696,537 posts

Tattoos are for trash

Reddit View
March 7, 2014
0 upvotes

Post Information
Title Tattoos are for trash
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 0
Comments 11
Date 07 March 2014 08:51 PM UTC (6 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/12299
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1zu6pj/tattoos_are_for_trash/
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pill
Comments

[–]2comment 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy

[–]needless_pickup_line 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

But these are all photos of terrible tattoos. It's like if you posted a photo of a female bodybuilder and said that women shouldn't go to the gym. I think, just like anything else, tattoos can be attractive if done tastefully and in moderation.

Here are some examples that aren't garbage:

http://i.imgur.com/or1K71u.jpg

http://31.media.tumblr.com/d599bb3c7896a08ee21203266cbbdaa3/tumblr_mnhorxQV631rbz3alo1_500.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/MvdZsWr.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/txGXhmT.jpg

http://imgur.com/a/vEikq

[–]redpillshadow -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy

1 horrible, additional damage by mutilating the face with metal

2 not an improvement

3 it is a woman, not a canvas. Doesn't enhance her in the slightest

4 mouth mutilated, earlobe mutilated, tattoo doesn't help

5 actually an improvement since it does hide the brutal scar

[–]16 Endorsed Contributorbankruptedcasino 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Anecdotal, but every girl I've ever dated who had a tattoo on one (or both) of her feet was a complete psychopath. It's the siren song of the crazy.

[–]CallMeMrBadGuy -2 points-1 points  (4 children) | Copy

The anti-tat mindset baffles me. I can never understand anyone who applies it. I assume they are either from some unpleasant tattoo-less Mormon society or something.

[–]Modredpillschool[S] 4 points5 points  (2 children) | Copy

Men with tattoos aren't actually all that bad- women like them, and they seem hot to them. That's because it's a risk-seeking behavior - permanent body modifications. On women, it's quite the opposite, you want a woman who is risk averse!

Obviously there are outliers, but I don't think this effect should be outright ignored.

[–]CallMeMrBadGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I mean if they're marked up like the subway in harlem. Or like some post-punk Kat Von D in the unemployable body zones, or has accompanying hoodrat/trailer-trash behaviours, I agree in playing with proper reservations. One should be able to understand those dealings. Though, there are people who just write off even the most innocuous tats. The current post in /r/gentlemanboners on /r/all has some of those types. I dont get it. I didnt even see it. Nor would I write someone off for such triviality in such a case.

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Obviously there are outliers, but I don't think this effect should be outright ignored.

The two categories of outliers are "single tasteful and obviously very expensive art piece in a tasteful location", and "small tasteful piece in discrete location, symbolic of commitment to husband".

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Me, I'm really fucking hairy. If I had a tat anywhere on my body I'd have to shave it every day. And two: I wouldn't know what the hell to tat.

[–]BeardOfKings -1 points0 points  (0 children) | Copy

Some look kinda sweet.

[–]czworooki -3 points-2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Basement is for this guy.



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter