TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Insider: "Inventions by women credited to men". What do you think of this article? I know I'm bringing up a dead topic, but I'm curious on what you guys make of it?

Strikester101

March 19, 2020
5 upvotes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
https://www.insider.com/inventions-by-women-credited-to-men-2018-9?amp
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Insider: "Inventions by women credited to men". What do you think of this article? I know I'm bringing up a dead topic, but I'm curious on what you guys make of it?
Author

Strikester101

Upvotes 5
Comments 24
Date March 19, 2020 4:04 PM UTC
(6 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/flch1t/insider_inventions_by_women_credited_to_men_what/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/insider-inventions-by-women-credited-to-men-what.1063807
https://theredarchive.com/post/1063807
Top posts by Strikester101

So, how much damage did women's groups cause to anti-rape activism regarding female-perpetrated abuse?

145 upvotes
August 9, 2022
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Q: Why are 70% of college graduates girls?

83 upvotes
January 8, 2021
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

A misandrist ad for Virginia Slims cigarettes. Thoughts?

81 upvotes
July 9, 2020
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

How much do women perpetrate child abuse of all types?

75 upvotes
August 21, 2022
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

TwoX: "It makes no sense to me that feminists are blamed for male rape victims not being taken seriously. The vast majority who mock them are men" | AKA being a flounder and focusing on the men

73 upvotes
May 29, 2020
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

What are the general rebuttals to "Men Commit the Vast Majority of Crime!" talking point?

67 upvotes
September 23, 2022
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Genuine question: Do male rape victims get punished/incarcerated by the legal system?

66 upvotes
August 22, 2022
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

OK, is anyone else bothered by how they are stereotyping the COVID-19 situation as "women are more effective than men"?

65 upvotes
July 17, 2020
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Comments

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 11 points12 points13 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I am certain it happened.

I think currently we're over correcting by attributing everything to some uncredited woman.

Like "Roz Franklin discovered DNA and Watson and Crick stole it! "

No. She didn't.

[–]SupplimentalDevice 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What really happened with Watson and Crick?

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 10 points11 points12 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Ros did some of the preliminary work taking pictures of the DNA molecule.

This was crucial to figuring out the structure. But she didn't herself figure it out.

Watson and Crick took that plus all the other data they had collected, got drunk, and over a weekend put all the pieces together to figure it out.

They probably should have given her more credit. But they were the ones to figure it out.

[–]Strikester101[S] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What do you think it means for male and female scientists?

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 10 points11 points12 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Long term?

Probably not much. This stuff is mostly about the egos of those involved. Not many people go in to science expecting any great recognition.

[–]Kuato2012left-wing male advocate 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

It's cool that we, as a species, are becoming more inclined to give women credit where credit is due. It's super not cool when articles like these engage in historical revisionism because they have an ideological axe to grind.

The article relies on half truths in order to paint a picture of grrrl power and patriarchal oppression. Anyone trying to set the record straight is then put in the uncomfortable position of looking like they're being spiteful toward women. Oh well, I'm doing it anyway.

"Watson and Crick received credit for DNA's double helix — but it was Rosalind Franklin who discovered it." Rosalind Franklin did good x-ray crystallography work but didn't reach that interpretation of the results. The A-ha moment did belong to Watson and Crick. (she didn't agree to share those unpublished results though, her boss did. So that's sketchy by today's standards)

"Nettie Stevens discovered sex chromosomes, but E.B. Wilson is credited for it." This one is almost right. She figured out sex chromosomes first, and she isn't as widely known as E.B. Wilson because he credited himself for it, and he published some very influential work. He also didn't credit a number of his male peers. Scientists back in the day had a bad habit of claiming sole credit for joint efforts and simultaneous discoveries. Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace both hit on evolution at the same time, and were even in correspondence about it, but fewer people know about Wallace for similar reasons. If Wallace had been female, I'm sure we'd be hearing all about how sexism was solely to blame.

"Ada Lovelace invented an early model of the computer." That's just a lie. Charles Babbage (who the article describes as her partner in the venture, lol), invented the difference engine. Lovelace was a mathematician who corresponded with Babbage. She translated one of his publications and wrote a program that the difference engine could theoretically run (which is why she is typically credited as being the first computer programmer). The article tries to paint that as a 50/50 collaboration toward the invention of the computer, which is the same kind of gendered erasure that they're accusing others of doing.

"Hollywood legend Hedy Lamarr invented wireless communication" This one is more of a lie by exaggeration. The idea she came up with was frequency hopping, which is a clever idea that modern wireless communication uses. But wireless communication (radio) was already invented, and the application of frequency hopping to modern communication systems wouldn't come until later.

"Esther Lederberg's husband claimed the Nobel Peace Prize for their discoveries in the field of microbial genetics." That's because Joshua Lederberg was the Primary Investigator. That is to say, it was his lab that she worked in, and Nobels always, always go to the PI. Never the postdocs, senior scientists, technicians, or grad students. And these historical revisionist articles always, always suggest that any women present in the lab were snubbed due to sexism. I'm not trying to diminish Esther Lederberg's legacy (she was also a Ph.D and a smart, talented scientist), but she would have needed to have her own laboratory in order to secure that Nobel.

"Lise Meitner discovered how to split atoms — but her male lab partner took all the glory." Again, half truths and lies. There were three people involved in the work, and only one got the Nobel. Funny how the article has nothing to say about Otto Frisch also getting overlooked. According to Meitner's biography, apparently there was also some fuckery in that year's Nobel prizes due to WWII: "during the war the Swedish scientists relied on their own limited expertise. Meitner's exclusion from the chemistry award may well be summarized as a mixture of disciplinary bias, political obtuseness, ignorance, and haste."

[–]Strikester101[S] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You pretty much pointed out the issues with the article. IIRC, weren't there male scientists as well who were supportive of women, in past and present? I don't know any specific examples.

Were there ever cases where female scientists took credit of male scientists?

[–]Kuato2012left-wing male advocate 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nowadays, it's totally the norm for male scientists to be supportive of female ones. It doesn't make headlines because that's every normal day. I'm a biologist, and I've never seen any 19th-century harrumphing over the womenfolk during any part of my career. You'll notice that all the horrible examples in the article were pulled from the 1950s or earlier.

But even then, let's look at the examples in the article itself. Ada Lovelace was supported by the men in her life. Read up on her, and you'll find that her intellectual pursuits were encouraged and fostered by everyone around her. Hedy Lamarr worked with George Antheil on her frequency hopping project. (but do you ever hear him credited in these grrrl power articles?) Esther and Joshua Lederberg were married and worked very closely together on several projects, and they copublished with both names on the papers. Or read up on Katherine Johnson (one of the women featured in Hidden Figures). The barriers she faced were largely institutional ones, and also a few individual assholes. But all through her life there were lots of men and women, black and white, who recognized and fostered her mathematical talents. It turns out that scientists, in general, are strong supporters of meritocracy.

Of course sexist discrimination did (and sometimes still does) happen. But for every example of the bad, there are hundreds of less headline-making examples of the good.

[–]plitox_is_a_bitch 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's the catch: men are expected to unconditionally support women, with the value of that support only able to be judged by the women supported, and who get to decide if the men get credit.

Men supporting women? That's not newsworthy. That's normal.

Men who don't...

And that's why this article exists.

[–]Strikester101[S] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (26 children) | Copy Link

/u/cromulent_weasel /u/spudmix

As well as taking a look at this article, can I talk to you about this phenomenon?

[–]spudmixMachine Rights Activist 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

You're welcome to, sure.

[–]Strikester101[S] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

For starters, what do you personally think of this phenomenon? And what does this mean to men and women in general (if there is any), especially in areas of science?

[–]spudmixMachine Rights Activist 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

I think it definitely happened, and I think to a lesser extent it still happens today. I would hope that the loosening of our normative gender roles has meant that people are more likely to see women as inventors, creators, scientists - and also on the other side, to see men not constrained to those roles. We're on our way, but not there yet.

I have experiences in upper management (and research backs this up) which lead me to believe that women still get shorted when they invent, create, or do science. My area is machine learning and AI, and it is still very much a boy's club, to the extent that my female colleagues doing their PhDs all have very poor experiences and feel discriminated against.

[–]Strikester101[S] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

I won't deny it happened (and in some cases, still happens). Hell, the idea of plagiarism in general is one of the few that interests me.

At the same time, I'm more or less concerned about this "female supremacist" idea of "Without women, men can't progress in areas of science" or, in the chance where sexism is neutered, it may objectively result in more women in science than men (gender disparity) or men being less competent. I know I sound like a worrywart, but it's that that still concerns me.

[–]spudmixMachine Rights Activist 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Where in the article does it hint at such things? Or is this just a personal concern?

[–]Strikester101[S] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

I guess you could say it's a personal concern, since I'm the only one who seems to have this.

I have read some articles similar to this and, well, let's just say it has been gnawing my psyche. A lot.

What do you think?

[–]spudmixMachine Rights Activist 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

I think thats more of a product of your anxiety than something to be worried about, to be honest. What's the worst that could reasonably happen?

[–]Strikester101[S] 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Well, that's kinda why I'm sort of frantic on the whole gender education gap TBH.

I want gender parity as much as the other person. I don't know how to exactly shake of this feeling off. It never happened before I got into the whole discourse about gender issues.

[–]spudmixMachine Rights Activist 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

It's important not to invalidate your feelings about the matter, but it is also important to recognise the extent to which they reflect reality. There's nothing wrong with feeling what you're feeling - you're not in charge of what your brain decides to feel to any great extent.

It sounds like one of your concerns (and correct me if I'm wrong here, please) is that men really may be inferior to women, and through a removal of sexist systems we may discover that men have a diminished place in the world.

Tell me, is that something to really be afraid of? We should, of course, oppose the idea that this hypothesis is true rigorously, but if it really is true what harm is done? If, say, men really are worse at science than women biologically - are we losing out by discovering the truth? I don't think so. The truth is the truth, and it is only very rarely that we benefit from denying reality. I do not believe that in such a hypothetical we would see men shunned, or excluded, or treated the way women have been historically when similar things were believed about them. We're better now - not perfect, but much better.

It is also critical when examining population statistics not to make the mistake of applying aggregate conclusions to individuals. There is nothing about the statement "men are worse at math" that means "Einstein is bad at math". Distributions are just that - distributions. If men really are worse at science, that says nothing about any individual male scientist. Hell, there are plenty of combinations of skill distributions that leave men far worse at science on average, but also mean that the top 5% of scientists will all be men.

I don't think there's a credible threat of us accidentally concluding men are essentially worse at science, as a society. On the other hand, if we discover something real about men's abilities and essential gender differences then that's a good thing (although bittersweet), and it also doesn't mean anything about any individual man.

Back to my major point, though; your fears here aren't wrong and you shouldn't feel the need to quash them or fight them. Fighting anxiety and fear seems to strengthen it, or at best beat it back into a corner where it hides, waiting to reappear. Most modern counselling instead focuses instead on understanding and allowing yourself to feel your anxieties. Once you have recognised and accepted the anxiety, then it is time to address the reality - which (for someone with an anxiety disorder like myself) is almost never as bad as you might think.

A quote from my favourite philosopher:

One is a great deal less anxious if one feels perfectly free to be anxious, and the same may be said of guilt.

Alan Wilson Watts, Psychotherapy East and West

[–]cromulent_weasel 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Sure. I think there's a stereotype of bosses taking credit for their underling's achievements that has a definite element of truth in it at times.

If you go back to an era where all the bosses were men, then there's an additional factor where an incompetent male boss can feel threatened by a female underling who produces better work than he does. He doesn't want to be shown up ot threatened by her, so it's important that he frames the outcome as being his own work.

That's not something specific to male bosses and female workers though. It's a boss-worker dynamic, not a male female dynamic.

I think there's also an additional thing going on with regards to 'the PA', which is a role largely populated by women. When the did experiments with different kinds of people at problem solving simple structures, mechanical engineers were far and away the best, but both CEOs and PAs were quite below average when working with a group of their own kind. But a mixed group of CEOs and PAs were very complementary at solving problems and were considerably more effective than the average person or even university undergrad. But when we think of high performing CEOs, we don't think of their accomplishments as being a combination of them and their PA. The glory goes to the CEO alone. Which is not a fair division of credit.

[–]Strikester101[S] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's not something specific to male bosses and female workers though. It's a boss-worker dynamic, not a male female dynamic.

Is there actually an example of female boss taking a male worker's credit?

But when we think of high performing CEOs, we don't think of their accomplishments as being a combination of them and their PA. The glory goes to the CEO alone. Which is not a fair division of credit.

I agree. It's something that I'm surprised people have not got out of this phenomenon.

I explained this before, but it's kinda psyche-gnawing that this phenomenon exists. I'm kinda "competitive" when it comes to science or general knowledge, so it personally bothers me. At the same time, does this phenomenon mean there are more female scientists than male scientists in the case of complete possible gender equality?

Like how does it compare in more egalitarian countries?

[–]SchalaZeal01 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Elon Musk gets all the credit of Tesla, but he also gets all the bad press of Tesla. It's huge weight on his shoulders.

[–]cromulent_weasel 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is there actually an example of female boss taking a male worker's credit?

I have had female bosses, so sure.

I'm kinda "competitive" when it comes to science or general knowledge, so it personally bothers me.

I used to be 20 years ago. But then I had an epiphany about what 'winning' was. Let's look at it from a competitive framework, since mine came in the form of playing mtg. I got to the point where I was working out that a team was FAR more powerful than an individual in terms of collective knowledge and experience. There was a huge asymmetry between myself and a team of players. But once I join a team then I'm not competing with those people any more, i'm collaborating with them to compete against the wider populace. And if I'm planning on travelling to tournaments I'm really not competing with anybody in my city, I'm collaborating with them so we can go and take scalps in those other cities. And if I'm planning on travelling internationally to GPs and Pro Tours, I'm not competing with anybody in my country, I'm collaborating with them to try and compete with those other pros.

So really there's a lot of egalitarian and selfless behaviour baked into even competitive models.

Once I had the mindset of who I was ultimately trying to compete with and that I wanted to collaborate with most people in most interactions, that fundamentally changed how I did things like that.

Now when I play games with my family or friends, I'm trying to achieve three goals: make it fun for everyone, help the less gifted players improve (if that's what they want) and win. And winning quite frankly is the least important of those three goals, even if it still happens disproportionately for me in my gaming groups.

At the same time, does this phenomenon mean there are more female scientists than male scientists in the case of complete possible gender equality?

No, I don't think it's going to mean anything like that. Or at least, any difference between the sexes will be so small as to be not worth making any bones over.

[–]Strikester101[S] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I think I'll bite: A: Yes author, plagiarism of inventions did occur, even to women. No, it's not specific to just women. So yeah, please take this ironically sexist BS out of your femdom fantasy. B: Ah yes, Lise Meitner, the sole discoverer of nuclear fission! Clearly she's the only one who made this discovery, and was never helped by anyone else (Otto Hirsch). Also, Otto Hahn and Lise Meitner were still on good terms. C: No author, Ada Lovelace couldn't be called the first programmer. It depends on your definition (and bias). It's more complicated than that.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter