Nearly three dozen Stanford programs discriminate against males, complaint alleges

Vista_Seagrape · 2021-06-05T18:01:08+00:00

Male disadvantage in American society starts early.

Boys get constant negative messaging from an young age. Boys get lower grades for the same work, so it is no surprise that boys earn lower grades in all subjects at all ages.

Boys are less likely to graduate high school and less likely to attend university. Despite this, there are less scholarships available for males.

Why is it that "liberal" and "progressive" seems to mean giving less to males? What is the point? How is that equality?

Tmomp · 2021-06-05T18:04:33+00:00

Where is the left on rooting out sexism against men?

Long_Cut_7015 · 2021-06-05T17:01:16+00:00

Even the people who created these discriminatory programs know it's illegal that's why they mention (an the end) that the program welcome all genders ! but as Adam Kissel say in the complaint :

The Supreme Court does not limit discrimination to “direct signs that people will see,” such as a program that literally says “women only,” but also “actual practices” such as “recruitment techniques,”

Kissel said website language for the programs, and the absence of male students in photos, would convince a “reasonable male” that he cannot participate in the programs because of his sex.

You can't call it Women's Ledearship and claim the program accept all genders !! that's illegal ! We are living in a time where 60% of college graduates are female yet they still get preferential treatment !

Title	Nearly three dozen Stanford programs discriminate against males, complaint alleges
Author	Long_Cut_7015
Upvotes	67
Comments	24
Date	June 5, 2021 4:58 PM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/nt05tx/nearly_three_dozen_stanford_programs_discriminate/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/nearly-three-dozen-stanford-programs-discriminate.1061164 https://theredarchive.com/post/1061164

Comments