~ archived since 2018 ~

Four Articles on Single Mothers

actanonverba8

December 23, 2012

11 upvotes

/r/MensRights

Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Four Articles on Single Mothers
Author	actanonverba8
Upvotes	11
Comments	21
Date	December 23, 2012 6:07 AM UTC (13 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/15be6k/four_articles_on_single_mothers/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/four-articles-on-single-mothers.1005896 https://theredarchive.com/post/1005896

Comments

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 13 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[+]DaNiceguy 13 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

In other words, we have a situation which is not sustainable and will continue to become more unsustainable until these entitlements are rolled back.

[–]oneiorosgrip 0 points1 point2 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]AhhhhhhNice 0 points1 point2 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]rightsbot 0 points1 point2 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 13 years ago* (16 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]actanonverba8[S] 3 points4 points5 points 13 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I'll just bring up a couple of things, unrelated to the most obvious thing (the billions taxpayers are paying for these women).

First, this situation is a nightmare for the children. They are being raised in a way which (absent father) that has been shown (in male children for sure, not sure about female children) to be most associated with delinquency and mental health issues. On top of that, they are only being raised with the feminine point of view. The normal complementing of the feminine with the masculine (and vice versa) is not there.

Second, this situation is destroy the status and bargaining power of men for relationships. Imagine if the government (which is really just the taxpayers being gutted) was providing men with similar services for things they desire. A man applies and the government (i.e. taxpayers) sense a reasonable looking woman out to his apartment three times a week. She does some cleaning, does some cooking, hangs out with him and is emotionally supportive, and provides sexual services. What do you think that would do to other women trying to have relationships with men? It would completely undermine them and destroy their status and bargaining power.

Or, another version. Imagine policies more exact to those women are getting. Policies that allowed for a man to apply to have a government surrogate mother carry his child, after which they pay the man to stay at home. A lot of men would go for that. The tempation is so great. Get to have offspring (a legacy, the enjoyment of family), get to stay at home with them, how sweet is that. Again, average women would be completely undermined and lose alot of power in forming relationships.

[–]stemgang 4 points5 points6 points 13 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Awesome points that deserve to be discussed in a separate 'self' post:

This situation is destroying the status and bargaining power of men for relationships. Imagine if the government was providing men with similar services for things they desire. A man applies and the government sends a reasonable looking woman out to his apartment three times a week. She does some cleaning, does some cooking, hangs out with him and is emotionally supportive, and provides sexual services. What do you think that would do to other women trying to have relationships with men? It would completely undermine them and destroy their status and bargaining power.

Imagine policies more exact to those women are getting. Policies that allowed for a man to apply to have a government surrogate mother carry his child, after which they pay the man to stay at home. A lot of men would go for that. The tempation is so great. Get to have offspring (a legacy, the enjoyment of family), get to stay at home with them, how sweet is that. Again, average women would be completely undermined and lose a lot of power in forming relationships.

[–]actanonverba8[S] 4 points5 points6 points 13 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Thank you. I could have also added the one-sided family law system to the equation. Basically, at every step of the way (single in a relationship or in a marriage), the government (under pressure from feminists) has set things up so that women have no reason (outside of their own senses of honor and fairness) to show men any respect or to even be reasonable or cooperative with men. Of course, men still are in reality needed. They have to keep paying taxes to fund all this. They have to enforce all this misandry upon their fellow men (e.g. white knights, manginas, law enforcement officials, businessmen running privatized vulture child support collection organizations--I say vulture because it has been documented that they use their insider status to influence child suppport amounts to go up and intentionally try to make men go into arrearages because the penalty fees increase their profits).

[–]wavegeek -1 points0 points1 point 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]mikesteane 2 points3 points4 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]actanonverba8[S] 1 point2 points3 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]DaNiceguy 4 points5 points6 points 13 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 13 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]DaNiceguy 5 points6 points7 points 13 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 13 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]DaNiceguy 1 point2 points3 points 13 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]ShitLordXurious 2 points3 points4 points 13 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[+][deleted] 13 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]ShitLordXurious 2 points3 points4 points 13 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]DaNiceguy0 points 13 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link