Sadly it's not just feminists who do this, I see a lot of women today doing this and some men too. They want to control the narrative, what is allowed/not allowed to be spoken based solely on what 'I like to hear/don't like to hear'. And they make it look like they are doing something virtuous. They attempt to make it look like they are standing up for a particular group of people by defending them from toxicity. I find this to be so unhealthy and evil. If this is done massively on a societal level, we will end up in a overly censored unjust society which punishes people for thinking in ways or asking questions the new moral police deems problematic (even if the point raised is factually correct). I think in a way we are already living in such kind of societies today. I brought this up here because I think feminists have used this tactic against MRAs.

Just because you don't like hearing something, doesn't mean it can't be true. Everything doesn't have to be about validating your feelings.