Wtf?

There's a lot here you're talking about so:

1) The idea that dressing provocatively leads to rape. If you say there is no way to prevent rapists from raping, then clearly not dressing "slutty" is not a way to avoid being raped, and there would not be less rape if women dressed to your standards of modesty. So you're just enforcing an arbitrary standard on women based on your personal feelings.

Which is kind of the definition of slut shaming and, ironically, what the OP was about. You're assuming that if a woman dresses the way you think is slutty, she's more likely to be raped. You are putting yourself in the position of the way you think a rapist thinks, and judging women's dress accordingly.

2) Feminists are trying to deflect responsibility away from women and onto men. The feminists I know are not into blaming genders, they're blaming societal norms. For instance, idk if you're a man or a woman. A feminist would take issue with your statements regardless. There are also many aspects of the way men are treated in society that fall under the umbrella of feminism, and are enforced by both women and men. See penis shaming or "boys don't cry" type of thoughts.

3) Intoxication and consent, in feminist circles, is not gender based. Drunk people should not be hooking up because of concerns about consent anyway, but it doesn't matter who is taking advantage of whom. When one A is more intoxicated than B and A is the sexual aggressor, it's assault because B is not in a position to give consent. Men are often victims of sexual assault while under the influence.

This is all really hard to prove in court. Most rapes are. But that doesn't mean that anyone thinks men cannot be victims or that consent does not apply to them, too.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

It gets hard to have a discussion when someone bounces around topics like this. It feels often like people do that on purpose to throw out a bunch of unsupported statements to distract from the fact that they're unable to support their original point.