Women are the "shoppers" of Evolution we are the articles

soyanon · 2013-06-03T03:34:51+00:00

Any thoughts on the future of our species?

No.

Not to kill your train of thought - it's fine to speculate or whatever. But evolution is VERY SLOW. For an individual, it is not useful to think about the future evolution of our species.

This kind of thinking is masturbation.

VZPurp · 2013-06-03T01:09:31+00:00

Use a time machine and get back to us.

Edit: It's hard enough to make accurate models of the present using information from the past. Anyone who can correctly predict our future path is a true visionary, but most likely just an impossible stroke of luck.

Deansdale · 2013-06-03T09:26:07+00:00

Here's our future.

AboveAFC · 2013-06-04T04:36:58+00:00

Modern feminism (socialism in disguise) and monogamy have probably ended the normal evolution we see in animals.

Monogamy has ensured many men who wouldn't get to breed in cave man days are passing on their genes.

Socialism/Welfare/Feel Good programs make sure the weak and unfit survive.

So evolution of the "natural" variety is probably done and we'll start manipulating our own evolution.

redpillschool · 2013-06-03T01:48:42+00:00

There are specific species where the gender roles are reversed. Predictably, in those species (well vertabrates anyway) the females are larger and compete over the males who then take care of the young. The north atlantic wren is one example. This is one of those cases where the exception proves the rule. It is the role and investment in child rearing that determines the morphology and dispostion of the sexes. That is which gender is the dominant one. I agree with red pill 100%, but compared to other species, sexual dimorphism is much smaller in humans than in some other animals since there is so much shared investment.

I indeed believe that IQ is important in human evolution, and that sexual selection has been instrumental in the evolution of the brain. It is likely (actually I am 100% sure, but every and all blue pillers disagree) that IQ is to a fair degree an x linked trait. In any animal with XY sex deterimination, the male will have something called pseudo-dominance. This is because with only 1 X, recessive genes (good or bad) can't be hidden by a second copy. This is why men have so much more variability in their IQ. Genes that may help or hinder just show in men where they might be hidden in women. Part of what women are programmed to do is to be able to discriminate the guys who got the bad genes. I like to think of the brain as a sort of human version of peacock feathers.

Remember though that throughout most of history we didn't have such a nanny state. I suspect in such conditions the high IQ male had a greater advantage over the dumb musclehead than perhaps exists today....

2013-06-03T06:07:05+00:00

The nature itself is a pretty harsh selector on women too. The mechanism of childbirth, especially for humans, has extremely unyielding specifications. The parameters don't have to be wrong by much, to cause the death of both the child and the mother. Giving birth was a shockingly common cause of death in the stone age, all the way until the development modern medicine.

This is actually where the "unattainable standards of beauty" stem from. They're not just "catering to perverse male pleasure", but in fact a matter of survival.

VZPurp · 2013-06-03T06:07:11+00:00

[permanently deleted]

Default8 · 2013-06-03T05:06:41+00:00

Some of that doesn't make sense... I suggest you proof read

2013-06-03T06:13:56+00:00

As a guy with an evolutionary biology background, I agree with you. Sexual selection generally operates on the males of the species. It may be the dominant force in some human populations (aside from genetic drift).

In Northern Europe for example, height is a positively selected trait. I suspect it's because girls there (and probably in a lot of places) naturally are attracted to tall guys.

2013-06-04T00:30:32+00:00

It's called the chase-away model. It's observed in many different species, and it's beautiful:

http://www.csus.edu/indiv/h/hollandb/pubs_downloads/Holland&Rice.98.pdf

This is why I recommend high T, extreme masculine game to pretty much everyone. It breaks womens sexual resistance and they basically become your playtoys whenever you like. They, on the other hand, have no concious thoughts about what sort of biomechanics are in play.

Title	Women are the "shoppers" of Evolution we are the articles
Author	MdPhdVictor
Upvotes	3
Comments	30
Date	June 3, 2013 1:04 AM UTC (13 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1fjvlj/women_are_the_shoppers_of_evolution_we_are_the/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/women-are-the-shoppers-of-evolution-we-are-the.4671 https://theredarchive.com/post/4671

Comments