714,030 posts

Wtf?

Reddit View
March 20, 2020
306 upvotes
post image

Post Information
Title Wtf?
Author QS26
Upvotes 306
Comments 72
Date 20 March 2020 04:36 AM UTC (8 months ago)
Subreddit antifeminists
Link https://theredarchive.com/post/710110
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/flotwr/wtf/
Similar Posts
Comments

[โ€“]VestigialHead114 points115 points  (24 children) | Copy

Hmm okay. So any women can walk around with a skirt so short we can see her panties and her tits showing and everything is fine.

Nothing slutty about it at all. Even though the ONLY reason she is dressed that way is to get potential sex partners to notice her. Which sort of does have a ring of sexuality and sluttiness about it.

Will these same femtards be okay with me attending their rallies with my cock out in some assless chaps? No feminists I am not innapropriately dressed - you are thinking like a rapist.

[โ€“]QS26[S] 28 points29 points  (0 children) | Copy

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

[โ€“]Terra_Ferrum26 points27 points  (3 children) | Copy

And also itโ€™s one sided. If a man wears something revealing he is disgusting and just trying to make women uncomfortable.

[โ€“]GiveMeTheBroccoli14 points15 points  (2 children) | Copy

Double standards double standards, also why can men wear skirts anymore? I want to move to Scotland

[โ€“]Lickiecat6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

Nobody does that here unless it is a wedding sadly.

[โ€“]pandolfio4 points5 points  (3 children) | Copy

If a girl has a short skirt and you're looking at it, you're a perv
If you're a guy and your balls are showing under a short, you're a perv

Head I win, tail you lose

[โ€“]VestigialHead2 points3 points  (2 children) | Copy

Hahaha nice. The crazy thing is there are some people that actually think like that.

[โ€“]pandolfio5 points6 points  (1 child) | Copy

All of feminism is based on the idea that women can have the cake and eat it. That they can have rights without responsibilities.

Well, if you have the right to show off your boobs in order to attract the best mate, then don't be surprised that people who are not the best mate are going to look at them as well.

And to make things worse, it's despicable how a woman will disparage (undesirable) men looking at her, for being thirsty dogs, taking a moral high stance. When in reality, the only thing that, in their minds, makes it immoral for a man to stare at her, is the fact that the man is not deemed attractive enough for her.

[โ€“]VestigialHead0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Yes it is incredibly hypocritical. For people that seem to think they are the smarter sex they certainly have some massive holes in their understanding of rationality and logic.

[โ€“][deleted]  (1 child) | Copy

[deleted]

[โ€“]VestigialHead23 points24 points  (0 children) | Copy

I have no issues with anyone walking around in a slutty outfit. Especially when they are young and looking for sex and not long term relationships. I just get annoyed when feminists claim that you are not bringing unwanted attention to yourself when you do so.

Because dressing provocatively will not only attract the people you want to sleep with - it will attract unwanted people as well. Some of whom are criminals and rapists.

So yes you are right - it is idiotic for feminists to complain about people objectifying them when they deliberately go out of their way to stand out and be objectified. They seem to want their cake and eat it too.

[โ€“]CustardKarim0 points1 point  (11 children) | Copy

You really think the only reason they wear shorter clothing is to find a sexual partner and her clothing determines her consent? You really are thinking like a rapist

[โ€“]VestigialHead1 point2 points  (10 children) | Copy

Yes. People wear slutty or shorter clothing for the express purpose of getting attention. That attention is either to attract potential mates or to make them feel better because people they find attractive are looking at them. Even if they are married they are still wanting the attention - just less likely to turn the attention into sexual actions.

Why do you think throughout history people have pushed their wives and daughters to wear long covering clothing? It is for the exact opposite reason. Clothing that covers up leads to less sexual attention. This is basic common sense.

I get that in our current social climate it is no longer considered okay to suggest a women or a man cover up like in the past. I have no issues with that. Women can wear whatever they want. They just cannot wear whatever they want and also think they are not effecting what happens to them.

I am not saying they are making the rape happen. I am saying they are pointing themselves out as a more likely potential victim by displaying their skin.

[โ€“]CustardKarim0 points1 point  (9 children) | Copy

It's not their fault. They don't get raped because of their clothing. They get raped because rapists rape.

[โ€“]VestigialHead0 points1 point  (8 children) | Copy

I never said that rape is not caused by rapists. I am simply saying that they are making themselves more likely targets by what they wear. Which I have repeated over and over again. Did you not read the chains of replies here?

[โ€“]CustardKarim0 points1 point  (7 children) | Copy

Well then the problem shouldn't be that women wear skimpy clothing. The problem should be that rapists are out and about and usually don't suffer consequences.

[โ€“]VestigialHead0 points1 point  (6 children) | Copy

Nope. One problem is that women wear skimpy outfits but do not want to accept that they are increasing the chances of unwanted sexual attention. This is just stupidity.

The other problem - which is certainly a bigger issue is that people rape other people. The majority certainly do face consequences - but these consequences do not in any way prevent people from raping. So if we can find a way to stop people raping that would be incredible.

BUT even if there were no rapes people still need to accept that their own behaviour can increase the chances of bad things happening to them. So skimpy clothing would still bring about unwanted sexual attention even if rape never happened again.

[โ€“]CustardKarim0 points1 point  (5 children) | Copy

WHYYY are we blaming the victims. The problem is that from the get-go, wearing the clothes they want will result in getting raped.

[โ€“]VestigialHead0 points1 point  (4 children) | Copy

Did you even read one word I wrote?

I was specifically blaming the rapists.

But just because the rapists are at fault does not mean the victims where not also at fault. They increased the odds of themselves being raped.

How is this difficult for you to understand? it is a very simple concept.

If you walk down a dark alley in a known dodgy area of town making heaps of noise and waving the cash you just won at the casino around do you really think you have not encouraged people to rob you?

Even though the robber is at fault for bashing you over the head and taking your cash are you not also at fault for advertising you have wealth in an area known for robberies?

I just cannot understand this desire from feminists to remove all responsibility for any of their actions and put it all on someone else.

[โ€“]CustardKarim0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy

Yes but the problem that I'M trying to communicate is that wearing skimpy clothing empowers rapists or increases your chances at all

[โ€“]throwaway6969696959624 points25 points  (7 children) | Copy

Ok so theyโ€™re saying that most rapists are women since women mostly slut-shame other women more than men?

[โ€“]QS26[S] 2 points3 points  (6 children) | Copy

No

[โ€“]throwaway696969695966 points7 points  (5 children) | Copy

Itโ€™s a joke

[โ€“]QS26[S] 4 points5 points  (4 children) | Copy

No itโ€™s not I got this from a feminist page.

[โ€“]throwaway696969695967 points8 points  (2 children) | Copy

I meant what I did was a joke

[โ€“]QS26[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

Oh of course

[โ€“]Terminal-Psychosis1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Poe's Law at work.

[โ€“]throwaway696969695962 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Iโ€™ve seen that phrase before

[โ€“]the-unflattering-610 points11 points  (4 children) | Copy

She looks like Jim Halpert from The Office. Literally no one thinks that.

[โ€“]QS26[S] 3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

You be surprised I talked to this SIMP who agreed with this statement.

[โ€“]seatbelt-malfunction1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Holy shit i said the same thing LOLOLOL

[โ€“]PrometheusMadLad0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

holy shit that's really accurate

[โ€“]Bazinga21200210 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy

Guys, we have to f-ing understand ! Just because she is making almost-naked videos of herself twerking and posting it on social media to attract thirsty simps and despos she is NOT a slut

[โ€“]qemist2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

You're not supposed to talk about how sexualizing so much women's clothing is.

[โ€“]Pugwhisper5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

Time to get the speedo out

[โ€“]baronmad4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

"Officer officer officer, a women is being gang raped in that alley over there"

"Im not dressed as a police officer, you're just thinking i am"

[โ€“]Lickiecat3 points4 points  (1 child) | Copy

I'm not dressed like lion food. I just like to put meat all over my body and walk through the cage, it is so empowering to watch the lions try to resist my deliciousness.

When is the next annual dress to make rapists think walk?

[โ€“]Terminal-Psychosis5 points6 points  (0 children) | Copy

The silly thing is, everyone knows that walking down a dangerous street at night in a business suit is basically attempted suicide.

Denying personal responsibility is a major tactic of the rad-fem cult, and it gets people hurt.

They are more happy about rape numbers than actually keeping women (they don't care about men) safe.

[โ€“]GiveMeTheBroccoli2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Just because she is starting strip in bed with you, it does not mean she is wanting sex, rapist simp

[โ€“]Terminal-Psychosis2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

He is not dressed like a wealthy business man,

you're just thinking like a gold digger.

These people have zero ability for self-reflection.

Girls that listen to this tripe get hurt. Rad-fem cult don't care.

[โ€“]casteliacitysax1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Ah yes, the same retarded argument from these freaks. She is dressing slutty.

[โ€“]JETS_WPG1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Pretty sure thatโ€™s a dude in the pic!!

[โ€“]DrPVM1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

She looks like a he

[โ€“]omawesomeness131 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Why does that person look the like John Krazinski if he decided to be a drag queen?

[โ€“]KindPrecise1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

I think itโ€™s positive theyโ€™ve used a man in the picture, to highlight this issue

[โ€“]QS26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

[โ€“]HungryBrain11 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy

Nah. Sheโ€™s likely dressed like a slut desperate for attention, drama, and the opportunity to claim sheโ€™s a victim.

[โ€“]QS26[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

Exactly

[โ€“]seatbelt-malfunction0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

I'm thinking like she looks like Jim Halpert in drag.

[โ€“]QS26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

That analogy is perfect

[โ€“]Sakura-Kaiba0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy

where is the original post? I want to troll this bitch so hard.

[โ€“]QS26[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Itโ€™s on Instagram the account is @feminist

[โ€“]GiveMeTheBroccoli0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

Her hair looks like pudding



You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

ยฉ TheRedArchive 2020. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter