TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

irrelevantmoniker Archive

View 0 posts and 590 comments by irrelevantmoniker on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
41

I mean. The rate of male victimisation is about the same as for females if you consider made to penetrate to be rape. So they're sort of not wrong. Because for men to be more likely to be accused than raped then over 50% of all accusations against males would need to be false. Unless my maths is off. Though I suspect feminist researchers don't consider made to penetrate to be rape.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 03:32 PM
4

I'll assume you mean 'they cheated, got knocked up, kept the kid' as the scenario you're talking about. Seen as that's the coercive side of the fork that statement could be talking about. But in general as ever male traditionalist responsibilities are alive and well, female traditionalist responsibilities were oppression and thus abolished.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 03:01 PM
17

It's interesting that all the mandatory fatherhood feminist positions on this amounts to a gender reversed version of "You should have kept your legs closed then shouldn't you slut" Cause that's what their position sounds like if you flip the genders around, something that conservative pro-birthers have been saying to women for decades.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 12:09 PM
22

Andrew Tate is like a badly written dudebro antagonist in a comedy movie somehow became real.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 12:58 PM
108

It's sampling bias. Men in MGTOW spaces are probably mostly going to talk about the one thing that unifies them as a group. Their belief that for varying reasons it isn't worth a relationship with a woman. Now their reasoning might range from 'seems exhausting and risky' to 'women are literally she-satan' but their discussion of all the stuff they're doing instead is going to be in other spaces.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 11:49 AM
1

Ever since her reporting on the honey badgers at the calgary expo Amanda Marcotte has been the absolute pinnacle of factfree ideological 'journalism' as far as I'm concerned, an early and very strong example of what it means to not even flinch at disregarding facts inconvenient to feminist goals.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 02:20 PM
3

"The Truth is, the game was rigged from the start" -Benny from fallout New Vegas. But rather applicable here.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 10:45 AM
3

The author is I think the same Michael Hobbes who is referenced as an authority by Amanda Marcotte in her own libellious excretions on this topic. Which is a pretty damned disreputable association to have honestly.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 08:35 AM
6

A student of history would come to the stunningly obvious conclusion that if the feminist movement was interested in dismantling the traditionalist aspects that burden and constrain men then there would be no mens rights movement. Warren Farrell was part of the feminist movement, when he brought up the idea of addressing negative aspects of traditionalism that applied to men he was summarily shunned and driven out. This is near as I can tell the genesis of the mens rights movement with the myth …
/r/MensRights12/06/22 09:48 PM
2

Trite but true response I think. Both MRAs and feminists agree on the topic of women having equal rights and freedoms to men. Where we completely disagree is women having equal responsibilities and accountability to men. I'm not even sure where feminists believe the acceptable level of moral agency and responsibility is for woman. At times it seems they believe a woman rates somewhere between a small child and a landslide as far as their accountability goes.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 03:46 PM
19

If team Depp are the deppfords does that make the Amber team the turdpolishers?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/22 10:32 PM
3

I don't believe that for a second. Ignorance isn't what you don't know, it's what you won't know. She's being willfully and intentionally stupid in order to not engage substantively with opposing viewpoints. It's not her dad's doing it and this tendency to ascribe responsibility and blame to the nearest male figure is getting old and tired.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 11:49 AM
8

I see you have too little reading comprehension to engage with, what a pity.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 10:35 AM
35

The other abandons the kid Or is prevented from seeing the kid by the mother, or has to work so long to pay child support/alimony to the mother that he doesn't have time or energy to engage in fatherhood or she got the house and he doesn't have a living situation that allows him to have the kids part of the time. Notice how your unquestioned assumption assumes absolute and authoritative agency on the father's part and that no external forces and certainly not the mother had any influence to curt…
/r/MensRights31/05/22 09:19 AM
37

Women would use the power to rule the world fairly she says? Amber Heard didn't even use her power of 'being a woman' fairly, i'd hate to think how many people she'd have destroyed if she had the power of ruling the world so that shit is right out.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 03:20 PM
5

even if that was true..she went to go party? while bruised? heck does the makeup stay on your skin if it gets touched or wet? because getting touched and wet is not impossible at a party...also parties involve alcohol, and i'm fairly sure that the kind of painkillers you'd need to not be bothered by having the tar beaten out of you would not respond well to being mixed with booze. As with any lie made by someone who assumes everyone else is stupid there are multiple levels on which the lie doesn…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/22 10:52 AM
3

And apparently our 'brave questioner' has already turned tail and run off to lie about the results of the questioning on inceltears. Personally I'm not sure if their shocking lack of reading comprehension skills demonstrated here is intentional or some kind of deficiency.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 09:20 AM
13

"reign themselves in to appease men: not complaining, not demanding too much, not expressing needs, not having expectations for emotional openness or fulfillment." And men don't do anything to appease women in her world? What colour is the sky?
/r/MensRights08/05/22 07:20 PM
8

"The question of gender has always been defined and contested by different kinds of patriarchy, and women and girls have always been forced to conform to societal norms of what it means to be a ‘good woman’." page 29. And yet feminists have no trouble with the idea they're building a social order which will dictate to men and boys what it means to be a good man. Honestly this sounds slightly orwellian. They see what they perceive as a dictatorship that rules over them, so they foment a revolutio…
/r/MensRights02/05/22 12:14 PM
9

"redesign how they promote content so that they align with the feminist futures we want to create." ...how authoritarian, youtube is too free, it should be a pulpit, and not just any pulpit, MY pulpit for my ideology. "“manosphere” content, the report said, referring to a collection of movements that tap into men who feel alienated from a society they see as being too good to women." But where does this feeling of alienation and that society is favouring women come from? Feminist analysis never …
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:14 PM
1

No but if there's one thing that this community is good at it's that there's a bunch of ninjas lurking in the wings with all these things bookmarked and one will be along shortly.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 08:48 AM
8

Yes. Feminists are on your side. Does their acknowledgment and anger that men assault, rape, and kill them actually bother you? If so, you are part of the problem No, it's that feminists paint rape and domestic violence as definitionally a male crime inflicted on females. This is a lie to paint men as monsters. Sexual assault rates are pretty close to even, DV rates likewise, intimate partners used to have parity until domestic violence shelters for women became a thing which dropped female perp…
/r/MensRights27/04/22 12:06 AM
13

Are you aware of the context in which you're replying? It is an attack if the woman is saying "No see, you're wrong, let me a woman define manhood, maleness and masculinity for you." Men used to define what it feminity and womanhood meant. That WAS the patriarchy, and those men were dicks..so how are women not cunts when they define maleness for men? don't you think any woman saying "I know more about being a man than a man does" is just a tiny tiny bit presumptous?
/r/MensRights26/04/22 11:59 PM
4

If Johnny wins all that will happen is that the feminists will take a step back, see how he did it, then start plotting and lobbying to make those specific steps impossible so a future mr depp will lose the next one. Case in point. Jian Ghomeshi in Canada. Man was accused of sexual assault by a cabal of lying women, they were revealed because Jian kept very very good records of correspondences that showed the discrepancies in their stories. Thus Jian Ghomeshi walked free though never got his car…
/r/MensRights24/04/22 02:05 PM
3

civilized society is a male project. It was built by the efforts of men, it can be destroyed by their inaction. As more and more men check out of the project or scale back their input the great wheel will slow and falter. Sooner or later those who style themselves the masters of this great wheel and the women who depend upon it will be faced with a choice, change the way it turns or let the wheel grind to a halt.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 12:40 PM
6

"bi directional violence was at least very rare" And yet there was this study right. I don't have a reference saved sorry but you're welcome to look, this is from memory. But it was of women who ended up in hospital due to injuries brought about in domestic violence. They basically interviewed them and their partners to get information on what led up to the hospital visit and used this to come up with advice for women to avoid hospital visits for DV. You know what they came up with as advice bas…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 09:39 AM
31

"stop recording me" Because the recording shows how crazy her lies are. Cause I'm not a woman, but if I was and my boyfriend had just grabbed me by the neck and thrown me in my room violently? the last fucking thing i'd do is get between him and the door.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/03/22 01:27 PM
29

Honourable ladies might deserve better. Deceitful females though?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/03/22 05:13 PM
23

this is i think the only sense in which we live in a traditional patriarchy. its a mind pattern people hold to where only men are agents. An agent is capable of action, but an object is only capable of reaction. A man thus when they do a thing its an action, something for which he is morally accountable that originated with him. A woman however when they do a thing its a reaction, something that was done in response to an action of an agent(therefore a man) and to which she is not morally accoun…
/r/MensRights04/02/22 12:18 PM
3

I wish I could argue your pessimistic perspective is wrong. But nothing is occurring to me yet.
/r/MensRights21/01/22 02:10 PM
7

"The very existence of MGTOW is a testimony to the failure of MRM." The very existence of MGTOW strengthens the MRM. As it gives the MRM leverage. In any negotiation you need to have the option to walk away from the table and perhaps more importantly the other side needs to know you have that option. If the feminists think the men don't have have a choice but to participate then what incentive do they have to amend their shitty deal? if they know men can walk away from it all then a rational neg…
/r/MensRights21/01/22 10:02 AM
3

I for one was not aware of this part of their history, just that whenever a post of "oh look AHS is slandering us again" is linked here it's furryhare behind it.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 05:29 PM
35

I want to note this post on AHS is by furryhare..every time the MRM is brought up there its furryhare. This individual has a rabid hate boner for the MRM and is apparently not mentally well. I'd say dont take them seriously, but the unfortunate reality is its possible that someone with authority at reddit will.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:06 PM
21

And drug rehab is full of conversations about how drugs are bad...while the reformed people are in the rehab meetings. Outside of those meetings they probably do a bunch of other shit. But you don't see that in the rehab meetings because its almost like those meetings have a focused topic.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 01:34 AM
6

I know you want to charitably interpret this woman's statements. But do you think for one fraction of a second that is what she means? cause if she did being not an idiot she would have written "97% of women have experienced sexual harassment. Every woman and girl has been subjected to this" but she didn't. So you're left with two options, either A. she is kinda dim and doesn't know how to write sentences properly B. she's implying its an ongoing issue affecting women and girls every day and she…
/r/MensRights04/12/21 02:10 PM
1

Even feminism is implicitly patriarchal. Women are not agents, they're objects, unable to act only able.to react. Even the movement for liberating women apparently believes women are not free moral agents able to act as more than a domino In a chain that was set falling by a masculine hand.
/r/MensRights04/12/21 10:42 AM
1

"Where as sometimes women just don’t want men around which is fine. We do the same lol" and then get called misogynist? where have you been that you haven't been paying attention to the past two decades. Feminism has been systematically attempting to destroy male spaces and safe guard female ones, i personally have a theory the reason for this is that in gender exclusive spaces a gender might share amongst its members advice in navigating the treacherous negotiation and interplay known as 'deali…
/r/MensRights04/12/21 12:55 AM
8

To answer your question you need to ask another question first. That question is 'why is there a mens rights movement if feminism came first and was about equality' ? The answer is why feminism and the MRM cannot cooperate, feminists decades ago were faced with men says 'hey we feel there are unfair social responsibilities, stereotypes and expectations on our gender do you want to work with us to address them?' and the response from feminists appeared to be somewhere between 'no' and 'no and you…
/r/MensRights03/12/21 08:34 PM
45

The minority of men who have a proclivity to rape are often deterred by the massive social stigma and punishments that they may experience as a consequence of their actions. The minority of women who have a proclivity for false accusations are often encouraged by the social acclaim and rewards they may experience as a consequence of their actions. But of course, these are exactly identical in all meaningful respects right?
/r/MensRights17/11/21 07:15 PM
1

No they don't think they are. Not even slightly. And they don't even say they're doing so. And you saying so is rather telling of your understanding and intellectual capabilities. You are an imbecile and any further effort to engage with you would be wasted as you're too stupid to bother with.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 04:23 PM
1

Except the last thing female dating strategy is fighting for is equality. Tell me at school was your favourite lunchtime treat the red crayon or the green one?
/r/MensRights05/11/21 03:26 PM
16

And notice the presuppositions that are always at play. It's not simply that they don't address the question of whether feminism is causing men to give up on gender relations and career and turn to porn and video games instead. It never occurs to them to ask the question cause the idea that feminism could have negative consequences is an alien concept. Feminism is a lot like the hardline belief that god is morally perfect and incapable of doing evil.
/r/MensRights02/11/21 06:03 PM
2

So a man walks into an Atheist convention. And he tries to use creationist hard line evangelical speeches from the 80s and 90s. He is shocked. Shocked I tell you to find that this is ineffective. Op. You're Eric hovind in this metaphor.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 11:43 PM
3

Well they threw Warren Farrel out for mentioning it, and if the moderate feminists really wanted to welcome discussion of this they could of opposed said throwing out no? therefore by your logic feminism is an extremist movement. And if you watch feminist activism then you see that there's a lot of downplaying of these issues.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 09:42 PM
7

"Why is there a men's rights movement?" Well, Warren Farrel is considered by some to be the grandfather of the mens rights movement with him writing the myth of male power. Warren Farrel before then was a member of the feminist movement. He was cast out for thinking outside the orthodoxy with that book. So to answer why is there a men's rights movement the answer could be two fold. Men have actual issues in how they're treated in society and these cannot be resolved by condemning and villainizin…
/r/MensRights19/10/21 02:53 PM
10

So by that logic as feminism blames men for everything feminism is misandrist. I agree.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 08:01 PM
18

If you steal a chocolate bar then no one makes a big deal. If you steal a car...then it's a big deal. Female sexuality is valued. Male sexuality is not.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 09:17 PM
42

...FUCKING... I keep on reading going "But why..." and i never get answers from the article. I am not saying any reason would possibly justify this. But the fact this inhumanity is done without any reason given, a senseless act of monstrous cruelty without rhyme or reason..that just makes it even more horrifying.
/r/MensRights08/10/21 09:22 PM
8

"in my experience they only say women have an advantage and have certain things on their side like how domestic abuse from women is a lot harder to report. How is bringing attention to this misogyny?" Because female accountability is EVIL...duh../s
/r/MensRights30/09/21 02:00 PM
16

When men and women had no services the rate of men and women murdering their partners was about equal. Then the refuges and such for women appeared and the female rate of murdering men dropped off but the rate of men murdering women stayed the same. Logically the argument would be to provide support for men, but that implies men aren't supported by the all powerful beneficial patriarchy. Therefore feminists oppose support for men EVEN IF IT SAVES WOMEN'S LIVES. Feminists care more about the ideo…
/r/MensRights27/09/21 06:27 PM
13

2% is the ones they can prove are false. Now remember that decades of feminist lobbying and pressure means its considered sexist for the police to look for evidence of falsehood.. So the 2% isn't the rate of false accusation. Its the rate of false accusations made by false accusers so incompetent and stupid they practically spill evidence of their crime into the laps of the investigating police. I'm not sexist so it follows that most women aren't this inept and the rate of false accusers who are…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 12:42 PM
2

Can't teach a feminazi empathy anymore than you can teach a fish algebra.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 09:36 PM
25

'caught a fucking crocodile' ...as solutions to food shortage goes, that's fucking metal.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 10:16 AM
227

Mens rights are allowed to criticize feminism and discuss matters of female accountability, responsibility and causation. Mens lib are not.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 12:57 PM
20

Such cherry picking, should work on a farm.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 02:26 PM
19

Not surprising. Remember that a subscription to FDS is the way they say "I have the amorality of a sea mine and the cold dead eyes of a shark" to the world. Though that's an interesting question to ask. Are the users of FDS Amoral, or Immoral? Do they not recognize morality as a concept or do they recognize it and choose to trangress?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/08/21 10:56 PM
3

Do you think even for a microsecond these people would be satisfied? No no. They are ideologically opposed to the idea of female accountability.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/08/21 04:32 PM
2

honestly i'm surprised that it isn't just the rabid attack womb furryhare posting about the MRM this time. That being said. And to be fair, as someone who did follow R mgtow before the ban. There were some posts that went more than a little too far there. I've always held to the MGTOW position that "society gives women power without responsibility or accountability therefore MGTOW" rather than the position that "women are nothing more than evil children in adult female bodies"
/r/MensRights22/08/21 10:08 PM
7

Wasn't the 1 in 4 statistic the result of Mary P Koss who then complained that 70% of those she said had been assaulted DISAGREED with that assessment? In fine feminist fashion she said the women were wrong and she knew better of course.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 07:55 PM
2

Even the basic definitions are out of whack. PUA is occasionally referred to as the red pill ideology, but the red pill can also refer to realizing there is something wrong with the way society is working around gender..which in that case the red pill is an aspect of all four positions. That said I can see sort of how this path could work. 0: red pill, something is wrong with the relationship between men and women 1: pua, i will use tricks to game the system and succeed despite what is wrong 2: …
/r/MensRights22/08/21 10:34 AM
23

"but there’s a related need to tackle misogyny across society. That should be part of the whole system, at every level" It's not really about incels, they're just the pretext, the wedge in the door. Lets not forget misogyny is defined really really god damned broadly by these people. To the extent that mens rights activism/egalitarian ideals qualify.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 01:47 PM
249

'Dating standards' Their standards are fucking impossible, they want respected confident rich extravagant supermodel practitioners of tantric sex mojo who simultaneously lack the self respect to expect anything in return from her and who are so spineless they put up with her every misbehaviour. This is a self contradictory definition, the individuals in question are a logical impossibility. But you know what. FDS just keep on FDSing, because it might serve as a red flag to anyone who realizes th…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 09:24 AM
39

Wasn't there recently that study that said that most men were engaging with mental health services prior to committing suicide and still went through with it? which to a cynical mind might indicate that they're not actually being properly helped by these services. I mean, it might be hyperbolic and overly pessimistic to phrase it this way but: Women use less lethal means and attempt suicide as a cry for help because they know that cry will be answered. Men use lethal means and commit suicide as …
/r/MensRights10/08/21 02:08 PM
17

You know what. Just for fun I'll highlight some bits that show there is absolutely no charity from the feminist author of the linked article for men. NONE. "There are a lot of women in the men’s rights movement. The ones who’ve bought into the concept that men's rights are being eroded, by women. These are the women who want to be accepted into a man's world, to “be picked” as the phrase goes. And then there are those who have raised men who have turned out to be violent but who refuse to acknow…
/r/MensRights08/08/21 11:19 PM
16

...Are you reading what I'm writing? I don't dismiss the ideas just because feminist subs are echo chambers of group think rigidly maintained through censorship and authoritarianism. I dismiss the ideas because they're not factual and are incorrect. And if you don't know what the facts are you can't correctly diagnose and treat the problems..can you?
/r/MensRights08/08/21 07:17 PM
18

"Do you believe that women should be treated equally in society and are you willing to be open and explore what that practically means?Congratulations, you are a feminist." No. No I'm not, you can't Motte and Bailey me with the dictionary definition that's a tired and worn out argument. Feminism isn't just a definition and a goal, it's a worldview. And what the hell are you on saying I'm not talking about ideas? Feminist ideas about how to address problems that women face are the problem, not th…
/r/MensRights08/08/21 07:03 PM
22

"So, my take is, Men’s rights can never be a meaningful movement without feminism." But feminism can't even solve women's issues. Why would they be trusted with male issues? Lets take domestic violence. Half of it is reciprocal and 70% of the rest is female only. Men are stronger than women so they have a tendency to inflict more severe injuries. But lesbian relationships have the highest DV. Now the stressors that cause this are complicated and some of it at least is based on generational viole…
/r/MensRights08/08/21 06:26 PM
13

"Talking about men's rights doesn't mean we are "anti-women" or "anti-women's rights" or anything like that" Ah but you see the MRM has made the cardinal sin. Which is saying women are capable of wrongdoing and might actually be a cause of problems. Don't you know believing woman are anything other than morally perfect automata of virtue is the height of antiwomenism?
/r/MensRights07/08/21 09:59 AM
8

Furryhare keeps on posting these things there. And they all sound this unhinged to the extent they make me question where feminism stops and outright mental illness begins.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 09:53 AM
1

So what do you want to say? that despite the many many things done by feminist leaders in the name of feminism that have harmed the human rights of men. Despite the fact these actions were done with the seeming support of the majority of feminists who did not object. Despite the fact that there are feminists in the name of feminism still to this day sabotage and work against the human rights of men? I am willing to accept for the sake of argument that you might not be a raging feminist asshole l…
/r/MensRights28/07/21 10:19 PM
1

I am saying "The leaders of feminist movements" did "Blank" and therefore "this movement" is a problem. And I know you're going to say "I didn't do that, I don't support those who do that" and even if I take you at your word it's a consistent theme for feminist organizations. Prominent feminist leaders exiled the early mens rights movement pioneers from their ranks and the feminist majority who made them feminist leaders did not hold them to account for this action. These prominent feminist lead…
/r/MensRights28/07/21 08:52 PM
29

"mens rights movement believes feminism is the cause of male problems" No, the mens rights movement KNOWS that feminism of the cause of at least SOME male problems. See everything you've already been told about domestic violence and have no doubt rejected out of hand as not conforming with feminist bias.
/r/MensRights20/07/21 01:21 PM
9

This is a problem, but sadly it’s a problem that will likely never be solved Sure as hell won't be solved by feminists, they want to make it so that more false allegations result in harm to men. See the situation with Jian Ghomeshi and numerous other occasions before and since. Also yes, at least 5% of allegations are false. Here's the thing about these false allegations in the present of a very much fallible police force. We don't know the actual rate of false allegations, there's a fraction of…
/r/MensRights16/07/21 02:33 PM
63

Can't say much about India on this. But here's my understanding regarding China. China for a long time had three forces that highly encouraged this process. A one child policy No social welfare for the elderly No expectation for female progeny to provide for their parents wellbeing Therefore if you as a parent in China wanted to not DIE in your old age due to lack of care then you made damned sure your child was male. A female child was taking a chance they'd provide despite the lack of societal…
/r/MensRights16/07/21 02:18 PM
4

"it's not like feminism is making decisions" People make decisions based on what they think the facts are. They base it on what they think to know to be true. If feminist scholarship is accepted as truly reflecting the world in a factual manner but is in fact deceptive due to its ideological premise then that will affect the decisions made. Are you even serious with this argument? okay analogy time. Lets say there's a prominent and respected scientist whose word carries weight, but he's also a w…
/r/MensRights08/07/21 02:48 PM
19

"Women’s rights and men’s rights are not fundamentally opposed" Tell that to feminists. It's feminists who historically exiled prominent egalitarians who wanted to discuss male issues and thus created the mens rights movement through their refusal to make common cause on these issues. It's feminists who lobbied for policy, public perception and widely accepted academic truths to be slanted in a way that was antithetical to the furtherance of mens rights. It's feminists who censor and shout down …
/r/MensRights08/07/21 09:11 AM
3

Do you think this bit where you don't read anything people write and just blindly accuse them of hating women on the basis of their sex makes you look clever or noble? Because it doesn't. It makes you look like an ineptly programmed chatbot.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 12:00 PM
2

women do not equal radical feminists. Not all women are feminists. Heck not all feminists are rabid feminists. Go back to primary school until you've mastered basic comprehension of the written word.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 10:55 AM
70

Now. This being a feminist saying this I have to ask for careful consideration to 'what does this person mean by 'misogynist' and 'kindness and understanding' because lets not forget misogyny can be defined as 'anything less than complete support for radical feminism' and kindness and understanding can mean all sorts. So here's what I think happened? MRA: So I'm an MRA and I think men have issues. rabid: an mra? you're a misogynist! MRA: No men have issues that are not being addressed and here a…
/r/MensRights03/07/21 03:42 PM
2

And once again FDS members show they have the amoral and callous disposition of a goddamn sea-mine.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/06/21 01:39 PM
17

" Then she rants about how men depend on women to live but women don't depend on men." 0.o? At what point does Feminism become indistinguishable from the effects of a mother drinking heavily while pregnant?
/r/MensRights28/06/21 07:48 PM
2

I think the goal is well covered. But I think the reason that they criticize feminism is feminism is in the way of equality. And feminism is in the way of equality because its worldview doesn't correspond to reality. Feminism is the witch doctor with the bucket of leeches and the book of the four humours standing at the bedside of society.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 08:40 AM
8

So we've found that the one thing feminism holds more dear than the welfare of women is the ideology of feminism itself. Feminists would rather see women continue to die than have their ideological positions questioned.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 12:56 PM
35

"why did social structure, law and custom support men's control over women?" Because it was necessary. Up until two centuries ago this was absolutely necessary for the functioning of civilization. One has to remember that up until industrialization, and arguably for a while afterwards, productivity was linked to hard labour and the margins were narrow. Men are suited to hard labour over women for two reasons. 1. upper body strength 2. disposability, they're not required to gestate and raise chil…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 11:35 AM
5

"His barrister, Markus Cunning SC, said the change in teaching had “allowed a blurring, a criminal blurring undoubtedly” of Young’s role, and he had “only really wanted to give extra help” to the girl." Gender flip the defence to show how absurd it is to the terminally stupid/feminist.
/r/MGTOW24/06/21 08:45 AM
6

I admit, I might have gone off on a tangent there. But it definitely is feminism that has decided to colonize various media spaces and franchises and organizations. Not any male organization doing the same for female media spaces, franchises or organizations. And note, I use the word colonize here, not immigrate. They want the female perspective to be the primary one catered to everywhere they go. Its not plurality but usurpation they desire. It's an imperialist attitude. The question to ask is.…
/r/MensRights23/06/21 08:33 PM
36

No see. If there's a community that exists that's exclusively or intensely for one gender inevitably part of the discussion is going to be about negotiating with the opposite sex to better the position of the community gender. The negotiations might be individual on individual but this lets collective effort be harnessed by the individual in the negotiation. This doesn't happen in mixed communities in the same way. As a result all male dominant communities must be diluted with females to neuter …
/r/MensRights23/06/21 10:17 AM
9

"Mental health organisation Beyond Blue says men are at least three times more likely to die by suicide than women. In Australia, every day, almost six men die by suicide. Beyond Blue says evidence suggests men are far less likely to seek help for mental health conditions than women." wasn't there a recent study that said that 80% of suicidal men had been in contact with mental health services before offing themselves?
/r/MensRights22/06/21 02:15 PM
87

You know. I like how everytime they hear "half of young men think feminism has gone too far" the thought "maybe we've gone too far" never even crosses their minds.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 05:09 PM
8

it's not really against hate sub reddits, its one misandrist with whatever the feminine equivalent of a raging hate boner is for mens rights....lets go transmetropolitan here. It's one particular misandrist with a rabid attack womb for mens rights. They're the one who post all of that shit watching this page like a hawk. I'd propose not giving them the attention they crave, the mental illnesses of any one particular individual are not worth getting worked up about.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 10:18 AM
9

"banning sex-for-rent." You know what, I'm fine with this, let the eviction notices flow!
/r/MensRights28/05/21 09:35 AM
1

"not realise that they sound...sus?" *insert well hello there hello kids meme*
/r/MensRights27/05/21 08:17 PM
13

"genuinely empower men by dismantling toxic masculinity. Mensrights clearly doesn’t give a crap about actually helping men, just being misogynists." You know how sometimes christian apologetics is so up its own ass it can't really recognize outside perspectives and argues presuppositionally? this is that but for feminism. Toenail clipping here can't conceive there might be a way to look at men outside of feminism's men toxic worldview or that feminism might not be a benefit to men. Therefore app…
/r/MensRights26/05/21 08:36 AM
13

It's not dumb, its very well calculated and they learned it off of christianity. If you say that something that's involuntary is a transgression then they have something you need to apologize and recompense for, and if its involuntary they're guaranteed to have it. If you need to give recompense to be absolved of your transgression then they can demand sacrifice and work from you. It's precisely arranged to make sure you are in the position of a wretched sinner who needs to strive towards their …
/r/MensRights13/05/21 08:21 PM
10

Feminists:"we are women, we are completely equal to men and deserve the same rights and privileges." also feminists: "except when we hit people, then we expect to be treated as if we were immature children and not receive retaliation for our actions."
/r/MensRights12/05/21 07:19 PM
1

Just accept feminism speaks ex cathedra and cannot be questioned you shitlord what's wrong with you?
/r/MensRights01/05/21 06:20 PM
5

The only appropriate response to these people is "We cannot structure the world to conform to your mental illnesses"
/r/MensRights25/04/21 03:09 PM
3

You can't..but those in power should consider that if they do make mens rights advocacy impossible then they make MGTOW inevitable.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 10:11 AM
3

They're not actually wrong. Feminism is the project to maximize the social condition of the female sex. Men having rights is an impediment to maximizing the social condition of the female sex as sooner or later for females to have more rights they need to have the right to transgress against the rights of males.
/r/MGTOW22/04/21 06:18 PM
9

You should be careful about this path. After all a complete insulation from contrary viewpoints and the banishment of all contrary opinions is how they operate. Claiming feminists who show up here are trolls who must be expunged from the subreddit is a slippery slope. But that's just my suggestion, make of it what you will.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 10:39 AM
3

" Men’s rights activists and white supremacists have actual access to power structures " what power structures do mens rights activists have access to?
/r/MensRights06/04/21 08:39 AM
22

If you think men can have their situation bettered entirely with their issues viewed through a paradigm where all issues are either their own fault or, if that cannot be asserted, simply considered nonexistent then mens lib is fine. But if you consider feminism open to criticism, women to be moral agents or females accountable you might have some trouble.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 06:46 PM
3

I think the fact your post about having a discussion with the MRA that you posted on the feminist subreddit has already been nuked by the mods should tell you something to the openminded willingness to discuss and compromise that feminism has.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 06:07 PM
8

ooh, first bitch thread has an amusing lie in it. " Manosphere "self help" is about strategizing how to dominate, control, exploit, emotionally manipulate, rape, and even murder women. In contrast, FDS self help is about women who want to avoid being dominated, controlled, exploited, emotionally manipulated, raped, and murdered. These goals are NOT of equal moral weight. " I can't say that the manosphere as a whole isn't as well, never been in PUA or incel sections, just MRM and MGTOW..but this …
/r/MGTOW13/03/21 11:20 AM
2

Better question is why are feminists against the MRA? Because if you go back historically the founding fathers of the mens rights movement are pretty much all blacklisted and ostracized from the feminist movement for talking about empathy for men or raising ideologically inconvenient facts. If feminists weren't against the MRA then there wouldn't BE an MRA, feminism could have become a compassionate and inclusive egalitarian endeavour. I leave ascribing motivation for the fact that didn't happen…
/r/MensRights12/03/21 01:04 PM
35

I like the lack of self awareness. Failed dating strategists if men didn't date mentally ill women then not a single one of you would have a date..which I suppose does in fact explain a lot.
/r/MGTOW11/03/21 09:36 AM
3

I like the absolute lack of consideration that maybe young men think this for a reason that lies within feminism.
/r/MGTOW05/03/21 06:28 PM
20

What feminists believe is I'm sure very interesting. But I think the difference is because a misogynistic man doesn't have social support, so he harms a single woman. A misandrist woman does have social support, so why would she bother harming a single woman when she can harm ALL men instead by influencing policy? Harassment, stalking, murder are the tools of the weak. Government is the tool of the strong.
/r/MensRights03/03/21 10:35 AM
1

Women have an ingroup bias and men have a women group bias. Can you imagine how the press would react if he did? A million white knights, a billion women, an ocean of simps all writing angry screeds about how dare he. Twitter would explode. Now some say any press is good press..but..not now and not here. All the money and power doesn't matter if the entire establishment unpersons you.
/r/MGTOW20/02/21 11:56 AM
8

Awalt for me isn't 'all women are evil' its 'society doesn't acknowledge the ability of women to do evil, gives them vast tools of evil and doesn't hold them accountable for their use' coupled with 'I am not nearly good enough at judging character to take that risk' It's not 'all women are like that' it's 'all women can be like that'
/r/MGTOW13/02/21 01:04 PM
5

I always like the fact they say 'maximum female benefit' because it's like they're not bothering with the mask. It's maximum female benefit, no matter how many men and children have to be harmed to reach it. It's peak goddamn sociopath. If FDS was male then every last one of them would be on a government watch list somewhere.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/02/21 12:21 PM
5

. ...just cause they've got a gash like a shipping channel..
/r/MGTOW02/02/21 10:01 PM
117

...and what do FDS mean when they say HVM? A Six foot tall, six figure salaried sixpack sporting six inch dick who is brimming with confidence and success against the world yet utterly submissive to her. A godlike adonis who despite all their triumphs has a lack of social confidence so deep they allow themselves to be bullied, walked on and treated like an ATM by a 40 year old overweight swamp monster with a bad personality and a natural body aroma like the inside of a shoe.
/r/MGTOW02/02/21 09:44 AM
2

It's probably their easiest way of making a character flawed. it might be lazy writing, but they need the character to be flawed in a way that's relatable to the audience AND in this case probably a way that doesn't stop the MC doing the cool stuff. Maybe they could pick a better yet still relatable way for the character to be shown to be flawed and struggling though I agree. But they do need to pick a way otherwise you end up with a gender swapped version of Rey from starwars.
/r/MGTOW09/01/21 04:16 PM
75

" who tell you that you’re important; and who will also kind of affirm your sense of victimhood; of your sense of everything that has kind of gone wrong in your life, you know, has an external cause. You know, and that, it’s, you know, and it has a very simple cause, right? I mean, this is the logic of white supremacists too. " from the transcript. I like how they apparently have all the self awareness of a drunk driver whose car is already three aisles into the grocery store.
/r/MensRights25/12/20 02:02 PM
10

You are not at fault here. They are. Considering they accused you of not listening to their points when they very deliberately didn't listen to yours they seem fond of projection. Consider the possibility that their accusations at you are also projection as a result. That would mean your sister is a man hating bigot who believes women are superior.. And you know what? that might be worth crying about to learn someone who you love hates you and thinks she's intrinsically better than you.
/r/MensRights21/12/20 11:22 AM
48

This is FDS you're talking about here. FDS is built in the premise they call 'maximum female benefit' which apparently could be written long form as 'maximum female benefit regardless of the harm inflicted on men, children and civilization' it's peak sociopathy. It's unsurprising they want the gloss over men being victims, if men being victims were acknowledged then they might get sympathy and if they got sympathy SOMEONE MIGHT STOP FDS MEMBERS FROM VICTIMIZING THEM and that'd spoil their fun.
/r/MensRights19/12/20 12:23 AM
4

for most of human history if you wanted someone dead..you needed to do it using brute muscle strength. An area where men had a vast amount more capability. Therefore throughout history most men were going to be the ones doing it due to biological capability. For most of human history society was patriarchal and women were kept out of the reigns of power. So throughout history most men were going to be the ones ordering it due to social capability. Opportunity and ability are not the same thing a…
/r/MensRights15/12/20 04:14 PM
4

It is completely relevant to the discussion, don't be dense you're better than that. and to answer your question as to how its different in " Is this any different than thinking all men can't be trusted because some of them rape? " rape is punished, rape is not socially applauded, it's a crime. You trust a man not to steal because robbery is a crime. You trust a man not to assault you because that is a crime. You trust a man not to rape because...you get the idea. While most people are decent pe…
/r/MensRights09/12/20 04:54 PM
5

Name one thing a man can lie about where the consequence for the unjustly accused is as dire and the consequence for the liar being found out is nonexistent? Go on. I'll wait.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 03:12 PM
62

she got 8 years for the random murder of a child...is that really a pass denied?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/20 07:13 PM
3

"due to the female rape victims being larger than male rape victims. " Which they aren't. but try telling a feminist that.
/r/MensRights07/12/20 12:47 PM
7

A cursory skim of the argument makes me wonder. Is there anything negative that happens to any ONE which she considers genuinely to be woman's fault? Not "actually men did it" or "well yes but the patriarchy made her do it" but a situation where something negative happened and the woman wasn't just a falling domino in a chain some man somewhere set falling?
/r/MensRights04/12/20 10:57 AM
386

What part of harsher sentence for the same crime did this Dullard not comprehend. Same crime not different crime. Also feminist intellectual heavy weight is an oxymoron so I am not surprised.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 08:10 PM
2

Also the data for that claim.of 230 times more likely is based on successful prosecutions brought by the crown for women who lie. And the crown would sooner piss on the queen than even attempt to prosecute a lying woman.
/r/MGTOW30/11/20 03:56 PM
5

Consider the history of Warren Farrel and Erin Pizzey. There is a divide between feminism and mens rights because when people in the equality movement talked about mens rights, male victimization or female perpetration feminists forced them out of the movement. The animosity, aggression and division was started by feminists. If they hadn't started it there would BE no separate mens rights movement.
/r/MensRights29/11/20 02:34 PM
5

They should name the subreddit blatantmisandry so you know the contents rather than what they're pretending to comment on.
/r/MensRights28/11/20 11:27 AM
1

It's radical feminist research all piled up in one place. I'm not versed in all the ways its bullshit but a cursory skim comes up with a few that are known to be bullshit. Remember feminist research is of such high calibre that they let a reworded version of Mein Kampf get published in their journals. I'm sure if the sterling debunkers here wanted to they could debunk this pile you've got here but considering it'd take a long time...probably they won't be bothered.
/r/MensRights27/11/20 10:25 AM
25

Honestly? The most startling thing about FDS is this. If you want a view of women that's truly just the worst? a perspective where women are the most amoral, shallow, vile, cruel, manipulative, exploitative and outright dangerous creatures to walk this planet. You don't go to MGTOW, or TRP, or any somehow not yet banned incel community. You go to FDS. Female Dating Strategy is women portraying themselves worse than anyone else does.
/r/MGTOW27/11/20 09:45 AM
1

I dont have to when we can simply watch what feminists have been saying and doing for the last 40 years. They were after all the ones who fabricated the Duluth model of domestic violence. If I want to say nazis hate jews I dont have to have personally interviewed Hitler.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 11:25 AM
1

40% is way closer to parity than feminism will ever accept. Remember in their model women are never perpetrators. 4 out of 10 victims being the male victims of female abusers isnt compatible with manhatred.
/r/MensRights21/11/20 09:37 AM
33

I like how they completely blanked on the 40% of domestic violence victims thing. It's like it was so outside their blinkered worldview they couldn't even see it in order to throw some handwave at it. But if we look at "more mental health care to kill or hurt less people" and the "men are more violent and commit more crimes than women" we get a very ugly picture. These people hate men as a group. In their eyes men are orcs in a shitty ass fantasy novel. I would distance yourself from these peopl…
/r/MensRights20/11/20 09:28 AM
2

...Why are you asking questions, she has a vagina so of course he's a villain. case closed, nothing to see here, go about your business, believe women. /s
/r/MensRights18/11/20 02:57 PM
31

The assumption that Heard overturned is this one. That any man is safe. If they can destroy Johnny Depp, a man with money, evidence and the sheer social brand that is Depp on his side...they can destroy anyone. No man is safe and they want it that way. So I suppose you're just supposed to live in fear and bend the knee now.
/r/MensRights17/11/20 04:03 PM
3

To throw out the stock answers. In america? the right to genital integrity and the right to vote. men have to sign for the draft to vote in america. The right to defend themselves from the opposite gender. There's any number of videos of women and girls violently attacking men and boys and the victim simply taking it and bystanders doing nothing, but the moment he fights back a billion arseholes descend on him to attack HIM for fighting back. ​ I'm sure there's a lot of other answers to this one…
/r/MensRights12/11/20 10:11 AM
12

Do you self identify as a feminist? No. How do you define feminism? Feminism is a confluence of Gamma Bias, the Women Are Wonderful Effect and a misunderstanding of history. How do you view feminists? There's two kinds of feminists, the well meaning and ignorant and the wicked and knowledgeable. Do you perceive conflict between feminism and heterosexual relationships? Well, seen as feminist title 9 efforts in american colleges have amply demonstrated that feminism wants men to be perceived as gu…
/r/MensRights11/11/20 07:21 PM
3

You know. It's kind of hard to blame FDS for not realizing its because Amber Heard is a Liar and an Abuser... I mean, that's like the prevailing misunderstanding in society. I'm used to FDS being either more evil, more insane or both than normal society and in this case sadly they're not.
/r/MGTOW11/11/20 06:26 PM
17

"Your vote is worth half of mine because you do not respect democracy"
/r/MGTOW09/11/20 06:37 PM
399

There is no help for him sadly. We live in an era where the highest crime is to be defiant when a woman has decided to destroy your life on a whim. It's really a little orwellian. They've started a revolution so they can revel in power. That is the narrative, a privileged rich white woman decided to destroy a man with baseless accusations and he was supposed to simply be destroyed so she could savour the raw naked exertion of power. But Johnny has tried not to be destroyed. And that attempt cann…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/11/20 11:14 AM
3

How could a movement to address equality be valuable to men if the movement has such a distorted perspective on reality that it cannot perceive either equality or inequality in said reality?
/r/MensRights09/11/20 11:09 AM
0

Yes within a time frame equivalent to the abortion window for women measured from the time he was informed. I understand that measuring from when he is informed is an inherently messy way of doing it but it does provide protection against baby trapping. I will even be scrupulously fair and say that till abortion can be done via email he has to fill in the form at the clinic.
/r/MensRights05/11/20 10:08 AM
37

I foresee a small problem with your plan to take the vote from american men ma'am. ​ Last time men didn't have representation in government in your country they engaged in armed and bloody rebellion against the government. I believe it was called the war of independence and was back when your country was a colony of my country.
/r/MGTOW03/11/20 11:05 AM
6

Mgtow = how to avoid the dangers of being harmed, manipulated and exploited by females by avoiding them. Fds = how to exploit, manipulate and harm men to maximize benefit to yourself. One is about protecting yourself and the other is about harming others. Its really that simple.
/r/MGTOW23/10/20 09:27 AM
2

I basically changed one letter of the user name of the person who posted in the screenshot. I didn't put as much thought into it as you have as turning it into lesion instead of lysion is a cheap shot at the username of an FDS member. That said your interpretation that her name means HERPES is one I quite like.
/r/MGTOW19/10/20 03:24 PM
14

Seraphinelesion. I know introspection is a forbidden concept on FDS. But when you keep on meeting men who turn out to not want to get into relationships the common feminine denominator in all those encounters is you.
/r/MGTOW19/10/20 12:37 PM
2

We arent. But the flipside of that is that there is no argument feminists can make against men having a paper abortion that doesnt make them sound exactly Republican prolifers if you flip the genders.
/r/MGTOW19/10/20 01:18 AM
1

Well crud it was always going "something went wrong" and not updating. So that was weird shit.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 02:22 PM
31

Okay. I will tell you what will happen if they get their wish. Maybe this will deter them but probably not. We use the legal system as an alternative to bloody vendetta and retribution because a civilized society doesn't work under the old fashioned way. But the legal system is implicitly built on the trust in it that the accused will have a fair chance to defend themselves if innocent. So lets pretend that their system is put in place. Do you think the accused will trust the system? do you thin…
/r/MensRights16/10/20 09:00 PM
1

i wonder why i cant seem to comment here
/r/MensRights16/10/20 08:58 PM
8

Depending on your personal definitions if someone asks for rights without responsibilities then what they're asking for not a right but a privilege.
/r/MensRights14/10/20 08:55 AM
1

Saying video games as if it's a narrow and fringe little hobby is liking saying 'reading books' is a little box
/r/MGTOW13/10/20 02:44 PM
1

"asking and not waiting for an answer is not getting permission" ...well if you just fucking make up extra details to the story of course it then becomes rape. Because by all accounts he was told no by some women and then what did he do? he apologized for being a messed up individual.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 08:27 AM
7

Soo a group of aggressive youths with cameras come and start pushing and forcing their way inside after being denied entry due to their clear intent to create a disturbance. ...well, sounds like a job for the police.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/20 07:38 PM
33

You make the mistake of believing feminism is about women's rights. It isn't. Rights are coupled with responsibilities, and feminism rejects the notion of responsibility and accountability as necessary female traits. So what they're arguing for isn't rights. It's privilege.
/r/MensRights03/10/20 08:21 PM
18

'Submitting' What an interesting choice of word.
/r/MGTOW29/09/20 06:32 PM
17

They both want the same thing. The differences are reasons and degrees. the right: "You must protect and provide for women because western civilization will collapse if you dont. And we think western civilization is important and should be preserved." the left: "you must provide every drop of protection and provision to women as you can because you as a man are a criminal, an evil monster whose crimes are too heinous and numerous to be recounted, you must provide women penance for your villainy …
/r/MGTOW19/09/20 04:29 PM
44

I am not required to have compassion for those who hate me
/r/MGTOW18/09/20 03:33 PM
2

Feel free to tell Erin Pizzey about how you can work with feminists for the betterment of both genders.
/r/MensRights17/09/20 05:41 PM
34

Funnily enough while I am both a programmer and someone who has a great interest in their own genitalia i've never found the answer to a programming problem while looking at my penis.
/r/MGTOW17/09/20 03:54 PM
2

Archive link as its behind a pay wall?
/r/MGTOW16/09/20 07:51 AM
3

Protip. if you want to judge someones intentions then pay less attention to their proclamations and more attention to what they actually do.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 09:09 AM
6

Because feminism is the project to maximize the social condition of the female sex. It will never be completed until all conceivable freedoms, rights and resources are granted to each individual female.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 09:44 PM
1

three reasons i suppose: Men are stronger than women, so its not considered serious if a woman hits a man. just because the physical damage chances are lower. men's emotional and mental state is not taken seriously, so the emotional damage of having a woman especially one they care about harm them is not taken seriously. Men are considered human doings, not human beings, only human beings have an inner world. There's this movement to maximize the social condition of the female sex called feminis…
/r/MensRights13/09/20 08:46 AM
5

Yeah. Absolutely all their data is a bit much. I'm there with the feminists on that much. But at the same time you need to collect this evidence because despite feminist beliefs...females aren't these morally superior beings who don't lie or do other bad things.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 11:57 PM
6

Is it cause he ghosted you or cause when he was ontop of you putting that mouth of yours to use you felt like you were being smothered with a pair of cantaloupes in a leather sack?
/r/MGTOW10/09/20 11:53 PM
137

So FDS, a community entirely about being predatory, manipulative, toxic and harmful to men then taking all their money... ..is framing a situation where a woman takes all the mans money as him being predatory, manipulative, toxic and harmful to women.
/r/MGTOW10/09/20 11:15 AM
5

So feminism is nothing to do with equality and everything to do with revenge? The men of today will suffer for the supposed sins of their fathers? You are justifying having discrimination, unequal treatment, sexism and bigotry in the present with tales of discrimination, sexism and bigotry in the past despite the fact that you're punishing different people. That is profoundly fucked up.
/r/MensRights10/09/20 09:24 AM
3

Could be a feminist sock puppet. I mean are you expecting intellectual and moral integrity from feminists?
/r/MensRights10/09/20 12:24 AM
1

Part of it might be evolutionary and harder to get rid of. I'm just theorizing here but I think part of the problem is we're tribal apes with modern technology and looks something like this. Lets picture ancient tribal ape humans. In this time females are valuable because they are the biggest predictor as to whether the tribe produces a next generation the same size or larger than the current generation. Two situations. Thad the caveman insults, strikes or otherwise aggresses against Burly the b…
/r/MensRights09/09/20 09:56 AM
7

And they say men aren't disposable. I hope every single one of these cops ends up behind bars.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 08:13 AM
1

I dont like seeing it that way. But on the continuum of feminist ideological positions there is a very strong contingent who believe children are not an end in themselves but a means to harm their father. On that viewpoint the fact sophie is being abused by the mother's boyfriend is irrelevant. Sophie is just a tool to harm the father. People being angry about Sophie's suffering is a detriment to what she is for in the eyes of this judge. Hence the removal attempt. ... so yeah. Once again I have…
/r/MGTOW05/09/20 07:03 AM
3

" Men are not genuinely nice to women " And you know this, how? no genuinely I'm curious. I mean, sure the cad exists as a type of man i'll grant you. But you made a blanket statement and I'm not sure how you can know the inner minds of men better than the men who you have those inner minds. For someone who is an atheist you really do like pulling a Romans 1:18-21 'all atheists are liars who are pretending they dont believe god exists' So I ask, what makes you a bigger authority on the minds of …
/r/MensRights04/09/20 01:42 PM
2

I didn't know that many rolls was anatomically possible.
/r/MGTOW03/09/20 09:19 PM
1

Want to be invited more places? Try not wandering around all the time with a loaded gun. Granted, you'd need to do some legal reforms to dismantle this weapon. But who built this gun and placed it in your hands hmm?
/r/MGTOW03/09/20 06:10 PM
6

Sigh. It's begun. A stupid woman's book has inspired even stupider women to start commenting on it.
/r/MGTOW03/09/20 03:05 PM
3

Actually Laura bates is using excerpts from this her toilet paper alternatives to try and shill it to the world at large. She wants you to buy her books. That's why there's these pieces, all in a short time frame, all by the same author. Laura Bates wants you to read her factually inaccurate feminist dribble. Personally I think someone should though. And do a deconstruction series on youtube explaining why its all wrong.
/r/MensRights03/09/20 11:28 AM
27

" To state the obvious: People deserve affection regardless of their alleged quality of pussy " Incels will be pleased to hear this. Then again. If I thought for a moment that men were objects of consideration in this fellow's mind then you know what? I'd of found the ultimate drugs and it'd be criminal of me to then not share.
/r/MGTOW02/09/20 04:22 PM
16

I figured the last part gave that away, where I explained that feminist positions are consistent if you assume they're built on certain premises that are politically awkward for them to admit to holding. After all its hard for them to say "We are a movement for equality on the premise that the male sex is intrinsically evil"
/r/MensRights02/09/20 04:03 PM
15

Dude. Do you are have not reading? Stop yelling at me and read what I fucking wrote.
/r/MensRights02/09/20 03:54 PM
106

No you don't understand. See. If women can accuse men of rape they'd never do it falsely or maliciously (or hardly ever) because women are intrinsically morally virtuous. They're like tolkien elves, angels or saints. They're just plain better people. If men can accuse WOMEN of rape though well that's completely different. They'd make false accusations out of malice all the time cause men are inherently evil and depraved. Like tolkien orcs, demons or saturday morning cartoon villains. ​ See, if y…
/r/MensRights02/09/20 03:04 PM
1

If you need women to be portrayed as unrelentingly evil and awful. You don't go to mensrights, or mgtow, or redpill, or incel forums or anywhere like that. You go to FDS.
/r/MGTOW01/09/20 05:19 PM
1

This is Journalist Katie from sisthis? the website that I think is honestly a poe as one of the contributors is listed as also contributing to beez fud. So I think this is a parody.
/r/MGTOW31/08/20 08:09 PM
8

" A HVM is REASONABLE. A HVM would come to FDS, read our rules, and say "That seems logical." They wouldn't think twice about it. A HVM thinks women are generally superior. Pay attention to interviews with HVM. For example, in interviews with Barack Obama he will usually mention something about women being the more level headed sex. HVM respect and admire women. They understand that we are goddesses and they are plebeians to our blessed wombs. HVM know what an honor it is to get to love a woman.…
/r/MGTOW30/08/20 07:54 PM
14

I call bullshit on the cycling thing. That said, if a man said he was interested in the topic of say...ah shit, perfume? overpriced fashion? romanc novels? something that's typically a female interest the same way coding is typically a male interest. I imagine he'd be asked some questions to verify this interest was genuine and not an attempt to build common ground out of nothing but sand.
/r/MGTOW29/08/20 08:40 AM
30

Even if all of that was true don't those 'out of shape, poor, uneducated rednecks' have enough guns they could each build a throne out of them song of ice and fire style?
/r/MGTOW27/08/20 05:53 AM
8

Asks about healing Male female communities on fds Isnt this like asking for help healing race relations at a Klan meeting?
/r/MGTOW25/08/20 08:36 AM
2

Feminism is an imperial project. They dont emigrate they colonize.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 10:29 PM
2

And lo did a djinn appear "Your wish is granted" he says and snapped his fingers. Malja found herself alone in an untamed wilderness. Within a week she grew weak and sick from hunger and disease. Within two weeks scavengers feasted upon her bones.
/r/MGTOW21/08/20 12:45 PM
2

Because it believes things about the world that just aren't true.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 12:07 PM
16

" Maybe I’m on the wrong side of twitter, but I don’t see men making fun of women even half as much " Oh that's simple. If a man does it then it's misogyny and they get banned for hate speech. There's nothing hateful about what this woman is saying according to the twitter administration.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 01:05 PM
1

I would like terms defined. Both of them. The fuck is emotionally weak men, the shit is emotionally strong women? This is on par with parfluggan men are fear amalaxic women.
/r/MGTOW13/08/20 12:53 PM
5

"highly empahic and kind woman" Is on a website that proudly touts that they believe in maximizing female benefit regardless of collateral damage to males and children. Though to be fair, I should be concise. I'm not sure if the harm to males is an inconsequential by-product to their tactics or an intended outcome. So I'm not sure if I'm accurate. They're either callous or malevolent though.
/r/MGTOW12/08/20 12:51 AM
3

It's an echo chamber. Why are you surprised?
/r/MensRights06/08/20 09:08 AM
27

" Now he is saying in our group that I got scared and chicken out " Because not being a fucking idiot is cowardice? What did he think was going to happen if 7 against 1 became 7 against 2?
/r/MGTOW05/08/20 08:11 AM
4

Imagine a bunch of folks around a table playing a game. The number isn't precisely important lets say a half dozen. Now this game is played under house rules that give certain players an advantage. Bob wants to amend the rules to make them more fair. Sharon spends her time saying the rules aren't unfair enough and need to be more unfair and also telling bob to shut up. Paradoxically this means she hardly has time to play the actual game. Ellen likes the advantage the rules gives her and keeps qu…
/r/MensRights04/08/20 04:29 PM
22

" a just and fair society will benefit them, too.' " Maybe. Just maybe the fact that young men are objecting is because you're not building a just and fair society and you should reconsider your chosen course of action... No wait, that's just crazy talk. Man feminism has infalliblity that the fucking pope would be envious of.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 03:53 PM
6

When caucasians were supporting black people having rights and campaigning against racism were they secretly lusting after ebony dick?
/r/MensRights04/08/20 09:30 AM
12

It's fine no really. But if a woman hits a man she ain't no woman anymore. Shes a bitch
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/20 10:31 AM
1

I see. Honestly considering how the last few times I've run into feminists around here have gone I'm skeptical. But what the hey. I'll be charitable and assume genuineness. And you know what, in the spirit of charity I'll give you a freebie right off the bat. The war against the right to choose in america waged by the religious right is unacceptable, I support the notion that parenthood should be a choice. But in that spirit I should note that men do not get to choose. I think men should have th…
/r/MensRights31/07/20 09:33 AM
2

I am pondering how to politely respond to this comment. And I can understand alternative perspectives plenty, but just cause I understand it doesn't mean its based in the real world. What are you actually trying to accomplish here?
/r/MensRights30/07/20 05:59 PM
2

I am afraid that I'm not sure if I can have a productive conversation with someone whose perspective of reality has been warped so badly by feminist dogma.
/r/MensRights30/07/20 02:54 PM
2

If their movement perpetuates injustice in the process? not really, terribly sorry about that.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 08:53 PM
4

Interesting. I've learned something today. Didn't anticipate that, have my thumbs up.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 08:50 PM
37

I think the first question to ask is what you mean by patriarchy. If you mean 'statistically more men than women are business and political leaders' then that's a morally neutral observation not something that needs to be dismantled. It's mostly down to the fact that men are less risk averse than women are. And it's also an apex fallacy. For every man you see who is a CEO or such there's at least a dozen men who that CEO had to step on the faces of while rising through the hierarchy. It's a high…
/r/MensRights29/07/20 01:01 PM
2

One day, feminists will legitimately acknowledge the fact false accusations are a thing..I propose we drink a brandy each day until they do so! JK, /S no seriously don't that's the best way to get liver poisoning as you'll take your final breath before feminists admit this.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 04:05 PM
5

If there are no innate psychological traits then how are men innately evil and women innately good?
/r/MensRights26/07/20 08:50 PM
5

well, if you're going to start being insulting I think we're done here. Have a nice day. I'm sure we both have more important matters to be getting on with.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 03:16 PM
5

"Scared of women having more power than you" AH, the mask slipped. I thought feminism was about equality. YES. Damned right men are scared of women having unchecked power over them. Why the fuck wouldn't they be? Let me tell you a story. There was a man in canada called Jian Ghomeshi, he was accused by a conspiracy of lying women of sexual assault. In trial the lies of these liars were demonstrated to be lies so this innocent man walked free. What was the response from institutional feminism? "W…
/r/MensRights26/07/20 02:49 PM
14

Just because you are a woman doesn't mean when someone stops you doing something they're discriminating against you as a woman..... Because that's fucking stupid. I mean where would it end? three AM this woman at a pub "Gimme another pint!" "...karen it's 3 in the morning, you can't remember your birthday, home address or who you walked in with. It's late, I don't want your death on my conscience, i'm cutting you off." "It is my right as a living woman-"
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/20 02:16 PM
4

I haven't and the quote isn't mine, that is the three year old quote from Karen Straughan, one of the more strident female MRAs and a member of the honey badgers. And it's brought out because VERY frequently all the bad things that have been done in the name of feminism are swept under the rug by a feminist with the claim they don't represent feminism. And the repost is the stock answer to that. The claim they don't represent feminism is so trite to MRAs and the manosphere that there was a stock…
/r/MensRights26/07/20 01:55 PM
8

sigh, you're so tiresome even the people who usually repost this rebuttal can't be bothered right now. Karen Straughan quote activate: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call th…
/r/MensRights26/07/20 11:17 AM
21

" Educating oneself on gender issues from another perspective " The irony levels with this coming from a feminist who can't conceive of a non feminist perspective on gender issues let alone educate herself on it.
/r/MensRights26/07/20 09:06 AM
3

No it's not recruit difficulty. Recruit difficulty has challenges, but they're much reduced. This'd be like if the game asked you to fight bunny rabbits but you could just press Y to have an npc do it. this isn't recruit difficulty, it's tutorial mode.
/r/MGTOW26/07/20 08:59 AM
24

"Sometimes i really really wish there was a way to purge these kinds of people out of the earth" Ah, a final solution? how very progressive of you.
/r/MGTOW25/07/20 10:38 AM
5

Warren Farrell was a feminist. They kicked him out. Mens rights activists are not the source of this hostility and the reason for the split. That is squarely the fault of the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 09:17 AM
13

Censorship is not how you protect strong ideas. I sometimes wonder, maybe I'm incorrect in my perspective of the world. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I should see if they have a good argument to share as to why they're correct. Then I get reminded that feminist thought can apparently only thrive in darkness. And that's not my opinion that's their opinion of their own ideology. The light of examination, the challenge of a contrary viewpoint, the testing of its assumptions. All of these are things that F…
/r/MensRights23/07/20 11:12 PM
356

Feminism will never be a movement for equality so long as it refuses to acknowledge the full humanity of men and women. Male roles that feminism does not acknowledge: powerless, victim, innocent, exploited, abused. Female roles that feminism does not acknowledge: moral agent, perpetrator, instigator, deceiver, assailant, abuser, villain.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 07:22 PM
3

I really wish I could remember
/r/MGTOW23/07/20 03:51 PM
44

Those without pride cannot have shame and those without shame cannot have honour and those without honour cannot respect truth and those who do not respect truth will lie their fucking faces off
/r/MGTOW23/07/20 09:39 AM
6

"I believe we should have a movement for mens rights, therefore i am an MRA" "mens rights? your movement is redundant, feminism is the only gender based rights movement you will ever need and we will give you all the rights you deserve as a man" "well what has feminism ever done for the rights of men?" "....*goes to r ask feminists to make post asking how dare men ask this question of her as a feminist*" "...sigh"
/r/MensRights21/07/20 02:26 PM
6

The sub is about exploiting men with no regard for the harm this causes. I think them not involving themselves with men is a good thing.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 08:54 PM
1

'equality' is a smoke screen. If you assume their actual goal is to maximize the social condition of the female sex then everything makes sense. Also note that 'maximizing' the social condition of the female sex is inherently impossible in the constraints of our physical reality so they will always have more power, resources or privilege they could conceivably work towards allocating towards members of the female sex.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 02:17 PM
6

I 100% support the females of FDS adopting hardcore lesbian separatism and I think it should be done as soon as possible.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 02:03 PM
7

Feminists pop up repeatedly here usually without being banned. Though considering that they're open to reason and contrary viewpoints calling them feminists feels kind of insulting.
/r/MensRights17/07/20 12:40 PM
2

FDS vs reality indeed.... ....FDS might finally be a group who are less grounded in the real world than flat earthers and antivaxxers.
/r/MGTOW15/07/20 08:46 AM
5

0.o I'm going to guess subsequent dates don't get cheaper either. Fuck that'd be a way to get poor quickly.
/r/MGTOW13/07/20 09:16 PM
4

"why are men so incredibly hostile to feminism" Because it's the project to maximize the social condition of the female sex. That's like asking "why them coloured folk so hostile to the klan"
/r/MensRights11/07/20 01:15 PM
10

Because feminism is the project to maximize the social condition of the female sex. Nowhere in that mission statement is there room for men to have rights.
/r/MensRights11/07/20 11:43 AM
22

Feminism (and traditional roles they've decided are convenient to them and should be enforced, and moral typecasting) are responsible for men not getting help. Then they say toxic masculinity causes men not to get help. The logic is inescapable. Toxic masculinity is feminism and feminism is toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights10/07/20 07:07 PM
8

" Social privilege? People tend to take men more seriously than women as a general pattern " ... Are you familiar with two names? Johnny depp Amber Heard ​ Amber came out with little more than her claim johnny abused her and the entire fucking world fell over itself to pour sympathy at her feet, elevate her to sainthood and cancel johnny while heaping a thousand hot coals of scorn on his brow. Johnny finally decided to defend his name tell his story of how she was the abusive one and backed it u…
/r/MensRights09/07/20 11:45 PM
5

considering the entirety of FDS is about enslaving men for fucking everything a man can provide I am dazzled by the projection here.
/r/MGTOW09/07/20 09:18 AM
4

Okay. But they don't believe that men are victimized by sexist laws or social norms. You have to get them to agree that facts are real before your argument makes sense to them.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 09:05 PM
10

You have to have our opposition accept reality first, only then can they see it this way. I mean yes, mens rights address the problems that cause men stress, strife and ferment misogyny. If women couldn't falsely accuse, violently attack, rape, steal from, imprison, slander and destroy men then there's a huge portion of men who would not be MGTOW. I dunno enough about incels to say whether it'd help in their case. But the problem is our opposition don't believe that women have any power let alon…
/r/MensRights08/07/20 03:16 PM
1

Feminism is the project to maximize the social condition of the female sex. You're not a feminist, you're an egalitarian. Honestly I think female dating strategy is an honest expression of feminism's goals just in the area of relationships. 'maximum female benefit' with the unstated add on 'no matter how many men or children have to suffer as a result' Some say that the feminist project is unaware of the harm they cause. I'm not so sure. I think they know. But they don't care as compassion is a …
/r/MensRights07/07/20 12:30 PM
93

" Everyone has a right to defend themselves — but it's problematic to do so on a public form " ..... but it's okay to accuse someone on this public form?! .... Fuck this shit. I'm out.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 10:51 PM
6

and unironically the author says as if it's a good thing " In Stockholm, snowploughing schedules prioritise residential streets, school zones, public transport and bike lanes. " Completely glossing over what resulted from this. also " In the Aspern district of Vienna, all of the streets and public spaces are named after women. " sooo, praise women = feminist...got it.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 09:38 PM
8

Some important issues raised by feminists: the wage gap(not a thing) the pink tax(ditto) manspreading, mansplaining,manslamming... the need to eliminate due process for male accused making it illegal to disagree with them. eliminating female prisons and female accountability in general Some important issues raised by mens rights activists: due process rights for men accused of crimes against women recognition and help for male victims of domestic violence and sexual violence doing away with tire…
/r/MensRights04/07/20 11:13 PM
3

There is no compromise to be had with those who themselves refuse to compromise. As feminism is the project to maximize the social condition of the female sex there doesnt seem to be a way of compromising with their goals.
/r/MensRights03/07/20 11:03 PM
1

Honestly. Possibly not. I mean. Feminism is the project to maximize the power of the female sex. So if they had the power to level an accusation against which there is no defence and for which there are severe ramifications that would be a great level of power and in line with feminist goals.
/r/MensRights29/06/20 10:19 AM
2

Because maximizing the power of women is not an egalitarian project.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 01:11 PM
13

I get the notion of moral privilege. But if this person believes white men still have it then I want to how she's tweeting at us from 50 years ago.
/r/MensRights28/06/20 10:50 AM
86

Since when was up to 60% a very small risk. I get it. No really I do. We built a society that said that men would gain social standing bestowed by women in return for providing for them so we had to give them social purity to make them capable of bestowing social standing. ​ But here's the problem. Women don't have social purity. We could pretend it in the past because we gave them limited rights. So their ability to cause harm was limited. ​ But now they have the same ability to cause harm as a…
/r/MensRights27/06/20 08:06 PM
7

Imagine an atheist group being moderated by fundamentalist christians.
/r/MensRights15/06/20 04:27 PM
12

and of course it is removed from r feminism, cant have it looking like their social project is resulting in dystopian results. If we ignore all the negative effects of our ideology then it has no negative effects right?
/r/MensRights12/06/20 11:48 PM
127

Mate, if your perception of a civilized justice system resembles that then I think we'd be better off living like tribal apes again.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 10:50 AM
3

Says no oppression, line before says men should be enslaved. This has been written by a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 09:37 AM
17

'incel subreddits' Man is in a relationship for 3 years. I think the word incel is being stretched just a tiny bit .
/r/MGTOW28/05/20 08:56 AM
30

It's the feminist goal. And the way they got to it is kind of entertaining in its own terrible way. police position: *this is a domestic matter and we should not arrest anyone* feminist: i think you should arrest the primary aggressor *rubs hands together assuming that's the man cause women are perfect angels* police position:*start arresting women for being crazy and violent* feminist: no no no what are you doing?! police: ...arresting the aggressor feminist: NO! stupid, i said arrest the aggre…
/r/MensRights26/05/20 08:44 AM
26

So they're proposing that women disproportionately benefit from the taxpayer's money. I don't know why people are objecting that sounds like business as usual for the western world.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 09:43 AM
18

There are only ever two kinds of feminists. The deceivers and the deceived.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 06:22 PM
1

6' 3" ...is it just me or are their demands still going up. I know its a slim minority who are 6' or above. But god how few must be 6' 3" Prediction. Within 5 years the minimum height requirement for dating will be outside natural human norms.
/r/MGTOW22/05/20 08:30 AM
2

Well yeah. Seen as maximum female benefit is 'maximum female benefit no matter how many men and children have to be hurt' you not offering yourself up to be harmed is counter to their goals.
/r/MGTOW21/05/20 08:47 AM
2

These do not sound like people amenable to reason
/r/MensRights18/05/20 08:58 AM
2

Non essential parts of society? Men are society
/r/MGTOW18/05/20 06:05 AM
1

Or or, bear with me on this. They require respect, and so a feminist girl is just no fun because feminists cannot respect men.
/r/MGTOW17/05/20 06:25 PM
6

MRAs are fish swimming in the waters of reality and apparently feminists are some kind of pond skater. Not only do they only touch the waters of reality in only the most superficial fashion but if you immerse them in those waters they drown.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 10:51 AM
4

This is a person who quotes approvingly a rad fem saying to criminalize all males who participate in hetereosexual sex as rapists by default. ​ So for all we want to point and laugh this person is either mentally subnormal or completely insane.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 07:49 AM
33

Weapons grade projection.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 06:12 AM
1

"shutting down the economy could have some bad consequences" o.0 are they somehow of the assumption that it wouldn't? what..how..the... *redditor.exe has suffered a critical error and needs to close*
/r/MGTOW09/05/20 10:51 PM
14

Not until they're in it. Matriarchy is a self cancelling project.
/r/MGTOW08/05/20 11:15 PM
124

"look where we are" The most technologically advanced civilization in the history of planet earth.
/r/MGTOW08/05/20 06:50 PM
13

“shame and silence survivors, and take away parents’ peace of mind.” unless those parents happen happen to be say, mothers of sons. In which case fuck them right biddy boy?
/r/MensRights07/05/20 06:14 PM
1

0.o Literally didn't happen that way around as recently as TODAY on reddit. Well yesterday considering when I'm posting.
/r/MGTOW07/05/20 12:56 AM
9

Well, we're holding them to the standard feminists hold men to? No matter what problem men have its assumed its self imposed. Men always have maximum agency under the feminist paradigm, they never need or want except by choice. They're always in control of their environment so if their environment doesn't suit then men MUST of done that to themselves. Especially if the problem might conceivably be blamed on the act of a woman, in which case its SUPER DUPER ULTRA the man's fault entirely. ​ Hones…
/r/MensRights03/05/20 05:38 PM
4

A fat sex doll? Christ that sounds awkward even cute and short sex dolls are heavy. Nevermind aesthetics you wouldn't be able to move it.
/r/MGTOW01/05/20 10:01 PM
28

and now, in the land of fucking make believe...
/r/MGTOW29/04/20 12:18 AM
76

Yet another person who doesn't understand us. Because they don't see us. Society is a train, and women are the passengers in this train. They have no say in where the train goes or what stops it makes, no control over its speed. But they look, and they see a bunch of men in the engine cab who DO have control of these things. And so they say "Men control the train", but that's because they only see the top few percent of men in the engine cab. Where are the other men you ask? They're the coal fed…
/r/MensRights28/04/20 08:30 PM
5

You know. this is in no way related to this at all no sir. But for the past...oooh, week? maybe more than that? I've been treated to the sound of a woman screaming at and berating a man off and on (for hours at a time) and he's never raised his voice enough for me to hear him say a word back to her.
/r/MGTOW28/04/20 11:22 AM
22

"It's okay to compliment women." if they deserve it "defend women in their comments section." If they deserve it. "women are right more than you think." They're also wrong more often than YOU think. "report onlyfans leakers to the police." salt much? "we should be male feminists." We should also be black klansmen.
/r/MGTOW26/04/20 06:58 PM
1

My personal interpretation is this. They exist but your ability to detect them is far from perfect and the price for failure is high. You cant detect whether you are about to get involved with a woman who will destroy you ahead of time. And some jackass decided women should have the power to destroy men. You're basically looking for a woman who can trust to put a gun to your head and not pull the trigger.
/r/MGTOW24/04/20 12:07 AM
2

So FDS have progressed to straight up lying about the contents of their own sub. Interesting strategy, though I doubt you could find a single person who is even slightly surprised.
/r/MGTOW23/04/20 09:10 AM
13

As someone who owns a kindle I find it baffling they make the claim that women dont get fan service. The amount of low quality romance stories that have chiselled abs on the cover you'd think they were all from a world where no one ever invented shirts for men. Women do get fan service, they get it in genres and media aimed at them. If action games were marketed towards girls instead of boys there would be a lot more abs involved.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 01:51 PM
9

A man can't do much to make themselves taller. But I assure you hun, you can do something about your pizza topping complexion, quintuple chins, odour of rancid pork and the fact kids keep on seeing you and coming to the conclusion they're visiting the planetarium.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 08:00 PM
7

"Men are so confused about their current market value" That's cause it isn't listed by the pound at the local butchers darling.
/r/MGTOW13/04/20 01:19 PM
2

They said it themselves. "a community that supports maximum female benefit" So no you can't advocate for men having rights, that would interfere with maximum female benefit. You know how people say "Your right to swing your fist ends at my nose?" well, that isn't the maximum right to swing her fist so the FDS woman objects to the assertion on fundamental principles.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 08:36 AM
3

Yeah nikki on quora is a gold star feminist. By which we mean her rarefied feminist fantasy land in which she lives barely touches real life at all.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 01:19 PM
2

Patriarchy made it possible for a man walk on the moon, matriarchy can't even make it possible for a man to take a shit indoors.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 09:53 AM
3

"When I asked what activism they've done, the free speech warriors of mens rights banned me for trolling" When you're liable to be everything short of physically attacked in public for espousing mens rights positions its a tad hard to do real life action.
/r/MensRights09/04/20 09:51 AM
5

Female dating strategy have been running a ban bot to enforce their own echo chamber since the dawn of their sub. But someone else uses one on them and suddenly it's not okay? Christ on a bike these people.
/r/MensRights08/04/20 12:31 AM
11

Feminists believe men are superior as well. A 12 year old boy has more agency than a 30 year old teacher who rapes him, and a drunk man still is held fully responsible for his actions with a drunken woman as if he is sober. He might need to consult his shoes for a minute to tell you his age if you asked him but he still has more agency than a woman. According to feminism men are superhuman. That aside yes, if you define 'equality' as the dismantling of female privileges and responsibility and ac…
/r/MensRights06/04/20 01:10 AM
77

Mother earth would indeed flourish without men. But women? Women would be fucked.
/r/MGTOW04/04/20 04:42 PM
72

Not the hero we wanted, not the hero we asked for, but damnit he's the hero we need.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/20 10:46 AM
14

Because if feminism didn't have double standards they wouldn't have standards at all. Their position is basically. When I am weak, I ask that you lift me up in the name of equality, because that is in accordance with your morality. But when I am strong, I make sure that you become weaker in the name of my self, because that is in accordance with MY morality.
/r/MensRights31/03/20 11:58 AM
3

I'm not sure if they're just too crazy to realize what their proposal will result or they're secretly Putin trying to collapse western civilization. Because this shit will burn civilization to the ground and piss on its ashes.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 10:23 AM
9

Men Going Their Own Way. Men daring not to be gynocentric, not pedestalizing pussy and putting unhealthy amounts of importance and effort into the act of attaining it. And worse still? the absolute worst thing? By not pedestalizing women they evaluate women's behaviour as if they were MEN! the gall. The sheer gall! Reddit put them in quarantine because that sort of behaviour must not spread, Women are wonderful didn't you know?
/r/MensRights25/03/20 01:02 PM
6

I think the alt right accusation arises something like this. Man: hey I'm having trouble with my burdens, I'm not okay and I think I have been treated unfairly. Traditional right: shut up and man up, be strong, provide and sacrifice for family God and state. Man: walks away. Man: hey I'm having trouble with my burdens- Progressives: oh fuck off you dont have problems you're a man. In fact just kill yourself youre probably oppressing someone by breathing. Man: leaves Man: I have problems. The alt…
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:16 AM
6

And anyone in a relationship with someone like this is probably MUCH better off alone. Honestly I don't get how they think this will work unless men are somehow not actually people in their minds. "Oh Hey, here's my dating advice for you. Under no circumstances be a net positive to the man you're dating. In fact the more you can drain his emotional and financial resources the better."
/r/MensRights22/03/20 12:10 AM
2

And we're quarantined while pink pill feminism isn't.
/r/MGTOW14/03/20 09:46 AM
7

It's two x chromosomes. You might as well try to find someone at a Klan meeting who would say that "the bigger who got lynched" didn't have it coming.
/r/MGTOW10/03/20 03:02 PM
46

In wording. Yes. In strategy? What choice does a man have when the deal presented to him is akin to "stick your dick in a grinder and say thank you for the privilege" Option one. Attempt to negotiate a better deal. That is the mra way. But most important to that is option two. Option two. Do not accept the deal. This must be on the negotiating table before the other side is willing to negotiate. Mgtow strengthens the mra bargaining position. That said a lot of mgtow are the result of seeing the …
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:56 AM
26

Menslib is the feminist version of mensrights. IE, you're allowed to consider male problems only so long as you follow the following rules. no matter what the problem is you are not allowed to believe that womens problems are not vastly more significant and worthy of consideration no matter what the problem is you are not allowed to so much as consider the notion that women or even worse feminism might be the cause Everything bad that happens to men is regardless of circumstances a result of eit…
/r/MensRights08/03/20 06:14 PM
3

Why do these people think a social situation that hasn't been actually in any way happening for well over a century has any relevance?
/r/MGTOW01/03/20 12:10 AM
2

Dude, I get where you're coming from but there's two key problems here that mean that they are always going to paint the whole movement with a hateful brush. They were doing that shit for years before incel ideology hit media attention anyway They were doing that shit because they consider it hateful to consider males as having issues that are anything other than trivial and self inflicted. And they consider it hateful to consider that feminism or women may have caused harm to anyone or anything…
/r/MensRights24/02/20 08:54 AM
6

So FDS doesn't understand respect. Lets put that on the list of things they don't understand including money, dating, sex, success, self reflection, introspection, men and their wants, women, math, statistics, self improvement, self evaluation, civility and politeness...
/r/MGTOW23/02/20 12:25 PM
2

translation engaged: "I MATTER! SEE I MADE A CLICKBAIT TITLE! COME BACK! GIVE ME ATTENTION! I'M ANITA SARKEESIAAN AND I'M IMPORTANT! please pay attention to me, i don't want to be alone..."
/r/MGTOW20/02/20 08:56 AM
22

Picture a woman and she rubs a lamp and says "what have men ever done for me, I wish to live a life free from them and everything they've ever done" Theres a flash.. she opens her eyes in a forest. Three days later, starving and unwell from tainted water she is eaten by a bear.
/r/MGTOW19/02/20 09:58 PM
32

No we imagine a world in which women rule men in the way feminists fantasized that men ruled women because that is the world feminists are attempting to build.
/r/MGTOW18/02/20 10:35 AM
6

I would rather spread the Corona virus than your words you dribbling meatflap.
/r/MGTOW18/02/20 10:31 AM
4

I am still trying to decide which is accurate: They are geneuinely pushing this ideology and just ignoring the fact that ideological movies float as well as talkative mafia accountants. It's a cynical ploy, they take a weak movie and put the 'feminist movie' angle on it so that if the movie bombs cause it's weak they can blame the misogynerds and misdirect from the fact their script sucked.
/r/MGTOW18/02/20 08:58 AM
3

Which was bullshit. The reason she didn't see it is cause she walked slowly on the rooftop at the very start of the game. If you play the game you see his ass plenty. Hell if you handed the game controller to your grandmother she would see more of batass than anita would just fumbling with the controls.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 12:48 AM
1

The reason its called a witch hunt and a lynch mob is cause you don't bother to check you're actually going after an asshole. You know when they talk about people so stupid they can't find their asshole with both hands and a map? yeah, look in the mirror cupcake.
/r/MGTOW16/02/20 12:05 AM
2

Oh and one of them can shoot fucking lasers out of his mouth. That also might be a relevant factor.
/r/MGTOW15/02/20 11:49 PM
7

Wait wait wait. A woman who subscribes to female dating strategy is saying its a bad thing for gender relations for someone to be manipulative and harmful.
/r/MGTOW15/02/20 11:12 PM
3

This is the key difference between mensrights and feminism. We have feminists able to show up and ask questions respectfully here, it happened like..yesterday i think. They're not banned, they're engaged in discussion. Feminism's reaction to unorthodox perspectives (orthodoxy defined here as absolute lock step 3rd wave feminism) is to scream, slam the door in your face and then fire machineguns through the door until they're sure they've scared you off.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 12:03 AM
3

Honestly I would settle for women not having disproportionate legal power and no accountability in how they use it. At least then pursuing a relationship with the supposedly fairer sex would be viable again.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 09:30 PM
17

No see. All of that evidence doesn't count because vagina. Even heard's confession doesn't count because vagina. You have to adjust your standards of evidence to the feminist rules. For a woman's accusation against a man needs little more than the accusation itself. For a mans accusation against a woman needs....well, no level of evidence is sufficient under their standard but that is not a bug but a feature.
/r/MensRights09/02/20 01:47 AM
2

" So what can be done? " So we have here a situation where they are seeing an increasing rise of men who have been hurt, seen men hurt, are aware of the ways men get hurt or sympathize with the men who are hurt... And their solution is not "Lets remove the hurt" it's "Lets censor them so they can't talk about it."
/r/MensRights08/02/20 12:11 AM
8

And if you want to talk about male perpetration, male villains, Male agency and male evil. You have a place for this. It's called the entirety of mainstream culture and society. But if we want to talk about female perpetrated acts, female villains, female agency and female evil. We have...just here, outside of the manosphere you cannot discuss these things. And now here you.are trying to say we shouldn't talk about them.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 04:03 PM
6

"But it's wrong to attribute all our problems to women" But what about the problems feminism causes? We live in a world where women have the rights of men, the privileges of women and the responsibilities of neither and where people like you are wilfully blind to how that might be harmful to society.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 03:37 PM
6

Consider how they intend to fight the patriarchy, quotas, gimmes, destruction of those who hold prestige with false accusations, etc. Then realize that all this time the patriarchy has been known to you by another name. The meritocracy.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 06:23 PM
25

" “I find this absurd and disturbing. That says two things about you: Either you’ve done something you’re afraid you might repeat, or you think you’ll do something you shouldn’t. Either way, that’s unacceptable.” " Or that you'll be accused of something that you didn't do and in this climate of knee jerk listen and believe where the accusation is the verdict you'll have your reputation and career destroyed. But strangely you seem unwilling to see that possibility. Honestly the ongoing inability …
/r/MensRights04/02/20 07:21 PM
44

"terroristic leaning men" "violent men wreak havoc on our safety" = A man who refuses to present themself for destruction upon her whim. Because she's either utterly clueless or that's what she means considering who she's talking about. Your refusal to let violence be inflicted on you by her or her state proxies IS violence against her in her mind. To withdraw from her violence, is violence against her. To defend yourself against her violence, is violence against her. There really aren't other w…
/r/MGTOW03/02/20 08:37 PM
6

I know it's a bit off topic but seen as you threw shade at mgtow I will explain my position as a mgtow as I do not consider it misogynistic. I am mgtow because we live in a society where to be involved with a woman means that I am placing myself at the mercy of the disproportionate legal powers she would have over me and for the use of which she would not be held accountable. And I cannot know her well enough to know for sure I could trust her with that power, nor that she would never change int…
/r/MensRights03/02/20 12:46 AM
7

By this logic Bethany.. well. Meet Steve, Steve's wife cheated on him, divorced him, took all his assets and slandered his reputation denying him the support of his friend group. Steve was wronged. Steve is hurting. Now, does this justify Steve going to your house Bethany and beating seven shades of crap out of you considering you didn't do jack shit to Steve? Except it's not even like that Bethany. This is more like a case where Steve's great grandfather went through the divorce.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/20 09:02 AM
2

You know what. She's absolutely right. Those are NOT the reasons man should stop being a feminist. They should stop being a feminist because they hold a belief that all humans should be treated with equal respect and the fact that feminism's unfettered and unchecked crusade to remove all respect, dignity and rights from all men is clearly antithetical to that aforementioned principal.
/r/MGTOW02/02/20 08:54 AM
4

"Women are priceless" You can set your price however high you like but the market will decide whether you're worth that much.
/r/MGTOW02/02/20 08:49 AM
6

Come for the human rights advocacy, stay for the dark humour.
/r/MGTOW30/01/20 10:36 PM
38

"Grow some heyvos and ask a girl out" But remember if she says no its sexual assault.
/r/MGTOW30/01/20 01:50 PM
35

The reason men use more lethal methods for suicide is this: A woman attempts suicide as a cry for help knowing it will be answered A man commits suicide knowing his cries for help will go unanswered
/r/MensRights29/01/20 06:14 PM
14

And I very much doubt this girl knows a single woman younger than 40 who does none of these things if you flip the genders.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 09:05 PM
7

If you tell young men that female approval is necessary for them to attain social standing, that if you can't get a woman to love you then you are a failure. Then you have to accept that there are always going to be people at the bottom of any status ladder. And yes, some of them are going to be bitter about that especially if they fail repeatedly. Now, the theory that women are somehow robots that lack agency or such is going too far (and the belief women don't have agency sounds suspiciously l…
/r/MensRights28/01/20 08:47 PM
3

But when are they going to get writers with sci fi backgrounds back into the show? i mean that's part of what's killing it, they've gotten soap opera drama writers trying to do a show about science fiction, fantastical things and high adventure. I mean, yes. The fixation on social justice doesn't help, but i wouldn't mind some progressivism if it was coupled with a competently written piece of entertainment.
/r/MGTOW28/01/20 09:05 AM
5

I've said it once and I'll say it again. It's not about them asking for accommodation but subservience. They're here as colonisers not immigrants.
/r/MensRights27/01/20 08:07 AM
3

I am not entirely sure it's bigotry and hatred in the sense you mean. They have to acknowledge you as some kind of person with inherent value and rights for that. How much could you hate an ATM? or a car? or any other inanimate object that serves a purpose in your life?
/r/MensRights25/01/20 05:07 PM
38

Even female mice can reproduce. But only human men can create civilizations.
/r/MGTOW25/01/20 05:03 PM
5

That line always gets me. Because a glance at their posts indicates the full line is in fact "a community that supports maximum female benefit regardless of the collateral harm inflicted on men and children."
/r/MensRights25/01/20 03:37 PM
12

Yeah no you can't. Just don't donate and laugh whenever they beg for money.
/r/MGTOW25/01/20 03:31 PM
14

'Narcissistic' ...what definition of this word is being used here.
/r/MGTOW25/01/20 03:26 PM
26

Say it loud, say it often. Say it proudly.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 12:49 AM
5

Make more unreasonable demands? Seriously. I think their definition of being a 'high value woman' goes something like this: assert you are a high value woman demand everything from a man offer nothing possibly don't be morbidly obese(probably optional)
/r/MGTOW25/01/20 12:41 AM
2

That last line about how it's wrong for a woman to do chores, provide compassion and empathy and put out. Does she realise her ideal position is to be a low value woman?
/r/MGTOW24/01/20 10:16 AM
9

We create a world where woman are pedestalized and men are told 'if you cannot convince a woman to love you then you are nothing' then wonder why those who fail consistently end up bitter about it. Society built this ladder knowing there was ALWAYS going to be someone on the bottom rung, and decided anyone who ended up there didn't deserve sympathy but to be kicked in the teeth by those on the rungs above.
/r/MensRights21/01/20 12:29 AM
83

"My presence is a gift" So is mine, so they cancel out.
/r/MGTOW19/01/20 01:07 PM
130

I am highly skeptical of the claim that FDS even believes that their approach is to cause the least amount of damage to others possible.
/r/MGTOW18/01/20 12:22 PM
18

Multiple options is an ever expanding percentage. Why are they not celebrat- Oh sorry. I forgot, it's not about them being included, its about men being excluded. This isn't them wanting assimilation into video games, they want to colonize video games for the matriarchy.
/r/MGTOW17/01/20 11:05 PM
6

No their goal is a man with the looks of bond, the compassion of Gandhi, the money of gates and the self respect and spine of a doormat. They want an 11/10.
/r/MGTOW17/01/20 01:49 PM
43

I remember an old quote, can't remember the exact wording but it was something like "When I am weak I appeal to your fairness that you might raise me up, as that is in accordance with your morality. When I am strong and you are weak I deny you aid, as that is in accordance with my morality."
/r/MGTOW16/01/20 08:39 PM
7

Remember the definition of 'misogynist' is 'disagrees with a woman' so she's not in any way inaccurate in calling you that.
/r/MGTOW16/01/20 06:43 PM
2

Feminism was built on the assumption that man would not change if you changed his circumstances.
/r/MGTOW16/01/20 10:25 AM
10

"Hello Faculty, I would like to make a complaint, my professor appears to be a moron."
/r/MensRights15/01/20 08:12 AM
1

The apostate, the heretic, the infidel, the unbeliever..he is always hated by the faithful. And the church of the sacred gash is a religion so dogmatic it'd make ISIS accuse them of taking it too far. You do not venerate their idols or sacrifice to their altars so you must be made to suffer. The remaining faithful CANNOT be permitted to know that there is another way, a life outside of the church of the sacred gash.
/r/MGTOW14/01/20 11:23 PM
6

Society systematically hates women fucking where?
/r/MensRights14/01/20 11:47 AM
12

Their definition of a high value Male is not the same as yours. Also a mess of contradictions. But basically a rich human atm with the self confidence of a door mat and yet the looks of a model is their definition.
/r/MGTOW13/01/20 01:23 PM
18

o.0 Okay then. Clear as fucking day. Feminists literally consider a man defending himself against a woman to be a heinous and unjustifiable act of domestic violence. Feminists lecture others on acceptable behaviour while they consider no behaviour to be unacceptable for themselves.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 09:43 PM
24

"A vow to actively hurt women." Is it just me or did she just throw that one out without providing evidence? Christ on a bike feminists are the most gullible people on earth if you discount special ed and anyone below the age of SIX.
/r/MGTOW12/01/20 03:28 PM
1

of course, but feminist beliefs are indistinguishable from their own parody so i'm not surprised you couldnt tell.
/r/MGTOW12/01/20 02:40 PM
3

I like how wonderfully this encapsulates the feminist imperative: "You give me protection, provision and a whole host of other things, and i give you nothing in return."
/r/MGTOW12/01/20 12:38 PM
1

But see, that is just you privileging your heteropatriarchal masculinized form of observation based knowledge over the far more sublime and pure form of knowledge derived from feminine intuition.
/r/MGTOW12/01/20 12:35 PM
20

And remember if you boil the feminist claims about DV or sexual assault being an exclusively Male perpetrated crime down far enough you get this claim "our demographic is more virtuous simply due to intrinsic nature, and their demographic is inherently evil by nature." And the last few times that happened we had lynchings and concentration camps.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 02:05 PM
1

I could do a fuck of a lot else with $2500 a month.
/r/MGTOW05/01/20 07:31 PM
1

Yes. A look at most parliaments, companies, governments etc would reveal that a tiny fraction of men hold the majority of the positions of power in the world. But yet despite this we live in a clearly gynocentric society so really from the perspective of a member of the 99% of men who don't have power, are never going to, and who aren't exactly being advantaged by this fact... we could replace the men at the top with a talking banana and it wouldn't change anything for me except it would make po…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 04:29 PM
1

" you have forgotten the additional feminist assertion that men with power use that power to benefit other men. " That's just it. That's my entire point. They leave that out UNTIL you agree. They then jump from "Men hold most positions of power" which is an observation and something I can agree is a thing to "Therefore the entire feminist definition of patriarchy is what you just agreed to." It's bait and switch, and they hope you won't notice or disagree when they pull it. I literally had this …
/r/MensRights05/01/20 04:14 PM
1

Well yes there's that, I think we've all seen that infographic. But the men in the 1% are still men. The annoying part is that they use this absolutely watered down definition of patriarchy "most positions of power are held by men" which is an observation, a statistical factoid but not one that on its own has any real meaning. And once you agree to that they assume you've agreed to patriarchy theory as a whole, which is not the same god damned thing.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 03:59 PM
1

It's a fact that most of the positions of power are held by men, and Kristie Winters on youtube has literally used this version of the bait and switch. She established most power was held by men, then jumped to 'therefore the feminist definition of patriarchy is what you just agreed to and it must be destroyed'. But uh, if the definition of patriarchy is 'most positions of power are held by men' its 'so what, on its own this fact is just a statistical observation, it doesn't mean anything' That'…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 03:54 PM
1

The trouble with the patriarchy..is they always use this word in a bait and switch. "Do you agree we live in a patriarchy, where men are the majority holders of positions of power?" "Well yes, that's obvious." "Excellent, then you agree we live in a patriarchy, a oppressive misogynistic hell-scape where society is systematically constructed at every level to advantage men and disadvantage women and this entire thing must be torn down." "wait what no!" "But you just agreed we live in a patriarchy…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 01:50 PM
25

"To sell you need empathy" "Also, those beliefs in being empathetic to men? those aren't real empathy, you need to stop having those. Real empathy is only the kind women receive."
/r/MensRights04/01/20 09:43 PM
3

I want to second the bit about making your own games. It's what I started doing. Warning, this will somewhat change your perspective on games you play as you become more aware of design decisions that were made.
/r/MGTOW04/01/20 05:46 PM
4

So what you want is for the man to have nothing to live for, nothing to lose, and for him to have no illusions as to who did that to him? I see no possible way this could end badly.
/r/MGTOW03/01/20 08:42 AM
42

when feminists talk about the patriarchy, word swap 'SATAN' in and in some cases it actually makes more sense.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 10:18 PM
9

If we use the FDS definition then. A HVM is stunningly good looking, yet utterly loyal to one specific bland looking sociopath with tits and a gash. A HVM is full of assertive competitiveness to acquire a fantastical amount of wealth, yet has a spine of wet noodles where a bland looking sociopath with tits is concerned and freely parts with what they took corporate scalps to acquire. A HVM is incredibly empathetic and soft able to soak up female tears like the strongest kleenex, yet has a heart …
/r/MGTOW02/01/20 10:15 PM
8

You cant , or at least not here. The Karen straughan quote should of made a dent if the douche canoe was open to being persuaded. You used it. It didn't make a dent. This person is a moron incapable of changing their mind.
/r/MensRights02/01/20 01:41 PM
3

"I make upper six figures in the business I built from scratch" Even if this is true so what? you're on FDS, he is going to have to make even more and you subscribe to a philosophy where spending even a dime on a man is viewed with a miserliness that'd make Scrooge look like a communist. Your money is literally irrelevant. What is relevant is you're on FDS, and therefore probably insufferable and DEFINITELY a manipulative sociopath.
/r/MGTOW02/01/20 12:50 AM
10

Is it any wonder with how insufferable they are that they need extensive strategies to not be single?
/r/MensRights01/01/20 07:57 PM
11

Every single post from the MRA patrol including quotes of their perception that reddit is a 'hive of MRAs' should be prefaced this way "And now, in the land of Make Believe..." So "And now, in the land of Make Believe.." 'Men are raped by other men, so you'd think MRAs would say this is a male problem, but nope! women are bad has to fit in somehow.' Just roll with it. Their understanding of the world should be treated as being as credible as the made up ramblings of an excited 12 year old at 11P…
/r/MensRights31/12/19 08:41 PM
4

yes but the question is who the power is used to benefit. Yes its going to benefit those tiny few at the top, but right after the men at the top who is it used to benefit? WOMEN. ​ Personally I think when feminists assume that men would only use their power to benefit their gender its projection.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 01:32 PM
5

I just want to say I quite like the notion of referring to such places as 'anti human rights spaces'
/r/MensRights31/12/19 12:50 PM
18

The hell was the british embassy supposed to do? pay 12 israeli teens to break into her hotel and rape her so that the events actually sort of happened?
/r/MensRights30/12/19 05:24 PM
4

Those fingernail extensions christ. I don't think you can make good on that promise to reciprocate with those.
/r/MGTOW30/12/19 02:04 AM
2

Not really. Feminism requires way too much in the way of excess resources to be properly sustained without technology. ​ The way I figure it went was like this. Human groups lived wild and savage before civilization, the women in the group all fucked the alpha male and every other male in the group wasn't therefore that invested in the group. This was great for the women as alpha male for all of them. But the other men didn't have a stake in the group because they weren't getting any. Unless of …
/r/MGTOW28/12/19 11:42 AM
6

There's fat and then there's having an arm like an overstuffed sausage with a hand on the end that resembles a rubber glove glued to a volleyball.
/r/MGTOW25/12/19 08:14 PM
26

But, this article doesn't exist. This is a made up headline. Why? Why are people doing this? Making shit up is a feminist strategy, and christ we're not short of shit that they actually do that would piss us off.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 03:39 PM
76

"No ones health is suffering because of their weight." Last woman I remember saying that died of heart failure at 31.
/r/MGTOW25/12/19 12:28 PM
2

It's not just that. It's 'maximum female benefit' with the clear subtitle 'no matter who we have to harm to get it'
/r/MGTOW20/12/19 11:15 PM
2

"And that in order to be responsible for your protection they would need to have authority over you?" feminist short circuits
/r/MGTOW20/12/19 10:07 PM
3

who? don't care female supremacy movement violent group who at least have a grievance Domestic terror organization, has no legitimate grievances and just wants to 'burn it all down, replace it with communism, then starve to death' Don't care the reason i'm staying mgtow don't care who? not ethical saves lives dont care up until the point my wallet is involved
/r/MensRights20/12/19 07:49 PM
4

"what can mens rights activists do for women" They can re-establish the necessary ground work for a cooperative relationship between the genders and stop western civilization collapsing. I'd say you're welcome, but honestly I consider myself more MGTOW than MRA because I'm not that hopeful that the MRM CAN do this.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 11:47 AM
52

And as ever. Feminism is about power. And yes. THERE IS power in having a place where a gender can talk freely without the other gender listening in or being involved. Especially if they can talk about the other gender. That's why feminists want to A. remove male spaces. B. retain female spaces. This is all feeling a bit 1984 really.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 12:52 AM
4

Here's an interesting question. Do you want western civilization to collapse? because feminism is built on the assumption they can change a man's environment and that the man will not change his behaviour. That you can shape society and law in the favour of women to the point where a man can be beaten, raped, slandered, defamed, robbed, incarcerated or killed by a woman with the blessing and support of the state and he won't change his behaviour? Because MGTOW, MGTOW is a feminist project. It's …
/r/MensRights17/12/19 07:38 PM
66

and according to the article this is because caitlyn was offended by a comment by kenan. she wanted him thrown in jail because he said something that offended her. read that again. Are you the fucking queen? are the police now palace guards? Monkey on a stick is this the end goal of feminist legal reform? you offend a woman and you get thrown in jail?
/r/MensRights17/12/19 12:25 PM
4

Soo as much as it makes sense, i can't find any article by jess philips with that name on the guardian and it's important to not make shit up.
/r/MGTOW17/12/19 12:22 AM
3

...if you were to yell up her arsehole would you hear an echo?
/r/MGTOW16/12/19 01:51 PM
6

Just sit back and laugh when they beg you for money.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 02:11 PM
82

"Father's rights? bah, the only rights father's have are to serve, pay and perish." and people wonder why we say society is gynocentric and misandrist.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 02:07 PM
3

Really? I thought the ideological basis behind menslib is that women are in no sense responsible for any evils in the world. If something bad happens to a woman then its never the result of her choices, its cause of a man or society. If something bad happens to man then its his fault or cause of another man or society even if a woman, women or feminism are in fact responsible.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 09:37 AM
1

Just so we know what your position is. Woman trades sexual favours for power and privilege = good Man trades power and privilege for sexual favours = SATAN that about right? Because there is no doubt he did the latter. I'm just wondering why only one of these is morally condemned.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 09:30 AM
4

Mona without men protecting your body for weird fantasy of a mob of women enacting vigilante justice murdering anyone accused or suspected of being a rapist would be over inside of 24 hours and not in any way you would want to see. To be direct and patriarchal about it you and your mob of women would be badly injured, killed or worse by sunrise the next day.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 10:50 PM
4

The mistake feminists always make about the patriarchy i think is down to projection. They assume that men would make civilization structured with the primary goal of benefitting them as if feminists were in charge that's what they would do. But men aren't women, so the men at the top didn't do that.
/r/MensRights10/12/19 08:53 AM
13

I am overweight, and it is absolutely a product of my lifestyle. I love food too much and exercise too little and I lack the willpower and self discipline to commit to changing that for long enough to have an impact. But I'm not a woman so I actually have agency in this world. So my condition can be and is my fault. Men act, women are acted upon. Even feminists believe that women don't have agency, which is just weird.
/r/MGTOW06/12/19 09:19 AM
2

Damn beat me to it
/r/MGTOW05/12/19 10:13 AM
8

...sunburn in there sounds god damn excruciating.
/r/MGTOW02/12/19 12:10 AM
3

Looking at their track records. Patriarchies let men land on the moon. Matriarchies cant even provide indoor plumbing for a man to take a shit inside. So only one has a track record of success and innovation. Also all matriarchies that are in contact with patriarchies only continue existing as long as the patriarchy permits it
/r/MGTOW29/11/19 03:01 PM
3

"fucked everything up" is an interesting way of saying "built the most advanced technological civilization in the history of this planet"
/r/MGTOW29/11/19 02:55 PM
1

I suppose it depends on the definition. Maybe they leave out the specifier trafficked for sexual purposes.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 02:06 PM
3

Shouldn't it be 100% of the ones they care about if that's how it's defined?
/r/MensRights29/11/19 01:53 PM
5

71% of human trafficking victims are female? Really? Is that really true?
/r/MensRights29/11/19 01:35 PM
11

So wait is this actually a feminist saying it's acceptable for women to rape males as revenge for patriarchy? There is no bottom
/r/MensRights29/11/19 12:16 PM
372

Rest in peace you legend
/r/PussyPassDenied28/11/19 02:50 PM
7

It's simple. Their theories don't take into account certain things so they don't get the results they expect. Why didn't world war 2 result in a global communist takeover? Why didn't removing the legal barriers for women result in them being equally represented in high risk, high investment, high stress high status jobs? They have no idea so they make up reasons.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 10:40 AM
8

"the harassment is just the latest instance of feminist fandom voices being shut down online" Wouldn't anita have to be a fan of something for her to be a voice of feminist fandom?
/r/MGTOW25/11/19 05:06 PM
11

yeah. "u fucked it up" ... by creating the most advanced and sophisticated technological civilization in the history of this planet?
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/19 10:25 PM
10

Well yes. Imagine you were a bully. You bullied the writer nerds, they bent the knee to you. You bullied the theater club, they bent the knee. You bullied the movie makers, they bent the knee. You bullied the gamer geeks...and some of them dared not bend the knee! This cannot be tolerated! they must bend the knee! they must submit! I AM A WOMAN AND I SHALL NOT BE CHALLENGED! REEEEE! and then, when that doesn't work, you get bitter over it for all time.
/r/MGTOW24/11/19 05:39 PM
7

yeah. that might make a lot of sense "I passionately hate the opposite sex with every fibre of my being and if i were stronger than them i would abuse and hurt them. Therefore any man must hate women and abuse and hurt them."
/r/MGTOW24/11/19 02:20 PM
71

how do you tell him? "I'm sorry, but I've secretly been a bitch for all these years and I have the loyalty and human decency of a piranha with blood in the water. I have an over inflated opinion of my self worth and I'm going to spend 3 years trying to get commitment from men way out of my league before falling flat. Then I'll try crawling back to you smelling of cheap wine and catfood."
/r/MGTOW23/11/19 01:47 PM
1

"the men who wont allow women to pump their own gas" I'm fairly sure that's categorized as toxic masculinity. ​ ​ that being said, it's easy to guess. I'm not sure there's anything that isn't toxic masculinity these days.
/r/MGTOW22/11/19 10:11 AM
2

except the muslims won't go along with it. Mission control for humanity's first manned mars mission will be speaking Arabic.
/r/MensRights21/11/19 01:42 PM
13

"Isolate and harm" Picture a man whose girlfriend assaulted and raped him. MRA position:"Oh my god, it was wrong what she did to you, are you okay? do you want to talk about it?" Menslib/feminist position:" Oh my god, what did you do to her? is she okay? can we talk to her about it?"
/r/MensRights19/11/19 07:50 PM
4

I actually get a kick out of the "maximum female benefit" line. Because it's so very clear that it's "maximum female benefit with no regards to how much men or children have to suffer to achieve it" It's like peak sociopath.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 10:19 AM
5

That after a disaster DV rates go up? Yes. That firefighters go back home, shake the spot off their jackets and then give their wife a shiner? Fuck no. The study just said that DV rates spike after a disaster. It wasn't saying more than that.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 03:47 PM
11

Wasn't this the study that said that the family of law enforcement officers were more likely to involve DV. But in fact it was more often the spouse of the officer doing it? Because the wives of cops more than any other wife knows there is no consequences for being a violent woman.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 03:45 PM
2

So what you're saying lady is he best be hashtag pimp hand strong. Right?
/r/MGTOW18/11/19 02:24 PM
4

Hell yeah doom 2016. Where they reversed every bad decision first person shooters have been making since possibly call of duty and halo or before. regenerating health? GONE. hitscan weapons? GONE. cowering behind cover? MY FIST CRAVES THE BLOOD OF DEMONKIND!
/r/MGTOW17/11/19 11:57 AM
2

....wait. if women are 51% of the population, and they're planning to discount 80% of the male population from the get go..what are the other 4 out of 5 women supposed to do? Oh wait nevermind silly me, maths is a tool of the patriarchy.
/r/MGTOW15/11/19 07:17 PM
18

And quietly a note is added next to shereles address in the fire fighters software "delay response time by 1 hour in event of fire"
/r/MensRights13/11/19 10:38 AM
1

I think I remember a quote Feminist caring about men and their issues is like a thug brutally kicking the shit out of a man on the floor and every so often stopping to ask "hey mate, are you alright?"
/r/MGTOW13/11/19 10:32 AM
3

Thats not terrifying at all. In twenty years they'll be calling her dear leader.
/r/MGTOW12/11/19 11:58 AM
53

Eye piercings?winces
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/11/19 03:47 PM
2

0.o okay. I'll cut a deal, as it's clearly going to be a shorter list...what isn't misogynistic at this point in the eyes of feminists? ... Better hurry though, before too much longer the written word is going to be a form of patriarchal oppression..hell i can see it now "Written words do not change after I have written them to reflect my current mood and the convenience of the moment. MY WORDS ARE OPPRESSING ME! TEXT IS RAPE! REEEEE!"
/r/MGTOW10/11/19 11:24 PM
2

You know. I'd never seen a man attempt to argue with a hair dye until today.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 06:00 PM
11

Which is why PUAs(the FDS nearest equivalent) teach a man to get SEX from a woman and then leave her. While FDS teaches a woman to get money, support, labour and time from a man over as long a period as possible until he's a hollowed out bankrupt night of the living dead reject.
/r/MGTOW09/11/19 08:43 PM
5

Harpies against Satan
/r/MGTOW09/11/19 05:13 PM
3

So sociopathic female dating advice sub quotes deranged misandric cesspool sub. Got it
/r/MGTOW09/11/19 04:46 PM
8

yeah that takes talent...i got to wonder though. Did this get practiced? Like is there some traffic cone dojo up a mountain somewhere our hero trained at under a bearded master?
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/19 08:57 PM
8

That bit always get me for how callous and sociopathic it is. It's maximum female benefit no matter how unfair exploitative or downright cruel it is to everyone else involved.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/11/19 04:41 PM
2

The consequences are negligible? Joan ghomeshi was found innocent in court through unusual circumstances and the incompetence of his accusers. He still had his career destroyed, was made a social pariah and is yet to rebuild his life
/r/MensRights07/11/19 02:03 PM
1

I for one am happy to be ineligible for receiving the interest of a reader of FDS. It's sort of like hearing a vampire saying "Actually, your blood will probably be bad for me, I'd rather not suck your blood"
/r/MGTOW06/11/19 08:00 PM
4

Fun mental exercise. Replace all references to boys with the words girl or woman and check the statement for accuracy.
/r/MGTOW06/11/19 10:05 AM
11

" All of the problems on this Men's Rights page are VERY real, and we need to solve them. However, blaming feminism is not the way, and doing so just might be making these problems worse. " Who created the duluth model of domestic violence then?
/r/MensRights02/11/19 11:55 PM
7

I have another question. what even is going on here? Is this like a punishment or something? cause otherwise I got to ask what he's supposed to do blinded and engulfed in sewer water while holding his breath down there.
/r/MGTOW02/11/19 08:35 PM
13

Why do we object to the idea that rape is somehow a vast majority men on woman crime? Because it implies that men are MORALLY INFERIOR TO WOMEN which well, is a feminist trope but anyway. Yes forcible violent physical rape is a majority man on woman crime. But that's due to capability and not intent. Women are physically weaker and less capable of such things than men. But that's not what rape means anymore. Rape now includes all violations of consent either coerced through means other than viol…
/r/MensRights02/11/19 03:34 PM
11

"do you carry yourself like a rapist, that people would believe an accusation?" Well, I have a penis, and I have a beard. So in this modern climate...signs point to yes as that's all that'd be needed to convict me.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 10:35 PM
2

what is this sub about? 1 part red pill rage 1 part women being reported on without the women are wonderful effect 1 part people waxxing philosophical 1 part pictures of automobiles and nature. blend together, you get the mgtow subreddit. Do you guys hate women? no, we hate a system that gives them unlimited power to harm and destroy on the assumption that they're somehow moral paragons who can do no wrong. What does going your own way entail? Not dating, it's incredibly peaceful. what do you th…
/r/MGTOW30/10/19 12:02 AM
9

Because for feminists anyone and anything is acceptable collateral damage so long as a woman benefits or a man is harmed.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 01:45 PM
6

christ did anyone go and look at some of the links on that article in vocal media? it's like visiting the bad acid trip mirror universe of wrong.
/r/MGTOW25/10/19 11:50 PM
4

0.8% is about as solidly grounded as the common feminist claim of 2% so why is anyone surprised. Feminist arseholes are so flexible from all the reaching they could make a mint as drug runners.
/r/MensRights24/10/19 07:44 AM
2

isn't the leading stated reason for divorce just 'dissatisfaction' or some other bullshit. If this woman were any less in touch with reality her rant would of included motherfucking dragons.
/r/MGTOW21/10/19 07:18 AM
3968

That man's fucks clearly had runneth dry sometime at least a half hour before he encountered this bullshit.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/19 05:03 PM
37

"And all we have is war and bullying and poverty to show for it." And the most technologically advanced civilization in the history of this fucking planet. Patriarchy put men on the moon, matriarchy didn't even manage to let them poop indoors.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 06:37 PM
12

This is one of those articles where you read the headline, pause...and then re read it to make sure you aren't being punked
/r/MensRights14/10/19 12:17 PM
20

I only hate women who seek to intrude in and dictate my life. If you keep on running into men who seem to 'hate women' then woman, ask yourself why.
/r/MGTOW13/10/19 10:00 PM
4

So you didn't use bridges, roads, gasoline or automobiles to get there then?
/r/MensRights07/10/19 11:43 AM
76

"Financially abuse women" You financially abuse a woman by not giving her your money and denying her access to your resources.
/r/MGTOW07/10/19 10:16 AM
31

" “The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.”
/r/MGTOW06/10/19 09:02 PM
1

...bit harsh. Gang raped to death? Granted I'm all for public execution in this case and their literature being destroyed, a message must be sent. But lets do this clean aye?
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:13 PM
19

Mens rights doesn't consider topics of female advantage, privilege, agency and responsibility to be off limits for discussion.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 07:45 PM
10

I only respect the respectful and respectable. Feminism is neither.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 02:19 PM
1

" There was just one monumental hiccup in the plan: who was raising the boys to step back from paid work, to adjust their thinking? " hypergamy. you need to be either in the top 20% genetically or the top 20% wealth wise. Now, it's not yet possible to adjust the former, but men strive for the latter. You can't set the rules of the game and then complain that men are conforming to the rules. How the hell is a man supposed to have a six figure income and do an equal (which probably means more than…
/r/MGTOW23/09/19 11:13 AM
5

That's a lot of screeching and flapping her arms. A hell of a lot of it.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 11:05 AM
13

I bet they'll U-turn on 'men shouldn't cry' if the reason the man was crying is because their cheating wife took the house and kids.
/r/MensRights20/09/19 12:46 PM
1

Okay touche I phrased it badly my bad. But Jian Ghomeshi's is a situation where it was clearly false, so clearly false that it didn't even survive the trial. And his life was still ruined by it. Even if you are found innocent, you are still guilty, and you are still punished. That and what happened to Alec due to Zoe Quinn rate up there as my examples for where even if the legal system works correctly or isn't given a chance to get involved the mere accusation is enough to destroy a man. Where t…
/r/MensRights20/09/19 10:49 AM
3

Rape allegations don't ruin lives? Where is Jian Ghomeshi's career?
/r/MensRights19/09/19 10:18 PM
4

This is written by Laurie penny, a famously delusional feminist. I know I know two words is redundant but she's more so than usual. Also there's evidence Zoe made the whole thing up, try to contain your surprise.
/r/MGTOW19/09/19 01:59 PM
19

The title of that sub is funny. Witches, at least the magic kind, aren't real. And the patriarchy, as in the systematic institutionalised oppression of women, isn't real. So the title of the sub is the equivalent of faeries Vs dragons
/r/MGTOW19/09/19 09:57 AM
5

I don't think "what men will gain" even crosses their minds. They know they will gain when men join feminism and I think that's where the thought process stops. They benefit therefore it is right.
/r/MGTOW17/09/19 09:23 AM
1

John the Other said they use respect as code word for 'obey women' because well. If they came out and said that then the jig would be up wouldn't it?
/r/MGTOW17/09/19 03:45 AM
1

Human instincts are evolution based. And civilization is too recent for evolution to have caught up. The females mate selection is still working in a paradigm where the invention of fire was black magic and agriculture was a distant future. In that context possessive, aggressive, strong and willing and able to do violence was the best possible mate. As an aside the fact we are cave men with modern technology probably explains a degree of fucked up ness
/r/MGTOW13/09/19 09:32 AM
2

He has money.
/r/MGTOW13/09/19 09:17 AM
2

Am I blind or is man forced to engage in vaginal sex not an option anywhere here?
/r/MensRights11/09/19 09:02 AM
2

*puts on feminist hat* what gender war? what do you mean there are consequences to our actions? no you see it's clear you don't understand, we didn't want negative consequences to our actions, so they're not going to happen. *nods, takes off feminist hat*
/r/MGTOW10/09/19 04:56 PM
1

Are we sure this was written by a man and not a particularly dogmatic teenage girl?
/r/MGTOW10/09/19 10:50 AM
5

man the harpoons
/r/MGTOW09/09/19 07:51 AM
26

You know in a world with even a shred of justice every time a man in family court is informed that Rachel is their judge they should have their lawyer Petition for a judge who isn't a biased rad fem. Admittedly a family court judge who isn't a biased feminist activist is a hard sell.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 01:44 PM
34

You know. It's depressing how many times we see videos like this. The woman starts attacking a man, a man larger than her, a man that by all rights could end this fight in the time it takes to write this sentence. But they feel they have a right to do so, they know that if he retaliates he will immediately become a villain and society will treat him as such. This shield of restraint on male behaviour exists, they know it exists, and they exploit it, they're empowered to do violence by knowing th…
/r/MGTOW06/09/19 07:41 AM
5

...that hole in the middle of the picture on the right is the air plug you use to inflate and deflate the doll right? ..wait...what...not a doll? .... ...hello again alcohol, I see we'll be spending some time together
/r/MGTOW05/09/19 10:18 PM
1

psst. Streetlamp. I hate to break it to you...Hillary Clinton is real. She's not a fictional character. Sorry to disappoint.
/r/MGTOW31/08/19 09:25 AM
8

And now you can compile a similar six images with...hmm, captain marvel and...come on give me five more characters who meet the criteria. need help here.
/r/MGTOW30/08/19 09:22 PM
3

Oh take your sockpuppet back to inceltears already you wanker.
/r/MGTOW29/08/19 09:53 PM
2

Feminism has defined itself as pro woman. Therefore to be anti feminist is to be anti woman in the eyes of the public. Nevermind that feminism is anti man this is the propaganda we're dealing with and you must comport yourself accordingly.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 09:30 PM
104

Prisoners dilemma. Because making college relationships into that sounds like a swell way to engender a good respect between the genders.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 11:26 AM
9

good news Jasmine. For your exceptional comments you've won a free mandatory government sponsored sterilization. From now on you can live your truth and fuck freely with men knowing you will not be burdened with the responsibility of caring for another life.
/r/MGTOW26/08/19 12:10 PM
1

"Feminism is about destroying the concept that men are evil, rapists, etc" fucking you what now?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 09:25 PM
7

I'll take 'hamstering away personal responsibility on the part of women for 500 Alex'
/r/MGTOW22/08/19 02:41 PM
10

Possibly because if a man shares his relationship woes anywhere else they will be told "It's your fault, you are the problem, you need to be better, you need to change" Just a theory.
/r/MGTOW17/08/19 11:33 AM
70

...what was she thinking there "well, first time he hit me i got knocked down...lets see if trying again goes better?" no..no it won't you're like a bunny rabbit attacking a dump truck.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/08/19 04:44 PM
3

"let me rephrase my answer. I'm a bitch. That is the reason I'm a feminist."
/r/MGTOW13/08/19 07:36 AM
3

No. Title ix investigators are like the people who banned evidence of consent from Canadian sexual assault trials after the conspiracy against Joan ghomeshi failed. They know false accusations are common and they want women to have that power to destroy a man with them.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 09:57 AM
13

Question, how will you be able to tell the difference from what is happening now?
/r/MGTOW06/08/19 10:40 AM
2

the future is free males
/r/MGTOW06/08/19 07:46 AM
6

The village that does not embrace its young men will be burnt to the ground at their hand.
/r/MGTOW05/08/19 07:57 AM
4

You know, if a teenage boy has more agency, responsibility and moral judgement than an adult woman then all sex between adult men and women is defacto beastiality. By that point an adult man would so far outstrip the woman that the gulf would mean she can't meaningfully consent. And now I understand why feminists believe all sex is rape, but not why they believe they should be allowed to make decisions.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 08:56 PM
26

No joke I legit thought she was a sex doll when I looked at the picture the first time.
/r/MGTOW02/08/19 04:41 PM
7

I remember there was a race picture with the key difference being the woman is on a man's back who is carrying her. And it says the man's choice are succeed or die. And the woman's choice is succeed or find another man.
/r/MGTOW01/08/19 03:32 PM
7

I like the way she assumed she would get default custody and acted shocked when that didn't happen.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/07/19 09:23 AM
4

sweet christ. this persons inability to address points and just assert their position dogmatically is annoying to read. If they were any more dense they'd collapse inwards under their own gravity.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 07:24 AM
2

Jian Ghomeshi. Who was only saved by him keeping very indepth records of communication which was unveiled as a surprise for the cabal of liars. Since then Canada has decided such records must be revealed before a trial begins in order that liars might change their stories to work around the evidence and put innocent men in jail more easily.
/r/MensRights27/07/19 03:27 PM
4

Well yeah, picture the scene. You're talking to your friends and suddenly you make the mistake of mentioning your money and bam, it's suddenly like a fucking reptile zoo. Hambeasts on all sides exorcist neck turning to look your way and you realize that in seconds they will tear you apart. All you can do is tranquilize the nearest one and bolt for the exit in the hopes that you can get to your car in time.
/r/MGTOW27/07/19 02:52 PM
2

If I was given five million even if I didn't invest it I could probably sustain my lifestyle off it for..with some extremely generous rounding up...a little over twenty years. And that is assuming no interest or investment.
/r/MGTOW26/07/19 11:38 AM
9

I like how their version of 'if he cared for you at all' does not resemble anything we'd call compromise and is basically 'he must capitulate at all times'. Gentlemen this is how feminists negotiate. They get everything they want, and you are shamed for merely expressing wants. This is what equality looks like to feminists.
/r/MGTOW25/07/19 09:43 PM
9

"Is it just me or is male abuse all anyone talks about these days?" God damnit. Of all the people who could end up in the better possible world it's little miss lucifer here, cause it sure as fuck isn't the world we live in and she sure as fuck doesn't appreciate where she's ended up.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 08:03 AM
2

" The answers that she got were that, because I am tall, I intimidated her " So that's why women insist on that 6 foot and over rule... They just want an excuse to lie about rape later.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 07:56 AM
3

I have never seen 'lets STEAL from others' defended as a moral good with quite this degree of sickeningly misplaced self righteousness before now.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 06:31 PM
5

also they say his very public display of anger against his abuser is a sign he is in fact the abuser. ​ And all I can think of is...Mattress Girl? Would they say the same about mattress girl?
/r/MensRights19/07/19 09:33 PM
17

You know, everytime they bandy around the definition I'm reminded that there's a place that calls itself the democratic people's republic of north korea.
/r/MGTOW17/07/19 10:40 PM
4

Here's the important question. If you used the chairs to beat the stupid out of her would both chairs break before you were done?
/r/MGTOW17/07/19 12:13 PM
6

Well sort of. I'm mgtow because my need is low and more importantly I recognize that in a relationship women have an insurmountable advantage when it comes to inflicting proxy violence upon the man. And yes if we go a little starship troopers then the courts and gynocentric laws are proxy violence.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:41 AM
25

" 'There are spectacular chase sequences and fights, and Bond is still Bond but he's having to learn to deal with the world of #MeToo." " Rum tonight then? Rum tonight.
/r/MGTOW14/07/19 10:31 AM
2

Agreed. There will be no fat people to be phobic of once civilization collapses and you're trading blowjobs for fried rat so you don't go to bed hungry.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 06:38 PM
8

Honestly. If only we had the power to get the message out. Make it so these people get the disrespect they deserve. "I work for the family court" should be met with the same reaction as "I am a professional burglar"
/r/MensRights02/07/19 01:33 PM
2

“I don’t feel guilty using them for a little help.” ​ Well no only people who have developed character can feel that emotion
/r/MGTOW01/07/19 08:02 AM
4

This is what happens when you take WE WUZ KANGS, read bell hooks, smoke all of undead chronic's drugs, pass out for 48 hours then decide to post online.
/r/MGTOW14/06/19 07:17 AM
47

And nevermind it wasn't even true. The Cape doesn't cover his behind if you run, jump, fight, glide or play the game. If you handed the controller to your elderly grandma she'd see more of Batman's ass than Anita sarkeesian did fumbling with the controls. All Anita did was show some footage of batman walking slowly on the rooftop you appear on at the very start of the game..then lied.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/19 10:01 AM
14

Mansplaining is only ever used to alleviate chronic cases of cuntfusion.
/r/MGTOW06/06/19 07:31 AM
2

fun fact i just got reminded of. when i was in the cinema and the trailer for 'i feel pretty' came on with amy schumer i heard in stereo from behind me two madlads yell "oh fuck off" at the screen the moment she introduced herself.
/r/MGTOW27/05/19 11:20 AM
13

"yeah if a dude says he hates feminism that's a big red flag for me" "Yeah if a nigger says he hates the Klan that's a big red flag for me"
/r/MGTOW24/05/19 09:50 AM
15

Drive a truck nearby facing this mess. honk the horn loudly. record the five minutes of pitiful flailing and wobbling as they try to get up off the ground. youtube. profit.
/r/MGTOW22/05/19 08:02 AM
2

The only way to rule clown world is to out crazy the clowns. Honk.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 02:27 PM
1

Every time "those are misandrists not real feminists" is used it should be instantly shutdown with that counter girlwriteswhat/Karen straughan wrote ages ago. Don't have it saved but in essence. When all the feminist leaders, influencers, legislators and academics..in short all the ones with any power, are raging manhaters.. I am willing to accept that you feminist don't hate men, I am even willing to accept a large number of feminists don't hate men..this doesn't matter. You don't matter. Your …
/r/MGTOW16/05/19 12:35 PM
5

Yeah. Your arms shouldn't taper at the same ratio as your thighs.
/r/MGTOW13/05/19 01:17 PM
3

and even if it doesn't fits. sits anyway. Had a cat who would 'sit' in a box, even if the box was only proportionally large enough to contain his ass and his forepaws pressed together.
/r/MGTOW11/05/19 07:58 AM
113

You know what this sounds like with the genders reversed "she should of kept her legs closed the dirty slut" That's what it sounds like.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 02:46 PM
2

Everything you know is wrong, you're saying down is up and short is long, cause everything you know is wrong.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 07:58 PM
14

I just had a long trip by train in the UK and you know what I didn't see? manspreading men. Do you know what I did see? bagspreading women!
/r/MensRights03/05/19 09:08 PM
3

"I may be ugly on the outside, but had I to care there are diets, exercises, creams, lotions, makeups and surgeries. What is there for the foul uglyness you hold within? What treatments are there for a rotten heart, a fouled soul and an ugly personality?"
/r/MGTOW01/05/19 02:59 PM
2

Okay but then it follows that abortion is murder. Oh wait nevermind I forgot that logic is a tool of the patriarchy
/r/MGTOW24/04/19 10:48 AM
29

Didn't two men legit stand up for the honour of 'my lady' on a train and both get stabbed by the guy when they decided to fight him? ​ So the potential is very very real.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 07:22 PM
56

"look where we've driven to" The most technologically advanced civilization in the history of life on earth you mean?
/r/MGTOW16/04/19 09:40 AM
255

fucking bro fist from dad deserves upvote all on its own.
/r/MGTOW13/04/19 05:51 PM
1

rare. the figure I always remember is that in 1996 the FBI said the rate of false rape accusations was 8% and this was the rate of ones they actually knew were false AFTER feminism had already made it so they didn't check. So even when they basically need evidence of falsehood to fall into their laps without looking for it the rate was 8% which indicates the rate was higher than that they just weren't measuring it fully by trying to figure out if she's lying. And this was two decades ago before …
/r/MGTOW05/04/19 07:52 AM
3

Speaking as someone who is heavier than they should be. I would like to see her manage a few flights of stairs and still have the same attitude.
/r/MGTOW04/04/19 01:25 PM
9

You sir are a dirty dirty fact-rapist. How dare you inflict contradictory factual information on a woman's worldview, don't you understand how violating that is? That's it you're going on a register!
/r/MensRights02/04/19 01:26 PM
0

damnit, you beat me to this metaphor. oh well, have an upvote instead.
/r/MGTOW28/03/19 09:28 PM
3

How about this. I'll stop staring, you stop looking at me like you want to make a fucking lampshade out of my skin.
/r/MGTOW24/03/19 02:02 PM
5

but when the morality of old white men told your boyfriend to buy your meal, or provide entertainment, or pay for your shit, or protect you from other men... ​ you were just fine with it then.
/r/MGTOW20/03/19 08:40 AM
3

Because feminists recognise that men's rights would imply a constraint of the female freedom from consequences and responsibilities they seek to establish.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 12:35 PM
1

Patriarchies landed a man on the fucking moon, matriarchies historically never got as far as inventing the indoor toilet. ​ Men have had their chance to run the world and they created civilization. Now open for bets as to how many generations of matriarchy it would take before we're living in grass huts and having to burn our faeces for warmth.
/r/MGTOW09/03/19 12:00 PM
15

Less than 1%? Try > 8% as that was the rate when the FBI last measured it in America...two decades ago before rabid feminism and unhinged social media and before mattress girl
/r/MGTOW08/03/19 11:09 AM
1

and even steel can break. But it doesn't break as easily as kleenex.
/r/MGTOW01/03/19 09:46 AM
73

No it shows that men are made of steel and women are made of Kleenex.
/r/MGTOW27/02/19 01:02 PM
12

I think it's telling that the last paragraph is like some autonomic nervous impulse to remove all responsibility and agency from women. Thing is, even if you pointed it out to them..I doubt they'd actually see it.
/r/MGTOW23/02/19 09:24 AM
1

Think of it as a game show. There are a hundred doors. You can open more than one door, but not more than one at a time. Behind most of the doors..is nothing, or a lousy prize. Behind a rare few doors is your happily ever after. And behind some of the doors..is a shot in the fucking face that kills or maims you. Now. if you're really careful you can Eliminate some of the shot in the face doors. But you will never eliminate them all from the list of possible doors. Happy playing.
/r/MGTOW22/02/19 11:59 AM
2

If you look at the comments the only people who are saying 'youre the asshole' are saying it's because he didn't dump her on the spot like bad rubbish. Everyone else is going 'not the asshole' and everyone is saying 'have some self respect'
/r/MGTOW19/02/19 10:13 AM
2

I don't think they CAN update it though. It's an evolutionary feature. And human civilization happened in the blink of an eye in evolutionary terms. Evolution needs waaay more time than we've given it to make any changes. ​ We go to the moon and use the internet, but we still have the biology of savage tribal apes whose idea of sophisticated technology was a lump of sharpened rock on the end of a stick.
/r/MGTOW18/02/19 11:43 PM
2

I'd say sound and fury signifying nothing. But I don't even feel much sound and fury from this. ​ It's like grand uncle hubert rambling and mumbling incoherently to himself. You wait, hoping he'll get to a point or something of use can be gleaned from him..and then twenty minutes later you realize he's lost control of his bowels.
/r/MGTOW18/02/19 10:37 PM
2

The mate selection algorithm was made when the tribe was two dozen people and nearly everything a man needed to do to ensure a woman's survival involved violence. Kill animals, kill rivals, kill members of other tribes. Kill. It hasn't really updated since muscular physique and a lust for death were the keystones of survival cause we hadn't invented agriculture.
/r/MGTOW18/02/19 12:18 PM
5

Human.
/r/MGTOW15/02/19 11:42 AM
1

"can not be signed under duress" "But judge he said if I wouldn't sign it he wouldn't marry me" "Unconscionable and clear signs of duress. You poor woman. Just for that I'm awarding her another 50% of his assets. And you you despicable man you should be ashamed of yourself for your patriarchal abuse of this woman."
/r/MGTOW14/02/19 11:00 AM
10

Why didn't black civil rights activists join forces with the ku klux klan?
/r/MensRights10/02/19 03:41 PM
1

"If men find it attractive, it's objectification. If they find it revolting, then it's empowerment. So sexy woman scantily dressed posing next to a car= objectification. 40 year old 400 pound feminist marching topless at a slutwalk with her nat geo tits out = empowerment." -TFM
/r/MGTOW10/02/19 01:48 PM
2

" Part of the mystery and wonder and awe of the feminine is precisely because there is no manual, and yet, this reality — our inherent unpredictability and the inherent confusion men experience as a direct result of it " the article. "The most important requirements for woman's divinity are, however, her propensity for masquerade and her stupidity. A system must either overwhelm its believers with its greatly superior wisdom or confuse them with its incomprehensibility. As the first possibility …
/r/MGTOW10/02/19 01:34 PM
20

"it would be inappropriate for anyone to purposely avoid a colleague out of fear of a false accusation of impropriety. Justifying this choice is the essence of a mindset that limits the potential for mentorship across gender identities. " Why...why is it inappropriate? inquiring minds demand to know.
/r/MensRights09/02/19 04:29 PM
29

No it makes sense. Men are just so patriarchal and masculine they can force a woman to be penetrated without using their hands. Through a sheer act of dominant will.
/r/MGTOW07/02/19 10:03 AM
1

" In reality, women commit 55% of homicides stemming from intimate partner violence. " can't find the source for this one.
/r/MGTOW04/02/19 06:21 PM
2

A hypothetical question as I am not proposing this action. But how funny would it be if all the subreddits that they say have bad karma automatically banned anyone with positive karma on late stage capitalism. How loud would the ree be? How much would they complain about the unfairness without a trace of introspection?
/r/MensRights31/01/19 10:37 AM
7

686 people have been misusing their oxygen privileges
/r/MensRights31/01/19 10:17 AM
4

what i don't get from the comments is why women willfully always misunderstand when a man says 'i am reluctant to mentor women, because a false accusation can ruin my career' and instead see something like "I am a pervert and menace to society! i can't stop groping anything with an ass! i pass through a flock of schoolgirls like a stiff northern breeze! my hands roam so much they've got frequent flier miles!" is this some kind of selective illiteracy going on? ​
/r/MGTOW29/01/19 11:17 PM
21

"Cassie edited the feminists to make them look bad" have these jackasses seen the raw interviews? In context and unedited they sound worse. Any editing would have to make them look better.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 01:44 PM
4

" There are just as many shitty men as there are women. " and a shitty man is condemned, curtailed and criminalized. A shitty women is empowered, venerated and mythologized. ​
/r/MGTOW27/01/19 02:51 PM
10

You.. you are never allowed to use the words 'win win' again. As you clearly haven't the foggiest what that phrase means.
/r/MGTOW25/01/19 08:29 PM
53

What would the real woman Vs girl chart look like and how many girls would it trigger?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/01/19 04:41 PM
4

In order to shame someone you have to be to them someone whose opinion they respect. Check between your legs if you need an answer as to whether they consider you someone whose opinion matters.
/r/MGTOW25/01/19 03:15 PM
53

Your man has a spine. Go him.
/r/MGTOW24/01/19 12:57 PM
7

So you work for decades to infiltrate and police male spaces to neuter the collective wisdom of men speaking freely. Then decide to shove them all in a room together with no women allowed.
/r/MensRights24/01/19 11:46 AM
3

Dad: *facepalm* "Well fuck i tried, with any luck you're not even mine you poster child for condom use."
/r/MGTOW23/01/19 05:38 PM
16

Gender studies. Seen as Peter boghossian managed to get them to publish a superficial rewrite of mein kampf as a legitimate article I think that's another nail in the coffin. What do you even call that though? Self Godwin ? Becoming Hitler to lose an argument?
/r/MensRights23/01/19 03:49 PM
6

Huh what's this about the child? I think I missed this one
/r/MGTOW21/01/19 10:32 PM
44

and afterwards she chases him down and just gets thrown to the ground...what did she think would happen?
/r/MGTOW20/01/19 07:28 PM
5

damned right i am entitled. I am entitled to my rights as a human being. I am entitled to not be bullied, abused, slandered or falsely imprisoned. I am entitled to the fruits of my labour, my money, to spend as i see fit. I am entitled to my life, as i only get one. ​ I am entitled. And that's okay.
/r/MGTOW19/01/19 04:35 PM
2

Well I stand corrected that feminists can at least have a stab at answering the question. And no you can skip over defining toxic feminity. As for me calling myself an egalitarian rather than a feminist. Until feminists stop actively opposing and reducing the rights of men I am not going to support them nor in fact am I going to involve myself with women due to the way feminists have structured society. And they are not the extremists. Theyre the part of your movement with all the power, influen…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 11:12 AM
1

I don't believe feminism as a movement aligns with the definition you just gave. As such I am an egalitarian. If I were a misandrist or female supremacist (which would be an odd position like a black member of the kkk what with being male) then I would be a feminist. Don't blame me blame the actions of the feminist academics and policymakers and people who matter for their decisions. And you of course didn't answer the question. Anymore than you could define toxic feminity. Because the entire fr…
/r/MensRights18/01/19 10:12 AM
2

define positive masculinity without also defining feminity or doing a laundry list of ways men can serve women better.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:58 PM
16

Ask a feminist to describe non toxic masculinity in a way that doesn't mean describing feminity and doesn't involve them listing off ways for men to serve women.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 10:49 PM
1

They haven't watched the show. If they're talking about that cast as the one for the next season they haven't watched the first season. The gay couple isn't a couple anymore as half of it is dead. And the progressive Georgiu Asian captain they mention? Replaced by her mirror universe counterpart the terran emperor who kills cooks and eats sentient lifeforms. Where does eating people fit in the sjw ideal?
/r/MGTOW14/01/19 10:18 AM
12

"As this person's penis i am calling a vote of no confidence in their brain's leadership on the grounds of reckless endangerment of myself and other body parts" ​
/r/MGTOW12/01/19 04:18 PM
3

And is she going to ask herself what she did wrong rather than getting mad about something? Oh wait of course not silly me
/r/MGTOW09/01/19 04:50 PM
8

Sounds boring. Make it a horror action flick, feminists and mgtow end up in a hotel together...surrounded by a siege of zombies
/r/MGTOW09/01/19 04:12 PM
1

Sounds hellish
/r/MGTOW08/01/19 03:48 PM
5

"so what have men being in charge brought to the world" patriarchies invented the computer you're using. matriarchies failed to invent the indoor toilet.
/r/MGTOW06/01/19 09:11 AM
1

Men's rights is essentially playing the jsdf to feminisms Godzilla. A brave and courageous and utterly futile attempt to stop or even slow down a destructive and uncaring force.
/r/MGTOW04/01/19 12:02 PM
8

Your womb might not be connected to the moon but your head sure is you lunatic
/r/MGTOW03/01/19 01:17 PM
1

You're looking for mens rights advocates. They're the ones who are willing to play the JSDF to feminism's godzilla.
/r/MGTOW02/01/19 06:53 PM
23

then go see nearly everything they ever did. feminism is about equality the same way the democratic people's republic of north korea is a democratic republic for the people.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 06:00 PM
16

It's like there's a sniper sitting in a water tower over the town shooting men. Some men, due to the sniper being off her game or the fact they had cover or the fact they got medical attention very quickly or just the plain fact they're too stubborn to die easy, survive being shot at. ​ Feminists then show up and declare 'there is no sniper because these men are still alive'
/r/MensRights26/12/18 10:36 PM
5

quite frankly any woman over the age of 18 who still uses social media is a lazy thot and should get a real job, and men should avoid them like the plague.
/r/MGTOW25/12/18 11:18 AM
25

" But a CPS review found that actions taken in De Freitas's case "were correct, and in accordance with our policies and guidance". Four days before her trial was due to start, Ms De Freitas' mother discovered that her only daughter had tragically taken her own life in the family home. " someone roll the huge fucking list of falsely accused men who took their own lives please.
/r/MGTOW24/12/18 01:25 AM
5

Reverse? dude we are past the tipping point. the event horizon whipped by with girls hanging their asses out the side of the car to take selfies with it a while back. There is no point grabbing the steering wheel when you've already hurtled out into the ravine. You might as well just enjoy the view at this point. ​ Western civilization is doomed, you might as well enjoy the decadent unravelling of a once great society.
/r/MGTOW22/12/18 04:39 PM
1

yeah i'm not seeing the 'crazy bitch wouldnt stop attacking him' bit. We need to be better than feminists here.
/r/MGTOW18/12/18 10:16 AM
11

no see there's no such thing as gender roles FOR WOMEN. men still have the gender role of protector, provider, self sacrificial fodder for the engines and mechanisms that make civilization go.
/r/MGTOW12/12/18 08:27 PM
5

Know what though? And is it of the slightest use to anyone, anywhere?
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 03:20 PM
1

Clementine ford seems to revel in her fart sniffing self indulgent ability to purposely misunderstand things.
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 12:33 AM
3

Genghis khan had power. His women couldn't use the government to falsely accuse him, ruin his reputation and career and have him thrown in jail and divorce raped of all his wealth and assets because...Genghis khan was a warlord, he was the government. Unless the mad Max dystopian collapse happens we are never going to be in a situation where Thai analogy applies. We live in a world of irresponsible unaccountable children with legal, political and social firearms and poor impulse control.
/r/MGTOW10/12/18 11:55 AM
1

What does the accused lose by having to have their cross examination done via the proxy of their legal representative? I mean it seems that the compromise doesn't diminish the rights of the accused.
/r/MensRights09/12/18 01:48 AM
1

So how do you warm up TPE dolls in order to get around that ruination? *considering purchasing one*
/r/MGTOW08/12/18 02:00 PM
1

From your question you imply that civilization is worth saving. At what point is civilization not worth saving to you? ​ Cause feminism has an end goal for human civilization: "Men will have no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All pleasures for them will be destroyed. But for women, ah for women, always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampl…
/r/MGTOW08/12/18 01:41 PM
11

"women who are imprisoned can have their right to procreate curtailed." The fuck? Procreation is a right is it? Does this apply to men? Or are we just making up new rights to give to women now?
/r/MensRights07/12/18 08:17 PM
3

Yes if a gangbanger gets killed as a consequence of his committing a crime we don't mourn. But we also don't throw someone in prison before they've committed crimes. If a man has desires you find inappropriate you don't get to throw him in prison until he acts on them. That would be an Orwellian nightmare. But if a man chooses to have a sex doll how is that not passive? He is not hurting someone or even interacting with anyone else. He has chosen not to go to women to satisfy his sexual desires.…
/r/MensRights07/12/18 11:11 AM
2

Their desires need to be eliminated, for them to be deserving of rights? Christ on a bike. I hope this is a devils advocate position cause this sounds god damn batty.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 10:07 AM
1

and won't they simply ban him and delete his post if he does that?
/r/MensRights07/12/18 08:53 AM
2

From their perspective I can actually see that not allowing the accused to directly address the accuser is a compromise to their desire not to 're-traumatize' someone who is genuinely bringing a true accusation (can't forget those do happen). ​ But of course this is them just lying to make things sound worse than it is. It's like with the whole Louis CK 'masturbating in front of them without the woman's consent' thing. Near as I can tell the facts is he always asked permission, they erased that …
/r/MensRights07/12/18 08:36 AM
1

yeah i suspected there wasn't a third solution. that's sort of why at this point all questions of feminists are rhetorical and go are you doing this cause A. you want to subjugate men out of some elaborate multigenerational revenge plot or B. you want men to suffer cause the hatred that burns in your heart cannot be quenched by anything less.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 08:31 AM
4

Also I'm fairly sure they are straight up lying about the accused being allowed to cross examine. Their representative lawyer is allowed to cross examine but they aren't.
/r/MensRights07/12/18 01:00 AM
5

I will ask this question here as all questions asked of feminists are rhetorical questions. What is her solution? Considering the 80 20 rule hypergamy and such some will have difficulty if not find it impossible to achieve a relationship with a female partner and thus get sex from them. But men will still want and desire sex. But she is against sex dolls and porn. So either her solution is a. Men suffer cause their desires cannot be fulfilled. This of course makes her someone who wishes sufferin…
/r/MensRights07/12/18 12:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter