Funny how there's no mention of gender in the title. Imagine if the roles were reversed.

ralphswanson · 2021-08-20T02:23:11+00:00

Yep. If some man laced drugs to a group of women it would be a hate crime, attempted rape, and, during a live fire exercise, attempted murder.

CarlMarks1884 · 2021-08-20T03:58:04+00:00

I couldn't find any mention of gender.

StudentOfTheTruth0 · 2021-08-20T07:29:27+00:00

The media's confabulation about women is fabulous.

When a woman commits a crime, they never mention the gender in the headlines. They mention ONLY women in the headlines when something bad happens, and there are victims, as if men didn't exist. When an adult woman rapes an underage minor, the "r" word is never used about women by the media. She "had sex" or "had a relationship" with the victim. Or even that the minor "seduced" the female teacher. In many cases the underage male victim of statutory rape is ordered to pay child support for the perpetrator, if she gets pregnant, when the victim turns 18.

General rules of the feminist media:

(1) When something bad happens, write only about women as if they were the only ones affected. Never mention men. Write about everything as if it were gendered, when it is not. Always claim that "women most affected", regardless of what happened.

(2) When a woman commits a crime, hide the gender from all headlines, bury it in the text. Write as if no crime was committed, absolve the perpetrator simply because she is a woman. Justify everything by repeating well-debunked feminist lies about how much harder it is for women (like "gender pay gap", "1 in 3 women are raped", "not enough household chores by men" - but never mention how many more hours men work a year, etc. etc. etc.) Never use the "r" word when a woman rapes a boy or a man. It was consensual, regardless of age or anything, simply because the perpetrator was female and the victim was male. Deny that "female perpetrators" or "male victims" can even exist.

(3) Weaponize every incident of a mentally ill person behaving in an insane way to defame and demonize men. Generalize every single mental case to all men, without any basis. Blame men for everything, including women's bad choices, and shame them for everything a man can possibly do or say. All of it is misogyny by definition.

There are more rules, these are just the most important three.

NiteTiger · 2021-08-20T03:32:33+00:00

Really? Really?! C'mon guys, we're better than this shit.

All the shit against men in this world, and you're bitching about a non-gendered headline? News flash, a non-gendered headline IS THE FUCKING GOAL.

She received no special treatment, and is being fully prosecuted. That's a WIN.

You want to know why the MRM is dismissed as petty? Shit like this is why. Gotta snatch a loss from the jaws of victory.

☹️

2021-08-19T23:10:25+00:00

Wtaf???

cosmoharley1 · 2021-08-20T01:39:15+00:00

How does gender have anything to do with this case?

IronJohnMRA · 2021-08-20T15:13:09+00:00

Sukstorf has the power to sentence Cogswell to the Canadian Forces Service Prison and Detention Barracks in Edmonton, if she sees fit.

I'm not holding my breath.

Title	Funny how there's no mention of gender in the title. Imagine if the roles were reversed.
Author	TrumpTruther
Upvotes	51
Comments	13
Date	August 19, 2021 11:00 PM UTC (4 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p7ps4d/funny_how_theres_no_mention_of_gender_in_the/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/funny-how-theres-no-mention-of-gender-in-the-title.1057746 https://theredarchive.com/post/1057746

Comments