TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Feminist organisation Engender campaigns against equal legal protection from hate crimes for men

griii2

October 18, 2025
104 upvotes
/r/MensRights

Feminist organisation Engender campaigns against equal legal protection from hate crimes for men : r/ToxicFeminismIsToxic

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Feminist organisation Engender campaigns against equal legal protection from hate crimes for men
Author

griii2

Upvotes 104
Comments 15
Date October 18, 2025 10:30 AM UTC
(9 months ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1o9sbgy/feminist_organisation_engender_campaigns_against/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/feminist-organisation-engender-campaigns-against.1564403
https://theredarchive.com/post/1564403
Red Pill terms in post
feminismfeminist
Top posts by griii2

Man getting robbed at knifepoint wets himself. 40k⬆, people find it hilarious and mock the victim. The empathy gap is real.

2079 upvotes
September 14, 2022
/r/MensRights

In response to International Women's Day boys in Belgian high school were not allowed to sit down during math lesson

1221 upvotes
March 12, 2023
/r/MensRights

UN Women: Women are the primary victims of wars and conflict - women and their children represent about 90 percent of the 8 million Ukrainians who have had to flee the country

1216 upvotes
March 9, 2023
/r/MensRights

A photo of an enslaved woman in Libya rocks Reddit - never mind, she is in a room full of enslaved men

933 upvotes
January 10, 2025
/r/MensRights

Decorated feminist author Jessica Valenti writes "feminists absolutely, without a doubt, do not hate men", proceeds to hate men

733 upvotes
April 23, 2023
/r/MensRights

Men in Spain suffer 94% of workplace fatalities and 85% of serious injuries. Therefore, the International Labour Organization issued a policy brief on "How to better protect women’s health and safety at work"

632 upvotes
March 5, 2026
/r/MensRights

Feminist author Kate Lister uses feminist statistics and feminist logic to calculate that bears are safer to be around than men

626 upvotes
May 2, 2024
/r/MensRights

How Disney's Turning Red normalises false accusations

603 upvotes
December 26, 2022
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Proud-Question-4479 23 points24 points25 points 9 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men ‘will exploit hate crime law to accuse women of misandry’

That's projection from feminists. 

[–]dougpschyte 16 points17 points18 points 9 months ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Feminists appear unaware of Kant's Categorical Imperative which dictates that for any law to be moral, it must be applied universally.

[–]Current_Finding_4066 9 points10 points11 points 9 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminism and morality? Do not make me laugh.

[–]SquaredAndRooted 5 points6 points7 points 9 months ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Feminist legal theory dominates family-law, usually utilitarian or egalitarian, not Kantian.

So Kant’s universality test is known, but often dismissed as too rigid or too abstract for social policy.

[–]dougpschyte 1 point2 points3 points 9 months ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Ah...utilitarian.

This article is a good precis of page 160 of 'The Master & His Emissary'.
https://thejollysociety.com/mcgilchrist-on-scheller-the-importance-of-value-in-constituting-reality/

Already disclosed on page 33 is the fact that the left hemisphere is oestrogen sensitive, whereas the right is testosterone sensitive.

Women tend to process in favour of utilitarian self-interest. Men for truth.

Consequences for female-led jurisprudence in Chapters 2, 3 & 4 of this free book.

https://j4mb.org.uk/2024/09/04/warren-perkin-ms-patterning-shes-making-mgtow/

[–]SquaredAndRooted 0 points1 point2 points 9 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Alas, we could debate even though we are on the same side - but what do you do with those who don’t follow the same ethics we're bound by?

Thanks for the references.

[–]Which_Ad_3917 5 points6 points7 points 9 months ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Whatever man, the law is already an obsolete concept. You can write whatever you want into law. The declaration of human rights exists and yet here we are

[–]Aardwolfington 3 points4 points5 points 9 months ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Nothing works all the time. Don't be absurd. Yes, here we are, same as once, there we were. So what? Change happens. If it didn't we'd all still be living in huts with an absurdly high child morbidity rate. I mean what do you want, laws with zero chance of being reassessed ever? Yeah, change can be for the bad, but be for the good too.

Tradition for tradition's sake is bad, but so is change for change's sake. Is why conservatives and progressives need each other, as well as moderates. Conservatives to argue for tradition, progressives for change and moderates to decide when the conservatives are trying to hold onto bad habits, or progressives are trying to eliminate good habits. But if laws can't change neither is possible. We end up stuck with bad habits, and positive change can't happen, and progress never occurs.

[–]Which_Ad_3917 0 points1 point2 points 9 months ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I think you’ve never been in a situation where you tried to find a lawyer willing to sue another lawyer for malpractice. I have. Do you know how many there are if you’re a nobody like both of us are? Zero. Have you ever had a conversation with a lawyer about what’s the best way to present the information cause the judge may not even read it? I have. It’s not a one-off thing either. Talk to any lawyer and they’ll tell you they have to think about how to make the judge read. The system you believe in does not exist. In practice the law is written by a bunch of people who don’t understand a thing about what they are legislating over, to be held up by judges and lawyers who literally swear to uphold it. It’s just the honor system with A LOT of extra steps. What happens if the judge doesn’t quite feel like reading the thing that morning? Poof, the whole system collapses. Unless you’re rich, of course. In which case you can go all the way up to the supreme court, where the clothes change and it becomes political. Decisions about the interpretation of said law can be reversed, influence is exchanged, how’s this gonna look in the public’s eyes? Catch my drift?

[–]Aardwolfington 0 points1 point2 points 9 months ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Your point is irrelevant, cause means we need change to fix, which we can't have without the ability to change, and system to enforce once we do. Systems go in and out of authoritarianism and corruption all the time, because people act to make change. At no point did I say things were fair, or perfectly great as is, quite the opposite really.

[–]Which_Ad_3917 0 points1 point2 points 9 months ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Go on and fix it then.

[–]Aardwolfington 0 points1 point2 points 9 months ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

That's beyond my crippled ass at this point. My activism days are behind me. All I've got is my voice. Recognizing something needs to be done, doesn't mean one has the ability to do it sadly. Wish I could really. The two tier justice system a problem for sure. Though... one must ask, if the system is so unfair to the impoverished how are there so many repeat offenders? Seems to me is tiered in an awful complex way to me that includes more than just rich vs. poor. Who is affected by the crime matters too. Criminals in poor neighborhoods, all good, let em run free, target someone who "matters", throw the book at them. Be someone who matters, put on the kid gloves. So yeah two tiered in the sense that only crimes against the rich matter, but crimes against fellow poors, all good. Riot and destroy a poor neighborhood, all good, get anywhere near a gated community and suddenly it's a problem.

[–]Wylanderuk 1 point2 points3 points 9 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ah yes the nutters that were trying to break the Scottish legal system...

Feminists pretty much the top group for "rules for thee, but none for me"...

[–]Background_Lettuce17 0 points1 point2 points 9 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They just come right out and say they don't want equality under the law. These are crazy times.

[–]BEEZY086 0 points1 point2 points 9 months ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hypocrisy levels are off the charts. A group that boldly claims to be about equality. So much so that they even include it in their mission statement.

But this is feminsim for you, and it's far from exclusive to Scotland.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter