A woman beat her husband (in a wheelchair) to death. She confessed, but was found innocent and released with no prison time

ZimbaZumba · 2020-04-24T03:31:51+00:00

She eventually got 2 years for manslaughter. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/woman-jailed-for-more-than-two-years-for-killing-control-freak-husband-with-wooden-pole-a4110796.html

12yuGemoS · 2020-04-24T00:42:17+00:00

Yes, surely it's more hard to leave a supposedly abusive man who can't walk than to kill him as he lay in bed.

Before the attack, Ramanathan had become "very angry" at finding out her husband had written to Sri Lankan police accusing her brother of fraud and theft, according to the prosecution.

Mhm, was he right? Why did he do it? What was the fraud and theft?

Stephen Kamlish QC, defending, insisted the killing was unplanned.

He suggested that if the defendant had wanted to kill her diabetic husband, she could have given him a bigger dose of insulin and "no one would have known".

Mhmm, quite a solid defense if I must say. No reason a revenge killing should be called a murder when she could have just given him more insulin.

"She is frail she is slight she is getting on for anorexic weight. It's hard to beat someone to death with a stick when you are that size".

Yes, so so frail, so frail that she couldn't have possibly intended murder by beating a man who cannot escape to death in his bed. Or maybe so frail that she had to beat him longer than usual, prolonging his torture before dying.

Mr Kamlish urged jurors to acquit her of murder, saying: "After the hell of this trial, the hell of 36 years of abuse, you can show what you think of this prosecution and do the right thing by coming to a very fast verdict."

So the real defense is to shame the jury into a gynocentric result.

After deliberating for half an hour, the jury found Ramanathan not guilty of murder.

And it worked perfectly.

RyansPutter · 2020-04-24T02:15:25+00:00

I'm confused as to how the UK legal system works. Why did she plead guilty to manslaughter and then get found not guilty for murder? If she plead guilty to manslaughter, wouldn't that have been a plea bargain and the murder charges wouldn't have gone to trial?

MilManShow · 2020-04-24T11:49:05+00:00

You expect what? See where it happened? You'[re surprised? You're new to this planet?

DubsPackage · 2020-04-24T19:53:07+00:00

I love how the media smears the husband on the wife's behalf by parroting that he "abused her."

Sure, if you kill someone just say they abused you, everyone will believe it and say, "What a bastard, he abused her, pass it on."

Whereas a dead body and a bloody stick needs a months long trial, evidence and lawyers to prove, "he abused her" is taken at face value without any trial or evidence because of false cultural narratives propogated by feminism.

In all other cases, vigilanteism has no legal defense.

If you see a crack dealer on the corner, you can't just walk up and shoot him, even if he really is a crack dealer. It's not a defense to say "he's selling crack near my kids."

But in women murdering their husbands, vigilanteism is not only a viable defense, but not even need to be proven to smear his name posthumously in a court-of-law.

And this in the UK is called "Justice."

Title	A woman beat her husband (in a wheelchair) to death. She confessed, but was found innocent and released with no prison time
Author	Allores
Upvotes	180
Comments	24
Date	April 23, 2020 11:18 PM UTC (6 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/g6x9vf/a_woman_beat_her_husband_in_a_wheelchair_to_death/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/a-woman-beat-her-husband-in-a-wheelchair-to-death.854231 https://theredarchive.com/post/854231

Comments