically gossip more than men, and like feminists, we are falling into the stereotype problem
/r/MensRights31/08/19 12:28 PM
2

real tribal Perhaps they get tribal, but that also means that they have strong in tribe relations
/r/MensRights31/08/19 03:59 AM
-4

I have several female friends and not one has gossiped about another friend to me
/r/MensRights31/08/19 03:59 AM
-1

in a combat zone. That is a special circumstance. The average person doesn't serve in a combat zone. It makes sense why war vetrans will have a special bond
/r/MensRights31/08/19 03:58 AM
1

From what I've seen, it is the opposite. Women have groups who will support each other, while men are fickle and put women over other men.
/r/MensRights31/08/19 03:58 AM
6

Every person has their own personal hell, as the saying goes Oh sure. Everything is so easy for them, they cry when the smallest thing goes awry. I've seen it. But as a whole, their lives are much better than mine
/r/MensRights30/08/19 04:34 PM
0

Poe's law?
/r/MensRights30/08/19 04:33 PM
5

Well I'm not average in many areas. But is doesn't help knowing that my female peers are putting in less effort to get a better life than I have
/r/MensRights30/08/19 02:06 PM
1

https://www.ceddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/cx4kbu/aita_for_the_way_i_acted_and_for_leading_someone/
/r/MensRights29/08/19 09:37 PM
4

Yep. Female privilege in a nut shell. Men are expected to work harder, women get work less, marry up, spend time with the kids, get more spent on them, get all savings split 50-50, get divorce rigged in their favour. I've said this before, women are the corporate class
/r/MensRights29/08/19 12:43 AM
1

Problem with what?
/r/MensRights29/08/19 12:31 AM
4

Someone should do of an AITA of a man wearing a dress shirt and dress pants w/ no suit and be declined an interview. Everyone would defend the manager then
/r/MensRights28/08/19 01:32 PM
16

It's pretty crazy. You specify a dress code and you are a sexist for telling women what to wear (even though men tend to have stricter dress codes). You don't specify, and you are in trouble for being vague
/r/MensRights28/08/19 02:32 AM
3

If you are female, affirmative action will help you find work and get promoted. If you are female, you will get to be asked out, get lot of compliments, get valued, and get men doing things to impress. If you are female, it is a lot easier for you to marry up as men are socially oppressed into being open to marrying down while women are allowed to demand men who outearn them. If you are female, your hormonal biological privilege means that people will defer to you (there is ample evidence for ma…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 02:22 AM
2

Hit it all right on the head!!
/r/MensRights26/08/19 03:48 AM
1

You're right. It's easier for women. Women can just marry up; while men are still expected to be providers. Women have the freedom to take time of work and spend with their kids, while men are expected to work for their corporate overlords
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:50 PM
1

This is why I believe in hell. So people like him and Bezos, people form whom hell was created, will feel the pain they caused others. They had all the money in the world to help others, instead they only chose to profit themselves with more money than they knew what to do with
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/08/19 10:56 AM
1

We need you too! :) Here is an online hug!
/r/MensRights23/08/19 03:02 PM
1

Happy to hear some good news!
/r/MensRights23/08/19 12:22 AM
2

I see coffee as a good first date. Reagrdless, if someone doesn't want to meet me casually, why would they want to meet me romatnically
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 11:28 PM
2

We need a cultural revolution to deal with this paradigm shift in gender dynamics What do you propose? And I agree, women are having the best of both ways. To me, a return to socially enforced monogamy and increased socialisation of women to act better is needed
/r/MensRights21/08/19 11:44 AM
1

I would be thrilled if a girl said: "I enjoy our conversations?" to me. I don't know why people are harping on it? It shows that you enjoy the person's company and value them as a person
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/19 02:57 AM
1

I would be thrilled if a girl said that to me. I don't know why people are harping on it?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/19 02:56 AM
1

That's what I am getting as well, but people do not seem to get that
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/19 02:56 AM
1

Cause my friends are all like "you never really asked her out"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/19 02:55 AM
1

Not from my experience. Women are respected for having standards, men are criticized for having them
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/19 02:54 AM
1

I'm sorry to hear about what you went through
/r/MensRights21/08/19 02:51 AM
1

I'm sorry to hear about what you are going through
/r/MensRights21/08/19 02:50 AM
1

Why not?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 03:55 PM
2

Karen S?
/r/MensRights20/08/19 03:46 PM
9

Men are romantic, women are practical" So men are socialized to love unconditionally, while women are socialized into loving w/ strict conditions. I want someone who loves me unconditionally for who I am. But seems like only women get that divine blessing. As a man, I cannot even have standards for wanting a woman at my caliber w/o being attacked for it.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 03:35 PM
5

Yes. Do they actually love men, or just the things men provide? Why are men systemically putting in more?
/r/MensRights20/08/19 03:33 PM
3

Okay but as a whole, do women love men? For example, there are some CEOs who actually care for their employees, but most see them as disposable objects. But most would say that CEOs don't care for employees, with some claiming that they do. It is the same idea, to women, in general, love men or not?
/r/MensRights20/08/19 03:06 PM
10

This is r/mensrights. It is literally about how men are oppressed and women are privileged in the modern western world. We will be talking bout "women" Of course each woman is different, but I am talking in general terms.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 02:55 PM
6

So women don't really express love but they still love, they really do /s ? That's what it sounds like
/r/MensRights20/08/19 02:54 PM
5

hey're out there - don't give up hope! Any idea where to find one?
/r/MensRights20/08/19 02:20 PM
4

Men and women express love differently Would you be able to elaborate?
/r/MensRights20/08/19 02:20 PM
11

Happy to hear that!! :)
/r/MensRights20/08/19 01:47 PM
1

I am not trans though and looking feminine is not going to help
/r/MensRights20/08/19 11:52 AM
2

ach gender has their own set of unique problems that the other doesn't and vice versa. Sure. Rich people have problems that poor people don't have. But on average, women have it easier. Everyone I met who lives a good life is female
/r/MensRights20/08/19 11:51 AM
3

Women do put in effort and do get rewarded for what they put in. They just have a boost. So I rather get rewarded more. Besides, the life I want is available only to women. I would like to just be the best version of myself and be inherently valued for who I am, rather than have to act a certain way in order to find love. I rather get sympathy for being single, rather than being criticized for it. I rather have close female friends, rather than male friends who are instepped in the women are won…
/r/MensRights20/08/19 11:50 AM
3

Life sucks for all, but some have it better. I mean on average, a richer person lives a better life - same idea.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 11:47 AM
3

Society treats them better, both legally and conventionally. On the conventional side it is how men are criticized for having dating standards, while women are respected for having them. How men are expected to make the first move and act in a certain way while women can just be themselves. How single men are criticized, single women are given sympathy. How despite the fact that women have higher earning potential and outearn men under-30 due to affirmative action, etc., women still expect men t…
/r/MensRights20/08/19 11:46 AM
1

If you think it is better to be a man, and you think that those have misfortune are at fault for their own misfortune, then why are you on this sub? Go to r/GreedIsGood or r/Sociopaths or something
/r/MensRights19/08/19 12:00 AM
1

Why is that?
/r/MensRights18/08/19 11:03 PM
2

I would NEVER want to be a woman Why is at the case? Who gives a shit others are more privileged? It kind of does matter. If you want something you don’t have get your ass up and get it. No one ever got anything by complaining. Life isn’t fair and it’s not supposed to be. The strong stand on top of the weak, it’s how it’s always been and it’s how it will always be. Oh great. Those Kevin O'Leary, Ronald Reagan types who blame the homeless for their own misfortune. Another thing, gender privilege …
/r/MensRights18/08/19 11:00 PM
2

Except I'm not white, so I don't have that (and I don't even think that is a thing)
/r/MensRights18/08/19 11:00 PM
1

No. Gender is one of the ways one could have it better. Health is another. Money is another
/r/MensRights18/08/19 10:59 PM
2

You sir... need to change your mindset That sounds like delude oneself into not seeing things that are not there. Women’s life’s are far from perfect man. Not women in general. Everyone has problems. But it is better to be female and all the people I know with the best lives are women
/r/MensRights17/08/19 03:04 PM
3

Well some people clearly have it better than others, sometimes in many ways
/r/MensRights17/08/19 03:03 PM
4

Oh yes. The classic you just need to be better. My LinkedIn profile is already pretty strong
/r/MensRights17/08/19 01:46 PM
2

I would love to have kid. But as a man, there is no way of getting one w/o being able to convince a woman to be a life partner. And keep her there so she doesn't walk out and take the kid. It must be nice being a woman and living the easy life
/r/MensRights17/08/19 01:11 PM
1

Why are you trying to push me into marrying down? You make a point, but then don't see to be willing to debate it
/r/MensRights17/08/19 12:34 PM
6

Best explanation I've seen
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/19 12:05 PM
1

I'm talking about success at my age. Success at my age means having a strong resume at 23-year old standards. Example, going to a good university, having great work experience, etc.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:57 AM
1

I don't like the culture. It's messed up in too many ways. I actually prefer Western culture. Not the way it is practiced right now, but how it was in the 1950s.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:51 AM
1

Yep. Housework is like 4 hours a day. It's a half time job
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:49 AM
2

Marrying across or up is going to be hell for you down the road. You want your arranged wife to be satisfied that she did well, so she works hard and takes care of things for you. Otherwise, she's very likely going to be resentful long-term, and cheat on you. So you are telling to accept a loosing deal, so that she won't cheat on me? F*** this nonsense. Essentially I have to accept financial or fidelity abuse. Interestingly, my mom said more or less the same thing once for her reasons. If she ma…
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:49 AM
4

Essentially give women the best of both models as it suits them
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:45 AM
1

Live in Canada. Please five me some insight
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:44 AM
1

I need someone who shares my values. Marrying a feminist is a recepie for disaster. And while I would love to marry up, I'm okay with marrying someone (I just can't find someone). I'm not going to marry down, on success or on moral values (so no cock carousel vetrans, etc.)
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:44 AM
2

Already in the west
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:43 AM
1

e basically bucks his entire family and gets disowned by them I left the faith. If I come out that I did, I will get disowned. My parents don't care that I left the culture. I do want to find a moral, successful, good character western woman, but am unable to
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:43 AM
1

Well women are more successful than men in the modern era though, so theoretically I should be able to find someone at my own level. Except women still think they have a right to marry up
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:42 AM
1

where affirmative action is illegal Really. I was under the impression that the UK, being very socially liberal, had affirmative action as Canada and the US do. men can and do the same thing, it's becoming increasingly common In theory. But a lot of women still want men who outearn them and can take care of them shall they choose to take time off work. Men are still pressured into being breadwinners
/r/MensRights15/08/19 11:09 AM
3

The difference being, that the other wage gap is caused by women having the privilege to marry up, work less hours and spend time with kids. This wage gap is caused by women having affirmative action in their favour. Yet they still generally refuse to marry down.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:03 PM
2

All things equal though, I would say that the woman has it easier. And a lot more girls meet the definition of attractive than do guys
/r/MensRights14/08/19 11:29 AM
5

Patrick Brown. Not completely proven false (yet) but the evidence that it is false is overwhelming. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_Brown_(politician) Read his book. His life was still ruined, but it was clearly false
/r/MensRights13/08/19 02:51 PM
4

Success means different things at different ages. Being in a good law school is success, at 23-year old standards
/r/MensRights12/08/19 07:51 PM
1

So why are racial minorities also jailed longer? Racism against whites? Best comeback!!
/r/MensRights12/08/19 04:39 PM
7

Let's not generalize like that. I know plenty of hard working women. We are better than feminists
/r/MensRights12/08/19 01:26 PM
4

Towards the other gender: Men. Men care about women's issues, women generally don't care about men's issues. Women know, for example, that men have to undergo an unfair societal expectation in making the first move, etc., but women still force men to do it. Single women get sympathy from single men, single men get attacked as an "incel" by single women. Towards their own gender: Women. Women tend to be collective and support each other, men tend to be competitive and bring each other down.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/19 02:50 AM
2

Because it is the thing that most people cite when asked how men have it easier. They lie about it to further their cause of becoming more privileged than they already are
/r/MensRights11/08/19 11:21 PM
1

Women do are valued inherently, and if they succeed they get more value
/r/MensRights10/08/19 05:49 PM
3

I would go with women having inherent worth while men needing to prove themselves to earn their worth as would be the root. That and women's biological hormonal privilege that makes men and women favour them
/r/MensRights10/08/19 05:45 PM
1

Sorry what?
/r/MensRights10/08/19 05:43 PM
4

It has been an interesting and frustrating perspective. Yeah. It clearly shows who the privileged and oppressed classes are. Not having to work and being able to marry up represent the epitome of female privilege IMO
/r/MensRights09/08/19 09:27 PM
0

All the best! :)
/r/MensRights09/08/19 09:25 PM
3

It is very much factual. The only reason people even suggest that it isn't is because hedonists want to sleep around w/o consequences and radical feminists want the "freedom" to kill their kids
/r/MensRights09/08/19 05:23 PM
5

As per Pew Research, only 14% of American men think women have it easier, while 28% think men have it eaiser: https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2017/10/18/wide-partisan-gaps-in-u-s-over-how-far-the-country-has-come-on-gender-equality/
/r/MensRights09/08/19 03:18 PM
4

Eh, I'm sympathetic towards the wife. Equality does go both ways, and the tradition of women taking the man's name, and the man's name passing on needs to stop. Of course, women need to give up a lot of their privileges, but I don't think we should be sticking our shoes in the ground for something like this.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:48 PM
3

That's all it is. If men were safer, there would be an uproar of women having to pay more.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:28 PM
2

Sex-based discrimination in car insurance is a form of sexism that is legally allowable cause of the entrenched misandry of our society
/r/MensRights09/08/19 01:27 PM
2

For me is more important that people are consistent amongst genders. I feel that in this case, it would be sexual assault as there was no romantic / hook-up history
/r/MensRights09/08/19 11:06 AM
2

Imagine if the genders were reversed. The guy would be called out for indecent exposure if he wore a kilt w/ no underwear
/r/PussyPass09/08/19 11:03 AM
3

Yep. Men are scrwed over in both traditionalism and feminism
/r/MensRights06/08/19 01:43 AM
2

Affirmative Action is specifically protected under Canada's constitution. Not sure about other nations
/r/MensRights05/08/19 02:55 PM
2

Isarel still isn't equal. Men do 3 years, women do 2. Plus the dangerous jobs are still done by men
/r/MensRights05/08/19 02:54 PM
2

Yet men are somehow considered privileged? The worst part is that many men won't fight it as men have conditioned over centuries that they, and not their female peers, have an obligation to die for their country
/r/MensRights05/08/19 02:51 PM
1

Where is this?
/r/MensRights05/08/19 02:48 PM
3

Racism and Sexism. Lovely. I'm South Asian (live in Canada) and love kids, as does my father. The fact that this could have been me or my dad really stings
/r/MensRights05/08/19 02:42 PM
1

Is this satires / a joke?
/r/MensRights05/08/19 02:41 PM
5

Yes. A socialist visible minority like myself is definitely a member of the Alt-Right /s
/r/MensRights05/08/19 02:40 PM
3

Yes. Men and women should be protecting each other in equal numbers. Men are systematically oppressed into dying for women, who are the epitome of privielge
/r/MensRights05/08/19 02:34 PM
3

Ayn Rand ideas Single men need to pull up their bootstraps and try harder. Their singleness is their own damn fault. Men need to be willing to work harder and take the loosing deal, rather than fixing the inequities that allow women to take the winning deal w/ less effort
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/19 11:26 AM
2

moderate their desires and to prioritize moral character and shared interests over looks. I do do that. Am still single. Men have been socialised since feminism started to stop being focused on looks. It is women who, on average, focus excessively only looks, money, and status. They should be socialised into changing
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/19 11:21 AM
2

once that becomes more the norm I will take it as a sign things have improved. Agree. Women need to get socialised that they have higher earning potential than men nowadays and that they should be the ones who should be open to marrying down
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/08/19 11:19 AM
7

I'm going to be quick. I do all sorts of things. I have quite a few female friends. However, I am unable to find a life partner, and the fact that people can improve doesn't solve that there is a systematic issue. The working poor struggling to make ends meet could be managing their money better; it doesn't change the fact that the system is broken
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/19 10:25 PM
1

refuse to deal with women who act badly. I agree. Men should form boycotts and work together, the way women do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/19 11:08 AM
6

Don't wish the game was easier, wish that you were better'? Well you're wishing the game was easier. Would you say that to a minimum wage worker for wanting a higher minimum wage? This is left wing male advocates. The system is rigged in favour of women. let's unrig it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/19 11:07 AM
1

Thank you for making an effort into understanding the root cause. Most people I feel become Incels because they don't get support and therefore become radicalised. Single women get an ocean of sympathy, while single men are seen as loosers and are attacked. What we need is to unrig the dating game. Just like men have been told that "looks are not everything", women need to be told the same - stop focusing on looks and money. You are entitled to marrying up and must respect men. What we also need…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/19 02:34 AM
7

And men get attacked if they do that. And we have no way of knowing. And since something like 90% of women have slept around, it is really hard for a man to do this. What we need is a return to socially enforced monogomy
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 12:52 AM
3

Unfortunately morals have gone down the drain and most people are interested in self-interest only. Women seem to love flaunting their privilege of sleeping around and then settling down. The only way out is if men stop accepting these women and refuse to be the betabux
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 12:48 AM
1

I would love to, but as you can see, it is nearly impossible to do
/r/MensRights01/08/19 12:44 AM
1

Yes as it is based on systematic socialisation, ergo systematic opression
/r/MensRights01/08/19 12:42 AM
2

hese women exist I'm not saying that they don't. But it is a numbers game making it difficult. There are some women who make the first move, for example, but in 99.9% of cases men have to initiate due to convention making it unlikely that a man can sit around
/r/MensRights31/07/19 10:54 AM
1

men value beauty over other characteristics. And that is genetic. Men and women both genetically value looks though. Some at different levels. Personally, I don't care about looks. But if money replaced strength genetically, then women wouldn't care about looks. But it is clear that they do The money aspect though is socialisation. Genetically, men and women both would want a partner of status. But men have had that socialised out of them
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 10:51 AM
1

genetic. Yes. I agree the preference for strong and tall men and for women with certain body proportions that are good for child rearing are genetic. However, money isn't a genetic trait. So the idea that women want men who outearn them while men are okay w/ marrying down would be soicalisaiton
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 10:41 AM
1

People are technically free, but societal pressure still runs everything. For example, women are raised into believing that they can marry up, while men are raised into believing that they have to be open into marrying down. Therefore, women will expect the winning deal, and men are expected to be able to be willing to accept the loosing deal, so that system will continue to happen. I'd love to marry up, but I know that it is almost impossible. But people are criticizing me for even wanting to m…
/r/MensRights31/07/19 10:38 AM
3

People are technically free, but societal pressure still runs everything. For example, women are raised into believing that they can marry up, while men are raised into believing that they have to be open into marrying down. Therefore, women will expect the winning deal, and men are expected to be able to be willing to accept the loosing deal, so that system will continue to happen. I'd love to marry up, but I know that it is almost impossible. But people are criticizing me for even wanting to m…
/r/MensRights31/07/19 10:38 AM
1

Well, which scenario do you want? Women earning more but through their own merit, not via affirmative action, and be open to marrying down, to the same level as men did in the past, based on earning potential when the relationship starts (usually college / early stage career). The economy was rigged in favour of men, and men did their societal duty and married down. Now the economy is rigged in favour of women, yet women still think they have a God-given right to marry up and that men are still …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 10:32 AM
1

Because historically, when the economy was based on physical strength, men have been socialised into marrying down as it was in the best interest of society. The economy changed but socialisation has no caught up.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 10:28 AM
1

Yep
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 10:22 AM
1

There are also numerous studies that show that women's biological hormonal privilege is what puts them in charge. Men and women both women over men. That's how they are in charge
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 03:25 AM
1

give to... women and children. Right. Thank you for proving my point that women get sympathy, men are attacked.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 02:48 AM
1

how we might get out of this point. Government intervention is the only solution I can think of. Government's need to start educating people about this gender inequity
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 02:33 AM
1

Thanks for admitting to your sociopathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 02:23 AM
1

Clearly they do Yeah we do. Cause we are f**ing oppressed in the mordern era
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 02:20 AM
1

Societal pressure due to decades of socializaiton
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 02:19 AM
1

Thank you for proving my point. Single women are loved and get sympathy. Single men are attacked and villified
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 02:18 AM
1

nobody owes anybody ... even sympathy It's sad that society has fallen so much that people don't feel that sympathy is owed. nobody is forcing you to do anything Effective forcing via societal standards
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 02:17 AM
1

cuz women don't run the country, Women do though. Being married to a CEO is like being CEO. You get the behind the throne influence and the money and power. In fact, by having divorce courts in their favour, women are the real ones calling the shots. There are also numerous studies that show that women's biological hormonal privilege is what puts them in charge. Men and women both women over men.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 02:15 AM
1

only women get to whine, remember? Exactly! Which is just proving my point
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 02:13 AM
1

What do you want? Sympathy. Something which women seem to get. But when it comes to men, everyone turns into an a**hole
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 02:12 AM
1

No. She's allow to reject him FOR ANY REASON. And so are men. But people don't get that. Like with men, it depends on the situation. Does she seem generally lonely You just said that there is no sympathy for single men. So you do admit that there is a discrepancy that single women do get sympathy while single men do not. No. Men actively seek women like that because they're easier to please. Also, men feel their manhood crushed when a woman is more successful than they are. That's a myth that ne…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 02:10 AM
1

No one makes those demands of men This demand has been made of me. And societal rules effectively for this
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 01:55 AM
1

Yep. Which is my point. People's behaviour here is only confirming it
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 01:55 AM
1

t's a matter of men prioritising looks and other factors over financial/ career success. Because in large part men are told that that a "real man" will provide for his wife while women are told that they will be provided for. People are socialised to act in this manner
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 01:52 AM
1

Clearly some people don't have any sort of conscience and can't place themselves in the shoes of others...
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 01:49 AM
1

Hold tight, I'm gonna see if I can scrounge up for some fucks to give. So you are a grade A a**hole who has 0 sense of sympathy. Got it
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 01:47 AM
1

ou do is cry for sexual handouts and empathy I'm not calling for "sexual handouts". It is about love, not sex. And it would be nice to get empathy. That is what normal, good people do.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 01:46 AM
1

I definitely find it irritating. It sounds like women are trying to sound flirtatious at all times. But to me, it doesn't sound attractive, just annoying and send the message that you flirt w/ everyone (which is a turnoff)
/r/MGTOW229/07/19 10:49 PM
1

There is still a matter of degree. How much more does she earn. If it is like 2%, then for all practical purposes they earn the same. Most people get together early career or in school. I guess the real question is what their earning potential is at the time.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 11:24 AM
-1

Abolish marriage, problem solved. Marriage is good institution though. Socially enforced monogamy ensures that everyone has a life partner and the whole 80-20 rule doesn't apply. Kids need a stable family structure as well
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/19 12:25 AM
1

And how often do women propose?
/r/MensRights28/07/19 01:55 PM
3

Men have tremendous worth as a partner and it is defaming and insulting for him to have to beg or pay for a woman's hand. 100% Agree. It's inherently demeaning. If a woman expects that, she is not worth being with. Being a woman must be so easy and enjoyable...
/r/MensRights28/07/19 01:43 AM
1

No need to push it the other direction
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:34 AM
1

Yeah
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:33 AM
6

man genuinely likes to buy The man is socialised into buying these things while women are socialised into accepting it. Men no longer accept their wives to cook for them, this also needs to be unsocialised
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:33 AM
2

The one sided dynamic needs to die, not necessarily the practice itself. I agree
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:31 AM
3

If she won't marry you unless you waste a load of money, move on. That is the plan
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:31 AM
2

I think OP is pointing out that you cant have traditional roles where the man is supposed to shower the woman in expensive gifts and pay for everything AND have real equality That is point. This is a quite classic case of having your cake and eating it. Keep old priviledges based on old roles while enjoying all the advantages of equality. While suffering none of the disadvantages real equality would have brought with it. Yep Not saying its unequal in all households, just saying that the keeping …
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:30 AM
3

I doesn't have to cost that much. Keep the tradition. But each side should buy for the other. would stay at home and raise the kids and the man would bring home the bacon. So how is this misandry? Women have the choice. Men do not. Staying at home is easier
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:29 AM
4

Naturally, if you were to ask them how their boyfriend would be the giant victim if she, the woman, was obligated to splash-out a lot of money for an expensive item he doesn't even need to accept... well, they don't see how that could possibly work. Go figure. Yeah. We need to compile a list of contradictions and double standards of feminism
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:28 AM
5

If the ring means she won't marry you then bullet dodged. That is my plan
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:25 AM
2

Plot twist: diamonds are actually not even worth almost anything... it was all a marketing campaign. Diamonds are not worth almost anything , you cannot really resell them, hence they're a complete waste of money Yep. Thanks for providing that info. I do personally like the simple wedding bands for both husband and wife Fair. As long as both sides are paying it
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:25 AM
3

I agree. Makes more financial sense. However, I still have issue w/ buying her a ring, unless she buys me one as well
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:22 AM
3

I don't think the concept of marriage should be done away entirely I am not saying that at all! All I am saying is that the concept of a wedding ring needs to die
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:21 AM
1

my friends simply choosing better than the average Happy to hear that!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/19 11:20 AM
2

Well she started the conversation... And she and honestly get along pretty well. There are some issues where she can be trigger happy but otherwise it (was - I don't work there anymore) a good co-worker relationship
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:19 AM
3

then she has still provided years worth of cleaning and childcare services That is less hours of labour compared to career. And men w/ stay at home wives still do a big chunk of housework. And kids are in school during the day anyway so there is not much childcare going on. Besides, playing with kids is fun
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:18 AM
3

She only quit a few years ago Then she only has a few years gap on his resume.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:17 AM
1

I'm so sorry to hear about what you went through
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:15 AM
1

Thanks!
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:13 AM
1

Thank you for providing this!
/r/MensRights27/07/19 11:13 AM
7

she'd struggle She will. But she got to live of his earnings when married. Now that they split, he should no longer be bounded by the agreement they had as a couple
/r/MensRights27/07/19 12:46 AM
2

I think what we need is to move to a 25 hour workweek. What has happened is that people are now working twice as hard as each is working 40 hours (or more like men work 60, women work 40). This way each person, regardless of gender, has the chance to both have a career or spend time with the kids. Right now women kind of have a choice. They have more options if they work but can still opt out and be taken care of. Men have to work
/r/MensRights27/07/19 12:09 AM
9

Somehow, women who are taken care of by their husbands are the real victims. Yeah. It's complete BS.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 11:50 PM
2

tried to rob me of my overtime pay by cutting a shady deal Wait what??? company dress code was not being enforced for women What was the male and female dress code; and what were women getting away with?
/r/MensRights26/07/19 11:46 PM
2

I agree. Men should also be allowed equal parental (not pregnancy) leave
/r/MensRights26/07/19 11:42 PM
15

After an affair happens and before the divorce is finalized, the stay at home spouse, if s/he was the adultress should have to pay the working spouse she s/he was living of his/her labour while violating the marriage contract. Other than that no alimony. It is a stupid concept. The stay at home spouse already benefitted from the working spouse's labour.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 09:07 PM
3

So what is your point?
/r/MensRights26/07/19 09:04 PM
5

The wage gap is in fact the earnings gap Which exists cause women have the privilege of working less hours and can take more enjoyable lower paying jobs as men are socially pressured into being breadwinners
/r/MensRights26/07/19 09:01 PM
1

Why should companies be penalized when women choose to have children? Because economic forces controlled by big money have dictated that we need two incomes now to support a family. Cause employers are by and large super wealthy and can easily afford it
/r/MensRights26/07/19 09:00 PM
3

That experience in the Army sounds harrowing. I'm sorry you had to endure this. Which country?
/r/MensRights26/07/19 08:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter