TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Homicide of Chad Read goes before grand jury, no charges will be filed against Carruth

Clemicus

April 7, 2022
12 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.kcbd.com/2022/04/01/homicide-chad-read-goes-before-lubbock-co-grand-jury-sources-say-no-charges-will-be-filed/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Homicide of Chad Read goes before grand jury, no charges will be filed against Carruth
Author

Clemicus

Upvotes 12
Comments 13
Date April 7, 2022 7:45 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/tyl2pz/homicide_of_chad_read_goes_before_grand_jury_no/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/homicide-of-chad-read-goes-before-grand-jury-no.1110862
https://theredarchive.com/post/1110862
Red Pill terms in post
Chad
Top posts by Clemicus

The Good of Men [thetinmen]

2615 upvotes
September 11, 2022
/r/MensRights

Déjà vu -- man tries to strike up a conversation in Starbucks

1098 upvotes
December 5, 2022
/r/MensRights

Music Teacher Charged For Sex Crimes With Student After Husband Turns Her In - The Police Tribune

620 upvotes
May 20, 2022
/r/MensRights

Misogyny and misandry to be recorded as an aggravating factor in crimes -- West Yorkshire Police

557 upvotes
December 2, 2021
/r/MensRights

Young women are starting to leave men behind

534 upvotes
September 22, 2024
/r/MensRights

Jess Phillips: MeToo pushed teenage boys towards Bad Influencers

488 upvotes
December 22, 2024
/r/MensRights

I’ll make wolf-whistling and cat calling illegal and create a national domestic abuse register, says Liz Truss

317 upvotes
July 28, 2022
/r/MensRights

Change the legal definition of Rape to allow women to be charged with rape

273 upvotes
March 14, 2025
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]vic_vega_is_fake 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

They got away with premeditated murder. They set him and killed him in cold blood.

[–]Rikkrikkrikk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

I don't think that's true. What happened was disgraceful and I would have hoped illegal. Maybe an appeal will reverse this travesty.

Aim for your targets with intention. If you exaggerate you'll be ignored.

[–]Clemicus[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

The basis of that argument is the child wasn't there at the appointed time. So either they were denying access but for whatever reasons didn't state that or that was planned. For one, it was escalated for no reason what so ever and the long gun was seemingly placed close for easy access

If you exaggerate you'll be ignored.

That's just some guy on the Internet -- we can speculate

[–]Rikkrikkrikk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

This wasnt a premeditated murder. There are much better arguments.

Should texas Castle laws apply to a visitor. It wasn't the killer's house.

The killer fired a warning shot, therefore the father looking for his child was acting in self defence in response to being shot at. This is how US law views self defence.

Cherry picking comments and quoting them while ignoring context never works out well.

[–]Clemicus[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Cherry picking comments and quoting them while ignoring context never works out well

Where did I do that?

[–]Rikkrikkrikk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

They got away with premeditated murder. They set him and killed him in cold blood.

This was the ridiculously false comment by "vic_vega_is_fake" that you defended. It wasn't stated as speculation, it was stated as a fact.

​

That's just some guy on the Internet -- we can speculate

This was your opinion about his false fact

​

Aim for your targets with intention. If you exaggerate you'll be ignored.

was my comment

​

Should texas Castle laws apply to a visitor. It wasn't the killer's house.

The killer fired a warning shot, therefore the father looking for his child was acting in self defence in response to being shot at. This is how US law views self defence.

cherry picking is ignoring all the inconvenient information and focusing on the irrelevant details.

[–]Clemicus[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

This was the ridiculously false comment by "vic_vega_is_fake" that you defended. It wasn't stated as speculation, it was stated as a fact.

I stated that's the basis of the argument. Which it is

it was stated as a fact.

Wtf are you on about? I'll try to put it as simply as possible: I can speculate regardless whether or not I agree with the premise. We are just people posting on Reddit. Nothing more nothing less.

This was your opinion about his false fact

The person you responded to is just some guy on the Internet. The OP could have stated it was aliens and I'd have replied with the same thing.

If you exaggerate you'll be ignored.

To whom? What's this in connection to? Again, that's just some guy on the Internet. The OP isn't connected to the case in anyway

cherry picking is ignoring all the inconvenient information and focusing on the irrelevant details.

Jog on

[–]Rikkrikkrikk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Who is "clemicus" and who is "vic_vega_is_fake"? When you work out who you are, then you can address others.

You are the OP, "vic_vega_is_fake" is the OC.

Facts and details are important. You need to know these before you can even have a credible conversation.

[–]Clemicus[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You are the OP, "vic_vega_is_fake" is the OC.

The context is there

The OP could have stated it was aliens and I'd have replied with the same thing.

...

Facts and details are important. You need to know these before you can even have a credible conversation.

Heh. You've got no argument

[–]Rikkrikkrikk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You are the OP "original Poster" vic_vega_is_fake is the OC "original commenter" You are confused.

[–]BeepBeepYeah7789 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm thinking that some are afraid of the feminist backlash and that's why they won't touch it.

To say that Carruth did NOT act in self-defense would be to validate (the now deceased) Read's case, at least to some extent. And the feminists can't have that.

I've been out of the loop on this for a bit though; can Chad's widow file a wrongful-death lawsuit? Or has that ship sailed, based on what else has transpired?

[–]denyjunctionfunction 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The day after Jennifer Read filed a wrongful death lawsuit against Kyle Carruth and his business for the death of her husband Chad Read, the judge presiding over the case recused himself.

Almost as if it’s in the article.

[–]goinsouth85 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

She can continue the wrongful death lawsuit. It’s a civil case and the lack of criminal conviction is almost irrelevant. Famous example, OJ Simpson - acquitted for murder, but hit with a $29M verdict for wrongful death

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter