Sex Robot Brothels Proliferating, Because They Are Legal

alexanderthegroovy · 2019-11-18T20:11:30+00:00

I don't even understand the argument that they should be illegal.

StiuNu · 2019-11-18T20:55:59+00:00

You are sick. You should only fuck what we say. Stop objectfying women, I mean inanimate objects. There is no profit for the government.

Don't fuck child like sex bots, it's wrong, you're sick. Roam free in the society until your urges make you a customer in our deluxe prisons, on our dime.

On the other hand, teachers preying on the male underage students can benefit from child support.

Yes, we should ban all male oriented sex toys. Only women are allowed to ask for payment in exchange for lousy sex

DangZagnut · 2019-11-18T20:52:29+00:00

WASHINGTON, D.C. (November 18, 2019) – There are already more than a dozen brothels in major cities where men can engage in their sex fantasies – including activities so extreme that human prostitutes refuse to participate – with increasingly lifelike sex robots (often called “sexbots”), and the number is likely to grow, even in the U.S., because laws in most places prohibiting prostitution and sex-related services apply only to human sex workers, not robots.

Not all prostitutes refuse to do "it", and they're trying to say "violence" when they probably just mean pissing or shitting on it, or god forbid having sex with the thing.

There is no way you're getting violent with a love doll. These things are not cheap. I'm pretty sure you have to have a hold for its value on your card in case you destroy it. So why would you?

Besides this is just a bullshit feminist piece anyway.

This raises issues about whether society is willing to permit such establishments to operate, especially without any restrictions or regulations, even if the brothels are willing to provide sexbots to under-age customers, to advertise and promote their services openly, provide sexbots which look and act like young children, and/or allow the female sexbots to be programmed to fulfill a customer's rape fantasies by pretending to be raped, suggests public interest law professor John Banzhaf.

Remember this name. There's a surprise at the end.

So you're saying children aren't allowed to masturbate? Taking away their body autonomy from themselves?

What's to regulate? And why? In fact now we're on the subject, why can't we regulate universities that teach subversion? Or the fact that women are the largest consumers of violent pornography?

Here's a guess, if this was a dyke pushed initiative, you wouldn't dare speak against it, even if they were destroying the dolls. You'd tout is as a some pro-strong independent woman therapy session and promote it as a money making business by women, for women.

Banzhaf, who is also an engineer with an interest in robotics, has written and lectured widely on issues raised by increasingly complex and realistic sex robots now using artificial intelligence.

You To Watch The Big Giveaway!

I know professors are very very stupid these days, but you can't really make a robot give you a rape experience according to feminists themselves. Feminists have long defined rape as being "about power and the subjugation of women", raping a toaster won't do that, so why would they rape it my feminist sisters? It doesn't give any power or oppress any woman, just the toaster which doesn't feel anything. And I highly doubt this jackass knows a fucking thing about AI. And I really doubt he's ever coded one. He's just watched to many movies.

His agitation on these issues may have been a factor in pressuring the U.S. House of Representatives to pass a bill to ban sexbots which appear to be children, including even young toddlers.

The bill is called the CREEPER Act (Curbing Realistic Exploitative Electronic Pedophiliac Robots).

O.k....I can sort of see that, although frankly the psychology is still out on that. Either they're saying the robots are so real that the pedo will get his jolies with it, which means they won't be a threat to actual children, meaning this is a good thing, or they're implying they'll get ramped up and will then go engage in sex with real children, which means this thing isn't realistic with an AI, it's just a fucking toaster that says "ooo baby" in a cold Siri voice and therefore isn't realistic when it comes to all the assault and crap that feminists babble about.

So which is it? Good or bad? Frankly I find it a bit weird as that's not my bag, and threats to children need to be stopped, but the argument sort of undoes the article.

Laws prohibiting - or in some situations strictly regulating - prostitution, or the provision of sexual services such as full-body massages, have traditionally been justified by the need to protect human females from exploitation and even sex trafficking, to reduce the incidence of street walking and the spread of venereal diseases, and related concerns, but these do not seem to apply when those performing the sexual service are robots rather than human beings.

O.k. back to puritans not seeing a benefit to this. It literally could destroy human trafficking, but I guess we want to keep actual human beings in sexual torment, because a toaster might get its feelings hurt?

This just shows how feminists hate women, ause them politically, and other than that, don't give a flying fuck about them.

But many might not only find that permitting adults to simulate sex (including rape) with child sexbots is demeaning, but that it might also offer an opportunity for those with perverted sex fantasies to test them out in a safe venue, and perhaps as a result become so drawn to the activity that they develop and then act upon an urge to practice it on real children.

Yes yes, video games cause violence, porn causes rape, playing your vinyl backwards summons the devil. We've heard it all before. The toaster didn't say "no" loud enough so it's rape.

I heard something absolutely ridiculous, that premarital sex damages pair bonding. It's pseudo science, but since you equate "stupid ideas" = harm to the bitches, then clearly women should not be allowed to fuck. Right?!?!?!?!

Some feminist organizations have also raised concerns that allowing men to "rape" female sexbots, programmed to appear so as to resist, may likewise encourage closet rapists to put their fantasies into practice, first with sexbots, but then graduating to actually raping real women.

Well of course they're going to say that, they hate men. And even they have to put "rape" is sarcastic quotes. Because they can't define it.

Also, exactly how many sex dolls do you have to rape, considering it can't resist in any way, before you decide to try taking a woman out on a date and forcing her to only be able to drink red wine instead of white? I mean, that's the bounds of the current definition of rape.

Again, you can't "rape" a sex bot, it's literally impossible, mostly because red wine will short circuit it's mother board, but because all you have to do is have it say, "I consent to everything baby, and I'm really into rape play, come at me bro" when you enter the room. It can even be on the rental agreement you signed.

And then it's consenting, unless you puritanical man hating feminists are kink and slut shaming? Who are you to say what's an acceptable kink, and I ask because I have videos of you feminists all into rape play when you were dating me. Just "require" that the toaster consent to whatever the man wants, that by your own stupid definitions make it not rape. In fact, make it say it every time it changes positions, so it's always consenting, so never being raped, because the robot is into BDSM play. And no "rapist" would ever "rape" something "consenting" right? So your problems are solved. As always, a man has to do the "heavy" thinking.

In any event, there are also real concerns about permitting teenage boys able - for less than the cost of many concert tickets - to be introduced to sex and sexual fulfillment in this artificial manner, and to permitting the open advertising and promotion of what some may regard as a perversion; sex with robots.

Perversion? Are you sure you went to the confessional today crispy religious guy? And teenage boys don't lack perversion, they whack off left and right. That chicken gets choked and they start doing their own laundry. I know you've never masturbated because you're so religiously pure, but I've yet to rape anyone and I masturbate all the time like the perverted freak I am.

You know the feminist jackass who is quoted throughout the article?

Author

JOHN F. BANZHAF III, B.S.E.E., J.D., Sc.D. Professor of Public Interest Law George Washington University Law School, FAMRI Dr. William Cahan Distinguished Professor, Fellow, World Technology Network, Founder, Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) 2000 H Street, NW, Wash, DC 20052, USA (202) 994-7229 // (703) 527-8418 http://banzhaf.net/ [email protected]

This jackass actually quoted himself in the third person all through out the article and wrote this bullshit, as if this dork is an expert. You've got to be kidding me. Feminist shills are the worst.

antifeminist3 · 2019-11-18T23:48:09+00:00

"Some feminist organizations have also raised concerns that allowing men to "rape" female sexbots,..."

Women should stop raping dildos and vibrators.

Tellnone25 · 2019-11-18T21:24:05+00:00

"You don't give an alcoholic a bottle of liquor to stop their addiction, so why would you provide a pedophile with a tool that would further normalize harmful actions? Once a child sex abuser tires of practicing on a doll, it's a small step to move on to an innocent child."

Wow. That analogy has holes in it.

Alcohol is a substance you consume and affects the body.

Also you think obtaining a child is as easy as getting alcohol? Are you part of the Epstein pedophile ring Rep. Dan Donovan?

Plus I rather these guys get attached to a doll, rather than them bottling up these impulses and then suddenly acting out.

Gear_Head_ · 2019-11-19T00:03:16+00:00

These bitches know they’re in trouble. It’s hilarious how they’re just grasping at straws here.

rocko20002 · 2019-11-19T00:38:24+00:00

These people really went all Helen Lovejoy "won't you please think of the children" regarding sexbots. They just assume that men (and yes, only men) that go for sexbots are eventually going to go for child sexbots, which is preposterous. And don't get me wrong, a child sexbot does sound creepy and straight out perverse and it's something that shouldn't be manufactured, but it's just an excuse for society to deny and oppress men. Basically a witch hunt.

And as far as women go, they don't need child sexbots. They already have plenty of real life boys available. Just ask your local slutty hot teacher. But if they already have battery operated dildos and Antonio Banderas inflatable sexdolls, what happens when they get a hot male sexbot? Let's ban those too!

2019-11-19T02:09:05+00:00

If I fuck a piece of plastic that looks like a 16 year old girl. It doesn't make me a pedophile you idiots. It's a fucking piece of plastic.

LiveTheTruth321 · 2019-11-18T22:04:54+00:00

I am betting STDs will go down to some degree.

jotta54 · 2019-11-18T22:18:41+00:00

Something odd about this article, either that or I am half asleep. But it say posted by John G Banzhaf, then further in the article mentions John Banzhaf in the 3rd person tense.

andreas-mgtow · 2019-11-18T22:37:36+00:00

Because They Are Legal

No, you fucking dimwit. Legality does not create demand.

Sex robots must be providing a service men desire at a price/risk point men find reasonable.

2019-11-19T00:13:43+00:00

allow the female sexbots to be programmed to fulfill a customer's rape fantasies by pretending to be raped, suggests public interest law professor John Banzhaf.

Rape is the most common sexual fantasy of WOMEN not men. I don't see anyone calling in public interest lawyers for that.

MegtowMonk · 2019-11-19T00:22:55+00:00

[deleted]

theduke562 · 2019-11-19T00:25:10+00:00

Wasn't there a Futurama episode about this?

"Proposition ∞ has proposed the legalization of robosexuality in the rest of America. Generally, robosexuality is deeply frowned upon by the religious community and casually frowned upon by the general public."

https://futurama.fandom.com/wiki/Robosexuality

citerunner · 2019-11-19T07:41:28+00:00

Wow... The picture above the article is a masterpiece of subliminal emotional manipulation.

Title	Sex Robot Brothels Proliferating, Because They Are Legal
Author	JackFisherBooks
Upvotes	36
Comments	39
Date	November 18, 2019 8:08 PM UTC (6 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/dy8mkb/sex_robot_brothels_proliferating_because_they_are/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/sex-robot-brothels-proliferating-because-they-are.647149 https://theredarchive.com/post/647149

Comments

This jackass actually quoted himself in the third person all through out the article and wrote this bullshit, as if this dork is an expert. You've got to be kidding me. Feminist shills are the worst.