Wikipedia Isn't Neutral at all. <--- Women's Rights. Link to Men's Rights Within.

2012-01-14T00:45:28+00:00

Stop going on about the Ball article, it's not a clear cut case either way and anyone from either point of view who suggests otherwise is wrong. Most of the media ignored him, if the article was to remain in place we'd have to source it to every possible news story written about him.

There are much more obvious examples of Wikipedia feminist activism than the Ball article, we really need to focus on those and identify the people guilty of bias.

Il128 · 2012-01-13T20:48:55+00:00

Men's Rights. WTF is going on?

2012-01-13T23:53:36+00:00

This is the kind of trouble women cause when you give them a simple project like set up a volentary encyclopedia. You'd think it would be like a librarian thing.....nope......they just love the drama.

Using a wiki reference carries as much wieght with intelligent people as referring to what someone said in a TV show. But the wiki is less intelligent. And openly politically biased. And proud of it.

Truth by committee! The sun revolves around the earth!

Taarguss · 2012-01-15T02:38:24+00:00

Women's Rights: a real movement inwhich (historically powerless) women gained equality.

Men's Rights: an internet forum where (historically powerful) men complain that women now have too much power.

This has no significance compared to the Women's Rights Movement. It's not close to the same level.

Title	Wikipedia Isn't Neutral at all. <--- Women's Rights. Link to Men's Rights Within.
Author	Il128
Upvotes	4
Comments	20
Date	January 13, 2012 8:47 PM UTC (14 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ofwpb/wikipedia_isnt_neutral_at_all_womens_rights_link/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/wikipedia-isnt-neutral-at-all.1029232 https://theredarchive.com/post/1029232

Comments