During my time on this subreddit, I’ve observed some very inconsistent logic on the part of the RP. Can any of you debunk these points? They just don’t make any sense to me.

  • Women are naturally less horny than men, but simultaneously ride the “cock carousel” throughout their 20s. Most have 10+ sexual partners and are whores.
  • Likewise, women should put out early for men because they [men] have sexual needs. Otherwise they’d be leading them on, such bitches!
  • Women are irrationally afraid of men, and should stop treating them as creeps when approached. However, when women get sexually assaulted by men after trusting them (most women are assaulted by men they know), they should’ve “known better,” and “picked better men”
  • It’s wrong for women to generalize men based on traumatic events. HOWEVER, it’s completely fine for men to generalize women. Isn’t that what RP is all about? Confining “women’s nature” to a set of characteristics and claiming that they all act a certain way (ie AWALT)
  • Women should be more accepting of ugly men, but shouldn’t be ugly themselves
  • Despite being the caring and nurturing gender, women are incapable of feeling genuine love due to their hypergamous nature, since they will settle for an average guy and “move up” once they find a higher value man
  • Women are naturally less logical than men, but selectively date the highest value men who can provide financial security and a stable life (due to hypergamy). In contrast, men date for sex and romance.

And many more….