TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

thingsarebad Archive

View 255 posts and 2,202 comments by thingsarebad on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
253

thingsarebad/r/MensRights20/07/11 09:07 AM
203

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 07:47 AM
120

thingsarebad/r/MensRights24/07/11 07:54 AM
86

thingsarebad/r/MensRights21/09/11 08:37 AM
80

thingsarebad/r/MensRights12/09/11 07:10 AM
57

thingsarebad/r/MensRights11/09/11 05:40 AM
50

thingsarebad/r/MensRights03/11/11 06:24 AM
50

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/07/11 07:24 AM
42

thingsarebad/r/MensRights08/11/11 06:24 PM
40

thingsarebad/r/MensRights27/05/11 11:22 PM
40

thingsarebad/r/MensRights21/09/11 08:03 AM
37

thingsarebad/r/MensRights21/09/11 10:48 AM
33

thingsarebad/r/MensRights20/06/11 06:42 AM
29

thingsarebad/r/MensRights25/07/11 11:21 PM
28

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/05/11 02:13 AM
25

thingsarebad/r/MensRights02/07/11 06:15 PM
25

thingsarebad/r/MensRights26/09/11 05:38 PM
21

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/05/11 04:23 AM
21

thingsarebad/r/MensRights11/09/11 01:39 AM
20

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/08/11 11:26 PM
20

thingsarebad/r/MensRights11/07/11 04:20 PM
20

thingsarebad/r/MensRights20/07/11 05:44 AM
19

thingsarebad/r/MensRights16/11/11 08:02 AM
18

thingsarebad/r/MensRights09/09/11 07:19 PM
18

thingsarebad/r/MensRights29/10/11 09:54 AM
17

thingsarebad/r/MensRights03/09/11 01:27 PM
17

thingsarebad/r/MensRights09/09/11 04:15 AM
17

thingsarebad/r/MensRights16/11/11 09:57 PM
16

thingsarebad/r/MensRights18/07/11 06:55 PM
16

thingsarebad/r/MensRights16/08/11 12:03 AM
15

thingsarebad/r/MensRights24/08/11 03:09 AM
15

thingsarebad/r/MensRights30/06/11 08:53 PM
15

thingsarebad/r/MensRights12/07/11 05:25 PM
15

thingsarebad/r/MensRights30/08/11 06:20 PM
14

thingsarebad/r/MensRights09/09/11 04:17 AM
13

thingsarebad/r/MensRights17/09/11 06:37 PM
13

thingsarebad/r/MensRights22/06/11 01:12 AM
12

thingsarebad/r/MensRights26/07/11 11:47 PM
12

thingsarebad/r/MensRights20/09/11 08:22 AM
11

thingsarebad/r/MensRights11/08/11 05:22 AM
11

thingsarebad/r/MensRights07/09/11 05:27 PM
11

thingsarebad/r/MensRights07/09/11 08:13 AM
10

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/09/11 02:11 AM
10

thingsarebad/r/MensRights21/09/11 08:37 AM
10

thingsarebad/r/MensRights30/11/11 01:43 AM
9

thingsarebad/r/MensRights02/07/11 06:07 PM
8

thingsarebad/r/MensRights24/07/11 07:18 AM
8

thingsarebad/r/MensRights11/09/11 08:30 AM
8

thingsarebad/r/MensRights14/09/11 06:04 PM
8

thingsarebad/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:27 PM
8

thingsarebad/r/MensRights29/06/11 01:17 AM
8

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 11:01 PM
7

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/07/11 04:48 PM
7

thingsarebad/r/MensRights22/09/11 06:47 AM
7

thingsarebad/r/MensRights22/09/11 06:29 AM
7

thingsarebad/r/MensRights16/09/11 08:28 AM
7

thingsarebad/r/MensRights16/10/11 02:46 AM
7

thingsarebad/r/MensRights26/09/11 09:38 PM
7

thingsarebad/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:31 PM
7

thingsarebad/r/MensRights20/09/11 02:26 AM
6

thingsarebad/r/MensRights02/07/11 08:44 PM
6

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/10/11 03:39 AM
6

thingsarebad/r/MensRights09/08/11 08:10 PM
6

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/07/11 06:30 AM
6

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/07/11 06:02 AM
6

thingsarebad/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:56 AM
6

thingsarebad/r/MensRights24/06/11 07:28 PM
6

thingsarebad/r/MensRights30/06/11 08:16 AM
6

thingsarebad/r/MensRights22/06/11 12:21 AM
5

thingsarebad/r/MensRights09/07/11 07:19 AM
5

thingsarebad/r/MensRights29/08/11 06:02 AM
5

thingsarebad/r/MensRights02/07/11 07:00 PM
5

thingsarebad/r/MensRights02/07/11 06:21 PM
5

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/09/11 09:09 AM
5

thingsarebad/r/MensRights31/05/11 06:20 AM
5

thingsarebad/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:26 PM
5

thingsarebad/r/MensRights25/08/11 06:09 PM
5

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/09/11 01:10 AM
4

thingsarebad/r/MensRights09/07/11 05:10 AM
4

thingsarebad/r/MensRights29/11/11 04:51 AM
4

thingsarebad/r/MensRights27/09/11 06:57 PM
4

thingsarebad/r/MensRights22/09/11 11:00 AM
4

thingsarebad/r/MensRights27/08/11 06:42 PM
4

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/07/11 07:18 AM
4

thingsarebad/r/MensRights07/07/11 08:06 AM
4

thingsarebad/r/MensRights20/09/11 07:12 AM
4

thingsarebad/r/MensRights19/10/11 06:52 PM
4

thingsarebad/r/MensRights26/07/11 01:41 AM
3

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/05/11 01:26 AM
3

thingsarebad/r/MensRights02/08/11 06:30 PM
3

thingsarebad/r/MensRights21/09/11 08:29 AM
3

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 11:11 PM
3

thingsarebad/r/MensRights30/07/11 04:30 PM
3

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/06/11 07:14 AM
3

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 07:01 AM
3

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/09/11 06:29 PM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights16/10/11 11:18 PM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:42 PM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights14/11/11 08:03 AM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights02/08/11 06:41 PM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights18/07/11 08:01 AM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/10/11 07:38 PM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/09/11 08:01 AM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights01/08/11 09:04 PM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/09/11 06:03 AM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights21/09/11 01:38 AM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights21/09/11 01:18 AM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights06/07/11 02:13 PM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights14/10/11 09:47 PM
2

thingsarebad/r/seduction07/11/11 08:10 AM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 10:26 PM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:12 AM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/11/11 09:24 PM
2

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 04:27 AM
1

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 01:40 AM
1

thingsarebad/r/MensRights19/07/11 07:06 PM
1

thingsarebad/r/MensRights16/09/11 08:29 AM
1

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/07/11 05:54 AM
1

thingsarebad/r/MensRights07/11/11 05:20 AM
1

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/09/11 07:51 AM
1

thingsarebad/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:40 PM
1

thingsarebad/r/seduction07/11/11 08:43 PM
1

thingsarebad/r/MensRights31/07/11 05:49 AM
1

thingsarebad/r/MensRights26/07/11 02:02 AM
1

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 10:39 PM
1

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 08:02 PM
1

thingsarebad/r/MensRights18/10/11 08:42 PM
1

thingsarebad/r/MensRights29/10/11 10:20 AM
1

thingsarebad/r/MensRights12/09/11 06:44 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/11/11 07:41 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 02:06 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights18/10/11 07:40 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/10/11 07:50 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights07/10/11 11:56 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights29/11/11 09:07 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights11/08/11 06:07 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights09/07/11 05:04 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights24/07/11 06:07 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights22/09/11 11:53 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights03/11/11 06:04 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights08/11/11 08:19 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:08 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights07/10/11 09:15 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights22/09/11 10:13 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/10/11 03:42 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights17/10/11 05:26 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights02/11/11 09:36 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/07/11 08:45 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/07/11 07:18 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/07/11 06:49 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights11/09/11 03:46 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights03/08/11 05:21 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights14/11/11 09:13 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/07/11 06:19 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights14/11/11 07:50 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/07/11 05:51 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights16/10/11 02:25 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/07/11 12:25 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights16/10/11 02:00 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights09/08/11 07:49 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights02/08/11 06:32 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights21/10/11 07:33 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights09/08/11 07:27 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights30/06/11 10:32 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/11/11 06:21 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights26/08/11 10:02 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:09 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights07/11/11 07:53 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights07/07/11 05:42 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights26/08/11 09:10 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights26/09/11 08:32 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:36 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights18/07/11 12:04 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights26/09/11 04:46 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/10/11 10:43 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights09/09/11 07:36 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/10/11 10:01 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:47 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:27 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/09/11 12:32 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/09/11 12:30 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights25/09/11 05:00 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:33 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:12 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights11/11/11 09:04 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights20/10/11 07:59 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights08/08/11 12:15 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights05/10/11 06:15 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights30/09/11 06:29 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights30/09/11 06:27 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights20/10/11 02:12 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights11/11/11 06:43 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights25/09/11 02:26 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights01/08/11 07:16 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights11/11/11 06:11 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:41 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights11/11/11 06:06 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights25/09/11 12:23 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights11/11/11 05:41 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights25/09/11 12:00 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights11/11/11 05:17 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights24/09/11 11:47 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights24/09/11 11:28 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:57 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights14/09/11 05:09 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights26/07/11 02:53 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights31/07/11 11:49 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights26/07/11 01:53 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights26/07/11 01:38 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights31/07/11 11:10 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights19/10/11 06:54 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:17 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:48 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:15 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights31/07/11 07:04 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights20/09/11 02:35 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/09/11 09:07 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights26/07/11 04:04 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights31/08/11 08:21 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights07/09/11 05:33 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights26/07/11 02:12 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights19/10/11 05:14 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 10:20 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 10:11 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 07:57 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights25/07/11 08:18 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:30 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:23 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/09/11 02:51 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights19/08/11 04:57 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/06/11 06:58 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:21 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights29/10/11 09:56 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:51 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:50 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights25/07/11 07:18 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:45 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights25/07/11 05:15 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights25/07/11 05:02 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:26 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights16/11/11 01:03 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights25/07/11 04:42 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:25 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/11/11 11:35 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 08:30 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:17 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights30/11/11 03:23 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights28/09/11 06:52 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 07:34 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights03/10/11 06:03 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 06:45 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 06:35 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights23/09/11 06:22 AM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights12/09/11 05:55 PM
0

thingsarebad/r/MensRights15/11/11 08:29 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,202 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

conveniently 18
/r/MensRights30/11/11 10:51 AM
-6

no one asked you faggot
/r/MensRights30/11/11 08:33 AM
-2

Awesomer bathrooms? You mean when I have to take a shit at a bar and all it has is two urinals and a shitter without a door, while the bitches' bathroom has three clean stalls with doors on them, I'm fucking privileged? Men have zero privileges. Zero.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 08:07 AM
0

You don't need ESP, retard. I saw the innuendo while you were willingly blind to it. It's simple, really.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 06:13 AM
1

Teaching your girls to be "a total sexy goddess".
/r/MensRights30/11/11 03:44 AM
1

It's conceited, shallow women who just said to little girls that being an "angel" is actually a worthwhile endeavor. It's teaching little girls that being a shallow, self-absorbed little princess who has nothing going for her but a bunch of make-up is a good thing. And when this little self-absorbed princess doesn't become an Angel, she'll just end up a fat, bitchy single mom who never lets her baby-daddies see their children. It's not just anything, idiot. Teaching little girls to be worthless …
/r/MensRights30/11/11 03:38 AM
1

I'll reiterate. You: Seriously, you're imagining things that aren't there. Me: She fucked him tonight, idiot. And that's that.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 03:16 AM
1

It is, actually.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 02:40 AM
0

She fucked him tonight, idiot.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 01:44 AM
-3

The teacher fucked him tonight, dumbass.
/r/MensRights30/11/11 01:43 AM
1

Whatever Jewboy
/r/MensRights30/11/11 12:26 AM
-1

Earlier today on his shit show Lifechangers a husband said he wishes his wife would be more submissive (and that he should be able to make decisions) and the whole audience was like OMIGOSH and Dr. Drew was like BAD MAN and mentioned he thought his audience might become a lynch mob because the guy said that. That was after Dr. Drew and some other quack excused a cheating whore of a wife. It was funny to see them talk about how she wasn't "in love" with him anymore and how that was important, ign…
/r/MensRights30/11/11 12:26 AM
0

Don't be callin me son Nigga
/r/MensRights29/11/11 11:42 PM
0

What you talkin' 'bout Cracka
/r/MensRights29/11/11 11:34 PM
1

Dr. Drew's Life Changers, that is.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 09:08 PM
2

nah "cracker" is a racial slur against white people, ignatiusloyola doesn't care about that
/r/MensRights29/11/11 07:56 PM
-7

Women get far hornier than men. A woman will do basically anything for a big dick, even abuse children. It's sick.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 09:01 AM
-2

lol fairy boy
/r/MensRights29/11/11 06:08 AM
-5

lol please stop trying to broaden the definition of "man" we already had that with "rape"
/r/MensRights29/11/11 05:15 AM
-9

I used to be a fairly liberal MRA, but unlike most I was actually willing to give up my delusions in favor of the truth. Anyone who's spent a fair bit of time here and still is foolish enough to call themselves a liberal is either very dense or unwilling to question their BELIEF system (or both). OThomson is an example of someone who is both dense and unwilling to question their RELIGION of leftism. OThomson is too stupid to really understand what he's doing. ignatiusloyola is not actually that …
/r/MensRights29/11/11 05:08 AM
-4

My political stance doesn't matter. Lol yes it does, because you intentionally censor those who disagree with you. Don't be a retarded cracker.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 05:06 AM
-9

Because the solutions require a renouncification of liberalism Exactly. Liberals like ignatiusloyola and OThomson would rather things stay as they are, leading to a collapse, than have a functioning society, because they are so invested in the childish idea that everyone is equal. OThomson has even admitted this. ignatius, on the other hand, always runs from a discussion.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 05:04 AM
-2

fairy boy is not a man
/r/MensRights29/11/11 05:00 AM
0

I'm doing exactly what I want to do. If I had a vagina, though, I could be doing 5 hours of real work a week and making 6 figures, though.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 05:00 AM
1

lol that's not racist
/r/MensRights29/11/11 04:57 AM
0

Pierce, don't listen to clowns like this guy and nallyyo2, they're idiots. Most of the people who complain like this about fine submissions are anti-male shills. -Jay
/r/MensRights29/11/11 03:13 AM
1

It seems the learning part of your brain has been damaged: too stupid to accept that your leftism is anti-male, too stupid to learn not to be a pussy-beggar despite all the articles teaching you how.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 03:12 AM
0

if men behaved like women, we'd be living in trees
/r/MensRights27/11/11 04:43 AM
3

Also note that under Ron Paul this kind of Big Brother shit would not happen.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 09:57 PM
0

Thank you.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 09:49 PM
0

Even the "straight" characters seem gay. The show doesn't just affect me, silly, it affects everyone who watches it.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 09:48 PM
1

I'm calling a society that glorifies female teachers using their male students as sex objects sickening. In the real world, it's a female teacher having threesomes with 12 year olds and shit. Also she doesn't tell him "no" strongly enough, and continues to flirt with him.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 09:47 PM
-2

I'm not an egalitarian, I'm a realist.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 09:43 PM
3

And here's why, even if you're a Democrat and even if you plan on voting for Obama, you should vote for Ron Paul in the Republican primaries to ensure the issues are actually discussed: http://bluerepublican.us/ (read the HuffingtonPost link)
/r/MensRights16/11/11 09:29 PM
2

Asian ignatiusloyola: me rikey po-rice state, me juss ruv big guvmint rong time
/r/MensRights16/11/11 09:16 PM
-3

Projection. You think I'm here because someone did better than me. No, I'm a summa cum laude engineer who has been a key component of multi-million dollar projects that help to ensure people are fed. I am not envious. I have no need. You do. As I said, projection. I've brought down much bigger fish than you in the real world. Lol, I bet you have miss feminist bigot. But not because of merit, but because you worked the system which is advantageous to you. When's the last time you contributed some…
/r/MensRights16/11/11 08:07 AM
1

I don't disagree. I do assert that male affection is often misconstrued as something harmful, and also that accusations are considered damning, and these facts complicate the case significantly.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 08:05 AM
-1

but nothing about that seems to obligate anyone to ensure that conception results in birth. I pointed out the flaw in this argument. You claim that conception determines where we place responsibility ONCE A CHILD IS BORN. Until then, there is no responsibility for that child. Therefore, if anyone chooses to abort that child, it is not wrong in and of itself. Or are you going to say that a woman who is carrying a child is somehow special, and is the sole arbiter of whether that child ought to be …
/r/MensRights16/11/11 05:20 AM
1

My motivation is that I want women to carry the burden of war too. As well they should, but only where it makes sense. The truth is that women may have some utility in certain positions in the military, but there are many things they should not do because it damages the effectiveness of the military. The truth is important. The truth is salvation. Anyway, the better path is to tackle the true problem: men dying in the military FOR SHITTY REASONS. Why should men die in the military to make the me…
/r/MensRights16/11/11 05:16 AM
-10

My genius is mostly due to my DNA. My natural drive for learning and ability to find solutions to questions has to be primarily influenced by DNA. My intelligence mostly comes from my father's side, but certain aspects of my mother's side also contribute. A very fortunate composition of DNA from both parents, actually. Though notably I grew up out in the boonies so it's also possible that my intelligence was enhanced due to drinking the well water we drank (no fluoride, a chemical which lowers I…
/r/MensRights16/11/11 05:07 AM
-10

Certainly I have. Affirmative action is discrimination.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 05:06 AM
-2

nothing about that seems to obligate anyone to ensure that conception results in birth. So then you'd agree that a guy can abort a child himself if he so chooses. After all, nobody has an obligation to ensure that conception results in birth.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 05:05 AM
-4

Could be. But Paterno certainly did nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 05:01 AM
-8

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/mchr0/women_only_rooms_at_colleges/c305jqq
/r/MensRights16/11/11 04:59 AM
-9

All you've done is discount actual discrimination against people due to their skin color, just because they are white. That's racial discrimination. If you think I'm going to respond seriously to a racist, you're wrong.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 04:58 AM
-9

It's impossible for these particular women to be smarter than me, yes. I've met a few women who were perhaps on par with my intelligence in my life; these girls were not, lol. I got to meet the interviewers and the other applicants. It was pretty clear they were looking for a little affirmative action eye candy because of all the sausage they already had.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:56 AM
-1

In any sense. I didn't talk about the sexes having equal responsibilities, I talked about conception necessiting responsibility.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:49 AM
0

I was being fairyphobic.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:49 AM
2

It amuses me a bit, and the songs are sometimes fun to watch (thought tonight's were shit). It's so blatantly ridiculously left-wing that I can laugh at it. I mean, almost everyone is gay lol.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:49 AM
0

From what I've seen in my limited viewing, Glee doesn't push the limits at all, it merely reinforces the leftist view point.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:40 AM
-7

My fiancee is black. Are you calling her a fucking "Monkey Boy", you racist piece of shit?
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:39 AM
-18

I lack melanin which makes me more susceptible to skin cancer. The sun discriminates against me. This is a video clarifying: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IccT99VMZR4 Your turn. Let's play oppression ping pong.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:35 AM
0

Violently homophobic? What are you talking about? I'm neither promoting violence nor homophobic. I just don't like incredibly annoying drama queens who sound like Tinkerbell. I wasn't provoking homosexuals. I was provoking you. i have heard many Gay men complain about the portrayal of that character falling into stereotypes and holding back gay acceptance No shit, which is why homosexuals actually won't be offended by what I said unless they really want an excuse. You are acting offended because…
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:32 AM
2

Thanks. In other words, they are celebrating the relationship between a male student and a female teacher, making it seem as if it's no big deal that she kissed him and that they continue to flirt. They also are pushing the whole "cougar" thing. It's pretty sick, actually.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:30 AM
-1

Me too. It's rather repulsive. My fiancee and I are both friends with plenty of homosexuals, and plenty of them are a bit flambuoyant, but not like that annoying narcissistic sack of flaming shit lol.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:28 AM
-1

I do see how it would be inflammatory to some people. I do not see how it would be unhelpful.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:27 AM
2

Of course schools should be segregated by sex and boys should be taught like boys, not little girls.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:26 AM
-2

Yep
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:24 AM
-15

Racism is fun when it's against white people! Thanks for proving my point. you can't even talk about the discrimination
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:19 AM
-1

How'd that plotline go? I haven't watched the show until recently.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:18 AM
-7

That's the one. Also in this episode: Fairy boy pledges to ban dodgeball at the school because it's a violent sport that "suppresses" people. Haha.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:18 AM
-12

Unlike you I value truth.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:17 AM
-8

As I said in my edit: A White female UC and Columbia Alumni. lol confirmed http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/mchr0/women_only_rooms_at_colleges/c303xyr?context=3 Isn't it funny when dummies like me can tell you're a woman just by the bullshit you spew? Though in actuality, I used to work at a Fortune 500 engineering company, and I knew a lot of very intelligent people there. Mostly men, of course, but a few women too. It is amusing that people like you who really serve as glorified sec…
/r/MensRights16/11/11 03:14 AM
-10

I was saying that having "soft" extracurricular activities does not equate to increased intelligence, and therefore ought not factor so heavily into admissions to a STEM program. And I'm still saying that because it's true. It's true that intelligence != IQ: http://hereticsway.gluontheferengi.com/2011/09/29/is-iq-intelligence/ But it's also true that intelligence != extra-curricular activities. There are, of course, certain activities that people can perform that can increase intelligence: music…
/r/MensRights16/11/11 02:42 AM
1

No games, please. There are many forms of white knighting.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 02:36 AM
0

Roughly, responsibility to care for the child.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 02:34 AM
1

You may be right, but see what I said here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/mdoq2/jerry_sandusky_denies_child_sex_abuse_charges_and/c3043c8 I also find it hard to believe that anyone would see a child being abused in such a way and fail to take it to the police themselves. How fucked up does someone have to be to do that? It doesn't make a whole lot of sense. It does, however, make more sense that they heard a lot of rumors about Sandusky, and perhaps were told that their was damning…
/r/MensRights16/11/11 02:14 AM
1

I'll admit I haven't read it. I remain skeptical when it comes to these things especially considering that "eyewitnesses" are prone to believing where there's smoke there's fire and thus being biased. I don't see anything inherently wrong with giving gifts to children or sleeping with them. Honestly would anyone be up in arms about a woman sleeping with a child? No. But a man? Yes. It's pretty clear it's social conditioning that paints men as child abusers that's at fault for this perception. Ev…
/r/MensRights16/11/11 02:08 AM
-7

Not really surprising considering Glee is a very leftist, feminist show, and feminism is all about women being able to do whatever the heck they want whether or not it hurts men and boys.
/r/MensRights16/11/11 01:10 AM
1

Women have a right to abortion stemming from their bodily autonomy. Then men have the right to financial abortion stemming from their bodily autonomy. They ought not be forced to work to support a child. QED
/r/MensRights15/11/11 11:38 PM
-1

Seems like he's the new Michael Jackson.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 11:37 PM
0

And if the sex is not consensual? Many of these folks would claim that a man is still responsible because what about the children! Yet they would simultaneously claim that a woman should be able to abort a child in the case of rape or incest or potential harm to the woman, which is cognitive dissonance. And if men have a responsibility to a child, then it would also be cognitively dissonant to claim that women should be able to give a child up for adoption. If mere conception equals responsibili…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 10:51 PM
2

Sorry for the misunderstanding. These are just my notes. Originally it was a message to someone else, not you. You can safely ignore anywhere I say things like: So please don't regurgitate anti-male propaganda straight from the mouths of feminist institutions. I have updated it to be more clear.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 10:07 PM
5

Oh here, I found my other notes. Bit of a mishmash. vawa by Celda http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/Celdazero/the-easiest-lie_b_1070799_117944427.html Simple. VAWA was created by feminist liars who falsely claimed that all domestic violence is done by men against women (in reality half of DV is done by women, and half of DV is suffered by men). They successful­ly promoted this lie in order to get funding to harm men and help women. That's a fact. Sources: http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assaul…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 09:45 PM
-2

lol yeah I see now, thanks, pretty hilarious that I did that
/r/MensRights15/11/11 09:30 PM
2

http://www.nij.gov/journals/261/who-perpetrates.htm
/r/MensRights15/11/11 09:29 PM
-7

Down-voted for feminist propaganda.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 09:27 PM
-9

lol now I see, thanks
/r/MensRights15/11/11 09:15 PM
-8

Oh lol that is hilarious, especially considering I was telling a story about an idiot who couldn't spell "prestigious". Hahaha. I of course know how to spell anecdote - I didn't even realize I did that. My typing was on auto-pilot I guess.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 09:15 PM
-18

You're very dumb. I can make this judgment based on a limited amount of information. You can actually gauge a person's intelligence quite quickly in the real world. It's not difficult. This is what I said, genius: Though in actuality, it's really not relevant how I presented myself, since the girls were, I'm sure, hired for eye candy over a bunch of other guys who would have done a much better job, not just me. My point was that it wasn't just two hotties vs me, it was two dumb hotties vs plenty…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 09:13 PM
-6

lol
/r/MensRights15/11/11 07:35 PM
-14

Yeah because my honesty about the fact that those girls were very likely hired due to their looks alone on reddit is a huge indicator of how I deal with people in real life. Though in actuality, it's really not relevant how I presented myself, since the girls were, I'm sure, hired for eye candy over a bunch of other guys who would have done a much better job, not just me.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 07:24 PM
0

no problemo
/r/MensRights15/11/11 07:23 PM
-10

What? He misspelled "prestigious". What does this have to do with my vocabulary?
/r/MensRights15/11/11 07:21 PM
6

attempt to make use of this room in a normal student manner. if denied or told you must leave, raise hell Yeah that worked out really well for this guy: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Stand-Up-for-Abdi/205949626097642?sk=info Basically a woman stole his study room and then called the police to falsely claim he abducted her. The police arrested him and only ended up dropping the charges because it got a lot of attention. Luckily, he was black, so everyone could get up in arms about how a white rac…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 11:14 AM
-26

Extracurricular activities that almost never have anything to do with STEM aptitude and thus should have no bearing on admissions. The reason they do is simple: to make it easier for women, who are far more interested in that kind of crap, to get in. I was in National Vagina Society, sorry, I mean National Honor Society, and that didn't help my case as a white male. Not that I particularly care that MIT didn't accept me. Carnegie Mellon did and I got a free ride to UT Austin, but I chose to stay…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 11:04 AM
-15

Hey at least you're not white, then you can't even talk about the discrimination without being called a racist AND a misogynist. After all, not only am I a male oppressor, I'm a white oppressor, oh yeah, and a cis hetero oppressing homophobe too. How do people generally respond to your pointing out discrimination against Asian males? I'd be surprised if the effect of this discrimination on Asian females is anywhere near that of Asian males. They are female, after all. God, that just makes me rem…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 10:55 AM
-16

Similar here, although I'm white. It's nice to know that if I could have sacrificed a lot of my intelligence and exchanged my penis for a vagina, I would have easily gotten into MIT and I'd be making hundreds of thousands of dollars a year without really having to be as good at what I do as the men are. But I wouldn't sacrifice my intelligence just for that. I ended up going to a top 10 engineering school close to home. And when I interviewed for an internship at a company creating stock market …
/r/MensRights15/11/11 10:52 AM
-1

How many people have you taught to pull the trigger? None. I've lost track. You act like this is a good thing. Perhaps you should have taught them to ask whether they should be pulling the trigger and killing children who are merely defending their homeland instead? But no, my tax dollars don't pay for that; they pay for killing innocents so that global corporations can make more money off the misery of others. But at least I'm not actively perpetuating it. At least I'm talking about it. At leas…
/r/MensRights15/11/11 10:19 AM
0

Can you tell me why you should glorify all females in the service because one is, so you say, a hero? See also: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/mcruf/women_in_the_army_are_paid_the_same_but_are_in/ Women are for the most part a hindrance and a liability in the military. They're used as a feel good publicity stunt. And with my tax dollars.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 10:13 AM
1

Actually, no, it never turns into a debate over presidents because no one actually ever argues FOR another candidate, they only argue AGAINST RP based on false information. From what I've seen of you, you're the "fucking retard" good sir.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 10:11 AM
2

how the hell does it help men to say women couldn't do the job?!? Women can't do the job. Not only do women not carry their own weight, but they also endanger male soldiers who will fight to protect them at the cost of the mission. This was pretty clear from the video, Mr. White Knight.
/r/MensRights15/11/11 10:08 AM
-5

And this is why I smirk whenever I hear about women "serving" in the western military. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m93x6/whenever_i_hear_someone_thank_a_woman_in_the/
/r/MensRights15/11/11 09:57 AM
-2

So what is your brilliant theory?
/r/MensRights14/11/11 08:05 PM
0

By the way, can you tell me why you think I should give any respect at all to my idiot of a cousin who resides now doing squat in sunny California other than fucking guys on base, after a few months as a paper pusher in an air conditioned office in Afghanistan, whose head is even bigger now that she lost some weight, and who treats her uniform like an accessory, while my tax dollars pay for it? And can you tell me why I should give any respect at all to all the other women who behave the exact s…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 09:07 PM
0

Similarly for Ron Paul: http://www.reddit.com/r/ronpaul/comments/mb0p0/there_are_ron_paul_downvote_bots_that_use_this/
/r/MensRights13/11/11 08:57 PM
0

Nope. Most men aren't better shots. Most women are. Lol, yeah right. That's just a stupid thing to say. Men's hand-eye coordination is much better than women's, especially at the top. And no, limiting the discussion to sniping doesn't count. There is no bad guy coming closer while you stand there. Sometimes there is. And sometimes there is a guy sucker-punching you. Well, you probably should have expected it, and if so, you probably shouldn't have let him sneak up on you, eh? Unless you're sayin…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 08:29 PM
-1

Perhaps mommy should move if daddy makes more money in the other school district, or daddy should just get custody 100% of the time because he brings in the most support.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:52 PM
-2

I've never denied that I enjoy being right. That's why I always strive for the truth. I enjoy competition, and I enjoy manipulating people to my own ends. It just so happens that my own ends are for more people to wake the fuck up and see what is true. Yes this is an emotional response, but it is in line with finding the truth, which is a most noble venture. I am lucky in this. Though I don't get erections from it. Why is it you military guys think you're "big men" just because you've been throu…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:31 PM
0

All you have to do is click and the comment will open up. I never said all lesbians hate men, only that many do. My post here is an attempt to find the truth, nothing more.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:23 PM
1

Because they know they can't defend the candidate's position. They're cowards. I welcome everyone to post information on how another candidate will help men so that it may be thoroughly debunked. Unlike them, I welcome discussion because it will bring us closer to discussion. They prefer we don't talk about it at all because they are afraid.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:21 PM
1

No, they're just more enlightened than you.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:20 PM
1

If you're a divorced jobless man with a huge child support payment minimum wage means you're going to jail for non-payment.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:20 PM
0

lol @ #2
/r/MensRights13/11/11 08:30 AM
0

Luck of the draw. Ignorant people are concentrated here tonight. Nevertheless, it is on-topic and should not be receiving any down-votes.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 08:02 AM
2

Then help get him on the ballot: http://bluerepublican.us/ Even if he loses, I'll be writing him in, and so will many others. When the results come in and it's clear that there are a significant number of people who vote for the Constitution, people will pay attention. It proves there is a voting block that will not settle for an establishment candidate, and Republicans will need to wise the fuck up if they want a chance at the oval office again. You only believe that Ron Paul can't win because …
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:59 AM
0

That's not logical. R/MR is one of few reddits where people don't buy into the mainstream bullshit view (that men are evil and women are all victims). Therefore it is a place where there will be some people who are smart enough and open-minded enough to realize that men's rights is part of a larger issue. Spending my time here is more valuable than going around posting links at every sub-reddit, obviously.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:56 AM
0

Economic reasons should never force someone to enter a job Yet they do. I'm talking about reality, not should bes. There will never be a successful draft in this country Bullshit. Did you see any of the Republican debate tonight? All other Republican candidates are talking about getting involved in wars around the world. Obama will do the same. Only Ron Paul is against these unnecessary wars. Basically we're heading for WW3 and if you think they won't institute the draft for that you have got to…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:52 AM
1

Ron Paul believes in no wars Not true. Ron Paul believes only in wars that are necessary to defend the country and are voted for by Congress, not declared by a President against the Constitution. Why does it seem everyone who's die hard against Ron Paul doesn't even know anything about him?
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:48 AM
-1

It's not unrelated, and it's not spam. Just because you don't agree with it doesn't make it unrelated or not spam. Learn a little reddiquette. The presidential race will have significant effects on the path our country takes and our boys will suffer greatly if we elect a president that gets us involved in unnecessary wars. The only presidential candidate who respects the constitution is Ron Paul. Vote for anyone else and you're voting for more state-sanctioned misandry, it's that simple. It's in…
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:45 AM
0

If you read the thread your questions are already answered.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:35 AM
0

1) if men are unemployed that means even more men who will sign up 2) if men do not sign up they will be forced to
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:34 AM
1

Care to answer this? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/maiiy/dont_want_a_president_who_will_take_us_to_war/c2zdu7i Honestly it's so stupid I can't stand to deal with it.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:19 AM
0

The sheer stupidity of this argument hurts my brain. Maybe someone smart like Demonspawn will take the time to educate you but I really don't have the patience to spend an hour explaining things to you. Safe to say I'm not surprised someone as stupid as you is against this article submission.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:17 AM
-2

This forum has everything to do with men's rights, and sending men to die in war is a men's rights issue. Take your partisan anti-libertarian baloney outta here.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:07 AM
0

That's not a solution.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 07:07 AM
1

Do you have a link to examples of the conversations? What you described is terrible, and should not be associated with feminism. Those people may think they are feminists, but to value one gender over another is exactly what feminism is against. lol
/r/MensRights13/11/11 06:14 AM
-2

What exactly do you take issue with? I give respect only where it is due. I do not blindly give respect because I am expected to.
/r/MensRights13/11/11 03:28 AM
-2

lol what's your problem?
/r/MensRights12/11/11 11:36 PM
1

So you're against abortion.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 11:01 PM
0

You really are an ignorant idiot.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 10:57 PM
2

A man simply can't move away and demand primary placement. Gotta love his anti-male bias, huh? If a man has to move away to find work, well he's just being fucking unreasonable! He simply can't move away and demand to see his kid! What a fucktard. Combine that with his other feminist statements.... You think it's a troll? After all you seem to think he's lying about his education.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 10:55 PM
0

TROLL cordial conversation TROLL
/r/MensRights12/11/11 10:50 PM
-1

Lol, no, there's nothing noble about doing a useless job which other people pay for through their tax dollars.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 10:24 PM
-2

what you're saying about female soldiers I'm not saying anything about female soldiers. I'm saying things about female paper pushers who sit in air conditioned offices yet have the nerve to call themselves soldiers. You keep dwelling on the very small percentage of women in the military who actually can call themselves soldiers. I won't play that game. any military man, or woman would gladly kick your ass for saying so I'm sure. However, although it can be seen as noble to defend one's country, …
/r/MensRights12/11/11 10:16 PM
-5

Hey you're that same troll from before! How's it going?
/r/MensRights12/11/11 10:14 PM
7

They already ruined the SAT by adding an essay portion that is graded subjectively, where the longer your essay is, even if it's a piece of gibberish, the better your grade is. http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/ConsumerNews/teen-student-finds-longer-sat-essay-equals-score/story?id=12061494#.Tr7tQEMg_UA Why? So women could do better. http://mirrorofthesoul.blogspot.com/2005_01_01_archive.html#110693474392497153 I really hate reading reports or articles written by women. They are too damn long. As an exec…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 10:03 PM
-2

She also got the Bronze Star, are you aware the military doesn't just hand these medals out like candy? To women, they do. Gotta make the women look good. I don't think you get how much of a hero Michelle really was, and to say she was a hindrance and received a "pussy pass" makes me want to put your pasty ass in a turret of a tank in a war and see how much you shit yourself, you sniveling coward of a man. She very well may have been, but I can't really believe anything coming from the MSM PC po…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:54 PM
-4

No, I didn't, and no, I can't. If she actually was one of the very few real female soldiers who actually served, then knowing that, I honor her. Of course, my default was still to smirk because the vast majority of women in the military do not deserve anything more. If you'd like to change that, then let us campaign together against women being treated as soldiers when they're not, so that real female heroes get the honor they deserve, if they indeed do exist as you so claim. Of course, I have t…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:09 PM
-3

Um, no, I'm not going to do that. I won't write more than is necessary for comprehension. I don't cater to the simple-minded and the effeminate. But thanks for the info! If I ever decide I want to write something that's comprehensible even by the most stupid of people, where every little thing must be spelled out in minute detail so as not to confuse, I'll consider it.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:02 PM
-4

Isn't it funny how many people blindly support the military even when it's doing bad things? You people are like the Germans under Hitler. Patriotism? Ha!
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:00 PM
1

More often than not doing well in school is an exercise in conforming and cooperating, not in questioning and competing. It's the feminization of education.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 08:56 PM
-2

Yes, the truth is painful. I have the gonads to deal with it.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 08:53 PM
-2

No, I just don't like the evil that people do.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 08:52 PM
-5

NAWALT! Few women in the military actually serve. Don't expect me to give any respect to the 90% who are a drain on my tax dollars. The truth is you should be just as upset as I am about the vast majority of women in the military who don't carry their own weight. They shit on the memory of the few actual female soldiers. If it weren't for all the bad women, the few good women in the military would get a lot more respect.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 08:51 PM
2

It makes you wonder if she orchestrated this whole thing with her daughter This was obvious from the beginning. It's a clear case of a woman abusing the misandric system to her own gains. But nobody listens to crazy ol' TAB.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 08:49 PM
13

Stop using common sense! Political correctness demands it!
/r/MensRights12/11/11 08:30 PM
0

Damn right. Furthermore, true intelligence is not what gets you success in our feminized school systems, it's being a good little obedient girl.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 08:30 PM
-4

Of course the SAT favors men; men are smarter than women. “The SAT and ACT are fundamentally discriminatory,” Mr. Soares said in a phone interview last week. Well, yeah, the SAT discriminates against the stupid.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 08:15 PM
-8

I'm not so bad a guy, really! Proceeds to man-blame poor innocent guys who don't understand the system and are victimized by it by schmucks like you. Whatever it takes to soothe your conscience, scum. I could be spending my time and resources fixing the fucked up corrupt system but nah, I'd rather make money, fuck 'em all. People like you are the reason this world is shit. But don't worry, you aren't alone.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 06:20 AM
-6

Volunteered? Yeah, I wouldn't call signing up for the force because there's nothing else you can do either because you dropped out of school due to the misandric educational system or never went to college due to the misandric educational system or you graduated college and found there weren't any jobs for you. Because that's the reality, nitwit. While women have the option to sign up and get a free education with almost no risk, men have to risk their lives for the same benefits - that is if th…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 06:16 AM
-9

That's one thing I've never understood with the men's rights movement (please take no offense) - I have NEVER seen unfair treatment when it comes to custody and placement. Maybe you should spend less time making money off the misery of others and more time reading then, dipshit. It would have taken you about 5 minutes to learn why your statement is idiotic. Shouldn't you be off adding to your net worth? Shoo fly.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 05:34 AM
-10

Guess what? My female cousin is a "Marine". Basic was a cake walk for women and hell for men, by her own words. Then she works in a fucking air-conditioned office building in Afghanistan. She's a blithering idiot who can barely spell. She talked to me on Facebook from Afghanistan but it was all in capital letters, it made my brain hurt. Meanwhile her roommate in basic decided to she'd "attempt suicide" to get out of having to deploy. Meanwhile men in the military are actually fucking dying fight…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 03:37 AM
-12

Are you saying that if you go into the military as a man you get to decide your occupation without any significant loss of income? I call bullshit. Men in the military put their lives on the line. Women do not. They are almost ten times more likely to die than women. http://usmilitary.about.com/cs/joiningup/a/recruiter3_2.htm "Guaranteed" Jobs. A word about "Guaranteed Jobs." It's important that you understand what a "guaranteed job" is in the military. If you have a "guaranteed job" in your enl…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 03:29 AM
-2

However, I do have information from my own trusted sources.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 03:26 AM
0

Could you take a look at what I've got here, especially regarding lesbians since I don't have as much experience with them personally? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m96wv/my_roommate_is_a_feminist_family_law_lawyer/c2z41ip (also see subsequent comments) If you've got the time, thanks.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 03:06 AM
-1

As I said elsewhere: I admit I don't have much experience with lesbians and am utilizing the experiences of others to come to these conclusions far more than with my other conclusions. Perhaps you have information to add regarding lesbians that could be useful?
/r/MensRights12/11/11 03:05 AM
-1

Often feigned?
/r/MensRights12/11/11 03:04 AM
-5

I admit I don't have much experience with lesbians and am utilizing the experiences of others to come to these conclusions far more than with my other conclusions. I would appreciate help in this area, but I really don't think I can trust it from you. I'll pursue other avenues, thanks.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 03:03 AM
-11

You know nothing about me. Safe to say, you're totally wrong. If you have a specific comment, please share. I never said my model was perfect, and with the help of SharkSpider it is already better. edit: I admit I don't personally know many lesbians.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 02:52 AM
-1

Let me also add, based on this conversation and this I am starting to think that not only does Group D belong with Group B, but so does Group E belong with Group B, as Group E is similarly malleable in their sexuality, distinguished only by their narcissism and the specific cultural factors that contribute to their sexuality. I really appreciate your help in updating/simplifying this model.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 02:51 AM
-9

The cause of feminism at the most basic level is the jealousy of women of men's accomplishments, and a resulting loathing of men because of it. Lesbianism, for those who choose it because of feminism (Group B) rather than being destined to it (Group A), results precisely because of this loathing of men. They do not loathe men because they are lesbian, just as gay men do not loathe women because they are gay. They are lesbian because they loathe men (either because of feminism or because they wer…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 02:43 AM
-2

Make sure you read the note I added after the fact under heading #5. It's important to note that when I say gay or bi or lesbian here I mean actively gay or bi or lesbian within the fictional society I mentioned there (I have added this to the original comment). One where homosexuality is not frowned upon but societal misandry, single motherhood, and feminism are not present. I am a strong believer that people's sexuality and masculinity/femininity is based on nature. But how they act out that s…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 02:26 AM
-9

I guess simply put, a lot of lesbians are lesbian precisely because they hate men (due primarily due to societal misandry but rarely to abuse), whereas very few gay men are gay precisely because they hate women (due to abuse).
/r/MensRights12/11/11 01:38 AM
0

Correct.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 01:16 AM
-4

I wish I had some spice. I think I'll go grab a six pack of IPA from the corner store instead. That was a lot of work. :)
/r/MensRights12/11/11 01:15 AM
-10

It's a Mentat computation :P. Do I have any peer-reviewed experimental data to confirm? No, only my experience, the experiences of others, and my armchair psychology. It certainly would be an interesting experiment to perform. But of course, it won't be performed, not by an unbiased entity. In a world where delving into such topics is frowned upon by the politically correct establishment, all we're often left with is assumptions, or as my father called them, educated guesses. Call it a theory. I…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 12:52 AM
0

Very good point. Could you review my work here? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m96wv/my_roommate_is_a_feminist_family_law_lawyer/c2z41ip I'm not sure about the percentages, but I think the groups are fairly representative. Could use some improvement, perhaps.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 12:32 AM
-5

Hard to put into words. There are homosexuals who are homosexual due in large part to nurture and there are those who are homosexual primarily because of nature. Many so-called lesbians are lesbian due in large part to nurture: anti-male sentiment in our culture, from their mothers, and from the educational system. If it weren't for their hatred of men, they'd have ended up straight and happy with it. On the other hand, very few gay men are gay because they've been taught to hate women (the smal…
/r/MensRights12/11/11 12:26 AM
-10

Most lesbians have an unnatural aversion to men. I find it especially hard to believe that a lesbian feminist lawyer does not, lol.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 11:22 PM
1

Actually the better solution is to stop fucking spending money on shit we don't need. See: Ron Paul. http://ronpaul2012.com/
/r/MensRights11/11/11 11:14 PM
-10

Regendered: Man spared jail for biting a hole in his girlfriend's scrotum
/r/MensRights11/11/11 10:49 PM
-1

Perhaps that's what it means to some. :) Anyway, I will be spending the rest of my life with my woman, but I don't know that I'll ever sign the government contract. It's becoming more and more meaningless in my eyes.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 10:46 PM
-11

My roommate doesn't hate men My roommate is a feminist family law lawyer. Lol. My roommate doesn't hate men (or date them- only women.) Lol. My roommate doesn't hate men "She's the mom, and I wanted to think, of course she deserves the kids" Lol.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 10:44 PM
-2

Meaning engaged.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 10:41 PM
-9

NAWALT satisfied.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 10:41 PM
-12

By enlisting they put their lives on the line. Women do not.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 10:40 PM
-2

nope
/r/MensRights11/11/11 08:58 PM
-1

nope
/r/MensRights11/11/11 08:58 PM
-2

Yeah guys who are attractive and drive a Benz can't get laid lol. Silly mangina.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 07:36 PM
-1

lolwut Shut up and enjoy your slavery, pansy!
/r/MensRights11/11/11 07:35 PM
2

We already know what kind of person he is.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 07:34 PM
1

Things used to be a lot simpler when things like this happened. She'd get her head chopped off and society would be better for it.
/r/MensRights11/11/11 05:23 PM
-3

And here's Ron Paul's Veteran's Day money bomb: http://www.ronpaul2012.com/ Here's why military personnel love Ron Paul (also the fact that he's actually a veteran): http://www.reddit.com/r/ronpaul/comments/m83v6/if_i_could_get_everyones_attention_that_is_not_in/
/r/MensRights11/11/11 08:35 AM
1

you saw my post that was down-voted by idiots didn't you? Plenty of links on masculinity http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m63q4/am_i_missing_the_point/c2ygifn Also here's another I found today: http://mirrorofthesoul.blogspot.com/2005_03_01_archive.html#111177538268776386
/r/MensRights11/11/11 06:05 AM
-1

He has a lot of other interesting comments on that page as well. For example: If you live in the western hemisphere and most likely the rest of the world because of a thing called satellite transmissions, you live in a matriarchal society. This is probably the first time you have heard the term matriarchal or matriarchy so let me explain. A matriarchy by definition is a form of social organization in which a female is the family head and title is traced through the female line and the definition…
/r/MensRights11/11/11 05:18 AM
-1

Related: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m7ujp/bitches_aint_nothing_but_hos_and_tricks/ Oh sorry, ignatius deleted my post because he doesnt like me. Here's the content: http://mirrorofthesoul.blogspot.com/2004_03_01_archive.html Bitches ain't nothing but ho's and tricks. It is true. I have ran several experiments to prove this theory. I usually go to the cigar bar and conduct them. When I drive my Benz and style fashionablely and talk smack with women I get many numbers and slumber …
/r/MensRights11/11/11 12:23 AM
2

That's not the right question.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:53 PM
1

nope
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:50 PM
-1

Demonstration of the fact that women see men as utility objects is not fucking spam.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:28 PM
0

Shut up.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:16 PM
1

Either you're not man enough to admit when you lose an argument, or you're too stupid to realize you lost it. Either way, you just went down a few notches in my perception of you.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:50 PM
-2

http://thatlawyerdude.blogspot.com/2011/11/strong-defense-of-joe-paterno-why.html
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:33 PM
-2

nope http://thatlawyerdude.blogspot.com/2011/11/strong-defense-of-joe-paterno-why.html
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:32 PM
0

The human race... what is this... I don't even... fuck. This is basically what I think about every day.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:03 PM
0

So?
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:02 PM
0

Honestly I'm going to ignore you now since I know you're a misandrist troll.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:49 PM
1

Nope, I'm saying the proper term is alleged because of this little thing called presumption of innocence.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:38 PM
-2

People are stupid, and the media helps. Ron Paul 2012
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:25 PM
1

There are eight young male victims alleged
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:23 PM
1

Great argument. Emotion triumphs over reason. Also see: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m7j73/penn_state_students_protest_in_support_of_joepas/c2yrowi
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:22 PM
2

What I'm saying is it isn't an example of "rape culture". The media certainly is painting it that way, and the public at large would certainly like to get all up in arms about it, but that's not what it is. There is no "rape culture". This is not an example of "rape culture". If there was a cover-up - and though you cannot call what Joe did a coverup, perhaps his superiors did, I don't know enough about the case to say - if there was a cover-up, it was not "rape culture", it was for other reason…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:07 PM
0

The fact is you don't know what Joe was thinking, you don't know the situation, and you don't have the fucking right to judge, nor does anyone else. Yeah, just like with the McDonald's incident. Joe obviously knew he likely figured that my guess is Oh you're a fucking paragon of impartiality. That's the difference between you and me. I can remain rational. You let emotion cloud your judgment. You don't know the whole story. You have no right to judge. And you're contributing to societal misandry…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 06:58 PM
2

I already explained here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m7j73/penn_state_students_protest_in_support_of_joepas/c2yrf3y It's not my aberration, it's yours. Just like when I corrected you on the FRS title. I was right then too. What I have been wrong about is my tone. You know, being a dick. That hasn't changed. So excuse me if I'm being an asshole, but 1) Your position is wrong, 2) This shouldn't be in men's rights, 3) It's a sensational distraction from real issues, 4) You are lett…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 06:52 PM
1

That's why you never trust the media, especially when it comes to an accusation of sexual assault, especially a child. They're usually just stirring shit up.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 06:46 PM
1

You know what this situation reminds me of? It reminds me of the McDonald's cashier who defended himself from two women. It reminds me of all the judgmental idiots in the public who claimed that he should have stopped sooner and that he went past self-defense, the sheltered fools who have never actually been in a life-threatening situation themselves. Similarly, you have no right to judge Joe's actions. He did what was legally and morally obligated. You have no right to judge Joe Paterno. He did…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 06:40 PM
1

assistant coach is a pedo No, Joe hears an accusation that a student saw the coach abusing a child in the hallway. reports to higher ups in the school, not law enforcement. Nope. He took it to the person who is, for all intents and purposes, the police commissioner of a 256 person police force which according to the Campus website says: "(The University Police are) governed by a state statute that gives our officers the same authority as municipal police officers." People are upset that he didn'…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 06:33 PM
2

Agree, of course. It's sad to see the FRS spend time demonizing Joe when they should be focusing on the fact that the accused is automatically painted guilty, and not just guilty because of the other charges, but based solely on this one individual charge. That's what FRS should be focusing on. All this article does is feed into the politically correct bullshit, the same bullshit that says women cannot rape men. From Wikipedia: On November 7, Pennsylvania state police Commissioner Frank Noonan s…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 06:25 PM
1

I don't agree with either of you on the article. I can't help but thinking that, were the alleged victims girls or young women, he'd be singing a whole different tune You did get this right, of course. The FRS has fallen prey to the classic "what about the children" emotional appeal. After an accusation of child sex abuse, Pierce has shut down the thinking part of his brain and picked up the pitchfork, becoming nothing better than a clone of NiceGuysSTFU marching down the street for a good lynch…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 06:22 PM
-1

Paterno didn't just give his information to a superior, he turned it over to the highest ranking official in that police department. That man, PSU's VP of Business called in the ACTUAL WITNESS and spoke to him. In other words Paterno could see an investigation. Jesus Christ, Pierce, you sound like a feminist. You aren't using logic. Then, I take it, Joe realized that the grad student, who had no motive to lie, was nuts, right? Really??!! Same thing a feminist says when the police decide not to p…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 06:15 PM
-2

What is this shit doing in MR?
/r/MensRights10/11/11 06:12 PM
-1

You really need to read what I already stated. You don't see how this is the same as "All men are stupid sex fiends" or "Men are simpler than women"? I already answered this: A generalization is not sexist or wrong if it is true. How is women sleeping with as many partners as they want outside a committed relationship MR issue? Here are some links that touch on the issue. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m51rg/justin_bieber_will_take_paternity_test_and_sue/c2y7lx5 http://www.reddit.co…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:29 AM
-1

That's different. You wouldn't know because you have no use as you cannot physically bleed. You can't compare that to an interest in technology, because technology is often seen as being a male thing, not a thing only men can do and understand biologically. False. It's irrelevant whether an attribute applies to all of a group or just most of a group, the generalization is still quite valid. Yes I agree with that. But when you're dismissed your entire life it's refreshing but it doesn't cancel ou…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:06 AM
0

Luckily you got up-voted and I got down-voted, so I guess you win! And here I thought you were man enough to concede defeat.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:59 AM
-2

I condemn societal discrimination that isn't reasonable, genius. I am the only one thinking of the human race here rather than myself.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:57 AM
2

IQ != intelligence http://hereticsway.gluontheferengi.com/2011/09/29/is-iq-intelligence/ There are other points to be made. For example, it's rather silly to look at the average IQ when it's the extreme ends of the bell curve we should be looking at. Also, if someone's a genius but doesn't know anything about human nature, sociology, or psychology, his naivety will likely lead him to liberalism, especially when combined with his indoctrination. I'm more intelligent than, at a minimum, 99% of the…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:47 AM
1

IQ != intelligence http://hereticsway.gluontheferengi.com/2011/09/29/is-iq-intelligence/
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:46 AM
1

I am disrespectful to 1) those who disrespect me and 2) idiots. No cause for down-voting. But these days, feelings are more important than facts, lol.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:44 AM
1

I am disrespectful to 1) those who disrespect me and 2) idiots. No cause for down-voting. But these days, feelings are more important than facts, lol.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:43 AM
1

Be less intelligent.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:38 AM
2

You have nothing to apologize for to this misandrist cunt.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:38 AM
-4

Well put. Yet would this not apply to leftism in general?
/r/MensRights09/11/11 10:23 PM
-4

Everyone thinks they're special and unique, but I really am.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 10:12 PM
-5

Of course we disagree, you're a deluded feminist troll who's never actually debated anything here. I dislike you and pretty much everything you stand for Yes, because you dislike the truth. That's why people like you will never solve anything. You're too busy clinging to your false ideologies. You say "this is how I think things should be" while we say "this is how things are". Obviously only one statement can lead to valid solutions to the problems we face as a society. You'll keep repeating "t…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 07:28 PM
-1

See the following: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m63q4/am_i_missing_the_point/c2ygxlc
/r/MensRights09/11/11 07:28 PM
-2

The reason why you don't see lengthy discussions about masculinity and what it means to be a man is because on the list of things affecting men in this culture, those are minor issues. No, the reason is that we don't have many intellectuals here. In fact, masculinity and what it means to be a man are at the core of men's rights issues. Without understanding these, we cannot effect lasting change. This sub-reddit focuses on simple sensationalist topics, it focuses on the obvious, and rarely the u…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 07:19 PM
-6

Don't expect another period of "novel discussion and debate". A year ago, sure. But most everything has already been discussed and worked out. Now, there are very few genuine intellectuals who participate frequently here (less than 10), and very few new ideas. The real discussion takes place on manosphere blogs such as A Voice for Men.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 07:14 PM
-6

Wrong as usual. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m63q4/am_i_missing_the_point/c2ygu47
/r/MensRights09/11/11 07:09 PM
-2

It's also attention to the fact that women commit these crimes because the media / culture generally hides or obfuscates the fact that women do bad things. It is therefore quite helpful to post articles about women behaving badly to prove that, contrary to what our misandric media and culture tell us, women do terrible things quite often.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 07:09 PM
-5

This sub-reddit is mostly just a place for people to vent, whine, complain, and post frivolous, sensational stories. There are a few real MRAs here, and a few people who actually get the whole picture, and occasionally a few people here will help someone in need, but mostly this sub-reddit is full of people who don't actually want to solve the problems our society has but only wish to complain about them. There are actually a lot of people here with ideologies that run counter to men's rights, b…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 06:38 PM
-7

Ok; can we please not do things like call women whores? I'll call whores whores when they whore, thank you very much. Most western women are whores. I did not "lump all women together", I lumped most women together. PS a generalization is not sexist or wrong if it is true. Women sleeping around obviously is a men's rights issue. I've already had this discussion today, you can see it here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m51rg/justin_bieber_will_take_paternity_test_and_sue/c2y7lx5 Fur…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 09:33 AM
0

Why would you ever think feminists can help the MRM?
/r/MensRights09/11/11 09:09 AM
-4

True misogyny is extremely rare, while true misandry is ubiquitous. Also see: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m50n3/for_all_the_good_work_we_do_pointing_out_feminist/c2y5b6j http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m50n3/for_all_the_good_work_we_do_pointing_out_feminist/c2y5p76
/r/MensRights09/11/11 09:07 AM
-1

How the fuck do you know? I judge people based on what they do. Most women I've met have been sub-par when compared to most men I've met. It's just a fact. It's not surprising when I'm in a field that demands excellence, and which women are given special advantages and affirmative action in. Yes, I've met a few great women on par with the best of men, but they are extremely rare. You can also tell a lot about a person by how they look and how they act. You think people just like to be assholes? …
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:51 AM
-4

after about one good question Uh-huh, so if the guy isn't a perfect salesman, it's his God damn fault that he didn't ask the right questions in the right way so as not to offend Miss Fragile Ego. I didn't know hardware stores were just full of successful career salesman who retired from the car dealership they owned. Those bastards, just sticking it to the women whenever they get a chance! Mean old men, why do they hate women so much?
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:46 AM
-4

Why is the world so full of infant minds in the bodies of adults? Stereotypes and generalizations are fine as long as they are accurate. Do you think a hardware store employee who treats every woman who comes into the store as technically savvy until he discovers otherwise is going to do a better or worse job than one who treats every woman who comes into the store as technically naive? If 1 out of 10 women are savvy, and he can't read fucking minds, then it makes a lot of sense for him to assum…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:40 AM
-1

But let's not kid ourselves. We're either heading for an outright collapse or a severe depression, and recognizing the value of tradition can stem the flow of blood. In a few years, PUAs and MGTOWs may end up starving in the streets while traditionalists band together. When the shit hits the fan, those who are not prepared will suffer the most.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:34 AM
-7

How about considering as spam the every-other-day posts by transexuals who think they can educate us on what men's rights means? Ahem: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m4qt1/im_a_transgender_female_living_as_a_man_i_have/ Not only are these posts distractions but they are always up-voted to the top by anti-men's rights troll brigades from the very same reddits you're talking about. Look at the up-voting and down-voting in that thread and it's very obvious.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:29 AM
-7

Not necessarily. I said the word "surely". You're smart enough that I don't have to explain why this doesn't mean I'm saying I'm 100% no-doubt-about-it saying that this child has "shitty DNA", aren't you? It just means I'm pretty damned sure. a child with the shitty DNA this kid surely has And obviously, I have more data points than just the fact that she's a greedy cunt. Do I really need to go into them? Come on, think for yourself, man, you've done it before. Really? 1) Greedy cunt 2) Single m…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:16 AM
-9

Very likely. Do you deny that psychological traits/disorders are inheritable? Move along now.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:09 AM
-8

Yes, shitty DNA. What's your problem?
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:01 AM
-4

Is the fact that car insurance companies charge men more than women arbitrary? No, because it is based on statistics. Arbitrary: Based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system. If you don't understand the definition of arbitrary I really can't make you. Please use your brain next time; there's no reason I should have to waste this much time explaining simple ideas to you.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:59 AM
-1

I have to assume there's a troll brigade in this thread, organized either on Reddit or IRC. The thread has nothing to do with men's rights yet was upvoted far more than regular R/MR members would have up-voted it. Down-votes are also way too massive to be explained by R/MR members. It's also hard to believe bigcitycrows isn't just a troll, but it looks like he is just a useful idiot.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:56 AM
-1

Maybe Susie couldn't handle it because she's incompetent, you sexist fuck? Like all feminists you assume that when women don't excel it's because they're downtrodden and when men don't excel it's because they're stupid. Your whining about sexism against women is all really just a bunch of examples of sexism against men: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m56nz/til_that_men_have_privileges_over_women_strange/c2y86dn?context=3
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:44 AM
-8

And? Stereotypes and generalizations exist for a reason. Most women are not technologically savvy, nor do they want to be. When I go to the store to buy feminine products, do you think I give a fuck that as a man I don't know what the hell I'm doing and that if I ask for help I'm treated with kid gloves? NO. You're treated differently because people stereotype in order to get through life. Stop whining about it. It's only a big "downside" if you make it one because you can't handle reality. Now,…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:39 AM
-2

I never said single motherhood was the only factor. Single motherhood is actually a result of a set of policies that have led to all our problems. They are all connected.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:36 AM
1

Do you even know what a white knight is, moron?
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:35 AM
-10

Traditionalist roles aren't arbitrary, silly.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:34 AM
-7

Young people are the ones who have had to live through the pain of leftist feminism. Baby boomers were the ones who let it happen because they were ignorant of the actual effects. Young people subconsciously realize that things are fucked up, women being whores is not a good thing, and that things aren't nearly as good as they were 60 years ago. Basically, we are nearing the misandry/leftist bubble, which when it pops will lead to a much more conservative, traditionalist era.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:34 AM
-2

Leftist silliness is unsustainable and shall soon lead to a collapse and more traditionalist views.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:27 AM
-5

Basically the liberal idiots who will solve nothing vs. the conservative intellectuals who already have (most of) the answers.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 02:24 AM
-5

Single motherhood will never stop being bad for society you imbecile. Have you been paying attention to the world around you? We're heading for a civilizational collapse. Some things work for civilization and some do not. If a society got into the habit of chopping off all genitals at birth, they wouldn't get used to it in a few hundred years, they'd be fucking dead. Fuckin' idealist hippy with no concept of cause and effect or the history of civilizations that have grown and died out because of…
/r/MensRights08/11/11 10:46 PM
1

Exactamundo. None of the crap that troll said is privilege for men. I also have explanations for this one: My professors seem to have a more active interest in my success 1) Confirmation bias and/or 2) This individual feels more confident as a man (the sex he identifies as) and thus receives more attention from people who pick up on this confidence and/or 3) This individual is an obvious and/or vocal transexual and is therefore favored by folks in academia and the workplace who are either a) PC …
/r/MensRights08/11/11 10:40 PM
-7

I'm not talking about beliefs, I'm talking about facts. The social acceptance of single motherhood as a norm is harmful to civilization and bad for children.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 10:32 PM
-9

Only because we say it's bad, does it become bad, because our norms say so. LOL. Right, right, and there is no inherent benefit to a child having both a mother and father, the sexes are equal and the same, and nurture always overrides nature. NOT. Our social norms stem from our biological nature, and until we become something other than human, single motherhood will always be a terrible bane on civilization and therefore our children's well-being. And one child's or one single mother's feelings …
/r/MensRights08/11/11 10:19 PM
8

And I believe a past president of the NOW New York chapter. Today, of course, NOW and other feminists absolutely loathe Warren Farrell. It's important to note this, lest people start to think there are actually any good feminists.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 10:00 PM
-13

Bastards and unwed mothers used to be shamed for a reason: so women wouldn't have kids without fathers in the vast numbers they do today and fuck up society. Hence a good reason for the title "little shit". Also the likelihood that a kid growing up with the faulty DNA of this bitch and whatever schmuck she fucked, and also raised by that same very bitch, turning out good regardless is extremely low. My anger is not at the child but at the shitty mother who ALONE decided to have the kid and false…
/r/MensRights08/11/11 09:46 PM
1

STFU with this man-blaming shit. Would anyone go up to a girl who was raped (real rape, not drunk regret sex) and say "You stuck your pussy on crazy dick, girlfriend"? No.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 09:43 PM
-20

Shit tends to breed shit especially when raised by a single mom.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 08:48 PM
0

So what you're saying is that there isn't any misogyny on reddit. Well good, then I don't have to worry about it anymore.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 08:43 PM
9

He's not the leader of NOW, don't insult him like that hah.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 08:38 PM
0

And?
/r/MensRights08/11/11 08:24 PM
-6

Generalizing is only bad if it's wrong.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 08:17 PM
-5

Women believe that men are better than them. And it's not hard to guess why: because men are the leaders, the pioneers, the risk-takers, the scientists, the creators, the builders of civilizations. Women aren't.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 08:02 PM
-2

They got sick of the focus on homosexuality over heterosexuality and bullshit LGBT month. Nice job bad-mouthing MRAs for no gain, idiot.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 08:00 PM
-4

Please shut up. There is no backlash against FTM transexuals here. There is backlash against sadistic fucks who are trying to fuck people without telling them and making it dangerous for all transexuals and people like you who constantly want to play the victim when you're not.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 07:57 PM
-3

Yep. And the reason feminism was possible in the first place was because of women's tendency to be jealous. They were jealous of men because men are better than women, not because men had it better.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 07:50 PM
-5

Women, many women, dare I say most women, tend to be envious over every little thing, and covetous over anything they perceive to be better than what they have. Which is why feminism caught on in the first place. Women knew men were better than them, and they were jealous. No, men did not have it better, they simply were better.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 07:49 PM
-5

And that's what I meant with my post too, good comment.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 07:42 PM
-4

That reminds me of feminists who say discrimination against men is really "benevolent sexism" against women. Mmhm, and the difference is that women are responding to imaginary problems, and men are responding to REAL problems. Call it "misogynistic" if you like, but that doesn't make it wrong. This so-called "misogyny" is NECESSARY to make people understand that misandry is NOT okay. In the long run, it is a good thing. some of that is a reaction against misandry All of it.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 07:38 PM
-17

there does seem to be a lot of misogyny on reddit. No, there doesn't. Most supposed "misogyny" is merely a logical reaction to women's true behavior. Misandry on the other hand is an illogical reaction to false claims about men's behavior. Misandry demonizes men for being something they are not. Most "misogyny" merely calls out women for how they truly behave or is a totally acceptable reaction to misandry. When you see "misogyny" on reddit, what you're really seeing is men's reaction to misandr…
/r/MensRights08/11/11 06:26 PM
8

Good luck.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 06:19 PM
1

I don't see anything wrong with it OR with your proposal. Males today are weenies and females today are whores.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 06:16 PM
-16

Typical BS. Standards are...higher in a good way. How stupid do you have to be to think that the fact that man actually have to be competent to be respected, whereas women are given respect even when they're incompetent so as not to hurt their feelings, as a privilege? That makes about as much sense as believing that homeless men are privileged because the standards for men are higher.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 06:01 PM
-28

The typical BS, it seems: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m4qt1/im_a_transgender_female_living_as_a_man_i_have/c2y31fq?context=3
/r/MensRights08/11/11 06:01 PM
-29

Men have no privileges due to their sex. See also: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m4qt1/im_a_transgender_female_living_as_a_man_i_have/c2y50h5
/r/MensRights08/11/11 05:58 PM
-42

being a lady had its downsides as well There is no downside to being a woman other than bleeding out each month. Some women will of course complain that "men don't respect them as much at work" or some such, but that's only because they're not competent, and don't deserve respect. Women who are competent don't have that problem.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 05:57 PM
3

you can't control her, her moods or her actions Well actually you can, but only if you go outside of the corruption of the legal system.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 05:26 AM
-4

You're in a relationship with a single mom with two kids, wahahaha.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 02:44 AM
-1

Ames Straw Poll significance from Wikipedia: As a straw poll, the Ames Straw Poll's results are non-binding and have no official effect on the presidential primaries. However, the straw poll is frequently seen as a first test of organizational strength in Iowa by the news media and party insiders. As such, it can become very beneficial for the winning candidate on the national level because it builds momentum for their campaign, enhances their aura of inevitability, and shows off a superior fiel…
/r/MensRights07/11/11 11:49 PM
-4

Stupid comment of the day.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 11:32 PM
1

Ron Paul continues to win in the polls. For example: http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2011/11/06/ron-paul-wins-first-place-in-2012-illinois-republican-pre-presidential-straw-poll/ Even when he was a close second to Michelle Bachmann in the Ames Straw Poll he was ignored. Do you believe everything the media tells you? Sadly, the only person to cover Paul's defacto tie for first (152 behind) in Iowa was a comedian. It's really, really funny though ... even if it is Jon Stewart. You'll get a kick out of …
/r/MensRights07/11/11 11:30 PM
1

So you're saying that only articles that specifically state why they are a men's rights issue are allowed to be posted here? You might want to create submission guidelines if that's your new position, because 99% of the articles here would no longer be valid submissions. PS, the men's rights movement is not just about "rights".
/r/MensRights07/11/11 10:11 PM
0

That is my problem with it, too. Thanks for elaborating.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 09:19 PM
1

A PUA claiming something is offensive? Please, grow a thicker skin. PUAs rate women's looks with numbers, you don't have a leg to stand on. Please spare me the "fatphobia" propaganda that shames men into pretending like they don't care when a woman is obese. The whole point of PUA is to have sex with good looking girls. Something tells me the goal of most PUAs is not to bang fatties, because they don't need PUA to do that. Bettering oneself by not banging fat chicks just to get your rocks off is…
/r/seduction07/11/11 08:39 PM
0

Yes it does. From "What is r/MensRights": The men's rights movement is just a collection of people who are tired of being taken advantage of, taken for granted, and lied to. Men are told that they're "fatphobic" if they don't want to bang fatties. And they are taken advantage of when they bang a fatty because they settle. One way men can stop being taken advantage of is to better themselves so they do not have to be reduced to banging fatties: either by banging a hottie or by remaining celibate.…
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:34 PM
0

Lol that's true, actually. They're all bought and paid for by the establishment and none of them actually talk about the real issues. That's why, even if you plan on voting for Obama, you should vote for Ron Paul in the Republican primaries, because at least he will make sure that the real issues are discussed: http://bluerepublican.us/
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:25 PM
2

Big government is not about protecting people. The reality is that human nature is the real problem, people's selfishness, a natural consequence of evolving in a competitive environment. So people employed by the government have a tendency to screw over everyone else and find excuses to remain employed and expand government to make more money. Therefore a method is needed to ensure that human nature is controlled. You know, like the constitution which we've thrown under the rug?
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:23 PM
1

They already did, and it's silly for the same reasons.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:20 PM
1

Joke or no joke it's grossly offensive. No, it's really not. Don't get your leftist panties in a bunch lol. Leftists just love acting all offended when someone says anything - a form of PC censorship. It's pathetic, and coming from you it's actually rather laughable. You say some of the most fucked up shit of any MRA on your blog, yet I still post it because people who are easily offended are stupid. You're a hypocrite. Also I never said leftists should be killed.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:17 PM
0

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/10/30/the-greater-good.aspx
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:12 PM
-4

I am a PhD candidate who doesn't know jack squat about the HPV vaccine and therefore is not qualified to discuss the adverse effects, a simple peon who's good at regurgitating what he's been told. Here's a real doctor's assessment of the HPV vaccine: http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/10/30/the-greater-good.aspx
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:11 PM
-8

Lol and this is what happens when you have a country that is so in love with political correctness and women's narcissism that they would actually consider this.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:06 PM
-1

I wouldn't vote for him either, he's an idiot. Hopefully it makes the fact that Ron Paul is the true front runner a little harder for the media to hide, but my guess is they will just use Cain's fall as an excuse to further promote Mitt Romney in his place to ensure Ron Paul's defeat.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:05 PM
4

Sexual harassment does not exist. There's just sexual assault and there's just harassment. The only reason there's a separate category is to further demonize men as sexual perverts and make women victims. The definition of sexual harassment is basically "any time a woman feels uncomfortable for any reason at all" - it's utter bullshit.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:01 PM
-3

None of their accusations are legitimate or relevant to his campaign.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 07:59 PM
-1

The truth is that a very few slutty males spread disease, while a great deal of slutty women do. Women also are more susceptible to STDs. It is women who are most responsible for spreading disease.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 07:51 PM
1

Indeed, the HPV vaccine is more dangerous than helpful. Merck used bad methodology in its pre-licensure safety studies that did NOT contain a true placebo. In reporting systemic adverse reactions to the vaccine, instead of using a true placebo that is not reactive on its own, Merck used a vaccine component (aluminum) in what they called the "placebo." Aluminum can cause inflammation in the body and can make your blood brain barrier more permeable, allowing toxins to pass into your brain and caus…
/r/MensRights07/11/11 07:47 PM
-2

Interesting. Though regardless of the fella's motivations or sexual interests, the quotation holds some insight into the female psyche.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:03 AM
2

Rebuttal of the lie that Ron Paul does not believe in evolution: http://www.reddit.com/r/ronpaul/comments/hzdu3/ron_paul_fact_posts_share_your_posts_that_you_use/c1zmc0v
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:01 AM
-1

It depends, and of course there's nature and nurture. The girl is likely to have mommy's narcissistic tendencies in her DNA. If she spent a lot of time around her, which it seems she probably spent at least 18 years, she's likely to have taken on her mom's personality. Also, she is a girl, and less likely to rebel against whatever she is indoctrinated into. Yes, we know there are some MRAs who had an evil feminist mother and ended up rebelling against her, but plenty of others just bought into t…
/r/MensRights07/11/11 08:00 AM
-1

Relevant due to previous discussions about having a black history month here at R/MR.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 07:54 AM
-1

Ha.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 07:49 AM
0

Oh please, who are you trying to convince?
/r/MensRights07/11/11 05:04 AM
2

Thanks, I'm not concerned.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 05:03 AM
2

Anyone willing to go on name-calling Ron Paul without actually making an argument is a pawn of the establishment and thus is no champion of liberty. But yes, yes, move along and do what the bought-and-paid-for media tells you to, silly pawn. Ron Paul is crazy and eats babies.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 05:02 AM
1

thinking Ron Paul is the messiah I don't. Why is it you leftists always resort to strawman arguments and seething hatred? You have no argument and no self-control. You're so angry, and I'm not sure what you're angry about. I'll be the first to admit that many in the right are just as guilty as those in the left. Do you know why I mentioned leftists specifically in my original comment? It's because leftists cannot take a joke. Leftists here continue to claim the high ground, yet any time someone …
/r/MensRights07/11/11 04:58 AM
-2

Yes, yes, dismiss Ron Paul as crazy so you don't actually have to make an argument. It's nothing new for folks like you who hate liberty.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 12:54 AM
1

A search for Ron Paul VAWA turns up a video where he states the federal government shouldn't be involved in it at all, indeed.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 12:34 AM
1

Big government is both a symptom and a contributing cause. There is a correlation between big government and institutionalized misandry. With smaller government comes a focus on the family rather than reliance on the government as a substitute husband. You're right that these things do not exist in a vacuum. For example, with women's suffrage comes big government.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 12:30 AM
4

Yes, yes, new generations always think they're so much more enlightened than previous generations. It's a form of hubris that has resulted in the death of civilizations countless times throughout history.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 12:24 AM
0

Leftists really do seem to have a habit of running away from a discussion, it's almost as if they know themselves that they can't support their beliefs. Disappointing, my man. I thought you were better than that.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 12:06 AM
7

Not better than Ron Paul. A vote for Obama or an establishment Republican is really no vote at all. Fully explained here: http://www.ronpaul2012.com/2011/10/23/ron-paul-explains-conservatism-on-meet-the-press/ If you don't watch any other Ron Paul video, watch this one.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 11:07 AM
12

Not joking. Ron Paul's the only politician that isn't bought and paid for by the establishment that will continue exactly what we have had for the last... several decades. A vote for Mitt Romney or Hermie Cain or Barack Obama is a vote for exactly the same. A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for the constitution. Also see: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m2a8x/im_not_voting_for_obama_because_he_whored_himself/c2xhtas
/r/MensRights06/11/11 11:06 AM
13

Either she is a rapist or she is a false accuser of paternity - either way it's a men's rights issue, and the response of the media is also quite relevant. She should be in jail either way, and the fact that she is not is proof of the misandry in this country.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 11:03 AM
32

No big presidential candidates are MRAs. I've heard some mention of Gary Johnson as being favorable to men's rights, but he's not really a candidate. Ron Paul is the only one with a chance in hell who would actually put an end to wasteful government spending, which is detrimental to men's rights. Every other candidate will just continue along the path we're headed. The truth is that without ending big government leftism, you really can't end legalized misandry. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights…
/r/MensRights06/11/11 11:00 AM
8

The lesser of all evils: Ron Paul.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 10:59 AM
4

You do realize the girlfriend will end up just like her mom, right?
/r/MensRights06/11/11 10:57 AM
1

I'm not a conservative, I'm a realist. If you'd like to discuss it sometime, let me know, though seeing as you're quick - as many leftists are - to resort to name calling, I am a little doubtful that you'll play fair. If you aren't willing to see the connection between leftism and feminism, though, you're just in denial. I can link you to previous discussions if you like. But if you're like OThomson and ignatiusloyola whose self-worth is tied to their belief in their leftist ideology, I won't bo…
/r/MensRights06/11/11 09:57 AM
0

It was an excuse to post it, nothing more.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 09:54 AM
-5

1) She got beaten by her dad for stealing. Not my business. Why should I care? Maybe she should listen to her father next time. 2) She's a narcissistic bitch who complains when she doesn't get what she wants. Again, why should I care? 3) The promotion of this video is just another example of society's willingness to demonize fathers as abusers while they shy away from examples where women abuse children, especially boys. 4) Most likely this judge was actually the sort that isn't extremely bigote…
/r/MensRights06/11/11 09:49 AM
1

I provided a direct quote and then highlighted the point you were making. As you well know, I never made the point you claim I did. Anyway, I'm done with you.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 09:42 AM
8

barbadosslim is merely trying to incite another trollfest. If I respond to his question, it devolves into more bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 12:22 AM
1

If people learned that treating men like shit resulted in death, they wouldn't be so willing. But yes, I am being a bit facetious.
/r/MensRights06/11/11 12:20 AM
2

Not wanting to have sex with men makes you a homophobe. Amazing isn't it?
/r/MensRights06/11/11 12:15 AM
1

shut up
/r/MensRights06/11/11 12:14 AM
1

Translation Interesting that you continue to feel the need to twist my words rather than actually showing how my words are supposedly "anti-gay". You see, I know a little bit about homosexuality and heterosexuality, and apparently a lot more than you do. There are a lot of boys who naturally would be a lot happier as masculine rather than feminine, and a few boys who would naturally be a lot happier as feminine rather than masculine. There are also a lot of boys who naturally would be a lot happ…
/r/MensRights06/11/11 12:09 AM
-1

And we agree again, phlake. You did a good job here too: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lx5pi/family_law_judge_beats_own_daughter_for_using_the/ You seem like you might be kinda bright. If only you didn't say stupid things like this: Pure meritocracy is a utopian illusion, and the systematic discrimination that you personally feel is everything that you deserve. You merit nothing better. Every few years, your type finds a new messiah to hype like this. Seeya in a few years when you'…
/r/MensRights05/11/11 11:56 PM
2

What he did was wrong but apparently she only reported it because he threatened to stop paying for everything and take away her mercedes Well duh, anyone with half a brain could have told us she had ulterior motives, but there are a lot of idiots here at R/MR who posted and up-voted the other posts about this. So what I'm saying is thanks and hopefully the idiots will stop posting about it, perpetuating into misandric stereotypes about men as abusers and women as innocent victims (which this bit…
/r/MensRights05/11/11 11:50 PM
-4

Yes. He has a penis.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 11:49 PM
-5

Well if I had control of every man we wouldn't have this problem in the first place. Anyway, if all men rebelled and killed all leftist, misandrist, feminists, that'd put a pretty big dent in the problems we have. :P Of course, human nature would take over again and in due time we'd be a gynocracy once again. A lasting solution would have to factor in human nature.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 11:42 PM
1

...according to your bullshit, gays should be kept in the closet because THEY MIGHT INFECT STRAIGHTS WITH TEH GAYSSSS!!! Um, nope, I never said that. It's easy to twist my words and argue against your straw man, but it doesn't change that nothing I said was anti-gay in the least. I merely stated that promotion of homosexuality over heterosexuality hurts a lot of boys. I could also state that promotion of heterosexuality over homosexuality hurts a few boys, which is exactly what a gay rights acti…
/r/MensRights05/11/11 11:30 PM
1

you're a Ron Paul supporter and have tried to use r/MR to spread his shit. I've posted a few informative articles about the only presidential candidate that would actually stem the tide of misandry through his policies, yes. I wouldn't call Ron Paul's message "shit". And like I said, I'm not "right wing". Furthermore, I haven't posted any "anti-gay shit" or "white nationalist shit" here. I have occasionally posted an article from sites run by white nationalists that have to do with men's rights.…
/r/MensRights05/11/11 10:59 PM
-1

I'm not scared of dykes... or Justin Beiber.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 07:58 PM
1

We actually agree on a lot, you just happen to be wrong about socialism.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 07:58 PM
1

Apparently I'm a rather conflicted right-wing white nationalist homophobe, seeing as I'm libertarian, engaged to a black woman, and just spent the last two days entertaining two gay friends and partying at gay clubs.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 07:56 PM
0

Apparently I'm a rather conflicted right-wing white nationalist homophobe, seeing as I'm libertarian, engaged to a black woman, and just spent the last two days entertaining two gay friends and partying at gay clubs.
/r/MensRights05/11/11 07:56 PM
-2

I don't really see it as a problem, so why should we "fix" a problem that doesn't exist? The real effect of such a policy would be to prevent newcomers who would like to contribute or need our help from posting at all. And even if there were a problem, the voting system easily takes care of it. The OP's true goal is to inhibit discussion that does not appeal to the mainstream view.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 06:30 AM
0

It was roleplay. Obviously. She set him up and recorded it, probably in order to get a leg up in divorce and/or a child custody battle, or maybe just because she wanted him to suffer. She wasn't actually forced to do anything.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 06:08 AM
-4

The OP is a feminist, leftist troll who loves censorship. Be wary.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 06:07 AM
-8

You're a feminist troll, no thank you. We don't need your leftism censorship here at R/MR, where you'd absolutely love to make it harder for anyone who disagrees with your viewpoints to say so.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 06:01 AM
-1

Actually, no, misandrists like you ruin it for the rest of us. STFU.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 06:00 AM
1

Except that the men in those situations actually were raped, whereas this woman framed an innocent man.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:03 AM
0

It's not an atrocity, she's a liar who got a guy sentenced to prison based on that lie. That's the atrocity. She's quite evil.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 04:03 AM
1

Six years for "forced oral copulation" with a woman's HUSBAND? Fucking ridiculous. This woman's a false rape accuser, too. Manipulative cunt who clearly framed an innocent man.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 03:59 AM
2

And you are right to trust your own conclusions over ones that do not fit. Related: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lqwd3/the_hpv_vaccine_is_now_approved_for_men_26_and/c2w06kh?context=3 What else am I to do? If I relied on the mainstream to tell me what's what, I would think "men's rights" is what Wikipedia says it is, and I would think that feminism is all about equal rights for women. No, I think I'll trust my own conclusions based on the data I have available, evaluating all pers…
/r/MensRights03/11/11 03:48 AM
-3

mangina
/r/MensRights03/11/11 03:27 AM
1

Has nothing to do with men's rights, and it's from a known misandrist.
/r/MensRights03/11/11 03:26 AM
1

The article previously contained a picture of a woman and her tits.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 02:33 AM
0

Regarding how dangerous the HPV vaccine is, I'm comparing the probabilities and coming to a conclusion based on the data I have available. Would you rather I simply place my faith in research done by those with clear biases? No thank you, that hasn't turned out well in the past - which is just another piece of data pointing to the only conclusion that can be made. Combine that with the government's past history of corruption, with Merck and other pharmaceutical companies' past history of corrupt…
/r/MensRights01/11/11 01:25 AM
1

Men and women are not equal.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 01:23 AM
2

It's safe for work now.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 06:44 PM
1

Actually the IQ test is gender-biased to ensure that women and men get average scores that are on par. IQ tests that aren't gender-biased show men having an average IQ at least 5 points higher.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 05:58 PM
6

Wiping is too much work, cut off a piece of his genitalia!
/r/MensRights31/10/11 05:26 AM
-2

There's no such thing as sexual harassment. There's just harassment and there's sexual assault. It seems you've been the victim of both.
/r/MensRights31/10/11 05:23 AM
1

Summa cum laude engineer.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 06:10 AM
0

No shit, so why would I take an expensive and unnecessary vaccine with unknown and very possibly dangerous long-term side effects? That's right, I wouldn't.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 06:09 AM
2

You may also find my comment here interesting: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lt7a0/feministmras_fmras_are_men_who_want_to_adopt_the/c2vhmqk?context=3
/r/MensRights29/10/11 10:18 PM
2

Well there are still plenty of people who will read R/MR who doubt that men really have anything to complain about in the first place, so it's important to keep pointing out that indeed, misandry is ubiquitous in our society. You also make the mistake of confusing R/MR with an activist site. R/MR is more 1) a place for people to whine, 2) a place for a few actual intellectuals occasionally to discuss and educate, 3) a way to link to genuine men's rights activist websites. With R/MR as it current…
/r/MensRights29/10/11 10:09 PM
4

Women aren't responsible for anything, duh.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 10:17 AM
2

This is an excellent post, but you should realize that it's ridiculous to call men who do not want children and cannot support them "scum" in the context of a society that celebrates single motherhood and demonizes fathers. If we lived in a society where women were actually held accountable, sure, it might make sense to hold men accountable too. But today, we do not live in such a society.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 10:11 AM
-7

You can thank feminism for this, as usual. If boys didn't have fathers pushed out of their lives so often, it would be much rarer that they'd do do this kind of shit.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 10:01 AM
2

So is ignatiusloyola.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 07:31 AM
2

ignatiusloyola doesn't like me because I'm not a leftist idiot (and he is). Same reason a lot of other people don't like me. And AnnArchist is a follower, so he listens to what ignatius tells him. It's that simple. Ignatius doesn't like me because I call him on his bullshit and tell people like it is, and he hates hearing the truth when it conflicts with his ideology. AnnArchist doesn't like me because Ignatius is whispering in his ear that I'm the bad guy, and AA is a bit gullible. Ignatius has…
/r/MensRights29/10/11 06:32 AM
-1

I cannot prove that water is not harmful. LOL you're a mental giant. Here's how you prove it: Don't drink water for a month and see what happens. Retard.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 06:30 AM
0

Where's the evidence, eh? Where are these so-called troll posts of mine? Why don't you list the names of the people accusing me of being a troll? I suspect they're mostly misandrists and other politically correct clowns who contribute far less than I do here. Where's the meat? Where's the substance? You can't even explain why my original post is "trolling". If you have nothing logical to say, why not just admit you don't like me and that's why you harass me? If you think your bullying attempts a…
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:39 PM
0

What are you talking about? A couple of mods trolling me, you're the ones "stirring up controversy".
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:25 PM
0

Please inform me how my original post is trolling. All I see is a couple mods trolling my post and detracting from the message. Sure, it's a lighthearted post, but it's not trolling. Don't you guys have anything better to do than harass contributors? If I'm on "thin ice" it's because you, and people like you, disagree with me on certain topics, and you don't like it. Then you come into my thread, falsely accuse me of trolling, and insinuate that you're pondering banning me. It's not like this is…
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:24 PM
0

Do you have something to say? Learn appropriate times to use your mod tag. If anyone's trolling, it's you.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 07:56 PM
0

it is a good step forward for public health That's a really stupid thing to say. Ingesting fluoride has no benefit for teeth but does lower IQ and cause other health problems.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 06:58 PM
-3

HPV is not a serious threat. If you want to limit the effects of HPV, then end feminism so women aren't such sluts, spreading disease. there are a lot of highly contagious, airborne childhood illnesses out there that were essentially gone, but we're now starting to see outbreaks and minor epidemics of, because of the idiots who think the vaccines are more dangerous than the actual diseases Oh, yeah, I'm shakin' in my bootsies. Did you know that human beings have an immune system and develop thei…
/r/MensRights28/10/11 06:39 PM
-5

Men are better leaders and creators. If women ruled the world we'd still be in grass huts.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 06:03 PM
-2

Oh yeah, I'm super-duper worried about any child of mine dying from HPV what with the 1 in 50,000 chance, oh deary me. Totally worth the hundreds of dollars and vaccine side effects that could be life-threatening. Yeah, really, HPV is such a huge concern for me. Or maybe I'd just tell the kid not to sleep with sluts, it's free and far safer.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 06:00 AM
0

Indeed, women really haven't changed all that much, they've always been adept at using men like appliances.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 05:57 AM
0

The truth is mammograms cause cancer. It's just another profit scheme. Manual breast examination is just as effective and safer, but how would anyone profit from that? It's a lot like the HPV vaccine.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 05:50 AM
1

just because the medical establishment endorses a public health measure, that doesn't mean it's safe. In the case of water fluoridation, the chemicals used to fluoridate the water that more than 180 million people drink each day are not pharmaceutical grade, but rather hazardous waste products of the phosphate fertilizer industry; it is illegal to dump them into rivers and lakes or release them into the atmosphere. And water fluoridation is a prime example of one of the worst medical practices p…
/r/MensRights28/10/11 03:43 AM
-1

Really? I don't think so. Yet you deleted them. Weird. Bye bye, cowardly little sheep.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 03:41 AM
1

"We came from Caladan--a paradise world for our form of life. There existed no need on Caladan to build a physical paradise or a paradise of the mind--we could see the actuality all around us. And the price we paid was the price men have always paid for achieving a paradise in this life--we went soft, we lost our edge." - from "Muad'Dib: Conversations" by the Princess Irulan
/r/MensRights28/10/11 03:09 AM
-1

Which proves my point.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 03:00 AM
-2

The only people doing damage are the fools promoting unnecessary and harmful vaccinations that have already killed people and now will kill and cripple plenty of innocent children.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 02:58 AM
1

Am I?
/r/MensRights28/10/11 02:58 AM
0

You're really condescending in arguments, eh? I hate it when people do that. Whaddayaknow, me too! Now if you hadn't deleted your previous condescending and stupid comments here, I could show you exactly what I mean: You're really condescending in arguments, eh? I hate it when people do that. It isn't conducive to progress.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 02:57 AM
1

This is true.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 02:56 AM
-3

Interesting. Safety may also be at stake. The researchers suggest that cars, too, should alter the sensitivity of their brake pedals, depending on whether a man or woman is driving. At the very least, by raising awareness about the limits to human reaction times, the study might offer just another reason to exercise excess caution on the road. Better not to let women drive at all IMO. Women's slower reaction time and lesser ability to pay attention to what's going on make them a hazard on the ro…
/r/MensRights28/10/11 12:49 AM
1

No study has shown long-term safety for this vaccine.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 12:47 AM
-1

All bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 12:46 AM
1

Do you have a point?
/r/MensRights28/10/11 12:45 AM
-2

There is a huge pro-unnecessary vaccination craze going on right now. Rest assured, it's largely unfounded, anti-intellectual bullshit, a mere profit scheme for big pharma.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 12:45 AM
-4

Gardasil has not been proven safe or necessary, and therefore you're playing a game of Russian Roulette if you or your children take it.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 10:01 PM
0

Not the long-term safety, genius.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 10:00 PM
-5

Not relevant. Stop playing games. And it's you who are spewing logical fallacies. I'll just state again the point of my whole argument: The HPV vaccine has not been proven safe, and it definitely is unnecessary. And therefore it's rather foolish to take it. That's about all I have to say on the matter. You can continue trying to make the argument about something else if you like, silly. But you'll never prove to me that the vaccine is safe or that it is necessary. Until you can do so, why don't …
/r/MensRights27/10/11 09:54 PM
0

Haha, yes, fees that pharmaceutical companies pay to get drugs approved. What? A motivation for the FDA to approve and promote harmful drugs? No way! Bye now.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 09:53 PM
-2

Haha, by the way, seeing as HPV is rarely serious, and can entirely be avoided through choosing appropriate sexual partners, I'm pretty sure any children I have will be just dandy without Gardasil, a vaccine with unknown long-term side effects that isn't even 100% effective in preventing HPV strains that cause cancer.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 09:51 PM
-8

I don't need an argument, it's the responsibility of pro-HPV vaccine wingnuts to prove that the drug is safe and necessary. They cannot do either.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 09:42 PM
-6

Um, no. There's plenty of information showing the HPV vaccine is dangerous. But as a courtesy you, I showed you why it isn't really even relevant. Even if I were somehow wrong that evidence shows the vaccine is dangerous, despite all the evidence to the contrary that can be found with an easy Google search, you still can't prove to me that it's not dangerous in the long term, which is my point. If I "moved a goal post" it's because defending the position wasn't relevant to whether the vaccine is…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 09:38 PM
-3

And your children will suffer an early death from an unnecessary and costly drug. Have fun, clown.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 09:35 PM
-1

http://www.fda.gov/aboutfda/reportsmanualsforms/reports/budgetreports/ucm153154.htm User Fees: The FDA budget proposes $828 million in industry user fees, an increase of $215 million compared to FY 2009, including $141 million in proposed new user fees. You don't even appear to grasp what a budget is, lol. I bolded the relevant information to help you, simpleton. You're stupid. Wait, I forgot my exclamation points. Jesus H. Tapdancing Christ, you're stupid!!! The Prescription Drug User Fee Act (…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 09:31 PM
-5

Why are you posting irrelevant things? 1) The long-term effects of Gardasil have not been studied. 2) The occurrence of HPV cancers is too low to make a vaccine worth taking, and it doesn't even prevent all HPV-induced cancers. So as I've already stated, the HPV vaccine is not only ineffective and unnecessary, but we don't know the long term side effects. I don't particularly feel like being a guinea pig in Merck's profit scheme, but you go right ahead and participate and give it to your childre…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 09:29 PM
-3

You've gotta fucking provide sources for claims like that, dipshit. No I don't. But thanks for providing one for me!
/r/MensRights27/10/11 09:24 PM
-3

Oh please, I won't fall for your trap. If I post links, you'll claim they aren't good enough, they don't matter, they're biased, whatever is convenient. If I don't post links, you'll claim I have no evidence to back up my assertions. It's this simple. Anyone who's actually interested in the facts can do an easy little Google search and find out the details for themselves. I provided more than enough information so that anyone truly interested can do the research themselves. You'd prefer that we …
/r/MensRights27/10/11 09:18 PM
1

True dat. You'll like this article: http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2011/10/26/virtual-disconnection/
/r/MensRights27/10/11 08:53 PM
-4

Hey, remember that thing that goes something along the lines of First, do no harm? Maybe that's something to think about when we rush into pushing unnecessary vaccines on people without actually having any idea as to the long term side effects. So no, it's not my responsibility to prove to you that the HPV vaccine does harm, it's the responsibility of those pushing the vaccine to prove that it does NOT: And they have not done so, not even close. The vaccine has seriously injured and killed many,…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 08:52 PM
-6

Hey, remember that thing that goes something along the lines of First, do no harm? Maybe that's something to think about when we rush into pushing unnecessary vaccines on people without actually having any idea as to the long term side effects. So no, it's not my responsibility to prove to you that the HPV vaccine does harm, it's the responsibility of those pushing the vaccine to prove that it does NOT: And they have not done so, not even close. The vaccine has seriously injured and killed many,…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 08:48 PM
0

Most doctors these days can't seem to follow a simple statement: First, do no harm. It's all $$$ for these swine.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 08:46 PM
-8

government scientists The government and big pharma are already in collusion, with the FDA and CDC ensuring that dangerous drugs and vaccines stay on the market. Government scientists would be no better. Other than that, spot on. The truth is that most "doctors" like Jadis are just in it for the money and don't give a fuck about the facts. Even a pharmacist can't do their fucking job right and warn someone that certain drugs are known to cause permanent side effects.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 08:41 PM
-4

Hey, remember that little thing that goes "First, do no harm"? Maybe you should follow it. Another way to state it is that "given an existing problem, it may be better not to do something, or even to do nothing, than to risk causing more harm than good." No? You'd rather follow the common mantra of doctors today, which is "First, make as much money as possible no matter how much I hurt people"? Great for you. Go fill your pockets from the suffering of others. Go fill a Lipitor prescription, you …
/r/MensRights27/10/11 08:39 PM
-11

Straw man because you have no actual argument.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:42 PM
-9

Lol, oh I see, so the people who died or were crippled were at fault for not notifying their doctor that they were allergic to the vaccine their doctors gave them. They should have known better. And the children who die or are crippled from this vaccine, well, they should have known better. Gotcha. At least the pharmaceutical companies can keep making money, though. And no, I won't shut up, because I'm not the kind of person who enjoys seeing corporations profit off the death and misery of child…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:39 PM
-11

As long as people keep posting about the HPV vaccine, I'll keep posting about its dangers. The costs and unknowns (death, disability, chronic pain, cancer, sterility) of the HPV vaccine far outweigh the potential benefits (preventing some cancers that rarely are caused by HPV in healthy adults). Don't get it, and definitely do not let your children get it. The vaccine does not protect against all strains of HPV that can cause cancer, has already killed and maimed plenty of people, includes ingre…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:37 PM
-2

Already told you: end your cognitive dissonance regarding your silly leftist utopia and you won't be so depressed. Get out there and get in touch with nature like human beings were meant to do. Feel the grass beneath your feet. Your leftist dystopia sucks. Your body knows it.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:20 PM
-7

It's not a claim, it's a fact that this drug has many potential serious side-effects, including death and lasting disability.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:12 PM
-15

Yes, it's a great idea to give an unnecessary drug with unknown long-term side effects that has killed and maimed people to children.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:10 PM
-12

As long as people keep posting about the HPV vaccine, I'll keep posting about its dangers. The costs and unknowns (death, disability, chronic pain, cancer, sterility) of the HPV vaccine far outweigh the potential benefits (preventing some cancers that rarely are caused by HPV in healthy adults). Don't get it, and definitely do not let your children get it. The vaccine does not protect against all strains of HPV that can cause cancer, has already killed and maimed plenty of people, includes ingre…
/r/MensRights27/10/11 05:36 PM
3

I've had an argument with Othomson before where he actually stated that if society can't survive his magical leftist utopian dream, then we might as well just all die off. That's how badly these idiot leftists cling to their ideology.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:27 AM
2

ignatius is a child clinging to his silly ideology no matter what facts are presented. He's a typical dogmatic leftist. The funny thing is, he claims to actually care about men's rights, even though leftism is the enemy of men's rights. ignatius frequently harasses anyone who calls him on his cognitive dissonance, just as he did you. But just remember, he's a great guy who really cares about people (nevermind that his ignorant belief system results in so much pain and suffering for people).
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:24 AM
2

The sad thing is that the lefties here (ignatiusloyola, ztakn, OThomson being among the worst) never learn. You could show them facts over and over and over again, yet they will not budge, instead clinging to their ideology no matter what. It's sad because leftism is the true enemy to men's rights, and these people actually think they're helping. Worse, even though ztakn is apparently depressed, he won't even acknowledge that it's precisely because of leftist policies that he is depressed.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 06:23 AM
-6

My intention was that the stereotypical evil man controlling everything in a woman's life and beating her senseless type of "domestic violence" that you see on Lifetime is very rare. It's feminist baloney. This is what actual "domestic violence" usually looks like: http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/how-to-slap-your-way-to-slavery/
/r/MensRights26/10/11 11:31 PM
-2

Um, yeah, women initiate 70% of domestic violence. Most domestic violence coming from men is merely a reaction to violence that women initiate. And that doesn't even include women's emotional abuse to egg men on until they hit them and then use that as a further method of control. See: http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/how-to-slap-your-way-to-slavery/ What's crazy is the truth: That women are the primary abusers. And no, I'm no expert about the psychology of abusive relationships, but Dr. Tara Pal…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 11:20 PM
-7

Women like this who kill a man in cold blood stay because they choose to stay, not because they're "afraid". And they choose to stay because they are just as abusive themselves, if not the primary abusers.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 09:53 PM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 09:25 PM
-17

The intent was to allow women another get out of jail free card. Because usually, the abuser threatens to hunt you down and kill you if you try to run away or tell anyone. Feminist bullshit, just like Battered Woman Syndrome. Women who are actually abused (very rare) have plenty of ways to get out of it that don't involve murdering someone or harm to themselves. Men who are abused, however, do not.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 09:21 PM
0

Truth. I don't like being lied to, and I like being fooled even less.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 09:19 PM
3

Who cares?
/r/MensRights26/10/11 09:09 PM
2

The truth is men in this society are demonized so fully that a lot of men start to believe they really are the bad ones who can do nothing right. Instead of taking out their vengeance on the court system and evil women, they kill themselves. It's actually very similar to why gay boys commit suicide more often: because they are more likely to be ostracized, to feel unwanted and disposable, just like men going through a divorce or custody battle. They say "to hell with it, I don't fit into this wo…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 09:07 PM
4

Here's the link: http://www.register-her.com/register/ I registered someone the other day, I just don't have the energy right now.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 04:29 PM
-1

No it doesn't have a fucking place at all. Not "BPS" either. There's self defense, and there's NOT self defense. You don't need an imaginary fucking syndrome at all.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 04:27 PM
-10

You are a moron.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 04:25 PM
0

Google it ya lazy twat. I don't waste my time further with a willingly ignorant sheep.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:31 AM
-2

Good lil sheep. Apparently it's nonsense to point out that it's stupid to take a near useless vaccine that is harmful or deadly in many cases with unknown long-term side effects. Even worse to give it to children who are more susceptible to the effects. I suppose next you'll tell me ADD meds such as Ritalin and Adderall are safe and effective too. Don't pay attention to the research that shows boys who take such meds have a vastly increased risk of heart attack and that they lower testosterone a…
/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:19 AM
-1

No.
/r/MensRights26/10/11 07:19 AM
3

They don't want no scrubs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpF5wOcy7os
/r/MensRights25/10/11 11:02 PM
-4

The HPV vaccine itself would probably kill more than 7000 people if we gave it to every American.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 11:01 PM
-13

Yes, that's the appropriate strategy. Use the term "vaccine denier" to attempt to paint me as a loon. That way you don't actually have to provide a genuine counter-point to the fact that the HPV vaccine is dangerous and ineffective, merely a profit scheme. Clap clap. Risking death and long-term disability so you can possibly be protected by a few strains of HPV is unwise. Adjuvant: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjuvant What? An ingredient in a vaccine specifically intended to cause an immune res…
/r/MensRights25/10/11 05:57 PM
1

Well, father's rights organizations are more organized, doing more real life activism - but you may not have the passion for those since you're not yet affected. As far as general men's rights, AVfM is about as far as we've gotten. Individual activism. But I think you'll see more soon.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 05:52 PM
1

No big presidential candidates are MRAs. I've heard some mention of Gary Johnson as being favorable to men's rights, but he's not really a candidate. Ron Paul is the only one with a chance in hell who would actually put an end to wasteful government spending, which is detrimental to men's rights. Every other candidate will just continue along the path we're headed. The truth is that without ending big government leftism, you really can't end legalized misandry. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights…
/r/MensRights25/10/11 05:49 PM
-8

The HPV vaccine is dangerous and ineffective. It's a profit scheme for the pharmaceutical companies. http://truthaboutgardasil.org Some of the comments at the article say it all: There is no way I'm allowing my boys to receive a vaccine whose long-term effects we don't know. Vaccines are contaminated with all kinds of ingredienys, such as aluminum. We don't know where drug companies conduct testing, it can be here or in other countries where there is little oversight. Our children's systems are …
/r/MensRights25/10/11 05:36 PM
1

1) Vote for Ron Paul. 2) Check out http://avoiceformen.com activism links. There are men there who are interested in doing "real life" activism but nothing really organized as of yet. 3) http://www.singularity2050.com/2011/01/the-time-has-arrived.html 4) http://saveservices.org - they work with politicians already and have groups set up across the country, but their focus is domestic violence and false accusations, they aren't actually "MRAs" but they do good work
/r/MensRights25/10/11 04:54 PM
1

Correction: MRM: No cunnilingus unless she's never been with another man. Oh, and, seeing as the HPV vaccine is a dangerous and ineffective way for a pharmaceutical company to make money, don't get it, boys.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 04:50 PM
0

The HPV vaccine is very dangerous and also ineffective. Do not get it.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 04:48 PM
-3

Bitches don't get to decide what a "true man" is anymore. They've lost that privilege.
/r/MensRights25/10/11 04:47 PM
-1

ignatiusloyola is a leftist mangina, what do you expect?
/r/MensRights25/10/11 06:19 AM
-1

reactionary You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. Also... "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." - from "Manual of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan, Frank Herbert's Dune Just be careful you don't go too far in order to appease the ignorant and moronic masses. It's vitally important to recognize that men's rights is anti-feminism, amongst other things.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 05:13 AM
-1

I'll mention that it would be helpful to provide a link to what it used to look like before the changes. It doesn't look like you guys did a full-on Wikipedia on it, so that's good.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 05:11 AM
-7

Stupid leftist statement of the day. Don't use that word! I don't like it! Even though it's entirely accurate! Censor that man! Shame him! Wahhh! Conspiracy is a completely accurate word, but the PC police and their pawns (you) have ensured that anyone who speaks of conspiracy is automatically labeled a loon. Kind of like those loony toon MRAs. Amirite?
/r/MensRights24/10/11 05:09 AM
1

You challenged the leftist entitlement complex.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:56 PM
0

True. The left = entitlement programs, including those for women at the expense of men. These two links demonstrate that leftism is incompatible with men's rights: The motivations of political leftists: http://jonjayray.tripod.com/leftism2.html Rotten from the top down: http://takimag.com/article/rotten_from_the_top_down/print#axzz1b0uPJnPU Big government is an enemy. I'd suggest a vote for Ron Paul if you want anything to change. Here's a video elaborating on Ron Paul's policies, rather than ju…
/r/MensRights23/10/11 10:51 PM
4

There's an old quote, I can't remember the source, but it's something like "democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others." Wikipedia's current set up is definitely not the best form to achieve a work that covers topics fairly. Wikipedia rewards editors who act like the popular girls in Mean Girls. Why? Because Wikipedia editors tend to stick together even when it is detrimental to Wikipedia itself. Why? Because many of Wikipedia's editors enjoy the power they have over ot…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 07:21 AM
-2

Until the failed LGBT month ploy ends, you can go to preferences > display options and uncheck "allow reddits to show me custom styles".
/r/MensRights21/10/11 07:03 AM
1

STFU with the "second coming" shit. You merely try to misrepresent what I'm saying because you have nothing factual to argue with. I merely said Ron Paul would be much better for our country than any other candidate with a hope at all of winning. No, Ron Paul isn't the "second coming", and no, he isn't "batshit insane" either. But you already know that, you just would rather paint me as a fringe loony because you're a simple-minded asshat who doesn't know what the fuck he is talking about, and y…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 06:58 AM
1

Wikipedia apparently is only good for looking up the plot of a tv show or a novel. It's terrible for learning about anything controversial that doesn't adhere to the mainstream view point, which is often (usually?) wrong. Wikipedia's policies encourage censorship of alternative view points, even when an article is entirely dedicated to an alternative view point, as was the men's rights article prior to its defacement.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 06:50 AM
0

Killerchihuahua's response is bullshit: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lix5f/lets_keep_em_honest_wikipedia_mens_rights_page/c2t8709?context=3
/r/MensRights21/10/11 06:48 AM
0

The article was not poorly sourced, that's a lie. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lix5f/lets_keep_em_honest_wikipedia_mens_rights_page/c2t8709?context=3
/r/MensRights21/10/11 06:47 AM
0

Killerchihuahua's response is bullshit: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lix5f/lets_keep_em_honest_wikipedia_mens_rights_page/c2t8709?context=3
/r/MensRights21/10/11 06:47 AM
3

Much of the content you are unhappy to see trimmed from the article was not sourced to any source which meets Wikipedia's "Reliable sources" guideline, or a source was there, but didn't support the content. Please stop spewing this bullshit. I randomly picked a section, Education: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Men%27s_rights&oldid=455508406#Education The section is well-sourced, although one of the links no longer works. Here is the flimsy justification for removing the section: With…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 06:39 AM
0

Anyone entering with the mindset that they want to edit war will find themselves quickly blocked, or at least banned from editing the article. Not true in the least. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lix5f/lets_keep_em_honest_wikipedia_mens_rights_page/c2t85l6 Obviously none of the original instigators of the edit war, the editors who trashed years worth of good work while falsely claiming it lacked reliable sources and replaced it with what everyone can agree is pure rubbish, have bee…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 06:32 AM
0

It is a war, actually. You just can't say it. I assure you they treat it as a war, they just feign innocence. See also: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lix5f/lets_keep_em_honest_wikipedia_mens_rights_page/c2t84pl
/r/MensRights21/10/11 06:31 AM
3

The entire debate was phrased in a negative light right from a start, and that unfortunately bothered a lot of people. Editors worked for years on that article and then a few biased editors came through and in one month entirely defaced it, and not justifiably. They were the instigators of hostility by their actions and their manner. Yet Wikipedia's policies and the bias of its editors ensured that users could not revert to the previous version that was much better than what is there now: http:/…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 06:26 AM
1

This is Wikipedia's culture: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lix5f/lets_keep_em_honest_wikipedia_mens_rights_page/c2t8143 It's really a form of censorship of views that do not adhere to the mainstream leftist view, as Wikipedia's editors tend far to the left.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 06:22 AM
-1

Essentially, it comes down to the way you phrase your request. That's silly. The end results are the same. It's kind of funny that Wikipedia tries to espouse "neutrality" as some sort of high and mighty goal when in reality editors rarely adhere to it when dealing with controversial topics. The bias of the editors who defaced the men's rights page is crystal clear - their aloof remarks, their obvious disdain, their obvious bias toward a feminist view of the world, their obvious collusion, all un…
/r/MensRights21/10/11 06:07 AM
1

Don't say asinine things and you won't get called on it. Why don't you re-read everything you've said in response to my post and then ask yourself if you just might come across as hostile yourself, and entirely deserving of my returned hostility.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 12:53 AM
1

Read. Comprehend. Post. It's not relevant because Ron Paul need not specifically state anything about men's rights for his policies to be beneficial to men. It's also not relevant because there is no candidate that specifically has stated they give a shit about men's rights that has any hope of winning. I'm not blindly supporting Ron Paul, ass. Stop saying stupid things, you uninformed twit. Go vote for Obama and enjoy the further treading upon men's rights like a good little sheep, dipshit. It …
/r/MensRights20/10/11 10:40 PM
7

The article was protected because a few editors got together and decided to deface the entire page without getting consensus from anyone that had spent time editing the page for years. When the editors that invested all their time and energy into making the page accurately reflect the term "men's rights" noticed what these people had done, they tried to revert it back to where it should have been left in the first place. At this point, the defacers decided they would use their power to block edi…
/r/MensRights20/10/11 10:36 PM
5

I just want it to be clear that I have no bias towards one group one way or another, and my role on wikipedia is only to enforce policy. Which is to say, you do have a bias, seeing as there is bias built into Wikipedia to favor the common consensus of experienced Wikipedia editors. And the common not-at-all-neutral feeling among those editors is that the "men's rights movement" shouldn't even exist and therefore doesn't deserve a page to itself. The "men's rights movement", and "men's rights", a…
/r/MensRights20/10/11 10:29 PM
8

None of the rules at Wikipedia are applied fairly or honestly. That's why when people who actually have an interest in seeing the men's rights page actually accurately depict the men's rights movement try to edit the page, they are labeled meat-puppet canvassers, regardless of any "assume good faith" rule. They pick and choose in order to get what they want.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 10:25 PM
7

Much of the content you are unhappy to see trimmed from the article was not sourced to any source which meets Wikipedia's "Reliable sources" guideline Translation: The editors who removed the material didn't like what was proven in the cited sources, so they removed the information.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 10:21 PM
7

Meanwhile they are allowed to have a whole WikiProject:Feminism to organize defacement of the men's rights page. But boy, if even one of us tries to talk to another person on their talk page, something the anti-male editors have repeatedly done, it's "canvassing".
/r/MensRights20/10/11 10:19 PM
1

Irrelevant. His policies would do more for men's rights than any other candidate.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 09:58 PM
1

Gee, I don't know, restoring the constitution seems like a good idea for men and their rights, unless you'd like to keep living in a country where your rights are routinely trampled on. As long as people like you choose to remain ignorant, though, I don't have much hope.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 08:07 AM
1

Bravo on your attempts to educate the horde. I've posted a re-post for the late nighters here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/li87y/for_the_late_nighters_my_mens_rights_activism_for/
/r/MensRights20/10/11 02:14 AM
1

AKA against men's rights
/r/MensRights20/10/11 02:13 AM
10

What wonderful bigotry.
/r/MensRights20/10/11 01:05 AM
1

Google wedded abyss.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 07:23 PM
-1

And many men who initiate divorce do it because the woman convinces them to or forces them to through her abuse. Since women initiate abusive behavior more often than men, more than 2/3 of divorces are caused by women. Anywhere from 80-90%. Then you also consider all the people who stay together in marriage, and how many of those relationships are emotionally or physically abusive on the part of the woman. I would say that in a significant portion of the 50% who remain married, the wife controls…
/r/MensRights18/10/11 07:19 PM
1

quoted for truth
/r/MensRights18/10/11 07:14 PM
1

Yes, yes, resort to shaming language. At least shame me accurately though. I haven't bothered to shave in a week or two and I don't have a job (I quit and am living on my savings now). So you could call me an unemployed neckbeard and at least be accurate.
/r/MensRights18/10/11 05:07 AM
2

The root explanation is that society sees men as more expendable than women.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:46 PM
0

Too much makeup caked on their faces, hiding the ugly beneath.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:36 PM
5

And for some reason the moderators refuse to respond to my requests to give NiceGuysSTFU a Troll tag.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:25 PM
2

In Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom, 98% of all fatalities were men, even though only 86% of military members were men. This means that men, on average, were roughly EIGHT times more likely to die than women. (Calculation: Ratio of male chance of death to female chance of death = (98 / 86) / (2 / 14) = 8.)
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:13 PM
0

I'm not really sure what you're talking regarding a circlejerk and hivemind. Yes it is. Reproduction is a well-known consequence of sex, if you are not willing to take that "risk", don't have sex. Your statement, in reality, only applies to men, because women DO have other options after conception, whereas men have zero rights after conception. In the context of today's world, your statement can easily be construed as misandric, even if it wasn't your intention, and so you really shouldn't be su…
/r/MensRights17/10/11 09:44 AM
-1

My fiancee told me that at the hospital she worked at, most of the female nurses were terrible employees - didn't give a shit, mean. The two male nurses, however, were excellent. I wasn't surprised.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 09:24 AM
3

I'd suggest you read or skim the links I posted. For example this one provides some obvious explanations that feminism is sexist: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/iy00r/men_and_women_of_reddit_do_you_consider_yourself/c27mrd4
/r/MensRights17/10/11 09:21 AM
-1

So whites have white privilege and blacks have black privilege?
/r/MensRights17/10/11 09:03 AM
1

Thanks for answering. As long as you're against abortion, except perhaps in the case of genuine rape or as a last resort to save the mother, as well as adoption (almost forgot that), then you retain logical consistency.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 08:48 AM
1

It seems pretty important that we know what you're actually saying when you post something, especially if you want to claim you shouldn't be seen as posting racist crap. Nope. You don't need me to do your thinking for you. I provide information, it's up to the readers to interpret it. other stuff This is a forum for men's rights, not gay men's rights, not black men's rights, not white men's rights, but men's rights. The focus should be on men and boys, and there is no need to put arbitrary perio…
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:21 AM
4

Men do seem to be the most common perpetrators of abuse. No, women commit at least as much domestic violence as men AKA they commit more. http://www.nij.gov/journals/261/who-perpetrates.htm Mothers also also commit far more child abuse against their children than men do. http://www­.acf.hhs.g­ov/program­s/cb/pubs/­cm04/figur­e3_6.htm They also kill their children more often than fathers: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm04/figure4_2.htm Sadly I have to down-vote this article because The…
/r/MensRights17/10/11 06:07 AM
3

without them thinking that I'm an anti-feminist If you are FOR men's rights, you ARE an anti-feminist. Feminism is not about women's rights, it's about privileges and the hatred of men. I'm sure the FAQ touches on this. You can also read all this: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kaef0/i_have_a_serious_question/c2ipj84 Really there were people at work who agreed with me on a lot of things, though no one was as passionate as me. Just talk about the obvious things that they can relate t…
/r/MensRights17/10/11 05:55 AM
0

how are we supposed to know which parts you agree with and which parts are to be ignored? You're not, nor do you need to. The content "added to the discussion" and therefore I posted it. Given the demographics of reddit (75% white, with the next biggest group being 9% Asian), "no special focus" ends up being "no focus" most of the time. Yeah, just like the world is dominated by men and all the focus goes on men because of it: oh wait, women are the only ones with all these legalized special priv…
/r/MensRights17/10/11 04:44 AM
1

The article had some good points, so I posted it. How often would you say each of those categories of unique issues get posted about? I would say each gets posted as often as they should get posted, without external influences demanding that we put special focus on them. Most of the issues discussed here apply to all men. Rarely, someone talks specifically about how men are discriminated against by affirmative action policies, and even more rarely someone mentions that whites also are similarly …
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:30 AM
6

The real question is "why do these wikipedia editors prefer to delete things that are easily cited rather than doing a quick search and adding the citation themselves?" and the answer is "because they don't like the content in the first place, so they delete it in order to censor it, and if you do add a citation they will claim you're giving it undue weight". PS you're supposed to sign your posts in the talk sections with four squigglies (~) at the end of them.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:24 AM
4

edit: If you're really saying you don't even know what Ma99ie is referring to, it's right here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ledli/cailil_wikipedia_admin_and_member_of_wikiproject/c2rzn6j The threat is that Ma99ie will be face consequences if she continues what she is doing. It's irrelevant whether the threat is justified, it is a threat. Your initial comment was that you did not see a threat, not that the threat was justified. So if your argument is that the threat was justified,…
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:11 AM
1

Yes, he made an ass of himself, claiming that he was the sole arbiter of what freedom fighting means. And so did you. He used his status as an American, you used your status as a veteran. Neither implies you give two shits about freedom. Perhaps you were somewhat jesting, but don't blame me when I point out the similarities.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:08 AM
1

So I would assume your stance is that when a guy gets a girl pregnant, he is responsible to care for their child? Is that right? And so you are in favor of child support? And can I also assume that your stance is that when a girl gets pregnant, she is responsible to care for the child too? Is that right? And so you are against abortion?
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:05 AM
0

That's only the final step of the resolution process, too. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution It's all quite convoluted and complex, and really all it does is force people who are trying to get the truth out to go through a complex bureaucracy full of people who are biased against the truth, and rarely can you ever get through it.
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:02 AM
3

Also see: http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2008/04/26/the-wikipedia-thought-police/
/r/MensRights17/10/11 12:00 AM
7

MRAs seek only truth. No hypocrisy in that.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 11:59 PM
0

I wouldn't say most Americans "have this thing about freedom" actually. And certainly not soldiers who spend time killing other people to make the rich richer. Being a USAF veteran doesn't make you a "freedom fighter", it makes you a mercenary, a hired gun, a willing pawn.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 11:34 PM
2

You're not going to like me saying this Actually I really don't care because it's totally irrelevant. Regardless of whether anyone finds it acceptable, that is a threat, which was the only statement made. I'm not seeing any threats. Am I missing something here? See, that's what you said. Don't make it about something it's not.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 11:32 PM
1

any account that persistently demonstrates a disregard for the rules will have their editing privileges revoked That's an implied threat.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 11:20 PM
1

You didn't answer the question. And I didn't say I disagreed with you. I asked you if you're against abortion, too. Because "Reproduction is a well-known consequence of sex, if you are not willing to take that "risk", don't have sex."
/r/MensRights16/10/11 11:19 PM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ledli/cailil_wikipedia_admin_and_member_of_wikiproject/c2rzn6j
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:50 PM
3

He has harassed Kratch similarly: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kratch
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:49 PM
-1

You have no concept of the influence I have here. I am the puppet master, and I've been here for years. I poke and prod, I tinker. I guide the discussion here. And I laugh when my puppets think they dance against my will. Hehehe.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:45 PM
1

Nobody is expecting you to like them. Wrong, see "fatphobia"
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:39 PM
-1

"Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can stop it" OOPS
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:45 PM
1

Sure, but fatasses are gross, and I'm not "fatphobic" for saying it.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:35 PM
1

See? Don't feign innocence with me, sugar. You'll get a few more up-votes from the ignorant masses, but regardless, you've been exposed.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:32 PM
-5

Strippers and cheerleaders disgust me. They all look like whores. And so does Pam Anderson for that matter.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:31 PM
1

a young man's taste is the same as an old man's taste - young women
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:27 PM
0

Yep. It runs in line with the demonization of men who look at young women. Men have always found young women the most attractive. It's the feminist and femi-servative strategy to control the sexual marketplace. theantifeminist.com deals with these topics a lot. Sad that you were down-voted, lots of fools here who don't want to see it.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:26 PM
-4

no
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:23 PM
2

Oh this dumbass is trying but is sure to fail.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 07:58 PM
2

I just took out major sections of the article for violating WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, and WP:V/WP:RS issues. I'm happy to discuss any individual point with anyone who is interested, but please do not restore the removed text without discussion. Kevin (talk) 01:04, 20 September 2011 (UTC) That was his first edit. By "major issues", he basically means he doesn't agree with the information or he didn't think the citations were "good enough". That's how many Wikipedia editors work - decide what they want in …
/r/MensRights16/10/11 07:57 PM
2

You seem really angry. I think you're reading into this too much. Stop being so sensitive. Let's talk about your feelings. Haha I'm just kidding dude, impressive rant.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 10:43 AM
1

I think pretty much all network television is shit these days. Especially the ones in the evening. I mean, they're just terrible. Nothing new, always so cliche. I don't really watch it, just happened to see a minute of L&O SVU today.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 10:22 AM
-1

My powers of perception must fail me, as I see no compliment, only a snide unthinking remark on your part.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 10:19 AM
-1

My powers of perception must fail me, as I see no compliment, only a snide unthinking remark on your part.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 10:18 AM
1

And unhealthy tends to equal unattractive.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 10:12 AM
2

He's one of the censors defacing the men's rights Wikipedia page. If I looked like that I guess maybe I'd hate the world too - though it's pretty shitty to focus that hatred on innocent men and boys by defacing a Wikipedia page on a movement that's trying to help them.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 10:09 AM
-2

Most.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 09:20 AM
1

Kill whitey!
/r/MensRights16/10/11 08:46 AM
-7

Either read and comprehend or shut the fuck up. If you can't comprehend the English text I so plainly wrote, then take your pea brain and spend some time with the FAQ. Don't insult R/MR by coming in here and claiming you know best when you don't know shit. Time to make myself some mac n cheese! edit: The cheese is melting now. Two pieces of advice, my dear: 1) Don't claim my position is shifting when it's not. 2) Don't respond to me again without having read and comprehended everything I linked …
/r/MensRights16/10/11 02:26 AM
-10

I'm not sure why you're confused. There is no "good" feminism: http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/when-good-feminists-do-nothing/ Women have always been the privileged, protected sex. Women are not oppressed in other countries, no more than the men are. So please spare me.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 02:26 AM
-3

And so feminists respond by demanding legislation that further treats women as lesser, as children? Feminism fought for more special privileges without any corresponding responsibilities. I'd suggest you read the FAQ and read the links I posted. Everything you've been taught is bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 02:01 AM
0

I am not undermining R/MR by attempting to remind people that it's counter-productive to down-vote posts that add to the discussion just because they want to plug their ears. This is more important than a single article at the bottom of the page.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 01:59 AM
0

My article contributes to the discussion through meta game.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 01:59 AM
-7

So you believe that blacks who celebrate "black pride" are racist. Interesting.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 01:56 AM
-7

I can see that the feminist movement came from a sexist society where women where regarded by society (maybe not the silent majorty) as lesser. Actually, no, feminism came from a society that always treated women better than men, because women wanted even more special privileges. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kaef0/i_have_a_serious_question/c2ipj84 Also, there is no "good" feminism: http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/when-good-feminists-do-nothing/
/r/MensRights16/10/11 01:55 AM
-2

It's not the real manboobz. Of course, the real manboobz agrees with what this guy posted. He just usually isn't as honest.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 12:16 AM
-9

Lol, of course you agree with what this guy posted. You just usually aren't as honest.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 12:16 AM
4

His choice is between sluts ... and bitchy sluts.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 12:09 AM
0

That is precisely what it means. I'm sorry but after stating something so patently false I did not bother to read the rest. I do not agree with everything I link here, nor do I ignore information just because I don't agree with everything the presenter believes. Try again.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 12:08 AM
0

I was just trying to help, jeez.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:44 PM
16

"I'm sorry, honey," she says, "Your grandfather fought in World War II, your father fought in Vietnam, but you play video games and use pomegranate body wash." Meanwhile, all your grandmother had to do was cook dinner, and your useless entitled ass can't even do that. Woman the fuck up.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:31 PM
6

So you're against abortion, then. Obviously if a woman doesn't want to get pregnant, she shouldn't have sex, either. If not, you're suffering from cognitive dissonance and a dash of misandry.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:12 PM
-1

For future reference, it's "used to".
/r/MensRights15/10/11 11:10 PM
-1

Know thyself.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 09:56 PM
2

Whites are privileged And here is an example of genuine racism, folks.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 09:55 PM
-1

No irrationality here. You misinterpreted what I said in your rush to find excuses to lash out at me. Now that you realize it, you continue to lash out at me to save face. You blame me for your own mistakes. Be a man, would ya?
/r/MensRights15/10/11 09:28 PM
2

I have never said anything seriously supporting discrimination based solely on one's skin color.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 09:26 PM
-3

Posting links to articles at white nationalist sites does not mean I support their views. Some of the articles dealt with men's rights. Also, mentioning that I got an article that was linked at r/niggers does not mean I support that sub-reddit. So why would I post white nationalist articles and a link from r/niggers? Only to demonstrate the hypocrisy in your response. Here's an example of the racism of some R/MR members against whites. Note how they don't actually address any of the issues raise…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 09:13 PM
1

I couldn't find it, but I wouldn't be pissed off about it. It's the typical tactic used to shut down discussion, to shame, to try to censor. It's the same tactic feminists use to try to shame men into their "proper place". Folks who engage in such disingenuous accusations are not actually MRAs at all. They're concern trolls.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 09:10 PM
0

And so you define what's acceptable by what you think "women would tolerate". Telling.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 09:06 PM
2

I don't think it's right to discriminate against anyone based on race. Just as blacks face discrimination, so do whites. I also see a lot of parallels between how men are treated as oppressors and how whites are treated as oppressors. I do think it's funny when people try to call me a white nationalist and a misogynist when I'm engaged to a black woman.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 08:54 PM
1

So you are you denying that males are disparaged or just whites? ANTI-WHITE RACISM Not only were we taught to be ashamed of our gender, they went so far as to blatantly make us ashamed of our race. Yes, if you were white and male, oh boy, you were in for a treat. Hours upon hours of all the horrendous crimes our ancestors did to the Africans, the native Americans, the Jewish people and of course, women. Not one, not a SINGLE mention of all the good we did, only the bad (and if they did happen to…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 07:46 PM
-1

Leftists have a monopoly on blaming. Because you are so stupid, it's apparent I need to explain something to you. When I said the following: Let me drive on over to my job in a sterile office, that's so much better than chopping wood with the beauty of nature around me, and a wife and kids I know won't leave me destitute. Haha. I was speaking from the point of view of your average Joe. By how I phrased it, you had no reason to presume I was talking about myself. It was clearly ambiguous. I don't…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 07:44 PM
-1

Why explain to someone unwilling to learn? Duh.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 07:08 PM
-2

Child payments and alimony are a problem for men who want to run away from their families You really are an idiot.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 06:59 PM
9

And if the child is a girl, she's a homophobe for not enjoying it.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 06:46 PM
-4

Many (most) men have a natural desire to work with their hands, celebrate mother nature, hunt, etc. I wasn't just talking about me. This modern life is not what men crave in their bones. Save more $. Quit job. Divorce wife. Oh, please, that's a great option for a lot of guys if they want to be hunted down and sent to prison. Why do you have so much hate in you?
/r/MensRights15/10/11 06:43 PM
2

Where's the mention that male teachers are in far more danger of false accusations?
/r/MensRights15/10/11 06:42 PM
-3

This isn't just about me, silly. You also seem unwilling to recognize 1) that many aren't even given the opportunity to realize what they're missing for much of their lives, and 2) for many people who do realize it, it's impossible to go back to that. Why must I explain this as if to a child?
/r/MensRights15/10/11 05:50 PM
-5

Irrelevant. I'm not going to take the time to explain why. It should be obvious.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 05:44 PM
3

It could have been the McDonalds employee with a fractured skull or worse. Exactly, and that's what makes his response reasonable.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 05:42 PM
4

Self defense. Maybe women shouldn't go around attacking men because they think they can get away with it. Recognize all the politically correct down-votes, and see that political correctness (leftism) is an enemy to men's rights - for example, men's right to defend themselves.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 05:39 PM
1

My suspicion is, if he/she is not a complete liar just trolling, then she is actually a sadist and a false rape accuser, as her story does not pan out.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 10:25 AM
0

Reviewing the Wikipedia articles on the Dune novels, it seems Frank Herbert was pretty smart. He knew that centralization of government brings stagnation, and that the only way to ensure the survival of the human race is to 1) make people loathe centralization, 2) ensure they scatter throughout the universe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Path_(Dune) If only some of the leftist morons here would take his advice, lol.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 09:51 AM
0

Reviewing the Wikipedia articles on the Dune novels, it seems Frank Herbert was pretty smart. He knew that centralization of government brings stagnation, and that the only way to ensure the survival of the human race is to 1) make people loathe centralization, 2) ensure they scatter throughout the universe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Path_(Dune) If only some of the leftist morons here would take his advice, lol.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 09:50 AM
0

Reviewing the Wikipedia articles on the Dune novels, it seems Frank Herbert was pretty smart. He knew that centralization of government brings stagnation, and that the only way to ensure the survival of the human race is to 1) make people loathe centralization, 2) ensure they scatter throughout the universe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Path_(Dune) If only some of the leftist morons here would take his advice, lol.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 09:50 AM
-4

Because this world and the economy are so wonderful. Let me drive on over to my job in a sterile office, that's so much better than chopping wood with the beauty of nature around me, and a wife and kids I know won't leave me destitute. Haha.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 03:36 AM
-7

Sex with a teacher is rarely ever abusive whatever the sexes.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 03:34 AM
-2

Some people cannot learn, they are unwilling to learn, and willingly ignorant. There is little possibility of being productive or counter-productive when the audience will not change its ignorant views, but it won't stop me from stating the facts.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:45 AM
-2

You mean you'll do whatever it takes to help the corporations, lol. It's funny when leftists think they are helping people.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:43 AM
-2

Shouldn't you be celebrating this post? It's leftist tree-hugging shit. Or are you only a leftist when it benefits the corporatocracy?
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:41 AM
-5

Better than we have today, honestly.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:41 AM
2

Hi troll.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:37 AM
0

Misrepresenting my argument. I'm done.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:36 AM
-3

No. We had a fine successful society until feminism came along. Feminists are the ones who destroyed the family, and really fucked things up. Sure, men and women were both discriminated against in traditionalism, but it was because they had to be - it made sense. Now, women are granted even more special privileges, and men and boys are treated like shit. It's unsustainable, destined for failure, and destruction of this civilization. Before, we had a society that functioned. Because of feminism a…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:35 AM
-3

overt antipathy towards women and feminists You falsely group the two together. If someone disagrees with your brand of fighting for "mens rights," they may think that it's because it's unproductive in the long term. Oh certainly, they do. But they're wrong, and they don't listen. They're stupid. I'm pretty damn sure that "leftism/pc" is a gross oversimplification of whatever your concerns are. Sure, but there's no better simple description.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:34 AM
-2

Shame on you.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:32 AM
-3

Men today find little solace in modern life. That's because they crave an existence where they use their bare hands and their minds to solve real problems. Men and boys have an innate desire to be in touch with their environment, to master it, to hunt, to climb trees, to build a fire, to wrestle, to walk on grass with their bare feet. Modern society has robbed us of that. Shame on you for down-voting.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:31 AM
-6

Of course men had issues, but not nearly as much as feminism caused. All feminism did was add further discrimination against men and privileges for women, when women were already the privileged sex. Of course "fucking up" feminists lies about the patriarchy will help men. Don't be silly.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:29 AM
-5

Leftism/PC.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:26 AM
-4

Hahaha. There is no "good" feminist: http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/when-good-feminists-do-nothing/ by focusing hate on Feminism we ignore the wider factors which caused most of our issues. Feminism created most of our issues, built upon a foundation of acceptable misandry. But oh yes, the vast majority of legalized discrimination against men is entirely due to feminist campaigning.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:25 AM
-4

Do something useful. All he's done so far is caused problems. He's a feminist. He's trying to be subtle about it, but I see through him. Be glad that kloo2yoo is technically still a moderator here, or things would be far worse.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:19 AM
-4

To turn R/MR into a place that adheres to his personal ideology.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:18 AM
-1

Kloo2yoo built the entire FAQ and the sidebar. ignatius has done nothing but bitch and complain.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:17 AM
-2

Well, yes, ignatiusloyola indeed is trying to do that, but he won't succeed. That's why I'm responding with counter-attacks. ignatius's trolling is only resulting in more activism on my part to counteract his attempts to shit on men's rights. On any given day, my posts dominate R/MR's front page.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:14 AM
0

Kloo kept the sidebar and FAQ up to date. My response is due to the foolishness of the moderators here. You can blame them just as you can blame them for all the recent trolling here in response to LGBT month.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:13 AM
-1

Really? You go out of your way to childishly antagonize me, you post pot shots at me constantly, and you wonder why I don't give two shits about anything you say? Are you really that dense?
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:13 AM
8

And men don't need women except for babies.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 01:12 AM
0

I live in the real world.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:52 AM
-1

Vote for me for moderator, and I'd give you something to relish.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:52 AM
8

That judge was pretty smart.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:51 AM
0

Since ignatiusloyola, in his childishness, has ignored my request, I've posted a request to AnnArchist here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lcnx8/annarchist_two_trolls_that_require_troll_flair/
/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:26 AM
-3

I'm sure they will. And not because I deserve one, but because ignatiusloyola is stubborn, and doesn't like it when he's made a fool of. AnnArchist will support him in a show of solidarity. I fully expect it. In the mean time, real trolls will continue to waste everyone's time, and the moderators will sit back doing jack squat about it. And why? Because ignatiusloyola hates me. It's very childish. The sad thing is AnnArchist won't even recognize how ignatiusloyola has taken a dump on his idea of…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:16 AM
-4

And the people I have submitted are trolls by your own defintion: Posts that either misrepresent the person's own views in order to create hostility and anger, or are off-topic and antagonistic messages in order to create hostility and anger. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kkflt/new_moderation_policy_regarding_trolls/ Both of my submissions meet that definition. Jesus, you're so emotional. I think I'll deal with AnnArchist directly now, because you obviously have something against m…
/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:09 AM
-1

To dumb people, I'm sure it is.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:06 AM
-1

I agree, the TransphobiaProject types have a very disturbing world view.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 12:05 AM
-1

lol for others: http://www.hulu.com/watch/46574/its-always-sunny-in-philadelphia-troll-toll
/r/MensRights14/10/11 11:13 PM
-2

Women are the privileged sex everywhere. Men work and die to support them. So please, grow up. In western civilization, where even though women have always been the privileged, protected sex, we have decided to make them even more privileged, men have absolutely no privileges over women other than their innate physical and mental superiority.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 11:11 PM
1

He/she is a troll, don't bother.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 11:07 PM
2

Confirmed troll.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 11:06 PM
3

Oh clearly I do not, as evidenced by my previous posts. The same standards apply to men and women. You're merely a hateful troll, trolling for seemingly outrageous quotes.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 11:06 PM
1

Uh huh. I spent plenty of time being reasonable with you. Then you showed your true colors, and I judged you as you are. Not only are you a sadistic false rape accuser, but you are a troll searching for something to be offended by so you can re-post it over at AMR or SRS, ignoring all the reasonable comments. When you weren't getting the hateful replies you wanted, you decided to make an obviously inciting claim, which clearly is a lie, in order to get a reaction from someone who doesn't take ki…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 11:02 PM
-1

You have to pay the toll, to get into this boy's soul. Pay the troll toll.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 10:58 PM
1

Turns out the OP is probably a false rape accusing sadist: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lchtp/what_should_define_the_rape_of_a_female_how/c2rkht3
/r/MensRights14/10/11 10:57 PM
1

Judging by this comment, you appear to be a sadist. My guess, therefore, would be that you led this guy on for two months, telling him you would have sex with him, but with no intention of doing so. You played with him and made him horny enough, coercing him into having sex with you, then cried rape. The reason: you didn't like him, but you liked it when he gave you money. Someone who actually had this happen as you tell it would not gloat about it in such a sadistic way. Pretty sick, babe. Sorr…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 10:50 PM
1

The best thing to do is to instill in people that if they do not consent, they need to demonstrate it clearly, first verbally, and not just as a simple "no" which could be misconstrued, but a very clear statement they do not consent, and pushing the other person away if at all possible. That way 1) fewer sexual assaults occur, 2) it's clear when a genuine assault occurs.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 10:48 PM
0

Now then, to address the issue of consensual vs nonconsensual sex. Once consent is withdrawn, then the guy should and needs to stop. It needs to be drilled into society that stop means stop. That's tangental to your question though. The question becomes, can we show that consent was retracted? No, there is not test to show if consent was retracted. At that point it is up to the jury to decide, was the person vocal about withdrawing consent? Lawyers could argue that for years I imagine. But no do…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 10:43 PM
-1

The first is sexual assault, not rape, and only if they are not "together". The second depends on whether she previously consented, and the sexual history of the two. The third question isn't clear. While it's possible a husband could coerce his wife into having sex with him, it's also true that due to the state of marriage, the husband whose wife does not give him sex is coerced into staying with her for fear of the consequences of divorce, whereas the wife who gives into her husband's requests…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 10:40 PM
2

Unless you had previously indicated you wanted to have sex, and maybe tried to (my girl was very tight and it was pretty impossible to get in there at first, lol), then you were sexually assaulted, and possibly raped. I guess I tend to think of rape as having intent - and from what you've said my guess is he knew very well you weren't ready, if so it's rape. But if you guys were talking about having sex, and you said you'd wanted to do it, and he stopped when you started screaming and crying, it…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 10:31 PM
1

Penetrating question. For a couple who has regular sex, unless the initiator has reason to suspect otherwise, I think it's reasonable to initiate sex while the other is sleeping. If that person continues while the other remains asleep and therefore they cannot get consent because they are unconscious, it's their responsibility to either wake the person up or stop - if you're getting your rocks off precisely because the person is unconscious, and they haven't explicitly consented to it, then that…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 10:09 PM
1

Re-read it, I updated it to reflect the unconscious possibility before you replied. Also note that my definition of rape applies equally to men and women. There is no need for separate definitions.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 09:55 PM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kco7i/internet_investigatingvigilantism_lets_not_be/c2j8a4w The definition of sexual assault, however, is broader.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 09:50 PM
3

Cool, cool. I'm re-reading the original novel again. I feel it's probably more productive than Reddit.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 09:49 PM
7

Even the MRA's article on wikipedia acknowledges women have been treated like dirt for centuries. That might have something to do with the fact that feminists gutted the original article on men's rights and replaced it with feminist propaganda. And yes, I know you're a troll (reported).
/r/MensRights14/10/11 09:39 PM
-1

There are two cases. Either she takes Xanax for fun or for an anxiety disorder. 1) Anxiety disorder = psychological problem, mental instability. 2) Taking Xanax for fun also indicates some instability. Messing with a girl who has pyschological problems that could worsen over time, especially when hormones are involved and she's taking pharmaceuticals, is a real gambit. There's no telling how her anxiety could manifest itself in the future.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 08:48 PM
1

I don't dismiss that blacks faced real discrimination or that they still do today. But I also don't dismiss that other races faced real discrimination, whether or not it was on the same level, or they they still do today. My beef with the victim/oppressor thing is that it is used to justify attacks against the supposed "oppressor" class, even years later, based merely on physical attributes of members of that class and not any real discrimination they participate in. Here's what I've said about …
/r/MensRights14/10/11 08:40 PM
1

I don't dismiss that blacks faced real discrimination or that they still do today. But I also don't dismiss that other races faced real discrimination, whether or not it was on the same level, or they they still do today. My beef with the victim/oppressor thing is that it is used to justify attacks against the supposed "oppressor" class, even years later, based merely on physical attributes of members of that class and not any real discrimination they participate in. Here's what I've said about …
/r/MensRights14/10/11 08:40 PM
6

Good work on that sub-reddit.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:13 PM
0

Haha, indeed. I wouldn't have sex with a woman with an anxiety disorder or a woman without an anxiety disorder who takes Xanax anyway. It's the old "Don't stick your dick in crazy" thing.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:11 PM
1

It's not "my website", it's a psychology site. Durr.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:10 PM
1

This is much worse than sex "by deception", as it has long lasting life changing consequences for the male. The amount of stress that this can induce is similar to the stress induced by a false rape accusation. It is actually similar to a life-threatening situation when you face your own mortality. This man is facing the prospect of his entire course of his life being changed and that he has little to no control over it. It is a horrible feeling: worse than losing a loved one, worse than being r…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:05 PM
-1

Only the truth has a monopoly on the truth. I'm merely willing to see things as they are, not as I want them to be. If you despise me, then it indicates that you're willing to compromise, to see things as you'd like them to be, not as they are. But then again... "My father once told me that respect for the truth comes close to being the basis for all morality. 'Something cannot emerge from nothing,' he said. This is profound thinking if you understand how unstable 'the truth' can be." - from Con…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 06:49 PM
1

I'm not mad, and I'm pretty sure the website I linked to that proves my point isn't mad either.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 06:06 PM
1

Then you despise the truth to some degree.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 06:05 PM
1

I just did. You elevate the presumed "victim" classes over the presumed "oppressor" classes. LGBTs need special focus because they are "victims". Black people need special focus because they are "victims" of whitey. It's clear you are a bigot because although you would consider an African American month, you will never consider a White Month. Why? Because you'll claim that whites don't need it because they're "privileged", whereas blacks do because they're "victims". It's the exact same mentalit…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:56 PM
-1

You didn't learn shit if you don't understand something so simple as the mindset of a sadist. It seems a lot of psychology they teach these days is feminized bullshit, anyway, so I'm not really surprised. Look, I did a quick Google search, it wasn't hard: http://www.minddisorders.com/Py-Z/Sexual-sadism.html sexual sadism is listed as one of several paraphilias . The paraphilias are a group of mental disorders characterized by obsession with unusual sexual practices or with sexual activity involv…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:47 PM
1

I'm not alone and people love me, so I really doubt it.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:45 PM
1

No ignorance, no bigotry. You're the bigot who feels the need to pander to LGBTs and other perceived victim classes, insinuating that they are "oppressed" by the oppressor classes. Men, straight people, whites: all oppressor classes. You are the real bigot.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:45 PM
-1

No. Just because you want to make yourself feel excluded doesn't make you excluded. Nobody excludes gay men here. I'm not excluding anyone when I state the fact that a lot of flamboyantly gay men seem to think rainbow colors are appealing. Stop trying to play the victim, trying to feel offended, you baby. As I've already stated, gay men have never been excluded here.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:43 PM
1

Didn't learn much didja?
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:42 PM
2

Ah yes.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:41 PM
1

Haha. I admit I could be wrong sometimes, but it's rare. I mean, I used to consider myself mostly leftist, but then I found the truth of human nature and realized that leftism leads to tyranny. I changed my mind based on the evidence. Today I have enough evidence to make solid statements on a great many matters. A lot of people just don't have the mental acuity to put all the evidence together and come to a conclusion, or they just don't have the willingness to let go of their preconceived notio…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:15 PM
1

Like I said, race is an easy example. Whites are the "privileged race" by PC standards. That's why I bring up whites. Duh. I link to white nationalist websites when they have something interesting to say. I'm not a mindless bigot, so I don't really give a fuck who is saying something when I find it interesting and relevant, whether I agree or not. And there have not been "numerous attempts" by white nationalists to "invade" this forum in the last 2 years I've been watching. Lately I've also link…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:07 PM
-18

Maybe you shouldn't date people fucked in the head enough to take xanax eh?
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:01 PM
5

Blame the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 04:59 PM
-9

What the hell is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights14/10/11 04:58 PM
1

I don't.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:22 AM
1

That's what I was going to say. Fuck playing the flute when you can hit something. A much better way to relieve stress.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:21 AM
-4

You have to keep in mind that Women's Rights started legitimately because women were being completely screwed over in similar ways. Nope, it happened because women wanted more privileges in addition to the ones they already had over men.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:21 AM
0

where is the piece on salon shootings being sexist? I'm sure we'll see plenty soon. Aren't you? also the article doesn't state if the kids on the playground were attacked due to their race, meaning it could be a response to initial racist actions. While it would definitely be over the top, we have no proof that this was the racist incident. You sure are bending over backwards to make excuses for black on white violence. Anyway, this isn't the only case: http://cofcc.org/2011/06/black-on-white-cr…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:14 AM
1

Ignatius is far too stubborn to admit to being wrong. He's kind of an idiot, seems to have no ability to learn new things, way too tied up with his preconceived notions about how the world should be, blind to reality. He's a lot like the TransphobiaProject folks, to be honest.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:07 AM
0

You shouldn't have done it in the first place, stupid. You caused it, not us.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:06 AM
-2

Besides, my logo won fair and square but ignatiusloyola didn't follow his own rules and put up a different one. You can see my awesome logo at http://reddit.com/r/gaymensrights
/r/MensRights14/10/11 07:05 AM
2

I'd be interested about the percentages when they point the figure at a specific man rather than just make up a rape entirely and play the easy race card to make it believable. As far as "oops need someone convenient to blame" or "regretted it the next day" false rape accusations, I'm sure a lot of these occur between college students. After all, this is where young women are indoctrinated that they are all victims. You might consider collecting demographics on accusers too. Race and age of both…
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:51 AM
1

Move along, you clearly don't know anything about psychology. The motivations are alike. You don't seem to understand much, so I don't think you'll understand that the mentality is the same even though the actions are different.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:33 AM
-1

There's also nothing wrong with NOT being "the stereotypical flamboyant homosexual who enjoys tacky rainbows". Guess what? Just because someone is a homo or a tranny doesn't make them deserving of special attention and privileges. We don't need an LGBT month here, we don't need a tacky rainbow to make stereotypically flamboyant homosexuals feel loved, and we don't need people like you calling us homophobes and transphobes because we won't treat you special and don't think it's okay for trannies …
/r/MensRights14/10/11 05:27 AM
-4

I have no intention of having an argument. You have bad taste, and so does anyone else who thinks that the logo looks good.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 02:08 AM
-4

You have bad taste.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 01:55 AM
-1

The two acts result in similar emotions, yes, and similar types of people (sadists) will enjoy both acts for the same reasons (domination, control, relishing in deceit). And that's because the transexual is indeed performing an act that can result in harm to their victim, just as when a man tries to infect another man with HIV, regardless of whether the person is actually infected.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 01:52 AM
0

2XC bans people for stating facts when it hurts women's feelings. They don't even care if you're trying to help a woman, if it hurts her feelings by encouraging her to take an action that would get a result, rather than responding only with "oh honey that's so sad, you are never to blame, find a man to blame" which is the typical 2XC response. They don't want advice, they want a pity party. So yes, they value feelings over facts.
/r/MensRights14/10/11 01:49 AM
0

lol, no
/r/MensRights14/10/11 01:48 AM
2

I wasn't. I'd suggest the troll flair is in order. http://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23MensRights
/r/MensRights14/10/11 01:46 AM
1

Realize this is all due to human nature, that we are a flawed species, that nothing really matters, but that it's important to find your purpose in life and work toward it, and enjoy it while it lasts. Also read delusion damage: http://delusiondamage.com/hidden-truths/what-is-it/
/r/MensRights13/10/11 10:52 PM
-2

A transexual who would lie to someone about it in order to fuck them is not the same type that would be terrified about violence. I'm sure there are a few transexuals who climb aboard the TransphobiaProject bandwagon who are actually timid trannies who fear for their own safety and so they wish that other people would want to bang them if they knew what they were, and so they make the same silly arguments as the rapist sadists who make up the majority, but they aren't the ones who would actually…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 10:50 PM
-1

r/masculism believes in "gender equality" which does not exist. They believe in being politically correct when PC is the enemy of men's rights. r/masculism is a place for people who want to look good at the expense of actually facing reality. Take this silliness from the r/masculism sidebar: Support for all men, including and perhaps especially focusing on those who are not gender normative or who have been silenced or overlooked No, we don't need a special focus on transexuals, huh-duh. Next th…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 10:38 PM
1

2XC is a really impressive community. It is open Lol, no. 2XC hates any opinions that dare to criticize a woman for doing something wrong. Instead we are supposed to care about feelings over the facts. Just like with r/masculism.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 10:20 PM
5

Do not leave the house, it only puts you in a worse position. Read the Divorce link in the side bar, there are some good forum links there. There's a domestic violence hotline here too: http://dahmw.org/ Maybe there's a lawyer you can consult for free. Maybe talk to local father's rights organizations.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 10:17 PM
0

Men have never had the upper hand. Women have always been the privileged, protected sex.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 10:15 PM
2

Known troll.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 08:37 PM
-3

I don't disagree with you on the whole. There are certain men's issues that affect homosexual men uniquely. A minor note: High percentage of black men being arrested? Racial issue. Large number of poor men ending up homeless? Poverty issue. Large number ugly men being treated like rapists? Ugliness issue. Causation does not follow from correlation.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 07:26 PM
-1

What? That's where I got it. What's up your butt? It happens to be an intersection between men's rights (women getting away with beating police officers) and r/niggers. I don't see any reason you should down-vote it. It's not like I down-vote actual men's rights posts just because they happen to be about LGBTs.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 07:07 PM
4

No one's saying gay men's issues don't belong here, we're saying shit that doesn't have any relationship to men's rights doesn't belong here, and that we don't need any special focus on gay men's issues. As someone who called into AVfM radio to specifically talk about how gay men are affected by misandry, too, I find it insulting that you continue to claim that people like me "don't think gay rights stuff belongs here". We need no special focus on it, and we don't need shit that has little if an…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:34 PM
-2

As long as the moderators here continue to encourage derailment by homosexuals and transexuals that are unrelated to men's rights, they can expect derailment in other areas too.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:31 PM
-2

I do this little thing called reading.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:30 PM
-2

Courtesy of r/niggers.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:21 PM
-4

You could say it has just about as much to do with mens rights as trannies who want to trick straight dudes into fucking them.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:07 PM
-1

They are a member of a "victim class" just like feminists. http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/kiv55/what_common_misconception_annoys_you/c2m81gq
/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:04 PM
-3

still no
/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:00 PM
-2

Oh I do understand the mentality of a rapist and sadist. Part of the thrill of raping someone is taking them against their will and making them enjoy it - men who rape women will try to get them to climax, and men who rape men will masturbate them. When you don't know what you're talking about, keep your trap shut.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:58 PM
-3

It's not a competent discussion, it's a bunch of troll morons spewing logical fallacies while r/mr corrects them, and it's the same "discussion" we've had here countless times with the same results: the tranny bigots don't change their minds.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:58 PM
-2

No, because in two weeks there will have been at least a few more of the same exact troll posts invading r/mr.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:57 PM
-2

When it has nothing to do with the topic of the sub-reddit and never changes and serves only to invade. Duh.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:56 PM
-6

It's not a trans or men's rights issue to trick people into fucking them.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:54 PM
3

nope
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:53 PM
1

You forget that I'm always right, and when you do not agree with me it's because you're wrong. You ought to strive to let go of your delusions and agree with me more often.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:44 PM
0

What race-baiting? Race is merely an easy example of the moderators' double standards. They will make an LGBT month and a black month, but not a white month because it is not politically correct. That's not "race-baiting".
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:43 PM
7

Trolling the same tired and non-existent argument about trannies fucking hetero guys by tricking them is not legitimate discussion.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:11 PM
1

Wouldn't be politically correct to ban any post tangentially related to lgbt shit even if it has nothing to do with men's rights. Of course, if someone posted a white pride link, igs would probably ban it.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:10 PM
3

Even the r/lgbt and r/transphobiaproject people mock you for putting up the silly rainbow logo.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:08 PM
-6

False. Gay men were never excluded here. Yet you felt the need to compensate for this imaginary exclusion by inviting trolls here for an entire month and giving the logo tacky rainbow colors that only the stereotypical flamboyant homosexual enjoys?
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:06 PM
0

You must be very intelligent to notice.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 07:12 AM
3

It is pretty funny how quickly they throw out the "homophobia" "transphobia" BS when all people are saying is it's not right to lie. And they act like it's because we must hate and fear transexuals. Um, no, we just don't like lying scumbags who would take pleasure in sexually assaulting someone. They just like throwing out accusations of "phobia" because it's an easy tactic. They adhere to a victim ideology, much like feminists do. See here: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/kiv55/what_…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:56 AM
-4

Good on you for your excellent comments. If the moderators at R/MR aren't willing to delete troll threads from transphobiaproject then I'm afraid their hate mongering will only continue. It seems the mods are more concerned with "looking good" to hateful bigots like the transphobiaproject people than actually ensuring R/MR remains viable as a vehicle for men's rights news and activism.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 06:25 AM
1

That's sad, but: The nature of Shepard's murder led to requests for new legislation addressing hate crime, urged particularly by those who believed that Shepard was targeted on the basis of his sexual orientation. Hate crime legislation is designed to make sure the PC perps (straight, white, male) are punished more severely for crimes against the PC victims (homosexuals, blacks, women). So this kid's death merely resulted in further legal misandry.
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:38 AM
1

I agree, but I don't think the moderators have the balls to ban discussions unrelated to men's rights, even though folks are coming here and upvoting troll threads from other reddits (TransphobiaProject) so that they stay near the top of the page. Every week we get a new post trolling us about trans crap, and they never make any coherent argument. It's always a troll post so they can get their rocks off, like I described above. Combine that with all the silly LGBT stuff, including the post at th…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:32 AM
0

The folks at TransphobiaProject do, or they would not argue that they should not inform their partners. There are really two options: Either you aren't the type of person who would enjoy sex with someone who doesn't want you, or you are. And if you are the type of person who would enjoy sex with someone that doesn't want you, it can only be because you get a sexual kick out of the knowledge that they would not want you if they really knew you. It makes you someone who gets aroused when deceiving…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:26 AM
1

It's not hard to draw this conclusion. These types see themselves as victims and heterosexual males as perpetrators. For them, they are getting revenge because heterosexual males are their enemies. They can justify any wrong against them because of this, and they delight in it, believing they are in the right. It's not that different from how feminists feel about men. Sure, there are plenty of M to F transexuals who aren't like this, but they also aren't the ones populating TransphobiaProject an…
/r/MensRights13/10/11 03:18 AM
-5

No, they are not women, and yes, they are technically gay. It is also true that gay bottoms and submissive women have a lot in common, a similar submissive mentality. But in the TransphobiaProject you will find the narcissistic sadists. A M to F transexual who has sex with an unknowing heterosexual male gets the same type of sexual satisfaction as a woman who says she's on the pill and has sex with a man in order to get pregnant, and this is the same type of sexual satisfaction that a man used t…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 06:45 PM
-6

Actually it's quite clear some transexuals would like to have sex with "transphobic" people (people who wouldn't want to have sex with them). The reason is that they are turned on by tricking someone into having sex with them who wouldn't otherwise do so. It's a form of sexual perversion that results in sexual assault. They are immensely turned on by the idea of tricking a man into having sex with them who wouldn't do so knowing what they are. Much like many gay men have a fantasy of seducing a …
/r/MensRights12/10/11 06:27 PM
1

Ask ignatiusloyola. If they are posting the information on Reddit I believe it is a violation and they can be banned.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 08:21 AM
2

You're probably right. Though I am reminded of The Human Planet episode where a man talks about how his wife has been complaining that he hasn't gotten honey for her for a while, and so he climbs a huge tree and gets stung to get it for her and the kids. Then again, at least he's actually living. I'd rather be climbing a tree for good reason than sitting here in my apartment. And I suppose women's selfish nature is necessary. Anyway, I don't particularly like the demonization of natural male sex…
/r/MensRights12/10/11 07:51 AM
2

I like to think it's possible we could have a functioning society that was not based on traditionalism, but I may be dreaming. There are certain elements of traditionalism and conservatism that either don't treat men fairly (perhaps necessary) or treat them like perverts and women as angels (not necessary). What do you think of the following articles? Conservative Misandry: http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/mens-issues/conservative-misandry/ A Letter to Traditional Women: http://www.avoiceformen.c…
/r/MensRights11/10/11 04:48 PM
2

There are a lot of people here who are in denial of reality in order to hold to the beliefs they want to believe in. From what I've seen, they tend to be liberals who plug their ears any time something true seems to come into conflict with their pre-conceived ideology, although liberals are not the only guilty ones. I guess traditionalism just comes a lot closer to the truth.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 05:39 PM
1

You're quite bigoted.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 12:03 AM
-4

That's funny, because the female goal in a relationship is to coerce a man into doing what she wants. It could be said that all heterosexual relationships are examples of coercive control type domestic violence perpetrated by the female, and they always have been. Basically.
/r/MensRights09/10/11 04:09 AM
3

Ignatius is a disingenuous, fickle person. What's to like?
/r/MensRights08/10/11 05:10 PM
-9

goodbye useless thread promoting bigotry against heterosexuals
/r/MensRights08/10/11 05:09 PM
-8

This isn't about lgbt issues. Most people in r/lgbt are not pro-men's rights because they aren't actually pro-equal rights, they are pro-special privileges and protections for women, minorities, homosexuals, and trannies. I don't give a shit what the r/lgbt bigots think.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 05:06 PM
9

People who say stupid things in public venues are open to rebuttal. You are getting reports from misandrists only.
/r/MensRights08/10/11 12:05 AM
1

At activism sites like avoiceformen.com, yes. Here, no.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 08:38 PM
-3

women moreso
/r/MensRights07/10/11 08:36 PM
-5

There are so few decent western women that in your situation I'd just suggest staying away from them altogether - I doubt you have developed the faculties to recognize the less than 1% that won't fuck you over. Just watch porn and live your life, have friends, you'll be a lot happier. kink.com is good for porn.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 06:29 PM
1

Ignatius is an ideologue when it comes to leftism and homosexuality. He's kind of like a feminist in that he doesn't care what the reality is, only that he adheres to his silly ideals. He's actually a huge bigot, as evidenced by his hatred of Christians, heterosexuals, and right wingers.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 06:18 PM
2

As far as I know I'm still a moderator there so I'll ask the head moderator if he knows what's up. I'm getting a forbidden. Maybe the Reddit admins disabled it because it's okay to have a sub-reddit called AgainstMensRights but not AgainstWomensRights because women are special and men are shit.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 06:16 PM
0

It's gaudy, it sucks. It's offensive to the eyes.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 06:43 AM
1

that the sole purpose of sex is for men to please and perform for women; rather than something that is mutual and equally effort-worthy. Exactly. See here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/l3unf/in_rtwoxchromosomes_what_are_your_thoughts_on/c2pjz2o?context=3
/r/MensRights07/10/11 06:39 AM
1

Wrong http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/l34ea/what_are_your_thoughts_on_tiny_penises/c2pe8sr Speaking from experience, I'd take a guy with a micropenis with no hangups about toys and oral to a guy with a donkey dick that he wanted me to worship, while he laid there and didn't do anything else. I really shouldn't have to explain just how full of female entitlement and angst toward men this statement is.
/r/MensRights07/10/11 06:38 AM
0

It's tacky.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:45 AM
2

Thanks
/r/MensRights06/10/11 02:35 AM
0

Yes, I did. 6 to 5. I won.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 06:20 AM
1

No, mine had 6 votes by the end of the week, Kill_The_Rich's only had 5 direct comments.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 06:16 AM
0

Um, no. Kill_the_rich did not vote for his own logo, and NiceGuysSTFU did not vote for it either. You said to reply with "vote" or something indicating a vote. Neither of them did so. It had only 5 votes by the end of the week. My logo clearly won. But of course, we both know you're a liar.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 06:12 AM
-2

The real question is why the logo that won according to the rules (my logo, which received the most votes) was replaced with the second place logo? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ktkco/lgbt_mensrights_logo_competition/ My logo won, what is this one doing up?
/r/MensRights03/10/11 05:59 PM
1

controlled by a human
/r/MensRights01/10/11 12:39 AM
0

What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights01/10/11 12:37 AM
-8

Yes, it was posted two hours ago, idiot.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 12:36 AM
1

Yet women are taught that standards that are in fact beneficial to them are detrimental to them. They live a lie.
/r/MensRights01/10/11 12:07 AM
-4

Even in theory feminists were very much anti-male. And they were masters of putting their theory into practice.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 11:28 PM
2

Gender identity is both nature and nurture. Two lesbians raising a boy who ends up believing he should be a girl is quite suspect.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 11:26 PM
0

I've found it hard to set standards when everything else in society tells her she should be in power and that she is a victim, that she should control me and I should never control her. I think it's likely that only when shit hits the fan will women really wise up and realize that men are the ones who should be leading.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 11:25 PM
-1

Spoke too soon - now they're talking about how people should get married over 40 because they're "more mature" and how "soul mates are real". The real message is: Women, you can slut around for 20 years and find a chump after that (the guy in this case was a huge chump). Also, women, you have a soul mate out there, so if your husband starts to bore you, divorce his ass because your real man is out there somewhere (prince charming complex). Oh women's daytime TV, how you disappoint by promoting w…
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:49 PM
2

Surely there is a case to be made that gay men face some discrimination precisely because they are men who are homosexual rather than women who are homosexual. However, devoting a whole month to it is the same as promoting specifically lgbt issues over men's rights issues, and necessarily pushes important men's rights comments off the front page while less important issues that happen to be LGBT-themed stay on top.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:44 PM
1

Well they do a good job overall, but they still fuck up once in a while, and they don't value input from R/MR. IgnatiusLoyola is willingly ignorant and unwilling to listen.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:31 PM
2

"Loose vaginas: Karma for slutty women?" Something tells me that headline would never pass the censors.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:24 PM
2

Lol, anyone who thinks that a BOY growing up with TWO LESBIAN MOMS and NO FATHER FIGURE does NOT AFFECT HIS GENDER IDENTITY is a complete idiot. I've already seen it in my cousin, who, though he would have ended up gay regardless, would not have been so effeminate and lacking confidence if he hadn't grown up with a shitty single mom and two older sisters.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:20 PM
-6

Nazis are not anti-Jew.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:14 PM
2

Troll. And AMR folks are also against... all men's rights. They are feminists who hate men's rights.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:12 PM
0

Haha, I saw the post earlier mentioning that, I thought about making this reddit myself if only to prevent some misandrist from doing it. Good job.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:12 PM
1

It's because they have to deal with women lol.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 09:11 PM
0

I grew up with a single mom all my life. I don't have gender issues. You have misandry issues. The kid's apparent first words were "I am a girl." After at least a year under the care of two lesbian women in his most formative years. Yeah. My cousin has gender identity issues too, and it's not because he was "born that way", it's because he was raised by a single mom with two sisters who never gave him any idea how to learn to be a man if that's what he wanted.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:10 PM
4

Bullshit. Women are above men in society's eyes, straight or gay or otherwise. Men are the only ones with laws that discriminate against them based on sex, and there is a sentencing disparity against men: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentencing_disparity
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:08 PM
-1

The correct question is "So are straight men's rights somehow less important than gay men's rights?"
/r/MensRights30/09/11 08:07 PM
1

lol
/r/MensRights30/09/11 07:26 PM
0

I really don't give a shit what misandrists think. I'll take actual MRAs who are doing things over shills like you.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 07:26 PM
1

Gee, I wonder why the kid could possibly have a gender identity disorder, growing up with two lesbian moms? Durr.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 07:24 PM
1

Yes, it is amusing that even the moderators of r/mr intentionally undermine it.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 06:59 AM
1

Um, no. Adoptive lesbian parents of boy who wants to be girl There doesn't appear to be any pressure on the boy What are you on?
/r/MensRights30/09/11 06:57 AM
-2

Adoptive lesbian parents of boy who wants to be girl Hm wonder why he wants to be a girl.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 06:57 AM
-3

No other presidential candidate is.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 06:29 AM
2

No, we must pander to the politically correct! Down with men's rights, up with unrelated LGBT!
/r/MensRights30/09/11 05:59 AM
14

I'll celebrate when the cunt gets two years for gross assault.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 04:11 AM
1

so you're voting for the picture?
/r/MensRights30/09/11 04:06 AM
1

You're right, for the most part. This guy doesn't know what the hell he's saying, to be honest. He is extremely cognitively dissonant. He's all over the place, really he's just whining that there is a study out there that shows that men become less manly when men are in relationships. He doesn't like that, because it doesn't align with the feminist viewpoint.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 12:54 AM
1

1) Men are not defined by fighting other men with martial arts. 2) Ryan Gosling looks like a little effeminate boy, he is only popular because women find him attractive. 3) Dr. Drew's life changers promotes a warped view of masculinity - gay and feminine.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 10:44 PM
1

This really isn't worth discussing with you because you are too stupid. But ignatius would claim he is doing this for the benefit of men's rights AKA the community. The truth is he is doing it for himself. He's wrong, but he thinks he's rights, and he won't listen to anyone, so he has only himself to blame for that. Meanwhile he'll claim it's all for the better, when in fact it is for the worse.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 10:42 PM
1

Surely there is some element of "what's best for the community" in what AnnArchist is trying to do, but there is also the element of trying to appease misandrists. Same thing ignatius is doing with the LGBT month, though ignatius is doing it to an even more outrageous degree. In the end, both will fail at doing "what's best for the community" because they put too much focus on appeasing misandrists.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 08:23 PM
1

:)
/r/MensRights29/09/11 08:21 PM
-1

I'm not surprised. He comes off as actually masculine in Mad Men, but in real life interviews he acts like he's 5 years old, with a silly grin on his face, he can't sit still, and he's a goofball more than a man. It must be very disappointing for the women in his life. I wonder who coached him on the show.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 08:18 PM
0

Disagree. There are real MRAs and there are clear posers.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 08:14 PM
0

The only good thing about you is you say things more out of innocent ignorance than out of willful ignorance and hate like so many others. It's not like you're willingly blind to the subtleties; you just don't have the sense for them.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 08:08 PM
-2

Lol are you this blind to misandry? Sorry, but just because the media tells you something is "manly" doesn't make it "manly". I really don't think you should ever use the term "manly" again, because you don't understand what "manly" is. It's kind of gross when you say it, being a mangina and all. I was also not just talking about movies. The television has a much greater influence on boys.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:57 PM
-1

Please, Alanna, you're just embarrassing yourself.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:56 PM
0

Every medication has its side effects. It's always a good idea to investigate all sources of information and decide for yourself what makes sense. It is clear that Gardasil has life-threatening dangers that make it not worth taking.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:54 PM
1

It's always a good idea to investigate all sources of information and decide for yourself what makes sense.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:52 PM
-2

You mean try some propaganda. Don't think! Accept what those who profit from your ignorance tell you! Be a good little sheep.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:49 PM
2

haha
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:49 PM
0

And that's what I mean when I say ignatius isn't listening. He's not. He's set in his ways because it would hurt his pride too much to admit he's wrong. So he denies the possibility even to himself, telling himself that those who disagree are just big meanie jerkfaces who are trolling him and have nothing worth saying. That's why every response to those who disagree with him is some form of "I don't give a shit what you say, and you're an idiot."
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:47 PM
1

They temporarily give the appearance of doing so, but in fact, they made things worse for everyone, and things will only get worse.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:46 PM
1

Great, looking forward to it.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:46 PM
0

Well, you'd be wrong. Of course you can, with the right data.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:45 PM
-8

Haha, sure, and feminist studies show that 1 in 3 women are raped.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:45 AM
-1

If there are a bunch of forums of victims sharing their stories and trying to deal with it, it's a good bet they're not just making it all up. Maybe you should think before you type. You aren't really the type that cares about people though. http://truthaboutgardasil.org/
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:43 AM
-2

If there are a bunch of forums of victims sharing their stories and trying to deal with it, it's a good bet they're not just making it all up. Maybe you should think before you type. You aren't really the type that cares about people though. http://truthaboutgardasil.org/
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:41 AM
-5

Wouldn't surprise me one bit if certain vaccines caused autism.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:41 AM
-2

Yeah, that's what big government colluding with big business gets us. Here's an article on fluoroquinolones, which I was exposed to (part of what made me stumble upon the corruption of pharmaceutical companies): http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2011/04/09/prescriptions-for-poison/ The video embedded there is pretty sick. You might also check out the victim stories page here: http://fqvictims.org/fqvictims/index.htm Luckily I stopped taking my dosage early after experiencing minor symptoms and read…
/r/MensRights29/09/11 07:37 AM
-2

No, REAL feminist activists. It's you who are a pseudo-feminist.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 06:44 AM
2

Not sure but you might try The False Rape Society.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 06:20 AM
1

Whites. The point: Every group is discriminated against in some way.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 06:17 AM
8

It's not an opinion, it's the truth. Furthermore, only discrimination against men is legislated.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 06:16 AM
-4

Upvoted so that others who do not wish to inflict themselves with an unnecessary vaccine may do their own research. If not, well, it's called survival of the fittest for a reason. Pro-tip: When you search Google for "XXX dangers forum" and you get a bunch of results explaining why XXX is dangerous, you should think twice before taking XXX. Google search Gardasil dangers forum and you'll see what I mean. Risking death and long-term disability so you can possibly be protected by a few strains of H…
/r/MensRights29/09/11 06:10 AM
-1

The feminine focus and emasculation and demonization of men and masculinity in the media isn't a new idea.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 06:07 AM
-5

Pro-tip: Drugs that are not dangerous do not spawn forums where people share their stories about how bad the drugs fucked them up. Drugs that are dangerous DO. The FDA estimates only 1 in 10 adverse reactions are reported.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 06:04 AM
-2

Whites face some unique discrimination, just as blacks do. You show exactly what I'm talking about with the victim/oppressor ideology, however. Blacks were discriminated against so whites never can be! Women were discriminated against so men never can be!
/r/MensRights29/09/11 06:03 AM
-1

You must not be paying attention.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 06:02 AM
-5

Drugs that are not harmful do not have entire forums dedicated to them. Drugs that are harmful DO for good reason. The FDA itself estimates only 1 in 10 adverse reactions are reported.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 06:02 AM
0

Promoting homosexuality as superior to heterosexuality and femininity as superior to masculinity is harmful to a lot of boys. That is not to say that gay=bad. See also http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kucym/celebrating_lgbt_ones_sexuality_is_not_a_choice/c2ne6my?context=3
/r/MensRights29/09/11 06:00 AM
3

Interesting point. The same propaganda that attempts to make men less masculine also convinces more women that less masculine men are preferable. I would postulate, however, that women are more likely to divorce more feminine men they marry. Although society tries to convince women that they should want a weak-willed servant, they generally want someone dominant.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 05:58 AM
-3

I don't see a reason to waste time explaining elementary things to you. The effort to make someone who willingly believes a lie see the truth is enormous, perhaps infinite. I assure you, you have no idea what you're talking about, and I do. You can read the following if you want to try to understand: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kucym/celebrating_lgbt_ones_sexuality_is_not_a_choice/c2ne6my?context=3
/r/MensRights29/09/11 02:40 AM
1

I agree. I don't think anyone will change their orientation, but they will change how they express it. And a lot of men with the tendency toward bisexuality or whatever you want to call it, if they are not exposed to masculine energies as an alternative, take on a more feminine, submissive vibe, which is not usually attractive to women, and therefore they'll be far more likely to engage in homosexual relationships. My cousin is 18 and identifies as bisexual and is mostly gay. He acts like a 13 y…
/r/MensRights29/09/11 02:32 AM
-1

Boop-a-doop-doop Another good search is for Gardasil adverse drug reactions. That's how I found the following: "Each 0.5-mL dose of the vaccine contains approximately 225 mcg of aluminum (as Amorphous Aluminum Hydroxyphosphate Sulfate adjuvant)" http://www.rxlist.com/gardasil-drug.htm "Study clearly demonstrates that aluminum found in vaccines can cause neurologic damage" http://www.healthsentinel.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2598:study-clearly-demonstrates-that-alumin…
/r/MensRights29/09/11 12:26 AM
-7

Pro-tip: When you search Google for "XXX dangers forum" and you get a bunch of results explaining why XXX is dangerous, you should think twice before taking XXX. Google search Gardasil dangers forum and you'll see what I mean. Risking death and long-term disability so you can possibly be protected by a few strains of HPV is unwise. Adjuvant: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjuvant What? An ingredient in a vaccine specifically intended to cause an immune response could result in auto-immune disorde…
/r/MensRights29/09/11 12:26 AM
-9

Another good search is for Gardasil adverse drug reactions. That's how I found the following: "Each 0.5-mL dose of the vaccine contains approximately 225 mcg of aluminum (as Amorphous Aluminum Hydroxyphosphate Sulfate adjuvant)" http://www.rxlist.com/gardasil-drug.htm "Study clearly demonstrates that aluminum found in vaccines can cause neurologic damage" http://www.healthsentinel.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2598:study-clearly-demonstrates-that-aluminum-found-in-vacci…
/r/MensRights29/09/11 12:25 AM
-11

No, I don't need "huge amounts of proof" to understand that taking something that triggers an immune response that could kill or maim me but gains me nothing is a stupid thing to do. All one really needs is common sense. But it ain't so common these days.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 12:05 AM
-5

What he really means is that the benefit is in the wallets of the vaccine pimps.
/r/MensRights29/09/11 12:03 AM
-7

Me too. If a shot can kill me or give me a lifelong disability I will gladly have the shot. Oh wait, maybe NOT. http://truthaboutgardasil.org/
/r/MensRights29/09/11 12:02 AM
0

Not a straw man. You claim without investigating the opposition that only "conspiracy nuts" would claim the HPV vaccine could possibly be dangerous and not worth getting. I say this is the same kind of thing a lot of people do when they hear about "men's rights" - because it is. You believe what you want to believe. You won't consider alternative views, which is why you won't seriously consider the possibility that Gardasil is dangerous and unnecessary (which is the truth).
/r/MensRights29/09/11 12:01 AM
-5

All about the profit. Manipulating women is easy. Manipulating men is easy too - claim it's for women's benefit.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:58 PM
-11

I didn't look at it because I've already done the research, and I have common sense. Adjuvant: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjuvant What? An ingredient in a vaccine specifically intended to cause an immune response could result in auto-immune disorders or death, AND HAS in many victims of this vaccine? Crazy! Meanwhile, because you cannot think, you will discount any and all stories demonstrating not only the dangers of Gardasil but the fact that it isn't even necessary. You want to believe it,…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:57 PM
-3

Yeah, conspiracy nuts like those men's rights wackos. Adjuvant: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjuvant What? An ingredient in a vaccine specifically intended to cause an immune response could result in auto-immune disorders or death, AND HAS in many victims of this vaccine? Crazy!
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:54 PM
-2

I'm disputing your lie that homophobia is the reason that flamboyant homosexuality is promoted in the media. I won't waste any further time with an obvious troll.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:53 PM
-1

Boys are taught primarily by females and these days are not allowed to express themselves. They're supposed to sit still like good little girls, cooperate, and listen. This is true throughout early grades too. See also: http://www.amazon.com/War-Against-Boys-Misguided-Feminism/dp/0684849569
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:52 PM
-14

You are wrong. It's not. Pro-tip: When you search Google for "XXX dangers forum" and you get a bunch of results explaining why XXX is dangerous, you should think twice before taking XXX. Google search Gardasil dangers forum and you'll see what I mean. Risking death and long-term disability so you can possibly be protected by a few strains of HPV is unwise.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:50 PM
-11

When you search Google for "XXX dangers forum" and you get a bunch of results explaining why XXX is dangerous, you should think twice before taking XXX. Google search Gardasil dangers forum and you'll see what I mean. Risking death and long-term disability so you can possibly be protected by a few strains of HPV is unwise. If you're in the military you are probably already subjected to a lot of unnecessary vaccines and experimental drugs, lol, but one less couldn't hurt.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:37 PM
-2

Well the fact is that big government, regardless of what you want to call it, is necessarily anti-male. I also think the left is most known for the victim/oppressor ideology which I just mentioned in another reply to you. This victim/oppressor ideology is also anti-male and anti-truth. Truth is what's important.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:36 PM
-1

Ignatius is equally responsible. AnnArchist is apparently easily manipulated, unable to stand his ground. Ignatius is stubborn and unreasonable. Regardless, they won't be going anywhere, I assure you. If the LGBT thing were really about focusing on LGBT issues, they'd have a "white male month" too, as there are specific issues affecting white males. But because it is really just a politically correct ploy relying on the typical victim/oppressor ideology, you won't ever see a white male month, th…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:33 PM
1

The ribbon is for prostate cancer awareness silly.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:25 PM
-1

Kill_The_Rich has ulterior motives. I mean, look at the username - total victim/oppressor ideology. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ktkco/lgbt_mensrights_logo_competition/c2n47qx Here's my submission haha: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ktkco/lgbt_mensrights_logo_competition/c2n3t1q
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:24 PM
-5

The mods are unreasonable, or haven't you been paying attention?
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:22 PM
-1

We'll see. R/MR still has the potential to be a good way to promote genuine men's rights issues, unless the moderators push their misandry further and start banning submissions from real MRA sites on some pretext of misogyny. Of course, Ignatius's silly idea about LGBT issues has turned the front page into a gay issues Reddit instead of a men's rights reddit, and it's burying real activism opportunities like the AVfM article on Biden. I will continue to submit genuine men's rights articles here …
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:18 PM
0

Thank you for pointing out the obvious so I didn't have to. I swear sometimes it's really like talking to children when they can't understand the simplest things.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:15 PM
2

Ignatius is not a good listener. He can do whatever he wants. He has his flawed view of the world and he hates it when you point it out to him. Now that kloo2yoo isn't around he's pushing the stupidity a bit further than before.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:15 PM
-1

I made a post about it but it was down-voted by haters and sheep. I felt it important for all those with sane comments to know. Blame the haters and sheep, not me.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:13 PM
-8

Pro-tip: When you search Google for "XXX dangers forum" and you get a bunch of results explaining why XXX is dangerous, you should think twice before taking XXX. Google search Gardasil dangers forum and you'll see what I mean. Risking death and long-term disability so you can possibly be protected by a few strains of HPV is unwise.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:13 PM
-3

Pro-tip: When you search Google for "XXX dangers forum" and you get a bunch of results explaining why XXX is dangerous, you should think twice before taking XXX. Google search Gardasil dangers forum and you'll see what I mean. Risking death and long-term disability so you can possibly be protected by a few strains of HPV is unwise.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:13 PM
0

I don't suppose that would be your response if someone had suggested an LGBT month. Only a white male month offends you? Mmhm. Oh, and in response to your comment: My not fucking losing it.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:12 PM
2

Good post. You might PM it to ignatius, I don't know that he'll read it. I'm not really sure he cares, though. He's not really the listening type. But hey, perhaps that's the irony of it - you don't listen to me when I'm right, and ignatius doesn't listen to you when you're right. :P
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:10 PM
-4

To be more accurate, most sitcoms are about women and feminine or white knight males, which only proves my point.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:08 PM
0

The truth generally is.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:06 PM
-1

I don't consider transexuals less human. That doesn't change the fact that biological women who have an operation do NOT become men. On the other hand, white men are men, so I'm looking forward to "White Male Month" at R/MR.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:05 PM
-1

I posted the reply to everyone who might find it useful because my post about it was down-voted by haters. Blame the haters.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:04 PM
-1

Feminism is merely an opportunistic extension of the female psyche. Chivalry is the male response to the female.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:03 PM
1

Of course feminists had something to do with the logo change - not only are you a feminist, but also it's the politically correct, left-leaning victim/oppressor ideology that feminism is based on that promotes LGBT issues over others.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 11:00 PM
-2

You doubt that the media would celebrate femininity and encourage it in males? Oh, it's because of "homophobia". Lol, riiight.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 10:58 PM
-1

duh
/r/MensRights28/09/11 10:57 PM
-3

I stand corrected. Thank God we have a front page full of gay issues while real activism is downvoted: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kujfl/save_calls_for_outrage_after_biden_appearance/
/r/MensRights28/09/11 10:56 PM
1

Nope.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 10:55 PM
-2

Only to fools. I linked to an article that happened to be at a White Nationalist blog. That is all I did.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 10:55 PM
0

The victim/oppressor ideologies are based on falsehoods. They cannot make things better for men.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 10:54 PM
-4

Pro-tip: When you search Google for "XXX dangers forum" and you get a bunch of results explaining why XXX is dangerous, you should think twice before taking XXX. Google search Gardasil dangers forum and you'll see what I mean. Risking death and long-term disability so you can possibly be protected by a few strains of HPV is unwise.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 10:53 PM
-7

Pro-tip: When you search Google for "XXX dangers forum" and you get a bunch of results explaining why XXX is dangerous, you should think twice before taking XXX. Google search Gardasil dangers forum and you'll see what I mean. Risking death and long-term disability so you can possibly be protected by a few strains of HPV is unwise.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 10:52 PM
-2

Phlake is a misandric troll. The most obvious indicator that ignatiusloyola and annarchist's recent ideas are moronic is that misandrists such as phlake and the AMR mods LOVE the ideas. No worries though. R/mr is not an activist reddit. Real activism is done at places like AVfM.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 09:34 PM
-5

The sad reality most people are gullible fools. “A sane person to an insane society must appear insane.” - Kurt Vonnegut, Welcome to the Monkey House
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:37 PM
-3

Spot on.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:36 PM
-8

No, the HPV vaccine is a profit scheme, and nobody should take it unless they like autoimmune disorders.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:35 PM
-6

The vaccine is about profit. It is unnecessary and dangerous.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:34 PM
-8

The HPV vaccine is unnecessary and dangerous.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:34 PM
-4

The HPV vaccine is unnecessary and dangerous.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:33 PM
-5

Bad idea.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:33 PM
-15

No they do not. The risks of the HPV vaccine far outweigh the benefits. The only reason they are promoting it for boys is to make an even greater profit.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:32 PM
0

I hereby decree the month of October White History Month at r/MensRights. Because LGBTs and other politically correct "victim classes" aren't the only males who face discrimination. And I have just as much right to claim "r/MensRights supports r/WhiteRights" as IgnatiusLoyola has to claim "r/MensRights supports LGBT History Month". The only difference is I'm not putting up a rainbow colored logo.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:25 PM
0

No, my victimhood status or lack of it has nothing to do with it. I walk and talk like there are victims who do not fall under the politically correct umbrella of "victim class". Just as LGBTs have issues, so do straight people, and whites. But those aren't politically correct, and they aren't perceived as "victim" classes. So you won't devote a month to them because you are a panderer.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:23 PM
1

LGBTs are a politically correct victim class. You won't see ignatius having a "white male month" because he believes whites are oppressors, not victims.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:21 PM
1

LGBTs are a politically correct victim class. You won't see ignatius having a "white male month" because he believes whites are oppressors, not victims.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:19 PM
0

LGBTs are a politically correct victim class. You won't see ignatius having a "white male month" because he believes whites are oppressors, not victims.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:18 PM
-1

At least an AMR mod agrees with you lol.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:18 PM
-4

LGBTs are a politically correct victim class. You won't see ignatius having a "white male month" because he believes whites are oppressors, not victims.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:17 PM
1

LGBTs are a politically correct victim class. You won't see ignatius having a "white male month" because he believes whites are oppressors, not victims.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:17 PM
0

Then I expect a white male month.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:16 PM
2

You won't see a white history month because ignatiusloyola prescribes to the victim/oppressor ideology that blacks are victims and whites are oppressors, just like women are victims and men are oppressors. LGBT month is politically correct, so it's fair game for ignatius.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:15 PM
2

I specifically stated that balancing political ideologies were important. You disagreed. Then magically a week or two later, that was exactly your stated reason for promoting AnnArchist.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:14 PM
1

I predicted it long ago. I'm guessing the reason he is not outright wreaking obvious havoc is that technically kloo2yoo is still the primary moderator.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:13 PM
0

Then let's have Asian month too. The fact is, ignatius sees whites as "privileged" just like most people see males as "privileged". Guaranteed, he will focus only on perceived "victim" classes: LGBTs, blacks, maybe some other minorities. This merely perpetuates the victim/oppressor myths that do so much harm to men.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:11 PM
0

I'm still waiting for white male month.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:09 PM
-6

Transmen are not men.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:08 PM
-2

It does, however, define your sex. Idiot.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:06 PM
-2

White history.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:05 PM
-6

He changed the title to appease man-hating feminists who believe we're all rape apologists: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:01 PM
-6

He changed the title to appease man-hating feminists who believe we're all rape apologists: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:01 PM
0

He changed the title to appease man-hating feminists who believe we're all rape apologists: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:00 PM
-7

He changed the title to appease man-hating feminists who believe we're all rape apologists: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3
/r/MensRights28/09/11 08:00 PM
-4

He changed the title to appease man-hating feminists who believe we're all rape apologists: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:59 PM
-10

He changed the title to appease man-hating feminists who believe we're all rape apologists: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:59 PM
-10

He changed the title to appease man-hating feminists who believe we're all rape apologists: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:59 PM
-9

Trans men are not men.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:58 PM
-7

He changed the title to appease man-hating feminists who believe we're all rape apologists: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:58 PM
-6

He changed the title to appease man-hating feminists who believe we're all rape apologists: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:57 PM
-7

He changed the title to appease man-hating feminists who believe we're all rape apologists: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:57 PM
-1

That's certainly better than "anti-equality activists". He changed the title to appease man-hating feminists who believe we're all rape apologists: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:57 PM
-4

He changed the title to appease man-hating feminists who believe we're all rape apologists: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:56 PM
-2

He changed the title to appease man-hating feminists who believe we're all rape apologists: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:56 PM
-2

He changed the title to appease man-hating feminists who believe we're all rape apologists: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:55 PM
-1

Maybe the mods should stop making changes and instituting campaigns without consulting us first. Then October could have been Domestic Violence Awareness Month, not a tangentially related LGBT month with a silly rainbow logo. Or is it more important to listen to feminists who think we're all woman hating rape apologists?
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:18 PM
1

He changed the title to appease man-hating feminists who believe we're all rape apologists: http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:15 PM
-3

I'm so glad you changed it based on what feminists want, who think R/MR is just a place where we assume all rape accusers are lying (AKA we're all rape apologists). http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/ktp63/which_sub_reddit_pisses_you_off_the_most_why/c2n9d0x?context=3 Pro-tip: Stop changing things without asking our opinions.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:14 PM
-13

The media glorifies homosexuality, bisexuality, and basically anything that's not heterosexuality, without an equal focus on heterosexuality. Cartoon characters often include a flamboyantly homosexual character, for example. Daytime TV is filled with women and feminine homosexual men. These are some examples that leave heterosexual boys, and even homosexual boys who are not flamboyant, especially those without a father figure around, without anyone masculine to identify with. Furthermore, the me…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 07:01 PM
2

Keep in mind that when presented with the facts your professor may claim that the methodology in your studies is somehow flawed. You can respond that the studies that show men as primary aggressors were in fact flawed, done by ideologues, ideologues with ties to domestic violence shelters for women and benefit financially from perpetuating such myths.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 06:58 PM
-1

It's September, not October.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 06:55 PM
4

It's not LGBT month. It's Prostate Cancer Awareness Month.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 06:28 PM
1

Indeed, it is not germane to our subreddit.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:59 AM
2

Ah, then indeed it may be a men's rights issue. I would have to investigate the matter further to determine the differing rates of HIV in gay vs straight men and the detectability of HIV in blood. If HIV and other illnesses that may be more common in gay men can always be detected in blood, then there is no reason to ban gay men from donating blood. If there is significant value to banning gay men from donating blood, then it isn't so much about misandry or homophobia but reality.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:57 AM
-3

It's a minor point. If the issue affects homosexual men but not homosexual women, then it is misandry. If it affects both homosexual men and women, then it is related to discrimination against homosexuals, which certainly has a lot to do with traditional sex roles, but isn't directly a men's rights issue. I see men's rights issues as generally related to misandry. Then again, you can't really "cure" misandry without focusing on the larger issues. I don't see a problem with talking about it here.…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:50 AM
2

You can do prostate cancer awareness all through the month of October. That's the point. Also, Domestic Violence month is October. A DV focus is far more useful than the senseless LGBT focus.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:39 AM
5

Who cares what misandrists think? Also, they will mock ignatius's (not my) silly LGBT logo idea while calling out all the ways in which they demonizing MRAs. This idea does nothing, and really is just plain silly.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:37 AM
-3

In some respects, yes. At the same time, they're not physically female.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:36 AM
-3

Still not really a men's rights issue. It's an issue for homosexuals only. It has nothing to do with misandry. Furthermore, we can discuss it, but it's not really an important issue for men's rights.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:32 AM
0

No. The victimhood ideology I speak of is one that says members of a certain class are always victims and members of another class are always oppressors. Women are victims; men are oppressors. Blacks are victims; whites are oppressors. Gays are victims; straight people are oppressors. Transgenders are victims; Cisgenders are oppressors. MRAs do not prescribe to this kind of victim/oppressor ideology.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:31 AM
-3

Unless we're having a white men's rights month, it's exclusive.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:29 AM
1

That's not misandry, but it is tangentially related to it.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 04:28 AM
1

Women are a victim class. Men are an oppressor class. LGBT are a victim class. Straight cisgenders are an oppressor class. Blacks are a victim class. Whites are an oppressor class. In many ways, straight cisgender and white issues have more in common with men's issues than LGBTs.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:56 AM
-4

LGBT is a self-identified group. Singling out LGBTs is exclusive. Lesbians are not afflicted by misandry. Gay men and bisexual men are. Transexuals are not really men or women.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:53 AM
0

More accurately: Male victims of DV co-opted by LGBT privilege.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:33 AM
2

Oh, and don't act surprised. Last time this rainbow logo idea came up it was shot down by a lot of people here, and that's why kloo2yoo didn't go with it. So don't act surprised and feign innocence, chum. You knew the reaction was coming, and for good reason.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:30 AM
1

You were disagreeing me on the following point, which is what I addressed: Just that race issues don't coincide the same way many LGBT issues do. I also think it's rather silly to have any race/sexual orientation months at r/mr at all, but if you're going to have one you should have them all. And not just supposed "victim" classes like minorities and LGBTs.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:22 AM
2

Honestly, ignatius, I was right about promoting a guy like AnnArchist - right-leaning - to the moderator position for some balance. You bitched at me then, too. But when you announced AA as the new mod, I didn't brag that I was right - out of respect for you. I could have, but I didn't. If you don't like me airing my disagreements in public, then why don't you ask me for my opinion first? I'm right more often than you seem to think. I have my thumb on the sentiment of many men's rights posters, …
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:17 AM
-4

By singling out one group, you are being exclusive. Something tells me you won't be having a white history month at r/mr because whites, just like men, have nothing to complain about, but LGBT are a government-recognized "victim" class, so it's politically correct for marketing purposes to promote them. Shit, you might as well have a women's month here.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:14 AM
4

The LGBT idea is nothing but a marketing ploy. The DV idea on the other hand would actually be useful. Promoting saveservices who are doing really great things would be splendid: http://www.saveservices.org/ A rainbow logo? Fucking useless.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:12 AM
4

Bitching and moaning that r/MR dares to acknowledge gay/trans MRAs? No, it's not acknowledging gay/trans MRAs, it's propping up a certain type of gay/trans person over everyone else for marketing purposes. I'm not a homophobe, but you certainly do like to mischaracterize what I say. I explained more thoroughly here, but something tells me your hate - yes, your hate - will cloud your interpretation: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ktkbc/rmensrights_supports_lgbt_history_month/c2n4pm2
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:09 AM
3

Yes, race issues do coincide the same way LGBT issues do. I already gave some examples. Would you like more? False rape accusations - first it happened to black males by white women, resulting in lynchings. Now it happens to everyone by women, resulting in ... well it wouldn't be a far cry to call them lynchings either. How many black women were lynched for rape, eh? And if we're going to have a black history month theme, we damn well better have a white history month theme too.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:07 AM
3

It's a valid question. Maybe I didn't ask it nicely, but then again, it's not like you posted something asking for ideas about a new logo for October, you posted one about LGBT. Why LGBT? To me it seems it's just a cheap way to curry favor with the typical ignorant masses. Why not do something meaningful like Prostate Cancer Awareness? Do you think the only gay men out there are the type that want to see a fucking rainbow colored logo for a month straight to make them feel part of a victim class…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 03:00 AM
1

People think men are pedophiles isn't exactly something just for gay guys. Exactly, which is why it's a men's rights issue. On the other hand, "Homosexuals cannot donate blood", although it has some ties to men's rights, isn't actually a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 02:27 AM
-3

Race and religious rights are not as intertwined with a mens movement as much as LBGT issues are. What are you talking about? White males are discriminated against in college admissions due not only to their sex but their race, with the same excuses: whites are privileged, men are privileged. Black males are discriminated against in the criminal "justice" system due not only to their sex but their race: it's worst to be a black male, second worst to be a white male, then a black female, then a w…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 02:19 AM
5

Domestic Violence? That'd be an even better topic than prostate cancer. LGBT month at r/mr is looking sillier and sillier in comparison.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 02:15 AM
3

Good response to a rational point. "fuck off"
/r/MensRights28/09/11 02:12 AM
0

Vote for the blue ribbon to stand against prostate cancer by replying with "vote": September is Prostate Cancer Awareness Month. October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month, which is represented by a pink ribbon because the assumption is that it only affects women, even though it affects men too. In protest, let's continue raising awareness for prostate cancer, which affects primarily men, by making the logo through October a blue ribbon: http://i53.tinypic.com/2n732mw.png And remember, gay men suf…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 02:08 AM
-3

Can we make the logo pink for October's Breast Cancer awareness month? Pink because breast cancer only affects women, of course. /s I did the work for you: http://i.imgur.com/QHdE0.png Oh wait, September is prostate cancer awareness month, which affects a lot of men. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/09/01/presidential-proclamation-national-prostate-cancer-awareness-month Here's my suggestion. Show the asshats who make Breast Cancer Awareness month about women only that we don't bu…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 02:03 AM
-3

Whites don't have a history month because they are privileged and we have no reason to celebrate their unique accomplishments. Same reason there's no men's history month. For that matter, I'm not sure why this "men's rights" sub-reddit exists either.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:54 AM
0

Are we going to have a black men's rights logo during Black History Month in February? What about a white men's rights logo? Straight men's rights? Gay men, black men, white men, and straight men all face their own unique forms of discrimination. If not, the LGBT theme seems like a cheap way of "looking good" in modern insane America, where only minorities, LGBTs, and women can be marginalized. And if that's the case, what are we doing talking about men's rights at all? Regardless I've submitted…
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:41 AM
-4

This! Can I vote for my own?
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:24 AM
3

Default size: http://i.imgur.com/GgiY7.jpg Very small: http://i.imgur.com/jE0n3.jpg I have alternative sizes available if my logo is chosen.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:08 AM
1

I'm sure they do haha. And asparthame doesn't cause cancer, and saturated fat is bad for you too! :)
/r/MensRights28/09/11 12:50 AM
-1

Uh, dudette, that doesn't mean I'm trying to "rally the MRM to white supremacy".
/r/MensRights28/09/11 12:48 AM
2

You might find this link interesting: http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/09/18/death-row-and-the-pussy-pass/ I posted it the other day but it was of course down-voted by misandrists, people who hate me, and other cowards.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 08:25 PM
5

Well Go Gurt isn't actually healthy (way too much sugar), so it would be more accurate to say advertisers may think of males as being someone they need to advertise their unhealthy food choices for children to.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 08:19 PM
1

Well, there are some people who aren't willing to change their minds and will deny reality even in the face of overwhelming evidence. A lot of them. And some of them are parents. The others, who aren't thoroughly emotionally invested in mutilating their kids' genitals, can be convinced.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 06:50 PM
-2

Girls are encouraged to enter STEM while boys are discouraged to learn throughout their education, yet men still kick women's asses in STEM. And men are still the pioneers of science and technology, even though women have had the opportunity for almost a century now. No, sex does not cease to be a factor.
/r/MensRights27/09/11 06:47 PM
-2

Lol @ the women saying "it shouldn't matter". one partner: 50% divorce rate, virgin: 25% divorce rate, 16+ partners: 80% divorce rate. http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2010/09/sexual-partner-divorce-risk.html
/r/MensRights27/09/11 12:01 AM
1

It really matters to bigots like you lol.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 11:55 PM
1

Basically, yes, male feminists are just men who are trying to gain the approval of women (get laid), with varying success.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 11:48 PM
7

Even though you're just having fun.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentencing_disparity A University of Georgia study found substantial disparity in criminal sentencing men and women received "after controlling for extensive criminological, demographic, and socioeconomic variables". The study found that "blacks and males are... less likely to get no prison term when that option is available; less likely to receive downward departures [from the guidelines]; and more likely to receive upward adju…
/r/MensRights26/09/11 11:13 PM
2

Of course it does. You chop off sensitive tissue, it's going to reduce sensitivity. The people who deny it are the reality-denying type, who won't listen to anything rational.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 09:28 PM
2

You can view edits here, but there are a lot since 3 days ago: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_serial_killers_by_number_of_victims&limit=250&action=history
/r/MensRights26/09/11 09:25 PM
1

Sigi1 clearly trolled me. I'll start reporting trolls rather than responding to them.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 06:22 PM
-1

It's not hard to correct mistakes. I have an iphone. An iphone would have corrected "yiu" to "you" automatically. Enough excuses. Either make your shit readable or STFU. I'm not going to try to decipher gibberish. The last meaningful thing said in this conversation was by me, where I said: There's an opportunity cost to women's "freedom". Sigi's response was to call me a troll. So was yours. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kq93f/highlighting_a_very_good_comment/c2mmo5q?context=3 Sinc…
/r/MensRights26/09/11 06:03 PM
3

Ah, apologies. I'm constantly attacked and have an itchy trigger finger.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 05:24 PM
0

Not at carrying babies in their bellies.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 05:23 PM
1

Well that's because there is a wrong answer. I can see both sides, or else I wouldn't know whether an answer is right or wrong. I know for a fact that big government is the wrong answer. Well actually, there's a wrong answer if you assume certain fundamentals. For example, if you assume it's not good for the majority of the world's populations to end up as slaves to a greedy few who will likely ensure the destruction of the human race, and that is an assumption, then big government is definitely…
/r/MensRights26/09/11 05:09 PM
0

Jews are smarter than whites, and it's sex, not gender.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 05:07 PM
0

I swear these days it's mostly idiots who don't know the meaning of "ad hominem" who use the term. Oh wait, there was a genuine ad hominem!
/r/MensRights26/09/11 05:06 PM
-1

I actually have a pretty good idea what it would be like to be a trans woman. I mean even be so fucked up by my self-loathing and hatred of the rest of the world that I might be able to warp my mind enough to deny reality. But really, I'm pretty sure I'd be smart enough to realize that I just am who I am, like other healthy transexuals do. I'm enough of an oddball myself, in more ways than you know, and I accept who I am just fine.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 05:05 PM
1

Yeah, the popular vote is a very reliable indicator of what's best, because it's not like most people are stupid sheep who will believe whatever propaganda they are fed.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 05:02 PM
-6

Oh I considered that, but it doesn't fall in line with everything else. Of course, physical power is an attribute in men that women use to their benefit for protection. But no, men weren't all like "me no smart as woman, so me beat her until she submit so she shut up, then me make fart joke with other men who women always say not so smart, who laughing now?"
/r/MensRights26/09/11 05:00 PM
-2

Seriously, another attempt to rally the MRM to White Supremacy? Bullshit moronic statement #1 of the day.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 04:59 PM
-2

I am more than equipped to handle it Obviously not.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 04:58 PM
1

women weren't forced to stay home, shaddup
/r/MensRights26/09/11 04:56 PM
-3

That's not an ad hominem, chump. He can't even fucking type, and he's trying to attack me. It's moronic. I can't read his retarded shit in order to reply to it with anything else but "are you fucking drunk?" Now kindly shut the fuck up when I'm not asking for your input, troll.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 09:31 AM
-9

I recently created a Reddit to highlight the plight of human-to-butterfly transformations. You might find it interesting. http://www.reddit.com/r/butterflyphobia A request for an alliance with members of r/TransphobiaProject: Greetings. I have taped plastic wings to my shoulders and I am now really a butterfly, just like a person who takes hormones and has surgery really becomes a different physical sex. I feel great comradery with you. I would appreciate if you would replace all gendered refere…
/r/MensRights26/09/11 08:44 AM
9

The ideology the OP adheres to is quite similar to feminism. It's a transexual victimhood ideology. Not all transexuals adhere to it, but it certainly is common on Reddit and places like TransphobiaProject. http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/kiv55/what_common_misconception_annoys_you/c2m81gq
/r/MensRights26/09/11 08:43 AM
-2

It's sexual assault.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 08:34 AM
0

Are you drunk? Learn to handle your booze.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 08:34 AM
-11

That being said, the transgendered (especially transwomen) have to be especially cautious given the abnormally high possibility of violence they could face from bigots. Attacking one's rapist does not make one a bigot.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 06:13 AM
1

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/krivo/why_i_laugh_every_time_i_hear_about_womens/
/r/MensRights26/09/11 04:49 AM
1

i'm going to delete this and post my blog post on it
/r/MensRights26/09/11 04:45 AM
1

But when you think about it, women really have just about nothing unique to complain about. And so when I see someone respond to a men's issue with some form of "but what about the wimminz", such as "oh, but that happens to women too (I won't mention that it's extremely rare in women's case)", I can't help but laugh at the stupidity of it. See also: http://www.reddit.com/r/masculism/comments/kpq1r/whats_the_difference_between_mens_rights_and/c2mlsao
/r/MensRights26/09/11 04:31 AM
0

Just remember, it's not a zero-sum game guys! Even though men and boys are discriminated against in countless social and legal ways, and the only thing women have to complain about is being called a slut when they sleep around because they face little to no real discrimination and have plenty of legal and social privileges without the same responsibilities as men, the appropriate response to a comment about men's rights is: What about the women? This is not a zero-sum game!
/r/MensRights26/09/11 04:22 AM
3

See also: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kqj9w/lets_push_for_real_equality/
/r/MensRights26/09/11 03:26 AM
-1

Indeed, men are smarter than women.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 03:25 AM
2

Man as disposable protector.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 02:09 AM
2

Feminists would probably hate this commercial. "Stop treating her like a child! That's our job!"
/r/MensRights26/09/11 02:09 AM
-2

That's not what you said. You said: LOL, WHAT? I would love to see the unbiased studies on that one, champ. And of course, then you realized that I'm right, and there are plenty of unbiased studies showing I'm right.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 02:05 AM
-7

And yet men still are superior to women when it comes to intelligence, innovation, and, well, everything that matters. For the most part women only "excel" at bullshit non-value-added positions that are there for the sake of making women look valuable. You also have the widespread feminization of education that ensures boys fail more than girls. Men are the geniuses of the world. They are the leaders, the inventors, the ones who have the capacity to advance society. Even with all the discriminat…
/r/MensRights26/09/11 02:02 AM
-3

So dumb. :/ I wonder how many shots I'd have to take to be dumber than you sober. It would probably have to be enough to kill me.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:57 AM
-4

You have to be a stupid human.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:55 AM
10

just another reinforcement See, I implied it is one of many. The stupidity of human beings is astounding.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:55 AM
-1

misogyny = hatred of women Jews tend to be smarter than other races too, yet I don't hate all other races.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:54 AM
-3

You're the one who said: Does this mean all Native Americans are weak compared to the might of the white man? Which implies you were speaking about all Native Americans. Led by the Queen, actually... Led by men. After these two instances of outright stupidity, I feel I must end this "conversation".
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:53 AM
-5

Yet the fact remains, amazing.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:18 AM
-7

White colonists led by men? Hm interesting pattern we have here. Lol Native Americans were led by women? What you smokin' sensei?
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:17 AM
-6

Still waiting to hear about all those successful women-run societies. Oh wait, none of them were successful and they all died out. Or maybe these male-dominated societies that made everything possible in the world were just lucky, hahaha.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:08 AM
-10

If so then natural selection took care of them. Let's let women run the world so we can all die too, good idea.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 01:01 AM
-4

Do you honestly think humanity is just a constant circle-jerk of fucking each other over and enslaving everyone they can for power, do you? Lol so you're saying it's not? I'm not falling for any fallacy, chum, I'm looking at the real world. And no evil woman fucked me over. And no shit, both sexes - not genders, sexes - fuck people over. There are people who seek power and those who do not. Those who do are what you would call "evil". And they manipulate dumb, "good" people. And smart, "good" pe…
/r/MensRights26/09/11 12:53 AM
7

Or most men laugh it off and take it as just another reinforcement that this really is how they have to treat bitches if they want things to remain "happy". They know nothing else, and if they stand up for themselves the bitch only gets angrier. They don't know that standing up for oneself and keeping to it would put an end to the bitch's bitchiness.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 12:45 AM
2

Yes, I tried to find a video of the second one to link here at r/mr the other day, but could not. And it merely enforces this type of submission in young men.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 12:44 AM
3

Knowing the truth brings happiness. You might also find this interesting: http://delusiondamage.com/hidden-truths/what-is-it/
/r/MensRights26/09/11 12:43 AM
-8

In what way? You realize I'm being sarcastic about men oppressing women and also about women's "genius"?
/r/MensRights26/09/11 12:41 AM
-10

Men are more intelligent than women, my dear cattypakes: http://www.angryharry.com/esMenareMoreIntelligentthanWomen.htm
/r/MensRights26/09/11 12:40 AM
-3

A slave speaks. I hope he asked his woman for permission.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 12:39 AM
-7

You do realize I was being sarcastic, and making the point that it is indeed absurd to think that every civilization oppressed the "genius" of the female and that's why they never accomplished squat? No, the truth is that women are not geniuses in comparison to men, and that men are the pioneers and the engineers of human civilization.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 12:38 AM
-2

Oh, is that what happened with women's suffrage in the US? Men lost the right to own women as property, and everything is now hunky dory? I guess you must be right then. :P
/r/MensRights26/09/11 12:37 AM
-3

Surely. I'm only against women's right to destroy civilization.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 12:35 AM
0

Would I rather see civilization wiped out so that people can feel good? No.
/r/MensRights26/09/11 12:34 AM
-1

Haha, though the funny thing is if today's men were only allowed to vote, they would immediately vote to let women vote again.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 07:01 PM
-1

I can't deny that things would be better off if only men could vote. I also can't deny that things would be even better off if only I could vote.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 06:58 PM
-1

There's an opportunity cost to women's "freedom".
/r/MensRights25/09/11 06:57 PM
1

I don't agree with how you critiqued this, but I personally do generally like to add an explanation of what the article is about in the title if it's not already clear. For example, "Life In An Insane Society: male teachers who hug students are demonized"
/r/MensRights25/09/11 06:13 PM
3

We live in an absurd world of insanity.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 06:11 PM
2

An injury during circumcision? Huh-what?!
/r/MensRights25/09/11 06:10 PM
4

It's amazing that throughout human history every civilization has managed to oppress the utter genius of the female sex so thoroughly. One might almost think that perhaps females aren't the geniuses of the human race after all.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 06:06 PM
-2

I think men and women would both be better off with the privilege of not being slaves to a big government corporatocracy.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 06:01 PM
0

And a vote for Rick Perry is a vote for the same establishment, really. Ron Paul is the only one who might even stand a chance against the establishment, but I don't think he'll win, and if he did they'd spend the whole time demonizing him and in 4 years we'd end up even worse. That is, if they don't just kill him off.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 06:00 PM
-3

Sure, it's more complex. It's not just the left but most people who buy into the victim ideologies and big government propaganda. Hey, what do you think of this? http://wnthinktank.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/women-in-the-21st-century/
/r/MensRights25/09/11 05:44 PM
-8

I'm feeling generous, so I'll provide a little more detail, though I don't expect you to understand. There is an opportunity cost associated with women's "right" to vote. G'day.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 05:35 PM
-9

No.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 05:29 PM
1

My "belief" in what is true is the very reason I am an MRA.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 05:04 PM
-8

The whole world suffers.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 05:02 PM
1

Me neither, but it's still true that's the only thing that would change his mind.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 05:01 PM
-37

Why? Because women's suffrage necessarily leads to the loss of rights for men. Let us now watch the rights of men in that country crumble over the next half century. And then I can say I told you so.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 03:57 PM
-23

Say goodbye to men's rights in that country too then.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 03:53 PM
2

You turned it into a left vs right, stupid. I never mentioned the right, only the left. Also left and right do not equate to Democrat and Republican. Ugh, stupidity.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 05:30 AM
1

I'd rather see a meritocracy than systematic discrimination against the successful (men). Response: Pure meritocracy is a utopian illusion, and the systematic discrimination that you personally feel is everything that you deserve. Don't be stupid.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 05:29 AM
2

Women love me. :)
/r/MensRights25/09/11 04:10 AM
1

Bow
/r/MensRights25/09/11 04:10 AM
6

Due to the historical discrimination against nerds in the dating market, I also demand that nerd GPAs be artificially inflated by 0.5 and football player GPAs artificially decreased by 0.5 to compensate, even though nerds have always had a GPA advantage over footballers. (Hint: women have always had many special privileges and entitlements over men, but we increased them anyway and discriminated against men while claiming it was for the sake of "equality" because women couldn't vote.)
/r/MensRights25/09/11 03:46 AM
2

I'd also like to note that Barry Sanders, the best running back of all time, was screwed out of true glory and many Super Bowl rings by choosing to stay with one of the worst teams in the NFL, the Detroit Lions. It's only fair that we compensate him for this historical discrimination by awarding him the 12 Super Bowl rings he deserved as well as transferring 10% of the earnings of all current football players to his pockets for the injustice he faced. -Signed, leftist retard.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 03:29 AM
1

What?
/r/MensRights25/09/11 02:11 AM
-4

I don't. Down-voted.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 02:10 AM
1

I didn't say screw everyone else, I said stop relying on big government elites who want to oppress everyone to do it, dum-dum. They prey on people like you who think "omigolly gosh I wanna do the right thing and it sure seems like leftists do too so I better hate everyone who disagrees even though the fact is leftists want to use and abuse me more than anyone else". You are stupid. You are the reason for injustice. Without idiots like you, it wouldn't be allowed. You are an animal, a sheep. And …
/r/MensRights25/09/11 02:01 AM
1

I am not selfish. You are. Those who deny reality in order to cling to lies are truly selfish. I am talking about true solutions to the injustices of the world. You are talking about bullshit. You are the one putting the needs of the few above the needs of the many by supporting big government leftism. You are just too stupid to know it. You are an ignorant child and will remain so until your death at the hands of the very people you are supporting.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:59 AM
2

Interestingly enough, leftism = irrational hate. You hate me because I tell the truth. Anyway, you might find the following articles regarding the misandry of traditionalism insightful. Conservative Misandry: http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/mens-issues/conservative-misandry/ A Letter to Traditional Women: http://www.avoiceformen.com/miscellaneous/a-letter-to-traditional-women/ A Letter to Traditional Women Revisited: http://www.avoiceformen.com/women/a-letter-to-traditional-women-revisited/
/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:40 AM
3

But anyway, the left -> feminism, the right is sort of aligned with traditionalism. Both feminism and traditionalism have misandric aspects, but feminism is the most guilty. You keep ignoring what I say though, so it's likely I will soon stop responding to you at all unless I deem it helpful for observers.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:36 AM
-1

No, just an honest observation that women are more likely to follow the herd than men. Look into researching women's propensity for social interaction compared to that of men.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:34 AM
-1

are you trying to tell me that prior to that we never elected a single terrible candidate? Well, of course not. But with women's suffrage any country is more likely to be bedazzled and flamboozled by the lies of the elite because women are more likely to be fooled by shallow bullshit. Get your head out of your ass and pay attention.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:30 AM
2

That's only because you defend the left. I never said the "right" was good.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:28 AM
3

It's not left vs. right. Idiot America, women's suffrage, big government, feminism, they are all tied together and inseparable. Leftism is largely to blame for all of these things. The right is to blame for other things. Admitting this is cohesive.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:22 AM
-2

Yes, I can, because we consistently picked better candidates until the culture changed and women's suffrage came with it. It's all tied together, which is what some people would like to deny. Idiot America, women's suffrage, big government, feminism, they are all tied together and inseparable. You wouldn't find this kind of gross stupidity in the media without them.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:20 AM
0

Lol the MRM is about politics.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:00 AM
-1

Men aren't the ones buying this drivel, women are. If women couldn't vote, Michelle Obama wouldn't be catering to their stupidity. Hence, if it weren't for women's suffrage, we wouldn't see this bullshit.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 01:00 AM
1

Lol. False Rape Society. http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/
/r/MensRights25/09/11 12:58 AM
-2

I love truth.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 12:58 AM
-1

Not this dumb lol. First Lady helps poor down-trodden homeless female veterans who had 1/7 the chance of dying in war as males in the military and are much rarer than homeless male veterans. Make sure to watch, ladies. Oh, yeah, and vote for Obama! ABC.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 12:56 AM
3

Denial.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 12:23 AM
2

Misandrists really don't like it when people point out misandry.
/r/MensRights25/09/11 12:00 AM
2

If one believes discrimination against a group is okay, one is a bigot.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 11:41 PM
4

Would you like my manhood's dimensions so that you may diminish them? :*
/r/MensRights24/09/11 11:36 PM
2

I'm outing a bigot who masquerades as an MRA so that others may consider their bigotry in future discussions.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 11:32 PM
8

Oh, questioning my manhood, that's a brilliant move. No wonder you're so "successful".
/r/MensRights24/09/11 11:00 PM
2

I wish I had big daddy government so willing to give me a free ride. Though somehow I think I'd be unhappy having everything handed to me without earning it. Guess that's kind of a masculine attribute.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:58 PM
7

Oh, so the discrimination against men is okay because it harms me. Got it.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:56 PM
1

No, but he'd make sure my taxes stop paying for Ponies for hateful bigots like you.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:54 PM
5

Lol, oh, so other people deserve to be discriminated against, but you deserve special privileges. No wonder you hate the idea of meritocracy. You don't have merit.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:52 PM
2

That's pretty dumb, since Ron Paul would improve opportunities for small business owners, unless of course you're a woman who received sexist federal funding who is only thinking of herself.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:49 PM
2

I used to call myself mostly liberal. Then I read some things. Then I read some more. Then I thought a lot. Then I read more. And I thought a lot more, and I wrote long essays working it all out, piece by piece. And I realized that despite what I'd like to believe because I am a good person, not all people are, and the reality of human evolution means that we are competitive, and will sacrifice others for our own gain, and the reality of power is that eventually those who are in power are those …
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:39 PM
-2

Well that's only because you're a sheep. Woopdeedoo. Enjoy your slavery, celebrate it.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:32 PM
5

I'd rather see a meritocracy than systematic discrimination against the successful (men). You can't ask for much more. We are human after all. And therefore Paul is infinitely better than any other candidate.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:30 PM
1

I'm not. It's obvious. We can't all be geniuses, my friend. Or maybe it's just that I read more than you. I really don't read much these days, so it can't be that. Hm, perhaps it's just that I read more eclectically than you rather than discounting everything I don't want to initially agree with. I chide you for that. Think I'm being an asshole? You are an asshole for assuming I am confused. I'm not. Big government led by humans means human nature wins means those in power are power seekers mean…
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:28 PM
-3

Feminism does not insist on equal legal rights, it is insists on special privileges for women and sexism against men. All legal sexism in the US is against men, not women. I suspect you are a feminist ideologue who does not care about what's true, but I'll nevertheless link you to a more thorough explanation of why feminism is not egalitarian: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/kaef0/i_have_a_serious_question/c2ipj84
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:19 PM
3

Read or watch the debate. Perhaps she softened her usual message, which obviously was a mistake, as she lost the debate. Maybe she'll learn something from it.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:17 PM
2

All women, as a group, are not. Duh. We live in a world where people find it necessary to say this, though it is already obvious. Finicky, really. Judge every loan application on its merits. Yes. If some people seem to have difficulty understanding how to get a loan or how to get their finances in order to obtain one, offer community classes on financial literacy, starting a small business, or keeping accounts. Indeed, poor people would benefit from these moreso than women.
/r/MensRights24/09/11 10:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter