TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

abcd_z Archive

View 35 posts and 1,170 comments by abcd_z on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
578

Red Pill Exampleabcd_z/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 06:40 AM
219

Off Topicabcd_z/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 04:35 AM
81

abcd_z/r/TheRedPill22/01/14 09:31 PM
38

Rant/Ventingabcd_z/r/TheRedPill22/07/14 10:32 PM
30

Red Pill Theoryabcd_z/r/TheRedPill21/07/13 01:12 AM
25

Men's Rightsabcd_z/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 05:01 AM
23

Red Pill Theoryabcd_z/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 12:39 PM
20

Resourcesabcd_z/r/seduction28/01/22 08:57 AM
11

Red Pill Theoryabcd_z/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 12:08 AM
10

Off Topicabcd_z/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 11:04 PM
5

Off Topicabcd_z/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 02:02 AM
5

Red Pill Theoryabcd_z/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 09:01 AM
4

Red Pill Theoryabcd_z/r/TheRedPill15/05/15 06:13 AM
4

abcd_z/r/seduction26/12/12 05:27 PM
3

abcd_z/r/MGTOW30/12/13 08:48 PM
3

abcd_z/r/seduction15/12/13 04:45 AM
2

abcd_z/r/askTRP06/10/14 03:11 AM
2

Rant/Ventingabcd_z/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 03:42 AM
2

Field Reportabcd_z/r/TheRedPill07/08/13 10:02 AM
1

Red Pill Theoryabcd_z/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 08:14 PM
1

abcd_z/r/askTRP15/12/13 04:35 AM
1

abcd_z/r/seduction21/08/12 12:14 AM
0

Off Topicabcd_z/r/TheRedPill10/12/13 10:15 AM
0

abcd_z/r/seduction06/10/12 08:27 AM
0

abcd_z/r/seduction15/12/11 12:09 PM
0

Blue Pill Exampleabcd_z/r/TheRedPill19/07/13 04:03 AM
0

Off Topicabcd_z/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 04:56 AM
0

Metaabcd_z/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 04:42 AM
0

Red Pill Theoryabcd_z/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 04:18 AM
0

Red Pill Theoryabcd_z/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 10:13 AM
0

Red Pill Theoryabcd_z/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 10:29 PM
0

Ask Red Pillabcd_z/r/TheRedPill18/08/13 09:28 PM
0

Red Pill Theoryabcd_z/r/TheRedPill22/08/13 11:45 PM
0

Off Topicabcd_z/r/TheRedPill23/08/13 01:22 AM
0

Ask Red Pillabcd_z/r/TheRedPill23/08/13 05:13 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,170 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I consider myself a romantic and like the idea of having a “queen” or someone who I can worship and dote on. I LIKE putting women on pedestals. It makes me feel like a man to make her feel like a women. Similarly, in bed, I often focus wholly on the women’s needs (because I enjoy getting her off and I also know masturbation is lowkey better than any blowjob or handjob I’ve gotten). There's nothing wrong with treating a woman well, as long as you're doing it from a place of self-respect and not n…
/r/seduction14/09/22 10:51 AM
3

Eh, not really. Like anything else historical, the good stuff stuck around while the low-quality stuff was forgotten.
/r/seduction28/01/22 03:39 PM
1

I...what? What does that have to do with anything in this thread?
/r/seduction28/01/22 03:37 PM
1

You're assuming OP is female.
/r/seduction01/07/19 01:46 AM
1

When I was in the PUA community about a decade ago, the term for this sort of woman was "freak". The other two types were "good girl" and "ho". Good girls will shit test you to see if you're strong enough for them to relax into. Freaks shit test to tear you down. Personally, I steer clear of Freaks in favor of Good Girls. Freaks just aren't worth the drama and shit tests. But, to each their own. More information: The original post that defined the three terms DogSoldier's Definitive Guide to Fre…
/r/askTRP06/01/17 08:31 AM
1

It really depends on the sort of woman you attract. I've had four long-term relationships in my life, ranging in length from 9 months to 3.5 years, and not one of them gave me shit tests with any frequency. I'll tell you, it confused the hell out of me because everybody was telling shit tests were inevitable, then they just didn't show up. Of course, all except the first were PUA polyamory relationships (I sleep around whenever I want, she has the same option to but never actually takes me up on…
/r/askTRP03/01/17 07:25 AM
8

I don't think you understand. Her denying you sex, for any reason, should be a deal-breaker. You should not have to struggle to figure out how to get her to have sex with you. She should sleep with you 100% of the time, without her bizarre internal struggle about it. Sexual frustration is real, and your situation will never improve. Your only real options are A) accept a frustrating relationship with a woman who won't reliably have sex with you, or B) break up with her and look for somebody else…
/r/askTRP02/01/17 08:43 AM
9

If your LTR doesn't put out, she doesn't deserve to be your LTR. Break up with her and find somebody who enjoys having sex with you.
/r/askTRP02/01/17 08:26 AM
2

I feel naturally inclined to compliment a girl I wanna nail in order to make her more "available". Any chump can compliment her. It's an obvious move. And that's why it's generally associated with guys trying to get in her pants (like you are.) If you compliment her because you want to get laid, she will be able to tell, and you will be less likely to get laid. If you compliment her because you felt like it, and not because you think it will increase your chances with her... well, it won't reall…
/r/askTRP27/12/16 06:22 PM
3

Just because a woman enjoys attention doesn't mean it makes her more likely to fuck you. In fact, it can easily make her less sexually attracted to you if you don't do it properly. "Doing it properly" in this case means A) you don't do it in a way that breaks social norms ("creepy"), and B) you don't do it because you're covertly trying to get something from her (like sex or validation). Really, it's probably best for you to just to steer clear of it until you've gotten a solid grasp of the fund…
/r/askTRP27/12/16 05:55 PM
2

Personally, I swear by cold approaches with the intent of getting laid in a reasonably short amount of time (no more than 10 hours spent cumulatively or 3 dates before she puts out). Benefits to this approach: You're approaching strangers, so if you screw up you can just walk away and you'll never have to interact with them ever again. You'll never have to worry about if she likes you or not. If she's willing to sleep with you, she probably likes you. Downsides: Takes a while to get good at. App…
/r/askTRP09/12/16 11:28 AM
1

He made that classic rookie mistake of not being attractive to women. Cured by approaching lots of women and learning from the failures. FTFY.
/r/askTRP13/11/16 08:16 PM
15

Day game. My last 2 GFs I met at a bus stop. The one before that, sitting outside the college library.
/r/askTRP13/11/16 07:50 AM
1

It really depends on the context. I say that sort of shit all the time, and it mostly goes okay, but then I've already got this shit pretty well calibrated. Are these people part of your immediate social circle or place of employment? Then yes, exercise some discretion. Otherwise, don't give two flying fucks whether or not it will make them "hostile". You're still learning this stuff, and it's okay to make mistakes. Just make sure to make those mistakes with people you'll probably never see agai…
/r/askTRP04/11/16 12:09 AM
1

"You should settle down. You know, find a nice girl." "Or, I could not do that, and suffer absolutely no negative repercussions from it." "Well, don't you eventually want to settle down?" "Not really." "Why not?" "I enjoy myself as I am. I get all the sex and snuggles I want, and there's nothing I could gain by settling down." "But if you don't settle down, she'll eventually leave you." "Maybe. But even if she does leave, I still have other options."
/r/askTRP03/11/16 11:17 PM
3

Actually, it is about children. The odds of catching an incurable STD that has a serious effect on your health are incredibly slim. The odds of getting her pregnant are substantially higher. source
/r/askTRP29/10/16 09:13 PM
1

I'm the inverse; my mom was warm, loving, and nurturing... right up until she developed paranoid schizophrenia and left the family. Every long-term relationship I've ever had has been with a similarly loving and caring woman.
/r/askTRP14/10/16 03:23 AM
1

Nice try, pedophile.
/r/askTRP30/09/16 05:51 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRixQKeveMc
/r/askTRP17/09/16 06:38 PM
5

For him and her, sure. Not so much for the other guy.
/r/askTRP08/09/16 04:42 PM
1

Yup. Before TRP was a thing, PUA used the same terminology.
/r/askTRP24/08/16 08:03 AM
1

Most of this was codified by a PUA that went by the name Tyler Durden, and he was actually better at day game than night game. Here's one of his field reports.
/r/askTRP20/08/16 07:25 PM
1

The goal here is not to logically convince her to sleep with you. The goal is to get her so attracted to you that she rationalizes walking around with you, then going back to your place, then up to your bedroom, then... To this end, be playful. Be fun. Playfully tease her. Accuse her of stealing your look, or of being a brat or a dork or trouble for whatever arbitrary reason. Melodramatically inform her that you're breaking up with her. Tell her she's awesome, then tell her you hate her. Come up…
/r/askTRP20/08/16 08:45 AM
1

Heh. "Please accept my resignation. I don't want to belong to any club that will accept people like me as a member." -Groucho Marx
/r/askTRP16/08/16 01:49 PM
1

Focus on getting laid with new women ("spinning plates"). When a woman has sex with you she becomes far more likely to want to see you again. If she's not interested in sex with you, she's not worth your time and attention anyways. If she won't put out within a reasonable amount of time (4-10 hours cumulatively spent together), drop her and move on to the next plate.
/r/askTRP08/08/16 04:10 AM
42

Actually, in this specific case it's okay. http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9.73.030 (2) Notwithstanding subsection (1) of this section, wire communications or conversations (a) of an emergency nature, such as the reporting of a fire, medical emergency, crime, or disaster, or (b) which convey threats of extortion, blackmail, bodily harm, or other unlawful requests or demands, or (c) which occur anonymously or repeatedly or at an extremely inconvenient hour, or (d) which relate to com…
/r/MensRights10/07/16 11:18 AM
-1

Oh. ... *clears throat awkwardly*
/r/askTRP04/07/16 11:36 PM
-1

Maybe, but I've never had to deal with female unpleasantness in any of my relationships. No drama, no arguments, no debates, no feeling put on the defensive or needing to defend myself. Ever. Can you say the same?
/r/askTRP04/07/16 11:14 PM
-6

"Oh, so you will buy me a ring?" "Nope." "But why not?" "Drop it." "Oh come on, can't you just explain why-" "Would you like to leave?"/"Would you like me to leave?" (depending on the location) "No, but-" "Then drop it." Then if she persists, you actually leave or kick her out, you go radio silent for a week, and you hook up with other plates (very important). My behavior and attitudes towards shit tests are heavily influenced by Blackdragon's Soft Next guide.
/r/askTRP04/07/16 07:49 PM
1

Then your octal life Lemme guess: auto-correct?
/r/askTRP27/06/16 07:39 AM
5

In the last 4 relationships I've had, over a span of roughly 6 years, not one of them craved drama, argued with me, or shit tested me. It confused the fuck out of me at first. Now I just accept that, for whatever reason, I don't attract that sort of women.
/r/askTRP06/06/16 06:13 AM
2

[Do you] feel kind of empty chasing girls ~10 years younger? Not even a little bit. :)
/r/askTRP26/05/16 12:12 AM
2

When you live at separate locations, you can always leave if the situation demands it. If you get in an argument, or she starts treating you poorly, you can withdraw and get some space, spend a few days by yourself, deciding how big of a problem it is and if you want to continue the relationship. As soon as you move in with her you lose that freedom. Compounding this, you'll be seeing a lot more of her, so all the tiny little faults you each overlooked or ignored in the past become greatly magni…
/r/askTRP15/05/16 07:45 AM
5

I became strictly non-monogamous. No need to worry about Chad stealing my girl if I never settle down with any of my plates.
/r/askTRP17/04/16 07:40 PM
1

If you figure it out, let me know. https://www.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/4f762j/how_do_you_stop_procrastinating/d26mehx
/r/askTRP17/04/16 07:33 PM
4

I swear by the book One Small Step Can Change Your Life: The Kaizen Way. Basically, too many people think that the only way to improve is to take on large projects. The alternative, kaizen, is simply to take one small step at a time. And I mean ridiculously small steps. Don't try to jog for thirty minutes each day; march in place in front of the TV for one minute a day. Don't alter your entire diet to lose weight; just remove a single item from one of your daily meals. Such small changes won't g…
/r/askTRP17/04/16 07:28 PM
1

/r/shittyadvice
/r/askTRP14/04/16 11:54 PM
1

If I'm reading this correctly, you can game women, but you get one-itis for the really hot ones, view them as better than you, and act beta towards them. Does this sound right?
/r/askTRP14/04/16 09:29 PM
1

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink. People will do what they want, and trying to force them to accept your beliefs will only drive them away. Give him space, let him make his own mistakes, and don't push your beliefs on him. Be there as an example for him, and if he ever comes to you for advice, then you can start steering him in the right direction.
/r/askTRP14/04/16 09:16 PM
3

I became strictly non-monogamous. No need to worry about Chad stealing my girl if I never settle down with any of my plates.
/r/askTRP12/04/16 10:37 AM
7

"I'm not generalizing" proceeds to make broad generalizations about an entire country
/r/askTRP04/04/16 10:58 PM
1

I've never been in this situation before, but here's a relevant quote from near the end of the autobiographical novel "The Game: Penetrating the Secret Society of Pickup Artists". Note that this is a published story, so the events may have been spiced up a bit compared to what actually happened. While Lisa slept in the morning, I crept downstairs with my phone book. I called Nadia and Hie and Susanna and Isabel and the Jessicas and every FB and MLTR and other acronym I was seeing and told them I…
/r/askTRP02/04/16 07:58 PM
2

Dude, you quadruple-posted this comment. Delete 3/4 of them.
/r/askTRP23/03/16 10:05 AM
1

Oh, well that's probably fine, then. Keep up the good work! :)
/r/askTRP23/03/16 04:23 AM
1

You handled that fine. I'd have handled it a little differently, but that's mostly personality differences. I would have chuckled like it didn't even bother me, then made eye contact and told her not to be a dick. Not joking, not angry; just making a command, then holding eye contact until she responded. As a side-note: have you had sex with this woman yet? If not, how many dates have you gone on? If more than 3 (4-10 hours cumulatively spent together), you need to cut her loose and find somebod…
/r/askTRP23/03/16 02:45 AM
-4

Condescending ass.
/r/askTRP23/03/16 02:36 AM
2

The Newbie Method
/r/askTRP07/03/16 01:25 AM
3

Difficult women remain difficult. Don't try to "upgrade" her, because that won't work. It would be a waste of time and an exercise in frustration (not to mention getting you more invested and making it harder for you to end the relationship if it becomes necessary). Make your decisions based on that assumption that she will always be like this, and that she will never change for the better in any fundamental manner.
/r/askTRP02/03/16 06:38 AM
2

You can do better. Don't settle down, don't stop spinning plates.
/r/askTRP02/03/16 04:14 AM
1

"None of your business." A woman loses social value if she's seen as promiscuous, and the better you are at being discreet, the more likely women are to hook up with you on the sly. Of course, if your social circle and hers don't overlap in any way (and you're absolutely positive of this), I guess it doesn't matter too much what you say.
/r/askTRP02/03/16 04:09 AM
-4

Let me guess: you vote Republican.
/r/askTRP08/02/16 03:00 AM
-1

When this will happen our society will no longer be defended by men, because they will either be AF who will want to fuck and not care what happens to society There are plenty of alpha males who want to (and do) join the military, and military service tends to toughen up men and make them at least somewhat alpha. or BB who just want to see the society burn Wow, I don't know where you're getting that from. There are plenty of beta males who just want everybody to be happy and would be horrified b…
/r/askTRP08/02/16 02:48 AM
1

That's why I practice PUA Polyamory. No need to worry about her cheating on me if I never expect monogamy from her in the first place.
/r/askTRP06/02/16 06:45 AM
3

There are plenty of things that could cause a woman to see you as a provider, AKA beta male. However, three of them come to mind here. 1: Living together, even temporarily. 2: Paying for things for her. 3: NOT FUCKING HER. And hey, you want to do all three at the same time. This can't end well. Also, if you've already been on three dates and haven't slept with her, you need to move on and find somebody else who will put out within a reasonable time frame. As the great PUAs of the past have said,…
/r/askTRP06/02/16 04:18 AM
0

Personally I swear by BlackDragon's postings when it comes to relationship management. Of course, he advocates open relationships, so YMMV.
/r/seduction05/02/16 10:22 AM
5

I've unsubscribed from the main TRP subreddit because of behavior like this. askTRP seems to be better about that, so I'm still subbed here.
/r/askTRP05/02/16 10:19 AM
1

I feel like you only read the first part of that comment. My point was that if you want specific advice on how to get laid, you ask a PUA.
/r/askTRP24/01/16 04:55 AM
1

If you want advice on general masculine self-improvement, you ask TRP. You want advice on specifically how to pick up women, you ask PUA. The best PUA forum I'm aware of.
/r/askTRP24/01/16 03:56 AM
1

Also, full of crime and corruption.
/r/askTRP17/01/16 11:43 PM
1

You also didn't say to do them at different times. It wasn't obvious whether the list entries should be done at the same time or one after another.
/r/askTRP17/01/16 11:42 PM
3

Hank Moody analyzed (make sure the Youtube annotations are enabled) Russell Brand owning a newsroom
/r/askTRP17/01/16 09:00 AM
6

I'm gonna give you the opposite advice of PragmaticRedTruth. He says "Focus on yourself first and foremost, but also spend a lot of time reading about women." (Which is pretty contradictory, now that I look at it.) I say, double down on the PUA. Go out and approach lots of attractive women. Try to sleep with each of them in a relatively short amount of time (usually 4-10 hours spent cumulatively together, but hit that sooner if you can pull it off). In short, Go Fuck Ten Other Women (GFTOW). By …
/r/askTRP17/01/16 08:01 AM
1

Sometimes a guy just wants to get laid. For this, I recommend PUA.
/r/askTRP17/01/16 07:50 AM
4

as chad is often painted as the enemy even after some success in applying red pill values to your life. Really? I've never seen this. Do you have a link? Personally I've just viewed the name "Chad Thundercock" as a verbal shorthand for the sort of guy that women are sexually attracted to ("alpha male"). Looked at from that angle, I don't see anything wrong with being a Chad, though I wouldn't choose to identify myself with that name (only because it sounds douchey as hell).
/r/askTRP15/01/16 05:50 AM
1

Look, just because you hook up with gold diggers doesn't mean everybody else does.
/r/askTRP14/01/16 10:55 AM
8

Increased risk of sexual disease (though I don't know what the exact odds are), a lack of intimacy (maybe not a deal-breaker for you, but I enjoy snuggling at least as much as I enjoy sex), and once you run out of money you run out of sex (I prefer relying on my personality, since that's far less likely to change).
/r/askTRP14/01/16 06:07 AM
1

Then I'm not sure why you've joined the conversation. From the OP: Say the only way to tell the difference was by cutting them open and finding wires instead of blood.
/r/askTRP11/01/16 10:46 PM
1

The sex with an Android can NEVER be as great as true sexuality with an actual being Why not? If the android was realistic enough, wouldn't it also include subroutines for intimacy?
/r/askTRP10/01/16 11:29 PM
1

How would you normally interact with her if she hadn't acted the way she had? There 'ya go. Just do that.
/r/askTRP07/01/16 12:45 AM
2

If he has an other female options, an abundance mentality, and non-neediness, sure. He can make use of her as just a friend. But he doesn't, which is why I tell him to cut her out entirely. Let's be honest here, if he did have those things, he wouldn't be posting here, asking how to get out of the friend zone. And yes, that's textbook TRP too. That's because it works.
/r/askTRP06/01/16 10:41 PM
2

The correct solution to being frustrated by the friend zone is not to accept being friends with her. It is to cut her out of your life and move on.
/r/askTRP06/01/16 10:19 PM
2

If she isn't giving you what you want, and you don't have an abundance mentality (which you don't), interacting with her will only cause more problems for you. Completely ignore her overtures. Don't try to be friends, that will just tear you up even more and make it that much harder to get over her.
/r/askTRP06/01/16 10:17 PM
1

abcd_z: "Go fuck ten other women." JesterAdventure: "But how will that help me get Oneitis?" abcd_z: "Just trust me on this one." *Later* abcd_z: "So how're things going with you and Oneitis?" JesterAdventure: "Oneitis who?" :D
/r/askTRP06/01/16 10:15 PM
1

If you're in conversation and you have no interesting life you'll come across as boring. That hasn't been my experience. maybe explain that he's saving to buy a yacht and motor around the world. That's horrifying. Saying this, even as a joke, implicitly places the guy in the frame of having to impress the woman. High value men don't have to impress women, and obviously trying to impress a woman conveys that you aren't a high value man.
/r/askTRP28/12/15 05:14 PM
2

Your goal should not be to be an interesting person. Your goal should be to be a sexually attractive person. This often includes being fun and outgoing, but it shouldn't have anything to do with where you take her. If you rely on external circumstances to get her interested in you, you'll always be at the mercy of your environment. Best to avoid that as much as possible. If you want to go do something because you enjoy doing it, and decide to invite her along, that's one thing. But don't take he…
/r/askTRP28/12/15 09:41 AM
2

Eh. Not a bad plan, I suppose. But you do realize that I wasn't actually advocating aggressive behavior, right? I was only advocating a caricature of aggressive behavior so you could frame his actions in a poor light. Similarly, you aren't actually being threatened here. You're being talked over and ignored, and you need to change your behavior to handle it (or just move away, I guess), but neither their behavior nor yours would qualify as truly aggressive. Just FYI, if you can't afford a place …
/r/askTRP23/12/15 10:00 AM
3

Obviously it does bother you, otherwise you wouldn't have written this post. If you aren't going to stand up for yourself, don't be surprised when other people trample all over you. If you keep doing what you've always done, you'll get what you've always got.
/r/askTRP23/12/15 09:46 AM
-1

For example, each of them (3) has asked me on at least 2 seperate occasion each how much I weigh....You know, one of those bro questions people ask at parties who are fans of the UFC.... So reframe the situation. You're already halfway there anyways. You: "Whoa, why do you want to know how much I weigh? That's a meathead thing to ask. (as yourself:) 'hey man, how's it going?' (as your roommate:) 'how much do you weigh?! I'll bet I weigh at least fifteen pounds more than you! (thrust your chest o…
/r/askTRP23/12/15 09:39 AM
1

Those guys are awesome and totally have lots of friends? :D :D :| :(
/r/askTRP23/12/15 08:31 AM
7

For a successful long-term relationship you need both, and the desired ratio is different for every woman. 85/15 alpha/beta is usually a good split.
/r/askTRP17/12/15 10:49 AM
10

All Women Can Be Like That, But They Aren't All Always Like That. More like, "Many women behave in that manner, but every guy thinks he beat the odds".
/r/askTRP17/12/15 10:48 AM
2

Neither; I'd prefer to maximize my happiness and minimize my unhappiness. Or, to put it another way, I'd prefer to get maximum utility (well-being of sentient entities) out of my life.
/r/askTRP11/12/15 09:12 AM
3

Duh. That's female psychology 101; betas chase women, alphas are chased by women. Betas invest in women (time, money, effort), alphas have women invest in them. The more you chase and invest, the less attraction she has for you.
/r/askTRP11/12/15 08:18 AM
1

I'm not jealous of your relationships, I'm jealous of how easy getting sex appears to be for you. I'm a PUA, but due to circumstances (focusing on getting a better lifestyle) I haven't been able to practice my skills for quite a while. It's frustrating. Also, what do you mean by "it was a nightmare"? Did she have a Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD)? Perhaps you noticed that if you treated her well, she would treat you poorly, and vice versa?
/r/askTRP11/12/15 07:11 AM
2

I've always been told I have a great voice/perspective/comedic talent There's a very big problem here that nobody else has pointed out. Vibing with other people and making them laugh is very different from getting onstage and making strangers laugh. I remember reading about handsome guys who were told they were funny by women, but went onstage and just weren't. If you really want to make this work, you need to actually test your comedic skills in a live environment. There's a good chance you'll …
/r/askTRP11/12/15 06:33 AM
3

Hate you hate you hate you hate you hate you...
/r/askTRP11/12/15 06:27 AM
1

Your focus should not be on one woman. Your focus should be on improving your overall skillset and getting laid in general. Cold approach other women and try to seduce each of them in a relatively short amount of time. Do this until you have had sex with several women. At this point, you probably won't be worrying too much about the woman you asked us about.
/r/askTRP09/12/15 06:58 AM
4

Are you sure that's a shit test? That sounds more like she's straight-up propositioning you.
/r/askTRP07/12/15 11:06 AM
1

Some can, many can't. Like anything else when it comes to relationships, you have to keep looking until you find a woman that gives you what you want. And then keep looking, because it never hurts to have a few backups. ;) The whole point of this rigamarole is to allow you to Soft Next the woman if the situation requires it. The Soft Next, the ability to take a break from the relationship, is the single most powerful tool in any man's arsenal and, counterintuitively, it should be used at the fir…
/r/askTRP05/12/15 02:12 AM
1

If you've done things right (and smart), you've kept the living arrangements and the bank accounts separate anyways, so the only hangup should be the parenting agreement. And that is conceptually similar to making a woman sign a prenup before marrying her.
/r/askTRP05/12/15 01:52 AM
1

That's the only reason I can see it being necessary. For the record, you don't even need to do this. Treat the relationship as if you'd already divorced, with separate living arrangements, separate bank accounts, and a legally-binding parenting agreement before impregnating the woman. The worst part of being a child of divorce is seeing your parents' stable relationship slowly tear itself apart. If the parents are split to begin with, it won't cause nearly as many problems for the kid.
/r/askTRP05/12/15 01:28 AM
1

And that's why I practice PUA Polyamory. All the sex and affection I want with absolutely zero drama. In exchange for this I have to let go of any need for commitment and do the work to get the women.
/r/askTRP05/12/15 01:25 AM
2

Instead of trying to approach a woman, just ask her what time it is. Do this several times until you're used to it. Then make the requirement just slightly more difficult, like maybe "say 'hello' then leave." Or, if asking for the time is too difficult, go the other direction and make the goal even easier. Like, "make eye contact for a few seconds" or even just "hover around her for 3 seconds then leave." The point is not to be an approach master. Nobody expects that of you. Just take small step…
/r/askTRP04/12/15 08:33 AM
1

Yes I got myself all horned up with my fantasy about finally having sex with him but forget to get him involved with it all :( That says it all, doesn't it?
/r/TheRedPill29/11/15 10:33 AM
2

Hard Nexts are for when she does something unforgivable, such as threatening your physical or financial health. This is a bog-standard shit test which OP accidentally passed with flying colors, and as such it really only requires a Soft Next; leave her alone for a week, then resume contact like nothing happened.
/r/askTRP26/11/15 02:59 PM
1

Tell her it was disrespectful and that you will not tolerate stuff like that in the future! Sure, if you want drama. Me, I choose not to do shit like this. But hey, whatever works for you.
/r/askTRP26/11/15 02:56 PM
5

Now go radio-silent for a week, then resume interactions with her like nothing happened. It's called a Soft Next and it's devastatingly effective.
/r/askTRP26/11/15 10:08 AM
6

Debates about terminology rarely leave with anybody convinced, because most people have personal definitions of words that are slightly different from other peoples' definitions, and everyone believes that their definition is the correct one. Regardless of what definition you use, as long as people understand roughly what I'm trying to convey, I'm happy.
/r/askTRP18/11/15 07:35 AM
13

Do you cuddle with them after sex? (You should.) Do you ever cuddle with them in general? (Occasionally a good idea.) You may be giving off too much of an alpha vibe. A good balance would be 85% alpha/15% beta. You don't have to spend money (in fact I'd recommend against it) but you do have to open up emotionally just a little bit, show some physical affection every now and then.
/r/askTRP18/11/15 07:03 AM
3

I'm convinced that those tears were 100% real though. It doesn't matter if the tears are real or not. They may very well be real (i.e. a genuine expression of her emotions), but that doesn't make them any less of an attempt to alter your behavior.
/r/askTRP16/11/15 08:47 AM
4

The battle cry of all truly insensitive assholes. And believe me, I've met a few in my time.
/r/askTRP16/11/15 08:38 AM
8

She's oversensitive and can't handle truth Sorry dude, but I have to side with your sister here. You're being a dick. Let me guess: you're "just telling it like it is"?
/r/askTRP16/11/15 07:56 AM
3

Why would you even care? You said it yourself: these people are not in your life, so it doesn't even matter what you say. Who cares if they find you boring? And for the record, your proof that they find you boring is that they get a certain look on their face. That could mean anything, dude! Don't even sweat it.
/r/askTRP13/11/15 11:46 AM
2

If you flash cash around you'll attract gold diggers. It would be better for him to improve his game so that women are attracted to his personality, not his wallet.
/r/askTRP03/11/15 01:39 PM
0

Read up on PUA material. TRP is focused on general self-improvement, while PUA is focused specifically on getting laid. Here's a compilation of some of the best PUA posts. Don't try reading it all at once. Read a bit, then go out and cold-approach women. I think the rule of thumb was 2-4 hours spent making cold approaches for every hour you spend studying. Otherwise you risk information overload and/or becoming a keyboard jockey; someone who mistakes theoretical knowledge for actual skills and e…
/r/askTRP03/11/15 01:37 PM
1

The big difference is that a Soft Next physically removes you from the situation. You wouldn't think such a small change would cause such a radically different effect, but it does. It really does.
/r/askTRP31/10/15 06:13 PM
3

Just kick her out. Be polite about it, but don't be afraid to tell her to leave. Then go radio silent for at least a week. During this time, go fuck other women.
/r/askTRP31/10/15 08:53 AM
1

Even if she walks out and never comes back, the situation is still in your favor. It acts as a screening tool, getting rid of women with undeserved senses of entitlement.
/r/askTRP28/10/15 11:16 PM
1

This statement clearly suggests You put TRP in Um, I'm not her. I just copied the comment. Also, chill out there. I can hear the anger and frustration in your online voice, and you're honestly coming across as a little unstable.
/r/askTRP28/10/15 10:01 PM
1

Repeat after me: "All women are like that." Now go fuck ten other women. By the time you're done with that, this one chick won't matter nearly so much to you.
/r/askTRP28/10/15 01:54 AM
1

From Cassie Jaye's AMA on r/iama: Hi CaptainWeeaboo, thank you so much for asking this! I hope you don’t mind, but I’m going to use your question to address everything I want to say about the title. The title The Red Pill refers to the cultural metaphor for “seeing the painful truth of reality” (which of course originated from the movie The Matrix). When I began this project in March 2013, 2.5 years ago, the MRM/MHRM was often using the term ‘the red pill’ when describing their moment of realiza…
/r/askTRP28/10/15 01:50 AM
8

It's a little worse than that. From the post in 2xC: A rape activist that does not know the origin of the word "Fuckboy" as coming from passed around, psychologically broken men used as sex toys in the southern US prison system, which was then pulled out of prisons by rap music which was then taken up with great aplomb by white women that thought it was a catchy term. Her ignorance is so multi-leveled its remarkable.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 01:13 AM
0

r/redpillmusic/
/r/askTRP20/10/15 02:21 AM
1

You don't need to get mad. Just Soft Next her.
/r/askTRP16/10/15 01:05 AM
0

Yeah. Poop remnants inside of her will get on (and if you aren't using a condom, in) your dick. Gross. Of course, if she's willing to give herself an enema beforehand, that's a different story. Hasn't happened yet, though.
/r/askTRP15/10/15 07:35 AM
2

Or before. Something like, "Hey guys, I've got a quick question for you. I can't stay on the internet for too long, but..." As a side-note, canned PUA material came to public knowledge about a decade ago when the book The Game was released. I can't help but wonder if I could start using it again with college students (18-25). They would have been; what, 8-15 years old when it came out? ... BRB, sarging.
/r/askTRP15/10/15 07:29 AM
-1

but BP crawled into my bed and started making me feel like a bad person This confused me until I realized you didn't mean it literally. "Who is BP and why did she crawl into his bed?"
/r/askTRP14/10/15 09:30 PM
2

Okay, so we're mostly on the same page here. I mostly deal with in-person Soft Nexts, so talking about this within the context of text messages didn't really occur to me. I can see how for text Soft Nexts you might want to wait for her to contact you. The only thing I'd suggest you try, if you haven't already, is waiting a full week and then trying to contact her. If I'm wrong I'm wrong, no big deal. But if I'm right, it means you can contact her as soon as you want after the No Contact period. …
/r/askTRP14/10/15 09:02 PM
2

I'm not going to argue definitions with you, because that never goes anywhere. Regardless of what you call it, this is what I do and it works.
/r/askTRP14/10/15 07:47 PM
2

Well that's interesting. I wonder what causes the difference in our experiences. Do you Soft Next her immediately after the Shit Test (no discussion, no debate, no arguing), and do you maintain complete radio silence for the entire week?
/r/askTRP14/10/15 07:07 PM
7

I use a longer-term variant of this called a Soft Next. Any time a woman shit tests me, I ask her to drop it or leave. If she doesn't drop it, she leaves. Then I go non-contact for a week and focus on my own personal goals and fucking other women. After a week has passed, then I can contact her again like nothing has happened. Unlike what you might think, they never give me shit when I contact them again; they're generally too happy that I contacted them again. Because of this, I enjoy multiple …
/r/askTRP14/10/15 06:12 AM
0

Maybe, but I'm an idiot who gets all the sex and affection he wants with absolutely zero drama* from any of his relationships. Can you say the same? *I'm using Blackdragon's definition of drama here: Any harsh negative actions directed from a woman to man where the man is the target of said negativity. Screaming, nagging, complaining, arguing, demands, crying “at you”, threats, ultimatums, the “silent treatment”, refusing sex because of non-medical reasons, all of these things are drama, and the…
/r/askTRP09/10/15 01:28 AM
-5

Go No Contact for at least a week (a "Soft Next") and GFTOW (Go Fuck Ten Other Women). She's getting too attached, and eventually she'll blow herself out of the relationship (or worse, start shit testing you hard). The Soft Next is to reset the relationship, and the GFTOW is to help you develop an abundance mentality and avoid developing neediness or one-itis.
/r/askTRP08/10/15 09:27 AM
4

See multiple women without promising monogamy to any of them. In TRP parlance, "spin plates". If you have several women you get sex and affection from, the behavior of a single woman won't bother you nearly as much.
/r/askTRP02/10/15 08:44 AM
1

He's a socially adept playful prankster (+), but he had a crush on the secretary Pam that he took forever to do anything about (I can't remember how they eventually got together), we never saw him pass any shit tests, and we never saw any evidence that he was sexually attractive to women (like, for example, seeing him with other women).
/r/askTRP02/10/15 04:35 AM
2

Does it have to be a movie? Because there are some TV shows with good alpha males. Two and a Half Men: Charlie Harper (before he became beta for his girlfriend) Nip/Tuck: Christian Troy Californication: Hank Moody Mad Men: Don Draper
/r/askTRP02/10/15 01:56 AM
0

I don't ever want kids, but if I did I'd treat the situation like I'd already divorced her. I wouldn't stop seeing other women, I'd keep my bank accounts and living arrangements separate from her, and we'd draw up a legally-binding parenting agreement where the child spent some time at my place and some time at her place.
/r/askTRP02/10/15 01:26 AM
3

Then that is what you need to focus on, not this one girl you're crushing on.
/r/askTRP30/09/15 02:08 PM
3

Fifteen years ago, PUAs called it "non-reactivity" and "cocky and funny". Now it's "amused mastery" and "agree and amplify". Everything old is new again.
/r/askTRP30/09/15 03:46 AM
19

Regarding "Are you seeing other women?": You must expect this question in advance, be ready for it, and rehearse your answer. 99% of women will eventually ask you this question, so waiting until they ask to figure out what to say will ensure you will say the wrong thing. If you say yes, you lose. If you say no, you lose. If you say no, she cackles with glee because she knows she's now got you by the balls and you will obey...betaization has begun. (You will have also severely damaged your EFA.) …
/r/askTRP29/09/15 10:38 PM
6

From a longer thread: Reward girls with the three A's - affection, attention, and appreciation. With but a few exceptions, every girl wants to be loved and held and cherished. If you thank her, touch her, kiss her, or fuck the daylights out of her for doing something good for you - do you think she will want to do it again? You bet. In terms of the actual pickup, touching her on the highpoints, qualifying her when she says/does something that impresses you, and giving her a Statement of Interest…
/r/askTRP18/09/15 02:52 AM
5

To be fair, there are other places he could approach women that aren't bars or clubs. Namely, social circles and "day game" (stores, sidewalks, college campuses, cheap restaurants, libraries, beaches, public swimming pools, rec centers, etc.)
/r/askTRP06/09/15 03:28 AM
1

If you're afraid women will treat you as a provider when they find out you got accepted to a law school, just don't tell them that. Don't bring the subject of employment up yourself, and if they ask, give them a smartass answer ("I'm a butt model", "I'm a disposable lighter salesman", "I'm a professional mannequin at the clothing store.") then change the subject.
/r/askTRP03/09/15 03:05 AM
2

Your problem is you lack abundance mentality. To fix this, GFTOW (Go Fuck Ten Other Women). By the time you get to woman number ten, this one woman won't be nearly as important to you. If you can't or won't do that, then that's what you need to focus on, not her.
/r/askTRP27/08/15 12:10 AM
2

It depends on two factors: 1) your level of commitment to her (are you a lover or a provider?) If you're a provider to her (beta), she's likely to start drama. If you've maintained the frame that you see whomever you want (alpha fucks), she... Well, she'll still give you shit, but it won't be as brutal as if she viewed you as her beta bucks. 2) Her sense of her own SMV If she's a 9 or a 10 used to guys fawning over her, seeing you with another girl is likely to show her that you have other optio…
/r/askTRP25/08/15 06:59 AM
3

You are in a relationship with a psycho freak. This is just who and what she is, and that cannot be changed. Don't even try. I'd sugggest Soft Nexting her immediately the next time she crosses a line, then only treating her like a plate from there on out, Soft Nexting her again whenever she gives you shit and Hard Nexting her if she ever damages your health or material interests. Under no circumstances should you move in together or share a bank account. That's just asking for trouble.
/r/askTRP22/08/15 10:51 PM
2

I'm reminded of this oglaf comic strip.
/r/askTRP14/08/15 02:05 AM
5

If I do say no she kind of like challenges me. This is a shit test. Standard advice around here is to agree and amplify, though some women will just continue to give you shit until they get a reaction from you. This is why I prefer to Soft Next woman who shit test me. I ask her if she wants to leave, then if she doesn't drop the subject, I kick her out and go radio silent for a week. It's surprisingly effective at teaching women to not give me shit.
/r/askTRP13/08/15 01:24 PM
6

"You want a 50-50 relationship? It means she owns you." -Attributed to dating coach David DeAngelo
/r/askTRP09/08/15 12:09 AM
-2

I'll agree that either one may improve your results (without making any claims as to which one is more effective), but I would have to say that "without a good body, [game] doesn't work on hotter women" is a limiting belief. Whether or not it's true, believing it can cause you to be less successful with women. "Oh, my body isn't good enough to attract her. I might as well not even try."
/r/askTRP24/07/15 09:56 PM
-2

I think at this point it's mostly speculation. Unless somebody here is personally familiar with two different groups of men, one of which decided to focus on getting ripped, and the other one which decided to learn game, there's really no way to know for sure which is more effective. Personally I think learning game is the better decision, but that could just be my personal biases showing through.
/r/askTRP24/07/15 09:30 PM
2

It might be, if "putting in more effort" didn't translate to "giving him shit and trying to take his balls".
/r/askTRP24/07/15 08:08 PM
-7

...which should really be a clue that "hit the gym" is probably not the best advice for somebody looking to get women. Too bad I see it so highly-upvoted around here (to a lesser extent) and on TRP (to a greater extent).
/r/askTRP24/07/15 08:05 PM
1

I agree, but there's a difference between "a good idea" and "a strict rule". If you're going to ban somebody for making contact, it should probably be explicitly stated in the rules first. Bear in mind I'm only referring to the people who weren't attacking OP. The people who were attacking OP get no sympathy from me.
/r/askTRP23/07/15 07:53 PM
0

It's not mentioned anywhere in the sidebar links. You could say that it falls under the "common sense" clause, but my response would be that it doesn't seem wrong to contact somebody who could use TRP. Also, you have a duplicate entry in the sidebar. Not sure if that was intentional or not.
/r/askTRP23/07/15 05:55 PM
1

Harassment is obviously not okay, but is there any specific written rule about not contacting other posters? I looked and couldn't find anything on the subject in the existing rules.
/r/askTRP23/07/15 05:35 PM
1

Hit up the local arcade so I can play some DDR, or maybe check out the local tabletop game store to see if anybody's running a game I could sit in on.
/r/askTRP18/07/15 06:06 AM
-1

Just yesterday I had my LTR ask me to stop whilst having sex with her I usually either ignore her and continue Jesus fucking Christ. This is rape. You understand that, right? If she doesn't want to have sex with you but you continue anyways, that is rape.
/r/askTRP07/07/15 08:48 PM
2

I don't think I've ever heard a woman say that.
/r/askTRP06/07/15 09:20 PM
1

If I ever wanted kids, I'd do so in such a way as to minimize my investment in the woman. To that end I'd treat the situation as if I'd already divorced her. Separate living spaces, separate finances, a signed parenting agreement, shared custody of the child, and I wouldn't stop seeing other women.
/r/askTRP06/07/15 07:33 PM
1

i can say i am better than them Why on earth would you compare the sum totality of yourself to anybody else? There's no such thing as a person that is "better" or "worse" than another person. Once in a while if i commit a mistake they would laugh Do they actually physically laugh, or are you projecting your insecurities onto them? Even if so, it's just human nature. It sucks, but it's nothing to get worked up about. I feel like they are trying to ruin my image What you're doing here is a cogniti…
/r/askTRP06/07/15 02:47 AM
1

White knighting is based on the false idea that doing nice things for a woman makes her more likely to be interested in you. That's exactly what you seem to be suggesting here, unless I'm misreading your post.
/r/askTRP05/07/15 09:15 PM
2

I agree and I disagree. First, I agree that you should always be spinning more than one plate. It becomes so much easier to be non-needy and non-reactive when you actually have other options and aren't dependent on her for your happiness. Second, I disagree about the shining armor thing. If things actually worked like that, "milady" would be an actual way to get women, instead of a cringey loser thing to say.
/r/askTRP05/07/15 02:48 AM
17

"She followed me home. Can I keep her?"
/r/askTRP05/07/15 01:30 AM
2

It's a scientific fact that we go insane after 2-4 months without any social interaction. [Citation please]
/r/askTRP28/06/15 08:49 PM
3

I'm gonna tackle this from a PUA perspective. She always talks about when were going to get married and when were going to have kids and gets upset when I say I probably don't ever want to get married, i'm nice to her for the most part but she often says that i'm distant or not emotional enough. These are betaization attempts. This is a good thing. It means she sees you as alpha and is attempting to turn you into a beta male. It's natural and instinctive for most women. Betaization attempts tend…
/r/askTRP27/06/15 07:51 PM
1

What I have observed is that single men (of which I know) chase the women most likely to fuck them on the first date and then seem genuinely surprised when the relationship is turned to shit. I only get into relationships with women who sleep with me relatively quickly (3 dates max, 4-10 hours cumulatively spent together), and I've never experienced that problem. Also maybe they should take it easy trying to get the "model" level type of females when they themselves look like shit and can't affo…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/15 06:45 AM
6

It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/15 06:06 PM
1

For the record, I agree with you. I'm not sure why so many people here disagree.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/15 01:57 AM
34

It's short for cisgender; having a physical body that matches the gender you identify as. EDIT: For the record, I don't see anything wrong with having a word that means the opposite of transgender, and I'm not sure why you guys are making such a fuss about it.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 06:27 PM
3

Oh, it totally is. We (the Red Pill community) have a swarm of lawyers sending out cease-and-desist notices at all times of the day to anybody caught Agreeing and Amplitfying (TM, (R), (C)) without our express permission. Yours will be arriving in the mail shortly.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/15 09:35 PM
96

Yeah. Reddit's really losing SMV (Social Market Value).
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 07:43 PM
1

This guy claims to be having regular threesomes He's (apparently) in multiple relationships. It would be like a mono beta guy claiming he has regular sex. A little unlikely, but not impossible. Also, a BMI of 25.8 is just barely overweight, which seems to match up with his claim of "I could lose maybe five pounds" (which would put him at a BMI of 25.08).
/r/TheRedPill09/06/15 07:56 PM
2

Why polyamorous with YOU? Why not some guy with enormous SMV? Some attractive women go out with beta males, right? Not all, but enough for men to believe that being a beta male will get you a relationship. And these beta males sometimes have sex with their girlfriends, right? And there are women out there who identify as polyamorous and specifically look for poly relationships. So why is it unbelievable that a beta male who identifies as polyamorous might have multiple female relationships, just…
/r/TheRedPill09/06/15 07:25 PM
1

In real life this would never fucking happen because an alpha by definition has no reason to commit to any one woman. It happens, for a number of reasons. Maybe the alpha male wants to stop being alpha and doesn't realize just how important it is to the relationship. Maybe he believes in the Disney Fantasy of "the one". Maybe he's getting older and believes it's time to settle down.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/15 02:15 AM
1

'man bag' for a satchel. (said tongue-in-cheek) "Hey, keep your hands off my man-bag! I'm not comfortable with you touching my man-bag like that. What, you don't like that term now? How about 'man-purse'? Is that better? Stop playing with my man-purse."
/r/TheRedPill08/06/15 02:04 AM
3

No way. Explaining yourself is an excellent way for her to try emotionally manipulating you and dragging you back into a relationship. Tears, anger, lies (or "truths for the moment")... these are all tools in the average woman's arsenal. Just cut her loose and move on. Don't even give her a chance to drag you back.
/r/askTRP02/06/15 12:21 AM
20

Just off the top of my head: "You're right, I don't. You can go now." Bear in mind that this has to be accompanied by the right body language and tonality. If you seem like you actually mean it you're sunk. But if you seem like you don't give a fuck what she thinks, one of two things will happen. Either she will leave (and really, if she's so gung ho on making you compete for her she wasn't worth your time anyways) or she'll stick around and accept that you won't be competing for her. But then, …
/r/askTRP01/06/15 08:44 AM
1

It's a lot easier as a PUA, because you can go out and actually test the behavior to see if it is more or less likely to get you laid. And let's be honest here: getting laid is the main reason we even care about the alpha/beta distinction in the first place.
/r/askTRP01/06/15 02:42 AM
5

The stupid comments in the AskFeminists thread were heavily downvoted, so don't assume that everybody (or even anybody) on that subreddit agreed with the comments made there. It would be like somebody claiming that TRP is misogynistic because a comment with large amounts of negative karma advocated beating women.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/15 05:48 AM
-6

Interrupt her interruption. Talk over her and finish whatever you were saying.
/r/askTRP25/05/15 08:57 AM
3

"Game" has meant "your ability to get laid" long before Roosh came onto the scene. EDIT: Although it's not exactly the same as PUA. As I've always understood it, "game" refers to the skills, while PUA refers to someone who consciously trains those skills. So a PUA could be said to have good (or poor) game.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/15 10:31 PM
8

Kind of reminds me of the time about a decade ago when the PUA Mystery tried re-branding PUA as "venusian arts", as an analogue to martial arts. The term didn't really catch on.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/15 10:04 PM
3

It reminded me of a video I once saw about all the crap freelance programmers have to deal with. This one. It should be required watching for anybody going into a web development or web design career.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/15 10:03 PM
5

Good to see an empowered black womyn sticking it to the patriarchy No, somebody who claims to be a black woman. Remember: the more victimized you are, the higher your SJW credibility.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 10:27 PM
6

I hate posts like this, because the focus should never be on just one woman. You should be hooking up (dating and sleeping with) with many women, to the point where any one specific woman isn't a big deal. Incidentally, being the sort of person who sleeps with many women greatly increases your SMV. It's an old concept called social proof.
/r/askTRP16/05/15 02:44 AM
5

Still couldn't be worse than Anakin "I don't like sand" Skywalker.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 01:25 AM
-4

I'll be honest, I'm disgusted by the number of people in this thread who are willing to tolerate a woman turning them down for sex. Do you want sexless relationships? Because this is how you get sexless relationships.
/r/askTRP14/05/15 12:31 AM
3

The more sex that a women has with different males the less oxytocin she releases. Interesting claim. Do you have a source for this information?
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 08:04 PM
1

Here. It's a compilation of the best PUA posts from the old mASF forum (now defunct) and a few other places. Start with the Newbie Method, go out and make cold approaches, and spend 2-4 hours in-field for every hour you spend reading.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 07:38 PM
2

"Dunno. Let's go get some food."
/r/askTRP13/05/15 07:32 PM
-1

You were right to kick her out for denying you sex, but you didn't see the threat to completion. Instead of kicking her out like you should have done, you let her call your bluff with meaningless bullshit ("why? why? why?"), and now she knows she can get away with not sexing you up. It's only going to get worse from here.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 07:20 PM
1

Roosh's videos, linked from his main website (such as this one) are posted under the youtube identity of Roosh V. That's the same person who posted the video linked to in this thread. EDIT: Sorry, I just noticed that the second video in this thread was uploaded by somebody else. Maybe that's what you were referring to?
/r/askTRP13/05/15 08:06 AM
1

Check the name of the youtube uploader. It's Roosh.
/r/askTRP13/05/15 05:28 AM
1

Don't bother reassuring her. Tell her straight-up how it's going to be, then if she doesn't drop it Soft Next her. She's free to vent her emotions, so long as I never feel like I'm being attacked. So "I miss you all the time when you're gone" is fine, but "You never come to visit me!" isn't and deserves an immediate Soft Next. Your examples are somewhere between the two, so I guess it depends on if you feel she's attacking you or otherwise putting you on the defensive, and if her behaviors are o…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 04:05 AM
1

I've Soft Nexted several women before, and none of them have said this.
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 03:51 AM
3

I dunno, I've met some fat bitches...
/r/askTRP11/05/15 05:20 PM
0

Bitch, did I ask where the main sub was?!
/r/askTRP10/05/15 09:53 PM
2

That's pretty horrible. With this approach you immediately place her value above yours based on nothing more than her looks, then you immediately make a request of her. This is likely to set off a woman's "there's something wrong with this guy" alarms. Be honest: has this approach gotten you laid?
/r/askTRP10/05/15 08:36 PM
2

An old PUA post by Zardoz: Subject: "Opening freestyle: The natural way" “Did you know the average male thinks about sex 137 times a day?” “Who farted?” “Bonjour.” “Hi.” “I’m a banana.” “Hey look at that!” Point randomly at a spot on the wall. “Would you quit staring at me, I’m not going to make out with you.” “I’m wearing tighty whities, what do you think of that?” “Should a guy kiss his girl at the beginning or end of the first date?” “This place is full of weirdo’s.” Good for hipster clubs. “…
/r/askTRP10/05/15 08:24 PM
2

Women tend to base their decisions on their emotions in the moment. So a woman may enjoy your company when you're with a group, but later on she will probably be in a different emotional state and will promptly flake on you. You either need to get better at one-night stands (taking a woman from the group, spending time with her one-on-one, then bringing her back to your place and sealing the deal that day/night) so that her emotional state doesn't have the chance to drop, or improve your phone g…
/r/askTRP10/05/15 08:09 PM
1

Condoms have a limit to how large they are legally allowed to be in the United States. It sucks when you're a guy (like me) for whom Large isn't quite large enough. I haven't done it myself, but I've heard good things about the custom condoms sold by TheyFit.
/r/askTRP08/05/15 07:03 PM
1

Is it a good idea to hit on the girls who've known you for being blue pill? No. Go make cold approaches in public areas. There are literally thousands of local women for you to hit on. Why limit yourself to the ones you already know?
/r/askTRP08/05/15 07:00 PM
1

Right, then. Here's a list of the best PUA posts I have that would be relevant to your situation. Read them, then go out and cold approach women. Go into a public place, find a woman you find physically attractive, start talking with her, and do your best to sleep with her in a relatively short amount of time. Continue talking to women until you get laid or you decide to quit for the day. IAmMaximus - The newbie method Tyler Durden - 25 common mistakes Hitori - Women Explained Regal - Reward and…
/r/askTRP08/05/15 07:17 AM
2

You still haven't answered the question. What, exactly, do you want?
/r/askTRP08/05/15 06:09 AM
-1

My wife has power over me. Ewwwww...
/r/askTRP08/05/15 05:19 AM
1

Thus, the invention of the Soft Next. It's a form of walking out on a woman (or kicking her out) that isn't permanent. It's more like a pause to give her the space to appreciate your absence (one week, minimum). Once the Soft Next is over, the relationship can resume like nothing happened. And believe me, it works. I have zero-drama relationships with all of my plates because I Soft Next their asses immediately when any of them give me shit.
/r/askTRP08/05/15 05:14 AM
2

Dude, you're all over the place with this post. What, exactly, do you want? If I am interested in a girl I will be available, be responsive, and subsequently look like a puppy wagging its tail in in excitement. Don't do this. High-quality men don't do this because they're used to having plenty of other women interested in them, so they don't see the need to go out of their way to accommodate any one woman. If you want women to show interest in you, you have to act like a high-quality man. Someti…
/r/askTRP08/05/15 05:01 AM
1

You'd think the uglier women are more likely to be open to you, but they aren't. They really aren't. Just approach whoever you find attractive.
/r/askTRP06/05/15 02:47 AM
39

Dump her. She's using sex as a leverage, when it should be a joyful experience shared between the two of you. What next? "I'll have sex with you once this month if you clean the garage"? The major problem with transactional sex is the price always goes up over time.
/r/askTRP01/05/15 04:11 AM
1

I practice PUA Polyamory, which is almost the same as RP, except that I plan to never settle down and only spin plates for the rest of my life. This means I have to be okay with the women see seeing other people, which a lot of Red Pill guys would not be okay with. Long story short, if it's something that turns you on, there's no reason you shouldn't do it. Just make sure you keep spinning other plates to avoid personal neediness and insecurity.
/r/askTRP01/05/15 04:09 AM
2

If the problem lies with the man, fine. But if the problem lies with the woman, and the guy assumes responsibility for her actions anyways, then he could end up beating himself up over something that wasn't his fault.
/r/askTRP30/04/15 03:05 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/PUApolyamory/comments/1tzujw/masf_repost_converting_from_a_sexless_marriage_to/
/r/askTRP29/04/15 11:41 PM
2

Sounds like a good plan to me. Just be aware that she will make some sort of emotional play to keep you around. She may try demanding the "real reason", refusing to accept whatever reasons you give her. She may cry and beg and promise whatever it takes to keep you around (even though her actual behavior will never change). She may try turning it around on you and make you out to be the bad guy. Hell, she may even try all three of these things in the same conversation. In any case, keep the conve…
/r/askTRP29/04/15 11:38 PM
2

It's possible that OP sucks in bed, but it's also possible that the woman just doesn't enjoy sex for sex's sake.
/r/askTRP29/04/15 11:30 PM
3

I wholeheartedly agree. The single most powerful technique in my toolbox is a Soft Next: No contact for at least a week, you do your own thing, and you sleep with other women. You would not believe how effective it is. Every single plate I've ever had has caused me virtually zero drama (defined here as nagging me, arguing with me, putting me on the defensive, or otherwise making me unhappy). This is also why I don't think monogamous relationships benefit the man. The more invested you are, the h…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/15 11:14 PM
6

P.S. and let's be honest here: not doing or saying something because you're afraid the woman will throw a fit is a practically the definition of beta.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/15 04:35 AM
4

Well, yeah. I've done this before and it's worked pretty well for me. I went to McDonalds with one of my plates when we first started going out (read: sleeping together) and had her cover the bill, no problem. Much later, that same plate asked me out to a local Thai Restaurant, knowing that she would be footing the bill. Low-value males do nice things for women. Extremely high-value males have women do things for them.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/15 03:56 AM
4

Flip the script. If you must go to a restaurant with a woman before sleeping with her*, go someplace really cheap (like, fast food cheap) and let her know up front that she'll be paying the entire bill. It's an excellent way to screen out women looking for beta bucks. *Although I recommend not taking her out at all until you've already slept with her. EDIT: Could somebody please explain why this comment is being downvoted?
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 06:56 PM
2

Our enemy's enemies are not necessarily our friends. "The enemy of my enemy is my enemy's enemy. No more. No less." -The Seven Habits of Highly Effective Pirates
/r/TheRedPill26/04/15 06:43 PM
2

Old PUA advice: Go Fuck Ten Other Women. By the time you get done with woman number ten, this one woman won't bother you so much. If you can't or won't do that, that's what you need to focus on, not Elisa.
/r/askTRP24/04/15 11:49 PM
2

Snuggling, affection, etc. is perfectly fine when you're with physically with her, so long as that's what you want to do. Here's a thread that might help you out a bit. http://www.pua-zone.com/showthread.php?3569-Relationship-Rules-3-0 FB: Fuck-Buddy or Friends with Benefits mLTR: Multiple long-term relationships LTR: Long-term relationships
/r/askTRP24/04/15 10:38 PM
-1

The caretaking woman operates from a position of self-loathing, incredibly abusive relationship. But no matter how high their "notch count" gets or how many relationships they are juggling, it is never enough. I feel you are misrepresenting red pill relationships in an attempt to make your "third option" look good in comparison. Personally I just practice PUA Polyamory. All the sex and affection I want, absolutely zero drama and unhappiness.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/15 07:11 PM
1

I'd strongly recommend looking into Schema Therapy. At its core is something called "Limited Reparenting", which sounds quite appropriate to your situation.
/r/askTRP21/04/15 10:48 PM
2

"You're so naive, Roxy. You see the good in everyone, even when it's not there. You're living a fantasy. There is no Easter Bunny, there is no Tooth Fairy, and there is no Queen of England." -Tighten, "Megamind"
/r/TheRedPill21/04/15 10:06 PM
13

From the wikipedia article on women in STEM fields: A meta-analysis concluded that men prefer working with things and women prefer working with people. When interests were classified by RIASEC type (Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, Conventional), Men showed stronger Realistic and Investigative interests, and women showed stronger Artistic, Social, and Conventional interests. Sex differences favoring men were also found for more specific measures of engineering, science, …
/r/TheRedPill20/04/15 06:57 PM
0

The opposites of these rules (going on dates with her, spending lots of time on the phone, spending too much time with her) are all things boyfriends/providers/beta males do. Doing them will make her more likely to create drama (starting arguments, putting you on the defensive), withhold sex, and not comply with your requests/orders. It's for this very reason that I plan to spin plates for the rest of my life. All the sex and affection I want, absolutely zero drama.
/r/askTRP20/04/15 04:24 AM
1

Are you getting laid?
/r/askTRP19/04/15 12:20 AM
6

That's easy: never come off as boyfriend/husband material. Have other options, sleep with other women, and if she tries making you wait for sex or denies you anything sexual, make sure you're seeing at least one other woman who will give you what you want.
/r/askTRP18/04/15 05:37 AM
3

Treat her like any other plate. Don't go on dates with her. Don't spend time on the phone with her unless it's to set up a meeting. Don't spend the night with her or let her spend the night with you. Don't see her more than once a week.
/r/askTRP16/04/15 05:30 PM
3

Not to be confused with Dread, which is a horror rpg based on a Jenga stack. Pull out a block every time your character does something challenging. If you knock the stack over, your character dies!
/r/askTRP12/04/15 11:58 PM
1

I love cuddling with my plates; it's sleeping over that's a bad idea. In fact, in the past I've flat-out stated pre-hookup that if she isn't into cuddles after sex she should leave now. No woman I've been with has ever had a problem with this.
/r/askTRP11/04/15 08:21 PM
4

because then the plate might get upset and go on a filthy cockhunt while she's out of town. She's a plate. You shouldn't care if she fucks other guys or not. Allowing her to believe (or at least act as if) you aren't seeing anybody else is just a train wreck waiting to happen.
/r/askTRP10/04/15 11:30 PM
13

If she brings it up in the first few months, A) your non-monogamous frame is too weak, you need to work on that, and B) brush it off with a cocky and funny comment and change the subject. "How many women are you seeing?" "A dozen. Two for each day, and the rest on Fridays." "No, really." "Okay, okay, I'm actually completely celibate and refuse to see anyone. It would conflict with the incredibly serious vows I took as an Ordained Monk of the Wibbly Order." "Come on, I'm serious!" "I'm really see…
/r/askTRP10/04/15 11:15 PM
3

Personally, I practice PUA Polyamory. Basically, it means I'm going to spin plates for the rest of my life and never commit or settle down with any one woman. In exchange, I get multiple concurrent loving relationships with attractive women who give me all the sex and snuggles I want with absolutely zero drama. That last bit is not an exaggeration. Because of the way my relationships are structured I experience zero drama. I never have to deal with arguments or being put on the defensive. I get …
/r/askTRP09/04/15 02:27 AM
1

I don't have a problem with spending time with her, getting to know her and building comfort and rapport with her. That's fine. The problem is that explicitly labeling the interactions as a date can cause her to see you as a long-term provider. The more she sees you as a provider, the less she will see you as a lover, the less sexually attracted to you she will be, and the less likely it will be for her to do what you want her to. My goal is always to have sex with her as quickly as possible. Fr…
/r/askTRP09/04/15 01:23 AM
1

Dates are generally a bad idea because they automatically put you in a "beta bucks" frame. The alpha counterpart to asking a woman out is sexual escalation (touching her, making out with her*, trying to have sex with her). Either she isn't interested in you as a sexual creature or you'll get laid, but either way you'll know where you stand. *club makeouts don't count.
/r/askTRP08/04/15 07:45 PM
-1

I'd recommend looking into the Pickup Arts. 1) Cold Approach attractive women. Go someplace with lots of people and say "hi" to women you've never met before. For your situation I'd recommend the Newbie Method. 2) Read up on PUA literature. Be very careful here; it's easy to spend all your time reading about PUA and never actually practicing it. A good rule of thumb is that for every hour you spend reading you should spend a few hours putting the theory into practice. 3) When you get stuck, disc…
/r/askTRP08/04/15 05:55 PM
4

Don't even worry about her. Go out, meet women, and sleep with ten other women first. Afterwards, this one woman won't be nearly as big a deal to you, and you'll be able to interact with her without the neediness and reactivity (massively unattractive to women) that you're currently saddled with. If you can't or won't sleep with other women, then that's what you need to work on, not your relationship with her.
/r/askTRP08/04/15 05:38 PM
2

*while putting on your coat* "We aren't going to have sex tonight. I am. You can do whatever the hell you want."
/r/askTRP08/04/15 05:32 PM
3

Alternate suggestion: Start small. Like, ridiculously small. Maybe you could ask an attractive woman for the time, and that would be the only thing you would expect from yourself for the day. If you try to take on too much, you run the very real risk of expecting too much from yourself, getting overwhelmed, and doing nothing. It's far better to take it one small step at a time, and allow your change to occur gradually, naturally over time. You'd be surprised how effective it can be.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/15 01:18 AM
3

"Always stay with a guy who's involved in IT. They'll do well" That sounds a hell of a lot like a "beta bucks" strategy.
/r/askTRP06/04/15 05:25 AM
2

Not really. IT is a logical thing. To attract women you have to affect them on an emotional level. If you have an IT job (or any other normal job, really) you can either play it up and be really passionate about it, or you can downplay it and give smartass answers the first few times she asks. ("I'm a disposable lighter salesman." "I'm an ass model." "I work in porn as a stunt cock.") Either approach should work.
/r/askTRP05/04/15 09:20 PM
8

This is an archive of some of the very finest PUA posts from the old mASF boards (no longer functional, most of the posters have moved to pua-zone.com), plus a few other places. Don't read it all at once. Read a post or two from the archive, then go out and apply it to meeting women. If you practice nothing else, practice the Newbie Method listed at the very beginning of that pdf.
/r/askTRP24/03/15 08:14 AM
8

My favorite comment that addresses the logical paradox involved in shaming red pillers would have to be this one: Yep, we are simultaneously creepy neckbeard losers who can't get laid and dangerous Svengali manipulators who lure defenseless women into bed with our rapey psychology techniques. I just hope that whole revolution thing happens soon. The way I simultaneously get laid and don't get laid is tearing a hole in my local space-time continuum.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/15 07:05 PM
3

There are tactics and lines you can use when dealing with shit tests, but the underlying attitude must always be, "You may decide to leave me, and I'm okay with that possibility". So really, we're mostly in agreement here.
/r/askTRP17/03/15 05:04 PM
1

A story written by a well-known pickup artist over a decade ago: The Iranian from Hell. Last year, I was in a Tokyo bar with one of my GFs. And, we spotted on the dance floor, the Iranian from hell. He looked like shit, was fat, ugly as sin, wore clothes that looked like it came from the salvation army, and a worn out baseball cap. Oh, and did I say he was 45 Y.O. about, and probably didn't speak ENglish, or Japanese..., and probably had a shit job taking chicken guts out of bird in a processing…
/r/askTRP17/03/15 04:41 AM
2

Accept that she wants more than you are willing to give her. Allow her the freedom to leave you, if that's what she so chooses. And for God's sake, spin some more plates. Guys that only have one plate tend to get needy and make dumb decisions.
/r/askTRP17/03/15 03:27 AM
9

Go Fuck Ten Other Women.
/r/askTRP17/03/15 03:07 AM
3

The post title is flat-out wrong. Google search for "Here are the results for subreddits plotted by Toxicity and Supportiveness:" to find the original post with the charts that actually load. In the first chart, TRP is found in the upper-right corner, meaning it's both toxic and non-supportive. On the second chart, TRP is listed as the single most bigoted subreddit they found. Whether these conclusions are accurate or not is immaterial. The point is that we most definitely made the list.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/15 12:50 AM
3

Just before it was deleted he added an edit saying that anybody who was interested in turning it into a movie should contact him. So not trolling exactly, but not exactly trustworthy either.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/15 05:45 AM
1

All this should be self-evident by the fact that a large part of campus rape accusations result in expulsions. Where are you getting this information? I don't know of any records of the number of accusations that result in expulsions. The ones that get media attention in the first place are the ones that are blatantly unfair, or at the very least are contentious, but that doesn't mean that the majority of situations are actually like this. I'm not saying that colleges aren't biased against men. …
/r/askTRP27/02/15 06:47 PM
2

Funny thing about college tribunals: they don't actually take place in state courts. Usually this screws over the man, but in the case that he records the encounter, this lack of legal rules may actually help the man. If he records the encounter and shows it to the dean (or whoever's in charge), it may be enough to get the "charges" dropped without worrying about the recording laws. Also, the laws vary by state, so it may be legal in your state to record without her knowledge. Check your local l…
/r/askTRP27/02/15 05:02 AM
2

Vicky Christina Barcelona.
/r/askTRP26/02/15 05:15 AM
4

They're steroid names. And I still don't get it.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 08:20 AM
3

how often can she get away with that before he gets annoyed over how much it takes to get head from his wife and starts to return the risque communiques of that one chick from work who's itching to choke on that dick for free? If he was the sort of person who actually had other women after his dick, you know the wife wouldn't be pulling this shit in the first place.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 08:12 AM
2

Actually, I think you should see a therapist, and here's why: I'm not sure exactly what the privacy laws are, but I don't believe mental health issues show up in background tests unless they rise to the level of an involuntary commitment or a legal judgment that you are "mentally defective." I'd look into HIPAA laws for more information about what information health care providers can and cannot disclose to third-parties. I'd go find a mental health care provider (psychiatrist, psychologist, the…
/r/askTRP25/02/15 07:32 AM
1

Invite her to hang out with you at your place. Once at your place, try to sleep with her.
/r/askTRP25/02/15 07:19 AM
1

Well the thread itself was deleted, so I doubt your reports had the effect you were hoping for. =/
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 07:09 AM
8

"Open and shut case, Johnson. I saw this once before when I was a rookie. Apparently this nigger broke in and hung up pictures of his family everywhere." -Dave Chappelle stand-up routine
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 06:01 AM
1

He allowed wife to keep her orbiters As I see it, this is a no-win situation. Either you don't raise a fuss over her orbiters (which comes with the obvious problems), or you insist she stop spending time with them, which will only cause her to hide her interactions with the orbiter(s) from you and will add to the appeal of spending time with him due to its forbidden status. Here's my solution to the problem: never settle down, spin plates for the rest of your life, and never promise nor expect m…
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 05:44 AM
18

George: Listen to this. Marcy comes up and she tells me her ex-boyfriend was over late last night, and "yada yada yada, I'm really tired today." You don't think she yada yada'd sex. Elaine: (Raising hand) I've yada yada'd sex. George: Really? Elaine: Yeah. I met this lawyer, we went out to dinner, I had the lobster bisque, we went back to my place, yada yada yada, I never heard from him again. Jerry: But you yada yada'd over the best part. Elaine: No, I mentioned the bisque.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 05:34 AM
4

Well this looks like an interesting- and it's gone.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 05:33 AM
8

This is why I never promise monogamy. If she feels there's nothing she could do to lose you, she's far less likely to make the effort to keep up her appearance and otherwise make you happy.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/15 01:04 AM
1

Moreover it seems that the consensus here is that all women are hell bent on manipulating men with the end goal of taking all their money, possessions, and children, and I just don't understand that. I'd say it's more like "Women are only after men for what the man can give the woman (emotions, money, status, children, etc.) and have little long-term fidelity to masculine constructs like 'honesty' and 'faithfulness' when faced with better options." To be fair, men are only after women for what t…
/r/askTRP18/02/15 09:20 AM
32

The hard part, and the important part, is to be that one guy.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/15 08:47 AM
1

Interesting that you should say that. Read The Game by Neil Strauss for some backstory from somebody who was very much at odds with him. Long story short: he's always been like that. Very analytical.
/r/askTRP18/02/15 03:00 AM
1

The reason she feels it's okay to disrespect you like that is because, as a man in a committed, monogamous relationship with her, she knows that you're very unlikely to just end the relationship and find somebody else who will treat you better. With that fear gone, she's far more likely to treat you poorly. This is precisely why I never settle down and only ever spin plates; it's so much easier to Soft Next a woman and GFTOW (Go Fuck Ten Other Women), which is the single most powerful action a m…
/r/askTRP17/02/15 10:17 AM
3

Hey, guess I was not supposed to notice what was going on. "What, was I not supposed to notice what was going on? Dude's my friend; I care about him. You, not so much."
/r/askTRP17/02/15 09:56 AM
3

You gotta admit, it's a better deal than most friend-zoned guys get. EDIT: And he deleted his post. Basically, he talked about how one woman would pay for expensive stuff whenever they went out. Basically, she was paying him to be her time bitch. As I said, still a better deal than most guys get.
/r/askTRP17/02/15 09:26 AM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/PUApolyamory/comments/1wv41z/pua_masf_repost_physically_touch_her_briefly_and/ http://www.theattractionforums.com/general-discussion/9287-guide-kino-art-touch.html EDIT: The second link uses Mystery Method terminology (A1-A3, C1-C3, S1-S3). All you need to know is that A1 means opening the set, A2 and A3 are all about building attraction, C1 is comfort-building at the initial pickup location, C2 is comfort-building at a different location, and C3 is comfort-building at th…
/r/askTRP17/02/15 12:30 AM
5

Women tend to prefer a pretext to sex the first time. I once brought a woman to my bedroom under the pretext of her helping me make my bed. She knew what was up, and we wound up sleeping together that day. Having said that, I'd recommend against sleeping with women that have been drinking. All it takes is one woman who regrets her decision for her to file rape charges against you, and recent laws have lowered the burden of proof for rape claims handled by the college, with none of the legal safe…
/r/askTRP16/02/15 08:54 AM
2

It's highly unlikely she would reject you in these situations. Look at it objectively: she's alone with you, in your room, during a party. Do you honestly think she'd allow herself to be put in that situation if she wasn't okay with the possibility of something sexual happening? And even in the worst-case scenario, if she does freak out and storms out on you, so what? It just means that either she wasn't expecting you to make a move (which, in this context, means she's kind of dumb) or she knowi…
/r/askTRP16/02/15 08:10 AM
6

"Like hell. I'll be sleeping in the bed, you can sleep wherever the hell you want." Of course, if she actually shared a couch with somebody else I'd take a break from the relationship, immediately downgrade her to plate status, and GFTOW (Go Fuck Ten Other Women).
/r/askTRP16/02/15 07:05 AM
1

Of course, there's always the nuclear option.
/r/askTRP16/02/15 03:41 AM
2

<kylev> BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA <kylev> hahahahaha <kylev> some girl just came onto our floor <kylev> and was yelling "sexual favors for anyone who does my sociology paper" <kylev> i just asked her what the paper was about <kylev> and she said the accomplishments and growth of feminism <`Neo> bahahahaha Source: bash.org
/r/askTRP14/02/15 04:33 AM
1

On a somewhat unrelated note, she's paying for valentines day tomorrow, because I told her to. You're doing it right. :)
/r/askTRP14/02/15 04:33 AM
1

Did you miss the part where I said "everybody thinks they can beat the odds"? If it were possible to tell ahead of time what sort of woman would screw you over, the divorce rate wouldn't be 50%! And you never answered my other question: have you slept with her?
/r/askTRP04/02/15 05:20 AM
1

A few Red Pill posts regarding marriage: I Was Divorce Raped. Don't Be Me. Millionaire spends his life donating to charity and helping his wife battle cancer. She beats it and divorces him because he's spent all his money.
/r/askTRP04/02/15 05:00 AM
1

A completely unfettered man will want lots of sex, but he won't want his partner to have had sex with other men. The ideal partner, then, would be some sort of virgin whore. Obviously this isn't tenable for a realistic relationship, so TRP has collectively come to the conclusion that you can sleep with low-quality (read: promiscuous) women all you want, and in the meantime look for a high-quality woman (read: virginal or mostly-virginal) to settle down with. I came here from the pickup arts (PUA…
/r/askTRP04/02/15 04:54 AM
1

Also, your goal should be to sleep with her as soon as possible, despite any conservative upbringing you may have. The reason for this is threefold. 1) The sooner you sleep with her, the better your chances of ever sleeping with her. Wait too long and your window of opportunity closes, trapping you in the Friend Zone. 2) If you're sexually incompatible with the woman, it's best you know as soon as possible so you can end the relationship. Sexual incompatibility never changes, and trying to make …
/r/askTRP04/02/15 04:29 AM
4

Have you slept with her before? If so, just invite her over to your place and put the moves on her there. If not, you're spending way too much effort over a woman you haven't even slept with. Drop her and move on.
/r/askTRP04/02/15 04:16 AM
2

Are you sleeping with other women? If not, are you at least approaching new women and attempting to seduce them? Because the questions you're asking seem like they're best answered through first-hand experimentation and experience. 1.) Approach any girls you find interesting. 2.) Talk to them like new friends. 3.) Playfully, casually try to seduce the one you like. 4.) Stay relaxed and cool in the face of unexpected, weird, or mean shit. 5.) Keep doing this over and over until something hooks.
/r/askTRP04/02/15 04:13 AM
1

I added this line to my post, but you posted so fast I don't think you saw it: Make her beg for the sex if that's your thing, but for God's sake, make sure you give her the dick.
/r/askTRP03/02/15 05:02 AM
0

"Before you've slept with a woman, she'll look for reasons not to see you. After you've slept with a woman, she'll look for reasons to see you." Putting off sex will only diminish your chances of seeing her again. Make her beg for the sex if that's your thing, but for God's sake, make sure you give her the dick.
/r/askTRP03/02/15 04:58 AM
23

It ranks right up there with something I heard a lot in high school: "I'm very mature for my age." The people who said that generally weren't.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/15 11:19 PM
2

Women with Borderline Personality Disorder will fuck you over regardless of how attractive you are. If you're that worried about it you should record your interactions with the women in case they try crying rape. Of course, in some states you need both parties to be aware of the recording, so check your state/country's privacy laws.
/r/askTRP01/02/15 05:45 AM
1

You want PUA (Pick Up Artist[ry]). The Newbie Method; a dirt-simple guide to cold approaching women. A pdf file containing the best PUA posts of all time. http://www.pua-zone.com - The best PUA forum I know of.
/r/askTRP31/01/15 02:38 AM
1

You know the difference between my solution and yours? Your solution makes you responsible for her emotional state and takes responsibility away from her. My solution leaves her with the responsibility for handling her own damn feelings. And what's more, it works. My current LTR is a 1-year plate, and my GF before that stayed with me for 3 years. I've also had a 9-month plate that recently stopped seeing me because she wanted more than just sex. All three of them have given me absolutely zero sh…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 07:24 PM
1

Well, if you can drop your need for monogamy PUA Polyamory is the best LTR game. Lots of sex from lots of women, as much love and affection as you want, and absolutely zero drama.
/r/askTRP29/01/15 05:19 PM
1

I agree that you should never listen to what a woman says. Instead, you should pay attention to what she actually does. This is also an old PUA concept that goes back at least a decade. "Treat what she says as the inane babbling of a small child." (Credit: Tubarao) However, I disagree with the unstated assumption that it's the man's job to lead her to a better emotional state. The implication is that if she's freaking out or causing drama or yelling at you or putting you on the defensive, you sh…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/15 05:10 PM
0

Your argument was that "Serial divorces screw the statistic", followed immediately by two website links. Any reasonable reader could assume that those links supported your claims, however upon reading those links I saw absolutely no reference to serial divorces. If I'm wrong, please show me a quote from either of those two links that support your assertion that "Serial divorces screw the statistic."
/r/TheRedPill27/01/15 10:22 PM
0

Neither of those links support your claim. Instead, they both argue that the divorce rate should include the people who are still married. Measuring the divorce rate like this skews the number to make divorce look lower-risk, because there will always be a large group of people that are currently married, and including them in the calculations lowers the apparent risk. This ignores the fact that an unknown percentage of people currently married will go on to divorce, which would increase the ris…
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 09:55 PM
1

The parenting agreement and a good lawyer(s), I would guess. Even with the chance of a court clusterfuck it's still simpler and easier than getting a divorce, and 50% of marriages end in divorce anyways. tl;dr IANAL. Delete Facebook, lawyer up, and hit the gym.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 08:46 PM
3

Only see them on your terms, on your time. If you only want to see them once a month, do that. You should never spend time with a woman because you feel you have to or are somehow obligated to.
/r/askTRP26/01/15 07:41 PM
2

Treat the situation like you're already divorced with joint custody. Separate bank accounts, separate living locations, and a parenting agreement signed by both parents. EDIT: and never, ever stop spinning plates.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 07:39 PM
1

What's challenging about it? See them once a week at most, blow them off if you don't feel like seeing them.
/r/askTRP26/01/15 05:06 PM
12

I'm telling you guys, spinning plates and never ever settling down is where it's at. Promising commitment to a woman immediately disables the "insta-eject" button and encourages drama, arguments, a lack of sex, and other unwanted behaviors from the woman.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/15 05:00 PM
17

I'm reminded of the Nash Grier controversy. For those of you who don't remember, he was a 16-yo teenage boy who had a 4.2 million members following him on Vine. He released a Youtube video talking with his friends about what they looked for in women (shave your armpits, don't be obnoxious and loud, etc.) and his followers absolutely crucified him.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/15 03:32 AM
1

There's a good (old) thread about lawyering up here.
/r/askTRP19/01/15 11:37 AM
1

Who cares?
/r/askTRP19/01/15 11:27 AM
1

TRP doesn't really focus much on pure approaches. I'd recommend checking out http://pua-zone.com. EDIT: Also, are you actively cold approaching women? If you aren't, that's what you should be doing. Cold approach women, and if you can't decide on a PU style just follow the Newbie Method.
/r/askTRP19/01/15 11:19 AM
2

It's not exactly what you were asking, but here's a record of The Red Pill's subscriber history.
/r/askTRP19/01/15 03:39 AM
24

"Why does a bride smile when she walks up the aisle? Because she knows she's given her last blowjob."
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 02:48 AM
1

Thanks. The problem with "only to the special ones" is it gives her more value than she should really have at this stage of the interaction. It qualifies her even when she hasn't done anything to earn that qualification. In contrast, "only to the ones that catch my eye" is a much lighter qualification that can easily be revoked if necessary.
/r/askTRP17/01/15 07:33 PM
1

I am not going to put up with someone who treats me badly It gets a lot different once sex and intimacy is involved. You'll become more attached to her, more afraid of losing her, and will put up with way more shit than you should because of it. To quote Ferris Bueller: Cameron's never been in love. At least no one's ever been in love with him. He's gonna marry the first girl he lays. And she's gonna treat him like shit because he's gonna kiss her ass for giving him what he's built-up in his min…
/r/askTRP17/01/15 07:29 PM
1

But you don't know. That's the point: you don't know because you've never experienced either and have no way of comparing the two. Since this isn't based on first-hand experiences, I can only conclude that you're basing your beliefs on your fundamentalist christian upbringing. If you stopped being religious, why are you still letting their beliefs dictate your actions?
/r/askTRP17/01/15 07:13 PM
1

It is because want someone to say by side for the rest of my life You realize that marriage has a 50% failure rate, right? For every 100 people getting married in a year, there are 50 people getting divorced. Besides that I imagine it would feel lonely to just go from one girl to another including one night stands. That's a limiting belief. I do it and I've never been happier with my relationships.
/r/askTRP17/01/15 07:10 PM
2

You could respond, "only to the ones that catch my eye," which frames you as being picky about the women you approach and thus having higher social value than if you were the sort of person who indiscriminately hit on every woman. Alternatively, you could set a trap for her.
/r/askTRP17/01/15 06:56 PM
2

I'm sure there were, but there are far too many people who ignore warning signs for the same reason he got back together with her; the only options he saw were ending the relationship or "talking it out," and he didn't want to end the relationship.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 09:49 PM
34

In a married relationship, a Hard Next means a divorce, and a Soft Next is impossible. No matter how long you leave for, she still knows you'll be coming back to her. Just one more reason marriage is a bad idea for men; it removes the single most powerful weapon in a man's arsenal.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 09:47 PM
1

This is precisely why I've moved away from a relationship model that requires female monogamy. Basically, I'm going to spin plates for the rest of my life. And I'm perfectly okay with this. B-)
/r/TheRedPill10/01/15 10:31 PM
2

No.
/r/askTRP09/01/15 05:14 PM
1

Oh, okay. These are all legitimate reasons to dislike pity. I guess I was imagining a situation where it hurts somebody's pride to be pitied. You know, like "don't you dare pity me!"
/r/askTRP04/01/15 09:40 PM
1

I'll be honest, I've never understood what's wrong with pity. It is literally defined as: sympathetic or kindly sorrow evoked by the suffering, distress, or misfortune of another, often leading one to give relief or aid or to show mercy. Could you explain to me why you dislike it?
/r/askTRP04/01/15 06:59 PM
1

No you didn't. You said "I kind of like the idea", but that's not necessarily the same thing as "I get sexual pleasure from helping her move." Personally, I get sexual pleasure from actually having sex. But I dunno, maybe that's just a weird fetish of mine. =P
/r/askTRP03/01/15 10:05 AM
2

The single most important thing from her is the desire to be your girlfriend. If she has it, she will let you know. If she doesn't have it, trying to make her your GF will be unattractive behavior to her and will only push her away.
/r/askTRP03/01/15 09:59 AM
2

You should be getting sexual enjoyment from her regardless of whether or not you help her move. If you aren't, she's not worth being your plate. Or are you claiming that you get sexual pleasure from helping her move?
/r/askTRP03/01/15 09:55 AM
8

You can't fuck her furniture.
/r/askTRP03/01/15 09:53 AM
2

Black Dragon's guide to the Soft Next
/r/askTRP03/01/15 09:46 AM
3

If she comes up with an acceptable excuse, which clearly shows that she understood, where she went wrong, you'll establish contact again after those two weeks and then explain to her, that this was the one and only time you are going to excuse such a behaviour. I was with you right up until this sentence. After a Next you shouldn't bring up the problems again. To do so is just to invite unnecessary drama. From Black Dragon's guide to the Soft Next: 11. Contact her 3 to 7 days later LIKE NOTHING …
/r/askTRP03/01/15 09:45 AM
16

The main course will be a serving of rape, followed by a light salad, with some red wine on the side (you never serve white wine with rape, that would just be tacky.)
/r/TheRedPill03/01/15 08:54 AM
4

Yup. From Wikipedia: In a survey of faculty at the University of Nebraska, 68% rated themselves in the top 25% for teaching ability. In a similar survey, 87% of MBA students at Stanford University rated their academic performance as above the median. [...] In ratings of leadership ability, 70% of the students [surveyed by the College Board] put themselves above the median. In ability to get on well with others, 85% put themselves above the median, and 25% rated themselves in the top 1%.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/14 02:29 AM
0

I've never heard of any studies that show a positive correlation between moral behavior and military effectiveness. EDIT: Or are you claiming that Greece was defeated because they were too stupid to defend themselves? I must admit, I've never heard that theory before.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 04:21 PM
1

Any time you use the word "should", you're making a statement that the world should fundamentally be different from how it is. It doesn't matter how you think the world should be different; the fact remains that you're saying things should be different. TRP isn't about changing the world. It's about accepting that the world is what it is and using that knowledge to your advantage. It's the difference between saying "women here shouldn't be so fat!" and "I'm going to move somewhere with skinnier …
/r/askTRP29/12/14 02:12 PM
3

Meh. People have always been complaining about the decline of societal standards, and people today aren't fundamentally different from how they were, say, 2000 years ago.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 09:49 AM
1

This is the major difference between /r/mensrights and /r/theredpill. Men's rights posters complain about how things aren't the way they should be. TRP posters accept that things are the way they are and use that knowledge to improve their own lives.
/r/askTRP29/12/14 07:27 AM
0

"I had a hard time with Ayn Rand because I found myself enthusiastically agreeing with the first 90% of every sentence, but getting lost at 'therefore, be a huge asshole to everyone.'"
/r/TheRedPill27/12/14 09:50 AM
3

The PUA Mystery came up with the guideline that you should be having sex within 4-10 hours cumulatively spent together. If not, cut your losses and move on. How do I become the alpha she wants to fuck all the time as opposed to the boyfriend who gets scraps? In order to get good with one woman, you have to learn how to get good with many women. For this, I'd recommend learning pickup artistry. The pickup artist (PUA) subreddits here really suck. I'd recommend downloading this compilation of 5-st…
/r/askTRP25/12/14 01:26 AM
1

Erm, yes and no. On one hand, the rules of PUA polyamory apply from the very beginning of the relationship. These are things like Soft Nexting her at the first sign of drama, always having at least 2 women in rotation, limiting the time spent with her, etc. On the other hand, you don't verbalize any of this for the first several months of the relationship. The fact that you're a sexy player who sleeps with other women should never be directly verbalized, but she should strongly get that impressi…
/r/TheRedPill19/12/14 03:09 AM
1

I've had this discussion with TRPers before. Basically, PUA polyamory (not polygamy) works fine so long as you can let go of the desire to ever settle down with just one woman. Unlimited sex and affection, zero drama (yes, zero drama), and if you were planning on forgoing long-term monogamy anyways, there's literally no downside. EDIT: I'd like to point out that PUA polyamory is as far removed from traditional polyamory as plate-spinning is from traditional relationships.
/r/TheRedPill19/12/14 02:45 AM
1

Serial monogamy? Fine. Plates? Fine. A live-in LTR? Not. Going. To. Happen. Sweet. You know, there's this subreddit you might be interested in...
/r/TheRedPill19/12/14 01:15 AM
4

Yeah, that's fine. The rule is just to prevent vote brigading, but the TRP bot doesn't discriminate between links to TRP subreddits and links to non-TRP subreddits. So stupid. Anyhow, I sent you the PM.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 04:06 AM
16

It probably isn't the one Dev_on was referring to, but I immediately thought of the TRP post entitled "Sunday TRP humor - girl requests open relationship while on vacation, boyfriend starts immediately fucking another girl, girlfriend melts down." Due to the subreddit rules I can't link to it, unfortunately, but it shouldn't be too hard to find.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 12:53 AM
2

It probably isn't the one Dev_on was referring to, but I immediately thought of the TRP post entitled "Sunday TRP humor - girl requests open relationship while on vacation, boyfriend starts immediately fucking another girl, girlfriend melts down." Due to the subreddit rules I can't link to it, unfortunately, but it shouldn't be too hard to find.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 12:53 AM
1

/r/PUApolyamory. The only major difference between PUA Poly and TRP is that many TRPers eventually want to settle down, while PUA Poly is about having unlimited sex and affection without ever settling down. Aside from that (admittedly major) difference, they're pretty much the same.
/r/askTRP15/12/14 08:50 PM
1

It's fine to fall in love, just don't get married. Hell, I'd argue you shouldn't even be monogamous, but that's a minority view here on TRP.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/14 02:25 PM
4

This is unconditional self-acceptance: You pick an important goal—such as work or love—and you evaluate its achievement as good or bad, successful or unsuccessful. But—watch it now!—you refuse to rate or measure your self, your being, as "good" or "bad". You realize that your performance is a part of you, but certainly not all of you. You did it and are largely responsible for it. But it is a single performance, can easily change (be better or worse) tomorrow, and is always—yes, always—one ever-…
/r/askTRP11/12/14 03:25 PM
3

and look like they can still have a sex life That's not really how that works. If anything, status-conscious women want to avoid looking promiscuous.
/r/askTRP09/12/14 10:59 AM
6

This is a complete breakdown of everything that isn't game And for that, this is a compilation of some of the best game posts of all time. Don't try to read it all at once, you'll just get overloaded with information. Read a bit, go in-field and approach women and put it to good use.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/14 10:42 AM
1

You aren't seeing the larger picture here. It doesn't matter if reassuring her was the right thing to do or not, because you shouldn't even have been in that situation in the first place. GFTOW. Screen out women with low self esteem and don't give them anything more than Plate status. Don't bother subtly implying you have other options; actually have other options!
/r/askTRP29/11/14 02:49 AM
-1

Verbalizing that you have options, no matter how subtle, is no match for actually having other options. When you actually have other options, you will naturally behave correctly. When you don't have other female options, i.e. when you're in a committed relationship, no amount of subtle implications to your partner will change that fact. No reassurance will ever be enough for a woman with low self-esteem. The only thing reassuring her will do is reduce her level of attraction to you. So basically…
/r/askTRP29/11/14 02:24 AM
5

Look dude, it's obvious that she means too much to you and that you're too invested in her. That's why she's losing interest. If you try Nexting her from this position it won't work, because she knows that she doesn't have to worry about actually losing you. Honestly, your best bet is to admit that this isn't working out, break up with her, cut contact for at least a week, and go fuck ten other women (GFTOW).
/r/askTRP28/11/14 12:36 AM
1

don't say "dread game" or "just be alpha" or shout " NEXT " explain to me how to get her attraction, because by doing NEXT I wouldn't have learnt anything from this LTR. I left my hand on the hot stove and now my hand is starting to burn. How do I turn this situation around? Don't say "take your hand off the stove" because by doing that I wouldn't have learnt anything from this situation.
/r/askTRP28/11/14 12:05 AM
14

a girl tapped on my shoulder and just tried to give me the camera. "Cool, thanks! Free camera!" EDIT: Fuck, Countpudyoola had the same idea.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/14 07:49 PM
2

These are not perfect or flawless men, but they are decent, honest, and kind. I can't tell whether or not he realizes that those are not the qualities that excite and attract women.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/14 05:28 AM
2

Okay, so we're mostly in agreement here. Some argue that you shouldn't bring it up at all until a few months into the relationship and she won't let the subject drop, but I think we can both agree that you shouldn't verbalize it until you've slept with her at least twice. Also, if you aren't already subscribed, there's /r/PUApolyamory, which I think would be a good fit for your relationship style.
/r/TheRedPill14/11/14 06:33 AM
0

Because most STDs are either treatable or so rare that you don't need to worry about them. Try to keep up with the conversation.
/r/askTRP10/11/14 09:08 AM
1

You know you don't have to settle down with any woman, right? You can spin plates for the rest of your life and live a perfectly happy, drama-free life with as much sex and affection as you want. That's what I do, and it's worked out pretty well for me.
/r/askTRP10/11/14 06:43 AM
-2

Take her up on her offer, break up with her, and Go Fuck Ten Other Women (GFTOW). Your larger problem is that you want her more than she wants you. GFTOW is an excellent way to clear your head and realize that she's not as important as you think she is.
/r/askTRP10/11/14 06:21 AM
-1

Uh huh. It's also completely harmless, being a different strain of the virus that causes cold sores on your mouth. There's also medication that can suppress it if necessary.
/r/askTRP10/11/14 06:11 AM
4

That wasn't a shit test, that was a meaningless vent of her emotional state. You way over-verbalized the situation. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that if you ever find yourself in a conversation about the relationship, you fucked up. Change the subject immediately. Here's how I'd have handled that particular situation: "would you rather date someone else?" "Shut up." *pulls her close and makes out with her* Now bear in mind that that wouldn't always be an appropriate response. Context is ever…
/r/askTRP10/11/14 05:43 AM
1

It's possible that she's telling you the truth, it's possible that she's full of shit. Either way, she's not worth the frustration. Your biggest problem right now is that you don't have (or don't feel you have) other options. Go to the local mall and mack on girls there until you have other female options.
/r/askTRP10/11/14 05:37 AM
0

Eh. Most STDs are either treatable or so rare that you don't need to worry about them. Source EDIT: Of course, if Vasalgel becomes hugely popular, that might change as more men have unprotected sex with women.
/r/askTRP10/11/14 03:30 AM
7

She is very different from many other girls No she wasn't. At least, not in the way you were hoping.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/14 08:26 AM
6

For future reference, if you're ever in a situation like that again where a woman walks out or you have to kick her out, maintain radio silence for a week, minimum. Any less and she won't feel the loss of your attention.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 07:21 AM
3

Quite a few people here rebel against the concept of treating game like any other skill and systematically working to improve it (in other words, PUA), which is why I didn't go into detail. Still, if you're asking, I'd suggest making cold approaches using the newbie method Urgh. automod won't allow me to link to the reddit post in question. Okay, let me think. Here. This is a compilation of all the best PUA posts in existence. The Newbie Method is the first post listed. Do not read through the e…
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 02:05 AM
6

Have an abundance mentality. Specifically, have other female options. When you know you could call up any of your plates and have sex that night, it becomes less pressing that you succeed with any specific woman. Of course, that creates a catch-22 where you have to be successful to get successful. In that situation the best advice is just "fake it 'til you make it." Practice being non-needy and non-reactive, even as you take action to move the interaction forward to where you want it. It takes a…
/r/TheRedPill08/11/14 12:17 AM
1

because after 30-40 I really want to just chill and lay back and enjoy my life with a woman The shit tests never end. What you're describing is called a Disney FantasyTM.
/r/askTRP06/11/14 04:25 AM
1

archived mASF post: "Fun vs. Funny - The Art of Bullshitting" by n3rv1
/r/askTRP06/11/14 04:17 AM
2

Here's some reading material that should help: archived mASF post: "Sexual Negotiation" thread with Neo-Rio and Aima archived mASF post: "Anti-Manifesto" by 60 Years of Challenge PUA Zone: "How i escalate to ensure sex on 1st date" by cobi
/r/askTRP06/11/14 04:10 AM
2

Dude, don't be a dick.
/r/askTRP05/11/14 02:54 PM
27

Actually, that whole scene is almost directly applicable to TRP. Continuing the dialogue: K: Fifteen hundred years ago everybody knew the Earth was the center of the universe. Five hundred years ago, everybody knew the Earth was flat, and fifteen minutes ago, you knew that humans were alone on this planet. K: Imagine what you'll know tomorrow. [...] J: Is it worth it? K: Oh yeah, it's worth it. K: ...if you're strong enough!
/r/TheRedPill05/11/14 09:44 AM
3

Preach it, brother.
/r/askTRP04/11/14 12:04 PM
1

Check the thread again; I just made two (rather large) replies that may help.
/r/askTRP30/10/14 05:30 PM
1

Stories.... In general try to avoid searching for good material. Some of the other posters are on target here when they say anything can be a story. You need to develop your ability to relate and express a story. Once you get good at this, you can create interest out of thin air. Anybody can get attention by telling a story which is in it's own nature entertaining. That type of 'good' material WILL keep attention, but in the end it is the story which is interesting and not you. That is bad. I ca…
/r/askTRP30/10/14 05:28 PM
2

You're referring to what Blackdragon calls "the Alpha 1.0", AKA "the Needy Alpha". Better than a Beta Male, but could still use some improvement.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 04:57 PM
5

Yeah. It was a little odd seeing the term "shit test" there.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 03:00 AM
-2

You're doing God's work, soldier.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 10:25 AM
1

Don't go on dinner dates. Arrange to spend time with the woman in a cheaper way that isn't as likely to trigger an unwarranted entitlement complex. Go to a museum, or go bike-riding at a park, or (my personal favorite) just invite her back to your place.
/r/askTRP27/10/14 03:01 AM
2

I'm not saying it can't work, I'm saying that verbalizing the relationship early on decreases your chances of sleeping with her. Still, I could be mistaken. How many women did you wind up not sleeping with in the situations where you verbally defined the relationship at or near the beginning? What percentage would you say wound up not sleeping with you, regardless of the reason, vs what percentage wound up sleeping with you? Additionally, when did these verbalizations come in relationship to whe…
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 10:26 PM
2

Make it very clear you two aren't in this for a future relationship no holding hands/affection in public and no worries of what she does on her off time. Sure, but don't actually verbalize this in the first few months of the relationship. Communicate it implicitly thought action and indirect conversation, sure, but don't explicitly state it.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 08:34 AM
3

I'm not the OP, but there's a lot more like it in /r/PUApolyamory. In fact, basically everything OP said can be found in the relationships portion of the stickied post there. Follow that, and you'll have all the sex and affection you could want with absolutely zero drama. The tradeoff, of course, is that you can't effectively use PUApoly techniques if you ever settle down with just one woman. For most guys on TRP this is a dealbreaker, because they really just want to settle down with the one wo…
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 08:28 AM
7

Sex is nice, but sex with someone you don't care about is empty, risky, and ultimately just scratching an itch. That hasn't been my experience. Most guys here eventually want to settle down with the "right woman". The odds are stacked enough against me (and men in general), and the penalty for being wrong is so high, that I've just decided to spin plates for the rest of my life. I have as much sex as I want in multiple affectionate, emotionally-fulfilling relationships, and I don't feel "empty" …
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 08:18 AM
237

The idea behind the tuxedo is the woman's point of view that men are all the same, so we might as well dress them that way. That's why a wedding is like the joining together of a beautiful glowing bride, and some guy. The tuxedo is a wedding safety device created by women because they know that men are undependable. So in case the groom chickens out, everybody just takes one step over and she marries the next guy. Thats why the wedding vow isn't 'do you take Bill Simpson', its 'do you take this …
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 07:50 AM
9

Or you could, you know... just not get married.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 12:41 AM
6

Relevant link: Why Engagement Rings Are a Scam - Adam Ruins Everything
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 12:33 AM
68

The sexual gap is not a myth! Equal orgasms for equal work! Don't be sick, suck my dick!
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 12:04 AM
1

It gets a bad rap around here, but I think PUA is exactly what you're looking for. It's like TRP, but with a laser focus on finding women and getting laid in a relatively short amount of time from meet to sex. (generally 4-10 hours, 3 dates max) PUA Polyamory subreddit Sedfast Forum, the successor to the mASF seduction newsgroup and the now-gutted fastseduction.com.
/r/askTRP23/10/14 11:47 PM
2

Ugh. I hate sites with that stupid large blocker popup that requires you to enter some sort of personal information to access the page. I always delete the popup div HTML nodes in Chrome's devtools (f12, right-click, "delete node") but it's still annoying and frustrating.
/r/askTRP23/10/14 10:54 PM
2

You'll want this older thread from the PUA Zone forums: How To Soft Next: Step-by-step instructions and answers to questions
/r/askTRP23/10/14 10:50 PM
5

Next her (cut all contact with her) and Go Fuck Ten Other Women (GFTOW).
/r/askTRP23/10/14 08:04 AM
4

my female roommate and my best friends gf are giving me shit for not ltr this girl. Women who give you advice tend to want you to stop being any sort of Alpha and be a nice Beta male. Think Tedd Mosby from How I Met Your Mother for both the behavior women tend to encourage, and exactly how unappealing it actually is to women. In the future, don't tell your female friends about the plates you're spinning. Honestly, don't even tell your male friends about it. The women you sleep with are nobody's …
/r/askTRP20/10/14 10:30 PM
6

PUA here, we don't even advocate that.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 03:52 AM
5

If she's too busy to hang out with you, she has no interest in you beyond just using you for attention. Drop her and find women who actually put out the effort to spend time with you.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 12:23 AM
5

I remember an episode one of those reality dating TV shows. The challenge was for the men to interact with the women in a swimming pool, and the man who interacted the best was the winner of that competition. Most of the guys were too self-conscious to do anything. They just awkwardly hung out at the edge of the pool. I assume that part of it was self-consciousness about their bodies, even though they were almost all fit men. But one guy, the fat guy of the group, went up to the women and struck…
/r/askTRP14/10/14 11:41 PM
1

Spinning plates for the rest of my life. It is good to be the king. B-)
/r/askTRP14/10/14 04:44 AM
1

At this point, I want you to think about a similar situation in your life and I want you to get angry. Get fucking mad and then channel that anger into a constructive course of action. Get mad, you sons of bitches! Get mad!
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 06:04 PM
2

Red Pillers tend to conflate love and monogamy. "You can't be in a loving relationship without monogamy," the logic goes. "So if you have plates you can't love them, and if you want a serious relationship you can't let them sleep with other people." I practice PUA Polyamory, which allows women the freedom to do whatever they want and allows me the freedom to do the same, while still allowing me to have loving, sexual relationships with those women. Unfortunately, I'm in the minority for my views…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 02:29 AM
1

Red Pillers tend to conflate love and monogamy. "You can't be in a loving relationship without monogamy," the logic goes. "So if you have plates you can't love them, and if you want a serious relationship you can't let them sleep with other people." I practice PUA Polyamory, which allows women the freedom to do whatever they want and allows me the freedom to do the same, while still allowing me to have loving, sexual relationships with those women. Unfortunately, I'm in the minority for my views…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 02:27 AM
0

Red Pillers tend to conflate love and monogamy. "You can't be in a loving relationship without monogamy," the logic goes. "So if you have plates you can't love them, and if you want a serious relationship you can't let them sleep with other people." I practice PUA Polyamory, which allows women the freedom to do whatever they want and allows me the freedom to do the same, while still allowing me to have loving, sexual relationships with those women. Unfortunately, I'm in the minority for my views…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 02:27 AM
2

Way ahead of you.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 02:22 AM
3

LINE BREAKS, MOTHERFUCKER, DO YOU USE THEM?!
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 02:21 AM
3

It's almost definitely a bot.
/r/askTRP07/10/14 07:51 AM
1

If you like I can share what my perfect relationship is Yes, I would like to know.
/r/askTRP07/10/14 04:04 AM
1

otherwise, you're not going to gain anything out of the relationship. You're operating under a traditional model, where commitment is either something you want or something that's expected of you. The question I posed in the OP was this: If you could have an otherwise-perfect relationship at the cost of any commitment, would the tradeoff be worth making?
/r/askTRP06/10/14 10:39 PM
1

No because that's far from perfection. Now you've got me curious: what would a perfect relationship (or relationships) look like to you, that wasn't covered in my post?
/r/askTRP06/10/14 10:14 PM
1

The only reason for a man to marry is if he wants to have children. Actually, not even that's necessary.
/r/askTRP06/10/14 10:12 PM
0

You're pretty much arguing for standard poly, as it is practiced in America. Oh, hell no! Standard poly is a recipe for drama, hurt feelings, and arguments. No, what I practice is much better.
/r/askTRP06/10/14 10:12 PM
1

My singular definition of love is that commitment is required 100%. My definition of love is simply this: "an emotional state". That's it. No requirements or expectations involved. I don't "wish", myself, to find someone to commit to because now I realize none of these women are worth it. Not one alive today. Not one at all. You know how post-wall, economically successful women have trouble finding men because their standards are too high? I suspect you may be doing the same thing here. I mean, …
/r/askTRP06/10/14 10:10 PM
0

I feel like we're talking past each other here. You can have soft emotions (love, affection, comfort) in a relationship without being committed to the woman. I've done this in all of my recent relationships, so soft emotions do not automatically require any sort of commitment. Dread-game is making sure that bitch knows she's replaceable. And there's no better way to do this than to actually have other options. Which do you think drives the point home better: saying "I could be with somebody else…
/r/askTRP06/10/14 10:05 PM
1

Settling down with a woman decreases your alpha status in her mind, leading to less sex, less compliance, and more drama. For me those tradeoffs aren't worth it, but I understand that everybody has their own preferences.
/r/askTRP06/10/14 09:57 PM
0

I have been in several loving, non-exclusive long-term relationships. My experiences disprove your claim.
/r/askTRP06/10/14 09:54 PM
1

Fair enough. Here's another question: if you could have a loving, non-exclusive relationship, would it be in your best interests to do so? I'm not asking if it's possible for you. We've already established that it isn't. I'm asking, if it were possible, would it be in your best interests to do so? Bear in mind that the sort of relationship I'm outlining gives you sex whenever you want, zero drama, and love, comfort, and affection. Also, you should always use condoms when sleeping with anybody wh…
/r/askTRP06/10/14 08:54 AM
0

Being emotionally invested is commitment. Wrong. Absolutely, unequivocally, one hundred percent wrong. I have several relationships with an emotional component to them. I am not committed to any of them, I will never be committed to any of them, and they know it. You can't righteously run any dread. Another name for dread game is Social Proof, and it's so freaking easy to display social proof when you aren't committed to a single woman. If a woman loves you she won't sleep around. In this contex…
/r/askTRP06/10/14 08:45 AM
0

I didn't say anything about commitment. In fact, the whole point of this is the lack of commitment. Do you wish to find somebody to commit to? Is that why you'd never take up the offer given in the original post?
/r/askTRP06/10/14 05:06 AM
1

Depends on your definition of "plate". I always thought of "plate" as equivalent to "fuck buddy": sex but no emotional connection. If you have emotional connections (love, affection, comfort) with your plates, then yes you are correct.
/r/askTRP06/10/14 04:31 AM
1

That doesn't answer my question at all. would she still be disqualified for a long-term relationship?
/r/TheRedPill06/10/14 04:17 AM
0

PUA is self-improvement with the aim of sleeping with women. There may be other routes, but they are definitely not as effective as PUA for getting laid. And if you aren't getting laid, they aren't plates.
/r/askTRP06/10/14 03:16 AM
1

In the first part of your explanation, though, the problem isn't her promiscuity. The problem is the fact that the man is or became beta. A low-partner woman will still have "boring vanilla sex" with a beta male, and a high-partner woman will still be more sexually aroused by an alpha male.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/14 02:14 AM
3

It sounds like you're talking about Freaks (using an old PUA typology of "Freak, Ho, Good Girl"). Low self-esteem, personality disorders, "you treat them well, they treat you poorly; you treat them poorly they treat you well". In my experiences as a PUA I've found that there are plenty of Good Girls who are willing to sleep with me. It's possible that they would have been willing to sleep with you, but your attitude towards premarital sex prevents this from occurring. If that's the case, then yo…
/r/TheRedPill06/10/14 02:09 AM
0

IME, women don't have "respect" in the same way men do. What they do have is "attraction". If you're alpha she'll treat you well and look for reasons to bond with you. If you aren't, she won't. In the context of female behavior, respect is a meaningless term. EDIT: And honestly, that's like claiming that because a second child was born many years later than the first child, it somehow got less of a maternal bond.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/14 01:45 AM
0

Okay, tell me if I understand this right. The RP assumption is that, because her choice to settle down was imposed by an external force ("the wall", dwindling options, fear of being alone), she is likely to revert to her previous behavior once she's settled down and that external force no longer affects her. That means her being open to cheating on her man. Does that sound about right?
/r/TheRedPill06/10/14 01:30 AM
-7

I'll be honest, I don't entirely understand the RP view on this. If a woman has a history of cheating on her partners, then yes I can totally understand that she's likely to continue cheating in the future. If, on the other hand, she's slept with lots of men but never cheated on any man she was in a relationship with, would she still be disqualified for a long-term relationship? If so, why?
/r/TheRedPill06/10/14 01:08 AM
2

I guarantee you're overthinking it. Start with this Newbie Framework.
/r/askTRP02/10/14 10:12 PM
3

Prophet, not profit. He was a prophet, he made lots of profits.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 12:12 AM
3

They hide in plain sight. Well, not exactly. There are some things that act as a warning when you know what to look for. "Signs of a Psycho Freak" "DogSoldier's Definitive Guide to Freaks, Ho's & Good Girls and How to Spot Them In-Field."
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 11:41 PM
8

I see it a little differently. To women, men exist on a sliding scale between Lover and Provider. A 100% Provider is a beta male, good for raising her kid while she's out partying but not much else. A 100% Lover is the guy she'll sleep with for a one-night stand, but she may not even try to follow up because she feels like there's absolutely no chance of a relationship (if she even wants one). Generally to get the best long-term results you want to be around 85% Lover/15% Provider. In other word…
/r/TheRedPill27/09/14 11:56 PM
6

No one needs a mother's love. Maybe not, but snuggling with an affectionate, comforting woman feels so fucking good.
/r/askTRP26/09/14 11:32 PM
3

One theory states that men crave both sex and affection, and that pursuing one to the detriment of the other is probably not a very good idea.
/r/askTRP26/09/14 11:31 PM
7

Allow yourself to feel those emotions; allow yourself to have the emotional intimacy you crave. Just don't ever let those feelings make you loosen your standards or relax your boundaries or break your own rules. Every time I break my own rules in order to stay with the snuggles and comfort and warmth, I eventually regret it. I'm doing better, though. In each subsequent relationship I manage to last longer (months/years) without breaking my frame. If you're not sure what your rules are or should …
/r/askTRP26/09/14 11:25 PM
2

And this is why you don't get involved with somebody you work with; if the relationship goes bad you're stuck interacting with her.
/r/askTRP26/09/14 03:28 AM
0

I dunno, are you getting laid? At the end of the day, Red Pill is about sexual strategy for men. If you're not getting laid you are, by Red Pill definition, doing something wrong.
/r/askTRP24/09/14 07:50 AM
1

Women basically exist to have sex and raise kids. If you narrow the scope of one gender's purpose to solely propagating the next generation, you have to be willing to do the same for the other gender as well. So would you stand by the claim "men basically exist to impregnate women"?
/r/askTRP17/09/14 11:55 PM
22

Just so we're clear, is this the same Sheryl Sandberg that advised that women to date a bunch of bad boys before settling down with a dependable guy? "When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner. Someone who thinks women should b…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 12:01 PM
11

"Quiet or papa spank!" - Batman
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 11:52 AM
2

She's testing you, subconsciously if not consciously. If you get jealous, you fail the test and she loses a bit of sexual attraction to you. So flip the script on her. Agree with her how funny it is that people hit on co-workers and tell her a story about one of your attractive female co-workers being flirty with you. Make up the story if you have to. Reacting to her jealousy plotline with jealousy: bad. Ignoring her jealousy plotline: better. Turning it around on her with your own jealousy plot…
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 11:45 AM
5

Spoilers: Women have always been like this. Mystery built his entire PUA career around taking advantage of what you've noticed in clubs (social proof, neg theory), and that was a decade and a half ago.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 02:57 AM
5

Occam's razor. Usually the simplest explanation is the correct one.
/r/askTRP15/09/14 01:44 AM
1

...and the only absolutely certain way to prevent pregnancy is to be abstinent, but we still have sex. It's not about avoiding all risk, it's about balancing risk with reward and personal safety. Besides, the only STDs that can't be easily cleared up and isn't otherwise harmless (*cough* herpes *cough*) is HIV, which is far lower risk than you might think, and condoms provide a high degree of protection against it. Your Honest-To-God Guide to STDs
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 01:39 AM
2

Why does everybody assume that because I sleep around I automatically have unprotected sex? I wear a condom. I am promiscuous, but that doesn't mean I'm stupid about it. And I haven't been tested for a while, but AFAIK I'm clean.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 12:33 AM
-14

I much rather get with a girl who got fucked 20 times in the past 10 days by one guy, than a girl who got fucked 5 times in the past 10 days by 5 different guys. Yes, but that's only if you eventually want a long-term monogamous relationship with the woman. I practice PUA Polyamory, which means I get to fuck both of them without worrying about their sexual history.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 11:19 PM
3

So many things wrong with this. First, I don't see anything about you sexually escalating. Sex should be a priority in any relationship and the sooner you have sex with a woman the more likely she is to see you as a Lover (alpha) and the less likely she is to see you as a Provider (beta). If she doesn't have sex with you by the third date, you need to cut her loose and find a woman who will put out. What you should have been doing was escalating physically. Touch her early and often. Touch her s…
/r/askTRP14/09/14 08:19 AM
1

Some context would help.
/r/askTRP14/09/14 08:05 AM
4

Go Fuck Ten Other Women.
/r/askTRP14/09/14 06:42 AM
1

Nope. The electric shocks used to gather ejaculate samples knocked some of the vasalgel loose and caused sperm count to start rising in some of the baboons.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 10:53 PM
1

Note that he mentions alcohol in situations 1 and 3, and I wouldn't be surprised if it was involved in situation 2 as well. EDIT: Never mind, apparently alcohol was not involved in situation 2.
/r/askTRP08/09/14 09:57 PM
1

In situation 2: was there any alcohol involved, and had you spent time with or slept with this woman before?
/r/askTRP08/09/14 09:17 PM
2

Yeah. Somebody pointed that out in the comments and BD agreed that Robin Williams shouldn't have gotten married at all then.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 10:23 PM
2

Most states allow a prenup to include an alimony waiver, but a handful of states don't. You'd have to check your state's laws to be certain.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 09:57 AM
5

Interesting. I've found BlackDragon to be quite helpful in other contexts, though I've never had reason to test his advice regarding prenups. In what way would you say his prenup statements are inaccurate?
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 08:55 AM
2

In the future please split your posts into smaller paragraphs. I can't speak for anybody else but it's hard for me to read your wall of text.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 01:54 AM
1

Is there any ideal way to do this without it going nuclear? Why are you afraid of how she might react? Let her react however she wants. To let your fear of her actions control your behavior is weak. Cut all contact with her. You don't owe her anything. Not your attention, not an explanation, and certainly not a chance to worm herself back into a relationship that you're no longer interested in.
/r/askTRP07/09/14 01:14 AM
3

I don't see why you're getting downvoted for this. It's the right answer. Anything else opens the door for her to cause drama, get an emotional reaction from you, and possibly suck you back into the relationship.
/r/askTRP07/09/14 01:10 AM
7

If you simply do these 3 things, you'll never need to worry about false rape allegations: Don't lay her the same night you meet her. Make sure she has not consumed any alcohol when you have sex the first time. Spend a little time with her immediately following the first lay. Don't fuck her then immediately vanish, kick her out, or fall asleep. (You can do those things on subsequent lays, but not the first lay.)
/r/askTRP07/09/14 12:56 AM
0

1) That would essentially create a single mother. We all know that no one benefits from that A single mother has to take care of the kid all of the time. With this situation you'd take care of the kid part of the time and pay for the kid's upkeep during the time he/she is with you. Fairer than alimony and less work for the mother. 2) That's interesting but I'm doubtful that a quality woman I would want to have in my sons life would want to share her husband As a PUA who does open relationships, …
/r/askTRP04/09/14 06:52 PM
-2

Option 1: Treat the situation like you've already divorced her. Put together a parenting plan and make sure it's legally binding. Under no circumstances move in with her. Drama level: low. Like, almost non-existent if you're doing it right. Upsides: 1) You get to keep spinning plates, 2) very low drama, 3) this option causes the least damage to you and your kid if the relationship ends. Downsides: 1) she may marry later on, causing your child to have two fathers, and 2) you have to be okay with …
/r/askTRP04/09/14 06:25 PM
7

Unlike women, men increase in value with age.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 06:13 PM
1

Yes, and that difference would be because chairs are objects and women are not.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 04:09 PM
1

Objectifying a person means treating them as an object with no personhood that exists only to be acted upon by somebody else. The opinions/preferences of an object don't matter. Therefore, it's okay to rape women because their preferences of not being raped don't matter. It's fine to sit on a chair, it's fine to rape a woman. Same difference, they're both objects that exist only to be used. You really don't see anything wrong with this? EDIT: Although I suspect we may have differing definitions …
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 07:26 AM
6

"I love me too".
/r/askTRP04/09/14 03:27 AM
3

Objectifying women can lead to disregarding a woman's boundaries. It can lead to sexual harassment and even rape because the aggressor doesn't see the victim as anything more than an object for their pleasure. It's precisely this logic that causes outsiders to believe that because I spin plates I must therefore automatically objectify women. I have to take time out and explain that even though I sleep with multiple women, I acknowledge each of them as a person in their own right, take their pref…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 11:23 PM
3

I did read some of your arguments. The only times your comments have been downvoted to negative numbers are when your comments are insulting and condescending. This tells me it's not the content of your arguments (which are sometime quite good) that are causing the disagreements so much as your hostile attitude (calling people "morons", telling people to "fuck off", etc.)
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 11:11 PM
26

Nobody here hates women. We just think that women are fundamentally different from men, that different strategies must be used when dealing with them, and that the effective strategies are not the ones that we've been taught our whole lives. There are some people new to this subreddit who are angry at women, but that's only because they haven't yet reached the acceptance of reality that this subreddit promotes.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 10:39 PM
1

"Hi, how are you?" "I LIKE PIE!"
/r/askTRP01/09/14 07:41 AM
-1

Why the fuck would you care?
/r/askTRP28/08/14 04:34 AM
-1

Game is a skill that can be learned like any other, so I strongly disagree that "it's of no use if they have no game".
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 12:46 PM
1

if that womans title isnt wife, you are letting your oneitis takeover, which will lead to needy tendencies. Hell, even if she is your wife you still shouldn't let oneitis/needy tendencies take over. EDIT: Can somebody please explain why this comment is being downvoted?
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 12:34 PM
4

Sometimes these guys don't even know how to get one girl, so telling them to get plates is not the solution. Then that's what they need to focus on: getting many girls, not getting that one girl.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 12:33 PM
6

"Madison" wasn't even a person's name until the movie Splash popularized it. "Maximus" made the list of top 100 baby's names only after the movie Gladiator came out. My point is, it's not just Disney that does this.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 08:56 PM
1

Actually, I'm pretty sure you're thinking of the Sunk Cost Fallacy. The St. Petersburg Paradox is something unrelated.
/r/askTRP30/07/14 10:50 AM
1

If you find yourself thinking that things should in any way be fundamentally different, take a step back and remind yourself that things are the way they are, and that you can really only change yourself.
/r/askTRP28/07/14 04:14 AM
11

I'm not sure how many people are aware of this, but 50 Shades was originally a Twilight fanfiction. The author just changed the names for publication. EDIT: aaand reading through the comments it looks like several people were already aware of this. Nuts.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/14 04:15 AM
15

I'd argue that "Neutral" is actually a better response than "Win". Having to turn every shit test around is reactive to the woman's behavior. A strong alpha male doesn't even notice shit tests. "You like women with black hair better." "Cool." (changes subject)
/r/TheRedPill24/07/14 06:56 AM
1

Ready to feel old? Pokemon was released on American soil 15 years ago.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/14 06:45 AM
1

"Bottom line it for me, what does it say on your diploma?"
/r/askTRP24/07/14 04:47 AM
0

Well, no. See, It's usually not a permanent end to the relationship so much as a temporary pause. I cut all contact for a week to decide if I want to continue the relationship and allow her the space to do the same, and when we get back together I'm usually treated better because she knows I'm not afraid to walk if necessary.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 07:02 PM
1

I suspect my intent wasn't clear in that comment. The idea was that I was trying to act like somebody who disagreed with you but I couldn't get the entire way through without laughing (and thus breaking character).
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 08:02 AM
2

I'm not saying "don't communicate with your partner." That would be stupid. I'm saying "communication is treated like a panacea when the problem often lies elsewhere."
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 06:34 AM
2

I wish I had more than one upvote to give you.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 04:31 AM
0

Hey! We are more than just our primitive instincts! I am a highy evolv- *snrk* Hah! Sorry, couldn't get through that one with a straight face. :)
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 04:05 AM
1

Ah, so you're saying the context is the same, not so much the meaning. Yeah, I can see that.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 02:34 AM
0

Nah. "Man up" means the woman has control. "Communicate" means nobody has control.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 02:22 AM
1

If she brings up getting serious within the first few months, it's a shit test and must be treated as such. C+F it away, and if she pushes the issue Soft Next her. If she brings it up after several months, seriously tell her your stance on relationships and don't get sucked into any drama. She may leave, but you'd be surprised how many stay.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 01:51 AM
2

PUA Polyamory doesn't really do commitment. It does emotionally and sexually satisfying relationships with zero drama. Committing to a woman makes it harder to end the relationship if you're not getting what you want, which means she has less incentive to treat you well, sex you religiously, not cause drama, etc. I prefer to sidestep the entire problem and maintain multiple open relationships with women. Having more options makes it easier to end or pause a problematic relationship, and if you e…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 01:41 AM
2

Every rom-com ever.
/r/askTRP17/07/14 09:09 AM
17

The world is what it is. You either accept that and work with it, or you try to work against it and end up hurting yourself.
/r/askTRP15/07/14 05:23 AM
2

You're upset because you're holding onto the belief, "Women shouldn't behave this way." The problem with this belief is that the world is what it is, and you're never going to be able to change that. Holding onto this belief, then, is only going to make you frustrated and upset. Choose to accept that things are the way they are, and that women act the way they do, even if you would strongly prefer otherwise. Let go of the "should"s and "must"s and replace them with "I'd strongly prefer X, but if…
/r/askTRP13/07/14 10:34 PM
11

Contrary to popular opinion, full immersion virtual reality porn will not cause the collapse of society. Full-immersion virtual reality porn achievement points will.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 01:55 AM
2

Yes, although going by your other comments it sounds like she may have Nexted you already. If you've been seeing her for a while you may do better to give her several months to half a year to get bored of her husband before inviting her over again. If it's somebody you just started seeing, you may have to give this one up as a lost cause. By the time she gets bored of her husband, you probably won't be emotionally relevant to her enough for her to get back to you to meet up again.
/r/askTRP09/07/14 08:21 PM
1

Minimum of a week, no contact. That means no texting, no calling, no answering her calls, no facebook chats, and no responding to any of her attempts to contact you for any reason until the week is up.
/r/askTRP09/07/14 07:00 AM
1

Yes. Look, her relationship status has nothing to do with you. All that matters is how she treats you. Sex is an integral part of any relationship, so if she stops having sex with you, no matter her reason, she's crossed a line and you need to respond appropriately. Don't get upset, don't hang around, just Soft Next her and GFTOW.
/r/askTRP09/07/14 03:23 AM
1

If I ever wanted kids I'd treat the situation as if I'd already divorced the mother: have her sign off on a parenting plan, live in separate locations, have joint custody of the child(ren), and have sex with other women on the side. A family breaking apart can be traumatic for the child. A family that was always like that would be considerably less upsetting.
/r/askTRP08/07/14 12:56 AM
0

I didn't realize you could own human beings. I'm pretty sure that's illegal.
/r/askTRP08/07/14 12:51 AM
2

Marriage may have been the best option a few generations ago when the odds were better, but modern marriage has a 50% failure rate, and every single one of those men went into the marriage believing they could make it work.
/r/askTRP08/07/14 12:46 AM
2

The easiest way to do this is to tack on a "favor" multiplier to your expenses. "Sure I'll bust my ass to get this done for you, but it'll cost you $X,000 more than we agreed on." In the case of the example with the supplier issues, if the person was set on becoming the client's major supplier he should have insisted on getting the contract before fixing the client's problem, possibly on the true grounds that it just wouldn't be worth the effort if he wasn't going to be the client's major suppli…
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 08:37 PM
2

I have. It contains effective strategies to get the best possible outcome for you when negotiating, but: it operates from a win/lose mindset where the other person is your opponent, some of the tactics border on unethical, and many of them operate from bad faith. Having said that, it's still a good book to read. I'd recommend supplementing it with "Getting to Yes: How to Negotiate Agreement Without Giving In", which works from a cooperation-based win/win mindset. Between the two of them you shou…
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 08:25 PM
7

Soft Next her for at least a week and Go Fuck Ten Other Women (GFTOW).
/r/askTRP07/07/14 09:13 AM
15

Here’s something you can expect when dealing with another person: Any concession you make to him or her will quickly lose its value. The value of any material object you buy may go up in value over the years, but the value of services always appears to decline rapidly after you have performed those services. Power Negotiators know that, any time you make a concession to the other side in a negotiation, you should ask for a reciprocal concession right away. The favor you did the other side loses …
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 08:54 AM
1

Work to make yourself (and keep yourself) an alpha male and you won't have to worry about her "settling" for you.
/r/askTRP07/07/14 12:32 AM
2

Do you have a source for the 7% number?
/r/askTRP07/07/14 12:27 AM
21

I usually A) keep it cheap, and B) have her pay for me. It's pimp game: increasing her perception of my value by making her do things for me.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 11:41 PM
8

Your problem is that you're getting one-itis for your plate. Standard advice applies: Next the plate (go at least a week without communicating with her at all), and go out and find several other women to sleep with. You're getting hooked because you don't have an abundance mentality. Go Fuck Ten Other Women, and I guarantee you won't be as concerned about the actions of your current plate. Also, I'd strongly recommend you open your marriage instead of going behind your wife's back, but that's mo…
/r/askTRP06/07/14 06:48 AM
1

This.
/r/askTRP06/07/14 02:53 AM
1

"I don't know who this woman is, but she sounds like a classy man."
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 02:12 AM
0

My God, it's like the blind leading the blind around here.
/r/askTRP05/07/14 02:26 AM
-5

Q: What does a Liberal Arts Major say at their job? A: "Would you like fries with that?"
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 09:22 PM
0

Are you talking about women who bring up their BF in casual conversation ("oh that's funny, my BF said the same thing," "I spent some time with my BF last weekend"), or women who flat-out tell you "I have a BF"? I'm only talking about the second situation, since that's what OP asked about.
/r/askTRP04/07/14 08:07 PM
2

If she tells you she has a boyfriend, it's one of two things. Either she's interested in sex with you and is telling you so you aren't surprised that she has a BF (possible but rare), or you expressed too much interest and she's not attracted to you, and this is her way of telling you that. In the "not attracted" situation I'd cut my losses and move on, and in the "attracted" situation any clever response is really unnecessary.
/r/askTRP03/07/14 06:32 PM
0

If you look up Sexism in the dictionary, you will find: noun 1. attitudes or behavior based on traditional stereotypes of sexual roles. 2. discrimination or devaluation based on a person's sex, as in restricted job opportunities; especially, such discrimination directed against women. What you will not find is: 3. Noticing one gender more often than you notice the other. And, indeed, in the comments section he notes that he is "taking an expansive view of what sexism is here". It's a shame, too.…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 08:08 AM
1

transcript of the video
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 08:03 AM
40

I love how she disputes the claim by bringing up a completely unrelated "fact". "No, no, you've got it all wrong! Alpha fuck, beta bucks is completely incorrect because.... I appreciate my husband because we're partners!"
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 10:01 AM
-2

If you don't want to dance, just don't dance. While she's dancing, you can spend your time socializing with others and flirting with other women. This is attractive to her. It feels like you have to make all the moves that match her expectations in order to proceed to greater intimacy.. Are you saying you think you need to dance in order to sleep with her? Think about what you're saying. You should never follow her lead unless it's something you wanted to do anyways, because there's no guarantee…
/r/askTRP02/07/14 04:46 AM
0

The strategies for short-term flings and long-term relationships are very different Speak for yourself. :P
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 05:11 AM
-5

An old PUA post on starting conversations ("opening"): “Did you know the average male thinks about sex 137 times a day?” “Who farted?” “Bonjour.” “Hi.” “I’m a banana.” “Hey look at that!” Point randomly at a spot on the wall. “Would you quit staring at me, I’m not going to make out with you.” “I’m wearing tighty whities, what do you think of that?” “Should a guy kiss his girl at the beginning or end of the first date?” “This place is full of weirdo’s.” Good for hipster clubs. “Are you in Metalli…
/r/askTRP27/06/14 09:56 PM
0

Damn, you beat me to it.
/r/askTRP25/06/14 12:46 AM
0

Do the work, improve yourself, develop your social and seductive skills, work out, and work to accomplish whatever personal goals you have. Then you can "just be yourself".
/r/askTRP25/06/14 12:43 AM
3

Or she just doesn't get much (or any) pleasure from sex. There are women like that. Regardless, it's not a reason to put up with it. That way lies /r/deadbedrooms.
/r/askTRP19/06/14 01:44 AM
8

This feels like a troll post.
/r/askTRP17/06/14 09:46 AM
3

I don't use it because I don't want to attract girls who aren't 'her'. You want to get an abundance mentality? Stop doing this ^^^^. Meet other women. Approach other women. Sleep with other women, and for the love of God stop comparing them to her. There are plenty of attractive women who actually want what you have to offer (unlike her), but you'll never meet them until you stop making excuses, get off your ass and make the effort. There are plenty of places to meet women outside of clubs. Prac…
/r/askTRP10/06/14 08:51 AM
9

I'd just like to point out that you can be a PUA and have emotional connections with the women you sleep with. The trick is that you have to let her come to you. If you try forcing an emotional connection with somebody who isn't interested in one, you wind up being Ted Mosby from How I Met Your Mother: needy and unattractive.
/r/askTRP10/06/14 08:47 AM
24

So STOP DOING THAT!
/r/askTRP09/06/14 10:51 PM
3

Go Fuck Ten Other Women (GFTOW). By the time you accomplish this, you will see that this one chick isn't that big a deal. If you can't or won't sleep with other women, that's what you need to focus on fixing.
/r/askTRP09/06/14 09:46 AM
6

What do you guys look for in a woman? My penis.
/r/askTRP08/06/14 06:49 AM
2

I would measure levels of masculine dominance within a male/female relationship (e.g. How often does the man make decisions vs the woman?) and see how well that correlated with the frequency and quality of sex in that relationship. I would predict a strong positive correlation between the two, though there could be confounding variable that would account for that correlation. For example, a highly sexual woman might be drawn to more dominant men. If I found that there was a negative correlation …
/r/askTRP07/06/14 07:14 AM
3

Upvoted for the scientific method. Even if it completely disproves everything I believe, this is how we learn. EDIT: Fuck, I just clicked your links. Upvote withdrawn.
/r/askTRP07/06/14 06:59 AM
2

I laughed viciously. :)
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 06:56 AM
1

After I broke up with my ex of several years I would occasionally check out her Facebook page. Every single time I saw her face it felt like somebody punched me in the gut, and it never helped me move on. The more space OP can put between himself and his ex, the better.
/r/askTRP06/06/14 05:17 AM
0

Your own health of mind is paramount, and if you see her again all the old feelings will come rushing back to you and it will be that much harder to get over her. Your best bet is to find an alternative to that club. Go to a different club or try your hand at day game for a while.
/r/askTRP06/06/14 05:13 AM
1

I do intend on having kids someday, but my plan was for each of us to have our own houses so that we can be together out of desire and not out of obligation. That's actually a pretty good idea. Living separately makes it possible to Soft Next a woman if the situation demands it, which is an incredibly powerful tool that I wish every man had in his relationships.
/r/askTRP05/06/14 08:56 PM
2

"What is he talking about? 900 isn't an even n- ... oh, fuck me."
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 07:32 AM
0

"And snuggles and warm feelings, yes." If I didn't use women for either of those, my response would just be "yup." Either way, if she kept on the subject I'd ask her "would you like to leave?" and if she didn't drop the issue after that warning I'd kick her out. Nexting works like you wouldn't believe. Seriously. Next time a woman gives you shit, Soft Next her.
/r/askTRP03/06/14 08:40 PM
3

Girlfriend's ex-boyfriend treated her like shit for over 4 years with constant on an off dating. He was such a dick that she almost killed herself over him. So she's a typical Freak (using the Freak/Ho/Good Girl typology). She just wants strong emotions in her relationship, regardless of if they're good or bad, and will cause drama herself if she starts getting bored. Fast forward to a month or two ago and I started dating her a bit after they broke up. She got in contact with her ex again a bit…
/r/askTRP31/05/14 03:58 AM
6

If her level of intoxication is higher than yours, you're generally on the hook for any rape charges if she feels bad about it afterwards. Never send any texts or leave any messages that paint you as being more coherent than her. If she asks, you don't remember that night but you wouldn't be surprised if you slept with her.
/r/askTRP30/05/14 07:36 AM
2

Why on earth would you care about being a gentleman?
/r/askTRP26/05/14 07:22 AM
1

I should probably clarify: the 10 hours/3 dates is maximum allowed time before sex. If she takes longer than that to put out she's not worth the effort. You definitely want to ramp up the sexual vibe earlier than this.
/r/askTRP23/05/14 11:03 PM
3

Approach other women, ones that you don't work with. Work on sexually escalating in a relatively short amount of time (10 hours maximum elapsed time or 3 dates, whichever comes first). Specifically, work on: * Sensual Eye Contact * Silence and Pauses * Sexual tone of voice * Physical proximity * Intimate Touch * Your sexual state (imagine how you interacted with your last lover in the bedroom before sex, then project that emotional state outwards towards her) The more women you escalate to sex w…
/r/askTRP23/05/14 09:00 AM
1

Good Lord, how did she get them to run a full-page online dating advertisement for her? I haven't even gotten to the text yet. Just look at the size of those photos.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 06:39 AM
1

Yup. That's why I only do open relationships now. She can't cheat if we aren't monogamous. *shrug*
/r/askTRP23/05/14 06:31 AM
4

And this is precisely why I practice PUA Polyamory. She loses interest and sexual attraction when she knows she has a guy, so just never let her have you.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 08:44 PM
1

Just slow shit, like maybe stop spinning side plates, That would be a phenomenally bad idea. Cutting off your other sexual options makes you far more likely to become needy and, subsequently, unattractive to her.
/r/askTRP15/05/14 01:15 PM
7

It's not about teaching her a lesson, it's about protecting yourself.
/r/askTRP15/05/14 06:26 AM
1

How long have you been sleeping with her? If it's only been a few months it's way too early to consider settling down with her.
/r/askTRP15/05/14 05:19 AM
9

If it's happening to somebody else, I just let them be. It's not my problem, and I doubt either of them would appreciate me butting in. If a woman was dumb enough to physically assault me, I would end the relationship then and there. I have very few permanent deal-breakers, but a woman physically assaulting me is one of them.
/r/askTRP15/05/14 05:14 AM
1

Hah! No. I have open relationships with women. Quite frankly, there's no point for me to settle down. The odds of a successful monogamous relationship aren't great and the costs of a failed relationship are too high.
/r/askTRP15/05/14 04:14 AM
2

Yep, all depends on what you want. If you want to just game easy targets (women who don't really "get" that you're gaming them) then what you end up with is a women who is susceptible to being gamed by any wannabe PUA and probably will jump ship to the next "alpha" at a moments notice. That's not really how that works. Attraction is maintained by a number of different things, one of which is how non-needy you are. The more you chase after her, the less attracted to you she is. The less you need …
/r/TheRedPill14/05/14 09:50 AM
-3

but I'd be willing to bang a slut who's a 6/10 on a drunk night any day of the week. Your Madonna/Whore complex is showing. You might want to do something about that.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/14 08:20 AM
-2

I'd just like to point out that you can have kids and still not be monogamous. Swingers, for example, do it all the time. EDIT: http://www.blackdragonblog.com/2012/09/09/but-how-would-an-open-marriage-oltr-actually-work/
/r/TheRedPill14/05/14 08:17 AM
8

I used to be "Live and let live" and encourage women to have fun while they're young, but I'm not so sure anymore... The TRP logic goes something like this: a woman with a promiscuous past is more likely to cheat in the future and/or lose interest in the man. If you want to settle down with a woman, your best odds are with one without a promiscuous past. Personally I think it makes more sense to just have open relationships with lots of sex, emotional fulfillment, and zero drama, but a lot of gu…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/14 07:46 AM
8

I felt bad for the guy at the beginning. Tyler was kind of being a dick to him and he just sat there and took it.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/14 07:38 AM
12

I doubt he's the real deal. TD has been a PUA since near the beginning of the movement, and one of the major tenets of PUA is not to judge a woman negatively for being sexually promiscuous. The TD on TRP, however, shows some very classic slut-shaming behavior.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/14 07:36 AM
1

Weeellll... on one hand, I actually enjoy hearing about a woman's sexual history. Hearing about that guy she fucked in the bathroom last week? So fucking hot. On the other hand, god damn, woman. Shower between guys. Sweaty buildup from sex with other people is just disgusting.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/14 12:55 AM
1

I'm not trying to change your mind, I'm trying to understand how you view these things. It might come off as attacking. That's not my goal. I've responded to your comments because of the disclaimer at the end each time. But honestly, it really does seem like you're attacking me, telling me how I'm wrong, and have no interest in what I have to say other than to disagree with it. Whether or not that's the case, that's how it comes off. I mean, you flat-out disagree with my personal experience, as …
/r/askTRP12/05/14 03:06 AM
3

Does she have sex with you? If yes, don't worry about what she says. If no, she's not worth the effort. Worrying about "is this one person into me?" is a waste of effort. Get more plates so that it doesn't matter if she's into you or not.
/r/askTRP12/05/14 01:23 AM
1

There's no reason you can't have deeper connections with the women you're sleeping with, so long as you do it properly.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 09:59 PM
6

I've done nothing but spin plates for the last year, and I haven't been bitter or resentful at all. I accept women for who and what they are, and structure the relationships so that I don't get hurt or frustrated by expectations that they can't or won't meet. I gotta tell you, it's worked pretty well for me.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 11:30 AM
2

What is so hard about telling a woman she has done something you don't like? 1) Women aren't stupid. If she does something I don't like and I end the interaction, she's going to be able to put two and two together unless she's a complete moron. 2) Discussing her behavior causes drama. When drama occurs, real change is unlikely. Drama makes it harder to walk away when the situation requires it. So I don't discuss it. Wouldn't you want a partner who told you what was wrong, instead of resorting to…
/r/askTRP10/05/14 03:29 AM
1

If you feel comfortable, please give me more details. Yeah, absolutely. First, yes. There has really been almost zero drama. That has legitimately been my experience when doing this. This is because a Soft Next occurs before drama has a chance to start. It nips it in the bud, so to speak. I don't argue, I don't debate, I just end the interaction and leave. If she has some problem with how I act or what I do and puts me on the defensive about it, that's grounds for an immediate Soft Next. No dram…
/r/askTRP09/05/14 07:16 AM
2

I currently have one lover and one friend-with-benefits. Both of them have been with me for over 8 months, and there has been absolutely zero drama. Before that I was with my girlfriend of 3.5 years, and the only drama occurred near the end of the relationship when we had already lost the spark of attraction for each other. So when you say "It can't possibly work"... sorry, but I know from personal experience that it can and does.
/r/askTRP08/05/14 05:43 AM
-1

So... just spin plates for the rest of your life?
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 09:41 AM
9

Still no.
/r/TheRedPill07/05/14 09:37 AM
1

It doesn't matter how she feels about it. All that matters is that you act in your own best interests, because I guarantee you she will act to take care of her own interests. Sacrificing your psychological well-being for her temporary happiness would be beta as hell.
/r/askTRP07/05/14 04:48 AM
2

It takes time to get over her, and every time you communicate with her all your progress gets lost and you have to start all over. Move on. Cut all contact with her. If necessary, tell her to stop contacting you and don't give her a reason why. (Justifying your decision to her will suck you back into communication with her, which is the opposite of what you need to do here.)
/r/askTRP06/05/14 09:23 AM
1

See, you're still trying to find the "safe" answer, the "correct" answer. Presumably, the safe answer is one that won't cause her to get upset with you. This is wrong thinking. Be bold. If she asks a dangerous question, don't be afraid to give the "wrong" answer. but she took it as I was about to try and fuck her which was usually a week long argument... Ah, that would explain it. See, I don't do "week-long arguments". If an argument starts, I soft next her. It give me the best of both worlds: I…
/r/askTRP06/05/14 05:49 AM
-1

And this is why you should never move in with a woman. It increases the level of drama that occurs and makes it impossible to permanently remove yourself from the situation (i.e. a Soft Next) without a lot of effort and/or frustration (moving out or kicking her out).
/r/askTRP06/05/14 04:37 AM
1

Brilliant analogy.
/r/askTRP06/05/14 04:31 AM
0

Limit the time you spend with her to once a week at most. Sleep with other women, and always have other sexual options. Never promise her monogamy. If you have already promised her monogamy, take a break from the relationship for at least a month to get your frame back. When you're not with her, focus on accomplishing your goals. Only communicate with her to schedule meetings, and keep those voice/text conversations short.
/r/askTRP06/05/14 04:27 AM
3

Old PUA advice: GFTOW (Go Fuck Ten Other Women). If you don't have the skills to do so, that's what you need to focus on.
/r/askTRP06/05/14 04:21 AM
1

Why would you want to find a safe answer? Be a playful dick and don't let her browbeat you into being a boring beta.
/r/askTRP06/05/14 04:19 AM
1

I should clarify: I'm talking about a Soft Next here, which is complete non-communication for a minimum of a week. A Hard Next, which is what you probably thought I meant, is permanent and is only necessary in situations where she threatens my health, wealth, safety, or general well-being. Two examples of Hard Next-worthy offense would be if she assaulted me or if she stole from me. For the most part I don't need to resort to something so permanent. And let me tell you, Soft Nexts work. Women ha…
/r/askTRP05/05/14 10:07 AM
1

Old PUA advice: Go Fuck Ten Other Women (GFTOW).
/r/askTRP05/05/14 06:47 AM
2

If you answer "yes", then she gets mad. A woman who gets upset at you or puts you on the defensive for any reason is grounds for an immediate Next, followed by GFTOW (Go Fuck Ten Other Women). Of course, I aim for a zero-drama lifestyle, so I have to come down hard on situations like that. It actually works pretty well, but not everybody is willing to follow that path. If she has an extra fifty to seventy five pounds, you telling her that she is fat isn't anything she doesn't already know, If sh…
/r/askTRP05/05/14 04:44 AM
5

Watch how I disarm her shit test! "Do I look fat?" "Yes." Admittedly, it's in the same way a stick disarms a bear trap...
/r/askTRP05/05/14 02:33 AM
1

Her sexual history is only relevant because it affects her odds of getting involved with somebody else while in the relationship with you. Never settle down or get monogamous. That way it doesn't matter if she sees other people or not. Boom, problem solved.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/14 12:37 AM
-1

I'm actually not sure what stance to take on ltr. Same stance, really. Or, wait, did you mean a monogamous LTR? Sorry bud, can't help you there. =/
/r/TheRedPill04/05/14 12:30 AM
2

No, I mean your entire chain of comments has had nothing to do with my original comment about wearing funny hats and eyeliner. You just kept going on about completely unrelated topics.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 08:26 PM
2

Seriously, what the fuck?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 07:10 PM
3

... what the fuck?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 09:30 AM
3

Being tall, sexually dimorphic, and muscular is an absolute must in a club if you expect to pull at a reasonable average That sounds like too much work. What if I just wore an outrageous hat and eyeliner instead?
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 08:55 AM
2

And then there's the Family Feud SNES playthrough, which is quite frankly hilarious.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 08:21 AM
2

The second one's an animated gif. Hilarious. :D
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 08:16 AM
4

"Dude, she's got... 'the angles'."
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 08:08 AM
16

Rofl. zyxz [Hambeast] January 7, 2009 This thread furthers my belief that everyone on OKcupid (and the internet in general) and brainwashed, media obsessed morons. There's nothing more I can say. Hamden1 January 7, 2009 But. You. Made. The. Thread.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 07:54 AM
4

The type of anti-harassment policy he'd like to see is one where any woman can make up any complaint about any man and have that man harassed or expelled by con staff on her word alone. Do you have a source for that claim? It's disturbing if it's true, but just saying that's the case doesn't necessarily mean it is.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 10:34 PM
2

Married Man Sex Life Primer.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 10:03 PM
1

As for the affair the skank had, she needs to be nexted. Too bad no fault divorce has a penalty of half of your shit no matter what she does. And that's precisely why I refuse to settle down.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 10:03 PM
2

Ignore it and change the subject to something you'd enjoy talking about. "You're a lucky guy." "Cool."
/r/askTRP29/04/14 09:36 PM
3

Oh good, I thought it was just me.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 07:38 AM
4

Answer honestly, hold frame, Next her if she gets out of line, and get other women regardless.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 06:19 AM
3

Yyyyup. It's the same internal mechanism that causes shit tests ("Why won't you spend more time with me?!"), but applied to a television show instead of a person.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 08:25 AM
7

Or you could just Soft Next her and not have to worry about it. That's what I'd do.
/r/askTRP21/04/14 12:33 AM
1

Are you sexually escalating? Is there a sexual vibe? How often have you venue changed with a woman? How often have you venue changed to your place?
/r/seduction20/04/14 07:11 AM
4

Get comfortable with the following, in order: Starting conversations with attractive female strangers. Socializing with them. Physically touching them. Leading them from one location to another (e.g. to a nearby coffee shop to talk some more), and then later to your house. Building a sexual vibe with them. Having sex with them. Have fun, be relaxed, pay attention to the feedback you get, and remember that whether you succeed or not isn't that big of a deal. Even if one woman doesn't go for it, t…
/r/askTRP20/04/14 05:49 AM
1

Some women shit test because they need to feel strong emotions to feel validated within a relationship. These women will continue to shit test even within the relationship. Other women don't shit test. They just want to settle down with a man they're attracted to. Women like this don't shit test you in a relationship because they don't need to. Once you settle down with her, she sees you as a beta male provider. This means that over time she'll become less likely to do nice things for you, less …
/r/askTRP20/04/14 05:26 AM
3

Don't forget all the rich male celebrities that come down with "sexual addiction". I loved the South Park episode about that, BTW.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 04:49 AM
1

I can see both points of view, but so long as you're happy with how you're living your life and it isn't hurting yourself or anybody else, your therapist can go suck a donkey dick.
/r/askTRP12/04/14 09:47 AM
3

...right down to the hormone supplements. Good catch. I'd like to point out that at the end of "John Tucker Must Die" the main character ended the relationships with the mono-girlfriends he was cheating on and decided to try open relationships instead.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 04:44 AM
3

It's a comedy. They tend to play situations for laughs that would be horrifying in real life. Nothing too surprising or shocking there.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 04:43 AM
1

THAT'S THE JOKE!
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 04:15 AM
1

"Yeah, I didn't ask for your opinion." If she's being a jerk to you, there's no reason to spare her feelings.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 04:14 AM
1

"Can you try to look...blockier?"
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 04:12 AM
1

Remember: "Just because you are unique does not mean you are useful."
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 04:10 AM
3

HuuuUUUUuugh.
/r/TheRedPill11/04/14 03:57 AM
10

You're already married to her. If you're not already "that honest" with her, you never will be. No, you're just afraid of her not liking your answer. Don't hold back just because you're afraid of her response. The more you hold back, the worse your frame is, and the less attraction she will have towards you. You've never wondered why the sex has declined over time?
/r/askTRP09/04/14 04:47 AM
3

Educate her slowly and reassure her of your commitment to her. Reassurance won't change her fears, and if she ever truly believes she couldn't do anything to lose you, she will stop working to please you.
/r/askTRP09/04/14 04:46 AM
1

Dropping plates is something you do when you have too many spinning, which is not your situation. I disagree with this. If you only have the one relationship it's far too easy to latch onto her and come up with justifications for keeping her around even when she needs to be dropped. I currently have a lover and a friend with benefits. I've been seeing them both for about 8 months, and I would drop both of them if it ever became necessary. In any event, getting other plates should be the OP's fir…
/r/askTRP04/04/14 03:04 AM
11

"So I've been chatting with this 13 year old girl online. Shes funny, flirty and sexy. Now she tells me shes an undercover cop. How fucking cool is that for someone her age?!"
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 02:39 AM
1

Instead of trying to find a vanishingly rare type of person to settle down with, with all the risks that requires (divorce, cheating, dead bedrooms, etc.) wouldn't it make more sense to build a way of life that doesn't require a unicorn for you to be happy? For me that's PUA Polyamory, but I'm sure there are other solutions out there.
/r/askTRP02/04/14 05:20 AM
9

I can't wait for Vasalgel.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 04:10 AM
2

She points out (and gets into a fight over) his weight gain, then claims that his weight gain doesn't bother her.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 04:08 AM
3

That means it's not about the nail.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 04:04 AM
1

There are two possibilities here. The first is that she isn't attracted to you and is spinning you a story to spare your feelings. The other is that she really does have low self-esteem, and is warning you that this is the case. Women who have low self-esteem don't believe they deserve good things. They will sabotage their own relationships and are often attracted to men who treat them poorly. It's possible to have a relationship with one if you consistently treat her poorly, but doing so causes…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 08:04 AM
1

"On second thought..." "I love you I love you I love you."
/r/TheRedPill27/03/14 02:56 AM
1

Fuck, for a second I thought this was posted in /r/shittyadvice.
/r/askTRP27/03/14 02:45 AM
0

However, consent should obviously be present here. We are talking about a beautiful, mutual dom/sub relationship, not an abusive, power-broken relationship. Oh yeah, that's fine. I misunderstood what you meant by this. If your first impulse is to go out and fuck as many women as possible in order to maintain frame and win her back, god bless you. LOL. Okay yeah, I agree with this too. If you're fucking other women anyways, why bother hanging on to the one who wants strange dick? Or at the very l…
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 05:31 AM
-1

If the man treats the woman more like his own property than a free, open soul, it can definitely work. You're... you're kidding, right? I can't think of a better way to cause drama than doing that. If the woman is the one suggesting an open relationship, you might aswell just dump her. OR you could develop the skills necessary to sleep with multiple other women, keeping her attracted to you as an alpha male. Betaization only occurs when the man agrees to open the relationship without putting in …
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 01:09 AM
1

In addition, there is a difference between polygamy and swinging. Yes, but IllimitableMan was saying that any dick breaks the pair bond. Swinging is an example that disproves this.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 12:28 AM
1

giving them access to strange dick breaks the pair bond. You're confusing cause and effect. If a woman is looking for sex elsewhere, it's because she's already checked out of the relationship.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 12:26 AM
1

What you call pair bonding the poly community calls New Relationship Energy. It's an intense feeling of love in a new relationship that blots out all other rational thought in regards to your significant other. It usually lasts 6-18 months.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 12:21 AM
7

Ah, I just saw your other comment explaining that she's asexual. This makes a little more sense now.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 12:02 AM
1

Well, there's also PUA polyamory. It emphasizes developing the skills to quickly attract and sleep with women before getting into any relationships.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/14 11:56 PM
1

unless you, the man, are some movie star. Or a pickup artist. B-)
/r/TheRedPill24/03/14 11:52 PM
4

I am allowed to fuck other women, but there is no way I would allow my wife to have other men. Out of curiosity, has this ever caused drama in the relationship? If so, how much drama has it caused and how often has it been brought up? Also, how often do you sleep with other women?
/r/TheRedPill24/03/14 11:51 PM
10

Except, there are plenty of swingers that have successful married relationships. According to 2005 estimates by the Kinsey Institute and others, swingers account for two to four percent of married couples with numbers in excess of 4 million people in North America. As of 2011, some experts believe that there are as many as 15 million Americans swinging on a regular basis. According to economic studies on swinging, the search for ever new sexual experiences delays long-period hedonic adaptation a…
/r/TheRedPill24/03/14 11:48 PM
8

As a side-note, a woman complaining about my behavior is grounds for a Soft Next (calmly leave immediately, followed by at least a week of no-contact). It's surprisingly effective at teaching her not to give me shit.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/14 11:26 PM
1

As I understand it, there's more than one version of MGTOW. I strongly disagree with the strongest form of MGTOW, which is men who completely cut off all relationships with women. I feel this is throwing the baby out with the bath water. But yes, my behavior aligns with one of the softer versions of MGTOW: relationships with women but no marriage or commitment.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 08:47 PM
2

Bingo.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 08:44 PM
1

Huh. I can see that working. I suppose it's just a matter of personal style.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 07:34 AM
2

Or you could... just not spend money on her. EDIT: What? It's a valid solution.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 06:11 AM
4

This subreddit I believe has become borderline sexist. What do you mean, "borderline"? Dictionary.reference.com lists two definitions of sexism: attitudes or behavior based on traditional stereotypes of sexual roles. discrimination or devaluation based on a person's sex, as in restricted job opportunities; especially, such discrimination directed against women. While I don't think very many people here advocate the second one, I know that a lot of men here would love to see a return to "traditio…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 05:58 AM
2

At what point in the interaction would you bring it up if she didn't? Before you headed to the restaurant? Once you're at the restaurant? While ordering? Once the food has been prepared? Also, what does "ratcheting it up" look like to you? Can you give a hypothetical dialogue example?
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 04:37 AM
7

I get everything I could want (sex, snuggles, love) from women without settling down with any of them. I don't need or want to settle down, and I believe that long-term monogamy is a fool's wager for men (drama, nagging, 50% divorce rate).
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 04:31 AM
4

And if she never volunteered?
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 03:15 AM
3

Why not be that blunt? If she's offended by the thought of paying for her own meal on a first date, she's not the sort of woman I would want to waste effort on anyways.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 02:36 AM
2

And then such PUAs settle down with one woman, which (in the long run) actually creates more pain and drama. Go figure.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 02:31 AM
1

Cheating is breaking the rules established within the relationship. For most relationships, sleeping with another person is cheating. If she was sincere in her offer to open the relationship, would you take her up on it?
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 01:48 AM
2

Have you been communicating with your wife? Because it sounds like you are not. In situations like this, "communication" just leads to shit-storms, drama, arguments and insults.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 01:45 AM
55

I figure she might've been shy, the first thing she said is that she was hungry and asked me if I didn't mind going to a restaurant. "Sure, but we'll each be paying for ourselves. Is that okay with you?" "No!" "Okay. Goodbye, then." -leaves-
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 01:17 AM
1

and most men are terrified of it. Most men are not terrified of marriage. ...but they should be.
/r/askTRP21/03/14 12:28 AM
1

Some guys want kids. Many guys enjoys the sensation of cumming in a woman. I was talking about the first group, though I will admit that many from the second group wind up having children whether or not they wanted to.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 08:02 PM
3

Because we are the product of thousands of generations of people who had kids, and mother nature has come up with subtle but powerful incentives to get people to reproduce. No idea what they are, specifically. For that you'd have to ask an evolutionary psychologist.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 10:44 AM
2

Well, we've got Princess Peach from the Mario series and Princess Zelda from the titular Zelda series. Kingdom Hearts has Kairi and Naminé, and the long-spanning Final Fantasy series has quite a few feminine characters (some of whom are even female!) And all of these are japanese examples. Hmm. To be fair, though, most of the women I listed are portrayed as plot devices designed to motivate the male lead (usually through their capture). I'm very much okay with female characters who are every bit…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 10:33 AM
1

This post has the same rating as my most recent attempt to discuss non-monogamy here. There's just something not right about that.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 10:01 AM
1

Accurate, yet unhelpful.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 09:42 AM
1

There's two separate concepts here. The first is the level of investment. The second is the presence or absence of sexual monogamy. One has nothing to do with the other. You can have any combination of investment and [non-] monogamy. If you're saying that being married with children generally means you have a higher level of investment in the relationship than just spinning plates does, I agree. If you're saying that being married with children has to mean that you cannot see other women, I stro…
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 11:32 PM
1

while you are stuck with her. Why on earth would you be stuck with her? The whole point of open relationships is that both sides are free to see whoever they want. If you spin plates you already practice non-monogamy. ++ 120 lab fees. The point is that you don't have to blindly assume that the child is yours. Modern medical technology makes it possible to tell whether or not the child is yours before investing large amounts of time and effort and money into raising it.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 10:50 PM
1

"I felt a lot of responsibility for it ending, but then I found out the real truth, which I can’t necessarily disclose because I keep it locked in my safe for a rainy day. I let go and I was like: This isn’t because of me; this is beyond me. So I have moved on from that.” So... he was cheating on her? That's what she seems to be implying, at any rate.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 09:19 PM
2

There are several trains of thought on this. TRP: "look for a woman with certain qualities (low partner count, good family relationship, etc.) and practice dread game to keep her attracted to you." PUA Polyamory: "Never promise monogamy, and never expect it from her. Always have other options, even if you're married to a woman." MGTOW: "You don't need women in your life."
/r/askTRP18/03/14 05:51 AM
1

What are some examples that the author gives of "vulnerability"?
/r/askTRP18/03/14 05:03 AM
1

Even in an LTR you still want to maintain as strong a non-provider frame as possible. It's harder but not impossible.
/r/askTRP17/03/14 02:17 PM
1

You seem to think that her seeing you as a provider is somehow a good thing. Being a provider is diametrically opposed to being a sexually attractive man. The more of a provider you are, the less sexually attractive you are to her, the less likely that she'll do what you want her to, and the more likely that she'll cause you drama.
/r/askTRP16/03/14 08:08 AM
1

It was a general question because I keep getting told by girls their intentions and I'm not open with my intentions I guess. Just because a girl shares her intentions doesn't mean you have to reciprocate. Keep things ambiguous. I dont want to use asktrp to be my coach for this ONE girl, I use it for general personality changes etc. Good, good. I want to spin plates but every single girl I come accross I could see myself enjoying a lot of time with. I'm biased, but I'd recommend PUA Polyamory. It…
/r/askTRP16/03/14 02:26 AM
1

Wait, is this a specific conversation you're looking for advice about? The way you phrased the original post made it sound like you were looking for general advice. In the future please include the context so our advice can be more helpful to you. How long have you known this person? What level of interactions have you had in the past? How do you know each other? You say you haven't hung out before. Does this mean this is an online interaction? What outcome do you want? What offer did you make h…
/r/askTRP16/03/14 02:11 AM
1

I share a house with 3 other guys. They don't cockblock me and I'm sure one of them gets annoyed hearing the women's sex noises, but it's never been an issue for me. Keep in mind that I actively screen out the women looking for financial support from me. My idea of going to a restaurant is McDonald's, and the only time I go with a woman to a non-fast food restaurant is when she offers beforehand to cover the bill. If a woman likes me because I spend money on her, then as soon as I lose my job or…
/r/askTRP16/03/14 01:55 AM
3

You shouldn't be having a conversation about the relationship with her. It just causes drama and doesn't advance your goals at all. The single best way to prevent her from getting attached and/or expecting commitment from you is to sharply limit the amount of time you spend with her to no more than once a week. Additionally, every time you see her she should be having great sex with you. Additionally, you should do your best to present yourself first and foremost as a sexual threat, a man-whore,…
/r/askTRP16/03/14 01:48 AM
1

Almost. There's also room for emotional connection and intimacy if that's what you want (snuggles are goddamn awesome), and when you do it properly there's virtually zero drama. The downsides are that yes, you have to be okay with her sleeping with whoever she wants and you have to keep spinning plates of your own.
/r/askTRP12/03/14 01:15 PM
2

Personally I practice PUA Polyamory. It's like traditional polyamory (if you'll forgive the oxymoron), but it doesn't require any commitment, it doesn't require much communication, and it creates emotionally rewarding, zero-drama open relationships. So, not much like traditional polyamory now that I think about it.
/r/askTRP12/03/14 12:34 PM
6

"No, that is not okay. If you have a problem with my behavior use your words, but threatening violence/biting me/hitting me like that is not acceptable." If they try justifying themselves instead of accepting responsibility for their actions, just walk away. You don't need that in your life.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/14 09:21 AM
1

Where would have been a more appropriate place to post it?
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 04:57 AM
12

"You get used to it. I...I don't even see the code. All I see is blonde, brunette, red-head."
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 01:03 AM
1

If I can't have the woman I want then why would I believe that I can comfort myself with someone else? No, you already have the woman you (presumably) want: your wife. But if she's only fulfilling, say, 75% of your desires, why not get another woman on the side to handle the remaining 25%? I don't feel that sex is important enough to feel like the bad guy in a situation like this. You have a dead bedroom? Rough. Personally I feel a lack of sex would be enough to end the relationship over, but I …
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 10:02 PM
1

Yes, but why not?
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 09:33 PM
1

As a PUA, let me just say: "Well, duh." Seriously. Two of the first things I learned were A) Don't judge her for being sexually active, and B) be outstanding in bed. It's nice to get independent confirmation, though.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 09:49 AM
1

I know I'll probably get downvoted for this, but I'm curious: if she isn't giving you 100% of what you want from a relationship, why don't you get somebody else on the side to fill in the missing gaps?
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 09:39 AM
1

Definitely.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 09:14 AM
1

I'm reminded of this comic.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 09:13 AM
9

I know what you mean. I think mine was a part-time environmentalist, because she kept saying something about a green card.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 09:11 AM
1

First, you just responded to a 2-month old message. Don't do that. Second, RJ may predate MM but Mystery was the first person to take a PUA method and display and teach it in-field. Third, Speed Seduction is about pushing the woman through emotional states through the use of hypnotic language. That behavior brings up all sorts of ethical concerns. If I was a trained hypnotist I would never hypnotize somebody without their knowledge and consent, and that's when I don't want anything from them. Wh…
/r/askTRP28/02/14 04:07 AM
12

That same day she calls me up and wants to talk. I agree, afterall we have a kid together it looks best to the courts if I am amicable and make an attempt. This was a mistake. You should never interact with the woman without a reliable third party present, ideally your lawyer. At the very least you should be recording (with her knowledge, if the state law requires it) any telephone interactions you have with her. I don't know if the courts care whether or not you are on friendly terms with her (…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/14 03:36 AM
23

I loved the post where the same thing happened but he started fucking another woman within 5 days of her going on vacation and she had an utter meltdown. :D I wish that happened more often than it does. =/
/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 06:15 AM
2

It requires hard work to get fit. It's far easier to shame other people for drawing attention to your weight than it is to take responsibility for it. I don't approve of this, but I can see why they do it.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 06:10 AM
1

and your efforts with women will bear fruit. FTFY. EDIT: What? "be bare fruit" doesn't mean a damn thing.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 04:06 AM
-1

I have no idea. Fortunately, it's not that hard to find out. From the post: go sarge up 20 women, tell them how hot/beautiful they are before you fuck them. Then sarge up a second 20, and don’t compliment their appearance at all. See how well you do with the first group, and compare that to your results with the second group. I'd be curious to hear how they compare.
/r/askTRP25/02/14 06:23 AM
-2

An open relationship is not a relationship. Yes it is. A friendship is a relationship. A marriage is a relationship. Two brothers have a relationship. An open relationship is a relationship. It's right there in the name.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 06:00 AM
3

It's funny, I just linked to this blog entry over in /r/PUApolyamory: Six Reasons Why You Shouldn’t Compliment A Woman’s Appearance
/r/askTRP25/02/14 05:49 AM
0

but it looks like all she wanted was people to make her feel better about being upset. She was looking for a way to get her boyfriend back and to get him to stop sleeping with that other woman. Unfortunately for her, nobody was interested in giving her such advice.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 08:40 PM
9

You sow seeds, you sew fabric. They're both pronounced "so".
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 08:37 PM
20

Woman sounds like a 4 if she's having that much trouble getting laid. As mentioned upthread, it was only 5 days of vacation before she posted to Reddit.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 08:34 PM
13

The more rules you place on her behavior, the more likely that they will eventually get broken and cause drama. Put as few rules on her behavior as possible, and the ones that remain should be important enough to take a break from the relationship over. My only major rule is "treat me well". As long as she does that I don't care what else she does, and if she's not doing that, why the hell am I putting up with her?
/r/askTRP23/02/14 09:19 AM
3

she prefers to just go as "friends". [...] I think if I do anything hasty this prom night, I'll end up being friend-zoned. Uh, dude? You're already friend-zoned. GFTOW.
/r/seduction22/02/14 06:12 AM
11

Diamonds aren't "worthless" and engagement rings are HARDLY their only purpose. Diamonds are useful for cutting, drilling, and membranes used in lasers, x-ray machines and vacuum chambers. All of those uses put together can't equal a fraction of the demand for wedding and engagement rings. You're right: technically, diamonds aren't worthless. They're just worth far, far less than cultural programming would have you think.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 05:15 AM
11

"Don't." In a monogamous relationship: The woman can withhold sex whenever she doesn't feel in the mood, and there's nothing you can do. The woman is more likely to cause drama, get in arguments, call you names, escalate physical violence, challenge your your decisions, and otherwise put you on the defensive. The woman is less likely to make the same effort to keep you around that she did when you started going out, because she knows she has you. And here's the thing: you cannot predict how she …
/r/askTRP21/02/14 03:18 AM
9

Ever notice its always women telling a man what a "real man" is supposed to do or behave like? It's the No True Scotsman fallacy. Sure, you're a man by biological definition. But you're not a Real Man unless you do what we say you should. EDIT: Ah, I see I'm not the only one who thought this. From the original post: [...] worthless assertions thrown around such as “real men accept what a woman is comfortable with in a quote unquote friendship” or some other bullshit true Scotsman statement based…
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 08:59 PM
1

up until our counselor said that marriage is 50/50 and we both had to accept responsibility for the marriage and any problems. As David Deangelo once said, "You want a 50-50 relationship? It means she owns you."
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 06:52 PM
1

Ending a relationship hurts, it helps your frame of mind immensely to have other sexual options, and most guys don't want their woman to see other men even if they're seeing other women. Given these three constraints, cheating is the best solution. Personally I advocate telling her you're going to sleep with other women before you do so.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 06:42 PM
216

Top-voted comment: He did not need to hire a prostitute. He has hands and managed to spend years not having sex in the past. FUCK. THAT. SHIT.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 08:35 AM
3

The men of London had an answer to this petition and issued, "The Mens Answer to the Womens petition Against Coffee, Vindicating their own performances and the Virtues of that Liquor from undeserved aspersions cast upon them by their scandalous pamphlet." This reply is far less entertaining than the Womens’ Petition and most of it is taken up railing against their wives for daring to complain. http://www.uni-giessen.de/gloning/tx/mens-answer-1674.htm
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 05:40 PM
22

"We rarely were able to see each other, but our relationship really started off as this fairy tale. I used to think people spent their whole life looking for what I found with Shawn." From the same post. Fucking New Relationship Energy.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 05:32 PM
4

You'll never be the most attractive guy there (loss of alpha status), That's not necessarily true. If you're busy doing your own thing and enjoying yourself without hovering around her, as well as flirting with other women, there should be no loss of "alpha status".
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 09:03 PM
1

They probably made the typical mistake of trying to apply traditional monogamy to what had been, up until that point, an open relationship. PUAs often think that just because they're good at PUA, they'll be good at maintaining relationships. This is untrue, as you have observed yourself. It's a completely different skill-set, and PUAs actually tend to do worse at traditional relationships than regular monogamuggles do, because they're used to freedom and are less likely to put up with poor behav…
/r/askTRP17/02/14 08:47 PM
1

I really really like sex with 9s/10s. It's the thing I love the most in this world. It doesn't happen too often for me, but when it does it's awesome. Have you considered becoming a pickup artist? The whole point of PUA is to meet and sleep with attractive women in a relatively short amount of time. Then use PUA polyamory to keep the women on-board without promising monogamy and your abundance issues should be a thing of the past.
/r/askTRP17/02/14 07:34 PM
2

Kino is a PUA term that just means "touch". He's telling you to touch her.
/r/askTRP12/02/14 08:07 PM
1

Really? Good Lord, that place has gone downhill. Well, you're welcome to check out /r/PUApolyamory. It's about developing open relationships, but about half the postings there are excellent posts on pickup artistry. I'm still uploading the best stuff I archived from the older forums, but there should be more than enough material to get you started.
/r/askTRP12/02/14 04:23 PM
1

Okay, when you say "hook up with", do you mean they asked you to hang out, or they asked you for sex? Because I find it rather surprising that two women would verbalize their desire for sex like that. Look, your focus needs to be on developing the skills necessary to attract and sleep with many women, not on that one woman. You have two women who want to hang out with you. That's great. Physically escalate and see if you can sleep with them. Regardless of what happens, keep going out and meeting…
/r/askTRP12/02/14 04:20 PM
6

without her feeling rejected to the point of leaving the LTR? You're asking the wrong question here. In order to fix a relationship you must be willing to end it. This is not the same as "you must end it". I'm merely saying that if you go into a relationship afraid to lose it, you won't have the strength to do what needs to be done to re-attract her. You acted red pill, she liked that, you stopped acting red pill and she lost interest. So... just start acting like you used to. Keep doing whateve…
/r/askTRP12/02/14 09:18 AM
3

Currently your focus is on "this one woman", which means you're far more likely to act needy and insecure around her. Two things that can help this are having experience getting other women and having other options. Go out. Meet other women. Attract and sleep with them. Fortunately it's winter right now, which means you have enough time to develop the necessary skills.
/r/askTRP12/02/14 09:09 AM
2

If she show symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder I'm out, although I understand the sex can be really good. If she treats me poorly or causes me drama I'll Soft Next her for at least a week and focus on my life, my goals, hanging out with friends and sleeping with other women. That way I don't have to worry about any skeletons in her closet. Instead, I just react to how well she treats me and take appropriate action if she treats me poorly.
/r/askTRP12/02/14 09:04 AM
3

Yeah, but A) herpes is mostly asymptomatic, B) 1 in 4 includes the strain that causes cold sores on your mouth as well as the strain that causes genital herpes, and C) social stigma aside, herpes is pretty much harmless. An excellent guide to STDs
/r/TheRedPill12/02/14 08:52 AM
2

Unfortunately not! RISUG is not yet on the market in India, and clinical trials of RISUG are only for Indian men who live near the study sites. We don’t know when RISUG’s developers will get it to market. So if you live in one of those cities in India, you’re in luck; but otherwise, Vasalgel is your best bet and we hope for your support! Source: http://www.parsemusfoundation.org/vasalgel-faqs/
/r/TheRedPill12/02/14 08:47 AM
3

"Can I just go to India to get RISUG?" Unfortunately not! RISUG is not yet on the market in India, and clinical trials of RISUG are only for Indian men who live near the study sites. We don’t know when RISUG’s developers will get it to market. So if you live in one of those cities in India, you’re in luck; but otherwise, Vasalgel is your best bet and we hope for your support! Source: http://www.parsemusfoundation.org/vasalgel-faqs/
/r/TheRedPill12/02/14 08:47 AM
13

Parsemus donation link.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/14 08:45 AM
27

Just the opposite, actually. From the Vasalgel FAQ: Vasalgel is being developed as a “social venture” (designed to make enough profit to be sustainable, but not make a killing). The primary goal is to make an affordable, effective male contraceptive widely available, so there’s no opportunity for riches—this is not the next Microsoft stock! Also, our format does not allow us to sell stock on the market. However, stay tuned for crowdfunding in 2014—or you can donate to the venture’s nonprofit par…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/14 08:40 AM
2

That was when I thought she gave you an orgasm. My new advice is to drop her and find somebody who isn't so conflicted about having sex with you.
/r/askTRP11/02/14 09:01 PM
1

If subreddits size is any indication, it's <1%... Yeah. It's a work in progress. :P
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 05:56 PM
1

Treats me well Sees other people Enjoys sex Has sex with me whenever I want Allows me the final say whenever I want Takes the initiative when I don't Enjoys doing nice things for me, even several years into the relationship (dressing sexy, initiating sex, occasional romantic gifts/gestures, etc.) Doesn't suffer from Borderline Personality Disorder. Never causes drama or puts me on the defensive Loves me Enjoys snuggling with me Invites me to spend time with her and her friends/Doesn't exclude me…
/r/askTRP11/02/14 05:21 PM
3

It gets very tiring and draining to put up with more than a year or two of constant shit tests. I prefer relationships where I never have to worry about shit tests because she knows I'd Soft Next her in a heartbeat if she tried. It works surprisingly well.
/r/askTRP11/02/14 05:11 PM
0

Why not explore the option of plastic surgery if he's self conscious about her boobs anyway? FTFY
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 01:26 PM
12

Too bad genders and ages are required for postings there.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 01:25 PM
2

It sounds like she got off his dick after the sex, not in the middle of it. Forcing a confrontation will only cause drama. It would be far better to tolerate the ambiguity between her words and her actions and only act based on her actions (not her words).
/r/askTRP11/02/14 01:22 PM
2

If you act correctly you could have her as a friend with occasional sex. Ignore what she says and learn to tolerate and accept the difference between her words and her actions. Sleep with her when she wants and the rest of the time just do your own thing or spend time with her as friends if you would prefer that. Ignore the words coming out of her mouth. They mean nothing. When she says "I don't want to ruin the friendship", just nod, smile, briefly agree and then change the subject. "Just treat…
/r/askTRP11/02/14 01:18 PM
3

Well there's always lemon stealing whores.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 12:52 PM
2

Of course there's also PUA Polyamory, which has much more to do with TRP than traditional polyamory does.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 12:49 PM
1

Sweet Jesus, this.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/14 03:10 PM
27

I don't know about legal accountability, but if I were you I'd call 911, tell them what she told you, and wash your hands of the whole thing.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/14 02:15 PM
21

My mistake must have been being too aloof, as i ignore her sometimes. No, there's nothing wrong with that. Sometimes you can do everything right and she still doesn't behave the way you want her to. That's what happens when you are in a relationship with another person with free will: you can't really control their behavior.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/14 12:31 PM
1

Everyone has their own "alpha" traits and "beta" tendencies. Pfft. Speak for yourself. I'm an internet tough-guy, which means I am literally 120% alpha-macho testosterone and -20% beta male. The numbers don't lie.
/r/seduction08/02/14 10:41 AM
1

So... just fuck women. If you don't think you'd enjoy having a girlfriend then don't bother with one. Problem solved.
/r/askTRP07/02/14 06:15 AM
2

It is always painful and difficult to go backwards in a relationship. If you become exclusive to her, it will be very difficult to downgrade her relationship status without hurting both her and yourself.
/r/askTRP07/02/14 06:12 AM
1

Attraction from a girl is there if she wants you badly but you don't need her at all. It's far easier to do this when you haven't promised her exclusivity, since having other female options greatly helps you be non-needy.
/r/askTRP07/02/14 06:12 AM
4

Personally I'm not against it. I practice PUA polyamory, though I get downvoted every time I bring it up in /r/TheRedPill.
/r/askTRP07/02/14 06:04 AM
12

Sitcoms worth checking out for alpha male role models: Entourage, Mad Men, Two and a Half Men (the ones with Charlie in it), Nip/tuck, Californication.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 02:10 AM
12

Hey, don't pin that shit on me...
/r/TheRedPill06/02/14 10:30 AM
1

And PUA polyamory bridges the gap. It combines sex and the possibility of loving multiple women from polyamory with red-pill concepts such as hypergamy, plate-spinning, hamstering and dread game.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 06:04 AM
-2

If it's done to avoid drama, heartbreak, betaization and financial penalties, MGTOW is an unnecessary extreme. Women have positive qualities to offer men, so long as the men can prevent all of the above from occurring. Fortunately, they can. PUA polyamory completely eliminates drama from relationships and prevents betaization when its rules are followed. The downside is that you have to be willing to let your women sleep with whoever they want, and you have to develop the skills necessary to sle…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 04:37 AM
3

Well, no. With prostitution you're guaranteed sex. That's the whole point. With a sugar-daddy relationship there's only the implication that she'll put out, and no guarantee that sex will occur as often as the man would like (or at all).
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 04:25 AM
1

So, um, how is she supposed to take it off for bedtime?
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 04:23 AM
1

You had one interaction with her in a small range of time. She chose to blow off the player and continue interactions with you. This tells you nothing about her. It was one interaction. She might have been looking for a beta male, or he might have done something to turn her off, or maybe she just knew better than to look like she was looking for a hook-up with a good-looking guy. Or maybe it was something else entirely that neither one of us could possibly know about. You can't take this one sit…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 04:12 AM
3

... Dammit. *upvotes*
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 03:58 AM
1

And has that been working for you?
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 12:27 PM
6

"vain, vapid, boring, unaware, absorbed, and tasteless." You're holding women to standards that they aren't meeting, and then become upset that they don't meet these standards. Take a look at your situation. Is it making you happy? No, of course it isn't. Can you change female behavior? Not really. So let go of the need to judge women. Just accept them for whatever they are without expecting any particular behavior from them (besides treating you well, of course). Learn to enjoy the feminine ene…
/r/askTRP02/02/14 12:03 PM
0

When you learn something new there's always the natural impulse to try and share it with others. But pushing your ideology on your friends won't make them see the light, it will just push them away. As far as I know TRP doesn't advocate pushing red-pill beliefs on others. That was all your decision.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 11:53 AM
16

Throughout her profile she talks about how she loves money and will only go on dates with guys with money That's a massive red flag. She's basically screaming to the world "Hey, I'm a gold-digger!"
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 08:58 AM
3

Eh, I wouldn't worry about it. If you're playing a character with low charisma you can either reroll your character (if the DM lets you) or just let another party member take care of the NPC interactions. Of course, if you're playing a solo campaign, things get a little trickier. EDIT: Oh! You meant "Red Pill Game", not "Role-Playing Game".
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 05:16 AM
8

*shrug* I don't know exactly how long they last, and it's different for different people. Just be aware that eventually it will fade.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 04:56 AM
3

LOL no. I practice PUA polyamory, so I don't need to search for a unicorn. :)
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 03:32 AM
23

Enjoy it while you can. She's experiencing New Relationship Energy: a feeling of euphoria that generally lasts 6-18 months, causing her to minimize or ignore your flaws. When that eventually fades, the rubber hits the road, she is more likely to take you for granted, and drama frequency and intensity is very likely to increase. So, just know what you're getting yourself into.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 02:36 AM
1

Dad's Divorce forum posting: The List. A post on tactics and strategies to get the best possible outcome from the divorce. You can worry about feeling better once that's taken care of.
/r/askTRP02/02/14 02:10 AM
5

I never had a say in the matter. Wrong. When your child is taken from you, you fight. You find the resources, you do the work, and you fight for your daughter. Cops won't help? Call again. Talk to a different officer. Show up in person. Take it up with the chief of police, and if he won't help take it up with the mayor. (Or whatever the Canadian equivalents would be.) Another angle of attack would have been to hire the toughest solicitor you can find to help you. If he won't help, fire him and g…
/r/TheRedPill01/02/14 01:29 PM
3

You've kind of screwed yourself over here by letting her be primary caretaker of your daughter. My advice? Find a lawyer. Reddit is no substitute for proper legal advice.
/r/TheRedPill01/02/14 12:30 PM
7

And people wonder why I'm against men getting married. =/
/r/TheRedPill01/02/14 07:43 AM
1

women love it when you make fun of other men That sounds like a catty, feminine thing to do. Which means it probably won't help you get laid.
/r/askTRP30/01/14 11:30 AM
1

I swear I just posted this in another thread... Sexual Negotiation Part 1, part 2 "How i escalate to ensure sex on 1st date" How To Segue To Sex Talk Note that the first one is hosted on a website that goes up and down like a yo-yo. Save them to your hard drive if you want to refer to them later.
/r/askTRP30/01/14 11:29 AM
5

It always starts out the same way. I'm attracted to a guy that seems fun, playful, mysterious. We get serious, and I mistake that initial strong attraction we have for love. So I say the words because I don't want to let him down. I want to see where the relationship leads. And then I get to know the guy more and see that he is, indeed, very much in love with me and has great qualities. I see him as a future husband, a father, my protector, and my lover. But then my eye starts to wander towards …
/r/askTRP30/01/14 11:26 AM
12

Ooh! Ooh! I know this one! You're looking at a LSNFTE! (And good for you!) LSNFTE – Long Soft Next For Temporary Exclusivity. A common occurrence with Alphas in nonmonogamous relationships where a woman leaves the Alpha, who will not give her monogamy, so she can get a traditional boyfriend or husband who will. The new boyfriend/husband is always an AFC, beta, or Alpha Male 1.0, who eventually either bores her to death, irritates her with too many rules, or cheats on her. The woman then leaves t…
/r/askTRP30/01/14 11:18 AM
1

And that's precisely why I'm a PUA polyamorist. She may be like that, she might not be, but with the weight of failure so heavy if I'm wrong it's not worth taking that risk.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 10:59 AM
3

"Fool me seven times, shame on you. Fool me eight or more times, shame on me!"
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 10:55 AM
2

*bro-hugs*
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 10:51 AM
5

A frame is the underlying meaning of an interaction. Frame control is influencing another person's perception of same. Negging isn't really necessary unless you're in bars and clubs, approaching the hottest of the hot women, and they're being rude or dismissive of you because they assume you have low social value. The example is this: I have a female friend who is probably a 6-7/10. I understand there is no exception to the rule, and I know this to be true as she has had a promiscuous past, but …
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 10:48 AM
6

The very fact that you want their exclusivity means that you're emotionally invested. The harder you try to get it, the worse the relationship will become. The only real solutions here are to either A) accept that they may sleep with other people and be okay with that or B) end the two relationships that see other people. Note that sooner or later your other two women are going to give you shit for your double-standard, so you'll have to decide what to do then.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 10:33 AM
3

Yeah, but settling down with a woman automatically lowers your SMV because you can't get with other women without cheating or ending the relationship.
/r/TheRedPill30/01/14 10:29 AM
3

Not specific questions, but general tips: Open-ended questions: Avoid yes/no questions. Your questions should be open-ended. "Got any family in the area?" would be a poor question, but "What do you do for fun?" is good. Silence When you ask a question, be comfortable with silence. If you rush to fill the silence yourself, it cancels the pull the other person would feel to answer the question. Just wait and have confidence that the other person will answer. Sandwich questions and stories: If some…
/r/askTRP30/01/14 07:48 AM
4

about 60-80% of divorce proceedings are initiated by women. That would be me, based on a number of internet searches on the subject. Different sources say different things, but they're all within the 60-80% range. I don't use that statistic to claim anything about women. I just use it to point out that the odds of a successful marriage aren't completely in your hands. No matter how alpha you are, you can't control another person's decisions. So on that point we seem to be in agreement. You overl…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 01:35 AM
3

Sexual Negotiation Part 1, part 2 "How i escalate to ensure sex on 1st date" How To Segue To Sex Talk You're welcome. ;) Note that the first one is hosted on a website that goes up and down like a yo-yo. Save them to your hard drive if you want to refer to them later.
/r/askTRP29/01/14 12:56 AM
4

Yeah, I have a great time with my other plates. Good. Should I just forget it? YES. I can't shake this feelin of seething anger and jealousy. BAD. I was thinking of bringing it up next time she wants to hang out and if she won't agree then I won't see her. Thoughts? "Ultimatums are expressions of powerlessness, empty threats designed to try to influence a situation someone has no control over." -Neil Strauss, "The Game"
/r/askTRP29/01/14 12:39 AM
3

I don't know which is better: that you advocate small steps when dealing with anxiety, or that it's the top comment here. :) As somebody who deals with anxiety issues, I can confirm the effectiveness of this advice.
/r/askTRP29/01/14 12:37 AM
1

Ding ding ding ding! That is correct.
/r/askTRP29/01/14 12:34 AM
3

David something in his newsletters... but he said that, instead of doting attention on a female you like, sometimes you just have to treat her like an annoying little sister. It was David DeAngelo, the guy who coined "cocky and funny".
/r/askTRP29/01/14 12:32 AM
1

I tried this once. Never again. I became way too paranoid about where she was and what she was doing, convinced there was a decent chance she was cheating on me. Not to mention the drama. Oh, the drama. Now I just insist that they see other guys. Ironically, it's much easier on my mind.
/r/askTRP29/01/14 12:25 AM
2

You're going about it the wrong way. The ultimate goal with women is to be non-needy and non-reactive, and your behavior fails at both of those.
/r/askTRP29/01/14 12:22 AM
5

The only reason you're obsessed with the concept of filming her is because she told you about it. Now it's preying on your mind and causing you to get frustrated by her behavior, causing you to become emotionally invested, even if only a little. Not good. What I do whenever I have a problem with one woman is to get some space from her and have another plate give me what I'm looking for. My lover doesn't want to dress up for me? No problem. I cut her loose for a while and call up one of my other …
/r/askTRP29/01/14 12:20 AM
1

No, just the opposite.
/r/askTRP29/01/14 12:15 AM
2

Not when losing your frame causes you emotional distress. And believe me, it does.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 12:08 PM
1

Or, you could take a third option...
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 10:38 AM
0

Sucks to be you.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 10:26 AM
2

But than all that holding frame means nothing? Women are attracted to non-needy men who do their own thing and men who are already attractive to other women. The easiest way to be that man is to not get married and have other female options. I suppose it's possible to maintain that frame in a marriage, but it's a lot harder. And I was thinking if she doesn't want sex than pick up some other girls and do something fun with them. As long as she knows about it, I have no objections to this. Most gu…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 10:22 AM
3

Never make decisions based on how you feel about the relationship. Make decisions based on how well you're treated. Also, treat any words that come out of her mouth as the inane babble of a small child. She says she's going to get help. Of course she says that. She'd promise to stop breathing if it kept you from ending the relationship. Assume that her behavior will always be like this: periods of "fine" punctuated by bursts of classless behavior and severe hamstering. If that's the sort of rela…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 10:17 AM
6

If it's a red flag, you know what to do. You only have one life, and it's your decision what level of unhappiness you'll accept in your relationships.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 10:06 AM
2

Marriage means you're unlikely to end the relationship unless it's something major, and she knows it, which means: She's more likely to cause drama She will be less motivated to work to keep you attracted She can deny you sex whenever she wants and there's nothing you can do about it.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 10:03 AM
3

she is like no your gonna have to wait. She wants to put you in the role of beta orbiter: investing effort and emotions in her without getting any sex. Fuck that. Interacting with a woman like that is only going to cause you frustration. When you're at your hometown, meet other women instead of wasting your efforts on her.
/r/askTRP27/01/14 09:53 AM
1

"I know! I hate it when women treat me like an object! I am more than just a sausage with legs, dammit!"
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 05:29 AM
1

I see two sticking points here. The first is in the initial approach, and the second is when you want to meet her again. The only time to be worried about your initial approach expressing interest is if she acts like a bitch to you for no good reason (the "bitch shield"). This normally only happens at clubs or bars. You shouldn't have this problem when running day game. As I recall a pickup artist named Mystery had a whole system designed around extremely attractive woman at clubs and bars. Sinc…
/r/askTRP27/01/14 05:27 AM
0

If there's no such thing as a unicorn, that means that looking for the right woman to settle down with is a waste of time and energy. Might I suggest an alternative? PUA polyamory is about developing multiple emotionally-rewarding open relationships with women. She doesn't have to be a unicorn for you to be in a healthy relationship with her, you just have to know how to create and maintain the relationship properly. Settling down never enters into it.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 04:30 AM
1

Oh hell, no. Marriage is a bad idea for several reasons: Marriage means you're unlikely to end the relationship unless it's something major, and she knows it, which means: She's more likely to cause drama She will be less motivated to work to keep you attracted She can deny you sex whenever she wants and there's nothing you can do about it. Also, when a divorce occurs it's the woman who initiates it 60-80% of the time.
/r/askTRP27/01/14 04:25 AM
6

I practice PUA polyamory. Open relationships, lots of sex with lots of women, and strong emotional connections with some of them.
/r/askTRP27/01/14 04:19 AM
13

Do you think it's possible to be completely emotionally invested while things are going well (i.e. feel "in love"), and be able to immediately move on once things fall apart? Not even remotely. The more emotionally invested you are in a relationship, and the longer you've been in it, the more it hurts when the relationship ends. If your several-year relationship ends it will ache like a motherfucker, and it will take a long time for that pain to subside.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 04:04 AM
2

Interesting. I didn't think that was possible to do without resorting to Nexts. Can you tell us how you turned the relationship around?
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 10:30 AM
1

It's generally understood that what goes on in the bedroom doesn't have much correlation with the larger relationship. For example, a woman could enjoy being dominated in the bedroom but hate being told to do the laundry. If she starts treating you poorly come to us for advice, but right now it doesn't sound like an issue. EDIT: Wait, do you enjoy pegging? If you don't enjoy it but you do it anyways that's very beta. If you enjoy it yourself it's not a problem.
/r/askTRP23/01/14 12:15 PM
1

While you have her dildo in your ass, bellow "You may be butt-fucking me right now, but I am the man in this relationship!"
/r/askTRP23/01/14 12:13 PM
4

"Because I don't owe you anything. Because I'm kind of a dick. Because you haven't done anything for me. Take your pick, I've got plenty of reasons."
/r/askTRP23/01/14 12:00 PM
7

(She has a past history of sexual abuse and has a lot of sexual problems in general). MASSIVE red flags. I love her and I want to help her. Completely understandable, but still utterly moronic behavior on his part.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/14 11:56 AM
0

What a brave, brave man.
/r/TheRedPill23/01/14 03:12 AM
7

I used to use the age range as an exclusion criterion when I was in my early 20's, but I don't have that luxury anymore. You don't, we do. Suck it up. We're not talking about adults in consensual relationships So we're talking about... non-consensual relationships? Lady, I think you just invented a new kink.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/14 09:29 PM
5

"How dare you!" "I dare, your majesty, because I am not part of your feudal little system! I am my own, independent person! If I feel like walking I'll walk. If I feel like jumping, I'll jump. And if I feel like saying something obscenely insulting, then that's! Exactly! What! I'm going! To do!"
/r/TheRedPill21/01/14 04:37 AM
4

Well, if your problem is you're rarely around women, take steps to fix that. Check out your local city community centers or YMCAs. Also, look on meetup.com. Dance lessons Cooking classes Yoga/pilates classes Arts and crafts photography Amateur sports (kickball, dodgeball, disc golf, pool, beach volleyball, ultimate frisbee, etc.) wine tasting EDIT: Or community colleges. Forgot to mention to check for classes there.
/r/askTRP20/01/14 08:06 AM
2

Just when she treats me poorly, causes drama, puts me on the defensive, or denies me sex. Note that nexting a woman isn't a permanent thing, it just means spending some time (a week minimum) without her, re-thinking the relationship and allowing her to do the same.
/r/askTRP20/01/14 07:48 AM
1

He asked how to make his wife feel attracted to him The knowledge that a man has other options (social proof) is very attractive to women. "Do this thing that may end your marriage" is terrible advice. Sometimes, in order to save your relationship, you have to be willing to risk destroying it.
/r/askTRP20/01/14 07:16 AM
-4

Prepare yourself for a divorce, just in case. Inform her that you're going to sleep with other women. Then do so.
/r/askTRP20/01/14 06:01 AM
1

In this case the FWB wants to upgrade to LTR and commitment. ...which is a next-worthy offense if it isn't something you want for yourself. It helps to have other plates. A female FWB gives sex, but at some point gets emotionally invested and wants a normal LTR. Only if you didn't manage the relationship properly.
/r/askTRP20/01/14 02:17 AM
-4

TRP focuses on the "what" (hamster-wheeling, hypergamy, plate-spinning, etc.) I'm looking for a subreddit that focuses on the "how". Specifically, how to meet, attract, and sleep with women in a relatively short amount of time.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 03:10 AM
-4

Do you know of any good reddit PUA alternatives?
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 12:42 AM
7

If I'm understanding it right, the concept is marketed to people who really don't have a lot of control over their lives (teenagers). They can't choose their family, they're forced to attend the cesspit of drama that is high school, and they can't really get a job and become self-sufficient unless they get very lucky. Once they become an adult, they become legally responsible for their own well-being, with all the benefits and challenges that come along with it. So yeah, it gets better.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/14 07:11 AM
21

"This is my banhammer. There are many like it, but this one is mine."
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 11:20 PM
1

Easy. Laugh, comment on it (something like, "and poor HB here is just looking at us like 'double-u tee eff'"), then change the subject to something she can relate to. If he tries to drag the conversation off-track again, just tell him that you want conversations that all three of you can be involved in.
/r/seduction14/01/14 04:48 AM
3

Reposting a comment I made elsewhere: 1) Define your goal. Make sure that the goal is SMART: specific, measurable, attainable, relevant and time-bound. 2) Figure out one ridiculously small step that would move you towards your goal. That's your goal for the day. 3) No, smaller than that. We're talking stuff like "march in front of the TV one minute each night" for the goal of losing weight, or "eat in the cafeteria instead of my office" for the goal of meeting new people. [note: in your case Sad…
/r/askTRP12/01/14 11:06 AM
3

This works with the right sort of woman before the new relationship energy has worn off, provided you haven't settled down with her. However: Some women will get defensive and cause drama when faced with such an explanation. She is more likely to cause drama in such a context later in the relationship (after the first 3 or so years). Once you've already settled down with her, subtly threatening to not settle down with her doesn't really work as a threat.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 10:09 AM
3

Showing interest is fine, so long as you do it from a non-needy, non-reactive frame. What you must never do is chase. If she flakes on you or gives you BS excuses, you must drop any and all pursuit. If she does this and you pursue her anyways you will never get her and you will only get frustrated while she enjoys the attention but never actually makes effort to meet you halfway. Unfortunately, I'm speaking from experience here. Express your interest if you want. Or don't. If she reciprocates, g…
/r/askTRP12/01/14 09:06 AM
2

Thanks! It's essentially a condensation of Albert Ellis' creation Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT), now seen as a subset of Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT). REBT in slightly more detail.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 08:49 AM
1

Wellllll... not exactly...
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 08:41 AM
12

Mocking you in front of your friends is a reason to dump her sorry ass. If you can't do that, your only options are to A) get angry, or B) put up with it. Neither one will change her behavior.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 08:32 AM
2

Two things: First, you don't define a specific type of shit test in the OP. You only say "intentionally try to piss you off to see your reaction". THIS IS ALL OF THEM. EDIT: Good point. Second, what kind of answer are you looking for?
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 03:16 AM
1

Well, there's always the third option: Develop long-term open relationships. Plenty of sex and affection, zero drama when done properly. Of course, you have to develop the skills to meet and sleep with plenty of young, attractive women, but I hardly view this as a downside. ;)
/r/askTRP12/01/14 03:07 AM
1

Does it matter? You can argue until you're blue in the face that you robbed that bank because of your crappy upbringing and drug habit that your role models forced you into, but that doesn't change the reality of the prison sentence. Likewise, a woman has reasons for her behavior. We all do. But that doesn't change how we, as men, must react if we want to maintain our agency and self-respect. Should we persecute these women, or feel sorry for them? Neither. You should treat them like women who a…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 03:01 AM
8

http://alphagameplan.blogspot.com/2011/03/why-we-shit-test.html
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 02:56 AM
34

How to spot a gold digger (AKA a "ho"): I must admit I always steer the fuck clear of ho's except to fuck a little with them when they try to hustle me for drinks... But I do have an amazingly hot pivot with clear-cut ho traits, so I frequently pimp her out when we're rolling together. The bulk of the following observations are based on my dealings with her as well as the ho's I've come across in the clubs: -Ho's dress for the symps. Meaning they'll look sexy but as opposed to the freak a ho wil…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 02:49 AM
11

Let me show you a similar but not identical viewpoint that is also derived from the Zen philosophy of non-attachment. "It's perfectly fine to get validation from women, so long as you don't need it." It is "shoulds" and "musts" and expectations that make us unhappy. I say, get rid of as many of them as possible. It's okay to want something, to prefer it strongly over not having that thing, but holding the belief "things should be in some way fundamentally different from how they are" will only m…
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 02:34 AM
2

That's what I'm saying! If more people were like that I wouldn't have needed to spin off the separate subreddit /r/PUApolyamory.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 11:19 AM
21

she wants to "reset" the relationship Perfect. Move out and see other women.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 11:16 AM
2

Oddly enough, I can't find anybody on Reddit talking about this except in MRA and TRP. I'm sure that means something, but I'm not sure what.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 10:45 AM
1

Much of TRP has a Madonna/Whore complex, so at least you're in good company.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 10:22 AM
2

There's just too much stuff to catch. Surprisingly, the odds are pretty low for everything short of pregnancy.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/14 06:18 AM
1

people who are able to back up their arrogance with things like money, status, good build etc Those are only required to back up your arrogance if you believe they are. I mean a lot of the people who are successful deadbeats pick women who are vulnerable and/or stupid to begin with. That sounds an awful lot like what anti-PUA feminists claim. "That only works on women with low self-esteem. A real woman would never fall for that." Another interpretation of what successful moochers do is that they…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/14 10:00 PM
6

Well, there's always /r/PUApolyamory. It's more for people who aren't looking to ever settle down.
/r/askTRP07/01/14 07:31 AM
3

Generally I look at her to see if she currently has all the cocks in her. If she doesn't, she's not a slut.
/r/askTRP07/01/14 03:56 AM
3

I would have to have rock-solid evidence that she is not currently sucking on several men's dicks while taking two in her ass and another two in her pussy. ...but that's just me, I'm old-fashioned like that.
/r/askTRP06/01/14 04:48 AM
0

Addendum to my previous comment: Never mind, I see what you're getting at. Yes. It's not a very mathematically rigorous correlation, but I can see that train of logic supporting the argument "Women under-report their level of infidelity." That's very different from saying "it's an order of magnitude different", though. EDIT: Still doesn't support the 13% number. If the source of the data is unreliable, then the conclusions drawn from that data will also be unreliable.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 01:19 AM
1

1) OP: A higher number of sexual partners DOES mean greater likelihood of infidelity. Just... stop disputing this point. This goes for both genders to be fair, but it seems like it could be especially true for women. There isa correlation between partners and marriage success: http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html You're linking to one of the posts I mentioned without addressing my argument that the fundamental nature of the information-gathering is flawed.…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 01:13 AM
1

There is a statistically significant correlation between claimed partner count and claimed frequency of infidelity. Right. You have proposed that the relationship between the two variables is not causative and that the correlation is rather due to a shared common factor that was overlooked, namely misrepresentation in the survey. That... sounds right. If your hypotheisis is correct, then assuming that few women claim to have cheated when they have not, A reasonable asumption. your theory require…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 01:07 AM
-1

The way I do it there isn't. Currently I have a lover and a fuck-buddy who both know I see other women. I have had them for several months, and there has been absolutely zero drama. Before that I was in a serious open relationship that lasted 3.5 years. Again, zero drama.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 12:21 AM
1

If there is indeed no association between infidelity and number of past partners I'm not saying there's no association. It could be a weak, strong, or non-existent correlation. We just can't find out with the tools at our disposal. we can conclude that the frequency of female infidelity is orders of magnitudes higher than we have been led to believe by the scientific studies conducted to date. Maybe, maybe not. There isn't reliable evidence in any direction. Morever, we can conclude that on aver…
/r/TheRedPill06/01/14 12:16 AM
2

I don't know what you're talking about. *cough*
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 11:40 PM
1

Look, the logic is simple. The results of surveys on sexual history are mathematically impossible. That means the data in the surveys themselves is unreliable. That means that any conclusions drawn from surveys about sexual history are unreliable. Your link relies on the results of surveys about sexual history, therefore any conclusions drawn from it are unreliable. QED.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 11:15 PM
-1

I don't do marriage, I do open relationships. All the sex and affection, none of the drama.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 11:10 PM
1

Are you... are you fucking trolling me? I got my answers from people who were willing to actually answer my question instead of going off on irrelevant tangents about "what this subreddit is supposed to be about." Frickin' retard.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 10:31 PM
1

Tell her to tell her supervisor or boss that the guy is sexually harassing her. Nah. I've been in this situation before without even realizing it. A woman claimed she was raped by a guy when (I later realized) the evidence pointed to her willingly having sex with him. I pushed her to talk to a college official about it. She dragged her heels and came up with reasons why she didn't want to, but I held her hand (metaphorically) through the entire process. Finally she went to see the person I wante…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 10:04 PM
1

Well, no. Assuming you're talking about the posts on The Social Pathologist [1] and [2], they rely on surveys. That is, what a person reported. If you wouldn't trust a woman's claims about how many sexual partners she's had, why on earth would you trust an aggregate of womens' claims about how many sexual partners they've had? There is no guarantee that a woman's self-reported indicators are trustworthy, especially when the number of self-reported sexual partners are mathematically impossible. T…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 09:54 PM
1

I should have stuck with my original response. I asked a simple question regarding TRP men's motivations, which could be answered by almost anybody here. It would only require a moment's introspection, and certainly wouldn't require they tell me "why the world is the way it is," just why he holds one specific belief about women. So yeah. Fuck you. I asked a question and I want a goddamn answer.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 01:53 PM
17

NO. WRONG. BAD. You're still acting under the assumption that she was telling you the truth. She may have been, she may not have been. There is no way to know for certain. Back away from the situation. Do not get involved. Give her moral support, but no more. Do not take any actions to solve the problem for her. Give her one suggestion when you're laying out the ground rules, and if she ignores it, let it go and never bring it up again. Her problems are not your responsibility. Her problems are …
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 01:46 PM
5

First, I'm not OP. Second, I didn't say you should do nothing. If she is actively willing to take the steps necessary to get him to back off (talking to HR, for example), then you should be there for moral support. However, it is her responsibility to actually take action. If you do the work for her, you run the risk of "solving" a problem that she lied about and didn't even have in the first place.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 01:36 PM
6

A significant portion of TheRedPill believes that a woman is less valuable as a potential wife if she's slept with more men. Presumably SamuraiNeil believes this as well, so he or anybody else who believes this should be able to answer my question.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 01:30 PM
7

The sort of person likely to say sexually inappropriate things at a woman's work isn't likely to back off just because somebody told him to. I mean he might, but it seems unlikely.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 01:26 PM
3

No, he means /r/askTRP. It's a separate subreddit just for Red Pill questions. Why they have that and the askTRP flair, I have no idea...
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 01:24 PM
7

:D
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 01:23 PM
11

it is pretty much your job to look out for her Um no, it's not. It's her job to look after herself. Becoming exclusive with a man doesn't suddenly remove her agency or self-responsibility.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 01:23 PM
1

you haven't read anything i wrote and you just reply by restating your opinion over and over. You haven't said anything that disproves my argument, which is why I keep coming back to it. i never put virginity as a requirement Hyperbole on my part. I only meant "a non-slutty woman". not did i ever say to trust a woman on her numbers. Weird. I feel like I've had this conversation about half a year ago in this same subreddit. Anyhow, if not relying on her numbers then how do you decide if a woman i…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 01:14 PM
12

This will likely happen again. This is because if she was serious the guy will probably push the issue anyways, and if she was causing drama she'll probably bring it up again because it got such an excellent reaction last time. Just don't bring it up until she does, wait for her to start complaining about him again, then the instant she does, no matter how small the complaint, drop the bomb on her. "From here on out I will back your play but you're responsible for it, I don't want to hear any mo…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 01:02 PM
44

She could be telling the truth, or she could be winding you up. If it really is a problem it's up to her to solve it, not you. Here's what I've done in similar situations: I told her that she should do something about it, and that if she decided to I would help her, that it was totally up to her if she decided to, but if she didn't I didn't want to hear about it any more. This tells her (if she's serious about this) that you'll back her if she wants to do something about it, while preventing her…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 12:48 PM
-1

So in order to restrict her hypergamy a man needs to create the feeling that if she so much as sniffs in the wrong direction he will happily leave her ass for a younger and hotter girl. That doesn't necessarily mean she won't cheat on you, it just means that she would be discreet about it if she did cheat.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 12:41 PM
-1

Yyyyeahhhh... Or you could just practice Pickup Artist Polyamory. It seems much easier to me, and it requires much less mental and emotional investment: let her do her own thing, sleep with whoever you want, and have as many emotionally-fulfilling relationships as you want, with zero drama whatsoever.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 12:41 PM
-2

The premise of looking for a woman who hasn't had many men is flawed, because women can lie and there's always the chance that you won't be able to tell. It makes much more sense to me to develop a relationship strategy that doesn't require her to be virginal in order give you the most happiness and the least unhappiness.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 12:36 PM
0

We're in agreement, then. My concern is only for the guys who say "yes, most women are hypergamous, but this woman is Not Like The OthersTM, so I'm going to settle down with her."
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 12:15 PM
1

(we benged meny time) I, uh, I don't think that's what you meant.
/r/askTRP05/01/14 12:11 PM
1

*ahem* You'll be wanting to skip to Section 24, though I recommend reading the entire thing.
/r/askTRP05/01/14 12:05 PM
10

"You know what this means? We're ruled by RETARDS."
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 11:57 AM
3

It's fine if a woman sleeps with 100 men. Seriously, it's fine. But she must accept the consequence that men will consider her LESS valuable as a potential wife. Just so I understand: this is because of the belief that a formerly promiscuous woman is more likely to cheat on her husband, right? Or is there something else I'm not seeing?
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 11:56 AM
0

They are manipulating the other person by allowing them to believing they feel a way about the person that they do not. Um, you do realize that ethical PUAs don't manipulate women, right? I personally would never stoop to letting a woman believe I felt something for her that I didn't.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 11:50 AM
-1

And TRP helps men see through this bullshit. Problems, indicators and other red flags that you can see become obvious. My problem is when people look for (unreliable) indicators of that rare woman who is non-hypergamous and hasn't had many sexual partners, then use those indicators to justify settling down with her. Instead of "most women aren't like this, so look for the vanishingly rare ones that are", it would make more sense and lead to happier relationships to say "most women aren't like th…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 11:44 AM
-2

I am in complete agreement with you. To me, the most important aspect of a woman is how she treats you. The problem is that a unicorn is often defined, at least in part, as a non-hypergamous woman who hasn't slept with many men. That's what I'm arguing against when I say "unicorns are unnecessary".
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 11:25 AM
0

I never claimed there was a "soulmate", and I agree that oneitis is a bad thing to be guarded against wherever possible. These are my questions: What would your relationships with women be like if you stopped holding out for a unicorn? How could you forge that into something that gives you the happiest possible life? What beliefs would you have to give up to do so?
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 11:20 AM
3

It probably loses something in the translation. From the translated comments: Mattias Näsman CancunKurt • 2 days ago There she is sarcastic about the phenomenon is that Sweden Democrats in particular, but anti-immigrant , xenophobic and racists in general long argued that one should throw out people who commit violent crimes and were born outside Sweden . The point will be to extend the argument to include men . It's the same argument. Score Magda then makes is that there is an inconsistency in …
/r/TheRedPill05/01/14 11:10 AM
1

"Have you ever heard of 'the ladder theory'? Basically, it means if I ever see you again, I'm pretty sure I'm going to beat you to death with a ladder"
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 08:32 PM
39

Different room. Discretion is important in situations like this. "Oh, no, he was giving me a massage. That's what those moaning noises you heard in the other room were." "Well.. can I give you a massage?" "Oh, sorry, but I'm all massaged out. Maybe another time!"
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 05:52 AM
1

-nods- My exact thought upon reading this story was: "That's... actually pretty clever."
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 05:09 AM
1

Good call. :)
/r/askTRP03/01/14 12:36 AM
1

You know, you don't have to settle down to be happy in relationships. Too many guys think, "Okay, I'll sleep around, then eventually settle down, because That's What You Do."
/r/askTRP03/01/14 12:34 AM
1

then I might just try and make myself homosexual. Alternatively, you could develop relationships that don't require the woman to be this One Special WomanTM who's Not Like The OthersTM. If you let go of the needs for monogamy and commitment, you can develop emotionally rewarding long-term relationships with women. The downside is you have to let go of any rules or expectations of her beyond simply "she must treat me well". Oh, also you have to get good at meeting and quickly sleeping with women,…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 12:32 AM
0

This is the real danger. Unicorns are rare, though I personally think their portion of the female population is a little higher than normally mentioned on TRP. The trouble is determining which "unicorns" are genuine and which "unicorns" are just extremely wiley/crafty/manipulative/deceptive whores. Oooooor you could develop deeply rewarding relationships that are effective whether or not the woman is a unicorn. Just sayin'. -/r/PUApolyamory
/r/TheRedPill03/01/14 12:27 AM
1

"If she withholds sex, you just move on." In this, we're in agreement. "I just don't see the advantages for me." Totally understandable. It's not for everybody.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 10:53 PM
1

What, like her enjoying multiple simultaneous dicks? I stand by my statement: screen her based on how well she treats you. If she's fucked up and causes problems for you, she gets the boot. If she loves getting gangbanged but is the sweetest, most loving woman you've ever met and never ever treats you poorly, keep her around.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 10:34 PM
1

Then screen her based on if she causes drama, not on how many dicks she enjoys.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 10:28 PM
1

*shrug* I tried doing it like that once myself. I became paranoid about where she was going and what she was doing even though she wasn't sleeping with anybody else. And any rule that you impose on somebody else is grounds for drama. That's why I recommend having as few as possible.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 10:20 PM
0

Yeah, because she will be getting as much dick as she wants all day long while you are out working to get pussy. Yes, and? You will always be at the disadvantage in that regard. As a general rule, you shouldn't compare yourself to other people. If they're better you'll just feel bad about yourself, and if they're worse you'll feel superior to them which makes it more difficult for you to empathize with them. In this case it sounds like you're saying "she shouldn't get more sex than me", which is…
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 10:14 PM
0

You get as much sex and affection as you want, with zero drama. If she ever breaks a major rule (withholding sex, for example), it's much easier to end the relationship. If one woman is maybe 85% of everything you're looking for, you can just find another woman who has the remaining 15% instead of either A) settling for 85% or B) holding out for 100%. Sounds like a good deal to me.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 10:05 PM
2

This is why you always get a DNA test. Polyamory has nothing to do with this. Even if you're not in an open relationship, even if you're absolutely convinced she's monogamous to you and only you, you STILL get a DNA test.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 10:01 PM
1

I dunno. "Double standard", I guess? The problem with doing it that way is that it causes drama, which is anathema to the PUA polyamorist. The goal is to have as few rules as possible that you impose on the other person.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 10:00 PM
0

I love it when people feed me straight lines. :) /r/PUApolyamory
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 09:56 PM
0

I never said you should go bareback. Condoms are effective at preventing STIs, which themselves actually have a very low encounter rate.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 09:54 PM
0

Au contraire. Red Pill is about seeing reality as it is and developing relationships that work with this. If anything, my relationships are MORE red pill than typical red pill advice, because (unlike TRP), I'm not trying to find that rare special woman who's not like the others and won't eventually cheat on me or get bored with me.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 09:45 PM
0

I know people here on the red pill want to avoid sluts for an LTR. Well, not all of us...
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 10:17 AM
1

[...] I want a slut. [...] [...] I'm not threatened by nor fearful of a woman's sexual appetites. [...] [...] I also don't care for marriage and children, so cheating isn't a disastrous situation for me. [...] Brother! :D
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 10:07 AM
1

Have you looked at /r/PUApolyamory? It's a way to have emotionally rewarding open relationships without ever settling down or getting married.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 10:01 AM
-7

That's why I set up my relationships such that it doesn't matter how much sex they've had or will have.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 09:58 AM
-3

Um, none? Long-term emotionally rewarding open relationships means that I don't have to worry about her promiscuity or lack thereof. I don't care if she fucked an entire football team so long as she's clean and treats me well. :)
/r/TheRedPill02/01/14 09:57 AM
1

Yes, those things are all possible, although STD odds are actually pretty low, and many forms of birth control are very effective (<2% yearly failure rate with perfect use). IMO the probability is low enough to justify taking the chance. YMMV, obviously.
/r/MGTOW30/12/13 10:56 PM
4

It's fine if she knows the stuff listed in the first half of each sentence. If she ever tries to pull something listed in the second half, just Soft Next her.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 09:23 PM
0

Making your happiness a priority can be attractive to others in the right context. I agree with you. You need to make your own happiness a priority. And if you're consistently unhappy with an aspect of the relationship, you need to take steps to change things. I'm just getting downvoted because I think that "opening the relationship" and "ending the relationship" are valid tactics in addition to "losing weight".
/r/askTRP30/12/13 07:45 PM
-5

And if the problem wasn't the weight?
/r/askTRP30/12/13 07:17 AM
-9

You're right, she shouldn't be expected to fake attraction. But if she's not sexually attracted to him, he is under no obligation to stick around.
/r/askTRP30/12/13 07:07 AM
-16

Her "obligation" is to make him happy in the relationship and treat him well by whatever standards he deems appropriate. In this case that means her taking the sexual initiative and acting like somebody who is sexually attracted to him. Since she's not doing that (and there are other women out there who would), he should probably rethink the relationship.
/r/askTRP30/12/13 06:43 AM
1

No, but here are a few links to information about divorce and alimony, Hopefully something there will help you. Divorce Planning Checklist 25 Ways to Divorce (meant for a woman but almost everything there is applicable to a man as well) How to calculate alimony and How a judge decides the alimony amount
/r/askTRP30/12/13 05:41 AM
1

When we were getting along, my wife and I had many talks about how bullshit alimony is. And yet you never made her sign a pre-nup. Guys, this is why you ALWAYS have an escape plan, no matter how confident you are that you won't need it.
/r/askTRP30/12/13 05:41 AM
2

Don't forget the people making fun of SRS.
/r/askTRP30/12/13 05:28 AM
11

Tell me what you regard as your greatest strength, so I will know how best to undermine you. Tell me of your greatest fear, so I will know which I must force you to face. Tell me what you cherish most, so I will know what to take from you. And tell me what you crave, so that I might deny you.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 02:46 AM
8

considering she's said she's only had sex with one other person That's assuming she's telling you the truth. She might be, she might not be. But it doesn't matter, because there are other women out there who will sleep with you much easier than her. Find them and fuck them instead. Only took her out to eat one time. We've hungout a few times these past 2 weeks though. Always end up naked but not having actual intercourse. That's not going to change any time soon. Difficult women remain difficult…
/r/askTRP29/12/13 07:15 AM
1

Not sure if you read my edit or not, but: make her meet up at your place instead of going downtown, since you had to reschedule. This should help keep logistics from getting in the way of you sleeping with her.
/r/askTRP29/12/13 06:56 AM
2

Dude, she hasn't "wasted his time". He spent a few minutes setting up the date, and she warned him before flaking so he didn't waste any of the time he would have spent with her downtown.
/r/askTRP29/12/13 06:55 AM
1

If she weren't still interested she'd just ignore your texts. Ask me how I know. Incidentally, this is why I always text to confirm the day before. She's giving you an alternative day to meet up, which is pretty much the best-case scenario here. She's still interested in meeting up with you, although I'd make her meet up at your place instead of going downtown, since you had to reschedule. This should help keep logistics from getting in the way of you sleeping with her.
/r/askTRP29/12/13 06:51 AM
8

Ever been called a "Nice Guy"? Same thing. Stop taking women out to eat before you've slept with them. That's an easy way to get slotted into Provider territory, where she won't have sex with you because she thinks you're special. Don't ask me how that makes any sense, because I have no idea. But it is how women think. When setting up "dates", invite her to your place. If she balks, she wasn't interested in sleeping with you in the first place. If you must get food, go somewhere cheap like McDon…
/r/askTRP29/12/13 06:45 AM
-2

Have you tried affectionate, loving open relationships?
/r/askTRP29/12/13 06:35 AM
-1

You guys know that there's a third option, right? A way to have your cake and eat it too. Develop emotionally fulfilling open relationships. That way you can continue to sleep with any woman you want, while getting the sense of love and affection that you crave. It's Pickup Artist Polyamory.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 06:06 AM
0

I don't know why you're being downvoted; you make a perfectly valid observation.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 06:02 AM
2

Um, can't you have kids without being married? As in, have a loving, kind, commited relationship with the woman, but not be married to her?
/r/askTRP28/12/13 10:25 PM
2

Many men on TRP will judge women negatively for being promiscuous. This is because many men are suffering from the Disney Fantasy where they will find That One GirlTM who's Not Like The OthersTM. PUA Polyamory, in comparison, is about building a relationship that doesn't require her to be any different from the vast majority of women. She might see other guys, she might not. The relationship might last the rest of your life, or she might decide to trade up next week. It's about developing the to…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 05:34 PM
2

PUA doesn't have to mean "no relationship". The reason that's a common assumption is because of something called the Madonna/Whore complex: either a woman is a slut and therefore not relationship quality, or she's a pure maiden and thus would never go for one of those nasty one-night stands. PUA Polyamory bypasses this completely. With PUA Polyamory the end goal is not a monogamous relationship, so it doesn't matter how promiscuous of a woman she is, so it's perfectly acceptable to turn those on…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/13 05:29 PM
1

In one of his earlier posts he said it was because he "couldn't take it any more" and insisted she come clean. ...seven years after the fact.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 06:06 PM
-1

Ah, I have a slightly different view. Assuming her story is accurate, what happened was rape. She didn't want to have sex, she felt like she had no control, and eventually she just let him. However, that assumes that she's telling the truth and not just what he wants to hear or a false memory that he unknowingly created.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 06:00 PM
0

The only violence unleashed should be on a punching bag (or something else designed to be hit). Just FYI, acts of violence don't reduce overall anger. Paradoxically, violently expressing your anger actually increases your aggression towards others.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 05:20 PM
1

yet be virgins for you to marry? Nah. I don't do monogamy, so I don't have to worry about her promiscuity. I don't care if she's fucked an entire football team, so long as I don't pick up any STIs, she sleeps with me when I want, and she treats me well.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/13 05:51 AM
7

Um, no. Waiting to have sex slots you firmly in the "provider" role, which is exactly what this poor guy experienced. on the off chance she gets insecure because she likes me, I wouldn't be able to get over her having insecurity before we're even "official". it'd slowly make me just want to bang her and not commit Then... just do that? There's no reason you should change your behavior just to make her feel better. It's like giving in and letting a tantruming kid have candy at the store. Sure it'…
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 08:57 PM
6

Very good, you've spotted a pattern. Now here are your options, ranked by how upset you are about the pattern: 1) You could unsubscribe from the subreddit. 2) You could continue to complain about it in a futile attempt to change the behavior of other people. 3) You could decide to not let it bother you and continue posting as usual. 4) You could take advantage of the pattern to accrue comment karma. Your call.
/r/TheRedPill25/12/13 06:33 PM
11

I don't think I could pull off the dreadiness, Then there is no hope for you. I don't get into monogamous relationships because it encourages this situation right here: unable to end the relationship if necessary, you're stuck "communicating" with her and hoping she behaves differently in the future. She won't.
/r/askTRP25/12/13 05:29 PM
6

It's a community thing. In this context, in this post, people in this subreddit either agree with the comment or feel it adds value to the conversation. Whether or not you feel this is the case is irrelevant. The community has spoken. :P
/r/TheRedPill25/12/13 05:23 PM
1

"SUCK MY DICK, BITCH!"
/r/askTRP25/12/13 05:27 AM
8

Tyler Durden's post on the "Secret Society"
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 06:35 PM
9

A few days ago I received a private message from a throwaway account informing me that: "if you're going to be posting weird, neckbeard-tier red pill shit, you should probably delete the comment where you gave out your Facebook account [...]. You're just asking for SRS to dox you." The message went on to tell me why I was a bad person and how I should change. The comment where I linked to my facebook page was a year old. This person had gone through my entire posting history to learn all about m…
/r/askTRP24/12/13 06:29 PM
1

I'm pretty sure that would be enough to turn her off the idea. ROFL. I hate to break it to you, but all she would do in that situation is (best-case scenario) agree with everything you've said, then go out and do what she wanted anyways. The worst-case scenario is mostly the same, except that she causes drama and puts you on the defensive for not trusting her.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 04:02 PM
1

Through her words to her friends ("imagine a monster dick like that pounding you, yum") she's expressed an interest in having sex with James Deen. Through her actions (filling out an application that requires time and effort) she's expressed a willingness to go through with it. She's shown her duplicity already by downplaying the application as a joke. A woman like that would never tell her BF if she did get selected. She'd just say she has a doctor's appointment or something and he'd never know…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 04:00 PM
6

if you just refuse the drama [...] If one party stops reacting If you're willing to put up with her constantly escalating attempts to cause drama and get a reaction from you, sure. Personally, I prefer to be in a relationship where she knows better than to even try causing drama. Much less emotionally draining that way. Just to prove it's possible: my last long-term relationship lasted 3.5 years. She only once caused any drama, and that was A) near the end of the relationship, and B) because my …
/r/TheRedPill21/12/13 03:59 AM
13

because he should have become emotionally detached since this revelation. A strongly upsetting revelation like this doesn't cause you to become detached. If anything, it reinforces the emotional states you associate with her. Happy, angry, sad, upset, it doesn't matter what the emotional state is, so long as it's strong and you associate it with her. The opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference. In this situation, the guy is too attached to think clearly. The only way to get the emotional…
/r/TheRedPill20/12/13 11:02 PM
3

As I said, Mystery laid the groundwork for most of modern Pickup and PUA workshops. I don't doubt his contributions to the field, I just wanted to make sure people understand the limitations of his system.
/r/askTRP18/12/13 01:46 AM
6

Mystery laid the groundwork for most of modern Pickup and PUA workshops, but the actual scope of Mystery Method is somewhat limited: Routine-based indirect club game. Alternatives to MM include natural game, direct and semi-direct styles, approaching women who aren't conventional 9s and 10s, and social circle game.
/r/askTRP17/12/13 10:05 PM
3

Page 1: Nnoooo, don't make me... Page 5: Cock! Cock! I love cock! <3 Reader: Well, that was fast.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/13 09:52 PM
9

It's full of truths, half-truths, and completely incorrect information. Personally I'd put more stock in this list of Indicators of Interest (IOIs), originally created by a well-respected PUA guru named Mystery.
/r/askTRP17/12/13 09:14 PM
2

How long have you been married to her?
/r/TheRedPill17/12/13 08:34 PM
10

A low-value male spends money and affection on a woman. A high-value male has women spending money and affection on him. If you want to be seen as high value (or at least not low value), it's very important that you sit her down and have a conversation about the spending money. Tell her that you're broke and that when you go out any time in the future she'll need to pay for herself. Do not apologize for this. Tell her the same way you might tell her it will rain tomorrow and that she should have…
/r/askTRP17/12/13 08:21 PM
31

"[God_isPoohBear], what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."
/r/TheRedPill16/12/13 08:20 PM
25

Really? Fuck. I must be doing things wrong then, 'cuz that's exactly what I look for on a first date.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/13 08:16 PM
4

Don't forget, for women relationships are supposed to "just happen". That's how their world works. The thing about humans is that we tend to assume that everybody else is like us, even when they're not. In this case, if a woman started complaining that things were easier for others, it would likely be because she actually was lacking confidence or desperate. So the women you talked to assumed that, since that's what it would be like for them, it must be the same for you. It's not, of course, but…
/r/TheRedPill16/12/13 08:14 PM
0

I'm assuming that sex within a short amount of time is your initial goal, as it is mine. Do you ever sleep with a woman at her place within one trip? If so, would it occur frequently enough to build my strategy around? How do you transition to going back to her place? One line I heard actually works well for this is "If I let you take me home tonight, will you feed me?"
/r/askTRP16/12/13 05:23 PM
1

I just never commit, under the assumption that it can be difficult or impossible to predict ahead of time whether the sex (among other things) will dry up.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/13 09:44 AM
1

Spin plates and follow the rules here labelled Fuck Buddy (FB) and you should be fine.
/r/askTRP16/12/13 09:38 AM
2

Don't feed the trolls.
/r/askTRP15/12/13 08:36 PM
0

I just have no urge or desire to bang a woman who is banging someone else. And that's fine, but to then take that preference and say, in essence, "anybody who doesn't think as I do is lacking self-respect" is insulting beyond belief. Even if it is "just your opinion".
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 08:32 PM
0

no self-respecting man knowingly shares a woman with another man I respect myself and I'm okay with sharing women, so I'm pretty sure you're wrong.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 08:01 PM
0

it just a attestation whore selling the sex tape. wut?
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 07:57 PM
2

there's no reason to keep them around. Well, not exactly true. Male friends can bring things to the table other than female sex. Namely, male friendship.
/r/askTRP15/12/13 01:13 PM
1

*whistles* Your logistics are even worse than mine. Well, good luck at college my friend.
/r/askTRP15/12/13 12:48 PM
2

The idea here is to screen for women who are willing to have sex with me in a relatively short amount of time. I'm specifically trying to avoid any woman who would string me along indefinitely with no intention of actually have sex with me, and any woman who would require a large amount of emotional investment and/or commitment before having sex with me. I suppose you can place the cut-off point wherever you want, but when you're approaching a large number of women like I do it helps to be econo…
/r/askTRP15/12/13 12:44 PM
1

Interesting. Out of curiousity, where do you go to meet women?
/r/askTRP15/12/13 11:49 AM
1

Unfortunately, that won't become an option until I graduate from college here in 7 months.
/r/seduction15/12/13 08:17 AM
2

I recommend reading the works of Albert Ellis on Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT). REBT is a subset of Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) that focuses on letting go of "musts" and "shoulds". Here's a 3-minute primer on the subject, though I strongly suggest picking up one of his books at the local bookstore. That's the psychological portion of it. The logistical portion of it, how to actually take advantage of the hamster, is simple but difficult: Be attractive to women. Have other women a…
/r/askTRP15/12/13 05:18 AM
3

I'm not sure about Chicago's laws, but here where I live pedestrians have the right of way, and drivers must do everything in their power not to hit them. Assuming it's the same there, she was well within her rights to assume that the driver wouldn't hit her as she walked with the light, on the crosswalk. Especially since this has happened many times to her before with no ill effects.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 03:33 AM
4

I'm not sure why everybody is turning this into a male/female dichotomy. She had a very bad experience, got drunk, panicked when confronted with a similar bad experience, and reacted very poorly as a result. That's not female-exclusive behavior, much as we might wish to believe otherwise.
/r/TheRedPill15/12/13 03:29 AM
17

Women aren't superior or inferior to men. They are different. Not better or worse, just different. There are some biological and/or cultural differences that cause women to process things differently and act in different ways than men do. Neither way of acting is better or worse than the other, but in order to live the best possible life and not get screwed over by your ignorance you have to be aware of the differences. That's all TRP advocates: learning the differences between the genders and u…
/r/askTRP13/12/13 03:35 AM
14

Get this ingrained in your mind: you are a booty call. You are not her boyfriend. She has other people she can see for lovey-dovey boyfriend behavior. Your only job is to give her intense orgasms. It is a good thing that she's going to the movie with somebody else, because then she won't be tempted to try to get you to settle down with her. When she starts trying to get serious with you, that's when you need to put your foot down. There's none of that here, so relax. You've got a good thing goin…
/r/askTRP13/12/13 03:12 AM
3

Well, at least you're honest. Now stop doing that. If it's nothing, and you know it's nothing, then stop making something out of it.
/r/askTRP13/12/13 03:07 AM
5

My dad is a lovable loser. For as long as I've known him he has been living from monetary crisis to monetary crisis. Some investigation revealed that this is because he sucks at saving money, but he refuses to see this. I only investigated the reason why he always seems struck by some unexpected financial setback or another after I loaned him several hundred dollars out of my student loans that I'll never see again. I loved him dearly, but he couldn't get my brother and me to do the work for the…
/r/askTRP13/12/13 03:02 AM
4

Taken from an old alt.seduction.fast post written by IAmMaximus: THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS TO REMEMBER AT ALL TIMES! 1.) Approach. 2.) Have fun. 3.) Be your idea of a cool, normal guy. 4.) Girls are just people, too. BODY LANGUAGE Practice this stuff alone and during your everyday life until it's second nature and just what you always do. 1.) Stand up straight with your feet shoulder width apart and your hands where they can be seen except in front of your face, chest, or stomach. 2.) When you s…
/r/askTRP13/12/13 02:47 AM
3

Many guys eventually want monogamy and figure that a promiscuous woman (i.e. a "slut") is more likely to cheat on him than a non-promiscuous one. This generally leads to one of two mentalities depending on how important sex is to the man: either "She needs to be sexually pure before she meets me but have sex with me quickly", or "If a woman has sex with me quickly, she's probably had sex with other men just as quickly." Not all guys are like this, but enough are to make it a problem. A woman loo…
/r/askTRP12/12/13 06:36 AM
5

He couldn't teach me what he didn't know.
/r/askTRP12/12/13 06:17 AM
2

I dunno, I can understand that. On some level fathers are expected to teach you what you need to know to be effective in life. Some fathers failed to be around, some fathers didn't teach effective life-coping strategies, some fathers didn't teach money handling skills... and some fathers never taught their sons to be attractive to women.
/r/askTRP12/12/13 06:16 AM
11

"I would immediately kick my girlfriend out if she denied me sex."
/r/TheRedPill12/12/13 06:08 AM
5

Hey, if he likes it he likes it. Not my place to judge. ...but you don't really need feminism for that. :P
/r/TheRedPill12/12/13 06:05 AM
5

Maybe not a transfer of power, but definitely a loss of your power. Moving in restricts your options and makes it harder for you to end a relationship that isn't giving you what you want.
/r/askTRP11/12/13 05:12 AM
1

Well the thing is I practice PUA polyamory. That means that I can get love and affection from the women I have sex with, without the urge to settle down with just one woman. [link 1] [link 2] I keep women in my life for as long as it stays positive for the both of us. That could be one night, one week, several years or a lifetime. I never expect it or need it, but if it happens it happens. My mistake in the most recent relationship was staying in it even though the spark had gone out some time e…
/r/askTRP10/12/13 11:31 PM
17

DON'T FUCKING DO IT. Moving in with a woman automatically transfers a large chunk of the power to her. Once she's moved in it becomes much harder to end the relationship if necessary. This makes drama occur much more often because, on a subconscious level, she isn't as worried about losing you.
/r/askTRP10/12/13 11:19 PM
1

I was a needy-fuck. I was like a baby asking to be taken care of. You know, I think I am you. All right, if my past is anything like your future, here's what you can expect in the next few years: After breaking up with her (and the subsequent emotional anguish) you find another woman a few years down the road while sarging who is still a little chubby but not nearly as obese as the first one and has a cute face. Due to your insistence on having things be all completely your way she follows your …
/r/askTRP10/12/13 10:53 PM
1

Not specifically. It's just the idea "Women are all one way and men are all another" exaggerated for comical effect. EDIT: In case it's not clear, the signature at the bottom of the essay links to the webcomic I found it at.
/r/TheRedPill10/12/13 11:34 AM
5

I believe that blue pill love was possible before adulthood. Not likely. One time I was throwing a green bouncy ball around while waiting for my dad to get done at a work party. A little girl, maybe 4 years old, started trying to get it from me. The instant i finally let her have the bouncy green ball she lost interest, dropped it on the floor, and wandered off. This typifies much of human behavior, whether the person in question is 5 or 50 years old.
/r/askTRP10/12/13 10:04 AM
3

No. My first girlfriend was quite obese and I'm still recovering from the relationship with my second girlfriend ending. I'll tell you what, though. Each time it fails I learn how not to do it the next time around. First girlfriend: monogamous. Wound up cheating on her. Not proud of it, but there it is. Conclusion: I don't do monogamy. Second girlfriend: I wasn't monogamous, but I promised that she would be the most important person in my life. After several years I felt like I owed her (time, e…
/r/askTRP10/12/13 10:00 AM
1

I get that bluepillers think they're screwing you over by saying stuff like this, and that's horrible. But in reality, a woman hearing "that guy has many women" starts thinking, on a subconscious level, "I've got to get me some of that!"
/r/TheRedPill10/12/13 02:12 AM
7

She can only teach him her point of view. Which is submitting to the other person. Brilliant.
/r/TheRedPill09/12/13 10:42 AM
13

then they start fucking calling you a player and what not in front of other girls Oh gosh, that's just horrible. Somebody is telling women that you have other women attracted to you? However shall you recover from this devastating setback? ;)
/r/TheRedPill09/12/13 09:52 AM
12

From the Vasalgel FAQ: Vasalgel is being developed as a “social venture” (designed to make enough profit to be sustainable, but not make a killing). The primary goal is to make an affordable, effective male contraceptive widely available, so there’s no opportunity for riches—this is not the next Microsoft stock! Also, our format does not allow us to sell stock on the market. However, stay tuned for crowdfunding in 2014—or you can donate to the venture’s nonprofit parent, Parsemus Foundation, now…
/r/TheRedPill09/12/13 07:08 AM
1

That photo may not be current.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/13 01:07 PM
6

Toasting your bread is evil manipulation. You didn't deserve that warmth, that crunch, and that enhanced taste. You raped the bread. Dammit, now I'm hungry.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/13 08:59 AM
2

There's a whole subreddit for this: /r/suavein. Needs more love.
/r/askTRP06/12/13 08:21 AM
2

"I refuse to believe that anyone in the red pill has ever interacted with a women long enough to have a conversation" It gets worse. We are somehow both virgin neckbeards AND masters of a mystical element called "game" which manipulates women into sleeping with us against their will. How this is supposed to work, I have no idea.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/13 07:19 AM
1

Or, option 3, you perform a Soft Next the instant she starts putting you on the defensive or causing drama. Seriously, it does wonders for the relationship. Look into it.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/13 07:07 AM
3

Personally I liked The Wedding Date. Not as an unintentionally redpill movie, but as a romantic comedy with an alpha male lead. The male lead is a male escort paid to accompany the female lead to her sister's wedding. He displays cocky and funny behavior (makes outrageous claims about his mother with a straight face then admits the joke when she believes him) and even uses NLP at one point take her mind on a brief trip and help her overcome some anxiety. It is still a romantic comedy though, whi…
/r/TheRedPill05/12/13 05:27 AM
1

Stage 1: Denial Stage 2: Anger/frustration Stage 3: Acceptance Most men never make it past Stage 1. These are the bluepillers, the manginas, the white knights. Some men get stuck at Stage 2 and remain bitter at women for not being conforming to what the man was taught. Hopefully you'll pull through to Stage 3, where you can take the necessary action to have the best relationships you can, without judging women for being women.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/13 05:17 AM
2

My point is that you don't have to take on total leadership. You can have a light touch and only demand compliance on what's actually important to you, and it can still work out just fine.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/13 09:08 AM
3

[repost from elsewhere in the thread] Because of my insistence on taking the leadership role, I spent the last 3 years in a relationship with somebody who unconditionally followed my lead but never initiated anything herself. It got very old. In future relationships, I'm not going to take on total leadership unless it becomes absolutely necessary. Fortunately, it hasn't been necessary so far. With the women I see now I make sure to get what I want (sex, affection, certain outings and activities)…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/13 08:52 AM
7

Because of my insistence on taking the leadership role, I spent the last 3 years in a relationship with somebody who unconditionally followed my lead but never initiated anything herself. It got very old. In future relationships, I'm not going to take on total leadership unless it becomes absolutely necessary. Fortunately, it hasn't been necessary so far. With the women I see now I make sure to get what I want (sex, affection, certain outings and activities), and the rest of the time we idly neg…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/13 08:48 AM
1

Oh, so it's Social Proof as seen from her perspective! Nice to know that the timeless concepts keep getting rediscovered. :)
/r/TheRedPill04/12/13 07:08 AM
6

Well, either way I think we can agree he should be preparing for a divorce, just in case it comes to that.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/13 07:03 AM
3

Well, he doesn't have to file for divorce. He could stay married and just get sex elsewhere, so long as he doesn't hide his intentions from his wife.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/13 06:58 AM
1

Do you have other options? If you aren't already, I would strongly suggest cold approaching women in public to increase your options.
/r/askTRP04/12/13 06:16 AM
2

She is fucking nuts has issues with sexuality and control. Steer clear of her and find other chicks to bang.
/r/askTRP04/12/13 06:14 AM
2

*ahem*
/r/TheRedPill04/12/13 06:01 AM
31

Just a head's-up: verbalizing that she's fucking up and withdrawing attention/affection will work in the short-term, but over time she'll slip back into her old habits. I haven't been in this exact situation before, but I'm guessing one of two things will happen: 1) Your behavior will work to adjust her behavior, but you'll need to keep repeating it every time she starts slipping into her old behavior. This can be emotionally draining, but it is an option. 2) Your behavior will eventually stop m…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/13 05:57 AM
7

Well to be fair, she does seem to be bugfuck insane. They had alleged she was often unreasonable and would explode into tantrums - such as once surging into a meeting, shouting about male genitalia and storming back out again.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/13 12:30 AM
2

No, that can't be it. My dad's a great guy, but he is a massive beta male. It's probably just the difference between the women my dad wound up with and the one(s) your dad did.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 06:44 AM
2

What, this guy?
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 06:35 AM
1

I learned that stepfathers can learn to love stepchildren, but stepmothers will never see their stepchildren as anything but a bitter reminder that her man has a past. I had two different stepmothers at different times, and I never experienced anything like this. I can understand, however, learning things that aren't true. Been there, done that.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 06:34 AM
1

It's scope insensitivity. Nothing new there.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 06:31 AM
1

The thing is, we don't know what causes marriages to fail, or to not fail. As far as I know, there have been no empirical, peer-reviewed studies that say "do this and your marriage will last and be happy." We have people coming up with their own solutions, and because you can only be one person in one monogamous relationship at a time, it's impossible to tell from the inside what works and what doesn't. That doesn't stop people from coming up with their own explanations, of course, but that also…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 06:15 AM
1

Using your coin flip example, there are many factors to why a coin could/will land on a certain side. Wind/Air Resistance/force on one side/ gravity. Wow, you're really proving my point for me. A coin flip is effectively random. Air resistance/gravity/whatever isn't something that you can control or do anything about. Especially when you're only flipping it once every several years. For you to imply otherwise tells me that you are invested in the idea of being able to control that coin flip (met…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 05:51 AM
1

Not everyone wants kids, but for those who do, properly raising children as a single man is much, much harder than raising children in a two-parent environment. Swingers manage non-monogamous child-raising. They sleep with other people and still manage to stay together and raise healthy children. You can do a whole lot to raise the odds - improving your game with the sexual strategy knowledge espoused in /r/theredpill, for example. I haven't seen the evidence one way or another that Red Pill str…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 05:29 AM
1

All men who get married do so because they believe they have the skills to make the marriage last, and half of them are wrong. To extend your metaphor, it would be like playing without knowing your own skill level in a game that is at least partially luck-based, and betting all your time, money, and happiness on the outcome of that one match.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 03:04 AM
1

Yes, thank you coinflipbot. >:-|
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 02:53 AM
1

Or is my thinking wrong? It's not flawed, it just missing something. To my mind, marriage is inherently flawed. From this point of view, there's nothing that can be done to change or improve the chances, otherwise it probably would have become common knowledge by now. Look at it another way: if you flip a coin, your odds of landing heads are 50/50. Imagine that somebody else came along and said "Now, wait. I know how to make it land heads. Just flip the wrist harder. If it lands tails, you're ob…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 02:51 AM
1

Too bad we don't see much of him on-screen.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 02:25 AM
3

TV shows: Entourage, Mad Men, Californication, and Nip/Tuck. Movies: Fight Club, Office Space and (oddly enough) The Wedding Date. Absolute favorite character: Hank Moody from Californication.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 02:21 AM
1

if you can keep a woman around that long without an actual marriage it seems like it may be a potentially healthy alternative. Living with her causes the same problems. Either she'll start badgering you for marriage or you become de facto monogamous with her or both. Additionally, if you leave and you're common-law married to her, she can sue you for money just as if you were "officially" married. What about ideas about children outside of wedlock? (I just realized the symbolism of 'wed-Lock') D…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 01:58 AM
3

[reposted from upthread] Actually, the length of time you date doesn't have an affect on marriage survival rate one way or another. Moving in with the person (which you usually do when you've been dating a long time) actually decreases the chances of the marriage lasting. Look it up if you don't believe me. But this is my point! Everybody thinks they know what they need to do to make a marriage work, and half of the marriages end anyways! You thought you knew that dating longer makes marriages m…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 01:40 AM
3

No, if you want a successful marriage it's a coin-toss chance whether or not you get it. Part of the reason is because you cannot control your partner's actions and decisions. Even if you're completely dedicated to making the relationship work, that's still only 50% of the battle. You cannot control her behavior. If she loses her interest and wants a divorce, there's nothing you can do! Oh, and here's another tidbit for you: women initiate divorce between 66% and 90% of the time. So the long-ter…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 01:37 AM
1

Every single male who gets married does so because he believes he knows how to make the relationship work, and that he can beat the odds. ... AND 50% OF THEM ARE STILL WRONG! So if you believe you know how do make a marriage last, congratulations. You're in the EXACT same category as all the other guys who have ever gotten married, and that means you still only have 50% lifetime success rate.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 01:31 AM
1

I never said you should cheat on a gf, though some people do that. The problem is not in the sexual exclusivity that comes with monogamy. The problem is the heightened drama and the lack of recourse if she stops having sex with you.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 01:28 AM
3

Seriously, three months. I have been with my girlfriend for three years and we are just starting to seriously talk about marriage. Actually, the length of time you date doesn't have an affect on marriage survival rate one way or another. Moving in with the person (which you usually do when you've been dating a long time) actually decreases the chances of the marriage lasting. Look it up if you don't believe me. But this is my point! Everybody thinks they know what they need to do to make a marri…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 01:25 AM
1

Yes, and in doing so you would have to spend time and money on it, possibly losing a large chunk of your savings and custody of any kids you have, in addition to the anguish that ending a long-term relationship causes. Yes that's an option, but a better one is to just not do monogamy at all.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 01:21 AM
1

If you are RP and your methods are not working, there are extreme measures you can take including sleeping with other woman. Right, but for me that's not "extreme" at all. That's the best, fastest, and easiest way to handle it. That's why I've set my life up so that I have several women I can sleep with if any one of them isn't doing it for me.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 01:18 AM
1

"Penguin monogamy." I love it. :) Short-term monogamy is fine, so long as you know it comes with an expiration date and set your plans around that. The mistake most people make is expecting lifetime monogamy when the odds are not in their favor.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 01:15 AM
3

Ooh, lucky. I usually have to shut down any inquiries about the other women I see because the women I attract can never handle hearing about it.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 01:12 AM
2

That's better than nothing, but it's not the same as actually sleeping with other women. There's a difference between giving a woman good feelings and actually being able to seal the deal. Unless you're doing the latter, there's no guarantee you'll actually be able to when it's necessary.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 01:00 AM
5

That's...not really relevant to the original post.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 04:37 PM
2

Self-improvement is always an option. You could have one-night-stands or fuck-buddies or girlfriends, or any combination of the above. You just have to be willing to put in the time and effort to improve yourself. So... what do you want?
/r/askTRP01/12/13 04:36 PM
3

There are guys for whom I'd give a 90% odd of failing from the get go, while others will be in the 10% (like an alpha who keeps frame during LTR). Perhaps, but monogamy itself generally tends to weaken your frame. It makes it harder to end the relationship if it becomes necessary, it eliminates any female options you might have had, and it prevents you from going out and actively practicing your pickup skills.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 03:58 PM
3

Harry Potter and the Sun Source. It's a crossover between Harry Potter and The Destroyer book series. Chiun is a racist Korean old man, but he is also the single most deadly being on earth, bar none.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 03:44 PM
0

I practice Pickup Artist Polyamory which gives me sex and affection, lots of happiness, and zero drama. Logistically speaking, I make sure I always have female options, I follow Tubarao's relationship rules and I soft next her whenever the situation demands it. Also, I work to have male friends and personal goals and hobbies outside of her.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 03:38 PM
4

Uh, yeah, we do. Many of us fear rejection. Those of us who are lucky and determined will work past the fear to accomplish the goals that are important to us. Look at it this way: which is more impressive, somebody who has never known fear or somebody who has felt the fear and did the job anyways?
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 02:59 PM
1

You should be aware of the reasons for female infidelity and always work to be so fucking excellent as a man that they never occur The problem is, her behavior is ultimately outside of your control. Yes you can (and should) be the best you can be and influence her behavior that way, but that doesn't guarantee that she will never cheat on you. Like I said, though, my solution probably isn't for everybody.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 02:41 PM
5

And that's fine for you, but that's not my priority. abcd_z: "I never expect monogamy from her." skinny_bitches: "That's a bad idea, because then she might fuck somebody else." abcd_z: "Well yes, that's kind of the point."
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 02:37 PM
1

Sex whenever you want it should be one of the rules you establish before entering the relationship. I agree with you, so long as you're willing to actually leave if she denies you sex. Monogamy generally makes it harder for men to do this (lack of other options, rusty pickup skills), though I suppose it is technically possible to do.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 02:34 PM
1

Yeah, you didn't actually answer my question. Why is not expecting monogamy from her a bad idea?
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 02:30 PM
7

Yes, it is possible to influence her behavior, but the choice is ultimately hers. If she just doesn't want sex, and refuses to have sex with you no matter what you do, how do you handle that? You can't go out and have sex with another woman, because monogamy means you promised not to. Assuming all your tactics to get sex from her have failed, your choices are either A) suck it up, or B) file for divorce.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 02:28 PM
4

Well, if you're confident in the strength of your frame, who am I to say otherwise? I am curious, though, why you say not expecting monogamy from her is a bad idea.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 02:20 PM
6

Nothing you've said changes the facts: in a monogamous relationship a woman can choose to not have sex with you, and in that situation there is nothing you can do about it.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 02:09 PM
9

If you drop all your other female options, you become more needy and more likely to develop oneitis and less likely to deal with shit tests appropriately. Besides, if you refuse to give her an answer, and you refuse to act like you're settling down with her, why not actually see other women? Personally, I accept that I won't always be able to tell if a woman is cheating on me. Because of this I structure my relationships such that I never expect monogamy from her in the first place. Of course, t…
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 02:04 PM
2

Make a small decision and see it through to a goal that's easy to accomplish. Buy one brand of shampoo instead of another. Say "hello" to one stranger. Decide on a small five-minute physical exercise to do once. Making decisions is like building a muscle: the more you do it, the easier it gets.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 01:55 PM
11

You can tell he's of two minds about it. The first two pieces of advice say "never get married", but then the other two say "well, if you do get married, here's what to do." He may be upset now, but several years down the road I guarantee you he'll be looking for the right woman to settle down with. ...again.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 01:25 PM
6

It means that our entire sexual happiness depends on one person and theirs on us. Yes! Exactly! This guy gets it. Also I doubt that installing male monogamy was of any benefit for anyone. It benefits the women. It locks the guy down to help her raise the kid(s) while she may or may not cheat and get some alpha male sex on the side.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 01:22 PM
6

"It wasn't long before Bo-Bae began telling me of her feelings. And we were happy." "Feelings?" Harry echoed weakly. "Indeed," Chiun confirmed. "And before too long, my gentle flower began offering me her suggestions. And we were happy." Chiun hid his smile at Harry sudden pallor. His son was well aware of how much Chiun appreciated suggestions. "After four years of wedded bliss, her mother Jin moved into our home, and Bo-Bae's suggestions became opinions that were soon joined by Jin's. And we w…
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 12:51 PM
4

*cough*
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 12:46 PM
4

I started with the assumptions that all women hamster and that all women are hypergamous, and built my relationship management system around them. In comparison, you seem to be looking for that One Special WomanTM who Isn't Like The RestTM and "get[ting] that love lockdown before someone else does". This seems like a waste of time and effort, TBH. Even if you do manage to lock her down before she realizes how attractive she is to men, as drrrrrr said, "All girls are going to get exposed to the "…
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 11:55 AM
1

You can't change the fact that they operate on emotional consensus Well no, but that doesn't mean you have to put up with her venting all over you.
/r/askTRP01/12/13 06:32 AM
2

"I'm sorry, but I'm really not interested in hearing you complain. When we're together I want to enjoy all the time we spend together. I want to keep things light and positive and fun. So let's talk about something else." "But-" -fix her with a steely gaze- "No. I am not interested in hearing it. If you need to vent, talk to one of your girlfriends. Not to me." From there I hold eye contact until either she agrees or she complains again. If she complains, it's an immediate soft next. I leave and…
/r/askTRP01/12/13 04:02 AM
1

Can we can the "privilege" talk? It's bad enough on feminist sites, I really don't want to see it here.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 03:37 AM
1

yyyyeahh... that'll get you downvoted into invisibility.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 01:45 AM
2

I loved the fact that she had at least two kids by this guy. We must be doing something right, eh?
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 01:44 AM
3

I think it's a form of projection: they can't imagine saying what we say and not being angry about it, so they assume that we're all like that.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/13 01:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter