For a woman to acknowledge that there's a specific need for discussion/ debate on sex and gender related issues online (advent of the internet/ 'information' age has somewhat temporarily circumvented the very real irl diatribe women face, dare one say give them an edge over the abusers but they are still the overwhelming doxxed demographic) shows there's hope for future generations of women who strive to think critically and also be given a forum to be allowed to be legally allowed/incentivised to think critically on these issue (Don't mean for this to come across as pity or pretentious).

When we all considering the fact that women have had to fight tooth and nail to keep, maintain and improve their rights. These situations can and have (Past and present) inadvertently/ advertently to situations where a spectacle is needed in order for their injustice to be seen (namely by acts of immolatory retribution); these spectaclea are absolutely necessary at times due to the burdens women instinctually deal with but their heuristics are losing steam among themselves, men and others, and really devolves at times into 'which of us kweens can throw the most gas on this fire without actually throwing the gas or even allowed by the percieved "customs"/ "tradition" to start a fire'.
As the addage goes 'hell hath no fury like a woman scorned' (in whatever manner in which they perceive). A woman can and will do any amount of gas throwing or gas lighting in order to rectify their perceived wrongdoing by men, women or otherwise.
They've essentially evolved from the overwhelming societaly pressure they face daily to identify when to pull at the right strings and at the right time for the full effect. Everything is for show, they live for the moment because their moments are consistently fleeting, actively tell eachother to go 'fuck everyone, fuck someones general wellbeing until I find something of theirs that gives me social standing, you do you kween or more aptly fuck off I'm a time god!' and tell will do any amount of chinese whispers in order to keep finding and then obtaining the next social standing or even high using any means necessary.
You could feasibly call a fair portion drug addicts for social diatribe, indirectly treat them as such while navigating life and you'll have a better quality of life.
Conversely, men generally opt for therapy roles because they themselves witness womens proclivities towards the implicit nature of socially-constructed social standings and implementations of such first hand.
But in reality, women arent all bad/ good, men arent bad/ good. There are too many dipshits of all genders but life isn't as binary as dogma might try to 'teach' people so long as procreation isn't the only metric that's fervently, socially and biologically adhered; everyone (man, woman or other) has their own story, we should all find a semblance of solace in this and actively encourage ways of living which can account for this.
Yes, fundamentalism is the cause for a majority of the detrimental socially engineered narratives. To give credit to it though even as an atheist, it's shown time and time again that it's also a begrudgingly but necessary cancer amongst developing societies.

Sanctimoniosity (whether it's derived tangibly/ metaphorically) is seemingly necessary for development of our conceptual and collective knowledge no matter how cruel society ends up. It's absolutely a cop-out that life is built upon a pragmatic or even engineered suffering but I digress.
I mean no disrespect to Mrs Degree in saying this. It would be remiss to not point out the tangential, empirical ans conjectural basis of this post too.
I will now go, unironically touch grass and then I may also unironically come back to this subreddit for discussion/ debate