TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

No women in school then

LOKSTED

February 4, 2019
64 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://i.redd.it/9aew8u9dqme21.jpg
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title No women in school then
Author

LOKSTED

Upvotes 64
Comments 26
Date February 4, 2019 10:40 PM UTC
(7 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/an7cb1/no_women_in_school_then/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/no-women-in-school-then.884497
https://theredarchive.com/post/884497
Top posts by LOKSTED

Change.org campaign to put women that lie about sexual assault in sex offender registry.

3725 upvotes
May 30, 2018
/r/MensRights

Transitive property

716 upvotes
March 11, 2019
/r/MensRights

Dollar shave club delivers product right at your door. The trail box is 5$ with free delivery. And fuck Gillette

655 upvotes
January 15, 2019
/r/MensRights

#(pound) metoo fires back

491 upvotes
December 3, 2018
/r/MensRights

And we're supposed to be the nazi?

414 upvotes
January 18, 2019
/r/MensRights

Sweden: Female left-wing politician sentenced for having sex with a 16 years old boy.

291 upvotes
December 23, 2018
/r/MensRights

"It's complicated" like they used to say when black people couldn't vote after the 15th amendment passed

199 upvotes
August 22, 2019
/r/MensRights

Mom starves baby only gets 10 years

164 upvotes
April 7, 2019
/r/PussyPass

Comments

[–]spacedoutdad 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link

what was she trying to accomplish w/ this sign ....

[–]privilegechecked85 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Pretty sure this was at an abortion rally and their point was it is easier to buy a gun than get an abortion.

But I could be wrong.

[–]maluminse 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That would make more sense.

[–]GingerRazz -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Even if that is their point, they'd be wrong. I'm huge on 2nd amendment rights and I'm 99% certain there are far more hoops to jump through to buy a gun then there are to get an abortion.

[–]maluminse 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Really? Getting an abortion in many states is quite the feat.

[–]GingerRazz 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When you say many states, give examples and the loops you have to jump through. Background checks and waiting periods are quite common for guns, and I'd say they're rare or unheard of for abortions.

[+]keiron21 -9 points-8 points-7 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

The way ppl fight for gun rights and gun rights are so heavily lobbied for. She wants women to get the same. Pretty simple

[–]maluminse 3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Not really. She didn't say support. She said rights. What rights do guns or gun owners have that women dont?

[+]keiron21 -8 points-7 points-6 points 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Omg you're so extra. You get her point. Its pretty simple

[–]GingerRazz 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

No, you are wrong. You're justifying her ignorant statement by reframing it in a context that you agree with that I still see as ignorant. I'm willing to defend either statement. Don't accuse him of being wrong for disagreeing with her preconstructed statement when he took her for what she said and you're redefining her words.

[–]keiron21 -5 points-4 points-3 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Its not literal. Just because you or him dont understand the point, doesnt make her statement wrong or ignorant. Sorry guys

[–]GingerRazz 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You are literally white knighting. She made a statement that flies in the face of logic and you are redefining it to defend her.

If you really want to do this, let's go. You make your arguments and I'll make mine. Define your position and I'll define mine. I am not charitable enough to redefine a statement that is false at face value to being reasonable.

I care about 2nd amendment rights and I'm sick of people shitting on them to make a statement about any issue they care about.

[–]summonblood 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Don't waste your time with people like this. She won't be using logic to make her points, she is acting intellectual superior to absolve herself of critical thinking.

[–]GingerRazz 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I love wasting my time. It's fascinating to see people's perspective weather or not it is tethered to objective fact. On top of that, how do you ever expect someone to change their opinions without someone "wasting their time"?

[–]summonblood 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't get me wrong, I love debating as well. But she isn't trying to win an argument with debate, she's ignoring your logic because you just don't 'understand'. You're wasting your time because you won't change her opinion. She's not here to have her opinion changed, she's here to act intellectually superior.

[–]keiron21 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He and i did.

[–]keiron21 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Calm down lol. Because she didnt write a 10page paper outlining what she meant in full. Doesnt mean its completely wrong. Not redefining it, im just not an idiot and i understand it. I get the point shes making - not everything is word for word literal (gun rights vs womens rights word for word).

Lol i didnt ask if you care about 2nd amendment rights.. guns arent going anywhere. Nobody is shitting on anything. 🤣🤣🤣

[–]GingerRazz 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you understand it, explain it in simple terms and stop lording your superior intellect above us lesser mortals. Seriously bro, make an argument that is specific for what she means that isn't wrong in your mind and then defend the argument if you're so sure you're right and understand what she's saying.

[–]maluminse 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No not without more context.

[–]summonblood 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So is her point that people don't fight for women's rights and that women are less lobbied for and have less rights than guns/gun owners? It's simply wrong.

Her actual point is to intentionally use hyperbole to antagonize gun supporters by labeling them as misogynistic.

[–]Maito_Guy 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Does this apply to UK? cuz I'm down for keeping my wife locked in a gun cabinet and only taking her out when I need to use her.

[–]Gark_kobold 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s perfect

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Nothing new, feminists love Islam...

[–]GingerRazz 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

WTF does this have to do with Islam?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The abject subjugation of women. If they had the same rights as guns do in the US, they would have similar rights under Islam

[–]MisterMazda 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it's a joke about women wouldn't be able to go to certain places and do certain things like some Muslim women can't...? Maybe? I don't know.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter