TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

mochacola Archive

View 3 posts and 2,074 comments by mochacola on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,074 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

You can't deprogram hard wired biology. Let's say we have enough kids up for adoption or medical science enable women to have healthy wombs past their 50s. Basically, what was true during evolution is no longer true. Will you find women in their 40s just as attractive as those in their 20s? It's unfair that society instinctively demands transfer of resources from men to women. It's unfair that women past their prime are of little value to men looking to start a family. It's unfair that society i…
/r/MensRights28/05/17 09:17 PM
–

You need to stop believing what's fed to you by MSM. His staff hadn't been cleaned out YET. US Presidency isn't a dictatorship. Classified reports that should be submitted to him only gets submitted to media outlets with false reports added into the docs. "Amazing battle for dominance is playing out between the elected US govt & the IC who consider themselves to be the 'permanent government'." - Julian Assange. The Intel community's expertise is overthrowing leaders who don't work with them with…
/r/MensRights23/05/17 11:57 AM
–

Because that's hard wired into our DNA and our society. It's been so since the dawn of time. Resources go to womb and offsprings. Tribes that didn't support this pattern had offsprings that didn't do well and faded in evolution. Here's the funny part: If women hadn't been robbing men through marriage/divorce, no man would see this unfair pattern. It's like the more women demand legal abusive power, the more men get redpilled into the reality that men are treated like shit.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 02:30 PM
–

He ran against the unbeatable well-oiled machine that's been in power probably since JFK assassination, and won. He still hadn't backed down to "get in line and play their game". You call that incompetence?
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:48 PM
–

Media ( owned by the powerful ) is very good at making him out to be a clown. I used to feel the same, until I figured out what was was actually going on, i.e. the deep state refusing to give the country back to the people.
/r/MensRights20/05/17 01:12 AM
8

Yes, a mere testimony of the student would be enough to put him behind bars. Read up upon past similar cases. Even for cases where the accuser retracts and confessed to lying, the accused would still be labeled as "rapists" for life in his community. So, your rationale is it's okay to ruin a man's career just to allow a girl to learn her mistake? Are you kidding me? The guy never accused his teacher when he was a kid, he was working hard to be an educator. So why should he suffer for someone els…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 01:01 AM
3

One thing you're missing. EVERYONE has to be taught there's consequences to every action. Doesn't matter if the subject is trivial or life altering. For example, women who ruined men's life through divorce law. We can blame the system and politics that had allowed that to happen. But, at the same time, those women have every freedom to not abuse those power. Let's say our law give men the right to take away kids from their mom. If a man does it, ruining his kids' and his ex's life, is he not hel…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 12:44 AM
3

You can decide FOR YOURSELF what info you find reliable and what you do not find reliable, right? What do facts had to do with anyone's psyche? Google's algorithm didn't create the chronology of events, phone texts sent, and legal reports on this case. I didn't say Google's algorithm will tell you if she had been raped. I'm saying, many had been following this case for a long time and a lot of truth had surfaced since then. But the two of you never bothered to pay any attention to this case, and…
/r/MensRights20/05/17 12:32 AM
1

Yeah, let's get someone who doesn't understand action and consequences; action and responsibilities, into medical services.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 07:52 PM
9

Dude, there's google. Find out facts on this case, then come back and tell me what you think. Geez. Maybe others are just more informed about this case than the two of you?
/r/MensRights19/05/17 07:44 PM
17

Get your facts straight, dude. Typical he said she said? Are you even aware of the details surrounding this case? You wanna look up what she said? Instead of what the media says? This isn't a gender bias case, it's political witch hunt. Both 'He' and 'She' said that. It's not a he said vs she said, it's what the couple said vs what the media/polticians ( which weren't present at the scene ) said. https://justice4assange.com/assange-case-fact-checker.html
/r/MensRights19/05/17 06:36 PM
1

Please read the article you posted. That was what was initially reported but turned out the be false. The ones saying it was hot were the pornographers, not him.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 06:30 AM
1

First of all, MGTOW is a response to changes brought upon by feminism, so, it's impossible for it to come before feminism. MGTOW is not interested in social engineering the governing body or education to adopt their view; MGTOW is not interested in denying kids of their moms, MGTOW is not interested in securing whatever wives provide to last a lifetime when divorce happens, MGTOW is not interested in demanding government to give them money to make these changes, MGTOW is not interested in bannin…
/r/MensRights14/12/16 07:10 PM
1

Potential likelihood to do harm again or not, is NOT victimhood status. It's not about him being a victim. It is he shows no sign of capacity to commit such crime again on his own, or even if urged by the cons. Basically, he pose no danger if released back to society.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 06:20 PM
2

Like what? Like I advocate violence against any women who don't agree with me? Please. Radical feminists? Duluth model is still taught in genders studies despite we already know domestic violence is learnt behavioral pattern and not a gendered issue. Has feminist stopped pushing the narrative that domestic violence is a form of male oppression on women? Nope. Who set up campus kangeroo courts? Radical feminists? Or feminists with enough funding and political muscle to lobby for White House to im…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:09 PM
1

You are still very ill-informed. I didn't made shit up to demonize any group. I stated facts. Why don't you keep an open mind, listen to what Erin Pizzey has to say, start from there, follow the white ribbit and see how deep the rabbit hole goes.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:28 PM
11

My God. I do not want women oppressed. Where did I say I want women oppressed? Telling the truth about domestic violence is oppressing women? 50/50 custody where kids get to have both parents is oppressing women? I understand a lot of people like you have very good intentions but just too naively innocent. I'm talking about exposing truth. How is exposing truth oppressing anyone?
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:14 PM
15

No, MRM shouldn't believe feminists is trying to help men too. No, the idea of 'toxic masculinity' was not invented to help men. Truth: feminist movement hijacked dv narrative to hoard relief funds to their movement, by rejecting the idea that men can be victims. But instead of admitting their Duluth Model was false, they spin it as toxic masculinity made it difficult for male victims to open up and seek help. Truth: feminist movement continue to use male violence as a potential threat to childr…
/r/MensRights13/12/16 02:06 PM
1

Well, that had been their stance all along, that kids need both their mothers and fathers. They are fathers for justice for kids being denied of a parent. They are not fathers for justice if men to reclaim ownership of their kids. To suddenly change their stance and say kids can be without a mom or a dad if raised by gay couples, just to be politically correct, would make them to be full of shit.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 12:31 PM
5

But their stance is not men's rights to their biological and adopted kids. Their stance is children first, and children need both mom and dad. To support same sex patenting would be hypocrisy. If two fathers is okay, why not two mother? If two mothers is okay, why is it wrong for kids to be without fathers? "Oh, so it's all about what men want and not what kids needs ..."
/r/MensRights13/12/16 12:11 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 11:38 AM
5

Yeah. I was showing how a femnut would still have no awareness of contradictions or hypocrisy in their bullshit belief even if you place them together.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 05:10 PM
7

So out of context. He was mocking media not reporting his male supporters set record high against past running candidates.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 02:45 PM
-66

Ad is trying to get rid of 'toxic masculinity'. Article is illustrating privileged men crying 'male tears'. What's your point? I don't see it.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 02:33 PM
9

How about stamp out gender stereotypes by telling girls, "Never hit a boy!"
/r/MensRights12/12/16 12:05 PM
1

Dude. I have story for you, and it's true. Back when rumors were spreading that partnership between Apple and Google was turning into rivalry, people caught sight of Steve Jobs having coffee with Eric Schmidt in public. One comment overheard was Jobs to Schmidt, "They're going to see it all eventually, so who cares how they get it."
/r/MensRights12/12/16 11:29 AM
1

Initial information indicated that Grooms described the act as “so hot” and that he planned to abuse another child ... Authorities, however, later found that the pornographers were the ones who described the abuse in that manner and that they unsuccessfully tried to convince Grooms to abuse another child. I never said he's too young and naive. Key indicator not being age or gender, but behavioral pattern.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 05:20 AM
1

Basically, all single men? In that case, MGTOW is your ally.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 09:03 PM
17

But that myth is what many believe. They also believe no woman will cry rape if they hadn't been raped. I myself used to think that was true throughout my entire life until I found out it wasn't true.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 02:15 PM
1

Did I say that? The whole point of putting people away for good, is that those criminals can no longer pose threats to society, as they are locked away from society. Which is also why when criminals are evaluated by doctors to be of no danger, they are released early. In this case, the infant's mom, the court, the DA, all believe this guy would cause no harm on his own. And sentencing is based on that. That, means the judge and the infant's mom think sexual assault on child is no big deal? The c…
/r/MensRights11/12/16 01:03 PM
1

You missed what I meant. I was pointing out maybe his sentencing was light because there's video evidence of pornographers trying to get him to commit the crime again, but failed. Meaning, the court believes the boy has no behavioral inclination to do such acts on his own, hence posing no danger, and therefore the light sentence.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 12:15 PM
3

There's no 'fake news' in 'report content' options. Time to update those options.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 11:36 AM
1

Divorce news is fake.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 11:34 AM
2

Of the phones exploding, 2/3 is of Samsung and 1/3 is of Apple. So, is this a Samsung problem because 2/3 is more than 1/3, or is this a problem of batteries? By the way, real studies collected since the 70s, indicate it's the same for both genders. It's learnt behavior and nothing to do with gender.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 10:11 AM
1

[ the pornographers ] unsuccessfully tried to convince Grooms to abuse another child. maybe that has some weight to placing responsibility on the pornographers.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 10:04 AM
1

I guess OP is trying to make a point on criminal court being more lenient/harsh towards women/men.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 09:56 AM
4

“... they successfully convinced hundreds of children to engage in sexual activity while they surreptitiously recorded it,” Makes me wonder why this group of pornographers and other children weren't outed by the media. I won't be surprised if they are women and young girls. You'd think 'hundreds of boys were convinced by a group of men to sexually abuse toddlers' makes for better click bait.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 09:52 AM
4

... the county prosecutor, whose office reached a plea deal with Grooms, said much of the criticism was based on “grossly inaccurate” information that has circulated online since the 19-year-old was sentenced on Sept. 12. For one thing, said Wapello County Attorney Gary Oldenburger, Grooms did not rape the toddler, as reported by several websites ... OP just read the headlines. The teen's case was turned into click bait fake news.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 08:39 PM
18

Because if it is not a gender issue, how the heck is WOW, VAW, WAVAW, etc, going to ask for billions of free money for dv relief efforts? It has to be a gender issue for the financial fraud to continue.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 08:32 PM
19

So, you think this movie is with filled with interviews like Erin Pizzey saying it's okay to stick a finger into an unconscious women's vagina? Or Camille Paglia saying women are just bitches after men's money? Why don't you watch it, then tell us what you think, instead of assuming it to be what it is not. You have no clue how far off you are.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 08:24 PM
1

I meant this article. If kids needs both mothers' love and fathers' love, how can women be obsolete?
/r/MensRights10/12/16 06:55 PM
7

A woman shouldn't vote what's in the best interests for her and her family. She should vote whatever benefits the feminists cult. That's what this is,
/r/MensRights10/12/16 05:04 PM
0

Sexbots are fine. They are not replacements of women. They are replacements of sleeves and hug pillows. Men who couldn't be bothered with relationships had been on the rise rapidly without sexbots. That happens first. Then, toys to entertain them comes later. Artificial wombs is a different issue altogether. MRAs have been saying kids need both parents. It'll be hypocritical to say kids don't need moms. The funny part is, feminist movement helping LGBT's push for same sex parent families, statin…
/r/MensRights10/12/16 04:49 PM
6

So, if she see it that way, it must be true? Sexbots are not replacement of women, they are just Ferraris of sex toys. If a woman practice celibacy because relationships are too much of hassle, society will applaud her for being independent, loving herself, whatever. If a man practice celibacy, he must be a loser who have no clue how to be with women? Some women would rather not bother with relationships, they have a box of sex toys. Some men would rather not bother with relationships, they have…
/r/MensRights10/12/16 04:36 PM
22

Hilarious. Show is trying to present young women topping boys. While, boys are watching fictional average boys being thrown into life threatening situations to fend off aliens, fight evil empires, go after corrupt villains, to protect their families, country, and planet, protecting both men and women, where boys don't have a choice but to step up, these fictional girls are going around stabbing boys who touch girls. Way to go. How about, just alert the boys' parents, the school, or the cops? My …
/r/MensRights10/12/16 03:44 PM
5

Hilarious. They are going to lower the risks of unsafe sex? Good for them.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 08:08 AM
3

Taylor’s first trial ended in a hung jury, 12 people not able to come to a unanimous decision on her guilt or innocence.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 07:04 AM
7

Her attorney said they will appeal the verdict. 8 months is too harsh for murder ...
/r/MensRights10/12/16 06:23 AM
5

Feminists didn't boycott. They went on to push for legislative changes to screw men AND women over, benefitting only their cult. Hijacking domestic violence relief effort and narrative to hoard fundings to dv. Rigging family court. Establishing campus kangaroo courts by fabricating fraudulent reports, and using hoax to generate hysteria. MGTOW does none of that. Both MGTOW and MRA had never raised funds to help defend a person who attempted murder. Feminist movement had. There is also no governm…
/r/MensRights10/12/16 12:51 AM
10

MGTOW doesn't screen people. It's not an organization. It's an idea that a man should place taking care of himself first before trying to please others, may it be partners or society's expectations. So I guess anyone can be MGTOW without 'joining MGTOW'. Because if a man listened to what a revered MGTOW said and didn't agree, and went in his own, he is still a man going his own way. I'm the opposite. I discovered MRA first but now leaning more MGTOW. I was first sick of feminists' nonsensical ra…
/r/MensRights09/12/16 08:49 PM
1

It's just a penthouse letter with a twist ending.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 08:00 PM
2

Tom Cruise get paid more than Gary Oldman, because Tom brings in more dough. This is the same case here. The interesting part is that this is an industry which women dominates, yet, feminists would discourage women to take part in because they believe these women promotes objectification of women.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 07:59 PM
3

Doesn't really matter if they are not psychotic. Doesn't really matter if they acknowledge male issues. It's still going to be based on lies like Duluth Model, patriarchy, rape culture. They won't be making changes to better everyone, they'll still think they have ownership to moral authority with mission to 'social engineer' education and legislations to fit their dogma. Just let feminism dig its own grave and young women can start something new. Heck, their way of working with men, is getting …
/r/MensRights09/12/16 07:42 PM
1

It's not fake news. It's an ad that looks like an article.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 01:35 PM
1

Four decades of lies.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 01:33 PM
12

Feminists would love to bathe in your 'male tears'.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 12:00 PM
26

Judge Lou D'Apolito ordered Hines to undergo a psychological evaluation, take parenting classes, She's a fit parent?
/r/MensRights09/12/16 11:32 AM
1

He's not going to look into men's rights as a whole. But, he vouched to take care of wounded vets. If he did that, and abolish kangaroo courts not as me's rights issue but just ridding redundancy by moving funding to local police, those won't count for something?
/r/MensRights09/12/16 10:26 AM
2

For all you confused MRA misogynistic dimwits, workplace orgasms increase company's value for shareholders.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 10:17 AM
1

That guy's a prick.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 05:35 AM
1

I take you to be my husband, to have and to hold from this day forward, for better, for richer, and in health, to love and to cherish, until your financial troubles do us apart. At which point you owe me half of your shit and lose rights to our kids. This is my solemn vow.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 04:55 AM
1

What's wrong with this? This sounds fun. I'm gonna make a profile page for each and every of my favorite Japanese porn idols.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 03:55 AM
2

a love letter to the Hillary Clinton generation Stories of scandalous corruption? Sounds fun to watch. Oh well.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 03:51 AM
1

Wildenstein was awarded $2.5billion and an additional $100million a year for 13 years after splitting from her husband of 21 years, Alec Wildenstein.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 03:44 AM
0

Telling others not to support this or that because it does not "fit with men's rights" is attempt to dictate monolithic thinking. Those guys aren't sending death threats and whatnot. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_by_zero
/r/MensRights09/12/16 03:31 AM
0

To get anything done, feminism need to die first. It's pointless to get the truth on dv while they rig family court, and while you try to right those marriage contracts, they set up kangaroo courts, and while you try to get boys their rights back, they lobby for new stupid shit. Kill it first, then clean up the mess they made.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 03:13 AM
2

Yes. Murders do not happen often. But if you see signs of someone who's violent, sociopathic with disregard to human lives ... wasn't there some ad that's circling around saying not to miss signs of gun violence? Signs of either indoctrinated or confused, is not good.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 08:17 PM
1

"Just in time. My 'Male Tears' mug needs refill. " This is just another effort to blame feminist movement's fraudulent legislative changes back to men. Fuck that. We are going to expose all the lies. We do not need society to accept men crying in order for dads to get custody. We need legislative changes, and we can do it now. We do not need society to accept men crying to prevent innocent college boys from having their lives ruined. We need legislative changes, and we can do it now. We do not n…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 05:15 PM
1

Factual Feminist is an oxymoron.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 04:56 PM
3

If you disagree with your teacher, just challenge him/her. Geez. Would you care if you want an abortion but your teacher, someone who you barely know for a semester in your entire life span, had a different opinion? It's not like he threaten girls that he'll see to it that God send them to hell if they had abortions. "I don't think X is right. But law doesn't agree." That was his point.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 04:53 PM
2

When A.I. arrives, there'll be new jobs that didn't exist before A.I. When banking was not electronic, there were a lot of manpower doing paperwork. Now that everything is online, there are a lot of people working on online banking' information architecture, user interface, security. Or, let's put this into economics. Work being replaced by automation must be more cost effective or no one will do it. Now, where's the new higher profit margin going to go? Those money aren't going to stay in the b…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 02:58 PM
3

It is not your duty to fix her. At current political climate, it's not wise to help her deal with her problems. Risks of screwing up your life is too high.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 01:09 PM
2

There won't be any legislative changes against men under 6'. Let it go.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 01:00 PM
3

It takes more than that. The cult is still being preached in colleges where indoctrinated kids are then released into the wild to work in other areas. Colleges need to get rid of courses that had been proven to be horseshit.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 11:05 AM
1

in the future, to appreciate a mans incredible capacity to love another human being That was not what I was saying. All human beings appreciate other human beings who love other human beings. Haven't you been watching movies? My point was, just because some women are strong, does not mean she'd be inclined to have empathy towards weak men. Hell, I'm a pretty feminine male. I'm not into sports or cars, not competitive, and have no financial ambition. As long as I can end up retiring with my own h…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 09:30 AM
1

However. When someone blames liberalism for this and that, and another points out, "Well, that's just not true, because .. such and such." I think that's healthy. Just as if a liberal points out, "You conservatives passed this and that law which resulted in this and that shit, some conservatives might think about chain reactions before voting for or against future legislative changes." That's very different from, "You liberals are just men haters ( misogynists ) and boy rapists ( rape apologists…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 09:09 AM
1

Sexual fetish, and your preference, has nothing to do with the fact that it's going to take drastic changes on planet Earth and thousands of years to undo programming built into human genome over millions of years of evolution. female can then embrace the feminine on the male. They can't. When they say they can, they meant they want guys to write them valentine cards, listen to their women problems. The minute they see weakness in men, they are appalled. Even an extremely strong mom would do tha…
/r/MensRights07/12/16 10:11 PM
2

Well, we courage him to report those to the police.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 09:34 PM
1

Was GamerGate true?
/r/MensRights07/12/16 09:28 PM
2

Verdict is 'not guilty'. It is close to impossible to prove innocence, or, in other words, prove conclusively something never happened. Think about it. Which is why campus courts are horseshit. For example, if the mattress girl's chat with her guy was not on record in written form, but verbally, or erased from chat history, how could he prove innocence even if he was? He couldn't.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 09:21 PM
1

Nah, I think they put them on because they know they'll get laughed at on the streets if recognized.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 09:10 PM
1

Fatherless children is a problem. There is an opinion piece on what might have contributed to it. So what's the issue here? Liberals can still stay liberal and vote against liberal party's decision for legislative changes. This really fascinates me. I've yet to see one guy going on personal attack like 'you're just a liberal/conservative nutcase.' which doesn't even imply a hate crime. But we are advised to tolerate 'you're a misogynist' from other commenters to keep debates with feminists ongoi…
/r/MensRights07/12/16 08:52 PM
1

in case you're wondering who's Elliot: https://youtu.be/ZantzARkMwM on domestic violence relief efforts: https://youtu.be/ln6I_zbgTTU
/r/MensRights07/12/16 08:05 PM
1

Men's jobs won't be replaced, men as a whole just move up. Jobs of designing smartphones and writing apps didn't exist. As jobs of repairing mechanical cars shrink, jobs of improving automated electric car boom. As some tasks are replaced by A.I., new jobs are created to make better A.I. We used to work the plantation. Now that work in the plantation is so automated that few workers can feed a whole village and more, we are still working despite growing into billions in population. We don't see …
/r/MensRights07/12/16 07:17 PM
1

Well, Silicone Valley is still giving out H1's and lobbying for raising the limit. Which means, there are well-paying jobs for Americans, in America. Job supply is still exceeding demand. Get rid of affirmative action, let deserving boys go into STEM, and they'll be productive.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 07:02 PM
1

You'd shake her hand? Shame on you.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 06:53 PM
1

I hadn't watch that film, but criminal definition of rape by FBI is this: Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim. Did Brando actually stick it in?
/r/MensRights07/12/16 06:48 PM
1

I guess I didn't make it clear. Excuses in this article: Typically, with women, its more emotional and less physical I was saying, if it's more physical and less emotional, they'll still be the victim and men are arseholes. All this "Real Women " Talk is redundant, if a man handles his business and takes care of his responsibilities, then women wouldn't or shouldn't have any complaints And I reversed that. If that's how men think when they cheat, it'd still be women the victim, men the arseholes…
/r/MensRights07/12/16 04:28 PM
1

Feminist debate? That's an oxymoron. Like what? Like when Karen Straughan stated the fact that for rape allegations, if dispute is over consent, are difficult cases because all which evidence can provide is sex happened. And the counter from Naomi Wolf was, "OMG, you're a rape apologist!" ? What a constructive insight. I'm only interested in correcting disinformation in the news ( when articles allows for comments ), so unsuspecting public don't buy into feminist lies.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 09:04 AM
1

They read it at college classes. That's the scary part.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 07:01 AM
2

No. It means all feminists believe all men are capable of rape unless taught otherwise. It's at the core of feminist cult.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 06:59 AM
0

I guess you guys missed my point. I said, these types of nonsense can be spun anyway you want. Which is, if women's cheating were more physical and not emotional, while men "give it a lot of thought" like the way that article claim women do, they can still spin it such that women are the victim and men the assholes.
/r/MensRights07/12/16 06:41 AM
3

My daughter was the victim. So much hugs she could have gotten during those times, but didn't get.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:01 PM
2

He was not implying. He was stating. And he is correct.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 09:57 PM
2

RAINN and FBI disagree.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 09:55 PM
2

It's money. If a college have a dedicated council to handle these cases, they get fundings to run these councils. It's feminist movement coming up with ridiculous nonsense to ask for free money. This is no more complicated than a divorced mom fabricating 'kids needs' to justify more free money from either the dad or the government. Feminist movement first fabricated the 1-in-4 to appeal to White House, and then used UVA hoax to expedite the funding approval to establish campus courts which are i…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 09:53 PM
2

MRAs generally want to change such attitudes. They want men to become more like women. What? Excuse me?
/r/MensRights06/12/16 09:07 PM
2

No. They are just not guilty. The problem is those types of stats reading assume all reports which didn't have substantial evidence to make it to court, and all trials which ended without guilty convict, are all rape. We do not know which side those flip, really. But judging by the fact that more than half of all criminals exonerated by the innocent project's DNA test were convicted rapists ...
/r/MensRights06/12/16 09:01 PM
3

That article is freakin' retarded. I'll tell you why it is men's duty to make women feel safe. Because men want their families safe, which includes women. It is simple as that. Law enforcement task forces had been mostly men. Legislators had been mostly men. And they are all designed to protect women and children first. These idiots just paraphrase whatever junk they were spoon fed and think they have created something of value.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:04 PM
1

The center would be pre 3rd wave feminism. That's a far swing back before the 70s.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 07:52 PM
13

it's about women always being the primary victims This. She can cheat, divorce a man, take his kids and half his assets, while still being supported by that man for life, and still be a victim ... because an "undeserving man wasted her youth".
/r/MensRights06/12/16 07:48 PM
-16

You can spin it anyway you want: Typically, with women, it's just purely physical and less emotional. Unlike half-grown boys, women are adults who seek adult needs. It's just physical but our emotional commitment is still to our men. But men, they just leave. It's not a fling for them. It's all emotional connection and intimacy. They think too much into what all those affairs means as if it's some kind of empowerment, they feel a talk to see the situation any differently is redundant. A man just…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 07:38 PM
1

I wasn't aware that I represented the entirety of humanity. But you are aware rapists represented the entirely of men?
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:33 PM
1

My point was, what did that talk accomplish? You won't have committed rape, with or without that talk. But you think if a rapist had that talk with his mom, that rapist won't have committed rape?
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:29 PM
1

Okay, then have a 5min talk with your daughter, teach her not to murder, so she won't. And hopefully, we won't have to try catch her AFTER she committed murder. And... you still refuse to answer my simple question. If your mom never told you that, you'd be okay raping a woman?
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:11 PM
1

You are too funny. Criminal court, give lesser sentences to black women than a white man of a same crime. Let that sink in. What I was illustrating is, when women ask for something, they get it. When men ask for something, no one gives a shit. Imagine a family court system, where, upon divorce, the man is freed of his financial obligations, but whatever contribution a wive provided during the marriage, may it be housekeeping or whatever, she needs to continue to provide those services to him unt…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 06:09 PM
10

Nah. Mizzou also suffered. Twitter taking the damage. The message is clear. SJW is bad for business. It just haven't sink in for others yet, but it's happening.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:42 PM
1

Still refused to answer my simple question. Rape being a crime had been in place for centuries. So, it's oaky for public and parents to tell young women not to kill their babies when they become a mom, because that's the same having a law in place to put such actions as hideous crime, right? Got it.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:30 PM
1

Yeah, like wounded vets who sacrificed their lives to services wanted proper medical care and they got it. Dads who demand legislative changes for 50/50 custody and got it. People demanding allegations against college boys be tried with proper due process instead of campus kangeroo courts and they get it, right? Right? Let's see, women demanded affirmative action to reserve spots in jobs and college entry specifically for women, thereby kicking out men who would otherwise be getting it, and wome…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:26 PM
1

It kicks in when you get that rape culture memo telling you 'rape is okay' from The Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 05:02 PM
2

all men are capable of rape Since when? If you are saying all men are capable of that crime, as in, all men feel fine watching themselves causing suffering unto others. That is simply false. If you are saying men can physically overpower women, well, all women are physically capable of murdering children. So?
/r/MensRights06/12/16 04:50 PM
2

Don't tell anyone not to do it It is ranked the second most serious crime by FBI, most serious crime being murder. You still didn't answer my question. You'd be okay pounding on a naked woman who cries 'no' in distress, if your mom never tell you that's wrong? Seriously? Just answer that simple question. just catch them faster after they do What? You want to convict a person as a rapist before that person commit rape? You are all about throwing punchlines. Catching a criminal after a crime had o…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 04:40 PM
1

Sigh. Rape will always exist just as murder will always exists. You think people who got stabbed to death didn't communicate properly they didn't want to be murdered? Or murders failed to recognize their victims were suffering? There will always be people who do not give a shit about causing extreme harm to others. They do not value human lives. Since theses types of abnormally will always exists, murder and rape will exist. We have tasks force catching these criminals. The best thing to do is t…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 01:45 PM
2

No. It's just plain idiocy that does not make any sense. It makes as much sense as, "since all news stories we have heard about infant killings are done by moms, we need to teach young girls not to murder their babies." Most moms don't murder their babies. Most men don't rape. Murder is a crime. Rape is a crime.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 01:29 PM
2

That's not what I meant. I'll reply to each fallacy individually. 'Most rapists are people victim knows.' Simply means, rapists have no problem attacking people they know. Should that be a surprise? Rapists are sociopaths with no empathy for others, they are okay with causing other great harm. Why would they care if people they harm are people in their lives or strangers? I keep seeing 'most rapists are people victim knows' as if it mean anything. As if that means everyone around you is capable …
/r/MensRights06/12/16 01:23 PM
1

So, if your mom never told you that, you'd be okay pounding on a naked woman who cries 'no' in distress?
/r/MensRights06/12/16 12:47 PM
2

We already have a legal system which made it extremely clear rape is a crime. It's done. FBI, for purposes of relocating resource priorities, rank crimes. The worst crime is murder, next is rape. Rape is considered a more serious crime, deserving more investigative resources than bank robbery, home invasion, assault with a deadly weapon. What else do you want? And are you also suggesting rape can happen due to miscommunication? And yes. We should stop 'teach men not to rape'. because it is not n…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 12:44 PM
1

Feminism, as it is now, can't be good or decent no matter how you fix it. They'd need to admit patriarchy is bullshit and apologize for hijacking domestic violence relief effort for massive financial fraud. And revert back to Camille Paglia's feminism. It's not gonna happen.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 04:14 AM
4

You think rapists rape because they didn't know what they were doing was wrong?
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:56 AM
1

Women who first wore pants got threats like this. No. Coco Chanel's male-attire made for women was well received from the get go. That was how she made it huge.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:53 AM
3

Junk ideologue not selling well. Good news.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:46 AM
4

critical thinking I don't think you understand what that means.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:22 AM
4

Please go to your local prison and give your rape culture talk to convicted rapists. See how that works. Also, since gold-diggers and prostitutes are predominantly women, we should teach young girls not to be gold-diggers and prostitutes? Is that your logic?
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:13 AM
1

I don't mean genetics like my family has a history of heart problems and diabetes. I mean genetic programing like when you see a starving kid on TV, a kid who you don't know and looks nothing like any kid of your race, you'd still want to help. We have cultures where women are attracted to overweight women on a basis of wealth. No, that is wealthy families picking a bride for their sons, a bride whose family would likely match their own socio-economic status, based on appearance of "excess resou…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 03:10 AM
3

Feminists are right that there IS a toxic masculinity Toxic masculinity is just bullshit feminists pulled out of their arse to blame everything back to men, while sounding like they care. You know, "If you only listen to us on how to be a proper human, all your problems will go away." Never mind it's actually all the legislative changes based on lies that's really screwing men up.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 02:16 AM
1

None of this is biology It is biology. You focused on a less relevant but nonetheless another compounding layer on top of the core. And think it's some social stereotype. Let me expand that for you again. Tribes with resource distribution ( including human lives ) biased to protect wombs at all costs, had far better odds than treating every life equally. A self-reliant man who tried to heal or medicate himself and failed, is of no loss to next gen offspring size. A self-reliant woman who tried t…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 02:55 PM
3

There is no flaw in reasoning, as this isn't philosophy that's up for debate. This is biological science. Let me take you step by step. Sadness is beneficial for community. Those distress signals gather people to come together as a team to solve problems that will benefit others too in the long run. Someone had food poisoning, someone's kid drowned, whatever. In a tribe where the community caters to men and women's distress equally, when shit happens and wipe out a huge chunk of the population, …
/r/MensRights05/12/16 01:22 PM
49

Yup. My ex and her sisters were not even exposed to feminism. They have no clue what feminism is. Yet, they still think the same. As soon as our daughter could understand some conversation, like 5, my ex proudly told me that she and her sisters taught our daughter that if any man touch her, especially in some areas, she has to tell an adult, even if that man is daddy. She took pride in that that's probably something men have no clue of. Expecting me to tell her, "Great job." Instead, I told her,…
/r/MensRights05/12/16 08:55 AM
2

Gender will never be equal. Men and women are different. It biology. We can strive for equal opportunities and whatnot, but this type of evolutionary biology can't be undone. Wombs are valuable, sperms are not. Women and kids need to cry for help because they are valuable assets for next gen. Men talk about their feelz and nothing gets done. Since life give everything a chance, there probably were tribes where men and women are the same like you described, but didn't make the cut when shit hits …
/r/MensRights05/12/16 07:59 AM
10

"I’m not sure I can be with someone who doesn’t want to have sex with me.” ... is coercion and hence, rape? Doesn't feminist movement tell men to talk openly about their feelz? This is how guys feel!
/r/MensRights04/12/16 03:37 AM
10

Stoicism is about the domestication, not necessarily the elimination, of emotions. It is not about turning humans into vegetables ... stoic sage is someone who transforms fear into prudence, pain into information, mistakes into initiation, and desire into undertaking. Nassim Taleb
/r/MensRights04/12/16 03:03 AM
7

Toxic masculinity is bullshit invented feminist movement to blame everything back to men. Let's have a reverse scenario, where I invent 'toxic femininity'. You tell me female suicide rate is far higher than males. I'd tell you, if you learn to be adults and suck it up like an adult, that problem will be gone, it's your 'toxic femininity' making you fragile. You tell me custody is aways awarded to the father, I'll tell you it's because your 'toxic femininity' make you a dependent of a household a…
/r/MensRights04/12/16 02:32 AM
1

You know it was once legal to give death sentences to homosexuals and it was once legal to perform lobotomy. How far do you think we'd progress if we just say, "No questioning the validity of the law. It doesn't matter because that's the law!"
/r/MensRights02/12/16 12:20 PM
1

No, it's not that simple. The initiator is still a victim of himself/herself, because he was exploited by the photo he/she took. While the receptive party also need to be prosecuted for the obvious reason that his/her phone has child porn not sent by the initiator, but taken by himself/herself.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 01:20 AM
1

So, she exploited a kid who is ... herself? While she's also a victim of child abuse who the predator is ... herself? Is she Schrödinger's cat or what?
/r/MensRights02/12/16 01:14 AM
1

Two 16 year olds sexting each other. Put both on sex offender registry, while both are also victims?
/r/MensRights02/12/16 01:01 AM
1

Bob from Fight Club.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 12:59 AM
3

It's 27 per 100,000 reported, meaning this stat even includes all false accusations. http://edition.cnn.com/2014/02/03/opinion/sutter-alaska-rape-list/
/r/MensRights02/12/16 12:55 AM
1

And how are they suppose to ask for billions of free money if they are no longer victims of patriarchy? Truce is not gonna happen. Just let feminism dig its own grave.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:13 PM
11

We don't want to get married because we've come to understand we use the Duluth model to keep women chained to family responsibilities. We now understand the importance of social engineering to rid marriage institution so women can be liberated from internalized misogyny to focus on grabbing political power and CEO jobs. You should be happy we do not want to get married. We do have other reasons but those are just privileged opinions, as such, I won't bother explaining those.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 07:26 PM
6

There are many cases of teen lovers where the boy was indicted against the girl's will. The couple got married after the fiasco, started a family. The dad is not allowed to be anywhere near kids' school and not allowed to be left alone with his own kid, because he's on sex offender registry. And what about teen couples who later moved on and never get married? Plus, at this day and age, sexting and exchanging photo with your girlfriend can get you on the registry.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 09:07 AM
2

Wasn't it Benjamin Franklin who said that?
/r/MensRights01/12/16 08:57 AM
2

It's ad pandering to women because they are the ones spending all the money during Christmas season. It's not political.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 06:44 PM
1

Because their hypothesis of patriarchal society where men are privileged, men oppress women, would fall flat on its face. They do not want to face the truth that their ideologue is a bunch of horseshit.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 01:18 PM
1

Men benefited from divorce more, which is why 70% of divorce are filed by women, and among those with higher education, 90% of divorce are filed by women.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 11:37 AM
3

It has everything to do with Men's Rights. Under the effort of "social engineering to deconstruct gender" to make kids gender neutral, boys on medications are on the rise, because they are being treated like "damaged girls". As in, girls are human beings but boys are born broken beings until corrected. So, if a teen boy likes playing video games, or being physically active, that's patriarchy trying to tap into his violent behavior so he can grow up oppressing women through violence. He should ta…
/r/MensRights30/11/16 10:52 AM
2

His balls is a social construct.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 09:51 AM
15

No, they are different. Women who want men to approach them, are normal. Women who do not want men to approach women, are feminists who men wouldn't touch with a 10-foot pole, and hence, they do not want men to approach other women. They jello.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 08:47 PM
19

Feminists do not want men talking to women whom men find attractive. Nothing new.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 05:54 PM
1

I was explaining what this change is actually meant for.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 08:57 AM
2

This isn't a debate on definition of consent. Two 15 year olds have sex. So, let's charge both with statuary rape, give them both jail time, put both on sex offender registry for life ... while both are also victims of sex without consent?
/r/MensRights28/11/16 08:11 AM
12

Not anonymous. In DV, usually friends and family of the couple would step up and say they regretted not speaking up earlier. This is the same, their friends had come forward regretting not speaking up earlier before allegations, but for Depp, against Heard. None of their long time mutual friends has yet come forward to support Heard.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 07:15 AM
19

Well, close friends of the couple and Depp's daughter had step out to say she's lying. While no one has yet to come out to confirm Heard's claim.
/r/MensRights28/11/16 06:04 AM
19

Well given that majority of gold-diggers are women, and their victim men, shouldn't they make it compulsory for tween girls to pledge to never be a gold digging bitch and to not remain silent if their friends act like one? See how insulting that sounds. And how harmful it is to ask kids to do that.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 06:17 PM
28

Also, men's day need not be awareness to men's issues. Men don't buy into that victimhood mentality. Appreciation and thanks to men's contribution to family, society, country, would be nice.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 02:31 PM
13

I'm going to say this again. Modern feminism is NOT built on the idea of striving for equality. It is built on fighting the delusional "patriarchy oppression" which does not exist. So, yes, it would be for a true feminist to be against setting aside a day to appreciate men's contribution to family, society, and country.
/r/MensRights27/11/16 02:29 PM
16

As if boys had never heard of "You can't hit a girl." from adults. Yeah, we've got it, we've heard it a billion times. Please, have your local government representatives go to your local prison and tell criminals who had committed violent crimes against women to take this pledge, okay?
/r/MensRights27/11/16 02:15 PM
1

I suggest everyone, mom, dad, singles, EVERYONE take 20min to go to your local prison and talk to criminals who had committed violent crimes, and tell them not to do it again. See how that goes. Telling our kids not to be violent had been going on forever. No parents ever tell their kids, "No hitting! Just tell him/her why you're upset." No parents ever did that?
/r/MensRights27/11/16 07:38 AM
1

So, if it weren't for you keeping him busy to make money for you, he would be unleashing his inner male violence on you and others? Okay then.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 09:02 PM
1

You still didn't answer my question. My question was, how would their family react if you dare ask those question? It is insulting. And to assume you know, is even more insulting. Your judgemental egocentrism is off the charts. That's like someone saying, "Suicide rate is high in LGBT community because they are sexual deviants on downward spiral who does not grasp healthy relationships. Anyone who disagree are just too weak and immature to discuss this type of topic." That would be what you are …
/r/MensRights26/11/16 08:56 PM
1

I meant charge her for making false report. Pretty sure that's a crime.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 07:23 PM
6

No.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 07:08 PM
2

LOL. No one is offended by male mannequin used as punch bags. That's the point. No one is campaigning to ban it, no one is campaigning to ban realistic looking dildos, is there? What this is, would be as ridiculous as someone campaigning to ban male mannequins, by claiming it will promote others to be violent against men. It's idiotic. Get it? Women getting upset over sexbots would be as ludicrous as claiming male mannequins used as target practice promotes violence against men.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 03:17 PM
2

You didn't even bother to click on those links did you? There are male mannequins designed for punching practice. Maybe you should worry about Hello Kitty vibrators will eventually lead women to go to Sanrio Store and rub Hello Kitty plush against their clit.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 02:16 PM
2

I'm so sick of this shit. In a population of 1,000,000. 100 committed violent crimes Of those 100, 90 of them have no issue whatsoever doing it to people they know. There. 90% of victims were harmed by people they know. So? All it says is majority of violent people would do it to people close to them. Is that any surprise?
/r/MensRights26/11/16 01:17 PM
2

Because it can be dangerous. Have you seen those Hello Kitty vibrators? Shouldn't we be concerned that it's gonna promote women to walk into Sanrio Store, and rub Hello Kitty up their vagina?
/r/MensRights26/11/16 09:40 AM
2

Please visit any family of a girl suicide victim, and ask her family, "Can you tell us why she hated herself so much? Guess we'll never know why she'd want to kill herself and maybe others." Better yet, do the same to a family of a male victim who was gay. And tell us how that went.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 08:48 AM
4

Then stop bothering men when they are busy not killing people. As long as when a man is not doing any violence, leave him be. You need men to be busily productive, because that's him getting more income for you to grab.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 08:35 AM
0

Because Nikola Tesla to Elon Musk took about 1,000 years. And technology progress in linear.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 08:26 AM
2

How else do they justify asking for donation funding? Everyone has rent to pay.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 08:06 AM
7

You got it wrong. Women's unrealistic expectation is they are all special snowflakes who deserve a billionaire to cater to their every wish.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 07:36 AM
1

C'mon now. In all seriousness, sex bot is not meant as a replacement of women. Men who'd rather be celibate and keep their wealth they work hard for and not take risks with women, they'd rather be celibate with or without sex bots. MGTOW would still be MGTOW even if all male sex toys were banned. Good for them. But since people are working for better toy than silicone sleeves, if they can pay, why not. It's good for the economy.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 06:44 AM
2

Imagine, when a woman withhold sex because she's not getting what she want, would bare no impact. That won't be a healthy relationship. Ask women.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 06:27 AM
2

Don't lie. It's for you to act out your violent fantasies towards Jude Law. If that's allowed, next thing you know, women would start seeing male actors as objects.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 06:16 AM
2

Still didn't answer his question. Should those be banned as those must be for people to act out their violent fantasies towards men and for kids to act out murder fantasies?
/r/MensRights26/11/16 06:12 AM
6

Exactly.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 10:23 PM
10

I am so addicted to playing this little game http://trumpdonald.org How long would you guess it would take before I do it for real, get a trumpet and blow on President Trump's hair?
/r/MensRights25/11/16 09:10 PM
1

Not in Japan. And Japan is one of the safest place for young women.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 09:05 PM
3

Violent revenge fantasies? Do women buy dildos to act out on violent revenge fantasies? My girlfriend has a dildo. She had it before I met her. Do I need to worry that she has this revenge fantasy of her ex whom she fantasizes dismembering his dick as her revenge trophy? That if we breakup, she'd do it for realz this time? It is a toy to kill time. Not a false ideology to worship to ( hint hint ). It has no negative social impact. Do you think if an analysis is based on bs, then it must not be v…
/r/MensRights25/11/16 09:01 PM
7

I'd love to see one planet run by men and another by women. You know what, we'd even give you the blueprints on how to mine metal, dig oil, refine oil, make chips, build satellites, build communication towers, do maintenance on communication towers, harvest electrical energy, in case you can't live without Twitter on your phone. Men can really take down civilization. Give ALL men a one week break at the same time, where men do nothing. See how bad it goes.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 08:18 PM
9

Please study on the history of feminism. Be open minded and see what Erin Pizzey and Camille Paglia has to say about the movement. Everything people hate about feminism IS THE mainstream feminism. So mainstream they had been successful lobbying for legislative changes that only made society worse off, so mainstream their harmful ideology are taught at college level, as a major. So mainstream that they get a panel on UN. So mainstream that they receive billions in funding while using those resour…
/r/MensRights25/11/16 07:22 PM
6

One more thing that many have overlooked with that preposterous argument. It's an argument that's making excuses for criminals, shifting blame when they should take full responsibility for their acts. "Oh, I am a victim of being exposed to violent games." It only make matters worse. "You did it, you are responsible for it, honest hardworking people at EA games had nothing to do with your act."
/r/MensRights25/11/16 06:55 PM
13

And there were men who'd act totally inappropriately towards women they know and don't know, before the invention of film. Those are the same type of people. Pervs exist does not equal causation.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 06:43 PM
8

You are claiming what impact a theme park might have, by comparing it to a real war? War is reality, it is not VR, it is not fantasy, it's not a theme park.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 04:44 PM
3

Corrected.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 04:40 PM
22

Sigh. Do some men create fantasies of banging some porn star when they play with sex toys? Probably many. And when they get to meet those porn stars at conventions, what happen? They ask for photographs and autographs. They don't unzip their pants and demand blowjobs, which is what they would do in their fantasies. Are you saying, if I custom made a Monica Bellucci sex bot, eventually, I would want to try the real person that is Monica Bellucci?
/r/MensRights25/11/16 04:05 PM
25

Do we really want them to eventually be able to also have sex with life-like and child-like robots? That seems really dangerous to me. No. Many pedophiles never acted on their tendency because they are drilled with the notion that it is not accepted by the society and it would hurt the victim and victim's family. Having robots does not invalidate that mentality. Pedos who act on it, they'd do it anyways, with or without robots. Resource and time wasted on banning robots would be better used on c…
/r/MensRights25/11/16 03:46 PM
24

ban violent video games It's a very bizarre stance. Just because men love action movies does not mean we'd enjoy it if aliens come to earth and start killing humans.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 03:35 PM
28

When you part with your property, it takes your kids, and half of your assets. Sounds about right.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 03:27 PM
23

Sex robots are simply very expensive toys, like dildos. Nothing more. Creating issues out of it is a farce.
/r/MensRights25/11/16 03:09 PM
2

Okay. Let couples share chores. When he does the dishes, she mows the lawn; when he do the laundry, she fix and clean kids' bikes; when he takes out the garbage, she pays the mortgage; when he vacuums, she helps with kids' science projects. And then, she can then complain, "You never help with mowing the lawn."? Chores had already been shared. It had always been a teamwork since my grandparents generation and probably many generations before them. It's not something new.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 03:14 PM
4

Okay, I'll be specific. I told my wife to stop wasting time with PTA's brownie sales and newsletters, that we use those for family time. Take kids out, come home, put them to bed, have sex. After the 50th time, of not getting what I want, I cheated. Does that make any sense. How about, break it off, end it, and start a new relationship? My ex never cheated but was constantly saying, "Women don't know they've married a bad deal until they've seen a bigger world.", namely, men with bigger houses a…
/r/MensRights24/11/16 12:35 PM
44

So, it's okay for men to cheat when women don't fix pluming, pay mortgage, mow the lawn, assemble IKEA furnitures, take out the garbage, fix kids' bikes? Or maybe, it's okay for men to cheat whenever men want women to do stuff and they don't, like you know, sex?
/r/MensRights23/11/16 06:50 PM
1

So, the "leave no men behind" is actually "remember to babysit your mates"?
/r/MensRights23/11/16 06:34 PM
1

Well, equality in marriage law only affects the minority gay community, so who gives a fuck, right? Have it occurred to you and your pal that perhaps looking into neglect of boys who were victims of rape, may actually end up helping ALL rape victims, male or female? Paying some attention to male victims does not mean we have to stop looking at female victims either.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 06:29 PM
3

Well, almost all department stores have 90% catering towards women.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 09:01 AM
1

However, you need to consider the possibility that a candidate might be hired because the hiring company believes his/her persona fits with company's brand image.
/r/MensRights22/11/16 09:00 AM
2

While I agree with you, I'm going to say this is again, about money. These programs aren't cost free. People organizing these programs get paid. You have a bunch of women graduating from women's studies with this "toxic masculinity" etc. nonsense that's completely useless in the real world, they can't work for tech giants, financial firms, or any profession that require acquired skills. So, they have to come up with shit to ask for grants, which is tax dollars, to pay their rent. That's the bott…
/r/MensRights22/11/16 06:10 AM
6

I'm still an active feminist, but now in the true sense of the word But that's not what the movement is. It hasn't been what you think it is since the 70s. You can believe in equality for all ( we all do ), and still not be a feminist. Erin Pizzey is the first person to abolish the notion that domestic violence is private business, and help victims suffering from such abuse. She has nothing good to say about feminism. Camille Paglia is a feminist who believe feminism went downhill. Feminist woul…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 08:39 PM
1

Feminism aims to make gender roles permeable, No, they are going for "gender is a social construct". A boy who is not like most typical boy, is not just a boy who is not like most typical boy, but "a boy who identifies himself as a girl". And a girl who act like a boy is not a girl who act like a boy, but "a girl who identifies herself as a boy". And all that nonsense. So, no, a kid can't be a boy and like girl stuff, because the kid then become "a boy who identifies himself as a girl". Also, ma…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 08:18 PM
3

We'll, since my previous reasoning somehow didn't fly, I'll try again. 'Americans shouldn't be talking about 9/11 because most bombings are done by Americans, and it rarely happen to Americans.' You see how disrespectful that is to all victims, and how idiotic that reasoning is?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 01:22 PM
1

Article is about a pilot's decision to make sure a family does not miss a transition flight to see their son who died in combat, upset 1st entitled class passengers who reacted with rude response.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 12:54 PM
3

In combat, soldiers die protecting their mates. Could have been anyone. Pretty sure there are female soldiers who died protecting their male combatants. If, military or rescue units lower their standards to fit in required female quota, then, that's a different issue.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 12:43 PM
2

Men are not raping. Men have a law enforcement system, created and run mostly by men, to catch and lock up rapists. Men do that because men have this biological need to protect their family and their community from predators. Male rapists is not a representation of men. For argument's sake, let's simplify and assume ALL rapists are male. Well, all jellyfish are ocean creatures. So, all ocean creatures must behave like jellyfish because all jellyfish are ocean creatures?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 10:11 AM
1

there's no such thing as gender, it's a social construct, try to keep up
/r/MensRights21/11/16 09:08 AM
1

I applaud those who stick around to fight. But I'd rather boycott and let Twitter die. Other businesses will soon learn catering to the loud SJWs is not good for business.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 09:04 AM
1

Media makes it sounds like victims have no say in the marriage. Pretty sure victims can rightfully deny marriage which perpetrators then still serve time. This just rid of cases of teens having sex.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 08:54 AM
1

What direct cause? You mean those men talking about male rape victims had directly rape other people?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 08:44 AM
1

than they should get men to stop it themselves Holy shit. Please, go to your local prison and tell convicted rapists not to rape again. See how that goes. Rapists rape not because they do not know it's wrong. They know it's wrong, they don't give a shit. It has nothing to do with "men". The entire population of men can tell them, "It is wrong, and to protect our family, we'd put you in prison." And they'd still rape.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 08:42 AM
3

Men didn't cause it. Men do not high-five their wive's, daughter's sister's moms' rapists for "scoring one for the male team", men do not give awards to rapists, men created a society where rapists get put in jail, to ensure men's family is protected. Argument is pure b.s.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 08:35 AM
1

That still didn't answer my question.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 07:57 AM
1

but that's also because men so often choose to not be part of their kid's life in the first place Wow. Just wow. I know of a couple where the wife would tell you her husband is the best husband and dad ever. Turns out her husband had a prior family where kids want nothing to do with him ever. But he is the same person. Explain. I'd put it in another context. Sports fan are on sports forums discussing sports. Can you tell me what can they achieve? What can one achieve by watching some else play g…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 07:53 AM
1

Kangaroo courts have no effect on college boys? Are you kidding me? So, if we indict the accused just by the accuser's say so, it does not affect the accused right to a fair trial? So if that's a the case, that's a problem in criminal court, but it's not a problem in campus kangaroo court?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 07:52 AM
1

You've already started making all these accusations with no basis behind them Name one.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 07:47 AM
1

Here's one little homework for you. Follow the money trail of how campus kangaroo courts were established. How UVA hoax was used to validate the fake 4-in-1 survey to justify funding. It goes all the way to The White House. Feminism has no voice in politics? How do you suppose they managed to get a celebrity to speak at UN for HeforShe campaign? That takes money and politics.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:16 AM
1

No, I'm just saying the women you mentioned are outliers. You didn't even bother to look them up, did you? If you're not willing to learn or be challenged, and so stubbornly believe the persona you want to believe, why bother debating/discussing? Next thing you're gonna tell me is Camille Paglia has nothing good to say about 3rd wave feminism because she was divorce raped. Or she dismiss rape culture because she either wants to rape women or was once falsely accused of rape. I don't think that d…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 05:07 AM
3

to compensate for the fact that you as an individual have a hard time coexisting with women? Good grief. Another holier than thou. Are you saying Erin Pizzey has a hard time coexisting with women? Wendy McElroy has a hard time coexisting with women? Clueless dude is clueless. If you have an ogre living in your house, what's the best way to keep your house clean? Allow the ogre to grow and breed even more little ogres, while cleaning up the mess they make day in day out, or kill the ogre and then…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 04:18 AM
2

If Hilary had won, I'm pretty sure Trump supporters won't be crying in fear of threats. Or beating up Hilary supporters. Or protesting because it didn't go their way. Or couldn't go to work because they need time to process what democracy is. So, it doesn't matter how ridiculous Trump is, reaction to election result pretty much demonstrated a huge chunk of Hilary supporters are the ones who are immature.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 03:52 AM
1

By winning, and thereby, prevented billions of promised fundings going into WOW and other organizations that'll use those resources to push for even more legislative changes that take away even more men's rights. It doesn't matter if that was just a side effect.
/r/MensRights21/11/16 03:49 AM
1

Let's look at it in another context. Let's say, when I go to ATM, sometimes, someone robs me. Bank is aware this shit might happen, so, they installed a button, where if I pushed it, just once, known criminals are block out of ATM booth forever. And when people are asking me, "Why don't you use that button?" Your response is, "Here's an idea, don't rob?"
/r/MensRights20/11/16 02:19 PM
1

I am not talking about trans people. I'm talking about healthy normal kids whose parents had either encouraged them or deliberately programmed them to be the gender they aren't born in, in the name of ideology. Remember that boy used as "successful" experimental result which all this "gender is social construct" is based on? Yeah, what happened to him? Trans people are people with certain biological build that requires continuous medical attention, no matter what they choose to do with their bod…
/r/MensRights20/11/16 12:50 PM
1

Most kids who were raised the opposite gender they are born in, end up committing suicide once adult. Kids do say they want to marry their mom, their grandpa. Are parents really going to do that because that's what their kids want to? It is not too late when they decide after they are aware of what that transition means.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 01:20 PM
10

Did anyone say it is okay to send dick pics?
/r/MensRights19/11/16 01:11 PM
23

No one is saying it is okay to send dick pics. No one is saying it is on her to change his behavior, because his own father & mother and best friend can tell him that's wrong, and still he's not going to change. Press 'block'. He can still keep on sending for all she cares because she no longer has to deal with it. This is rich. When it comes to custody battles, women then suddenly realize they have a million complex manipulative ways to block out kids' dad.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 01:07 PM
4

Liking girly stuff does not mean he'd grow up wanting to have a vagina be stuffed by penis. Behaving like a boy does not mean when she grows up, she'd want to have a penis to stick into a vagina.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 10:44 PM
4

What would destroy feminism is when billions of free money going into their organization stops. It is not going to stop.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 10:24 PM
-4

Lolz. Spot on.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 09:20 PM
3

With feminist movement, I can no longer tell what's real and what's comedy from The Onion.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 10:36 AM
4

Getting laid or not getting laid isn't that big of a deal. But imagine it's quite a funny insult to say, "If you don't agree with me, I hope your pussy never see a cock again.". As if value of men are validated by having allowed access to pussy. The drug addict who's banging young girls everyday has more worth, or the guy fighting for better care for veterans?
/r/MensRights18/11/16 10:06 AM
2

Data can be used to spin anyway you want. Without actual scientists connecting the dots, I can use the same set of data to make opposite claims.
/r/MensRights18/11/16 07:30 AM
10

Of course any kid can learn to behave badly. I don't think kids are born toxic either but that toxic masculinity says boys are, until they learn from feminists to get rid of it. But what this 'toxic masculinity' truly is, is to blame everything back to men. For example, if there are no dv shelter for men because feminist movement hoard all dv relief funds and will deny funds to any shelter that support men, and make it a male-aggression issue when it is not, they'll spin it as 'toxic musculinity…
/r/MensRights17/11/16 07:48 PM
1

You missed a word he said, 'monogamy'. For a long time, it was okay for the wealthy to have many wives.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 07:11 PM
2

Good. I have nothing against marriage. But until divorce and custody law changes for the better, boycott marriage.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 07:07 PM
1

But feminism is meant to make money for those spreading it, and that's all. There's really only one goal. They'd care shit what happen to others.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 07:02 PM
0

So, feminists fought against stereotypes like The Simpsons where dad's a buffoon, son's a trouble maker, daughter would likely end up as a president and mom's the one holding the family together? Don't get me wrong, I like the show, but what about stupid stereotypes that dads are clueless around babies? And how about the most idiotic stereotype that men are rapists unless taught otherwise? Pretty sure feminists created that one out of thin air.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 06:51 PM
28

I think you meant 'toxic feminine', which is to say all women are born broken until fixed by men, the equivalent of 'ridding toxic masculinity effort'. Feminism is a toxic political ideology, but women aren't born with feminist DNA. Edit: I'm not saying women are naturally toxic. I'm saying that would be the equivalent of what they are doing to boys. As opposed to just an ideologue they subscribe to.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 06:17 PM
24

Dude, feminism isn't about progress to rid sexism. Feminism is aimed at come up with bullshit theories/excuses to justify more funding to "makes changes".
/r/MensRights17/11/16 06:08 PM
-4

Oh, you are telling me others were kicking him in the head in front of witnesses while she's the one on trial and others were not? Are you kidding me?
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:14 AM
0

Good grief. Me throwing your cat across the room could not have killed it but the fact that you have a brick wall home that hit the car's skull did the work. Me pushing you out to your balcony didn't kill you, but you tripped over the fence and fell 20 floors was what killed you. Me stabbing you didn't kill you, your excess bleeding did. You think a man kicking a woman in the head and didn't stop after he fractured her skull is not murder?
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:11 AM
-1

... he was kicked and punched in the head repeatedly, while bystanders watched
/r/MensRights17/11/16 08:06 AM
-4

Are you saying skull fracture had no direct connection to his head being repeatedly kicked by his attacker?
/r/MensRights17/11/16 06:05 AM
-3

Maybe the court is biased because she's a woman, and victim a man? Court does not always make the right decision even though it's the best we can get. That's why we are here, to improve things.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 04:52 AM
0

Dude. I remember a case where a huge guy was attacked ( all witnesses at the scene agree on that ), so he punched back. His attacker fell. On falling, attacker's skull hit concrete and attacker died. The guy defending himself now serves life in prison. I'm not saying that's right, just sayin' this isn't a 'court not having enough proof' case. If you kick a skull repeatedly, it's going to break. This bad argument is like saying, me stabbing you didn't actually kill you, but excess bleeding that d…
/r/MensRights17/11/16 04:32 AM
3

There's her side of the story. Victim's parents are sent to therapy by the court. And zero reporting on the boy's side of narrative.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 04:21 AM
1

Feminism isn't dying. They have found out their old ways does not work, so now they invent this 'purging of toxic masculinity' to 'help men', to appeal like they care about men too. Saying boys can get the same love as girls, love which boys are deprived of, and would no longer be broken human b.s. And the way to do this is drug perfectly normal boys and then them they are all born criminally-inclined.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 06:37 PM
1

I'm a feminist who believes wholeheartedly in eliminating toxic masculinity Sigh. As much as you seem well-intended, sorry to break your bubble but that school of ideologue only make things worse, for men, women, kids. I agree with Vergara that kids shouldn't be born with parents hating each other. Kids should have both parents as a team. For Leob to say he just wants the kid and nothing from Vergara is extremely selfish of him. But as far as privacy is concerned, it's not right to question his …
/r/MensRights16/11/16 06:12 PM
5

Don't stop. Please continue to vote-shame Trump's supporters. Let their true self shine so unsuspecting public can see them for who they really are.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 06:03 PM
13

Women file for divorce = husbands unable to make them happy; men file for divorce = immature husband unwilling to uphold responsibilities, women value marriage more and more willing to make sacrifices to make it work. Argument can be spun in so many ways. 80% divorce are filed by women because nothing changes for them. They still get kids and financial support as if marriage never ended. Imagine a divorce system where men's obligations are terminated, but wives still need to have sex and do chor…
/r/MensRights16/11/16 05:41 PM
10

accuses Mr Hayatleh of “seeking to avoid his financial responsibilities to her arising out of their marriage” His responsibilities to his partner is when the partnership still holds. When it ends, responsibilities end. That is so with all partnerships. You pull this shit with your college, your scholarship ends; you end your business partnership, there'd be no more financial support, you denounce your own family, you don't expect them to continue to support you. Just because some crappy law allo…
/r/MensRights16/11/16 07:48 AM
3

It's not that complicated. A child is born to find out his/her parents hate each other. It's wrong. Kids need both parents working as a team. If women have the right to keep their ex's sperms and have kids against their ex's will, would you support it?
/r/MensRights16/11/16 04:45 AM
27

If she was to make it gender neutral, funding would stop. She would then lose her job and another one willing to comply takes over to make it a gender issue. This has been going on since the 70s when feminist movement hijacked DV relief effort from Erin Pizzey to make it political.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 09:46 AM
22

Hilary lost mostly because people do not trust her. The middle class has awoken to the notion that the likes of Hilary do whatever that advance their careers and connect to the most wealthy and powerful. That Hilary wants to be president for the sole purpose of obtaining the title and nothing more. If other non-agressive males won against Trump, then your theory won't hold up. But I agree in desperate times, people -both men and women- seek strong leaders. However, women often are the ones who'd…
/r/MensRights15/11/16 06:38 AM
2

it's possible that Trump will help him getting pardoned We can only wish. That'd be super awesome. But WikiLeaks did go against U.S. Military's ways of conducting things, and Trump is in full support of U.S. troops. So it might not be that simple, politically.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 05:00 PM
1

That's odd. Hilary pledged to fund WOW in the billions when she wins, and we all know Erin Pizzey, in her 2014 DV Symposium, said the first person she'll sue for financial fraud is Hilary Clinton.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 04:12 AM
3

was made to apologize to everyone What did you need to apologize for? For pointing facts out? This is what I can't stand about feminism. They'd rather side with ideologue they have no clue of, organizations that's making money off them, and go against their own family members for stating out simple facts. Disgusting.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 09:44 AM
3

Back in the days where royals control everything and anyone who claim anything against them, gets beheaded, except for comedians who deliver the truth as a form of entertainment. He is still a person with an opinion, even if he's not the press. I'm not the press, you're not the press, that does not mean what we deduced from our observations is invalid.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 03:00 AM
2

In three words: White, male voters. This is too funny. I suppose in Japan, Japanese should not vote for what's in the best interest of Japanese too? The middle class had had enough. They'd rather have a bad wildcard than endorse the entitled elite hoarding assets. It's a class war, not a gender issue. They'd rather take the 50/50 chance of things getting worse than having things as is.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 06:31 AM
1

It's great to see the machine fail against even someone as ridiculous as Trump. That really sends a message.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 04:17 AM
3

Hilary pledged to fund WOW and other feminist organizations in the billions when she win, as if they aren't getting enough already, to secure women voters. And we all know what these organizations had done to men's rights. It's not even hate, that's for the brainwashed clueless minions. Money runs the world. If feminist movements doesn't make up lies and bullshit to justify legislative changes to take away men's rights, they have no set goals to validate fundings they ask for, which then means f…
/r/MensRights11/11/16 04:14 AM
2

People will believe what they want to believe This. You can show religious people the astrophysics of our universe and they'll still believe in supernatural God being; God himself can come down an perform miracles and atheist would try to find ways to illustrate it to be nothing more than illusion tricks. It's pointless trying to sway people from what they believe in deeply. They have to want to try to see things outside their restricted mind frame on their own will. And if they do, they don't r…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 07:23 PM
1

LOL. No. There was an in depth journalism ( done by a German women, which has now being taken down, so I can't post the link ), that found the opposite. During genocide, men and boys civilians are main targets. Yet, when UN sends in rescue, it's women first. And when UN observed these women were traumatized, resources were used to set up care for their well being, while nothing was done to help men being slaughtered. It's biologically ingrained. Wombs are of high value in times of crisis, sperms…
/r/MensRights10/11/16 09:37 AM
1

Well, if college boys get their rights to fair trial instead of being hanged at college kangaroo courts, then it won't be an issue if they get accused, would it? As I stated, as long as men get basic human rights. My point being, even when we do get father's rights, or this right, that right, all rights we can list now, achieving all we can think of now does not guarantee it's over. New ones may arise. So, it's kinda pointless to list the changes required, as that list is going to change as time…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 11:50 PM
0

I'm aware of that, but many were hoping to indict Cheney.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 11:26 PM
1

It didn't need to be as complicated as issues a, b, c, d, and so on. As long as men get basic human rights and are being treated like humans, and not as disposable resource extraction -may it be their lives or assets they spent their life earning- Also, when issues listed in post are resolved, it does not mean no new issues won't arise. For example, let's assume we took care of wounded veterans, but then, feminist movement making college boys out to be rapists was not an issue, it was a non-issu…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 11:03 PM
10

Nope. She was picked by those in power to rig the election because she would be a complaint and willing puppet. It's amazing Bernie even went that far, it indicates there's already an awareness ( which is good ).
/r/MensRights09/11/16 10:19 PM
17

I suppose all women, gays, lesbians, minorities, handicapped, who didn't vote for Hilary should die too? It never occurred to these women that there's a possibility that it's precisely because of women like them that Hilary lost.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 08:02 PM
5

Don't be frustrated. Take this as a great news. They are making themselves to look like idiots and it's going to backfire, and less and less people would want to be associated with them.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 07:56 PM
0

He's probably talking about Valerie Plame case.
/r/MensRights09/11/16 07:19 PM
7

Saying it is very different from motivated to make it happen against all odds. Being passionate to get it to happen is very different from actually being competent enough to make it happen. All former presidents would like to go down in history as the president that made a difference. But U.S. is not a dictatorship, everything goes through certain channels before any work can be done. As much as I think Trump is a joke, I'm very glad many feminist organizations won't be getting their promised-fu…
/r/MensRights09/11/16 09:57 AM
2

The boy should testify. The whole point of putting people behind bars is not punishment. It is to avoid more victims falling prey to criminals. Bad "plea deal".
/r/MensRights01/07/16 08:37 AM
2

To be fair. I never talked about my ex being abusive, and didn't file reports. But when divorce happened, I spilled it all out. At the same time, I get what you mean. I'm being accused of a drug addict, encouraging our kids to try drugs, let them have free access to porn, having unsanitary space, reckless driving, all that nonsense. Yet, during our decade long marriage and 3 years of separation, she was never concerned about any of these "problems".
/r/MensRights31/05/16 10:08 PM
5

Aren't those products extremely sexist? Imagine toothpaste that claims 'maximum freshness' that's specially for women, or cotton swabs as 'women's ultimate beauty secret'.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 01:45 PM
1

The goal, is to justify any and all bad female behaviors. False accusation, assault, gold-digging, doxing, using kids to extort money from ex, not earning more, anything.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 01:38 PM
8

I agree there's always other options. Relief these women of their financially incompetent husbands, and pass them over to Huffington Post to be cared for.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 01:32 PM
11

At 16, you would mind a bunch of fat 40 year old factory workers sitting on your face when you didn't want it. Rape isn't sex, it is about power. I would imagine women who rape, are in fact, venting their anger or mental issues, whatever it may be. It's probably as sexy as some woman belittling, mocking, and insulting you. This isn't horny women in porn.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 12:02 PM
8

Rape culture, in feminism's doctrine, and as taught in college level gender studies, is the belief that our society thinks rape is okay, rape is no big deal, rape is funny. Which, is a bunch of bullshit.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 11:52 AM
5

You are only arguing for arguing's sake. So, because one sociopath goes undetected by his aunt, that means there's a possibility that every man is a rapist in waiting? Really?
/r/MensRights23/05/16 11:44 AM
2

I knew the police wouldn't help. I had heard of friends going to the police, only to blamed or slut-shamed. I assumed I would be met with similar accusations And this is why feminism is bad for young women. Feminism had helped promote the idea that reporting to the police is pointless.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 11:32 AM
52

I am (much) more likely to be the CEO of a company, an MP or at the top of any profession you care to name. Tell that to a miner, a construction worker, whatever. You think they had a better chance than a 9-year old girl backed by her billionaire parents to "start a fashion-line business" before she hits teen? Privilege had always been a socio-economic class issue and will always be.
/r/MensRights23/05/16 11:15 AM
2

There's nothing wrong with partnering up someone for life to start a family. Most mammals do that. But, boycott marriage until laws around the whole divorce business is changed. Since no one is going to do anything or even listen. Bankrupt the system first.
/r/MensRights22/05/16 06:07 AM
1

In any case, we are talking about 'hypocrisy' here. She didn't do her 'listen and believe' to accuser, and this one happens to be a real victim who is a kid. Not some grown up woman with vendetta.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 05:51 PM
2

Nope. Her job is to make sure her clients get a fair trial. To make sure the jury does not have prejudice against her clients, that there's no media smear campaign against the accused, that the accused get their due process, that police didn't fabricate evidence, that inconsistencies and lies of the accuser be brought to light, and so on and so forth. And, if her clients are guilty, try to determine if her clients need medical help, if not, advise her clients on how to cooperate and be remorsefu…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 07:23 AM
4

She helped defend rapists who she knew were lying, directly to the prosecutor. She had a submittable "evidence" ( that she knew was false, and admitted it on tape, to the prosecutor ), as a bargaining chip for a settlement deal, against a 12 year old girl. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/20/exclusive-hillary-clinton-took-me-through-hell-rape-victim-says.html
/r/MensRights20/05/16 09:56 PM
2

I think he meant fathers won't be fighting over a toy, or throw tantrum, or unfriend kids, or interacting with kids like a peer. But at the same time, fathers can still take their kids to his family and friends where there are cousins and other kids.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 07:34 AM
2

At this point, I won't be surprised if that is for realz.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 04:46 AM
9

I don't think it is directly linked. Just that the dude could have issue of depression that is biological and that is one issue that sent him over the edge. That said, how would a woman feel if she learnt her vagina had gone through mutilation as an infant, in the name of "cultural preferences"? And to top it off, when she and others try to raise the issue, no one gives a shit? It's like being wounded in war is one thing, but then being totally ignored when trying to get attention that wounded v…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 04:42 AM
2

Whats the issue here? Victimhood mentality is now no longer only indoctrinated in college gender studies. It has permeated to elementary school. My son, when in elementary school, won the design of the school's year book. A girl ( who didn't even make it to top 3 ) started a rumor that my son had his friends rigged the votes, so she demanded a recount. School complied. During the recount, she rallied girls to vote for her to fight back "bullies", when the correct way to recount, is to to vote wh…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:02 AM
12

Dear Facebook, Look at Twitter. It's not good for business to pamper the tantrum whinnies.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 01:21 PM
12

to persuade Hungarians to donate 1% of their personal income tax to the office They are asking men to fund to help perpetuate men as predators? Am I getting this right? The level of delusional arrogance.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 01:17 PM
1

I don’t understand that - the wife isn’t pregnant, only the mistress. I meant in the reverse scenario. If the wife's affair does not want the baby, he can't abort the baby even he wants to. So, you saying a mistress can abort the baby is kinda moot because a side-men can't. Which is why the reverse is told this way. There’s no meaningful comparison between the two. I agree paternity fraud is far worse. But the point being made, is what is expected of men. What that "being supportive no matter wh…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 12:43 PM
1

If the wife's fling doesn't want the baby, why can't he force the wife to abort the baby, just in case? It may not be equivalent of fraud, but it is pointing out what is asked of the other partner. Women expects men to be supportive and forgiving of their 'mistakes', yet, would have never tolerated the same to be asked of them.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:48 AM
1

It didn't need to be 100%. If, of all parents, only 10% of mothers sought for custody, and most of them get it. And 70% of fathers sought for custody and most of them get it. Then, there are parents who are in good terms where they just arrange it themselves. And so on. Also, a parent getting custody does not mean the other lose custody time either.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:41 AM
1

Yeah, basically, most parents who had been denied any custody, had been wronged.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:37 AM
2

Reverse the genders and you'll see it. A wife had an affair with a man. Her fling wants nothing to do with the kid. But the wife wants to keep the baby. Just that in most such cases, the wife simply doesn't tell her husband the truth. We are so used to the double standards that when it is reversed, you find it ridiculously outlandish.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:34 AM
4

There's a huge problem with propaganda spinning data, and public just eat it up. This is another good example. Let's say 50%-80% of dads get visitation time when they contest it in court. That simply means those dads have rights to see their kids in the first place, but needed to go through lengthy litigation and spend $$$ to get their parental rights. Basically, 50% to 80% of dads who challenge their ex, they shouldn't need to in the first place. Or, 50% to 80% of dads were wronged, and it take…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:14 PM
1

Like I said, if "police suspects the accuser is lying". Which is not a he-said she-said where it hangs inconclusive. It's when there's strong evidence showing the accuser is lying. Most types of these were not pursued. The infamous UVa case did not pursue to investigate against the false accuser. Not only that, that case remains open today, just in case she was raped but is having false memories from trauma. Imagine that. Mattress girl was also not investigated. Ellen Pao not investigated. Harva…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:04 PM
5

This is a source that states that men get 50-80% of the time some form of custody That simply means they are allowed to see their kids. Dads shouldn't have to fight in court to get shared custody.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:52 PM
1

What you are saying is redundant. Anyone convicted of false accusation would have gone through due process, just like any other crime. OP's question was, should they be punished? I have a bigger question. When an accuser's story doesn't add up, and police suspects the accuser is lying, should criminal investigations be conducted against the accuser instead of just simply dropping the case ( which is what we do now )?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:34 AM
1

Yes they need to be punished. It is not just false accusation. It is a vicious crime of malice, ruining a man's life. Such vicious crime need to be punished.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 05:31 AM
6

I guess if someone wrongly accuse my wife for deadly assault, the right thing to do is to not stand by her, but file for divorce while she's in prison to get 4 million from her. Because, what's more important is, deadly assault is a hideous crime. Am I right?
/r/MensRights14/05/16 12:09 AM
40

Maybe many men who were accused never seen the inside of a cell, because they didn't commit the crime and our justice system is working? More than half of all prisoners exonerated by The Innocent Project were innocent people convicted of rape.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 11:04 PM
1

Then don't try to look like Thor and try to be more like Elon Musk, Frank Gehry, Ridley Scott, whoever. Sheesh.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 04:17 AM
0

This isn't a dating sub.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 04:08 AM
1

No shelters for men; the rate at which husbands murder wives has not decreased. What? Are you saying male victims of domestic violence are murderous? I don't think I am.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 06:50 PM
1

Just leave. Don't even bother to deal with calling police to make your case. Don't respond when she tries to reach out to you.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 06:45 PM
21

The whole custody agreement is a joke. If I had full custody, and my ex wants some time with kids or kids miss their mom, what is stopping me from agreeing to them having time together? Nothing. There's absolutely no need to stick by the agreement if both parents are reasonable. The agreement is 'useful' only when one parent wants legal rights to deny another parent.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 12:43 PM
112

Well, you are lucky to get 50/50. I don't mind paying if I can even get 50/50. And I'd love it if my ex is screwing around to get a new guy to take some financial burden off me.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 08:31 AM
36

Yeah, like only moms are humans, right? I'm so sick and tired of this bullshit mentality that kids and dads bare no emotional impact if they don't spend time together.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 07:48 AM
1

I see it more as painting a hypothetical scenario to make a point.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 07:43 AM
1

Yeah, no. The world now is very different from when civil rights movement was going on. How many people can you reach out from posting posters when everyone is looking at their cellphone? Go to public media forums, news outlets and challenge lies, and expose the truths. That has far greater impact. If you don't believe me, how much truths had you gotten out of being in MRM from local protests and posters, and how much have you gained, how much had you been influenced, from internet debates on re…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:50 AM
9

I'd say he has to pay for child support, ethically. But if that's going to send him to jail because he can't pay, you'd have to weigh in if you want your kids to see that. I'm sure kids would rather live on less than to see one parent put another parent to jail. Personally, I will never ask my ex to pay for child support if I get full custody, or shared custody, even if she's freakin' rich. Again, ethically and morally, I do think he need to get his acts together and pay. But, the pros and cons …
/r/MensRights03/05/16 11:24 PM
1

'If Google was a guy'?
/r/MensRights03/05/16 10:50 PM
1

I don't think it's an issue, as in real life scenario, women don't get a pussy pass on DUI arrests. They might get less sentencing when they face court, but they are arrested just like men. Very hard for a drunk woman to be acting like she's some victimized angel, and impossible for any cops to think a drunk woman at the wheel is harmless, even if cops think she's harmless when sober.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 09:28 AM
2

It does matter. If boys can defend themselves, girls will get the message that there'll be reaction to every action. Girls can't have the mentality that they can do whatever the fuck they want with boys with no repercussions whatsoever, not even getting a time out lecture at the office.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 12:06 AM
2

Chill. If she's pulling stupid shit like this, she has no money to sue you.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 04:29 AM
1

Also, dads who take their little girls to use men's restroom. What are those dads thinking? Taking their daughters to be surrounded by a bunch of creeps.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 04:25 AM
4

How about boys in the same restroom with gay men? Oh, that's bigotry?
/r/MensRights02/05/16 03:58 AM
2

Well, according to that logic, Barbara Walters should not have parental rights over the daughter she adopted because she didn't take part in the reproduction process that created the child; gay couples should have no parental rights over any child. And if a child lost his/her mother, the mother's family have no parental right over the child even if the father is unfit. So the father who helped his kids with science projects, play sports with his kids on weekends, provided for his kids, should ha…
/r/MensRights01/05/16 09:43 AM
36

Boys who fail at school end up as unemployed men with HOT hardworking wives who support them? Since when?
/r/MensRights01/05/16 09:14 AM
1

Yes there was. Read my other response in the post. That was false. And now they are biting on that '1-in-3 would rape' and finding various ways to 'verify' that conclusion. I'll add the studies in my other response when I find them.
/r/MensRights01/05/16 01:23 AM
5

I had looked into that "study". It is actually a misrepresentation to another study, which is the actual study. People unfamiliar with scientific research won't be able to tell why it was misrepresented. The study's ( original ) goal, was to see if rapists have self awareness that they are likely to commit rape. To compare these samples, it would be pointless if only 1% of the sample are violent-prone. Because if the study is a sample of 300 ( and I recall that was the size ), that's only 3 to c…
/r/MensRights01/05/16 01:10 AM
1

That reply still didn't answer my question to you, if Erin Pizzey and Camille Puglia should be ashamed for blasting feminist movement? No, I don't think they're worse. I think they're exactly the same, which is the problem. Given enough time, if and when the MRM gains enough momentum to have the size and power of current feminist movement, the radicals of the MRM will start acting EXACTLY like the radicals of the feminist movement, IF we aren't wary of acting like they do. Blanket hatred and opp…
/r/MensRights30/04/16 08:20 PM
2

whether or not they agree with the actions of the radicals You are still not getting it. It is not the radicals messing things up. It is those funded organizations with money to lobby for political changes, which is the movement itself. The movement which campaigned to get their people into all legislative posts to make changes against men, for the sake of getting more money back into their movement. I don't give a rats arse about #killallmen "radicals" because they have zero power install any m…
/r/MensRights30/04/16 10:43 AM
3

Good grief. So, it's better to fight for equal parental rights while allowing feminist movement to install campus kangeroo courts, and deal with that too? Or is it easier to not have a political machine deliberately spreading false studies to install campus kangeroo courts to get fundings which allow them to lobby for more bullshit? How the hell are you going to clean up four decades of mess they have already made when they still exist to both resist that clean up and create even more mess? It's…
/r/MensRights30/04/16 03:46 AM
2

The MRM doesn't have to be anti-feminist You have gotta be kidding me. Please do your research and come back when you are aware of what's going on. If a pest enjoys pooping and peeing all over your house, what's your strategy of keeping your place livable? Keep whining about how you keep seeing shit and pees, trying to figure out a way to clean it up, while that pest continue to pee and poop while you are at it? Or kick out the pest first, and then, clean up the mess it had already made?
/r/MensRights29/04/16 11:43 PM
3

What are you ashamed of? That MRA is good at laying out facts to expose truths? Feminist movement is not about equality, has not been so since the 70s. It is a hate movement. Why should anyone be ashamed of exposing what it really is? Should Erin Pizzey be ashamed for speaking out against that movement, calling it a hate movement, an evil empire, a fraud? Should Camille Paglia be ashamed for saying feminist movement had infantilized women? No, they should be applauded for willing to go under fir…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 11:37 PM
4

Did you even bother to spend time to read it before having your knee-jerk reaction? Even in the first citation: https://web.archive.org/web/20140325231605/http://www.now.org/nnt/03-97/father.html That did not come from Twitter radicals. That is from a president of National Organization for Women. Do you know how much funding they get and how hard they lobby for legislative changes? You have no clue what feminist movement had done since the 70s. Who do you think installed campus kangaroo courts a…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 10:42 PM
1

I don't know who she is either, but it's easy to put it together that she makes money off whining about how oppressed women are.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 03:24 AM
1

If I had married my current girlfriend instead of my ex, I would be happily married. The problem isn't so much marriage. If it's bad, just get out. It's the breaking it off part that will burn men like it's hell on earth. With current laws and social climate, you'd need to be dead certain you can't be ( as opposed to wouldn't be ) screwed over if things fall apart. Those situations aren't the norm. Otherwise, it's not worth the risks.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 03:05 AM
7

Delusional narcissism, what else?
/r/MensRights26/04/16 06:35 AM
6

Peasants would kill themselves if they woke up being royals, and we'd kill ourselves if we woke up being the 1% billionaire. I hope that help clear things up. But of course, she'd want to kill herself because no one pays entitled men for whining about how bad their lives are. She knows she'd have to do real work if she was a man.
/r/MensRights26/04/16 06:34 AM
1

Hahahahahahahahaha.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 04:55 AM
2

The FBI, for purposes of its Uniform Crime Reports, has a hierarchy of crimes — a ranking of violent crimes in order of seriousness. Murder, of course, ranks first. Second is rape. It would never occur to anyone to leave the adjudication of a murder in the hands of a school’s internal judicial process. Why, then, is it not only common, but expected, for them to do so when it comes to sexual assault. The simple fact is that these internal boards were designed to adjudicate charges like plagiarism…
/r/MensRights19/04/16 04:33 PM
6

I'll go off tangent a bit here. Feminist movement will tell young girls that those fields lack women because those are "boys clubs" with very "sexist" environment. How does that help?
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:41 AM
1

I was referring to the predator's defense/excuse.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 05:06 AM
5

But she's different, she only pick kids with daddy issues and give those poor kids the sexual attention they lack from parents.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 11:39 PM
5

It's a business decision, not a propaganda. Who will see Star Wars? Boys. So how do you get more people to consume Star Wars, to make more money? Make it appealing to girls.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 10:04 AM
6

Well, they are fighting for the right to hold kids hostage for extortion. They are'n't fighting for equality.
/r/MensRights08/04/16 05:17 AM
14

Good grief. Menninist is neither men's rights nor men's issues. It's a parody taking a jab at silly feminists "issues".
/r/MensRights06/04/16 11:31 PM
1

Well, Marissa Mayer was under scrutiny and accountability. Not that she's female or male. But her time at Yahoo was questioned by many.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 05:26 PM
16

I actually like the idea of getting rid of the word 'feminist' and call out anyone who is sexist as sexist. However, calling anyone non-feminist as sexist is just idiotic.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 05:07 PM
28

she conceded she had not financially contributed to the purchase of the ticket, had not picked the winning numbers and her husband had been buying weekly tickets with those numbers since 1995. So Elon Musk's wife helped shaped Tesla to become what it is today? Wish this simple common sense applies to all.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 09:24 AM
5

I think the correct term is Post Traumatic Non-existing Event Disorder.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 08:20 AM
7

Then don't buy. My ex spends 4X my expense when we were married. After divorce, I cut down my expense to 1/2 of what I was used to. My current girlfriend spends 1/10th of what I spend. Pretty sure I can go to some region in poverty and find women who look good. So how do they do it? How about they go on, say, two dates, and we watch the expenses pile in on both sides? Pretty sure that'll be enough to offset "additional costs" of a year.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:09 AM
3

Unless you find it okay that a woman get on drug addiction and blame it on her ex, and then sing about a threat to kill. Then, this is just as not-okay. He may have artistic rights, but I don't see how that's men's rights issue. There's no legislative bias or political effort to protect female artists's freedom of expression at the expense of censoring male artists.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 03:04 AM
2

Kids are now 15 and 13, but lawsuit and accusation started 2 years ago. There was a 3-year separation before she filed, and those 3-years were bliss. I had a great time with our kids without having to deal with my ex's abusive behavior. The week before my ex denied me of our kids, they were still urging me to get summer pass for a water park which we did in previous 2 years. Right before blocking me out, my daughter still enjoy me carrying her piggyback, and cuddle up when we watch movies. My so…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 02:25 AM
2

If it's any consolation, our custody mediator assigned by family court was a woman who sided with me 100%, but it had no impact. We each get to laid out facts and our mediator blasted my ex for blowing things way out of proportion and even told her kids need their dad too, that my ex was sabotaging kids' relationship with me, something that'll impact kids for the rest of their lives. Our mediator actually used the word "sabotage". But just as I was getting all giddy, our mediator asked my ex, "S…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 02:12 AM
1

Mother took our 3-year-old daughter for 2 pelvic examinations. It must pain you to see your ex willing to do that to your daughter, just to make a false claim. My ex took our kids to "consultants", where I have no clue what she put the kids through. And I can't ask. But they come out not wanting to speak to me anymore. It's like watching other people doing you-don't-know-what to your kids while at the same time your protective-dad DNA kicks in in high gear and you can't do anything about it.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:25 AM
1

everyone loses So true.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:22 AM
2

If you think about it, what comes out of divorce corp., is simply an agreement between two adults. That, can be achieved by both adults behaving like adults, where they can keep adjusting their agreements as life moves on, as life changes, without any outsiders' help. It is when one narcissistic adult refuse to make it work and would rather seek entitlement from family court, that family court exists. Maybe in extreme cases, family court can help protect one party form being bullied, but in most…
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:04 AM
2

You are just dropping money into a black hole unless you can prove that your child's health and safety is threatened. So why won't the court give 50/50 by default unless the mom "can prove that child's health and safety is threatened.", in cases where dads do live close by? I live 5min away from my kids.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 12:00 AM
2

I agree the whole "choose stability over moving the child" is bullshit. If a married couple move from the ghettos to a upper middle-class neighborhood, are the parents causing traumatic events to kids by creating instability? My brother and I lived in 9 different cities in 3 different countries over 2 continents by the time we finish high school. It wasn't always for the better, for us, as far as living standards go. It's upgrades and downgrades. But we did just fine. My brother and I even felt …
/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:56 PM
3

I would characterize men frustrated with how wounded vets are treated, men getting angry/disappointed/depressed how dads are treated in family court, etc, are expressing emotions. I never see these types of talks interrupting or hijacking any event dedicated to women's issues. I had only seen the reverse where men talking about these issues get shut down attempts by feminist movement, get mocked by the media. Or whenever men are given a panel to speak about these issues, hosts will always invite…
/r/MensRights05/04/16 04:38 PM
1

But no one ever come clean and say this is the main reason, or even a reason, in any of these types of articles with women pushing for pro-vasectomy.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 07:33 AM
14

Well, "emotionally honest" was mocked as "male tears" mug where feminist drink it up and piss it off, no?
/r/MensRights05/04/16 07:23 AM
8

Only when you combine sound intellect with emotional discipline do you get rational behavior. -Warren Buffett
/r/MensRights05/04/16 07:21 AM
12

Well, that article was an incoherent mess.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 04:14 AM
1

To make it simpler, just because a wife thinks her husband having a life insurance makes her feel more financially secure, just in case he's not around to provide any more, does not mean she has a plan to kill him or wish him dead so she can collect. Vasectomy is a financial insurance policy, for them.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 11:41 PM
1

all the other married women in the world All other married women in the world don't try to convince their partners to get vasectomy, do they? So, I was not blanketing all married women. My point being, when a guy sees divorce coming and start planning to secure his finances, or, secure finances for their kids so it doesn't go waste away to his kids' mom's luxury expenses, or his kids' mom's new boyfriend, as an insurance in case of a divorce, is he a cunt? That's their perspective, a father who …
/r/MensRights04/04/16 08:26 PM
2

I didn't say men wanted two families. I said, many women would prefer securing resources for their kids on their terms. So, it is women like them who are paranoid, over financial security. Like I said, I almost went for it due to housing price, I wasn't even concerned about kids from other women because I know there'll be none. I never expected my marriage to end, but she was the one who planned in advance as an insurance. I opted out due to it being a surgery. So, how does that make me paranoid…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 08:05 PM
1

Securing resources for their own kids, how is that not justifiable from their perspective? From their perspective, men not wanting vasectomy is in the wrong, because that's possibility of ditching financial responsibility to his family in the event of a divorce/affair. Are you saying wealthy men who take precautions on finances in the event of a divorce, or men who refuse to marry, yet, never stopped telling their wives, "I love you.", are cunts? But from women's perspective, those men are cunts…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 07:52 PM
2

I am going to say this again. When I agreed to vasectomy, it was for family planning. We had two, I was on progress to save up enough to get a 3 bedroom house and can't afford a 4 bedroom, not in Silicone Valley. That was the reason we discussed. However, that was not what she had in mind, she just never spilled it out. You want to hear her reason during our discussion? She didn't want me to work too hard and carry so much financial stress if a third child arrive. While at the same time, if she …
/r/MensRights04/04/16 07:45 PM
3

Because what we saw is very different from what you suggested as "sometimes that is required". Let's say my wife was throwing a tantrum far worse than that of a developmentally disabled kid ( and that did happen a lot ). Well, is it okay for me attack her from behind so I can drag her around, because she's hard to deal with? It's not okay, is it? So, it is not okay to do it to an adult who is capable of conducting herself properly but refuse to, but it is okay to do it to a kid who can't conduct…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 11:50 AM
1

Of course if a guy wants a vasectomy, that's his choice. My point was, when articles put out all sorts of reasons to be pro-vasectomy, it is all bullshit excuses. You never hear these types of articles saying, "If you intend to never have kids and enjoy sleeping around, get vasectomy to avoid your dates claiming pregnancy to be yours." Or any other reason that would make men want to do it. See, in that scenario, women will lose, being unable to claim financial support. So, women would rather tho…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 08:15 AM
11

According to feminists, it is wrong for men to even suggest some understanding of what women face in society because, well, they aren't women. So, why bother.
/r/MensRights04/04/16 07:23 AM
4

Don't be fooled. Pill works just fine. Act I: I was perfectly fine with the idea of getting vasectomy when my wife-at-the-time urged me to do it. For reasons you described, among others. I also trusted her. I later decided not to, because it's still a surgery. Act II: My wife-at-the-time, who had urged me to get vasectomy, got pregnant and wanted to keep the child ( That happened right after I was seriously considering divorce due to her abusive behavior getting worse. In hindsight, a possible m…
/r/MensRights04/04/16 06:13 AM
11

The truth of why a woman would want her man to get vasectomy: to make sure other women can't have his kids competing for his money that "should be hers". Even if they end up in a divorce. Well, especially if they end up in a divorce. She does not want him to have the ability to start a new family. It has nothing to do with family planning.
/r/MensRights03/04/16 07:39 PM
15

Men do talk about their troubles. Problem is, society doesn't want to listen and don't give a shit. How long had vets being protesting lack of care for wounded soldiers? How long had dads being protesting losing their kids and life savings and jobs due to family court enabling vindictive ex-wives to have their way? How long had college boys being complaining about false allegations ruining their lives? What has been done? Nothing. Men figure out sooner or later that society does not listen to me…
/r/MensRights02/04/16 05:41 PM
6

According to my ex, me watching porn means I'll eventually turn into a rapist and she needs to intervene to help correct me, but her gay friends taking her to gay porn store to shop for gay porn was super cool and heart-warming. There you go.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 11:25 AM
5

'Listen and believe' ( to women, that is ) that's being pushed hard by political lobbying, is MRM issue.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 10:28 AM
4

Is Wendy McElroy "rape culture" because she advocates due process for the accused? https://youtu.be/zdlVcjYYCbs
/r/MensRights02/04/16 10:09 AM
7

https://rainn.org/images/03-2014/WH-Task-Force-RAINN-Recommendations.pdf In the last few years, there has been an unfortunate trend towards blaming “rape culture” for the extensive problem of sexual violence on campuses ... Rape is caused not by cultural factors but by the conscious decisions, of a small percentage of the community, to commit a violent crime ...
/r/MensRights02/04/16 10:06 AM
2

I agree. My two kids are the best thing that's ever happened to me. But my divorce and custody battle made me discover there is hell on earth.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 09:14 AM
1

I was not arguing if it was rape or not. I was saying, we shouldn't judge if it should/shouldn't be based on what's tolerated now. If he fucks her, hes raping her because hes using the threat of violence to get it. No clue what you meant by that. Officers did not do cavity search on the woman. Complaints indicate her breasts were exposed in public during the search. Cavity search was done on the guy. I guess OP's point was rape of men goes unnoticed. Imagine police officers doing roadside cavity…
/r/MensRights02/04/16 09:10 AM
1

I said, don't rule out the possibility it can be just because cavity search can be done without enough warrant preceding it. And you are going to leap straight into assuming me thinking allegations from liars like the mattress girl and that Harvard 'The Hunting Ground' coke-head woman are actually rape? That's a huge leap.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 08:40 AM
3

vagina going on a penis without consent. Fyi, if you're going by what's legal, that, is not rape: https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/recent-program-updates/new-rape-definition-frequently-asked-questions Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 08:33 AM
1

Just because it is legal in year 2016 does not mean it can't be rape. Pretty sure many crimes were legal law enforcing procedures in 1712. Hack, lobotomy is legal not that long ago.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 08:28 AM
3

I actually overheard my ex admitting to that, to her friends, sometime in our troubled marriage. That she realized what she was looking forward to was wedding, getting married, but she didn't give a thought to what marriage would involve. That many stuff escaped her narcissistic naive mind, simple common sense such as: I have a brother, I have parents, and I would want our her kids to spend time with my family, and my brother's family.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 08:16 AM
0

Good call.
/r/MensRights02/04/16 07:07 AM
17

Well, this isn't even about wedding, but about marriage. They are very different things. If wedding is the only time men are ignored, that'll be a bliss.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 09:57 PM
1

It's not more common, it's just these crimes are now being reported more and being in the press more.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 09:51 PM
1

Yeah, police task force working on these criminal cases are all women, right?
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:38 PM
8

Oh don't like me spamming your wall? Don't post horse shit calling me unattractive. Okay, let's strike out that 'don't be too fat'. And just let it be 'whatever you may be'. Which kinda proves the pics's point even more. Btw, meninist is a satire mirroring feminist's whining. Getting upset over it is like taking some SNL skit as serious commentary and then getting pissed.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:20 PM
3

When they are being taught of actions and consequences, of responsibilities in caring for others, like boys are being taught.
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:11 AM
5

If she's intelligent, she would get this: Whenever shit hits the fan, it is not men who benefit at the expense of women, it is the wealthy and powerful ripping off the average people. Katrina victims weren't left to die because they were mostly women, 2007's financial collapse didn't create wealth for men at the expense of women losing their homes and jobs, etc. Wedding panning exist because businesses know when couples get overly excited, it's easy to make them pay ridiculous bills. Most of the…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 08:05 AM
11

hard facts Erin Pizzey, the woman who started the shelter movement to help battered wives, was terrorized by feminist movement's effort to silence her. Why? You look it up yourself, and follow the white rabbit and see for yourself how far the rabbit hole goes. look at all those false rape claims I have no study for Please, what's that attitude? No one cares about false rape claims if false rape claims are treated like false rape claims. What Men's Rights is concerned about, is due process for th…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:53 AM
3

having higher average salary, more CEOs and judges So, you are more likely to be a CEO or a judge or make six digits just because you are a man? Buahaha. Please tell that to miners and oil riggers and construction workers that do maintenance on communication towers, and your local landmark bridges. You have to work you way to be a CEO. A less financially successful man can't be married to a female CEO and live off her success. A financially unsuccessful woman can date a CEO and experience the li…
/r/MensRights31/03/16 07:37 AM
2

What you school is doing is this: Someone has video evidence of a bank robbery. Your school is saying, well, that person who own the video can report that and make criminals out of those bank robbers, which, is a disadvantage to the bank robbers as they are exposed to possible extortion by the one with video evidence of crime. It is beyond idiotic.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 11:22 PM
5

Re-traumatize over something that did not happen? What?
/r/MensRights30/03/16 11:18 PM
6

Hypocrisy, would be people getting censored for criticizing MRA. For example, people getting censored for laying out facts that challenge the idea that family court is biased against men ( if there's any ), or people challenging Wendy McElroy's debate at Brown, or dissing Erin Pizzey's interviews. MRA often respond with a debate, not censorship. What happened, was a couple of users bringing politics with name calling which had nothing to do with men's rights. Men's Rights is not interested in be…
/r/MensRights30/03/16 07:22 PM
1

Neither is better or worse. Sex workers were also once children of some family.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 07:07 PM
54

she bragged about it to all her friends I'm not surprised. Abusive partners take pride in having total control over another person's life. They love it when results indicate they are good at it.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 07:04 PM
13

He reported but retracted his report when his ex guilt trip him. Abusive partners do that all the time, male or female. Manipulation and control is what they pride themselves with. His school is claiming he has ownership of video evidence as a threat to his ex, where his ex is at a disadvantage. As in, he can use those videos to ruin his ex, or extort something from his ex, etc. It's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 07:01 PM
1

I have sexual desire for thick curvy tall chicks. So I guess at some point, it's reasonable for me to go and rape some women that look that way, by that logic. No? And I guess 99% of women must have raped billionaires at some point in their lives.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 07:27 AM
1

And what would you say for a 23 year old male teacher/predator with his "ongoing sexual relationship" with his "horny teen" 14 year old girl student/prey?
/r/MensRights30/03/16 03:55 AM
3

You missed my point. If the gender was reversed, she would have committed rape. The reason it was a "sexual relationship" and not rape, had nothing to do with age and blah blah. It was only because by a very flawed definition, that boys can't be raped be female rapists. Which, is just plain stupid. That's not considered rape and it shouldn't be considered rape Mutilating a girl's genitals with objects is rape. So why is not that so if done to boys? Hmm? Because of biased "definitions"?
/r/MensRights30/03/16 03:50 AM
2

https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/violent-crime/rape Prior to 2013, charging a woman of raping a boy, is impossible, because by legal definition, women can't rape men. Its criminal definition specifically laid out the victim to be female. It has now been updated to: Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim. What was…
/r/MensRights29/03/16 10:31 PM
4

See, she sacrificed her career which could have made her a world-changing visionary billionaire, and if it weren't for her, Elon Musk would have been a nobody. That's how family laws justify these finances.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 10:18 PM
2

6-digit income only gets more potential for marriage as a start, which is what this video and the article it addresses was on. Men and women getting married. That high income does not guarantee a divorce-free marriage. In fact, there was a study poster here a while back stating lower-income class has the least divorce rate, while high income class has the highest divorce rate. Very interesting video, btw, looking at this issue in a very grand context which most of us would have missed.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 10:11 PM
2

looks like they are definitely getting a wrong reputation Which parts are wrong? 'for nobody' and 'good'?
/r/MensRights29/03/16 08:22 PM
8

ongoing sexual relationship Pretty sure people don't go to jail for having relationships. So, we all know what this is, it's rape. There you go, "rape culture", normalizing rape as "sexual relationship".
/r/MensRights29/03/16 08:03 PM
2

You know, that case around the same time when a rape charge was dropped due to the court finding the accuser's skirt to be too short. I always have the two mixed up.
/r/MensRights29/03/16 05:46 PM
1

It is their shaming tactic. Don't want to feel like the society think of you as a pig? 'Man up' and do as told to have your self worth be validated by women.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 10:21 PM
53

Burden of proof is on the accused? I say you ate foul food before bedtime last Wednesday, and threw up afterwards. But out of fear of being judged, you didn't tell anyone, except me. Now, you prove conclusively it never happened.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 06:55 AM
2

She did not encourage him to seek help at all. She mocked him for being a coward for drawing his suicide attempts forever and never commit to doing it. Well, if a psychiatrist said the same to him, that psychiatrist should be held responsible. Bin Laden is not responsible for 9/11 then? Because he only help those bomers plan it and used his freedom of speech?
/r/MensRights28/03/16 05:29 AM
0

Nope. If anyone close to him wanted to help him, all they need to do was inform his parents that he's very troubled. That'd be enough. Or tell him, "You need to get well, before we move our relationships further. We need to take a break from this." expressions of love Nope, the choice of her words were very mean. Sometimes mocking him to be a coward who kept delaying his suicide on and on and just won't commit.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 05:24 AM
2

You missed my point. Rape culture is a myth. We all agree. I was pointing out its core problem has to do with its idiotic ideologue, not "when is a number sufficient enough" to warrant it a "culture".
/r/MensRights27/03/16 09:14 PM
1

First of all, 25 per 100,000 is reported rape, not convicted rape. For simplicity's sake, let's assume all reported are true and all victims are not male. That, is still 25 per 100,000 too many. I get your point that no one worries about being murdered despite murderers exist but you are not addressing "rape culture" by what in the right approach. Rape culture is the idea that men high five each other for being able to get away with rape. Which is false. It is the idea that men are so clueless t…
/r/MensRights27/03/16 08:03 PM
-1

objectification double standard Yes, you are being whiny. Just because sjw whine about objectification does not mean you have to say "us too". There is no legal punishment for refusing to adhere to certain body standards. And there is no political lobbying effort to make sure men look certain ways. You have every right to reject any body image b.s. you see. So, it's a personal choice. Just because some women whine about it does not mean men have the right to whine about it too. Maybe the right m…
/r/MensRights27/03/16 07:05 PM
2

perhaps the girlfriend also had suicidal thoughts, and by sending the messages Nope. If I had to take a guess, it is as simple as she's narcissistic and felt the burden of him intolerable. She wanted to get rid of him. It's all in their dialogue. But instead of breaking up with him or telling his parents he needs help, she thought 'why don't he just go kill himself' would be much easier. Teens say that all the time, but this one meant it literally.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 06:48 PM
8

Well, if a dad kept telling her mentally ill daughter she should kill herself, repeatedly over a long period of time, and even when she was at the edge but couldn't do it, he urged her on. Now, would you hold him responsible? You are on the fence only because you are still seeing her as some naive kid who made a mistake. She knew full well what she was doing, if you read all the details on this case.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 06:39 PM
5

What she was doing, was just calling attention to others that she is getting your attention while not wanting your attention. You know, just in case others were not paying attention to her dress. Therefor, exaggerated theatrics that gets public attention was the way to go.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 06:30 PM
0

A correct one It is not a correct one. No court ever weigh their sentencing because, "he almost got his victim pregnant". And are you suggesting rape victims who are on the pill would then grant their rapists lesser sentence?
/r/MensRights27/03/16 06:18 PM
2

The lunacy is this stigma that women are fragile little things and boys could handle anything. We sent boys to war zone to experience having their friends being blown to pieces in front of them, before they are allowed to have sex, for christ sake. And adult grown women past 40s can still cry in court and be treated like they are as vulnerable as 4 year olds.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 06:13 PM
6

Bernie understands it's the 2% power class running U.S., ripping off middle class. Which means, he does not believe we have a patriarchy where men oppress women, but knows we have a situation no different than royals owning and running everything.
/r/MensRights27/03/16 01:04 AM
8

Contacting her is bad advise. She can claim it is coercion to silence her.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 11:29 PM
1

Got it. But better to mock them being bios of 'journalist writers'.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 11:20 PM
1

I didn't say women who are willing to pump out kids without giving much thought. I said, 'starting a family', and lifelong would be implied. No different than apes starting lifelong families without any legal bindings. Their success rate seem pretty fine, far better than us married humans.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 09:22 PM
2

What does this have to do with Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights26/03/16 08:58 PM
2

Dear Universities, Accusers hate you for not convicting accused on the basis of accusers' say-so; accused hate you for denying them due process. RAINN went to White House to ask for some common sense that your admin is not equipped to handle serious crime. So, get a clue, hand these criminal investigations over to the police. It'll save you a lot of trouble. Stop looking at the pile of cash that's funding campus kangaroo court, it's not worth it.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 08:50 PM
3

No, it'll end up like campus kangeroo court and family court.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 09:13 AM
12

They also labelled F4J as terrorists.
/r/MensRights26/03/16 08:41 AM
9

Find someone who is fine with starting a family with you without any legal bindings.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 08:27 PM
5

997 out of 1000 allegations did not lead to conviction. It could mean criminals get very lucky, or it could simply mean justice system is working. Who knows. Of 33 reported, 29 have enough weight to be recorded as crime; of those 29 only 12 have enough evidence to press charges. Of those 12 charges, only 3 would be found guilty. That, is what is actually going on. I can read it as, "for every 1000 allegations, 997 of them would be wasting police's time". Can I not? If I want to spin it like they…
/r/MensRights25/03/16 07:37 AM
1

they hand things off to a lawyer who is not invested in the case and is glad to take the money as long as they are being paid. however, there are many cases of men that have won their situation in court after reading up on what the law actually says and putting in the time and effort to build their case That's a myth. Lawyers charge you on the clock, and they take retainers, meaning you have to pay upfront first. With your paid fees being depleted as they work, and you replenish when it's dried …
/r/MensRights25/03/16 07:28 AM
2

There is a greater chance of you being gay if you live in San Francisco. But living in San Francisco won't make you gay and homosexual is not a geographical issue. Domestic violence is mostly learnt behavioral pattern. And people who grow up in such environments tend to not do very well in career and parenting, and thus not do well financially. People with such issues tend to end up in certain socio-economic class. That does not mean being in certain socio-economic class lends to being in such r…
/r/MensRights24/03/16 08:19 PM
3

Dumb analogy. There's absolutely no need to use analogy to mock feminists' mentality of equality. Just look at what the movement had done for over four decades. It's that simple. Feminist movement knew full well domestic violence is not a gender issue but made it to be, to snatch fundings. Hack, they even terrorized the very woman who started the shelter movement to silence her from speaking the truth. Feminist movement know campus courts is illegal and even RAINN denounced "rape culture", they …
/r/MensRights24/03/16 08:03 PM
10

This is cool. It's really stupid but people are gonna start to wonder how did this happen. And they're gonna realize this policy was pushed to punish boys and boys had been getting it for a long time, yet no one gives a shit.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 07:38 PM
6

Teen's aunt is just one person, and it is understandable. I would feel the same for my niece. Also, being acquitted just mean not enough evidence to be found guilty, it does not mean innocent. However, it'll be interesting to see how this plays out, what new info was unearthed, and how journalists, media, and the public respond.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 07:33 PM
135

Don't just sue colleges for discrimination, sue them for violating civil rights. Keep fighting. Kill campus kangaroo courts before it gets as bad as family courts.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 11:13 AM
3

Domestic violence is not a gender problem and not a class problem, for fucks sake. When will people start to address domestic violence as it truly is?
/r/MensRights24/03/16 10:49 AM
1

Of course it's not all, but 99.9%. Evolution gives everything a chance. Otherwise, male homosexuals' probability would be nil because they can't have offsprings.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 08:38 AM
2

I disagree with prevailing opinion on this sub all the time. No one held a grudge against me and blacklist me to auto-downvote me for every single comment onwards. Again, we only knew what she hit, we don't know what she was aiming for, do we?
/r/MensRights24/03/16 08:31 AM
3

The car was in motion when shots were fired. And how the hell do you figured you are 100% certain that was what she was actually aiming for?
/r/MensRights24/03/16 08:29 AM
3

left most MRAs bitter I guess you think Erin Pizzey is "bitter" simply due to her opinion of feminist movement? Or does she just have a better understanding of what it really is?
/r/MensRights24/03/16 08:21 AM
1

I suggest you first get informed on the truth of campus kangaroo courts: http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/26526/ Office for Civil Rights ( OCR ) “strongly discourages” schools from letting parties cross-examine each other, prohibits schools from letting accused students appeal unless their accusers get the same right, and even allows schools to make the same person the “fact-finder” and the “decision-maker” – all of which contradict “essential protections [that] defendants in a court of law enj…
/r/MensRights24/03/16 08:15 AM
3

Men's rights is exposing feminist movement's devious history and atrocious acts while feminists do not want their lies exposed. It's simple.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 06:05 AM
4

It is not as simple as women treating men like crap. It's multiple facets. If family court is treating men like crap, men will avoid starting a family. Technology had allowed women to compete in workforce. Women with no skills now can make as much as men with hard jobs. Sales at some designer retail may make more than construction workers who built the air conditioned building those women work in. That means more and more women will be aiming for men with higher income brackets. However, men wit…
/r/MensRights24/03/16 04:46 AM
1

??? What does that have to do with men's rights? To address the comic. Good men can't be doing productive work? Like being an architect, inventing stuff, working, creating? The Wright brothers and many great men didn't have relationships, I believe. All good men are capable of is playing video games, watching porn, committing suicides, just because they are not validated by vagina? Do you even see how degrading that is?
/r/MensRights24/03/16 03:24 AM
3

It's just a strained relationship with an ex-girlfriend So would a guy shooting bullets into his ex's car engine while her car was moving be an incident of 'strained relationship'?
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:47 PM
6

Cracks me up. I wonder what feminist teachers think about this.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:31 PM
3

Yeah, problem of pedos hiding in schools as teachers is because we have a "teacher-rapist culture" where we joke about it and make it acceptable, and also because normal healthy teachers weren't taught not to rape. Hahahahaha.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:30 PM
1

It does, indirectly. Now female teachers who did their gender study's degree will start to wonder, "What do pedo female teachers had anything to do with us?" Well, duh.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:27 PM
1

But this is good news. Now female teachers who subscribe to cult of feminism will understand what it's like to be presumed rapists based on other criminals sharing your gender/career. Cannibalism I'd like to watch.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:22 PM
1

and it's root Spell check. I think you meant 'it is hoot', because 'it is root' does not make sense to me.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:06 PM
8

Yes they are innate. I'm going to say this very unpopular view that'll get me down voted to hell. Not only are men attracted to women of youth and health; women attracted to men with capacity to gather resources and/or offer protection, people generally avoid partnering with people with disabilities and illness that are physically obvious which is also innate because that seems like risks for unhealthy offsprings. Basically, humans who didn't have this instinct, their kids didn't do well and the…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 10:00 PM
1

Well, this is an odd issue. It isn't that the man is still imprisoned as guilty after the accuser admitted fraud for purpose of extortion, but that he did do time for a year while awaiting trial, and that record denied him of legal residence. Because immigration laws can't be reverted even if criminal charges had been dropped. They are two different bodies that work separately. So, it's more a case of false accusation ending a man's career. And it's not gonna look good when he go back to his cou…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 09:45 PM
4

No civil rights had been violated, no legal punishment is lobbied, for refusing to find them attractive. No problem to solve.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 09:30 PM
2

Great video. But illustration is of women being the ones buried to bankruptcy by child support? https://youtu.be/196XCAXfqrI?t=13m
/r/MensRights23/03/16 09:23 PM
2

they deserve respect They do deserve that. But are they getting it or are their sacrifice taken for granted? If those brave men lived through it, would they get unbiased treatment in family court? Wanna take a look at how wounded vets are being treated? Male sacrifice is no longer valued or appreciated by those benefitting from it.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 09:25 AM
2

Until technology invent some sci-fi shit to reprogram that code that's built into human DNA, it's not going anywhere. I actually don't mind it if chivalry is appreciated. But it is no longer valued or appreciated by those benefitting from it, so I agree it should be done away with. However you are going against evolutionary instincts, chances are slim.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 09:16 AM
1

Doing exactly what whiny feminists do with "but us too" is not only pathetic but very hypocritical. I'm going to say this again: No civil rights had been taken away from any men who refuse to look like underwear models. None whatsoever. What civil rights are you trying to claim here? Due process? Burden of proof should be on accuser? What right? What? You have every right to not look ripped if you want to. You have every right to refuse to take steroids if you want to. So what exactly is the pro…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 07:45 AM
1

Yeah, so? So is other drug use. Stop whining like feminists. There is no legal punishment for refusing to use steroids. There is legal punishment for innocent college boys being falsely accused with no due process, there is legal punishment for men failing to pay for support of kids that are not theirs, there is legal punishment for dads being falsely accused in family courts, etc. And their civil rights had been denied. There is no legal punishments if you refuse to be ripped. And no civil righ…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 07:42 AM
2

To falsely accuse someone of murder, you need a dead body. To falsely accused someone of armed robbery, a robbery need to have had happened. Those crime's existence aren't a debate on he-said she-said. To false accuse someone of rape, sex or maybe no sex, need to have had happened. I have seen it said many times that false accusations of rape are roughtly the same as false accusations of other crimes. The stats they cite, are people who had been convicted of false accusations. In most rape alleg…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 04:11 AM
1

Well, he's more than 2 decades older, so he's a perv.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 03:51 AM
1

When women are not the default for sex, they will no longer be white knighted. They will no longer receive preferential treatment. Wishful thinking. Women will be protected, white knighted, because wombs are precious. Human DNA is programmed to protect wombs and kids at all costs. Let's be honest, it's our instinct to protect women, because that's where we get our sex. No, because through evolution process which span over millions of years, tribes that carry genes which value men more then women…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 03:38 AM
0

But body image affects men as well so maybe? Men do not care about body image, please, we are not fembots with victimhood mentality. What do you think of when you think of George Lucas, Franck Gehry, Steve Jobs, Elon Musk, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Bill Gates? Fat or thin? Does some celeb rocking a good body really make any men feel pressured to be the same? Please stop with the "men too" on these trivial stuff which men do not care.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 03:24 AM
0

Are you victim blaming? Please teach all men to pay no attention to females.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 01:43 AM
1

They live in a bubble thinking everyone's every action is about paying attention to them.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 01:42 AM
8

Try and tell this story at dinner table and lunch at work, to people not subscribed to any gender ideologues. I can assure you sentiments will be the same.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 09:39 PM
30

So, last generation of moms were shit? Because they forgot to teach their boys not to rape and stuff?
/r/MensRights22/03/16 12:33 PM
1

I think OP meant women are often the ones who initiate divorces. I do agree comments are sane. No one said, "I'm still getting his money as usual but I don't have to deal with him anymore, so why stay." If women advising other women on the 'not to' end up with less failed marriage. It's better for everyone, men, women, and especially kids.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 11:05 PM
1

I get where redpill came from. But there's been enough deliberate attempt to mix the two together. Call it something else.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:59 PM
2

I haven't watch the video but sex robots are not replacements of women. They are just the same as fancy expensive dildos, but sleeves for men, replacements of DIY. So, for men who opt out of relationships, which is a decision that comes first, these are replacements for lubed hands, not replacement of women. It is not that robots are good enough that people opt out. It'll be other factors that make men opt out. And that will create a demand for masturbation toys. That's the correct cause-effect.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:41 PM
0

Confusing title. Title says redpill, synopsis says men's rights activists. Which one is it?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:37 PM
1

Chinese knew moon's changes from full to crescent was from the shadow of Earth ancients ago, which, would be shadow of a sphere. Which is why their calendar is based on lunar cycle. Maybe the general public may not realize it because education was only for the privileged and their education focused on moral philosophy with little on science. But scholars knew. On topic. Feminist movement ( the ones at the top with financial and political muscle ) know full well on the truth on domestic violence.…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:01 PM
1

Bernie is against the top 2% who can ( and will ) eventually buy out U.S.'s democratic process. Defying Goliath. You don't get any manly-er than that.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:28 AM
2

If it is, say, 50/50, then women spending more time with their children will unfortunately lead to more women murdering children than men. Is that an inherent bias? Btw, if I remember the study correctly, it was not dads comparable to moms, but single dads compared to single moms. So time spent is not a factor. And the study deliberately did not account for toddler death due to negligence. I recall they tried their best to factor in socio-economic class as most single dads are doing financially …
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:10 AM
2

“It was an alcohol-fuelled split second lack of judgment,’’ Judge Smith read Really? Alcohol as an excuse? Really?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:41 AM
2

It took us a very long tortuous history to accept the Universe does not revolve around Earth/humans. Because it was politically incorrect to suggest so. However Chinese astronomers knew that centuries before western scientists made their claim. If the narrative of domestic violence is set to feminism's dogma, it'll hinder investigative studies because everything will be interpreted to what they believe must be true. And any voice that counters that belief would be politically incorrect and thus,…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:14 AM
10

Sad but true.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 06:56 AM
6

In this case, he's a parasite. But so are women relying on state to award them excessive alimony.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 06:55 AM
6

If she's a stranger, defend yourself. If she's your girlfriend or spouse, don't bother, just leave her on the spot because it'll only get worse over time.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 05:25 AM
3

No. I don't see any posts on how to game to get women.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 05:16 AM
0

I didn't mean intelligence. I meant the omission of inquisitive process to better understand the how and why because there is already dogma which everything must be interpreted to be.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 04:56 AM
2

r/feministmartyr
/r/MensRights21/03/16 04:49 AM
3

While the stats are true ( I'll need time to dig it out ), what he suggests is too simplistic a view to have any credit. For example, boys who are subjected to long term sexual abuse do not become pregnant. Boys who fall victim to drug use and become mentally ill under drug influence, do not become single dads. Also when people notice men with any sign of abusive behavior, their kids are taken away from them, but kids are rarely taken away from their moms. Also men are out working, if men are me…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:36 AM
7

You can always downvote posts and comments you do not like. I had many of my comments downvoted to oblivion. But the cool thing is, no one here ever blacklist me to make sure they disagree with me every time after.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 12:59 AM
1

I'm pretty sure size of bank account matters more. Sad but true. No ex-wife ever tried to file for monthly support of use of her ex's penis, by claiming she's accustomed to big penis lifestyle. And if you're gonna argue she can get penis elsewhere, well, she can leave him be and go gold-digging elsewhere too. No ex ever held kids hostage as bargaining chip for more ex-penis time either. No ex ever forgo alimony and split assets because she's happier having found bigger penis. You get the pattern…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 12:44 AM
16

Justifying abusive behavior towards men as normal part of being in a relationship, in public media, is a men's rights issue. Because it's a civil right to criminalize one's abuser, a right that men apparently do not have in the eyes of such public media.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 12:28 AM
39

Well, my abusive ex claims her abusive behavior was because "we love each other too much". I'm pretty sure abusive men say the same to their victimized spouses. Male or female, they are all the same. Problem is, feminist movement is painting all men to be potential abusers while justifying all abusive behavior of women to be fault of men. That's like trying to understand the mystery of astrophysics while deeply indoctrinated by religion.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 11:07 PM
3

So is he admitting he is incapable of making policies that isn't biased to favor men? That he, as a man, would push legislations to oppress women to benefit men? Because that's what feminists believe.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 08:20 PM
1

What a shame, if those psycho pervs had been taught what consent is, they won't have sexually assaulted those kids, right? Right? Yes, there are victims of sexual assault and will always have. But people who are more concerned with making it a gendered issue, only hinders any real effort in solving these problems.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 05:37 PM
7

We need a /r/IcantBelieveItIsNotOnion
/r/MensRights20/03/16 05:30 AM
4

a men's rights advocate would try to defend rape Men's Rights support this: https://rainn.org/images/03-2014/WH-Task-Force-RAINN-Recommendations.pdf You know whose ideologue is against RAINN? You should also question why RAINN had to go to White House instead of urging Universities directly. Like you said, rape is an intentional act of violence. So, no amount of "teach men what is consent" ( a video like this ) is going to prevent rapists from committing a hideous crime because rapists know exac…
/r/MensRights20/03/16 05:14 AM
2

I agree. I was mocking the whole "accidental rapist" thing.
/r/MensRights20/03/16 12:17 AM
7

Rape happens due to miscommunication. Rapists in prison should take communication classes to avoid future re-offense.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 09:57 PM
1

We don't know either way as of now.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 07:42 PM
2

Do husbands make their wives clean other people's houses and keep their wives' paychecks? You know those maids who are married to low income households, who helped pay bills, get almost nothing in alimony and lump-sum split, right? While gold-diggers who do nothing but brunch and spa all day with hired nanny and maids are the ones getting ridiculous amount in "unpaid labor" alimony, right?
/r/MensRights19/03/16 03:08 PM
1

Where did he say he expect others to pay for his kids and family?
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:53 PM
5

So why do cleaners cost money? Re-read his points, doesn't matter if I agree with it or not. Cleaners get paid cleaning other people's living space. Why should you get paid for cleaning your own living space? Plus, you don't provide cleaners with free rent and free car and free vacations and free shopping spree, do you?
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:51 PM
1

This may not help you 'debunk' the study. But will help you understand it. Studies like this offer some insight. But not sexism. Fore example, if we learn, in the same medical field, women earn less. We might look into why men end up in higher paid jobs like surgeons while women prefer being pediatricians. Job market is simple. The less replaceable you are, the more valuable you are. The more hours you work, the more pay you get. End of story. Nothing to do with gender. Go to Google Inc, where e…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:48 PM
4

easier for a 40 year old man to take his 7 year old daughter to the toilet Use the family bathroom. Just have more of those.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:29 PM
3

I won't like gender neutral bathroom, but are you suggesting 40 year old men are potential pedo?
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:29 PM
1

Women are not more vulnerable to domestic violence. Domestic violence is not a fence issue. Both men and women are just as likely to be victims.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:14 PM
2

Yes, it's messed up regardless of who is paying. Let's even assume it is fair for only men to pay. Now, a low income household where the wife work 2 odd jobs of minimum wage to help pay bills, will get very little alimony. A spoiled brat wife of a multi-millionaire who contributed nothing financially, living the life of brunch and spas and fancy dinners with hired maid and hired nanny, will get a lot of alimony, How is that fair, even among women receiving it?
/r/MensRights19/03/16 02:00 PM
2

Oh, so man can request in U.S., so that is fair? Requesting does not mean they'll get it. Men had been requesting to see their kids and they had not been getting it. Also, just because some men managed to get custody does not mean law on custody is fair. Alimony is not fair, period.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 01:46 PM
3

Find me the law that states only women are subjected to pay alimony, in Singapore. I'm calling bullshit on your claim.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 05:31 AM
3

Among couples who are college educated, 90% of divorce are initiated by wives.
/r/MensRights19/03/16 01:25 AM
3

Only women are required to pay alimony in Singapore? That is a load of crap you are spewing. Alimony in U.S. Is unfair due to its b.s. justification. Imagine Lee Kuan Yew got a divorce. Alimony is based on the assumption that if his wife didn't become a mom, she would have a career as successful as Lee Kuan Yew, and that without her support Lee Kuan Yew would not amount to anything. You can also look at it in another way. When a divorce happens, the wife is no longer required to carry her respon…
/r/MensRights19/03/16 01:08 AM
2

Only 6% of men on the planet become self-made billionaires. The horror of women meeting a billionaire, be careful.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 06:25 PM
4

Most men are rapists? I don't know what type of friends you hang out with, but you need new friends.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 06:16 PM
1

sentenced to 21 months’ jail. http://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/ohio-man-pleads-guilty-to-kidnapping-son-from-mother-in-2002/ar-BBqtZ1O?li=AAggv0m&ocid=iehp faces up to 54 years in prison We'll see
/r/MensRights18/03/16 06:00 PM
1

Well, wasn't F4J a "terrorist" organization? /s
/r/MensRights18/03/16 05:48 PM
1

Okay, fine, you have a point. I was thinking more inline of "evidence". When there was none. No sex ever happened between the accuser and the accused, versus, there was actually sex involved, but the dispute was on consent.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 05:10 AM
2

I'd guess so too. That's motive for many false accusations. These liars got pissed and decided to retaliate, because they know they can get away with it.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 04:51 AM
2

More than half of all prisoners released by the The Innocence Project were convicted "beyond a reasonable doubt" rapists. But yeah, campus kangaroo court is not a court and very much illegal.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 04:39 AM
1

This fiasco is men's rights issue, but where have you been, to ask for cases with less evidence where the accused got convicted? The accuser did not retract a lie she made on impulse, because she was confident the accused would be freed since she knew there was no evidence. Yet, he was convicted. When she did come clean, police spent more time trying to find evidence that she was coerced to change her story, than they did investigating her lies. https://youtu.be/e2zQAnIpdvs The accused retracted…
/r/MensRights18/03/16 03:37 AM
3

Are you in the right sub? Many had been found guilty of rape when there were no evidence. So yes, I can find plenty cases where the accused is found guilty with less evidence than this.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 09:02 PM
2

The only people installing fear into young women is the feminist movement doing fear mongering shit like this. I once asked my daughter what would hinder her from going into field of science and engineering. She looked extremely baffled, and after a long thought, replied, "If I don't want to?", looking even more puzzled like I was asking the dumbest question ever. I'll bet she'll give me some b.s. answer if she was indoctrinated by some gender studies classes.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 07:14 PM
2

Who is "he"? As much as I think the note is immature, and even creepy to some extent, he didn't leave any clue as to who he is. So, he's not looking to benefit from the note. Maybe he had heard college girls pouring their hearts out to him crying about being lied to, too many times. And he hadn't learnt people ( both men and women ) will want what they want.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 07:06 PM
1

Replace 'crazy women' with 'bully', and that's probably what OP meant. What makes it worse is, in the real world, these bullies act like they're being victimized, and it's difficult to get others to see what's actually going on.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 06:57 PM
1

Exactly. As if DNA test can show if sex was consensual. And if accused denied there was sex, then DNA kit would be tested, which is the system we already have.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 07:20 PM
0

Wishful thinking. This is how it'll go down. ALL rape kits are tested. Since most dispute is over consent, rape kids are useless because the accused already agree sex did happen, and DNA test is not going to prove or disprove there was consent. And here's how feminists will spin it: of all rape kits collected and tested, only X% were ever used as evidence ( since majority (100-X)%'s case are over dispute on consent ).
/r/MensRights16/03/16 07:17 PM
2

Dude, DNA test is not gonna tell the court if sex was consensual, is it? Majority of cases, both the accused and the accuser agree sex did happen, but the dispute is on consent. What's DNA gonna prove? Something the accused said happen? It's only when the accused deny sex ever happened, that kits can show the accused lied. And that's when kits get tested. Thus, no point testing ALL kits. Get it?
/r/MensRights16/03/16 07:13 PM
2

Holy shit. I don't know what friends you grew up with where economy matters. I grew up very privileged compared to my close friends. Many of my friends have 3 generations (6+ people) living in a tiny studio or 1-bedroom. I have my own room in a 4-bedroom luxury condo with community pool and tennis court. I'm in a family of 2 parents plus my brother. There was never a time where this disparity was an issue with them or me.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 12:41 AM
0

Whatever advice you can get here, his lawyer probably knows better. Wish there's a better way to help.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 10:52 PM
18

Good for him. Aim higher, become a senator, get more shit done.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 10:50 PM
15

Fashion industry need walking coat hangers because they want those fabrics to move when models walk the stage. But since most people aren't getting paid that way, there's no reason for average folks to look that way. So I don't see why that is an issue with women. Women are these fashion brands' customers, not employees. That's like me whining RedBull extreme athletes are setting unrealistic human standards, when my income is based on work not related to sports, but I like to drink RedBull.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 10:38 PM
2

Where does money come from? Just because kids' mom think their kids need to take $6.5k school trip overseas, the dad automatically get that raise from his boss? Teaching kids about budgeting is part of parenting. If they are going to go on some expensive school trip, then, they have to give up their ski season pass. If they want to get piano lessons, then, they practice tennis with school coach as opposed to paying for private coaches like other rich kids do. They have to learn priorities in bud…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 10:28 PM
23

Don't forget that stunt 20/20 pulled: Editor's Note: ABC News wants to clarify that the two passages quoted in the second paragraph of this story, which were originally part of a comment posted several years ago by a user on the “A Voice for Men” website, were removed by Mr. Elam shortly after they were posted and that he posted a warning to contributors that such comments “would not be tolerated” on the website.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 10:01 PM
26

So why do MRAs seem to get blamed for like...everything? I don't get it. Feminist movement is afraid of what we know and can say. Which is why there is no debate but just pure silencing effort from them. No one is calling out their lies because that'll be 'incorrect' behavior, but we are. Feminist movement rely on creating a public delusion that truths we present can't be trusted, because if people know what we know, feminism's ideologue collapse.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 09:40 PM
8

He had sole custody, his ex took their kids out of U.S. without informing him or family court, refuse to return their kids to him. His ex violated custody orders, so how is this him committing kidnapping?
/r/MensRights15/03/16 09:19 PM
1

My point was, yeas, it was ridiculous, but it served its purpose with no harm done. Just as ads for male deodorant would look idiotic to women and kids, yet we love it because they are funny as shit. And ads selling junk food snacks to kids look like puke, but kids love it. That was my point. That ad was a result of them figuring out how their customers would see their brand.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 09:14 PM
-10

You won't be facing court sentencing if you refuse to take steroids to get bulked. So, it's not an issue. We really have to stop mirroring all the whining feminists do. Men hitting other men to death, is not a "social culture". Those men need to take full responsibility for their personal actions.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 09:10 PM
3

You think this applies only to people with money? It may not be wine, but women do have ridiculous requests to add on top of child support, as other needs. Which I think is b.s. because it's up to the person getting child support to balance his/her budget. I can't go to my workplace and tell my boss to give me a raise because my kids are now taking expensive piano lessons and need ski trips every winter break. So why are courts allowing women to demand more on top of support that is already NOT …
/r/MensRights15/03/16 09:04 PM
6

female emoji I don't know why everyone was so eager to mock that emoji episode. 'Always Inc' is not a political movement, and is not owned by any feminist organization. Their goal was to market their brand to a very young crowd so these young women get hooked on their brand. So, what gets their target audience's attention? Emojis. What makes this demographic happy? People telling them, "You're awesome but no one sees it!" So, a marketing campaign with the sole goal to sell a brand, was born. It …
/r/MensRights15/03/16 08:47 PM
3

Society does not want to listen to men in distress. We just don't. Our best bet is to get strong leaders to look at the truth and say, "Enough is enough, this is inhumane." That, people will listen.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 08:37 PM
53

It does not affect men because men do not care. Men love to watch ripped Captain America kicking arse. Men are not jealous of other fit men. Stop whining like they do. Men are held by unrealistic standards too, but far worse than you think. It's not that hard for an average woman to look like a super model. That's at the top 1% of being desired as a female. What's the top 1% of men that's being desired? Self made billionaires, which is impossible to measure up to. But so what, just ignore women …
/r/MensRights15/03/16 08:26 PM
1

Don't you know law often marginalize kids to benefit adults because there are no underage law makers?
/r/MensRights15/03/16 08:16 PM
4

Personally, I think exposing feminism's acts in its history and b.s. theories, is key. Many obstacles men face today in trying to get laws fixed, are rooted in false narratives and political lobbying from multiple branches of feminist movement. How are we to get rid of false accusations upheld by courts against dads and college boys, if people still buy into the myths that normal men are potential threats to women, at home, in campus? If people still see feminism as fighting for women's rights w…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:35 PM
2

Also, even if it's not scripted, it is edited. So, they could have easily taken parts that meet what they were looking for.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:19 PM
3

Man up and pay for her WoW.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:16 PM
25

So, why are these obnoxiously wealthy people in court fighting over petty expenses like wine and Uber rides? Your guess is as good as anyone’s. Because she's utterly incapable of generating income to match her desired expenses, and her only source of income is from squeezing every penny out of her ex. Isn't that obvious?
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:17 PM
28

"I have to say that I do not find it very edifying that people in this financial bracket should be taking up a day of court time over a sum which to them, though not to others, is objectively so small." Because it is wrong and unreasonable? The guy didn't feel like his ex should be profiting off him. That's not okay because he can afford to be ripped off? It's his right if he'd rather spend a day in court and a million in attorney fees just to deny her 1/4 million. If these men with power gave u…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:06 PM
13

Video games are sexist. Video games teach boys to risk their lives to save a damsel. The message is, if boys died trying, they suck and need to try harder.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 03:44 PM
2

https://redd.it/4aduvy https://redd.it/4ahdgq
/r/MensRights15/03/16 03:34 PM
1

feminists complaining about ironing too much or always cooking dinner. Totally legitimate to say, it's acceptable to refuse doing it. Just because feminists are doing it does not mean we have to mirror what they do. The worst thing to do is do what they do. Feminists would say they refuse to cook on the notion that that's expected of women. That does not mean men should refuse to fix plumbing, and say, "You expect me to fix this sink leak just because I'm a man?!!!" I've never said it's unaccept…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 07:13 AM
1

Always Corp, is not a political movement. What's going on here, is Always trying to appeal to their target audience for its brand marketing ( as opposed to political ) campaign. Get tweens to like their brand, and they'll keep using the same brand for life. So what is current crop of new customers into? What can hook them in? Emojis.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:49 AM
8

But that's how family law works. Women of low income households who need to work 2 minimum wage odd jobs to chip in, in a marriage where the couple have barely any savings, gets nothing. While women who does nothing all day but brunch with friends and spas, get millions. And it is somehow all justified.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 06:21 AM
12

they deserve something I have another question. So women of low income household who worked multiple minimum wage odd jobs to help with family's bills and couldn't afford nannies deserve nothing upon a failed marriage, while women who spent their day at brunch and hip cafes with luxury of having babysitters deserve something?
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:59 AM
1

No posts about bannings by other moderators (too common, not relevant to topic of "rights")
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:51 AM
6

I think the legal age for boys to marry should be the year they fully comprehend how family court works.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 05:48 AM
4

Good marriage is okay, good marriage with kids is great, if divorce never comes. It's the ending being handed by a broken system that is shit for men.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 03:50 AM
-1

In America I'd say we're nearly equal Explain yourself.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 03:42 AM
1

But it is not a violation of civil rights because men have every right not to pay for dates and not to pay for online dating services. Yeah, it'll piss off some women, but that's it, Saying that is expected of men is no different than feminists whining about looking good is expected of women in dating scene. Both sides have the option of not playing the role expected, at the expense of losing some dating prospects. That's all.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 02:16 AM
69

They deserve to continue being spoiled after breakup? Hey, my ex wife has nice tits. Should she come over and let me play with her tits because I've now grown accustomed to nice tits? The whole point of break up is each then move on. That's life. If I worked for Google and had enjoyed all benefits that come with it for decades, and then I had a fallout with Google Inc, should Google keep paying me after my split, because my new job isn't paying what I'm accustomed to?
/r/MensRights15/03/16 12:25 AM
3

"Yale Men's Basketball fully supports a healthy, safe and respectful campus climate where all students can flourish," the team statement said. "Our recent actions to show our support for one of our former teammates were not intended to suggest otherwise, but we understand that to many students they did. We apologize for the hurt we have caused and we look forward to learning and growing from these recent incidents. As student representatives of Yale we hope to use our positions on and off the co…
/r/MensRights15/03/16 12:13 AM
2

What's the worst that could happen? Community service plus 2 year parole for refusing to use online dating services which make you pay? Here, no one could be forced into a situation where they can't reject, so there's no violation of civil rights. I can probably come up with a dozen reasons that'll make me not want to date someone. I don't care where I get those ideas, biological or nurtured by society, that's my choice. So, the reverse should be the same. These sites and women on these sites wa…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 11:37 PM
2

Patriarchy exists? Take note it states 'feminism', the ideology. Now, go and look up any and all videos of how feminist movement talk about women who refuse to subscribe to feminism.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 10:11 PM
1

Gynocentrism not being seen is an issue. But no one is going to arrest you like what they did to Rosa Parks for not doing what the society expects. So, locking dads up in prison over child support payments would be an issue, locking men up simply based on accusations of women's say so, would be an issue, men getting fired because some woman overheard a joke which she then broadcast on social media, would be an issue, and so on. There is no legal punishment for men refusing to act like what's exp…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 09:51 PM
1

Yes, we can deny that gender role by not playing it. But we are not going to get arrested for not meeting those expectations. In other aspects of life, that won't be true. And that's where real issues come in.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 09:46 PM
3

Family court is not part of our legal justice system despite all court orders, however ridiculous, are legally binding and enforced. So, whatever positive change you see in civil rights or DOJ will have no effect whatsoever in family law.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 09:06 PM
0

Geez. I didn't say it is okay to be victims of abuse. And I should know. I am one. I'm not obligated to alimony because I was a victim of an abusive marriage and my ex didn't even want to challenge that in court. The reason I stayed for a decade plus despite her abuse, was because I kept hoping things will get better so my family remains intact but it only got worse, way worse. I saw leaving as a selfish act on my part, which on hindsight, was dumb. I stayed in an abusive relationship not becaus…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 08:55 PM
2

Dude, if you want to expose feminist movement, showing comments on Reddit does nothing. They can simply deny them as 'fringe extremist'. To expose feminist movement, you dig into what they teach at college level, the legislative changes they had made and are still pushing for, the track record of their acts throughout their movement's history, the lies their brunch organizations had fabricated. Someone on Internet said something, amounts to nothing of value.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 08:21 PM
1

Dating issues are not men's rights issues. Unless there are legal laws enforcing dates to progress certain way.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 07:56 PM
18

Prenup get thrown out by the court all the time.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 06:51 PM
1

without proof of these allegations it would be impossible to deny them visitation I am going to say this again. The therapist who my ex's attorney demanded I see, actually felt I had been set up, but he said, "Between you said, and she said, if the judge made an error and take your words, your kids could end up being harmed, but if the judge made an error taking her words, then, the worst that could happen is kids grew up without their dad. What do you think a judge would do?" It has nothing to …
/r/MensRights14/03/16 06:46 PM
1

Yes, and some people win money at Las Vegas. I'm 2+ years in, 25k in legal fees, and still going. So don't tell me I didn't fight. And which is more important? Me winning in litigation after years of adding gasoline to the fuel which probably will hurt our kids, or my attorney convincing my ex's attorney to settle out of court as quick as possible to stop all these nonsense that's probably dragging my kids into emotional abuse? You keep assuming because there is a court, then law and parental ri…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 06:35 PM
2

No, I'm just very aware of how things came to be the way it is today. I have a very inquisitive mind. For example, I did not get burned in 2007's financial collapse, I made a lot of money of it. But I'll still tell you where all the faults are because it boggles my mind how that could have happened. http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=a41532d6-d4df-46a2-a784-f6499938f3b0 https://youtu.be/D3TtOpfWsFA Going on personal attack does not legitimize your argument. If you do no…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 05:57 PM
28

The difference is the top pic is false, the bottom pic is true.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 05:09 PM
13

Please enlighten me on 'some of the rhetoric'. Thank you.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 05:08 PM
82

So, if Elon Musk's ex didn't become a stay-at-home mom, she would be a CEO launching a space travel program; and if Tiger Wood's ex didn't become a stay-at-home mom, she would have been a highly sponsored top athlete; and if Laura Bush didn't become a stay-at-home mom, she would have became a U.S. President? They were separated. Just as she is not responsible for providing anything he needs after that point, he should not be held responsible for providing anything she needs after the split. Ther…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 05:06 PM
2

Good grief. You want science? Please tell us how scientific Duluth model is on domestic violence, and what the real science is on domestic violence. Feminism is not empowerment. Telling young girls they'll be discriminated in STEM when that is not true, is not empowerment. That is deterring women from going into STEM. Feminism is fear mongering women into thinking they need to subscribe to a cult to be protected. It is also selling perceptual victimhood to young women. How is that empowerment? O…
/r/MensRights14/03/16 07:23 AM
3

Dude, please study feminist movement's history and their ideology. It has nothing to do with women's rights.
/r/MensRights14/03/16 03:22 AM
4

Limiting the right of ... who???
/r/MensRights14/03/16 03:20 AM
3

They are so concerned with rapist at large on campus that students are unaware of. Which is why they never reported rape.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:37 PM
3

There is a reason they don't go to the police.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:33 PM
1

Okay. You have a point there. I have to admit I failed to see it that way until you pointed that out. Point was, I see this as an issue for potential abuse of the system which can criminalize decent men, rather than a double-standards issue.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 07:36 AM
-6

I did not say men do not need shelters. I said, it is highly unlikely a man fear getting out of an abusive relationship was due to being financially dependent on his abuser. Men suffering from domestic violence should have a place to get away immediately.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 07:34 AM
-11

Men are rarely financially dependent with fear of becoming homeless if they escape their abusive partner. The world is not fair, and in some aspects we have to accept so due to differences between men and women. The real danger is women eyeing to take advantage of this and will fabricate claims which can ruin innocent men's lives.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 06:39 AM
9

As much as I support this for real victims to exit abusive environment, this may well end up giving more incentives for liars to make false claims of domestic abuse, as if there aren't enough already. This better have a strict definition of domestic violence in place that require enough evidence.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 06:18 AM
1

Personally, I'm okay with marital rape in some aspects. Like if my wife gave me a blow job without my consent while I'm sleeping or intoxicated with weed.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:41 AM
1

Well, Bill's good.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:26 AM
4

Nope. Please look it up. I understand what you were saying. I'm all for Sanders and understand the urgency. But Hilary isn't only about maintaining the power imbalance as is. You think those movements are helping Hilary not expecting any return favor? There will be people keeping Trump in check, please. You think Obama got to do whatever he wanted without opposition?
/r/MensRights13/03/16 03:50 AM
4

Hilary had vouched to help fempire raise more fundings, in the billions. U.S. can recover from a Trump disaster. Not so sure if the state of a feminazination can be corrected when Hilary exits.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 03:29 AM
2

Op wants to speak, but not at the expense of precious Reddit karma
/r/MensRights13/03/16 12:01 AM
3

Let me also ask you another simple question. Will convicting innocent men of rape, stop rapists from committing rape?
/r/MensRights12/03/16 11:41 PM
2

I think he's sincere, but just dumb.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 11:29 PM
4

Everyone thinks rape is s hideous crime. Everyone. And your point? Are we okay with convicting innocent men of murder just because murder is a hideous crime?
/r/MensRights12/03/16 11:02 PM
3

I just did. And I am certainly not on your side of convicting innocent men.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 10:45 PM
3

That's because you are clueless to what's actually going on. Read again. The only people discouraging victims to come forward, are the feminists.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 10:40 PM
1

Please word it properly. No one cares about name calling battle. But, if you got called a fuckboy at office and HR didn't care, then you have something.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 10:37 PM
6

The only people discouraging rape victims from coming forward, are the feminists. Feminists sell myths like the court will victim blame them for dressing like they deserved it. Name me one rape allegation where the criminal court dismissed the case based on length of skirt the accuser wore. Feminists sell myth like only 5% of rapists ever get punished. So, what's the point of reporting? When the truth is, 95% either did not have enough evidence to reach trial or the accused were found not guilty…
/r/MensRights12/03/16 10:15 PM
2

Well, there's 3 accusing you now. It's unlikely all 3 of them are lying. Stop denying.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 10:03 PM
44

As much as I think this is a civil rights issue and difficult to prove as a discrimination issue, mattress girl was not just an accuser, she was known liar by the University. So how does this set a precedent for accusers? It only set a precedent for liars who got caught lying.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 07:22 PM
2

They weren't convicted due to false allegation. They were convicted due to clear evidence of fraudulent and criminal activities.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 05:52 PM
7

Here is what I've learned. Most pople don't change. Consider the possibility that if you are just the way you are, but partnered with someone else, there'll none of these nonsense; but if you stick around and keep forcing yourself to become what you don't want to become just to make her happy, she will still be just as unhappy.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 03:47 PM
25

Why is men's rights keep getting mixed up with redpill? I'm aware there are people who subscribe to both but most pretty much reject the other, no?
/r/MensRights12/03/16 02:43 PM
9

It's domestic violence. But it does not fit Duluth model, that model which shaped the broken family court today.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 05:43 AM
2

It is sexist, only if, upon being told the surgeon was his mother, you said, "Yeah, right."
/r/MensRights12/03/16 04:32 AM
27

It is also possible she had been behaving like a 2 year old her whole life.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 04:23 AM
1

Makes us wonder why family court judges are so afraid of fathers speaking about their ordeal publicly.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 02:48 AM
14

It's great to sell this to the narcissistic type, and prevent them from ruining some men's lives. I don't really care if they are deluding themselves, as long as they aren't forcing some poor soul into what they dictate partnership should be.
/r/MensRights12/03/16 01:16 AM
3

So Ke$ha's mom is admitting she'd rather more young women being raped by not reporting a rapist than lose the money tree that is her daughter?
/r/MensRights11/03/16 01:04 AM
5

Yes they are. Shopping bags too. Also, spreading is fined only if it prevent others from taking a seat.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 05:15 PM
2

What's stopping you from having the happy shared life without the paper? Apes form lifelong family unit without state contracts.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 02:36 PM
1

Yes. I am not helping. Just as I can give my lawyer $15k, tell my lawyer he is not helping, and it's still the same. Okay then, tell me why he needs to go to court to ask for visitation? The mom has adult friends, right? Those adults can see her kid, right? They don't need to go to court to see his kid, do they? Let's say the court gave me full custody. My ex said she want to see our kids. What is stopping me from allowing her to see our kids? Nothing, Nothing. Nothing. Get it? If he can't get t…
/r/MensRights10/03/16 01:05 AM
1

I understood it's different kid. What I was saying is a judge seeing him not valuing his time awarded to him, why give him any time? It won't matter if it was the mom making it impossibly difficult. It would be his responsibly to maintain 'good communication' with that mom so stuff like that won't happen. Also, that mom can claim she disappeared because she's protecting her kids. Which is even worse. Him not using his visitation time with other kids is very bad news.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:13 PM
1

I make a claim. Burden is on you. I do not need to prove anything I say is true. It is true unless you show otherwise. That was the point. Burden is on you. Tell me how do you prove something that didn't happen, never happened? I say you had a bad dinner last night and puked afterwards. Now, argue your way to show that never happened. In that case she was homeless. You expect a judge to send the kid to homeless shelter or be on the street with mom? Don't give me extreme cases. Mom claims this. D…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:08 PM
1

可不可以麻煩一下寫英文？
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:37 PM
5

I'm 2 years and 30k in. I guess 5 more years and 70k more and I'll get my rights to see my kids? My kids would be age 20, 18 adults by then.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:34 PM
5

Fempire has so much money they are running out of stuff to spend on, that's why.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 03:27 PM
1

If he has visitation schedules which he does not bother to show up, as opposed to he's busy working 3 jobs, he's not gonna win any more time. He had time, he didn't use it, what's the point of giving him more time? That's what a judge would think.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 02:28 PM
1

You think the dad who got his daughter was due to his rights? Or he went into debt spending on lawsuit while his ex can't afford a lawyer? Or his ex has drug issues? Or his ex met someone but her new bf didn't want a woman with kids? Did he win the case against a false accusation or did his ex just didn't care about custody? Where's the full story? I already told you, our custody mediator appointed by family court, who is a woman, thinks my ex's accusation was dishonest and straight out told her…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 02:24 PM
1

Oh, you're THAT guy.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 09:31 AM
1

Or maybe women are only capable of minimum wage jobs?
/r/MensRights09/03/16 09:12 AM
5

Regarding trust issues. What if men all look like successful wealthy professionals and women don't get to know their true financial worth until after sex happens? Hmm? At least beauty is subjective and kinda IS part of the person. Whereas money is just money.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 08:53 AM
1

She does not have to make a case. She just has to claim so. For my case, it did not tilt in my favor. For the years I had been with kids, "no judge will allow either to have full custody" so says my attorney. We have not gone in front of a judge yet. What denied me of my right, was she claimed our kids are afraid of me. No proof required. My 3-hr per week require me to see therapist as her request. So, she does not have to honor anything. She can claim my sessions didn't help and deny all visits…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 08:16 AM
3

Less than 1%? So, less than 2% of men are married/divorced? And 90% of tax are paid by men when 1/2 of that resource goes to women?
/r/MensRights09/03/16 07:12 AM
1

That's good news. It won't matter if he was previously the primary caretaker. That's just excuses feminists made up. That is not why custody is most often awarded to moms. The real reason moms get full custody, is they can easily claim their ex-husbands are awful parents. Good news is, if he is seeing his other kids now, it's not going to be convincing if his ex claims their kid will have a hard time with him. That's what I think. But I'm no lawyer. Also, you can't assume your friend is just bei…
/r/MensRights09/03/16 06:13 AM
1

Gotcha. Yup, it is horrific.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 07:30 PM
1

If the mom believes kids are better off without their dad, or if she gets satisfaction out of denying her ex of their kids, it's over. Simple as that. The best he can do is get a child custody evaluator to determine if kids should have more time with him. But the service is 15k and up. Then, pray for the judge to take the advisor's words. And again, the best way to get time with kids is to remain good terms with their mom. For mature adults who really do make decisions in the best interest of ki…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 07:02 PM
2

Dude, psycho like her is one in a billion. Don't dwell on it.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 06:10 PM
1

I don't do drugs. I don't smoke. I don't even drink alcohol. I was lucky enough to generate income from home in my decade long marriage so I was always home. During our 3-year separation, I took kids 3-8 on 3 weekdays and a full day on weekend, sometime both days. Never hired babysitter. I had annual family pass to science museums, art museums, water parks, etc, which I take them to. I don't do drop off and pick up for my daughter's ballet class, I stayed her entire class. I helped them with the…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:33 PM
2

Visitation time depends on mom. End of story. The court can give him time but as long as the mom says she's "worried", that's enough to deny him time. His best chance is to be on good terms with his kids' mom. So even if the court deny him of visitation, who's to know he is seeing his kids as long as the mom doesn't mind?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:23 PM
3

What does becoming independent has anything to do with inability to control temper and throwing violent tantrum.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:39 PM
13

They run for 1-day, patriarchy run for 364-days.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:11 PM
-1

Exactly. If the responsible party is average Joe working at Home Depot, she won't even bother to sue.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:09 PM
1

the department keeps citing its own earlier guidance as justifying its later guidance. LMFAO
/r/MensRights08/03/16 03:33 PM
2

We don't need to do what they do ya know.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 02:57 PM
1

In the case of spousal abuse, yes. But when people think child abuse, no one is going to think only girls can be victims. There's no feminist false-narrative where boys are exempted from abusive adults while girls get beaten to a pulp. Public is also aware the infamous Catholic church scandal claimed many male victims.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 12:45 PM
1

who thinks money grows on trees No, money will come from the top 1% who never pay their fair share of dues. One example out of many, many, many. The Wal-Mart descendants family of 4 have more assets than the entire bottom 40% of American population. That's where money will come from. http://assets.motherjones.com/politics/2011/inequality-page25_actualdistribwithlegend.png https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b3/If-us-land-mass-were-distributed-like-us-wealth.png What Bernie is after …
/r/MensRights08/03/16 12:29 PM
2

Took them this long to figure out the bullshit they used to help propagate?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 11:55 AM
2

You're exactly right. They are looking for stories that fit their narratives of 'charming date gone wrong', and 'guys didn't know what they did was rape'. It's not about rape victims and their suffering, but to showcase feminism's false-narrative exists. I feel really, really bad for real rape victims getting mixed up participating in that film. I was actually quite surprised the film allowed a victim's dad to speak. Usually, these narratives avoid reminding people one simple fact: even when a v…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 11:20 AM
3

Ugh. Can we just get past the whole x-in-y and gender designation? Just state it as child abuse. I don't care if it's 1-in-10,000, that is still 1-in-10,000 too many.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 09:52 AM
2

I would say the difference is naive youngsters subscribing to pretty-packaged idea feminist movement sell to them vs the movement itself, what the movement had done and continue to do. Karen Straughan coins it as your 'coffee shop feminist' who are under the impression that feminism is for equality and women's rights, vs 'feminists' who had been indoctrinated by feminism's ideologue in academia.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 06:09 AM
1

Money as an argument is completely invalid to me, money means nothing. Yes it does. If there is a way to help alleviate victims of domestic violence so victims can be empowered to move on, feminist movement won't allow it. If fact, shelters ( run by feminist movement ) are making sure victims remain dependent on shelters. Those victims are not women or victims. Those are head-counts to claim revenue. I told you, truth about domestic violence was known for over four decades now, but is still buri…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:56 AM
2

I don't think you understand what feminist movement actually is, what they had done for decades, the ripple effects to what they had done. Women's rights? Have you considered why the very woman who started the shelter movement to protect wives from abusive homes end up being terrorized by the feminist movement? Feminist movement is about money. Money, money, money, and more money. From there, they buy power, and use that power to get more money. Your average college kids subscribing to that cult…
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:18 AM
2

Feminists like Christina Hoff-Summers, those who actually are seeking equality for everybody, are what I consider to be true feminists As much as I'd like to applaud you for your optimism, feminism is long gone beyond any possibility to be savaged and redefined. Start a new women's movement and kill that fempire.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 05:00 AM
3

women have further to go in their quest for equality than men Excuse me? maybe a new name for anti-feminism should be defined No, anti-feminism is just fine. It's basically anti-lies.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:55 AM
6

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/doublex/2015/06/the_hunting_ground_a_closer_look_at_the_influential_documentary_reveals.html http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/the-continuing-collapse-of-the-hunting-ground-a-campus-sexual-assault-propaganda-film/article/2565464 The Hunting Ground' crew caught editing Wikipedia to make facts conform to film http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/the-hunting-ground-crew-caught-editing-wikipedia-to-make-facts-conform-to-film/article/2576792 Emails reveal …
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:08 AM
2

This has to be spoof. This can't possibly be real. Please tell me this is not real.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 10:28 PM
1

if you can't say something nice Saying something nice, like "You look pretty today!", is sexual harassment. Get with the times, dude.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 10:17 PM
7

The message is those are the things guys do and guys need to be told to stop doing these shit.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 09:06 PM
11

Their silencing effort is a good sign: When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say. -A Clash of Kings
/r/MensRights07/03/16 08:39 PM
1

C'mon, you still have 2-in-3 chance he's not. And the one that is, just show him a YouTube video on consent to teach him not to rape.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 08:31 PM
3

Well, nutcase is nutcase. But I don't think their reasoning is going to stand in court. At least not yet. So, forget about it.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 07:39 PM
1

No, I'm questioning your logic, in the opposite direction. That law is there, and there's a legal "explanation" for it which everyone parrots, but that does not make that explanation valid.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 07:30 PM
46

Jake and Josie on a date. Josie: Buy me a drink. Jake: No. Josie: Why? Jake: I want to have sex after.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:57 PM
1

What I meant was, designated marketing cost = X. So, X = fees to ad agency + ad space purchase + extra bonus to employees + such and such. It's a cheap way to build a brand.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:49 PM
4

Extra $500 x (number of employees ) -> partial cost of marketing a brand. That's what it actually is.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 06:42 PM
115

Because the defendant did not plead guilty to a sexual crime, she will not be required to register as a sex offender. What dimwit prosecutor came up with such shitty deal? This criminal went from life to possibly 5 years tops. That's way beyond cutting her some slack. Allowing her not having to admit guilt to sexual crime so she doesn't have to register as sex offender? WTF? Explain to me what was gained for the community of that city in this plea 'bargain'?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 05:58 PM
13

Do you also want anyone to know kung fu, or just Asian?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:59 PM
2

I guess 'they'=feminist? And now they are shrinking down to '18% of women identify themselves as feminists'. So that's about 9% give or take. However, keep in mind the power class is just 1%, and the fempire machine managed to push 1-in-5 myth out of Obama's mouth.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:42 PM
1

Good point!
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:34 PM
1

I guess people has every right to verbally abuse their spouse, berate their spouse on daily basis, and the receiving end can't claim domestic abuse on those 'free speech'?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:23 PM
1

He killed himself, nobody forced him. What about those suicides victims after prolonged bullying with inaction? No one is responsible then? Granted, this is different. But it's not so clear and simple. What about Men's Rights being concerned with male suicide rates? Since no one force them to to kill themselves? Or, what if I pay you to kill someone? I should be relieved from the responsibility of the murder because I didn't force you to take action ...?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:12 PM
1

That article did not paint the full story. She texted her friends to say he had gone missing and she feared he was going to take his life. But other texts revealed that she was messaging him the whole time. After his death, she pretended to have no knowledge of the plan. She texted with the boy's relatives, asking where he was in the hours before his body was found.. She messaged one of her friends nearly a week later expressing her fears that her messages to him had been found ... 'I just got o…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 04:08 PM
1

Are you new here? Or you just don't give a shit about getting yourself fired? I don't mean what you said, but you are now marked. Vindictive payback is down the road. Good for you being so brave, though.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:28 PM
4

a book or a guide on how to get women to like you Men's Rights is not interested in dating tricks or how to get laid or how to become more desirable. That's the last thing we'd be concerned about. We are focused on exposing decades of lies in the media and academia, and bring awareness to disinformation, so things can better for everyone. You might want to try your question at /r/TheRedPill/
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:10 PM
3

He's a comedian. Just because he said so doesn't mean it happened. https://youtu.be/GIwpypavI4o
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:10 PM
1

I don't understand why IUD is not popular.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 11:16 AM
3

Dude, patriarchy does not exist in North America.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 11:14 AM
11

So, out of curiosity, I looked up some links from those links. From here https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/wiki/mensissues There's this claim with a bunch of links: Feminists are responsible for changing the FBI's definition of rape to include male victims. So, I looked up those links provided on that very statement. From 'Rape Is Rape' campaign: The FBI’s definition of rape – "the carnal knowledge of a female, forcibly and against her will" -- was written more than 80 years ago and is the b…
/r/MensRights07/03/16 07:41 AM
2

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2479908,00.asp
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:35 AM
322

... and if she can't financially support her child, she gets financial aid and subsidized housing.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:31 AM
5

The amount of over sharing that goes on in this world today is sickening. This mother's post had nothing to do with constructive discipline and EVERYTHING do to with demonstrating to the world what a great mom she is. She sacrificed her child's privacy for her massive ego and I'm glad it backfired on her. This great comment gets downvoted?
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:29 AM
80

She was femterupting.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 02:23 AM
15

I was mocking her rationalization of her despicable actions to be 'parenting'.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 01:51 AM
6

I agree wholeheartedly with you and RAINN that these matters are for trained law enforcement and not school boards.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 01:09 AM
4

This is why political propaganda hurts real rape victims. The second I saw this, my mind went: 'Not again. Someone felt left out after watching The Hunting Ground.' Then, I thought, well, maybe this is a real case.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 12:48 AM
9

Can't believe what gets upvoted in the article's comments section.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 12:35 AM
16

She taught her son a very valuable lesson. When he becomes a dad and had to teach his own kids about action and consequences, the best way to parent is through humiliation in public and broadcast it for all strangers.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 12:18 AM
5

It is not that men don't express distress. It is when men do, no one wants to listen, except maybe your brother. Dads had been screaming at the top of their lungs on how the family court system is rigged against them. The very same people who advocate that men be encouraged to express feelings then mock these feelings to be 'male tears', 'male tears' these feminists proudly drink up in mugs and piss out. 99.999999% of what was taught at your gender studies are all bullshit at best and fabricated…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 11:20 PM
5

I agree she shouldn't. And I'm pretty sure we all agree no one wants that. I think OP's 'question' was to illustrate how flawed the logic of maintaining financially responsible for the other party is. That's how I read it. As opposed to 'why can't I ask for the same in return'.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:54 PM
7

I don't think OP really want that. He's wondering why the opposite is never required.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:38 PM
6

A family court judge can do just about anything. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?406186-Dad-jailed-for-online-criticism-of-family-court-judge But it's unlikely a judge would ask a woman to continue her duty. A woman is not even required to continue the very simple duty of letting her kids see their dad.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:33 PM
1

Engrish prease.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:18 PM
2

I was just mocking a comment made in the video...
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:15 PM
1

Why are you worried about big motherfucker gorilla of a man? He's much stronger so he's not allowed to fight back unless his life is threatened.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 08:59 PM
0

Not gonna happen. I'd be content if step 1: Lies concocted and devious political moves made by selling those lies throughout history -by the feminist movement- are all exposed step 2: That their downfall be taught in history and political science Everything else will slowly correct itself to clean up the mess feminist movement had created. It's like cancer. If you don't kill it, it'll end you ( our society ). But, if you can just get rid of it, your body will heal itself. And as another has said…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 08:34 PM
3

I think he is sincere, just newly exposed to these ideas.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 07:38 PM
9

It doesn't matter who is president. The society as a whole, even if governed by men, will protect women at the expense of sacrificing men. It's built into our DNA through evolution. Go and compare how government treat war vets vs how they treat single moms. Then think about what each had contributed and sacrificed to better society. Dads who can't pay child support see prison time, moms who don't have money to raise kids enjoy financial aid and subsidized housing. We didn't need a female governm…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 07:33 PM
8

In my previous household.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 02:35 PM
2

Good for her she's not a he Well, she must have internalized misogyny and just doing this to impress them boys.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:48 PM
1

No, you just need a daily reminder https://youtu.be/y1ykyPRTIT4
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:23 PM
3

Actually no. They had been told their whole life each of them are unique snowflake who deserve the best, and any man who fail to see so, is not a man. Most women see the top 20% of men as above average and bottom 80% as invisible. Basically, an average-attractive female would delude herself that she's a catch for the top 20% of men.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 01:15 PM
1

Should we be at least a little happy that some of them can see that men don't just have it all? Fuck no. Because it is not about 'men have it bad too'. It is about feminist movement fabricating lies, and we need to call them out. This piece is still very dishonest. In a philosophical sense, this piece is still a pile of lies because the function of lies is to prevent truth from revealing.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:10 AM
0

the statistics on domestic abuse in marriages may well challenge your assumptions It was not assumptions. Experts working in domestic abuse knew all along it was not a gender issue since the 70s. It was not assumptions. It was a deliberate lie being sold to academia and the public by the feminist movement for financial benefits.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 10:07 AM
77

When they make those claims, I always just respond: "If you women go and buy tickets for films with strong female leads, like Winter's Bone, Still Alice, The Girl, Beast of The Southern Wild, Coco Before Chanel, Fair Game, etc, then, those types of movies will be made. But no, you want to watch Pitch Perfect 2, Twilight, Sex and the City."
/r/MensRights06/03/16 09:45 AM
1

I didn't say they are being punished harshly. I said, harsher punishment is not going to make them not do it, just like you can give male rapists harder punishment than it is now, and you won't see less of their crimes. Point was: we are simply starting to hear more of them, they had always existed by the same number, it's not that's more and more of them. Female criminals like them had always existed, just rarely reported by the media. So, for the sake of illustrating my point, let's assume the…
/r/MensRights06/03/16 08:46 AM
1

I'm pretty sure rapists know their victims were suffering from their actions during the time of crime. Those criminals just don't give a shit.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 08:20 AM
3

It's a funny parody on Gone Girl, which doesn't really put psycho bitch in good light.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:35 AM
1

He obviously was not just trespassing. He has a penis. Do you know what disgusting things men do with their penis? Yeah, that is why he was there.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:24 AM
5

Great video. They should make this mandatory video lesson to convicted rapists in prison. That'll ensure those criminals understand consent so they won't reoffend.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:21 AM
1

It is because news outlets and the public are now just starting to see them as predators. So, in the past these predators are just as common but they are seen simply as women making bad decisions because they were madly in love and need help. They'll still do it even if punishment is harsh. Just as rapists would rape even when they knew what would happen if they get caught.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:05 AM
1

It's a cult. Indoctrination first, then, creating evidence to fit their ideologue, and reject any reality that does not fit their ideologue. The most you can claim is some feminists are not self-aware of what they are doing. That does not mean they aren't doing it.
/r/MensRights06/03/16 05:52 AM
3

There already is one: https://redd.it/492o31
/r/MensRights06/03/16 05:08 AM
2

Sigh. My joke was that feminists getting butt hurt over their lies exposed by Lauren.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 10:04 PM
2

Okay, I vote for Wendy McElroy and Camille Paglia.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 10:01 PM
4

Feminists don't care about rape victims. What they care is stories that fit their feminist narrative. Remember Mercedes Carrera tried to get some help for a friend who was brutality raped? No feminists responded. Not one. Why? The rapists were not "privileged white male", victims include the woman's husband who was beaten to a pulp. It's a narrative of devious criminals harming civilians, not of men oppressing women. So, they don't care. There is a documentary on sex traffickers preying on naive…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 09:50 PM
11

Men treating me like I treat women? Wow, never in a million years have I thought there'll be a day I consider going gay.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 09:32 PM
2

Ackbar should be the best man.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 09:28 PM
-3

I don't think that's an issue. It's designed to cater to their target customers. They are expecting mostly female clients. And if a competing business caters better to male clients, then, they lose out on those potential clients, that's all. Or if they start having more and more male members, they'll definitely update their facility to adapt.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 09:23 PM
1

Alimony is about partnership, custody is about ownership.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 09:06 PM
0

What is there to think? Just don't.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 08:41 PM
0

So, should my ex spouse come over to provide sex and housework until I find a way to move forward because I was depending on her vow and she broke that vow?
/r/MensRights05/03/16 08:40 PM
1

Gimme a break. If a parent can't get money, go earn it. If a parent is denied his/her kids, that takes a huge toll on his/her mental well being, and there is no way to remedy that. If that's how you weigh importance. Then someone being emotionally abused but not having to pay rent is a good deal? Or someone whose kid is kidnapped but get free rent and food is a good deal? The reason wives file first is to ambush their husbands with TRO and kidnap kids for extortion. It's almost standard procedur…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 08:01 PM
1

Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon?
/r/MensRights05/03/16 07:50 PM
1

Google Erin Pizzey.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 07:41 PM
2

I see. Thanks for the info.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 07:35 PM
4

Women need reasons to be mad?
/r/MensRights05/03/16 05:23 PM
3

I'd say it's stupidity of family court judge and the farce that is family court.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 04:50 PM
1

What I do not get is, why can't he pay child support, and have the mom return the sum back to him? Because it seemed like the mom and the biological father aren't after his money. If they were, they would have been asking for it all these years. She even apologized for all the trouble he had to go through. She filled in his name because she needed a name. Then she got back with the biological father to raise the kid. Then they moved, they never perused for child support. She didn't even know he'…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 04:44 PM
2

He wasn't a victim of fraud. The mom did not try to extort him for money, otherwise, she would have been going after him all these years. He is a victim of a sever who lied, and an incompetent judge who can't make the right call despite all evidence. I'm not talking about the fact that the child was not his. But the fact that he was never served papers notifying he needed to have this issue resolved. He actually took the initiative to resolve it, so the judge's reasoning is bullshit. The media n…
/r/MensRights05/03/16 04:29 PM
2

That motion must be filed within three years after the child's birth, or within one year after the order of filiation is entered. He was never served, judge fucktard.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 04:25 PM
1

No, we either see it as just, or see it as unjust.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 03:47 PM
1

Well, water doesn't hurt. Truth hurts.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 01:32 PM
1

Say, you are fighting to abolish slavery. Real slavery. Do you consider blacks being able to own whites as slaves as a "step forward" while you are advocating to abolish slavery? Isn't that hypocrisy?
/r/MensRights05/03/16 01:31 PM
1

Yes, you have the right to your opinion. I just think you're not seeing it is all. It has nothing to do with "a reason being less likely".
/r/MensRights05/03/16 01:29 PM
2

How can we say that we (or our movement) are, for lack of a better term, superior to the feminist movement when we fall into one of the same major pitfalls that they have? Dude, we don't fabricate lies for four decades and use those lies to push for legislations to benefit men by screwing over women. Please. I don't think you understand what feminist movement is.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 07:10 AM
6

Because women are not strong enough not to have their ideas dictated by their boyfriends?
/r/MensRights05/03/16 06:55 AM
8

That's cute. You think they'll leave us alone just because patriarchy does not exist?
/r/MensRights05/03/16 06:44 AM
3

I'm in a hate sub? Like we hate lies and injustice and stuff?
/r/MensRights05/03/16 06:32 AM
1

But what are the benefits of the person/people setting the trap, if it is one?
/r/MensRights05/03/16 02:07 AM
1

We are trying to get rid of alimony, are we not? This law, reversed, would be like, despite abolishing alimony, if your ex developed cervical cancer or breast cancer, then, you are bound to pay her medical bills.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 09:33 AM
1

Well, correcting them is to ensure when they are released, they are unlikely to reoffend. Point being, the purpose is for the safety of the masses. Which is why I think the decision should NOT be up to the mom to decide based on her finances. That's like saying, let's get rid of Megan's Law because it makes people registered as sex offenders difficult to find work, but their dependends need that money. Well, what about what happened to Megan?
/r/MensRights04/03/16 05:09 AM
2

Feminists, are indoctrinated to an ideologue that will make them hate men even if they don't. Try pointing out the 5-in-1 is a myth and next thing you know, you are probably the type of men who want rape to be legal. Only men who agree with them are considered decent.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 04:16 AM
3

People do that because "reporters" do that. Reporters know that's not the case but they still do it. It is all deliberate. There are tons of people who had left comments on those news channels. Those comments even get highest upvotes. Yet the same "reporters" who had been corrected a million times, will continue to do it.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 04:09 AM
8

Deliberate smear campaign. They know MRA can't be heard. What kept feminism going strong is no one is calling out on their lies. MRA is.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 04:08 AM
2

Yeah, those neon colored hair loud mouth trying to shut down lectures are an economic threat to 6-digit income engineering career.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 03:51 AM
1

She didn't state (a). What she stated was, it is meaningless to protect the rights of fictional characters at the expense of violating the rights of female artists to work as they wish.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 03:00 AM
1

Prison is not meant for punishment, it is to keep dangerous people away. The mom should sort out her finances so other kids are not at risk. Why it is up to her to decide?
/r/MensRights04/03/16 12:03 AM
2

We don't give a shit if our ex upgrades. As long as we can revert DV narrative for what it actually is, and not allow false accusations in family court go unchecked, then, no matter how much our ex is acting on women biology to secure resources, it won't matter because the law does not allow them to behave like kids throwing tantrum. We don't give a shit if women lies. As long as we get rid of campus kangaroo court and give those accused get their due process. Get it? And we certainly don't give…
/r/MensRights03/03/16 10:16 AM
1

Okay, kidding aside, my guess would be the university does not want to take the risk of a second student claiming allegation against the same dude. The accuser can then sue the university for not taking precaution if the accused is later found guilty. It's just the university covering its legal arse. Does that violate civil rights? Probably.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 09:23 AM
3

Well, they get to do whatever they want in the family court, then they had corporate laws catering to their need, then they monopolized campus kangaroo court. So yeah, they are bored out of things to bitch.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 09:16 AM
6

People saying what they want in polls vs people acting on their wants, are two very different things.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 09:10 AM
16

So sexist. Where's my "I'm polishing my nails" emoji? This is a serious violation of men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 03:26 AM
8

It's not an issue of jurisdiction. Under guilty until proven innocent law, he is a potential threat to other students. Remember the two guys cracking jokes privately at a tech conference where a woman ( who was not their colleague ) overheard, twitted it, and got the two guys fired?
/r/MensRights03/03/16 01:49 AM
4

So we are suppose to not be "don't-be-that-guy"?
/r/MensRights02/03/16 05:12 PM
6

Not good enough, they forgot to show the mom mowing the lawn, fixing plumbing, fixing kids' bikes, assembling furnitures, helping with kids' science projects, washing cars, ...
/r/MensRights02/03/16 05:10 PM
1

Well, it's up to OP to decide if that relationship is worth repairing, isn't it? That's rich. So you're suggesting if a woman can't tolerate her husband cheating, she need to support her husband financially for the rest of his life because that was her decision not to tolerate him? That's your logic? Or are you arguing just for the sake of arguing?
/r/MensRights02/03/16 04:56 PM
1

Since you are all about communication and trust, and "growing up", how about this, for argument's sake, rid family court altogether like Scandinavian countries. Now, you'd ask, so how do we guarantee women are compensated upon divorce for their "sacrifice" ( which is another debatable topic )? Well, the couple are grown adults, and they can make adjustments trough communication. But if the husband decides not to give a single cent after the divorce despite he made that vow at the wedding, then, …
/r/MensRights02/03/16 04:55 PM
3

Don't be fooled. People like them just use whatever trending topic of the day is, to draw attention to themselves.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 12:24 PM
-5

I am all for getting rid of alimony and any claim on money awarded to vets. But to ask she financially support her man after the divorce? Isn't that what we are trying to get rid of? That'll be like saying, now it's very easy for dads to make false claims to alienate moms, and that's one step towards equality. And god forbid if my brother got into accident and need financial support, I'd think it's my duty, not someone he divorced or somone who divorced him. Isn't this equivalent to men be held …
/r/MensRights02/03/16 12:09 PM
3

Not clicking it. Not gonna give them traffic.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 07:46 AM
1

What women's issues do you think are most important or not address properly? We should protect young women's healthy mind from being indoctrinated by the cult that is feminism.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 07:29 AM
1

International Women's Day is a day where people are also interested in men's issues What? Makes no sense.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 07:27 AM
3

Political campaign, obviously.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 07:24 AM
2

^ this
/r/MensRights02/03/16 07:05 AM
2

On campus? Get the police and lawyers on it. Now.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 07:05 AM
1

She's pissed she didn't get to stand on that Oscar song, getting hugs from celebrities.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 07:04 AM
9

that people die every year undergoing heart surgeries, should we ban that too? If they don't do those heart surgeries they die. Baby boy is not in a situation where he is gonna die if you don't cut skin off his penis.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 05:33 AM
2

If you are against the hysteria that is rape culture, the article shows what a farce it had become. Granted, it would have been better if OP just posted the article itself, instead of a video comment on the article. The article by Jezebel, considered medical examinations of women during their pregnancy period to ensure baby's health, to be rape. Basically, all moms had been raped by their doctors. Some of these crazy ideas will get to some young women, and down the line, some male doctor somewhe…
/r/MensRights02/03/16 05:23 AM
-14

I actually think this is very unfair to women. This is not going to affect gold diggers or irresponsible narcissistic behavior in divorce. This will bound women who are willing to marry the class of men in dangerous jobs like mining, soldiers, etc ( men who can't provide luxurious life in the first place ), to be caretaker of their men for life. Granted, that was what's expected of wives two generations ago. But this shift does not affect women lying in family court and denying kids of their dad…
/r/MensRights02/03/16 05:18 AM
1

Hitting someone on the head with a case is not quite similar to spraying water gun.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 04:59 AM
3

I was assaulted by my scoutmasters for several years. I think I need to speak up.
/r/MensRights02/03/16 03:15 AM
0

she's given up 10+ years of career advancement Are you suggesting, Tiger Woods' ex wife, or Elon Musk's ex wife, would be as successful as their partner if they hadn't married? How about we settle alimony based on the average of our ex's college friends who didn't become stay at home moms minus what our ex could earn? Also, do you know even if your ex has a master's degree but she'd rather not work and rely on alimony, calculation of support will assume she can only work for minimum wage? There …
/r/MensRights02/03/16 02:59 AM
1

I wasn't talking about "bonus points". I was saying you made assumptions and then made judgements based on your assumptions. Going on and on with relationship advice. I know a mom who will tell you her husband is the best husband and best dad ever. Well, turns out her husband had a previous marriage and his kids from previous marriage wanted nothing to do with him, and if you were to ask his ex-wife, she'd tell you he is scum of monstrous proportion. But he is the same person. Explain. Like you …
/r/MensRights02/03/16 02:31 AM
1

No.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:50 PM
27

Yeah, it's designed by women for women, by a company run by women, but the two female founders must have developed internalized misogyny. It's patriarchy's fault.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:46 PM
1

Also, if anyone need "growing up to do", it is his ex. She wanted to move on, then move on and cut him loose so he can live. A child decides he/she no longer want anything to do with his/her parent. The child then moved out, but expects his/her parent to still support her financially while so he/she does not have to work. You call that grown up?
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:39 PM
0

I worry about red pill movie. Mixing MRA and red pill as one and the same is a red flag of bad research and lacking focus.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:31 PM
0

Pre-nup is useless, it get thrown away by family court all the time. Everything is debatable. Everything. As long as one party does not agree to a term, it's on the table to argue.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:14 PM
3

So any guy who walks into a seedy ghetto deserved to be ripped off, because it benefits the locals, and the locals would be foolish not to rob the lost tourist? Geez.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:13 PM
2

My ex wife was abusive to me, should I consider why she was abusive? Maybe we should go to women's shelter and ask them why their husbands would be violent towards them? What he said is just worded differently than what many of us had said here. When marriage ends, the man's responsibility still holds as if the marriage never ended. But his family is taken away from him. Whereas for the women, all benefits remains intact while all her responsibilities to her husband ends. Blame the system, not "…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:08 PM
3

Maybe it'd be fun if tax money is gender separated. Men get to vote where their money would go and women get to vote where their money would go.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 07:56 PM
1

What? Supreme Court? Not family court? So was it a civil suit then?
/r/MensRights01/03/16 07:54 PM
5

Please go to you local city hall and ask for the form couples sign to get married. Read it, read the "contract". Please. Find me the item where moms have the right to kick dads out of kids life with false accusations. You guys are clueless. When people say the "contract of marriage" it's just a term, there is no actual contract.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 07:11 PM
5

Sorry, no, I would tell my daughter not to listen to her lawyers and focus on making sure her kids maintain good relationships with both parents. That money isn't everything. Since any man who go into marriage deserved to be ripped off, then, it's settled. Why bother wasting time trying to fix family court? Why?
/r/MensRights01/03/16 07:02 PM
11

Throughout boys lives, all the way to adulthood. There is only the lessen on being responsible and take care of others. There is no freakin lesson on how family court functions and what divorce is like. So, no, he did NOT walk into a marriage knowing what he was getting into. Go to your city hall and ask for the form people sign to get married. Now, find me the item on the "contract" that states mom can make any allegations against the dad and it will be held as truth by family court. Or the ite…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 06:56 PM
7

contract that you entered into as an adult who is responsible for his own actions. You made a series of regrettable choices over the past 13 years He made the choice to have his ex go cheating? You think trying to take on 2 jobs so he can provide better lives for his family ( that end up biting him ) is a bad choice? He would be a well respected man and being appreciated for being a good dad and husband just two generations ago. He is not even bitching about women, or double standards of trivial…
/r/MensRights01/03/16 06:47 PM
6

So, you are telling your daughter to take advantage of the bias we are trying to change? I have both a son and a daughter. I won't tell her that.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 04:30 PM
12

Stories like his will bring awareness so younger generation boycott marriage. You want them to stop "whining" and shut up so others can fall into his line? Geez. Zero empathy. Why are you even here?
/r/MensRights01/03/16 04:24 PM
17

What the fuck is wrong with you two? Do you know how many people are brought up learning, once you start your family, work hard like an honest man, things will turn out fine? No mass conspiracy? You're telling me 4 decades worth of rigging family court is not men's rights issue? There is no fucking marriage contract. There is nothing on the papers at city hall that states, if you get divorced, this and that is gonna happen. That happens during the divorce in family court.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 04:21 PM
1

I got banned within 2 minutes. I don't know why, I didn't break any of their rules r/feminism's rule is to never speak against them. They have a blacklist and I'm on it. I've never even step foot in that sub. I'm banned from their sub because I'm active here. Start with Erin Pizzey, and go down the 4-decade rabbit hole. Sorry to hear about your awful and traumatic experience. On a side note, it is true that most rapists are someone the victim know. Feminists will try to spin it as "there's 80% c…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 05:23 PM
2

True
/r/MensRights29/02/16 05:00 PM
2

I don't see it.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 04:11 PM
4

Reports of truth managed to get out ...
/r/MensRights29/02/16 03:35 PM
1

He meant denying dad of any visitation.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 03:32 PM
2

Look up psychomotor activity retardation then. It's basically lack of motivation due to depression. And see how different it is to schizophrenia. That's like saying if someone is high on heroine and did crazy shit, then, someone smoking pot would experience the same.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 03:22 PM
3

Why is this an issue?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 03:18 PM
6

Toxic masculinity is a nonsensical term feminist made up to blame everything back to men. Suicide is predominately men? That's not due to challenges men face in society. That's because toxic masculinity prevent men from expressing their feelings. Custody bias in family court? That's not due to 4 decades of effort rigging family court, that's because toxic masculinity teach men not to express tender caring towards their kids during the years of marriage. No shelter for male victims of domestic vi…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 02:40 PM
2

TRTAP was not saying that. It's all in the details. Some girl did this to him that year, another girl did something to him another year, TV portray men badly, those sounds like feminist-whining. If he grew up realizing he had been put on meds only because schools expect boys to behave like girls ( which is what's happening now ), then, it is raising an issue. Just as my son had been bullied by girls many times, my daughter also complains about a few boys constantly bugging her and calling her na…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 02:20 PM
2

Why is it impossible to achieve? Moms already had tons of blood test during pregnancy, blood sample will be collected from newborn for health test. Only thing missing is dads' blood samples. So, as long as men agree to it, it's done. Or are you talking about the impossibility of getting this law passed?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 01:34 PM
1

I'm pretty sure hospitals take blood samples of newborn. There are tons of blood test on the mom during pregnancy period. The only one not providing blood info yet, is the dad. So I don't see why women should be concerned with paternity test.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 01:26 PM
6

Sigh. You think a dad killing his kids because he can't feed them and went into depression is gonna get sympathy votes? You think that's gonna fly? Yeah, there is no gender mentioned, so what? http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/jason-dalton-depressed-days-mich-shooting-article-1.2543542 Let's bet on how this "depression" claim goes. So far, she had not being diagnosed. The only claim was she experienced poverty as a kid.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 12:54 PM
1

Well, he had not been paying what he owed. So, if you sue someone for say, fraud, and he/she was ordered to reimburse you financially, then, you won't want him/her living a luxurious lifestyle while not putting any effort to pay up.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 12:49 PM
4

Because it's a crime men can't get away with. Pussy pass issue.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 11:03 AM
2

accused was incapable of knowing the nature of her act on If she didn't know what she did, why did she tried to commit suicide after?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 11:02 AM
1

I see what you did there. It's not the same. Lame.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 10:52 AM
1

Yeah, continue reading. What was the challenges she faced against the guy's action? Go to HR and tell. Be upset until 5pm. And he's gone. That was it. That was what she had to deal with. It's entirely possible the guy simply said she's the most attractive woman to be working in the building, and the whole "ranking" thing was just her blowing things out of proportion. Have you ever talked to a femnut and then have them twist what you said? And he's fired, that is what he had to deal with. Point b…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 07:40 AM
1

For argument's sake, let's put this in a different perspective. Let's say, for any mom that lies about dads being abusive, they receive very harsh punishment the very next day. And all moms are warned by the court when they file for divorce, and explained why that's bad for the kids. Now, you are telling me just because of that, you expect a world where no woman will lie in family court? No? Why won't you expect so if we already drew a clear line of what is okay and what is not? Yeah, because hu…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 07:29 AM
2

No, I did not agree it was ok he was fired. I said, if she was able to get her fired that fast, what's she complaining about? That workplace should be free of idiots? My point was, there already are compulsory programs, rules HR is firm on, laws that allow people to file suit. What, you need everyone to be religious to the "bible of what's appropriate" before they can work? And even so, how many bible thumping people actually follow the bible? People of poor judgment will exist. Some stupid arse…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 07:14 AM
1

Again, did he say it was okay? I already said. Your workplace is filled with humans, and they are going to say shit. So, you are pissed at your boss grinding down on you, and you blurted, "Are you having PMS or have you hand't your cock sucked in years?" Way out of line and inappropriate. You get fired the very next day. Now your boss whines and whines about why can't work place be all these perfect eden where everyone knows how to behave appropriately and do as they are told by HR just like kin…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 07:11 AM
2

You are not getting the point across. Say, in a firm, you say anything remotely racists, it will get you fired. Now, is that place then deem a hostile environment for minorities? Or, let's say, in Apple, if you curse at Steve Jobs, that'll get you fired next day. So now Apple is a hostile environment for poor Steve Jobs to work in because some clueless employee cursed at him which was very inappropriate?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 03:24 AM
0

Yeah, again, no one is claiming what he did was okay. If the situation was reversed, you'd be probably rambling on about it's immature to do "I'm gonna tell on you and get you fired." When the guy could have simply said, "You're going with that line? Seriously? Are you even aware that's offensive ( or whatever )?" Where was the "challenge" women face in this case? There is none. That's jjj's point. And yeah, people talk all the time in all places and male colleague will also say stuff that other…
/r/MensRights29/02/16 03:11 AM
0

Airlines should learn from this. Next time, upgrade the dude.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 02:15 AM
3

No. She was unhappy with her free upgrade. So I'd compensate her by downgrading her next time she buys first class.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 02:12 AM
-6

Not quite the same because airlines do not subscribe to a religious dogma that men are pedophiles. But we're almost there.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 02:04 AM
-1

In other words, when Bono says kids in Africa are dying of AIDS, he meant black people is the reason we have AIDS, right?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 01:49 AM
2

As much as I think N.O.W. is a joke, this has to be fake.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 01:38 AM
0

But will it get you fired? And if he can get you fired in a day, does that show that that particular workplace is anti-gay? Are you guys blind or what?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 01:28 AM
-1

Good grief. You were responding to a comment that simply pointed out the fact that it is extremely easy for women to get a guy fired, and therefor, workplace is not male dominated. And you went on and on about dating advice.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 01:01 AM
0

You missed his point. How big a challenge was it for her to get him fired? So how is that a male dominated space? Imagine the scenario gender reversed. How much hassle does the guy have to go through to get her fired? That is, if it's even possible. So how is that a male dominated space?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 12:57 AM
3

Women can now experience monthly pains men go through by paying the full bill for household of 4.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 11:42 PM
2

It's never in the best interest of the child to do this, because moms end up kicking dads out of kids' lives just to squeeze more money.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 11:38 PM
14

That was not "some woman" criticizing feminist movement. That was THE woman who started the shelter movement to protect women from abusive spouses. Also, Erin was not criticizing feminist movement, she was exposing feminist movement for what it is.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 10:45 PM
1

So you had been to his house?
/r/MensRights28/02/16 03:26 PM
1

Some asian tourist found out she caught some sort of flu that's North American while visiting Kansas. But hey, so what? Maybe she caught it from an Asian guy? And the point of that is ...?
/r/MensRights28/02/16 03:18 PM
1

It is geographical. Next thing you know, Bill Gates saying his foundation is helping certain region rid certain illness is being racist.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 03:12 PM
2

Well, for every quarter million you have in bank account, you get credit for 1-inch.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 03:00 PM
3

I was wondering who went to the moon before the first guy who went to the moon. Also, are they saying when little girls see what Elon Musk is doing, they are incapable of being inspired by it? Or when they see Frank Gehry's architecture, they feel nothing? That it has to be Zaha Hadid's work to inspire them to build stuff? And who came before Zaha Hadid doing the stuff she's doing?
/r/MensRights28/02/16 02:47 PM
13

So, which one of them makes more? That was his point.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 02:34 PM
3

Prediction: husband divorce her and she gets custody, plus half of her husband's savings.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 03:43 AM
2

Counter sue her for defamation. You are a billionaire, hire a bunch of lawyers.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 03:39 AM
3

Since women are the gatekeepers to having babies, they should (a) determine gender of baby, and (b) determine if the dad agree to raise the kid as a feminist, then decide if they want the baby. All women and all men who are not ungrateful to their mom, should vote women into political power in all seats. Men had their chance and they screwed up, ignoring women, it's about time women have their turn. And so on and so forth. Wasn't there a feminist who wrote a public piece that men who are not spe…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:03 PM
3

That logic will fly right over their head, and they'll say only 2% of rape allegations are false or whatever. They can't see their own flawed logic, trust me.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 12:39 PM
2

At this point in time, it's hard to tell. You wouldn't believe the stuff I hear debating femnuts on open forums.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 12:30 PM
7

Just tell her teen boys who watch porn not only grow up expecting women to be like porn stars but they also grow up expecting their pizza delivery to arrive in 1min.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:48 AM
0

You are dumb. Let's say, you grew up, and realize what sexual relationship is. Then you remember there was a time when you were a kid and sick in hospital and this 50 year old female nurse put your dick in her vagina. Now that you finally have the capacity to understand what that was all about. How do you feel now? Loved? Or abused?
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:36 AM
1

How the fuck do you know he enjoyed it? And even if he did physically, he won't know he was raped would he? Consider a woman, mentally disabled. Then some sicko neighbors then use her as sex toy as they please. She says in court she didn't feel it was wrong. So those men "helped her experience love"? Those men knew she would have no clue they were using her, which is the very definition of predators preying on victims This is why there is a law to protect these people. Maybe the male nurse in Ki…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:31 AM
1

They don't have IQ of disabled kids. Don't make shit up just to argue. And yes, if a family member can provide evidence that their loved one has mental disability, anyone who get that mentally disabled person into sexual acts, is considered a predator. Simple as that.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 03:22 AM
6

As much as I'm loving this, this won't stop the common tactic of making false accusations against dads to stand without evidence.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 02:39 AM
1

So quick to jump into conclusion. What does Fox news has anything to do with this? And I hate Fox news. Like I said, you did the job. So what? Your justification is no different than man hating femnuts saying they did the job in helping rape victims and therefore, everyone else have no clue. When I was arguing against campus kangeroo court, some fembots just threw, "I work in college handling these cases, you hadn't helped any victims, you have no clue." Please. Psychology is still at its infanc…
/r/MensRights27/02/16 12:56 AM
3

But those aren't censorship, those are harassments that trigger trauma.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 12:32 AM
2

It's obvious this piece was written someone indoctrinated by feminism.
/r/MensRights27/02/16 12:00 AM
2

Since rape culture is a freakin' fabricated lie, the opposite of rape culture is truth.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 11:58 PM
2

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2479908,00.asp
/r/MensRights26/02/16 11:46 PM
5

I laughed so hard.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 11:44 PM
1

Such bullshit. I'm divorced. I never ask my kids to do chores at my place. They do chores all the time at their mom's place. And their mom don't even work. Moms ask their kids to help out all the time, that is not a bad thing, it's good, but dads rarely do. And why is the dad apologizing? Did the kid help in paying rent?
/r/MensRights26/02/16 11:15 PM
1

the end of men? Sweety, your phone needs satellites, metal mining and fabrication, and so on and so forth. These women. Sometimes I wish we can kick them to another planet and let them start a world. We'll even supply all the knowledge we have available. See how they do.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 11:06 PM
5

Women don't need men because they can make sperm? So, they are finally admitting marriage in the name of love is all bullshit? Good. Now go and make babies using those lab-grown sperms and stop conning man into marriage.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 11:01 PM
2

In other news, my local restaurant can falsely accuse women of murder as long as a man says so, because that restaurant is allowed to ban sneakers at their premise.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 10:53 PM
2

So ... let's blame all the blood diamond killings on women then.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 10:47 PM
5

But, but, but .... moms are angels, no?
/r/MensRights26/02/16 10:44 PM
1

Yes I can because the victim here has a brain that is as developed as a toddler. Go ask his mom and brother. Gawd. That is the very reason sex with him is illegal. This law applies to all people with such disabilities. They are incapable of giving consent to sex no matter what, just like toddlers.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 03:31 PM
1

Well, ever consider the possibility that rapist who are let out, they re-offend on kids, and some of these long-term victims then take up the same violence learnt? Or, have you considered the possibility that the culprit is genetic mutation, no different than other genetic mutation, which, will continue to happen, regardless of if we rid the psychology of the previous batch. Just because you give artificial limps to assist some handicapped, does not stop future new borns to be born with those ha…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 10:41 AM
3

Or, there's that possibility that the 1-in-5 is total bullshit.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:27 AM
3

What happens here is not love. Jesus. It's control.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:15 AM
2

You are not thinking properly. If sex can be traumatizing for toddlers, it can be just as traumatizing for someone who's brain is only as developed as a toddler.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 05:14 AM
1

Good to hear police assessed the situation as it is. However, looking at all the details, I think your local police should investigate if your brother's girlfriend is a Terminator robot from the future.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 04:52 AM
3

Of course she loved him. She gets to control him to "say" things exactly the way she wants to hear.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 04:48 AM
1

Does that make this article rape-apologist?
/r/MensRights26/02/16 04:45 AM
1

Care to explain why Megan's law was created? The way you are approaching this, is no different than preaching "listen and believe" by asking, "Have you had experience in helping rape victims and their families deal with their trauma before?" Just from the opposite end. Rape is a hideous crime and I highly doubt any of them will contribute anything meaningful if given a second chance. Waste a pair of working hands? I'd rather economy's growth is slowed down by 0.000000000001% over the course of a…
/r/MensRights26/02/16 04:44 AM
1

Dude, most rapists re-offend when they get out. I'm in favor of locking them up forever. There's a valid reason for creating the sex offender registry. But whether everyone on that list deserve to be on that list is another debate.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 03:00 AM
4

Yeah, but who's gonna pay for those child support? That's what I thought.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 02:33 AM
3

Action and consequences. Something people like her never need to grasp even way past adulthood.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 02:31 AM
2

It's about time decision makers at Universities have some common sense.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 02:30 AM
8

Great! See, this is what SJW had done in support of Ke$ha, they helped create the necessity of a lawsuit Ke$ha can't win.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 02:24 AM
2

I hold doors for others often. And I learnt it from other strangers who held doors for me.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:16 AM
32

I'm a guy. I've had many, many strangers held doors for me, and they are from either genders and of different ethnicity.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 01:14 AM
0

Sexist is discrimination of gender, misogyny is hatred of women. These ads really make me hate women because these ads make women look vile and disgusting and undesirable .... yeah. In a way, these ads are misogynistic. No sarcasm here. A bunch of obese chicks are probably hating on those models.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 12:06 AM
1

Your approach is not going to work. They'll say suicide attempts are the same but men's toxic masculinity make them chose violent methods that are more successful. They'll ignore the fact that most female suicide attempts are seeking attention and not seeking death. They'll also say more men are in prison proves the point that men are more likely to commit crimes. They'll spin everything. The best thing to do is call them out on their lies where they have no way to refute. Domestic violence issu…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 11:56 PM
5

So, only type of sex that is legal is when women pay their share of bills, rent, mortgage? This is great.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 11:39 PM
3

Because most men are not aware of this, and even those who do, they delude themselves into thinking, "But not my wife, she won't do that to me." Also, the whole "real man" label to lure men in, and the "man child" insult to shame men if they don't comply.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 04:40 PM
2

Straight men probably have it worse.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 04:36 PM
1

My guess would be that those who can afford an extravagant wedding, have a big bank account to split. And when a woman refuse to deal with her spouse, her tragic outcome is that she take half of his wealth, while still being supported for life, why would she stay?
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:37 PM
3

She didn't report the rape, her dad did. More like a jealous dad with daughter issues. She refused to testify against those kids.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:27 PM
1

I'm not saying was you said. I was trying to illustrate the logic you missed. To answer: I never agreed throwing anyone accused into jail was a good idea. Makes zero sense. That escalation will only make the rapist become rapist-murderer. Again. There's a flaw in your "edit" logic. Go back, read it again, and think it through. I don't know how many different ways I need to explain for you to see this. If anyone accused goes straight to prison, it is a bad system for the accused innocent. But, yo…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:41 PM
0

A healthy marriage, would be similar to those we found in the animal kingdom. Where male and female couple up to form life-long family unit without the need of marriage contract.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:19 PM
3

Do we need to create "safe space" for wall street crooks and economics students when we discuss 2007's financial collapse? What a bunch of babies. Why are they in Universities? If a subject matter bothers you, don't go.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 12:19 PM
3

Yeah, they know, even if they are happily married. Men are naively clueless when it comes to this.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 12:00 PM
1

More men are in prison cause toxic masculinity. Women are angels, why would they be in prison?
/r/MensRights25/02/16 11:48 AM
1

I agree with you here. Not to mention it was her dad who filed the report, but she refused to testify against those boys. It looks more like her psycho dad was pissed some kids were having fun with his sex toy.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 11:16 AM
34

Aren't feminists the ones teaching women to be scared?
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:57 AM
1

The woman is fake trying to play victim, and the guy is a jerk making private matter a public drama.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:40 AM
1

Women are not marrying or men are waking up not to sign up. Either way, when no one gives a shit about marriage contract, it's great news.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:32 AM
1

And she also implies that married women are "reproductively & sexually dependent" upon the men they marry? It means, when women want sex, it depends on if they can make their husbands happy first. She also needs affirmative consent from their husbands or it's rape. And if women want a baby, they need their husbands to agree to it.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:23 AM
1

one ear in, the other ear out
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:12 AM
2

We all know what he's doing. He's trying to act all "correct", so after he gets home, he can get some "you're a good boy today" pussy. Such a man he is.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 06:56 AM
8

I know this is men's rights. But seeing how the girl is 18. They seriously need to investigate her dad on when their incestuous acts started.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 06:54 AM
-1

I agree. She told him to stfu about what she did but he didn't do as told.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 06:49 AM
1

It'll be good if these types of job start having women workers, but not for gender issues. Once there's enough women workers, companies profiting off these work will figure out more measures to make these types of work safer.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 06:33 AM
3

You are doing exactly the opposite of what MRA is doing, which is, everyone should be held accountable for their actions. And you are doing exactly what whiny entitled feminists nutcase do, blame disgusting acts on society. Just stop trying to "make us see". You are in the wrong here.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 05:54 AM
1

That dude believed his wife not as his wife, but as a professional nurse.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 05:41 AM
1

There is a way to hide your violent acts. If you are a woman and can cry on demand.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 05:21 AM
24

Why am I not surprised.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 05:11 AM
63

In other news, a 30 year old guy was betrayed when he trusted his 17 year old female student to stfu about their sex only to find out she recorded evidence.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 04:54 AM
9

Woman up and suck my cock, make me happy. And if we get divorced, woman up and resume your responsibility, come and clean my house, cook for kids, even though I won't let you see your kids. Because that's what moms do.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:32 AM
3

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2479908,00.asp
/r/MensRights25/02/16 03:02 AM
3

No, because getting pussy is not how we measure value of men. A male ape can get ape pussy, a male dog can get dog pussy. Frank Gehry probably get less pussy than some drug pusher in the ghettos. It means nothing.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:52 AM
1

Definitely.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:43 AM
1

Listen to other women discuss how they managed to squeeze money off their ex.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:37 AM
-3

Women accused of being gold digging whores are gold digging whores until proven otherwise. Women accused of being psycho bitches are psycho bitches until proven other wise. And those aren't even crimes.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:31 AM
2

Anyone thinks it's okay to kill a baby just to avoid responsibilities? Anyone ever?
/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:27 AM
3

Shit topic title. Psycho is psycho. No excuses.
/r/MensRights25/02/16 01:22 AM
1

From her obligations she signed
/r/MensRights24/02/16 03:59 PM
1

LOL. Yup.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:40 PM
2

Did this woman tell those men to stop waving? Did any of those men then responded with "hell no"? Yeah, women do not like attention, which is why women post half-naked selfies to compete who can get the most strangers to look at them. Not everyone is the same. Some dude can tell you he hates it when women do this and that, but maybe I'll love it. Also, Men had been saying they hate it when women nag and nag. Did that stop? Apparently not. Men had been saying they hate it when women say men need …
/r/MensRights23/02/16 03:05 PM
22

Dear Taylor Swift, There are many, many real rape victims out there who do need long term medical help and they don't need a quarter million. Also, don't pay Ke$ha, pay Sony, and buy her out of her contract so she can make a better deal with another label, that's what she wants.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:47 PM
27

I thought MRAs said Kesha is trying to get out of her contract with no evidence of her claims, which is also exactly what the court said? And that is it?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:44 PM
1

Carbon Fiber Masculinity LOL. What?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:31 PM
3

Are we fear-mongering now? Like women are nutcase, as in men are rapists? She's a psycho, she will be charged. If she gets off scott free, or play victim, then we talk.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:23 PM
4

"Did I mean for any of this to happen? No. It's just an unfortunate situation," Simms said in court. She is still not taking responsibility for her actions. So why is there a plea deal? WTF?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:15 PM
7

Well, actually, I'm all about taking away women's rights ... Women's right to make false accusations in family court without accountability. Women's right to deny kids of their dads. Women's right to run kangaroo courts in college campuses. Women's right to take half of your wealth even if they were the ones responsible for destroying the family unit. Women's right to be physically violent to men with no recourse. Women's right to lie. Women's right to label men as potential rapists. You get the…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:09 PM
7

“They’re more concerned about their public image than keeping people safe.” Um, if you meant Paul, yeah ...
/r/MensRights23/02/16 01:58 PM
1

Sigh. I get it. I'm saying, the only scenario where it would escalate to the victim being murdered, would be, the accused IS a rapist. So, what's the problem of that scenario where there's 100% conviction rate? Because that'll escalate things? What if we have a futuristic sci-fi system where rapists will be caught and convicted, 100% guaranteed. And the only way for rapists to get away with it is their victims keep quiet. Is that a bad thing just because that'll escalate things?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 01:46 PM
1

Justice system is to make sure those who are innocent won't be wrongfully charged. Justice system is not which defense lawyer can find the best loophole to get those guilty off the hook, despite that is how it is used. There is a reason laws keep updating to close up those loopholes.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 01:32 PM
1

Yeah, saying men need to be taught not to rape really help a lot in viewing men as non-violent. My grandpa could play with kids in our neighborhood, my dad could too. I can't because I'll be accused of being a pedo. How'd that happen?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 01:27 PM
2

I guess this help pay for your wife's/daughter's care when she's pregnant? Save you some money? Win-win?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 01:20 PM
1

Divide up the marital assets? How? Consider a multi-millioare shoes wife just shops and goes to any brunch and gossip with a nanny, and a wife of a low income household who contribute by doing laundry and tailoring at home while taking care of kids. Why is the did-nothing wife getting millions while the wife who worked her arse off to help with the bills got nothing?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 01:05 PM
1

She'll be convicted. I see no problem here. It's not systematic due to some biased legal system that's being pushed by big political muscles.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 01:02 PM
1

You are a target of revenge porn, therefor, you need ......
/r/MensRights23/02/16 11:51 AM
1

But, but, but, what about all those annual fundings in the millions we universities would get from the government if we set up kangeroo courts?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:59 AM
1

I actually think it's good it'll be getting a movie. Women will eat it up. Guys will be curious, and once the dig into it, they'll discover how deep the rabbit hole goes. It will raise awareness.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:53 AM
1

Why the "after reaching 18"? Because moms has no custodian power over them after that anyways?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:41 AM
1

Okay. Let's rally up all the grandpas who marry their wives when their wives were younger than 18 and convict them as rapists.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 09:26 AM
1

suicide statistics evens out if we take into account suicide attempts. someone who survives an attempt is a lot likelier to get medical help than someone who kills themselves on their first try. the sad truth is that men do not attempt more suicide, they are just too successful with it and do not get the "second chance" needed to get help. This I do not agree with. Many women's attempts are just seeking attention, not seeking death. So, those do not count. But yeah, these stats do not have have …
/r/MensRights23/02/16 08:54 AM
1

I was going to point out the same.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 08:52 AM
1

These types of double standards really have no impact at all. And I'm saying this as a man who is offended by the joke. It's not a joke about violence that bothers me. It's their sense of ownership and that "men needs to be trained like they are dogs" by using threats, that is insulting. It bothers me because I've lived it. This is the type of stuff that my ex say to me from time to time. "If you ever dare to cheat on me, I'll make sure your kids know you'd rather be with sluts than spend time w…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 07:16 AM
1

Remember that boy who was brought up as a girl? That "successful" experiment in which the thesis "gender is a social construct" was based on? You might want to look up what happened to that boy. In nowhere did the parents say, "We tried to raise him like a regular boy but he didn't like any of the stuff." They are deliberately doing it, "so he can understand women". This is no different than religious extremists trying to let their kids learn that gay people and atheists are all amoral.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 07:08 AM
1

You two have no clue how people who are indoctrinated think, do you?
/r/MensRights23/02/16 07:01 AM
1

Yeah, but up-voting non-issues like this will make us look no different than them, you know, winning about non-issues.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 06:54 AM
1

I think what he meant was, women will definitely prefer ( and benefit from ) being the 7th wife of a top 20% than being in a manganous marriage to the bottom 40%.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 06:26 AM
1

Don't forget several nutcase murderers who had nothing to do with MRA were also labeled as MRA by the media
/r/MensRights23/02/16 05:30 AM
0

On public publications that is spreading lies, if there's a comments section, correct and challenge those disinformation. Basically, raising awareness. What I believe, is feminist movement need to die before any change of course to repair damaged done can even start.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 05:00 AM
1

All this will do is increase the number of rape-murders, since rapists will choose to kill their victims to ensure they don't go to rape court. What I was getting at is this. Let's say, all claims are taken as truth, with no due process. I'm accused, and I'm innocent. Does that compel me to murder the woman accusing me even if i know I'll get jail time 100% despite I'm innocent? No, because I don't know her and even if I do, I'm not a psycho. Now, some rapist is accused and he knows if this goes…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 04:14 AM
1

She was arrested. So, it's a non-issue. It's an issue when women make false accusations and innocent men get convicted without any due process. Or, when it is found that they lied, they go unpunished.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 03:48 AM
0

I agree kids are great. But the whole "it takes a real man to be a father" is idiotic. An ape can be a father to baby apes.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 03:33 AM
2

Just pay. If you make her work, you won't be seeing your kids soon. You'll be falsely accused of being abusive to your kids. It is how it is.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 03:25 AM
7

As much as this info-graphics is b.s. Let's do this. Let's just change the labels. Rapists -> Claims Reported -> Reported without enough evidence to see trial Faced Trial -> Faced trial but found to be not guilty Jailed -> Convicted ( keep in mind more than half of all prisoners released by innocent project are convicted rapists ) Falsely accused -> Liars that did get punished. That's not what I'm suggesting it is, but that's the way they are interpreting data, I simply switched it around. Only …
/r/MensRights23/02/16 03:11 AM
11

Btw, it is exactly posting shit like this that will deter real rape victims to come forward. You know, "Well, most people who suffered the same never report, and even if I report, it's likely nothing will happen." Stupid feminists. Constantly fear-mongering that no one will believe victims.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 03:01 AM
2

Not just your money, your kids too.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:57 AM
22

The reason that only a fraction of those reported goes to trial is because those that did not make it to trial, did not have sufficient evidence. Not having sufficient evidence can be either the rapist got lucky, or the accuser was lying. We do not know which, and can't assume otherwise. Same goes with those who went to trial but never see prison time. It could be that they got lucky, or the justice system is doing its work and they are innocent. We don't know which is which. No point assuming e…
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:54 AM
3

Get rid of the multi-billion dollar divorce industry? Who's going to come in and fill that dent to economy? It should be done, I agree. But it's not happening. The only way to go about it is boycott marriage. Dolphins, lions, apes, whatever, all form lifelong family units of their own without contracts.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:32 AM
4

That was what was what was proposed: Johnson is in favor of putting an end to alimony because that would compel each individual to be financially accountable for him- or herself, and would demand that women become financially literate And I agree.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 02:31 AM
1

He was just explaining evolution at work over millions of years, which you probably don't get. It is very important MRA understand this so you get the full scope of the uphill battle you're against.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 12:18 AM
1

You don't understand what he is saying. Consider two tribes, one tribe has the DNA to protect men first when disaster strikes; the other tribe has the DNA to protect women first if disaster strikes, at the expense of men. The tribe that value men will eventually dwindle in population and die off. The tribe where men are inclined to sacrifice themselves, and women are very okay to be selfish, will prosper in population. So, we all carry those programing and it's not going to go away. This is why …
/r/MensRights23/02/16 12:11 AM
1

Hey, ever consider the possibility he married a nutcase but getting out of it will destroy him financially and deny him of his kids? What you are doing is similar to this: I'm happily married that's because I do this and that and treat my husband this and that way, so those of you in a bad marriage where your husband is always drunk and beat you up from time to time, you should try to be more like me.
/r/MensRights23/02/16 12:00 AM
1

And there was that girl who thinks if a guy beat her up, that means he love him. Then there was that cuck who thinks his wife sleeping around taught him about feminism. It's a gag gift. But just because he say this and that doesn't mean anything. There was that guy who took out loan and worked to pay for her gf's college. He'd tell you it's okay because when she's done, she'll pay it off. It's between just him and her. You can guess how that ended.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:47 PM
1

Dude, this isn't a he said she said. She has the body of her dead son in her car trunk for 10 years. You don't know you had a dead body in your car for years?
/r/MensRights22/02/16 11:29 PM
2

Learn to spot women who do not buy into those nonsense.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 02:20 PM
2

Your form won't help. She can say halfway through sex, you became forceful but she didn't tell you to stop because she's afraid it'll get worse. Or that you coerced her into signing or she signed it under influence or whatever. Also, non-feminist won't mean jack. There are guys who say they had few years of good relationship with their women and parted with no bad feelings, somewhere down the road, their ex joined the feminist cult and start telling their mutual friends that they were raped a fe…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 02:16 PM
1

You don't quite get me. How can an innocent man be pushed to murder his rape victim to avoid court when he did not even rape the victim? So, the only men who would murder their victims are actual criminals. And criminals should face court that will punish them. You might as well say, we should give rapists lesser sentence so they won't escalate to murdering their victims because decades in prison is too harsh, and they'll do anything to avoid that. Just stick to "we need due process". Removing d…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 01:50 PM
8

You can't tell she invited him for the meeting so she can get a video of it and hope her video goes viral?
/r/MensRights22/02/16 01:30 PM
2

When they come clean with what they had done since the 70s, the damage they had caused, and made effort to change their course. But it will never happen, so it's pointless talking about it.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 01:02 PM
2

I was with you until your stupid "edit". Are you suggesting we let rapists have easier time in court, with possibility of letting them go unpunished, so they won't murder their victims?
/r/MensRights22/02/16 12:47 PM
6

The funny part about this video that no one noticed, was the man was treating her exactly the same if she was a man. Which is, calling her out on her b.s. ( as opposed to, "she's a woman, they whine, it's expected" ) and asked her to behave professionally.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:55 AM
10

She ambushed him hoping her video would go viral. Basically, using him to market herself. Wake up.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:35 AM
2

That's just dumb. The outcome mentality won't be, "Wow, those celeb went to jail with no due process." What? Because they are celebs? The outcome mentality would be, "We told you so, they are guilty and we are finally seeing justice." There had already been many, many, many cases of CONVICTED rapists spending years or decades in jail only to be found not guilty by the innocent project. In fact, more than half of all prisoners released by the innocent project are convicted rapists. How about, jus…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:33 AM
6

Dude, guys attending Warren Farrell's talks are being called rapists. Does that give the guys the right to start punching at their harassers? Yeah, the guy is dumb, that much is clear. She's an attention seeker and she used him, and he fell for it. But you don't see Any Warhol going around hitting people because people made fun of his soup can art, do you?
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:17 AM
2

"a real man knows when he's had enough" I thought that would be an ad for hiring divorce attorney.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 09:00 AM
1

Though correlation is not causation, both marriage rate and divorce rate follows very closely to economy.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 04:47 AM
1

It isn't even an issue of you know or you don't. Go to a prison and talk to convicted rapists, ask them if they knew it was wrong. The whole campaign of teach men not to rape is degrading. We might as well campaign to teach moms not to murder their kids because some moms did.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 04:35 AM
1

Oh, so when she changed her stance, it meant she wasn't strong enough but now she is. Okay, all married men should listen up. You should not be held by your marriage contract because you only agreed to the marriage at a time you were not strong enough to say no. But now that you are strong enough to get a divorce, you should voice out that your marriage was not consensual. You were coerced into taking the vow.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:31 AM
2

Heartbreaking. The horror is that these happen more often than people are aware of.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 02:12 AM
2

Well, I don't see any problem with that unless you think all those allegations must be true because those women said so. My problem with Hilary's rape allegations, is she defended criminals she knew full well committed rape against a 12 year old girl. Something she admitted on tape. Victim blamed the poor child in court and used a lie detector result she admitted to be false, for them to settle a bargain. All on tape. And no one is bothered by it.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 02:09 AM
1

C'mon guys. The nutcase ex-boyfriend who paid for the lie is just as guilty. And he is male.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 02:00 AM
1

By making it clear this isn't an issue of "straight guys would love this shit".
/r/MensRights22/02/16 01:53 AM
6

Dads will be the first one to jump in front of a lion to protect their kids. It's not even morality of responsibility and duty, it's at a biological level, something dads can't get rid of even if they want to. To not trust dads with their own kids is so idiotic. But current state of mind do seem to see dads as potential predators. Because the 0.01% of psychos need to be constant reminders.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 12:40 AM
4

Well, for women, it's a great idea to con men into marriage. For men, it's not a good idea. It has nothing to do with gender or commitment or monogamy or family or how the idea or marriage was created. It has everything to do with current state of family court's laws and how it's being abused.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 12:29 AM
2

Plus the teen typo and language. If it were not for seagull's original news post, I would have taken it as a 100% joke/spoof post.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 11:50 PM
2

Feminism does not believe in equality of sexes.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 04:13 PM
1

My point was, there's no guarantee. I was married. The reason I got married? I wanted to start a family. The reason she got married? She wanted to start a family. For me, kids' needs come first, before anything. For her, kids' needs come first before anything. And when our marriage fell apart and we were separated, for those 3 years, I still see my kids 4 days a week from 3pm to 8pm. Now that the divorce filing is finally happening, I'm being denied of my kids entirely. And over time, my kids ar…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 03:08 PM
13

Hahahahahahahahahaha. If they boycott Sony, then, they'll need to boycott ... Kesha. And any artists at Sony who's now supporting Kesha. Did they even think it through?
/r/MensRights21/02/16 02:37 PM
27

Since they're going to go by all straight men must love it, you should just say, "Maybe it's not that he is gay, but you're just not hot enough to pull that off."
/r/MensRights21/02/16 02:34 PM
1

It's understandable they want only non-white non-men writers. It's business. It's bad business to get lawsuits for stuff your staff wrote. Having pussy pass is better.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 07:54 AM
4

It's all made up nonsense.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:57 AM
6

Really? I ended up with so much free time now that I'm divorced. No driving half an hour to a hot spot spending another half hour looking for parking, only to wait another hour, for fancy dinner. Then, sit for another hour after dinner for gossips I'm not interested in. On regular basis. Now, when my kids are with me, they are with me. I'm not doing meaningless chi-chats with people I rarely know and will forget in a year, while my kids are playing with other kids. I'm free as can be. What extra…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:56 AM
1

Prosecutors declined to pursue the charge of concealing her son's body Why?
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:42 AM
1

Right. Some people go into vow expecting it'll end bad. Please. Go to all weddings and ask all couples if they are committed to 20 years to bring up kids in a stable family. 100% of them will tell you they won't be the ones failing. Yet, more than half of them will. Your measure of "find somebody with the same goal and make an agreement with them to share power and responsibility" is kinda idiotic. Because when the relationship goes down the drain, no one will keep their word especially when loa…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:27 AM
7

Yes, women went and did the work and created shelters, like you know, Erin Pizzey. Well, that is until some shaddy organization hijacked it to profit off shelters.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:12 AM
1

Sigh. A wife can't give birth, she gets pregnant via artificial method with someone else's womb with her husband's sperm. So, there's a mom because it comes out of her womb? The kid won't know, will he/she? Yeah, a guy really, rally want his kid to have both parents. Now, tell me how. Get married? Yeah, right. This isn't about ownership. It's avoiding kids getting ripped apart psychologically by divorce battle.
/r/MensRights20/02/16 07:19 AM
1

You guys can't see past the smokescreen. It is not that she does not want more kids. It's that she does not want any possibility of her husband having more kids, even if their marriage falls apart. My ex wife wanted me to do it and nagged on for a year. I was okay with the idea itself but just do not like surgery. Then, few years down she got pregnant and I was the one who said 2 is enough and she wanted the 3rd. Basically, she changed her stance. I'm glad I didn't do it. Our marriage fell apart…
/r/MensRights19/02/16 03:05 PM
1

That's what many women do, using "everyone is on my side" to pressure you into something you do not want.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 02:51 PM
1

Boys need to be taught the reality of family court system first.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 08:40 AM
1

I don't agree with the slogan, as since when were little boys being taught their grandmas and moms and teachers and cousins aren't human because they were female?
/r/MensRights19/02/16 01:07 AM
1

By "them" who do you mean? Fembots? Or the board of directors who are making bad decisions to pacify fembots resulting their stocks worthless?
/r/MensRights19/02/16 12:07 AM
1

Like I said, I agree we know nothing of what led to this. And I think that's a more important issue than "hitting is just wrong". Because EVERYONE just jumped into the ASSUMPTION that the boy must have done something to provoke her.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:54 PM
1

I agree we know nothing. I was saying, retaliating against physical harassment is fine by me, may it be a boy or a girl defending himself or herself. You can't go blanketing that hitting people is always wrong.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:33 PM
1

Well, they boy posted online, "She gets physically violent when she's upset." That wasn't very nice of him.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:19 PM
1

I was talking about physical harassments, and immediate retaliations as a response to what just happened a second ago. No different than fighting back when you are getting attacked by strangers on the street.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:12 PM
1

Sigh. Again, what makes you think the dad does not have sisters, a mother who's more than happy to help full time, or he won't have a girlfriend down the road? All of which are still far better options than have your kid come back to you at 24 and reconcile that he/she realized he/she had been used by the system to extort money. So, a man decide kids need both biological parents. Tell me ONE way for a man to guarantee that for his kids, just ONE. There is none.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 11:10 PM
1

Date someone outside your campus. Anything goes wrong, case goes to the police, not your school administrators.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 10:54 PM
5

Retaliating against a bully or a harasser is NOT wrong. That's self-defense. It's just that in this case, we do not know who is the harasser and who is the victim.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 10:41 PM
7

It has everything to do with mens rights because the video is titled something like "girl get harassed and kicked her attacker's arse", and everyone just take that as truth. Because you know, no girl will go berserk over nothing, they are angels. And any guy who gets violently attacked by a woman, must have done something wrong.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 10:39 PM
11

Casares declined to be interviewed, but a statement released by his lawyer says that he "categorically denies the false accusations of sexual misconduct leveled against him by a colleague." Excuse me? According to the kangeroo court you run, you are not allowed any attorney, so dude, practice what you preach. And don't forget about that "listen and believe" part.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 10:18 PM
1

That is debatable. If a 14 year old boy was sexually harassed by some 18 year old teen, I'd say he has every right to fight back. So, I'd say the same for girls.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 10:03 PM
1

Like I said, if I were a betting man ... and looking at stats and probability has nothing to do with projecting. What are the odds of a 14 year old boy being recruited as murderer-soldier in a war torn area? Versus a boy who grew up in upper-middle class America? That does not mean I'm projecting.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 10:00 PM
1

Geez. Who says being a dad is owning another human being? Are you saying all single moms treat their kids like slaves they own? Or, if a parent dies and the widower decide to never have a relationship, then, that parent becomes a sicko who want to won another human being?
/r/MensRights18/02/16 09:58 PM
41

Get a lawyer now and get district police on the case if the accusation is taken seriously by your school. Do not trust your school's suggested proceedings, there is no due process, and do not let school administrators handle it.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 06:27 AM
9

Oh, so the part where the girl was taunting the boy and and the boy didn't retaliate while by-standers were trying to calm the girl down, was edited out? Why am I not surprised.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 06:20 AM
5

The problem with that video, is assumptions. It was titled something like "girl fight back to a guy who harassed her". And everyone just take it as truth.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 06:19 AM
1

It is revealing the truth and pointing out all the lies out there.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 06:03 AM
1

Who says a man with a kid can't provide a mother for the kid? No one says creating motherless kids is "regaining rights". Any accusation of dads, burden of proof is on the accuser, that would be enough. But it isn't happening. Bottom line, what is the way to ensure your kids won't be kidnapped for extortion, or even brainwashed to hate you? This is just a boycott of very flawed system, nothing to do with "creating motherless child". Are you saying couples who adopt kids are creating parentless c…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 05:56 AM
1

Really? You were taught to never hit a man since you were a kid? If you were a betting man, how would you bet on the outcome of the hearing, given the track record that adult women can glass their boyfriends' face and got off with community service?
/r/MensRights18/02/16 05:51 AM
1

She's still pending hearing. She could get off scott free. It's a men's rights issue because women know they can get away with being violent against men. Do you think she didn't care if she would go to jail, or the possibility of being in jail ever crossed her mind? Do you think a violent man didn't know he could end up in jail, or he just didn't care? That's the difference.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 02:07 AM
2

Even though women have it pretty easy, life isn't about finding the easy way out free of accountability. I would still pick men only because I enjoy sex with women and can't see myself having sex with a man. I also don't see given the power to act like spoiled little brats ( as far as the family court system is concerned ) as a positive thing to have. I don't want to be 90 and suddenly realized I've screwed up my kids life by denying them of their dad just because I could.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 02:03 AM
1

Well, don't get too optimistic yet. If I recall correctly, Universities that adopt kangeroo courts run by feminists to handle rape allegations, gets way more than quarter million a year in funding. So this dent won't dissuade them of anything. Money talks.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 01:49 AM
3

She was a kid. My son is now accusing me of stuff I never did. He is not a woman or feminist. Blame feminist movement for pushing such kangeroo courts. If family courts act like criminal/civil courts. It won't matter if moms use kids to lie their way, it won't stand in court. And if the court will hold them accountable for such acts, no lawyer will coach them this strategy. For instance, if the law states that if any kid grew up and realized they had been manipulated by a parent and his/her lawy…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 01:40 AM
1

No point bringing up dictionary definition. By definition, communism is utopia.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:13 AM
1

No MRA can be a feminist. If they are, they have no clue about feminism's history and what feminism is.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 12:12 AM
1

Eh, more than half of all marriages end in divorce. 75% filed by wives. Among the college educated, 90% are filed by wives.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:59 PM
1

Kate Winset wants total control and complete ownership of her kids. And she gets it. The point, is the risks involved for men. It's regaining the rights to make decisions.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:57 PM
1

As oppose to risking letting your kids have fatherless child because your ex kidnaps them for extortion? All legal? Some even going to the lengths of making accusing you of criminal acts, or making your kids hate you? All legal? The point, is to regain rights.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:54 PM
1

He didn't mean he deliberately pick those. For example, if he plays Battlefield and NBA games and GT5, and such and such only, which happens to have no women.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 11:21 PM
22

It's real. Also, the very Anita who says men play video games to live their misogynistic fantasy of violence against women, is on Twitter's board for policing what's acceptable. Twitter is dead.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 12:50 AM
1

Well, eventually companies will refrain from hiring them. They are walking lawsuits waiting to happen.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 12:48 AM
6

Dude, I've never ever said a word there and I am banned from that subreddit. Only because I'm very vocal here. They have a blacklist and I'm on it. Never even bothered to enter that subreddit.
/r/MensRights17/02/16 12:46 AM
35

Good. Twitter dies, and hopefully other organizations will learn from this.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 10:31 PM
3

Rape, by legal definition that can lead to criminal charges, is penetration of body of victim against the victim's will, or something like that. So, despite they are both drunk, if she didn't stuff objects into his butt or mouth, it's not rape, in the court of law. Statutory rape, which is sex with minor, is easier to define.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 03:28 AM
1

Good. People want to vote for strong leaders, people do not want to vote for victims. We don't vote for a president because we sympathize him/her.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 12:28 AM
21

Bernie is more than just "not Clinton". The power disparity is snowballing at an insane exponential rate now. If this does not get corrected, the next election, which is four years later, will be entirely owned by the 1%, and it can't be reversed.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 12:22 AM
25

Maxwell said that false accusations "can be undone by an investigation that clears the accused, especially if it is done quickly." Oh really? What happened to the mattress girl? What happened to her wrongly accused whom she initiated flirting with after the "rape"? Rape is considered the worst crime. It's social suicide even if it's a false allegation. It can't be undone. A victim of such false allegation can kiss his life goodbye, unless he move to a different country.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 11:23 PM
6

Yeah ... and if a man divorced his wife for leaving glasses by the sink, women should learn from it and wake up and realize if they truly love their husband, they would be happy to make him happy. Please. She dumped him ( if this article is even true ), for other reasons that she's too coward to admit.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 11:15 PM
1

Current divorce law, if reversed, is this: Wife needs to continue to provide sex and housework until the husband finds a new live-in girlfriend, to compensate for the years he wasted in providing for the family that is no longer there. And the husband gets to deny the wife of their kids if he feels stressed in anyway or that he's not getting enough housework done or not enough sex from his ex.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 11:03 PM
8

She is charged only because nothing happened. If she had lied about a non-incident in a he-said-she-said, and she was found to be lying, the guy would be free of her allegations, and that is it. She won't be investigated for false report. All women being charged with false report so far, either no harm even took place or they fabricated bruises onto themselves. Both of which no suspects can even exist. So, we are still far off.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 05:45 AM
1

Correction, it is 15k a month for raising HER OWN kid.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 02:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter