I read a post on TRP a few months ago that said that many social conventions and institutions are there purely to satisfy the wishes of the Beta male, as opposed to pure human instinct that benefits the Alpha and women.

The example was that back in the days of cave men, where everone acted according to their raw human instincts, the Alpha male would have the most influence over others due to his natural physical strength and strong minded decisiveness. Women instinctively find these traits more attractive than the Beta traits of following instructions and working hard to provide for others, so would naturally gravitate to the Alphas, meaning they got all the women and many Betas were left out. Without women, Betas would have been able to independently provide for themselves their basic needs of food, water, and shelter with only a small amount of effort (perhaps in small autonomous groups of beta-males) with most of them seeing this as a better alternative than working hard to provide for women and Alphas with no compensation in return. So, since the Alphas had more influence over the groups, they made a deal with the Betas - come join us, work for us to provide, and in return you'll get to choose a woman to have as your own. This then turned into the social insitution of marriage. All cultures around the world have independently developed very similar marriage conventions over the centuries which means that it's a natural social order inherent to humanity - something that can override human instincts with rationality. With this deal, the Betas were very happy, not having the obligations or accountability of the Alpha influencers but had a woman and sense of purpose in life as long as they did their part to provide. Women and Alphas needed them, or else they'd starve or be exposed to the elements.

So that got me thinking, over the last several decades the insitution of marriage has been slowly but steadily undermined by social movements like feminism and new age liberalism. Dating conventions have changed, it's now quite common for women to treat men as disposable and act on their pure natural impulses, going from Alpha to Alpha sexually and having a posse of Beta orbiters to help them whenever they need to move house or when their car breaks down. Prior to the 60s, women more or less needed to be married to hold any social respectability and had all their needs provided for by their husband, but since the liberation movements of that age it's been great for women, able to hold high standards of physical attractiveness, strength and masulinity for the men they fuck, while these Alphas have also had a great time acting on their natural impulses to fuck, getting so much pussy. The Betas on the other hand have been left out, it's much harder for them to get women, just like in the cave men days, which is why we are seeing so many basement dwellers, NEETs, and part time wagecucks who are often very smart and capable in many areas but have thought 'fuck it' and decided not to work hard to play their full part to provide for larger society. Many of these Betas are perfectly happy living simple lives, playing vidya all day and shitposting on 4chan, completely able to provide for only themselves their basic needs of food, water, and shelter. There comes a time when any Beta will reconsider being a woman's orbiter when there is no promise of sex and the Alphas won't have enough time or resources to provide for all the women they're fucking. Over the coming decades, will Betas play their instinctual powerful social card and with movements like MGTOW re-establish social norms for women to be monogamous? Otherwise we may see many more single mothers and used up roasties over the age of 40 with nobody to provide for them except social welfare. Are Betas in the ultimate position of strength in society due to their ability to force women and Alphas to override their basic instincts with social conventions in return for them to live happy, purposeful lives, providing for others?