Book Review: "The Feminist Friendly Alpha Male" By Zachary Daniel

BluepillProfessor · 2017-08-21T16:08:44+00:00

TRP at its core is not incompatible with feminism

This is completely Bass Ackwards. TRP is a reactionary movement opposed to feminism.

If you want to say TRP is not incompatible with human nature you are right.

If you want to say TRP is not incompatible with happiness and fulfillment for women then you are also right.

However, you can't say a male strategy of being dominant is consistent with a particular female strategy that advocates for women to be dominant.

TLDR: Feminism is only compatible with TRP in the sense that matter is compatible with anti-matter.

[deleted] · 2017-08-21T18:29:55+00:00

There's a lot of really misogynistic stuff written on here and it gives this community a bad rep

If any subreddit in the entire fucking world does not care about "rep" it is probably TRP.

Rollo_Mayhem3 · 2017-08-21T18:21:56+00:00

Modern feminism is (obviously) 'gynocentric' and has nothing to do with empowering men.

Star-burner · 2017-08-21T15:08:38+00:00

Mainstream feminism (in my limited understanding) is kind of compatible with TRP goals of being an alpha male, though - if we're accepting the whole "if you want to have sex, be someone worth having sex with" and don't complain about what women find "worth having sex with".

This 3rd wave stuff supports the 80-20 pareto principle / sexual liberation idea, the whole "mess around for however long you want, settle down (when you're ~30) with a BP provider nice guy who'll feel lucky to have you" plan. The hot alpha guys just don't settle down and pull younger women (or whoever they want) as they get older, because of a bunch of gender/social dynamics. There's no shortage of "sub-average" (read: 70-80% of guys) BP dudes to settle down with.

max_peenor · 2017-08-21T16:56:12+00:00

There's a lot of really misogynistic stuff written here

Like what?

JamesSkepp · 2017-08-21T18:15:35+00:00

There's a lot of really misogynistic stuff written on here

Post some thread names (can't post links).

newName543456 · 2017-08-21T19:33:22+00:00

Sounds like it's watered down to pass for mainstream then.

MattyAnon · 2017-08-21T21:06:09+00:00

From my understanding, this bitterness toward feminism is because it has led to the pedastalizing of women by betas.

No, the pedastaling happens regardless of feminism.

We hate feminism because it's a lie. It's entirely designed to get preferential treatment and special privileges for women, under the pretence of "equality". It has led to unfair treatment of the majority of men in order to benefit women. I'll spare you the countless changes to our culture and laws that have been impacted, but suffice to say men have not benefitted one iota from it, but have paid a dear price.

Basically, Zachary Daniel's main points were that if you can't get women, your problem is you don't know who you are, you aren't sure of yourself, you need to work through your problems in order to find yourself before you can have any success.

As usual, men get the blame. If a woman isn't happy, it's men's fault. If a man isn't happy, it's men's fault.

Fact is that men have to do certain things to get women, and this place is honest about them. We remove the lies ("just be yourself" / "just be nice to her") and replace them with cold hard facts that have been endlessly field tested ("get muscles" / "lose the bodyfat" / "be dominant" / "do not supplicate or do anything else nice to or for her").

He denounces the PUA approach, as it leads to men faking confidence and never really building any genuine personality trough experience.

While of course never criticising women for their fake skin (makeup), fake body (pushup bra / waist cincher), fake personality, etc.

Daniel advocates approaching women and flirting because you should "genuinely be interested in who they are" rather than just wanting to fuck them

Awww.... that's nice.... genuine interest in her as a person.

What a beautiful, beautiful lie.

This isn't what women want, and it's not what men want to be either. It's socially acceptable though.

one of which was that it's "gentlemanly" to pay for your date's meal

Gentlemanly = beta. Paying = supplicating. Don't go out for a meal, it's a dumb date idea.

There's a lot of really misogynistic stuff written on here

Biology is misogynistic. We say it how it is.

We get a bad rep because we lift the lid on female sexual strategy. They hate that. In fact it's a necessary part of her AF/BB strategy that men believe that she's a nice girl, and that men never doubt her n-count of 3 at age 30. We threaten her marriage chances. This was never going to be popular.

TRP at its core is not incompatible with feminism

Feminism is the female sexual strategy. TRP is the male sexual strategy. They are fundamentally incompatible. Both sides cannot win this war... and never ever doubt that a war is raging.

[deleted] · 2017-08-21T14:34:28+00:00

Based on what you described about this book, it seems like it has absolutely nothing to do with the actual ideology of feminism. Nothing more than a purple pill attempt to define a safe version of the alpha male.

The Feminine Alpha Male would be a better title.

VaginalFury · 2017-08-21T15:01:21+00:00

Sounds like the same kind of purple pill stuff as "How to be a 3% Man" by Corey wayne. Those authors teach some RP lessons and mix them with bluepilled crap to maintain their "good image". its unnecessary as fuck.

Roaring40sUK · 2017-08-21T15:01:23+00:00

What the actual fuck...

This sounds like utter PP horseshit.

Title	Book Review: "The Feminist Friendly Alpha Male" By Zachary Daniel
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	0
Comments	22
Date	August 21, 2017 1:59 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/6v32wx/book_review_the_feminist_friendly_alpha_male_by/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/book-review-the-feminist-friendly-alpha-male-by.45473 https://theredarchive.com/post/45473

Comments