TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Rational Male
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Let's talk statistics

despoticVeracity

April 3, 2015
1 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Let's talk statistics
Author

despoticVeracity

Upvotes 1
Comments 11
Date April 3, 2015 4:56 AM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/31a1eb/lets_talk_statistics/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/lets-talk-statistics.30944
https://theredarchive.com/post/30944
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill
Top posts by despoticVeracity

/r/relationships woman's husband finds out about her 15 drug-fuelled college threesomes

520 upvotes
March 21, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

They're waking up -- /r/relationships discovers the AF/BB divide when a woman 'takes it slow' with OP for the first three months by fucking a dude on the side

488 upvotes
June 13, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

/r/relationships wife nonchalantly mentions to her husband that she cheated on him, then dances with the affair partner in front of him, all on his sister's wedding day

207 upvotes
June 5, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

So You Want to Talk About the Pill in Public: A guide to Bluewashing

82 upvotes
May 15, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

/r/relationships man concerned about criticising his single-mother date for getting her tits out at a party with her ex and sending Snapchats

42 upvotes
April 3, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

/r/relationship_advice woman gives her perspective on her husband's adoption of TRP (x-post /r/TheRedPill)

17 upvotes
May 2, 2015
/r/MarriedRedPill

Interesting Background Reading: The Selfish Gene

17 upvotes
February 23, 2015
/r/TheRedPill

"Are you mad?"

12 upvotes
April 15, 2015
/r/MarriedRedPill

Comments

[–]amberoid1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This google book has a ton of statistics. link-hope it works.edit: formatting of link

[–]indlife2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I've read various statistical surveys and the like, and really the only one I'd be likely to believe are those by Dr. Terri Fisher of the OSU. Her surveys are different in that she uses lie detectors with some subjects. Her first study like this was done in 2003. College aged women 18-25 who weren't hooked up to the machine would claim an average of 2.6 sexual partners when giving the answer in front of or too a person. Those who provided anonymous answers reported 3.6. Those hooked up on the machine, they reported 4.4. Her study clearly reports that women lie about their numbers. Unfortunately she doesn't actually use the machine to see what the true numbers are, she is just trying to prove that people do lie about their past sex life.

She did a similar study again in 2013, so ten years had past. The results I believe went up a bit for both men and women to around 6 lifetime partners.

The problem though is that I couldn't find out what they defined as "sexual partners." In one Kinsey survey, 66% of one group said that if a person had just oral sex, they felt that was enough to use the phrase "They had sex." or something along those lines.

Another good source can be sex neutral forums. These are forums based on various topics, but don't come across as having a lot to do about sex and relationships. For example, the female writers at Total Sorority Move (and the guys at Total Frat Move) definitely defend the casual sex culture. Some of the female writers have written articles about their one time in a threesome. Any young person reading that would believe that 100% of sorority girls are like that, but that isn't true. On a forum about sororities, you get a different view. There is admission that 10-20% of any given sorority will have girls who are very promiscuous and sleep around. Then you have some that actually are in committed relationships. And they even said that some girls are still virgins, though very few (and that could be due to being unattractive, or introverted). One comment that is good for a debate was when one girl said that most of her close friends had only had about three partners each in college, relationships at that. However, one of their sisters would constantly brag about her virginity, like she was better than everyone else. However, that girl performed oral sex on at least ten guys. So who is more innocent?

It is hard to know exactly what is going on out there with stats to use them to prove various RP beliefs. All we can really do is sit back and see where the marriage rate is for the productive middle and upper classes are in ten years, then in twenty years. If promiscuity is heavily practiced by both genders, then we will have pretty good proof in marriage and divorce rates and if they have changed or not.

I read these stats on higher ed because I work in that field and many higher ed blogs discuss them (and debate them and the rape culture...which is just a huge issue on most campuses right now), and the entire hookup and casual sex culture is a huge issue. I personally believe that if binge drinking went away, so would hookup culture.

[–]684616748970514549800 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If I wanted someone to understand TRP and how it actually works irl (which i dont really care if people do except maybe a close friend like my brother), i would have them read the first page of /r/relationshipadvice, the first page of /r/deadbedrooms, one episode of 'everybody loves raymond', and then ask them if that's what they want their life to be like. if not, read the top all-time of trp

problem solved. reading through relationship advice and DB, it's so cringeworthy and pathetic the shit these guys do and ask about, like they have no idea

"my gf was flirting with another guy in front of me... but i understand she should have male friends"

"my wife hasn't touched me in 8 years and constantly ignores me"

lol...

[–]despoticVeracity[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're pointing them towards a forum dedicated to people with relationship problems and a sitcom. The critical thinker will, quite rightly, call it out as a biased sample non-representative of the overall population. The thinker will then note that you haven't provided a reason to go to TRP over, say, a more general relationship advice blog.

[–]684616748970514549800 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

many of the problems you read in those two subs can easily be applied to many couples in real life, it's just now you get to read the person's private thoughts as they share those on the internet

[–]1oldredder0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

The strongest example is atheism. People have begun rejecting religion, belief in God and religious values in favour of... Nothing.

This is no such example.

Atheism's foundation is needing evidence and not having random beliefs in any story shoved in your face in lieu of evidence.

The Red Pill makes a large number of very strong assertions about gender roles

The red pill - predating reddit's existence - does a lot more than that. It investigates. It researches. It poses questions and evidence. Everything in law, policing, war, finance and social relations, including gender roles and relations is questioned in the red pill.

It's very odd this subreddit actually microfocuses to just one fraction of the red pill while calling itself the red pill.

[–]despoticVeracity[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Perhaps I was too flippant with the atheism example. My point is that in the absence of evidence, people will eschew age-old traditions in favour of an ambiguity. It illustrates the growing importance placed upon hard evidence.

As for the pill being about other things: the pill analogy has been around since Caroll. Every fringe group wanting to push an alternative 'truth' has used it at some point. There seems little reason for the neo-PUA crowd to get in bed with the /r/conspiracy or /pol/ lot. Supporting one fringe doesn't mean one necessarily supports another.

[–]1oldredder0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

there is no alternative truth: there is a method of proving the fraud that is the major architecture of the society we live in and to seek it, to prove it, is red pill. It's the exit from the lies, the Matrix, you can't ever turn back once you know the system is a lie meant to enslave you.

[–]thehonestdouchebag-1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Atheism is the belief that there is no God. Theism is the belief that there is a God/Gods.

Agnosticism takes the position of not being able to be sure either way based on what we know now. Atheism is just as logically inconsistent as Theism, if we are going off pure facts, then Agnosticism is the most logically sound stance.

[–]1oldredder0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

atheism has no beliefs.

There is no proof of a god, nor unicorns, nor leprechauns and a list that could fill a thousand books of folk tales.

An atheist has no belief there is no god any more than he/she has a belief there is no Thor, Zeus, lucky leprechaun, etc.

[–]thehonestdouchebag0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

According to Mirriam Webster ( other dictionaries have similar definitions )

Atheism :

a :a disbelief in the existence of deity b :the doctrine that there is no deity

Edit: also would like to point out that it is a belief because just as there is no definitive proof of a deity there is also no definitive proof disproving a deity. Even Dawkings rated himself a 6 on his 1-7 scale of belief of a God ( 1 being sure of a God, 7 being sure of a lack of a God ).

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter