let's say artificial wombs are fully developed and marketable, and single men have access to them just by paying. not only that, but this allows men to buy frozen egg cells to grow their own children without women.

let's say that men would prefer egg cells from women with specific traits, to the point that egg banks refuse egg cells from women under 5'8''.

lets say there was a movement called meninism, complaining that this victimizes men.

because this is exactly what this article claims about sperm banks: that women desiring men with specific trait related to power and status (height, educational attainments, salary, working certain professions) victimizes them, "them" being women.

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-golden-cage-of-sperm-banking-industry-Bokek-Cohen/c51a42f84c03c4e84e4355d31bb9f8b47346975d

i'm hazarding a wild guess: given the hypothetical situation i described, the same people together with many more would claim women are victimized by it too, to the point where selling egg cells would be illegal or at least egg banks wouldn't be allowed to discriminate against women on physical traits.

in my opinion this will always be a hypothetical. the more realistic artificial wombs seem to become the more second thoughts feminists seem to have about them