Misandry allegedly does not exist "because the fact that someone hates a man does not mean men as a whole are or will be oppressed, as it effectively happens towards women." Yeah right. I'll smoke what she's got.

whiskeyjack1 · 2013-09-19T11:32:06+00:00

it is funny how this statement is all proof for the existence of misandry you can ask for. the simple sentiment of "women have it worse, men should not complain, ever." i thought this "you are a man, you have it easy" stuff was growing old, but obviously i am wrong there.

saint2e · 2013-09-19T12:27:45+00:00

In today's episode of Tumblr, we re-invent the definition of words so that we're not wrong about things!

Pecanpig · 2013-09-19T12:51:36+00:00

I'll take 42kg of whatever she is smoking.

lazlounderhill · 2013-09-19T15:34:35+00:00

This is a fine example of how feminists usurp and co-opt language to further their misandric agenda. Why do they do this? Because once you redefine the meaning of words, you can baffle and mystify otherwise reasonable and intelligent people into believing and agreeing to everything you say, simply for fear of being perceived as stupid. It's a malevolent trick, invented by the most ruthless propagandists, and it's high time we started drawing attention to it, in a BIG way.

2013-09-19T18:01:46+00:00

This is literally what modern critical theory espouses--that is, modern academic feminism based on conflict theory.

Comments