Dr Rick Bradford discusses the (UK) Sex-Based Harassment Bill. He summarises it as "just another step in the ever-expanding criminalisation of men’s every act". A commentator: "The definition is hugely vague and ambiguous, allowing any vindictive woman to make an allegation fits into the definition"

wntk · 2022-12-24T23:12:25+00:00

Here's the full quote from the commentator that I quote in the heading:

"The purpose of this type of legislation is generate vexatious litigation against men and to harass men by forcing them to incur significant legal fees and time defending themselves. The definition is hugely vague and ambiguous, allowing any vindictive woman to make an allegation fits into the definition. As noted, no physical evidence required. Men will have to prove their innocence, as usual. This is not a civil offense, it is a criminal offense, which means the accusing woman gets the police to work on her behalf and the Crown Prosecution Service lawyers to work on her behalf, all free of charge. Even if the case fails, the accused man is left having been “punished” by the police and CPS for having dared raised his voice against a woman, who is always to be treated by the courts as “vulnerable” (children with adult faces).

Would someone like to generate a letter for all of us to send to our MPs asking they reject this bill?"

jacare_o · 2022-12-25T00:59:16+00:00

Men in the UK. Leave. And take your labor, wealth, talents and taxes away with you.

Educational_Bet_6606 · 2022-12-25T12:29:37+00:00

A lot of women have gone mad.

icemanww15 · 2022-12-25T02:33:00+00:00

its really going downhill since they left the eu

ERiC_693 · 2022-12-25T16:49:31+00:00

Is rhe act gender specific to male perp/female vic?

Next is most of those things are most likely illegal anyway. But we all know feminism wqnts more and more of these laws to be sex specific. Womens aid uk wants the equality act 2010 to be ammendedto allow them to block male victims of DV from getting help.

Comments