TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

karissa36 Archive

View 67 posts and 1,880 comments by karissa36 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
476

OutrageKarissa36/r/MensRights24/09/14 03:08 AM
289

Edu./Occu.Karissa36/r/MensRights06/12/15 03:08 PM
256

Marriage/ChildrenKarissa36/r/MensRights27/09/17 03:34 PM
155

NewsKarissa36/r/MensRights21/04/15 01:44 PM
138

Legal RightsKarissa36/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:46 AM
127

Edu./Occu.Karissa36/r/MensRights23/12/22 05:37 PM
102

Fathers/CustodyKarissa36/r/MensRights25/05/16 06:55 PM
76

Karissa36/r/MensRights10/10/16 07:34 AM
72

Fathers/CustodyKarissa36/r/MensRights29/12/16 02:46 AM
65

SlapfightKarissa36/r/MensRights10/10/15 05:16 PM
52

Social IssuesKarissa36/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:18 PM
49

DiscriminationKarissa36/r/MensRights02/07/15 10:53 PM
47

Karissa36/r/MensRights20/10/16 05:27 PM
41

Social IssuesKarissa36/r/MensRights19/01/16 02:25 AM
41

DiscussionKarissa36/r/MensRights01/04/15 09:55 PM
39

Legal RightsKarissa36/r/MensRights05/05/18 04:29 PM
38

ProgressKarissa36/r/MensRights30/11/18 04:40 AM
37

DiscriminationKarissa36/r/MensRights06/12/15 02:43 PM
34

GeneralKarissa36/r/MensRights29/06/18 02:32 PM
33

NewsKarissa36/r/MensRights23/04/15 12:34 PM
33

Edu./Occu.Karissa36/r/MensRights13/08/15 03:43 PM
33

Fathers/CustodyKarissa36/r/MensRights22/11/15 12:27 AM
30

GeneralKarissa36/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:08 PM
28

NewsKarissa36/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:58 PM
27

Social IssuesKarissa36/r/MensRights18/09/15 02:13 PM
22

Social IssuesKarissa36/r/MensRights15/09/15 04:40 PM
22

Social IssuesKarissa36/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:28 PM
22

Marriage/ChildrenKarissa36/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:55 PM
21

Activism/SupportKarissa36/r/MensRights18/01/18 04:06 PM
21

Social IssuesKarissa36/r/MensRights29/04/15 02:54 PM
19

Social IssuesKarissa36/r/MensRights15/06/18 11:21 PM
19

DiscriminationKarissa36/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:10 PM
19

GeneralKarissa36/r/MensRights30/06/19 01:05 AM
18

Legal RightsKarissa36/r/MensRights16/11/16 10:42 PM
17

Activism/SupportKarissa36/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:16 PM
16

ProgressKarissa36/r/MensRights24/08/19 04:29 PM
15

Legal RightsKarissa36/r/MensRights07/06/17 03:56 PM
14

Karissa36/r/MensRights07/11/16 03:02 PM
13

Karissa36/r/MensRights23/09/16 08:19 PM
13

Social IssuesKarissa36/r/MensRights29/12/16 08:27 AM
13

Social IssuesKarissa36/r/MensRights01/08/17 07:15 PM
13

Social IssuesKarissa36/r/MensRights02/06/17 08:38 PM
12

Legal RightsKarissa36/r/MensRights25/08/15 06:33 PM
10

GeneralKarissa36/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:16 AM
10

NewsKarissa36/r/MensRights08/04/15 03:53 PM
10

Social IssuesKarissa36/r/MensRights13/11/15 09:25 PM
9

UnconfirmedKarissa36/r/MensRights01/10/15 09:41 PM
9

Legal RightsKarissa36/r/MensRights31/12/15 05:30 PM
8

Karissa36/r/MensRights17/06/16 12:01 AM
7

DiscriminationKarissa36/r/MensRights29/12/16 09:26 PM
7

Social IssuesKarissa36/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:10 AM
7

Social IssuesKarissa36/r/MensRights04/05/18 12:05 AM
7

Legal RightsKarissa36/r/MensRights07/10/15 01:14 AM
5

Social IssuesKarissa36/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:26 PM
5

Marriage/ChildrenKarissa36/r/MensRights23/08/18 05:22 AM
5

Edu./Occu.Karissa36/r/MensRights17/12/16 02:55 PM
4

Activism/SupportKarissa36/r/MensRights17/08/18 06:49 PM
3

Edu./Occu.Karissa36/r/MensRights10/07/15 08:24 PM
2

DiscussionKarissa36/r/MensRights15/04/15 05:24 PM
1

Social IssuesKarissa36/r/MensRights01/08/15 01:08 AM
0

Karissa36/r/MensRights30/08/16 02:08 PM
0

DiscussionKarissa36/r/MensRights12/11/14 12:56 AM
0

GeneralKarissa36/r/MensRights28/04/15 09:36 PM
0

Marriage/ChildrenKarissa36/r/MensRights26/09/18 05:06 PM
0

Anti-MRMKarissa36/r/MensRights27/08/15 02:07 PM
0

Activism/SupportKarissa36/r/MensRights21/11/16 12:22 PM
0

GeneralKarissa36/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:23 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,880 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Do men in India refuse to marry women who are not virgins? It is two sides of the same coin.
/r/MensRights09/01/25 04:39 PM
5

>Straight men- Conforms to social expectations to proclaim attraction toward a patriarchal hyperbole of a traditional feminine woman... It is a social expectation specifically because the majority of men have the same inherent biological attraction. >Straight women- Is attracted to feminine men who vocally support feminism and reject the idea that masculinity is an inherent and real verve. This is complete and total nonsense. No one wants to have sex with Mr. Rogers -- or Tim Walz. These men are…
/r/MensRights09/01/25 04:36 PM
11

It is not logic. It is jealousy. Older college girls, especially the ones who packed on the freshmen 15 pounds and kept going, resent the senior college boys dating freshmen and sophomores. It is the very first pang of apprehension about getting older and many women don't handle it well. So this generation has manufactured fake sexual assaults with any age gap. Also the best thing we can do for single men is to normalize marrying women from foreign cultures and foreign countries. Gen Z women des…
/r/MensRights09/01/25 04:02 PM
1

Please recognize this as not just an insult, but an attempt at censorship. Democrats have thrown up one false victim after another in their incessant attempts at censorship. Now we are apparently supposed to stop criticizing female politicians because it might hurt their children's feelings. This is complete nonsense on all possible levels. Attack it hard for what it is -- censorship. Also note the narrative that Nancy Pelosi is trying to promote -- Female politicians are unfairly attacked for t…
/r/MensRights07/01/25 03:24 PM
1

I suggest that you first check out meetup.com It has similar features with hiking and other activity based meetups. They also have men and women only groups.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 04:50 AM
1

It is easy to set up an account on X. There are other men's rights groups there who might circulate your petition.
/r/MensRights30/12/24 04:45 AM
4

When the Civil Rights Act was passed and SCOTUS removed school segregation, democrats in the South did not change overnight. Just like the current democrats, they believed that truth, morality and history were on their side. Change occurred as a result of lawsuits against government, employers, schools, and every other imaginable entity. The republicans won this battle so decisively that democrats today lie about a party switch. (Biden personally fought to oppose school desegregation. He was a d…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 01:02 AM
5

We can help young men by normalizing and publicizing Passport Bro's and successful men in America marrying women of other cultures. JD Vance is an excellent example. Trump is a much less excellent example. Young women are acting like crap because they think there is no competition. There has been a decades long media effort to portray men seeking women outside their own culture as miserable losers. American women do not appreciate the competition when it is well known that women from other cultu…
/r/MensRights17/12/24 09:37 PM
6

How does marriage benefit me? Financially. It gives you a lower income tax rate. It allows you to hold real property jointly with right of survivorship and no tax penalty upon the death of your spouse. It allows you to hold financial assets jointly with right of survivorship and no tax penalty upon the death of your spouse. It allows you to receive non-joint assets like IRA's and 401K's with no tax penalty upon the death of your spouse. It allows you to participate in your spouse's pension plan.…
/r/MensRights16/04/24 02:31 PM
3

They should have a joint account for household expenses that they both contribute a percentage of their income to. For example, each one deposits 80 percent of their paycheck. Then each one has a separate account for other purchases. If she continues to complain in public, his response should be, "The kids have a father who pays child support. That money is intended to pay for activities." His response to her should be that she should file for more child support if the kid's father is not paying…
/r/MensRights11/04/24 01:46 AM
3

If you find yourself in this situation, call a lawyer and ask about third party custody. This originated after gay couples started raising children together, then only one parent would have any rights to the children if they broke up. Anyone who has acted as a parent with the biological parent's consent for an extended period of time can file for visitation and custody rights.
/r/MensRights29/01/24 08:46 PM
-9

Is it acceptable to marry a non-virgin woman in your country? If not, then you need to change that first.
/r/MensRights21/01/24 11:50 PM
3

A guy I know went through a really rough divorce. He saw two different therapists for a couple years -- both female. His first visit to a male therapist uncovered this insanely traumatic previous college romance that I didn't even know about. So traumatic that he dropped out of grad school for a year. Suddenly the emotional parallels of his two romances became clear and it was a big break through for him. I think it just never occurred to the female therapists to ask, "Did anyone ever break your…
/r/MensRights14/01/24 01:10 AM
-5

It is rather hard to fake abandonment.
/r/MensRights14/01/24 12:35 AM
1

This is Senator Grassley's letter to the FBI and DOJ laying out the evidence and requesting that charges be filed: https://www.scribd.com/document/392233494/Chuck-Grassley-Munro-Leighton-Referral-Letter-With-Redacted-Enclosures#fullscreen&from\_embed The Senate investigations are now following up on this letter, since of course the FBI and DOJ just hid this under a rock or something since 2018, instead of filing charges.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 07:46 PM
3

The American Bar Association just stopped requiring the LSAT as a prerequisite to an accredited law school. Colleges are going to drop the SAT and other standardized tests also. The primary motivator is that the U.S. Supreme Court is going to get rid of affirmative action in higher education very very soon.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 06:54 PM
3

We already know your pronouns, Fangirl. ;) I agree with you.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 06:48 PM
-7

The proliferation and tolerance of snowflakes is what is astounding. Life has many uncomfortable moments. You can suck it up and be briefly uncomfortable, allowing both yourself and everyone else to go on with their day promptly and their job unobstructed, or you can make it all about you and your extra special feelings that you demand other people cater to. This is not personal weakness. It is arrogance and passive aggression.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 06:27 PM
1

You have 50/50 custody. The mother being rude over Our Family Wizard is not going to change that. You can alert the U.S. government that you do not consent to your minor child being taken out of the country. Then she would need a court order to over-ride that. Google it. As a practical matter, the court is flatly unable to make your ex-wife always be respectful to you and/or your religion. Regardless of your permanent protection order. Now you are just getting divorced, and no one is going to fo…
/r/MensRights13/11/22 04:28 PM
2

Lots of people don't use a phone to surf the internet.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 08:27 PM
1

I think that our younger generation of men are really struggling with intimate relationships. In a sense, the vast majority of them have been dealt a losing hand. The false rape allegations are part of it. The deal with so many false rape claims is that by solving one problem, we created another. The pendulum has swung too far. Consent is good and necessary. However, some young women's idea of consent now has morphed into a standard that women should never ever be uncomfortable in a sexual encou…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 06:41 PM
2

I am against paper abortions and generally against any actions that diminish the parental rights of fathers. I think many young men would choose a paper abortion, then deeply regret not being able to have a parental relationship a couple of years later, when they are in a more stable position.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:54 AM
2

It's a slippery slope like euthanasia. When does the right to die become the duty to die? Assume that you do successfully convince legislators that the child's interests are not significantly affected by the absence of a father, and that your personal freedom is more important. What about the personal freedom of a mother who decides she doesn't want you involved? Can she just say no thanks to child support and blow you off forever? Keep in mind you just convinced people that fathers were not tha…
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:51 PM
1

Only in some extremely rare paternity fraud cases does assuming the parental position make a man liable for child support. Generally these are long term marriages where one parent decides to paternity test during the divorce. Equity in those very rare cases goes to the best interests of the child not to be deprived of an established parental figure. In addition, many of these cases were filed by the non-biological fathers to obtain a right to custody of their non-biological children, which the c…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 11:10 PM
2

Your post is confusing and so most of the answers you have received are incorrect. This is your comment farther down: >It is her son to she birthed him and walked out on us. She does not even live with the kid that is her's. She sees him maybe 5 hours a week he lives with her father while she gets support for the kid from the kid's father in another state. So you helped raise her biological son along with your own biological son, while living with her for four years, and then she and her son mov…
/r/MensRights03/10/22 06:31 PM
2

OP you might want to edit your post to say if you are not in the U.S. Otherwise you will get a lot of irrelevant U.S. divorce law advice, when I think you are really seeking advice about your personal and professional relationships. Please tell me more about the road bullying and anything else that shows an organized group acting against you. This sounds like more than your typical divorce situation.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 05:53 PM
4

It depends on what you hired the lawyer to do. Four months is unfortunately kind of trivial for cases that often last years before resolution. Regardless, your remedy is to set up a meeting.
/r/MensRights03/10/22 04:53 PM
1

Child support is not owed if both parents share the same household.
/r/MensRights27/07/22 05:48 PM
2

I've been trying small things to combat this. Leaving a festival with extra drink tickets? Let's give them to a guy. A guy is shadowing our waitress? (Which means he is training and doesn't get any tips.) Slip him $10. on the way out. Hold doors open more often. Learn the name of the guy who pumps my gas. If I wasn't pretty obviously partnered up in most of these situations, I would be more hesitant about being misinterpreted.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 02:58 PM
5

America's greatest public health crisis? LOL, how did the miss obesity? Why do they always miss obesity?
/r/MensRights26/05/22 07:29 PM
6

Musk is standing against censorship. That the government is openly advocating censorship is dangerous. Very dangerous. As far as I'm concerned right now, the guy walks on water and I don't care about anything else.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 12:13 AM
3

Wow, that sucks. I haven't been around the sub much lately, (Covid got me into politics), but I'll come by more often to check and report if necessary. Also, they are trying to get the entire sub banned, not just gather material for their own sub. This is serious.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 12:01 AM
6

I'm expecting an expansion and upgrade of the women's locker room very soon. Perhaps with some nice exercise equipment.
/r/MensRights27/01/22 10:26 PM
2

Exactly what I imagined online "influencers" to be.
/r/MensRights22/01/22 05:31 PM
4

I see your point. Really. Except in this case the elderly gentleman is supposed to clean an alley. What happens when your property borders an alley is all kinds of scuzzy people drop their junk on it. Why pay fees and drive to a junkyard, when we can just drive 6 blocks and dump it there? So there is a good chance that he didn't even obstruct the alley to begin with.
/r/MensRights17/01/22 09:08 PM
-15

>What if he's completely unaware of it? Then he is completely irresponsible. Sticking around long enough to know if you might have made somebody pregnant, or that they have a suspiciously timed pregnancy that could include you as father, is really basic human decency.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 11:40 PM
-22

LOL If all the men agreed to not have sex with each other's wives, there would be no problem. You understand that, right? That in every case of paternity fraud there is a man not meeting his parental responsibilities and allowing another man to be fooled instead. French men leaving France would just be bringing the problem with them.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 10:54 PM
-20

>But paternity fraud is a crime of deceit that has a sex – and it’s the female sex. It’s an offense committed solely by women against men and children. Nope. That sperm had to come from a man. The French law just favors one group of men over another. For every husband supporting a non-biological child, there is another man not meeting his parental responsibilities.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 10:40 PM
-10

She might want another single parent with a complementary schedule. So if both are 50/50, they can start out by spending one week together and the next week with their kids. Also there is a general prejudice that a missing mother is always a tragic story and a traumatized child. Like the child of a drug addict or something. That's drama she probably prefers to skip.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:45 AM
-52

Or just that teenagers are notoriously challenging to a parent's new partner and she didn't want to put up with it. This would not be as much of an issue if you rarely saw your child, but full time custody was enough to scare her off.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:33 AM
-1

Being an abuse victim does not mean he didn't kill her. Very few people would be so cruel as to refuse to tell her family anything unless they had something to hide. You also seem to have forgotten that domestic abuse is often committed by both parties in the relationship. Most of all, nobody is going to care he had a few scratches when she is missing and most likely dead.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 12:55 AM
5

Your annual child support payment is already reduced for the months that you have the child. It's just divided into even payments. Just like teachers that work for 9 months but have their salary paid over 12 months.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 10:10 PM
4

I consider it the unofficial partner sub of r/WhereAreTheGoodMen. Both subs I would like to think are just satire, but it's really hard to tell.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 04:04 PM
2

This can't possibly be right. I have it on excellent authority from the five - yes, five! - porn movies I have seen that a pizza delivery guy or pool maintenance guy will randomly appear at my house with romance on his mind. No need to go outside! Step 1: Get a pool. /s
/r/MensRights31/05/21 02:23 PM
4

Right, like does she really have to currently exist? What if she existed once like a couple hundred of years ago? There is always a remote possibility that we will invent time travel. How do you expect to get a girlfriend when you keep rejecting your options? You need to be more open minded. Also build a time machine. /s
/r/MensRights31/05/21 02:04 PM
1

Actually I kind of like #MENtalHealth. Maybe we can make this happen.
/r/MensRights29/05/21 03:57 PM
1

Some common sense at the beginning would have also been helpful. This man was in drug withdrawal and actively having hallucinations. He should have been in a hospital.
/r/MensRights21/05/21 04:46 PM
4

Mom did not leave "us". She left you. Semantics are important here because you don't want the kids to mistakenly feel that their other parent didn't care about them and abandoned them.
/r/MensRights24/04/21 09:18 AM
-14

The USA version is a man still living with his mom who doesn't have or keep a steady job.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 01:05 AM
1

There is also a very strong correlation between older fathers and children with autism independent of maternal age. Correlation is not causation but expect more research on the horizon showing that waiting until your mid-forties and above to father a child is not without increased risks.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 08:03 PM
1

It strikes me as a humble brag. Not really a complaint.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 10:04 PM
-1

>young actor from This Is Us and these are the kinds of messages women send him. All we know is that he was sent these messages. We do not know if they were sent by men or women. It's also very naive to think that female actresses do not regularly receive these types of messages.
/r/MensRights25/02/21 01:26 PM
7

I think you missed her point. She does not want to hook up with some random stranger. She wants to actually get to know someone and have a relationship. Maybe she is on the wrong app for that in your opinion, but r/Tinder has very regular posts of people in long term relationships and getting married who met on that app.
/r/MensRights16/01/21 04:23 PM
1

Plus the Walmart parking lot is so scenic.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 06:02 PM
1

As an attorney licensed in two States, I am telling you that you are a complete and absolute moron. Stick to giving advice about something you know. Which in your case is probably cheetos and jacking off.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 06:00 PM
1

Holy shit! Somebody please inform this complete moron that assets acquired during the course of a marriage are marital property and subject to distribution to both spouses. This of course includes any companies acquired and those companies' assets even if one spouse is not listed as a company owner. Could he get any dumber? Like why the heck does he think Jeff Bezos with Amazon didn't do this one slick trick?
/r/MensRights31/12/20 04:55 AM
10

There should absolutely be no camera recording in any bathroom.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 04:29 AM
1

r/Custodyr/LegalAvice
/r/MensRights01/12/20 03:22 PM
1

Depends on the State.
/r/MensRights10/11/20 09:44 PM
0

That's only temporary custody. A full hearing would be ordered in approximately 30 days. Sometimes in 10 days. What you do not do is grab the kid and go on the run. You wait for that court date and deal with it in court.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 02:22 PM
0

Perhaps you missed the part where custody and his parenting time has already been worked out in court. He is complaining about small and ultimately irrelevant details from many years ago.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 02:18 PM
0

You said before that she refused to cross the border for parenting exchange. That's what I responded to. So now you have moved the parenting exchange point to customs at the border. Sounds like a reasonable compromise. Except don't the kids have to isolate for 14 days when they return to Canada? Won't someone have to take care of them for those 14 days in isolation? If the kids will miss school for 14 days and she will miss work for 14 days after every U.S. visit to you, then that's a rather hig…
/r/MensRights31/10/20 02:02 PM
0

I am very sure that when she fled from you across the border, taking her small children, and eventually ending up in a shelter, your home in the U.S. was no longer her residence. If she never intended to return to your home then it was no longer her residence.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 01:50 PM
-2

At the moment I believe Canada is refusing to let anyone from the U.S. enter the country. So if she crosses the border for parenting exchange she can't get back home. Maybe they have some kind of 14 day isolation program or something but I seriously doubt right now she can just skip back and forth across the border. That also is a form of quarantine. Unless you really object for really excellent reasons to the children's school this is also something that you should just let go. Because there is…
/r/MensRights30/10/20 11:40 PM
-5

Dude, let it go. You are just going to waste time and money. >So while my ex wife testified in US Court she could not live at her parents in Canada, take a guess what address she put down on the applications for the certificates of citizenship in Canada...you guessed it her parents!! Did you really expect her to list the address of the shelter? That's not the way it is done. She is going to list her most permanent address whether she is currently living there or not. (Since you like legal resear…
/r/MensRights30/10/20 11:28 PM
-1

>Back in June, Yvette was staying with her father, Virgil Henley, but a court would rule that she was in danger, and guardianship was granted to her grandparents, Gary and Kim Forester in Hesperia. After that ruling, Virgil and Yvette disappeared, and after several weeks, police were unable to find them. First, courts do not just randomly rule that children are in danger and transfer custody temporarily to grandparents. Second, the child was found living in a cheap hotel room which doesn't say m…
/r/MensRights30/10/20 10:40 PM
0

Right, and the movement for racial justice also does not condemn Eldridge Cleaver. In fact he is regarded as a hero. In case you didn't know, he started the Black Panthers.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 03:26 PM
0

Cat calling depends on context. It's one thing when a random stranger says you look nice in the grocery store. It's a totally different thing when a random group of men start whistling, hooting and commenting on your ass when you have to walk past them on the sidewalk.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 05:08 PM
6

It is very likely that if you file a motion you can get a court order to prevent this. Physical discipline of children is not illegal in the U.S. but judges don't take it all that kindly. Since CPS didn't work out I suggest you call your child's teacher and express your concerns. That will at least give you another competent adult with regular access to your son looking out for signs of abuse.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 04:51 PM
-19

It was the 1960's. A lot of crazy stuff was done and said. I'm not blowing off Black Lives Matter because Eldridge Cleaver advocated the rape of white women as some kind of racial justice statement. Just saying, dude. Learn some context.
/r/MensRights25/10/20 04:18 PM
1

>Among women, rape includes vaginal, oral, or anal penetration by a male using his penis. It also includes vaginal or anal penetration by a male or female using their fingers or an object. >Among men, being made to penetrate someone else could have occurred in multiple ways: being made to vaginally penetrate a female using one’s own penis; orally penetrating a female’s vagina or anus; anally penetrating a male or female; or being made to receive oral sex from a male or female. It also includes f…
/r/MensRights15/10/20 09:55 PM
-12

Male rapes female = male pays Female rapes male = male pays Both fathers and mothers have a legal duty to support their children. If one parent is getting child support it is based on their comparative incomes. The parent paying child support has that number reduced based on the other parent's income and the amount of parenting time they have. The laws are sex neutral for child support. I have no idea why this sub just can't understand that.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 09:09 PM
-12

So if a 20 year old man gets his 16 year old girlfriend pregnant you think he should be 100 percent responsible for supporting the child, with no financial help from the girlfriend, until he is age 39 and she is age 35? Even if she gets a college degree and a good job and he does not? How about if he has 100 percent custody? This is just not as simple as you think.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 07:22 PM
-6

More of the intelligent discourse this sub is known for.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 07:14 PM
-4

LOL. No idea where you are getting those numbers from.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 07:13 PM
-42

Female statutory rape victims are also legally required to support their children and there are definitely a heck of a lot more of them. Is there some reason this sub has to have this same discussion twice a week every week for literally years now?
/r/MensRights15/10/20 04:53 PM
5

There are still plenty of questions to ask. Like did more baby girls die of starvation and so were not included in this study of children?
/r/MensRights22/09/20 05:04 PM
27

>This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 12:50 PM
1

So it's perfectly fine for all of those children in the above chart as long as they were abandoned by their fathers before birth and not after? Is that really your position?
/r/MensRights27/07/20 01:57 PM
-1

If you can't determine just by reading my comment which side I am on then you need to brush up on your reading comprehension skills.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 01:52 PM
4

LOL. One of your few comments that I agree with. By the way it rained yesterday. Men are responsible and women were most affected. It's not like women were doing all that coal mining that led to emissions and global warming. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights27/07/20 02:38 AM
-7

No, they are not two different things. ALL OF THEM ARE CHILDREN.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 01:59 AM
-9

YES, LET'S TALK ABOUT IT. Let's talk about this r/MensRights post, which is just another sorry example of the practically identical posts, which have been posted on this sub at least 3 times a week for at least the last 3 solid years with constant upvotes and agreements by commenters every single time!!!!!!!!!!!!!! https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/hy30n1/if_a_woman_has_the_right_to_chose_to_keep_or/ Let's talk about how one of the MRA's most consistent and frequent talking points is …
/r/MensRights27/07/20 01:51 AM
7

Also only if you have worked at least one year for the employer and the employer has a minimum of 50 employees in your location.
/r/MensRights27/07/20 12:58 AM
1

A judge is not going to accept a report from your physical therapist. You need a neurologist or an orthopedic doctor to write a report that you are permanently disabled and unable to work at any job. After you get that, a motion needs to be filed to reduce your child support. However, this is a double edged sword. If you are completely unable to work many judges will feel that you are also unable to properly care for your child. California generally has a presumption for 50/50 parenting time but…
/r/MensRights26/07/20 10:38 AM
5

What the fuck!!! I was initially very skeptical about this news article. Mainly because it happened in California, and California is the only State that allows attorneys to graduate from non-ABA approved law schools. So I kind of expected, considering how crazy this seems, that I was going to find it was filed by a lawyer who had spent 7 years or more going to "law school" part time in a trailer. Another redditor in this thread helpfully gave me a link to the Complaint. So I could not only see t…
/r/MensRights16/07/20 02:45 PM
4

>Owens’ impressive play on the field earned him lucrative deals that saw him make around $67 million on contracts and roughly another $13 million in endorsements. However, his bad choices with his money have put him in the hole financially, where he has nowhere near what he made during his career as he has an estimated net worth of $500,000. >That has landed Owens in plenty of financial trouble with his child support to three women who have had four total children. >Owens has struggled to keep u…
/r/MensRights10/07/20 06:24 PM
1

>"Men go out and perform dangerous activities putting themselves at risk every day. Every day for over 40 years of a working life." In 2018 approximately 73 million men were employed full time in the U.S. In 2018, the number of men in the U.S. who died from occupational injuries was 4,837. 4,837 out of 73 million. The fact is that the U.S. has an extremely low occupational death rate for both sexes. No, the extreme vast majority of working American men do not perform dangerous activities that pu…
/r/MensRights09/07/20 03:31 PM
0

​ https:/www.statista.com/statistics/192351/number-of-full-time-employe-since-1990/#:~:text=Full%2Dtime%20employed%20men%20%2D%20number%20in%20the%20U.S.%201990%2D2019&text=This%20statistic%20shows%20the%20number,time%20basis%20in%20the%20U.S. ​ In 2018 approximately 73 million men were employed full time in the U.S. 4,837 of those men died. Out of 73 million. While these deaths are unfortunate and continuing safety measures should be pursued, comments like the following which are fairly typical…
/r/MensRights09/07/20 03:00 PM
-3

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/27/the-10-most-dangerous-jobs-in-america-according-to-bls-data.html In 2018 the number of workplace deaths from the above 5 categories was as follows: Loggers: 74......Fisherman: 30......Pilots: 70......Steel Workers: 15......Roofers: 96. For a total of 285 deaths. https://www.vox.com/2020/1/30/21113782/pregnancy-deaths-us-maternal-mortality-rate >According to a report out Thursday from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Vital Statistics System…
/r/MensRights09/07/20 02:53 AM
-3

Well sure, of course. Even though the vast majority of their employees are and historically have been male, women should just assume that they will welcome female candidates. /s
/r/MensRights02/07/20 06:38 PM
-1

>We want women to be hired competitively, for being the best candidate. The point you are missing is that for almost every job there is no single one best candidate. There are a group of potential candidates all of whom could do the job competently. Affirmative action encourages and brings in potential candidates who otherwise might not have applied.
/r/MensRights02/07/20 03:32 PM
13

From the same article: >In another series of tests, running from 1946 to 1949 and intended to study maternal iron absorption, over 800 poor women living in and around Nashville were deceived into taking part in a nutritional study funded by Vanderbilt University. The Vanderbilt experiment, as it came to be known, saw pregnant women given pills with radioactive iron-59 and tested for iron levels on subsequent visits.
/r/MensRights19/06/20 03:03 PM
0

If they had included as neglect failure to pay child support, which realistically they should have, these numbers would be very different. Yes, failing to help pay to feed, clothe and house your children is in fact neglect.
/r/MensRights12/06/20 11:56 PM
1

Covid 19 is a risk to their lives. There's also HIV, hepatitis C, etc from accidental needle sticks.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 02:59 PM
3

It looks like you are already doing everything right. You have excellent reasons for the move, you have a lawyer and you are filing in advance for court permission. I expect that you will be successful.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 07:34 PM
-2

Thank you kind stranger for the gold!
/r/MensRights23/05/20 12:05 AM
8

You don't think a prosecutor can figure out who signed a check? Yes, him doing it is actually worse. At least in the eyes of the law. Neither one of them is getting squat for jail time so I don't think there is much "saving the other spouse" going on.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 12:04 AM
36

Maybe you need to work on your reading comprehension. >Loughlin, 55, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud while Giannulli, 56, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud and honest services wire and mail fraud. She plead to one crime. He plead to two crimes. She plead guilty to conspiracy which means she planned the crime with him. He plead guilty to conspiracy and to actually committing the crime. Which means that he was the one wh…
/r/MensRights22/05/20 10:27 PM
38

>Loughlin, 55, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud while Giannulli, 56, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud and honest services wire and mail fraud. She plead to one crime. He plead to two crimes. She plead guilty to conspiracy which means she planned the crime with him. He plead guilty to conspiracy and to actually committing the crime.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 10:13 PM
-1

Dad is a relative.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 01:38 AM
11

Actually there is no evidence that the mother abandoned the baby. It could have been the father who abandoned and/or killed the baby. They are worried about the mother because in cases of abandoned newborns there is a very high rate of incest, extremely underage mothers and domestic abuse. As in for example there is a much higher than normally expected possibility that the mother is some 12 year old impregnated by a family member, forced to hide the pregnancy and give birth in secret without med…
/r/MensRights09/04/20 03:18 AM
0

Have you somehow missed the full scale war on women's reproductive and abortion rights that's been going on in the U.S. for at least the last decade?
/r/MensRights09/03/20 03:08 PM
3

Both parents have to sign consent for a minor to get a passport.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 07:38 PM
4

>Thomas' distraught mother said child services ignored her cries for help The child's father is the one who killed him.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 11:34 PM
-1

That's not what the article says. It says that for the MBA program Stanford gave preferential treatment to women with a background in finance and domestic, (as in U.S. citizen) male applicants over other applicants. I don't have any sources but I do believe there are substantially more male U.S. citizen applicants for a MBA program than women with a background in finance.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:47 PM
-2

Get back to us on that when men equally share the physical burdens of pregnancy and childbirth.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 06:46 AM
1

The U.S. has far more resources to enforce the draft now then there were in the 60's and 70's. In a single stroke for example they could suspend all driver's licenses and vehicle registrations of individuals who fail to appear. They could force all employers to use e-verify and prevent the noncompliant from being able to work anywhere except under the table. They could use facial recognition (taken from driver's license photos) at all borders and airports. I think you under-estimate the differen…
/r/MensRights04/01/20 10:21 PM
1

What makes you think Steve Downs had any interest in being the custodial parent after the divorce? He didn't even take his kids after Diane was arrested and then imprisoned for shooting them. >Downs' two surviving children eventually went to live with the lead prosecutor on the case, Fred Hugi. He and his wife Joanne adopted them in 1986.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 04:03 AM
3

>A (pap) smear test, contraception and an STI check could all be done by the same person in 15 minutes, she said. So exactly like we have been doing it for many decades in the U.S. >But at the moment, girls and women are being pushed around from pillar to post because a nurse or the health practitioner or the GP that they visit hasn’t got the commission to actually do the other things as well. WTF? There is no reason at all those things should take 3 appointments. > Women should not have to go b…
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:31 PM
-6

Very few babies are given up for adoption and close to none to Safe Harbor. Even if she chose those options if the father wanted the baby then he would get full custody and she would have to pay child support. She also has the option for abortion and he doesn't. Frankly, I don't give a shit. It is biology and that is not changing. She does not have the option to make him carry and deliver the baby. Also biology and also not changing. I did not say that a female rapist is the one that deserves ou…
/r/MensRights02/12/19 04:07 PM
-12

This is actually gender neutral. When an underage girl gets pregnant by an adult man she also still has a duty to support the child. Let's face it now that occurs with underage girls a heck of a lot more often. So who here thinks that the adult men in this situation should be solely 100 percent responsible for supporting the child for the next 18 years? Assume a 15 year old girl with a 21 year old boyfriend. She gets pregnant but manages to graduate from college and get a good job when the child…
/r/MensRights02/12/19 02:36 PM
3

Seriously dude, just book yourself a massage. A legal massage with a licensed massage therapist in a respectable place. (Not the happy ending kind of place and it is very easy to tell the difference.)
/r/MensRights01/12/19 12:29 PM
0

Hospitals would be told not to operate on patients to try to slow the progress of osteoporosis (brittle bone disease) You do realize that osteoporosis affects mainly women, right? Also recommendations for frequency of mammograms and pap smears have drastically decreased over the last 10 plus years. Just like recommendations for frequency of PSA tests. Both for the same reason. There were too many false positives causing too many unnecessary interventions that caused harm.
/r/MensRights30/11/19 06:30 PM
1

That is actually his 4 year old son.
/r/MensRights28/11/19 02:25 PM
1

You clearly have not read all my comments. It is most certainly incriminating evidence and she should have lost her job. Advice for the ex-husband? Get a lawyer.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:19 PM
0

It is both revenge porn and incriminating evidence. The two are not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 06:36 PM
5

Also, something that I noticed is more of the women being sentenced for a crime posts, but nothing about how it's a men's rights issue. I'd suggest that if you are looking at posting this type of thing, that you look for a similar case in the same geographic area where a man got a harsher sentence and post that for comparison. I find these type of posts so frustrating. Sentencing varies wildly based on so many factors that don't appear in a news article. As you noted jurisdiction is a big one al…
/r/MensRights02/11/19 03:47 PM
2

Sounds bad, but it doesn't really matter what law she was convicted under. She still was sentenced to 20 years of State incarceration which will be served initially in a State mental institution and then if she becomes sane the rest to be served in State prison.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 03:34 PM
2

There is no real line. It is not illegal if it is consensual. It is not even sexual harassment if it is consensual. The problem occurs when people say they were coerced into it due to the power differential. Arising from this has created the general belief that sex with a subordinate coworker is always unethical. Members of Congress must adhere to high ethical standards. So she left voluntarily before they kicked her out.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 03:23 PM
1

What else would you call it? She did not know the pictures existed, she never gave consent for the pictures to be taken and she definitely didn't agree to distribute them. If that's not revenge porn, what is? Also I believe that's her ex-husband. The actual theoretical victim here is the subordinate coworker. Except she is not complaining. Which doesn't make it right of course. Katie Hill should still have lost her job. That does not mean it is ok for her naked pictures to be unwillingly distrib…
/r/MensRights02/11/19 03:14 PM
1

Anthony Weiner voluntarily texted his own photos to strangers. It's kind of hard to claim a privacy interest after that. Katie Hill claims she didn't even know these pictures existed, did not consent to them being taken and certainly she did not distribute them. Katie Hill was most emphatically wrong to have a sexual relationship with a subordinate coworker. No doubt about that at all. She should have lost her job. However the issue of revenge porn and how it plays out in politics is still valid…
/r/MensRights02/11/19 02:55 PM
17

TIL that not banging your subordinate coworkers is an uptight Boomer value. Funny thing is I seem to remember a couple decades spent with litigation to convince the Boomers of exactly that.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 02:22 PM
0

I agree with you.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 03:34 AM
0

??? Did you watch the video? That's not my proposal to prevent incel attacks, it is OP's proposal.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 02:58 AM
1

Yes, that is the law in the U.S. There is no child support before a baby is born.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 09:06 PM
2

No excuses! Come on, haven't you ever heard of a mercy fuck? Be a better person. Show us all how it is done. Put your ass where your mouth is.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 06:02 PM
4

WTF DUDE!!! You propose charity brothels where women are supposed to voluntarily donate sexual services to self described Incels?!!! Wow, I can really see how well that pitch is going to go. "Yeah, we got these sexually unappealing men here who are social rejects, unable to reliably get laid and might become violent mass murderers. How about you fuck them for the good of society?" You know what? I am 100 percent positive that there are many sexually unappealing gay men who are social rejects, un…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 05:54 PM
2

Many people would like male birth control. However, at least in the U.S. it will be very difficult to get a drug company to invest the likely billions needed to get it to market. Consider the practicalities. Women release one egg on average about once a month. Men produce hundreds of millions of sperm in the same time period. Ovaries don't have much to do with sexual function. Testicles are crucial for sexual function. The risks of birth control for women can be justified by showing that birth c…
/r/MensRights12/10/19 04:54 PM
6

Google makes guesses on your intended search based on your recent internet history. For example my first suggestion on google search for "why" was "Why is the sky blue?" (I just spent 20 minutes on a reddit parenting sub.)
/r/MensRights12/10/19 04:19 PM
-1

Because it is a fetus not a child.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 03:14 PM
1

Why does man need to be registered as father and obliged to pay if he doesn't want the child? Because it is an innocent child that needs to be protected and those needs should be met by the child's parents. Both of them.
/r/MensRights12/10/19 12:31 PM
5

Sigh. Do we really have to circle jerk about this every single day? In between complaining that men's rights has a bad reputation in the media and everywhere else. What does men's rights stand for? IT'S NOT FAIR THAT WE HAVE TO SUPPORT OUR OWN CHILDREN!!! Plus we don't like the bathroom signs. Well, OK then. I'm sure society is going to jump right on that. /s
/r/MensRights12/10/19 12:19 PM
2

No, this is not a real thing.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 08:13 PM
3

He hit her on the head with a crowbar more than 30 times while she had her hands up trying to protect herself. Then he burned his clothing, hid the crowbar and told the police someone else killed her. I'm pretty sure a woman would have been found guilty too.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 03:22 PM
1

Once again we have an Incel post with many comments in which not a single person mentions autism spectrum disorder. I understand that hypergamy is a much more comfortable explanation but how long can we ignore the elephant in the room? What we are seeing with Incels is that the first significant in numbers group of men on the spectrum, (diagnosed or not), has grown up. They are attracted to bright and shiny things. As in computer screens and games. Sure, they would like to have sex but that woul…
/r/MensRights11/10/19 10:56 AM
1

Why don't the MRAs condemn their own outliers? Paul Elam would be a good start.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 03:17 PM
0

I don't really see feminism as absurd, just that a minority of some very vocal outliers have taken it to absurd levels as occurs in many groups. This does not prevent me from supporting Men's Rights, which also by the way has a minority of very vocal outliers taking it to absurd levels. So I suggest that you don't try to frame this as a black and white issue like some caveman grunting "Feminism bad -- Men's Rights good". Instead try asking them some questions. Should the NAACP disband and join t…
/r/MensRights14/09/19 11:17 AM
2

Second I don't fantasize about hitting women Right, you just spend your time watching YouTube tapes about men hitting women because they are "so satisfying". Seriously dude, get therapy or something.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 09:21 PM
0

Retreat as soon as possible and report it to a teacher or the principal.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 08:50 PM
1

Hitting back is still hitting and you're still sitting around fantasizing about it. Most people do not sit around fantasizing about situations where they can get away with hitting someone. So what do you think is wrong with you? Why are you specifically fantasizing about hitting women? Maybe think about that.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 08:48 PM
1

From your cited source: Now when we compare violence committed by men in relationships and violence committed by women, are we comparing apples to apples here? Well that's a really good question and one unfortunately we were not able to tease apart in this review of the work. What we do seem to find is that even though the rates are similar, they are different in terms of their severity and also the likelihood that they're going to inflict injury. And that's not to say, for example, that a woman…
/r/MensRights02/09/19 07:26 PM
-5

Oh great, your second masturbatory troll post about hitting women posted TODAY. Again, don't you have anything better to do?
/r/MensRights02/09/19 07:10 PM
1

Oh great, another masturbatory troll post about hitting women. Don't you have anything better to do?
/r/MensRights02/09/19 07:06 PM
-4

Really? Four girls as a group have physically attacked you on repeated occasions? Maybe you should work on your social skills. In the meantime I suggest that you avoid them. If a violent situation occurs you should use only as much force as needed to promptly extricate yourself from the situation and report it to a teacher or the Principal. All schools have video now so it won't take them long to see that the girls were in the wrong. In other words, retreat as soon as possible. The same advice h…
/r/MensRights02/09/19 07:01 PM
-2

Have you considered that there might be something wrong with you having fantasies about how much violence you can inflict on girls in completely nonexistent and strongly likely to never happen situations?
/r/MensRights02/09/19 06:49 PM
1

Not only is this idea idiotic, it very literally will NEVER be the law in the U.S. NEVER. The best interests of the child is far too ingrained in the law and our culture. Nobody is ever going to trade the best interests of a man for the best interests of a child. (Half of whom are male by the way. It's rather ironic that you are so willing to throw boys under the bus so that you can have carefree sex.) So it is a complete waste of time for MRA's to keep keep jerking off to paper abortion and it …
/r/MensRights02/09/19 06:40 PM
1

Women endure a far greater physical burden with pregnancy and childbirth than men do. It's only fair that they should have greater rights. By the way, nothing is stopping you from banking some sperm and getting a vasectomy. You have the choice to take complete control of any conception opportunities. You know, in a way that doesn't try to control women's bodies or duck out of any responsibilities for your own damn children. Like an adult or something.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 06:22 PM
2

It certainly does violate somebody's rights. The rights of the child to be supported and to have a relationship if possible with the father.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 06:11 PM
8

Quite often conception is something that NEITHER party consented to.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 03:14 PM
5

That's in England. You can't compare sentences in England to sentences in the U.S. England is much more lenient on sentencing.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 07:54 PM
2

What year for UCLA was that and do you have a cite? A quick search on google did not turn one up.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 07:51 PM
2

That's nice for historical. What evidence do you have that U.S. colleges are using affirmative action to benefit specifically women right now? Why would they even have to when women generally have higher grades and SAT scores?
/r/MensRights28/08/19 07:38 PM
1

yet the admission standard is still much lower for women... This is complete bullshit for U.S. colleges. What proof do you have? Cite some sources.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 04:24 PM
7

According to court documents, agents from the Department of Homeland Security in Birmingham received these images which depicted sexual exploitation of 2 prepubescent children and a teenage female under the age of 18 by Hooks in Alabama. Hooks is the man. So yeah, there might just be a significant difference between raping children and possessing film of it.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 04:16 PM
1

What is the parenting time arrangement? Do you have 50/50?
/r/MensRights27/08/19 10:43 AM
5

There is literally nothing in that post that says the wife does not also work and also contribute to the family income. Lots of married couples combine finances and have joint accounts. Stereotype much?
/r/MensRights25/08/19 07:03 PM
3

Jock straps.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 04:26 PM
3

Among other things they were instructing teachers that boys should be taught in a way that they compete against each other while girls should learn together cooperatively. I think everybody should compete or everybody should learn cooperatively but we definitely should not have separate grading and teaching systems for different sexes. Nor should we have extended time for girls on tests because allegedly they need it to be "fair" since girls allegedly experience more stress with tests.
/r/MensRights24/08/19 05:33 PM
5

All update posts get locked on /r/LegalAdvice. Repost it and don't put update on the title.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 10:41 PM
3

If his health problems prevent him from working he should file for social security disability benefits. This will also provide benefits for his children.
/r/MensRights16/08/19 02:31 PM
-1

He made a voluntary decision. It's not like he got screwed by the courts.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 04:31 PM
2

Beginning of video part 2: Boyfriend responding to you, "So I have no say in your daughter's life? Well, seeing as she is with me 90 percent of the time I do feel a certain responsibility..." What happened to video part 1 of this dispute?
/r/MensRights25/07/19 02:59 PM
9

In his written statement to police, which was prepared in advance of his first videotaped interview, he said the complainant initiated oral sex and got on top of him without a condom saying “don’t worry, I can’t get pregnant”. The statement contradicted Mr. Rivera’s earlier testimony that when he attended the police station the first time he did not know anything about the alleged complaint. When this was put to him in cross-examination, he testified the written statement was brought to the seco…
/r/MensRights05/07/19 06:01 AM
8

Notice how she automatically assumes that Man#2 left the bathroom for HER comfort and not his. Like it's absolutely impossible that maybe he did not want to share the bathroom with a female stranger.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 12:10 PM
1

Just imagine if the more than $150,000. donated to the Honey Badgers for a completely baseless lawsuit, (which has now been lost), had actually been used for something that benefited men.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 07:37 PM
4

No, you are wrong. That site does not say what you think it says.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 07:52 PM
2

Agreed and I am also an attorney.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 07:49 PM
15

In the U.S. the only way for a man to give up parental rights when the child still lives with the mother is if the mother gets married to someone else and her husband is willing to adopt the child.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 03:51 PM
15

My accuser could not be cross examined or interviewed by my attorney as she was a minor. This is complete and total bullshit. All criminal defendants have a constitutional right to confront their accusers with cross examination, either through their attorney or representing themselves. That does not change if the accuser is a minor.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 09:35 AM
0

Again, what I cam for is simply this: If one parent signs the kids up for a sport, is the other parent required to get them to the said activity during their time too? No. You have no right to say what the kids do during her parenting time. The two of you will have to negotiate activities. Also it was incredibly insensitive for your new partner to be a coach on the team when you know that your Ex hates your partner.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 09:31 PM
-4

https://supportpay.com/what-is-the-average-child-support-payment/ But on average, the latest statistic we have available comes from the 2010 Census. According to the Census Bureau Reports, the average monthly child support payment is $430. Of course that's the average assessed child support payment regardless of how many children there are and how much money each parent makes. It's not the average actually paid child support payment. https://www.verywellfamily.com/us-child-support-statistics-299…
/r/MensRights23/05/19 07:27 PM
2

Mark 10:11 He said to them, “Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her; and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery.” Since your wife has not married another man, it is really a big stretch to claim that somehow just reading this passage from Mark led your son to independently conclude that his mother is an adulteress. You are at rock bottom with this argument and beginning to dig now.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 01:31 PM
1

I'm really not seeing that you are loving your enemies when you are teaching your 6 year old (falsely) that his mother committed adultery. Question -- Have you specifically told your 6 year old that his mother is not an adulteress? Of course not, because that is exactly what you want him to believe. You led him down that path and you are just thrilled with the result. So maybe you are not the right person to be talking about loving your enemies. Your only thoughts for your enemies are that they …
/r/MensRights16/05/19 01:13 PM
-1

but the topic keeps coming up organically in our bible reading Did you forget your own post? Your 6 year old is not suddenly interested in the 7th commandment about adultery because he just randomly remembered some video he watched with his mother YEARS ago. YOU have been bringing the topic up in your bible reading. With a 6 year old! What angered her was that of his own reasoning he deduced that if that is the definition of adultery, then maybe she is an adulteress. I didn't tell him that... Wh…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 12:51 PM
-5

Dude?!!! As in Dude!!! Generally I support 50/50, but you are the very definition of parental alienation! From your post history: My 6 year old son knows the 10 commandments, but doesn't understand the definition of "adultery." I tried to give him a kid appropriate version that doesn't talk about sex itself and generalize it to "faithfulness in marriage"... but my wife and his mother recently left me and filed for divorce without biblical grounds. My son has been vocal about not wanting a divorc…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 10:32 AM
2

There is no such thing as a father's rights contract or legal document in advance of conceiving. Or after conceiving. Or after birth. You could make up your own but it would not be enforceable in court. This is because the standard for family court is what is in the best interests of the child. Situations can always change, so even court orders for custody and parenting time are never set in stone. Assume hypothetically that you agree to a contract that the father is to have the baby 50 percent …
/r/MensRights11/05/19 10:18 PM
1

Are you in the U.S.?
/r/MensRights11/05/19 09:19 PM
1

Yes, alimony is based on financial positions and not behavior.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 05:27 AM
16

I suggest you delete this post and then post it again with a correct title. This title is painfully wrong.
/r/MensRights01/04/19 12:42 PM
1

That's why I said retroactive. The court would wait for the baby to be born and a DNA test establishing paternity and then award retroactive child support back to the week of pregnancy where there is a fetal heart beat.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 01:22 PM
0

That's actually the only intelligent proposal in this bill. If Georgia wants to insist on no abortion after a fetal heartbeat because it's a baby, (which I do not agree with), then retroactive child support kicking in at the same time after paternity is established is pretty reasonable. Pregnancy and childbirth is expensive. Medical bills, at least 6 to 8 weeks lost wages, maternity clothes, additional food and prenatal vitamins, breast pumps, baby clothes and baby supplies like car seats, cribs…
/r/MensRights20/03/19 04:31 AM
1

"Stalking" on dating sites is not illegal. Even if everything she said is true, as long as you never threatened her, it is perfectly legal. I recommend that you just ignore her. Crazy people tend to have short attention spans.
/r/MensRights18/02/19 12:18 AM
2

Me too. :)
/r/MensRights16/01/19 09:49 PM
6

Actually it is well known that women are the primary consumers of home goods for the family. Women do the grocery shopping, the drug store shopping, Walmart, Target, etc. for the entire family. So Gillette doesn't have to worry all that much about pissing off men. Their wives, their mothers and their girlfriends are buying the razors for them.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:29 PM
2

A blood test can rule out a father but not confirm a father.
/r/MensRights13/01/19 07:42 PM
2

It doesn't bother me if you just want to go through life full of hate and ignorance. Do realize that it is a choice though.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 07:25 PM
-9

Women who make accusations against men at work are often rewarded with... lifetime employment as no firm would ever dare let them go in fear of an employment lawsuit. Yeah, no, there are these laws called the statutes of limitations which foreclose any possibility of a civil employment related lawsuit after a certain period of time. This is pretty damn sloppy here for someone writing a blog specifically dedicated to advising men on the law.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 03:38 AM
1

Oregon began a pilot diversion program in 2015, basing it on a Washington state program that serves both mothers and fathers facing incarceration. This year, Oregon extended its program to pregnant women, too. Maybe if you had actually read the article you wouldn't be posting based on fantasy.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 03:19 PM
1

Not everybody in the world has such a good recall of names and faces. It does appear that rather promptly Kavanaugh did figure it out and then left the room. This is a ridiculously whiney complaint decades after the fact.
/r/MensRights06/11/18 07:33 PM
8

Ten years after the Great Recession, 25- to 34-year-old men are lagging in the workforce more than any other age and gender demographic. About 500,000 more would be punching the clock today had their employment rate returned to pre-downturn levels. See the chart: 74 percent of millennial women are currently working. 86 percent of millennial men are currently working. Considering that age 23 to 34 is also a prime age period to have young children it is very possible that many of these men are sta…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 12:45 AM
21

A lawyer gets upset when someone he doesn't recognize is in an empty conference room going through confidential documents? What a surprise!
/r/MensRights06/11/18 12:17 AM
1

No, I do not. It is extremely easy to just find a random police report on the internet.
/r/MensRights28/10/18 04:08 PM
2

She runs out of my apartment and calls the police. If she was out of his apartment how would he know she called the police? Twenty minutes later, the police knock on my door. A response time that literally no police department has ever unless there is a significant emergency. Apparently she had told them I was blackmailing her and recorded us having sex. Most definitely not an emergency. In fact the police would not even be able to write an initial report from her in 20 minutes, let alone get it…
/r/MensRights28/10/18 04:05 PM
1

Of course I read it. Did you miss the part where Dad has been convicted of a series of drug related felonies including one in 2017 when he was living with Mikey? How about the part where Dad set up another GoFundMe claiming that he was paying over 3K a month in unreimbursed medical expenses, except it just so happens that his State has a truly excellent free medical insurance program for children that would definitely include Mikey and cover all of his needs including child therapy? How about th…
/r/MensRights16/10/18 08:16 PM
2

https://turtleboysports.com/i-hate-to-say-it-but-there-are-some-things-that-just-dont-add-up-about-this-viral-help-us-save-mikey-campaign/ Sorry, OP, this case is a scam.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 02:09 AM
3

https://turtleboysports.com/i-hate-to-say-it-but-there-are-some-things-that-just-dont-add-up-about-this-viral-help-us-save-mikey-campaign/ More about Mikey's dad and the scam he is pulling.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 02:07 AM
1

https://turtleboysports.com/i-hate-to-say-it-but-there-are-some-things-that-just-dont-add-up-about-this-viral-help-us-save-mikey-campaign/ Sorry, OP, this seems to be a scam. There is definitely another side to this story.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 02:03 AM
0

Sorry, OP, but this seems to be a scam. https://turtleboysports.com/i-hate-to-say-it-but-there-are-some-things-that-just-dont-add-up-about-this-viral-help-us-save-mikey-campaign/
/r/MensRights14/10/18 01:57 AM
-3

Except there were no communication problems. Cheryl wanted another baby. Rod wanted to join an expensive golf club and buy an expensive boat. Rod's plan was just to wait her out being passive aggressive until her biological time clock ran out. He was not going to change his mind. So would Rod be better off being a divorced father and forced to live off his own income today? Or was Cheryl just supposed to be his wage slave for life?
/r/MensRights26/09/18 07:15 PM
-5

Still the same question. There are a tremendous number of accidental unwanted pregnancies that turned out to be wonderful and incredible. Doesn't mean I don't support choice. Does mean that sometimes you should embrace serendipity.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 07:03 PM
2

It means that he can still bring a lawsuit against the clinic for medical malpractice. A lot of jurisdictions have a type of pre-suit mediation or similar for med mal cases.
/r/MensRights24/09/18 10:01 PM
1

Lawrence v Texas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas States may not criminalize homosexual sodomy. Rostker v Goldberg https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/453/57 Requiring only U.S. men to register for the draft through selective service is not unconstitutional. Johnson v Transportation Agency https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/480/616.html An employer, including a government agency, can make favorable promotion decisions based on the person's status as a minority …
/r/MensRights11/09/18 01:53 AM
2

No. You get out of that relationship.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 12:35 AM
1

It is not legally justified to hit anyone except in self defense or in defense of another. Actual physical contact is not necessarily required. If she is standing there holding a knife and threatening to stab you or your baby you don't have to wait for actual physical contact.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 12:33 AM
6

He can file a motion and the judge will order the girls to attend counseling and/or family therapy and his wife will be in contempt if she does not comply. Judges love therapy.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 12:24 AM
3

I think you will be surprised at how open the parents will be. I once did this. I complained that every time I picked my daughter up from after school daycare literally all of the boys were playing (learning) games on computers and all of the girls were in the next room coloring. Children this age will self select playmates by sex so I didn't disagree with that but I wanted them to start staggering the computer times. I thought the girls needed a push towards using the computers more and the boy…
/r/MensRights08/09/18 03:24 PM
-12

Tamarion had returned from school on Tuesday with a punishment he had to have signed by his parents. He went on to explain that he had continued to repeatedly call his teacher “ma’am” despite her requests not to, and was told to write the word “ma’am” written on a piece of paper four times per line on both sides as a penalty. I don't think this is so outrageous. The teacher has a right to be called by the name that she prefers. I think plenty of male teachers would object to being called Sir esp…
/r/MensRights07/09/18 06:17 PM
3

Perhaps she can bring in a male independent contractor once a week to teach a specialized class. For example, my kid's very small private school has done this at various times with karate, yoga, art and music classes. Does the school have an after school daycare program? That is also an area where she could bring in some men. Is the school large enough to need a full or part time teacher's aide? There are men in that profession and they wouldn't need to be Montessori certified. In my area the po…
/r/MensRights07/09/18 06:03 PM
1

There is no shortage of law on any of the causes of action. Nothing about this case is precedential. In any event Alison has confirmed that an appeal has already been filed. So we will be waiting to see what the appeal has alleged the "palpable and overriding errors" are which is the standard on appeal. “Palpable” is interpreted as "clear to the mind or plain to see". To be overriding, a palpable error must discredit the result. Where the evidence is otherwise capable of supporting the trial jud…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 12:11 AM
9

Some information that might interest you especially since you post a lot of action opportunities. Some new legislation is being considered to strengthen the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/20/opinion/prison-rape-sexual-violence.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2017/08/09/we-have-standards-to-stop-prison-rape-why-were-rapists-allowed-to-enforce-them/?utm_term=.3932e42c76f9 https://justdetention.org/congress-takes-key-step-to-strengthe…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:54 PM
1

Three billion is approximately 9 percent of the total 26.7 billion NIH funding. https://www.npr.org/2017/12/22/572298802/nearly-dying-in-childbirth-why-preventable-complications-are-growing-in-u-s Childbirth is the leading reason that people go to hospitals, accounting for nearly 12 percent of all U.S. hospital stays in 2014. Medicaid, which pays for half of all U.S. births Every year in the U.S., nearly 4 million women give birth, the vast majority without anything going amiss for themselves or…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 04:05 PM
1

Obstetrics is a very significant and often complicated area of medicine that affects many people and society in general and has no real corollary in men. Maternal and infant mortality rates in the U.S. are some of the highest in the world. It is disingenuous to claim that this is just cherry picking.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 08:55 PM
1

You do understand that NIH funds studies related to pregnancy and childbirth, right? Studies that not only benefit women but also unborn children 50 percent of which are male.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 08:25 PM
2

Yes, actually he was disbarred for being an incompetent lawyer. Competent lawyers don't make repeated billing errors.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 03:02 PM
3

Only if you actually have a real lawyer. Not with someone who has been disbarred and is not even allowed to call himself a paralegal "representing" you. Which he could only do because it was small claims court which does not require a lawyer.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 02:55 PM
3

You realize that your "legal representative" is a disbarred lawyer who isn't even allowed to call himself a paralegal right? No one in their right mind would pay him 55K.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 02:26 PM
3

In 2013 the average cost for a 7 day trial was 82k. Our trial was 7.5 days. Do the math. That is when you are paying a lawyer. Which you were not.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 10:40 AM
2

Hey there, /u/typhonblue. Hey there, Alison. We're asking how you spent the 75K you crowd funded in donations for your worthless lawsuit. You know, the one where you did not even pay a lawyer and could not have recovered more than 50K due to jurisdictional limitations. So how exactly did you spend that 75K Alison? Inquiring minds want to know.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 03:54 PM
3

Why do you think the readers here would be able to answer questions about exactly how the Honey Badgers spent the 75K they received in donations? Note of course that the Honey Badgers and/or Alison have completely failed to do this. Not only in response to this comment. They haven't produced this information anywhere.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 11:30 AM
2

A fucking therapist who talks to the GAL who talks to the judge. Who is believed more, by virtue of being supposedly independent, than either one of the parents.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 04:05 AM
-9

Sorry, OP, but you totally over-reacted here. The therapist is entitled to have a session with only mother and daughter. It was wrong to try to intrude on their session. It was painfully wrong to call the police and cause a scene in front of your child on a false claim of kidnapping. You knew damn well she was not kidnapped and exactly where she was and that she was with the parent who presumably had parenting time. You have pissed off the therapist who is going to tell the GAL that you are a nu…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:40 PM
0

https://www.themarysue.com/calgary-expo-gamergate-evicted/ The Comic & Entertainment Expo Committee does not tolerate harassment of any type at any of its events. Harassment can take many forms. It may be, but is not limited to, words, signs, offensive jokes, cartoons, pictures, posters, e-mail jokes or statements, pranks, intimidation, physical assaults or contact, or violence. The convention also has large signs indicating that neither verbal nor physical harassment will be tolerated, in addit…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:24 AM
1

The judge included that the Honey Badgers don't exist as a legal entity because the contract was signed with the Honey Badgers but Alison was the real plaintiff. It was just what we call a housekeeping matter, a clarification. No disrespect was intended. Okay, first off, you don't know the court's reasoning, since the judge didn't include it. Sure I do. It is included in the opinion in the manner that he stated his conclusions. I summarized it above as follows: In brief, the court found that the…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 07:43 PM
1

What worries me more is that public perception seems to be the underlying clincher here too, according to the judge. Yes it is. You have to consider Calgary Expo's position. They are running a public event and don't want their clients uncomfortable. A number of people complained and any way you look at it Gamergate was not being portrayed positively on the internet. Calgory Expo is not required to have a full blown trial or ferret out the finer points of Gamergate. "It looks bad, it sounds bad, …
/r/MensRights18/08/18 05:09 PM
2

A copy of the judge's decision is now online. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XNW_6Y4CKy-RNtbJ4z-UEarnanbulyvo/view
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:38 PM
2

At no point did I state a timeline for Alison to show up and provide a breakdown of how the 50K was spent. We all know that redditors don't just sit around on reddit. However, note that typhonblue has now commented on this post and no breakdown of monies spent has been provided.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 03:35 PM
2

Are you saying that you don't know who user typhonblue is? Or that she is a mod on this sub?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:42 PM
2

Zero. It was easy to ascertain immediately that any possible recoverable damages did not justify the costs of litigation. The rest I learned as the case went along but right from the start this was clearly just a fund raising scam.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 01:36 PM
1

I have no idea as to the mental competence or senility of any judge in this case... I am going to rely on more than 20 years of litigation experience to explain it to you. No the judge is not mentally incompetent or senile. No, the judge could not care less about the political implications. He couldn't care less about feminists. This is SMALL CLAIMS COURT, ok? Where actually no one gives a shit about any opinion entered. If the judge dissed them for any reason, it is because they forced him into…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:15 AM
1

For maybe the first time ever, we agree. This case is absolute bullshit with no chance ever to seriously make any impact. It was narcissist crap to begin with and has only become worse over time. To throw 50K in donations to this stupid small claims case, with no precedential value at all, when the donations are really nothing but a vacation fund for people who have actually accomplished crap for the men's movement, is a travesty. To ask for more donations now for a hopeless appeal? You have ser…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:01 AM
1

Except I am actually asking the Honey Badgers. They come here to raise money, right? They sure as heck know about this post since they sent in the flying monkeys. So how is how they spent that money a secret? No, I do not need a personal message. What do they have to hide that they can't tell all of us? It's obvious a person's true goal is to undermine a group, when that person goes to and ONLY to their supporters, not the group itself... Hostility much? What do the Honey Badgers have to hide? G…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 11:51 PM
2

They already spent the 50K so none of that went for a transcript. If they choose to appeal they will need a trial transcript. Transcription costs are the same for everyone. The hair-raising amount for this trial transcript is because for some stupid reason they decided to do a seven day trial on a case with highly doubtful chances of success when the most damages they could ever reasonably recover were less than 5K. So yes, they are looking at paying more for that trial transcript than the case …
/r/MensRights17/08/18 09:26 PM
1

The entire lawsuit was a quixotic effort. Or more accurately a fund raising scam.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 08:17 PM
1

Interesting that you think an expectation of ethical behavior is a fantasy. If they claimed "we're gonna win millions and its a sure thing", then your argument is valid. How about soliciting funds for "legal fees" when they did not have a lawyer?
/r/MensRights17/08/18 08:13 PM
1

I plan to wait for the actual judge's opinion, not whatever revised version Karen decides to write down in the hopes of getting more donations. In fact the Honey Badgers should have the written opinion already. Why isn't it posted on their site? This verdict needs to be appealed and overturned. It is rife for abuse. Oh my God, the sheer arrogance is only outweighed by the ignorance. This is a SMALL CLAIMS COURT opinion! Nobody in the legal field, and I do mean absolutely nobody, gives a shit. It…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 08:09 PM
0

True, no one has to donate, however soliciting donations under false pretenses is still unethical. The Honey Badgers most definitely did not volunteer the information that their lawsuit sucked, they had minimal damages at best and in no event could recover more than 50K since they were in small claims court, and they were asking for "legal fees" without even having a lawyer.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:37 PM
1

So at what point does she have agency? At what point does she say no thank you to expensive jewelry? At what point does she say no thank you to expensive dates? At what point is he not her very so convenient back up plan if she needs a ride home from the bar one night? At what point does she not call him if the car breaks and she needs someone to translate into English whatever it is the mechanic is saying? Are you really not seeing the ethical implications of leading on and using a man who just…
/r/MensRights30/06/18 06:24 AM
2

My plan, if it comes down to that, is to negotiate for an agreed upon order for civil restraints. Which gets us out of the quasi-criminal domestic abuse restraining order in this State. It's called quasi-criminal because it goes down in family court, with a lesser standard of proof, but still appears on a record and has lots of bad things associated with it. Like not being able to get or keep a gun license and it definitely will impact the ability to work in certain jobs. Actually in my State if…
/r/MensRights30/06/18 06:11 AM
1

LOL again. User name checks out.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 05:12 AM
1

LOL. Guess you haven't checked my post history. I have been on this sub for a very long time. Posting on various issues. Pretty sure this is the first post for me on the friend zone.
/r/MensRights30/06/18 05:11 AM
3

Your STBX is legally correct. She does not have to supply the kids with clothes when they are with you. The child support she receives is for expenses at her house only. Medical, dental, school activities and school supplies are in addition to child support and typically split between both parents. Considering how fast children grow and seasons change, this can seem pretty burdensome if you only see the kids every other weekend. However, the major complaint on the flip side is that when one pare…
/r/MensRights01/06/18 02:44 PM
4

A lot of the women will simply end up childless instead as well, because you did so many forced vasectomies. If you disallow divorce and enforce monogamy the men with children won't be getting another woman pregnant anyway. That's kind of the whole point, right? Shifting opportunities for reproduction to the bottom 25 percent of men. So no more women would end up childless if we go with forced vasectomies. You need 2.1 children per woman to sustain a population. Fine, we'll also do a voluntary l…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 05:43 AM
3

What actually happens often is that men who are already fathers get recycled. I find it interesting that your proposed solutions primarily involve controlling women. Reducing access to birth control pills, reducing access to higher education, reducing women's income, penalizing single mothers, enforcing monogamy for women, etc. Hey now, OP, since you are up for radical solutions we can do this one heck of a lot quicker and easier. Assume that 87 percent of women want to have children. A forced v…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 04:15 AM
2

How does homosexuality affect these disproportionate figures? Both gay men and gay women may want to have children. However, it is exponentially easier for gay women to obtain sperm than it is for gay men to find a woman to bear a child. How does infertility affect these disproportionate figures? It is generally accepted that male infertility is the cause of 30 to 50 percent of couples unable to reproduce. However, medical science for female infertility is light years ahead of the medical option…
/r/MensRights12/05/18 03:50 AM
1

https://www.amazon.com/AIBEILE-Personal-Motorcycles-Trackers-T8/dp/B071X652G1/ref=sr_1_5?ie=UTF8&qid=1525998936&sr=8-5&keywords=gps+tracker+for+kids For anyone facing a similar problem locating your children buy one of these, put it inside of a stuffed animal and mail it to the P.O. Box.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 12:47 AM
6

Upload your tape to YouTube. You don't have to use your real name. This will both preserve it and give you an easy way to show people your side of the story if needed. Definitely see a lawyer. Definitely consider obtaining a domestic abuse restraining order. This situation is not going to improve. Do a DNA test when your child is born. Just in case because she seems very unstable.
/r/MensRights07/05/18 12:09 PM
-3

Are you really really sure about that? Or is this just kind of a convenient whatever? Don't much want to think about the possible implications if it doesn't turn out to be narrow in scope....
/r/MensRights06/05/18 02:41 PM
3

How about this fact pattern? A 15 year old girl lies to a 21 year old man, says that she is actually 18 and for proof shows him her older sister's driver's license. She is also using her older sister's name. Did she rape him? Fifteen year olds can be charged with rape and also tried as adults in almost every State. So, 20 years in prison? Sound good? Keep in mind now that this guy is dealing with more than just the emotional aspects of rape by deception. No, he is also being charged with statuto…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 02:37 PM
-3

Oh, my sweet summer child. A legal precedent set by a State Supreme Court lives on and on. It sets the standard for all lower court cases of even remotely similar fact patterns that come after it. It is not just a flash in the pan. "Women, and men, must be free to decide, on their own terms, who their sexual partners will be," Chief Justice Mark Cady wrote for the majority, further concluding that Kelso-Christy's actions denied the woman "the freedom of choice that breathes life into our sexual …
/r/MensRights06/05/18 02:06 PM
1

WTH? I am beginning to wonder from the comments here and a couple other subs on the same topic, is this just a generational thing? Is this what happens when the "everybody gets a trophy" generation grows up? In what universe does it seem right to be using criminal courts and criminal penalties to enforce social niceties?
/r/MensRights06/05/18 01:17 PM
1

Illegal in CIVIL law. Not criminal law. There is such a major difference! In civil court you get sued for monetary damages. Worst thing that happens is you lose everything you own and maybe have to file for bankruptcy to discharge the debt which messes up your credit score for a long time going forward. In criminal court you are publicly charged, likely arrested in front of your family and neighbors, have to try to make bail or sit in jail innocent since not yet proven guilty for six months, go …
/r/MensRights06/05/18 01:08 PM
1

Robbed her? Dude, he could have murdered her! In a very very uncomfortable way. Considering that all women are carefully taught beginning before puberty to always watch our backs and have situational awareness, the level of sheer stupidity here is absolutely awesome. So her door must have been unlocked in order for him to come in. Right. So tell me about why he was convicted of burglary again? Which requires at an absolute minimum an illegal entry. When the facts don't match the law but you stil…
/r/MensRights06/05/18 12:40 PM
10

The court would not apply similar reasoning to the purchase of a used car. Which would be a lot easier to enforce legally than policing intimate relationships. Imagine if every used car purchase that turned out to be bad was theft by deception and carried a prison sentence? The criminal justice system was never designed for this. It's purpose is not to promote civility and courtesy and to shelter people from bad decisions. Especially bad romantic decisions. Somehow the court drifted from the con…
/r/MensRights05/05/18 06:26 PM
1

Please send me another comment after you have actually watched the video. Then we can have a more nuanced discussion.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 04:44 PM
2

Ok now, I agree that this should not be necessary. Except it kind of is. Unless you are in a very very expensive place there is not going to be a completely separate room just for breast feeding. Now while some women are cool with just whipping out a tit anywhere, a lot of women and cultures and husbands are not. Next up seems like a simple solution, but some babies just will not eat with a blanket over their head. (Would you?) So assuming that modesty is a factor, your choices kind of go like t…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 07:21 PM
8

True, but it is a little more than that. In the nicer places this type of room will have a small lounge type area for breast feeding. This sign alerts breast feeding mothers that men might be there too. In case the mothers want to cover up.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 11:15 AM
1

Call around to some other criminal attorneys. That fee sounds high to me and you can generally get a criminal attorney on a flat fee basis.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 07:18 PM
4

Congratulations on joining reddit two hours before you made this post. Troll.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 05:40 PM
1

Dude, seriously? Way to over react and scapegoat. the resignation follows a series of voluntary disclosures by Mr. Voge... First, you do not make voluntary disclosures if you don't think you did anything wrong. Second, he wasn't fired. He resigned. I object very strongly to our current draconian PC culture. That doesn't mean I don't believe it exists or that PC violations of a head partner could not unfairly tarnish a firm's image. This guy did not resign because he thinks he is completely innoc…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 08:40 PM
1

Latham’s executive committee said the resignation follows a series of voluntary disclosures by Mr. Voge related to “the exchange of communications of a sexual nature with a woman whom he has never met in person and who had no connection to the firm.” The committee said that Mr. Voge, who is based in London, “engaged in subsequent conduct relating to this matter that, while not unlawful, the executive committee concluded was not befitting the leader of the firm.” The contents of the communication…
/r/MensRights21/03/18 05:57 PM
64

The problem here is that what you wanted is kind of like calling a doctor on the phone and asking him to give you tips on how to remove your own appendix. Sure, it would be cheaper but no doctor is going to do that.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 05:24 AM
1

Apparently you don't know much about child support. In the U.S. it is determined by both parent's incomes and the amount of parenting time both parents spend with the child.
/r/MensRights20/02/18 08:16 PM
1

my 13-year old son.... When you have a child in later life this is what happens. You don't get to retire with the rest of your peers.
/r/MensRights19/02/18 11:36 PM
3

School officials got "multiple reports" about the contest last year and launched an investigation, which concluded in January 2018, the Post reported. It does not appear that they kept this private.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 02:43 AM
2

But it made me think back on how many times this has happened in similiar situations... /r/ThatHappened
/r/MensRights03/02/18 05:15 PM
-1

I believe you are referring to one very isolated case in Canada. I'm not even sure if the man was actually convicted since that is quite a novel interpretation of rape. In the U.S. rape does not include contraception fraud.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 03:29 AM
-1

Flip the genders and everyone will disagree. Incorrect. Assume that a man falsely tells a woman he has had a vasectomy and as a result she gets pregnant. She also decides to keep the baby. What are that man's parental rights to custody and visitation and child support? The same as every other man. Lying about birth control really doesn't matter in family court for either sex.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 02:18 AM
1

He was disbarred for stealing money. Billing for more than 24 hours in a day is a lot more than sloppy recordkeeping.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 02:39 PM
1

One dissent is not actually worth shit. Obviously, since it was not enough for him to keep his license. Get a clue here. This disbarred lawyer was so sleazy and so dumb that he billed a single payer for more than 24 hours of legal services a day. How stupid do you have to be to do that?
/r/MensRights19/01/18 05:55 PM
2

They did not file a claim under the Canadian Human Rights Act so there will be no such precedent. (Not that small claims court is any place to get a precedent anyway.) They cannot collect any verdict against The Mary Sue since U.S. law forbids the collection of foreign libel judgments. They would have to file suit in the U.S. for that.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 09:19 PM
2

He was disbarred for spending more than he was allotted in the broadest sense. Incorrect. Lawyers like this bill by the hour. He was disbarred for falsely claiming that he worked more hours for the legal aid clients than he actually did. As was proven rather easily because it is impossible to truthfully bill for more than 24 hours worked in a day. He is morally outside a system that won't help men and boys. He personally and for his own sleazy profit intentionally bilked one of the largest syste…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 09:11 PM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Kopyto In 1989, Kopyto was charged with professional misconduct by the Law Society of Upper Canada for allegedly overbilling the province's legal aid plan by $150,000 over a three-year period....The three-person disciplinary committee recommended disbarring Kopyto. The Law Society's benchers voted to disbar the lawyer on November 7, 1989. Among the findings of the tribunal hearing the case were that it was physically impossible for Kopyto to have billed the su…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 06:52 PM
0

As /u/Karissa36 has pointed out, roughly $50,000 in money has been crowdfunded to support this action. If the goal was to make money, then this action has been a complete failure. The issue is who the goal was to make money for. Get donations to cover the costs of suit, airline tickets, accommodations, food and the mysterious per diems for the Honey Badgers, lots of publicity for your "quest for justice" to draw in even more donations, and then keep any settlement or verdict for yourself. After …
/r/MensRights18/01/18 06:33 PM
2

I have settled literally thousands of civil suits in my career. Less than 5 percent had an NDA. Even with medical malpractice many clients refuse to agree to it.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 06:15 PM
1

No, what is dragging it on longer is that it took a year for their "paralegal" to sue the right parties.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 06:05 PM
0

Actually very few settlements require an NDA. Most often this is used for professional liability settlements like medical malpractice.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 06:03 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/7o7m27/so_what_happened_to_the_honey_badger_brigade_vs/ds7w6nv/ [–]weltallic 9 points 13 days ago* In all likelyhood: a settlement on the condition of no further comment. "Let us make this crystal clear: If you discuss the payout; even the smallest tweet even hinting at the outcome... then the entirety of the settlement is null and void and will be withdrawn and you will be held liable. So I offer you this friendly advice: enjoy your fuckton of cas…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 05:36 PM
1

They have already collected more in donations, the majority allocated toward airfare, accommodations, food, and mysterious "per diems" solely for themselves than they can recover in this lawsuit. It is impossible for them to recover more than 50K in the court they filed this lawsuit in.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 05:29 PM
7

Big commercial passenger planes are very safe. Smaller planes are not. Smaller commercial planes are often used to transport goods and passengers to isolated regions with harsh terrain and weather conditions. When I lived in Alaska it seemed like a small plane went down on average about twice a month. These pilots were a lot more like taxi drivers than pilots who work for big commercial airlines. They own their own plane, make their own deals and fly into "airports" that are scarcely more than a…
/r/MensRights06/01/18 02:23 AM
1

Marriage vastly improves father's rights in a custody battle.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 04:46 PM
-4

This is a double edged sword. It is unfair that he is paying child support for a child that is not his. However, it would be just as unfair if after raising a child he thought was his son for three years, his Ex could just get a paternity test and completely cut him out of the child's life. The law hurts men in this situation but it also protects them and the family relationship they have established.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 04:42 PM
3

Dirt and pine needles in a vagina are going to be painful.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 03:27 AM
5

So what does the above tell you? It tells me that she is a pretty experienced party girl. I wonder how many times she’s 'hooked up' at parties where she was totally sloshed and incoherent, but just chalked those up to 'having fun.' We are talking about an individual who clearly does not learn from her mistakes. Now not learning from her mistakes and getting 'caught' by the Swedes is ruining Brock Turner’s life forever. If this is Brock's "truth" he should still be in prison. Dirt and pine needle…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 01:22 AM
1

But the employer is not the one in the clutches of this vicious, corrupt, selectively blind entity. While I disagree with your assessment of the court, you are basically correct. The employer is not a party in the case so the judge has limited or no power over the employer. So from the court's perspective there are only two parties. The man has more control over his employer than the mother does. It is his responsibility to make sure the employer sends in the money. As always, rule number one pr…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 07:29 PM
11

I am going to take this opportunity to use this case as a teachable moment. First, the person who really belongs in jail here is this man's employer. The way child support works is the employer gets notice from the court to withhold some wages every pay period and send them to child support enforcement instead. Some unscrupulous employers will deduct the wages from the paycheck but not send them to the court. The man does not know this. He knows he was paid for example $200. less that week and e…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 06:43 PM
-3

The problem here is that babies can't roll over until they are around 4 months of age. So any reported fall in a younger baby is going to be automatically viewed as very suspect for abuse. Chris should be able to obtain supervised visitation soon.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 12:16 AM
1

We probably won’t even get a monetary reward. The point of this is to contest corporate abuse of power and to pave the way for others to contest it. In small claims court? You have to be kidding. You understand that in small claims court you are extremely unlikely to even get a published decision, right? LOL. You are not setting any precedent.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 05:49 AM
-2

Guess what? In the real world you just look up the appropriate corporate entities on publicly available information. There is no such thing as a ghost corporation either in the U.S. or Canada. You don't have to sit around and just hope that maybe the defendants voluntarily tell who they are so you can sue them. Now and then you might need to sue a couple extra corporations just to make sure you included the right ones and parse it out later. That is what real lawyers do. Under no circumstances d…
/r/MensRights13/11/17 05:37 AM
1

A judgment occurs when a case is finally ended and the appeal period has run out. Not when a trial is still pending. You do not have a judgment and you have not set any precedent. Merely managing to keep your case in court instead of having it dismissed before trial, which pretty much any fool can do, means absolutely zero for precedent.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 03:55 AM
-5

Our case has set a precedent for other small businesses and content creators to pursue redress under “injurious falsehood” in Alberta Civil Courts. If we do anything, we’ve made the way a little easier for other people who own small businesses who have their business dealings maligned by media or corporate gatekeepers. HA HA HA! NOTHING in a small claims court case that hasn't even gone to judgment yet sets any kind of precedent. The opinion, even if written which I seriously doubt, won't even b…
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:27 AM
-5

Oh yes, another money grab by the Honey Badgers for this hopelessly worthless lawsuit yet again raises it's ugly head. The questions are just never ending. Why are they now set to raise more than 50K total to fund a lawsuit (and airfare and hotel fees and per diem fees and wages and God only knows what else) when they filed in a court where the most they can ever recover is only 50K? Does that sound like a good use of donated funds? Why do they keep asking for attorney fees when they are not eve…
/r/MensRights12/11/17 07:15 AM
1

That update did not explain how they collected more donated money for "litigation" costs, travel and whatever, then they could ever hope to recover in the court they sued in. Or why they are not even being represented by a licensed attorney.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 12:32 AM
1

So what is going on with that hopelessly worthless lawsuit the honey badgers collected so much money to fund? Haven't heard any updates lately.
/r/MensRights11/10/17 11:56 PM
2

Sigh. You have clearly never had a child in high level gymnastics or on a traveling soccer team. Don't even talk to me about ballet or hockey. Edit: I am not saying that these are the only choices. I am just saying that I have personally been in the position of telling a very highly talented child, "Look kid, don't plan on going to college or anywhere else off your talent in sports X. Cause I have to work and so does your dad and we don't have the time to be carting you around endlessly for this…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 11:21 PM
6

Do nothing because there is a 99.9 percent chance that nothing else is going to happen. You unfortunately today came into the vicinity of crazy. A very long time ago one of my psych professors explained that mental illness type paranoia is basically arrogance. Since the unreasonable "someone is following me" etc really means that someone gives a shit about me. As compared to the reality that nope, no one really cares where you are walking or whatever. Just in case in the future do be super consc…
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:59 AM
8

Your wife might like this sub-reddit. I do. https://www.reddit.com/r/MealPrepSunday/
/r/MensRights11/10/17 03:23 AM
2

All evidence shows that children have the best upbringing when both parents are involved. Sure, and you know why, right? Because those two parents work together and don't actually hate each other. When you have two parents who cannot get along, it is a much different story. The court steps in then to protect the child from conflict. In that case, every time, as in every time, dad loses. I am just telling you like it is. I did not make the law and it is not changing.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 10:49 PM
2

So can you breast feed? There are still some biological imperatives and newborn babies needing their mother is one of them. The law recognizes that. That law is not changing. I am just telling you what is. I didn't make the law, but better know what it is. Better not be a dick to the mother if you want to see your baby more than four hours a week.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 07:03 PM
4

No, actually. There is not a snowball's chance in hell he will get 50/50 parenting time with a breast fed baby. No, actually. No court is going to order that the baby be fed with formula instead. No, actually. No court is going to order that she use a pump to milk herself like a cow just so he can spend equal time with the baby. No, actually. He has zero rights to that baby until he establishes paternity, which is going to take at least a couple months, and then his rights for a very long time a…
/r/MensRights04/10/17 09:38 AM
1

Well now having given birth to 3 children, there is no possible way in the world that any woman has an abortion without negative emotions. It would be like chewing your arm off.
/r/MensRights11/09/17 04:37 AM
2

Don't even get me started on grandparent's day!
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:47 PM
1

You have obviously never stood over some co-worker literally having to dictate for him what to write in the card for some other co-worker who is at Betty Ford. Then do that again times 15 people. It's not fun, it's not easy, but it is what civilized and thoughtful people do.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:46 PM
-5

Interestingly, women also often do the emotional labor kind of tasks. Somebody has an extended illness, a death in the family, a new baby, a birthday, a retirement, etc? Who buys the cards, makes sure everybody signs them and that they get delivered? Women.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 10:51 AM
7

If lighter duties include making coffee, cleaning up the office kitchen, planning and bringing in food for office parties and watering the office plants then yes, it is very common. On the flip side, men lift things that are heavy. Like you said it's invisible. Nobody even notices.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 10:01 AM
1

Yes, the dumbest reason in the world. The kids have been living all the time with us for more than two years. Except the child support order still stands and he didn't make the time to hire a lawyer to change it. So more than two years of arrears. For all the time the kids have been living here.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 10:54 AM
2

The main problem for the prosecution (and the judge who does not want to be over-turned on appeal) is that the defense was claiming a First Amendment right. Awful as her behavior was the validity of this conviction is in serious legal question. A sentence like this one encourages the defense to not appeal the conviction.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:49 PM
6

I think it is sentenced to 2.5 years in prison but eligible for early release and probation after 15 months. It's pretty common in the U.S. for prisoners to be released early on probation.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:35 PM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 12:55 AM
1

And....this is one of the things that frustrates me about this sub. Seriously, what good is convincing a few randoms on Facebook going to do? Why are you spinning your wheels like this? Get political, get active, do something concrete.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 05:39 PM
1

Generally speaking if you are in the U.S., going to court to file for custody and visitation is the only answer.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 05:33 PM
3

The 75% is important in terms of mental health after a divorce. The person who files for divorce has effectively already checked out of the relationship. It may have taken them years to get to that point of emotional disengagement. The non-filing party may be caught by surprise and take years to get to the same point.
/r/MensRights21/07/17 07:56 PM
2

By delaying the abortion. The law would also delay care and allow for the "father" of the fetus, or a "grandparent," to essentially block a woman's abortion. For example, if there is a dispute between a woman and her sexual partner about how to deal with the remains, the issue would have to go to court. "That's just nuts," Camp said. "These woman would just be sitting around, waiting." The longer the delay the more risky and expensive an abortion becomes. Also there are very few clinics that do …
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:25 PM
2

Meetup.com If you can't find a group there then you can start one there.
/r/MensRights15/07/17 03:03 PM
1

I'm guessing that you do not have children. Especially that you do not have multiple children. When you move from one on one to zone defense kids are more free to run around.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 10:23 PM
6

They might have broken up, but she is not over him. Objecting to him dating other people confirms this. Since how would that affect the baby? Not at all. The "bring me food and do stuff in my house" is an attempt to pull him back in so they can play happy couple.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:52 PM
1

Or just possibly maybe parents do not want their young daughters looking at strangers' penises. Maybe you wouldn't be all that comfortable standing at a urinal with a small girl looking at your's. Kids can be hard to control. This is less about discrimination and more about social etiquette.
/r/MensRights04/07/17 09:40 PM
-23

It's not just that women do not like STEM fields. It's also that the men in some STEM fields tend to be kind of quirky. Like somewhere on the high functioning autism spectrum kind of quirky. Poor social skills and especially bad with women. So who wants to work with that all day and every day? It's not so much the material of certain STEM fields. (Women are doing just fine in medicine, thank you.) It's the culture of certain STEM fields that women find hostile. (Computer science, I am looking at…
/r/MensRights04/07/17 01:18 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAfxs0IDeMs Sperm jacking and paternity fraud in the same immensely popular at the time song. (This is a fun post, OP. Thank you.)
/r/MensRights30/06/17 04:12 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QN_89-_K3f0 I had an interesting discussion with some teenage girls recently about how this really was considered a love song when it came out. Today the poor guy would have a restraining order slapped on him.
/r/MensRights30/06/17 03:46 AM
2

Add in here that it is very socially awkward for fathers to take young daughters to the bathroom. Mothers can take both young sons and daughters to the bathroom. Kids have to go to the bathroom a lot, so this puts a lot of extra traffic in the women's room.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 06:39 PM
13

In a nutshell, the MRM lacks maturity. From Paul Elam being obnoxious and unreasonably combative, to MGTOW's insisting that marriage is worse than death every single time, to frustrated young men whining that confirming consent would interfere with their ability to get laid, to paranoid dipshits constantly saying "always be recording", to randoms who want us involved in their Facebook arguments with other randoms, to high school boys insisting that not being able to wear shorts to school is some…
/r/MensRights28/06/17 05:34 PM
29

Oh for heaven's sake! What does she intend to do about his bodily autonomy when he is 2 years old and determined to run into the street? There is at least a couple years there where your toddler and young child does NOT want to hold your hand in parking lots and other dangerous places. And what about when he has a toddler tantrum melt down in the middle of a restaurant or grocery store? She is just not going to pick him up and haul him out to the car? StupidMomDecisions
/r/MensRights17/06/17 02:13 PM
1

Correct, when it comes to unmarried parents, mom is the parent of baby (for obvious reasons) and dad is a maybe. An unmarried father must take affirmative steps to prove his paternity and assert parental rights. This might be by an affidavit of paternity or by signing his name on the birth certificate or by going to court to demand a DNA test to prove paternity. This must absolutely be done in a timely manner. Wait a couple years and you are very likely to lose all parental rights.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 12:54 AM
1

You should be able to obtain a custody and parenting time order that prevents your child from being removed from the country without your permission. Unfortunately, as long as the crazy wretched hag is not a danger to your child there is little you can do about it. You might find /r/JustNoMIL helpful in getting the mother on board with setting reasonable boundaries for grandma.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 02:13 PM
1

Do you have a custody and parenting time order? If you are in the U.S., not married to the mother and do not have a court order then the mother can take the baby out of State without your permission. Your odds of getting a restraining order against grandma in this situation are basically zero. If you do have a custody and parenting time order that prevents the child from being taken out of State without permission from the other parent then you have some possible recourse if you go to court and …
/r/MensRights30/05/17 12:50 PM
1

Note here -- nothing but crickets.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:54 PM
1

Show me one doctor in the western world who'd recommend that a pregnant woman should start drinking. Show me one doctor in the western world who'd recommend that anyone ride a motorcycle. You have a whole lot of more chances to become an organ donor than I do. So should we make all motorcycles illegal? Should we err on the side of caution? No, of course not, that might interfere with your precious bodily autonomy. Since you actually seem to be a shitty person, kindly be advised that from your po…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 08:37 AM
1

Kindly inform me of an issue that affects ONLY men, and an attempt to control ONLY men's bodies, that the medical establishment has undeniably been lying to the American public about for the last three decades. Holy shit, you are correct!!! Circumcision of male infants does fit into this category.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:56 AM
1

This work was primarily supported by grant number AA01455-01-15 from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Right, because they are not biased or anything. /s Note that they also only found an adverse effect to the child when alcohol consumption was at least or more than two drinks per day in pregnancy. I personally would not consider 14 drinks a week to be moderate drinking. Whether pregnant or not.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:18 AM
0

The fact that the recipients of the advice in question are women is, in my opinion, incidental. Well whoop de doo for you. Since you are convinced that it is only incidental that the medical establishment has been lying for the past three decades in an attempt to control pregnant women's bodies, I am sure that you can give us a few examples where they have also been doing this to men. Waiting... Waiting... Crickets...
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:07 AM
1

There are men's vitamins, children's vitamins, women's vitamins and pregnant women's vitamins. All based on some semblance of scientific proof about the needs of different people. This is not sexism. Also, if people had no special concern for a pregnant woman's health and well-being, When are you going to get a grip here? Show me some studies that actually prove having even one single alcoholic drink will adversely affect a pregnant woman's health. Can't find any? Yeah, me either. This is not ab…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 05:01 AM
1

Focus again. Why are we only concerned about alcohol related injuries that remotely, extremely remotely and without any medical proof, might possibly maybe be caused by pregnant women ingesting small amounts of alcohol? Not that we can prove it actually causes any harm of course. Tell me again why this incessant urge to control pregnant women's bodies, in the complete absence of any competent medical proof of harm, is not sexism. Be sure to include examples where the medical establishment has sp…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:45 AM
1

Oh wonderful, I am really glad that you don't think this is sexism. Kindly inform me of an issue that affects ONLY men, and an attempt to control ONLY men's bodies, that the medical establishment has undeniably been lying to the American public about for the last three decades. The doctors even admit it. I am really waiting to hear this. Since pretending that a slight amount of alcohol poses grave risks to a fetus, despite the lack of any scientific proof, is not sexism. According to you. (By th…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 04:29 AM
1

Are you aware that drugs, alcohol and high heat can damage sperm? Do you know that we now have a definitive link between autism and older fathers? Kindly list for us all of the things that you think men should be legally required to do before conception in order to "not fuck up their child for life".
/r/MensRights20/05/17 03:56 AM
1

Caring ONLY about infrequent alcohol related injuries that might be possibly caused by pregnant women, while ignoring the vastly greater alcohol related injuries and deaths actually caused by young men, is sexist. That's what you don't seem to understand. Somehow, amazingly, when it comes to trying to control what people do with their bodies, the "context" is very very often limited to pregnant women.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 09:25 PM
0

That blue writing in my above comment? We call that a link. Click on it.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 09:11 PM
1

Are you perfectly good driving after a single drink of Scotch? I'm pretty sure there are many studies that show even a single drink can slightly impair your driving abilities. WHY ARE YOU TAKING THAT CHANCE? WHY ARE YOU TAKING THAT RISK? DON"T YOU KNOW YOU COULD POSSIBLY HURT SOMEBODY? That's what it is like being pregnant. Get pregnant and society suddenly feels entitled to judge even your most trivial life choices, based on flimsy or no actual evidence. This isn't the sub for it, but I would l…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 08:43 PM
2

You keep repeating this as if that makes it true. It's not. Source? because we don't know how much alcohol puts you at risk. http://www.french-paradox.net/book/fpbkch19.html On the contrary, we have a very good idea how much alcohol puts you at a reasonable risk level. You act like protecting defenseless babies is a bad thing. Protecting defenseless babies against the world's most remote chance of harm by lying and trying to control all pregnant women's bodies IS a bad thing. Women are entitled …
/r/MensRights19/05/17 07:55 PM
0

http://www.french-paradox.net/book/fpbkch19.html On the contrary, we have a pretty good idea how much it takes to be dangerous. That's kind of the whole point here. Hysterical over-reactions to the extremely extremely remote chance of harm from a single alcoholic beverage during pregnancy are just ridiculous.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 07:19 PM
1

Are you really suggesting that the class of ALL PREGNANT WOMEN is somehow equivalent to the class of CONVICTED CRIMINALS ON PAROLE? without even remotely having any valid evidence that it is harmful. Convicted criminals have already demonstrated an inability to adhere to expected social standards. Alcohol abuse is rampant in this population. Alcohol is involved in 40 percent of violent crimes. Parole is designed to hopefully prevent recidivism and alcohol consumption is not conducive to this. Go…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 07:12 PM
0

Considering that it's currently impossible to cure neonatal herpes, which can severely harm and kill babies, wouldn't it just make sense to never have sex until after you are married? https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC321459/ While fluctuations in the incidence of neonatal HSV disease have been observed, the current estimated rate of occurrence is approximately 1 in 3,200 deliveries. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/fasd/data.html Using medical and other records, CDC studies have identified…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 06:45 PM
1

http://www.french-paradox.net/book/fpbkch19.html The medical research is really not all that ambiguous. We have lots of research that failed to show any harm, and in many cases showed a benefit, to moderate drinking in pregnancy.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 06:04 PM
1

http://www.french-paradox.net/book/fpbkch19.html More information on this subject.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:50 PM
0

The issue here is that drinking small amounts of alcohol while pregnant has not been shown to harm the baby and may even be beneficial. The medical establishment is basically lying about this because they are concerned that if they admit it some women will drink too much and that may harm the baby. This is profoundly disrespectful to the vast majority of pregnant women who are perfectly capable of limiting their alcohol intake. How would you like it if you were told that you have to give up all …
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:40 PM
1

Much like we do with pregnant women... Famous last words. Show me an example in which we tell an entire group of men that they should not have even one alcoholic beverage for a sustained period of time, (as in months, not days or hours), without even remotely having any valid evidence that it is harmful.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:02 PM
-1

Why don't we impose the "slightest inconvenience" of not ever drinking any alcohol on men ages 18 to 40? They are the ones who are causing one hell of a lot more alcohol related injuries and deaths than pregnant women. If we were actually interested in public health we would be imposing alcohol restrictions on the group that causes more alcohol related injuries. Unless of course the underlying goal is really to control the bodies of pregnant women. In that case we will just ignore the huge numbe…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 12:41 PM
-1

Why are you only interested in alcohol related injuries that might be caused by pregnant women? Men ages 18 to 40 cause vastly more injuries and deaths that are alcohol related, so why don't we tell this group not to drink? That would be much more effective if what we actually cared about was promoting public health and safety.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 12:04 PM
-7

That being said, I don't see the sexism in this particular thing. This only affects women. That is the sexism. Consuming too much alcohol (by both sexes) causes all kinds of injuries and fatalities. So why are we only focused on policing the behavior of pregnant women? https://www.alcoholrehabguide.org/alcohol/crimes/ On average, roughly 40 percent of inmates who are incarcerated for violent offenses were under the influence of alcohol during the time of their crime. Well now, we all know which …
/r/MensRights19/05/17 05:26 AM
-1

In 2007 the government changed its stance and, despite the lack of new evidence, recommended total abstinence during pregnancy closely followed by similar advice from the British Medical Association. But a year later the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) said that there was no evidence of harm provided women drank no more than one or two units a week. Dr Gavaghan, writing in the Journal of Medical Ethics, said research from the University of London seems to back up thi…
/r/MensRights19/05/17 04:09 AM
12

A residential college at the Australian National University has banned students from playing Daddy Cool hit Eagle Rock at certain events in a bid to prevent an associated tradition in which male students join arms, encircle women and drop their pants. News flash! That is already a crime. No, you don't get to join arms, encircle strange women and show them your dicks. No matter what song is playing.
/r/MensRights14/05/17 09:07 AM
3

Sounds nice, doesn't it? Never been on Tinder, but as a pretty attractive woman with experience on a couple dating sites, I can tell you this. It's not real until you meet. Messages don't mean anything. How many of these women actually came through? Heck, how many of them actually even showed up? How many of them were even actually female? Maybe less than 50 percent. Things like this don't mean anything. It's not real until you meet. Once you do meet it's going to be a very rare woman who doesn'…
/r/MensRights04/03/17 03:35 AM
1

It's a social club but also it is very typical for all fraternity members to live together in the same fraternity house. Space is obviously limited. So imagine about 15 or 20 guys all living in a very big house. With maybe 3 or 4 bathrooms. Women living in the same house is definitely going to change that dynamic.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 03:15 AM
5

After which (c) she hates your fucking guts and (d) you can kiss off on any hope of amicable co-parenting for the rest of your life. Damned if you do and damned if you don't.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 07:55 PM
1

How are communities selected for “popular”? We selected the top most popular subreddits and then removed: Any NSFW communities Any subreddits that had opted out of r/all. A handful of subreddits that were heavily filtered out of users’ r/all. In the long run, we will generate and maintain this list via an automated process. In the interim, we will do periodic reviews of popular subreddits and adding new subreddits to the list. How will this work for users? Logged out users will automatically see…
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:56 PM
1

I think that you are under-estimating what those possible side effects could be and the litigation happy U.S. mentality. Worst case scenario -- maybe 1 out of 1,000 times it doesn't stop the sperm, but instead lets defective sperm pass that result in severe birth defects in offspring. That's a quick trip to bankruptcy for the company and it's a problem that's unlikely to be caught in prior testing. Second worst (and almost inevitable) case scenario -- some men claim it has caused ED and/or impot…
/r/MensRights08/02/17 05:35 PM
2

Wait it out. The odds of this alleged victim and her witness showing up in court to testify against you are very slim.
/r/MensRights07/02/17 07:05 PM
2

It would be just as profitable as the IUD, a long term reversible contraceptive for women. I think it's more a matter of the risk involved from starting from scratch with men, instead of just continually reinventing the wheel on women's contraceptives. I also think that we have become accustomed to accepting a certain level of complications for women's contraceptives and companies are not sure that any complications would be as well accepted for men. It's easier to justify the risk with women be…
/r/MensRights07/02/17 06:46 PM
3

It is not bad advice on paternity and child support just because it isn't the advice that you want to hear.
/r/MensRights04/02/17 09:52 PM
4

Actually, I agree with you about AA. However, if your spouse in a high conflict divorce is complaining about your drinking, you damn well stop drinking.
/r/MensRights01/02/17 06:26 AM
4

Anything seem off here? Well, yes. She is complaining that he drinks too much and he is complaining that she goes to too many AA meetings. Come on, if you were the judge, which one would you give the kids to? It's then that he drinks too much, which he does, so he went from drinking every night to just on the weekends. That is not going to be good enough. Not in a high conflict divorce. Get your buddy to some AA meetings himself and find him a sponsor who can testify in court.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 10:30 PM
2

Excellent State subsidized child care would go a very long way in balancing out the responsibilities of both parents. As long as we have a system where it is economically unfeasible or incompatible with a job for a substantial proportion of parents to work, somebody is going to be primarily responsible for child care and somebody is going to be primarily responsible for making income.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 08:48 PM
1

It's because the general public can't differentiate, or in some cases does not choose to differentiate, between MRA's, MGTOW's, the Red Pill, pick-up artists and incels.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 08:40 PM
6

Statute of limitations has probably run out and no charges can be filed. It's usually around 4 years for statutory rape.
/r/MensRights19/01/17 08:31 PM
1

We have six people on our witness list, we would also like to bring up the team to help fill the courtroom plus we have to cover the travel costs for our legal agent, Harry. This is a total of 12 people. Basic math. It's a thing.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 07:24 PM
-1

How the hell do you think change is made? Not by a very minor contract dispute by an unknown comic in small claims court, who derailed and disrupted a conference at a Con and then put it on YouTube. If this is the best way we can figure out how to spend $45K, MRA's might as well just throw in the towel right now.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 11:51 AM
0

Read the other comments on the prior post. I mean the comments from redditors who are NOT part of the Honey Badgers and trying to get free airplane tickets and hotel rooms. I am always amused by people who try to dismiss me as a troll on this sub. My post history begs to differ: https://www.reddit.com/user/Karissa36/submitted/ Personal insults are not going to help you win any arguments. Especially not a cost versus benefit analysis of collecting over $45,000. in donations for a very remote chan…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 02:27 AM
-4

http://www.feedthebadger.com/projects/honey-badger-brigade-legal-fund/ So far the Honey Badgers have collected approximately $45,000. in two separate requests for donations just to bring this hopelessly shitty case to trial. It's not even the Honey Badger's case. The only plaintiff is Alison Teiman, and it's going to be very hard for Alison to prove damages, even if she miraculously manages to win. Which she most likely will not. The previous post from ten days ago is here and you will note from…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 12:45 AM
-2

Ok you have a point here, and I respect that. You have your reasons. Except I just choose to not believe it. I am a very strong person, but if I hurt anyone, it hurts me. It really seriously hurts now. I just refuse to believe that most normally competent persons would just randomly choose destruction, would just choose to hurt anyone, let alone their loved ones. That's not my world and it's damn well not going to be. If I am blind, well then I choose to stay that way.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 04:23 AM
-4

No. Just no. I understand the need to be cautious because there are too many crazies out there. You have your problems and I have mine. You duck false accusations while I duck the stalkers. But I understand that 90 percent or more of men are not like that. Neither are 90 percent of more of the women.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 02:42 AM
3

Texas is one of those weird States where your child support obligation is not reduced based on how much you have the children. 50/50 won't do a damn thing to reduce it. No one cares if she had an affair. That also will do nothing to reduce your child support or to give you more of the marital assets. Expect to divide the marital assets and debt 50/50.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 07:49 AM
-8

No. Actually, no. Mentally healthy women do not make false claims of rape and assault. This is a problem that exists in an extremely small minority of women. Just make sure that you get to know her first. It's not all that hard to recognize mental illness and dysfunction.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 07:38 AM
1

Correct, but first she is going to have to prove that she actually sold comics before this. Also this was like a 2 or 3 day convention and she spent one entire day there and was kicked out the next morning. So the amount (if any) of her sales originating from that first day is going to be important.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 05:14 PM
4

The article actually has three different restaurants doing this using different code words. Yeah, WTF? Secret posters in women's bathrooms basically saying, "Don't like him? We will get him away from you."
/r/MensRights29/12/16 09:45 PM
4

How much did you collect in donations?
/r/MensRights29/12/16 12:11 AM
5

This is not the Honey Badgers trial. This is Alison Tieman's case and only Alison Tieman's case. She is the only listed plaintiff.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 11:42 PM
1

Women also have both sexual and reproductive health to take care of. This is a one purpose app that doesn't address anyone's sexual health.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 11:39 PM
4

You went to the Con on donated funds to begin with. Remember? That makes it rather hard to believe that YOU sustained much in pecuniary damages.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 11:34 PM
3

Dream on. For the judge this case is only a tempest in a teapot. Considering the very minor amount of possible damages it is nothing but an annoyance. That's what you should be concerned about. The judge couldn't care less about gamergate, men's rights or feminism in the context of a very minor contract dispute.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 10:51 PM
2

So where exactly is the badger cave? Are the services that it provides listed on any web site? If I don't make that business separate from myself, it will only exist as long as I do. So who owns the business?
/r/MensRights28/12/16 10:38 PM
2

The donations collected allegedly for the suit are grossly in excess of any possible damages that could be proven or awarded. It's a money making scheme to obtain donations.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 10:31 PM
4

If they are not on your witness list, they are not going to testify. Period. End of story. Note that this is not the Honey Badger's case. This is only Alison Teiman's case. Alison Teiman is in the best position to testify about her contractual dispute and her damages. A couple of the other Honey Badgers who were present at the con might also be helpful to fill in details of what occurred, but flying in random "team" members who weren't even present is absurd. That's why you only have six people …
/r/MensRights28/12/16 10:24 PM
6

This is for reproductive health, not sexual health. Women have monthly cycles to track and need to know when best to time intercourse for reproduction. Men do not.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 08:02 PM
3

Must be a very small club since the Honey Badger website doesn't even list it.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 06:41 PM
1

This person is a troll. Says the person who went on YouTube requesting funds to build her own private club house. How's that working out?
/r/MensRights28/12/16 04:35 PM
3

Let's look at where the money they are requesting is allocated as per their own fund raising site. Only $1000. is for attorney fees, presumably because they have already collected enough to pay their lawyer. They are however requesting a substantial sum of money to fly, feed and put up in a hotel six people, (their team), who are not expected to testify and have no role at all in this trial. Six people watching are obviously not going to "fill the courtroom" or have any impact at all on the verd…
/r/MensRights28/12/16 07:10 AM
2

Let's look at where the money you are requesting is allocated as per your own fund raising site. Only $1000. is for attorney fees, presumably because you have already collected enough to pay your lawyer. You are however requesting a substantial sum of money to fly, feed and put up in a hotel six people, (your team), who are not expected to testify and have no role at all in this trial. Six people watching are obviously not going to "fill the courtroom" or have any impact at all on the verdict. W…
/r/MensRights28/12/16 07:05 AM
5

The Mary Sue did not publish anything until after they were kicked out and so can't be liable for that. As for the convention itself, it retained wide powers to kick out anyone disruptive or bothersome in any way. The Honey Badgers not only disrupted a meeting, they put it on video and on You Tube the night before they were kicked out. Plus their alleged damages are all complete crap. No one in the Honey Badgers was even remotely a successful cartoon artist before this, and trying to claim that …
/r/MensRights24/12/16 11:45 AM
2

This is nothing but a scam to make money. There is not a snowball's chance in hell they will win this lawsuit.
/r/MensRights24/12/16 04:05 AM
1

Sure. If you just happen to have minimum 80K net after taxes or more to blow on a surrogate. Who may not conceive the first, second or third time.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:39 AM
1

Well, when you walk into a police station and say some men raped you, but you have absolutely no clue who those men are, that's pretty much the end of their investigation.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 06:32 AM
1

Eight minutes of video is not going to prove everything that happened in a three hour period.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 03:57 PM
2

You need to understand that 6 or 8 minutes of cell phone video, in sexual encounters with multiple men that occurred over hours, isn't evidence of consent. Especially when consent was never mentioned in those videos. She could agree to have sex with one man and not another. She can withdraw consent to continue at any time. The "proof" that you think exists simply does not. Now these players are in a position to try to prove that she consented to having a train run on her while multiple strangers…
/r/MensRights17/12/16 09:19 PM
1

Colleges can basically make their own rules. It's not against the law to stand on a corner and yell, "N-word, N-word, N-word." Can a college kick a student out for that? You bet. No doubt about it.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 08:53 PM
1

There are no videos saying that she consents. To either the sex or to being filmed or to that film being disseminated to many other students. Just filming secretly and disseminating the film to other students is enough to get these players kicked out of college for sexual harassment. http://kstp.com/kstpimages/repository/cs/files/U%20of%20M%20EOAA%20redacted4.pdf This is the college's investigative report and decision. It's more than a little hard to say that any of these guys were heroes.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 08:50 PM
2

http://kstp.com/kstpimages/repository/cs/files/U%20of%20M%20EOAA%20redacted4.pdf Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is not the standard for college hearings. It's very hard to read this and believe that they were all innocent.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 08:41 PM
1

http://kstp.com/kstpimages/repository/cs/files/U%20of%20M%20EOAA%20redacted4.pdf
/r/MensRights17/12/16 08:38 PM
1

http://kstp.com/kstpimages/repository/cs/files/U%20of%20M%20EOAA%20redacted4.pdf Not necessarily.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 08:36 PM
1

While not generally acknowledged, plenty of abortions occur because the pregnant woman decides, "I am not dealing with this asshole for a lifetime." This case is an excellent illustration of that.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 08:19 PM
5

They will lose their scholarships. That's a very high price to pay to support your team mates for "running a train" on a woman who objected immediately after getting away from them.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 08:05 PM
6

These players were involved in "running a train" on a woman who immediately after being able to leave was very certain that she did not consent to that. While I certainly agree that she should have been a whole lot more vocal and physical about not consenting at the time, (yeah, yeah, go ahead and accuse me of blaming the victim), I also think that when you are involved in dubious group sexual activity with a complete stranger that 99.99 percent of women would never agree to, you have one hell o…
/r/MensRights17/12/16 08:01 PM
7

http://kstp.com/kstpimages/repository/cs/files/U%20of%20M%20EOAA%20redacted4.pdf This is the University's EOAA investigative report. I think claiming that this was a fake accusation is perhaps going a bit too far.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 03:55 PM
0

http://kstp.com/kstpimages/repository/cs/files/U%20of%20M%20EOAA%20redacted4.pdf The college's investigative report.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 02:54 PM
1

Do not drop out of school. Your child support will be based on your income. Better education generally results in higher lifetime income for both you and the child. This is better in the long run for both of you. Once the baby is born get a paternity test and then file for visitation and joint custody. You won't get much visitation as long as she is breast feeding but you can negotiate a step up plan that increases it as your child gets older.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 09:29 PM
2

https://np.reddit.com/r/IncelHeaven/comments/5e2u54/for_beta_orbiters/ This is what you think their place is. Seriously, dude, it's no wonder you are incel.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 09:00 PM
2

https://np.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/5ee1pm/my_wife_broke_up_with_me_today_heartbroken_shes/dac70w1/ Don't want to point the finger OP but I can see why your SO is leaving. You have a nice car, nice rig, nice chair, buy games and spend money constantly but you've been out of work for over a year.. "Depression and anxiety" are terrible things but if you loom on them and top it off with no real schedule (just sit at home and game) they just get worse. Even now you don't want to make any s…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 05:11 PM
3

This study was done only in New Zealand. It is doubtful that identical results would occur in the U.S. since New Zealand is a much more socialist country. New Zealand taxes pay for far more government welfare type services, for socialized health care and for old age pensions.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 04:56 PM
10

Researchers looked at markers of fatherly involvement such as being confident with their child, forming a strong bond, feeling fulfilled and parenthood making them feel closer to their partner. They then gave fathers a score on a relative scale for three different factors: emotional response to the child; how frequently they were involved in domestic chores and childcare; and how secure they were in their role as a father. Missing from this study is the acknowledgment that fathers who are able t…
/r/MensRights23/11/16 03:56 PM
-2

Most people do not agree with that Most people like who? The FDA sure as hell agrees with that. Hormonal birth control with substantially greater risks for women is still being sold isn't it?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:23 PM
-1

Correction: SOME women have access to abortion SOMETIMES.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:17 PM
0

Why suggest that to MRAs? We're not the ones who created those hoops. Do you think I did? I'm still stuck with them regardless. When you want financial abortion, which is premised on the right to an actual abortion, it's extremely reasonable to consider the obstacles that prevent that right. You just want to sign a piece of paper instead? Well, aren't you special. Her rights and his rights go hand in hand. If you won't support her reproductive rights, don't expect any great interest in supportin…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:10 PM
0

I oppose men having financial abortion when many women as a practical matter don't have the right to an actual abortion. Take away the right to an actual abortion and financial abortion makes no sense.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 04:56 PM
-4

They immediately went on the attack, calling men babies when a prototype birth control pill was announced to have extremely dangerous side effects like rendering men permanently infertile and one man who took it even committed suicide and the fact there were actually lives involved in this yet feminists in particular chose to mock it does not sit well with me. Oh God, have you ever heard of the Dalkon shield and infertility? Do you know what the actual risks of hormonal birth control are for str…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 04:43 PM
0

The only difference is that now, for the first time, you're concerned about the risk of your own rights being partly eroded. Wake up and smell the coffee. Abortion rights have been under attack for decades. Decades, and significant erosion of those rights has already occurred. Many many women have been consistently fighting to protect the right to abortion for decades. The only difference is that now that fight just got a lot harder. Where the hell is your reproductive choice if I don't have one…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 04:23 PM
-2

The person using Congress subpoenas to lean on abortion doctors is Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), apparently a woman. Yes, I know. I mentioned that in my post twice. This is not a men vs women deal. (It's also not a democrat v republican deal.) Second: Roe v. Wade happened under Nixon and a Republican SCOTUS (one of the 2 dissenting opinion was a Democrat, actually); it survived reagan and a pair of Bushes. Is there any sign of an incoming reversal? Yes, there is actually. Roe v Wade has been the m…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 04:04 PM
6

Did you read the article? It was a facebook post. She never contacted the police. If lying on facebook becomes a crime we're going to need a lot more prisons.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 06:20 PM
5

If you ever want to see your son again, get this off the internet! There is far too much identifying information in this letter!
/r/MensRights19/11/16 05:08 AM
1

Speaking only on the home schooling issue, you have to remember that both Brad and Angelina were almost always working on some movie in a foreign location. If they didn't home school so the kids could come along neither parent would have seen the kids very much.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 02:35 AM
6

On February 28, 2013, in a 286–138 vote, the House passed the Senate's all-inclusive version of the bill. House Republicans had previously hoped to pass their own version of the measure—one that substantially weakened the bill's protections for certain categories. The stripped down version, which allowed only limited protection for LGBT and Native Americans, was rejected 257 to 166. The renewed act expanded federal protections to gays, lesbians and transgender individuals, Native Americans and i…
/r/MensRights16/11/16 11:07 PM
1

I agree. Absolutely. We should have laws that automatically mandate 50/50 upon separation or divorce. That should be the standard. You should have to go to court and prove with convincing evidence that 50/50 will not be good for the children to change it. We need to change the law.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 07:58 PM
2

I sympathize with your frustration, but be aware that this is not happening because you are a man. If I had a dollar for every time some random stranger talked to one of my children or gave me unsolicited parenting advice, I would be very wealthy. As you said in another comment, "I swear he would would be a better wingman then a basket of puppies and ice cream." Babies and toddlers are like a magnet. Men tend to hold back, but I can't even leave my house without some random woman telling me some…
/r/MensRights07/11/16 10:44 AM
1

However men and women are not equally situated in terms of biology. Responsibility is dependent on the options available to you. Assume we have person A with a corvette that has bad brakes and bald tires. Person B has a new SUV in excellent condition with snow tires. I have no problem at all saying that it is irresponsible for person A to drive in a heavy snow storm, but not irresponsible for person B. The "same level of personal responsibility" would be to suggest that neither A or B should dri…
/r/MensRights04/11/16 03:25 PM
-12

In my view, rape ought not be a crime, There is no point in attempting to engage with you in intelligent discourse.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 05:00 PM
-37

Irrelevant evidence is excluded in all criminal trials. Rape shield laws are not some incredibly unique due process violation. Someone on trial for bank robbery does not get to offer evidence that the bank teller witness had a previous DUI. It's possible that the witness's prior DUI might suggest that he might have been drinking the day of the bank robbery and that might have affected his ability to properly perceive and remember. The law won't allow that kind of defense evidence because it is t…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 03:36 PM
2

I personally believe that we are now raising an entire generation that is unable to concentrate on one thing for an extended period of time. It's the instagram, twitter, texting, facebook generation. Constant communication but only in short bites. Constant interruptions. Constant multi-tasking. This is going to have consequences for successfully handling sustained tasks. Boys seem more comfortable to successfully master technology earlier. This might have a down side.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 01:14 AM
1

You have plenty of legal advice here so I'll offer some parenting advice. A 1 year old and 4 year old should be taking naps and going to bed long before 10 pm. Sleep when the children sleep. Switch to paper plates and plastic cups to cut down on dishes. Cook food in large batches and freeze some for later. Kids really only need a bath every other day. Put half the toys in garbage bags in the garage and rotate the toys to cut down on clutter. This is all to help make your current situation more b…
/r/MensRights23/10/16 09:07 PM
14

Nevada. It's really a bad idea to get married in Nevada. Edit: Most people think that going there is just a quick and easy ceremony. What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. You can go right on back to your life on the East Coast. Well, no, actually you can't. Come to me and any other lawyer and that divorce will be complicated.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:01 PM
2

Looks to me like he is coming to the defense of the deputy.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 02:54 AM
2

Agreed. I would go further. All male rape consisting of made to penetrate is downplayed. It doesn't matter whether a passed out man wakes up to find himself the unwilling recipient of a blow job from a woman or a man. Either way, it will be downplayed.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 07:11 PM
1

Agreed there is a very significant number of male victims being made to penetrate. However, that does not mean that their rapists were all women. We don't know for example how many of these victims were passed out and woke up to find themselves the unwilling recipient of a blow job from a man. (Or the potential unwilling recipient of an attempted blow job by a man. Attempts count in these numbers, not just completions.) That's why the "40 percent of rapes are committed by women" statistic doesn'…
/r/MensRights17/10/16 06:57 PM
1

http://archive.is/mbOly You are correct that the 12 month figures are much the same. The problem is that we don't know how many of these men were forced to penetrate by other men. For example, how many of these men unwillingly received a blowjob from another man? Either through force or while passed out or the other possibilities? You can't say that 40 percent of rapists are women when we don't know how many of the above rapists were actually women.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 06:04 PM
1

Look into the White Ribbon fiasco with Elam and Pizzey. She lost a whole lot of credibility with that one.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 03:10 PM
-2

Since the entire point of this thread was why is Google manipulating data on Erin Pizzey, my comment is very relevant. Unless you happen to have another opinion on why that might be occurring.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 12:33 AM
3

I really couldn't care less about any of these allegations against Mr. Clinton or Trump. Unless they are raping someone in an alley, I really don't care who they got a blow job from, or didn't. It has nothing to do with running the country. My personal and I think very rational opinion, is that everyone is entitled to make a pass once. With no repercussions. Get a firm no thank you and just keep coming again and again? Well, then I might get mad. Once is just fine. Once is even kind of expected …
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:24 PM
-13

Perhaps we should talk about the disgusting and manipulative use of an old and sick Erin Pizzey by Paul Elam to attempt to high-jack the White Ribbon organization. Along with how horribly that attempt failed and all of the bad press that occurred for years. That's kind of hard to come back from especially when you are old and sick.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:04 PM
4

It's pretty much human nature. You won't get too many men saying there is anything wrong with their willies. That's not a place they want to go. Understandably.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 07:54 PM
3

http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/06/22/national/social-issues/nearly-40-of-single-japanese-not-interested-in-romance-survey/#.WADk6eArLIU Actually a higher percentage of Japanese women are avoiding romantic relationships than Japanese men.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 02:03 PM
9

Obligatory not your lawyer. If you want 50/50 you are going to have to get it one bite of the apple at a time. This contempt hearing will not be a slam dunk and a change in the parenting time schedule will not even be heard by the court. Likely she will only be scolded by the judge. You are however building a record of her non-compliance. You take her back to court for continuing contempt a couple more times and then you try to get 50/50 or better. Your goals for this hearing are to: Complain th…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 08:05 PM
2

The mom and girl both asked that he not be prosecuted and admitted that she lied about her age. Unfortunately, that's not the same thing as innocent.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 07:04 PM
1

Once again, blaming every woman ever born for current problems is stupid, immature, self-centered and dishonest. It is also misogynistic. Men's rights issues should be addressed in a rational manner. Not by just indulging in hate rants against women.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:35 PM
-5

It is utter nonsense that HALF THE POPULATION has no empathy for men.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 04:17 AM
-6

I think it's obvious that he is seriously lacking in empathy for HALF THE POPULATION. Not an attitude I support.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 03:57 AM
0

It's not always obvious when a kid needs surgery. Example -- appendicitis.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 03:06 AM
-5

Redditor for two hours.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:20 AM
1

Swordfish, you have been a redditor for less than one month. Your submitted posts here have been both prolific and.... Well, everyone, take a look: https://www.reddit.com/user/Swordfish101101/submitted/ I don't choose to communicate with you any longer.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 11:37 PM
-5

NO. If that kid needs surgery then eating is dangerous. A lollipop also isn't the best thing for a kid who is throwing up or has raging diarrhea. Sick kids are also particularly anxious and thus often fully into "stranger danger" mode. A friendly stranger can really freak them out. Also keep in mind that parents feel constantly judged and especially when their child is sick. The last thing you want to say when the nurse asks everything your sick child had to eat today is, "I just gave him a gree…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 08:41 PM
6

In all fairness, a hospital emergency waiting room is the absolute last place you should ask if a child wants a lollipop. That kid might have been throwing up for the past 36 hours. The parent is stressed and exhausted and not usually sure what's wrong with the child. The child is stressed, exhausted and sick. While the exhausted parent is sitting there in the waiting room anxiously (and seemingly endlessly) waiting to see a doctor, he is just as anxiously trying to keep his kid from having a to…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 08:07 PM
2

In the U.S. it is only legal to use enough force needed to stop someone in self defense. However, culturally your opinion is generally accepted. I have heard that some States have a "mutual combat" defense, and lots and lots of prosecutors recognize one informally. For me, I think it is wrong to escalate violence in the absence of a credible risk of harm. Of course, I would be retreating fast anyway and not jumping into it.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:32 AM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/56ln9u/im_sure_most_fathers_would_agree_its_time_to_give/ As we now have proof that a mother is not nessearily ideal to raise upstanding boys, it might be time to rethink the nesecity of a mother in a family unit. The human race needs to put the integrity of its males as a paramount ideal. Single mothers are not cut out for the role. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/56ii8j/if_57_of_rape_cases_dont_finish_in_conviction_it/ While we can cert…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:03 AM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6l92Ss1zDSA Perhaps we didn't watch the same video. Try this one which has cameras from both angles. He spits at her first, she slaps him and immediately backs off and walks away, he follows her into the elevator and is standing practically on top of her as she pushes the floor button, she shoves him away, then she goes to hit him and he immediately punches her in the face and knocks her out.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 10:23 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6l92Ss1zDSA Perhaps we didn't watch the same video. Try this one which has cameras from both angles. He spits at her first, she slaps him and immediately backs off and walks away, he follows her into the elevator and is standing practically on top of her as she pushes the floor button, she shoves him away, then she goes to hit him and he immediately punches her in the face and knocks her out. He wasn't trapped in that elevator. He followed her into it. That was a …
/r/MensRights10/10/16 10:00 PM
0

I don't have a problem with self defense. However a disproportionate return of force is not self defense. For example, there were far too many comments defending Ray Rice's actions because "she hit him first". No, you don't knock somebody unconscious because they slapped you.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 08:34 PM
4

Just like my politics, I consider myself independent. I call it like I see it, issue by issue, and not according to which group it comes from. Talk to me about financial abortion and we are not going to agree. Talk to me about the rights of men to have equal custody of their children, and most especially to not have their children adopted away against their will, and the rights of our sons to not be unfairly labeled rapists in kangaroo courts in college, and how both men and women should have to…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 01:38 PM
-6

LOL. So you are checking out permanently from the gene pool. It would be kind of snotty to say "thank you", since you seem very selfish, so I won't be doing that. Just remember, like everyone else in the world, best case scenario you are going to get old someday. Hopefully you will have money, but it is going to be someone else's child making your food, cleaning your house, probably changing your diapers someday. Someone else's child taking care of you. You should maybe have a whole lot more res…
/r/MensRights09/10/16 03:11 AM
-1

Hope you feel the same way when you have a heart attack at age 50. You do understand that women get sick having babies a little sooner, and then hope to return to work, but men get sick with heart attacks and strokes and cancer a little later. A lot sooner than women do. Who is holding down the fort then? When you are the one out of work for a couple months? What comes around goes around. Be careful what you ask for. You might just get it.
/r/MensRights09/10/16 02:46 AM
1

I see that you are a redditor for 26 minutes. By the way, how about actually reading the article before commenting? You know, the article I took the direct quote from.
/r/MensRights08/10/16 08:03 PM
3

Approximately....12,000 men are raped in England and Wales alone every year... Are these men also lying about it? Because the conviction statistics sure don't support this. Edit: Just noting you were a redditor for less than 3 hours when you made this post. During which time you have been very busy. https://np.reddit.com/user/Innocent4gudcause/
/r/MensRights08/10/16 07:52 PM
2

Women are by default the victims. For the benefit of other members, /r/Divorce is in my opinion one of the best subs on reddit, and the (male) moderator LaTuFu one of the best moderators ever. People come into that sub exhausted, angry, broken and bleeding and LaTuFu and others will hold your hand while gently dragging you into the light. If you need support and advice, go there.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 11:50 PM
4

Good for Indiana! However, in the absence of some other time stated in your agreement, the Guideline's weekend times will control. You have a long enough established course of conduct to most likely obtain an order allowing you to pick up earlier, but you'll have to go back to court to change the order. A letter from a lawyer threatening to do so might convince your Ex. Or it might just escalate things.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 12:01 AM
-5

I am quite certain that you are noticed by women a lot more than you think. It's just that women have learned to be very subtle about it.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:52 PM
2

Wow! That's really bad. There is a pretty good argument that only Saturday and Sunday are really the weekend. I suggest you stick to your 5:30 Friday pick-ups unless you want to go back to court.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:35 PM
2

What time does the agreement say you get them on Fridays?
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:19 PM
8

There is a much higher future success rate with frozen embryos.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 02:48 AM
0

Well, yes. I have no respect at all for people with anger management issues. How hard is it to just walk away and not hit someone?
/r/MensRights05/09/16 02:29 AM
3

Corporate America never accepted a single thing that might be inconvenient for them willingly. From child labor laws to over-time laws to FMLA, it all had to be legally shoved down their throats. Do you think your employer is going to be happy if you get a heart attack and have to stay home for eight weeks recovering? No, actually they are not. You are going to force the issue because the law is in your favor and you would prefer not to die while also being able to continue to support yourself a…
/r/MensRights05/09/16 02:21 AM
3

What makes opposing LPS sexist, is maternity leave. See, The government and public are more than willing to put forward tax payer money to help women overcome the disadvantage their reproductive biology causes them. Not in the United States. Men and women have equal rights to time off after the birth or adoption of a child under the FMLA. Note that only unpaid leave is guaranteed and is only required for certain employees. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_and_Medical_Leave_Act_of_1993 In the…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 07:43 AM
-1

"Equal rights and equal lefts." Or in other words, this strange view that if a woman slaps a man, he should be able to punch her and knock her unconscious. Don't get me wrong. I think all violence by either sex should be condemned. However, I also believe that all civilized people of either sex should retreat from a violent situation whenever possible before hitting back. If self defense is required, it must be proportional. It must be also actual self defense. The most obvious example was the (…
/r/MensRights04/09/16 07:28 AM
1

We don't have enough information to answer those questions. We know they haven't been to court and they are not married. So is his name on the birth certificate and/or depending on the State, did he sign an affidavit of paternity? We just don't know. Nope, no out of court agreement is going to be binding without first establishing paternity. Mommy has baby, daddy is maybe. That's how it works when you are unmarried. Legally establishing paternity, by one route or another, is step one. Edit: Momm…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 09:18 AM
1

An unmarried mother, absent a court order, will always have sole custody unless the unmarried father signs an affidavit of paternity and/or is listed as the father on the birth certificate. (Depends on the State.) This might seem unfair, but not really. As they say in the medical world, it's mother's baby and daddy is maybe. We know for a fact that mom had the baby. Daddy is maybe, until you either sign an affidavit of paternity and/or the birth certificate or get a court order establishing pate…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 03:36 AM
2

if she gets custody she will take the benefits and he will be dragged across the coals. he needs custody since he will not be asking for entitlements. She already has custody, in case you didn't notice. She has not applied for any government benefits. so now pay her to be a mother Well, sure, if he would prefer he can just quit his job and stay home from work... Lose his house... Otherwise, in the real world, he is going to need childcare. Wake up and smell the coffee. Lincoln freed the slaves. …
/r/MensRights31/08/16 03:24 AM
1

So, in my own personal experience, nice guys are not exactly rare. They are more common than not. They are also good looking, they are also well educated, they also make good money, they also will be good husbands and fathers. The stereotypical nice guy thinks that somehow being nice makes him special. Well, no, actually it does not. What I like about this post is that it says you need to bring more to the table. That incredibly cute guy who always has women flocking around him? He is not an ass…
/r/MensRights30/08/16 10:59 PM
2

No, it's not that he is a man, it's that he makes too much money to get government assistance. 24K a year and one child and you can basically forget about getting any government assistance in the U.S. If she can provide childcare and has a free place to live, then it is cheaper to just pay her instead of child support reimbursing government benefits and more. He kicks in some money to help her out with the child. She skips all government benefits, since as she said, she doesn't want him to have …
/r/MensRights30/08/16 09:06 PM
1

Depends on how old you are. This was possible before the 90's. Then federal law changed and forced States to collect child support and mothers to identify fathers for child support to get assistance.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 11:54 AM
2

You can make whatever informal arrangements that you want. You don't have to sign anything. I suggest that you both avoid court as long as your parenting relationship is amicable.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 11:50 AM
3

He might not be in a good position to take custody. Full time daycare is really expensive. Like $250. a week in my area. Net. That is literally more than half his gross income. Since she is currently a SAHM, this discussion might be better tabled until the child is old enough for public school kindergarten. She has support from her own parents. Now is an excellent time for her to take care of the child, with help from her parents, and go back to school to train for a decent job.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 11:48 AM
0

You can't apply for welfare, food stamps, medicaid, subsidized daycare or any other public welfare benefits if you want to avoid child support. The State will sue him for child support whether you like it or not. CPS should not be an issue. The State will just file that suit. You should be OK on the FAFSA. As long as you were not married, his income or lack of it won't be an issue.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 11:33 AM
2

LOL. Yeah, I was thinking that too.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 06:30 AM
1

For the following 5 months I get to visit with my son a lot, and also learn that babymama applied for a passport awhile back. That was definitely the time for him to go to court to get a custody and parenting time order, which also could be used to keep the baby in the U.S. Now he would have to go to court in Italy which will be expensive.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 02:57 PM
1

and despite having a custody agreement which includes weekly dinners and overnights every other weekend, he still has problems seeing his eight children, because Gosselin states that he can only see four of his kids at a time. I'm wondering if he doesn't have a vehicle that seats 9? If he only has a 5 passenger car that could make visitation very complicated. Kate doesn't have to loan him whatever vehicle she uses to transport the kids, (although morally I think she should), but the court could …
/r/MensRights13/08/16 02:46 PM
1

If you are gay, why is it so hard for you to not stare at strange women's boobs?
/r/MensRights12/08/16 07:56 PM
1

There is no such thing as common courtesy if that courtesy makes me feel awkward and uncomfortable in the world that I pay my taxes to live freely in. That is why it is called "common" courtesy. It makes the most people feel comfortable. Not just YOU, you selfish moron. The most people. The entire world and all other people do not revolve around making only YOU feel comfortable. Why on earth would you think it should? If it means they can't help but stare, so be it. Anyone with an IQ over 65 can…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 07:18 PM
2

Don't bother to respond. I never take female opinion seriously. This is why you are deleting yourself from the gene pool. Voluntarily or not. I'm an expert in fashion and it's social constructs. LOL. Let me guess, did you learn that from porn?
/r/MensRights12/08/16 07:12 PM
5

So you want to be involved with a woman who thinks it is cool for you to abandon your own child. Yeah, that's going to work out well. /sarcasm Well, at least both of you have the same immaturity, selfishness and lack of values. Do the world a favor and get a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:49 PM
1

If a woman does not want to be touched, or stared at, or cat called it is legally her responsibility to avoid such. LOL. I suppose you can make that the rule in your mother's basement. If you want to go out into the rest of society then I suggest you learn common courtesy. Also, don't touch strange women. That is not going to end well for you.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:21 PM
1

If we all know how difficult it is to not look at something that is clearly displayed in front of us, why should I have to expend valuable concentration and energy to constantly avert my gaze from someone's property? If your coat is really ugly and I stare, then don't wear it. If I find its cut intrigues me, don't wear something so intricate. If what your doing is so brutal that I can't help but stare, stop being brutal. And if your tits are hoiked up to ur chin, I'm gonna stare at them. If you …
/r/MensRights12/08/16 06:12 PM
1

A lot of scholarships administered through the school are in fact privately funded. Donors are allowed to set their own parameters. Some donors want to build a building. Some want to help the sports teams. Some apparently want to help women.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 02:18 AM
1

https://nddhacts01.dhhs.state.nc.us/WorkSheet.jsp This site will help you calculate what you can expect to pay for child support. Note that NC allows retroactive child support, so if your child is older you could get hit for a large sum. It always best to get a lawyer.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 05:59 PM
1

Both committed the same offense and act, Incorrect. The man could have chosen to also engage in an action that would also only cause a slight bruise. That would be the same offense and act. The degree of harm caused is an integral part of determining the severity of a criminal offense. This is for obvious public policy reasons. We want to prevent serious injuries and deaths, so serious injuries and deaths are punished more harshly, even though actions which didn't cause a serious injury or death…
/r/MensRights27/07/16 04:52 PM
2

I'm done responding to you. You don't understand the tax law, or the other law and you deliberately misquoted me. Note the "only serious physical injuries and death" part that you so very conveniently chose to leave out. As supported by every U.S. crime statistic, men commit this in intimate partner violence at a much higher incidence than women. You insist that we should only rely on surveys instead. You know why just asking people if they have suffered serious injuries or death as a result of …
/r/MensRights24/07/16 03:51 PM
3

Just remember what she asks for and what she gets can be very different.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 09:22 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4omzog/please_help/ One month ago you had 50/50 custody. Did something happen to change that? If your STBX is just talking crap, that doesn't mean anything and you shouldn't believe it. The reddit subs called Divorce and Custody are good resources with very supportive communities. You might want to check them out.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 07:07 AM
1

Some women, like Erin Pizzey, are worth defending. I agree. However we disagree on what type of defense she deserves. I think this (by her own words) not very computer literate and obviously older person deserved not to become Elam's pawn in taking over a site, after he wrongfully stole the real White Ribbon's name and then knew for a fact he was likely to be sued. Elam was using the site to collect donations for his own legal fees before he promptly handed it over to Erin Pizzey instead. Almost…
/r/MensRights24/07/16 06:33 AM
2

What do you mean by "if that were true"? It's obviously true. This is in fact the first sentences of the fundraising petition: We are AVfM Education, LLC, which operates A Voice for Men, an activist organization dedicated to issues faced by men and boys. We are launching this legal defense campaign for domestic violence pioneer Erin Pizzey... With Paul Elam's picture, name and contact information right beside it. Why is this important? It's important because Paul Elam and A Voice for Men have a …
/r/MensRights24/07/16 06:10 AM
2

They'll pay CGT and whatever the equivalent of income tax is on dividends, rents and royalties etc, but the only time the beneficiaries of the trust ever pay tax is when they receive beneficial income from the trust. I don't think you understand taxes. Payment of legal fees is beneficial income to Erin Pizzey and is taxable. I can't avoid taxes by having a trust pay my mortgage directly. Same deal with paying legal fees. It's still income. I think you missed my point. Most legal entities can ded…
/r/MensRights23/07/16 10:10 PM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4tqqu2/white_ribbon_australia_attacks_erin_pizzey/d5jl3o3 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4u2dzg/can_you_help_by_sharing_this_video_and_if_you_can/ Links to previous comments so I don't have to repeat myself.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:09 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4tqqu2/white_ribbon_australia_attacks_erin_pizzey/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4u2dzg/can_you_help_by_sharing_this_video_and_if_you_can/ https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4tz111/erin_pizzey_legal_defense_fundraiser/ Is there some special reason that these last 3 posts about the exact same fundraiser, all within the last 3 days, were not enough? We really needed a 4th post about the exact same thing because why? You just did…
/r/MensRights23/07/16 06:55 PM
2

It's nice you were able to spare some time from moderating AVfMHotLinks on reddit to drop by and comment. Who exactly is the shill here? Edit: took out link to the sub
/r/MensRights23/07/16 06:41 PM
2

Sure they do. However, Elam hasn't promised that's the only "overhead" that will be deducted from donations.
/r/MensRights23/07/16 06:37 PM
2

Well, Paul's not collecting the money personally, his organisation is... Seriously? You expect anybody who knows anything at all about AVfM to think that Paul won't have access to this money? Erin said in the FundAnything video that she is "very computer illiterate", which is consistent with her hosting her site with AVfM. She probably doesn't have the IT wherewithal (or equipment) to make a video and start a FundAnything campaign. According to FundAnything website: Anyone can start raising mone…
/r/MensRights23/07/16 06:34 PM
2

Are you one of them? Proving yet again that we can always count on the staff of AVfM to have a paranoia streak a mile wide.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 11:40 PM
0

Hey, thanks for dropping by Suz. It must have been something special that made you break your 8 month streak of not commenting or posting on reddit, and leave the echo chamber over at A Voice for Men, just to come to this thread and attack me. Did somebody call you for help? LOL.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 11:36 PM
2

Every cent of this is for lawyers... Not according to Paul Elam. In the video Paul Elam says that donations will be used for legal expenses and "overhead". "Overhead" is a weasel word. Especially when spoken by Paul Elam. http://fundanything.com/en/campaigns/whiteribbon-org-legal-defense-campaign Note that the requested donations are going straight to A Voice for Men instead of to Erin Pizzey.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 10:26 PM
1

The donations are going straight to Paul Elam and A Voice for Men. In the video Paul Elam says that donations will be used for legal expenses and "overhead". "Overhead" is a weasel word. Especially when spoken by Paul Elam.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 10:07 PM
2

http://fundanything.com/en/campaigns/whiteribbon-org-legal-defense-campaign Note that the requested donations are going straight to A Voice for Men instead of to Erin Pizzey. Well, he's said that he'll publish full accounts. If so, that will be the first time he ever did. Except why is Paul Elam collecting the money at all? Why is Paul Elam in charge of distributing it? Surely they knew how to set up a fundraiser that would go straight to Erin Pizzey and/or her lawyer.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 09:44 PM
-1

No. McDonalds is a trademark/tradename - that's entirely different. McDonald is a family name. It didn't just come from no where. There are literally hundreds of thousands, and possibly millions, of people in the U.S. with the last name McDonald. It's not unique, but they better not plan on opening restaurants. Someone got there first. IF Erin Pizzey was 'passing off' to extort money from contributors then it would be very different, but I can't see a case here at all. Really? You don't think El…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 06:03 PM
2

The most bang for the buck is reducing serious injuries and death from domestic abuse. It makes the most sense to focus on the people who are most likely to do that. Given the effort that goes into training men (since they're little kids) to not hit women, I think it's not going to be the most bang for your buck to double down on it. Those efforts have not been working well enough. Too many men are slipping through the cracks. More training seems in order. As I said before, no one of any sex sho…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 12:48 PM
-2

Low effort and low value comment.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 11:37 AM
0

Low effort and low value comment.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 11:36 AM
1

I haven't seen anything where White Ribbon say that ONLY men commit domestic violence. Have you?
/r/MensRights21/07/16 11:35 AM
1

Think Ray Rice. Which one of them ended up unconscious on the floor and which one of them was dragging the other out of the elevator? Like seriously, you expect people to care as much about Ray Rice being domestically abused? No, these two things are not equal. No one should be hitting anyone, but these two things are not equal.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 11:33 AM
-3

I don't believe it will be a trade-mark. It could be, but I'd be very surprised indeed. In fact I don't think they'd have a case at all. It's not 'unique' enough. Do you have any idea how many people there are with the last name McDonald's in the U.S.? Good luck trying to open up your own restaurant with that name. Seriously, good luck. /sarcasm. You will be sued and lose in a flash. White Ribbon has established their name in about six countries. There's not a snowball's chance in hell of winnin…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 05:03 AM
1

Oh, bullshit. This is one of the weakest points of the MRA movement. Claiming that men are seriously victimized just as much as women from domestic violence. It is impossibly stupid and should be abandoned. Just take a look at the FBI statistics for which sex ends up most often seriously injured or dead from intimate partner violence. It's not rocket science. Cobbling together a bunch of random studies that include alleged emotional abuse or controlling behavior or acts that don't lead to seriou…
/r/MensRights21/07/16 01:09 AM
-4

Bullshit. Like it or not, when it comes to only serious physical injuries and death, men do commit the most domestic abuse. By far. There is no credible study in the world that doesn't show that. I fail to see how opposing this is "not in men's best interest". Sometimes public shaming is warranted. They are not targeting every man that exists. In case you haven't noticed, their whole entire deal is that they are composed of MEN against domestic abuse. White Ribbon is the largest effort in the wo…
/r/MensRights20/07/16 10:25 PM
0

You don't have to support their charity if you don't choose to. That's no reason to try to illegally steal their trade marked name. It's focus solely on female victim/male perpetrator domestic violence ignores the very significant number of male victims and places women as passive, dis-empowered victims. This is a shocking betrayal of male victims, and a horribly patronising view of women. I don't see why their view of female victims as passive and dis-empowered is any different from your view o…
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:47 PM
0

This site is what white ribbon should be, helping victims of domestic violence regardless of their gender. It is very clear that the Elam/Pizzey site hasn't done anything but circle jerk and re-post old articles for the entire past two years. Also, the site has done damn little of even that. Elam and Pizzey should have no trouble at all moving this little content to a site with a different name. Of course, that is not as profitable as crowd sourcing donations, now is it? http://whiteribbon.org/
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:23 PM
0

http://www.whiteribbon.org.au/uploads/media/093-WR_Annual_Report_2014-15_vPrint2.pdf Note that the real White Ribbon has annual public reports on all funds collected and how they are spent. Elam's White Ribbon? Crickets.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:09 PM
10

This site is what white ribbon should be, helping victims of domestic violence regardless of their gender. White Ribbon Australia have filed a complaint with the World Wide Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) over ownership of the domain. They want to take the site whiteribbon.org from Erin Pizzey. According to what they have put on their public record, the driving force behind their records is partially ideological. This is complete and total bullshit and there's not a snowball's chance i…
/r/MensRights20/07/16 02:42 PM
2

http://www.thenewyorkworld.com/2011/10/25/sex-segregation-policy-on-brooklyn-bus-line-to-end-hikind-says/ On the other side, NYC refused to allow a bus line to accommodate Hasidic men's religious beliefs by having women sit in the back.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 05:19 PM
1

What is more likely depends on your opinion of Paul Elam. I think we all remember Elam's first conference when he insisted that threats from hordes of rabid feminists forced him to move to a much cheaper venue. (With no partial reimbursement given to any of the conference attendees.) In fact, no feminists even bothered to show up and protest the first conference. What seems more likely? That all those rabid feminists just completely lost interest or that Elam orchestrated those alleged threats f…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 05:06 PM
3

https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4sb0l1/media_blackout_on_icmi_2016/ Or maybe Paul Elam noticed that the media literally doesn't give a damn about his conference and he decided to create some drama to get attention. Edit for np link.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 04:32 PM
-2

It's also effortlessly easy for Paul Elam to orchestrate this as a publicity stunt. Since the media is otherwise completely ignoring the entire conference. https://np.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4sb0l1/media_blackout_on_icmi_2016/
/r/MensRights11/07/16 04:25 PM
4

Hope you feel better soon. Also it is really important that you and all your sexual partners get tested for Chlamydia. The antibiotics will probably cure it if you have it, but then an infected partner can just give it to you again.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 05:22 PM
7

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/436154-overview http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/epididymitis/basics/treatment/con-20032876 http://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/genitourinary-disorders/penile-and-scrotal-disorders/epididymitis You need better research. For OP, and all other members, the above-listed 3 sites can be trusted to give accurate and up to date medical information. OP, get yourself to a doctor. Right now. You need antibiotics.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 04:50 PM
5

http://www.nccourts.org/Courts/CRS/Childsupport.asp This is the site that you need. It is all determined by the child support calculator. Basically, the court doesn't care about your bills, credit card debt, etc. They expect you to pay your child support first and then live on what is left. A six fold increase is very unusual. Did you recently get a new job or a big salary increase? Just because she asked for it doesn't mean she will get it. It all goes by the child support calculator. Edit: In …
/r/MensRights08/07/16 04:32 PM
1

News Flash! If she is getting really anxious without a drink, or even worse the DT's, she is drinking a whole lot more every day than just those two or three drinks in the evening. She is hooked on it and that doesn't happen with only two or three drinks a day. Alcoholics are really good at hiding it when they choose to. You are right to beware.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 12:46 AM
1

Lots of law firms intentionally build their conference rooms with a glass wall that looks out into the main office for just this reason. You have to protect client confidentiality. So you can keep the door closed but still anyone nearby can see in.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 12:22 AM
3

You might find it rather difficult to find a judge who doesn't have 2 or 3 drinks a night. Calling her a high functioning alcoholic is really pushing it. Some people can drink while on Prozac and some can't. Apparently she can. Sadly, the judge won't care about the new boyfriend either. Definitely will not care that the ex cheated on you. The ex is not a bad mom As long as this is correct, you have no chance of getting full custody. You must show that the children are actually being harmed or ne…
/r/MensRights28/06/16 12:04 AM
2

http://www.aarp.org/relationships/love-sex/info-10-2010/how_sex_changes_for_men_after_50.html Not really. By 50 men are slowing down and a significant number of them are experiencing difficulties with performance.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 03:28 PM
1

What she wants is irrelevant. Google "your State" and "child support calculator". That will tell you what, if anything, you would be expected to pay in child support.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 07:26 AM
1

WTF already!!! I attempted to get a lawyer but as I wasn't informed of the hearing until a few days before no lawyer would agree to represent me on such short notice. Dude, there is not one single lawyer in the entire United States who doesn't know how to request a continuance. He also told me that I couldn't plead the 5th and if I did he would throw me in jail. /r/ThatHappened Seriously? She has all my stuff and my car and my lawyer is saying I have to ask for it. So your lawyer advised you to …
/r/MensRights19/06/16 06:52 AM
1

It doesn't matter if I (or you) think it is legit. What matters is that this is not conduct addressed by the statute you cited. In addition, absolutely nothing keeps you from calling this camp and requesting their prices and requesting receipts. It's a little soon this year for a receipt since it doesn't look like he is enrolled yet. What you need to know now is the price. Did you never get a receipt from the last four years he has been in camp? Your ex is saying that you did and failed to pay y…
/r/MensRights18/06/16 09:12 AM
3

One of the best things about /r/MensRights is that it is not an echo chamber. That means sometimes an OP will hear things he doesn't want to.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 08:38 AM
0

She's required to get his consent prior to him being required to pay for half. If she doesn't bother to get his consent, he is not required to pay for half of the activity. Incorrect, since his refusal to consent cannot be unreasonable. There is nothing unreasonable about this camp in his post. The kid has been attending this camp for the past four years. If he thought it was unreasonable he should have gone back to court long before now. harassment isn't only about safety. Agreed, but the statu…
/r/MensRights18/06/16 08:36 AM
-4

You haven't paid for even one extracurricular activity since 2005? When your son has attended the same summer camp for the past four years? Unless it's a summer camp devoted exclusively to underwater basket weaving classes, you don't have a leg to stand on. In addition, you must first meet the requirements of section 1 before section 2 is in effect. Section 1 requires that the conduct: causes that other person reasonable, in all circumstances, to fear for their safety or the safety of anyone kno…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 06:37 PM
1

Not only does it ignore female offenders, it doesn't recognize instances of non-physical coercion as rape specifically. While I agree that it should recognize female offenders, defining non-physical coercion as rape is a slippery slope that I don't think should occur.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:35 PM
9

A request for social security survivor's benefits for the kids will come first. Plenty of fathers are worth much more dead than they are for child support.
/r/MensRights25/05/16 11:13 PM
2

It would be an unusual daycare that wouldn't be thrilled with a parent volunteer a few times a week. I wonder if he checked out that option.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 05:24 PM
2

I have to partially disagree with you. In the U.S. daycares, you get what you pay for. I was always amazed at the parents who would put their kids into a sub-standard daycare to save $25. a week. A really good daycare is a wonderful thing. (Not necessarily for a baby though.) When it came time for kindergarten, the children who had nannies or stay at home parents were almost always at a clear disadvantage over the daycare children. Not just in knowing their letters, numbers, colors, shapes, etc.…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 05:22 PM
1

FMLA covers both men and women for the birth of a child.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 02:02 AM
1

This is why you have to use donor eggs and invitro with surrogates. Never have a biological DNA tie to the surrogate. A contract to give up future biological parental rights will always be open to attack.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 06:17 PM
1

The laws would need to be changed to assert the presumption that 50/50 is best for the children. Many judges do not believe this, especially for kids below kindergarten age. Many, if not most, teenagers reject 50/50 even if they tolerated it when younger. For parents who live very close together and co-parent well it can be a good solution, although eventually teens are still likely to reject it. However there are many hurdles to making it a default solution. One of the biggest is the idea that …
/r/MensRights06/04/16 06:04 PM
2

This is the second problem. Because of how I'm paid, and going from Ohio to Missouri, she never gets the full $700 each month. Since I literally have no rights that I'm aware of, I only know that my check is half of what it usually is every 2 weeks. I don't know when it's sent, I don't know how it's sent, when she receives it, or anything. She doesn't tell me anything about what's going on until I ask for something. Your employer has some of this information. Ask for it. More than a few fathers …
/r/MensRights04/04/16 11:15 PM
2

The biggest problem here is that the parents live so far apart. Inevitably, one parent will win and the other lose in this situation. The second test is adverse effect to the child, and because my daughter is smart, is doing fine in school, etc., that even with the shoplifting and everything else that has gone on, it was a very close decision, the space between my fingers close, but overall, the father did not prove adverse affect. Yes, this is the deciding factor. If the child is doing well, th…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 10:53 PM
-2

Right, like that's the only reason fathers ever abandon their children. HA HA HA! Try again.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:34 AM
-1

It’s really no secret that the family courts are stacked against fathers. According to the US Census bureau, nearly 83% of single parents are mothers. If we had a fair version of the system that we have now, fathers would be awarded custody about 50% of the time, and mothers would be awarded custody about 50% of the time, on average. The fallacy in this reasoning is that it assumes fathers actually want and seek custody at the same rates as mothers. This is untrue and you are comparing apples an…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:28 AM
2

http://www.people.com/people/package/article/0,,20395222_20991973,00.html A more practical plan is to try to get celebrities involved with specific men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 04:57 PM
1

Men on dating websites are heavily outnumbered by women, Say what? It's completely the opposite.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 04:48 PM
2

http://travel.state.gov/content/childabduction/en/country/Peru.html There is a right way to do things and this was not it.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:37 PM
18

https://np.reddit.com/r/seduction/comments/48jrd7/i_asked_out_100_women_in_real_life_and_got_14/ You are 24 years old, do not attend this college, are 40 pounds over-weight, and you hit on ONE HUNDRED women in the same day! WTH did you expect to happen? The way to handle this is to stay off the college campus permanently. You will never be able to live this down.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 07:07 PM
1

If a judge is ordering the ex-husband to pay alimony, could he order the ex-wife to perform basic domestic duties around her ex-husband's new home/apartment? No. The judge can only order relief in a divorce that is provided for in the statutes. Providing domestic services to an ex-spouse, aside from things like transporting children for visitation or providing information about school and medical issues related to the children, is not relief that a judge can grant.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:35 PM
2

http://www.zoominfo.com/p/Christopher-Fletcher/40816960 A family practitioner claims he did an "informal study" that is never published anywhere, fails to list how many men were even examined, or when, how many were and were not circumcised, their actual ages, his methodology.... THIS is your proof???!!! You must be kidding. Also, for the third time now, you have failed to answer the question in my comment.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 06:30 PM
1

Did you read your own site? Average erect penis length was 16.0 cm (95% CI 12.2-19.8) in 156 White men aged 18-55 years (mean 33) in Sydney, Australia [Richters et al., 1995]. Length in the 102 who were circumcised was 0.8 cm (5% or 1/20th) less than length in the 43 who were uncircumcised. The most likely explanation for this difference is NOT that circumcision reduces penis length, but rather the age difference of the circumcised and uncircumcised men, where in Australia uncircumcised men are …
/r/MensRights02/03/16 05:54 PM
2

No, it was a perfectly reasonable and relevant question. Directly relevant to your comment. A comment that you obviously are unable to support.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 05:50 PM
2

Once again you have failed to answer the question in my comment.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 05:08 PM
5

I know that you are unable to intelligently answer a question.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 04:52 PM
2

That seems very unlikely. Do you know of any studies showing that European men on average are longer than American men on average?
/r/MensRights02/03/16 04:46 PM
2

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/fox-news-host-bill-o-reilly-loses-custody-of-his-children-after-alleged-domestic-violence-incident-a6904336.html According to the 1,400 word opinion issued on 24 February, the court’s four justices unanimously ruled in his ex-wife’s favour based upon “the clearly stated preferences of the children” and the “quality of the home environment provided by the mother”. Mr O’Reilly’s 17-year-old daughter told a court-appointed forensic examiner last year that sh…
/r/MensRights02/03/16 04:30 PM
2

They could have asked a man to switch seats with him to get him into a row with only men. Apparently, it only occurred to them to ask a woman to move. Yes, that is sexism.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 04:38 AM
2

Troll. OP has been a redditor for 3 hours.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 02:08 PM
2

Technically, he is guilty of failing to seek necessary medical attention for his son's severe injury. That is also child abuse.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 04:08 PM
3

The moral of the story here is that if you want to engage in BDSM, get a signed consent form first. Sample consent forms are available on the internet.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 09:38 AM
0

So Paul Elam, the asshole who abandoned his two children and never paid any child support, wants to force other women to have children. What a fucking surprise! Not. At least most pro-lifers actually believe fathers have some duty to support their own children. Those kind of ethics are just too complicated for Elam. How long are MRA's going to continue to support this misogynistic piece of shit? Take a minute and see how he is representing the movement. It's not a good look. http://www.buzzfeed.…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:18 PM
1

I'm done feeding trolls for today. Look elsewhere.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 09:01 PM
1

You cannot possibly be so obtuse that you think these two things are equivalent. The vast majority of OB/GYN's refuse to do abortions because they don't want to be continually harassed and possibly shot. How many Urologists refuse to do vasectomies for the same reason? I'm calling troll here, because nobody is that stupid. Edit: a word
/r/MensRights17/02/16 02:32 PM
1

The vast majority of U.S. doctors refuse to do any abortions at all.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 01:55 PM
1

I don't understand. How is your pregnant wife leaving you parental abandonment? Do you have other children?
/r/MensRights14/02/16 05:09 PM
5

It depends on how bad your condition is. I think the major factor is if you will be able to care for him by yourself consistently and be able to deal alone with any emergencies. Another factor will be where he goes to school. If he is not attending school in your district then 50/50 is pretty much not going to happen. The court won't make your wife transport him back and forth to your house for school every day. It also sounds like you spend a lot of time in the house. A court will hesitate to h…
/r/MensRights12/02/16 05:49 PM
6

She seems to think I have no chance gaining custody because of my health issues... I hate to say it, but she might be correct.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 04:01 PM
3

That is not possible. OP can only sue for divorce in the State he lives in.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 03:49 PM
1

I have generally had good results on this following the rule of D's. D stands for door, desk and distance. Always try to have one or more of these when interacting with a guy you are not interested in. An open door, a desk or other item of furniture in between you, or a distance of at least 4 feet. Don't be afraid to casually get up and move away from him to maintain your D's. Just do it without saying anything. Ninety plus percent of men will catch on to these social cues. For the rest you have…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 09:19 PM
1

Maybe an article from the website run by Paul Elam, WHO VOLUNTARILY ABANDONED HIS TWO CHILDREN, isn't such a great source. Single mothers need to be forced to allow the father to help raise the kid. Not all fathers want to help raise their kids. Go ask Paul about that.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 08:05 PM
1

The hospital is not selling the foreskins. Not in the U.S. It's illegal to sell any body parts in the U.S. All foreskins are donated.
/r/MensRights02/02/16 05:09 PM
2

Cultivated tissue and stem cells. Both. Not foreskins.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 07:12 PM
1

If the child was 12, I would agree with you. This child is 6. That means that number one Dad was in prison for a very short time. Strongly suggesting an iffy and ambiguous conviction, most likely a forced plea deal, at best. Overwhelmingly proof that Dad was an ideal prisoner who followed all the rules. Which is very hard to do in prison. A conviction for rape, especially an ambiguous one, is no proof this Dad is a danger to a son. I don't think a judge would choose some stranger to raise the ch…
/r/MensRights28/01/16 04:07 AM
0

They sell both.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:37 PM
1

They are not selling foreskins, you moron. They are selling cultivated tissue made from a single donated foreskin. One donated foreskin can produce 250,000 square feet of cultivated tissue. Read my other link.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:14 PM
0

I have seen medical foreskins being advertised for $300. Link?
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:58 PM
0

Learn something about science.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:55 PM
1

http://oklaw.org/resource/court-forms-family-law Try here for the proper forms. He needs to file for custody in the county courthouse where the grandfather lives against the grandfather. The other person is basically a legal stranger. He should definitely include that the child is not living with the grandfather at all.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:55 AM
0

http://discovery.lifemapsc.com/stem-cell-differentiation/in-vitro-cells/dermis-fibroblasts-homo-sapiens-human-neonatal-dermal-fibroblasts-dermagraft-organogenesis Yes, it is an urban myth. These are donated, not sold, and the companies need very few of them to make a huge amount of cell graft tissue.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:21 AM
1

http://discovery.lifemapsc.com/stem-cell-differentiation/in-vitro-cells/dermis-fibroblasts-homo-sapiens-human-neonatal-dermal-fibroblasts-dermagraft-organogenesis Selling body parts is illegal. These are donated and, as you can see from the link, the companies don't need very many of them.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:19 AM
0

http://discovery.lifemapsc.com/stem-cell-differentiation/in-vitro-cells/dermis-fibroblasts-homo-sapiens-human-neonatal-dermal-fibroblasts-dermagraft-organogenesis First, these are donated foreskins, not purchased foreskins. Second, a single donated foreskin is used to culture and create over 250,000 square feet of cell graft tissue. It is nonsense to believe that hospitals are making money selling foreskins. This is a myth that should die and die very soon here on /r/MensRights. It just makes th…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:15 AM
1

How old is the child?
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:02 AM
2

They would most likely use it if they could, but ED is a diagnosed medical problem. ED is in most cases a completely natural result of aging. It wasn't a medical problem 50 years ago because there was no way to treat it. It wasn't until Viagra came out that there was an effective remedy. ED is just as "natural" as women having periods and being fertile. Also something there was no cure for before the pill. So your argument does not hold up.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:48 AM
3

Likewise, if a woman dines alone with a man, don’t ask what is the dish, because the dish is you, even if he is 37 years your senior, unattractive, has come on to you twice before unsuccessfully, and you are a lesbian. Seriously? Who writes crap like this?
/r/MensRights24/01/16 07:10 PM
1

You will have to file to establish paternity and request custody in North Carolina.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 07:00 AM
2

Great comment!
/r/MensRights08/01/16 09:57 PM
0

Am I being unrealistic? Well, yes, like the other doctor in comments said. You are getting older. It's not some kind of disease that can be cured. ED is not going to get better as you get older. It's going to get worse. That is natural and a urologist can't fix it. Drugs are your first and best option. I'm sorry she wasn't so polite, but this is not about the gender of your doctor or the nurse. Medicine can't fix everything. Drugs are the first line resource for ED. There is not going to be any …
/r/MensRights08/01/16 09:53 PM
1

Actually I think he will be convicted.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 09:27 PM
2

don't I have some say? You can try to fight it in court but it's going to cost a lot of money and there is little likelihood that you will win.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 09:05 AM
2

You need to understand that from the judge's perspective your ex did not put your daughter on Zoloft. A doctor did. So it's not you versus mom. It's you versus mom and a licensed physician. That's a tough case to win. I strongly suggest that you discuss your concerns directly with your child's pediatrician. Since this is only the first month, it is likely a very small dose and just for a trial run period to see how she responds. You can discuss other alternatives, like counseling, with the docto…
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:48 PM
-2

So you folded your own clothes? Like big fucking deal. She was complimenting your wife for not being your damn slave. Just one or two generations back it was unheard of for men to do their own laundry. Now it is different and grandma recognized that. You don't get a special award here. No one is impressed that you folded the laundry. Except maybe grandma. Hard to see how this has anything to do with men's rights. Fold your own laundry, and when the kids come around, plan on doing their laundry t…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 01:45 AM
26

So a woman who is assaulted while completely blacked out and unconscious and she doesn't remember a thing has been raped. A man who wakes up to actually find himself being sexually assaulted is just a victim of "unwanted contact". He couldn't possibly be as emotionally and physically damaged as she is. WTF here?
/r/MensRights27/12/15 06:15 PM
2

Not so much anymore, at least not with a 6 year old. (Infants are a different story.) It won't be easy but it's a fight that can be won. Especially with any evidence of neglect or abuse. Fathers need to be encouraged to fight for what they want. It might take some time, but courts are much more open to 50/50 than ever before. Courts are much more open to fathers having primary custody than ever before. Especially for sons.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 09:56 PM
7

Took me awhile to figure this out also. Looks like OP has been calling up lawyers and saying we are just going to keep him. Now we will need legal help on the best way to violate the court order. That's not going to work. That's like calling a criminal attorney and asking for help on planning a bank robbery. The lawyers are going to very quickly get off the phone. Texas is just an easy excuse.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 06:22 PM
2

WTH?!!! Then Texas has nothing to do with this. I don't understand why all the lawyers are turning you down. Unless you are calling them all up and saying that you are just going to keep him. They wouldn't get involved with you then. We have no issue sending him back if we KNOW we can get a lawyer who can help us. No lawyer can guarantee results and you have to send him back or you won't get a lawyer to help you. Try calling different lawyers and saying, "We want to file a motion to enforce the …
/r/MensRights23/12/15 06:18 PM
1

He has been in ISS and OSS in school because he is not being medically managed and not enrolled in councling. You can definitely get a modified order in Texas to force her to obtain medical care and counseling. You may end up having to pay for all of it since apparently she doesn't work. I am very confused as to how we can be told, count on never seeing him again. If you violate the order by essentially kidnapping your child, this is what happens. How do fathers proceed at this point??? They fol…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 06:02 PM
2

If we keep him here and enrol him in school and counceling etc as requested by HIM (My step son) What is the WORST case scenario? Worst case scenario is you go to prison on federal kidnapping charges. That's unlikely but possible. More likely scenario is you lose all custody and visitation rights. as requested by HIM For heaven's sake the child is 6 years old. The judge isn't going to give a flying fig who he wants to live with. This can backfire on you badly if the court suspects parental alien…
/r/MensRights23/12/15 05:43 PM
4

Texas has jurisdiction. She might have violated the order, but by taking him out of State and keeping him, you have violated it much worse. More important, you didn't file motions for contempt when she violated it, so there's no real court record of that. Your best option is to immediately file an emergency motion for custody in Texas. You need a Texas attorney to do this. No Missouri court will accept the case. We got a lawyer who went to file through with asking for custody, The lawyer Backed …
/r/MensRights23/12/15 05:27 PM
1

Even if what you allege were true, actually were true, what you fail to describe is, why the fuck should anyone care? He is a hypocrite, a liar and a fake. If you can't see that other people definitely can. He is such an easy target he makes the whole men's rights movement look bad.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 08:18 PM
1

Elam hasn't disputed any of it, other than a lukewarm response that he doesn't know for sure that Bonnie is his kid. Since he never bothered to get a damn DNA test.
/r/MensRights21/12/15 09:48 AM
0

http://www.buzzfeed.com/adamserwer/how-mens-rights-leader-paul-elam-turned-being-a-deadbeat-dad#.wnob817Mq
/r/MensRights19/12/15 01:54 PM
8

Forty-three percent of total respondents were approached by a woman. Some were also asked to observe their significant other having sex with the male sex worker, with an additional 13% indicating there was a threesome of either two men or a heterosexual couple. The other 45% were never approached by a woman. How do you think the above paragraph supports your chart that claims 43 percent were exploited ONLY by women and 13 percent were exploited by both men and women?
/r/MensRights12/12/15 04:33 PM
6

43 percent of exploited boys said they had been approached by a woman at least once... How the hell does that translate to a chart saying that 43 percent of boys were exploited by women only?!!!
/r/MensRights12/12/15 04:21 PM
3

If you meet a woman with alleged multiple instances of domestic violence with multiple prior partners, I strongly suggest that you avoid her. Maybe that's cold, but it generally takes two dysfunctional people to have a highly dysfunctional relationship.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 06:17 PM
1

I would say two gunshot wounds to the chest is not over-charging for attempted first degree murder. Plus she went out to the car to get the gun first. I think the biggest factor was that the boyfriend initially told the police he shot himself, has apparently had a good recovery, and didn't want her badly punished. Also it is kind of shocking that she goes to the doctor because she thinks he broke her ribs and that same day goes right back to him. (Another factor. Even with just bruised ribs she …
/r/MensRights08/12/15 06:11 PM
1

I'm just explaining the reasoning, not necessarily agreeing with it. The PTSD came from previous abusive relationships. This set her up with "battered women syndrome" or the propensity to grossly over-react to a perceived danger from the new guy. Remember this was evidence offered in mitigation for sentencing after conviction. In her case not offered as a defense. All kinds of things can go towards mitigation in sentencing. A lousy childhood, a low IQ, mental illness, etc, or on the good side, a…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 04:43 PM
7

http://www.military.com/join-armed-forces/military-myths.html Easy. About 80 percent of jobs in the military are non-combat occupations. I might not be able to build my car's engine, but I can sure as heck drive it. I don't know code, but I use a computer just fine. I can't build an office building, but I can work in one. When 80 percent of military jobs are non-combat positions, there's no reason at all to exclude women from the draft. *Some women of course can do all those things that I can't,…
/r/MensRights08/12/15 03:22 PM
2

Eaton, court records state, told the deputy she and Scott had been arguing throughout the day. She said an argument became physical and she had gone to the doctor earlier that day since she believed her ribs might be broken. Looks like this was a mutually abusive relationship.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 02:58 PM
4

Allow me to just say that you must be a genius. I submitted this post only 11 minutes ago and 5 minutes later you made this comment. Dude! You are awesome!
/r/MensRights06/12/15 02:56 PM
7

True story. When my husband and I went to our first grade son's parent teacher meeting, she looked at us and said, "What's wrong with (son)? Well, he's a boy!" Now mind you, this was a child scoring in the top 1 percent of the nation for educational achievement!!! He also was kind of active. The teacher couldn't get past that.
/r/MensRights28/11/15 03:50 PM
3

I think the better point here in the article is that dads teach daughters what to expect from men. A good dad teaches daughters to expect to be respected and treated decently. Girls with self respect will not be sluts. They can resist and be offended by a 2 am booty call. They expect the significant other in their life to really care about them, not just their tits and ass when convenient. They don't need to dress like a hooker, because they have so much more going on in their lives. So let me t…
/r/MensRights25/11/15 08:23 PM
22

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/24x2dv/lets_talk_about_something_more_important_than/ Here is an archived post I did on the same subject if you would like to learn more about father's rights and adoption.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 12:17 PM
1

Calling /u/LaTuFu. Check in.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 05:32 AM
4

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/24x2dv/lets_talk_about_something_more_important_than/ Here is an archived post I did on the same subject if you would like to learn more about this issue.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 02:49 PM
7

Please don't tell me this means that a father that successfully registers as the father of the child in Florida for example has no legal right over that same child if the mother gave birth to him/her in the state of Utah. Sad, but true. Adoptive parents only need to produce an affidavit that they checked the State registry of the State the child was born in.
/r/MensRights21/11/15 02:43 PM
17

The only way as of now to fight this is to inform every single potential father in the state of Utah... It's worse than that. Pregnant women are being flown into Utah and States with similar laws to temporarily reside until the birth of the baby. Out of State adoptive parents then commence adoption proceedings in Utah to take advantage of the law. What we need is a national putative father registry. Currently men must both: 1. Know that a State putative father registry exists and sign up for it;…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 02:13 PM
1

/r/Divorce and /r/LegalAdvice are good resources.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 02:48 PM
3

This is called economy of scale. Assuming two parents and children, it is obviously cheaper to pay for one residence, one set of utilities, one set of furniture and one home's maintenance, one meal for everyone, instead of dividing all those things into two. It is cheaper to have a family cell phone plan and two family cars for insurance. This is why married people are generally richer than singles, even with identical income.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 08:04 PM
2

Write an essay about X. Nope, I'll just write an essay about Y instead. Come on, that's never going to work out well. Just because there are abused men does not mean there are no abused women. If I was supposed to write an essay about puppy mills, I wouldn't write one about kittens instead. I wouldn't write one about killer whales at SeaWorld. It's called following directions and it's perfectly reasonable for a college bound essay to do that. It doesn't have to be your personal pet project or wh…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 07:53 PM
0

Well now, that depends. If the husband is pulling his weight on the home front, helping to take care of the kids and the household, I doubt there is much marital strife. It's the husbands stuck in 1950's mode, who also aren't bringing in the majority of income, who find themselves marginalized.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:43 AM
0

Yeah, but for how long? Those earnings fade out within 5 years and men make more after that.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:39 AM
0

True, but men die younger which should at least partially even it out. The fact is no one thought it was a national crisis to have more college educated men than women in America all the way up to 2010. (Well, no one who wasn't crazy.) A less than 7 percent difference in women graduating from 4 year colleges currently doesn't seem all that bad. Even with that, a higher percentage of men (and women) are graduating from 4 year colleges than any time before in American history. I think there are a …
/r/MensRights13/11/15 11:23 PM
1

Sure, right after you point out the part of his post that refers to his ACTUAL EXPERIENCE IN FAMILY COURT. You know, that part where he actually filed papers in court for custody and visitation, and he actually appeared in court, and he actually received a judge's written decision.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:43 AM
-2

Dude, get a clue. Blah, blah, blah, men's rights, let's just ignore the law... Other dude is totally justified for trying to break into his ex's home and causing injury to her. Likely in front of the child. NOT.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 05:00 PM
-1

The punishment was 3 months in jail. What would you suggest instead? A pat on the head and some cookies? Sooner or later, everyone needs to grow up and suffer the consequences of their own behavior.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:44 PM
-1

Will he make mistakes? Of course. Will those mistakes include causing injury to others weaker and smaller than he is? No. Not in a million years. It's called parenting. It's called civilization. Jesus, get a clue.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:40 PM
-1

Forcing entry, while the other party tries to hold the door closed, is the absolute definition of assault and battery. He agreed he knocked her to the floor. It's not much of a stretch to assume that she suffered injury as a result. It's a pretty crappy defense that, "Oh yes, I was violent and slamming into the door of a home I had no right to enter, and she fell to the floor, but..." Seriously?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:31 PM
0

Of course there is not a law that says one gender wins. As a practical matter, for a breast feeding baby, the mother will receive the majority of parenting time. Since the mother is a free citizen in a free country, and we don't require free citizens to stop breast feeding their babies. We also don't require them to pump breast milk for someone else's convenience. So for the first year, a breast feeding mother will always have priority. That's biology, and it's not changing anytime soon.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:24 PM
-3

Gosh, it's just so awful isn't it when the facts get in the way of the narrative?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:58 PM
-2

Three months in jail for violently trying to shove his way into a private residence and injuring the child's mother in the process. Quite likely in front of the child. What "different" punishment would you recommend? Should we give him a pat on the head and a box of cracker jacks?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:29 PM
0

People who plead guilty are convicted criminals. He plead guilty because his lawyer told him very correctly that he was guilty. No one has a legal right, (absent a life threatening emergency), to try to shove their way into a private home and cause physical injury in the process. This is not a matter of the odds being stacked against him. It is a matter of not being a violent hot head. In precisely what universe does anyone think it is in a child's best interest to try to shove their way into a …
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:21 PM
-4

This isn't the circle jerk over at AVfM where only people who engage in Paul worship are welcome.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:11 PM
2

Did you see anything in his post that said he had gone to court to object to her not following the custody order? Yeah, me either.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:05 PM
1

Sharks!
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:22 AM
-1

Well, yeah. We don't really think it is such a good idea to allow violent convicted criminals to raise children. That being said, if the child was truly in a dangerous situation, he could call CPS and the child would be removed. He could go to court and prove that he is now a decent citizen and obtain custody. He apparently does not feel the need to do that.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 08:12 AM
-4

Sure. Tell this asshole he has no right to try to force his way into a private home and cause injury in the process. This is A.) criminal, and B.) domestic abuse.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 07:55 AM
2

Equating adult women with children. Total fucking fail. One group you can legally spank and the other group you damn well better not. Another embarrassment for A Voice for Men. Seriously, how long are we going to tolerate these misogynist fucking morons?
/r/MensRights11/11/15 07:46 AM
-1

Do you have a driver's license? If so, you took a driver's ed class or at least read the book. Did you object to learning the information about DUI because you are not an alcoholic? Yeah, you have about the same hope of success with this protest.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 07:24 AM
1

There is no legal basis anywhere that says either gender can try to force their way into a private home, that they have no legal right to enter, and cause physical injury in the process.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:58 AM
4

We only need to look at what he said. He tried to force his way into a private home, that he had no legal right to enter, and caused physical injury in the process.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:55 AM
-5

It will be a cold day in Hell before America decides that people can violently shove their way into your private home and injure you in the process.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:49 AM
-10

I have a son too. I trust that I have raised him not to violently try to shove his way into private property, that he has no legal right to enter, and cause physical injury in the process. I also trust that I have raised him not to be all butt hurt about not being able to break the law and wantonly injure other people without repercussions.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:45 AM
-12

You need the MRM so you can shove your way into your ex's home, which you have no legal right to enter, causing physical injury in the process? Come on, get a fucking clue here. This was A.) criminal, and B.) domestic abuse.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:37 AM
-7

Sigh. Bullshit post. Visitation with your child, assuming there is a court order for that, is a right. Entering the home of your ex is not. Trying to shove your way over protest into the home of your ex will always be a crime. Stay on the porch. Call the cops if your ex won't hand the child over contrary to a custody order. Document that and then return to court for sanctions. You are never entitled, absent a life threatening emergency, to try to force your way into your ex's home. Toss physical…
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:21 AM
1

Janae should not have assaulted Ray, but no one had to drag Ray unconscious out of an elevator. Ray's response was criminally disproportionate.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 08:46 PM
0

Tell me again how this keeps women safe? Well, I expect there are a few less women these days getting punched unconscious in elevators. Assholes possibly learned to look around for a security camera first.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:58 AM
-5

Does anyone really give a damn what some professor of philosophy thinks? Outside of college in the real world? These people just mentally masturbate for a living. I would sooner ask the opinion of the guy who delivers my pizza. At least he has some real world life skills.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:26 AM
2

You think that schizophrenia, bipolar and autism are very rare? Ok then, no worries, just carry on.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 08:05 PM
3

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854059/
/r/MensRights03/11/15 07:49 PM
3

Schizophrenia and bipolar disease, (increased risk with older fathers), rarely show up in children. Lots of late onset diseases don't show up in children. I agree with banning the procedure. I also feel pretty sick about the current womb transplants being done. Transplant a womb, pump a woman up with constant anti-rejection medication and get her pregnant. What could go wrong? /s
/r/MensRights03/11/15 06:35 PM
3

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3854059/ Try this article instead. I always like to start with easily comprehensible articles since not everyone wants to wade through scientific studies. (Note in particular the studies showing sharply decreased success rates of IVF when fathers are over 50.) There's really no point in hiding your head in the sand just because you don't want to hear it. The emphasis should be on more research on male fertility and better medical treatments. Edit: For …
/r/MensRights03/11/15 06:14 PM
3

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fact-or-fiction-men-have-biological-clocks/ There is actually a lot of good science backing this up.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:52 PM
3

Yesterday my son had to go to the doctor to get a note for his job saying that he shouldn't have to shave. It was causing him constant acne and his job has a strict clean shaven policy. The doctor agreed immediately and his boss backed off when given the note. So, you do have this option if having the same trouble in your workplace.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:48 PM
4

That is pretty interesting. In medicine, it comes to the reverse -- which babies are more likely to be seriously compromised at birth with cerebral palsy or whatever -- it goes like this: White males, then Black males, then White females, then Black females. At birth, Black females are pretty much the strongest thing on earth.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 08:51 PM
1

LOL. That's really good.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 08:39 PM
1

I think it is unrealistic to believe that this film won't include The Red Pill and MGTOW as part of the men's rights movement. We know that Paul Elam (the face of the men's rights movement) appears in this film and has been heavily associated with both.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 03:04 PM
1

You need a formal custody and parenting time order. You can't prevent her from moving or changing jobs. You might be able to prevent her from taking your son to live with her, depending on the circumstances of what is in his best interest. That being said, this could be a big opportunity for you to gain primary custody. Many working parents arrange for child care before and after school. It's definitely not impossible. If the school itself doesn't have a before and after program, local daycares …
/r/MensRights21/10/15 09:40 PM
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1oahqCzwcY&bpctr=1445048422 You didn't include the video link. Gosh, why not?
/r/MensRights20/10/15 12:08 AM
1

Enjoy the circle jerk over there with the 299 other only "true" MRA's.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 11:49 PM
-1

It's hard to say which is more cringe worthy. The ass kissing article or the cascade of ass kissing comments. As always, not a whisper about financial transparency. AVfM continues with their "just send us money and don't ask questions about how Paul spends it" philosophy.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 10:05 PM
-6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1oahqCzwcY&bpctr=1445048422 So does everybody agree that none of the high school boys in this video could have benefited from a consent class? That every single one of them was just a fucking rapist sociopath? Against all odds, the whole damn high school football team in a small town was all a bunch of sociopathic rapist fucks. Right? Or maybe not. Just maybe while you don't need it, rape culture is a real thing, and colleges can't tell who needs it. All things c…
/r/MensRights17/10/15 02:04 AM
1

Actually, he failed to diagnose her with a suspected ovarian cyst because he failed to do a prompt physical exam. This should have occurred prior to the CT scan. A physical exam is always a first step for any patient prior to imaging and allows the doctor to (often) determine which patient needs emergency imaging, not to wait for hours for a CT scan. Agreed that this was not sexism. It would be just as reprehensible if the doctor failed to do a physical on a man with abdominal pain and delayed a…
/r/MensRights16/10/15 07:10 PM
1

http://statelaws.findlaw.com/texas-law/common-law-marriage-in-texas.html You can only have a common law marriage in Texas if you: 1.) agree to be married; 2.) live together as a married couple; and 3.) tell other people that you are married. In other words, it is not something that randomly happens. Common law marriage is a legal holdover from frontier days when a priest to marry couples could be hard to find. It also serves to protect creditors. It is not some random gotcha.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:23 PM
1

So instead of producing better content he decides to act like a drunken obnoxious moron? Wow.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 05:19 PM
1

You don't seriously believe that Paul Elam has to create ammunition for critics, do you?
/r/MensRights12/10/15 02:06 PM
2

$2.8 million in gross revenue and executive compensation of only $248,000. That's the kind of information that people want to know when you are asking for donations. So does Paul Elam take more than 8.6 percent of AVFM's gross revenue as salary?
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:47 PM
2

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/521477004 Seriously? You really think you need to email someone to get this information? Dude, wake up and smell the coffee. Edit: You might also want to see these: https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=national+organization+for+women+&state%5Bid%5D=&ntee%5Bid%5D=&c_code%5Bid%5D= All 4,857 pages of lists of women's organizations that have financial transparency.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:19 PM
1

There is not enough out there for men even to support one psychologist come truck driver. If Elam has another job that he is supporting himself with besides AVFM, that's news to the rest of us! What is it?
/r/MensRights11/10/15 01:05 PM
1

We must learn to live within our means by careful measurement and planning, and to make every dollar we have go a very long way. Agreed. That begins with financial transparency when you are soliciting donations from the public. Elam's refusal to do so makes AVFM look like a cult.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 12:48 PM
0

An academic feminist or feminist lawyer will have at least 7 years of college and post-grad education. Elam has a 4 year degree in psychology, which in the U.S. is not well paid at all. In fact, he left that field to be a truck driver. That was his occupation for most of his life before AVFM got big enough to support him.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 12:38 PM
2

Thank you to whichever Mod changed my flair. I couldn't find that one and it is appropriate.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 09:06 PM
6

AVFM is not a non-profit. Non-profits have to register themselves and abide by strict accounting rules which include financial transparency. They also to be successful have to generally accomplish something besides running a blog and doing some YouTube videos.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 09:04 PM
-1

"Drunken" is hardly how I would characterize it, as I never saw anyone drunk. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfimcqjWHIQ&feature=youtu.be So you guys did this video while sober? Cause it is kind of unusual to display that much poor judgment while sober. My apologies. I over-estimated AVFM. It does seem that Attila made poor financial decisions. This just shows more strongly why AVFM should have financial transparency.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 08:17 PM
6

I don't think the first one was a lie. More like weasel words. What he meant was that he only borrowed $300. for his personal use. Most of this fall out seems to be over expenses for his Men's DV Conference, which he apparently expected AVFM to help pay for. I have no idea if Tim Viers has limited means or what he donated money for. Again, weasel words. It's pretty clear that Attilla is not a saint. It's also pretty clear that money donated on both sides of the border to both organizations is fl…
/r/MensRights10/10/15 07:20 PM
2

https://archive.is/domDS This is the other side of this pissing match. No doubt there will be more to come.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 05:10 PM
1

Prosecutors are under extra pressure to pursue DV charges. The laws were put in place because so often the victims refused to cooperate. A regular bar fight case would likely be dropped. A child abuse case or a statutory rape case would not. Basically, if the victim is regarded as especially vulnerable prosecution is likely to go forward even with an unwilling victim.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 09:15 PM
-1

Maybe a way to get more public support for the high rate of men's suicide is to note how often men take other people out with them. We need more and better and more easily accessible mental health services for men.
/r/MensRights03/10/15 05:52 PM
1

Or it was just a trick to get the students to all be standing still in the same place. Did you read the link above?
/r/MensRights01/10/15 10:08 PM
1

It's really really obvious that no one is answering the question about what happened to that lawsuit? Are the donations going to be returned? There is no legal value at all to a draft complaint that is never filed in court.
/r/MensRights01/10/15 09:54 PM
2

Well, dude, that was a prostitute. Probably also a drug addict. She was desperate and hoping for money in exchange for a sexual encounter. I agree with the advice that you should yell at her to get away from you. By the time the cops arrive, she will be gone. Not worth the aggravation. Also if you just tell them up front, "I have no money", they will suddenly find you not so appealing.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 01:07 AM
1

Right, and the point here is that this is a Facebook record, that is at best ambiguous, from only four girls. Thirteen girls are accusing him. It's pretty clear that those 4 hated him, but not clear at all that they made their accusations up. Maybe they had good reasons to hate him. Maybe they banded together for strength. Thirteen girls are accusing him. He threatened many of them to keep their mouths shut about what happened between them. Normal men with normal sexual encounters don't do that.…
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:57 AM
0

Female MRA Alison Tieman became an MRA precisely because she found contemporary Feminism’s fetishization of victimhood... So what happened to that lawsuit that Alison Tieman solicited all those donations for? You know, because she was a "victim" for being kicked out of a comic con? After she solicited donations to attend the con in the first place. There has been more than enough time and more than enough solicited donations to get that lawsuit filed in court. Where are the copies of court time …
/r/MensRights29/09/15 07:54 AM
0

ONE lousy men's rights conference. When the feminists have been doing multiple annual conferences for decades. Without getting "too tired" or something to do the next one.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 02:47 PM
0

This is the internet. You don't have a fucking clue what other people might be doing on their own to further men's rights. The funny thing here is that there seems to be too many people here that seem to want to tell Elam and crew what to do with his website despite not never supporting or donating to the site... Well, yeah. Since how dumb do you have to be to not know that soliciting donations, (which Elam apparently is living off as he has no other job), comes with a duty of transparency on ho…
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:00 AM
2

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=male+infertility Try this list instead. I was aiming for a more easily comprehended list with the last cite. In addition, keep in mind that the most common way that male infertility is "treated" is for the female to undergo in vitro with his sperm. A reduced sperm count or poor quality sperm may not inseminate naturally, but a lab can almost always inseminate an egg with it. Edit because I have a little more time. My point is that medical research and adv…
/r/MensRights24/09/15 08:47 PM
3

“No major subject in all of medical science is more neglected than male infertility,” said the scholar. “Treatment hasn’t advanced in 50 years. It still consists largely of general health advice – wear loose pants, don’t smoke, don’t drink, don’t be overweight.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=male+infertility http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/436829-treatment Yeah, no. Maybe the author of this article should try talking to an actual expert in the field.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 02:53 PM
0

From the comments: These are the people who come here and criticise AVfM for things it does in a campaign for instance, or they try to belittle and condemn a bunch of men who go away together, let their hair down and have a whole lot of fun for a day or three. They pull the guilt trip on these men, saying that what they are doing (and saying) is going to harm the public's perception of the MHRM. These are the toxic traitors and they must be excised from this organisation, as a surgeon would cut …
/r/MensRights24/09/15 01:01 PM
2

I think a few things are going on here. The first is an attempted money grab by limiting content to subscribers. If you’d like to support the work that A Voice for Men does, you can subscribe to one or more of a range of membership options, each of which involves monthly dues. The second is an attempt to shield AVfM from negative publicity by hiding the more volatile content behind a pay wall. This is not going to be very successful because it only takes one person to do screenshots and post the…
/r/MensRights20/09/15 01:39 PM
3

If you’d like to support the work that A Voice for Men does, you can subscribe to one or more of a range of membership options, each of which involves monthly dues. We all should send Paul Elam money? Yeah, no...
/r/MensRights20/09/15 01:21 PM
3

and indeed access to some, a good bit actually, of site content is going to be restricted to activists. Translation: "We are going to restrict most site content to primarily people who send us money."
/r/MensRights20/09/15 01:05 PM
0

So are we just done with Denmark? Time for the entire country to die out? That seems very harsh. I'm not so sure that the high reproducer countries are a better alternative.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:54 PM
1

Thank you. One of these days I will figure out how to do that.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:48 PM
3

Next headline: "Danish Fathers Obsolete. Completely Optional." As the birth rate slowly decreases.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 04:48 AM
-1

See, here's the deal. Presumably you would only be falsely accused of rape once. From one particular encounter. However, to fully protect yourself in this scenario, you would need to secretly film all of your encounters. Each separate secret filming is a separate crime. So one decent subpoena that seizes your technology, depending on how active you have been for how many years, could easily subject you to lots and lots of separate criminal charges. The statute of limitations for criminal charges…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:14 AM
5

I thought it was interesting that she didn't suggest women get to the sperm bank quicker so they can have more than one child.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 09:47 PM
1

Paternal rights top my list. Specifically with adoption and custody. Followed by campus rape adjudications. Then unfair treatment in criminal matters, from arrest right through to prison rape. Then a selective service sign up only for men. That's not an exhaustive list, but definitely a start. Custody and campus rape are in conflict with feminists. The rest I'm not sure about.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 10:06 PM
-5

Oh really? Because barely a day goes by in which someone feminist in the mainstream media claims that Roosh V or some nutcase like Elliot Rodgers is a "men's rights activist." http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/game/bang-the-definitive-interview-with-rooshv-part-one/ Umm, yeah. But it cannot happen until feminists stop blocking our meetings, The "success" of these blocking attempts, as far as I have seen on this sub, consists of one pulled fire alarm, six minutes of chanting and noise m…
/r/MensRights14/09/15 09:58 PM
-5

Did you miss all the crude sex insults? Of course Elam is an asshole. The point is this asshole is the "face of the men's rights movement". AVfM is listed on the /r/MensRights side bar. While he continues to now apparently be rapidly spinning out of control. It's dumb to blame the MRM image problems on feminists when people like Elam provide so much easy ammunition and have so many followers. I really wish the MRM would cease this endless pissing match with feminists and focus the message on the…
/r/MensRights14/09/15 08:37 PM
-6

Feminists have tried, and to a certain extent succeeded in branding the MRM as a bunch of masculinist tradcons and misogynists, not through any actions of our own... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfimcqjWHIQ Since when did Paul Elam and the bunch at AVfM become feminists? Wake up and smell the coffee. There is no shortage at all of information generated by people in the MRM that has contributed to this branding.
/r/MensRights14/09/15 07:51 PM
1

???
/r/MensRights12/09/15 03:32 PM
2

Women are genetically designed to have looser ligaments. The pelvis needs to stretch to safely deliver babies. Pregnancy hormones facilitate this and it is systemic. For example, many women gain a shoe size with pregnancy. Put women in the military where they are not supposed to get pregnant and most will be on birth control pills. Birth control pills mimic pregnancy hormones. More ligament injuries is practically a no brainer and no training can change this.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 01:57 PM
1

Not me. On a related note, I'm kind of surprised that with all our technology the soldiers are still carrying packs in excess of 100 pounds. I wonder if there is any big push in the military to find better products that would weigh less.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 01:45 PM
1

Current legal guardians are receiving welfare benefits for the child. Paid by the taxpayers. It's a State issue.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 03:54 AM
6

Well, obviously, those 2 moms are not supporting the child. Otherwise they wouldn't be collecting welfare benefits. Which is the only reason the State stepped in to collect child support. Mom number 2, (or whatever), dropped the ball. And it's stupid to ever jack off in a jar if it's not for a licensed sperm bank. No law will protect you from being legally, (and genetically), the father. Moral of the story: Don't give out sperm on Craig's List. Especially to the financially irresponsible.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 03:51 AM
1

Do I need to define "legal" for you?
/r/MensRights29/08/15 08:30 PM
1

He was married when the kids were born and his name is on their birth certificates. Legally, he was the father. He agreed to give up his paternal rights.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 12:51 PM
1

What is it about "voluntarily abandoned his own children" that you don't understand? No one kept him from getting a DNA test. Any father can take his kids in for a DNA test, assuming of course the father ever bothers to actually see them. Which Elam didn't. Custody is not an issue. He never got it because he never wanted it after abandoning his family. That ship sailed long ago while he blew off his kids for decades. Not only are his kids grown up, he is a grandfather. With grandchildren that he…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:39 AM
-3

So what exactly are you suggesting? That it is OK for a bunch of immature selfish sadistic fucks to manipulate young women, (age 15 already!), to get their dicks wet? No, actually it isn't. Have some damn moral values already. This asshole deserved everything he got and more.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 12:25 AM
1

On the inside of some other woman's panties? Umm, yeah. Look, she was 15 years old and his semen was on the inside of her panties and she was howling rape. WTH do you think was going to happen?
/r/MensRights29/08/15 12:09 AM
2

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/jury-reaches-verdict-prep-school-rape-trial-n417836 DNA evidence presented at trial indicated there was the presence of Labrie's semen inside his accuser's underwear. "He was going to get what he wanted and not take 'no' for an answer," prosecutor Joseph Cherniske told the jury on Thursday. Really stupidly hopeless defense. "I never had sex with her." Gosh, so how did your semen get there?
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:14 PM
-1

Carney, Labrie's lawyer, said the young man's boasts about having sex with the girl amounted to the most damning evidence against him. He said Labrie was convicted because he wasn't mature enough to tell his friends the truth. Duh, they found his sperm on her panties, (note she was 15 years old), and he's just a damn lying asshole. This is not a man that the MRM wants to support.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 10:47 PM
1

No one has to try to assassinate his character. This is the guy who voluntarily abandoned his own children, then sits around for decades complaining about child support. Which he never actually paid. LOL, the man is a joke.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 04:06 PM
1

LOL. Houston is the 4th largest city in the United States by population. Local doesn't always mean small. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houston
/r/MensRights27/08/15 10:58 PM
0

Read the link in the comments here.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 10:06 PM
-1

He is an embarrassment to the men's rights movement.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 10:05 PM
1

Local newspaper.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 10:04 PM
0

See the links in comments. He bit off way more than he can chew and probably everyone else at AVfM was on the verge of mutiny. This obnoxious little toothless guppy can't attack sharks like the Washington Post and Time magazine.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 01:56 PM
1

Safe Haven (also known as Baby Moses) laws exist in every State specifically for legally abandoning babies. In my big city area there seems to be one abandoned every couple months. Then you have the more rare cases like this one where babies are just left somewhere. No one seems to be keeping track of the total number of abandoned infants. They aren't looking for mom so that they can return the baby, they are looking for her because she is likely in medical distress. That looks good in the news,…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 08:12 PM
1

I wrote another post awhile back about how ridiculous it is that we don't even have a national paternity registry for fathers trying to prevent their children from being adopted. You have to play "guess the State my baby might be born in" and register separately for every possible State. That's assuming you are one of the lucky few men who has even heard of a paternity registry. The thing is a paternity registry won't help you for an abandoned infant because it tracks by the mother. So we need b…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 07:51 PM
-9

Sure they do. That doesn't mean it should be the only thing on the menu.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 06:39 PM
-4

Yes, all parties have agency and responsibility. However, that's no excuse for someone being an asshole. You don't get a free pass for being a jerk just because someone else put up with it. She could've just walked away if she felt the affair was unacceptably unequal. She not only could have, she should have. It's amazing how many people completely lose their frigging minds and do insane things over failed romances.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:28 PM
-14

People can be assholes without resorting to guns and black mail. Doesn't mean they still aren't an asshole. I agree the article is unclear.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:45 PM
-16

Apparently, they never had sexual intercourse, but she would perform oral sex on him. I think your mom's point is that an "affair" which consists only of the woman giving him blow jobs is very one sided. It does kind of give off an icky Clinton/Lewinsky kind of vibe. If that's what happened. The article isn't all that clear, but you can find plenty of women complaining on reddit (will not link) about partners who primarily only want blow jobs and just ignore their needs.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 03:15 PM
2

Heart attacks could definitely be from exertion. However, a prime fatal heart attack victim is often a former male athlete type who is between 40 and 50 and has become an out of shape desk jockey. Exactly those kind of upper management administrative positions that male officers are more likely to have. (According to OP's cite.)
/r/MensRights25/08/15 02:36 PM
6

Just scrolling down the list, there are a very large number of heart attacks listed as the cause of death. (Presumably these occurred on duty.) I think it is highly likely that women officers are disproportionately younger and thus less likely to die of a heart attack on the job. Also I'm pretty sure that heart disease tends to hit men at a younger age and is more likely to be fatal to men during the first heart attack. There are also a ton of deaths from vehicle accidents. The (from your link) …
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:20 PM
2

http://www.crossattorney.com/family-law/child-support/retroactive-child-support/ Here is a helpful article.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 02:47 PM
1

I just answered that. It was also only "near equal" in 1975 and 1976. Those two years could just have been an aberration.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 08:18 PM
1

Your own study contradicts that.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 08:15 PM
1

It's still a trial and the "battered women's defense" must be proven. If you look at the study, of these cases that went to trial, 56 percent of the women in a position to claim that were still convicted. They are allowed to get away with murder if they say they were being abused , men cannot so easily do that. Once again, looking at your study, only 10 percent of men even claimed that they were assaulted or threatened with a weapon at the time of the murder. As compared to 44 percent of the wom…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 07:59 PM
1

How do you explain the fact that the homicides were near equal in the 1970s but aren't now? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Burning_Bed Watch this movie based on a 1977 homicide. Seriously, watch the movie. I really don't think you understand how very few options there were for abused women in the 1970's. The fact is that the incredible rise in both awareness of domestic abuse and domestic abuse shelters since the 1970's has allowed women more options to escape from their abusers. Instead of h…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 07:44 PM
4

Begin filming the custody exchanges and tell her that you are doing this. That should cut down on a lot of the harassment and if it doesn't you will have evidence. Take screen shots of the social media posts for more evidence. The order specifies where you should pick up and drop off. Getting 50/50 with a breast feeding baby is going to be extremely difficult with or without a lawyer. A step up is likely in the cards either way. She is continuing to make the exchanges miserable and she still pos…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 07:06 PM
1

On this group, we'll stick to FBI statistics on reported crimes strictly when speaking of rape and sexual assault of women. the usual MRM Achilles heel -- honesty & integrity. Except that you only agree to the FBI statistics that further your own narrative. Honesty and integrity? Try again. Also, which do you think is less likely to be reported to the police? Rape or a dead body?
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:23 PM
1

The study in the comments section shows that women are getting away with DV homicide at an astonishing rate. No, it does not. Also the very same study you are relying on showed the reason for the rather minor discrepancy rate. According to information contained in prosecutor files, more wife defendants (44%) than husband defendants (10%) had been assaulted by their spouse (threatened with a weapon or physically assaulted) at or around the time of the murder. In certain circumstances, extreme vic…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 06:12 PM
1

Follow your own link. All it shows is that the number of men killed by intimate partners has precipitously declined since 1975. There is no information whatsoever that female intimate partners are killing men in great numbers and getting off. The comments section refers to a single study of a couple Counties in 1988 which showed that women have a slightly lower conviction rate. As the study noted, women had a significantly higher rate of receiving injuries during the period of the homicide, with…
/r/MensRights21/08/15 02:36 PM
1

There is no excuse for all those men killed by their female partners. It's a problem that should be addressed. However, it is not equal to the problem of the four times more women killed by their male partners. Pretending otherwise is just stupid.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 01:55 PM
1

So what's your excuse for all those women killed by their male partners? More people die in car accidents. LOL. Another shining example of irrational thought. Yeah, let's just tell everyone that women's deaths from domestic violence don't matter. That's sure to win people over to men's rights! /s
/r/MensRights21/08/15 07:20 AM
0

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fvv.pdf Or you could just look at the FBI statistics. Including the ones where they counted up the dead bodies. As compared to asking random people random questions. Seriously, this kind of bullshit is what gives men's rights a bad name. You don't look smart trying to deny the obvious. So what's your excuse for all those women killed by their male partners? "She started it." Jesus Christ, this isn't a school playground. " Then the goal posts will be moved to de…
/r/MensRights20/08/15 03:21 PM
1

Assisting a suicide is generally a crime. This isn't a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 09:31 PM
2

Although we had planned to conduct subgroup analyses examining grade and specialty, we decided not proceed because the data available did not allow the formation of meaningful groups. There was no data to support that was a meaningful difference in rates of being sued. Also, as another comment in the referenced thread notes, family practice doctors are third most likely to be sued in the U.S.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 11:06 PM
1

What schedule are you trying to get? Can you for example take your child Monday through Wednesday instead of on weekends? Especially when kids reach school age the courts are focused on the child having a predictable parenting time schedule. Not one where you'll take her for the weekend unless you have to work and then you'll just take random make-up days. That's too stressful on the child and on the other parent. It's harsh, but at some point the court will no longer force your ex to accommodat…
/r/MensRights10/08/15 11:59 PM
1

I don't remember that there was no car in the video. Time?
/r/MensRights10/08/15 09:04 PM
1

Buying a "fixer upper" car for a not yet driving age teen and then spending the next couple years working on it with him is something that many fathers do. My neighbor did this with both of his boys and it's pretty common in my extended family. It's not just a car, it's a hobby they can share that the boy is excited about. Maybe not this boy with his step-father... :(
/r/MensRights10/08/15 03:33 PM
1

It's a very bad idea to encourage your child to violate a custody order and film your child doing that during a scene that you have obviously set up with the child in advance.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 02:58 PM
1

I don't know where you live. Here in the U.S. living next to a big city, murderers are a dime a dozen. One shows up on the news every day and then they quickly fade away. Male, female, black, white, old, young, whatever... It's just a fact of life. Do you know that 45 people were murdered in Baltimore in the month of July? The month of July. We don't need history books and we sure as heck don't need to scour the globe to find examples of it. Is women getting away with murder not a men's rights i…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 02:38 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3g5rqr/montreal_feminists_are_attacking_a_mens_self_help/ This post and comments was published today in /r/MensRights. Once again, don't blame feminists because journalists think Roosh is part of Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 02:07 PM
-1

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded/expandhomicidemain FBI. United States. Convicted murderers by gender. Slightly over 90 percent are male. Being slapped, pushed or punched really doesn't compare to being murdered. Plus dead bodies are very hard to hide. So yeah, there's that. Kind of difficult to claim that the differential in genders is due to prejudice.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 01:49 AM
1

there is no society where the word nigger is used in a positive or neutral manner, LOL. Ha ha ha. Dude, you obviously are not familiar with subsets of American music or culture. The point is that only some people can use it and you darn well better know which group of people you are. No one can or does use the C word in America, except in a highly derogatory manner. Reddit is used by other countries than America? Sure, that's nice. There is no excuse for intentionally deeply offending people. Yo…
/r/MensRights08/08/15 12:56 AM
0

Right, just try using the N word in America. The C word is very close to the same. Some words you don't say without expecting a major backlash. It's not like there is some profound lack of other vocabulary.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 12:23 AM
-2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3g0pwl/meta_cunts/ Well now, gosh, maybe if we didn't have 40 recent comments in this sub defending referring to women as cunts, we wouldn't have posts like this. You think? Just possibly?
/r/MensRights07/08/15 11:45 PM
0

Nine out of ten convicted murderers in the U.S. are men. Of course the news stories will more often involve men as the accused in murders. Men are more often violent. Do you expect the newspapers to fudge the numbers? It is what it is. Same deal for Black Americans. It is what it is. There is a significantly higher violent crime rate. We could all sit around howling about prejudice, but how are we supposed to explain all those dead bodies? It is what it is.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 11:25 PM
-4

Since 9 out of 10 convicted murderers in the U.S. are men, that's actually representative of what the news will be. This is not prejudice. This is reality.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 11:11 PM
1

All of these alleged crimes were extremely recent. Are you suggesting that the criminal justice system should not be followed for women? Surely you understand that this takes time?
/r/MensRights07/08/15 11:07 PM
0

Apparently you completely failed to read my post. Try doing that.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 11:05 PM
-1

I am an MRA. For the issues that I believe strongly about. Check out my previous posts: https://www.reddit.com/user/Karissa36/submitted/ I don't come here to harass people. I just pick and choose my issues. Want to talk to me about the extreme injustice of single fathers who involuntarily lose their children to adoption? I'm actually on the verge of rabid about that. Hell will fucking freeze over before any child of my son is involuntarily given up for adoption. In Utah or anywhere else. I am st…
/r/MensRights07/08/15 10:49 PM
0

None of the 4 women in the above posts has been convicted, let alone sentenced.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 08:56 PM
0

None of the women in the above 4 posts have been convicted, let alone sentenced.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 08:54 PM
-1

Well, thanks for sharing. Maybe some of us would prefer to be here on a well moderated subreddit. Maybe some of us think that Men's Rights would benefit more from being on reddit, a site with a huge worldwide audience, then on some site most people have never heard of. Maybe some of us would prefer that you go piss in the pool somewhere else. Since you don't give a damn if all of us get banned here.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 08:51 PM
-2

“Women are wonderful” effect From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The “women are wonderful” effect is the phenomenon found in psychological research which suggests that people associate more positive attributes with the general social category of women compared to men. This effect reflects an emotional bias toward women as a general case. The phrase was coined by Eagly & Mladinic (1994) after finding that both men and women participants tend to assign exceptionally positive traits to women (men…
/r/MensRights07/08/15 08:42 PM
0

Which would be helpful if even a single one of the women in the above posts had been convicted and sentenced. Now, not so much.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 08:19 PM
-1

Not even one of the 4 women in the above posts has even been convicted yet, let alone sentenced. So differential punishment is obviously not an issue yet or a reason for the posts.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 08:17 PM
1

http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/human-life-and-dignity/abortion/post-abortion-healing/ This is a resource that you might find helpful. They help men as well as women.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 01:46 PM
86

Agreed. I strongly suspect that if the plaintiffs had been Hasidic Jews who wanted to keep their side locks the decision would have been different.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 01:12 PM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2w68fr/a_voice_for_men_publishes_interview_celebrating/ A Voice for Men interviewed Roosh and wrote a favorable post about him. So don't blame feminists because journalists think Roosh is part of Men's Rights.
/r/MensRights06/08/15 11:46 PM
3

As long as /r/KillingWomen and /r/CuteFemaleCorpses still exists, I doubt this sub has anything to worry about. Reddit still has many subs that are just sick, sick, sick!
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:43 AM
0

An article about Indian men seeking divorce because their wives didn't make tea for their male friends once, or wore pants to work, or have acne. Seriously?
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:25 AM
1

Yes, it's real. Get to know Paul Elam better and you won't be surprised at a lot of the shit that site wrote and did. Start here: http://www.buzzfeed.com/adamserwer/how-mens-rights-leader-paul-elam-turned-being-a-deadbeat-dad#.gpxZbK4JM
/r/MensRights06/08/15 10:08 AM
1

A kid that he never supported. Yeah, don't sign me up for his cheering squad. Look, the mere fact that the DA has referred to this as a cold case means that the rape was reported a very very long time ago. Likely by the kid when she was 13 years old. The mere fact that the DA is prosecuting this 40 plus years later means that the report and charges are actual rape, not statutory rape. For a 13 year old. The mere fact that the prosecutor after all these years somehow got a DNA match means that th…
/r/MensRights06/08/15 02:32 AM
2

On top of that i was under the impression that Va has a statute of limitations on statutory rape. I am quite sure that it does. He must be charged with regular rape. Just because he now describes it as consensual doesn't mean that she agreed. (Let's face it, if they have his DNA the only thing he can say as a defense is that it was consensual.) Since they had to test DNA from other people, it is likely that she was unconscious or passed out when the rape occurred. Or she was raped by a stranger …
/r/MensRights05/08/15 09:20 PM
1

The terms were not broken. A prosecutor can agree to recommend a certain sentence, or to not oppose it when a defense attorney recommends a certain sentence, but the judge has sole discretion in what sentence is given. Most of the time a judge will follow the agreement, but not always. So the prosecutor can never absolutely promise a certain sentence. The parents seem very legally unsophisticated here. Their petition asks the prosecutor to drop all charges. This is impossible because Zachery has…
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:07 PM
2

I think that you meant that guilty pleas can be coerced. However, there is no evidence that happened here. He had a private attorney. What happened here is an unexpected case of judicial discretion. A prosecutor and a defense attorney can agree to recommend X punishment for a guilty plea, (or at least that the prosecutor won't oppose the defense attorney's recommendation), and most of the time a judge will just rubber stamp that. However, a judge does not have to agree and rarely a judge will im…
/r/MensRights05/08/15 02:09 PM
0

I have read 50 Shades of Gray and it does not depict actual rape. She consents in advance. Heck, she even consents in writing in advance. The book is classic BDSM themes. Badly written, but not rape.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 07:20 PM
7

He already plead guilty so the conviction can't be appealed. Their only hope is that the judge will voluntarily reduce his sentence.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 06:36 PM
0

I agree that timeliness is important for a fair hearing in the justice system. (Although you would be amazed what the statutes of limitations are for many serious criminal charges.) However, these women aren't using the justice system. They are just publicly speaking out. You can't go around defaming people unless you have evidence. Testimony is evidence. You don't have to have a rape kit, etc. As to whether it is defamation, that decision would be made based on credibility of the parties.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 01:45 PM
-1

Sure, if the woman wants criminal or civil action taken against the accused, she must proceed in a timely manner. However, her choice not to do so doesn't mean she can't ever talk about what happened for the rest of her life. Failing to report earlier is a credibility issue, but there are lots of issues that can affect credibility on both sides. "Large numbers of alleged victims didn't complain about it then so they can't complain about it now" didn't work out very well for the Catholic church's…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 12:34 PM
0

Thank you. I'll keep that in mind in the future. That's not a bad rule to have. However, it should also be applied to the endless "I got banned from subreddit X" posts here on /u/MensRights. They are becoming quite tiresome.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 11:51 AM
0

Wow. They deleted everything!
/r/MensRights01/08/15 04:04 AM
0

No, I have no idea who the user is who posted that. This user does have a number of other posts in /r/MensRights, so I am thinking he/she is legit.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:21 AM
-1

The comments are more important than the post. The post was only a couple sentences restating the title.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 01:59 AM
1

Black people do not kill more people than white people in the U.S. because they are only about 15 percent of the population.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 01:58 PM
2

You know, you can't always tell from a dead body the race and gender of the person who killed it. You can't always tell whether it was a homicide. True, very true. What's your point? That women are just amazingly better at committing murder and not getting caught? Men are actually being murdered by the thousands while women just get away with it? Do you have any proof of that? Nor is homicide the only way in which someone could be "violent" or "controlling". Also true, very true. Check out the d…
/r/MensRights29/07/15 01:12 PM
0

Generally, years are used as the time period. It's not some vague formula based on seasons of the moon or something. Proxy violence is certainly a creative argument. I'll overlook that your two examples were based on fiction. However, the fact is that U.S. law vigorously prosecutes "proxy actions" that lead to criminal acts as conspiracy. For example, if you hire a hit man and he kills someone, both of you will be charged and likely convicted of murder 1. Same deal if a woman just gets her boyfr…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 09:10 PM
-4

Of the female murder victims for whom the relationships to their offenders were known, 37.5 percent were murdered by their husbands or boyfriends. Can you show that an equal number of men are murdered by their wives and girlfriends? Of course not. Don't you think it is absolute disregard for women's lives to equate their domestic violence MURDERS with throwing dishes? I suggest you reconsider whose argument is asinine.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 07:45 PM
-2

Not always. When it is a fact that more than 9 out of 10 female murder victims were murdered by men in a certain time period, that 90 plus percent is not an estimate.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 07:11 PM
-4

We don't need "estimates" when we have the actual crime statistics. Get back to us when you have an actual crime statistic that shows women are more likely to be violently attacked by other women instead of by men. Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 07:01 PM
-5

http://www.americanbar.org/groups/domestic_violence/resources/statistics.html Here is a comprehensive collection of U.S. Department of Justice statistics on domestic violence. From actual criminal cases of domestic violence, not college surveys. The kind of cases where people actually need medical treatment for injuries. Not surprisingly, men are overwhelmingly the perpetrators. So who is more violent? Who is actually causing physical injuries? Yeah, let's just forget about murder and hospitaliz…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 06:56 PM
-7

Do I think there is some massive U.S. conspiracy to just randomly hide huge numbers of dead bodies killed by white people and only prosecute black people for murder? No, I don't think that. No intelligent person thinks that. The criminal justice system is racist in many ways, but at the end of the day you have to say, "Hey, where did all these dead bodies come from?" The answer is the answer is the answer.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 06:38 PM
-2

Of the female murder victims for whom the relationships to their offenders were known, 37.5 percent were murdered by their husbands or boyfriends. How's that for domestic violence? You know, the kind of domestic violence where someone ends up dead. Not the kind where college kids fill out a survey. Men are overwhelmingly murdered more often by men. Women are overwhelmingly murdered more often by men. So who is more violent? It's titles and claims like on this post that makes MRA's look stupid. S…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 06:28 PM
-6

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded/expandhomicidemain Yeah, right, let's just ask college students questions instead of looking at the official U.S. crime statistics to decide which sex is more violent. /s More than 90 percent of U.S. murderers are men. Men are the overwhelming majority committing violent crimes. We know that from actual convictions and actual dead bodies. Not from asking questions on a su…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 04:50 PM
1

That's what you don't seem to understand. I don't give a shit what your opinion is. We'll see what happens with the lawsuit which as of now hasn't even been filed.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 04:36 PM
1

Go ahead. When the lawsuit, (if it is even filed), is resolved then we'll see who is right.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 04:18 PM
2

A judge can base child support on your earning ability rather than your actual earnings. This happens most often when a judge believes that you have voluntarily decreased your income. a portion of which is managing the estate of my father who also was in the music business. This could be a problem if it represents a significant portion of your income. The judge could believe that you would get the residuals anyway and very little "real" work is involved. You won't be forced to get a different jo…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 11:41 AM
1

Or maybe I just object to a group collecting thousands of dollars in donations for a lawsuit that has very little chance of success. They have already collected more in donations than they are ever going to get in court. It looks like a scam. Edit: The link says that they have already collected over $30,000. in donations for legal fees. For a lawsuit which on a really good day might be worth $3,000. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 11:03 AM
1

Anger management is how people control and prevent those reflex reactions. This can and should be learned. In therapy if necessary.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 02:35 PM
4

I'm really not getting where all these emotionless men are supposed to be. The men I know are pretty articulate about their feelings. Granted they don't sit around crying in their coffee at work, but neither do I.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 02:26 PM
3

Even if there is a restraining order against you the court will still give you parenting time. Don't give up. As for the other, if the marital situation is bad enough to cause you to flip out and hit her, you really can't complain that it caused her to flip out and be a total bitch. Nope, "she made me mad" is not an acceptable excuse for hitting her. Why do women expect to be treated like women if they do not act that way? What way? In a way that never makes you hurt or angry? Dude, seek therapy…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 02:04 PM
-3

I agree it's a huge disappointment for you but biology has to be the trump card on this one. She needs as calm as possible environment to give birth, bond and successfully begin breast feeding. For whatever reason she views you as a hostile presence, which would cause stress to her and by extension to your newborn. Stressing out a new mother is not good for the baby and can interfere with breast feeding. You can expect to establish paternity and get an order about 8 to 10 weeks after filing. The…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 05:28 AM
1

Yes. I think that his whole "I am a feminist" story is just some bullshit to get other women to have sex with him. Like many many men, he pursued an open relationship only to realize that his wife can get laid any time but other women aren't all that interested in him. This is nothing new in the polyamory/open marriage/swinging communities. It happens all the time. Maybe in this case his wife really did push for it. Most of the time it's the men who push for it thinking they are going to find so…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 06:37 PM
2

Being older than the average redditor, and married for most of my life until my husband died, I would like to just drop here some of the reasons that other married men had for trying to convince me to sleep with them. 'My wife never has sex with me. We haven't had sex for 10 years." Really? So who is the father of your children? This is a really fun sentence to drop into that conversation. "My wife doesn't understand me." Yeah, like I care. "We have an open relationship." Great, have your wife c…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 02:33 PM
2

TIL: There are Asians with blond hair. Really?
/r/MensRights24/07/15 01:55 PM
1

No, actually it ties in with the heavily increased U.S. weights for women of child bearing age during the same period. It's not politically correct to say it, but you really can be too damn fat to have a healthy baby. ACOG, the American College of Gyn/Ob's, has recently come out with a statement urging doctors to tell selected women to lose weight before becoming pregnant. It's just so painfully obvious that over a reasonable weight pregnancy is highly dangerous for the mother and the baby. Gest…
/r/MensRights24/07/15 01:41 AM
-4

He said that he was in the article.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 09:26 PM
-1

I don't even begin to understand the dynamics of open relationships. I can tell you that there is plenty of social prejudice towards them. So, sure, he might have just seized on a reason to justify their behavior. A reason which he perceives as more likely to get him laid than "We just want to be promiscuous".
/r/MensRights23/07/15 09:24 PM
7

WTF is up with everyone completely ignoring the fact that this guy is banging other women too? Which he admits in the article. By the way have you ever heard excuses from married men who bang other women? While I'll grant you that feminism is a very unusual excuse, it is by no means the dumbest excuse I have heard for infidelity.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 06:04 PM
9

Japan is a special case. The cost of living is insanely high, workers are expected to be on the job for 12 or more hours a day, and it is almost impossible for a woman with even one child to stay employed. On top of that adult children are expected to support their parents, most often while living with them in a very small space. Japan has profoundly failed at work life balance while relying on working age adults to solely support an ever increasing older population of family members. It is not …
/r/MensRights22/07/15 02:21 AM
3

http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/pmss.html There is better information at this link. Some of it is just better reporting, but hypertension, diabetes and heart disease have also drastically increased in U.S. pregnant women. Frankly, far too many women of child bearing age are grossly over-weight. Pregnancy puts an additional and significant strain on the body. We also have a huge infertility industry, pumping older women full of hormones to achieve and maintain fragile p…
/r/MensRights21/07/15 12:50 PM
3

Why do womens periods and therefore estrous/ovulation sync up with other womens? When breast milk is the only possible food to keep infants alive, and the maternal death rate is high due to child birth and other things, synchronized pregnancies are a good thing. If the mother dies or can't successfully breast feed at any time during the first year, the baby can still survive if there is another breast feeding mother.
/r/MensRights20/07/15 05:01 PM
3

Hunting large animals with primitive tools, even in groups, is quite dangerous. Hunter gatherer societies had to be willing to encourage risk taking and lose a few men for the greater survival of the group. In addition, there is really no substitute for breast feeding in subsistence cultures. With a high maternal death rate from child birth, having another lactating woman available to feed the baby if the mother died or became sick and lost her milk supply was a huge survival advantage. Think ab…
/r/MensRights20/07/15 04:37 PM
3

Who are you kidding? He was married and sexually active with his former wife when both of his children were conceived. His former wife says both kids are his. He never got any DNA tests to disprove this. No other alleged father has stepped up. Ummm, "maybe the kids aren't mine, since I don't feel like paying child support, but I won't set up any DNA tests to actually determine that" is complete and total bullshit. Having the mother of your children decide that it is in the best interests of the …
/r/MensRights20/07/15 02:49 AM
-8

For example, vaginal rape disclosure was elicited as follows: “I put my penis or I put my fingers or objects into a woman’s vagina without her consent by: taking advantage when she was too drunk or out of it to stop what was happening Reading comprehension. It's a good thing. Also, are you claiming to be unable to determine if someone is falling down drunk or passed out without a witness? That's pretty convenient, considering how few witnesses are around during a rape. 1 out of 10 men might agre…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 06:36 PM
-11

So we found the 1 in 10...
/r/MensRights17/07/15 05:55 PM
2

http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2375127 690 out of 737 men who admitted committing rape reported doing so once before entering college and then never doing it again. It is likely that the vast majority of these encounters involved teenage girls incapacitated by alcohol. It is also likely that the boys at the time did not consider this to be rape. Edit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1oahqCzwcY&bpctr=1437154238 Just like these high school boys in the Steubenville rape cas…
/r/MensRights17/07/15 04:59 PM
2

http://www.buzzfeed.com/adamserwer/how-mens-rights-leader-paul-elam-turned-being-a-deadbeat-dad#.hmx4wXr7M Paul Elam is a complete embarrassment as the "face" of the men's rights movement. Hostile, misogynistic, selfish, antagonistic, lazy, money-grubber piece of shit who abandoned his own children to get out of paying child support. Then complains about the family courts that he never actually even used to try to get visitation with his children or anything else. If he was in politics he would …
/r/MensRights17/07/15 12:38 PM
-3

Went to Voat and looked around. Seriously, it sucks. Can r/MensRights kindly stop pushing Voat? Not only is it an amateur site with few members, but last I heard they were paying people to set up subs and bring new members in. Go sell tupperware or something. Stop fear-mongering. /r/MensRights will not be banned.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 03:04 AM
1

This would be a much stronger case if a man had filed it. I expect one will soon and then we will have equal draft registration. Which we should. However, I doubt that would actually result in equal numbers of men and women being drafted, especially for combat. The military has a lot of discretion and it's not hard at all to come up with "reasons" for some exclusions. As an example, consider this one. "Now that we have our pick of people, we're only going to draft (unless we desperately need mor…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:22 PM
2

You made the podcast before you were kicked out of the convention. How did the comments go on that podcast? Did they all talk positively about the panel members? That will give you an excellent idea on whether you created a negative environment by making that podcast. It doesn't really matter what your reasons were. If the convention decided that you were creating a negative environment, they were entitled to eject you. It is completely irrelevant whether you accused panel members of being misog…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 04:28 AM
3

This doesn't make much sense. You would have costs for attending 20 conventions over the next 10 years. Now maybe you wouldn't need to bring the entire team of Honey Badgers with you, but it is doubtful the cost would be substantially less than $700. per conference. There is also the problem of privity of contract. I don't recall which name you signed the contract for a display booth under, yourself or the Honey Badgers, but that is the only entity the convention has a duty to. You can't get dam…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:36 AM
2

We didn't use "recorded quotes" during the podcast. I can't find the podcast on YouTube anymore. I seem to recall you used quotes. Perhaps you just stated what was said. Regardless your podcast was quite negative about the panel discussion, I don't think it was fairly indicative of the entire panel discussion which on the whole was quite balanced, and you directly accused the panel of "damseling". We uploaded the recording after the allegations of "harrassment" were made. But before they kicked …
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:15 AM
1

35 comic books per convention at 20$/book for 10 years, assuming no increase in popularity. It should be painfully obvious that if it cost over $12,000. to attend the convention, (as the pleading claims), and their anticipated comic sales at each convention were only $700., it's impossible to show a loss of income from not being able to attend future conferences. In addition, this is anticipated sales of $7,000., not $14,000. The damage claim here needs some very serious work. "To Be Provided" d…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 07:54 PM
-1

There was nothing said or done by her that would in any way create a negative or unsafe environment or show disrespect to those with whom they contended. As I recall this was one of the stipulations required of attendees at the conference. As I also recall, on the evening of the 17th Alison published a Honey Badger podcast on YouTube which was quite negative about this panel discussion, selectively used recorded quotes that were not fairly indicative of the entire panel discussion, and generally…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 07:34 PM
1

What most people don't realize is that FMLA does not require employers to offer any paid leave at all. (There are also lots of U.S. employers that don't offer any or extremely limited paid sick or vacation time, for maternity leave or anything else.) The use of sick time here is not really discriminatory. Assume instead that a husband has a heart attack and both husband and wife take FMLA. He gets his sick time paid. She will not. He is sick. She is not.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:50 AM
1

http://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs28B.pdf You are entitled to up to 12 weeks unpaid leave for the birth of a child. Unlike mothers who give birth, you can't use your sick leave because you will not be sick. You can use vacation time.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 01:41 AM
0

That works out to 4 hours a week. For hourly workers then certainly a gap would be justified. For upper management and professionals not necessarily. It's a pretty common practice in offices I have seen for professional women to work through lunch and/or skip breaks to leave earlier because they have daycare pick-ups. I would like to see the original survey questions and whether they addressed lunch and breaks.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 11:45 PM
-1

according to recent survey data from the American Medical Group Association, with nearly 4 in 10 female doctors between the ages of 35 and 44 reporting in 2010 that they worked part time. It's 40 percent and only from the ages of 35 to 44. Considering that most female doctors by necessity delay child bearing, these are their young child rearing years. It doesn't mean they will never go back to full time. Older doctors are more likely to be male because it is only in the last couple decades that …
/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:36 PM
6

This study only included medicare patients. Almost all medicare patients are over 65. What this study tells us is that male doctors have more patients over age 65, and possibly that those patients are sicker than the ones seen by female doctors. (Possibly, because there are other factors that may influence the increased procedure rate of male doctors. Not all of these factors are benign.) I strongly suspect that female doctors are more likely to be practicing things like pediatrics, family medic…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:03 PM
1

http://content.foxtvmedia.com/wjbk/pdf/tsimhoni_kids_sent_to_jail.pdf This is the court transcript. Note that the parents have been fighting in court for the last SIX years. It is painfully obvious that the kids have been alienated from their father.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 05:25 PM
-1

First seven seconds.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:00 PM
-2

First seven seconds. He shoves her in the back, she turns to look, and then he shoves her again from the side.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 05:41 PM
-3

She attacked him first He made first physical contact. Three times. He shoved her twice and then grabbed her wrist when she made a fist to back him off. He was not legally entitled to touch her. Ever. He did it three times and was still grabbing onto her when she hit him.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:32 PM
-3

I'm baffled at how many people think repeatedly shoving someone to get to the bar is okay. He made first physical contact. Three times before she hit him to get him away and he was holding onto her wrist when she did. He was not legally entitled to touch her. Ever. This just isn't that hard to understand.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 04:12 PM
-2

Did you not see where he shoves her twice? Watch the beginning again.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:55 PM
-1

http://www.meetup.com/find/?allMeetups=false&keywords=men&radius=100&userFreeform=19102+-+Philadelphia%2C+Pennsylvania%2C+USA&mcId=z19102&sort=default Gosh, how do you think all these men managed it? Have those nasty feminists just not discovered meetup.com yet? Or maybe they are just targeting you personally? Really, this "we can't accomplish a damn thing because of feminists" trope is wearing very thin and getting very old.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:24 PM
-4

He was holding onto her wrist when she hit him and not letting go. He shoves her twice, is way too close to her, and when she raises a fist telling him to back off he grabs her instead. He is NOT legally entitled to "mild physical contact". In a crowded bar or anywhere else. I would not have punched him, but only because I am more mature and would not be drunk. When you tell some fucking stranger to back off and he grabs hold of you instead that is a panic situation. He should never have made ph…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 03:11 PM
-5

the inequality of a women believing she can instigate violence and be excused He shoved her twice. He instigated. He made first contact. Twice. No, there is not some God given right to get to the bar and shove people out of your way to do it.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 02:24 PM
-3

Yes, after he shoves her twice and she raises a fist to get him to back off and he makes it a physical confrontation instead -- he is an asshole.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 02:18 PM
-5

She hit him first, in the face, it's her fault. Period. He shoved her first. Twice. He was clearly and aggressively invading her personal space even after she told him to back off. I do NOT see excessive shoving LOL. WTH is the matter with you people? NO shoving is ever acceptable (or legal) at any time. He made first and second contact. What I see is that she wants that spot for herself, but he doesn't let her. She was in that spot first. If he can't move into a spot without shoving or rubbing …
/r/MensRights08/07/15 02:12 PM
-17

So here we are again with the constantly recurring /r/MensRights thread defending some asshole who punched a woman. Not a good look.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:47 PM
-7

Women need to understand even though it is socially expected for them to have some courtesies from men, they shouldn't feel they deserve it and expect it from everyone. Yeah, no. Women are perfectly entitled to expect that some asshole is not going to repeatedly shove them while trying to get to the bar. Respecting personal space is not optional.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:37 PM
-9

Or he could have backed the fuck off after already shoving her into the bar twice. Look at that video. He is way way too close to her. No, getting to the bar by shoving other people is not some basic right. He is screwed in court with this video. I am really surprised how many people are defending this neanderthal. TIL: many people on reddit go to much rowdier bars than I do.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 01:14 PM
-1

Dude, men set up men only groups all the time. You can do it for only $30. dollars a year on meetup.com. Just do it if you want to. Nope, no one is going to care, let alone seriously bother you. If you want it you can do it and no one will stand in your way. We are not talking rocket science here. Want a group, create it. Like minded individuals will join.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 12:29 AM
-5

They weren't married. I don't think that legally she can unilaterally put his name on the birth certificate. Also it's just bad policy to expect hospitals to mediate some tug of war over who visits the baby if they can't all be in the same room. What if he wanted to stay for 8 hours? What if she demanded that the baby be returned to her? What if all this stress interferes with breast feeding? The practicalities are just a cluster fuck of massive proportions.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 05:30 PM
2

In the lawsuit he wanted to be notified when she went into labor. The court was understandably unwilling to order a woman in labor to track down and communicate with someone she apparently hates.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 05:20 PM
3

Is he going to be naked in the delivery room too?
/r/MensRights07/07/15 05:15 PM
16

The problem here is that the father was demanding in the lawsuit that he be notified when the mother went into labor so he could be at the hospital. Now on it's face that seems pretty reasonable. The reason the court wouldn't go for it is that it is just plain unenforceable. Labor and delivery are highly unpredictable, highly stressful and often highly painful. The courts don't want to be in the crappy position of sifting out all possible reasons through testimony that the mother didn't inform f…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 04:55 PM
6

Well, no, not within a few minutes. I can't support snatching a naked newborn from his mother's breast while she is still delivering the placenta or being stitched up. After the baby has been taken to the newborn nursery, bathed and medically cleared is soon enough.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 04:41 PM
3

http://www.meetup.com/find/?allMeetups=false&keywords=men&radius=100&userFreeform=19102+-+Philadelphia%2C+Pennsylvania%2C+USA&mcId=z19102&sort=default Meetup.com costs about $30. a year to set up your own private group. There is no reason someone couldn't use it to set up a men's group at their university. It would just be a private (not university sponsored) group.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 04:26 PM
0

"Is your complaint that men haven't created these groups for themselves?" was the first reply, which came a couple minutes later. Well??? This is a pretty reasonable question and the fact is that you have not created a "men only" support group. Co-ed groups may often have an added element of sexual attraction/romance/sexual harassment in the mix that these women don't want to deal with. They don't have to. Considering your previous issues with Erica, I'm surprised you seem to automatically rejec…
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:13 PM
10

You win! Spoiler Alert -- Those poor women prison guards maybe don't have a man at home and are lonely, then these male inmates start being all charming and acting like they are in love... Poor deluded women just can't resist. You really should watch the video though just to see how unashamedly blatant this is. On a major TV network. Also note the frequent references to "consensual" sex.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 11:43 PM
2

http://blog.mlive.com/kalamazoo_gazette_extra/2008/09/coping_with_divorce_local_grou.html Quite a few churches in my area host divorce support groups, so if this location isn't convenient encourage your friend to call other churches.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 09:29 PM
3

Source? I doubt you can find any proof that married women cheat more often than married men.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 03:16 PM
4

You do realize that a man participates every time a woman has sexual intercourse, right? Seems your judgment is appallingly one sided.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 02:57 PM
1

Not from the examples of her behavior that he listed. She is pointing out examples of what she perceives to be sexism against women in the workplace. Granted her examples are pretty weak, but no lawyer is going to be eager to take a case saying that women shouldn't be able to complain about sexist behavior or comments in the workplace because this somehow creates a hostile working environment for men.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 08:23 AM
1

He can't prove anything. None of this is directed at him personally. He has no more of a case than any other one of a thousand random men in the company.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 03:57 AM
8

Stay out of it. Trust me, management likes her a whole lot less than you do. This social justice warrior crap may get respect in college, but in the real working world she is more than an annoyance, she is a walking lawsuit.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 09:32 PM
1

It is your income. Married parents support their children with their after tax (net) income. Divorced and single parents should do the same. Shifting child support to be income of the children for tax purposes would essentially just shelter it from all taxes or have it taxed at a far lower rate than the parents. Since we don't do this for married parents it would be unfair to do it for single and divorced parents.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 12:38 PM
-25

Four students clap hands and shout and then promptly leave. Total time of disruption from when students start to when students leave is two minutes. Frankly, this is at worst a minor annoyance. All movements for social change will face backlash. Successful movements focus on accomplishing their goals, not on wallowing in a victim complex.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 01:09 PM
-6

The problem here is the assumption that there is always one person best qualified for the position. This is rarely true in real life. More often for most jobs employers have a number of different people to choose from and all of them are qualified. In this scenario nudging employers out of their comfort zones to achieve some diversity is justified.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 10:21 AM
-9

Gay people, like everyone else, can do as they please. Feminists have no duty to save the world. No one does and it's not like men's rights ever did. It's pretty easy for people who have accomplished basically nothing to criticize other people's movements from four plus decades ago. It looks ridiculous. What the hell has Dean Esmay ever actually accomplished, for men's rights or anything else? Sitting around bitching and whining and fighting with random internet feminists is just circle jerking.…
/r/MensRights27/06/15 03:49 AM
-38

So basically here we have an entire article of unsupported slander against feminists. Unless you count random anonymous tweets and the mysterious unattributed quote about the red stockings and other unnamed feminists in the 1960's and 1970's. Where did that quote come from? Guess? Another unsupported slanderous article written by A Voice for Men. http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/m-g-t-o-w/feminist-gay-bashing/ Yeah, I can understand why Dean didn't want to identify his "source".
/r/MensRights26/06/15 07:34 PM
0

Sensible women don’t jump into bed with men for a sex assignation, then complain if they don’t behave like Prince Charming. Sensible women would develop a trusting relationship with a man before taking it to a more intimate level. No, Asshole! Sensible men (and women) don't cause physical harm to any sex partner, under any circumstances, unless they are very damn sure that behavior is welcome. Suggesting that only partners in a "trusting relationship" are entitled to not be physically harmed is …
/r/MensRights26/06/15 06:49 PM
2

Not in the U.S. In some States divorced parents are responsible for child support through college. However, if this kid really did file for child support against his dad, he would have known it is not called alimony. I think this is a troll post.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 06:27 PM
0

Two wrongs don't make a right.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 01:10 PM
1

Google your State and child support tables. Fill out the forms and they will show you what you will have to pay. It's much better to get a lawyer and file for joint custody while you are still living with your child.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 12:19 PM
10

Volunteer at soup kitchens and homeless shelters. They primarily serve men.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 02:51 PM
2

There was only a 2 percent difference between the opinions of college students and adults out of college.
/r/MensRights20/06/15 12:51 AM
2

No, they assume that because that was really the position of anti-feminists back in the day, and is currently the position of some anti-feminists today.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 12:50 PM
2

Nope, dude, this is the real world. Men do get child support. When there is a significant income differential and both are involved in caring for the child.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 11:02 PM
2

The problem is that in American society as a whole there are very very many "old school" feminists like me. Reddit tends to have a much younger demographic, but when it comes to actual voters and actual people in positions of political power, attacking feminism is unproductive due to all the (somewhat) older people with old school feminist beliefs. Very few old school feminists have the slightest idea about the very real inequalities and problems for men that currently exist. Attack feminism and…
/r/MensRights13/06/15 10:38 PM
2

He is a firefighter. She is a doctor. If he sought any visitation at all then she would be paying him substantial child support. She doesn't want or need his money. She doesn't want or need him involved.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 07:37 PM
1

I did read your second link. He helped on average 6 men and children a year for 3 years. Let's just be nice and say that he was unable to demonstrate a significant need for taxpayer funding and that people who kill themselves may not be all that emotionally stable. As for CAFE, there is this: http://www.vice.com/read/we-went-to-a-mens-rights-lecture-in-toronto Once again, Paul Elam screws up what could otherwise be a fairly decent movement. When are we going to kick this hateful misogynist to th…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 07:17 PM
1

Seriously??? You seriously want to tell people that if the men's rights movement raised the money and opened some shelters for abused men that feminists would somehow stop this? Do you know how stupid that sounds? Other activist groups manage to raise money and proceed with their own projects. Other activist groups engage in the political process. Other activist groups actually do something, build something, create something, help people, etc.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 08:08 PM
1

The upcoming annual conference of the National Organization for Women does not list ISIS or Boko Haram on its agenda. While the most recent Women’s Studies annual conference did focus on foreign policy, they were only interested in Palestine... Right, the men's rights movement should blame feminists for not doing enough. Feminists should have added that topic to their conferences. Oh wait, they actually have annual conferences? They have been doing this for decades? Like they don't get "tired" o…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 02:31 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/38hg4t/entitlement_nice_guys_and_feminism/ It's because of posts and threads like this one above. Also the red pill type posts and comments. Also A Voice for Men. Also the gamer gate group. Also the constant attacks on feminism. Also what appears to be a complete lack of any productive action in the men's rights movement. Example: Bitch endlessly about how men are victims of domestic violence also and yet have very little access to domestic violence sh…
/r/MensRights10/06/15 01:27 PM
-10

Redditor for less than 30 minutes when this post was made. Troll post.
/r/MensRights08/06/15 09:33 AM
23

Private schools often just have one blanket field trip permission for parents to sign that is valid for all trips all year.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 03:38 PM
2

You posted stories on suicidewatch and are surprised no one called you a liar? What kind of sick fuck would attack a suicidal person? For that matter, what kind of sick fuck would troll a suicide help group and divert resources and attention from the people who really need it?
/r/MensRights05/06/15 12:42 PM
0

Of course it is a lousy solution, but for some of these guys it is the only way they will find women willing to have sex with them. It's a heck of a lot more reasonable than their half assed reasoning that somehow magically they can demand that women just change to accommodate their ongoing needs because women "should" want to have sex with them.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 12:25 PM
1

No, you are only presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a criminal trial. A legal presumption is not a fact. It is only a presumption. How long a jury deliberates doesn't mean anything because there are too many variables, including but not limited to they just wanted to go home.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 11:31 PM
-1

Well, sure, if you consider "no one has the right to have sex with someone" a twisted sense of morality, I am going to continue to justify that. Do I understand how being unable to find a romantic partner can be frustrating and upsetting? Sure. Does that give you any reason to blame the uninterested potential partners? No.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 11:15 PM
1

LOL. Nice user name you have there also. Wishful thinking?
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:27 PM
-2

Not only that but this "extended adolescence" would also mean that women are choosing to spend the best years of their lives, where they are at their highest sexual value, with the wrong kind of men for the wrong kind of reasons. LOL. Let me guess here. The "wrong kind of man" is a man who is not like you. I seriously doubt that those "wrong kind of men" would agree with you. Obviously, the women don't. That, in of itself, is pretty significant. It would be like telling men "you are not good eno…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:23 PM
-2

There are many countries where prostitution is legal. There is even a place in Nevada where it is legal. Get on a plane.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:08 PM
-1

What moron thinks that we need scientific proof of a type of social attitude so we should just ignore the many many examples of same? Like all those posts of self-proclaimed "good guys" are just irrelevant. Typical man.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:06 PM
1

Every acquittal is not a false accusation. Posts like this one are coming up again and again in this sub and make MRA's look stupid. MANY actual crimes of all types can not be proven in a criminal trial beyond a reasonable doubt. That doesn't mean they didn't happen. This is why the jury verdict is always "not guilty" and never "innocent". Criminal trials do not determine innocence. Only whether there is proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt which is an extremely high standard. The fact is mo…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 07:12 PM
3

Now, I know some guys take dick space too far, but personally, its uncomfortable as hell to sit with my legs together in certain pants. You are responsible for your own clothing choices. It's one seat per customer. Deal. If someone's boobs encrouch on your seat then you would have a valid comparison.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:48 PM
-5

And, yet, not only is that what women, and feminists, are constantly doing on a daily basic with men, on a massive scale, with things like fat-acceptance The fat acceptance movement is going no where. I seriously doubt that men in droves are having sex with women they do not desire as a result of feminism, fat acceptance, or anything else. it is also completely ridiculous to call men entitled for demanding not to be held to different, unhealthy or unrealistic standards because they are men. The …
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:31 PM
-6

The bottom line is that women are the choosers Great! I choose George Clooney. Tell me when he will be calling. /s The fact is that men and women choose each other and the sex ratio is pretty even. So women by sheer logistics do not hold most of the cards. There is no evidence that women long term prefer irresponsible men. There is evidence that both sexes are delaying marriage and child bearing. This has resulted in my opinion in a sort of extended adolescence for both sexes, but I doubt it wil…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 06:01 PM
-8

Men find nice, sensitive women highly attractive, so it's jarring to learn that the same isn't true the other way around. There are plenty of nice sensitive ugly fat women who would disagree with this. I disagree with the article that these men having many short term partners shows in any way that women prefer them. First, the number of partners were self-reported, not independently verified, and these men seem very prone to lie. Second, note the partners were short term. Apparently none of thes…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 04:55 PM
-7

genuine desire Yes, that is what it comes down to. No, no one is entitled to demand that from some other person. If most women find that you are socially, romantically and sexually undesirable, then you need to figure out what YOUR problem is. It is not a cultural problem. Just like genuine desire, it is uniquely personal. men being penalized for being nice The idea that men are penalized for being nice is just arrogant bullshit from men who refuse to acknowledge the real reasons that women don'…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 04:14 PM
-3

http://www.np.reddit.com/r/niceguys/
/r/MensRights04/06/15 11:16 AM
-13

As long as prostitution exists these men are not involuntarily celibate. It is also highly unlikely that these men can't find any other women at all willing to have sex with them. So the issue is not that sex is completely unavailable for these men. The issue is that they can't get sex from the women they prefer to have sex with. Yeah, that's an attitude of entitlement.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 09:27 AM
-5

Sure, discussion is good. Sixteen years! As in seriously 16 years! I am reasonably certain that I could be struck dead by lightening tomorrow and my children would still manage to find each other. Sixteen years? Like wth was he doing? 24 hours wouldn't go by before I declared my children missing. Like seriously, wth? You make a report with the police and with CPS and with any government agency you can find and then you hit the internet. Hard. You seriously hit it hard already. Who the heck loses…
/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:39 PM
-17

Screw your ideology. Like the complete lack of going to CPS and the police and saying, "Hey, my fucking child is missing!" Yeah, actually, normal people do that. They don't wait 16 years either.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 05:09 PM
-49

Well, no. Your own child does not magically somehow disappear while you spend 16 years looking for her. There is a lot that is missing from this story.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 02:41 PM
1

When abortion and birth control were available and legalized back in the 60s, women earned the role as sole gatekeepers to parenthood. Hate to tell you this, dude, but women have always been the sole gatekeepers to parenthood. It might have been more messy and inelegant when newborn babies were just abandoned to die, but bottom line is women have always made the choices on who to propagate with. Women will always make the choices on who to propagate with. Unless you hope to set up slavery or som…
/r/MensRights01/06/15 07:40 AM
0

You live a charmed life. Where every parent actually cares about their children. Where every parent actually wants to raise them. Nope, that doesn't always happen. Then we deal with the debris of what happens next.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 03:05 AM
1

His investigation and resignation are much more likely to be related to the extramarital affair with his law clerk than to the DV.
/r/MensRights31/05/15 06:43 PM
2

This law is ridiculous and would probably be found by the courts to be void for vagueness. Misrepresenting the purpose of the act could be something as common as "We have a committed relationship" if the other person says they wouldn't have engaged in sex otherwise. Are we going to criminalize break-ups and cheating?
/r/MensRights31/05/15 06:38 PM
-1

This is ridiculous. There are no feminist hate law rules of evidence for U.S. criminal trials.
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:17 PM
-2

I rather thought the point was that precisely because of the feminist attack on civil rights and due process, you have no basis for telling who is innocent and who is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This is nonsense. You could have a vicious gang rape of a nun at gunpoint in an alley caught on a security camera and Elam still would not convict. Go ahead, explain how that is an advocacy for civil rights and not blatant misogyny?
/r/MensRights28/05/15 05:01 PM
0

Your attempt to balance that with the article you linked to is pathetic even if the article had been a comparable act of anti-civil rights advocacy. But of course it was not. On the contrary it was an advocacy for civil rights. The article states all men on trial for rape, no matter how flagrantly and obviously guilty, should not be convicted. This is an advocacy for civil rights? In what frigging universe? Since when is it a civil right to be able to rape women without consequences? What about …
/r/MensRights28/05/15 03:26 PM
0

https://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/p60-246.pdf Try again. Nearly 60 percent of all parents awarded child support did not receive the full amount in the year of the last U.S. census. (This piss poor figure was actually an improvement from previous years.) The average annual amount of child support received in the year of the last U.S. census was $3,770. This works out to about $300. per month or about $75. per week, primarily paid by non-custodial fathers who also were not doing the work of chi…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 06:11 PM
0

The distinction is that in the first case the needs of children are being met. In the second case the needs of children are not being met. These are not equal situations.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 02:07 PM
0

Why did/do we need a law forcing parents (overwhelmingly fathers) to provide for children in the circumstances where their parents part company? It's because many hundreds of thousands of them over many decades were not doing so voluntarily!!! This is not rocket science. I have better things to do than search google for you to show what we all know to be true. Just for fun, try searching this subreddit for all of the posts on legal paternal surrender and financial abortion. On which of these pos…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 02:01 PM
0

Why do you think we have child support laws in the first place?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 01:25 PM
-4

https://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/p60-246.pdf Try again. The average annual child support amount received in the latest U.S. census was $3,770. This works out to an average monthly payment of $314. per month. women go around that option frequently by popping holes in the condoms and/or misappropriating it's contents to sperm-jack his seed. Frequently? Dude, you are a paranoid whack job. Men underpin absolutely everything, both with their labor and money You also have delusions of grandeur. Ov…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 12:41 PM
2

Abolishing out of wedlock child support would instantly drop the skyrocketing out of wedlock birthrate AND the number of single parent homes. Those men who father multiple kids from different women and can't afford them, they are usually broke or have low end jobs and spotty work history. The flaw in your argument is that these men already are not supporting their children. The taxpayers are supporting their children. The mothers and children get the same amount of welfare, food stamps, low inco…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 09:47 AM
3

As a result, men are not fathering children with more than one other woman on average. Mothers on average have children consisting of two or more fathers. Well now, these mothers are not all getting pregnant from sperm banks. I suggest you check the validity of your sources. If the sources are valid, then what would you suggest we do about the few non-average men apparently having many children that they can't support?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 07:59 AM
-8

LOL. Here's a tough life lesson. Only have children with a person that you are married to and committed to and both of you are committed to raising your children together and both of you are capable of supporting your children together. You would be amazed how many social problems could be solved with self discipline, maturity and a sense of responsibility. On the flip side, there is not and never will be any default of law that can turn a person who just doesn't give a shit about their children…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 07:29 AM
1

A woman who lied about being on contraception and became pregnant.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 12:53 AM
-7

So tell us for how many years you did not pay, while your children still needed food and shelter and clothes, for the arrears to get this high?
/r/MensRights27/05/15 12:51 AM
0

Once upon a time in a galaxy far far away... Teenage boys dreamed of being the only 10 percent left of men in the world as part of their fap material. Wouldn't the women fight over them then? Those women who currently ignored them. Completely forgetting that the (delusional and not socially accepted ever at any time by any rational person) plan was to use sperm banks to repopulate the world. Frankly, there are a lot more men who are enthusiastic about this plan than feminists ever were. Yeah, yo…
/r/MensRights27/05/15 12:37 AM
105

I'm sure this law was also proposed for those "oops" pregnancies when women lie about using birth control. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights26/05/15 02:15 PM
3

What is she saying in your custody case?
/r/MensRights24/05/15 10:28 PM
2

The court will follow the support guidelines unless you have a really compelling reason not to. Call your car loan company. They might agree to extend and lower your last 2 payments. So you would pay over 4 months instead of 2 months.
/r/MensRights24/05/15 12:56 PM
14

That poor kid is going to need a lot of therapy.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:17 PM
-12

Hmmm. I agree with you that circumcision is not necessary. However, I believe much more strongly that you never ever ever, as in ever, give your husband reason to think that you believe any penis is more preferable than his. For you this is academic. For him it is personal. What you are saying and what he is hearing can be two very different things. Back away from this topic. Back away. If he came to the conclusion that circumcision is bad easily, that's one thing. However if he instead believes…
/r/MensRights22/05/15 02:07 PM
1

This is mockery not slander. Not illegal.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:39 PM
-11

He secretly filmed a drunk 15 year old girl having sex with him and then showed the film to his friends.
/r/MensRights21/05/15 08:17 PM
1

Thank you for your reply. I have seen before much more dubious posts claiming that it is actually men who are victims, not women, because men do suffer more injuries from violent crime. Considering that men are also by far the biggest number of violent criminals, this just is not a good argument. There is a certain amount of "live by the sword, die by the sword" playing into this. The better position is to look at the total number of men and what a very tiny percentage of those men commit violen…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 07:59 PM
1

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/10shrtbl03.xls You didn't consider this one. Homicide offender data from 2010. Almost 10,000 male murderers compared to 1,075 female murderers. Edit: Note that according to your own cited statistics, 1,095 women in 2010 were murdered by their husbands or boyfriends. A greater number of women in 2010 were murdered by their husbands or boyfriends than the number of all female murderers who killed for any reaso…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 04:45 PM
1

I’m not talking about the obvious cases of overt racism, but something much more nuanced: the White women who are more or less on our side, but who don’t know their place in the conversation. As a result, their comments are often more presumptuous, who say things like they don’t “see race,” they’re not the enemy, or they’re feeling hurt and attacked. Now, I’ve had invectives hurled at me by trolls in the comment sections on news commentary I’ve written, on my Twitter feed, and in my personal ema…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 03:56 PM
1

The men's rights movement is composed of a large assortment of individuals and groups. Some of which are vague, undefined and often shifting. Basically, nothing prevents random whack-jobs from claiming to be MRA's, especially on the internet. Even if a random whack-job does not claim to be a MRA, (as in this case with ROK and the Mad Max movie), the press is lazy and might just slap that label on anyway if it fits their narrative. The men's rights movement is in early stages. It has not grown po…
/r/MensRights20/05/15 09:42 AM
4

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_women_in_World_War_II We had 350,000 women serve in the military during WWII in the U.S. I am quite certain that any future draft would include women.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:14 PM
2

If they were unmarried and his name wasn't on the birth certificate, the father would automatically not have custody rights unless he filed in court to obtain them. In some States even if his name was on the birth certificate, an unmarried father still would have to file in court to obtain custody rights. So he probably didn't "lose" custody. He probably never had it.
/r/MensRights16/05/15 02:02 PM
1

It can be anything — money, status, general manliness — but for far too many men, life is nothing but one long ridiculous cock-joust, a continuous attempt to outdo and beat down their contempories. Ha. Ha. Ha. I'll take corporate male culture over the "mommy wars" any day. Many mothers are fiercely competitive and determined to prove endlessly that they are the "best" mothers and have the "best" children. Other mothers are relentlessly bashed for not using cloth diapers or allowing their kids to…
/r/MensRights15/05/15 02:34 AM
-2

During which time they had a greater risk of being struck by lightning.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 07:40 PM
1

The author completely missed the point of the Baby M case. It wasn't because the woman had a uterus. It was because she was the biological mother of the child. For public policy reasons we don't allow biological parents to sell their own children. Contracts for the sale of children for the parent's profit, either before or after birth, are unlikely to be enforceable. Modern day surrogacy uses donated eggs through in vitro to prevent this problem. With donor eggs there is no biological tie to the…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:18 PM
-1

Just making things up as you go along is not the law.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:52 AM
-2

It is not a necessity for a 16 year old to have his own car. BOTH parents have a responsibility to provide the child with food and shelter.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:30 AM
-2

It doesn't matter if zero men have been drafted since 1973. It does matter when some whack job says women shouldn't be able to vote because something might happen, (only men being drafted), that hasn't happened in 40 plus years and is highly unlikely to happen in the future.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 09:08 AM
-2

Child support is for basic living needs like food and shelter. Not for the child to spend on whatever unnecessary thing he thinks of. That's why he is called a CHILD.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 08:59 AM
-1

No indication of that from what I read.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 08:56 AM
-1

If only the ones who go to war can vote then they should have to pay for the war. If the theory is that war benefits society then the entire society should vote on that.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:22 AM
-3

Registration at a certain age is mandatory, but updating your address and contact information after age 25 is not. After age 25, men are allowed to disappear from the system. For all practical purposes they are no longer part of SS registration. The military wouldn't want them for a draft after age 25 anyway. So cut the shit. It is definitely not true that American men spend most of their lives subject to a draft. LOL. Or that any American man younger than age 60 has ever been subject to the dra…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:19 AM
-3

ZERO men in the U.S. have been drafted since 1973. Purely theoretical and illusory risks are not real. Get back to us when actual men get actually drafted and women do not. In the future that will be a very cold day in hell. As in it will not ever happen.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:12 AM
0

No. No high school age kid deserves a fully paid for insured car.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:07 AM
1

Sorry, post was deleted and didn't see it. Only read a few comments.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 03:06 AM
-1

Yeah, well no American man has died from being drafted since 1972. As in ZERO. The number of women dying from pregnancy related complications and illegal abortion related complications since 1972 is much greater than zero.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:30 PM
-8

Post has been removed, but I read some of the comments. Kid is a selfish jerk. Child support is to help keep a roof over his head and food on the table. Not to provide him with his own insured car.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 09:18 PM
-1

So either remove SS for men and or employ it for women. I'm ok with either option. I also firmly believe that if there is a future draft women will be included. It is unreasonable to think otherwise. However, filling out a postcard when we haven't had an actual draft since 1973, and not a single American man currently under the age of 60 has ever been drafted, is not particularly burdensome. Claiming that women should not get to vote because some American men under age 60 have had to bear this r…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:54 PM
-1

Dude, get a clue. MANY women in the U.S. have been unable to obtain a legal abortion because of all the political road blocks put in their path. Like having to travel 600 miles to a clinic, pay for an unnecessary ultrasound, wait around for 3 days, obtain parental permission if a minor, etc, etc, etc. It's not forced legal abortion, it is forcing them to have the baby or get an illegal abortion. As a result of which since 1973 women have died. This is not just a theoretical risk. It is an actual…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 08:10 PM
-1

By that reasoning, draft eligible men should not be the only ones able to vote on war either. Unless of course if the majority votes yes, they are going to fund the war solely with their own assets. If a bunch of young hot heads decide to go light up some other country, why should I have to pay for it?
/r/MensRights13/05/15 07:54 PM
-5

It's not much of a lottery when not a single person has been drafted since 1973. Women have faced a far more significant "lottery with their lives" on issues surrounding abortion, including incessant political attempts to prevent them having access to same. At least some of those pregnant women denied access to legal abortion through various political strategies since 1973 died as a result. So do you think that only women should be allowed to vote on abortion?
/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:33 PM
-5

Registering for Selective Service is not conscription. Conscription is actually being drafted and required to perform military service. There is a huge difference between filling out a post card and being drafted and sent to war. Now if you want to claim that only men required to register for Selective Service should be able to vote, that would be only men ages 18 to 25 in the U.S. All men age 26 and up are legally in the same position as women. Selective Service requirements do not apply to the…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 05:14 PM
-1

No one has been conscripted in the U.S. since 1973.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 04:56 PM
2

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_Service_System Only men ages 18 to 25 are required to even register for selective service in the U.S. Of that group a substantial number are ineligible for military service due to previous criminal convictions, previously diagnosed mental illness, and various physical problems and issues including weight and height restrictions. So the group of men in the U.S. who are not draft eligible includes all men age 26 and up. Now theoretically if needed the age ran…
/r/MensRights13/05/15 04:50 PM
4

The subreddit /r/ForeverAlone has a lot of very vulnerable members (suicide resources are listed on their side bar) and sometimes they get some really offensive comments. Directly under the comment box on every post is this message in a separate box: Your account must not be new and a Minimum of 15+ Comment Karma is Required to make a Comment. Also your user name must not contain the words throw or throwaway. Maybe they have a bot that removes these comments automatically?
/r/MensRights13/05/15 02:26 PM
16

Shouldn't men who are not draft eligible due to age or other circumstances also be prohibited from voting? They are legally in the same position as women. If we go by U.S. history with Vietnam, that would result in only a small percentage of the total population voting on a war. As a related example, should only women of child bearing age be able to vote about abortion?
/r/MensRights13/05/15 02:06 PM
2

The totality of facts and circumstances make the woman much more credible here.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 10:19 PM
2

Her phone doesn't work and he is her only source of transportation to get home. What would suggest the rapist do? Kick her out on the porch and lock the door behind her?
/r/MensRights08/05/15 10:16 PM
-1

You would also need some evidence about the missing property and how you were mugged. Which can be established through your testimony.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 10:14 PM
0

Include the possibility that no one accuses you of rape, but some woman comes across your treasure trove of secret sex tapes and turns you into the police. Each separate tape is a crime. See you in about 20 years....
/r/MensRights08/05/15 10:09 PM
-2

She was very quiet, constantly playing with her phone, resisted his initial sexual advances and said she wanted to leave. On their first date. Those are excellent signs that there isn't going to be a second date, by the way. It takes at minimum an extreme level of social ineptitude for him to take her phone away and initiate sex again after all of the previous occurred. It blows my mind that his response to her saying that she wanted to leave, when he was her source of transportation, was to say…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 07:13 PM
1

It's extremely clear from his post that she won't be testifying that they were all happy and cozy watching a movie. Even he won't testify to that.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 06:19 PM
1

Your statistics, even if true, do not apply only to cases where the alleged victim immediately after sex fled at the first opportunity to a stranger's house to call 911 and report that she was raped.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 06:11 PM
-2

Sure, and OP is entitled to use any of those as a defense if he can prove it. However these defenses were missing from his post.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 06:05 PM
1

Oh yeah, women run out of apartments all the time immediately after consensual sex and seek help from strangers to call 911 and report rape. That's just incredibly common. Happens every day. Why, the police have tons of fake rape reports from women who leaped out of bed and immediately fled the scene screaming for help. That's just something common women do after sex. Oh, wait... /sarcasm
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:43 PM
-1

How do you prove someone is guilty? With facts and reasonable inferences from those facts.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 05:31 PM
1

I do have law experience and your analysis is excellent. I would argue that since there is still a possibility of pregnancy after a vasectomy, even though remote, his lying would not rise to the level of extreme and outrageous. It was an assumed risk. By comparison, there is zero possibility of pregnancy from a blow job, so the doctor did not agree to assume any risk.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 04:56 PM
0

No doubt about it, it is always better to have the choice. Although it would be nice if here on Men's Rights it was acknowledged more often that getting an abortion can be extremely difficult for young or poor women in many States. That "option" is sometimes illusory.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 04:40 PM
5

How reasonable and likely is it that a presumably rational woman would have fully consensual sex and then immediately flee at the first possible opportunity to a stranger's house to call 911 and report that she was raped? Sure, it could happen. Is it likely? No. It would be a weird and strange aberration. Likewise, how likely is it that after a man has consensual sex the woman immediately flees howling rape to 911? Does that happen to men often? No. Her version is more credible because OP can't …
/r/MensRights08/05/15 04:27 PM
4

Secretly video-taping someone having sex in a place where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy, (i.e. not in public), is highly likely to be a crime in most States. Don't do this. In one party consent States you can secretly record audiotapes of your sexual encounters, but video is a big problem.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 04:05 PM
2

Canada convicted some guy of rape for messing with the condoms and getting the woman pregnant. I really don't agree with that. It's not the law in the U.S. At least not yet.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:59 PM
1

This is not the law and incorrect.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:21 PM
1

Those "multiple options" to deal with the pregnancy come at a high physical and emotional cost. It is unreasonable to assume that an unexpected pregnancy conceived due to a guy's deliberate deceit would not cause emotional distress. I also don't think we can necessarily quantify his distress as greater than a woman's in this hypothetical. I personally would drastically prefer to discover that I somehow (magically) had a child I didn't know about as compared to going through a pregnancy and givin…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:20 PM
5

Her story told to the police is that he raped her. In a he said/she said scenario, you look at the surrounding undisputed facts to determine credibility.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 03:05 PM
5

Sex happens. After, I go to take a shower and I come out and she is gone. My back door is open. I drove so she doesn't have a car. About 20 minutes later, the police come by and arrest me. Apparently, she says she felt unsafe and I raped her and when I left to take a shower, she "fled" the house and went to the neighbors to call 911. She said he raped her. It's a he said/she said case. It is clear from his statements that she was uncomfortable. It was a first date, she had no transportation, her…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:49 PM
2

If a guy lies and tells me he has had a vasectomy, and I get pregnant, can I also sue for emotional distress? Interesting question. I'm pretty sure the answer is no.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:22 PM
10

No, he was not raped. He engaged in consensual sexual activity. If a guy lies and tells me he has had a vasectomy, and I have consensual sex with him and get pregnant, I was not raped. I was tricked by an evil person, but not raped. MRA's need to hold a hard line that rape is only a lack of consent, not later regrets upon discovering the person you had consensual sex with is a piece of shit. Expanding the definition of rape to include morning after regret, even in extreme cases, should not be to…
/r/MensRights08/05/15 01:14 PM
9

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=fertility+doctor+uses+own+sperm+2012 Well, there are these guys. Doesn't look like any of them tried to get custody.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:52 PM
3

No. The egg is only able to be fertilized for a short time. Maximum not more than 3 days. A period starts on average 14 days after ovulation. So you could maybe find the discarded egg but you wouldn't be able to impregnate it.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 12:33 PM
-9

Hoax.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 07:21 PM
3

Seek help.
/r/MensRights07/05/15 07:15 PM
1

Exactly!
/r/MensRights29/04/15 07:24 PM
3

I agree with the feminist issues in the article, but I still find the poster inappropriate about men. The kind of unspoken theme is that men have dirty sexual impulses and women are pure. So men should avoid "contaminating" women with sex. What are the men here supposed to be protecting women's character against? Their evil penises. Apparently men are so uncontrolled that they need to have posters telling them to keep their zippers shut. Don't besmirch the ladies! It is kind of vague but this ju…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 05:42 PM
1

I understand, but "news" should be a fairly common and non-controversial flair. There really isn't a good substitute for news.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 10:20 PM
1

Not necessarily at that time. Once informed to leave any continuing presence is trespassing. There definitely wouldn't be a right to stick around until they were satisfied with the reasons given, which in any event would never have occurred. The Expo has given some reasons and their terms of use are so broad that it will be almost impossible to fight this.
/r/MensRights27/04/15 02:00 AM
-1

If these were high school students the pictures are quite likely to be child pornography. If all that happened was a school suspension, all of these kids got off really easy. Technology is not always our friend. We need to teach everyone that if you receive a picture of an under-age person under-dressed, delete, delete and delete immediately! This is nothing to mess around with.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 08:19 PM
5

Emma and the school were perfectly fine legally with her "performance art" right up until they identified this guy publicly. You can't just publicly call some poor guy a serial rapist with no reasonable proof to back that up. This is the first lawsuit by a man wrongfully accused at a college that is likely to win. Extremely psyched for his prospects and the change it will bring for all men wrongfully accused on campus. I really hope that he does not settle and this case goes on to have a public …
/r/MensRights26/04/15 08:11 PM
1

Send an email to the college's diversity office. Note that you object to the college offering special scholarship status to single mothers but not to single fathers. State that you believe this is a title IX violation. Come on back and tell us their response.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 12:44 AM
1

Many federally funded colleges offer scholarships that are basically a reduction in tuition. This one is not open to applications by both sexes if single mothers but not single fathers get special status for reduction in tuition. That is a title IX violation.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 12:35 AM
2

Is this a school scholarship and does this school receive federal funds? If so, this looks like a Title IX violation.
/r/MensRights25/04/15 04:46 PM
2

North or South?
/r/MensRights23/04/15 12:53 PM
6

I see where this is going. After the survey results are complete, it will be claimed that incidents of sexual violence against women were grossly under-reported because victims couldn't complete the survey due to "triggers". Sigh. It's like Tinkerbell is running our colleges. Clap your hands and say, "I believe!"
/r/MensRights23/04/15 12:49 PM
1

Thank you for your service. men are better at running because we are born with bigger hearts Not sure that would really be a factor because heart size is related to body mass. Smaller mass is pumped the same by a smaller heart. What is a definite factor is that men have more iron, which leads to more and better red blood cells that carry oxygen. This is crucial for all types of endurance activities. (Recall Lance Armstrong cheated by EPO which increases red blood cells.) Women of child bearing a…
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:53 PM
1

You need to take into account the combination that women live longer and the rather abysmal state of U.S. healthcare insurance. Many older married couples are driven into bankruptcy by overwhelming medical expenses. Statistically, the first terminal illness is likely to be suffered by the husband. He dies and she is left penniless after paying his medical bills. Just paying for prescription drugs can be a nightmare. Also, medicare does not cover nursing home bills. Medicaid doesn't kick in for n…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 03:59 AM
3

I think it was the inclusion of Gamer Gate posters and materials for sale at their booth that was the real problem, along with the perception that a lot of their crowd funding to attend the conference came from the Gamer Gate community. This was after all a comic convention, not a gaming convention, and Gamer Gate is highly controversial. It also wasn't such a great idea to post a YouTube video insulting the panelists the night before she was kicked out of the conference. The title was something…
/r/MensRights20/04/15 03:40 AM
1

Note to self -- /u/o9JOhY6iPn is also /u/wolfofthewest_
/r/MensRights18/04/15 01:18 PM
1

You shame yourself.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 01:51 PM
2

Who gives a shit what you have me tagged as? You are obviously a hopelessly dysfunctional moron. Why are you so invested in wanting to be able to have sex with unconscious women? Yeah, I think we all know the answer to that.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 01:48 PM
1

Seek help.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 10:44 AM
4

The entire point of a festival like this is to shatter inhibitions and promote and encourage wild, rampant, uncontrolled sexual frenzy. WTF is the matter with you? Seek help. The vast majority of people go to Spring break parties with no intention of participating in a damn drunken orgy with strangers. The real insanity here is that there are, apparently, women who participate in this bacchanal with absolutely no awareness of the point the bacchanal. The real insanity here is that you think that…
/r/MensRights17/04/15 09:29 AM
1

Do you really think the Sheriff decided to lie to the press about what is on the tape while actually naming the men he claimed did it? His liability for slander would be a massive amount of monetary damages. This is not just a he said/she said allegation. It's on tape. (Apparently on quite a number of tapes because other people started turning in their cell phone videos when the story came out.)
/r/MensRights15/04/15 07:21 PM
1

I edited my post to add more information. She was completely unconscious and doesn't remember any of it.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 06:07 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3247ja/abc_is_airing_an_interview_of_mary_kay_letourneau/cq7up0t Dude, seriously? Just go. Find another sub to troll.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 09:26 PM
1

Well, hey, thanks so much for joining reddit (3 days ago) and coming on here to lecture the rest of us.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 09:14 PM
1

Says the redditor for 3 days...
/r/MensRights13/04/15 08:53 PM
1

Re-post at /r/LegalAdvice and list the State or country you are in.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 03:55 PM
-2

Tots don't walk. They are carried. They also don't drive or park a car. Get a clue. Those parking spaces are not for the tot.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 03:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter