[–]VestigialHead114 points115 points116 points 3 months ago (24 children) | Copy
Hmm okay. So any women can walk around with a skirt so short we can see her panties and her tits showing and everything is fine.
Nothing slutty about it at all. Even though the ONLY reason she is dressed that way is to get potential sex partners to notice her. Which sort of does have a ring of sexuality and sluttiness about it.
Will these same femtards be okay with me attending their rallies with my cock out in some assless chaps? No feminists I am not innapropriately dressed - you are thinking like a rapist.
[–]QS26[S] 28 points29 points30 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
[–]Terra_Ferrum26 points27 points28 points 3 months ago (3 children) | Copy
And also it’s one sided. If a man wears something revealing he is disgusting and just trying to make women uncomfortable.
[–]GiveMeTheBroccoli14 points15 points16 points 3 months ago (2 children) | Copy
Double standards double standards, also why can men wear skirts anymore? I want to move to Scotland
[–]Lickiecat6 points7 points8 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy
Nobody does that here unless it is a wedding sadly.
[–]pandolfio4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago (3 children) | Copy
If a girl has a short skirt and you're looking at it, you're a perv If you're a guy and your balls are showing under a short, you're a perv
Head I win, tail you lose
[–]VestigialHead2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (2 children) | Copy
Hahaha nice. The crazy thing is there are some people that actually think like that.
[–]pandolfio5 points6 points7 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy
All of feminism is based on the idea that women can have the cake and eat it. That they can have rights without responsibilities.
Well, if you have the right to show off your boobs in order to attract the best mate, then don't be surprised that people who are not the best mate are going to look at them as well.
And to make things worse, it's despicable how a woman will disparage (undesirable) men looking at her, for being thirsty dogs, taking a moral high stance. When in reality, the only thing that, in their minds, makes it immoral for a man to stare at her, is the fact that the man is not deemed attractive enough for her.
[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
Yes it is incredibly hypocritical. For people that seem to think they are the smarter sex they certainly have some massive holes in their understanding of rationality and logic.
[–][deleted] 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy
[deleted]
[–]VestigialHead23 points24 points25 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
I have no issues with anyone walking around in a slutty outfit. Especially when they are young and looking for sex and not long term relationships. I just get annoyed when feminists claim that you are not bringing unwanted attention to yourself when you do so.
Because dressing provocatively will not only attract the people you want to sleep with - it will attract unwanted people as well. Some of whom are criminals and rapists.
So yes you are right - it is idiotic for feminists to complain about people objectifying them when they deliberately go out of their way to stand out and be objectified. They seem to want their cake and eat it too.
[–]CustardKarim0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (11 children) | Copy
You really think the only reason they wear shorter clothing is to find a sexual partner and her clothing determines her consent? You really are thinking like a rapist
[–]VestigialHead1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (10 children) | Copy
Yes. People wear slutty or shorter clothing for the express purpose of getting attention. That attention is either to attract potential mates or to make them feel better because people they find attractive are looking at them. Even if they are married they are still wanting the attention - just less likely to turn the attention into sexual actions.
Why do you think throughout history people have pushed their wives and daughters to wear long covering clothing? It is for the exact opposite reason. Clothing that covers up leads to less sexual attention. This is basic common sense.
I get that in our current social climate it is no longer considered okay to suggest a women or a man cover up like in the past. I have no issues with that. Women can wear whatever they want. They just cannot wear whatever they want and also think they are not effecting what happens to them.
I am not saying they are making the rape happen. I am saying they are pointing themselves out as a more likely potential victim by displaying their skin.
[–]CustardKarim0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (9 children) | Copy
It's not their fault. They don't get raped because of their clothing. They get raped because rapists rape.
[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (8 children) | Copy
I never said that rape is not caused by rapists. I am simply saying that they are making themselves more likely targets by what they wear. Which I have repeated over and over again. Did you not read the chains of replies here?
[–]CustardKarim0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (7 children) | Copy
Well then the problem shouldn't be that women wear skimpy clothing. The problem should be that rapists are out and about and usually don't suffer consequences.
[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (6 children) | Copy
Nope. One problem is that women wear skimpy outfits but do not want to accept that they are increasing the chances of unwanted sexual attention. This is just stupidity.
The other problem - which is certainly a bigger issue is that people rape other people. The majority certainly do face consequences - but these consequences do not in any way prevent people from raping. So if we can find a way to stop people raping that would be incredible.
BUT even if there were no rapes people still need to accept that their own behaviour can increase the chances of bad things happening to them. So skimpy clothing would still bring about unwanted sexual attention even if rape never happened again.
[–]CustardKarim0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (5 children) | Copy
WHYYY are we blaming the victims. The problem is that from the get-go, wearing the clothes they want will result in getting raped.
[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (4 children) | Copy
Did you even read one word I wrote?
I was specifically blaming the rapists.
But just because the rapists are at fault does not mean the victims where not also at fault. They increased the odds of themselves being raped.
How is this difficult for you to understand? it is a very simple concept.
If you walk down a dark alley in a known dodgy area of town making heaps of noise and waving the cash you just won at the casino around do you really think you have not encouraged people to rob you?
Even though the robber is at fault for bashing you over the head and taking your cash are you not also at fault for advertising you have wealth in an area known for robberies?
I just cannot understand this desire from feminists to remove all responsibility for any of their actions and put it all on someone else.
[–]CustardKarim0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (3 children) | Copy
Yes but the problem that I'M trying to communicate is that wearing skimpy clothing empowers rapists or increases your chances at all
[–]throwaway6969696959624 points25 points26 points 3 months ago (7 children) | Copy
Ok so they’re saying that most rapists are women since women mostly slut-shame other women more than men?
[–]QS26[S] 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (6 children) | Copy
No
[–]throwaway696969695966 points7 points8 points 3 months ago (5 children) | Copy
It’s a joke
[–]QS26[S] 4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago (4 children) | Copy
No it’s not I got this from a feminist page.
[–]throwaway696969695967 points8 points9 points 3 months ago (2 children) | Copy
I meant what I did was a joke
[–]QS26[S] 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy
Oh of course
[–]Terminal-Psychosis1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
Poe's Law at work.
[–]throwaway696969695962 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
I’ve seen that phrase before
[–]the-unflattering-610 points11 points12 points 3 months ago (4 children) | Copy
She looks like Jim Halpert from The Office. Literally no one thinks that.
[–]QS26[S] 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy
You be surprised I talked to this SIMP who agreed with this statement.
[–]seatbelt-malfunction1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
Holy shit i said the same thing LOLOLOL
[–]PrometheusMadLad0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
holy shit that's really accurate
[–]Bazinga21200210 points11 points12 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
Guys, we have to f-ing understand ! Just because she is making almost-naked videos of herself twerking and posting it on social media to attract thirsty simps and despos she is NOT a slut
[–]qemist2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
You're not supposed to talk about how sexualizing so much women's clothing is.
[–]Pugwhisper5 points6 points7 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
Time to get the speedo out
[–]baronmad4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
"Officer officer officer, a women is being gang raped in that alley over there"
"Im not dressed as a police officer, you're just thinking i am"
[–]Lickiecat3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy
I'm not dressed like lion food. I just like to put meat all over my body and walk through the cage, it is so empowering to watch the lions try to resist my deliciousness.
When is the next annual dress to make rapists think walk?
[–]Terminal-Psychosis5 points6 points7 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
The silly thing is, everyone knows that walking down a dangerous street at night in a business suit is basically attempted suicide.
Denying personal responsibility is a major tactic of the rad-fem cult, and it gets people hurt.
They are more happy about rape numbers than actually keeping women (they don't care about men) safe.
[–]GiveMeTheBroccoli2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
Just because she is starting strip in bed with you, it does not mean she is wanting sex, rapist simp
[–]Terminal-Psychosis2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago* (0 children) | Copy
He is not dressed like a wealthy business man,
you're just thinking like a gold digger.
These people have zero ability for self-reflection.
Girls that listen to this tripe get hurt. Rad-fem cult don't care.
[–]casteliacitysax1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
Ah yes, the same retarded argument from these freaks. She is dressing slutty.
[–]JETS_WPG1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy
Pretty sure that’s a dude in the pic!!
[–]DrPVM1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy
She looks like a he
[–]omawesomeness131 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
Why does that person look the like John Krazinski if he decided to be a drag queen?
[–]KindPrecise1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy
I think it’s positive they’ve used a man in the picture, to highlight this issue
[–]QS26[S] 0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
[–]HungryBrain11 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy
Nah. She’s likely dressed like a slut desperate for attention, drama, and the opportunity to claim she’s a victim.
[–]QS26[S] 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
Exactly
[–]seatbelt-malfunction0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
I'm thinking like she looks like Jim Halpert in drag.
That analogy is perfect
[–]Sakura-Kaiba0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy
where is the original post? I want to troll this bitch so hard.
It’s on Instagram the account is @feminist
[–]GiveMeTheBroccoli0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
Her hair looks like pudding
[+]unsurelife83comment score below threshold-24 points-23 points-22 points 3 months ago (18 children) | Copy
It’s correct though, right? I mean, the invite should come from the woman, not her dress.
[–]QS26[S] 7 points8 points9 points 3 months ago (7 children) | Copy
🤦🏾♂️ OMG you don’t get it.
[–]unsurelife832 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (6 children) | Copy
Oh! Sorry. May be I am not understanding this post.
[–]QS26[S] 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (5 children) | Copy
Are you trolling?
[–]unsurelife832 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (4 children) | Copy
No no.. I’m not. As I mentioned, may be I’m not getting the gist of the post.
[–]QS26[S] 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (3 children) | Copy
The fact that they say someone thinks like a rapist for this is ridiculous.
[–]unsurelife832 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (2 children) | Copy
So isn’t the post gist “dressing provocatively is not an invite to rape”? My comment above was based off on that. My apologies if I misunderstood.
[–]QS26[S] 7 points8 points9 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy
No 🤦🏾♂️ the gist is saying that if you think a woman is dressed like a slut it means that you think like a rapist which makes no sense.
[–]unsurelife833 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (0 children) | Copy
Oh.. yeah it doesn’t make sense.. thank you.
You are being sarcastic right?
[–]unsurelife832 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (7 children) | Copy
No, I am genuinely not understanding here. My assumption about the post was “dressing provocatively is not an invite for rape”. May be I misunderstand the post.
[–]VestigialHead-3 points-2 points-1 points 3 months ago (6 children) | Copy
Ahh so you are a feminist trolling the site. Got it.
[–]unsurelife833 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (5 children) | Copy
I can’t help it if you think I’m a troll. I have seen similar pictures before and they all had the same message “provocative dressing is not an invite to rape”. I’m come from a country where rapes crimes are pretty high in numbers. In most cases, the criminals reasoning to rape was “she was dressed provocatively”. So it’s become a PSA of some sort to say dressing shouldn’t be a reason for rapes.
Except that it is a certain fact that dressing provocatively WILL elicit a person unwanted sexual attention. So it IS increasing the chance of a rape. No-one is saying that a person dressing provocatively should be raped. No-one should ever be raped. But the fact is there are many criminals who do rape. They are more likely to target someone if they dress provocatively.
So the PSA is absolute bullshit. It is simply feminists not wanting to shoulder any responsibility for bad things that happen to them.
[–]BlatantNapping1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (3 children) | Copy
If you encourage one woman not to dress provocatively to avoid being raped, you're just saying "make sure the rapist rapes someone else." Ok, let's say all the "slutty" women stop dressing "slutty." Who are the rapists raping now?
Why do you seem to care more about women dressing slutty than addressing "the fact" that there are criminals who rape?
[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point2 points 3 months ago (2 children) | Copy
What the fuck are you talking about? At no time have I said that it was okay for someone to rape someone.
If you know of a way to prevent criminals raping people then I am all ears. most of the world would like to hear your solution.
As I see it there is NO WAY TO PREVENT people raping. They have mental conditions that mean they cannot filter out their desires and have to act on them.
I do NOT care whether women dress slutty or not - completely their choice. BUT I do care if they then claim that their wardrobe choices and actions had no effect on those around them which includes rapists. Because feminists have been trying desperately to deflect all responsibility away from women and place it onto men.
They claim women are raped if a man and women both drink and get drunk and then have sex. To them this means the women could not consent. But for some incredible reason this does not also mean the man could not consent. It seems only a women needs to give consent. Nice equality.
So because of this aggressive attempt by the third and fourth wave feminists to deflect all responsibility, men have to fight back to gain equality again. Something men have not had for decades now.
[–]BlatantNapping1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (1 child) | Copy
There's a lot here you're talking about so:
1) The idea that dressing provocatively leads to rape. If you say there is no way to prevent rapists from raping, then clearly not dressing "slutty" is not a way to avoid being raped, and there would not be less rape if women dressed to your standards of modesty. So you're just enforcing an arbitrary standard on women based on your personal feelings.
Which is kind of the definition of slut shaming and, ironically, what the OP was about. You're assuming that if a woman dresses the way you think is slutty, she's more likely to be raped. You are putting yourself in the position of the way you think a rapist thinks, and judging women's dress accordingly.
2) Feminists are trying to deflect responsibility away from women and onto men. The feminists I know are not into blaming genders, they're blaming societal norms. For instance, idk if you're a man or a woman. A feminist would take issue with your statements regardless. There are also many aspects of the way men are treated in society that fall under the umbrella of feminism, and are enforced by both women and men. See penis shaming or "boys don't cry" type of thoughts.
3) Intoxication and consent, in feminist circles, is not gender based. Drunk people should not be hooking up because of concerns about consent anyway, but it doesn't matter who is taking advantage of whom. When one A is more intoxicated than B and A is the sexual aggressor, it's assault because B is not in a position to give consent. Men are often victims of sexual assault while under the influence.
This is all really hard to prove in court. Most rapes are. But that doesn't mean that anyone thinks men cannot be victims or that consent does not apply to them, too.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It gets hard to have a discussion when someone bounces around topics like this. It feels often like people do that on purpose to throw out a bunch of unsupported statements to distract from the fact that they're unable to support their original point.
I am not saying that if women do not dress provocatively that there will be less rape. I am saying that if a criminal goes out into the city with the desire to rape then a women who is dressed provocatively is a much more likely target. So slutty dressing WILL increase the odds of a particular women being raped - as simple as that.
As for the consent when drunk thing - I personally think the entire thing is absolutely ridiculous - every adult can and does give consent when drunk. But the issue is with the inequality in this area. There are several caszes on universities where a man and women who already like each other and have spoken about having sex went to a bar and got drunk - both were drunk. They then went to a dorm room and had sex. The man is then accused with rape. The women is NOT accused with rape. This has happened several times. So even though you seem to be claiming that both partners are equally to blame - that is not what is happening in real life. So yes there are many prominent professors and university students that DO think only women need to give consent.
© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]VestigialHead114 points115 points116 points (24 children) | Copy
[–]QS26[S] 28 points29 points30 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]Terra_Ferrum26 points27 points28 points (3 children) | Copy
[–]GiveMeTheBroccoli14 points15 points16 points (2 children) | Copy
[–]Lickiecat6 points7 points8 points (1 child) | Copy
[–]pandolfio4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy
[–]VestigialHead2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy
[–]pandolfio5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy
[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy
[–][deleted] (1 child) | Copy
[deleted]
[–]VestigialHead23 points24 points25 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]CustardKarim0 points1 point2 points (11 children) | Copy
[–]VestigialHead1 point2 points3 points (10 children) | Copy
[–]CustardKarim0 points1 point2 points (9 children) | Copy
[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy
[–]CustardKarim0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy
[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy
[–]CustardKarim0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy
[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy
[–]CustardKarim0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy
[–]throwaway6969696959624 points25 points26 points (7 children) | Copy
[–]QS26[S] 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy
[–]throwaway696969695966 points7 points8 points (5 children) | Copy
[–]QS26[S] 4 points5 points6 points (4 children) | Copy
[–]throwaway696969695967 points8 points9 points (2 children) | Copy
[–]QS26[S] 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy
[–]Terminal-Psychosis1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]throwaway696969695962 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]the-unflattering-610 points11 points12 points (4 children) | Copy
[–]QS26[S] 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy
[–]seatbelt-malfunction1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]PrometheusMadLad0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]Bazinga21200210 points11 points12 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]qemist2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]Pugwhisper5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]baronmad4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]Lickiecat3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy
[–]Terminal-Psychosis5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]GiveMeTheBroccoli2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]Terminal-Psychosis2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]casteliacitysax1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]JETS_WPG1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy
[–]DrPVM1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy
[–]omawesomeness131 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]KindPrecise1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy
[–]QS26[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]HungryBrain11 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy
[–]QS26[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]seatbelt-malfunction0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]QS26[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]Sakura-Kaiba0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy
[–]QS26[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]GiveMeTheBroccoli0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy
[+]unsurelife83comment score below threshold-24 points-23 points-22 points (18 children) | Copy
[–]QS26[S] 7 points8 points9 points (7 children) | Copy
[–]unsurelife832 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy
[–]QS26[S] 1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy
[–]unsurelife832 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy
[–]QS26[S] 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy
[–]unsurelife832 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy
[–]QS26[S] 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy
[–]unsurelife833 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy
[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy
[–]unsurelife832 points3 points4 points (7 children) | Copy
[–]VestigialHead-3 points-2 points-1 points (6 children) | Copy
[–]unsurelife833 points4 points5 points (5 children) | Copy
[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy
[–]BlatantNapping1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy
[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy
[–]BlatantNapping1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy
[–]VestigialHead0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy