Men don't commit Whataboutism when they ask "what about men?" when they're being deliberately discriminated against. Feminists use the word as a shaming argument-shutter because surprise, they don't understand how the fallacy works as it requires basic logic.

Have you ever stopped to think that "Whataboutism" could be yet another feminist insta-silencing and shaming label, since they do that all the time?

Feminists can't understand basic logic so I feel like I'm attacking a group of children and feel sad, but here it goes.

If you google it, you will realize feminists use this fallacy incorrectly.

Whataboutism: the technique or practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counter-accusation or raising a different issue.

99% of the time a guy is asking "what about men" because something (almost always in feminist origin) purposefuly discriminated against men or male victims. Sound like feminism to you? It does to me.

Now look, male children or men who need aid from dying in crises like homelessness, violence, terrorism or another universal difficulty is not a "different issue," male victims are never an unrelated issue in any universal conversation, that is literally only possible if you are deliberately or subconsciously removing male victims (and only care about helping one gender.) Which is what feminism is about. Seriously, they want to only care about women or female victims, which is why male deaths become "Whataboutism" to them.

And surprise, it's feminists who commit this fallacy all the time because they always bring completely unrelated female issues when you talk about a male dominated issue to deflect from it, and it looks like this: "men suicide so much, but we fear going outside so we can't even live!!!" That's an actual, real whataboutism, men almost always ask "stop removing male victims and men!"

Men are not barging in masses to do fallacies, they're asking you to stop being sexist and removing men or male victims, like from receiving aid or support that should've been universal. Or shit like 85% male victims being removed and saying women most affected. That's just pure discrimination and doesn't fit the fallacy.

It's only if you said female rape, female depression, male suicide, male depression, it'd be specific, maybe get into the field of psychology and then it'd probably now be a fallacy as it's no longer a universal conversation. Same with childbirth. I've never seen a guy barge in to talk about his gender's problems when it came to death in child delivery, that'd be obvious Whataboutism, but I had sooo many fucking times where random twitter or feminist women use my own inability to give birth to downplay or mock male issues. Lol. And actually, I'm pretty sure "patriarchy" is a whataboutism as much as it's victim-blaming. Seriously, deranged people we dealing with...