Study: "In every country (without exception), more girls than boys aspired to a people-oriented occupation, and more boys than girls aspired to a things-oriented or STEM occupation."

pride4eva93 · 2022-02-14T07:47:13+00:00

We have so many programs/scholarships trying to increase the number of women in STEM majors. STEM employers aggressively recruit women, even when their resumes are weaker than male job seekers. Yet, we never see the same for men seeking jobs in occupations dominated by women (i.e., nursing, teaching etc).

OldEgalitarianMRA · 2022-02-14T13:20:45+00:00

This truth hurts feminists deep down. I think there are more trolls on this post so far than MRA's.

WhereProgressIsMade · 2022-02-14T16:01:42+00:00

One reason I picked a STEM major 25 years ago was so I could minimize the number of BS “woke” liberal arts classes I had to take. Sounds like its only gotten worse.

red_philosopher · 2022-02-14T13:50:00+00:00

As the modern feminist strives to create a more equal outcome for their brethren, they inadvertently create a disparity that grows wider due to a poor understanding of the underlying key performance indicators.

This is proof positive of college educational sex differences inadvertently promulgated by feminism. It goes hand-in-hand with the information demonstrating that feminist's efforts to decrease IPV by providing resources for only women has, in fact, made men safer.

They can only cry wolf so many times before nobody listens anymore.

Kindly-Town · 2022-02-14T07:18:31+00:00

Feminists want women to dominate in every occupation. We don't even have that much population of women.

DavidByron2 · 2022-02-14T19:57:04+00:00

The S in STEM means "science" which includes plenty of people orientated sciences such as psychiatry and other medical. Feminists define STEM specifically to make women sound like victims -- like EVERYTHING else they talk about -- whereas they are the majority in STEM.

TendieDinner777 · 2022-02-14T06:25:20+00:00

Study? I thought we just made shit up.

DavidByron2 · 2022-02-14T20:03:33+00:00

What is always the case is that the judge will reprimand the false accuser in the severest terms for undermining confidence in the process and hence potentially causing juries to doubt an alleged victim’s claims in future cases. ... it is a tacit admission of the judges’ lack of confidence in their own judicial process. Sexual assault cases have, in truth, veered away from the standards of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ and ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. The combination of the nature of the law, the operational practices of prosecutors, and the courts themselves, have allowed a system to arise in which a man can be incarcerated for many years based entirely on the unsubstantiated word of the accuser. Judges’ harsh words to proved-false accusers are therefore motivated, in part, because they reflect so badly on the practices which the judges have allowed to arise. They know they are culpable themselves and it would be more convenient if false accusers did not come to light.

Comments