if you were to stand sluts and non-sluts mute, wearing the same plain outfits and expressionless faces, would there be any discernible differences on average in physical attractiveness, breast size, weight, etc.?

AsianAway · 2020-06-01T20:45:22+00:00

AWALT
Any woman will be a slut for the right guy.

LilLoserFreny · 2020-06-03T05:28:08+00:00

Honestly slut is woman, you just have some that hide it better. Also they come in all shapes and sizes.

red_philosopher · 2020-06-01T21:41:46+00:00

I'm certain that the answer is an unequivocal "yes" with significant margins of error. It depends heavily on what classifies as a "slut" vs a "non-slut," as certain thresholds of certain categories will vary. Take for example age vs number of sexual partners. If a "slut" is someone that has had, say, more than 20 sexual partners, and there's a woman who is aged 40 with 21 Sexual partners, she's a slut, and her attractiveness is likely to be much lower because her attractiveness naturally has decreased with age. Is it because she's a slut, or is it because she's just older?

Rather, indicators of promiscuity are more likely to be a better set of factors. Things like: multiple tattoos (2+), single motherhood, multiple children with multiple fathers, mental illness, 2 or more instances of having had an STD, body piercings aside from up to 4 (total) in the ears, education level at high school or below, uses or has used illicit substances, and an addiction to alcohol or nicotine, multiple divorces, no relationships greater than 3 years in length. Then rate the women's average attractiveness based on how many of these traits they possess, or perhaps by each individual categorical trait, and compare. You may want to segregate the groups based on things like age, socioeconomic background, and race.

However, the data simply doesn't exist. And obtaining it, well, that's just fraught with difficulty.

Then there are things like, is there a "difficulty" factor? Is a slut someone desperate for sex? If so, women with an SMV of 4 or less will basically spread their legs for just about any guy worth a damn. They find more men attractive because of their lower SMV (even though they'll still reach for the top 20%). In my experience, fat, ugly, and older women are definitely far thirstier and will do almost anything for a whiff of dick. Had a woman (God she was gross... Maybe a 3?) basically cream herself when I put my hand on her back just to prove a point to a friend.

Then again, there are the who are objectively attractive and sleep with hundreds of guys but don't get pregnant or do drugs or basically anything like that. Are they sluts? Most people would say yes. But they don't fit much of the criteria above.

So it's probably best to assume AWALT.

TheGirlGetter9000 · 2020-06-01T22:02:15+00:00

Really generalizing here and correlation doesn't mean "yes this is a slut 100%" but...

Weird hair color + tattoos
Masculine facial features, especially jaw, mean more T in their system, more masculine traits, and higher n-count
Extremely generalizing but bigger boobs often correlates to sluttiness. Think it's to do with being sexualized at a younger age
Contrary to popular opinion, weight and sluttiness probably correlate to where larger women are sluttier. Reason being they're more accustomed to being desperate and degrading themselves for men, and have no hope with the top-tier of men all women like. Weight also correlates to low impulse control, depression, etc--and that will drive count up too
Likewise to above, ugly women are statistically proven to be sluttier
More innocent looks also correlate to more innocent behavior. People tend to build their image after how they view themselves with hair-cuts, genetics, dress (I know you said don't include this), skin-care, gym, and etc. How people present themselves will always be linked to something they want you to know about them

That said, AWALT. A woman could hit every bad metric I just laid out above and be a 22 y/o virgin. Likewise she could hit none of them and be a huge whore. But it'll correlate to the count, for sure

Comments