Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.
It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.
I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.
Support the archive
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]omdoks 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]huntwhales 12 points13 points14 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Demonspawn -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]RelevantWikiArticles 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]omdoks 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Demonspawn -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]AmazingPerson -7 points-6 points-5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]KOAN13 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]omdoks 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MuForceShoelace 4 points5 points6 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]abk0100 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Demonspawn -12 points-11 points-10 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Demonspawn -4 points-3 points-2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]BatmensBegins 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]omdoks 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]therealbarackobama 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]CommanderJuanShepard 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]omdoks 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]thingsarebad[S] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Demonspawn -3 points-2 points-1 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]otakuman 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz 2 points3 points4 points (55 children) | Copy Link
[+]CoonTown [recovered] (51 children) | Copy Link
Out of curiosity, do you have a source for the claim that most women's productivity is imparied while they are on their period? Or is this just an assumption?
[+]jmnzz -6 points-5 points-4 points (50 children) | Copy Link
[+]CoonTown [recovered] (49 children) | Copy Link
His statement was that women make less because they are less productive while they are on their period. This is the reason he was fired. Do you believe this was a true statement? If so, do you have any evidence that this is the case or is it just an assumption?
Hope this clears it up for you.
[–]jmnzz 2 points3 points4 points (46 children) | Copy Link
[–]omdoks 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]CoonTown [recovered] (43 children) | Copy Link
I like the part you so conveniently didn't bold:
Dude is literally saying women take more time off because they have periods. That's a profoundly ignorant thing to say. Women are perfectly capable of working through a period. This smacks of the excuse bigots use to justify not voting females into office. "But what happens when she nukes Iran cuz she's on her period? Har, har!" Sorry, that's not how it works.
He was fired because he made a completely ignorant statement (Women are paid less because they are less productive on their periods). Not only that, he is head of an employment group which is supposed to protect the interests of both male and female members. Claiming that you don't care if the female employees you represent are paid less because "once a month they have sick problems" is a terrible idea. It's akin to the female head of the teachers union saying men should make less because they don't have a "motherly instinct" to protect their students.
I'm not sure if you know this, but two things can be wrong at the same time. Sharon Osbourne made an ignorant statement, so did this guy. And assuming I see "nothing wrong with that" is extremely small minded and childish.
[insert snide remark here]
[–]Demonspawn 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[+]CoonTown [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Well, informal studies show that women actually are sick more often then men. The life expectancy gap can be explained by a myriad of different reasons, the principle one being that men see the doctor much less regularly than women. So, if a man is diagnosed with a serious illness, it is likely to be in the late stages of the disease, when they are showing serious symptoms. Women are much more likely to get regular physicals, so doctors notice diseases earlier, when they are more curable. Also, men are more likely to participate in risky behaviors, such as smoking and drinking to excess.
It's also important to note that women are often the primary caregivers of children. They are much more likely to have to take a sick day to care for the children then men are. This does not mean men are better workers than women, it simply means that traditional gender roles dictate that, if someone is to take a sick day to be with the kids, it is to be the woman. If gender roles were completely removed from society, I would expect the sick days of men and women to be very similar.
Also, the gap between men and women in terms of sick days is miniscule, only 40 days out of their entire working careers (which averages about 47 years). Women only take an extra .85 sick days per year than men. Hardly a reason to state that women are somehow less productive than men.
Source: Here
[–]Demonspawn 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[+]CoonTown [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link
Can you possibly link one of these studies? I have never seen this posted. I am curious as to whether the difference in sick days is actually statistically significant, because when women with children are factored in, the difference is only 40 sick days per 47 years working.
[–]Demonspawn1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Cookie 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz 0 points1 point2 points (36 children) | Copy Link
[+]CoonTown [recovered] (35 children) | Copy Link
I'm bringing it up because that is why he got fired. He got fired for claiming that women take more sick days because they cannot work through periods. Picking through facts of this case is not "trolling". I'm simply explaining to you why he was sacked, and why he was ignorant.
One of those reasons is complete horseshit. Which is why he was fired. I'm not "twisting his words", as you imply. He literally said women take more time off due to monthy "sick time", which is wrong. He even admitted in subsequent interviews he had no data to back this up. It doesn't get more ignorant than that.
Claiming women are less productive because they have periods is sexist. It'd be the same as a female teacher's union head claiming that men should be paid less because they lack a "motherly instinct"
Tell me how I am exaggerating what he said. He literally said women take more time off, and are less productive due to, "monthly sick problems". I don't think exaggerate means what you think it means.
[–]jmnzz 1 point2 points3 points (34 children) | Copy Link
[+]CoonTown [recovered] (33 children) | Copy Link
I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding, where you think that he cannot be saying two things at once. He said it is okay to pay women less money than men because:
1) They have children, maternity leave, etc.
2) Because they have periods. (or, as he so eloquently stated, "monthly sick problems")
Now, I do not believe that is reasonable. It is not justifiable to claim that women should be paid less because they care for children, or that they have periods. When pressed for data to prove his assumptions, he stated that he did not have any.
Now, here I am going to explain to you what Alasdair Thompson does for a living. He was the head of a business union in New Zealand. That labor union represented the interests of many different companies, employing many different people, including women. Claiming that you do not care if women are paid less than men is not a good way to grow your union. The union only makes money if businesses join up, and pay dues. Now, I suspect this is the real reason he got sacked, rather than the offensive nature of his comments. Acting like a buffoon on television, and claiming that periods affect productivity (which he DID DO! In addition to other things) is not a good way to promote your union.
Okay, now here's the tricky part. When you head a large organization, your opinions look like they are the opinions of the entire organization! See, EMA did not want prospective members to think they do not value women as being as productive as men, so they sacked Thompson. It's a smart business move.
Now, if you reread the interview, he actually says:
This is the same as saying "women are sick more often because they have periods". Which is pretty wrong. No research backs up this assumption.
EDIT: IF you chose to respond to this, can you try to not splice the entire thing into sentence long quotation fragments?
[–]omdoks2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]omdoks1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Celda -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]CoonTown5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]rantgrrl 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]jmnzz 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AliasRooster -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BatmensBegins 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Fatalistic -2 points-1 points0 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]abk0100 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Maschalismos 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]dorisfrench 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Revorob -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link