As titled, that same person couldn't grasp that the sentence: "according to just about every western government who's definition if rape only includes forceful penetration of the victim" wasn't an agreement with it but plainly stated the limitation of the governments' definition of rape.
This was preceded by "It's why you never see 'female teacher raped young teen/boy' but will see any derivative of that in news articles".
Apparently, I need to disclose that I oppose the governments' definitions rather than it being acceptable that it is implied given the example provided.
God damn that riled me up. Guys like him give us all a bad name.
[–]a-man-from-earthleft-wing male advocate[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]MelissaMiranti 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Skirt_Douglas 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SuspicousEggSmell 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sinistaire 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WeEatBabiesleft-wing male advocate 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Zaronaxleft-wing male advocate[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link