Fluzzers like to highlight examples of Floozers that have extreme views that most people consider crazy, or at least pretty nasty. Floozers are quick to retort that although these people might call themselves Floozers, most Floozers are not like this, and that true Floozers have actually come up with some pretty great ideas.

Floozers highlight that Fluzzers don’t understand or empathize with the problems they face. Fluzzers sometimes acknowledge that Floozers do have problems, but insist that the problems of Floozers are nothing compared to what Fluzzers face, and that the stories of Floozers suffering are just isolated examples that pale in comparison the daily struggles of Fluzzers.

Occasionally Fluzzers and Floozers can have a civilized discussion. But it doesn’t take long for the Fluzzers to start pointing out that the Floozers are biased, and their opinions are shaped by their own negative personal characteristics. Floozers are naturally offended by this, and highlight that this resort to personal attacks used by the Fluzzers demonstrates just how weak their arguments are.

Then someone comes along calling them self a Flazzer, who scoffs at how silly both Fluzzers and Floozers are, and then proceeds to feel very clever about them self. The Fluzzers and the Floozers both agree that its easy for the Flazzer to be smug when he isn't bothering to contribute a view of his own.